By Caitlin Taylor

Apr 7, 2009 9:36am

President Obama to Europe: Sorry About the Bush Years*

ABC News’ Jake Tapper and Karen Travers report:

ISTANBUL — "I know there have been some difficulties in recent years," President Obama said today at a town hall meeting with Turkish high school and college students." In some ways, that foundation has been weakening. We’ve had some specific differences over policy, but we’ve also at times lost the sense that both of our countries are in this together — that we have shared interests and shared values and that we can have a partnership that serves our common hopes and common dreams. So I came here to renew that foundation and to build on it."

As he’s traveled throughout Europe this past week, from the G-20 economic summit in London, to the NATO conference in Strasbourg, France, to here in Turkey, President Obama has not only made clear his policy differences with his predecessor, and his markedly different diplomatic style, he has made it clear to Europe and the rest of the world that his respect for the way President Bush conducted foreign policy knows bounds.

"America is a critical actor and leader on the world stage," President Obama said at the conclusion of the G-20 summit in London, asked how he differs with President Bush on international relations. "We shouldn’t be embarrassed about that," he said, but he added "we exercise our leadership best when we are listening; when we recognize that the world is a complicated place and that we are going to have to act in partnership with other countries; when we lead by example; when we show some element of humility and recognize that we may not always have the best answer, but we can always encourage the best answer and support the best answer."

These principles, of course, are direct contrasts with the way President Obama has in the past criticized President Bush: that he too often lectured and seldom listened; that he saw the world in black-and-white; that he had no compunction in acting unilaterally; that he besmirched the American brand; and that his administration embodied American arrogance.

President Obama’s expressions of regret for the Bush years is only one aspect of what has been jam-packed schedule full of announcements and negotiations, but it’s been a striking part of his message.

Some conservative critics have expressed chagrin at this. On Fox News, conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer said "When Kennedy arrived in Paris, he did not attack Eisenhower and the United States. When Obama’s elected president, he is president of all of the United States, including Americans who opposed him, and he owns American history, including a past he may not have wanted to engage in. I think what he did is, in order to gain the adoration of the crowd, he denigrated his country in a way that I think is disgraceful."

The Obama White House sees it quite differently, pointing to poll numbers showing an erosion of support for the U.S. during President Bush’s two terms, and improved international poll numbers now.

Not only was this trip an opportunity for President Obama "to establish personal relationships with leaders of many countries, with leaders who are going to be important to us in promoting America’s interest in the world," said White House senior adviser David Axelrod Tuesday morning, "as important, we’ve I think begun a dialogue with the people of these countries, as well… That will make it easier for leaders of these nations to work cooperatively with us moving forward is the fact that we have a more positive image among their constituents."

Axelrod said "that plainly is true — you can see it in all the polling that’s been released in the last few days — I think in every country in Europe, we’ve made progress in this."

The first expression of regret during this trip came on April 1.

"Over the last several years the relationship between our two countries has been allowed to drift," President Obama said as he announced a July summit with Russian President Dmintry Medvedev, announcing that relations would now hopefully improve.

That same day, asked about the financial crisis, President Obama said "if you look at the sources of this crisis, the United States certainly has some accounting to do with respect to a regulatory system that was inadequate to the massive changes that had taken place in the global financial system."

At a town hall meting in Strasbourg, France, the president told the European crowd, "we’ve allowed our Alliance to drift. I know that there have been honest disagreements over policy, but we also know that there’s something more that has crept into our relationship. So I’ve come to Europe this week to renew our partnership, one in which America listens and learns from our friends and allies."

"Over the last seven, eight years," he said, "a lot of tensions have developed between the United States and Europe…There have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive" toward Europe. "In Europe, there is an anti-Americanism that is at once casual but can also be insidious. Instead of recognizing the good that America so often does in the world, there have been times where Europeans chose to blame America for much of what’s bad," Obama said.

And speaking to Turkish Parliament Monday, President Obama acknowledged "differences about whether to go to war" in Iraq. "I know there have been difficulties these last few years. I know that the trust that binds the United States and Turkey has been strained, and I know that strain is shared in many places where the Muslim faith is practiced. So let me say this as clearly as I can: The United States is not, and will never be, at war with Islam."

After the G-20 summit the President said he  hoped he would "set a tone internationally" where other nations "give us the benefit of the doubt… At least we can start with the notion that we’re prepared to listen and to work cooperatively with countries around the world."

Referring to his campaign statements about "very specific decisions that the previous administration had made that I believed had lowered our standing in the world," the president said, "I would like to think that with my election and the early decisions that we’ve made, that you’re starting to see some restoration of America’s standing in the world."

– Jake Tapper and Karen Travers

* This headline was mistakenly put in quotations; obviously the president never said that, it was meant to express the sentiment of his remarks. Apologies for any misunderstanding.

User Comments

Charles Krauthammer a neoconservative who led the cheering section for Bush and Cheney to invade Iraq. Just like that idiot Bill Kristol. David Brooks is the only pundit worth saving from that sorry bunch.

Posted by: Eleanor Clift Fan | April 7, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Mr. Obama is an honest, forthright individual who has done more to engage and calm the world in the short time he has been president than his predecesor did in 8 yaers. What’s wrong with telling the truth and not hiding things under the carpet. The American people can take it.

Posted by: Movn1 | April 7, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am

I wish he would use some of his popularity to point out some of the good America’s done.
If you read his Bush’s speech in Instanbul in 2004, it could have been the one Obama gave yesterday. Complete with the talk of the bridge between the East and West and praise for Turkish basketball players.
The Iraq war was tough, but so was life under Saddam. The Taliban mistreated Afghanis. Under Bush we pushed for Turkey’s entry into NATO, we provided aid to Tsunami victims in Asia, we provided aid to earthquake victims in Pakistan and Iran. And you know, these countries weren’t all that nice to us all the time.
This President needs to praise some of the good recent things we’ve done before he was President (more recent than Lincoln building the railroad and FDR’s new deal).

Posted by: MayBee | April 7, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

GIVE ACT
The words “mandatory” appear in this House version on page 43 and on page285 .
SEC. 6104. DUTIES. b 6 (6) Whether a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people could be developed, and how such a requirement could be implemented in a manner that would strengthen the social fabric of the Nation and overcome civic challenges by bringing together people from diverse economic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds.
Here is the full text of the 13th Amendment:
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime where of the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2. Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
————–
I think this is the second amendment that Congress has pissed on.

Posted by: thosewerethegodolddays | April 7, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am

I certainly didn’t agree with Bush about very much, almost nothing, in fact, but I do not think it serves America well to have a new president denigrate his predecessor.
Is this the new way? Will it now be acceptable for Obama’s successor criticize him publicly, overseas, because that president almost certainly won’t agree with Obama’s policies, or the embarrassing manner in which the Obamas represent the US overseas? Obama still thinks this is all about him. He really does not seem to understand his position, representing ALL Americans, not just the Obamabots who cheerlead for him constantly. He does not listen, he is too arrogant to think he needs to, but it makes a nice sound-bite, doesn’t it?
I never supported the invasion of Iraq, but a very large percentage of Americans did support it. You may all lkie to forget that now, but most of you thought it was a great idea at the time. You were as unable, or unwilling, to think independently then as many of you are now. And, of course, the media has served us poorly for many years. In that area, Jake deserves praise for trying to get answers to serious questions.

Posted by: Keith | April 7, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

America’s new boy king, Barack Obama, has brought his charm offensive to Turkey. Wasn’t it just a few days ago that he was posing for cameras at the G20 and offering half-baked ideas about rogue capitalism and stimulus packages, European cooperation and more NATO troops for Afghanistan? With great fanfare, and many more photo-ops he rejoiced that, unlike his first magical mystery tour to Pakistan in 1981, he could enter an Islamic country with an American passport.
It’s easy to see why, like Bush before him, Obama is currying favor with the Turks. The military and the oil men want him to. Israel wants him to. And why shouldn’t he smooth over the rift.
Turkey can be an interlocutor among Egypt, Hamas, Syria, Israel, Palestine. Then, there’s pesky Iran. Operation pincher. Iran between the nutcrackers of Iraq, Turkey, Afghanistan. How long will it be before someone insists there, too, are weapons of mass destruction.
What does King Obama offer Turkey in exchange for her delights? Entry into the European Union. Obama has offered Turkey, in his churlishly arrogant way, Europe’s hand in marriage; whether the Europeans like it or not. Europe has strongly intimated that it does not want a shotgun marriage. Turkey is not Western enough and certainly not Christian. Being tacitly secular, for a former Islamic state, is not enough. Europe is full to the gills with undigested Muslims. Why doesn’t Obama offer the Turks American citizenship?
One other pesky problem: the Armenian genocide, which the Turks deny and the Armenians and the rest of the world avow. During the campaign for the presidency, Obama’s website stated the the Armenian genocide was an “admitted fact”. A House resolution is slated, yet again, to deal with the question of the massacres that cost 1.5 million Armenian lives during WWI. But it is currently being reported that “no one can predict” what the little king’s expedient stance will be now that he as been elected.

Posted by: frombadtoworse | April 7, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am

When blaming the previous administration ceases to poll well, the administration will stop doing so.

Posted by: mad | April 7, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am

It takes a bigger man to apologize. Only the midget minds would never do so. President Obama understands that before anything get better….you have to have humility. I teaches this everyday to my patients that has been “broken”. Strength comes with humility. God bless our President.

Posted by: sngeorgia | April 7, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

what the HELL is going on ??
making deals with the devil in muslim countries?
calling human rights an ideal not a priority?
defending child rapists and murderers because they’re black?
writing that rape is a cultural construction that must be understood in context?
refusing to call honor killings what they are?
glorifying the stepford wives of the G 20?
this is a wicked mix of ugliness . . .

Posted by: wehaveaproblem | April 7, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am

The more I get to know President Obama the more I’m glad I decided to vote for him. Been a Republican all my life, but decided in the voting booth it was time for a change. I haven’t been disappointed. I think he’s representing the best of America and he’s making at least this old Harley rider proud.

Posted by: harleyrider | April 7, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am

First- Mr. Tapper and Ms. Travers, well written article- even handed, factual, and totally devoid of the annoying cheer leading for barky present in AP “analysis” pieces.
From the article:
“There have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive”
Well, this stuttering moron would know a thing or twenty about arrogance and dismissive/derisive behavior. “I’m going to trump you on that..I won” or “I’m the only thing standing between you and the pitchforks”- yeah, that’s some diplomatic, humble talk right there.
“he hoped he would “set a tone internationally” where other nations “give us the benefit of the doubt…”
And he is a delusional boob if he really hopes that. “Benefit of the doubt…”? What is he, 12? Has he read a history book, ever? The euros do not like us, haven’t in 40 to 50 years (minimum), and will go down under sharia law in the next 20, hating us all the while.
“with my election and the early decisions that we’ve made, that you’re starting to see some restoration of America’s standing in the world.”
So simply because jugears the stupid got elected, our standing in the world began being restored- what was that about arrogance again?
Early decisions – Well, sucking up to the euros then dropping a trillion more we don’t have into the IMF definitely made jugears the cool new kid- for a while, until everyone needs more lunch money. And I don’t think the Czechs and the Poles are too happy with him these days.
I just don’t know that what he did over there was constructive- I’d call it more…what’s the phrase in Austrian again? Ah, nevermind.

Posted by: 2Brixshy | April 7, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Who and what else caused these problems. President Obama did this all in 75 days. The fact is simple…this world was not in chaos until the Dummie took office via a court.

Posted by: sngeorgia | April 7, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Arrogrance..at it’s best over the last 8 years…don’t believe this ole broad, ask the world! Thanks Mr. President for you strength, courage and intelligence. You clearly know that humility is a sign of STRENGTH not weakness. The wingnuts are confused and don’t have a clue…..aren’t these folks the ones who “yells” their faith and religion? Sorry, but my faith and religion teaches me all about Humility.

Posted by: sngeorgia | April 7, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am

People make up America….she is not perfect……….read it’s history. Until the imperfections are admitted and accepted…..those who choose to ignore it, will remain the same. Nothing changes, nothing changes!

Posted by: sngeorgia | April 7, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am

“what the HELL is going on ??
making deals with the devil in muslim countries?
calling human rights an ideal not a priority?
defending child rapists and murderers because they’re black?
writing that rape is a cultural construction that must be understood in context?
refusing to call honor killings what they are?
glorifying the stepford wives of the G 20?
this is a wicked mix of ugliness . . .”
It is also a complete fabrication.

Posted by: silky | April 7, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

it’s one thing to apologize for our actions and claim that we are trying to make things right…it’s another to say ‘it was all HIS fault.’ if he wants to apologize, fine…but quit pointing the finger…that is what he has done on every issue so far…how long will the ‘the previous administration caused this’ excuse be used?
how many times do people need to be reminded that obama was a senator prior to becoming president. he voted on the stimulus bills, budgets, etc…but nothing thus far has been his fault at all. he ‘inherited’ everything…even though he had a vote.

Posted by: stdntDrvr | April 7, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am

People make up America….she is not perfect……….read it’s history. Until the imperfections are admitted and accepted…..those who choose to ignore it, will remain the same. Nothing changes, nothing changes!
============
We aren’t perfect, but we aren’t unworthy of praise, either. There is a lot of good in America, and there was before Obama took office.

Posted by: MayBee | April 7, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Charles Krauthammer both you and Bush along with your neoconservative supporters own Iraq. Think about that!
Also Ike’s granddaughter Susan Eisenhower is a Obamacan who threw her support to Obama when he needed support last year.
Charles Krauthammer we challenge you to go on The Rachel Maddow Show! Hell throw in Karl Rove too. Rachel can take you both on at the same time!

Posted by: Daniel | April 7, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am

“Over the last seven, eight years,” he said, “a lot of tensions have developed between the United States and Europe…”
Oh! really, no wonder many of those European countries ended up electing more pro-American government during the Bush years
By next year this time, Obama will not be able to use “I inherited” excuse anymore…I wonder who he is going to blame then?

Posted by: frieda | April 7, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Referring to his campaign statements about “very specific decisions that the previous administration had made that I believed had lowered our standing in the world,” the president said, “I would like to think that with my election and the early decisions that we’ve made, that you’re starting to see some restoration of America’s standing in the world.”
——
Well now you piece of work, beg for troops for more war…..OIL is IT and always will be about the OIL. You are a bigger BUSH than BUSH. WAR without end, LIAR!

Posted by: warmonger | April 7, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am

sngeorgia you are so right, keep up the good work!

Posted by: Darryl the Contractor | April 7, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am

at least under bush the stupid TARP program required congressional approval, which allows the citizens to hold their representatives accountable eventually for their actions. . .
the latest TARP-like bank bailouts are being done extra-congressionally through workarounds cooked up by the white house, treasury, and the FDIC which means NO CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL REQUIRED. . .
very scary.

Posted by: veryveryscary | April 7, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Hey Jake,
I read the article and i saw nowhere where Obama is directly quoted saying “SOrry for Bush Years.” I am a fan of both Bush and Obama. I think it would be appropriate if you changed the title to this blog. It is misleading. I’m a fan of you and the work you do.

Posted by: peter | April 7, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am

GIVE ACT
The words “mandatory” appear in this House version on page 43 and on page285 .
SEC. 6104. DUTIES. b 6 (6) Whether a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people could be developed, and how such a requirement could be implemented in a manner that would strengthen the social fabric of the Nation and overcome civic challenges by bringing together people from diverse economic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds.
Here is the full text of the 13th Amendment:
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime where of the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2. Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
————–
I think this is the second amendment that Congress has ###### on.

Posted by: givemeabreak | April 7, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am

How humble is humility which is constantly trumpeted by the humble one?

Posted by: mad | April 7, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

US Recovery Is Far Off, Banks Are ‘Basically Insolvent’: Soros
The U.S. economy is in for a “lasting slowdown” and could face a Japan-style period of relatively low growth coupled with high inflation, billionaire investor George Soros said on Monday.
Soros, speaking to Reuters Financial Television, also warned that rescuing U.S. banks could turn them into “zombies” that draw the lifeblood of the economy, prolonging the economic slowdown.
An announcement from President SOROS!

Posted by: WALL STREET IS BAILED | April 7, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am

What exactly is different from when the Messiah left?
Do we have more allies in Afghanistan like he promised?
Are we all comfy with Tehran?
Did he stare down the North Koreans into not launching that missile?
Words. All lefties need are words. Substance matters not. Achievement matters not.
No wonder this country is going to hell.

Posted by: drjohn | April 7, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Obama is the worst advertisement for the United States.
Obama tries to build himself up by putting the rest of America down.

Posted by: Will Stanton | April 7, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Obama trip:
He wanted more money from the Europeans in the economic bailout. They said “NO”.
Grade for Obama: Failure.
At the NATO meeting he wanted more combat troops for Afghanistan. The European response: “NO!”.
Grade for Obama: Failure.
Obama gives a speech about disarming the US nuclear deterrance.
In response North Korea shoots off a missile one day capable of hitting the US with a nuke.
Grade for Obama: “Failure”.
Other than fluffy press for Obama and Michelle, the substance of the trip was failure.

Posted by: Sally J | April 7, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Soros is doing very nicely. Everything Obama does seems to make Soros money.
Hmmmm

Posted by: drjohn | April 7, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am

i hear Obama described by the radical right haters as “arrogant” constantly.. if he were white this would never be mentioned…he would just be considered “confident.” when a black man show self-confidence, pride and high achievement he is considered “arrogant.” but consider the source and origin of “arrogant” in reference to Obama (Limbaugh, O’Reilly, Fox et al).

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Sally J—and Bush was such a success. the president doesn’t own the world. your post doesn’t reflect the nuance in what happened in Europe or the gains made. diplomacy is not a pass/fail as your post would reflect, quite the opposite. but hey just cut and paste O’Reilly and Limbaugh and you won’t even have to attempt to think. “FAIL” lol.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

i hear Obama described by the radical right haters as “arrogant” constantly.. if he were white this would never be mentioned…he would just be considered “confident.”
========================================
REALLY??? Then Bush policy was “confident” rather than arrogant and Bush was a “confident cowboy” rather than an “arrogant cowboy”?
Bush being white and all…

Posted by: mad | April 7, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am

“Other than fluffy press for Obama and Michelle, the substance of the trip was failure.”
Not really. They knew what they were going to get going in. I think the goal was to lay the ground work for future dialogues. That goal was reached with flying colors.

Posted by: silky | April 7, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

I believe the Jeremiah Wright comment is hitting the nail on the head.
Obama claims he wasn’t sitting there paying close attention but it is obvious Obamas teleprompter was.
This weeks anti American rhetoric of arrogant Americans was from the Wright pulpit.
Have you ever heard an American president, especially while on foreign soil bash the previous President as Obama does? It really is disgraceful whether or not you agree with Bush he was an elected US president. Representative of the Constitution of this country.
He bows to the King of Saudia Arabia and their policies and bashes the former
Presidents of the USA ??
Something is terribly wrong here.

Posted by: Wrong YOU got it wrong | April 7, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

sally j
“Obama trip:
He wanted more money from the Europeans in the economic bailout. They said “NO”.”
Actually $1 trillion, nice try though, back to Hannity you go
Grade for Obama: A
At the NATO meeting he wanted more combat troops for Afghanistan. The European response: “NO!” (please cite quotes of nations that said “no”.
Grade for Obama:
Obama gives a speech about disarming the US nuclear deterrance.”
Russia and US agreed to arms limitation and better relations are restored between the two countries
Grade for Obama: A

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

“Sally J—and Bush was such a success. the president doesn’t own the world. your post doesn’t reflect the nuance in what happened in Europe or the gains made. diplomacy is not a pass/fail as your post would reflect, quite the opposite. but hey just cut and paste O’Reilly and Limbaugh and you won’t even have to attempt to think. “FAIL” lol.”
Hear, hear.
EPIC FAIL.

Posted by: silky | April 7, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Apparently none of you have read any european newspaper they are having a good laugh at Pres.Obama some of the comments are: weakest President ever!!! when will he leave??? how come he insults the US??? How dare Michelle Obama puts her arm around the Queen, was she not told about protocol??? Europe might not have liked Pres. Bush but they have no use for Pres. Obama they call him the Pres. with no backbone. But then you would never hear what that from our press because they are so unbiased.

Posted by: Lizzie | April 7, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Obama speaks for YOU!
he also told his muslim audience that the age of “selfish and crass” American culture is over.
HUH????

Posted by: stop the madness | April 7, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am

I wonder if Obama will blame Bush and the United States for the democracy in Iraq.

Posted by: Sigmond | April 7, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am

“Apparently none of you have read any european newspaper they are having a good laugh at Pres.Obama some of the comments are: weakest President ever!!! when will he leave??? how come he insults the US??? How dare Michelle Obama puts her arm around the Queen, was she not told about protocol??? Europe might not have liked Pres. Bush but they have no use for Pres. Obama they call him the Pres. with no backbone. But then you would never hear what that from our press because they are so unbiased.”
For example?

Posted by: silky | April 7, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am

“I wonder if Obama will blame Bush and the United States for the democracy in Iraq.”
No, just the 4,000+ American casualties, 100,000+ Iraqi casualties and the fabrication that led to their deaths.

Posted by: silky | April 7, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Lizzie, please cite your European newpapers that say Obama is a joke. (and O’Reily and Limbaugh are not european newspapers).
oh how dare she touch the queen/break protocol? the queen touched her as well (breaking protocol).
well anyway back to limbaugh you go so he can give you the cool quotations of the day and your opinion as well.
Obama is a success at home and abroad. deal with it. or live with Limbaugh in denial (like his drug addiction).

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am

What a complete and total self-promoting, self-aggrandizing SLIME. OOPS, I mean how unpresidential. There is no precedent for this anywhere in the world.
Obama got nothing for his groveling except to appease anti-americans overseas and lower our stature and security worldwide.
His oath was to “protect and defend” not screw the US. We have pulled Europe’s a** out of the fire over and over again, and I don’t just mean WWII
Most recently, the Europeans could not even handle conflicts in their own European Union. They called on us to take care of their problems in Kosovo, Yugoslavia(Bosnia/Serbia) and are total ingrates for our efforts.
We have nothing to apologize for, they should be thanking us, not cheering an apology from a slimebag.
We will however soon share their inability to defend themselves, even among themselves.
Obama is moving this country to a Euro financial model, even handing over our financial sovereignty to some unelected group of self interested Euros..which he agreed to during the G20.
European countries cannot afford to defend themselves, they have a chronic very high 10 percent unemployment, they have LOUSY national health care with high premiums and high cancer death rates as they are forced to ratio
n care. This is the model Obama seeks for us.
Now Obama denigrates the US to appease this group of LOSERS!
When Europe has contributed something, or for that matter managed their own conflicts without our help. Or, when Europe gets their own financial house in order then we can discuss any theoretical BS merits in apologizing for helping them and defending them.
Come to think of it, maybe Obama should resign and run for president of the EU, he seems to appreciate EU while being derisive of the US.

Posted by: MNM | April 7, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Of course. for the Obama-Haters, nothing the President does will suit them.
Mostly, we see a bunch of whining, sore loser, morally and intellectually bankrupt neo-cons, who caused most of our problems, criticize the President as he attempts to clean up their mess.
While these anti-Americans are unlikely to shut-the-hell-up, we can ignore them. They can have their say at the next election. Until then, neo-cons can SUCK IT UP!

Posted by: Sammy | April 7, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am

“Now Obama denigrates the US to appease this group of LOSERS!”
You have to love the people born with a winning lottery ticket chastising those who weren’t for not being born with a winning lottery ticket. U-S-A! U-S-A! U-S-A!

Posted by: silky | April 7, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am

That’s one example of the arrogance he’s referring to, fwiw.

Posted by: silky | April 7, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am

During the G-20 no world leader trashed their own country–and no world leader trashed his/her predecessor.
Except for Obama.
I think that says volumes about his character and integrity.

Posted by: meggie | April 7, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

I am waiting to hear what Leader of the World will tell US troops?
Will he call them Infidels?

Posted by: call him out of here | April 7, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

I love the way Obama set the stage to make himself look like a rock star.
Then he and Michelle strutted around like they were models on a catwalk.
I can see why our enemies are so intimidated by Obama–that grin is scary.

Posted by: tyler | April 7, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Krauthammer is right!
President Obama is a disgrace to
this country and an embarrassment!
For him to continue his attacks on
former President Bush almost 3 months
into his term is dispicable and
ungracious!
President Bush presided over one of
the smoothest transitions in presidential history. To this today he has refused to
second guess Mr Obama on either
foreign or domestic matters.
You are our leader now President Obama!
You weren’t elected to complain
ad nauseum about the previous
administration.
You were elected to fix the economy
and keep us safe.
If you can’t do that than I suggest
that you resign!

Posted by: reaganfan | April 7, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

meggie—i think it’s a lie to say Obama trashed our nation. by portraying the US as a nation of diplomacy, a country that respects others, that the United States is a nation of tolerance, and that the last 8 years weren’t a portrayal of the best the US had to offer the world is right on. Obama has never trashed this nation. saying we have not been perfect and that relationships with other countries need to be repaired is not un-American, it is the exact opposite.
the hate radio of Limbaugh and O’Reily are the true un-Americans. they perpetuate the fallacy that the US is so much better than everybody else—and that is pompous and stupid and not at all realistic.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Many, many, many obots voted for Him because they liked the way he looked and how well he reads a teleprompter. Pitiful. They get what they deserve.

Posted by: A DREAM/NIGHTMARE | April 7, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

You have to love the people born with a winning lottery ticket chastising those who weren’t for not being born with a winning lottery ticket. U-S-A! U-S-A! U-S-A!
Posted by: silky | Apr 7, 2009 11:57:24 AM
———–
You have that backwards. That is to say we used our lottery winnings to help the LOSERS, over and over again, but they still gave us the proverbial finger and our slimebag President apologized for our generosity of blood and treasure to pull them out of trouble time and again.

Posted by: MNM | April 7, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

As I have stated before, it’s certainly refreshing to see that BO is continuing the long-standing, liberal tradition of gallavanting around the world and blaming everything on the US along the way.
Liberals love to apologize for America’s greed and arrogance, but they somehow how always forget that America donates more $$$ to global charities than all other countries combined. Or that “evil” George W. Bush is also the same man who holds the WORLD RECORD for sending more $$$ to Africa’s AIDS programs. Or that people risk their lives EVERYDAY in record #’s to come to the USA. I wonder how many people are trying desperately to enter France right now?
The fact that BO goes to socialistic, impotent countries who have not lifted a finger to fight the terrorists (or as liberals would call them- freedom fighters) and apologizes for America’s aggressive stance on the war, is disgusting.
These pathetic world leaders BO is groveling to, whom he is also desperately trying to emulate now, are the same ones who have relied on the US to do everything throughout the last 50 years.

Posted by: Jill | April 7, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Posted by: silky | Apr 7, 2009 11:48:17 AM
“The US President is in no position promise to rid the world of the Bomb, says Janet Daley.”
“Michelle Obama, take note: we don’t do hugs”

Posted by: drjohn | April 7, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Obama says, in America there is a failure to appreciate Europe’s leading role in the world. When there was genocide on Europe’s doorstep, in the Balkans, it didn’t lift a finger until America led. When Saddam invaded Kuwait, Europe didn’t lift a finger until America led. It’s because with America spending over half a trillion a year, keeping open the sea lanes in defending the world, Europe is spending pennies on defense. It’s hard to appreciate an entity’s leading role in the world, when it’s been sucking on your teat for sixty years as Europe has! And then Obama calls America arrogant, dismissive and derisive, in order to gain the adoration of the crowds. Obama denigrated America in a way that is disgraceful.

Posted by: The Magical Obama Aplology Tour | April 7, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

The Radical, more self-absorbed Jimmy Carter. He’s a miserable President for American prosperity.

Posted by: mark | April 7, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Watch this:
Posted by: Sammy | Apr 7, 2009 11:57:01 AM
Hey Sammy, which program of Obama’s do you support?
Making the wounded pay for their own treatment?
Government controlling the banks?
Government dictating our salaries?
Government taking over health care?
Government owning the suto industry?

Posted by: drjohn | April 7, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

saying that the way international affairs were handled during the last 8 years and wanting to do better is not trashing President Bush. it’s stating simple facts. during the Bush years America portrayed itself almost constantly in contradiction to america’s highest ideals. Obama didn’t even mention his Bush’s name.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

drjohn—ooooooh janet day said

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

President George W. Bush held the position for 8 years with dignity and respect. He was not involved in any scandals where he lied under oath regarding his relationship with one woman, or where his administration audited another woman he slept with, before she could tell her story.
President Bush also provided barry O a very smooth transition, not like the clinton who trashed the white house before they left when he came in 2000.
Barry is the epitomy of the left- blame others for your own incompetence and tell the masses that gov’t is the only way to obtain happiness.
Wake up people.

Posted by: Dave | April 7, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Polls? They better be paying attention to the poll numbers here in the good ol’ USA where the divide is stark.
Is Obama and company hoping that the unrest and the tea parties will just go away if they don’t mention it?
Look here Obama, you DON’T speak for me. I will not apologize for our country and you bring shame to the presidency by talking negatively about our country on foreign soil. You are a FIRST in many, many ways.

Posted by: Oink | April 7, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Perhaps Obama should have paid a visit to Normandy. All of Obama’s actions are simply a result of being George Soros’s and the Center for American Progress’s puppet. It is their philosophy that he is propagandizing. (If you don’t believe this, check out their website; it’s all there; read George Soro’s opinions about America.)Obama continuously puts down America and this is disgraceful and VERY UNPRESIDENTIAL. Look at history and the destructiveness that Europeans have caused by the leaders they have promoted. They refrain from helping even when the conflict is in their backyard, such as the Balkans. It has always been America that has come to their rescue. Adding to the propaganda is Obama’s narcissistic personality disorder bordering on sociopathic. We are in for a very long and destructive 4 years. It’s time for the other half of America, who idolize him, to wake up and recognize what is happening to our country.

Posted by: Butterlylady | April 7, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

The Magical Obama Aplology Tour
Well said! It’s too bad that BO’s adoring fans do not see how terrible this man really is for America. We have just elected rev wright to the White House..
I just hope the media’s bubble that they have him in eventually bursts and everyone will see what he really is- an anti-American socialist.

Posted by: Jill | April 7, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Obama sounds like the Dixie Chicks!

Posted by: Sal | April 7, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

I shudder to think what the next president will be apologizing about for the Obama administration.

Posted by: ctmom | April 7, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Bush had too much class to go after the Clintons, and as far as that is concerned there was a whole lot to go after.
Bush remained presidential and put the dignity of the country over self partisan interests.
Obama could learn a few things from Bush, but Obama thinks he knows everything, so that is unlikely to happen.
Bush always was careful to do what he thought was best for the US, agree or not.
Obama is only interested in doing what is best for himself, reading the US the riot act, and making us pay for our past success and generosity. He will most certainly continue to “teach the US a good lesson” , one that we will likely never forget.
How did it happen that we elected a President that HATES his own country and will sacrifice us to the rest of the world because of that.

Posted by: Nobama | April 7, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

I have to say, while I don’t disagree with everything that Obama said, some things are best left unsaid. I wouldn’t call it disgraceful, and I know Bush is now the ex-president, etc. but it is inappropriate to slam America’s recent history in such an unsubtle manner while overseas. It’s not like European leaders are stepping up and making concessions about rank anti-Americanism when they come to the U.S. It takes two to tango, and until we see tangible benefits from this exercise, I’d rather Obama didn’t cross the pond and take shots at our recent history.

Posted by: Republocrat22 | April 7, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

A DREAM/NIGHTMARE—most americans are educated enough to know that all major politicians giving speeches use teleprompters…all your heroes did: Eisenhower, Nixon, Reagan, Bush I, Bush II.
and most americans voted for the president because we feel he was the best candidate to handle the complexities of the world.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Krauthammer is absolutely correct on this. Obama and the left’s “dreams” are childish and dangerous. It really is like taking candy from a baby when it comes to liberal foreign policy. Also Obama claims to look to the future, but boy does he constantly complain about Bush. This isn’t truth. This is a distraction from his pathetically disorganized White House and the democratic socialist agenda.

Posted by: Krauthammer Fan | April 7, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Nobama—President Bush had plenty to say about “my predecessor.” Go back and read/listen/watch.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Um, Jake? Karen? Please show me where Obama says, “Sorry about the Bush years.” – your headline implies it’s a direct quote. Is it?

Posted by: nffcnnr | April 7, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

and most americans voted for the president because we feel he was the best candidate to handle the complexities of the world.
————————
How wrong can you get! Say your sorry……good excuse to use is I drank the kool Aid!

Posted by: ugly American | April 7, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Your title says:
President Obama to Europe: “Sorry About the Bush Years”
OBAMA NEVER SAID THAT. YOU ARE QUOTING SOMETHING HE NEVER SAID!
NO WHERE IN YOUR POST DO YOU EVEN QUOTE WHAT IT SAYS IN YOUR TITLE.

Posted by: LeAnn | April 7, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

“These pathetic world leaders BO is groveling to, whom he is also desperately trying to emulate now, are the same ones who have relied on the US to do everything throughout the last 50 years.”
Wow…it’s hard to imagine why the world views the U.S. as arrogant.

Posted by: silky | April 7, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

If Cheney is not acting like a statesman when he criticises Obama in front of Americans, then Obama is certainly not a statesman when he continually criticises and condemns Bush in front of non-Americans. With his genuflexions to Arab kings, caving in to European leaders and snide words about Bush, Obama is bringing shame and ridicule on the USA. I’m definitely unimpressed.

Posted by: Paul UK | April 7, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Somebody needs to reboot Obama’s teleprompter. His 27 year-old chief speechwriter knows only the campaign speech, slightly retuned. Every speech starts with Bush-bashing: Him Evil; Me Good. Didn’t his (Obama’s) grandmother ever tell him you don’t build yourself up by tearing the other person down. Yes, Mr. Obama, we know you’re different from Bush. Get on with it.

Posted by: Rob Easterling | April 7, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Funny how you never heard Reagan whine and complain about the mess that Carter left. Stop trashing the country and start leading it instead. On second thought, why not stay in Europe with all the other socialists?

Posted by: Reagan Conservative | April 7, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Many Democratic Partisans made this conception of a lowered opinion of the USA, when a Republican is President, for pure political gain.
Having traveled and worked throughout Europe over several decades, it is simply a myth. It reflects the ugly partisan effort to dehumanize the opposition, and is actually quite dangerous.
If Democrats in the MSM, actually think it has merit, they are truly delusional, as the anti-American sentiment was the same as it was during the Clinton – Carter Eras, as it was during the Reagan – Bush Eras.
In fact, during the Clinton Era, the US President was often considered the source of jokes, and the USA was considered weak.
Sorry, but just because many Partisans who favor the large Government – socialist lean of the modern Democrat Party, become more vocal during a Republican Tenure in the Executive Branch, doesn’t equate to a change in USA reputation.
We know how manipulative polling data can be as well. When the Media reports biased material during a Republican Presidency, of course less positive conceptions are going to exist.
The reality remains, GW Bush liberated Millions in the ME, in both Afghanistan and Iraq. Far more in the World have shown a new appreciation for US sacrifice. If we poll the population of the new Democracies who were born from former Iron Curtain, we see a far different picture from the Western European conceptions.
Also, the mindset in Europe, with it’s overt anti-Semitism, is not exactly the most attractive to be following.
For example, just because Chirac, Schroeder, Putin, etc., wanted to keep a monster named Saddam for the contracts on Oil, doesn’t mean the USA should have followed this folly.
Sometimes, the USA has led admirably, and some in Europe have resented the positives in a juvenile form of jealousy.

Posted by: brooklyn | April 7, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Paul UK—Obama did not mention Bush by name as Cheney did. and he was not direct. merely mentioning the fact that the last 8 years don’t reflect the best of america or how it dealt with the rest of the world.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Unadultured adulation clouds the mind.

Posted by: JamesJ | April 7, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

“Lizzie, please cite your European newpapers that say Obama is a joke. (and O’Reily and Limbaugh are not european newspapers).”
Excerpt:
His speeches have long under-delivered, usually leaving a faintly empty sensation in this listener even though I welcomed, moderately, his victory last year as offering the possibility of a fresh start and a boost to confidence.
Yet, we are told that he is a great orator and in one way he certainly is. He does have a preternatural calm in the spotlight and a mastery of the cadences we associate with the notable speakers in US history – such as JFK and MLK. But beyond that, am I alone in finding him increasingly to be something of a bore?
The Obamas have handled their trip well and in their public appearances have been a credit to their country. But I’ll wager that within a year or so he’ll be marked down as a wind-bag.

Posted by: sheryl | April 7, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Rob Easterling, could you tell us in all honesty that your hero, George W. Bush, never used a teleprompter or ever said “um”, “er”, “uh”? what president including Eisenhower and beyond has not used a teleprompter? which one? please, do tell us. Obama has every right to let Europe know that things are different and that we won’t be acting like we own the world. he hasn’t apologized for Bush (as Tapper wrote simply to inflame this thread with hyperbole). he’s only said that the last 8 years were not the greatest for US-European relations, and that is a factual statement.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Hahaha! I have to laugh at anything Krauthammer has to say about President Obama or anything else for that matter. Krauthammer is a right wing ideolog who has as much credibility as his cohort Rush Limbaugh. For him to compare Bush to Eisenhower is simply ridiculous. If Eisenhower had pulled the stupid stunts Bush pulled, he might have been criticized by Kennedy too, but we’ll never know for sure. One thing is for sure. Bush will go down in our history as THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER! Krauthammer, I hear your fellow stooges are having a tea party. Why don’t you join them? Hahaha!

Posted by: leftyintexas | April 7, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Well it appears the worm continues turn beyond the criticisms of Obama in British papers.
This is an excerpt from Der Spiegel. The Germans and French appear to believe Obama is quite arrogant in so publicly telling them to accept Turkey into the EU. Apparently they understand some things are best said privately or not at all, like bashing your own country.
Excerpt below:
——————
US President Barack Obama says Turkey’s future is in the European Union. Not everyone agrees. Numerous politicians in Germany have gone on the attack, and even French President Sarkozy is unimpressed. Turkey’s role at the NATO summit has soured the mood. …
Now that Obama is in Turkey, however, some political camps — particularly in Germany — have discovered the political efficacy of Obama bashing. While in Ankara, Obama reiterated his support for Turkish membership in the European Union, a position he first voiced on Sunday in Prague. That doesn’t sit well with some.
“Turkey is bound to Europe by more than bridges over the Bosporus,” Obama told the Turkish parliament on Monday. “Centuries of shared history, culture and commerce bring you together. And Turkish membership would broaden and strengthen Europe’s foundation once more.”
It is a sentiment not universally shared in Europe. On Monday, a number of politicians, particularly in Germany, went on the offensive. “It is a meddling in the internal affairs of Europe,” Bernd Posselt, a member of the European Parliament from Bavarian’s conservative Christian Social Union (CSU), blustered in an interview with SPIEGEL ONLINE. “The EU is not Obama’s plaything. … He should accept Turkey as America’s 51st state instead,” he continued. …
Indeed, Sarkozy was quick to reject Obama’s support for Turkish EU membership. Speaking after the US president said in Prague on Sunday that membership for Turkey would “ensure we continue to anchor Turkey firmly in Europe,” Sarkozy said: “I have been working hand in hand with President Obama, but when it comes to the European Union it is up to member states … to decide.”

Posted by: MNM | April 7, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

We know how manipulative polling data can be as well. When the Media reports biased material during a Republican Presidency, of course less positive conceptions are going to exist.
—————–
So true. In fact a poll released today by NYT/NBC has grossly oversampled democrats to obtain a higher approval rating 66%, for Obama.
In fact if they had properly, using statistical sampling accepted standards, he would have lost ground over the previous poll by the same biased, democrat oversampled group. The Newsweek poll recently did the same thing.
It is a flagrant attempt to dishonestly inflate the opinion of Obama here and abroad, and give a false impression that his most recent Euro tour was not the failed enterprise that it was.
The reverse was true during the Bush years. The polls were “mis-sampled” in order to give a falsely negative impression of Bush. The rant of the sore losers was so long and so loud it became accepted as true and eventually did negatively influence impressions of Bush here and overseas.
It was shameful.

Posted by: MNM | April 7, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

there’s such a thing as an “Eleanor Clift Fan”? – that’s too funny!!!!

Posted by: ratbass | April 7, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

“what the HELL is going on ??
making deals with the devil in muslim countries?
calling human rights an ideal not a priority?
writing that rape is a cultural construction that must be understood in context?
refusing to call honor killings what they are?
glorifying the stepford wives of the G 20?
this is a wicked mix of ugliness . . .”
It is also a complete fabrication.
Posted by: silky | Apr 7, 2009 10:36:47 AM
————
This is no fabrication, and would never have happened while Bush was in office. Laura Bush, just like Jay Leno’s wife, fought for womens rights in Afghanistan, FOR YEARS. The media failed to report on Laura’s efforts due to the usual bias.
Obama is more interesting in appeasment in Afghanistan if it helps his settle the situation, even if that means going along with new laws, recently enacted that restrict womens rights according to Sharia law, even spelling out the right of men to RAPE, their wives.
Obama’s position is that it is their choice and that we should see it in context.
NO NO NO, the women did not choose enslavement and to become property to be used and destroyed at will.
Human rights are not a priority to Obama, he did not object, as Bush would have. Obama is interested in his goals only. The women in Afghanistan be d*mned.
Bush made womens rights a condition of support. Obama wouldn’t dream of such a thing. Obama loves Islam and Sharia, women in the US need to be very afraid.
Obama just nominated a judge for a federal position that believes our courts should, in some circumstances, take Sharia law into consideration when deciding cases.
Where is the outrage?
Where is the media lashback at such an outrageous nomination?
The US is in deep trouble with this Obama guy in charge. His priorities are to promote Islam and denigrate the US, his words, not mine.

Posted by: MNM | April 7, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Some appear to be living their own reality world(LA LA LAND). They read things that are not there. If they knew ANYTHING about German politics, he’d know that the views of a right wing CDU politician from Bavaria about President Obama carry as much weight as anything Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh has to say. The fact is…
AMERICA LOVES PRESIDENT OBAMA AND WELCOMES THE GREAT CHANGES HE IS MAKING! The polls don’t lie. Deal with it!

Posted by: leftyintexas | April 7, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Paul Wall – excellent post at 1:01pm.
Also, it seems to me the best argument that Obama supporters have is a deflection to the “Bush years”, totally ignoring the weak strawman speeches; gaffes; no spine apologetic approach of Barack. It’s as if they’re all third graders making a point that their guy is in charge and to hell with the results, even to the detriment of our country.
Why don’t you Obamabots grow up, put down the celebratory party whistles for a second, get off your Obama worship rug, take a look around you and see what this man is doing to the U.S. before it’s too late?

Posted by: Obamanot | April 7, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Barry is just another anti-American, apologist liberal who believes that the USA is the root of all evil throughout the world.
Barry is nothing more than jimmy carter with MUUUCH better marketing.

Posted by: dave | April 7, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Paul Wall
The point is that Bush was called an idiot by the liberal media, as ALL republicans are, despite the fact that he never flunked out of lawschool like Al Gore, and he got higher grades then John Kerry did.
The whole teleprompter is an issue because the media has sold barry O has the greatest mind of our time, but they never mention that wihout prewritten speeches in front of him he repeats “”uuhhhh uummmm uuhhmm errhh uuh”.

Posted by: dave | April 7, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

If they knew ANYTHING about German politics, he’d know that the views of a right wing CDU politician from Bavaria about President Obama carry as much weight
Posted by: leftyintexas | Apr 7, 2009 1:49:34 PM
———————–
Gee I guess if you cherry pick your politicians and don’t include Merkel and Sarkozy you might have said something true, but they do count, like it or not. Read the whole article at Der Spiegel. Merkel struck out at Obama before he even arrived in Europe when she exclaimed that he would not dictate their finances and tell them to offer a stimulus.
IN fact polls do lie. CBS/NYT were just caught oversampling democrats, defying statistical acceptable standards. Why would they inflate his popularity if he were not in a downward trend right now. Maybe not in trouble yet, but certainly not moving in a direction that could be interpreted as positive.
So the CBS/NYT poll, along with the most recent Newsweek poll do lie.
The NYT numbers as they admit are:
Democrats – 39%
Republicans – 23%
Independents – 30%
This grossly underrepresents repbulicans by at least 8-10 percent.
If they had followed accepted standards Obama would have stayed the same or lost ground following his fabulous apology, get nothing back, euro tour.
So if he is doing so well, why do prominent liberal news organizations have to lie?

Posted by: MNM | April 7, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Remember how George Bush used to blame everything on Bill Clinton? Me neither.

Posted by: Jim Treacher | April 7, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

“The point is that Bush was called an idiot by the liberal media, as ALL republicans are, despite the fact that he never flunked out of lawschool like Al Gore, and he got higher grades then John Kerry did.”
He was an idiot.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 7, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

“Remember how George Bush used to blame everything on Bill Clinton? Me neither.”
ROFLMAO!
This has to be excellent sarcasm

Posted by: Ryan C | April 7, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

The headline is misleading despite the explanatory note at the bottom (and who reads those?). Also, I recall Bush actually giving the Saudi king a kiss on the cheek at one time. Somehow a slight bow seems less, well, intimate, although we know that the Bushes had very intimate relations with the Saudis. Obama is not constantly apologizing for the actions or arrogance of the US. And yes, Bush and Cheney especially were arrogant. Remember Rumsfeld’s dismissive comments about old Europe.

Posted by: BachisBest | April 7, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Sounds to me like republicans are very sore loosers.

Posted by: Smithers-Jones | April 7, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

“The NYT numbers as they admit are:
Democrats – 39%
Republicans – 23%
Independents – 30%
This grossly underrepresents repbulicans by at least 8-10 percent.”
Not really.
From last year:
In 5,566 interviews with registered voters conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press during the first two months of 2008, 36% identify themselves as Democrats, and just 27% as Republicans
From the new Pew poll:
The Republicans, in particular, have lost quite a bit of support over the past several years; those persons who continue to identify as Republicans are a hardened — and very conservative — lot. Just 24 percent of voters identified as Republican when Pew conducted this survey in March, which is roughly as low as that total has ever gotten.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 7, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

BachisBesti agree with your post overall. but specifically i agree that the title of this thread was poorly handled. it’s unbelievable that Tapper couldn’t have corrected it. it’s an easy-fix for someone familiar with computers. and if Jake couldn’t handle it himself isn’t there someone at ABC who could clean it up? i mean he was able to insert the asterisc and add the note and the bottom of his article. this was done simply to inflame political polemic and add flames to inter-party rancor. very sad.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Paul Wall,
If Obama is not referring to Bush when he makes his critical comments and negative insinuations about American policy over the past eight years, who is he talking about? Bill Clinton?
Come on! Admit it, it is not very fitting or becoming of the president of the United States of America to come out with such petty and vindictive statements.
…Just watched Obama in Iraq on British TV. Don’t think he had his teleprompter, but instead was using 3×5 cards. Does this guy never say anything from the heart? Does everything have to be scripted for him?
When he told us that some Americans are arrogant (I presume he was implying Republicans), and then turned around and displayed indisputable arrogance in his disdain of European leaders over Turkey, does that mean that all Americans are arrogant?
He is not a very good advertisement for America!

Posted by: Paul UK | April 7, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Ryan C
Funny how Bush never got caught plagerizing in college or in the 80′s during his first presidential run like Biden did. Biden is a blundering fool and the only reason he was not destroyed by the media is because he had a (D) in front of his name.
Lesson learned…. Democrats can flunk out of lawschool (gore), get caught cheating while in lawschool(biden), and receive lower grades when compared to their republican opponents (kerry), and yet the republicans are still the ones the media deems as “idiots”.
Oh, and Barry O walks on water, and once he sings cumbuyah with our enemies
they will all love us.
Is that right, all you obamabots?

Posted by: Jill | April 7, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Sorry About the Bush Years*
It really doesn’t matter if he used those exact words or not because they convey precisely what he meant, and every one knows it, and it’s an absolutely disgraceful way to treat a former president!

Posted by: Paul UK | April 7, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

dr.john…………actually, I agree with most of what our President is doing. I don’t agree, however, with your deliberate, mischaracterization of what he is doing.
Are you one of the Obama-Haters?

Posted by: Sammy | April 7, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

The Republicans, in particular, have lost quite a bit of support over the past several years; those persons who continue to identify as Republicans are a hardened — and very conservative — lot. Just 24 percent of voters identified as Republican when Pew conducted this survey in March, which is roughly as low as that total has ever gotten.
Posted by: Ryan C | Apr 7, 2009 2:27:50 PM
———
Wrong. Republicans have been gaining ground. It is sampled daily, with robo, not personal calls that can influence results, using the highest of polling ethical standards, achieving a much more accurate result –because of daily not snapshot polling by Zogby and Rasmussen —and the republicans range anywhere from a low of 31. 7 percent to 34.8 percent. Times they are a changing.
While that does not equal the number of dems YET it does far exceed the sample of the NYT/CBS.
A poll is only as good as the polling standards utilized. While some people complain about Rasmussen because they prefer different results NO ONE has yet been able to attack their polling methods as they are of the highest standard.
Those that don’t like the results simply dismiss them as biased, but if that were so, and they were biased like the dem pollsters Obama would poll even lower and republicans would poll even higher.
Talking about last years poll is such a waste of time and only proves that you desperately want to deny the facts, just like CBS/NYT.

Posted by: MNM | April 7, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

dave—i, unfortunately do not have access to Gore’s, Kerry’s or Bush’s college transcripts as you do, so i will accept them as genuine.
while i doubt seriously that Obama is the leading mind of our time, he is far more intelligent than Gore, Kerry or Bush.
but i fail to understand theneo-con, radical-right fetish with Obama and the telepromter. every president from Eisenhower and beyond have used them. your political heroes have all used them: Reagan (sold, as you say Obama is, as the “greatest mind of our time” by media and the far right as well, and that without a college education), Nixon, Bush, McCain, Dole. even with his “umms” “errs” “uhs” and “ahs” Obama still responds extemporaneously very well to unexpected questions. linguistically these speech patterns are normal to most english speakers.
do you think that Obama’s use of the teleprompter makes him stupider than his predecessors? if you were going to be speaking to a group of people to inspire them would you prepare some remarks or shoot from the hip?
i don’t give Obama any extra points for his inspiring speeches any more than i take away any for the fact that he occasionally uses a telepromter.
since you have access to college transcripts would you happen to have the results for Obama? you left them out. i assume they were below Gore’s (who you said failed law school) or you would have mentioned them. but Obama completed law school if i’m not mistaken, but i may be.
you seem to acknowledge that the telepromter is a lame argument so why does the right keep making it? it implies the president is stupid, a fact not supported by his educational accomplishments or rhetorical gifts. do you remember Reagan’s “umm”, “err”—they were legendary, his wife even had to finish his sentences.
i always assume a person, regardless of party, will speak better with a telepromter than without one.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

“yet the republicans are still the ones the media deems as “idiots”.”
Well truth hurts.
And apparently people are catching on since self identified Republicans are down to their lowest levels ever.
No one wants to admit they are Republican so as to associate themselves with Republican idiocy.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 7, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Americans should be sorry about the Bush years. They were disaster for domestic and foreign policy. We are less safe and certainly a lot poorer.

Posted by: Bob Johnson | April 7, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Oh oh the stock markets are dropping like a rock again ..obama must be on his way back to the USA. Why can’t he stay with the rest of the socialists and communists there in europe.

Posted by: Obamadrone232424 | April 7, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Isn’t there some sort of saying about glass houses and stones? Obama, for whatever intentions, is spewing nonsense. It is one thing to kiss up but to do so at the expense of another is not very courageous and certainly not what we expect of anyone-let alone the President. I would caution the Axelrods that it will be his job approval here that will be critical not how much the rest of the world likes him.

Posted by: david | April 7, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

Paul UK—please do some research into american political history to find ample examples of presidents talking down about other presidents (i.e. Bush’s blaming Clinton for 911, EXPLICITLY). Obama was indeed referring to Bush’s policies in his speeches but never said “President Bush…” because he was speaking about poicies not personalities. US policy will be different and more engaging with Europe and the rest of the world. that the US acted high-and-might during Bush’s presidency is a fact (although i think it is more of an indictment against Rumsfeld, Cheney and Gonzalez rather than Rice or President Bush).
while you are feeling so sorry for President Bush and feeling his treatment is “disgraceful” perhaps you will remember your press and citizens speak disgracefully about the Queen and Prime Minister Blair ( a friend of Bush and Obama).

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

but i fail to understand theneo-con, radical-right fetish with Obama and the telepromter. every president from Eisenhower and beyond have used them. your political heroes have all used them: Reagan (sold, as you say Obama is, as the “greatest mind of our time” by media and the far right as well, and that without a college education), Nixon, Bush, McCain, Dole. even with his “umms” “errs” “uhs” and “ahs” Obama still responds extemporaneously very well to unexpected questions. linguistically these speech patterns are normal to most english speakers.
——————-
No president has relied on the teleprompter the way Obama has. They use it for major speeches such as state of the union, or their Inaugural speech and on rare occasions in between. Other wise they simply rely on note cards to prompt them. They already had full knowledge of what they wanted to say and only needed a tiny prompt, unlike Obama.
Obama does not move or speak without his teleprompter. During the campaign when he tried to do this he ended up with an incoherent answer loaded with ums time and again.
The end result of incoherent answers following the non stop ums was even mocked by the usual fawning british media.
Obama makes no sense when he speaks without a teleprompter, unlike other presidents. Bush may have stumbled over words on occasion but, for the most part, he always had a coherent intelligent answer, Obama cannot even do that.
Then there were the times he slipped and actually told us what he thought, which was also a no no because the public would not like it. Axelrod put a stop to that. There would be no more discussions of “redistributive justice” “economic justice” “desires to bring gas prices back to 4$/ gallon by increasing taxes to discourage use, and on ad nauseum.
Obama has lied so many times about what he intends to do vs what he tells the public, earmarks and fiscal responsibility are only the tip of the iceberg, he NEEDS a teleprompter to keep his stories straight.

Posted by: MNM | April 7, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

North Korea is testing long range missiles. Iran is funneling money through NY banks for nuclear weapons.

Posted by: Kyle | April 7, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Lets remember one thing about the Europeans, the Europeans would all be speaking German had it not been for the US.

Posted by: Kyle | April 7, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Well truth hurts.
And apparently people are catching on since self identified Republicans are down to their lowest levels ever.
No one wants to admit they are Republican so as to associate themselves with Republican idiocy.
Posted by: Ryan C | Apr 7, 2009 2:59:31 PM
—————
Wrong and wrong. Republicans, as I posted earlier are beginning to gain ground and dems are beginning to lose ground based on party identification. Admittedly dems are still ahead, but they are losing ground.
However when you have a president who has denigrated his predecessor and his country in a manner that is embarrassing and indefensible dems resort to lies and name calling as usual.
The point of this article is the shameful, slimy, self-aggrandizing attacks on the US by it’s President. What an embarrassment.
Obama is a weak empty suit and he is taking us down with him. Even N.Korea thumbed it’s nose at Obama’s weakness and empty oratory.
Still waiting for the big O’s stern response. Oh, wait, was that it?
N. Korean leaders are shaking in their boots, and let that be a lesson to Iran.
Obama hates his own country so much he not only won’t defend it, his faux empty posturing weakens our security.
Last time N. Korea did this we cut off access to their offshore accounts. Bush had the clout to get the UN and other countries to cooperate. They laugh at Obama.
But hey, they really, really like a guy they can wrap around their fingers while they rape the resources of the US, as Obama hands over control of our financial institutions to some euro board, in defiance of the declaration of independence.
They recognize Obama hates the US as much as they do, and they love Obama for that. Obama wants to make the US pay for imagined wrongs as much as the rest of the world, especially the mideast and europe does.

Posted by: MNM | April 7, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

“Wrong. Republicans have been gaining ground.”
ROFLMAO!
“It is sampled daily, with robo, not personal calls that can influence results, using the highest of polling ethical standards, achieving a much more accurate result –because of daily not snapshot polling by Zogby and Rasmussen —and the republicans range anywhere from a low of 31. 7 percent to 34.8 percent.”
Zogby doesn’t do daily polling.
Gallup and Rasmussen do.
And Rasmussen’s figures for self identifieds for either party are higher than other polling.
What’s really weird is I went to hotair (where you found the story complete with pimping for Rasmussen as the only pollster) to find the demographics since they were not obvious on the pdf. They said it was on page 23 but it was not pn page 23.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 7, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

“Wrong and wrong. Republicans, as I posted earlier are beginning to gain ground and dems are beginning to lose ground based on party identification.”
Based on what?
The latest sample from Rasmussen?
Republicans were LOSING ground in that survey.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 7, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

“No president has relied on the teleprompter the way Obama has. They use it for major speeches such as state of the union, or their Inaugural speech and on rare occasions in between. Other wise they simply rely on note cards to prompt them.”
OMG its notecards vs the telepropter!

Posted by: Ryan C | April 7, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Isn;’t it time for Obama to stop campaigning and start leading?
Who are these idiots that think he’s doing a decent job?

Posted by: malclave | April 7, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

Republicans were LOSING ground in that survey.
Posted by: Ryan C | Apr 7, 2009 3:29:52 PM
——————-
They having been gaining ground over the last coupld of months and only recently have dropped a point, but they are still above where they were a couple of months ago, and almost 10 points above where you claimed they were.

Posted by: MNM | April 7, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

TELEPROMPTER—every president since Eisenhower have used the telepromter extensively. “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall” (Reagan) was read from a telepromter as was “Ich bin ein Berliner” (Kennedy). if you’ve heard Reagan and Kennedy away from the telepromter they “umm” and “err” like Obama and Bush. these are linguistic fillers people use while speaking in situations when they don’t have pre-planned remarks. obviously all people have to think before they speak.
it’s stupid, childish and ignorant to use the telepromter as an indication of anything. some speeches are scripted, some aren’t.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

no one or political party had to “go after bush” everytime he opened his mouth to say something as president to
shamed himself and this country.
george w bush and his crew were their own worst enemies.
it is a good thing that the people who think like george bush and co. are a small minority of people.

Posted by: WHAT! | April 7, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

just because you don’t agree with me doesn’t mean i am wrong. just because i don’t read what you read doesn’t mean that what i read is false. i’m sorry i don’t read Limbaugh or Politico. but there are many places to get information from.
and just because you believe in something doesn’t make it true. and just because i believe something doesn’t make it true.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Ryan C
You are going to adamantly defend barry O all the way to the United Socialist States of America, aren’t you?

Posted by: Jill | April 7, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Bush has been far mare gracious to barry O then he deserves. Barry has trashed W. and blamed him for everything wrong with the world right now, but I wonder why he also doesn’t mention that since Nov 4th, it has been the worst POST ELECTION sell-off of the market in history. That probably doesn’t fit in with his whole “smoke and mirrors gig he has going.
I guess the stock market can recognize an anti-American socialist far better then many of the lemmings on this post can.

Posted by: Dave | April 7, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Jill C:
Sorry to see the paranoia runs so deep. The whole “socialist takeover” thing is just complete malarkey. And after all, where were you when Bush was radically expanding Gov’t power and signing us up for a multi-trillion dollar medicare drug benefit?

Posted by: Tungsten | April 7, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

but there are many places to get information from.
and just because you believe in something doesn’t make it true. and just because i believe something doesn’t make it true.
Posted by: Paul Wall | Apr 7, 2009 3:48:55 PM
———-
Really?
OK, I gave you a legitimate, neutral source for my claim. Politico. Obama has an unusual reliance on the teleprompter.
Lets hear you offer up one neutral source that claims all presidents use the teleprompter with the frequency and dependency of Obama.
Your opinion is not fact, back it up, I did.
By the way, you keep mentioning Limbaugh and I have to wonder why? I never mention him only because dems feel that discredits information however untrue that may be. So lets agree to leave him out of it as his opinions are not a part of my post.

Posted by: MNM | April 7, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

“They having been gaining ground over the last coupld of months and only recently have dropped a point,”
Actually its the other way around, they were ebbing down after a brief jump during the election, then jumped a pt last month before losing 4/10 this latest survey.
“but they are still above where they were a couple of months ago, and almost 10 points above where you claimed they were.”
That’s if you accept Rasmussen’s numbers as gospel.
Since other polling organizations have found lower GOP self ids, I inclined to take his numbers as some of many vs the end all be all.
Pew is a more respected polling org and they have GOP self IDs at 24% with Dem self ids at 36%.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 7, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Pew is a more respected polling org and they have GOP self IDs at 24% with Dem self ids at 36%.
Posted by: Ryan C | Apr 7, 2009 4:01:39 PM
=========
The Pew methods are less accurate than zogby and rasmussen which run a daily poll.
Snapshot polls have a much lower degree of reliability and the framing of the questions can affect the response. You have heard of “PUSH POLLS”.
I accept Rasmussen as most reliable and it’s polling methods and standards have never been questioned. A rolling poll, not push poll, being more accurate places the republicans almost ten points above your numbers.
We will have to disagree on this point.

Posted by: MNM | April 7, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

“OK, I gave you a legitimate, neutral source for my claim. Politico. Obama has an unusual reliance on the teleprompter.”
That was an opinion piece bout a nonsense issue.
But I understand that right wingers would much rather talk Prompter than the GOP budget dud that was dropped last week.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 7, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Leftintexas
One could easily win the argument in court that barry O is the typical liberal who HATES America.
If barry O doesn’t hate America, then why has he surrounded himself with anti-American people his whole life?
In audacity of hope, which was titled after one of rev racist’s sermons- audacity of hope, barry said “in college i sought out the marxist professors”.
Really? When I was in college I was arguing with those traitorous fools.
And what about the whole rev wright lie he told us? When I was in church several years back the pastor said something that enraged me. I never went back to that church again. Barry on the other hand, lied about his knowlegdge of rev racist’s statements from the pulpit, had the man marry he and his wife, baptize his children -the relationship is solid for 20+ years. Barry refers to him as his best mentor MANY times throughout that 20 years.
Not to mention the fact that bill ayers gave barry O his political coming out part in the early 90′s. Any country loving American would not be in the same room as that terrorist traitor, but not barry.
Then there is of course michelle’s incredibly patriotic comments that she has never been proud of her country…

Posted by: Dave | April 7, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

Tungston
Here is the difference between Bush’s and BO’s “bailouts”. Although both were TERRIBLE for the economy, Bush did it because he thought he was saving capitalism. BO is doing all of his bailouts because he wants to end capitalism.
One doesn’t spend 20 years in rev wright’s pews and think capitalism is a great thing.

Posted by: Jill | April 7, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

MNM says “In fact the polls do lie”. Oh really? Talk about cherry picking. I could take lessons from you pickers on the right. Gee I’ll just bet all those polls that gave Bush 27% job approval rating were lying too! And Cheney’s poll was so low that they’re still looking for it. I’ll bet that poll was lying too! And all those polls that showed the Democrats were more trusted to govern than the Repubs. were lying too? And now YOU say Americans don’t like President Obama even through ALL the polls say otherwise? Son, you are a little confused to say the least. Hahaha.

Posted by: leftyintexas | April 7, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Which conservative president will need apologizing to the American people about the last 4 years of the Obamanation in 2012.

Posted by: Bugher | April 7, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Dave, read my comments to MNM. They apply to you as well.

Posted by: leftyintexas | April 7, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

“The Pew methods are less accurate than zogby and rasmussen which run a daily poll.”
Zogby does not run a daily poll and his interactive poll isn’t worth publishing.
“Snapshot polls have a much lower degree of reliability and the framing of the questions can affect the response.”
I love how you mix up the talking points here because you have no idea what you are talking about.
You are trying to make the case of daily tracking polls vs sample polls.
You are also trying to make the case for robo-calls vs interviewer.
But since you don’t know the mechanics, you blended the two together in a mishapen talking point.
“You have heard of “PUSH POLLS”.”
Yes.
A push poll is designed to pass along a negative and usually false talking point under the guise of polling right before an election.
Perhaps you can tell me how a survey asking if one identifies with a party or not, taken 1 year and 6 months before the nearest national election is a push poll.
“I accept Rasmussen as most reliable and it’s polling methods and standards have never been questioned.”
His weighting has been questioned many times.
look up mystery pollster and rasmussen

Posted by: Ryan C | April 7, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

President Bush and his administration were the worst in American history. They damaged relationships with allies and inflamed our enemies to the extreme. Regardless of what some of our conservative friends say, the U.S. can’t go it alone. We are no longer the sole superpower in the world, able to throw our weight around to get what we want. And our superpower status is further threatened by a weak economy and tons of debt, all thanks to President Bush and the Republican controlled Senate of the past 8 years. No, Obama should not HAVE to apologize to the world, but our Republican friends have made it necessary.

Posted by: DaveM | April 7, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Paul Wall, you said: (i.e. Bush’s blaming Clinton for 911, EXPLICITLY).
I find plenty of accusations floating around on looney-left websites about what Bush is supposed to have implied about Clinton, but the ABC’s ‘The Path to 9-11’ docudrama clearly indicates that Clinton bears the most responsibility for what happened on 9/11. But I’m sure there is plenty of blame to go around. One thing is certain, however, as Bush stated, ‘9/11 proved that 50 years of US policy in the middle east was a failure’. Something different and more radical had to be tried.
But this is all just a red herring. American politics should stop ‘at the water’s edge’, and it is very crass indeed of Obama to endlessly beat a dead horse. It demeans the office of the president. Of course Bush made mistakes, like all leaders do, but he also made some very wise and courageous decisions which have given freedom to tens of millions of Muslims. And as a member of a British family who helped liberate Europe from the scourge of Nazism and Fascism, alongside our American allies, I am proud we also had a part in Bush’s wars to liberate millions of others who lived under repression and tyranny.
Another thing, Paul, I notice that you do not disagree with my assertion that, according to Obama’s words and actions, most Americans can be considered arrogant.

Posted by: Paul UK | April 7, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

I find it amusing to read the bush apologists trying to make their case against President Obama. The fact is America is “sorry for the Bush years” and righfully so. The President is moving at great speed to undo all the Bush screw-ups but it may take a while…say a second term perhaps. We can only HOPE…

Posted by: leftyintexas | April 7, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

MNM—”By the way, you keep mentioning Limbaugh and I have to wonder why?” oh i don’t know maybe because of statements like “They recognize Obama hates the US as much as they do.”
you are correct though, you aren’t mentioning Limbaugh, so i will not.
i have no evidence, i confess, that all presidents use a teleprompter equally. but i never made that assertion. i could say Obama uses a teleprompter less than any of them but that would be no more factual than you saying he uses it more than any other president (an assertion you did make).
political posts are not evidence whether here, Politico or any other source. that journalistic writer, regardless of their political persuasion says “it seems like the president uses the teleprompter alot” is stating an opinion.
there are a shortage of facts is all i’m saying. and you are disingenous if you pass off political opnions posted on websites as fact. if you had a scientific (factual)study measuring all the presidents teleprompter use in the past 50 years that would be meaningful. saying “i found a liberal news outlet that says Obama uses the teleprompter alot” does not make it factual or unbiased.
MNM, this is all just opinion. none of us are right. we all need hard numbers are hard facts. so much confusion over fact and opinion is precisely in conservative and liberal talk shows. my parents watch O’Reily religiously and believe that they are watching the news. sadly for them (and happily for me) they are not watching the news.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Don’t worry Bugher, it’s not going to happen any time soon.

Posted by: leftyintexas | April 7, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

DaveM ‘They damaged relationships with allies’
So much so, in fact, that both Germany, France and Italy have elected conservative leaders who are a lot closer to Bush in their thinking and policies than to either Clinton or Obama. Ironic, isn’t it.
America’s enemies feared Bush but, as we have already seen, they have no respect whatsoever for Obama. Both enemies and allies are succeeding in pushing Obama around and it is painful to watch.

Posted by: Paul UK | April 7, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

“but the ABC’s ‘The Path to 9-11’ docudrama clearly indicates that Clinton bears the most responsibility for what happened on 9/11.”
ROFLMAO!
You mean the film by Rush and David Horowitz flunky Cyrus Nowrasteh that he admitted taking dramatic license with?

Posted by: Ryan C | April 7, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

“America’s enemies feared Bush but, as we have already seen, they have no respect whatsoever for Obama”
America’s enemies played Bush like a fiddle.
They knew he would react like a cowboy, shoot first ask questions later.
He almost gave them the war on islam they wanted.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 7, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

The obamabots will continue to sing his praises even as he drives the stock market to 5000 (worst POST-ELECTION SELL-OFF in the history of the market). They do not understand why the housing market collapsed, which is why they lined up in droves to vote for change! change! change!
Little did they know that the whole spread the wealth around mentality of liberal polticians is what brought the housing market down in the first place.
It’s too bad that they didn’t spend more time reading history books. If they had, they just might realize that young/charismatic speakers don’t always do the best jobs at leading people. Just look at Germany, Cuba, Soviet Union, ect.
All their leaders promised change and that “change” led to some of the worst genocides/economic conditions in history.

Posted by: Jill | April 7, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

‘tons of debt’
Bush’s fault, eh? And here I was thinking that a lot of this toxic debt originated from loans that banks gave to some sections of the population after being pressured to do so by enthusiastic young community organisers.
Silly old me!

Posted by: Paul UK | April 7, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

“Bush’s fault, eh? And here I was thinking that a lot of this toxic debt originated from loans that banks gave to some sections of the population after being pressured to do so by enthusiastic young community organisers.”
Actually the failure of government oversight coupled with deregulation and good old fashioned greed are the reasons we are in this mess though right wingers like to blame poor people.
Even before the economic crisis we were looking at a ridiculously large national debt thanks in part to large budget deficits under Bush.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 7, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Paul UK said…
Bush’s fault, eh? And here I was thinking that a lot of this toxic debt originated from loans that banks gave to some sections of the population after being pressured to do so by enthusiastic young community organisers.
Great post!

Posted by: Jill | April 7, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Oh, and good luck blaming the Dems for this mess. The polls don’t lie. The country blames the Republicans and rightfully so. They suck as evidenced by the election!

Posted by: roxsteady | April 7, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

As I always say.. Obama’s biggest problem is W’s forgetability factor.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 7, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Ryan C
Do you honestly believe all those liberal talking points you insist on repeating?
The housing crisis is the direct result of liberal politicians’ spread the wealth around mentalities. Those idiots, along with charismatic community organizers, FORCED banks to lower their lending standards. This led to the poor getting loans they could NEVER pay back, and they greedy obtaining more then they could afford, too.
It was people like barney frank, chris dodd, chuck schumer, maxine waters, harry reid who FORCED the banks to give bad loans. Liberals are socialists, and apparently the stock market knows it better then you do.

Posted by: Jill | April 7, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

“I recall Bush actually giving the Saudi king a kiss on the cheek at one time.”
Not a great thing to do but that’s hardly the same thing as the full bend at the waist, head lowering bow Obama gave the Saudi King.
Obama looked like a subordinate. I’m just glad the Matrix Media didn’t bury the tape of the meeting.

Posted by: Sheryl | April 7, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Paul UK—you don’t contest my statement that President Bush explicitly criticized President Clinton and his adminitration. i don’t know what docudrama you are watching and could not possibly care less. i agree with you that both administrations (Clinton’s and Bush’s) are to blame for the leading up to 9/11 (Clinton, which he himself has admitted) and Bush (for entering into a war that was un-necessary and under false pretense [and please remember the US and UK did not go to war with Iraq to "save the Iraqi people" but because of Iraq supposedly having weapons of mass distruction: there was no concern about the welfare of the Iraqi people at that time, that was a ruse later risen after no weapons we found]). don’t you believe that if the US were in the war business to “save people” we would have invaded N. Korea, a nation, indesputedly, with the worst human rights record, followed by Zimbabwe (both non-oil-producing nations). so please skip using the “concern for human rights” and “Bush administration” in the same sentence. perhaps under your logic the US should emancipate and save the people of N. Korea while the UK takes care of the dying in Zimbabwe its former colony).
you failed to condemn the UK’s press treatment of Prime Minister Blair, a good friend of both President Bush and President Obama. but you are much more concerned with politics this side of the pond.
i do not think President Obama is artrogant at all. if he were a white president he would be considered “confident” but in america, as you may know being such a studies reader of US News probably know that when black presidents are confident or have self-esteem they are considered, pejoritively of course “arrogant.”
i applaud your concerns for human rights as i am involved with Human Rights Watch and follow UN trials which just sentenced the prime perpetrorot of the Rwandan genocide to life in prison (not well reported in US or UK news; after all who cares? i will support you in your support of “wars of liberation” when they have some genuine concern from human rights rather than trans-Atlantic political posturing.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

Sherl, President Obama’s greeting sure beats holding hands with and kissing the Saudi prince. Don’t you think?!

Posted by: leftyintexas | April 7, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Sheryl—yeah kissing and hugging from Bush. but Obama shows respect and is unamerican, socialist, a traitor? right wing thinking knows no logic.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Sheryl—”Not a great thing to do but that’s hardly the same thing as the full bend at the waist, head lowering bow Obama gave the Saudi King.” are you for real? and you are quite serious? you are right the two are not the same thing. Hugging and kissing is much different the a bow in respect. that arrogant Obama, showing respect. what would you have said had he given the King a big kiss and hug like Bush did?

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Jill—President Bush’s change (initiated with Ronald Reagan [deregulation of financial institutions]) brought us this financial collapse. but it’s soooo easy to blame everything on a president who has not even served much more than 100 days. Obama was in law school when all your pals were deregulating financial institutions. he became a senator well after all the damage had been set in motion. but neverthless you blame Obama completely and the poor, the defenseless who were preyed upon institutions that were basically loan sharks. very classy.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Paul Wall,
I love America, whether it is under Clinton, Bush or Obama. Americans are great people, so generous and willing to help. I have experienced their kindness many times. I have also witnessed the tremendous work that Peace Corps workers and American missionaries do in different parts of the world, especially Africa, and I would caution you not to believe everything you might hear on CNN or some other media outlets about what people think of America. Americans are highly respected all over the world, in spite of the negative coverage that their tourists and some of you policies receive. The USA is still the destination of choice for those fleeing hardship and oppression.
Tony Blair was ‘gunning’ for Saddam long before Bush came along. He was very much part of the Afgan and Iraq wars. Many people in the UK did not agree with him, but have come to recognise the underlying benefit of getting rid of the Taliban and Saddam and his sadistic sons, and they no longer hold his involvement against him. It was a political decision that went against the popular opinion of the day but it has eventually reaped, hopefully, long-lasting benefits.
Iraq turned out to be a lot more costly than first anticipated, but, sadly, sometimes, peace can only be found on the other side of war. I have seen first-hand the consequences of civil war in Africa and it is good to hear that some of the monsters in Rwanda are being dealt with.
The USA does a tremendous amount of good in the world, – most Africans love Bush – btw, but your media and somewhat vindictive political system helps to create a more negative impression than would otherwise be the case.
Gotta go. Nice chatting. Have a nice evening!

Posted by: Paul UK | April 7, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

RE: TOTUS. agreed Presidents since Eisenhower (or before) have used teleprompters. And that when speaking w/o all Presidents have used verbal fillers. I don’t know of any POTUS the has used a TelePrompTer for the most trivial photo-op events. Or used them to answer pre-canned questions from reporters at a press conference.
And I don’t think you want to into a comparrison of use of verbal fillers between Barry and past Presidents because I assure you it will be ugly. Barry downright stutters when his Teleprompter fails. He is figuritivly frozen. This man would fail an 8th grade speech class without his prompter. This wouldn’t keep getting written about if there wasn’t something there

Posted by: Dave | April 7, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Dave—Obama uses a telepromter at a press conference or while answering questions informally? are on the chronic?
maybe Obama couldn’t pass an 8th grade speech class, but he could pass all the other ones which is more than can be said about your pals.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

i wouldn’t count my chickens before they hatch. especially with a popular president and a bunch of pathetic losers and haters in the other party which is in paralysis and pinning its hopes on anybody who doesn’t have the deer-in-the-headlights look. who’s it gonna be Palin, Jindal, Limbaugh?

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 7, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

“The housing crisis is the direct result of liberal politicians’ spread the wealth around mentalities. Those idiots, along with charismatic community organizers, FORCED banks to lower their lending standards. This led to the poor getting loans they could NEVER pay back, and they greedy obtaining more then they could afford, too.”
Think about it.
Wall Street greed collapses on itself with the perpetrators riding off into the sunset with bonuses worth millions of dollars and who does big money blame for this?
Poor people.
Of course, after all otherwise you would have to admit that laize faire capitalism with few regulations and little government oversight is a bad idea.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 7, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

“This wouldn’t keep getting written about if there wasn’t something there”
ROFLMAO!
How convenient.
Right wingers talking about the teleprompter incessantly then cite their own talk as evidence that its an issue.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 7, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

“Not a great thing to do but that’s hardly the same thing as the full bend at the waist, head lowering bow Obama gave the Saudi King.”
Only a bend at the waist?
The other right wingers have already exaggerated it to the point where he was on his knees.
Catch up would you.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 7, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Obama is a disgrace.

Posted by: Rasputin3.14 | April 7, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Bravo. Plaudits and kudos to President Obama in reaching out to the rest of the world.
You must be the change you wish to see in the world.
Mahatma Gandhi

Posted by: kahuna606 | April 7, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Let me give you a little “prompt” Mr. Obama: perhaps you should also apologize to all the Cuban Americans for JFK, to all Americans for Carter and perhaps, in the not-so-distant future, to all the world, for you.

Posted by: ProtectFreedom | April 7, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

The whole teleprompter baloney is standard procedure for the right-wing smear machine. Look what they did to John Kerry. They knew that his service in Vietnam was a threat to Bush who managed to dodge going over there. They launched a comprehensive attack on a real Vietnam vet to degrade the importance of his contribution. Now they are confronted by a gifted orator so they are trying to diminish public opinion of his skills by trying to tie his abilities to an artificial aid. Don’t expect any letup in this strategy.

Posted by: Skip | April 7, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Who is really calling the shots at the White House? It surely is not The One. He is nothing more than a marketing prop, a narcissistic empty suit devoid of any sense of pride in America’s history and what it means to be an American.
I told my dad before the election that it seems Obama has a chip on his shoulder. My opinion has been validated by the way he has conducted himself on this “apology tour” through Europe.
Where is his next campaign stop?

Posted by: tjp612 | April 7, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

“a gifted orator ”
A gifted orator should be able to give a speech without having to read it.

Posted by: Sigmond | April 7, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

You guys think there is any chance Obama will apologize in advance for destroying our country financially through massive spending, borrowing and taxation? And for trying to limit constitutional rights? Or how about, now that he has weakened our security, he will apologize in advance for the next homeland attack? I say, not a chance in heck!

Posted by: TxBoB | April 7, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

Concerning the Obama bow to the Saudi king, the bow is not a sign of respect. It is a sign of submission and subservience to a superior. Intentionally or unintentionally, Obama just told the entire Muslim world he’s submissive to them. HUGE mistake.

Posted by: Ken | April 7, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

“Concerning the Obama bow to the Saudi king, the bow is not a sign of respect. It is a sign of submission and subservience to a superior. Intentionally or unintentionally, Obama just told the entire Muslim world he’s submissive to them.”
I leave it to right wing anti-Muslim lunatic Charles Johnson
Charles Johnson, whose blog, “Little Green Footballs,” is best known for its key role in uncovering the reporting flub by 60 Minutes that led to the ouster of legendary news anchor Dan Rather, provided a video showing Bush bowing before King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia to accept a medallion.
“More than a few people on the right are screaming that Barack Obama should be impeached for bowing to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia,” Johnson wrote. “Those of you who are buying into this hyperventilating nonsense need to see this video.”

Posted by: Ryan C | April 7, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

I saw the video.
If the king had turned around, Obama would have been in the perfect position to kiss his $$$.

Posted by: ceeLeelee | April 7, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Re: “Concerning the Obama bow to the Saudi king, the bow is not a sign of respect. It is a sign of submission and subservience to a superior. Intentionally or unintentionally, Obama just told the entire Muslim world he’s submissive to them. HUGE mistake.”
I agree. Sadly, though, Dubya bowed to him too. Americans don’t bow to any king or queen! What’s going on? The Founding Fathers must be spinning in their graves.

Posted by: Joan | April 7, 2009, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Re: “perhaps you should also apologize to all the Cuban Americans for JFK”
When are the Cubans going to apologize for breaking into the Watergate Hotel.

Posted by: Joan | April 7, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Kennedy spoke all the time without a teleprompter. In fact, I seriously doubt he used one back then at all.
Reagan was an ACTOR who went senile. He’s the one who began using them extensively.
What’s Obama’s excuse? I can understand using them for big speeches like the State of the Union, but he uses them for everything–town hall meetings, press conferences. Doesn’t he know the issues?

Posted by: Joan | April 7, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Whether George W. Bush used a Teleprompter or could not use a a Teleprompter is besides the point…
The Man was a Very Bad Leader..
Who left this Country…
[15 Trillion Dollars in Debt]
Talk about [Generational Debt] !1
Who Absolutely Destroyed this Country’s Image of World Super Power, Leader in Democracy and Good Will towards all.
Not to mention George W. Bush’s…
6 Year, 20 Billion Dollar Per Month with Interest to …
[Communist-Socialist China]
Damn the Teleprompter Bull-Spit…
Where was his Dissenters-Detractors, during the Bush-Cheney Years..
An how about the Maniacs who Voted this Man in Office for …
[ 8 Long Years] !!!
The same People Squawking and Howling about the Teleprompter…
Knowing Bush could Not Read Fast and Concise Enough, to keep up, with a..
[Teleprompter]

Posted by: O. | April 7, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Oh Yeah, Bring Back George W. Bush for 4 More Years !!!
Borderline Bull-Spit !!
—————
George W. Bush left this Country with …
[[15 Trillion Dollars of Debt]]
I Thought You Low Life’s are Concerned with…
[[Generational Debt]]
HYPOCRITE
Obama’s Spending Stimulus will not start until..
[[2010]]
I guess it does not matter if its a [[Republican President]]and a..
6 Year Majority Ruling [[Republican Senate & Congress]] Screwing up the Country and leaving …
[[Generational Debt]]

Posted by: O. | April 7, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Don’t get mad at US!
WE didn’t name Teleprompter Man the “Great Orator.”
:D

Posted by: ceeLeelee | April 7, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

look i cant blame obama for relying on the telepromter you cant have your president out there looking dumb or stupid cause he cant talk really would you want him out there without it, um ah um oh and uh and oh and umm get real he has to use everyone can see that noone wants there president looking dumb
and another thing terrorism didnt start cause of bush look at the cole ,the barracks in lebanon all under clinton and he wasnt the first either its there because of israel is living on diputed territory maybe obama should appogize for that TOO

Posted by: david reyes | April 7, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

ceeLeelee—”WE didn’t name Teleprompter Man the “Great Orator.” yes you did, just like you named him “Teleprompter Man.” who is “WE” anyway? do you have a mouse in your pocket? are you speaking on behalf of a group?

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 8, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am

david reyes—hey man, don’t forget your hero Ronald Reagan. over 300 soldiers were killed in Lebanon on his watch. or were you not born yet?

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 8, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

david reyes—”The Great Communicator”, Ronald Reagan was a teleprompter-dependent, high-school educated president who couldn’t speak away from a teleprompter. his wife finished his sentences for him. “Well, uhhhh…” let’s just be fair.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 8, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Ken, after Bush kissed, hugged and held hands with the Saudi king, was that a good message to send the muslim world? perhaps we should hope for peace with muslim nations? muslims are people just like us.

Posted by: Paul Wall | April 8, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Paul Wall,
Hugging, kissing and holding hands (in many cultures) indicates friendship and mutual respect. One person bowing to another, on the other hand, indicates subservience. That’s why Obama did not bow to Queen Elizabeth. He should not have bowed to the Saudi king either.
The world is still weighting Obama up. His weak, vacillating actions over the past week or so are inviting disaster. It is good to see, however, that ordinary Americans in the Indian Ocean are not put off from having a go by a wimpy president in the White House.

Posted by: Paul UK | April 8, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

“One person bowing to another, on the other hand, indicates subservience.”
So does that mean when Bush bowed to the Saudi King he was being subservient?
“That’s why Obama did not bow to Queen Elizabeth.”
Obama did bow to the Queen.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 8, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Obama almost knelt in front of the king. At least that is what it looks like in the photographs I have seen.
But don’t you find it amazing that the most major media outlets have studiously ignored the event?
Even Camille Paglia, who is no right-wing conservative, – in fact she is a registered Democrat – writing in Salon expresses her horror with Obama’s recent series of embarrassing gaffes.
But maybe she is just ticked off with the fact that Obama’s administration is 2-1 in favour of men. So much for hope and change!

Posted by: Paul UK | April 8, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

“Obama almost knelt in front of the king. At least that is what it looks like in the photographs I have seen.”
The bow gets lower and lower with each lying retelling by right wingers.
It was a quick bend at the waist.
Here’s Charles Johnson (right wingers who is no fan of Obama or the Saudis) on the hypocritical controversy
provided a video showing Bush bowing before King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia to accept a medallion.
(Click here to watch the video.)
“More than a few people on the right are screaming that Barack Obama should be impeached for bowing to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia,” Johnson wrote. “Those of you who are buying into this hyperventilating nonsense need to see this video.”
Johnson said American presidents have long been kowtowing to the Saudi Arabian loyalty, and will continue to do so for as long as America is addicted to the country’s oil.
“Even Camille Paglia, who is no right-wing conservative, – in fact she is a registered Democrat – writing in Salon expresses her horror with Obama’s recent series of embarrassing gaffes”
ROFLMAO!
Camille Paglia is still miffed at Obama from the thumping of Hillary, cried about Palin and even dabbled in the some birther tin foil conspiracy theories.

Posted by: Ryan c | April 8, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

Ryan, you had better get your story straight.
Apparently the WH is now saying that Obama didn’t bow after all. I suppose those photos and videos were edited by some secret right wing nutjob just to make it look like he bowed. Looks like we have all been conned.

Posted by: Paul UK | April 8, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

“Apparently the WH is now saying that Obama didn’t bow after all.”
I suppose you are referring to this
“”It wasn’t a bow. He grasped his hand with two hands, and he’s taller than King Abdullah,” said an Obama aide, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.”
That aide is wrong.
With the many problems this country is facing, right wingers are focused on the debate of teleprompter vs notecard, protocol with royalty and a budget with no numbers.
2010 is gonna be a breeze.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 8, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Obama is a disgrace – plain and simple.

Posted by: rider1a | April 9, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.