President Obama Prepares to Mark ‘Hallmark Holiday’ of First 100 Days
President Obama starts the week of his "First Hundred Days" milestone (on Wednesday April 29) with a 69 percent approval rating, and 50 percent of the country thinking the U.S. is on the right track — the highest rating in six years. (In October, only 8 percent of the American people thought the nation was on the right track.)
The White House calls the "100 Days" marker a "Hallmark Holiday" — a day of little actual significance, but probably best to play along and exchange cards anyway.
So here are some takes for the day:
The New York Daily News’ Michael Goodwin calls the Obama presidency "an extraordinary high-wire act. He started by pushing record spending and tax hikes, and ends under fire over charges he is jeopardizing America’s safety by releasing tough-interrogation memos and seeming to support prosecution of the Bush administration officials involved. The twin moves, bookends for the first 100 days, amount to Obama’s doubling down his bets that he is not bound by the ground rules of history. Like Frank Sinatra, he does it his way."
The president used his first 100 days to build a foundation, says Reuters’ Steve Holland, who also notes that the president has yet to bridge the partisan divide.
McClatchy’s Margaret Talev says "President Barack Obama’s first 100 days on the job exploded with activity on many fronts: the $787 billion economic stimulus, the order to close the Guantanamo Bay prison within a year, a withdrawal plan for Iraq, an expansion of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, and outreach to several hostile nations. Still, America’s economic crisis largely shaped these 100 days. It also empowered Obama, even as it overshadowed some of what he’d hoped to do."
"The public clearly likes his persona more than they like his policies," Michael Barone tells Fox News. "There’s certainly a lot of uncertainty, qualms and reservations about many of the policies."
"All new presidents get the benefit of the doubt for the first three months," adds Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas. "That benefit of the doubt will evaporate shortly when the impact of his policies becomes better known."
"Much of the country has invested its hopes in Obama, and he has made a powerful first impression," writes the Washington Post’s Dan Balz. "The glimmers of optimism that go along with the glimmers of improvement in the economy have accrued to his benefit. But ahead lie major battles over health care and energy. How durable and sustainable his support, and how he uses it, will be the story of the next 100 days — and the next 100 — of his presidency."
What do you think?
– jpt

Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
Wow! I can hardly wait for the 24X7 coverage of the most incompetent, unprepared, ill equipped, naive, sock puppet of the Nazi collaborator George Soros and raised and tutored by Marxists, dear leader and rock star, chain smoking, do as I say not as I do, ego maniac President to begin! I hope the Teleprompter has been practicing!
Posted by: WallyG | April 26, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Your question: “What do you think?”
My answer: That this “administration” (that is a generous use of that term) proves that the USA is no longer the greatest nation to exist in history, and it is no longer a nation to be proud of. Instead, with this bunch in the Exec. Branch along with the 111th Worst Congress Ever, this nation has sunk into the cesspool of failed nations, and failed ideas.
Benjamin Franklin told a woman that they had given us a “republic, if we could keep it”. Now, we are in an avalance of big government greed and powermongering, and our citizen ninnies cannot give up their freedoms fast enough, when promised a handout by this Mafia-like “government”.
Sure, the media has a weeklong propaganda fest planned, in concert with the Chicago Mob. So what? I suppose those who think Jon Stewart is a respectable news source will fall for it. But then they were dumb enough to fall for the whole Hopey McChange burgers that the media has been feeding them for a year or more.
100 days? Exactly what was expected. A huge, colossal, epic failure of this nation, its citizens, it’s ballyhooed “free” media, and its government. This entire administration is garbage – crooked, unpatriotic, and amoral.
OBAMA = FAILURE
Posted by: JD | April 26, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Wow! Celebrating the first hundred
days of the second coming of the
Titanic AKA Barack Obama!
This is a prime example of why voters
should not vote in anger they should
vote for the most qualified
candidate!
Those of you who hated Bush and wanted
to punish the Republicans how is that
working out for you?
2012 can’t come soon enough.
Posted by: reaganfan | April 26, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Hey Jake,
What’s up with the propoganda? Don’t you know Gallup has Obama’s “first 100 days” approval ratings behind George W. Bush, Herbert W. Bush, Nixon, Carter and Reagan’s approval ratings. Gallup has Obama at 56%.
Come on man!
Read and learn!
