Scare Force One — Another Look
When the President first heard that the White House had approved it so one of his Air Force planes would fly over Manhattan, he asked, incredulously, "Why would someone approve that?" a White House source tells ABC News.
That incredulity soon turned to a different mood, and the president was furious.
The president directed deputy chief of staff Jim Messina to investigate how and why White House military director Louis Caldera made the decision to conduct this flight without telling anyone above him.
Will Caldera lose his job?
"The president will look at that review and take any appropriate steps after that," White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Tuesday.
A memo from the Federal Aviation Administration obtained by ABC News’ Rich Esposito informed some officials about the flight, but per White House military office instructions said the information "should only be shared with persons with a need to know. Information in the document shall not be released to the public or the media."
ABC News’ Pentagon reporter Luis Martinez reports that this afternoon the Air Force estimated the cost of the terrifying photo op at $328,835. The president says the old picture of Air Force One — taken over the Grand Canyon in 1990 — was working just fine.
Our World News report:
–jpt
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
“Scare Force One”? Really, Jake? So now you’re using the moniker adopted by the right wing trolls on your previous posts on this topic?
Not cool.
Posted by: Lisa | April 28, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
I’d really like more background and details on this reported price tag. Was this the actually “over-cost”, ie. what this “photo op” cost over and above the normal operations of Air Force One (which, as I understand, is required to perform a certain number of training hours).
Or is this a matter of the Pentagon reporter simply asking how much it would cost to fly Air Force One to New York and back? Whichever it is, we deserve to know because those are two VERY different questions. I hope you in the media are aware that viewers are not stupid and can tell when an answer to a question is not necessarily the full truth.
Posted by: Lisa | April 28, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
How can it take a week to look into it? Just ask Caldera.
I can’t believe they actively tried to keep this secret- under threat of sanctions. I really thought it was just an insensitive oversight.
How odd.
Posted by: MayBee | April 28, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
“should only be shared with persons with a need to know”…
Yeah, like ALL residents of the NYC region! That’s who “needed to know”. What stupidity.
For a photo-op? Ever heard of Photoshop morons!
Posted by: Raymond | April 28, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
even PMSNBC is saying scare force one
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 28, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
The white house is LYING as per usual for Obama
Posted by: moronhunter | April 28, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
How could Air Force be ANYWHERE w/o POTUS knowing?? Hmmmmmm????
Nice post, Lisa. Not everyone is on there knees for president chicken! :)
Posted by: chris | April 28, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
What did Bush know? And when did he know it????
Posted by: chris | April 28, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
Dear ABC, there comes the time when ‘damage control is nothing but damage done’.
They’ve found explosives in WTC dust.
Report it.
Posted by: Leut | April 28, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
“They’ve found explosives in WTC dust.
Report it.”
Oh dear God! ACORN is here!
Posted by: chris | April 28, 2009, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
Call it as you wish.
Just facts.
I for one cannot turn my head away from the atrocity we’ve witnessed.
Posted by: Leut | April 28, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
This was just so incredibly stupid. Whoever wrote and approved that memo should be granted a brain transplant.
Posted by: El_Pajaro | April 28, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
After bombing Iraq into submission, destroying their info-structure, power plants, water treatment plants, telephone systems and their homes. They report they found explosives in the dust. Daah – any chance it might have been left by our own bombing and artillery.
Posted by: Finkelburger | April 28, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
I was referring to findings of Danish scientist who discovered the traces of explosives in WTC dust.
Their study is peer reviewed and published by source which is endorsed by Nobel Laureates.
It was widely reported in Europe.
Posted by: Leut | April 28, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
“Information in the document shall not be released to the public or the media.”
That doesn’t sound like transparency.
Please find out who was on the plane. I think that is very relevant…and it IS our right to know.
One of the biggest problems I see with this foolish action is the “boy who cried wolf” effect. Now if a similar event happens that really is an attack, people will be hesitant to evacuate because they will all believe that it is the President or the military once more. People could die in the future because of this recklessness.
Posted by: paul | April 28, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Obama doesn’t have no foreign policy. His foreign policy is so ‘weak’. He has a ‘lack’ of inexperience and leadership.
Posted by: anonymous | April 28, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
The time has come, the time is now — bring back ‘Distraction Dog’!! We need to pull the wool over the public’s eyes and fast.
Posted by: Michelle | April 28, 2009, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
You really think Obama didnt know about this…Give me a break people and wake up and enjoy the sickle on the flag. We have an usual country now.
Posted by: David | April 28, 2009, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
MayBee:”I can’t believe they actively tried to keep this secret- under threat of sanctions. I really thought it was just an insensitive oversight.”
Are you playing dumb or do you really not have any experience with the military?
The local authorities were informed and they apparently did not have any complaints. If anyone, it was the job of the locals on the ground – the NYPD and mayor’s office – to predict this sort of problem and communicate back to the Feds. If they were informed in a manner that did not allow for such communication, Caldera should be out. Otherwise, it’s the fault of those who SHOULD have known better – the local authorities who had the foreknowledge to raise concerns.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 28, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Obama would have stopped Scare Force The One from flying over NY if the teleprompter didn’t get ahead of him. The teleprompter needs to be fired (after it recovers from swine flu).
Posted by: Ben | April 28, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
paul:”Please find out who was on the plane. I think that is very relevant…and it IS our right to know. ”
WHY do you need to know who was on the plane? Why aren’t you railing to know who was on the 2004 photo-op over Mt Rushmore? Why did that not matter a whit?
I guess republicans are really desperate to find something, anything, to attack Obama on.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 28, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
Are we supposed to believe that Obama didnt know about this in advance? Yeah, right. Just like he wasn’t aware of the tea parties. What a farce!
Posted by: Mitch in NC | April 28, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
Maybee: I can’t believe they actively tried to keep this secret- under threat of sanctions. I really thought it was just an insensitive oversight.
==================================
That very large $329,000 pricetag is a good reason to keep it on the downlow….
Someone forgot the jet engine silencers, though.
Posted by: mad | April 28, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
I think he knew about it all right; I think it was preparing for his 2012 campaign…just imagine “keeping Americans safe”…ad nauseum.
Posted by: Justme | April 28, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
I so don’t get the story. Nobody did anything wrong. Planes can fly low anywhere else but not in NY? Get a grip
Posted by: Question | April 28, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Since this “Scare Force One” incident was all about getting a photo of Obama’s plane flying next to the Statue of Liberty, then it only makes sense that either Obama himself, or one of his closest aides, say David Axlefraud, ordered this event.
They were most likely going to use footage of this for an Obama commercial in which the theme was “President Obama is really, really good for our Liberty”.
Posted by: OxyCon | April 28, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
I think Obama knew about this. This reminds me of when he claimed to to know anything about Reverend Wright after sitting in his church for 20 years. It also reminds me of the time he tried to blame Chris Dodd for executive pay raises even though he knew about them.
Obama will throw anybody under the bus.
I also think this is much ado about nothing. Some people in NYC like to keep 911 in the news.
Posted by: Molly | April 28, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
I was willing to give Obama a chance but must say that his first 100 days have been a disaster. I hope he ups his game in the 2nd 100.
Posted by: patW | April 28, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
come on Obama…whats morons run your administration. I could have used Photoshop and put Air Force One with any background,scenery,building in the world for 1/2 of $328835….LOL
Posted by: JWx2 | April 28, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Well, we’re not speaking about those torture memos or utter lack of suspects.
Eh?
Posted by: Leut | April 28, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
Why is this such big news – it only cost the tax payers $328,000. That’s a small drop in the bucket compared to the waste in his budget.
Posted by: DRF | April 28, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
I can’t watch Obama anymore on TV. It’s not that I don’t like him but I can’t get that telepromter out of my mind. The way he looks back and forth at that thing is just to weird. What I thought was a gift turned out to be a crutch.
Posted by: ben | April 28, 2009, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Tapper covering for Obama again…. geez
Posted by: How am I doing now Comrades | April 28, 2009, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Jake, I’m still not buying your Pentagon reporter’s estimated price tag. It sounds to me like he asked the Air Force “how much would it theoretically cost to fly Air Force One and a fighter jet from DC to NY and back?” Please, Jake, if there was more in-depth reporting (were these regularly scheduled flight hours? How much did the “photo op” aspect of it add to the cost, if so?) I would love for you to prove me wrong. I strongly suspect I’m not wrong, though. If I’m not wrong, can you explain to me how this is responsible journalism?
Awaiting your detailed explanation…
Posted by: Lisa | April 28, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
This is just another example why we don’t need to expand government. We’re
already paying a lot of people who apparently have nothing else to do than
spend our money on stupid ideas like this!
Posted by: ohiopolitico | April 28, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Responsible journalism?
lol!
Posted by: Leut | April 28, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
Why are the findings of that Danish scientist missing within US?
Huh?
Posted by: Leut | April 28, 2009, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
jhw: Are you playing dumb or do you really not have any experience with the military?
=========
The FAA demanded secrecy from the NYPD, the Secret Service, the FBI and even the mayor’s office and threatened federal sanctions if the secret got out.
I have no idea what you are referring to when you talk about experience with the military.
We regularly know when the real AF1 with POTUS aboard is going to be leaving and arriving at a given city. This empty flight was to be kept even more secret than that. I don’t know why, do you?
Posted by: MayBee | April 28, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
Who requested the flight?
Who was on the plane?
P.S. I don’t believe a word Obama says.
Posted by: Michelle | April 28, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
I just want to know three things. Who was on the plane besides the pilot? Where were the photographers located on the ground to take the photos? And, where are the photos now?
Posted by: 3Questions | April 28, 2009, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
MayBee:”We regularly know when the real AF1 with POTUS aboard is going to be leaving and arriving at a given city. This empty flight was to be kept even more secret than that. I don’t know why, do you?”
The default position of the military is secrecy. This is not new.
I have not noticed AF1 scheduling be released – events are, but the flight movements are typically not released until day of movement, if then.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 28, 2009, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
The default position of the military is secrecy. This is not new.
I have not noticed AF1 scheduling be released – events are, but the flight movements are typically not released until day of movement, if then.
==========
This isn’t a military issue.
Nobody needed to know the military flight movement.
Whoever planned it just had to see to it that it was announced on television and radio, “You are going to see AF1 and some fighter planes flying around Manhattan today. Don’t be alarmed, it is a filming and training exercise”.
People know the general whereabouts of the real AF1 every time the President goes somewhere. An empty one shouldn’t require threats of secrecy.
Posted by: MayBee | April 28, 2009, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
patW,
I hate to tell you, but this IS his game. He is not only a leftist (which is not a sin, of course), but he is incompetent and he is a liar. Dont belive me? Then why has he broken his promise about posting bills for 5 days before they are voted on?
Posted by: Mitch in NC | April 28, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
People are overreacting, and Obama is giving into it. He’s more follower than leader. All he has to say is that he’s sorry if anybody was frightened, but since this was NOT an attack, there is no reason for alarm.
Case closed.
Posted by: boogienights | April 28, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
MayBee:”This isn’t a military issue.”
Yes, yes it is.
“Whoever planned it just had to see to it that it was announced on television and radio, “You are going to see AF1 and some fighter planes flying around Manhattan today. Don’t be alarmed, it is a filming and training exercise”"
Amazing – you have 20/20 hindsight, what a gift. Why didn’t the NYPD or mayor’s office suggest that? Trust me – it’s not like they’re docile wilting flowers scared to speak up. Why didn’t the NYPD complain if this panic was so obvious?
It was probably only one in five thousand New Yorkers who gave a rip about this, unfortunately when you have a couple million folks on the island that’s enough to get national airplay.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 28, 2009, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Mitch in SC:” Then why has he broken his promise about posting bills for 5 days before they are voted on?”
That’s your proof of incompetence? That he hasn’t stuck to the letter of a pledge (which had a big ‘ol ‘except emergency legislation’ escape clause)?
Talk about a petty and irrelevant opposition party.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 28, 2009, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
“WHY do you need to know who was on the plane?”
Two reasons. One is that I paid for the flight. And two is that knowing who was on the plane will provide a much clearer picture of who knew about this flight beforehand.
“I guess republicans are really desperate to find something, anything, to attack Obama on. ”
I’m not a Republican…and I don’t think anyone needs to look very hard to find plenty of problems.
Posted by: paul | April 28, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Mr. Transparency should have no problem telling us who was on that jet. Heck, it can’t even be classified.
If he doesn’t it would prove what a lying hypocrtical Obama is.
Posted by: drjohn | April 28, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
“WHY do you need to know who was on the plane?”
“Why do you need to know interrogation tactics?”
Posted by: drjohn | April 28, 2009, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
Let me clarify this for people who seem obsessed to know who was actually on the Boeing plane involved in the NYC flyover …
2 Pilots …
Clear enough … ?
Now after y’all get your panties out of the bunch it is, you can go on obsessing about the American President’s Birth Certificate …
At least that tinfoil argument was nuttier for us observers …
Posted by: Blogger | April 28, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
“It was probably only one in five thousand New Yorkers who gave a rip about this,”
My goodness, what a tin ear you have, jhw.
Where are you- in Los Angeles or somewhere similar where they think disasters are all in the movies?
Posted by: drjohn | April 28, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
NY Post: AIR HEADS IN DC TERRORIZE CITY
NY Daily News: President Obama calls Air Force One flyover ‘mistake’ day after low-flying plane terrifies New York
Posted by: drjohn | April 28, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
WSJ: “The review of the flight, which rattled windows and spread fear of another 9/11-style attack in lower Manhattan, is expected to focus on the White House Military Office, the unit responsible for approving the flyover.”
Posted by: drjohn | April 28, 2009, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Several businesses were evacuated
From NBC NY”
Jumbo Jet, F-16 Buzz Lady Liberty, Put New York on Edge
At least two people were treated for minor injuries at Jersey City Medical Center after falling during the rush to exit their buildings.
“Everybody panicked,” said Daisy Cooper, a Merrill Lynch worker in Jersey City, who lost a nephew on 9/11. “Everybody was screaming and we all ran downstairs. I’m devastated…Everybody was running, we didn’t know why we were running. We just knew it was a plane, there we go, 9/11 again.”
“It’s completely asinine after 9/11 to do that,” said Keith Mercantine, who witnessed the chaos in Jersey City. “I saw ambulances out here with pregnant women.”
Posted by: drjohn | April 28, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
It takes an idiot to minimize what happened yesterday.
Posted by: drjohn | April 28, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
Well, jhw, if President Obama (who is reportedly furious) reads the review he’s ordered and finds the NYPD at fault for not pushing back against the federal government’s plans for the AF1 flyover, I hope he makes that very public.
Posted by: MayBee | April 28, 2009, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
Posted by: Blogger | Apr 28, 2009 11:20:33 PM
Then there should be no problem in making it official, right?
There’s nothing to hide, right?
What are you afraid of?
Posted by: drjohn | April 28, 2009, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
What am I afraid of ?
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING !
I LIVE in NY. And i find it quite disingenuous for people who will wish that liberal state did NOT exist as part of the Union to argue so vehemently for something that should NOT be a big deal as a Nation compromising it’s values and engaging in a practice that we will prosecute other nations for taking part in, TORTURE …
Now IF you can prove that you REALLY feel the need to know who actually was on a Plane and HOW that information is somehow going to “absolve” some form of contempt you hold towards the new Administration , MAYBE I will find your inquiry credible …
Until THEN, I will suggest you hold a Tea party Protest decrying Obama’s “NY Scare” and see if THAT produces ANY results ( since your last one was so successful /sarc )
Posted by: Blogger | April 28, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
drjohn:
if you really want to get into the ‘what are they afraid of’ state of mind lets review:
“Just before launching his invasion of Iraq, President Bush went on national television to issue an ultimatum to Saddam Hussein, urging him to leave his country within 48 hours. Bush also had this message for “all Iraqi military and civilian personnel”:
War crimes will be prosecuted, war criminals will be punished and it will be no defense to say, “I was just following orders.”
Posted by: USA | April 29, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am
Just a few of Obama’s 1st 100 days…
ELEVEN TRILLION DOLLAR DEFICIT $11,000,000,000,000.00 That’s $26,000 per person, but only 50% pay taxes, so EVERY WORKING PERSON IN AMERICA will owe $52,000. That’s Hope?
“What?? They get Bonuses??”
“That wasn’t a bow, he was reaching down ‘cos the King is short.”
“Veterans returning from Iraq are considered a threat to US security”
“Get me to the CIA right NOW so I can mend fences over this release of interrogation techniques and explain my way out of a MAJOR BREACH OF NATIONAL SECURITY”
“Air, er… SCARE Force One flew over WHERE with an F-15 in chase!!!???”
“B’du-b’du-b’du-hamina-hamina… I don’t know!”
The Messiah is proving to be nothing but a greenhorn Chicago politician in WAY over his head, and all his bad choices for cabinet posts are screwing up everything they touch.
Change = The monkeys are now running the zoo. Obama (alleged zookeeper) cannot control his own people. (No offense to monkeys).
A friend of mine walked over to me during a break the other day and sarcastically asked if I was glad “we” voted for the president. I had to remind him of the day I tried to talk him out of it as he repeated: “8 years of Bush is enough, we gotta give him a chance”, but he didn’t remember anybody who wasn’t for Obama. The blindness over Obama has been astounding, but there’s light at the end of the tunnel. The entire administration are waving flares.
Posted by: Fren Banklin | April 29, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am
BTW, to the publisher of this article, Jake Tapper, I am quite unimpressed by your journalistic affluence in your choice of “play of words” …
You of all people should know that when a President of the USA is not on the plane it is officially NOT Air Force One …
So naming your article Scare Force One is really very Disappointingly Inappropriate …
Try Again …
Posted by: Blogger | April 29, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am
Just a few of President Obama’s 1st 100 days …
* Confidence in direction of country soaring back up …
* Dow higher than when Boosh left office …
* The USA is claiming back the moral high ground when it comes to Torture …
* The views of the international community towards the USA are significantly being repaired …
* All natural disasters are receiving the most prompt of attentions from the Federal Government …
* The LOSERS are STILL WHINING … ( I’m loving it … )
CHANGE = Oh Yes! It Already Started …
If you are one of the few in the minority that think the Administration is “waving flares”, just wait till you see a McSame/Flailin administration where both the leaders and the staff have ABSOLUTELY ZERO control of their operations … ( thank goodness we NEVER had to witness THAT ! )
Posted by: Blogger | April 29, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am
“…but since this was NOT an attack, there is no reason for alarm.”
WRONG. Especially against a bright sky, the average person cannot distinguish AF1 from any other airliner, and the presence of an F-15 (a very well known shape) in chase of said airliner leads to anticipation of one of the following two scenarios:
A) The low-flying airliner is about to crash into a building, a’la 9/11.
~or~
B) The fighter is about to shoot said airliner, causing flaming debris and the jet itself to crash upon the city.
Both are perfect justification for the ensuing panic. People on the ground could not have anticipated any other scenario since they were not informed of the true purpose of the flight. Both scenarios were obvious and eminent from the perspective of anyone on the ground, save the few in the NYPD and FAA who were instructed by the White House NOT to inform the public. It matters not who was on board. It was a rookie White House cabinet member perpetrating an astounding blunder of biblical proportion which caused chaos in equal proportion. They all seem to do as they please without repercussion, but it is after all, a liberal at the helm, and a rookie at that. He must start firing these idiots just to get control of the ones who remain, but of course he will not, as they are only making “honest mistakes”.
I love how the followers of the Messiah rush to minimalize or excuse even this supreme stupidity and incompetence. Those who were deathly afraid of an administration that knew exactly what it was doing every day of its existence and by every measure, using every PROVEN technique made our country safer, are not the slightest bit shaken by one that continually proves it hasn’t the slightest hint of a clue, even to the point of actually wreaking havoc on an entire city (NYC at THAT!), so long as the promise of hope and handouts is part of the package. My God, this is truly hilarious! Well, I guess it would be if it weren’t so incredibly frightening.
Posted by: Fren Banklin | April 29, 2009, 12:59 am 12:59 am
JPT:
Here’s fodder for a question or two, from “A Blog For All” although I can’t vouch for its accuracy:
“Joey Devilla, meanwhile, quotes Chris Taylor who seems to have come across a very curious line of questions – why was a F-16 chosen as the platform from which to take the photos, given that the F-16 is normally a single seat aircraft – there is a two-seat trainer version, but the plane doesn’t appear to be that version. More to the point, the F-16 was repeatedly shown trailing the VC-25, meaning that they wouldn’t be getting the most prominent view of the plane.”
Back on the mondo bizarro front, apparently a second shoot, now scrapped, was scheduled to take place over Wash. DC!
Posted by: JM Hanes | April 29, 2009, 1:20 am 1:20 am
I’m willing to bet the flight of AF1 was briefed to Mr. Obama either the day before or the day of. Just a bullet point in a long daily briefing. Maybe he was distracted or thinking of something else when it was briefed.
The point has been made that if it were Mr. Bush still in the White House, there would be a very different treatment of this by the press. When will the press get off its knees and start to cover the stories of the day?
As for Mr. Obama being furious, get a grip Mr. President. This is nothing compared to the screw ups you will have to deal with in the future. It is the nature of government to screw things up. Maybe you should play back some video of Mr. Bush to learn how to handle these things with grace.
Posted by: Terry | April 29, 2009, 1:24 am 1:24 am
Well, Jake, I just found the full Air Force statement about the “cost” of this photo op and it seems your report is indeed disingenuous. You state the “cost of the terrifying photo op” was $328,835. But was that really the cost of the photo op? The Air Force statement says that “the flights were a training mission and the hours would have been flown regardless…” So the cost incurred was actually the cost of a regularly scheduled, and budgeted for, training mission, NOT the cost of the “photo op”.
So what, if anything, was the ADDED cost of the photo op aspect of this? That’s the only question you should be asking. Unless your point is that all regular training missions should be abolished.
Posted by: Lisa | April 29, 2009, 1:43 am 1:43 am
Blogger,
We’re all not gonna get to see the President’s birth cert.(state secret)
But, how about his mom’s passport?
Where is it?
Why can’t we see it?
If she was in Hawaii on August 4, 1961, it will show she was there, not Kenya.
Should be a slam dunk for the President.
Or, is it that a state secret too?
Posted by: J House | April 29, 2009, 2:24 am 2:24 am
Good Grief, if George Bush had made a blunder like this the media would have gone ballistic and pictures would be all over the front pages of every liberal rag in the country. I find it incredulous that Obama didn’t know about the Photo Op and I think he should have said more about it than the arrogant statement he made this morning. Another thing, Rober Gibbs performance at the Press Conference was total insanity….this ignorant boob is unbelievably dense, arrogant and snippy. He has to go!!!
Posted by: Peggy | April 29, 2009, 3:40 am 3:40 am
This was a scene from an upcoming movie. Angelina Jolie is in Albany NY filming an the movie ‘Salt’ where she plays a CIA Agent. They had the whole interstate upstate closed for a car crash scene as well. I wonder if they will scrap the scene now because of the uproar.
Posted by: Jack Frame | April 29, 2009, 5:14 am 5:14 am
“if you really want to get into the ‘what are they afraid of’ state of mind lets review:”
Obamatons cannot resist moral equivalence. They cannot evaluate an OBama blunder without going right for the “Well Bush did….”
It’s a sad comment for you guys and Obama when you feel you have to go back to Bush as a comparison. It means Obama really is as bad as we thought he was.
Posted by: drjohn | April 29, 2009, 7:26 am 7:26 am
“Is it really so hard to believe that Obama had no idea this was happening???”
Yes it is. Just about impossible.
Let’s see any of you find an example of a VC 25 sent out without the President’s knowledge.
Go ahead.
Posted by: drjohn | April 29, 2009, 7:28 am 7:28 am
“President Obama’s media cheerleaders are hailing how loved he is. But at the 100-day mark of his presidency, Mr. Obama is the second-least-popular president in 40 years.”
Washington Times
heh
Posted by: drjohn | April 29, 2009, 7:30 am 7:30 am
Obama didn’t know?
So he’s either incompetent with a staff that runs circles around him , or he’s a liar.
Posted by: Trend | April 29, 2009, 7:43 am 7:43 am
I would not drop the soap around these guys if I were you
Posted by: joey | April 29, 2009, 8:10 am 8:10 am
I would not hold my breath to see the birth cert. or other offical documents. we ain’t ever going to get those. but you can see some really reveling pictures of the big guys mommy.
Posted by: stanley | April 29, 2009, 8:14 am 8:14 am
Mr. Tapper, good luck tonight. I hope you get to ask some questions to the big guy. But be careful. His boy Gibby has tried to intimadate you and others in the past and we don’t want you to back down from these clowns. you are one of the only “reporters” who ask Barry/Totus hard questions. Hopefully Barry won’t talk to ‘prompter totus out loud tonight. maybe he will be on the lowdown.
Posted by: bobbyq | April 29, 2009, 8:21 am 8:21 am
I guess the Obama peeps are programmed to get a photo op at any cost!!
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 29, 2009, 8:34 am 8:34 am
Please complain some more about calling it “Scare Force One.” This will of course discourage people from doing so.
Posted by: Jim Treacher | April 29, 2009, 9:01 am 9:01 am
The F-16 had a red tail which signifies it was from the 100th Fighting Squadron, the famous Tuskegee Airmen, reactivated in 2007. Perfect flyover shot for tonight’s speech – the 100th FS representing an all Black squadron from WWII. I mean if you just needed any old F-16, there were many closer than Alabama.
Posted by: ConservativeWoman | April 29, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am
“Let’s see any of you find an example of a VC 25 sent out without the President’s knowledge.”
No. That’s a ridiculous request and you know it. How about you provide proof that he’s lying, instead. How about somebody on the record saying that the President has to okay all movements of the planes. Shouldn’t be that difficult to find, it it’s the case. Otherwise, it’s just more right wing baseless speculation and lies. How do you people look yourselves in the mirror when you so regularly are blatantly dishonest? You don’t care about honesty on the road to political points. It’s sad.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am
“Perfect flyover shot for tonight’s speech”
Huh? Have I been missing the “flyover shots” during Presidential speeches?
“Good Grief, if George Bush had made a blunder like this the media would have gone ballistic and pictures would be all over the front pages of every liberal rag in the country.”
You must not read much, because every news outlet in the western hemisphere has been hammering this story on their front page.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am
“”President Obama’s media cheerleaders are hailing how loved he is. But at the 100-day mark of his presidency, Mr. Obama is the second-least-popular president in 40 years.”"
According to what poll? What was the question? Not that I would be all that surprised considering the unparalleled challenges that moron left him. But I’d like to know the details supporting that claim.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am
Obama is pretty tight with his own money considering his choice of gifts.
But he sure enjoys spending someone else’s money.
$300K for photo op
$170 million for inauguration
millions for Greek Temple
millions for Chicago celebration
9,000 gallons of fuel on Earth Day
But he tells us to cut back.
Posted by: nick | April 29, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am
“Well, Jake, I just found the full Air Force statement about the “cost” of this photo op and it seems your report is indeed disingenuous. You state the “cost of the terrifying photo op” was $328,835. But was that really the cost of the photo op? The Air Force statement says that “the flights were a training mission and the hours would have been flown regardless…” So the cost incurred was actually the cost of a regularly scheduled, and budgeted for, training mission, NOT the cost of the “photo op”.”
THIS BEARS REPEATING.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am
I love it when Gibbs told the press to ask the White House–when asked questions about the flyover.
Obama and Gibbs are both in the dark when it comes to what is going on in the WH.
Wasn’t it Michelle who said something like–if you can’t control what goes on in your own house how can you control the WH?
Posted by: max | April 29, 2009, 9:29 am 9:29 am
The difference, Silky, is that they’re not blaming Obama personally for it, but his underling Caldera.
If Bush had done it, the personal attacks and insults would have been endless.
Speaking of which, isn’t a uniformed military person supposed to be in charge of the White House Military Office? Why is a civilian running it? Maybe that’s the problem.
A uniformed head for the office might have a more realistic, un-Hollywood idea of how to use military assets.
Posted by: citizen voter, not "worker" | April 29, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am
“Huh? Have I been missing the ‘flyover shots’ during Presidential speeches?”
Nice deflection of a perfectly good discussion point. Care to follow it with your theory as to why the F-16 had to come all the way from Alabama? Representing the Black airmen of Tuskegee?
Notice how BHO never takes responsibility for anything that comes out of the White House. You would never have cut an inch of slack to GWB.
Posted by: ConservativeWoman | April 29, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Wasn’t Obama asking suggestions a few days ago on how to save money?
Here’s some…
Stop wasting our money to make yourself look good with AF1 glamour shots.
Try to get control of your staff.
Posted by: millie | April 29, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am
“Nice deflection of a perfectly good discussion point. Care to follow it with your theory as to why the F-16 had to come all the way from Alabama? Representing the Black airmen of Tuskegee?”
I have no idea if that’s who it was, where the plane came from, or any other circumstances involving the plane for that matter. If you have anything substantive to offer on the subject other than the tail marking matches that of a wing from Alabama, I’m all ears.
“Notice how BHO never takes responsibility for anything that comes out of the White House. You would never have cut an inch of slack to GWB.”
He takes responsibility all the time. You want him to apologize, which he’s not going to do as it’s inappropriate for somebody who didn’t pull the trigger to apologize. He’s acknowledged the mistake, indicated it won’t happen again, and he’s having it investigated. That’s enough.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am
“Wasn’t it Michelle who said something like–if you can’t control what goes on in your own house how can you control the WH?”
I don’t know, but if you’re going to imply she said this, you should have the quote.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Also, as has been told to you people ad nauseum, these planes and pilots all train. Training requires flying time. Flying time costs money. Supposing that plane did come from Alabama, who cares if it’s logging hours over the Gult of Mexico or over New York Harbor? In fact, if it’s an AF1 chase plane, that’s where it needs to get it’s training…with the VC-25s.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am
“Stop wasting our money to make yourself look good with AF1 glamour shots.”
Ha! Glamour shots? He wasn’t lying across the roof of the plane, rocking blue steel. In fact, he wasn’t even on the plane.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am
This flyover is just another example of the Obama administration/Democrats disconnect with the people.
They seem to have a pre-9/11 mentality
based on the insensitivity of this flyover
and their willingness to prosecute those who kept us safe right after 9/11.
Will NY’ers remember the flyover when it comes time to vote in 2010?
I hope so.
Posted by: riley | April 29, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am
$300K for a photo op.
Two sets of rules in the Obama administration.
One for them one for the people.
Posted by: ross | April 29, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am
“Will NY’ers remember the flyover when it comes time to vote in 2010?
I hope so.”
Maybe, but New Yorkers, by and large, aren’t idiots, so most won’t be considering this “flyover” when voting.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Silky:
Because you asked and because I should have provided the quote.
Michelle was ripping Hillary about Bill.
“If you can’t control your own house how can you run the White House?”
So I say to Michelle–have a talk with your husband.
How can he run the country when he can’t even control his own staff?
My quote.
Posted by: max | April 29, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
“$300K for a photo op.”
This was a training mission, with the photo op merely piggy-backing. Are you suggesting we put a stop to the regular training of the VC-25 pilots and ground crew?
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Silky, the “poll” they’re talking about is a bogus Washington Times editorial that claimed his Gallup “approval rating” was 56% (when it’s actually in the low to mid 60s). It was a misinterpretation of a Gallup poll that had 56% saying Obama is doing an “excellent” or “good” job. That wasn’t his “approval rating” because there was also a category that said he was doing an “okay” job (which would be included as “approval”). The righties are running with this bogus “56%” number and claiming that makes him the second least popular Pres. at this point in his term or some such nonsense. It’s all based on a bogus misreading of a poll.
Whatever helps them sleep at night while their party crumbles, I guess. ;-P
Posted by: Lisa | April 29, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am
“How can he run the country when he can’t even control his own staff?”
You have much to learn about the Executive if you think that it’s akin to managing a 3 person family.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am
A plane flew near Manhattan; the FAA and air traffic controllers knew about it and approved it; the NYC Police knew about it; the White House knew about it and approved it; but Obama didn’t know and wouldn’t have approved? I don’t get this. No harm was done. A NY Mayor with Presidential ambitions whines to the press and Obama treats it like a National Emergency. This is as dumb as it gets. At least now we know that when Michael Bloomberg says “jump”, Obama will ask “how high”. I am disappointed to say the least. I don’t think Obama is being sensitive to my feelings. :)
Posted by: Sean O'Brien | April 29, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am
JM Hanes raises an excellent point.
Where were the cameras?
Posted by: MayBee | April 29, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am
I agree. Where were the photographers located and where are the pictures from this “Photo Op”? As taxpayers we should at least see what we paid for. Also, who was in the plane besides the pilots?
Posted by: 3Questions | April 29, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am
In a memo obtained by CBS 2 HD, the Federal Aviation Administration’s James Johnston said the agency was aware of “the possibility of public concern regarding DOD (Department of Defense) aircraft flying at low altitudes” in an around New York City. But they demanded total secrecy from the NYPD, the Secret Service, the FBI and even the mayor’s office and threatened federal sanctions if the secret got out. Well, it’s official. We the people don’t count!
Posted by: LongT | April 29, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am
I flat out don’t believe that Obama didn’t know this was going to happen. I think he wanted trinkets to hand out, his ego demanded new photos and the cost — of all kinds — be damned. I believe he knew about it and authorized it. His “fury” is all for show.
Posted by: Lizzie | April 29, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
ABC News’ Pentagon reporter Luis Martinez reports that this afternoon the Air Force estimated the cost of the terrifying photo op at $328,835.
=====================================
Who is supposed to benefit from this photo op? Was it just a photo or was it movie footage?
Rahm’s brother is in the movie business.
Posted by: mad | April 29, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Keep spinning, Silky.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | April 29, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
“Where were the cameras?”
In the tailing fighters?
Posted by: Ryan C | April 29, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
“ABC News’ Pentagon reporter Luis Martinez reports that this afternoon the Air Force estimated the cost of the terrifying photo op at $328,835.”
It was a training exercise. So, now we want price tags on all training exercises? Attributing the cost of this to “a photo op” is not only incorrect, it is blatantly irresponsible journalism.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
“Keep spinning, Silky.”
Please point out to me what I’m spinning. Don’t make an accusation like that without an example.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Hummm…..who was taking the pictures?
Was a helicoptr involved?
Oh..I bet George Bush took the photos.
Posted by: Angie | April 29, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
NOBAMA KNEW ALL ABOUT SCAREFORCE 1 BEFORE IT HAPPENED. HE’S BLAMING EVERYONE ELSE.
Posted by: Peggy | April 29, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Do they actually do training flights around Washington and New York?
One would think that that area is too populated.
Posted by: Angie | April 29, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
“Do they actually do training flights around Washington and New York?
One would think that that area is too populated.”
Who knows, but that’s not relevant. Regardless where the exercise would have been done, it would have been done. The airtime would have been logged.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
When did the “‘Photo-Op’ to update pictures of the standby Air Force One near American landmarks” become a “Training Mission”? That my dear boy, is SPIN. We still haven’t seen the photos from this “Photo-Op” paid for by taxpayers like me and, maybe, depending on your income, you.
Posted by: 3Questions | April 29, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Silky: They are spinning this as a
training flight. All hours are logged, so. Know a person that works with a
training facility and he tells me that
training flights would NOT be done in that area. Just another shenanigan
with a whole lot of cats covering up.
Posted by: Angie | April 29, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Hmmm… a “training” flight flying at low altitudes near lower Manhatten (which just happens to be near Ground Zero/Statue of Liberty). What on earth would they do if the “training mission” went wrong? Ditch it or shoot the plane down over a heavily populated area? Was Cap’n Sully on board? Nah, this wasn’t a “training mission”, this was a big ole Obama mistake, but why? For a campaign shot? (“I won.”) Where are the pictures?
Posted by: Ruh-Oh | April 29, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Time to amend the Constitution, instead of we the people, it should read we the DEMOCRATS will do what ever we want, when we desire, no matter the cost.
Posted by: GEB | April 29, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
In the tailing fighters?
===========
You think there was a photographer in the second seat of an f-16 taking still photographs of the plane in front of it?
I don’t.
I’m going with the theory that this was for a movie, and the film crew was on the ground or in a nearby building somewhere.
Posted by: MayBee | April 29, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
If there is a second seat in that F-16, it’s a good bet that whoever was in it was taking pictures.
“Silky: They are spinning this as a
training flight. All hours are logged, so. Know a person that works with a
training facility and he tells me that
training flights would NOT be done in that area. Just another shenanigan
with a whole lot of cats covering up.”
You’re missing the point. The point is that the cost would have been incurred either way. Of course, the training wouldn’t have been done over NY Harbor, but the cost would have been incurred. You follow me?
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
That’s not spin, that’s the truth.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
The WH was planning another photo shhot in May.
But since it was going to be in DC guess it would only cost us about half of the NYC flyover.
Probably only $100K or so.
Americans should cut back so Obama can have his photo-ops.
Posted by: ross | April 29, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Silky:
Think you mean, a cost would have been incurred no matter where this aircraft was going whether it be training or a photo-op. My question is: what was the real reason for it being in that area?
Just because it can…and it was a ha, ha I can do what I choose, it is my toy,
and folks didn’t take it as being funny.
I sure don’t.
Posted by: Angie | April 29, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
“You think there was a photographer in the second seat of an f-16 taking still photographs of the plane in front of it?
I don’t.”
Maybee,
Aerial photography is usually done via mounted camera pods.
It was not some guy in the back seat with a telephoto lens.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 29, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
“I’m going with the theory that this was for a movie, and the film crew was on the ground or in a nearby building somewhere.”
If it were for a movie, they would have done CGI.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 29, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Well… I’m NoT comforted by hearing that nobody in the Obama Administration knew a jet was overhead until it arrived… What does that say about the effectiveness of our Homeland Security against another fly-over attack?
Either someone is lying about what we knew when we knew it, or our national security is severely incompetent.
Posted by: pbatus | April 29, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
“Think you mean, a cost would have been incurred no matter where this aircraft was going whether it be training or a photo-op. My question is: what was the real reason for it being in that area?”
Lol. Okay, let’s try this again. The plane would have been on a training exercise, no matter what. The costs would have been incurred regardless where the exercise took place. It was going to be in the air flying around anyway. Caldera decided to kill two birds with one stone and have them do the exercise where they could get a good new stock photo for Air Force One. Is that clear?
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Just another example of the type of leadership you get from someone who has no experience. Obama was simply a product and a defective one at that.
Posted by: Chris in TN | April 29, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Think. If the idea was to update file photos of Air Force One flying by national monuments (in this case, The Statue of Liberty), the pictures would not be taken from the air. They would be taken from the ground or from a building. Where are the pictures, where were the photographers?
Posted by: Ruh-Oh | April 29, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
“Well… I’m NoT comforted by hearing that nobody in the Obama Administration knew a jet was overhead until it arrived… What does that say about the effectiveness of our Homeland Security against another fly-over attack?”
Absolutely nothing. But it does say a lot about your ability to analyze a situation.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
They would not fly a training mission over lower Manhatten. That is just nonsensical SPIN.
Posted by: Eyes Wide Shut | April 29, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
“Think. If the idea was to update file photos of Air Force One flying by national monuments (in this case, The Statue of Liberty), the pictures would not be taken from the air. They would be taken from the ground or from a building. Where are the pictures, where were the photographers?”
Think. Ever seen any of the prior stock photos? They’re all taken from the air.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Hey Jake,
I think I can see what you are about now. But that is okay because everyone is entitled to their opinions.
Posted by: Dawg | April 29, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
“I’m going with the theory that this was for a movie, and the film crew was on the ground or in a nearby building somewhere.”
If it were for a movie, they would have done CGI.
=======================
They would have, would they.
Posted by: MayBee | April 29, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
“They would not fly a training mission over lower Manhatten. That is just nonsensical SPIN.”
Please actually read the posts if you’re going to throw around accusations based on them. This *was* a training mission, something that has been confirmed by the Air Force, and it wasn’t “over” lower ManhattAn (“a”, not “e”). It was over the Hudson River and New Jersey.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Silky:
No, it is not clear. Maybe we are saying the same thing only in two different ways. Training exercises are done in certain areas.
Not in Washington and New York. Yes,
this aircraft had to take off from Washington, and yes, someone had to authorize him to fly to New York.
And, for whatever reason it was spun
as a training flight and to get photos.
It was not funny….as you say lol.
Posted by: Angie | April 29, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
“They would have, would they.”
What realistic scenario can you come up with where what your suggesting could come to fruition? No freaking way.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
They would not fly a training mission over lower Manhatten. That is just nonsensical SPIN.
Posted by: Eyes Wide Shut | Apr 29, 2009 2:07:49 PM
=====================================
I’m with you. They got caught doing a silly thing and now they are spinning it like a top. Training flights don’t take place over highly populated areas. Yes, the aircraft has to take off and land, but it goes to an airfield for touch-and-go take offs and landings.
Posted by: Angie | April 29, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
What realistic scenario can you come up with where what your suggesting could come to fruition? No freaking way.
==
Why is it less believable than using a training mission to fly low over NYC and DC for a standard photo op? It was a bad call either way.
All the production company would have to do is ask some liaison if they can film AF1 flying over the city. The military has allowed jets and other equipment to be used for movies before- Top Gun for example, and other Michael Bay movies.
So the liaison likes the idea and says yes, figuring…what can go wrong?
Posted by: MayBee | April 29, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
The military is currently working with Michael Bay on the “Transformers” sequel.
They are using the New Mexico missile range, enlisted men and women as extras, tanks, Raptors, F-16s, Humvees, and even parachute troops.
Posted by: MayBee | April 29, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
And Salt and Transformers have the same production company, Di Bonaventura Pictures.
So it isn’t really an outlandish theory.
Posted by: MayBee | April 29, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
“Why is it less believable than using a training mission to fly low over NYC and DC for a standard photo op?”
Because the “photo op” was FOR AIR FORCE ONE. Updating the stock photo happens from time to time. Having a 747 with the seal of the President on it buzz New York Harbor for 20 minutes for Hollywood is beyond far-fetched. To my knowledge, the military doesn’t rent out AF-1 to Hollywood. The military does, however, take pictures of AF-1 over U.S. landmarks from time to time.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
To my knowledge, the military doesn’t rent out AF-1 to Hollywood.
==================================
The military didn’t make the arrangements. A political appointee did.
Posted by: mad | April 29, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
To my knowledge, the military doesn’t rent out AF-1 to Hollywood. The military does, however, take pictures of AF-1 over U.S. landmarks from time to time.
============
So you think the thing that makes it far-fetched is that it was AF1. Like that is a line that wouldn’t be crossed.
Well, possibly.
But you would also think buzzing tall buildings in NYC with a low-flying presidential jet and fighter planes trailing is a line that wouldn’t be crossed. Yet it was, for one reason or another.
I could be wrong, but since we’ve already seen the bad judgment in action on this incident, I don’t think “that would be bad judgment!” is compelling enough argument.
Posted by: MayBee | April 29, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
“So you think the thing that makes it far-fetched is that it was AF1. Like that is a line that wouldn’t be crossed.”
That is a line that’s never been crossed and never will be crossed.
“But you would also think buzzing tall buildings in NYC with a low-flying presidential jet and fighter planes trailing is a line that wouldn’t be crossed. Yet it was, for one reason or another.”
It didn’t fly over Manhattan. And it certainly didn’t fly low over buildings in Manhattan.
“I could be wrong, but since we’ve already seen the bad judgment in action on this incident, I don’t think “that would be bad judgment!” is compelling enough argument.”
This is completely a hindsight deal. It’s reasonable to not forsee people freaking out. Planes fly over the Hudson all day long and the President’s plane is instantly recognizable. It’s simply an unfortunately thing.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
It didn’t fly over Manhattan. And it certainly didn’t fly low over buildings in Manhattan.
==========
The people that evacuated their buildings in lower Manhattan surely seemed to think so.
Posted by: MayBee | April 29, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
“The people that evacuated their buildings in lower Manhattan surely seemed to think so.”
They did? How do you know that? And if they did, that’s odd, because nothing I’ve seen indicates the planes flew over Manhattan at all. Certainly, none of the video I’ve seen.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Google air force 1 manhattan and you’ll get all kinds of stories.
WSJ says:As a result, to onlookers Monday all across downtown Manhattan — where the World Trade Center once stood — the photo shoot looked like a terrorist attack. People watched in horror as a massive aircraft, trailed closely by an F-16 fighter jet, banked and roared low near the city, in a frightening echo of the events of Sept. 11, 2001.
Fearing the worst, thousands of people streamed out of the skyscrapers and into the streets. Some buildings ordered evacuations. “Oh God, it was mayhem in here, just mayhem,” says Rubin Shimon, manager of Styling Haircutters, a barbershop near Ground Zero. Many people took shelter in the shop to call loved ones on their cellphones
=================
Posted by: MayBee | April 29, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
The NYTimes said:
But the exercise — conducted without any notification to the public — caused momentary panic in some quarters and led to the evacuation of several buildings in Lower Manhattan and Jersey City. By the afternoon, the situation had turned into a political fuse box, with Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg saying that he was “furious” that he had not been told in advance about the flyover.
Posted by: MayBee | April 29, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
ABC News said:
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is “furious” over a Department of Defense low-altitude flyover of NYC in the area around Ground Zero this morning, calling it “ill-conceived” and a “waste of taxpayers’ money.”
New Yorkers in lower Manhattan jolted by promotional Air Force One photo shoot.
A photo shoot involving a 747 used as Air Force One and one fighter jet flying at low altitude led to hundreds of frightened calls from residents and workers in Lower Manhattan this morning, triggering memories of 9-11 as many evacuated their offices. The president was not aboard.
Posted by: MayBee | April 29, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Obviously, there are many psychological reactions in us that not even we could predict of ourselves. Once a year or so we get a low-flying jet over our neighborhood, and children run out yelling for adults to come and have a look. To me, it says a lot about the good quality of our civilian life and security that so many Americans are so sensitive to sights and sounds that many people in the world live with everyday. It also says a lot about the quality of our highest levels of organization, that a digital mock-up is not good enough for a presidential photo. It’s also a relief to know that We the People are not ashamed of being human, and making (and exposing) mistakes from time to time. Out of my poor estate, I would be happy to take on 1/20th of the expense for all of that.
Posted by: Mark Leavenworth | April 29, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
None those posts indicate that the planes flew over Manhattan, MayBee.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Get a map. The first line in the article says Manhattan and the Statue of Liberty is located just offshore of lower Manhattan.
We took our children to NYC in the summer of 2000 and kept missing the exit for The Statue of Liberty. We kept circling by the World Trade Centers to try to take the right exit. We laughed about it at the time. Not so much anymore.
There is also lots of video and pictures available of workers on Wall Street who had evacuated their buildings (also lower Manhattan).
To deny it is ridiculous. This was an insensitive selfish act by the White House. I wonder if they will ever release the photographs…
Posted by: Eyes Wide Shut | April 29, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
ABC
…Department of Defense low-altitude flyover of NYC in the area around Ground Zero…
===============================
Is this what you are looking for?
Posted by: mad | April 29, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
NYTs:
At 1 Liberty Plaza, according to another person who works in Lower Manhattan, a loudspeaker announcement said at 10:55 a.m., “Planes were observed flying low over Lower Manhattan, but were part of an approved federal action.”
Johnny Villafane, 42, of the Upper West Side, said, “The plane did a 360. There was a vibration. The glass in the skyscrapers was shivering.” He added, “It sounded like the building were cracking, everything started shaking. I thought the plane was coming down.”
Sidney Bordley, a floor director in an office building at 1 Battery Park Place, said, “People were running out of the office, claiming they saw a commercial flight being pursued by F-16’s.” He added, “There was some confusion and a little excitement.”
A group of financial services workers, who were gathered outside the same building but declined to give their names, described their reactions. “I saw the landing gear and I was out of here,” one said. Another said: “There were people in my elevator, sweating and shaking.
Posted by: MayBee | April 29, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
I liked the sound bite from Obama, where he says “We found out about it at the same time you fellows did.”
I am extremely reassured by his calm and collected demeanor.
Golly jeepers … I can’t wait until he finds something REALLY big has gone missing. I mean, it’s awfully easy to misplace a VC-25, you know!
Posted by: Howard Beale | April 29, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Silky-
1 Liberty Plaza- Manhattan
1 Battery Park – Manhattan
area of ground zero = Manhattan
Posted by: MayBee | April 29, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
I want a list of names that was on the manifest list. I smell a “Thank You” junket and the Prez signed off on it!!
It took three different calls to obama to get the Green Light to trigger 3 pirates by Navy Seals. You can’t tell me that the smartest man in the world (sarc) didn’t know who and where his Air Force One was!!
I want names!!
Posted by: American Infidel | April 29, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
“Get a map. The first line in the article says Manhattan and the Statue of Liberty is located just offshore of lower Manhattan.”
I don’t need a map. I know exactly where the Statue of Liberty is in relation to downtown. MayBee indicated they flew low OVER downtown. I have seen nothing indicating that is the case. That’s an entirely different thing than banking around the Statue of Liberty over the Hudson.
Posted by: Silky | April 29, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Silky-
this is what I said:
“But you would also think buzzing tall buildings in NYC with a low-flying presidential jet and fighter planes trailing is a line that wouldn’t be crossed. Yet it was, for one reason or another.”
======
I don’t know what you are arguing with.
Posted by: MayBee | April 29, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
what would this guy do if someone misplaced one of his ‘prompters. I bet he’d be really mad then, spitin’ mad
Posted by: man | April 29, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm