President Obama Calls New Women-Oppressing Afghan Law “Abhorrent” — But Suggests It Won’t Change US Mission
PRAGUE — President Obama expressed opposition to a new Afghan law sanctioning the oppression of women in society Saturday, but suggested the U.S. would continue its mission in that country regardless.
The law, signed by Afghan President Hamid Karzai last week, codifies sharia, or Islamic law, creating restrictions on when women can leave their homes – saying they can only do so “for a legitimate purpose.” It would forbid wives from either being educated or employed without the express permission of their husbands.
The provision receiving the most attention requires wives to meet the sexual needs of their husbands. “Unless the wife is ill, the wife is bound to give a positive response to the sexual desires of her husband,” the law states, which critics say would legalize marital rape.
The law applies to Shiites, which represent approximately 15% of the population in Afghanistan.
“I think this law is abhorrent,” President Obama said at a news conference in Strasbourg, France, at the conclusion of a NATO Summit. “Certainly the views of the administration have been, and will be, communicated to the Karzai government. And we think that it is very important for us to be sensitive to local culture, but we also think that there are certain basic principles that all nations should uphold, and respect for women and respect for their freedom and integrity is an important principle.”
That said, Mr. Obama suggested that whatever the law stands or not will not affect his new strategy for Afghanistan, with its narrower mission. While President Bush spoke as recently as last December about creating a “flourishing democracy” in Afghanistan, his successor has stated no such goals, and in fact did not use the word “democracy” when discussing that country in his major policy address last week.
“I want everybody to understand that our focus is to defeat al Qaeda and ensure that they do not have safe havens from which they can launch attacks against the Alliance,” President Obama said.
Mr. Obama’s comments stand in contrast with those of NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, who told the BBC on Friday that NATO troops “are there to defend universal values and when I see, at the moment, a law threatening to come into effect which fundamentally violates women’s rights and human rights, that worries me.”
Added the Secretary General, “how can I defend — or how can the British government defend, the Canadian government, the Dutch government — that our boys and girls are dying there in the defense of universal values and you see a law, almost come into effect not yet there is still a possibility not to sign, which fundamentally violates women’s rights and general human rights?”
On Saturday, Karzai suggested that “the Western media have either mistranslated or taken incorrect information and then published it. If there is anything in contradiction with our Constitution or sharia, or freedoms granted by the Constitution, we will take action in close consultation with the clerics of the country.” He said he would review the law.
But experts suggest no one is mistranslating anything.
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay said in a statement that the law “is another clear indication that the human rights situation in Afghanistan is getting worse not better. Respect for women’s rights – and human rights in general – is of paramount importance to Afghanistan’s future security and development. This law is a huge step in the wrong direction.”
She said the law “is extraordinary, reprehensible and reminiscent of the decrees made by the Taliban regime in Afghanistan in the 1990s.”
Asked if US troops might be less motivated to fight such a mission, President Obama said “our troops are highly motivated to protect the United States.”
He said “we want to do everything we can to encourage and promote rule of law, human rights, the education of women and girls in Afghanistan, economic development, infrastructure development, but I also want people to understand that the first reason we are there is to root out al Qaeda so that they cannot attack members of the Alliance.”
- jpt
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
This raises some interesting questions.
Do we have the right to interfere with law making in Afghanistan?
What would the repercussion be if the law is changed by NATO or us pressure on Karzai?
Was the existence of this law known to Obama previously and is the reason he changed the policy eliminating “democracy” as a goal?
Posted by: Sigmond | April 4, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Even more interesting questions.
Why are we escalating in Afghanistan 8 years late and do we have any realistic chance of achieving our goals at this late date?
Is this another example of the support Obama gives to women’s causes?
As far as I’m concerned he’s looking more and more like G.W. Bush every day.
Posted by: jan | April 4, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
Interesting observation Sigmond. I’m not sure of the implications of one democracy telling another: “hey, you are doing it wrong.”
Posted by: Dave | April 4, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
If a nation created a law allowing the legalization of slavery should other nations interfer? If a nation creates a law allowing the raising and harvesting of humans for food…should other nations interfer?
There are certain principles and ideas that demand people of conscience to act.
We cannot sit still or idly by and do nothing when presented with causes of this nature.
