Apr 15, 2009 3:00pm

President Obama Heralds Tax Cuts While Gibbs Tweaks Tea Party Protestors

"I decided not to bring Bo today," President Obama said this morning as he prepared to speak about taxes.

And why was he not bringing the family’s new six-month-old Portuguese Water Dog?

"Because he stepped on my economic speech yesterday," the president joked.

With that, the president talked about tax day, making the argument that April 15th will be less painful for most Americans because of his actions.

"I know that April 15th isn’t exactly everyone’s favorite date on the calendar," he said as he stood in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, flanked by nine American taxpayers. "But it is an important opportunity for those of us in Washington to consider our responsibilities to the people who sent us here and who pay the bills. And I’ve brought some friends of mine who sent me here and pay the bills."

With approximately 250 protestors rallying against big government and taxes across the street at LaFayette Park, the president ran through six points he wanted to underline on tax day.

"First, we’ve passed a broad and sweeping tax cut for 95 percent of American workers," he said. "This tax cut will reach 120 million families and put $120 billion directly into their pockets, and it includes the most American workers ever to get a tax cut."

Other steps include helping small businesses by allowing them to offset their losses during this downturn against the income they’ve earned over the last five years; simplifying the student loan process and offering a $2,500 tax credit for all four years of college; providing a tax credit of up to $8,000 for first-time home buyers; working to end tax breaks to companies "that stash profits or ship jobs overseas," and letting the Bush tax cuts expire for the wealthiest two percent.

The president also pledged to "simplify a monstrous tax code that is far too complicated for most Americans to understand, but just complicated enough for the insiders who know how to game the system." He mentioned that earlier this year, he asked adviser Paul Volcker and the Presidential Economic Recovery Advisory Board to review how to simplify the tax code.

"We will rewrite the tax code so that it puts your interests over any special interests," President Obama pledged. "And we’ll make it easier, quicker and less expensive for you to file a return, so that April 15th is not a date that is approached with dread every year."

Asked if the White House had any specific response to the tea party protests, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs reiterated the tax cuts the president had mentioned, including the Making Work Pay tax credit, the first-time homebuyer tax credit, an increase in the Earned Income Tax Credit, and an increase in the American Opportunity Tax Credit.

President Obama has pledged — and Gibbs today reiterated the pledge — that he wouldn’t raise taxes on anyone who makes under $200,000 a year as an individual, or $250,000 as a family. How, Gibbs was asked, does that square with President Obama raising cigarette taxes, as he did when he signed the State’s Children’s Health Insurance Program.

"People make a decision to smoke," Gibbs said. "People get on airlines and pay taxes to land a plane at O’Hare or in Washington. Those people also got a tax cut. I don’t know how much they smoke. I guess that depends on the individual consumption with nicotine habits involved in those at tea parties around the country. Maybe on a rainy day such as today, one might light up a few more times in hopes of surviving the drizzle."

Another reporter asked Gibbs if the "tea parties reflect a genuine grass-roots sentiment out there in the country of frustration with the president’s tax policies, or is it something contrived?"

Gibbs suggested that the reporter "speak to the organizers, I guess, on … whether they’re contrived … If you’re one of the 95 percent of working families in this country I think it’s that earns less than $200,000 a year, you’ve seen a tax cut. That’s not contrived. Those are facts. … I’ll let the organizers of whatever these are speak to their motivations. I think they can be reasonably assured, though, maybe they fall outside the window of making a quarter of a million dollars a year."

– jpt

User Comments

Please tell me: I’m one of the no-account parasitic bums who pays no federal income tax. Which of my taxes has Mr. Obama cut? Nothing that he talked about today gives me any tax cut at all. Surely some leftist out there can enlighten me–tell me which of my taxes has been cut. I’m waiting…

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 15, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Were is Distraction Dog when you need him?

Posted by: jim | April 15, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Gibbs:
What Tea Parties?
There are no Tea Parties.
No Obama didn’t bow.
Believe your leader not you lying eyes.
And sadly many will.

Posted by: millie | April 15, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

It’s Tax Break Day for the Obama administration.

Posted by: nick | April 15, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Go out and spend the $14 tax break that BO gave you.
Spend your money to make him look good.

Posted by: ross | April 15, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

How much was the tax cut for most of these people? How much was an actual cut, and how much a reduction in withholding?
I wonder if it occurs to Gibbs or Obama that many people simply don’t buy their projections and considering that, don’t trust his math.

Posted by: MayBee | April 15, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

The Tea Parties Are Against 1.) Higher taxes, 2.) Bigger, Out of Control Government and 3.) Out of Control Government Spending of Borrowed Communist Chinese Yuans.
Mr. Obama is FOR 1.) Higher Taxes (Hidden or otherwise), 2.) BIGGER More Intrusive Government Smashing the U.S. Constitution and Individual Liberties and Freedoms and 3.) Tripling a Debt and Spending That Mr. Bush Already Doubled.
Live Free From Socialism or Die Trying!

Posted by: Newts Wally | April 15, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Will Obama go on Leno tonight?
He needs some kind of distraction from what is going on around the country.
Maybe he can take his shirt off and accidentally get photographed.
Where’s Bo?

Posted by: tyler | April 15, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

“If you’re one of the 95 percent of working families in this country I think it’s that earns less than $200,000 a year, you’ve seen a tax cut. That’s not contrived. Those are facts. … ”
Um, I make less than $200k per year and did not receive a “tax cut”…that’s not contrived. That’s a fact.
“Believe your leader not you lying eyes.” (liberty taken)

Posted by: tjp612 | April 15, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

lmao O-DUMB-Ah new tax code: how much you make? send it to me
Today Obama is the laughing stock of millions as networks scramble not to let the people see what is going on…DUMP THE MEDIA STOCKS GE, DISNEY, CBS inc, TIME WARNER, NYTs, WASHINGTON POST,
time till this post is down ….20 seconds and counting

Posted by: The Media is the problem | April 15, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Can this idiot speak without a telepromt?

Posted by: Ramonna | April 15, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

So did the tea parties get hundreds of thousands of people like FoxNews breathlessly told us for the last 2 weeks?
Looks like its not so good.
In Boston, which held its protest in Boston Common, near the State House, about 500 people showed up, fewer than the 1,500 that had responded on the internet.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Can this idiot speak without a telepromt?
Posted by: Ramonna | Apr 15, 2009 3:25:52 PM
…………………………………..
He can spell without one, and complete a sentence. Take away from that what you will.

Posted by: Ron | April 15, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

“I guess that depends on the individual consumption with nicotine habits involved in those at tea parties around the country. – Gibbs” ..That, my friends, tells you the way this administration plans on looking down on/treating AMERICANS, who do not agree with them. If you do not bow to Obama, if you are not marked with their number, you are scum. And remember, the Department of Homeland Security has your number.

Posted by: mojo | April 15, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Not Many People turned out for the Tea Parties

Posted by: Angie In PA | April 15, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

This is so easy to fix. Call Neil Boortz radio personality, and Representative John Linder. They have the correct answer to overhauling the tax system. It is called the FAIR TAX.Implementing the tax code will fix all the tax problems.

Posted by: Lara | April 15, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

The federal taxes taken from my check and my wifes checks are less. My wife and I are bringing home over $200 more a month now.
That is fact. I’ve checked my checks multiple times and I am definitely paying less fed tax now….

Posted by: Flip Floppin | April 15, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Small turn out for tea parties? Must be because most of us, who wanted to attend, had a job.

Posted by: mojo | April 15, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

The tax thing is way overblown. What’s killing people are ballooning fees, credit card company rip-offs and corporate greed. Pay your damn taxes or whatever portion is left after you’ve cheated, failed to declare “under the table” earnings and lied about your dependents and charitable contributions.

Posted by: Mike R. | April 15, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Large turnout in New Haven, CT fot Tea Party. Lasted about 4 hrs.

Posted by: Michelle | April 15, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

tjp612, you are forgetting that the taxes we owe this year are based on the 2008 tax code. Our tax cuts are coming, and we’ll be seeing it in our takehome every payday beginning this month. We won’t have to wait until the end of the tax year to start plowing the extra dollars back into the economy.
If you don’t know what you’re talking about, don’t talk. Listen and learn.

Posted by: Kent | April 15, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Live Free From Socialism or Die Trying!
========================================
Sadly, many of you conservatives are already intellectually dead…..And it has nothing to with trying to live free from socialism….

Posted by: indy_voter | April 15, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

“I’m one of the no-account parasitic bums”
You can say THAT again!
TEABAGGERS UNITE!!! TEABAG THEM BEFORE THEY TEABAG YOU!!!!
LOLOLOLOL

Posted by: R Mutt | April 15, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Fair tax, yes. Flat tax, no. I will go to my grave believing that it is morally wrong to tax beans at the same rate as caviar.

Posted by: Sue | April 15, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

So far I like to see my paycheck increase because of the changes in Law. So far I like the low interest rates for homes. So far the stock market is getting better. So far Government is only reacting to the conditions left by the last administration. So far so good. You dont like bigger Gov..where were U when Bush introduced the Patriot Act? I prefer bigger government to oversight greedy companies. I do not like bigger Gov to oversight ME! Pick one!

Posted by: Really? | April 15, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Then there’s the inflation tax that will come from all the printing to bailout Barry’s beloved bankers. Which will make that lousy $13/week worth exactly nothing once Helicopter Ben’s inflation machinations come to fruition.
Or is monetary/price inflation not a concept Big Bank Barry is familiar with?
The Capitol Hill Clowns are driving us down The Road to Serfdom at a breakneck pace continuing on with Bushonomics (big spending, printing and borrowing) only now, it’s on steroids.
Enjoy your Change®, suckers!
Government Sachs has the matter well in hand.

Posted by: Gone Gulchin' | April 15, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

To those of you who think the President is destroying the economy. The day he took office the DOW was at 7849.09. As of right now it’s at 7972.19. A gain of roughly 23 points over a three month period. Take the last 3 months to the day of the Bush presidency on 10/20/08 it was 9265.43. A difference of roughly 1300 in the negative over the same amount of time. Take the last 6 months of Bushes Presidency and it’s down over 3600 points…Since the peak of 13900 and some change…down around 6000 points… What exactly are you republicans afraid of anyway?

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

The 95% income tax cut is a lie.
95% of Americans do not pay income taxes.
Only approximately 70% of Americans pay income taxes.
Therefore, Americans who do not pay taxes are not getting a “tax cut”.
If anything, they are getting a federal welfare check.
And, furthermore, the tea parties aren’t just about taxes.
They are also about the reckless, irresponsible spending that will affect everyone down the road(more business failures, higher inflation).
They are also about the crushing loss of liberty due to the vast high handed expansion of government by Obama.
And, in any event, Obama does favor high taxes on the poor and middle class(eg. gas taxes, cigarette taxes)

Posted by: ConstantXI | April 15, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

We got your back Prez. Keep up the good work and know that the Sore loser party/tea party crybabies will eventually get over the lost.

Posted by: nubiangent08 | April 15, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

I prefer bigger government to oversight greedy companies. I do not like bigger Gov to oversight ME! Pick one!
Posted by: Really? | Apr 15, 2009
Well said… Keep government small except in people’s bedrooms and doctor’s offices.

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

The 95% income tax cut is a lie.
95% of Americans do not pay income taxes.
Only approximately 70% of Americans pay income taxes.
Therefore, Americans who do not pay taxes are not getting a “tax cut”.
If anything, they are getting a federal welfare check.
And, furthermore, the tea parties aren’t just about taxes.
They are also about the reckless, irresponsible spending that will affect everyone down the road(more business failures, higher inflation).
They are also about the crushing loss of liberty due to the vast high handed expansion of government by Obama.
And, in any event, Obama does favor high taxes on the poor and middle class(eg. gas taxes, cigarette taxes)

Posted by: ConstantXI | April 15, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

It is SHAMEFUL that the national media is ignoring the TEA DAY RALLIES across America! If this was two guys on a corner protesting for gay marriage, then ABC would be all over it.

Posted by: dee | April 15, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

I went to my neighbor’s tea party today! We had biscuits and Lapsang Oolong! YUMMY!!
Then we knitted mittens for our nieces!!!
VIVA LA REVOLUTION!!!
LOLOLOLOL

Posted by: R Mutt | April 15, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Why are neo-cons so concerned about welfare all of a sudden? Shouldn’t you have been this outraged when we gave Iraq the biggest welfare check in American history?

Posted by: Con servatives are a joke | April 15, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

I’m still waiting. If I don’t pay any federal income tax anyway (and 43% of Americans are like me), which of my taxes have been cut? Surely one of the leftists here can answer that very simple question.
And if in fact those 43% have, like me, received no tax cut at all, must we sadly conclude that Mr. Obama is looking us in the eye and lying? It seems inescapable…

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 15, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

This President has contributed to the economic failures.
He was part of the Democratic Congress we’ve had since 2007.
He didn’t lift a finger to reform Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac(in fact he resisted reforms ad was the second largest recipient of Fannie Mae campaign contributions).
Bush and McCain both proposed reforms to Fannie Mae(which Obama opposed).
He voted for TARP one and he has voted for every reckless spending program since then(ramming through these bills containing hidden major policy changes with little or no debate).
At the same time, he is destroying the First Amendment by trying to silence conservative and opposition speech through “diversity in ownership” rules designed to silence Rush, Hannity, and other conservative talk show hosts.

Posted by: ConstantXI | April 15, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

The 95% income tax cut is a lie.
95% of Americans do not pay income taxes.
Only approximately 70% of Americans pay income taxes.
Therefore, Americans who do not pay taxes are not getting a “tax cut”.
If anything, they are getting a federal welfare check.
And, furthermore, the tea parties aren’t just about taxes.
They are also about the reckless, irresponsible spending that will affect everyone down the road(more business failures, higher inflation).
They are also about the crushing loss of liberty due to the vast high handed expansion of government by Obama.
And, in any event, Obama does favor high taxes on the poor and middle class(eg. gas taxes, cigarette taxes)
Posted by: ConstantXI | Apr 15, 2009
You are bakwards on everything here. Most poor don’t have a car and live in the inner city…gas hikes won’t matter. If they smoke(And it is a higher % among the poor) maybe that will be the incentive they need to quit…and save on medical bills that they can’t afford. A healthier America is cheaper for everyone. Why do you think the tobacco companies are republicans… They lobby for low prices and no regulation to ensure that the poor(who also tend to be less educated) keep buying the smokes…and I’m a former 3 pack a day smoker as of last year… I quit because of the prices….I’m better off for it.

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

The reason you did not get a tax cut is you do not work. and even if you got a tax cut you would have said you did not get one . Its not about taxes you know that. President Obama is the best.
The people spoke, get over it.

Posted by: beverly parsons | April 15, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

“Why are neo-cons so concerned about welfare…?”
Please explain what you think a neo-con is. Can you identify any neo-con who has posted a message on this thread?
I, for one (a conservative, not a neo-con) am not nearly as concerned about welfare as Bill Clinton was. He ended it as we knew it.
Why is Obama giving all this additional welfare to Afghanistan?

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 15, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

A quick example of how FoxNews lies
Fox report on Boston protest attendance
Close to 2,000 demonstrators in Boston — some dressed in colonial wigs with tea bags hanging from their glasses — held signs and read speeches lambasting government spending since President Obama took office.
Also in the same article
Crowds of up to 5,000 are expected in 300 cities in seven states, including New York, Atlanta, Tulsa, Philadelphia, Boston, Hartford, and Indianapolis.
Actual attendance figures
In Boston, which held its protest in Boston Common, near the State House, about 500 people showed up, fewer than the 1,500 that had responded on the internet.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

I wonder if it occurs to Gibbs or Obama that many people simply don’t buy their projections and considering that, don’t trust his math.
Posted by: MayBee | Apr 15, 2009 3:15:16 PM
————————————
You said “many people etc…” I take it that you are referring to the Republican/Conservative Movement?
I don’t think “many” is quite the right adjective/modifier ,in this case anyway.
More appropriate might be ” a few people” (or a few nuts ,as it were)

Posted by: seriously? cmon... | April 15, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Mr. President, We’ve got your back against tyrants and traitors.

Posted by: Iraq Vet | April 15, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Kent:
“If you don’t know what you’re talking about, don’t talk. Listen and learn.”
I’ll tell you what: I don’t make $200k and I am not expecting a “tax cut” (just as I did not get “tax cut” in 2008 from Mr. Bush). Since you enjoy talkin’ trash, if I do not receive this heralded “tax cut” are you willing to pay me the $7.70/week (gross) instead?

Posted by: tjp612 | April 15, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

“He didn’t lift a finger to reform Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac(in fact he resisted reforms ad was the second largest recipient of Fannie Mae campaign contributions).”
Obama proposed the STOP act aimed at mortagage fraud.
“Bush and McCain both proposed reforms to Fannie Mae(which Obama opposed).”
McCain proposed nothing, he gloomed onto a bill that languished in committee for over a year before he became a cosponsor.
And the miraculous “reform” for Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac?
Removing Congressional oversight.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Not a tea party supporter but just busy trying to find health insurance for my family with the $10.00 tax reduction per month I received.

Posted by: William | April 15, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

GIbbs is lying. The cap and trade energy tax will remove all of the other tax cuts plus some and be, in reality, a tax increase. never mind the incredible deficits that Obama is creating which must be paid back. These guys are nothing but frauds.

Posted by: brian | April 15, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

ABC, NBC and CBS and the rest of the national media are appalling. Even if YOU don’t agree with the TEA PARTIES…YOU SHOULD BE COVERING THEM.
SHAME ON YOU, YOU ARE ANTI AMERICAN.

Posted by: mjl | April 15, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

“It is SHAMEFUL that the national media is ignoring the TEA DAY RALLIES across America”
A few hundred right wingers and FoxNews viewers deserve coverage?

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

“Fair tax, yes. Flat tax, no. I will go to my grave believing that it is morally wrong to tax beans at the same rate as caviar.”
Sue, who are you, or the government to determine what is morally more taxable? This sort of power should NEVER reside with government, that is facism. Whether it is a right-winger telling me that I can’t buy certain things on a Sunday because it is a Holy Day, or it is a health nut telling me that I can’t buy tobacco as it may be harmful to me.

Posted by: Lloyd | April 15, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

“ABC, NBC and CBS and the rest of the national media are appalling. Even if YOU don’t agree with the TEA PARTIES…YOU SHOULD BE COVERING THEM.”
They actually are covering them and covering for them.
They don’t mention how small the protests are compared to projections and they don’t pull away during crowd shots to show how small the crowd is.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

“The day he took office the DOW was at 7849.09. As of right now it’s at 7972.”
The day he was elected it was 9625. Immediately thereafter investors started selling off on the basis of the policies on which Obama had campaigned. When the market opened on inauruation day the Dow was at 8275.
By the time he finished his inaugural address the Dow had dropped to 7949.
But don’t take the Dow as the ultimate measure of “the economy”; the two are related, but no too closely. Look at unemployment. Over two million Americans have lost their jobs since this man was elected. Business owners are not in a mood to hire with a man like this in the White House. Unemployment will continue to rise. Keep your eye on it. And remember that Mr. Obama owns it.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 15, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

I was watching some of the people protesting and they made no sense.

Posted by: rachel | April 15, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Lloyd:”Sue, who are you, or the government to determine what is morally more taxable? This sort of power should NEVER reside with government, that is facism.”
Nonsense, that is the basis of modern government for over a millennia. Society empowers the government to enforce the common values. And calling it facism just shows another area of deep ignorance about basic governmental structures.

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

“They actually are covering them and covering for them.”
What did you expect? Everyone knows that ABC, NBC and CBS are nothing but right-wingers.
In the meantime, tell us which taxes have been cut for the slothful 43%.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 15, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Ok first of all I really think that Obama has screwed the nation over even more. His massive stimulus bill put this nation deeper into debt. I guess no one has seen that, but when Bush wnated to spend money evenyone was screaming an saying how much were are in debt. Now no one seems to care. I really think that we are seeing the cahnge from a democracy to a socialistic country. thanks for all those who voted to have a moron run the country.

Posted by: Seth Vesco | April 15, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Fascist Hyena:” Unemployment will continue to rise. Keep your eye on it. And remember that Mr. Obama owns it.”
Sure I shot him five times officer, but when I kicked him to the emergency room curb he was still breathing, so OBVIOUSLY those ER doctors are to blame for his death not me. They own it.

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Go ahead and make fun of the tea parties, but you won’t be laughing when the rich people pull back their money and start hoarding it. Then you won’t be able to fund your precious monsterous government that is like a savior to so many low lives its not funny. It reminds me of people looking to jesus as their savior, but in this case its the pathetic US government. How sad of a nation can we be when so many look to the government to come save them. LOL at the people that need to do that, how uneducated can you get. And I am not talking about those that are disabled and have a good reason to not be able to work. Go to school, get trained, do something other than drugs and alcohol and then you will see your life improve. cutting taxes is the single best way to grow an economy, but yeah I know you people don’t care, you only care about your ideology. Losers, get a brain and think on your own.

Posted by: Eric | April 15, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

What percentage of the below $200K families smoke? Probably the lower income portion and they just received a huge tax increase. Obama and Gibbs are liars.

Posted by: brian | April 15, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

What astounds me is that people are affraid of the word “TAX”. If everyone had to pay an extra 10% income tax across the board for free healthcare…there would be an uprising. But with the average helath care costing each family roughly 20% of their income each year when you factor in the care you will recieve your entire life to incude nursing homes and cancer treatments and surgeries…You’d rather pay that…as long as it’s not called a tax. I have a proposal… Let’s keep our taxes where they are and have everyone pay in to a 10% health care “POOL”. It’s a shame that anyone has to go without healthcare in this country. The only industrial country in the world that treats it’s citezens like that… We are selfish as a people. And we call ourselves a Christian nation… blah

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

I filed my taxes and these guys should too, I often feel like I am beign penalized for beign single and childless during tax time. When do I get a break for not increasing the population?

Posted by: rachel | April 15, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

obama’s trillions in deficits are bankrupting the country. He singed a stimulus bill he never even read. This is not responsible government and he needs to be throttled. Elect a different congress in 17 months that just says “NO” to Obama.

Posted by: brian | April 15, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

” that is the basis of modern government for over a millennia [sic].”
So, which government was the most modern in, say, 1156 A.D.? And how come the US congress wasn’t empowered to tax personal income until the 16th amendment was passed?

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 15, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Ryan C – what do you care how many people show up to a rally? The truth is that over 500 rallies & parties have been organized and there is a movement growing. THANK YOU OBAMA for uniting the nation AGAINST socialism!!!

Posted by: dee | April 15, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

“OBVIOUSLY those ER doctors are to blame for his death not me.”
If they had fired additional bullets into his chest, they surely would be to blame. And that is what Obama has done, and is continuing to do.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 15, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

I remember Comrade Obama’s victory speech – “…I’ll be your president too.” He promised to listen to those who disagree with him; instead, he sends his lackeys to deliver assorted zingers and otherwise marginalize his critics.

Posted by: Ed | April 15, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

The fairly well attended Tea parties around the country cannot be brushed aside as insignificant and are supposed to be against the politicians of both the major parties who have shown the audacity of being indifferent to the voice of we the people. There is a resentment brewing in the country against the bailout, the wall street swindling and the mounting deficit. Some people in this movement are trying to make it an anti-Obama movement and that is deceptive and unacceptable to those who of us not a part of the movement but who are observing it from the sidelines and who welcome some of the changes that Obama has already made but resent the lack of change and movement away from the Bush economic and defense policies.

Posted by: gjkotw01 | April 15, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

“A quick example of how FoxNews lies…”
Yet another example of blind, ideologically-based, knee-jerk reaction… What makes you think your “source” of “actual attendance” is accurate?
I live in Atlanta – I would not be surprised at all if 5,000+ people show up tonight.

Posted by: tjp612 | April 15, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

obama’s trillions in deficits are bankrupting the country. He singed a stimulus bill he never even read. This is not responsible government and he needs to be throttled. Elect a different congress in 17 months that just says “NO” to Obama.
You failed to note that three republicans crafted the bill, so you call your own party out. NO! Why b/c you dont know b/c you did not read the bill either.

Posted by: nubiangent08 | April 15, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Tired of Republican evil lies and manipulations?
Tired of 8 years of subjugation and abused by republicans?
I say that we waited for 8 years to have a real American President.
And Finally we have one.
I say we Stand UP to Republican lies.
I say we stand up to extremist that all they want if the coming down of a democratic elected government.
I say we stand up to anti-patriots that only care about themselves and no-one else.
I say Americans Stand Up to this republican nonsense.
8 years of republican evil doings is enslavement enough!!

Posted by: Candie | April 15, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

The 95% income tax cut is a lie.
95% of Americans do not pay income taxes.
Only approximately 70% of Americans pay income taxes.
Therefore, Americans who do not pay taxes are not getting a “tax cut”.
If anything, they are getting a federal welfare check.
And, furthermore, the tea parties aren’t just about taxes.
They are also about the reckless, irresponsible spending that will affect everyone down the road(more business failures, higher inflation).
They are also about the crushing loss of liberty due to the vast high handed expansion of government by Obama.
And, in any event, Obama does favor high taxes on the poor and middle class(eg. gas taxes, cigarette taxes)
Posted by: ConstantXI | Apr 15, 2009
There’s a difference between large amounts of spending that will generate a return such as with health care, education and energy…as opposed to massive spending to outsource our jobs by giving tax incentives to corporations to move overseas…ans funding a trillion dollor war that wasn’t needed….and I was there. We didn’t belong there. There is no return on the money we spent there…

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

What a SICK administration we now have!

Posted by: Gotterdammerung | April 15, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

rj3141 – Now you know how us Ron Paul supporters felt as the republican neoconservative types were turning a deaf ear.

Posted by: Huh | April 15, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

I was watching some of the people protesting and they made no sense.
Posted by: rachel | Apr 15, 2009 4:03:00 PM
Rachel, of course they dont. They dont even know why they are out their. LOL!

Posted by: nubiangent08 | April 15, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Ok first of all I really think that Obama has screwed the nation over even more. His massive stimulus bill put this nation deeper into debt. I guess no one has seen that, but when Bush wnated to spend money evenyone was screaming an saying how much were are in debt. Now no one seems to care. I really think that we are seeing the cahnge from a democracy to a socialistic country. thanks for all those who voted to have a moron run the country.
Posted by: Seth Vesco
There’s a difference between large amounts of spending that will generate a return such as with health care, education and energy…as opposed to massive spending to outsource our jobs by giving tax incentives to corporations to move overseas…ans funding a trillion dollor war that wasn’t needed….and I was there. We didn’t belong there. There is no return on the money we spent there…

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Fascist Hyena:”So, which government was the most modern in, say, 1156 A.D.?”
I don’t see how that has anything to do at all with the original poster, who seems to have no conception of the empowerment of a government to serve as a care taker of the common good (just like Henry the second was empowered under the feudal system, to provide your completely irrelevant triva). How is that relevant to the original post and my response?

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | Apr 15, 2009 4:12:02 PM
Great post!

Posted by: nubiangent08 | April 15, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

I am annoyed by all that noise the bad losers make.

Posted by: clops | April 15, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

To those who want to marginalize today’s tea parties, you completely miss the point! This is not about democrat or republican, rich vs poor, white vs black!
THIS IS ABOUT STUPID SPENDING AND TAXING ANYONE TO JUSTIFY IT!
Honestly, how far can you go to rationalize spending on “wants” on top of “needs” in a down economy? Call it a “crisis?” Give us a break!
In your household you have a limited income and a budget that includes spending on basics for yourself and possibly your family. Are you going to tell us ts OK to spend more than you bring home, especially on luxuries? Do you really do that? If not, why should we allow our government to do it?
Our Free Market has survived many obstacles over the years. Even the Depression! So please, stop bashing efforts to convince our politicians to stop throwing every wishlist earmark around as “needed” to avert a “crisis!”

Posted by: clarkohrepub | April 15, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Gibbs sure doesn’t have many answers. What is the point in keeping him around?

Posted by: Jeffrey | April 15, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

“Yet another example of blind, ideologically-based, knee-jerk reaction… What makes you think your “source” of “actual attendance” is accurate?”
Because its the Boston police.
And you’ll notice that FoxNews reported attendance in excess of those who had RSVP’d.
But hey when your whole life centers around being spoonfed by Fox, I imagine its quite upsetting when its demonstrated how they LIE to your face.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Fascist Hyena:”If they had fired additional bullets into his chest, they surely would be to blame. And that is what Obama has done, and is continuing to do.”
According to you. The majority of Americans and a large number of reputable economists strongly disagree.

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Why is it that when someone disagrees with Gibbs, that he can’t answer in a professional manner? His remarks are always sarcastic and snarky.

Posted by: Kathy in Dallas | April 15, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Whilst preparing my taxes today I often asked myself “what would secretary of the treasury Tim do?”. Needless to say I didn’t end up having to pay any taxes!

Posted by: Joe | April 15, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

“Ryan C – what do you care how many people show up to a rally? The truth is that over 500 rallies & parties have been organized and there is a movement growing.”
The truth is this experiment in media marketing By FoxNews and the rest of the right wing talking heads is an EPIC FAIL at this point.
More people showed up to protest the anniversary of the Iraq Invasion last month with ZERO media coverage or promotion.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Kathy in Dallas – Gibbs is arrogant. He and Cheney could be brothers.

Posted by: Huh | April 15, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Tired of Republican evil lies and manipulations?
Tired of 8 years of subjugation and abused by republicans?
I say that we waited for 8 years to have a real American President.
And Finally we have one.
I say we Stand UP to Republican lies.
I say we stand up to extremist that all they want if the coming down of a democratic elected government.
I say we stand up to anti-patriots that only care about themselves and no-one else.
I say Americans Stand Up to this republican nonsense.
8 years of republican evil doings is enslavement enough!!

Posted by: Candie | April 15, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

clarkohrepub:”Honestly, how far can you go to rationalize spending on “wants” on top of “needs” in a down economy? Call it a “crisis?” Give us a break!

Our Free Market has survived many obstacles over the years. Even the Depression!”
You know what got us out of the Depression? WWII – MASSIVE government spending on building complex and expensive bombs, planes, tanks, and ships that were literally blown up or sunk into the ocean within a few years. I find it hilarious you chose to reference the big ‘ol, real world case study that best proves your assumption that national economic policy is just like planning the next family vacation budget is embarrassingly over simplistic.

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | Apr 15, 2009 4:16:33 PM
………
There’s a difference between economic fascism and social fascism.
We have had economic fascism in this country since the 30s, thanks to that Mussolini-loving, evil SOB FDR.
It’s a bipartisan thing. Both parties practice it, to We the People’s detriment.
Google: Economic Fascism and the Bailout Economy (mises)

Posted by: G | April 15, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

“The day he was elected it was 9625. Immediately thereafter investors started selling off on the basis of the policies on which Obama had campaigned.”
So investors sold their stocks in a panic over Obama’s proposed plans thereby massively driving down stock prices for everyone which means they lose a great deal of money.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

I think Obama is the reason why tea parties are happening. He needs to advocate lower taxes

Posted by: nycusa05 | April 15, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Kent: tjp612, you are forgetting that the taxes we owe this year are based on the 2008 tax code. Our tax cuts are coming, and we’ll be seeing it in our takehome every payday beginning this month. We won’t have to wait until the end of the tax year to start plowing the extra dollars back into the economy.
If you don’t know what you’re talking about, don’t talk. Listen and learn.
–$14 dollars a week!!!OOOOOOHH!!AAAHHHHHHH!!GO FORTH AND SAVE THE ECONOMY!!!ROFLMAO

Posted by: HA! | April 15, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

“You know what got us out of the Depression? WWII – MASSIVE government spending on building complex and expensive bombs, planes, tanks, and ships that were literally blown up or sunk into the ocean within a few years.”
I do enjoy the irony of that.
Government spending prolonged the depression until that spending was exponentially increased!

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

“Ryan C – what do you care how many people show up to a rally? The truth is that over 500 rallies & parties have been organized and there is a movement growing.”
Even if ther are 500 and rallies…and there are 500 people at each of them which I doubt…that’s only 250,000 across the country. hmmmm…less than 1%. I’m trembling.

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

It will be fascinating to see how things are one year from now… The state and local taxation rates will skyrocket while the Federal government wrestles with hyperinflation and discontent from all quarters. The bloom is most definitely off the rose…

Posted by: Jon | April 15, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

–$14 dollars a week!!!OOOOOOHH!!AAAHHHHHHH!!GO FORTH AND SAVE THE ECONOMY!!!ROFLMAO
Posted by: HA! | Apr 15, 2009
People are much more likely to spend an extra $14 a week rather than a lump sum check for $500. That would mearly go to a credit card or into savings… $14 extra a week is an extra night out once a month for a young couple…or fresh vegitables rather than canned… or better clothes for the kids… If you don’t want it…send it to me. I bet you don’t send it.

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

HA!:”$14 dollars a week!!!OOOOOOHH!!AAAHHHHHHH!!GO FORTH AND SAVE THE ECONOMY!!!ROFLMAO”
If you don’t need the $728, then feel free to donate it to a worthy cause. And I’m puzzled at how you seem to think over $80 billion dollars left in people’s pockets will have no impact on the economy. It certainly isn’t enough alone, but it’s not chump change.

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

The 95% income tax cut is a lie.
95% of Americans do not pay income taxes.
Only approximately 70% of Americans pay income taxes.
Therefore, Americans who do not pay taxes are not getting a “tax cut”.If anything, they are getting a federal welfare check.—————-
SO WHAT?!!
I am glad to help those who need it.
I am glad to have a true American President who wants all of our citizens to live well.
I am not an avaricious person who thinks only in myself.
I am a Christian.
So if people need help from the government which means help from me…I am happy to do it.
If you are not, stay republican.
Bush has given US this.
Republicans gave US this.
I am glad to have a president who is humane and humanitarian.
Not an enslaver and an abuser Republican.

Posted by: Candie | April 15, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

I think Obama is the reason why tea parties are happening. He needs to advocate lower taxes
Posted by: nycusa05 | Apr 15, 2009 4:23:24 PM
wow, a website to watch a new president, but not one for the previous president who had 8 years, and raised the debt by 3 trillion, wow. tax cuts for the rich, and never got trickled down to anyone else. Two wars neither brought results. two stimulus packages neither helped 01 and 08. Wow, 750 billion , Pauslon, bush, idea. didnt work. 80 billion unaccounted for.
2008 fundaments of economy are strong says bush and Mccain, what happen 3.5 million jobs lost since sept 08. millions of forclosures, etc.
Wasteful DOD spending for planes and helicopters not even used and more are being built wow. 400 million for white house helicopters, bush’s approved.
GOP controlled senate, nothing got done.
DOP controlled senate, stimulus package which helps unemployed, increase in minimum wage, road and bridge construction, 2500 for education assistance, NCLB gets adequately funded finally. I can go. I am posting facts not a partisan website or news group, faux news.

Posted by: nubiangent08 | April 15, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

You know what got us out of the Depression? WWII – MASSIVE government spending on building complex and expensive bombs, planes, tanks, and ships that were literally blown up or sunk into the ocean within a few years.
Posted by: jhw539 | Apr 15, 2009 4:21:29 PM
………….
You’re wrong. What ended the Great Depression were massive tax cuts and massive cuts in government.
FDR’s own Treasury Secretary admitted nothing they did helped, rather they only made things worse and prolonged the Depression.
What the DC Clowns are doing right now is creating the Second Great Depression.
For the generations of public school students left behind (misled), please read a more accurate account of history:
Google: “America’s Great Depression” by Murray Rothbard (You can read it in full @ mises.)

Posted by: Gone Gulchin' | April 15, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

The simplest tax code of all would be no income tax at all, and implementation of a Federal consumption or sales tax. The next simplest would be a flat tax rate with no loopholes for anyone regardless of income. My guess is that the President’s “simplification” will actually be yet another Democrat trying to juggle the numbers to set up a share the wealth scheme through taxation.

Posted by: Publius | April 15, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

It will be fascinating to see how things are one year from now… The state and local taxation rates will skyrocket while the Federal government wrestles with hyperinflation and discontent from all quarters. The bloom is most definitely off the rose…
Posted by: Jon
Funny…didn’t you say the same thing three months ago…but you said three months ago rather than a year. In 7 years…you’ll be saying… Just wait and see. All of Obama’s programs will hit us in 20 years….

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

“There’s a difference between large amounts of spending that will generate a return such as with health care, education and energy…”
“Return”? Here’s the return I see:
- Health care: Eventual loss of my private insurance when the govt. crowds out all private insurance; rationing of health care and lower quality for all (hey, but we’ll all be equal! it’s only fair!)
- Energy: Solar is subsized at a rate 30+ times that of nuclear and coal (BTW – two forms of energy that are available 24 hours per day); BTW – when will the hypocrisy of Ted Kennedy and John Kerry end with regards to the Cape Wind project in Nantucket Sound? “Do as I say, not as I do” (“everyone needs to sacrifice” unless you are political class)
- Education: What return are you expecting? Is throwing more money at education the solution? More wasted $$$ and favors to teacher unions. How about reform, school choice, and accountability? Much cheaper, better results

Posted by: tjp612 | April 15, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Robert Gibbs is the most unprofessional press secretary ever. He can’t answer a question about his lord and master without sarcasm. But if you are one with the “one” he practically bends over you know bows like Obuma did for the nasty little Saudi. Gibbs said he had to go that low because the king was so short. Quaint? What about the white Queen of England? Much smaller than the little king and what does she get. Well a little teenie tiny bend. Wow. Whoops forgot the ipod made in China. What a phony.There are millions of us in the little towns around the country that couldn’t get to a tea party but we are with you. Remember O’Reilly is the most watched cable news program on TV so you can slam Fox all you want to but the they got the numbers baby!!! Take that MSNBC!!!!

Posted by: madvtr | April 15, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

“You’re wrong. What ended the Great Depression were massive tax cuts and massive cuts in government.”
ROFLMAO!
The government was rationing and controlled wages during WW2
The government did not cut taxes and government expanded.
“FDR’s own Treasury Secretary admitted nothing they did helped, rather they only”
Unemployment went down from 25% to 10% in 4 years under the New Deal.
When government ratched back spending to appease Republicans (sound familiar) unemployment jumped again.
It was not until MASSIVE government spending and near government control of the economy that we got out of the Great Depression.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

You’re wrong. What ended the Great Depression were massive tax cuts and massive cuts in government.
FDR’s own Treasury Secretary admitted nothing they did helped, rather they only made things worse and prolonged the Depression.
What the DC Clowns are doing right now is creating the Second Great Depression.
For the generations of public school students left behind (misled), please read a more accurate account of history:
Google: “America’s Great Depression” by Murray Rothbard (You can read it in full @ mises.)
Posted by: Gone Gulchin’ | Apr 15, 2009 4:30:47 PM
If that’s the case…why was the tax rate for anyone in the top 1% under Eisenhauer at 90%. Hmmmm…A Republican no less. How could that be?

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

“- Energy: Solar is subsized at a rate 30+ times that of nuclear and coal (BTW – two forms of energy that are available 24 hours per day);”
You think power from solar is only available during the day time and not at night?
ROFLMAO!

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

$500.00 a year tax cut is NOTHING and Gibbs stupid response to the cigarette tax (apprx. $1.00 a pack) makes me dislike him for the idiot puppet to Obama that he is.—What about the energy tax that’s coming up??? That will affect more than just smokers. There goes that whopping $500.00 per year times times about 10!

Posted by: Fay | April 15, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

The “tea party” rallies are a joke. They were invented, promoted and reported on by FOX news and radio. The only media that feels the necessity to create a news story so they can report on it. The rallies were about as “grass roots” as FOX news is “fair and balanced” neither is a true statement in anyone’s reality. The GOP is under the misassumption that the majority of the American populous is stupid enough to fall for political gimmicks and smoke and mirror economic strategies. The ONLY people that attended the so called “tea parties” and are listening to this dribble are the Lemmings that regurgitate almost word for word everything they hear on Limbaugh and Hannity.

Posted by: dan | April 15, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

Publius: The simplest tax code of all would be no income tax at all, and implementation of a Federal consumption or sales tax. The next simplest would be a flat tax rate with no loopholes for anyone regardless of income. My guess is that the President’s “simplification” will actually be yet another Democrat trying to juggle the numbers to set up a share the wealth scheme through taxation.
*Agreed. Obama has stated on numerous occasions that he advocates finding a way to redistribute wealth not only through congress, but through the courts. I’m certain the IRS is just another weapon of choice…

Posted by: ... | April 15, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

“There’s a difference between large amounts of spending that will generate a return such as with health care, education and energy…”
“Return”? Here’s the return I see:
- Health care: Eventual loss of my private insurance when the govt. crowds out all private insurance; rationing of health care and lower quality for all (hey, but we’ll all be equal! it’s only fair!)
- Energy: Solar is subsized at a rate 30+ times that of nuclear and coal (BTW – two forms of energy that are available 24 hours per day); BTW – when will the hypocrisy of Ted Kennedy and John Kerry end with regards to the Cape Wind project in Nantucket Sound? “Do as I say, not as I do” (“everyone needs to sacrifice” unless you are political class)
- Education: What return are you expecting? Is throwing more money at education the solution? More wasted $$$ and favors to teacher unions. How about reform, school choice, and accountability? Much cheaper, better results
Posted by: tjp612
Education…Build up our schools and colleges. Get out and get a better paying job…which in turn generates more revenue through their income tax.
Healthcare…Please read my prior post. To ad to that…why does every industrial nation that has national health care have a longer life expentancy than we do if their care is so horrible?
Energy…You are only going off of what is available now. If we invest in other ways to find MULTIPLE solutions, then we can have a stronger infrustucture through diversification. Hence with the greatest wind tunnel in the world going through the plain states…you wouldn’t ship that energy to Florida.

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Somebody below is wrong. Spending did not end the Great Depression. World War II did.—Another thing, I’m SICK of hearing about Obama’s DOG!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Fay | April 15, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

“$500.00 a year tax cut is NOTHING and Gibbs stupid response to the cigarette tax (apprx. $1.00 a pack) makes me dislike him for the idiot puppet to Obama that he is”
So a $500 a year tax cut is nothing.
But raising the Fed cig tax by 68 cents (not a $1) would mean a pack a day smoker could expect a tax increase of about $250.
So to recap, you think a $500 tax cut is nothing but you are outraged by a $250 a year tax increase on smokers.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

It sure is fascinating how we have become a nation in which such numbers of childish loxers have nothing new to say other than TAXES TAXES TAXES. Even in the face of the fact that even the wealthiest are taxed less than they were under Ronald Reagan and Obama has lowered the taxes on all of us making less that $200,000 as a single or $250,000 as a couple. How silly can you get? Just read the garbage!!

Posted by: Herb Gray | April 15, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

“Somebody below is wrong. Spending did not end the Great Depression. World War II did.”
So how did WW2 end the depression?
Why by MASSIVE government spending!
“—Another thing, I’m SICK of hearing about Obama’s DOG!!!!!!!!”
This is where I think right and left can find common ground.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

It not just about taxes you big government dolts. Of course you know that but choose to mischaracterize it anyway. The spending is killing our future.

Posted by: Wendell | April 15, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

“The truth is this experiment in media marketing By FoxNews and the rest of the right wing talking heads is an EPIC FAIL at this point. ”
On what basis do you make this assertion? What is your source of data? MSNBC?
“More people showed up to protest the anniversary of the Iraq Invasion last month with ZERO media coverage or promotion.”
Again, sources? Perhaps no media coverage as it might put The One in a bad light since he predicted no way, no how could sending more troops into Iraq improve the situation there. He was simply wrong (as was Joe Biden’s suggestion to partion the country into three separate pieces)…but this is a whole other discussion that will I’m sure will be attacked as it is red meat to leftists.

Posted by: tjp612 | April 15, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Wow – I guess the 54,000,000 people who voted for McCain/Palin are all out there in full force today having their tea parties. That’s quite a large number of people. Oh, wait. Obama had 65,000,000 people who voted for him, and will do so again in 2012. And we’ll vote for more Democrats in 2010. Looks like the teabaggers are outnumbered. Aw shucks.

Posted by: geecee | April 15, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

By the way….we had a very large turnout in downtown Cincinnati!
The crowd was peaceful and respectful of the small group of Obama supporters that attempted to be louder than the speakers. They got their news interview and disbanded. Sure they will get more time on tonight’s news than the message from the tea party group!
FYI…Fountain Square was absolutely clean after we left….unlike when radical left-wing zealouts gather there!

Posted by: clarkohrepub | April 15, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

“Remember O’Reilly is the most watched cable news program on TV so you can slam Fox all you want to but the they got the numbers baby!!”
LMAO…that’s becuase it’s the only channel spouting that rhetoric. The rational people split their viewing pleasure over about 20 other channels… Hence one channel has a hold on the market.
BTW…the only two religous groups larger than Catholics and Babtists are Agnostic/Atheists. Does that mean that we are better than Lutherans, Episcopals, Evangelicals, Jews, Muslims, Mormans…etc…. Just a thought. I mean…if you logic had weight…you’d have to agree that we do.

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

“The Tea Party movement is an incredibly dangerous concept”
Yeah? Obama’s policies and approach to the U.S. economy are incredibly dangerous concepts.
“I hope the protesters fail in their mission to bring their message to a national audience. It’s a message of fear, prejudice and, quite frankly, hate. … The Tea Party movement represents a real danger to the tenets of democracy Americans have embraced for centuries.”
Dissent is no longer patriotic? Public demonstrations are no longer allowed? This viewpoint seems a bit facist to me…

Posted by: tjp612 | April 15, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

The Bush tax cuts are still in place. When they expire, the stories will change! Taxes will go thru the roof!!

Posted by: a | April 15, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Let me throw this out there…I see a lot of people on here supporting FOX and bashing ABC…
Why exactly are you on ABC and not FOX right now?

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

“Again, sources? Perhaps no media coverage as it might put”
Media coverage came after the fact with a few summary articles the next day but nothing frontpage.
There was no promotion of it as FoxNews has done.
You can google war anniversary protest for sources as you know the blog deletes links.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

The Bush tax cuts are still in place. When they expire, the stories will change! Taxes will go thru the roof!!
Posted by: a
You are so right…. By a whole 3% for the top 1%. How are they going to live having to buy a BMW instead of a Benz. I mean really…who would be caught dead in a Beemer…oh yeah…I would.

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Why exactly are you on ABC and not FOX right now?
Keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer.

Posted by: Angie | April 15, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Why does the tax code need to be streamlined? Most of the people who find it too difficult to understand are probably the same people who don’t pay taxes and never will. Should they ever develop the business acumen and sophistication to have a bank account, prepare a P&L statement or take out a loan, they’ll then have no problem reading and completing the return.

Posted by: moira russoniello | April 15, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Ryan C: Actually cigarettes in my state went up over $1.00 a pack. I believe that included a state tax as well. That is beside the point. $500.00 a year is nothing when you consider all the other taxes that Obama is going up on. You didn’t even mention the energy tax which will affect heating your home, driving your car, etc. ——- Anyway, glad we all agree on being sick of the Obama dog story. Have a good one. P.S. When I said that World War II ended the Great Depression, and you pointed out that was also massive spending, I should have been clearer in my remarks. All of Roosevelt’s senseless spending projects did not end the Depression. I was not implying that war is not massive spending.

Posted by: Fay | April 15, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

The tax code is a monster!! The only folks who seem to like it are the tax accountants and tax lawyers. Please simplify it!! Those with resources are able to game it to their advantage. Many average folk who have tax benefits coming to them fail to get them because they just don’t know about them. Besides taking too much of the middle class’s hard-earned money, the government makes it an ordeal to file an intelligent return. Another thing that’s broken and doesn’t make any sense for average Americans.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | April 15, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

I can’t wait till blogging is taxed… don’t think it’ll happen? All of these comments will soon “pipe down” when people have to pay for it. It will begin with the newspapers that are losing revenue faster than you can type your blog entry. It’s inevitable and it won’t be a straight tax, it will be in the form of a membership of some sort similar to cable or satellite deals. People have too much to say and there are too many voices talking all at once. As for this article, I’m a man of faith who believes that “… my God shall supply ALL my needs…” and I’m not afraid of higher or lower taxes or even who’s in office. (Matt 6:26 & Phil. 4:19) You people need to wake up and remember ALL politicians are people like yourselves, you expect too much of them.

Posted by: Mark | April 15, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

I assume, Devil_Mutt, that dissenters are here to ensure that people can see that the illusion that everyone loves the current government and thew path it is taking to be exactly that – an illusion. Independent thought is still alive and well in America despite the government and their groupies’ best attempts to quash it.

Posted by: Publius | April 15, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Fay:”You didn’t even mention the energy tax which will affect heating your home, driving your car, etc. ——-”
There is NO ENERGY TAX. Even the proposal of capping carbon has been regulated to the back burner. You are condemning the real tax cuts that took effective this month with a tax that DOES NOT EXIST AND IS NOT EVEN DEFINED YET. Please join reality if you want to debate.

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

on a side note for you “extreme” lefties….. it is april 15th and snowing in las vegas. i know what you are going to say…. “global warming causes freak weather changes such as these”. tomorrow it will be sunny and 75 and that will also be global warming. go figure.

Posted by: stickman | April 15, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Obamanation spoke great things that only the stupid believe. The liberals went on a spending spree and surely the collection bill will come.His math does not add up people, sober up.

Posted by: Frank | April 15, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

jhw: what are you doing with your smack in the face 10 dollar a week tax break? tax break…. fodder for the left. how do you think you pay for all this? taxes have to go up somewhere sometime. if it’s not smokes, its guns, if its not payroll, it’s energy hikes. one way or another if you think you are not going to be paying more you are on drugs.

Posted by: stickman | April 15, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

I’m going to leave work early to head over to the tea party.
They were just saying here that everyone is going. Dems and Reps.
I am one who is upset at the amount that our property tax is.

Posted by: Julie | April 15, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Of the “tea party” events I have looked at so far there has been “less than” 1% attendance as compared to population within a 10 mile radius of the event.
Example: Cincinnati has about 2.1 million people that live within a 10 mile radius of Fountain Square. There would have had to of been 21000 people to make 1% attendance. Based on the pictures I seen there were less than 2000. Many were probably in transit on the sidewalks because the photographs were taken about lunch time. Some of the attendees may have been there to protest the protesters

Posted by: rightbehind | April 15, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

stickman:”tomorrow it will be sunny and 75 and that will also be global warming. go figure.”
Actually, reputable scientific bodies technically call it climate change – you know, what the CC in IPCC has stood for since it’s inception over two decades ago. Beyond that, I’d rather argue with an evolutionist at this point.

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

I assume, Devil_Mutt, that dissenters are here to ensure that people can see that the illusion that everyone loves the current government and thew path it is taking to be exactly that – an illusion. Independent thought is still alive and well in America despite the government and their groupies’ best attempts to quash it.
Posted by: Publius
Let me ask you this…If FOX is all you have and everyone else is center or left…and this is a democracy… I’ll let you finish the statement.

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Hey Ryan C. I have been sticking up for FOX News since they went on the air years ago. If this mistake in the numbers of those attending the Tea Party in Boston was intentional, then all my posts in support of them have just been rendered a lie. To let even one reporter slip a lie into their story, taints my trust in them. Facts must be checked, to make sure they are factual.

Posted by: mojo | April 15, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

The politicians still don’t get it: The income tax is both unconstitutional and illegal — our nation did not have it from 1776-1913.
Then again, how can I expect the politicians to understand when the citizens don’t even understand.

Posted by: David | April 15, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

hey ryan c is here… lets try that question you avoided yesterday. i can name many people and policies i am not in favor for on the right… can you name just one policy that barry has that you are against? i can’t wait to read your answer.

Posted by: stickman | April 15, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

Beyond that, I’d rather argue with an evolutionist at this point.
Posted by: jhw539
Is that because we use facts, evidence and structured, rational thought?

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

The concept of tax cuts is a lie. Bottom line: the government is taking in and spending far more money then ever before.
That is an overall tax increase on the nation and will inevitably result in lower productivity from the economy as a whole.
That means fewer jobs, less pay and a lower standing in the world economy and it’s all guaranteed by the steal and spend socialists.

Posted by: Erik | April 15, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

“Ryan C: Actually cigarettes in my state went up over $1.00 a pack. I believe that included a state tax as well.”
So a $365 tax increase (if one smokes a pack a day) vs $500 tax cut.
You cast the increase as a horrible burden then discount the tax cut…why?
“That is beside the point. $500.00 a year is nothing when you consider all the other taxes that Obama is going up on.You didn’t even mention the energy tax which will affect heating your home, driving your car, etc. ——-”
That’s because carbon cap and trade is not law and in now pretty much on the back burner, perhaps even till the next session of Congress.
“All of Roosevelt’s senseless spending projects did not end the Depression.”
Unemployment was cut from 25% to 10% in the first 4 years of the New Deal.
Government spending began to ebb (the two year period before the war) and unemployment rose again.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

global warming, climate change…. change the language all you like, it’s still a lie. let me guess were going back to the 70s now and we should melt the ice caps right? i don’t mean to pick on this issue but it is so easy.

Posted by: stickman | April 15, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

stickman:”what are you doing with your smack in the face 10 dollar a week tax break? tax break…. fodder for the left. how do you think you pay for all this?”
If I see $10 on the sidewalk, I pick it up and think myself lucky. I’ll probably give it (and the other $600 that accumulates) to Cheech, my mechanic, to get my car tuned up for a few track days this summer. But how is this relevant?
How do you think the US will pay for ANYTHING if the economy is allowed to collapse into a deflationary spiral? It’s not too hard to understand – we can quibble over a 23 or 25% tax rate, but if the total pie is cut in half we’ll be hard pressed to maintain a first world nation infrastructure and ever drag ourselves out.

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

hey ryan c is here… lets try that question you avoided yesterday. i can name many people and policies i am not in favor for on the right… can you name just one policy that barry has that you are against? i can’t wait to read your answer.
Posted by: stickman
Yup…
1. raising of the minimum wage.
2. trying to reach across the isle to a party that actually told it’s members to not talk to the President when he came to the hill in his first week in office.
3. Not going for a truly nationalized health care system.

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

“Education…Build up our schools and colleges. Get out and get a better paying job…which in turn generates more revenue through their income tax.”
Nicer buildings does not proportionally equate to better results. I grew up in a small town in one of the poorest states in the U.S., but got a great education – Not because of great facilities, but due to great teachers and parents who made education a priority.
“Healthcare…Please read my prior post. To ad to that…why does every industrial nation that has national health care have a longer life expectancy than we do if their care is so horrible?”
Did not read your post (apologies). There are a number of factors that contribute to life expectancy (personal responsibility is high on that list, which we Americans believe hold true in fewer and fewer numbers). Compare cancer survival rates in the U.S. vs. countries with socialized medicine such as the U.K., France, and Canada. Guess who has better rates? The U.S. Why? Because wait times for treatment are shorter and care is not “rationed”.
“Energy…You are only going off of what is available now. If we invest in other ways to find MULTIPLE solutions, then we can have a stronger infrastructure through diversification. Hence with the greatest wind tunnel in the world going through the plain states…you wouldn’t ship that energy to Florida.”
I don’t disagree with alternative energy. What I do take exception with is the government hypocrisy (e.g, Kerry and Kennedy) and their selection of winners and losers. Why not more natural gas (which we have in abundance)? Nuclear? Instead, government decides to promote ethanol, subsidizing agri-business while at the same time driving up corn prices (a staple for the poor in Mexico which led to rioting and government price controls). Further hypocrisy: U.S. places tariffs on cheaper Brazilian ethanol.

Posted by: tjp612 | April 15, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Everyone pays taxes in order to keep Govt going. The problem is that it now seems that current Govt DOGS both Republican AND Democrats are spending like there’s no tomorrow! STOP SPENDING ON THINGS THAT WE DON”T NEED RIGHT NOW!!! Worry about the economy first. Health care can wait a year or two. Quit building a bridge into my pocket!! I have to think that this is something donkeys and elephants can agree on.

Posted by: UNITEalready | April 15, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

global warming, climate change…. change the language all you like, it’s still a lie. let me guess were going back to the 70s now and we should melt the ice caps right? i don’t mean to pick on this issue but it is so easy.
Posted by: stickman
If that’s the case…call it the estate tax and not the death tax. Call it anti-choice instead of pro-life… call it superstition rather than religion. Words matter… too bad the last POTUS didn’t understand that.

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

“Hey Ryan C. I have been sticking up for FOX News since they went on the air years ago. If this mistake in the numbers of those attending the Tea Party in Boston was intentional, then all my posts in support of them have just been rendered a lie”
I feel for you.
Just the other day Neil Cavuto thumped his chest about the fair and balanced FoxNews coverage of the Million Man March.
“We are are going to be in the middle of these protests because at Fox, we do not pick and choose these rallies and protests. We were there for the Million Man March, even though, as I pointed out, it turned out to be well shy of a million men.”
The Million Man March happened in Oct of 2005.
FoxNews went on a year later.
Neil Cavuto just told a brazen lie.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Erik:”The concept of tax cuts is a lie. Bottom line: the government is taking in and spending far more money then ever before.”
You do know that the population is higher than ever before, right? At least a couple million more people per year, so OF COURSE the government will take in more and spend more. Isn’t that obvious? What is it on a per capita basis?

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

I Love this Country!

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 15, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

“can you name just one policy that barry has that you are against? i can’t wait to read your answer.”
I disagree with him strongly on FISA which is what I posted to you last time you asked.
I don’t think the government should be able to spy on American citizens via secret courts and warrants.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

“Why not more natural gas (which we have in abundance)? Nuclear?…”
Natural gas -yes, nuclear -NO!

Posted by: Skip | April 15, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

With all the bashing on this board, this tea party turnout must really be getting under liberals skin. Is it because you are afraid it may lead to you losing your entitlements from Nobama? Or maybe its because you may be forced into the capitalist system someday where you will be forced to think and be productive vs. depending on the government? Is it because minority groups like ACORN may lose there movement to socialism? What a pitiful bunch! I’m switching back to FOX news to listen to real Americans. Have a nice day…

Posted by: StopStealingMyMoney | April 15, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

“it is april 15th and snowing in las vegas. i know what you are going to say”
It rained in Southern California yesterday.
I guess our drought is over.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Stickman – you are right! Try and buy ammunication for a 9MM or any other kind of gun. Taxes are going to go up on ammo and guns. Taxes are going up on everything. I don’t smoke – thank God! At 5.00/pack that’s a budget killer!
You leftist idiots – why do you think you aren’t going ot have to pay for all of this spending?!! I don’t get it. Maybe it’s OK that your children will be paying for it, so you don’t have to – nice.

Posted by: A | April 15, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Of the “tea party” events I have looked at so far there has been “less than” 1% attendance as compared to population within a 10 mile radius of the event.
Example: Cincinnati has about 2.1 million people that live within a 10 mile radius of Fountain Square. There would have had to of been 21000 people to make 1% attendance. Based on the pictures I seen there were less than 2000. Many were probably in transit on the sidewalks because the photographs were taken about lunch time. Some of the attendees may have been there to protest the protesters
To show how insugnificant this event was the old Cincinnati reds stadium could hold 52,952 people.

Posted by: rightbehind | April 15, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Hey I just went to the FOX news site and looked at all the pictures of the Tea Party Rallies. Two things…one I went to FOX because none of the other news sites is even mentioning them and two…not a single person of color in any pictures…so much for a unified America.

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

words matter all right. like: not proud of my country, spread the wealth around, above my pay grade, going through the tax code line by line, no earmarks, shall i go on?

Posted by: stickman | April 15, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

I have seen More money on my pay check under President Obama. I am not going to portest that. THANK YOU MR. PRESIDENT

Posted by: ETHAMR | April 15, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

“Two things…one I went to FOX because none of the other news sites is even mentioning them”
Other news sites are covering them but its not frontpage stuff.
I have found summary articles on the big 3 and CNN.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

Why is it the the Neo-Cons can only stomach to say the Presidents name as in insult such as No-Bama or “The One”. I don’t recall many dems doing that to Bush as much as we hated him. We might call him an idiot for policies or the way he was unable to form coherant sentances…but we never resorted to insults. If you’re an idiot then your an idiot. That’s not name calling. No-Obama is in direct contrast of what he is actully trying to do against the grain of the “NO” Party of Reps. Oh the Irony

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

“Two things…one I went to FOX because none of the other news sites is even mentioning them”
Other news sites are covering them but its not frontpage stuff.
I have found summary articles on the big 3 and CNN.
Posted by: Ryan C
That to me suggests how insignifigant they really are then…

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

‘‘We, the People are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts — not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution.’’
— Abraham Lincoln

Posted by: Kate | April 15, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

‘‘It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.’’
— Justice Robert H. Jackson
Couple of quotes that fit this tea party theme.
See ya there!

Posted by: Kate | April 15, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

“Why is it the the Neo-Cons can only stomach to say the Presidents name as in insult such as No-Bama or “The One”. I don’t recall many dems doing that to Bush as much as we hated him”
Possibly not in your circles but Bush certainly had his share of disrespectful names including Bushit (as in bs), Chimpy, *, Dumbo, etc.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

i have to go even though i do believe this is a quality debate. ryan thanks for your answer, he really did change direction on that one and i commend your response. one last thought…. these people are out protesting spending. both bush and barry have gone WAY overboard and there is no end in sight. how do any of you come on here with a straight face and say “lets spend more”? if you do you clearly have no prior education in economics in any fashion at all period. i will look forward to reading everyones posts… have a great day.

Posted by: stickman | April 15, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

So, you’re not going to tax income, your going to tax what I spend it on. How is that different except for dirty, sleazy, denial that you just raised taxes on 1/5th of the adult population to pay for health insurance for families who make more than I have ever made in my life?
I tell you, that’s sleazy. You think tax doesn’t cost smokers money?
It was the decision to tax that made me angry, but the denial gives birth to contempt.

Posted by: sobi | April 15, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

‘‘It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.’’
— Justice Robert H. Jackson
Couple of quotes that fit this tea party theme.
See ya there!
MY QUOTE: THE TEA PARTY IS EIGHT YEARS TOO LATE AND WHO STOP BUSH FROM HIS ERRORS!

Posted by: Robin | April 15, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

I’m also sick of hearing about Obama’s dog that he got from Kennedy. As usual he lied to everybody again. Do you remember he wanted a dog from a shelter?
This is so typical of this so called leader. I wonder, if he was sending men into combat if he would change his mind in the middle of the operation and get a whole bunch of men shot up just because?

Posted by: oldrtoy | April 15, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

“…which means they lose a great deal of money.”
No. It means they sold their stock rather than watch it go down further.
Invest much, do you?

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 15, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Posted by: StopStealingMyMoney | Apr 15, 2009 5:16:23 PM
“With all the bashing on this board, this tea party turnout must really be getting under liberals skin. Is it because you are afraid it may lead to you losing your entitlements?”
No, I’m frankly concerned about the subversive control of the Religious Right over conservative thinking.
For decades, right wing Christians have warned that evil “secular humanists” were taking control of public schools and universities, the news media, and the entertainment industry, with the aim of driving Christianity from American life and creating a “socialist” state. Sound familiar?
For the past 8 years, the response was to attack US national education and challenge the teaching of Evolution. So it concerns me that conservative mouth pieces have rallied their listeners by describing spending on public schools is “fiscal child abuse” and “irresponsible”.
For decades the extreme Religious Right has objected to income tax as “idolatry,” property tax “theft” and inheritance taxes simply not allowed in the Bible. And, over the past 8 years they made inroads to build their version of a “Christian Nation.” Deregulation and tax cuts swept through America’s financial system, as if the free market’s “invisible hand” was the hand of God.
It concerns me that fiscal policy based on tax cuts created a pitiful 5 Million new jobs over 8 years, and it concerns me that deregulation was at the heart of our financial mess. So the Conservative solution is more tax cuts and less government?
President Obama’s proposed new government regulations and a return to earlier tax rates fly in the face of not only conservative economics, but also Right Wing religious beliefs. Obama’s policies jeopardize the ideals of a “Christian Nation”, so I am concerned that these policies have been re-packaged and promoted as “socialism”.

Posted by: Center One | April 15, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

stickman:”words matter all right. like: … no earmarks”
Why do people keep attributing a McCain quote (and pledge) to Obama? The person who said the words matter too you know.

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

“Possibly not in your circles but Bush certainly had his share of disrespectful names…”
With my buddies it was usually: George W Tush, Dlck Shady and Donald Dumbsfeld.
-couldn’t resist -still bitter I guess…

Posted by: Skip | April 15, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

There are a few clear goals of the GOP. Give to the rich so they may remain rich. Consign the middle and lower classes to wars that protect the wealth of the rich and by all means do not regulate the cheating ways many of the rich got rich.

Posted by: dan | April 15, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

“So how did WW2 end the depression?”
World War II ended it when other nations made gigantic purchases of US defense equipment from Sept. 1939 on.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 15, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Devil Mutt:”Is that because we use facts, evidence and structured, rational thought?”
If science deniers actually used facts and evidence they would be sitting in a shiny new lab building next to Exxon HQ awaiting their Nobel prize (they’d get one quicker than the guy who proved that bacteria can cause ulcers).

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

I’m also sick of hearing about Obama’s dog that he got from Kennedy. As usual he lied to everybody again. Do you remember he wanted a dog from a shelter?
This is so typical of this so called leader. I wonder, if he was sending men into combat if he would change his mind in the middle of the operation and get a whole bunch of men shot up just because?
Posted by: oldrtoy
Wow…that’s a stretch if I’ve ever seen one. The dog was a gift…he didn’t go to a puppy mill to get one. That was the idea he wanted to promote. And being that the dog had to by hypoalergenic…not a whole lot of muts out there that would fit the bill at a shelter. I mean come on…they took 6 months looking for a dog and couldn’t find one. And for you to reach a conclusion about combat based off of recieving a present… That just goes to show that you are trying your best to instigate an arguement. If you have valid points of disussion…please present them. I doubt you’ve ever been to combat. I have. It’s up to the commanders on the ground to change orders and tactics… The president can only give the go ahead or to stop an operation…not change tactics in the middle of it.

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

“How is that different except for dirty, sleazy, denial that you just raised taxes on 1/5th of the adult population to pay for health insurance for families who make more than I have ever made in my life”
Pity the poor smokers who only cost us billions in healthcare.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Fascist Hyena:”World War II ended it when other nations made gigantic purchases of US defense equipment from Sept. 1939 on.”
Congratulations on making me literally laugh out loud. Nothing like revising history with a fat point sharpie!

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

“I assume, Devil_Mutt, that dissenters are here to ensure that people can see that the illusion that everyone loves the current government and the path it is taking to be exactly that – an illusion. Independent thought is still alive and well in America despite the government and their groupies’ best attempts to quash it.”
Response:
“Let me ask you this…If FOX is all you have and everyone else is center or left…and this is a democracy… I’ll let you finish the statement.”
Several points about that, Devil_Mutt. First, your response has no relevance to the initial comment. A blog that has only one point of view represented is less than useless. Second, your assertions are both conditional and subjective so that any conclusions are meaningless in an absolute sense. And finally, any view – left, center, or right – is purely relative so that none of them can be viewed as wrong in the absolute sense you seem to imply.

Posted by: Publius | April 15, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

“World War II ended it when other nations made gigantic purchases of US defense equipment from Sept. 1939 on.”
Wrong.
Other nations got US defense equipment on loan and on credit, the famous Lend-Lease program.
I think Norway is the only country to ever repay its WW2 debt in full.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Center One – I hate to break it to you but NOT EVERYONE in this nation is Christian. Religion does NOT control this country and it NEVER will.

Posted by: dan | April 15, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Golly Ned, this is quite fascinating. Here Mr. Obama goes on television and says that he’s cut taxes for 95% of Americans. Yet 43% of Americans pay no federal income tax at all. So I have repeatedly asked–and I ask again right now–which taxes has he cut for that 43%?
I ask the question, and yet not a single one of Obama’s fawning sycophants who regularly show up here can provide an answer–they don’t even try. I am left to conclude that they know their man is simply lying. I can understand their embarrassment.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 15, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

jhw: i have to work, why do you force my hand? google obama says no more earmarks and there are about 100000000000000 stories on this subject. devil mut… . just keep taking from that one percent see how far that gets ya. good luck all, bash me more i cant respond anymore.

Posted by: stickman | April 15, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Center One …say that again…it wasn’t loud enough. Bravo. I think you just summed up in one blog what I’ve been trying to say over the last hour or so…

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

I’m also sick of hearing about Obama’s dog that he got from Kennedy. As usual he lied to everybody again. Do you remember he wanted a dog from a shelter?
This is so typical of this so called leader. I wonder, if he was sending men into combat if he would change his mind in the middle of the operation and get a whole bunch of men shot up just because?
Posted by: oldrtoy
Be fair, oldrtoy. The President paid off the Human Society once the public voiced its outrage like every conscientious professional politican.

Posted by: Publius | April 15, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

Ryan C. strikes out yet again. Per the BBC:
“Under the lend-lease programme, which began in March 1941, the then neutral US could provide countries fighting Hitler with war material.
The US joined the war soon after – in the wake of the attack on Pearl Harbour – and the programme ended in 1945.
“The final payment of £45m will be made by the 31 December, meeting a 1945 obligation to repay the debt in full.
“‘Repayment of the war loans to the US Government is expected to be completed on December 31 2006,’ the Treasury’s Ivan Lewis said in a written commons reply.”

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 15, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

I also am tired of hearing about BO. The Messiah seems to think that everyone is SOOOOOOOOOOOOO HAPPY with his TAX CUTS. Well I have a bunch of friends that haven’t noticed anything and they are not over the $250,000 earings. They feel they are getting HOSED by this Administration, but with a the Dems in their they don’t pay their TAXES anyway, so they don’t care about us PEE ONS…. GOD HELP US, CAUSE OUR COUNTRY IS GOING TO GO INTO A DEEP RECESSION IF NOT DEPRESSION. If you believe this guy you are so FOOLED, because he hasn’t KEPT ANY OF HIS PROMISES YET. He couldn’t even get a dog from a shelter, because his daughter is alergic to certain dogs. He new that when he promised his daughters that during his CAMPAIGN. But yet we are suppose to accept this aren’t we???

Posted by: Joy | April 15, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

This is so typical of this so called leader. I wonder, if he was sending men into combat if he would change his mind in the middle of the operation and get a whole bunch of men shot up just because?
RESPONSE TO IGNORANCE: THIS SO CALL LEADER DID GET NOT SEND US INTO A WAR BASED ON A LIE. SOLDIERS AND MILLIONS OF INNOCENT CIVILIANS ARE DEAD BECAUSE OF BLOOD OIL AND PRESIDENT BUSH.

Posted by: Robin | April 15, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

I ask the question, and yet not a single one of Obama’s fawning sycophants who regularly show up here can provide an answer–they don’t even try. I am left to conclude that they know their man is simply lying. I can understand their embarrassment.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena
They’ve been cut by allowing them to hold on to more of their paycheck rather than the government. This only means they will get a smaller tax return but it would be a wash… They will get that money back in a year or so anyway but now they collect interest on it instead of the government. Doesn’t amount to much but it’s something. Also if they got an extra couple of bucks a paycheck…they are more liekly to spend it as cash rather than putting on the CC. That means they will pay less in interest fees to the banks… Because when they have to use their larger tax return to pay off the credit card that they used little by little over the year…it amounted to a lot of interest that now they might not have to pay.

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

All of these so-called tax protests are just people who voted for John McCain and are still mad. This “grassroots” movement was scattered across the country but nothing like the Obama rallies during presidential election.
A poll released today says that Obama’s economic policies–including his tax cuts–have BROAD support. These protests are very similar to those flash mobs that were so popular just a few years ago.

Posted by: princess9681 | April 15, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

I also am tired of hearing about BO. The Messiah seems to think that everyone is SOOOOOOOOOOOOO HAPPY with his TAX CUTS. Well I have a bunch of friends that haven’t noticed anything and they are not over the $250,000 earings. They feel they are getting HOSED by this Administration, but with a the Dems in their they don’t pay their TAXES anyway, so they don’t care about us PEE ONS…. GOD HELP US, CAUSE OUR COUNTRY IS GOING TO GO INTO A DEEP RECESSION IF NOT DEPRESSION. If you believe this guy you are so FOOLED, because he hasn’t KEPT ANY OF HIS PROMISES YET. He couldn’t even get a dog from a shelter, because his daughter is alergic to certain dogs. He new that when he promised his daughters that during his CAMPAIGN. But yet we are suppose to accept this aren’t we???
Posted by: Joy
They haven’t noticed a difference yet because the cuts didn’t go in to effect until April 1st. The first paycheck after that is….TODAY. They will notice a difference. I get paid weekly and I’ve recieved more money in pocket already.

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

stickman:”google obama says no more earmarks and there are about 100000000000000 stories on this subject.”
And not a single ACTUAL QUOTE. It seems to be a favorite of the Right to make up pledges and attribute them to Obama. McCain pledged no earmarks, and Obama – when put on the spot to match the pledge during a debate – refused to do so.

Posted by: JHW539 | April 15, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

If you believe this guy you are so FOOLED, because he hasn’t KEPT ANY OF HIS PROMISES YET from Joy
Said he was going to withdrawls from Iraq…in process.
Said he would reverse torture…did that
Said he’s close Gitmo…did that
Siad he was going to go after Al Queda…in process
Said he was going to introduce a stimulous bill….done.
Said he’d overturn the ban on Stem Cell research….done
Said he would reach across party line but was rebuffed by the reps when they were to told not to talk to him when he showed up on the hill in his first week…
Need I go on? You make a false statement such as he hasn’t kept any promises…

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

WHOS RUNNING THE WHITE HOUSE OBAMA OR IS IT HILLARY WHAT ABOUT THE SENTERS THAT DONT PAY THEIR TAXES ? AND THE ONES
ARE IN THIRE IS CRIMINALS LIKE HILLARY IS A FELON ALL THE ONES THAT OBAMA PUT IN HIS PARTY IS A CRIMINALS IT TIME TO PUT THEM WHERE THEY BELONG IN PRISON
WHERE IS THE JUSTIC AT

Posted by: RAMBOW99 | April 15, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

YOU SAY YOU CANNOT TRUST PRESIDENT OBAMA! THEN GO FIND PRESIDENT BUSH BECAUSE WE ALL KNOW HE TOLD THE TRUTH!

Posted by: ROBIN | April 15, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

“They’ve been cut by allowing them to hold on to more of their paycheck rather than the government. This only means they will get a smaller tax return but it would be a wash… They will get that money back in a year or so anyway but now they collect interest on it instead of the government. Doesn’t amount to much but it’s something. Also if they got an extra couple of bucks a paycheck…they are more liekly to spend it as cash rather than putting on the CC. That means they will pay less in interest fees to the banks… Because when they have to use their larger tax return to pay off the credit card that they used little by little over the year…it amounted to a lot of interest that now they might not have to pay.”
What exactly are you huffing, Devil_Mutt? Earn INTEREST on $13 per week? From my calculations that’s an average of about $2.50 for the year. WHOOPEE! Also, where do you get the bizarre idea that someone will spend the $13 each week rather than put it into their checking account. Most people figure how much they need for the coming week and withhold that as cash. They aren’t suddenly going to withhold $53 each week instead of $40 because their net pay is $13 per week more. I’ve read a lot of bizarre defenses of the spending bill but yours is over the top.

Posted by: Publius | April 15, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

PRESIDENT BUSH WAS A LIAR AND MILLIONS HAVE DIED DUE TO LIES, PRESIDENT REAGAN SOLD WEAPONS TO IRAN AND HELP CREATED THE MONSTER OSAMA BIN LIDEN WITH THE HELP OF THE FIRST PRESIDENT BUSH. EVERY PRESIDENT WAS INVOLVED WITH SLAVERY AND IGNORED THE GENOCIDE OF BLACKS UP TO THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT, PRESIDENT NIXON WAS IMPREACHED AND PRESIDENT CLINTON HAS THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL; AND YOU ARE COMPLAINING ABOUT PRESIDENT OBAMA BECAUSE WHERE HE GOT HIS DOG; YOU GOT TO BE JOKING!!! YOU ARE NOT THAT STUPID OR MAYBE YOU ARE!!!!
Posted by: robin
Robin…I appreciate your vigor but you are wrong on most of these… Bush has killed around a hundred thousand…not millions. I was there. Nixon was never impeached. He resigned prior to impeachment hearings but would have been. Been Ladin is from Saudi Arabia.,…not Iran. Not every President was involved in slavery until the civil rights movement because slavery ended in 1865 and the civil rights movement was in the 1960′s. 85 year later and a lot of presidents in between. But I get your point… I’m a liberal too but please use facts…not anger to promote your views. It makes us all look dumb.

Posted by: Devil_Mutt | April 15, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Publius:”Also, where do you get the bizarre idea that someone will spend the $13 each week rather than put it into their checking account.”
Just to be clear, you are arguing that a $80 billion tax reduction is a bad thing? I’m really muddy on what your point is, other than you appear to think $10 bills are worthless.

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Smokers don’t cost you billions. That’s just one of the rhetorical lies continuously repeated by an entire new industry that depends upon a shared popular sentiment of hating smokers for a living.
We cost less in the final accounting because we die earlier. No one costs more than lingering elderly for health care consumption, of public and private dollars.
We’ve been the state’s targets for a decade, now the feds want their cut. But no one wants to own up to the fact that it is nothing more than an exploitation of a group of people against whom prejudice is popular and accepted.

Posted by: sobi | April 15, 2009, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

“I’m a liberal too but please use facts…not anger to promote your views. It makes us all look dumb…”
Oh let Robin yell at them, it’s good therapy. Besides, right-wingers mangle facts all the time–in fact it’s standard procedure–and don’t care if they look dumb, so why should we?

Posted by: Skip | April 15, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

“Ryan C. strikes out yet again. Per the BBC:”
Gee silly me for not knowing that the UK had finally paid off their WW2 debt 60 years after the fact.
Of course that really undermines your point that foreign countries were buying war material from us and that is what got us out of the Depression since we just finished getting paid for it.
But wait maybe you are on to something perhaps these much delayed loan repayments were the foundation of the vaunted Bush economic miracle!

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

He wants to simplify the tax code, yet his “tax cut” has made filing more complicated….. That extra money you are getting in your check right now….The tax tables have not changed, so if you forget to take the “credit” on your taxes next year, you will owe the money back. And that doesn’t cover what married people with two incomes have to deal with. You’d better look at your withholding, because chances are you are now underwithheld and will owe money when you file your taxes next year. The change in the withholding tables assumes that only one person is working. That’s a lot more simple, isn’t it?

Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 15, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

“Smokers don’t cost you billions. That’s just one of the rhetorical lies continuously repeated by an entire new industry that depends upon a shared popular sentiment of hating smokers for a living.”
Healthcare costs for smoking related illnesses:
$20B a year under Medicare.
$8B a year under VA Medical
“We cost less in the final accounting because we die earlier.”
Even more reason to quit.
I did 3 years ago.
I hope you can find the strength to do so too because it is not easy.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

“The tax tables have not changed, so if you forget to take the “credit” on your taxes next year, you will owe the money back.”
The tax tables for 2009 are not even out yet.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Devil_Mutt “They haven’t noticed a difference yet because the cuts didn’t go in to effect until April 1st. The first paycheck after that is….TODAY. ” Not true. It was in my first check of the month (April 2nd). Of course, I have to change my withholding so I don’t owe money next April 15th, because between my husband & myself, they are not withholding enough.
Posted by: Devil_Mutt |

Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 15, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Ryan C – It is stated on the IRS site that the tables are not changing. There is a credit associated with this so-called tax-cut (which automatically, means that it isn’t actually a tax-cut).

Posted by: ellsbell930 | April 15, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

If you were a smoker, why are you contributing to a hate campaign against people who smoke?
Look at your remark. It isn’t aimed at money, it is aimed at smokers.
I know it is hard, and I’ve been trying. But when I succeed, I hope I’m not guilty of the “born again” hate speech.

Posted by: sobi | April 15, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

“Publius:”Also, where do you get the bizarre idea that someone will spend the $13 each week rather than put it into their checking account.”
Just to be clear, you are arguing that a $80 billion tax reduction is a bad thing? I’m really muddy on what your point is, other than you appear to think $10 bills are worthless. jhw539″
The point, since you obviously missed it, is that the intent of a stimulus plan is to promote spending. When I got my $300 stimulus check I bought a new mower – something that I hadn’t planned to do until it arrived. How many people (you included, up to now)are planning to kick their heels each week and rush out to spend this tax cut? $13 per week is not to going to stimulate anything. A $100 million Powerball win is a fantastic life-changing experience. Spread over 10 million winners it’s meaningless.

Posted by: Publius | April 15, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

“google obama says no more earmarks and there are about 100000000000000 stories on this subject.”
Stickman that right wing echo chambers repeat the same lies over and over again does not suddenyl make them true.
Obama promised no earmarks in the stim bill.
There were none.
McCain campaigned on banning earmarks, Obama has sought to make that process more transparent by creating a gov’t google for earmarks.
See his work with Coburn on this issue.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

“Ryan C – It is stated on the IRS site that the tables are not changing. There is a credit associated with this so-called tax-cut (which automatically, means that it isn’t actually a tax-cut).”
From the IRS
Payroll Checks Increase This Spring. The Making Work Pay Tax Credit will mean $400 to $800 for many Americans. The IRS has issued new withholding tables for employers. Taxpayers can check the IRS withholding calculator to make sure enough tax is withheld from their pay.
This is the same as the stim checks in that the next tax filing had them built in.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

The Ron Paul supporters (like me) resurrected the Tea Party back in ’07.
The current Tea Party movement was first proposed on Karl Denninger’s market-ticker forum back in Jan. to oppose the No Banker Left Behind Bailout policies of Bushbama.
The Boston Tea Party (political party) caught wind of it and wrote a resolution a few days later supporting it.
Santelli then brought the idea up on his show and it went viral.
FOX usurped the grassroots movement.
The WH, the press and the progs (but I repeat myself) are welcome to show nothing but disdain and mock their fellow Americans wrt their concerns over the banker bailouts, this crushing debt Obama and Co. are accruing, the impending inflation, and the inevitable tax hikes on the middle class all they like. (See The Hill’s “Obama’s tax reckoning”)
It was not meant to be for just conservatives, but for all Americans who care about these very serious issues, and the future of this Republic.
But hey! Who knew progressives loved paying taxes for banker bailouts and megacorporations, and lining the pockets of special interests?
It’s a crazy, mixed-up world!

Posted by: Gone Gulchin' | April 15, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

“Of course that really undermines your point that foreign countries were buying war material from us and that is what got us out of the Depression since we just finished getting paid for it.”
Not one bit. Just how do you think all those huge receivables were carried on the nation’s books the minute the goods were shipped?

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 15, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Ryan C – That is the WITHHOLDING tables, NOT the tax tables. They are TWO DIFFERENT things.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 15, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Ryan C said”Obama promised no earmarks in the stim bill.
There were none.” I almost can’t type, I’m laughing so hard. You obviously didn’t read the stimulus bill. It was FULL of earmarks & pork.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 15, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

oldrtoy said ” I’m also sick of hearing about Obama’s dog that he got from Kennedy. As usual he lied to everybody again. Do you remember he wanted a dog from a shelter?” He never promised to get one from a shelter. He said he’d like to. The important promise surrounding the dog is the one he made to his kids & he kept that one. I will not vilify him for getting a dog that was appropriate for his family. That was a family decision, NOT one for the rest of the country to weigh in on. (And it makes me sick that I actually have to defend him on this point).

Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 15, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

rightbehind said ” Of the “tea party” events I have looked at so far there has been “less than” 1% attendance as compared to population within a 10 mile radius of the event.” That’s because most of the people who want lower taxes and less spending were working while they were going on. I would love to have attended, but I was working.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 15, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Ryan the whole bill was one big earmark. you guys are crazy. sometimes you have to have to laugh at your own comments. if you can’t laugh at yourself you can’t laugh at anyone.

Posted by: stickman | April 15, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

“It was FULL of earmarks & pork.”
Seriously learn the definition of an earmark as well as the fact that pork and earmarks are not synonymous.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

“Just how do you think all those huge receivables were carried on the nation’s books the minute the goods were shipped?”
ROFLMAO!
You think the companies that manufactured the war material worked on receivables (collected decades later) rather than being paid by the US gov’t upfront…how cute.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

“Ryan C – That is the WITHHOLDING tables, NOT the tax tables. They are TWO DIFFERENT things.”
So by all means copy paste the notice you claim the IRS made.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

For those who think Obama’s irresponsible spending is necessary, consider the seminal study of economic downturns by Geoffrey H. Moore. He tells us that since 1920 there have been three depressions and six sharp recessions.
Of the two recessions, one lasted 43 months–from 1929 to 1933. But lo and behold, the next (and last) depression was in 1937-38, and lasted thirteen months. It began four years after FDR and the Dems had swept to power with huge majorities, and had begun spending on an unprecedented scale. What good did all the spending do? FDR’s treasury secretary later said that it did no good at all.
Keep in mind that unemployment in 1940–seven years after FDR took office–was still at 17%. Then there arose war and mobilization–nothing like putting 11 million men into uniform in a nation of 150 million to lower the U/E rate. But for those of you who think spending will do it, please consider the foregoing.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 15, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Bushbama is an interesting nickname. Considering the policies Mr. Obama has not changed from his predecessor, I can not see how some of his supporters can criticize Bush on one hand and support Obama for doing the same thing. Perhaps issues of national security and American economy causes the person in power to only have 1 hand to play, no matter who they are. In this way, one can either sympathize with Bush (perhaps not the worst president?) or give Mr. Obama a little slack for having limited options for change.

Posted by: t961585 | April 15, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

“Ryan the whole bill was one big earmark”
Stickman, learn the definition of an earmark.
The federal Office of Management and Budget defines earmarks as funds provided by Congress for projects or programs where the congressional direction (in bill or report language) circumvents Executive Branch merit-based or competitive allocation processes, or specifies the location or recipient, or otherwise curtails the ability of the Executive Branch to manage critical aspects of the funds allocation process.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Obama’s simpified tax code:just sign your paycheck and send it in.

Posted by: art | April 15, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Ryan C – I know they are two different things, hence the use of each of the terms. If I thought they were the same thing, I would have only used one. And most of the stuff in the bill fits either one definition or the other.

Posted by: ellsbell930 | April 15, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

“Keep in mind that unemployment in 1940–seven years after FDR took office–was still at 17%.”
Keep in mind that when FDR took office the unemployment rate was 25%.
Also keep in mind that in 1940 the unemployment rate was 14.6%.
So basically FDR shaved the unemployment rate nearly in half even with the 2nd recession in ’37-38 (where unemployment spiked to 19% in ’38).
That is quite remarkable.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

sorry ryan, you win again. that bill went through the process, without being read, without debate, and signed into law…… seems like an earmark to me. but i will concede your point.

Posted by: stickman | April 15, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Gibbs just don’t get it! But if he did I guess he couldn’t remain on the payroll. . . . . The tea parties are not a knee-jerk reaction, they are a grass roots movement by a populous too smart to believe one can spend or borrow his way out of debt.

Posted by: Ed Taylor | April 15, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

“sorry ryan, you win again. that bill went through the process, without being read, without debate, and signed into law…… seems like an earmark to me. but i will concede your point.”
Its semantic quibbling.
There was plenty in the bill that can rightly be called pork.
Since pork is more debatable as a definition, let’s call pork any wasteful spending regardless of how it ended up being approved.
That is what I have considered pork.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Ryan C said “So by all means copy paste the notice you claim the IRS made. ”
Okay – here: ” In 2009 and 2010, the Making Work Pay provision of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act will provide a refundable tax credit of up to $400 for working individuals and up to $800 for married taxpayers filing joint returns.
This tax credit will be calculated at a rate of 6.2 percent of earned income and will phase out for taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income in excess of $75,000, or $150,000 for married couples filing jointly.
For people who receive a paycheck and are subject to withholding, the credit will typically be handled by their employers through automated withholding changes in early spring. These changes may result in an increase in take-home pay. The amount of the credit will be computed on the employee’s 2009 income tax return filed in 2010. Taxpayers who do not have taxes withheld by an employer during the year can also claim the credit on their 2009 tax return.”
Now let me explain it to you: There will be a line on the 2009 (and 2010) Form 1040 (whichever version you use)to take the credit. Because you are being given it through an adjustment to your payroll withholding, your credit should equal the additional amount not withheld from your check. The tax rate & tables do not change. You have to claim the credit or according to your 1040, you will owe it back. What they are counting on, is that people either will forget to take the credit or will not understand that they have to.

Posted by: ellsbell930 | April 15, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

“Since pork is more debatable as a definition, let’s call pork any wasteful spending regardless of how it ended up being approved.”
But even then there could be quite a bit of debate about whether a particular amount of spending for a certain project etc is wasteful or not. The term ‘pork’ is pretty dubious.

Posted by: Skip | April 15, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Hmmmmm . . . Did I hear right that Obama gave some 6.5 per-cent to various charities? As a professed Christian I wonder how much he tithes?

Posted by: Ed Taylor | April 15, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

“You have to claim the credit or according to your 1040, you will owe it back. What they are counting on, is that people either will forget to take the credit or will not understand that they have to.”
You can only claim credit if your employers do not now implement withholding changes.
But this caught my eye.
“The amount of the credit will be computed on the employee’s 2009 income tax return filed in 2010.”
You basically just helped me disprove your nonsense…thanks.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

Posted by: dan | Apr 15, 2009 5:41:44 PM
“Religion does NOT control this country and it NEVER will.” Well, Dan, I’m not so sure.
Unfortunately, Religious Right groups and their allies insist that the United States was designed to be officially Christian and that our laws should enforce the doctrines of (their version of) Christianity.
The Religious Right made serious inroads into government policy over the past 8 years – in one small example, our nation spent $1 Billion on failed “abstinence only” education programs.
And extremist talk shows have been promoting Religious Right views for decades, including the notion that income tax as “idolatry,” property tax “theft” and inheritance taxes are simply not allowed in the Bible. It is their intent to make our country a Christian Nation. They work to dismantle the public school system, and blame the news media for driving Christianity from American life and creating a “socialist” state.
If you are a Libertarian, watch out for the goals of those you side with.

Posted by: Center One | April 15, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Ryan C – You have it wrong. You have to claim the credit in order to NOT owe money to the IRS next April 15th. If your employer (for whatever reason) doesn’t follow the new withholding tables, then you will get the money back as a refund (or you will owe less if you were already underwithheld). Don’t believe me if you don’t want to. I am a financial analyst & my co-workers & I went over this with a fine-tooth comb.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 15, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

It seems like the term ‘pork’ requires some kind of consensus. Debatable potentially wasteful spending could be called ‘porkish’.

Posted by: Skip | April 15, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | Apr 15, 2009 7:01:26 PM
…………
The progs don’t care about facts. They truly believe (as they have been led to) that FDR is up there in heaven sitting to the right of God.
It makes no difference to them that the despot ushered in Economic Fascism, loved Mussolini (who loved him right back), interned innocent people in camps, seized private property, tried to stack SCOTUS when his policies were found to be unconstitutional, set up a censorship office, sent exiled Jews back to the Nazis, killed livestock and destroyed crops in an effort to keep prices up while people were going hungry, and prolonged the depression with his fascist economic meddling, some of which we are still suffering for today (see Fannie Mae).
They also truly believe that WWII ended the Depression when in reality it didn’t end until after the war.
“War prosperity is like the prosperity that an earthquake or a plague brings.”
—Ludwig von Mises
(Wartime Prosperity? A Reassessment of the U.S. Economy in the 1940s)
They also believe Obama is the next FDR, but this Depression is different than the last. Then, we had more savings, manufacturing and farms, and the world owed us money. This time, we have no savings, little manufacturing and fewer farms, and we owe everyone money. Lots of it.
If the Obama supporters want his presidency to be a success and for the economy to recover (but I repeat myself), they would beg him to stop this insane spending and cut taxes across the board, or else and pray for a Republican Congress in ’10.

Posted by: Gone Gulchin' | April 15, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

“I am a financial analyst & my co-workers & I went over this with a fine-tooth comb.”
You and several of your coworkers had to go over it with a fine tooth comb?
Its a 1 page statement that is clear as day.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

“It makes no difference to them that the despot ushered in Economic Fascism”
ROFLMAO!
I think Ron Paul nutters are my favorite kind.
They operate via some alternative history.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

“If the Obama supporters want his presidency to be a success and for the economy to recover (but I repeat myself), they would beg him to stop this insane spending and cut taxes across the board, or else and pray for a Republican Congress in ’10.”
Is this right out of the latest proposal for the Republican ethereal budget that has no numbers in it?

Posted by: Skip | April 15, 2009, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

“Is this right out of the latest proposal for the Republican ethereal budget that has no numbers in it?”
Well it was more talking points than budget numbers ;-)

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

It seemed more like a how-to pamphlet on the benefits of Republican economic philosophy.

Posted by: Skip | April 15, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Robert Gibbs is the most obnoxious, unlikable press secretary since Dana Perino.
One would think that the job description calls for someone with a modicum of intelligence and likability.
He has neither.

Posted by: paul | April 15, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Posted by: Ryan C | Apr 15, 2009 8:06:17 PM
“I think Ron Paul nutters are my favorite kind. They operate via some alternative history.”
Hahahaha and by supporting the Conservative “do nothing” tax agenda, they snuggle up to Evangelicals intent on strangling our schools and government oversight while taking away our Constitutional freedom of separation of church and state.
Alternative reality.

Posted by: Center One | April 15, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

“It seemed more like a how-to pamphlet on the benefits of Republican economic philosophy.”
Which certainly is worthwhile to get the message out about.
But when you are responding to criticism that you offer no solutions, a broad outline of your economic philosophy isn’t what the doctor ordered.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Well Rick Perry just killed his chances at the GOP nomination come 2012.
From the Houston Chron blog
Speaking with reporters after a tea party rally in Austin today, Gov. Rick Perry said Texas can leave the union if it wants to.
“Texas is a unique place. When we came into the union in 1845, one of the issues was that we would be able to leave if we decided to do that,” Perry said. “My hope is that America and Washington in particular pays attention. We’ve got a great union. There’s absolutely no reason to dissolve it. But if Washington continues to thumb their nose at the American people, who knows what may come of that.”
And shockingly like most right wingers he doesn’t know his history.
Just FYI, on Perry’s 1845 statement, Texas came into the union with the ability to divide into five states, not withdraw. After seceding during the Civil War, Texas was allowed to re-enter the union after ratifying the 13th Amendment. The 13th Amendment banned slavery in the United States and any territory subject to its jurisdiction.
UPDATED: Texas v White, a U.S. Supreme Court case decided in 1869, said Texas cannot secede.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

“Robert Gibbs is the most obnoxious, unlikable press secretary since Dana Perino.”
Isn’t he the only press secretary since Dana?
But let’s not forget ol’ Ari Fleischer. It was apparently part of his job description to hold the press in as much contempt as possible while trying to make all their questions seem ridiculous.

Posted by: Skip | April 15, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

You want to talk about astroturfing?? Obama made it into the WH with the help of the Astroturf guru himself – Axelrod. Now people realize they were manipulated into supporting someone low on substance, but high on charisma. Geo Clooney would have been a better candidate…at least more experienced.

Posted by: AstroturfAxelrod | April 15, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Ryan C- It’s obviously not clear, since you don’t understand it.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | April 15, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

“We’ve got a great union. There’s absolutely no reason to dissolve it.”
He ought to make the trip to Arlington National Cemetery to see what happened the last time someone tried to dissolve this union.

Posted by: Skip | April 15, 2009, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

You People Need A Reality Check! Stop paying attention to race start paying attention to the road to recovery for U.S citizens, and America in general in for which Obama stands for. Hes tring to impliment change. Something that really no other president has achieved of the century. Obama is great! You people need to give in, and support the president in his endeavors. We as a people will reep the benefits. Jerks.

Posted by: big jon | April 15, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Texas probably has the best chance at success. Here is how it can work. The annexation agreement made when Texas joined the union provided that Texas would be able to divide into 5 states. This would create 8 more conservative Senators.
If Texas were to try to divide and be rebuffed, the US would be in violation of the agreement and Texas should be able to go free.
It is not all that far fetched.

Posted by: Sorros | April 15, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

“Texas probably has the best chance at success…If Texas were to try to divide and be rebuffed, the US would be in violation of the agreement and Texas should be able to go free.”
Leaving the United States is ‘success’?
Has anyone ever questioned your patriotism before?

Posted by: Skip | April 15, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

We hear over and over from right-wingers how liberals hate America, and then once the Republicans lose power they talk about leaving the union? Now we find out how much these hypocrites really love their country. They only love it when they’re the ones running it!

Posted by: Skip | April 15, 2009, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

“The annexation agreement made when Texas joined the union provided that Texas would be able to divide into 5 states. This would create 8 more conservative Senators.”
I am pretty sure that annexation agreements became null and void when Texas seceded during the Civil War then petitioned to rejoin the Union.
But to make you right wingers feel at home here’s some of the text from the original TX secession in 1861
“We hold as undeniable truths that the governments of the various States, and of the confederacy itself, were established exclusively by the white race, for themselves and their posterity; that the African race had no agency in their establishment; that they were rightfully held and regarded as an inferior and dependent race, and in that condition only could their existence in this country be rendered beneficial or tolerable.”
Feel that pride!

Posted by: Ryan C | April 15, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

The president also pledged to “simplify a monstrous tax code that is far too complicated for most Americans to understand, but just complicated enough for the insiders who know how to game the system.”
I guess the President was talking
about his Cabinet, especially
Treasury Secretary Geithner!
Yes they really know how to “game the
system and get rewarded for it with
high paying government jobs!

Posted by: reaganfan | April 15, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

That moron Gibbs couldn’t “tweak”
anybody! Uh, duh, uh.
It’s a toss up as to who is the
biggest embarrassment to
President Obama, VP Joe Biden or
Press Secretary Gibbs.
I say it’s a tie.

Posted by: reaganfan | April 15, 2009, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

I guess those people are worried about the confiscatory tax rates coming down the pike as part of Obama’s “recovery” program.
I guess these people are worried about the stupendous inflation that’s around the corner, and the massive expansion of government they’re now expected to finance.
Maybe these people were irritated to hear the Vice President goad them into paying higher taxes to be patriotic, when 3/4 of Obama’s cabinet picks turn out to have evaded their own taxes. Or, they could just be questioning why they have to pay for everyone’s free college tuition, healthcare, job training and home, when they worked, saved and covered such expenses for themselves without government help.
Maybe they wonder why they should pay higher taxes after the Bush tax cuts expire when Obama appoints person after person for his cabinet who turns out to have evaded their own taxes. Maybe they question this administration’s motives after it tries to do away with tax deductions for charitable contributions, or tries to make wounded veterans pay for their own healthcare.
Maybe they’re offended by the DHS report impugning anyone who disagrees with this administration as a potential terrorist, yet won’t allow anyone to call the real terrorists what they are: terrorists. Pirates who terrorize shipping are just “common criminals”. But people who think immigration laws should be enforced? Terrorists!
Maybe they wonder why DHS sees vets as a problem because they have paramilitary training, when others like police and first responders who also have such training are unmentioned in the report.
Maybe they foresee the effects of massive borrowing, spending and deficits on the future promise and opportunities of their children and grandchildren. They’re probably sick of hearing proposals like “smart meters” to monitor their own home energy usage, or of having no options but tiny deathtrap “smart” cars to buy and put their children in.
Maybe they’re wondering why the government is so opposed to banks repaying the TARP money, and why the administration’s so wigged out that some states don’t want to take the money.
Probably don’t much like the idea of bailing out mortgages of people banks knew didn’t qualify for loans that some Congressmen pushed lending institutions into, either.
Or, maybe it’s because they’re tired of the classwarfare and wealth redistribution disguised as “reform” coming out of this administration. Or, they could see that the revolutionary changes in the American way of life proposed by this administration are not compatible with America’s traditions, beliefs and founding values. They might even think a country split between a shrinking pool of producer/tax payers, and a burgeoning class of recipients of government largesse won’t be much of a country.
They might even be aggravated because they thought Obama would “govern from the center” and be a “JFK Democrat”. Many of them voted for Obama. Many were Democrats. Joke’s on them.

Posted by: jordan | April 16, 2009, 8:20 am 8:20 am

As my screen name suggests I have a close relationship with Texas – turns out, I live there (or here). Texas is not big on taxes and we are doing pretty well without them. No income tax is a singluarly important condition in the Constitution of Texas (yo- R-Dude, check it out with your fine tooth comb analytic skills). Thing is – and this is really important – Texas had a 10.7 Billion dollar surplus in 2008 (from March 2007 through March 2008) Admittedly a big part of this surplus is the result of oil and gas revenues and higher gas prices and that is a big contributor, no question. If you back out the oil and gas contributions you still have a surplus. This no income tax business is actually working.
Do y’all think we oughtn’ give California a call and let ‘em know? I know they view us as a bunch of country bumkins and they are probably right (couldn’t be happier to be full blown, card carrying country bumkin ). Simple or not we are not sending out IOUs out because we have run out of money.
So let’s put things in context for the “with it” crowd (as it were). On the one hand we have Texas with no state income tax and a full blown surplus in the middle of a recession. On the other we have Calfornia with some of the highest state taxes in the nation and they are on the brink of bankruptcy and are making up new and improved taxes to fund it.
Let me see here….
Ummmm……
OK – I think I have it – Texas might have something in this no income tax position. (It was a close call and all – this whole ‘being with it’ or not gave me pause) (I decided that solvency trumped progressively hip, slick and cool)

Posted by: Lone Star Rules | April 16, 2009, 8:20 am 8:20 am

jordan | Apr 16, 2009 8:23:45 AM
Great post. You nailed it.
I find it interesting that libs are up in arms about Gov Perry intimating (but not overtly stating) that Texas might secede if the DC crowd continues extension of power and influence over states (“it’s treason!”).
If Arnold or Paterson were to suggest that Cal-e-forn-ya or NY might do the same I don’t think there would be many complaints from conservatives…

Posted by: tjp612 | April 16, 2009, 8:42 am 8:42 am

Yes, please simplify the tax code:

Posted by: devilkev | April 16, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

Lone Star Rules—hello, i agree with so much of what you are saying. i live in Dallas and although i don’t consider myself a lib, a commie, a socialist, a terrorist or a traitor, i voted for and supported President Obama. i know his economic plans are costly. seccession is not an option for me, as i am a citizen of the United States first and foremost and always. i think if Texas did secceed we would have a state income tax. and the governor’s refusing stimulus funds may bring Texas closer to having to have an state income tax. i work for the state and in August (at the end of the fiscal year) we are expecting 25% lay-offs. i am not a senior employee si i am at high risk. if i lose my job i feel there is still hope for me in Texas as far as emplyoment. but predictions (ecnomic indicators) are that in the early fall the financial crisi will hit Texas and hard.
it’s cool that Gov. Perry wants to grandstand and refuse government funds. i know he will begging on bended knee soon (and privately, of course). obviously he has political ambitions and he is tapping in to popular disappointment we all share.
i hope Texas doesn’t ever even consider seceeding. i would hate to move and even more i would hate a civil war as i doubt we could win.
all of this is just photo-ops and grandstanding. this is not Texas Pride as i know it, it is the Texas Pride the cheap beer. it does not relect Texas well, at all.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 16, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am

This country wouldn’t have the problmes it has if you didn’t have people driving around in Escalades, BMW’s and Yukons on their way to food stamp offices…. The Food Stamp system, free health care for anyone who can walk into a hospital and all the people claiming other peoples chilren for a tax break at tax time is why we are in the shape we’re in..

Posted by: Liz | April 16, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am

Everyday I fathom waking up and listening to OBAMA I never thought I would appreciate PRes Clinton in hindesight. This man is a disaster. He is out for CONTROL which is unconstitutional he is to take care of GOVERNMENT not the private sector. where are the conservative CEO and bankers go after OBAMA take him to SUPREME court DON”T BE SCARED let him know that HE has no BUSINESS.. in BUSINESS>

Posted by: sherry | April 16, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

Liz wrote:This country wouldn’t have the problmes it has if you didn’t have people driving around in Escalades, BMW’s and Yukons on their way to food stamp offices….
I like my BMW, I worked hard to get where I am, I don’t get Foodstamps and a lot of taxes pay for people who don’t work,don’t pay taxes and want a check from the government for their share of the tax-refund.So speak for yourself.

Posted by: Lizzie | April 16, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

correction; a lot of MY taxes

Posted by: Lizzie | April 16, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

sherry—your hatred of the president is palpable. that is so much negative energy. no one agrees on everything. but the president is not a criminal. and it just doesn’t work that you hate somebody and they get taken to the Supreme Court. many people believe the president is doing the wrong thing. many people believe he is trying to save a falling nation. there have been no serious alternatives put forward.
hate will just eat you up inside and tomorrow when you wake up there will still be President Obama.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 16, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

sherry—conservative CEOs and bankers are what brought this nation down. maybe you should be angry with their selfish policies which are ruining our nation. if it were not for them the president wouldn’t have to save the economy from the real criminals who belong in court.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 16, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Liz—”people driving around in Escalades, BMW’s and Yukons on their way to food stamp offices”—the reason these people are driving these cars and on welfare at the same time is the same reason for the mortgage collapse. banks and predatory lenders selling things to poor people they can’t afford and reposessing them.
Lizzie works hard and pays for her BMW. she probably bought her car for a price instead of a payment.
how often do you see commercials that say “no credit, no problem”? “bad credit approved!”? this is the problem and cars and houses are still being sold like this today.
seriously, how can an unemployed person be driving around in an Escalade? only one reason: he was able to make one or two payments and is hiding from the repo man. in my state (Texas) there are probably 100 of these companies (and car dealerships) in Dallas alone.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 16, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Did Robert Gibbs explain how people that don’t pay income tax get a tax cut or why we have to borrow $2 Trillion this year to give “tax cuts”? I didn’t think so. Gibbs make Scott McClellan look like a rhetorical genius.

Posted by: robtr | April 16, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

How did they get the Escalade?
Easy enough, they got the ninja liar’s mortgage a few years ago. As the rising market inflated the value of their house, they took an equity loan, bought the car with the cash and defaulted on the house.
Now they are in Section 8 housing and no one can take away their ride.

Posted by: TC Rider | April 16, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

jordan | Apr 16, 2009 8:20:15 AM
absolutely nails it. Thanks, Jordan

Posted by: tanarg | April 16, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

stop the move toward socialism
stop the spending
stop the growth of government
stop the bailouts
stop the borrowing of money
stop printing money
STOP the liberal democrats that control both the House and Senate from continueing to do all the above by voting them OUT OF OFFICE in 2010

Posted by: Neville | April 16, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

“STOP the liberal democrats that control both the House and Senate from continueing to do all the above by voting them OUT OF OFFICE in 2010″
ROFLMAO!
Because when the Republicans were in office they were fiscal conservatives and watchdogs against financial impropriety….errr….ummm….yeah that’s the ticket!

Posted by: Ryan C | April 16, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Bush Administration spending and deficits harmed this nation
Obama Administration is the Bush spending and Deficits on steroids.
Bush – 1.5 trillion in Deficit spending over the course of 8 yrs
Obama- 7- 10 trillion in his 10 yr budget proposal
Obama has already CREATED 3 trillion in deficits –The TARP bailouts – the STIMULUS package – The Treasury PRINTING 1.2 Trillion
For Democrats to complain about Bush spending and support the out of control over the top, outragous spending of Obama and the liberal democrats proves only that the kool aid is working,

Posted by: Neville | April 16, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Obama named the dog after himself…Bo? BO? How self centered is that? Obama has some real mental problems.

Posted by: MBNA Joe | April 16, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

I have never seen a White House spokesman speak in such a condescending way about so many Americans at one time.
Truly astonishing.

Posted by: RR GOP | April 16, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

In his Gettysburg address, President Lincoln said, “that Government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth. That government President Lincoln talked about may not have perished, but it sure has gone into hiding. It has become a Government of the politicians, by the politicians, for the politicians. It doesn’t matter which side you prefer. Both Democrats and Republicans are the same when it comes to candidates for elected offices. They have four goals in common: 1. Get elected. 2. Make the other look party bad. 3. Attain riches from the wealthy lobbyists. 4. Get re-elected. If during the course of the above, they do anything beneficial for the public or the country, it is purely coincidental or accidental … which ever you prefer. The politicians are elected to serve the public and the nation, but they have become a group of self serving, greedy, power hungry, thieves. Yes thieves, because they misappropriate our tax money, and they don’t earn their salary. Even when they are convicted of crimes and sent to prison, they still receive pensions. Why? They also squander our Social Security contributions and refuse to fix the problems for fear that the other party might get the credit. The politicians have their own fat retirement plan and therefore have no interest in fixing Social Security. The offices of Senator and House Representative were never meant to be life long nor even career long positions. Why do we allow them to spend their whole life in a position that was never intended to be for life. I could go on-and-on, but you know what I’m getting at. The way to prevent this abuse of power is to set term limits. Term limits for both the Senate and House of Representatives. It’s time to start a national movement for term limits. The office of President is limited to two terms. So should be the office of Senate and House of Representative be limited to two terms. This may not completely eliminate the abuses, but it’s a start in the right direction.

Posted by: Robert Pascale | April 17, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Paul Wall – Thanks for your post. I disagree that this recession is going to hit Texas hard. We simply do not have the same economic conditions that give rise to the large layoffs in the Northeast, upper mid west and California.
Texas does not have much in the way of Unions for one thing and, even though it is clear that Unions have performed a valuable function in this country they have also been instrumental in interupting the flow of commerce. They are not helping now. Also, taxation does not end with State income tax in most of the state north of the Mason-Dixon. In PA workers and professional alike have to pay an annual occupation tax. So if you are a fork lift driver you have to pay a fork lift driver tax. Sales tax, real estate taxes, income taxes and occupational taxes all add up to a constant drain on available cash that could be spent in the economy or saved. Instead the State taxes their population to death and they decide how the money is spent. Goverment is never as efficient at stimulating the economy as the current Democratic regime would have you belive. The other thing that sets Texas apart is that we do not have a large manufacturing base. In Dallas there is a large telecom and computer presence – EDS, Nortel, Cisco, TI and Perot Systems are all important employers in Dallas – Houston has HP, Austin has Dell. Add to this that our real estate prices never went stupid high so we are simply not experiencing the same meltdown that other places are going through. Most of Texas has hit bottom and, in view of 5.7% unemployment (versus as much as 10% elsewhere) people are buying real estate.
Texas has its issues, no question – but we are doing a lot better than most of the rest of the country and, I would expect we will continue to hold steady through the rest of this downturn. It is not going to be a east street by any means but it is very unlikely that Texas will crash and burn as you suggest. We have too strong of legs in the middle of all this. As for goverment layoffs I really don’t know – but I know we are standing tall in a world where our neighbors are wobbling – we don’t tax and they do. Turns out: it matters.

Posted by: Lone Star Rules | April 17, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Now let me explain it to you: There will be a line on the 2009 (and 2010) Form 1040 (whichever version you use)to take the credit. Because you are being given it through an adjustment to your payroll withholding, your credit should equal the additional amount not withheld from your check. The tax rate & tables do not change. You have to claim the credit or according to your 1040, you will owe it back. What they are counting on, is that people either will forget to take the credit or will not understand that they have to.

Posted by: nike air jordan jumpman pro | October 26, 2010, 5:35 am 5:35 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.