President Obama to Convey to Credit Card Execs INSTANT DISAPPROVAL!
You may be bombarded with junk mail from credit card companies promising INSTANT APPROVAL! And LOW RATES!
President Obama will convey a different message to credit card company CEOs today: instant disapproval, amidst high rates of public anger.
This afternoon President Obama will tell top executives from 14 credit card companies — including American Express, Bank of America, Discover, MasterCard and Visa — that greater consumer protections are coming for their customers, with or without their cooperation.
The House Financial Services Committee on Wednesday passed "The Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights," a bill from Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-NY, that would require companies to provide a 45-day notice before any rate increase; prevent the companies from retroactively imposing higher interest rates to existing balances; and ban "universal default," which the companies use to raise interest rates on consumers late in payments to completely different creditors.
The bill was passed out of committee with a bipartisan 48-19 vote. Nine Republicans voted for it, an increase from two Republicans who voted for similar legislation last year.
Credit card companies, however, say many of these steps are necessary, given escalating losses due to consumers who default on their credit card loans.
An example: Bank of America wrote off more than $3.7 billion in defaulted loans in the first quarter of 2009 — $1.3 billion more than in 2008.
Increased interest rates for customers "is about properly pricing our portfolio either based on risk or realigning a portion of the portfolio that is priced below what is prudent in the current market," Bank of America spokeswoman Betty Reiss recently told ABC News.
The president will today tell the company executives that he supports greater protections for consumers —
* banning unfair rate increases, abusive fees and penalties — such as charging interest on debt that consumers have already paid on time;
* requiring forms, statements — and all terms of contracts — to be written in plain language and easily accessible;
* requiring greater accountability so companies that engage in deceptive practices can be rooted out; and
* keeping credit card companies from signing up minors as clients.
Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, senior adviser Valerie Jarrett, and National Economic Council director Larry Summers will join the president at the meeting.
An industry source tells ABC News that the executives expect to hear from the White House that "the industry is unpopular right now." The source forecasts that the meeting will be "a carrot-and-stick" deal — the administration will tell the executives that they need their help in dealing with problems such as high interest rates, but they will emphasize the threat of legislation.
"It will be a come-to-Jesus type of meeting," the source said.
President Obama "is pushing very hard for a very strong program of regulation that is going to correct many of the mistakes that were made last time around," Summers told "Meet the Press" on Sunday. "He’s going to be very focused in the very near term on a whole set of issues having to do with credit card abuses, having to do with the way people have been deceived into paying extraordinarily high rates that they wouldn’t have paid if they knew they were getting themselves into."
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that there "will be a focus on some of the deceptive practices that trap people into a credit card rate despite the unsustainability of that; that if — and we talked about the idea of having a rating system so that you — so that people would know exactly what they were getting.”
You might remember a few weeks ago when President Obama hosted CEOs from the biggest banks in the U.S. and cautioned them to clean up their act. Amidst much anger at the bank executives, the president told them he was "the only one standing between you and the pitchforks."
The message will likely not be as stark today, White House sources say, but it could be stern.
– Jake Tapper and Matt Jaffe

Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
This will be entertaining. Obama wants lower interest rates so people will spend and default more.
Perfect.
The result will be less credit and more expensive credit.
When does Obama demand more responsibility from those who spend far more than they could afford?
Posted by: drjohn | April 23, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am
The President’s own half brother was denied a visa.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 23, 2009, 9:07 am 9:07 am
“This will be entertaining. Obama wants lower interest rates so people will spend and default more.”
No he doesn’t… he wasn’t to stop credit card companies from picking peoples wallets. I think the article makes that clear.
Please tell me exactly how it helps to make it MORE difficult for people to pay their debt back by jacking the rate up to 30% and tacking on additional fees and penalties?
Posted by: Patrick | April 23, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am
I am one of the angry ones. I pay my credit card bill on time every time. Yet they INCREASE MY RATE by nearly DOUBLE with 30 days notice. This isn’t on new purchases mind you but on the existing balance. While *I* can afford to walk with my feet – many cannot. There’s NO REASON to raise rates on someone who is paying – has paid – and has an excellent credit record for YEARS. It’s absolutely WRONG. With the prime rate near 1% – a 20+ percent credit card rate is CRIMINAL.
Posted by: Pangolin | April 23, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am
“Credit card companies, however, say many of these steps are necessary, given escalating losses due to consumers who default on their credit card loans.”
In other words – once again those who do pay their bills are stuck paying for the ones who don’t or can’t. Haven’t we been here before?
Posted by: Keith | April 23, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am
If the credit wasn’t given to people who are unable to pay it back, they wouldn’t have such a problem with people not paying it back. It’s the equivalent of sub-prime except without a catchy word to describe it.
Posted by: Matt D | April 23, 2009, 9:19 am 9:19 am
These guys are charging 35-45% on cards. A couple of decades ago, anybody caught charging that would be put in jail as a loan shark.
Thank you Republicans for making loan sharks legal!
Posted by: John Robb | April 23, 2009, 9:19 am 9:19 am
“The result will be less credit and more expensive credit”
Well isn’t what your saying is that would be a good thing if less people had credit.
If they don’t have it then they can’t spend it and default right?
Problem solved…
Posted by: Patrick | April 23, 2009, 9:19 am 9:19 am
Here’s an idea. Don’t give poor people credit cards. Sure, they’ll spend, but it won’t be a dime of their own.
Irresponsible choice making for an irresponsible nation.
Posted by: aRandomPerson | April 23, 2009, 9:20 am 9:20 am
The best way to make this story irrelevant to yourself is to be debt free. I no longer have a credit card so I am indifferent! I urge you all to adopt the some mentality.
As Dave Ramsey says:
“Debt is dumb, cash is King.”
Determine your own financial well-being.
Posted by: Mike | April 23, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Wonder if Obama’s card gets declined next time he’s out for dinner?
Posted by: Kevin | April 23, 2009, 9:22 am 9:22 am
“Please tell me exactly how it helps to make it MORE difficult for people to pay their debt back by jacking the rate up to 30% and tacking on additional fees and penalties?”
Pay your bills on time and none of this is an issue.
Posted by: drjohn | April 23, 2009, 9:22 am 9:22 am
They need to stop charging for foreign currency exchange as well. They already make money on the differential value of the dollar. If I charge a meal at a foreign restaurant they charge a few dollars. When I charge the hotel bill they charge the same rate but now it is in the tens of dollars for the exact same process. This too, is an abusive charge which they do not tell you about until you get the bill a month later.
Posted by: Marcel Kates | April 23, 2009, 9:22 am 9:22 am
I think he is trying to help people like my husband and I who, despite lots of financial difficulties, have managed to NEVER miss a credit card payment. For this, we were ‘rewarded’ with letters that say something to the effect of “You have an excellent credit history with us, but we are increasing your rates,”; followed by a notation that our interest rates are doubling.
Posted by: ginncjb | April 23, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am
“Well isn’t what your saying is that would be a good thing if less people had credit.”
In a sense, yes. But credit will be worsened across the board. It’s way tight right now, and worst of all it’s tight for worthy borrowers.
Posted by: drjohn | April 23, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am
Bank of America is currently raising their rates across the board on their good customers without warning. I noticed their stock went up. So they expect their good customers, folks who may have never even been late on a single payment, to cover the losses they incurred because they gave out bad loans and credit cards to risky customers, while their executives and stockholders benefit.
Posted by: Skip | April 23, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am
About god damn time.
Hi. You’ve paid ontime and online, but we still charged you late fees again. Thanks to a new series of rules we posted online in the smallest possible font on a paper bill you elected not to receive as part of our “Less Paper/Less Landfill” drive. You wont know for at least 30 days that we then upped your interest rate due to the late pay on your monthly statement from 8% to 32.95%. What you have other credit cards? Those have now been readjusted from 7-11.95% to 32.95% interest rates.
All those bastards should die. FIGHT CLUB!
Posted by: Angry Dan | April 23, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Obama does not realized that he was elected to protect and defend the Constitution and the America people. He was not elected to micromanage every big industry in the country. He has failed at every attempt to gain his stated objective in the international arena, and it is obvious that he wants to maintain a “crisis” situation in the domestic economy in order to push through his radical agenda of socializing the total economy.
He was not elected for that purpose. Frankly he is what you get when a majority of Americans vote for someone out of hatred for a prior president. The United States (for how long?) will suffer for a long time for basing its voting on the major premise of hatred.
Have a good day…there will be few of them left.
Posted by: Mel | April 23, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am
What about the high fees charged to customers already late? Isn’t that putting more gas on an existing fire? IF SOMEONE CANNOT AFFORD TO MAKE THEIR PAYMENT, HOW CAN THEY AFFORD THE EXTRA HUGE SLAP FOR THE LATE FEES? It’s just STUPID!
Posted by: Dave | April 23, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am
This is way over due, these greedy card companies have been out of control for WAY too long. 28% – 32% after their introductory rate is INSANE!!! They randomly up your avail able rate encouraging you to spend more, I have canceled cards for not keeping my limit where I wanted it to be… Yet another example of corp America being too greedy at our expense.
Posted by: frey | April 23, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am
wonder how much of that 1.3 billion increase in default is due to unfair increase in interest rates? My husband was paying and doing well, but had limit reduced to $1 above his current balance for no reason and they mailed the statement 1week before payment due. Lucky for him he takes care of his business online and he was able to react quickly. Nice try Chase. We are done with you.
Posted by: marie | April 23, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am
I have a great credit score and never missed or was late on my CC payment. Bank Of America just informend me my rate was being raised. Card rates should be like other loans. They should be termed so we at least know when we are going to get our rates raised.
Posted by: Paul | April 23, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am
About time I am sick of these Credit card Compaines Rasing My Interest Rates I have never been Late and always pay them off. I dont use my credit cards anymore i went from 9 percent to 21 percent and was never late they must be stopped!
Posted by: Angie in Pa | April 23, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am
and Dave is so right. Raise interest rates to outrageous rates, cut your limit in half ( whick lowers your FICA score) send you statements late, charge you over the limit and late fees…and then complain that people default???
Posted by: marie | April 23, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am
I agree the credit card company is nothing but organised crime.
I had a score in the high 700s last Aug. so me and my wife bought a new car. All seamed fine i even paid my only high credit card down to nothing, and what happened.
Bank of america said I had a high debt ratio so they droped my limit nearly 7 grand. This put me over the 50% ratio causeing my score to drop to 600 something. They Have a monopoly on the system and are able to keep people right were they want them.
They also get 3% of every credit card transaction even debit cards used as credit. Thats a lot of money for doing nothing. but they still charge 20% interest. NOTHING BUT CROOKS
Posted by: joe | April 23, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am
“Pay your bills on time and none of this is an issue.”
You’re walking into an avalanche of pain.
Posted by: Skip | April 23, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Who will be first to say these new rules are racist?
Posted by: Sally J | April 23, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am
I am someone who doesn’t carry a balance and has never been late on a credit card payment and I say bravo. I am a fiscally conservative liberal who thinks that money is a means to an end. I think it is high time that people realize that the end does not need to be a basement, attack AND garage full of things they never use paid for by credit they should have never got.
Posted by: Responsible Spender | April 23, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am
DR. JOHN…wrong. I pay on time, every time. I pay more than the minimum. I owe less than 35% of the credit line available. My rate was scheduled to jump 5 percentage points.
I called B of A and, politely, had a fit. I was told it was “due to the economy.” I asked…how was it logical to raise interest rates, and therefore minimum payments, in a time when the economy is so bad. You have people who can barely pay now…they’ll stop paying in the future due to this. Because they won’t be able to pay. Then it’ll get shuttled off on those of us who still can pay. I asked him what he thought would happen if those of us who still could pay got so ticked that we just stopped paying, too?
Jacking interest rates over 20 and 30% on people who are not in default is going to put a percentage of them into default. If those people decide to just stop paying…rather than trying to absorb all the late fees and over the limit fees that companies will tack on every month…and go into bankruptcy, then the best the compnay is going to get is a third of what’s owed. AND that’s only if the personl doesn’t qualify for a bankfuptcy that totally wipes out all debt.
I’ll tell you something else…due to people losing jobs and either not being able to find a job at all or accepting ones for less than half pay just to have a job—the number of bankruptcies where all debt is wiped out are increasing.
My own brother just took one. B of A is sucking lemons on that one since my brother had both personal and business accts with them. His business tanked due to the economy and he got behind…but he still paid. He got caught up and the rates lowered for a few months. Then…even though he was current and didn’t charge any more, the rates bounded to over 30%. He just stopped trying. He closed the business, stopped paying, and took a job working for someone else. He qualified to have all debts wiped out. The banks lost tens of thousands, just on him.
Posted by: Annoyed | April 23, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am
The short term result will be less credit card issues due to stricter guidelines, the Congress will tell the credit card issuers to issue cards to all aplicants, later on we will have bad loans a credit issues with companies going bancrupt. And everybody will blame the card issuers. That is what happened to the mortgage companies.
Nobody forces anybody to have a credit card or to carry a balance.
Posted by: Ray M | April 23, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am
I recently wrote this to B of A
To Whom It May Concern:
I have used my Montana State University Alumni Association credit card since 2005 as a proud reminder of my time spent at that University. In using the credit card, I have abided by every rule set forth in the credit card agreement, though I have built up a balance. I am very disappointed to see that Bank of America is now attempting to change this agreement. My fiancee also recieved a similar change in her credit card agreement. Regardless of current legal definition, I believe that this should be a predatory lending practice that should be covered under borrowers’ legal rights. Please let it be known that I will also be forwarding this letter to my state and federal representatives here in Orlando Florida, as well as local newspapers, tv stations, and radio stations.
Bank of America states on the notice of Amendment that “(It is) making this change to your Annual Percentage Rates due to a change in our business practices, and due to the pattern of payments and Annual Percentage Rates on the account.” The only changes to the pattern of payments I have made recently is to make more payments per month and in larger amounts. I do not believe that the decision to change my APR was based in any way upon my “pattern of payments.” I do believe that it is based upon the 7.99% rate that I have been paying for the last four years, and Bank of America’s recent risky business practices. Bank of America, as well as nearly every other bank, took on risks that it did not understand, and it is now attempting to penalize its customers for the cost of those mistakes. Shame on you. Apparently tax dollars are not enough, or Bank of America does not like the terms of those tax dollars. If you don’t like the terms of the tax dollars, you should have rejected them. Please do not pass the cost of those tax dollars on to me, I’m already paying for them. Once is enough.
With the projected change in APR, the amount of interest I would end up paying on this account will nearly double. From the perspective of risk measurement, I have not become a riskier client. To the contrary, my account balance has been decreasing. In understaning risk myself, I must make my decision based upon what I know about myself and Bank of America. Since I am in good financial health, and it is Bank of America that is on shaky ground, I plan on taking advantage of the current promotional 0.99% interest on balance transfers. I also reject the proposed change in our credit card agreement, understanding that I may no longer make charges to the card following the rejection. The current benefits of using the card under those conditions does not match the cost. Once my balance is paid off, within a year, I will likely resume using the credit card for my monthly expenses, paying the balance each month as all responsible consumers should do.
Sincerely,
Nathaniel ————
Posted by: Nate | April 23, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Banks are the “Evil Empire” and always have been. You get a card from one with a good limit and rate. Then they raise your credit limit and tempt you to run up much more debt than you had intended to in the first place. After this they inform you that due to your high debt ratio they must now increase your interest rate because you are a risk.
Posted by: Mike | April 23, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Go Obama! Credit Card companies have earnings that make our GNP look like pocket change. This industry is sitting pretty while the rest of us pay for the caviar for his dog. No question in my mind-they need the reigns pulled in.
Posted by: conlippert | April 23, 2009, 9:49 am 9:49 am
I had never missed a payment with my B of A card. Been paying on time for years. Haven’t charged anything to it for years.
Out of the blue B of A decides I have to pay a lot more monthly. I couldn’t do that but kept paying what I had been paying for years.
They decided this wasn’t enough all of a sudden…and so B of A sold me to collections.
Needless to say this was bad for my credit.
“Funny” ending: I arranged the exact same payment plan I had before, but this time with the collection agency.
Who is going to stand up against this type of scam?
Posted by: BofAVictim | April 23, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am
What’s a credit card?
Posted by: Fiscally Responsible | April 23, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am
The biggest problem are the CREDIT REPORTING agencies.
Even if you have the money, if your credit is not stellar you won’t get a car loan or home loan.
President Obama could help millions of Americans right now by simply limiting the power of Experian, Equifax and TransUnion.
We all need a fresh start.
But this won’t happen with credit reporting agencies looming over our heads.
Posted by: Freshstart | April 23, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Here’s one that BofA tried to pull on me:
When my paper statement failed to show up in the mail, I paid online, two days before the due date shown on the website.
A week later, the paper statement arrived in the mail, showing a due date the day BEFORE I paid online. Of course there was a hefty late fee.
When I went online to check, the due date had been scrubbed from my account, and was not included on my payment confirmation.
I raised holy hell and they backed down.
Unbelievable scheming CROOKS. Obama needs to straighten out this mess. Give ‘em hell, Barry!
Posted by: R Mutt | April 23, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am
The pubic is red hot over the banks and their credit card shenanigans. When folks who have paid on time and are good customers get hosed for BofA’s (or whomever…) bad decisions, there will be populist repercussions.
Posted by: matt | April 23, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am
Because of their intimidating and threatening tone CC companies are always the ones to get paid first and on time whenever I have to make a choice. I would much rather pay my other bills / obligations first – doctors, utilities, etc. I NEVER have gotten a notice of term changes from ANYONE I owe money to except CC companies – and it is always in their favor. They are constantly offering to increase credit limits (never accepted of course) and then they turn around and raise the rates. It is as if they can’t make money one way, they try another.
It is about time the government put a stop to these usurious practices!
Posted by: Bill in Vermont | April 23, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am
To everyone who is complaining about their rates/fees…
1. Read your disclosure. Everything they are/have done is clearly written within your contract.
2. Don’t use credit cards. If you can’t pay cash for it, you do not need it.
It’s not the credit card companies’ fault that people are stupid enough to keep paying and paying while swapping balances from one card to the next and so on and so forth. The problem isn’t the credit card companies…the problem is the cardholders. If you wouldn’t use their products, you wouldn’t be in this situation. If you read your disclosure, you would know that anything/everything is fair game. Don’t blame other people for your stupidity. I have 1 card. I do not carry a balance…if I need to use it, I pay it off at the end of the month. I do not make major purchases on it…I save. I also survive this way with 3 kids…who always need something…so it is possible…people just have a problem with instant gratification.
It’s not the president’s issue…it’s not his responsibility to hold your hands to make sure you are doing your own research and have an understanding of your contracts.
Posted by: stdntDrvr | April 23, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
“The result will be less credit and more expensive credit.”
Good. The less consumer credit at this point, the better – particularly for low-income and/or poor credit clients. Bank executives have admitted that they make most of their money on people who have trouble paying on time; that’s why they had to make it harder for people to declare bankruptcy, so as to keep their “portfolios” viable.
American business has become a community of entreprenuers – entrepreneurs at screwing each other.
Posted by: David Minnich | April 23, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Mel – How do you know why the people of America elected President Obama? Do you speak for us all? Not for me, thank you very much. These actions are EXACTLY why I voted for him. Instead of passing on the cost of their riskly business decisions to the rest of their customers, the CEOs of these credit card companies may have to give up their million dollar bonuses.
Posted by: hangfire | April 23, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
“Frankly he is what you get when a majority of Americans vote for someone out of hatred for a prior president”
Yes… we get a vast improvement over the previous President. Hatred for Bush
wasn’t the reason I voted… realizing we could do better was.
…and we have.
Posted by: Patrick | April 23, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
B of A also raised my rates! I am stuck. Been a loyal customoer, always paying on time, always working to reduce my balance.
What they are doing will result in more people going into default. They are shooting themselves into both feet!
Posted by: Adam | April 23, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am
Collusion: an agreement, usually secretive, which occurs between two or more persons (Banks) to deceive, mislead, or defraud others, or to gain an unfair advantage. It is an agreement among firms (Banks) to divide the market, set prices, or limit production when rival companies (Banks) cooperate for their mutual benefit.
Prime Rate: underlying index for most credit cards over which Banks charge additional interest to make money – as of 22 April 2009 it is 3.25%
Fed Funds Rate: interest rate that Banks charge EACH OTHER for money loans – as of 22 April 2009 it is 0.25%
How can Banks justify a loss which such advantageous interest rates for themselves, and outrageous 21% to 35% interest rates for the Consumer??
Posted by: The Real Issue | April 23, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am
I think looking back on the 2000s (and perhaps earlier), what I will remember most is “Don’t worry, the government will take care of us.”
In a nutshell: Stop buying more than you can afford, from houses to anything on credit cards. They are NOT a second income. If you must have the Plasma and the double-latte’s, shop at Nordstrom’s, and your kids have to have an Xbox and PS3, and you must eat out every other night, but you have to use a credit card to fund it, rather than putting away $25 or $50 a week until you can purchase it — you are irresponsible. Get over yourself, pay off your debts, stop whining that your $300 blu-ray player you bought last year ‘ON SALE’ now costs you $400+ because you charged it….we don’t want to hear about it.
Posted by: Bubers | April 23, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am
If your card was issued by “FIA Card Services”, now owned by Bank of America, please remember that it’s just the renamed, flaky old MBNA who, in the 1970s, was enticing college students to get their credit cards, even though they had no regular job or means of paying the balance. Send a powerful message to BofA by refusing their FIA Card Services cards. Send a message to Obama to butt out and mind his own business: This isn’t Nazi Germany or Fascist Italy (yet).
Posted by: Andrew P. | April 23, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am
“Everything they are/have done is clearly written within your contract.”
NOT TRUE.
Faking and altering due dates to extract additional fees and jack up interest rates is FRAUD, plain and simple.
THESE PEOPLE ARE DISHONEST.
Posted by: R Mutt | April 23, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
I’m paying my credit card bill on time and most of the time I sent twice as much as the required minimum payment. I was never late but they Bank of America, sent me a letter that they will change the contract that I signed with them. Why should I be punished for their mismanagement of the company? They might as well change their name to “Bank of Deception for the Americas”. Although I didn’t vote for President Obama, I am very grateful for him for standing up against these crooks. I honestly can say now that I made a mistake for not voting him into office. God Bless you.
Posted by: Fred Mariano | April 23, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
STDNT DRVR
I have had an 8 Percent Interest rate for about 4 years Bank of America increased it to 21 Percent without WARNING! never was Late always Paid off so yes it is their fault and they need to be stopped they are ROBBING US!I Have cut up my card i am Done with them!
Posted by: Angie in Pa | April 23, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
This is perfect.
You have a wealth bubble that has for the last 30 years or so been driven almost solely by debt, both public and private. So how do you get out of it? Encourage more debt!
America is going to have to face the facts, we’ve been fueled by foreign money and as a result we’re not nearly as rich as we think we are. There will be no recovery, our artificial standard of living is going to come way down. The debt must be liqiudated before we can start over. An ugly reality that has to be faced.
The problem is that our idiot king Obama is trying to encourage even more private debt while at the same time jacking up public spending to undreamed of levels. A recipe for apocalypse.
Posted by: SmashTheState | April 23, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am
This outrage by banks is symptomatic of the greater – long term “race to the bottom” of American business practices that now put them on par with thieves and gangsters 50 years ago.
Banks are receiving huge bailouts from the public and getting tiny interest rates from the Federal Reserve. Yet that is insufficient to satisfy their ugly greed. Does anyone remember their rationale for encouraging the destruction of the 12-20% loan interest usury laws of almost every State not that many years ago? (Interest they are presently charging used to be called “loan sharking” and would catch you a jail sentence) Then the banks sent their lobbyists and money to Washington to get the Republicans to dump our bankruptcy laws solely to benefit their profits and reduce their risks.
If you have been paying attention at all and have a non-partisan memory longer than your your little pinky finger, none of what I’ve just said is news to you at all.
signed,
NoJustice-NoMore
Posted by: James Lamp | April 23, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Angie,
You are given a notice 30 days prior to your rate changing. You have the right to close the account if you do not like the increase. So, why didn’t you do this?
Posted by: stdntDrvr | April 23, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am
The message will likely not be as stark today, White House sources say, but it could be stern.
—————-
Obama’s stern warning and response only emboldened North Korea. I doubt this is more than another photo op.
The problem is this. These credit card companies are bank owned. Obama and Geithner are shifting taxpayer stock in these same “bailed out” banks to the equivalent of nationalizing the banks.
Today they proposed taxpayer guarantees of 100% of financed mortgages via these banks, even though they will not allow confirmation of applicants income. This is the same problem that led to the first housing crisis but this is on the taxpayer dime.
Will Obama use this event as an opening salvo to take control of credit card companies, owned by the now “nationalized” banks?
The next logical step for these credit cards and mortgages in keeping with his “economic justice” “income redistribution” theme is to pay off the mortgages and credit cards, and let the taxpayers, at least the diminishing percentage of citizens that pay taxes, foot the bill.
This is where things are headed.
I know some of you will blow a gasket, but we predicted at the beginning he was going to nationalize the banks and low and behold here we are! You guys blew a gasket at that suggestion too.
Posted by: MNM | April 23, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
The next logical step for these credit cards and mortgages in keeping with his “economic justice” “income redistribution” theme is to pay off the mortgages and credit cards, and let the taxpayers, at least the diminishing percentage of citizens that pay taxes, foot the bill.
This is where things are headed.
Posted by: MNM | Apr 23, 2009 10:24:58 AM
——————-
This is probably so. Obama is stoking the outrage in order to gain support when he makes the move and once again scr@ws the taxpayers to pay for those who bit off more than they could chew.
This is another Obama dog and pony show with another agenda beyond the obvious.
Posted by: Nobama | April 23, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Most of the furor seems to be over Bank of America and their FIA Card Services (formerly MBNA) operation. When I realized a couple of years ago that they were fraudulently charging me late fees even though I had sent my payments in time, I zeroed the accounts and stopped using their cards — end of problem. If your card is issued by FIA Card Services, get rid of it and send Bank of America a message!
Posted by: Tony R. | April 23, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Obama is not going to do anything, his left wing facist regime needs their money to run again
The Culture Of Corruption in the democrat party will remain untouched, and unreported, The thugs and criminals sit in washington DC..How m any democrats involved in tax fraud, sex crimes, spying, pay2play, ethics violations, and campaign fraud? is it 26 now?
Posted by: Breaking News | April 23, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Yes they do notify you now with a letter of the Rate Change. Most people never actually read it. It does say you do not have to accept the new rate and can lock your card at the current rate. You just have to write a letter as it states in the notice and then not use your card again. This is because continuing to use the card is your acceptance of the new rate. I did this with one card and it is still locked at 12% and I have found it is easier to just save the money to get what I need then charge it. The best thing is that I have watched my debt reduce every pay day as I pay off credit debt without charging more. Just shows what you can get from reading the fine print in things.
Posted by: Alex | April 23, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
I deeply regret voting for Obama. I respect the presidency, but I strongly question what he is doing. The credit card anger, bonus anger, GM anger are all clever PR stunts, to make sure no in focusing on the real theft that is going on.
Why is he giving $3 trillion to the banks through the PPIP program without asking congress, or getting a second opinion ? Why is he forcing the media to not focus debate on PPIP? $3T is $60000 in taxes for EVERY family in US. $3T puts every 15million people back to work for 3 years AND solves healthcare AND rebuilds every school AND change to spare.
The banks are going to steal $3T with Obama/Summers/Geitner/Paulson/Bush’s help while you gloat over your “$40 late fees” victory. That is $60,000 from your family in taxes.
Posted by: swisskabab | April 23, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am
The credit card companies ARE NOT bank owned, MC, VISA, Discover and AMEX are their own financial entities. The cards are just ‘branded’ by banks in the case of MC and Visa.
Posted by: fedup29pct | April 23, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Here’s my recent email to BOA that fell on deaf ears….and FYI – I carry little if no balance – only used for large temporary purchases and scheduling hotel and airline reservations….”Please pass on my sincere regards to your CEO and board of directors as to their recent “business process change” decision as I’d like to be the one of the many 800+ FICO score holders that will be cancelling an account in the next week or two. I received a notification in the mail that my 8.99 fixed card was moving to a variable 14+ percent. Upon making contact with two BOA representatives I was not treated like the 20 year loyal on-time paying customer that I have been, but instead treated like some non-abiding, non-paying, idiot. I assure you sir that my word of mouth advertisement of BOA and its subsidiaries will not be kind due to this uncalled for snide disrespectful treatment. Oh – one more thing…..I’m sure you are aware that business decisions have consequences, some good, some bad. I am assuring you now that by making the decision you made to antagonize good credit worthy customers, a consequence of your decision is the inevitable down-turn in BOA stock ratings and the like. Good luck on your future bailout attempts as I am sure you will be facing that exact scenario in the not too distant future. I WILL NEVER, EVER, NEVER, EVER use any BOA related services or products for the remainder of my natural life. PS – just got back from my credit union – will be receiving my fixed 8.79 credit card in the mail….will be cancelling BOA….Regards….R Williams”. If you’re thinking about BOA stock forget it – unless you love losing money…!
Posted by: R Williams | April 23, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Whatever happened to saving up for something? That was great when banks actually offered decent interest on savings accounts. They used our money in savings as collatoral to conduct business and they paid us for it. Now they don’t want people to save, and people have succumbed to gotta-have-now.
Posted by: Bev | April 23, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Stdnt Driver
They did not give me a notice The Increase was Just in the Next Months Statement NO NOTICE Just a Little Memo on my Statement saying they have Increased my rate AFTER THEY INCREASED IT And I have closed my account!
Posted by: Angie in Pa | April 23, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
The Government seems to think that we are in a civil emergency due to the economy, issuing bailout bills to banks and insurance companies. During this economic civil emergency, people are losing their jobs may reasonably depend on credit to help pay bills. Meanwhile, cc companies are increasing the cost of borrowing money. This is called Price Gouging, and its a felony in Florida. I believe that a court could reasonably find that we are in a state of civil emergency making what the cc companies are doing a serious crime.
Posted by: Nate | April 23, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
The Republicans always claim to be the fiscally conservative & responsible ones, but when in power, led by George Bush, they sure screwed their Good Christian voters. Usury laws, (preventing excessive interest rates, etc) based on the Bible, (and good sense), that had been around a long time, had been dismantled over time. IF the Republicans cared about the people, they would have reinstated those laws. ALL the politicians are at fault. Some for doing the wrong thing, and the others for NOT standing up for what is best for ALL the people (not just the rich ones).
Posted by: pragmatist | April 23, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Remember …the only time you need a “good” credit score is when you buy A HOME OR CAR…..if you aren’t doing that, screw em, there is no debtors prison….yet
Posted by: walldodger1969 | April 23, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am
fedup29pct – you are incorrect. The cards are bank owned. The Visa/MC/Amex brand are associations. Very big difference. Prior to Visa’s IPO, it was owned by banks. The purpose of these associations is to ensure that their (the banks) standards are being met whether it be security, signing, etc. Visa/MC/Amex do not own the debt…nor do they issue any cards.
Posted by: stdntDrvr | April 23, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Angie,
It is federal law that they must inform you 30 days prior to the increase. The letter was probably sent in a plain white envelope and not as ‘pretty’ as their marketing so that you wouldn’t notice.
Posted by: stdntDrvr | April 23, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am
“This will be entertaining. Obama wants lower interest rates so people will spend and default more.”
Huh? That’s asinine. Unless he’s suggesting credit limits be increased what you’re saying makes no sense whatsoever.
Posted by: Silky | April 23, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am
The real problem is that people allow themselves to be abused by the credit card companies because the refuse to live within their means. If people where to use more cash and less credit, they would not have the high card balances that makes them “victims” of credit card abuse. Obama is oly looking for more ways to inject the federal government in to private industry. That’s right, it’s called socialism.
Posted by: BubbaRight | April 23, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am
“When does Obama demand more responsibility from those who spend far more than they could afford?” =====
You mean like the Federal Government (i.e. ‘us.’?) Good idea, but I’m still waiting. It seems neither party really wants to balance the books in D.C.
Posted by: kseyetie | April 23, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am
To me, the bigger crime is how the credit card companies don’t care about our personal data/card data being stolen and misused. They act like they want to do something about it ~ but it’s ALL PR and lip service!
One thing they could do, right away, is make all our cards expire in one year. This greatly narrows the window for abuse of a stolen card number. But why won’t they do this? Because it would cost them an extra 50 cents per card user to replace our cards, annually.
One up close example: When i called Chase about my WaMu account they had absorbed, their response to the fact that a porn charge originating in Europe showed up on my extremely inactive account was that “the data is still in transit”. I told them how it probably happened and how we could track it down, but that’s NOT their concern.
And, the WaMu Fraud Specialist i spoke with sounded extremely tired and burned out…
My husband and i write software that includes a credit card gateway, and i will testify to you that they (the credit card companies) are all uncaring, lying, profit-only-oriented ########.
Posted by: Tina | April 23, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
I paid finally paid my credit card our, and properly disposed of it.
Well, now I can’t get a rental because I don’t own a major credit card.
The banks has us my the strings…for lack of a better word!!!
Also, those of you whom are republican or whatever…will never agree on anything the President do or say, even if it actually benefits you.
You dear people are the real reason our country and policies are so screwed up.
Posted by: msrose | April 23, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
What an absurd distraction.
It’s going to be a long time before the irreperable harm Obama is now inflicting on the economy becomes indisputably evident. By then, it will be too late. The US will never again enjoy the periods of sustained economic growth that have characterized it for over a century.
I’m just glad that I’ve already got mine. You folks will never get yours.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 23, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am
I’m not about to defend every choice the credit card companies make. But I’m not sure why POTUS needs to bring in the CEOs. He won’t be writing the laws.
I’m guessing he wants credit for the public shaming of the greedy greedy companies.
Posted by: MayBee | April 23, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am
The credit card companies ARE NOT bank owned, MC, VISA, Discover and AMEX are their own financial entities. The cards are just ‘branded’ by banks in the case of MC and Visa.
Posted by: fedup29pct | Apr 23, 2009 10:36:10 AM
——————
This may be true, but it does not remove the federal management of these cards if banks are the middlemen.
That is the whole point of nationalizing the banks. EVERYTHING will fall under the federal control one way or another.
I don’t dispute some of the abuses of the credit card companies, but getting Obama involved in this for whatever PR or nefarious purpose is not a good move. He has proven his willingness to throw trillions into systems without any approval.
For example the initial $750 billion Tarp bill, half of which was spent by Bush, has turned into 3 TRILLION DOLLARS, with no further congressional or public discussion. Obama has once again multiplied into infinity any debt or problem he inherited. The taxpayers will pay and pay and pay for his using our tax dollars to buy control of the entire US economy, which of course equals power.
This is beyond Orwellian and Atlas Shrugged control.
Posted by: MNM | April 23, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Why are we claiming credit card companies? Most of Republicans in Congress are strongly supporting their practices. If you have enough money to pay off your cards every month, why do you need to worry about interest rates? Watch and see Republicans in Congress will unify to defeat any bill that is against these companies’ interests!
Posted by: oh | April 23, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am
blah,blah,blah.
Posted by: tom | April 23, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am
msrose…Cancel your cards or pay off your balances..If you own a debit card with an credit company logo, you CAN get a rental..That is if you have money in your account, your problem not the banks.
Actually as an Independent, who leans Republican on Economic matters, I see no future benefit to Obama’s plans whatsoever. He is spending beyond his/our means, 787 billion stimulus, 3.6 billion budget, and the bills will have to be paid for one way or another by higher taxes or lay-offs. One trillion more in deficit spending means higher inflation down the road…
As far as “screwed-up,” this mess has been in the making for years that truly began with the Clinton Administration who with Barney Frank insisted on softening Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac regulations on loaning to people who could never afford to pay back their huge mortgages..Once interest rates began going up in the Bush Administration,everyone wanted to jump on the band wagon and get unregulated loans thus demand went up for money, causing supply to go down, and caused the interest rates to increase the ARM’s went up thus monthly payments went up and foreclosures began to happen…
Yes, I am sure we will recover at some point, but at what point, I am not referring to time but at what standard of living…We Americans work hard but we are also spoiled for the comforts of life..No I don’t think Obama will get us back to where we were and I truly believe he is making a bad situation worse…It is not only the banks who are at fault here but irresponsible politicians and human nature….
Posted by: Parallax View | April 23, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Why are we claiming credit card companies? Most of Republicans in Congress are strongly supporting their practices. If you have enough money to pay off your cards every month, why do you need to worry about interest rates? Watch and see Republicans in Congress will unify to defeat any bill that is against these companies’ interests!
Posted by: oh | Apr 23, 2009 11:22:19 AM
———-
Right now the dems can pass any bill they choose without republican support.
If the dems wanted reform they have the votes.
The goal is complete control and payoff of the debt of the credit card shirkers who bit off more than they could chew.
Again, I don’t dispute some of the abuses of the credit card companies, but federal management is not an answer, it is the democrat goal however.
If dems want to pass some regs on notification of interest rate changes and so on they could. They probably won’t, but they are free to do so without the help of any republican.
So ask the dems in congress what they are waiting for?
Posted by: MNM | April 23, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Thank God something is being done, but will it be enough? Many people who have been responsible are now being affected. It is morally wrong!. Credit lines being cut, sorry this affects your credit score, interest rate hikes, etc.
If something is not done the deliquency rate is going to skyrocket and who is going to bail them out.
Most people who are in trouble need TIME, not harrasing phone calls, higher interest rates. If consumers are going to loose everything then do you think they are going to feel obligated to get this paid down?
However, if CC companies actively worked with people, most understand the importance of credit and would strive to keep it.
Posted by: kelly | April 23, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
“…the deliquency rate is going to skyrocket and who is going to bail them out?”
When and where did we get this idea that everybody has to be bailed out by somebody else?
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 23, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
If you charged your credit card and can’t pay it off the next month, then you could not afford the purchase in the first place. You should have thought about that before saying CHARGE IT.
Posted by: Lizzie | April 23, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
The citizens of this country should go on a debt strike. Everyone, just stop paying on your debt. Put down this plutocratic economy once and for all.
Posted by: David Minnich | April 23, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
“I deeply regret voting for Obama. I respect the presidency, but I strongly question what he is doing”
Why weren’t you questioning Bush when he added 5 trillion to the debt? Thats unbelievable.
Posted by: Patrick | April 23, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
“years that truly began with the Clinton Administration who with Barney Frank insisted on softening Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac regulations on loaning to people who could never afford to pay back their huge mortgages”
Your completely wrong of course…the mess began because banks invented credit default swaps and placed an artificial perceived value on them. When that perception collapsed so did the economy.
There is no law not the CRA that says banks have to lend money to people they know are unqualified. If you find it why dont you post it? I’ll be waiting a long time.
Posted by: Patrick | April 23, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
“The President’s own half brother was denied a visa.”
That made me laugh
Posted by: Plumber | April 23, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Americans. If you have a credit card or several that you have balances more than 30 days past due …
CUT THEM UP ,YOU CAN’T AFFORD THEM!!
Do that ,then call/contact a debt management counselor (preferably a us government agency or dept.)
Get your finances in correct order ,even if you have to live in a trailer and drive a fiesta.
Don’t use credit , that’s rule 1 .
If everyone would just do that the banks will be forced to lower rates because they would be out of business otherwise. They need for people to borrow money .
It’s like pay-for-view. I remember when all that stuff was free and was paid for by advertising mostly. Now that “they” have figured out people are stupid enough to pay billions annually for terrible b movies and wrestling ,there is no end to “pay for view”.
I canceled my cable ,the bill was too high. I guess a lot of other folks did to because now the cable company has lowered their rates to 1990 rates ,that is if you complain.
If not they happily charge whoever doesn’t raise a stink the full retail price (and raise that regularly as well.)
Keep blindly and moronically paying for what you don’t really need , and you’ll get charged plenty extra for the convenience , that’s your conundrum America…
NO CREDIT WITH A RATE OVER 6% . THAT IS THE NEW MANTRA!!
Posted by: Dean | April 23, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Interest rates aren’t the real problem. Paying down the principal is. Credit card companies should be forced by law to allow at least some percentage of every payment made to go toward the principal. Otherwise they’ve got consumers where they want us — permanently indebted to them!
Posted by: Joan | April 23, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Neither a borrower nor a lender be;
For loan oft loses both itself and friend,
And borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.
——————————–
Was this guy smart or what?
Posted by: Brain? | April 23, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Why weren’t you questioning Bush when he added 5 trillion to the debt? Thats unbelievable.
Posted by: Patrick | Apr 23, 2009 2:13:49 PM
———–
We were complaining all the way.
Obama is scored by his own CBO as creating a deficit, this year alone, of 1.85 trillion.
That did not even include his handouts of 1 trillion to the IMF and 1 billion to Pakistan, or the Tarp run up to 3 trillion dollars.
Obama has made all the presidents combined that preceded him look like misers, He is on course to completely devastate the economy and our future.
Whatever trouble he inherited he has multiplied over and over again
Quite an accomplishment for just 100 days
All that assumes he just stops spending now for the rest of his 4 year presidency. We know that won’t happen
Posted by: MNM | April 23, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
“Obama is scored by his own CBO as creating a deficit, this year alone, of 1.85 trillion”
Your numbers are fabrications… BTW Bush outspend all previous POTUS in his 8 years.
Posted by: Patrick | April 23, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Cutting credit card interest rates retro actively and forward moving is the one thing Obama can do that will spur the economy forward. If people know they might be charged 29% on a credit card loan – there is absolutely no incentive to spend. And if you charged items and the credit card companies suddenly increase the interest then people are stuck with 29% interest vs. the original 6%. Discriminating credit cards more than housing have put the halt on spending. Banks would make more if the cash flow of spending and paying were free flowing.
Posted by: anony | April 23, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Joe Biden won’t be allowed within the Wilmington DE city limits.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 23, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
The Credit Card Issuers have the same attorneys that the CIA Torture Guys used.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 23, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
“Quite an accomplishment for just 100 days”
Job Approval ratings in the low 60′s, personal favorables in the low 70′s and right direction numbers improving.
Yes I would say he is doing quite well for his 1st 100 days.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 23, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Since they foreclosed on your home and you won’t finance a new car.. just use your mortgage and car payment money to pay whatever the bank wants to charge you for your consumer credit interest and fees… and all the gas money differential that you have accumulated… oops.. forgot.. unemployment benefits don’t stretch that far.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 23, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Another fiscally responsible liberal chiming in…. I use my credit card every month but I pay it off, in full and on time, every month.
The CC companies (at least the ones I use) hold statements before mailing them – I get them a full ten days after they say the statements are mailed. Why do CC statements take ten days to arrive when all other mail takes two days? Then I have to write my payment w/in two or three days in order to get it in on time, because they hold payments, too.
They say you have three weeks to pay the bill…but ten days for the statement to come to me and ten days for the check to get to them!? That’s almost three weeks right there. Should definitely be illegal. And if it is, should be *enforced.*
Just saying – even if you are very careful about payments, the CC companies are definitely still looking for ways to trip you up. And…I need to switch to a new company.
Posted by: Snaps | April 23, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
“How m any democrats involved in tax fraud, sex crimes, spying, pay2play, ethics violations, and campaign fraud? is it 26 now?”
How many republicans been bribed my military contractors? How many have received massive donations from KBR and Halliburton? How many want to build bridges to nowhere? How many are nothing but shills for tobacco companies?
Et cetera…
Posted by: Patrick | April 23, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Uncle Barry is going to make the mean ol’ evil credit card companies toe the line. Big whoop. What he is proposing is next to worthless and designed to get him a few feel-good Barry-takes-on-big-business headlines to cover up all his other mistakes.
If the Democrats really want real credit card reform they should pass a simple usury law with some teeth in it.
On the other hand if joe sixpack is an absolute fool and wants to pay 20+ percent on his credit cards and run up 10s of thousands of dollars in debt on them I say have at it. We, the American Taxpayer, shouldn’t bail him out. The bailout is coming. These people probably voted in the the people who are now telling us a trillions of dollars of debt is okay and that we can just worry about it tomorrow because Uncle Barry will take care of us.
Do community organizers really understand how consumer credit works?
Tear up your credit cards America!!!! If everyone did that we’d see credit card companies reforming themselves in a hurry.
Posted by: MadJayhawk | April 23, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
“Just saying – even if you are very careful about payments, the CC companies are definitely still looking for ways to trip you up. And…I need to switch to a new company.”
Did you ever hear of automatic withdrawals? Works great. Also you can pay online the day you get the bill. That works great too.
The credit card companies don’t trip you up. You trip yourself up. If, for some reason, you can’t use the tools the Banks give you to pay the bill on time, DON’T USE THE CARDS. Your choice.
Posted by: MadJayhawk | April 23, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
I’m sure his personal charm, charisma and glistening pectorals will win them over just as He has done with terrorists and foreign heads of state.
We are so fortunate to have Dear Leader. I weep with blessed joy.
Posted by: RR GOP | April 24, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am
I’m faux Gibbs:
‘..why don’t we just enforce the ‘bill of rights’ that we already have..’
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 24, 2009, 9:05 am 9:05 am
Mad, Obviously you missed my point.
I said that the CC companies are dishonest about their own policies, and that should be illegal.
I do pay my bills on time, as I said, but I expect the company to follow their own rules.
Posted by: Snaps | April 24, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Forgot to add: good point on the auto withdraws. I prefer to write checks for all of my bills, but I realize I’m in the minority on that one (in an ever-widening gap). Switching to auto pay would probably make my life a lot easier, LOL.
Posted by: Snaps | April 24, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
About 8 years ago I consolidated all my credit cards to one. I have the account with Chase. I have always paid my bill on time. I consolidated because they gave me a 3.9% apr for life of loan. In Feb09 I got my bill and my monthly payment fee was $500.00. This was raised from $210.00. They also charged me a $10. monthly fee. I almost threw up, knowing I now had to come up with $300.00 more a month. I had been paying on time and the % rate was still in good standing. I called Chase, I was told they have every right to charge me whatever they want a month. I told the girl they were out of their mind. She said she can change my monthly fee back to $200., but I would be penalized with a 7.9% apr. She said that Chase is trying to get all their account holders to pay off faster so they can loan out more money. Since Obama’s news conference with these bankers I have only received $30. credit for the $10. monthly fees. I am still paying $500. a month.
Posted by: RoxyPoint | April 28, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
You can always shop around and transfer your balance with a new credit card company. Al the major credit companies have 0% balance transfers for up to one year.
Posted by: klardi | April 28, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
My two kids are college students and I did not allow them to get credit cards. Chase hounded us to open “free” checking accounts so they could have debit cards — stating they would be free since they are students. We open the accounts and come to find that if my kids do the responsible thing and check their balance before withdrawing cash at a non-chase ATM, they are charged $2 by CHASE!! If they withdraw money, they are charged by the bank owning the ATM (not unusual) but they are also charged $2 by CHASE! BUT THE REAL ABUSE IS THEY ARE CHARGED TO CHECK THE BALANCE OF THEIR ACCT! WE WERE TOLD THESE FEES WOULD NOT APPLY WHEN WE OPENED THE ACCOUNT< BUT CHASE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE THEIR POLICIES. SO I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO TELL EVERYONE ABOUT CHASE's ABUSIVE TREATMENT OF RESPONSIBLE STUDENTS!
Posted by: Laura Wolfe | May 4, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Uproot all credit card companies. We do not need any credit card companies. Let people leave within their own means meaning, let them use their own money from the debit cards.
Posted by: ANONYMOUS | May 9, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am