When something like this arises there are only two choices to consider…
act or don’t act. There’s no in between
So yes. We should most definitely interfer if necessary on such a law that so willingly and openly supresses and harms women.
I understand the statement and concerns on such action, but to do nothing would in my opinion be worse than the consequence of doing something.
Posted by: commonsense | April 4, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
I understand Obama’s Real Politic view of the situation, but installing harsh sharia law on women is so reprehensible and against everything that we stand for that I feel that he HAS to stand up for the women. Karzai needs to know that he needs to not go back to Taliban policies.
Our troops are very valiant and will continue to do a great job to protect us. So, I don’t thin this will effect them much even if it does bother them.
Are we going to see women covered in all wool covering and girls not allowed to get an education next? That is just reprehensible.
Posted by: Tony | April 4, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Well Was the Afgan war a result of women being abused, or because they harbored terrorist who attacked us and would not turn them over?
Do we go to war because of abusive relationships? Do we go to war when millions in another country are being killed, by abusive dictators? We never have. Should we? I think not, we couldn’t.
Posted by: Thinking | April 4, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
Interesting, Iran and many other nations under sharia? Why the fuss? Or does the left just wanna be anti-war some more?
Posted by: Anthony | April 4, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
“So yes. We should most definitely interfer if necessary on such a law that so willingly and openly supresses and harms women.
How would Afghanis react if the US or NATO pressured the law change? Would we end up fighting Afghani’s, too?
It’s a dilemma, no doubt.
Posted by: Sigmond | April 4, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Hmmmmm, a situation that is just as bad as slavery warrants no action, no words, just nothing?
Just what kind of message is Obama really sending?
Posted by: ceeLeelee | April 4, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
State sanctioned rape . . . no reason we should get upset about that. This is insane policy by Obama. At least we fought for liberty and individual freedoms in Irqq.
Posted by: rplat | April 4, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
I understand these points, all of them good ones. However, we ARE there now. American military and civilian men and women are dieing in that land. As long as American blood is being spilt in their land it should be strongly suggested to them that certain ideals and concepts of basic human rights be accepted into their society and culture.
Perhaps some new ideas might be a good change.
Posted by: commonsense | April 4, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
uhm guys? this shouldn’t be a suprise to anyone who knows anything about the islamic religion. Let’s deal with the wildfire before we worry about the sparkler next to us.
Posted by: rayhagermanniraqvet | April 4, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Hmmmmm, a situation that is just as bad as slavery warrants no action, no words, just nothing?
Just what kind of message is Obama really sending?
****************************************
Why the hell aren’t we in a war in Africa then? We should have been based on your premise for the last four decades.
Posted by: Thinking | April 4, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Do we go to war because of abusive relationships?
good point. No, we shouldn’t. Afghanis should make their own laws, repugnant or not. We are after our enemies. It’s a dilemma.
Posted by: Sigmond | April 4, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
To Jake Tapper:
Hillary didn’t even know that Karzai had done this.
On Wednesday when the Belgium Foreign Minister brought it up to her Hillary wasn’t aware of this.
Isn’t she breifed on anything or does she ever research news online?
This law by Karzai and the parliament had already been in the news for weeks.
Reminds me of the time Clinton called Helen Clarke the prime minister of new zealand at the time the former prime minister.
Please report this major Clinton gaffe.
Posted by: David | April 4, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
We need to fight a war somewhere in the world or OUR economy will fail. This is why Afghanistan is vital to USA interests. War is the only thing the USA does well as a business. There will never be peace there. Its filled with opium fields, dens and husbands who have the right to rape their wives. Its an unwinnable war so we will continue it as long as possible. Rather than burn down poppy fields etc. Its keeping the U.S. economy alive!
Posted by: obamaisbad4u | April 4, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
To all of those that said Obama is not a Socialist ………….
The banks are now trying to give back our tax dollars because they no longer need the money. Obama is refusing to take it back!! The only reason he will not take it is that he is looking for Power and Control of the financial industry. Socialist. Thanks to all of you that voted for him!! …… you sold out our country. Don’t worry the rest of us will bail you out as usual.
God Bless America! God Bless Liberty!!
Posted by: JimOnTheRight | April 4, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Hillary Clinton, the US Secretary of State, became aware of it only when it was raised by her Finnish counterpart at the Afghanistan conference in The Hague on Wednesday. She is said to have raised the issue with him but without the full text President Karzai was spared her opprobrium.
Posted by: David | April 4, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
When I was growing up, it was part of the marriage law in every state (of the U.S.) that a wife could not refuse her husband. I haven’t checked recently, but it wouldn’t surprise me if that provision was still on the books in a number of states.
Posted by: tiktin | April 4, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Barky ran a sexist campaign and now you are all suprised that he won’t stand up for women. Get a clue.
Posted by: Joan | April 4, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
The Teleprompter does not care about the Afghan women. We are sending billions to rebuild the armpit of the earth and we can’t demand basic human rights? But we loan an American car company GM money and he fires the CEO. Controls the banks too. It will continue to be a haven for terror as long as liberty and freedom is absent. BOs fascist mind can’t seem to understand. History will find GWB had much more wisdom that he gets credit for.
Posted by: Craig | April 4, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
jim on the right, did you bother reading the whole story or did you just stop on the refusal part? the whole thing about the money was, like medicine that you stop to early, giving back the money would be foolish if too early and require another act of congress. joan, a bit on the sour grapes aren’t you? this is sharia, islamic law. you know, the same religion that bush said was peaceful and merely hijacked by terrorists? let’s put out the wild fire, then we’ll worry about the sparklers.
Posted by: rayhagermanniraqvet | April 4, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
I supported the war in Afghanistan because of the Taliban’s treatment of women. I find it interesting that this new Afghan law was brought in after Bush left and Obama took office. The Republican’s would never tolerate this! OF course if I were president I’d invade the Congo to stabilize the US Chocolate supplies!
Posted by: Natalie | April 4, 2009, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Though it’s unfortunate that more can’t be done for Afghan women, I think Obama got the language right here. We can’t say we’re there to provide Afghan women with safety. America’s official, primary mission has to be limited to defeating Al Queda.
However, that shouldn’t stop America’s liberal feminist community from speaking out and supporting programs to assist them. Since 2001, I haven’t heard so much as a whisper from western feminists about it.
Afghan women were bravely the first to get in the voting lines in their first election after the Taliban were toppled. NATO’s (America’s) fight against AQ is their golden opportunity to carve out a humane life for females in their country. Hopefully, they will seize the opportunity.
I understand the need to respect their cultural traditions, and that it’s a huge part of Gen. Petraeus’ approach to counterinsurgency, but there’s a big difference between culture and brutal abuse. Let’s not be swayed by the “respect their culture” rule. Either there are universal human rights, or there are not.
While Obama characterizes the priorities of our missions correctly, there’s no reason why other high-profile women couldn’t be calling attention to the problem. There are many programs here that try to help.
A country that tries to stabilize itself while persisting in tragically misogynistic practices is like trying to row a canoe with one oar. As we can see from their history, the society ends up floating in circles, going no where.
But I applaud Obama taking the time to talk about it far more than anyone else has.
Posted by: emjay | April 4, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
No one should be surprised by the status of women in Afghanistan anymore than they should be surprised by the status of women in Iran, Iraq, ad nauseum.
These “living in the Stone Ages” societies will treat women as possessions forever – as they have forever. The absence of equality for women demonstrates how invalid their “religion” is.
Posted by: saftgek | April 4, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
I suspect that every country in the world has some laws Americans would find objectionable.
Posted by: MizFW | April 4, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
The first step to peace and stability is to normalize their legal system, however keeping in mind of their
Heritage, The history of their lands should be kept in part, however in order for their Government to move forward for the full betterment of the people, They { Afghanistan Government} must be willing step forward and move ahead by Granting full Rights to a compete education and fair treatment to all both boys, Girls, Women and men alike is the only true way that the nation of Afghanistan Will ever over come it’s many problems and be a productive part of main stream in the modern World today.
I truly believe if the government of Afghanistan is not willing to do such, Then either the Union Nations – NATO or the UNITED STATES, should take them over to stabilize not only Afghanistan, but the entire region.
My personal and professional views, such as they are
Bill Adams, President.
Adams Consulting International
Posted by: Bill Adams | April 4, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Regarding your ongoing coverage of the Afghanistan situation and Obama’s appeal for NATO help. Consistently in your news stories you seem to overlook that some countries, including Canada, have been there since the conflict started. Numerous Canadians have lost their lives in this war effort and it is frustrating to hear US politicians insinuating they are handling this crisis on their own.
Regards,
Kathy
Posted by: Kathy | April 4, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
Sounds like typical islamist bullshlt. Of all the problems going on in Afghanistan I’m sure glad the idiots are confronting the real problems. We should have used the LSD bombs.
Posted by: matthew | April 4, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
Why are more soldiers going to die in Afghanistan? What about our American and ally friends and relatives who died from roadside bombs in Iraq that its friendly innocent people made after we arrived and liberated them from Saddam? Now more Americans are going to die in Afghanistan because Mr. Obama says its ok! Are we going to eradicate poppy fields? No just occupy? If we arent stopping the flow of terrorist cash via sale of opium what are we doing? How is Obama different is Obama from Bush really switch his party and skin color and you would have almost the same person doing the same poilcy.
Posted by: obamaisbad4u | April 4, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
“These “living in the Stone Ages” societies will treat women as possessions forever – as they have forever…”
While we find these laws to be backward and unjust indeed, let’s be fair. These societies are nowhere near ‘stone age’. We had slavery right here in America 150 years ago.
Posted by: Skip | April 4, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
This is ridiculous.Talk about moving right back to square one. All the problems in Afghanistan and they waste time with this. We should have used the LSD bomb.
Posted by: matthew | April 4, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
This new Afghan law is cruel and abhorrent.
But I am very happy President Obama has enough wisdom to NOT allow such disgusting law to sidetrack America from its al Queda focus. This anti-women law can and probably will be amended, but now is not the time to back off al Queda.
America was sidetracked for the past 6-years in Iraq. Yes, this anti-woman law is repugnant and repulsive, but America does not need to get sidetracked again.
Posted by: Perusing-Through | April 4, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
1. The law reflects what is already going on in the culture.
2. Our opponents, the Taleban and alQaeda are certainly no better, infact there were widespread stories of rape which surfaced after the Taleban were ousted from power.
3. There is a chance that we can influence the government to recscind the law in the sometime in the future. If we cede Afghanistan to the Taleban, there is no prospect of change.
4. Our principal reason for being in Afghanistan is our own self interest, the destruction of those who attacked us on 811 and their protectors.
We need to succeed in Afghanistan.
Posted by: Jim H | April 4, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
Obama needs to tell The Mayor of Kabul Karzai, if thats the law you are going to live by we are pulling all our troops out. Putting acid in women’s eyes. When are these people going come into the twentieth century much less the twenty first?
Posted by: 3rd party | April 4, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Al Qaeda is in Pakistan. What are we doing in Afghanistan? Obama is as bad as Bush. What are we stupid? This war isn’t about Al Qaeda or we would be in Pakistan… right?
Posted by: Cami | April 4, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Mr. Obama is getting very predictable. Something in the news that people is showing outrage. A day or two later, Mr. Obama would make a statement, “I am outrageous with what happens; we should work together.” Then a few weeks later, nothing is accomplished and everything is forgotten then another outrageous story capture the media attention, then the cycle begins again.
Posted by: young_voter | April 4, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
bush and the right would have ‘used’ this afghan law to cease alternates to out and out war… thankfully obama isn’t such a war monger
Posted by: earth_not_flat | April 4, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
That’s because all Obama has are “words, just words.”
Most of us already know that Obama’s words are not worth anything.
Posted by: ceeLeelee | April 4, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
That said — I think it’s abhorent, but, gosh, i’ll be a waffle anytime. Cuz that’s what I am. A do-nothing waffle.
Posted by: Lizzie | April 4, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Until governments figure out that you have to separate religion from governing you will continue to see situations like the one in Afghanistan. Bush may have messed up but his basic idea was correct. A thriving democracy in Iraq would be a great model for other nations in the area. The problem is that these countries, including Iraq, cannot force themselves to separate religion from government. Get the Taliban and get out and continue to help Iraq form some sort of democracy.
Posted by: ms1236 | April 4, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
That said — I think it’s abhorent, but, gosh, i’ll be a waffle anytime. Cuz that’s what I am. A do-nothing waffle.
****************************************
Yea, Yea, so we go to war with every Muslim country in the world because we don’t like the way they treat women. You really think we can win that one do you? So now we fight wars on a cultural base. To hell with strategic interests.
How foolish your argument is.
Posted by: Thinking | April 4, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
I am very glad President Obama has the wisdom to limit his mission in Afghanistan to something definable and just possibly, achievable. We cannot really change the social customs and Dark Ages religious mentality of people who have no other frame of reference, and are totally brainwashed by their trusted leaders. The hope might come in the next generation, or the one after that, as the world grows inevitabley smaller and more intertwined. Some young Afghans may observe that we are not their enemy. they may have to quietly file away that impression until they reach their own adulthood. Very slowly, we can hope for change. Until then, we can be grateful for the blessings of a free country, where mothers, sisters, daughters, wives, friends and lovers are encouraged to reach for their own fulfillment, and respected for their own contributions to society.
Posted by: Phoenix Lady | April 4, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
To all of those that said Obama is not a Socialist ..
The banks are now trying to give back our tax dollars because they no longer need the money. Obama is refusing to take it back!! The only reason he will not take it is that he is looking for Power and Control of the financial industry. Socialist
*******************************************
LMAO – Jim on the FAR FAR right. See if they have a dictionary there so you can have some knowledge of what a Socialist is – and it ISN’T Obama.. Sorry to burst your bubble.
Posted by: Huh?.. | April 4, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
POSTED BY COMMONSENSE:
“So yes. We should most definitely interfer if necessary on such a law that so willingly and openly supresses and harms women”.
“I understand the statement and concerns on such action, but to do nothing would in my opinion be worse than the consequence of doing something.”
= = = = = = = = =
Dear Commonsense,
Your logic sounds noble but is not WISE. Also, your assumption is that President Obama is doing nothing regarding that anti-woman law. This is flat out wrong! You need to pay attention!
(1.)
This repulsive and disgusting law is primarily supported by Taliban extremist. The Taliban pushed this law to sow seeds of division between pro-President Hamid Karzai supporters and pro-Taliban supporters, with hopes that the Afghan men will vote Hamid out-of-office if he oppose the new law. With Karzai out of office, a candidate more sympathetic to Taliban and al Queda will win. COMMONSENSE, IS THIS WHAT YOU REALLY WANT FOR THE WOMEN OF AFGHANISTAN; IS FOR THE TALIBAN TO BE IN-CHARGE AND THEREBY SEND WOMEN FURTHER BACK TO THE STONE AGE?
(2.)
President Obama is providing “ACTION” for Afghan women that will help lead to the elimination of this law. Again Commonsense, you lack the wisdom to see further down the road.
Obama’s “ACTION” (as oppose to IN-ACTION) is in the form of helping Hamid Karzai to root out al Queda and those Taliban extremist that harbor al Queda members. With al Queda eliminated and Taliban extremist neutralized, Hamid Karzai can eliminate laws that treat Afghan women as second-class citizens.
DON’T FORGET = = Commonsense is a good thing, BUT WISDOM is a far better jewel.
May GOD Bless the United States of America!
May GOD Bless the “Obama-Biden-Clinton-Gates” Leadership Team!
Posted by: Perusing-Through | April 4, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Is this what Biden meant when he warned Americans to “gird their loins” because Obama would make the wrong decisions when confronted with crisis.
So far Obama hasn’t met a crisis he didn’t bow down and roll over for.
The Afghanis never would have dared to pass a law subjecting women to physical abuse and death when President Bush was in office. Especially considering that they are our puppet government. But they know that Obama is weak and timid and they knew he would meekly roll over and allow the Afghani women to be beaten and killed. We have to respect Islamic culture and all, right? Because if we don’t, then they will hate us and try to attack us, right?
Posted by: Welcome Back Jimmy Carter | April 4, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Think about it. Judging by him committing more troops to Afghanistan with no clear purpose, not to free its people, advance womens rights and democracy, not to stop the flow and growing of opium. Obama appears to be George Bush in blackface military policy-wise but without showing good judgement, insulting us, not promoting freedom and democracy to Afghanistan & acting like U.S. President and statesman should. He is saying we want to deny Al-Qaeda and the Taliban safe-haven but its ok if Afghan citizens rape their wives. We arent here to free them like G.W. Bush would. I’m just Obama dont you just love me Europe and NATO? Obama what a humanitarian. What a joke!
Posted by: paulieshere2 | April 4, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Well HEY! We have all sorts of ‘partners’ we’ve had to do business with, Communists to make our electronic toys, Nazis to help boost our economy, dictatorships we’ve had to support to get what we want. But hey, WE’RE a ‘democracy’ and our hands are clean!
Posted by: HedgeHoggie | April 4, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
As long as Islam exists in militant form, it is a danger to freedom — anywhere.
Posted by: tanarg | April 4, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
The mission is to destroy Al-Quada and kill Bin-Laden. Everything else is secondary. Obama is 100% correct. We will not be distracted!
Posted by: Common Sense | April 4, 2009, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
Janet – Oh yes the MSM should latch on to this latest right wing talking point and report it widely. There’s so many of them – how can they keep up?
btw – do you think Odinga and Pastor Muthee hang out together?
Posted by: stop the Nonsense | April 4, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Welcome Back Jimmy Carter-
It was Bush and his D..k who install this guy. Or you forget that.
Posted by: Albert K. | April 4, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
To the poster who said the Afghans would never have allowed laws mistreating women to be passed under President Bush, who are you kidding? The radical Muslim view of women is rooted in oppression that has taken place for a millenium. This has never been an “enlightened” society. President Bush made limited headway with the politicians he had placed in power. Behind the scenes, the abuses and “honor killings” continued unchecked. To blame Obama for not wanting to beat our collective heads against a stone wall, costing untold lives that might not have to be lost, is to fly in the face of reason, just to spite our president, and to undermine the real and necessary mission in Afghanistan.
Posted by: Phoenix Lady | April 4, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
“I feel that he HAS to stand up for the women.” Tony
No, Tony, he doesn’t have to stand up for women. This is a man who flipped off Hillary Clinton during a campaign speech. This man doesn’t have respect for women. He doesn’t even have respect for his own Kool-aid drinkers. He thinks they’re stupid, and he’s right.
Posted by: Janet | April 4, 2009, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Hmmm, is ‘zat so????
How ’bout ACORN?
ROFLMAO!
The only “pants on fire” are Obama’s. Don’t stand too close to him – yours might catch on fire too.
Posted by: ceeLeelee | April 4, 2009, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
This is a man who flipped off Hillary Clinton during a campaign speech. This man doesn’t have respect for women.
*********************************
How do you flip someone off with two fingers (clearly shown in the photo) while scratching your face?
No respect for women? So the signing of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair pay act into law is what? chauvinistic?
Janet – you are quite the right wing extremist with no regard for the truth or your country.
Posted by: stop the Nonsense | April 4, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
How ’bout ACORN?
ROFLMAO!
**************************
Acorn – the right winger boogyman – You said it best
ROFLMAO!
Posted by: stop the Nonsense | April 4, 2009, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
“Acorn – the right winger boogyman – You said it best
ROFLMAO!”
Um, I am no right winger.
However, I am glad you are laughing with me. Prepare to laugh some more in the coming months. We will be sharing much more with you and it won’t be nonsense. :D
Posted by: ceeLeelee | April 4, 2009, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
“Acorn – the right winger boogyman – You said it best
ROFLMAO!”
Um, I am no right winger.
However, I am glad you are laughing with me. Prepare to laugh some more in the coming months. We will be sharing much more with you and it won’t be nonsense. :D
Posted by: ceeLeelee | April 4, 2009, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
The President should be impeached and forced from office for forcing American soldiers to fight for these beliefs.
Posted by: dougx | April 5, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am
We must bring an end to “Manifest Destiny” in countries that don’t want to be Christianized, or have numerous versions of Christian faiths bombard countries just to mandate “Manifest Destiny”. Americans pushed Manifest Destiny onto native Indians, and anyone who came into American paths in the growth of America. American women of the New Frontier wanted to give manners lessons as well as teach Christian religion to those who were different.
There are reasons for multiculturalism in the world. God did not make us one of a kind, but made us in His likeness, meaning in His Spirit, not looks, not religion, not faith, but in His goodness. Christians aren’t the only ones who are “good”. There are many great people in all religions, countries, and cultures, therefore, we must be willing to respect other religions and cultures in their respective regions and countries.
As we took measures in America to bring change for women’s rights, women in other countries have the same rights to challenge their laws as well, if they so choose. Are there risks, yes many. If these cultures want to make changes, they will do so for their own freedoms, not placed upon them by other countries.
Posted by: Gg51 | April 5, 2009, 12:39 am 12:39 am
Republican term for democracy is “Manifest Destiny”, conversing Christian religion with you, “wink, wink”. These type of Christians spreading Manifest Destiny actually defeat the purpose of the meaning and philosophy of Christianity in the world.
Posted by: Gg51 | April 5, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am
commonsense, since the beginning of time human beings have been considered food to cultures. In the days of the Vikings, if they didn’t like someone, that person or those persons were dinner that night. This practice continues in some countries and cultures in the 21st century — it’s reality. Fortunately in civilized America, it’s forbidden.
Posted by: Gg51 | April 5, 2009, 12:49 am 12:49 am
dougx, we are fighting to cease the existence of al quada, and not “Republicanized” Afghanistan. Sorry pal, Bush.Cheney are out, the “Manifest Destiny” duo.
Posted by: Gg51 | April 5, 2009, 12:52 am 12:52 am
Obama is right once again. We are not there to impose Western values in Afghanistan. Nor are we there drag Afghanistan kicking and screaming into the 21st century. We are there to prevent Afghanistan from returning to a haven and training ground for terrists wishing to attack the US and other countries around the world. We can offer non-military assistance to increase their economic and governmental infrastructure, and provide alternatives to growing poppies and narco-trafficking.
Posted by: w_roos | April 5, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am
So I guess Obama ‘likes’ muslims and islam so much that its ok to let millions of Afghan women and children suffer so we can ‘find Bin Laden’ (who may be dead) and ‘root out Al-qaeda’ how? We arent freeing their people and burning the poppy fields or cutting off the flow of cash to Al-Qaeda. What do you mean we wont be distracted? We are distracted! Distracted from being a real American like in World War II? We freed everyone. We killed the bad guys. End of story! Why cant we do that now? Political correctness? Its an islamo-fasicist trick!
Posted by: obamaisbad4u | April 5, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am
Islam isn’t the problem but extremist in any form is — extreme Christianity and extreme Islam are the very same — religions of control and hatred towards others who are different.
Posted by: Gg51 | April 5, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am
So we are going to ‘provide alternatives’ to narco-trafficking in Afghanistan – but not STOP it right? Stupid!
Posted by: paulieshere2 | April 5, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am
obamaisbad4u, what did Bush.Cheney do about all the American women who were stolen and sold in human traffic for sex and drugs during their reign? What about the young woman who lived in Italy who was killed? What about the Alabama high school senior who was stolen? How many run aways in Las Vegas and LA become in that number, all under Bush.Cheney’s reign? How many? The numbers were staggering.
Posted by: Gg51 | April 5, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am
paulieshere2, just look around your own neighborhood. Certainly you don’t live in the “perfect” city in America, or do you? Individuals like you always point the finger and so unprepared when three fingers are pointing at you.
Posted by: Gg51 | April 5, 2009, 1:05 am 1:05 am
Yet North Korea starves their people, while blustering and threatening for concessions from the world. Whom will we first take to task?
Posted by: Nick | April 5, 2009, 1:09 am 1:09 am
Press “full court” sanctions on North Korea, and do the same with Iran if they pull any “cute” similar measures as North Korea has recently done. America is after Osama bin Laden, and won’t rest until he is found and disposed.
Posted by: Gg51 | April 5, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am
Nick, if you know anything about strategies, you will know that we mix it up — sometimes zone, and sometimes man to man. Always find out the opponents’ weakness, and play only to win against the weakness. Wear down the opponent. America only has one option — win on all fronts. It’s all mental, physical, and spiritual.
Posted by: Gg51 | April 5, 2009, 1:20 am 1:20 am
Tony, one of the reasons this law has been enforced is to protect the women from harm, preparing for one more war in their country. During a war, women who have more freedoms are more targets than under specific laws. Therefore, having to have relations with one husband versus many strangers is more logical. Do I agree with their law, of course not, but if it protects these women from extreme harm and harsh punishments and violence, then so be it. Ceasing Al Quada is the main goal and mission at hand.