Posted by: No-Bull Please | April 26, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
Gallup has Obama at 56%, behind Nixon, Carter, Reagan, George W. and Hebert Walker Bush after their first 100 days in office.
Posted by: Dan | April 26, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
“What’s up with the propoganda? Don’t you know Gallup has Obama’s “first 100 days” approval ratings behind George W. Bush, Herbert W. Bush, Nixon, Carter and Reagan’s approval ratings. Gallup has Obama at 56%.”
I didn’t see Gallup cite any numbers re: GWB but that 56% is the number of people who say he is doing an “excellent” or “good” job. If you add the people who say he is doing an “OK” job, which I don’t think you can call “bad”, he’s at 79%. In their daily tracker, he’s at 65 approve and 29 disapprove. H
Seems like you are the one spreading propaganda. Face it, the guy is popular and people are willing to give him time to fix the problems that face us. That may not be the case a year from now but right now, that’s the reality.
Of course, George Soros is probably just days away from ordering Obama to travel to his real home country of Kenya, where he will eat live puppies and French kiss Ahmadinejad wearing an “I Heart ACORN” t-shirt, all under the direction of a record-size teleprompter, so I epxect the dip in approval ratings to begin shortly.
Posted by: OGLiberal | April 26, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Since we’re on an ABC blog – how about the latest ABC/Washington Post Poll?
“Obama’s overall rating remains high, with 69 percent of Americans approving of his job performance. He gets solid marks for his handling of the economy, maintaining a better-than-2-to-1 advantage over congressional Republicans on the issue. Majorities said that Obama has exceeded their expectations in his first three months in office, has accomplished big things and has kept his main campaign promises. Further, public optimism about the economy and the country’s direction also remain on the rise since his election, even as few think his major economic initiatives have moved the needle on the nation’s flagging economy, their communities or their finances.”
Posted by: Jesse | April 26, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
They laughed when Cheney said this:
“Clinton tells Iraq: ‘Bombs are a sign of success’
“US SECRETARY of State Hillary Clinton said yesterday that last week’s deadly bombings in Iraq are a sign that extremists are afraid the Iraqi government is succeeding.”
“‘I think that these suicide bombings… are unfortunately, in a tragic way, a signal that the rejectionists fear that Iraq is going in the right direction,’ Clinton told reporters travelling aboard her plane ahead of her unannounced visit to Baghdad.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 26, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
The nation’s most accurate pollster, Rasmussen, has him at 55%.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 26, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Okay, here’s the deal Jake:
Gallup seems to be changing their headlines to fit the needs of the “progressive” community. Now their latest headline reads: “86% say Obama passing or meeting expectations.” But the fact of the matter is, according to Gallup, only 56% of Americans believe Obama has done an excellent or good job. 20% say he has done a poor or terrible job. And about a quarter of Americans are on the fence, saying his performance has been “just okay”. It’s all about spinning it the way they want to spin it. For a comparison of previous presidents’ approval ratings, check out the following:
Jake, it would behoove you to do a more thorough study of these polls, lest you get swept up in the mainstream media’s spin. I expect better from you, Jake. I don’t know if they had “on the fence” ratings during the previous presidents’ tenures, however, “on the fence” means, “on the fence” – and it is not an approval of Obama.
Posted by: Dan | April 26, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
WallyG: That was a heckuva rant – satire, right? Knock ‘em dead! LOL
Posted by: R Mutt | April 26, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Congratulations to Obama…however for accurate results it might be best to wait and see the results of his policy agenda
Posted by: Parallax View | April 26, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Since the electorate voted in President Obama based on his plans regarding health care and clean renewable energy, I think the next hundred days are going to be much worse for the Republicans than for the Democrats.
The Party of No doesn’t have a plan for either health care OR clean renewable energy. Kind of embarrassing, yes?
Posted by: Jan | April 26, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Kind of hard to be down in the polls when virtually all of the MSM is in the tank for him.
Why look for fair, factual, and balanced when supporters can live in lala land with Obama where everything
is rosy.
Posted by: ross | April 26, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Fascist Hyena:”The nation’s most accurate pollster, Rasmussen,”
Why do you call them the most accurate pollster? I haven’t seen any analysis indicating that, their use of an in-house, proprietary “likely voter” model to adjust results even in non-election years (like now) has really come under some fire.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 26, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
In 100 days Obama has put us trillions in debt mostly to China-who had to cut him off.
He has insulted our longtime allies
and even has Canada booing our National Anthem.
He wants to be friends with Chavez, Ortega, and Castros who have all insulted him.
The CIA no longer can depend on him because he decided to be a doormat to his base and reveal Top Secrets.
While he tried to hide the memos that showed interrogations kept us safe.
Gosh I could go on and on.
And then there’s that deep deep bow.
Posted by: nick | April 26, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
President Obama has move quickly and directly on the exact issues he promised he would while campaigning. As his history in IL (and, briefly, the federal Senate) would suggest, he has compromised and picked his battles. But he has made progress on delivering what he ran on, so other than McCain voters (who inexplicably attribute McCain’s “no pork” promise to Obama) it’s not surprising he’s still popular. And the Republican’s total obstructionism is only giving Obama a convenient scapegoat for his biggest misses.
The real grade will come in 2012 when we will have some idea how what he promised will actually work.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 26, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
Liz Cheney for president in 2012.
It’s going to be so bad by then even Democrats might want a Cheney for president.
She is pretty sharp!
Posted by: bailey | April 26, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
….Mr. President, I say good job. Now…..the American People sent you on a Mandate. We Got Your Back.
Posted by: sngeorgia | April 26, 2009, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Gasping for Straws?
Posted by: sngeorgia | April 26, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Nick, You’re one “Smart Guy” (hehe)
Posted by: sngeorgia | April 26, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Obama should be even higher in the polls.
America only gets to hear the positive things about Obama from most of the media.
The majority of Americans bought his bull in the campaign and they are still buying it.
Posted by: tommy | April 26, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
100 days of campaigning but still no leadership.
Obama doing the only thing he knows how to do–but he is good at reading TOTUS.
Posted by: marly | April 26, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
OBAMA = FAILURE
***************************************
With an aproval ratings in the mid 60s?
What then do you call the GOP?
Posted by: Thinking | April 26, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
C’mon!
It’s really 100 days of Pelosi’s presidency.
We know who is really calling the shots at the WH.
Posted by: max | April 26, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
“Obama doing the only thing he knows how to do–but he is good at reading TOTUS.”
But you guys are even better at reading and repeating from your neo-con human teleprompter Rush Limbaugh.
Posted by: Skip | April 26, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
100 days and Obama still can’t make a decision.
He tries to decide, throws it to the media, waits for poll results and reactions, then he changes his mind.
He is weak-willed and indecisive.
Probably why he voted “present” over 120X in the Senate.
Posted by: len | April 26, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
I’m sure the Taliban/enemies are happy with Obama’s 100 days now that they know our secrets.
Bet they are looking forward to the next 100 days.
Posted by: tyler | April 26, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Obama has exceeded my expectations.
Posted by: jcarob | April 26, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
He is weak-willed and indecisive.
****************************************
Then why are you guys whinning about all his decisions? (Hint if he is indcesisive he doesn’t make any)
Posted by: Thinking | April 26, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
The first 100 days of Obama has been great I must say.
I have never seen the GOP in such disarray. We owe it all to a “rookie senator from chicago”, a “community organizer”, a “marxist”, a “radical leftist” a “weakling” a “teleprompter” a “rev wright protegee” a “socialist”
wow….. republicans! someone like that can wipe the floor with you – IN AMERICA
Now that is Change you can Believe In.
Posted by: Omentum | April 26, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
How durable and sustainable his support, and how he uses it, will be the story of the next 100 days — and the next 100 — of his presidency.”
****************************************
Actually this 100 day crap has got to go, he has 8 years to go, and every 100 days is going to give the GOP more to whine about. It is torture I tell you.
Posted by: Thinking | April 26, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Thinking….
I totally agree.
If we ever get in a position where we have to interrogate, we can just let the prisoners listen to Fox or right wing radio.
they will break in a few days.
Posted by: Omentum | April 26, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Amazing viewpoints by supposedly informed Americans.
WIth this kind of nonsense (by both the extreme left and the extreme right) there can be little hope for a unified nation. As such, there is no hope for long term survival of the USA. That is what you get when you cling to your partisan extremes and your dishonest media.
I have to say, as an independent (I used to be a Republican, but that was before Newt Gingrich) I find Obama honest and intelligent. The nonsense about socialism and doom is unfounded in fact. If liberals had any sense they wouldn’t salivate every time an absurdly fat right wing republican talk show host spewed drug induced paranoia on the airways.
I would very much like to see reasonable balance on the right against the likes of Nancy Pelosi (she does appear in the minority in the Democratic party, so lets get a grip on that one). Unfortunately, the Republican party appears to suffer at it’s own hand — having embraced idiots like born again Palin and economic/regulatory religion as though the works of man were perfect. The Republican party is going to die if it keeps this up.
The Democrats are not in much better shape, but at the moment they do have the tide of history on their side, and Obama is very astute about what he faces from within his own party. If there is ANY recovery by the end of this year — obstructionist and non-contributing Republicans will have nothing to sell except fear (wait, that’s been their one card since 9/11) about future generations. But here’s the rub: Americans tend to live in the moment, and if the moment is improving fear ain’t gonna cut it.
Posted by: vic winkler | April 26, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
I am struck by how polarizing Obama is, especially for a president who campaigned on being bipartisan and bringing the country together. He is even more polarizing that Bush was due to the intense support from his base, but I don’t see that as a positive from him as he has few on his side of the aisle who will do anything to help him be a moderate who brings the country together.
Posted by: Jason | April 26, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
Omentum said:
If we ever get in a position where we have to interrogate, we can just let the prisoners listen to Fox or right wing radio.
they will break in a few days.
Sorry to burst your bubble O but
a couple of hours of listening to
any of President Obama’s speeches
will send the terrorists screaming from
the room and begging for mercy!
That truly is Torture!
Posted by: reaganfan | April 26, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
I am struck by how polarizing Obama is, especially for a president who campaigned on being bipartisan and bringing the country together. He is even more polarizing that Bush was due to the intense support from his base, but I don’t see that as a positive from him as he has few on his side of the aisle who will do anything to help him be a moderate who brings the country together.
Posted by: Jason | Apr 26, 2009 8:20:13 PM
========
No Jason
It is clueless people like yourself who are polarizing. Clueless because you don’t realize that the same ideas that the right is bringing to the table are the SAME ideas that got us into this mess.
It is amazing that the right wingers still havent figured out the definition of INSANITY = doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.
Posted by: Omentum | April 26, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS DONE A GOOD JOB IN HIS FIRST 100 DAY’S BETTER THEN EVERY PRESIDENT SINCE JFK.
Posted by: Robert Dillon | April 26, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Hmm, the last time before this that a newly-elected Democratic President passed a budget over the unanimous opposition of the Republicans in Congress, the Republicans called it “job-killing poison for the economy” and predicted it would destroy the United States. Instead, the economy surged and eight years later we were running a surplus.
So if they’re predicting dire consequences now with Obama’s budget the future looks very bright. (At least if we can avoid the stupidity of forgetting our history and letting some future Republican write a budget for us.)
The Republicans are going to have to learn that with the internet’s ability to record and remember what they say, their credibility will be stuck at zero until they join the reality-based community, start telling the truth, and stop making grandstanding their primary modus-operandi.
Posted by: James | April 26, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Omentum said:
If we ever get in a position where we have to interrogate, we can just let the prisoners listen to Fox or right wing radio.
they will break in a few days.
Sorry to burst your bubble O but
a couple of hours of listening to
any of President Obama’s speeches
will send the terrorists screaming from
the room and begging for mercy!
That truly is Torture!
Posted by: reaganfan | Apr 26, 2009 8:49:44 PM
=====================
Now just imagine a “radical islamist extremist” who have fundamental religious beliefs concerning the covering of women looking at FOX News “aka” softporn with all the mini skirts and caked on lip gloss. Also they would be spooked out of their minds looking at glen beck’s psycho-sadistic arse.
Not to mention how Fox has that highly animated “news alert” just to show a kitten caught in a tree.
Then just imagine listening to Hannity’s nasally voice for a day and Levin’s old crotchety “get off my lawn” voice. The prisoner would spill the beans in seconds.
Posted by: Omentum | April 26, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
President Obama has move quickly and directly on the exact issues he promised he would while campaigning.
================================
He’s scored a miss on his promise of a net spending cut.
Posted by: mad | April 26, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
And guess where Larry Summers is now (Google him if you are ignorant).
“If there is a pattern emerging here it is not incompetence but, say Obama’s critics, ‘capture’. Both Bernanke and Geithner stood at the heart of the Bush policy elite during the days of dither and denial that followed the collapse of Lehman Brothers. Obama, lacking credible economic heavyweights in his own circle, was obliged to reach into the ranks of Clinton-era Democrats. The irony of Larry Summers’ appointment as chief economic adviser was not lost on historians of the credit crunch: Summers had hailed the 1999 law that deregulated Wall Street as ‘a major step toward the 21st century’.
“Obama is surrounded by decision-makers who had ‘drunk the Kool Aid’ during the subprime bubble and were profoundly committed to the neoliberal ideology of self-regulation that has now fallen apart. Only the fiscal stimulus truly bears Obama’s chosen brand values of audacity and untaintedness. But this, too, is proving heavily problematic.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 26, 2009, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
“President Obama has move quickly and directly on the exact issues he promised he would while campaigning.”
Sure he has.
“There is no doubt that we’ve been living beyond our means and we’re going to have to make some adjustments.”
– Obama during the campaign.
This year’s budget deficit: $1.5 trillion.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 26, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
Don’t try and rain on our Obama parade now. Look at the numbers: Despite the scope of the challenges facing him Obama is doing pretty well in most peoples’ opinion. Besides, when did running up a huge deficit while telling Americans to just feel better about themselves ever bother self-proclaimed conservatives before? It’s right out of the Ronald Reagan playbook, so it should have a warm familiar feeling to it.
Posted by: Skip | April 26, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
“Gallup Tracking Poll: Up to 66% approval and down to 27% disapproval!
“The neocons used evvery label they could think of in…”
The nation’s most accurate pollster has him at 55% approval, 35% strongly approve, 32% strongly disapprove.
Sandy, could you tell us what you think a “neocon” is? I’m dying to hear what the term means to you. (It does have an actual meaning, and it is apparent that you simply do not have a clue what it is.)
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 26, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
Hmmm…
“Gallup reports that 56% of the public believes that Obama is doing an excellent/good job. Gallup reported 62% approved of George W. Bush’s job performance after the first 100 days.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 26, 2009, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
And more hmmm…
“The president’s approval is nearly identical to the job rating George
W. Bush received at the same point in his first term, as 63 percent of
Americans approved [of Bush] and 22 percent disapproved (April 18-19, 2001).
“One noticeable difference is that approval of Obama is much more divided
along partisan lines today than Bush’s ratings were eight years ago….
“Gallup reports that 56% of the public believes that Obama is doing an
excellent/good job. Gallup reported 62% approved of George W. Bush’s
job performance after the first 100 days.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 26, 2009, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
Rasmussen today:
”The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows that 35% of the nation’s voters now Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Thirty-two percent (32%) Strongly Disapprove….
“Overall, 54% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the President’s performance so far. Forty-five percent (45%) disapprove.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 26, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
Facist Hyena:”The nation’s most accurate pollster has him at 55% approval”
Again, why do you call them the most accurate pollster? Have you picked a tightly defined range of predictions to grade Rasmussen on, or are you just moving from the Big Lie to the Repeated Lie method? I’m dying to hear your defense of their black-box “likely voter” adjustment of all their poll results.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 26, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Facist Hyena:”"One noticeable difference is that approval of Obama is much more divided along partisan lines today than Bush’s ratings were eight years ago…. ”
It has been very well noted that President Bush received much more support from the opposing party after his election than Obama, extending all the way to Congress where he was able to pass his signature tax cut and education reform bills even though Dems controlled the Senate. This documented reality only serves to make the hyper-partisan actions of the Republicans in Congress look even more self-serving and hypocritical.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 27, 2009, 12:02 am 12:02 am
“…when did running up a huge deficit while telling Americans to just feel better about themselves ever bother self-proclaimed conservatives before?”
Constantly, which is one reason many conservatives did not approve of Bush. But if they don’t bother you–and everyone–right now, you should look at the numbers.
Obama’s own projections call for him to run deficits that will double the national debt in a mere five years, and triple it in ten. Think of it: In five years he will have added to the national debt an amount equal to the accumulated debt of all the presidencies from George Washingto through George W. Bush. He will take the debt from 40% of annual GDP to 80%. Absolutely unprcedented–by far–in the entire history of the nation.
Does each of you understand that that is real debt, the kind that absolutely must be paid off or the United States will simply collapse? How do you think that debt will be paid. Where will the money come from when the notes held by China and the American public come due?
I would urge you to consider this. Those of you who are young will regret this to your dying day. I am old and rich, so it won’t affect me at all. But if I were in my twenties today I’d be terrified.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 27, 2009, 12:02 am 12:02 am
“This documented reality only serves to make the hyper-partisan actions of the Republicans in Congress look even more self-serving and hypocritical.”
And how is it that we can determine that today’s congressional Republicans are hyper-partisan, while today’s Democrats are not. It seems as simple as it can possibly be to me that both parties are 100% partisan today, and have been since the Democrats changed their minds about a war they approved and authorized the president to wage.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 27, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am
“Again, why do you call them the most accurate pollster? Have you picked a tightly defined range of predictions to grade Rasmussen on, or are you just moving from the Big Lie to the Repeated Lie method?”
I’m relying on the ranking of twenty polling organizations during the 2008 election cycle as published in the study done at Fordham University. Of course, Fordham University could just be putting out the big lie, couldn’t they? Why don’t you look at their study and tell me what data you think they have falsfiied?
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 27, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am
‘Night, all. Go do your homework this time.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 27, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Fascist Hyena:”I’m relying on the ranking of twenty polling organizations during the 2008 election cycle as published in the study done at Fordham University.”
Could you be more specific? All I can find is a single professor who rated firms based only on the single point of the 2008 presidential election (Rasmussen was best), and an address by Nate Silver who crunched all their state-by-state calls and did not find Rasmussen to even be in the top three (google up “Creator of Polling Website Reflects on 2008 Presidential Election” Fordham).
My problem with the ‘study’ you seem to be citing is that a single point test is merely trivia. For context, of the 27 states Rasmussen polled immediately prior to the election, Mr. Silver’s algorithms called 19 of them closer and tied on 6.
Most accurate pollster my foot. If you care about the nuts and bolts, check out Mr Silvers cite. Rasmussen has a well documented Republican house effect (it doesn’t look dishonest, but a consistent result of their techniques and data cleaning).
Posted by: jhw539 | April 27, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Obama’s popularity with his supporters is the triumph of hope over reality.
Posted by: drjohn | April 27, 2009, 8:05 am 8:05 am
69 percent.
Responsible polls include independents and Republicans.
Posted by: drjohn | April 27, 2009, 8:09 am 8:09 am
“This documented reality only serves to make the hyper-partisan actions of the Republicans in Congress look even more self-serving and hypocritical.”
“This documented reality”
Hilarious.
When Bush was President dissent was patriotic, and now it’s not. The documented reality is that Democrats are hypocrites.
Posted by: drjohn | April 27, 2009, 8:10 am 8:10 am
President Obama has proposed new spending programs that will add over the next 10 years $6.5-trillion (all figures U.S.) to the American national debt. That’s $6.5-trillion over and above the debt that would have been incurred had the existing policies been left alone. (Not that those existing policies were so great either.)
That’s $65-billion in new debt every single day of the first 100. EXPENSIVE.
And this figure is surely too low, because it is based on (1) almost certainly unduly OPTIMISTIC ASSUMPTIONS about the growth of the U.S. economy over the next few years and (2) unduly optimistic assumptions about the costs of President Obama’s HEALTH-CARE ideas.
Posted by: carl | April 27, 2009, 8:26 am 8:26 am
Jake
With all this new transparency do you think we could see Obama’s college transcripts and the list of lobbyist waivers?
Posted by: drjohn | April 27, 2009, 8:27 am 8:27 am
So they polled acorn and got good rating for the destroyer of our nation. Poll a red state you spineless worms. No left turn! Stop the taxes! I borrowed money to off pay my loans, but for some reason I still have a loan to pay. Why didn’t borrowing money to pay my bills eliminate all my debt? Its go to work for BO, right? NOT!
Posted by: mogo | April 27, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am
Jake
Could you please ask Gibbs why Obama redacted this sentence from Dennis Blari’s letter?
“I like to think I would not have approved those methods in the past,” he wrote, “but I do not fault those who made the decisions at that time….”
TIA!
Posted by: drjohn | April 27, 2009, 8:53 am 8:53 am
Republicans On Board dont be Jealous Because your Party is in Exile! And Other then the 30 someting Percent Of your Party The rest of the Country could care Less about the GOP And we have good reasons!
Posted by: Angie in Pa | April 27, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Obama is flat on his butt in the face of a Flu Epidemic……..
The Obama administration declared a “public health emergency” Sunday to confront the swine flu — but is heading into its first medical outbreak WITHOUT A SECRETARY of Health and Human Services OR APPOINTEES IN ANY of the department’s 19 key posts.
President Barack Obama has NOT YET CHOSEN A SURGEON GENERAL OR THE HEAD of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. His choice to run the Food and Drug Administration awaits confirmation—in a heavily Democratic Senate.
Posted by: After 100 days no leaders at HHS | April 27, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
I think Obama gives America something it needs badly: a mix of toughness and liberalism. Many Americans mistrust liberals because they tend to be `soft’. Some suggest that JFK, obviously a `tough’ leader, would have been a Republican had he lived today (just to give you an idea). Obama appears tough, particularly when he defends his own liberal agenda. That’s something conservatives don’t expect from liberals. And they seem to be impressed by it. They may not like his policies, but they are secretly proud of his leadership.
As for the GOP, if this administration continues to be a success, the best they can do is keep quiet, or even support the President, or risk being viewed as the party on the wrong side of history.
Posted by: xavier baudet | April 27, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Yes, Obama really said this in his weekly address. George Orwell is spinning in his grave!
“We cannot settle for a future of rising deficits and debts that our children cannot pay,” the president says, adding that we must “recognize that we cannot meet the challenges of today with old habits and stale thinking. So much of our government was built to deal with different challenges from a different era. Too often, the result is wasteful spending, bloated programs, and inefficient results. It’s time to fundamentally change the way that we do business in Washington.”
Posted by: Obama: The Audacity of Hypocrisy | April 27, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am
“The Obama administration declared a “public health emergency” Sunday to confront the swine flu — but is heading into its first medical outbreak WITHOUT A SECRETARY of Health and Human Services OR APPOINTEES IN ANY of the department’s 19 key posts.”
And the Republicans wouldn’t happen to be blocking any of these appointments would they?
Posted by: Skip | April 27, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am
And the Republicans wouldn’t happen to be blocking any of these appointments would they?
Posted by: Skip | Apr 27, 2009 11:06:23 AM
The only nominee the Republcans are blocking is Sibelius, who LIED about campaign contributions from Pro-Abortion groups.
Posted by: Obama: Celebrity Over Leadership | April 27, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
“The only nominee the Republcans are blocking is Sibelius, who LIED about campaign contributions from Pro-Abortion groups.”
Nonetheless it reveals dishonesty in the complaint that the position should be filled by now. A more honest complaint would be that Obama has not chosen someone that you approve of by now.
Posted by: Skip | April 27, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am
A more honest complaint would be that Obama has not chosen someone that you approve of by now.
Posted by: Skip | Apr 27, 2009 11:21:45 AM
It is not mere disapproval, but Sibelius’s violation of campaign law–like Geithner’ violation of IRS law–that is the problem.
Posted by: Crook County, Illinois | April 27, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
xavier baudet:
“tough leader”?
You forgot about his European trip
where he trashed his country and
got nothing in return aside from
glowing reviews from the
Whitehouse controlled liberal media!
Maybe you meant the Latin American
Summit where Obama sat without a peep
as Daniel Ortega attacked the U.S.A!
Yeah real tough. Not!
If he continues to be a success?
What success?
Pushing trillons of dollars in an
uncontrolled frenzy through a
Democrat controlled Congress.
Get your facts straight before you
most such drivel!
Posted by: reaganfan | April 27, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
You forgot about his European trip
where he trashed his country and
got nothing in return…
Posted by: reaganfan | Apr 27, 2009 12:03:29 PM
During his trip to France, Obama could not even be troubled to pay tribute to our War Dead at Normandy. But he and Michelle did hit all the hot spots in Paris.
Posted by: carl | April 27, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
“You forgot about his European trip
where he trashed his country and
got nothing in return…”
We think that blustering swaggering saber-rattling doesn’t impress anybody anymore. Accepting responsibility where it is due does.
Posted by: Skip | April 27, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
“Rasmussen today:”
Ahhh yes Rasmussen who consistently had the highest approval ratings for George Bus out of any polling organization and has disapproval ratings for Obama that are about 10 pts higher than any other poll.
Some of his other polls indicate that Americans don’t want torture investigated and support the tea parties (that poll was hilarious as he had to weed out people who did not support it to call it a majority)
No wonder he is FoxNews’s go to guy for polling.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 27, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
“Gallup has Obama at 56%, behind Nixon, Carter, Reagan, George W. and Hebert Walker Bush after their first 100 days in office.”
Nope, the right winger who writes for History News Network got it wrong citing a poll about people thinking Obama doing an excellent or good job vs approving of the job he is doing.
She then compared the job approval numbers to other presidents which Gallup had just compiled.
Those numbers are as follows
Obama’s 63% first-quarter average matches the historical average of 63% for elected presidents’ first quarters since 1953. However, it is the fourth highest for a newly elected president since that time, and the highest since Jimmy Carter’s 69% in 1977. The historical first-quarter average includes two presidents whose scores exceeded 70% (John Kennedy’s 74% and Dwight Eisenhower’s 71%).
Posted by: Ryan C | April 27, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
“Fascist Hyena:”I’m relying on the ranking of twenty polling organizations during the 2008 election cycle as published in the study done at Fordham University.”
Which is hilarious since the college grad student who wrote that gets the final percentages WRONG in order to call Rasmussen the most accurate.
Final poll results had
McCain: 45.6
Obama: 52.9
On the Fordham study the grad student rounds up the McCain percentage 46% and rounds down the Obama percentage to 52% in order to fit Rasmussen’s last projection.
Even funnier is Rasmussen now cites this study on his wesbite as an endorsement, which shows he cares more about message than accuracy.
Just like his republican employers.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 27, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
“Of course, Fordham University could just be putting out the big lie, couldn’t they? Why don’t you look at their study and tell me what data you think they have falsfiied?”
Easy.
The prof rounded up the final vote totals for McCain and rounded down the final vote totals for Obama.
He also used the last poll taken for the Presidential Election only.
No other races were factored in.
Most political scientists would laugh at such shoddy work.
Rasmussen touts it on his website as a veneer of credibility.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 27, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
President Obama promised on the campaign trail that he would have the most transparent administration in history. As part of this commitment, he said that the public would have five days to look online and find out what was in the bills that came to his desk before he signed them. It was his first broken promise, and it’s the promise that keeps on breaking. He has now signed 11 bills into law and gone, at best, 1 for 11 on his five-day posting promise. The Obama administration should deliver on the Web-enabled transparency he promised and post bills for five days before signing.
To the thrill of technology and transparency advocates, candidate Obama promised sunlight before signing: “As president,” his campaign website said, “Obama will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days.”
But nine days after taking office, he signed a bill into law without posting it on Whitehouse.gov for five days. Since then, 10 more bills have become law over the president’s signature, and only one has been posted online for five days — and that was for five days after it cleared Congress, not after formal presentment. Two bills have been held by the White House for five days before signing — but they weren’t posted online!
Posted by: Most Transparent White House Ever. LOL | April 27, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
The Big O has a lot on his plate this week, what with the celebration of his phenomenal First 100 Days, the publication of his book documenting his First 100 Days, his weekly TV show on Wednesday, the release of the commemorative plate, coin, and stamp of his First 100 Days, the speech he’s making in St. Louis recounting his First 100 Days, and then film, fashion, and musical retrospectives of his First 100 Days.
Posted by: John Stewart | April 27, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
At what point will it be appropriate to start counting the days left?
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 27, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
I just love the fact that a right-winger can bitch and moan about the fact that Obama wasn’t quick enough to get a bill posted online for him to read. Perhaps you’ll recall that Bush and Cheney actually managed to set a record their first term in the White House for the least amount of press conferences held by a president since the advent of television – guess they were all worn out from protecting us from the terrorists. Oh, but wait a minute…that doesn’t explain why every meeting they ever attended pertaining to public energy policy has been sealed…also doesn’t explain why so many other Bush/Cheney meeting records have been sealed, even when the subject of the meeting seems pretty benign in nature.
Anyway…no, Obama hasn’t been perfectly transparent and I hope that changes, but when you compare him to his predecessors, I think it’s pretty obvious that he is at least putting forth some effort.
Posted by: EyeBallKid | April 27, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
At what point will it be appropriate to start counting the days left?
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow
————————————- We have exactly 1,354 days until January 20,2012.
Posted by: Peggy | April 27, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
At what point will it be appropriate to start counting the days left?
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow
————————————–
I’ve already started. We have exactly 1,354 days left until January 20,2012. Hopefully we will be swearing in General Petraeus as the 45th POTUS and will be rid of the Saul Alinsky Wannabe! God Bless America!
Posted by: Peggy | April 27, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm