President Obama Heralds ‘Historic’ Effort at G-20
President Obama this afternoon expressed confidence that the economic and regulatory steps the G-20 countries committed to this afternoon will mark "a turning point in our pursuit of global economic recovery."
"In life, there are no guarantees, and in economics, there are no guarantees," the president said when asked if he was confident that the measures would help the world avoid a depression or deeper recession. "The people who thought they could provide guarantees — many of them worked at AIG, and it didn’t work out so well. So — so there are always risks involved."
That said, the president said he had "no doubt… that the steps that have been taken are critical to preventing us sliding into a depression." Another way of putting it, he said, was that "the steps in the communiqué were necessary. Whether they’re sufficient, …we’ve got to wait and see."
As is standard, language was drafted in the communiqué allowing countries to claim victory in pushing back on issues with which they disagreed.
Stimulus plans, for instance, were kept acceptably vague.
President Obama and his team had pushed for the G-20 countries to commit to stimulus packages that amount to 2 percent of the combined Gross Domestic Products of the G-20 nations; as of now 1.8 percent has been committed. Countries such as France and Germany pushed back, suggesting their stimulus plans were sufficient and they didn’t need to do more.
So the communiqué references stimulus plans countries have already passed, accentuating what has already been done. The G-20 countries are "undertaking an unprecedented and concerted fiscal expansion, which will save or create millions of jobs which would otherwise have been destroyed, and that will, by the end of the next year, amount to $5 trillion, raise output by 4 percent, and accelerate the transition to a green economy. We are committed to deliver the scale of sustained fiscal effort necessary to restore growth."
This is the same basic language adopted by the finance ministers at their G-20 meeting, which the Obama administration has deemed acceptable, if not perfect, and not a firm commitment of the G-20 counties to commit to more.
The president sought to belittle media coverage of these disagreements, saying today "that in the days leading up to the summit, some of the you in the press, some commentators confused honest and open debate with irreconcilable differences."
The communiqué also noted that the G-20 nations further agreed over $1 trillion of additional resources for the world economy through our international financial institutions and trade finance."
These steps include tripling resources available to the International Monetary Fund to $750 billion as well as efforts "to restore credit, growth and jobs in the world economy."
What about the "global regulator" whom France and Germany were pushing?
Said regulator does not appear in this document, per se.
But there is a pledge "to establish a new Financial Stability Board (FSB) with a strengthened mandate, as a successor to the Financial Stability Forum (FSF), including all G20 countries, FSF members, Spain, and the European Commission."
What will the precise powers of the FSB be? That is kept vague. But it’s charter is broad.
The FSB is to "collaborate with the IMF to provide early warning of macroeconomic and financial risks and the actions needed to address them,… reshape our regulatory systems so that our authorities are able to identify and take account of macro-prudential risks,…extend regulation and oversight to all systemically important financial institutions, instruments and markets. This will include, for the first time, systemically important hedge funds; ..endorse and implement the FSF’s tough new principles on pay and compensation and to support sustainable compensation schemes and the corporate social responsibility of all firms;…take action, once recovery is assured, to improve the quality, quantity, and international consistency of capital in the banking system. In future, regulation must prevent excessive leverage and require buffers of resources to be built up in good times."
On the subject of tax havens, the communiqué states that the FSB is committed "to take action against non-cooperative jurisdictions, including tax havens. We stand ready to deploy sanctions to protect our public finances and financial systems. The era of banking secrecy is over. We note that the OECD" — Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development — "has today published a list of countries assessed by the Global Forum against the international standard for exchange of tax information."
Said President Obama: "By any measure, the London summit was historic. It was historic because of the size and the scope of the challenges that we face and because of the timeliness and magnitude of our response."
– jpt

Email
Gulf of Mexico to Become Gulf of America?
Can Mitt Romney Win Conservatives Back?
Tax havens? they don’t need no stinkin’ tax havens……
A Republican representative repeated the tired line today that “the U.S. has the second highest corporate tax rate in the world”. He said this while trying to defend some new Republican tax proposals, and he added that if we don’t cut the corporate tax rate we’re sure to lose more jobs overseas.
There’s just one small problem with his argument:
According to the non-partisan Government Accountability Office (GAO), nearly two-thirds of U.S. companies and 68% of foreign corporations in the U.S. paid NO federal income taxes from 1998-2005.
Posted by: Blue | April 2, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Obama:The president sought to belittle media coverage of these disagreements, saying today “that in the days leading up to the summit, some of the you in the press, some commentators confused honest and open debate with irreconcilable differences.”
==============
Does that irritate you, Jake?
It irritates me, considering he himself is so eager to pretend honest domestic debate about issues doesn’t exist. “Party of no ideas”, etc.
He surely can’t expect the press to put the same gloss on the G-20 summit that he wants to.
Posted by: MayBee | April 2, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Scared, clueless politicians all trying to hype up something that they think makes them look better at home.
And good bye tax havens, the big selling point they all harp about from their shindig? Yeah, sure, we all have our money stuck in tax havens. That is such a tiny drop of money.
Posted by: Sally J. | April 2, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Blue , you left off something. If they brought the money home, they would be taxed at 35%. If you are doing business in say Ireland and they tax the profits made there at 10% are you going to bring it here to be taxed at 35% after you have paid the host country 10%?
I doubt it.
Posted by: david | April 2, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
The President of the United States is handling this shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhht
Posted by: sngeorgia | April 2, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Besides giving away more of the tax payers money, putting some of our freedoms at risk and talking about more troops what has he accomplished? Maybe I will see some help down the road but now my $10.00 increase in my retirement check for April is a big old joke on me and my Democratic family. Unlike our country. I am pleased to see some of the world leaders tell him no on some of his plans unlike our congressmen who keep giving him a blank check to control our future for decades.
Posted by: William | April 2, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
aaaahhhhhh!!!!
its been a long long time since we have sent a president overseas without shoes being thrown.
Posted by: Omentum | April 2, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Dare I suggest that perhaps our friends over-seas are placing Obama on a pedestal in order to now put the world’s global economic crisis upon him..our hero is now under the gun to perform or else..if Obama drops the ball it is Obama and America’s fault for the “Great One” failed the world’s trust in him..perhaps Obama has been appointed the sacrificial lamb and he doesn’t even realize it…
Posted by: Parallax View | April 2, 2009, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
God, isn’t Obama great! Isn’t Obama
God! Tell us, MSNBC, which is it?
Posted by: Trajan | April 2, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
It is embarrassing. He is the worse President in this history.
Posted by: anonymous | April 3, 2009, 5:44 am 5:44 am
There is no doubt that having a Preident that is popular overseas is a good thing. (Forget those pesky riots; they were a fluke.)(Just kidding). There is little doubt that this President has the charisma and it is working. (The part about giving the iPod to the Queen was cute and the fact that it had videos of some of the best of Obama was funny.) He is selling the US and there is no doubt this will go a long way in promoting cooperation with other world leaders economically and otherwise.
Folks – we are still in the rock star phase of this administration.We have not past the 100 day point yet and we are yet to see any actual results from all this heavy spending – domestically or internationally. The jury is still out.
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | April 3, 2009, 7:03 am 7:03 am
Maybe we should breakdown the cost of this high-effort communique. It’s nice to hobnob with the leaders of the top twenty — but, will this really result in change we can believe in?
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 3, 2009, 7:43 am 7:43 am