Posted by: Gg51 | April 5, 2009, 1:30 am 1:30 am
As in the movies Home Alone, Kevin says before the house crooks invade his abodes “Don’t get scared now”. As women were left to continue the needs of the homestead in the “old West”, women had to say to themselves and their children “Don’t get scared now”. They had to be tough and lead their families with unbelieveable strengths in their husband’s or man’s absence. These same strengths were seen in women during WWI and WWII. Women must realize that standing up, being strong, and utilizing mental, physical, and spiritual strengths are very feminine. Being weak isn’t an option. Being strong for the men in our lives assists them in knowing they can be stronger, better, and do the right things without worrying about any weaknesses in us. Strong women make strong men. Let’s work together in building greatness and getting the jobs at hand done. Winning is our only option.
Posted by: Gg51 | April 5, 2009, 1:45 am 1:45 am
Democrats…forget about BUSH. I have yet to hear any Democrat either compare Obama to a Republican other than Bush OR reply to a Republican blog with anything other that pure hatred because of the quote- “last 8 years” -just stop and think. Stop letting your judgement be cloud3ed with anger. Human rights (especially womens) should be held to the highest accountability standards during any American operations. Hold Obama accountable for not caring just as much as you helf Bush accountable for not caring. TO THINE OWN SELF BE TRU!
Posted by: PLEASE | April 5, 2009, 3:24 am 3:24 am
this is treating women as slaves. this law is horrible, I hope the Afghan men will stop oppressing women.
Posted by: guest | April 5, 2009, 3:59 am 3:59 am
obamaisbad4u, this isn’t WW2 where there are victims in death camps who are asking anybody they can to help get them out of death camps and etc. Al-quaeda gives them free schools, they aren’t forcing them into slave labor death camps. the poorer people along with extremists are kind of cooperating with al-quaeda who is obviously an enemy of America, which is why American politicians keep saying the answer isn’t just military, the poor people need more options, more schools (not just schools that teach hate), etc… this isn’t WW2!!
Posted by: this isn't WW2 | April 5, 2009, 4:08 am 4:08 am
Mr.Obama, I think you had better pay attention to North Korea rather than worry about Afghan women covering their faces.
Posted by: Mihann | April 5, 2009, 4:36 am 4:36 am
of course it doesn’t matter! we need to focus on safeguarding those opiate/heroin fields in afghanistan that the cia has been funneling here to the states for decades!!! karzai gets his cut too… of course obama is once again OUTRAGED, but he knows what the puppet masters have ordered him to do…
Posted by: bhudda flii | April 5, 2009, 6:08 am 6:08 am
Messing in politics and cultures is not the business of any president!!! It certainly is not in the best interests of Obama to interfer in this matter even though it’s unacceptable to our beliefs. Better he should pay attention to matters affecting US security and also focus on the good that Americans do rather than insult them in a world-wide speech!!
Posted by: lallen | April 5, 2009, 6:48 am 6:48 am
He is right (in this instance), we cannot save a people from themselves. This mission isn’t about the Afghans but more about their unwanted visitors and their next door neighbors.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 5, 2009, 7:08 am 7:08 am
You guys are crazy to not say Afghanistan should be a free democracy and we are trying to stop Al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda is an ‘idea’ we may have stopped what the Nazi’s were doing but arent there still neo-nazi’s all over the world to this day? Why let give these people the right to rape their wives and grow and ship us heroin unless the USA/CIA has a hand in it? Dont you think Al-Qaeda makes money from the opium they grow in Afghanistan its 90% of their gross national product for God sake! Why dont those people deserve to be free? We set up Karzai as their government. We did. The USA. You can say George Bush didnt help this one or that one but guess what hes not in charge anymore! Obama is! This is North Korea and Afghanistan testing the waters to see what they can get away with they know Obama is being too politically correct to other countries and tied to it.
Posted by: obamaisbad4u | April 5, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
I am ashamed that some of you people call yourselve Americans and say whats going on in Afghanistan or any other not-free country is ok! You dont believe in American ideals. You probably werent born here so you didnt have American history class. You arent an American! You just live here.
Posted by: paulieshere2 | April 5, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
A good point was made earlier: Did we go to Afghanistan to root out al Queda that was being protected by the Taliban or, did we go there to give women rights and change their laws?
Posted by: Sigmond | April 5, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm