Sources: Obama Plays Peacemaker in French-Chinese Smackdown Over Tax Havens
According to sources inside the room, President Obama just played peacemaker in a spat between French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Hu Jintao, President of the People’s Republic of China.
In the finaly plenary session among the G-20 leaders, Sarkozy and Hu were having a heated disagreement about tax havens.
France and other European nations have been pushing for rules and regulations to apply to various tax havens; Germany’s Finance Minister Peer Steinbrueck has said "these tax havens are also places where unregulated financial market deals are made."
But Chinese leaders fear a crackdown would hurt banking centers in Macao, Shanghai and Hong Kong. Other countries agree, though they are less outspoken publicly.
The exchange between Sarkozy and Hu got so heated, said a source — who is not a member of the Obama administration — it was threatening the unity of the G-20 leaders’ meeting.
"They were going through the revised draft," a senior Obama administration official said.
The issue: Sarko wanted "a list of non-compliant jurisdictions," tones that allow tax havens, he senior official said. "Other countries wanted it too, but (Sarkozy) was the most outspoken."
Sarkozy specifically was pushing for a list from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to be included in the G-20 Leaders’ Statement.
Headquartered in Paris, the OECD has 30 member countries — all capitalist democracies.
China opposed any such list being included in the final Leaders’ Statement.
"China tends to have a problem endorsing the documents of organizations like the OECD that they’re not a party to," the senior administration official said.
But Mr. Obama, according to this account, stepped between the two men, urging them to try to find consensus, and giving them a "pep talk" about the importance of working together.
The senior adminstration official said that Mr. Obama pulled Mr. Sarkozy aside, took him to a corner, "and discussed possible alternatives," the senior official said.
Once they arrived at one, President Obama "sent a message to the Chinese" that a counter-offer was on the table. The Chinese spent some time considering the offer. But they took a few minutes.
So Mr. Obama, with the assistance of translators, suggested that he and Mr. Hu have a conversation as well. They, too went to the corner to talk. After a few minutes, Mr. Obama called upon Mr. Sarkozy to join them.
"Translators and sherpas in tow, they reached an agreement," the official said. "There was a multiple shaking of hands."
The agreement: the final G-20 document would state that the G-20 nations "stand ready to deploy sanctions to protect our public finances and financial systems. The era of banking secrecy is over. We note that the OECD has today published a list of countries assessed by the Global Forum against the international standard for exchange of tax information."
The Obama administration official described this compromise as a "meeting in the middle." The word "note" — as in "we note the OECD has today published a list" — doesn’t necessarily carry any weight.
Moreover, any sanctions are "future-oriented," the senior official said, meaning there are as of now no actual sanctions.
The OECD also has yet to publish any such list, though Obama adminstration officials said the organization would do so today.
Soon after Mr. Obama helped to resolve the problem, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown announced that "we have agreed to tough standards for those (tax shelters) who don’t come into line in the future," which seems to overstate the case.
"I’d suggest we’d still be in there had he not done this," the senior Obama administration official said.
– jpt

Email
White House Blinks Amid Catholic Church Anger?
Navy SEAL Commander Advised: Get the Hell Out of the Media
But Mr. Obama, according to this account, stepped between the two men, urging them to try to find consensus, and giving them a “pep talk” about the importance of working together.
======
Ha! I can imagine just how eager some Obama aide was to leak this scoop! Obama taught them they are both special!
Sadly, Obama’s idea of finding consensus is misrepresenting your opponent’s position, then leaving them out of discussions altogether.
Maybe Sarkozy can start saying that Hu is the leader of “no ideas”.
Posted by: MayBee | April 2, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am
We finally have a president who is intelligent with common sense. I’m very proud of him and his wife.
By the way the stock market is really going up and Pres. Obama is geting very favorable reviews.
Posted by: Barb | April 2, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am
What’s the deal with the “thumbs up” in the group photo? Can he be that naive?
“In Bangladesh, Iran, Iraq and Thailand the ‘thumbs up’ sign is traditionally an obscene gesture, equivalent to the use of the middle finger in the Western world.”
I guess he’s not well versed in international relations…
Posted by: Sigh | April 2, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
The stronger this economy gets under Obama, the angrier the republican clowns get.
THIS IS GREAT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: You YEAH YOU | April 2, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
This must be such a bad day for you Frency Republicans..After all isn’t that the way you solve a problem…by screaming the loudest??welcome to the french Republican Party…LOL
Posted by: cowgirl | April 2, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
To Barb: Right, and next he’ll be leading them in a chorus of “kum bay ya”. Obama is NOT what’s driving the markets up, it’s the fiscal restraint the OTHER members of the G20 are insisting upon. He’s basically being ignored. Obama’s a referee for the real leaders…good for him. Enjoy your koolaid.
Posted by: Kristine | April 2, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Hey repubs. What’s that you were saying about how President Obama is doing everything wrong? Come on now. Let’s hear some more of that bitterness you are all harboring. Don’t let something like reality stand in your way. You never did before.
Posted by: libertyrulz | April 2, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Yes Will…sometime looking at an issue from another perspective will change how you act and leads to a resolution. For example, Mr. Cantor sees a deficit where Mr. Obama and others see an investment.
Posted by: Wilber | April 2, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Sarah Palin mocked Obama’s community organizing experience but I think he called on it very well on an international stage. Community organizers get this kind of nattering all the time and it’s their job to refocus the energy on a common goal rather than have it wasted hissing and spitting like two cats fighting over territory. It’s not “kum by hya” but rather very astute statesmanship.
Posted by: Karen | April 2, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
I think that the republicans and conservatives can find nothing good to say about 20 global leaders being able to work together and agree on how to approach the current economic crisis. I think it’s great that our President is in there on a human level, keeping it real. THIS is progress. If the r’s and c’s can’t see that, too bad for them. Keep dishing out your negativity. It will be your demise.
Posted by: BLforO08 | April 2, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am
note to editors: ***Macau***
Posted by: MayBee | April 2, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
The picture posted with this post
shows what an inept clueless clown
we have as a president. Not presidential
at all. The same could be said that
the others in the same pose,are not
representing their countries well
either. I wonder what will really come
out of this meeting other than the
idea that someone is trying to do
something that no one knows how to
handle.
Posted by: wis134 | April 2, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Folks, just because someone doesn’t want a world bank and government dominated by lying, thieving trading partners and anti-U.S. hegemonists doesn’t mean one is a Republican. Get with the program… your future is being sold to a bunch of international bureaucrats who don’t care one bit whether your standard of living and political freedom is better or worse than China or India. Government screwed up and now they want us to give them more money? Their arrogance never ends…
Posted by: Patriot | April 2, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
To MayBee: Macao is correct in pin yin.
You sound like a real naysayer. I’m thrilled that we finally have a President about whom I feel proud. FINALLY!!
Posted by: Karen | April 2, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
Dethug err Debra…Not at all. Most California Repubs I’ve talked to have no problem with Obama’s likability factor. Successful??? Remember we have nearly four years yet; and thus far, he has, quite frankly, done nothing that gives me confidence in his economic policies nor foreign policies..Any President can spend money if he has a Dem House and Senate behind him..Just believe you will be stuck with the bill and it will come. He will judged on the results not the introduction. As for foreign policy can be best explained by JFK…
“Domestic policy can only defeat us; foreign policy can kill us.”
Obama’s knowledge is only as good as his experience which is not much on both fronts..
Posted by: Parallax View | April 2, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Diplomacy is the stronger weapon than the silver bullet and it costs nothing! Our President knows this and I am extremely proud of him.
Posted by: RS | April 2, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
We know he’s “smooth” wht we don’t know is if he knows what he’s doing ? Doesn’t look promising unless you were that guy carrying the “OUTLAW MONEY” sign.
Posted by: Ron | April 2, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Great piece of diplomacy on the part of our President.
Sarkozy does rather have a reputation for being somewhat of a hot tempered blowhard.
The last time I saw one of our Presidents be so well received in Europe was one of John Kennedy’s trips.
Posted by: PumaJ | April 2, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
wis134
“The picture posted with this post
shows what an inept clueless clown
we have as a president. Not presidential
at all. The same could be said that
the others in the same pose,are not
representing their countries well
either. I wonder what will really come
out of this meeting other than the
idea that someone is trying to do something that no one knows how to
handle.”
The picture shows the human and free spirit of our president along with the Italian and the Russian. Do you think Clown Bush was better in entertaining?
Come On, have some respect and let the president have some light moments.
wis134
Posted by: silkwool | April 2, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Karen: Macao is correct in pin yin.
You sound like a real naysayer. I’m thrilled that we finally have a President about whom I feel proud. FINALLY!
===
I’ll take your word for it. My passport stamp says Macau.
I’m glad you can be proud of the President, whatever that gets you.
I’d rather have a sound fiscal policy.
Posted by: MayBee | April 2, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
As of today, the DOW, NASDAQ and S&P 500 are all higher than they were on January 20th.
…
I now have faith in Obama’s team. Keep up the good work.
…
……..Jan. 20 Today
DOW……..7949….8028
NASDAQ…..1440….1613
S&P 500…..805…..840
Three cheers for Obama….hip hip horray!
Posted by: Joe the CEO | April 2, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
regarding the “thumbs up” photo, there is an article online (Newsweek) that Obama hasn’t yet named a chief of Protocol and that he and his staff were unaware the state department had an office of protocol. hence his ignorance or naivety of the inappropriate gifts and hand gestures.
Posted by: granny | April 2, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Throwing trillions at banks is all about Wall Street and Wall Street is all about creating and spinning a story. A favorite method is to incorporate the buzz phrase “BETTER THAN EXPECTED” or “EXCEEDING EXPECTATIONS”. Wall Street has to create some negative potential so they can later proclaim some kind of outcome that is “better than expected”. The Wizards of Wall Street are playing games again. The DOW is GOD.
Posted by: francie | April 2, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
too bad, it would have been great to see sarkozy and jintao come to fisticuffs.
Posted by: davidfrat21 | April 2, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Obama has no class at all. He is like all the other politicians from Chicago. They are laughing behind his and Michelle’s backs………
Posted by: maniteu | April 2, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Republicans HATE when that dow goes up. And to top it all off, all of their gloom and doom predictions about how Obama would be received in London were TOTALLY WRONG.
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: You YEAH YOU | April 2, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
A great statesman and diplomat as President of the U.S.A. I can say that I’ve never been so proud to be an American as today. We’ve elected a great President. Now, we’ve got one more goal – destroy the G.O.P. 2010 elections will be the perfect opportunity to achieve this goal.
Posted by: caliguy55 | April 2, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Great job Obama. Unity! Now that’s what I’m talking about. Let’s all come together in peace and stop all these wars! Those who talk bad about our president when he is doing good… SHAME ON YOU!
Posted by: Tanya | April 2, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
His Teleprompter told him to say what ?
Posted by: Ron | April 2, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
joetheCEO,
if you’re really a ceo or businessman of any kind, you’d understand that the reason the stock market is going up is simply because of the favorable debt ratios blue chips are now experiencing. but the key is that the debt ratio is more favorable because the american people have assumed most of those debts in the form of the bailouts. so, yes, the companies are healthier, but the economy is not because the burden was simply shifted from one party to another. it’s voodoo economics my friend. an accounting shell game.
Posted by: davidfrat21 | April 2, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
silkwool, have some respect? You called Bush a clown in the prior sentence. Your opinions are biased and therefore useless. Anyway, I’m glad we’re cracking down on the Chinese. They’ve been scr*wing the economic system for years. They cheat at everything, even gymnastics.
Posted by: GK_1970 | April 2, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
Wis134 You seem to know it all so what are your great ideas?
Posted by: BLforO08 | April 2, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
caliguy55,
please tell me you really don’t want a one-party system. the problem is that BOTH parties need to be done away with. one-party rule ALWAYS results in oppression.
Posted by: davidfrat21 | April 2, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
maniteu – seems Obama has more class than you… Look what he has accomplished already…don’t think you can do better. You should speak proud of your president when he is doing great. You ain’t from round here! Go Obama!
Posted by: Tanya | April 2, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Obama certainly is making a difference on the International scene and removing the unpopularity of the US under the Bush presidency. If he can get the bone headed parties in the middle east to move closer to peace and also get the Pakistanis and Afghanis to work to end the terrorist havens in their border, he will have achieved a major push toward peace.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | April 2, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Tanya, you from Chicago too? Like I said they are laughing at him behind closed doors, he will do nothing for America, he doesn’t know how to deal with people if they don’t think he’s the Messiah. You will see what becomes of this summit
Posted by: maniteu | April 2, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
This is not too surprising to anyone who looked into his legislative record during the election. He seemed to actively avoid mentioning it, but he’s pretty centrist with a tendency to compromise rather than stick to ideological guns (a great feature in a president, although it would probably have hurt him in the primaries!).
Posted by: jhw539 | April 2, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
I thought being warmly recieved by other national leaders was a good thing..not a bad thing? And when did trying to get your views across without osterisizing the person or persons your speaking to, start becoming something that is looked down apon? We’ve experienced what happens when when we have someone who leads us, by their ability to not listen to others, being a leader who has the “It’s my or the highway” attitude. It not only got us angry at our gov’t but with eachother as well. Now we have a person who is at the very least TRYING to open the lines of communication and going to the G20 summit, not to lecture, but to throw ideas back and forth to try to find a solution to a global problem. It’s nice to see a leader such as ours at least be humble and not stand on his soapbox, screaming at other leaders to do what he wants or else.
Posted by: Michelle | April 2, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
wis134 – The wise clown is on you. Obama achieve his goal right. So what’s a clown gots to do with it…You should always speak great of your President when he has accomplished a goal! What planet are you from? Pluto
Posted by: Tanya | April 2, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Well said Michelle. Wonderful!
Posted by: Tanya | April 2, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
I figured out the problem “conservatives” are having these days and why they seem like and even bigger pack of blithering idiots than in days past:
They can’t figure out who to focus their hate on. The rich and powerful? No, they’re in control. Working stiffs? No, that’s their base.
They’re desperately and unsuccesfully trying to figure out how to blame the mess we’re in today on gays, blacks, latino’s or anybocy else but can’t, because in the end, the blame comes square back at them and their pro-big business policies.
Personally, I find their slow painful demise thoroughly inspsiring and affirming of the universe’s tendency toward what is right and good.
.
Posted by: Outraged | April 2, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
May bee: It doesn’t get me anywhere. But this is the first time in my 48 year lifetime that I’ve felt we have a highly intelligent, modern, capable, ethical and wise person in the office of the Presidency. And what a relief – I’m so tired of being embarrassed and saddened by our leadership.
Sound fiscal policy? This is complicated – it’s easy to make such a pithy statement. Do you have the answers? Do you genuinely think that Obama is not looking to turn this ship around? There are a lot of years of excess consumption and unsustainable practices to correct. You try detoxing a nation.
As for Macau and Macao – look them up – they are both correct. It’s just a system of alphabetizing the Chinese. But it sounds like you like to make things black or white…
Posted by: Karen | April 2, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
maniteu – Who cares who’s laughing. I’m standing by my president. So far, he is doing greater than any president I’ve known. I don’t follow the crowd I make my own decisions.
Posted by: Tanya | April 2, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Tanya, what has Obama accomplished? Oh, he reinstated abortion spending to other countries, pushed through an historic spending bill, and soon an historic budget.
Posted by: GK_1970 | April 2, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Obama is the answer to my prayers… he is amazing, shows great presence, focus, strategic, moral…. wow – how lucky our country is today! Finally we have a man in office who is up to the job of being a world power.
Posted by: jackieb | April 2, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
You hate conservatives, just wait, we will pull our money out of things, and watch you fail, big time. We working out it, we’re not not just organizied yet. We did it to mortgages, we did to the automobile industry, we are working on food stables next. Your going to pay soon.
Posted by: heavenislikethis | April 2, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Communism, capitalism, monarchy, socialism… it’s all the same stuff. This ‘show’ of unity proves it. It’s all the same ole same ole slavery.
Posted by: Mockingbird | April 2, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Tanya, he must be the ONLY President you have paid attention to……..too bad, you picked the worst to try and support……you just don’t get it do you?
Posted by: maniteu | April 2, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
This is a continuing stance on voting “present”, can’t make a stand without his teleprompter telling him what it is. Axelrod hasn’t decided yet it seems. What an embarassment this clown is.
Posted by: HH | April 2, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Yah! Diplomacy,,, feels great…
Dare I say it,,, Can you imagine John and Cindy McCain being so well received???
Ah,,, NO!
I am very proud of this President, I think his first two months in office have been more productive than Bush’s 8 yrs.
And hey,,, how about that Republican Budget,,,, lol,
No great new ideas, nothing new to offer, just a continuation of the last 8 yrs… same stuff, different day…
GOP, if we wanted more of the same we would have voted for those ideas…
Posted by: theafalcon200 | April 2, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
hail ceasar all he is doing is feeding the mob he is the ceasar of modern day everybody close there eyes and he can’t do no wrong he is great talker we american people are the mob of modern rome
Posted by: gregg | April 2, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
I come from generations of republicans… leaders in the party. And I am proud to say I don;t need to belong to a club – not a republican or a democrat. I vote for the best person…. and in this case we scored big time with Barack Obama. As a person who travels internationally all the time, I am not myopic, have my eye on the bigger picture, and I can tell you we are so so lucky. Things may be painful for a while but it always hurts before it feels better. As long as we work together and support our president, things will be fine….
Posted by: jackieb | April 2, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Obama with his charm and mystical powers should walk out into the middle of the crazy mobs outside.
If BO is so loved and admired surely the mobs will stop fighting and go home at his request.
Hopefully no one will mention he is a multimillionaire that eats $100 a pound steak, and takes huge contributions from AIG/Wall Street.
Posted by: sammy | April 2, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
maniteu – You still hurting from the election.. I get it! Get over it already!
Posted by: Tanya | April 2, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
jackieb:”Obama is the answer to my prayers… he is amazing, shows great presence, focus, strategic, moral.”
I wouldn’t go overboard. So far, he’s pretty average for a president. He only looks so good because he is following the worst president we’ve had in a 100 years that was enabled by a Republican Congress for most of his term (and protected by a record number of filibusters the last couple years).
Remember Bush Sr wasn’t too bad either – he raised taxes to keep the budget responsible and put together a true coalition to deal with Iraq (removing them as a threat without getting us bogged down in there!).
Posted by: jhw539 | April 2, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Obama is the answer to my prayers too. He is Bush II. HE is sending more troops to Afganistan, He is increasing government spending like bush. He is deregulating markets so us rich people know before hand where the money is going to be made. He is increasing survelence monitoring of the internet, and airport security. He is BUSH too.
Posted by: Heavenislikethis | April 2, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
youyeahyou…12,000 more people filed for first time unemployment last week alone..
The tenth consecutive week that continuing claims rose to a record high…
Consumer loans at least 30 days late rose to a seasonally-adjusted 3.2 from 2.9 prior quarter of 2.9
AIG CEO…”Bail-out not working.”
As for the market going up today FASB is set to approve new accounting rule to bank that allow them to NOT write down the value of their assets BASED UPON distressed sales of SIMILAR ASSETS BY OTHER BANKS…In other words what is good for the us is not necessarily good for them…all on paper
Try reading the Financial Times and look at facts rather than elementary quotes that don’t mean spit….yeah right
Posted by: Parallax View | April 2, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
AND WHEN ALL THIS FAILS? WHEN THESE PEOPLE HAVE BEGGED BORROWED AND THIEVED THEIR WAY INTO THESE TRILLIONS AND IT TURNS OUT NOT TO HAVE BEEN THE ANSWER, WHAT THEN? LET ME TELL YOU…..WE GO FROM SIMPLE REGULATION TO EXTREME….WE WILL SEE PRICE CONTROLS!!! FORCIBLE AND UNAVOIDABLE!!! THE SAD THING IS THEY COULD HAVE DONE THIS IN THE VERY BEGINNING THEY COULD HAVE PREVENTED THESE EXCEEDINGLY DANGEROUS MOVES WHICH WILL LEAVE OUR NATION AND OUR WORLD IN DEEP TROUBLE.
Posted by: wa | April 2, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
sammy:”Hopefully no one will mention he is a multimillionaire”
Not many Americans have a problem with millionaires who earn their money fairly, and Obama (who did not achieve that millionaire status until the books he personal wrote hit it big in 2005) earned his money.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 2, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
I would like to know how many people that voted for Obama voted in past elections. Do they really know the issues? I highly doubt it! He just ran a fancy marketing campaign with a couple of key phrases and that was about it. I am willing to bet over half the people that voted for this empty suite have no idea what is going on!
Posted by: dd22 | April 2, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Patriot,
YOU ALREADY HAVE A ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT. You just didn’t notice.
And it is NOT the UN. The UN cannot do anything unless the United States, Russia and China (all of whom have Veto power in the Security Council). Since the U.S. will never agree to anything that limits its own freedom of action, and neither will China or Russia, you can forget about them doing anything meaningful.
Nope. The world government is called the WTO. World Trade Organization.
The WTO has the power to impose THREE HUNDRED PERCENT tariffs as penalties if you do anything with your trade policy to promote your own economy!
We signed up to this and now there is no way out! On the bright side, now you have something real to complain about.
Posted by: Walter | April 2, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
“What’s the deal with the “thumbs up” in the group photo? Can he be that naive?
“In Bangladesh, Iran, Iraq and Thailand the ‘thumbs up’ sign is traditionally an obscene gesture, equivalent to the use of the middle finger in the Western world.”
Yeah so? Why do we have to always keep them in mind? The REST of the world sees the thumbs up as a GOOD sign. Screw them, I say if they cannot understand Western culture. I’m sick of always having to kowtow to their sensitivities!
Posted by: BJs | April 2, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Obama is doing a great job. Keep up the work OBAMA!
Posted by: Tanya | April 2, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Walter:The WTO has the power to impose THREE HUNDRED PERCENT tariffs as penalties if you do anything with your trade policy to promote your own economy!
We signed up to this and now there is no way out! On the bright side, now you have something real to complain about.”
All I have to complain is that your fantasy is not true. It would be great if the WTO could impose 300% tariffs on any nation in the world. War would stop overnight and battles would be fought in moderation sessions. That’d be great.
I hardly fear someone coming to take my freedom with a tariff, and neither should any free nation.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 2, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
jhw539….Bush Sr never removed Saddam Hussien as a threat. Actually, I cannot remember what was accomplished in the 1st Iraq war. But I believe it was essentially nothing. Why do you suppose we felt the need to return there for another war? But I agree with jackieb, Obama, so far, has demonstrated sorely missed leadership qualities. I expect that shall continue.
Posted by: stuart2560 | April 2, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Tanya, your bias makes your opinions useless.
Posted by: GK_1970 | April 2, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
MayBee – it must be tough being so cynical all the time – even when good news happens, you find the negativity in it. You and your fellow haters can bash Obama all you want about the “iPod gifts”, the “thumbs up”, the “community organizing” nonsense. The Man is doing a great job as President and all of us “real” Americans are indeed very proud of the him (and his lovely wife, by the way). Sorry your perspective is so different.
Posted by: geecee | April 2, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
dd22 – I do. Obama is doing a great job. Go OBAMA
Posted by: Tanya | April 2, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
LMAO… thank god we don’t have Bush around anymore. I couldn’t imagine how disatorous this meeting would be if the decider was in attendance.
Feels good to have someone worthy of being the Presidnet of this ocuntry for a change
Posted by: Flip Floppin | April 2, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Jack J. “McCain would have been as big a failure as Buckaroo Bush because neither can control their childish attitudes.”
No need for hyperbole. I certainly agree John ‘economics aren’t my strong suit’ McCain would have been a very poor choice for getting through this crisis, but there is just about zero chance he’d have been as bad as GW Bush.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 2, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
GK_1970 – Go Obama!
Posted by: Tanya | April 2, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
jhw53: Do you understand that this job crunch we are in now took a long, long time to come down. In business, you have to inject capital sometimes to make the business grow. If you pull out the plug on spending, and just sit there scared and fearful, the company (in this case the country) will surely do down the drain. Fear is pervasive in this country – it is pitiful. We have to be strong, get up and keep moving, get money moving… And the press has got to stop scaring everyone…
Posted by: jackieb | April 2, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
As Brit I don’t why there so any anti-Obama people out there when it is clear he is the smartest and most repected President in the history of your young country. Sarkozy was made to look like a man with little man sydrome illogical. He has forge new relations with China and Russia in a few hours! The only thing his critics put on him the problems clearly created by Bush.
I know America is full of ignorant people who think Fox news is viable source of news, but America hasn’t had it as good.
American has it’s mojo back. Yeah baby baby!
Posted by: Del | April 2, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Too bad Obama’s little pep talk about working together doesn’t work with Congress.
As Obama often reminds everyone–”he won” and he’s keeping score on those who disagree with him.
Obama may be a bully at the White House but our enemies know what a weakling he is–Iran,Russia, China, North Korea don’t seem the slightest bit intimidated.
Charm and smooth talk only goes so far.
Posted by: tyler | April 2, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
stuart2560:”jhw539….Bush Sr never removed Saddam Hussien as a threat. Actually, I cannot remember what was accomplished in the 1st Iraq war. But I believe it was essentially nothing. Why do you suppose we felt the need to return there for another war?”
Saddam WAS removed as a threat and locked down quite tightly by the first war. And it was done so with worldwide support (more than the UK and Poland…) and essentially no diplomatic blowback. Made me proud that I voted for Bush Sr.
We DID NOT NEED TO RETURN THERE for another war, as has clearly come out as we are on the hook for rebuilding the husk of Iraq we took over. A very tiny thing I give GWB credit for is that he didn’t even bother to try to plant fake WMD’s in Iraq to make his boondoggle look less stupid.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 2, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
tyler:”As Obama often reminds everyone–”he won” ”
I have heard him quoted as saying that once in the course of a long meeting with Congressional leaders. The comment was mostly in jest and greeted by laughs.
Can you cite where he has said it a few other places (“often”) or are you wildly exaggerating?
Posted by: jhw539 | April 2, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Del: You are so so righto Del! We have an intelligent, thoughtful, strong leader FINALLY!!!! Gosh – I love the Brits!
Posted by: jackieb | April 2, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
To all who are having a heart attack over the thumbs picture, get a life, GOOD GRIEF! Are you out of your mind, or is there no end to this buffoonery? Compare this picture to that of our “president” who went about squeezing– AHEM, correct that–choking Angela Merkel at a summit, chewing food as if he were the caveman himself, and spewing obscenities to Tony the poodle that were picked up by an open microphone. And these jealous critics were proud to call that man president.
We all know how presidential President Obama has been on his first trip to Europe. They can’t get enough of our president over there. Those who are getting green with envy over his success, go ahead! Make my day! DIE!!!!!!
Posted by: Mamba | April 2, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
dd22 – Obama is doing just great! Say what you want. The majority of people feel the same way….so jump ship!
Posted by: Tanya | April 2, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
I think I just read a post by someone who said Obama is the worst PResident yet….really? He’s been in office for what…around 70 something days…and he is worse then the 43 Pres.’s before him? Maybe I was under a rock since 2000..because I swear there was someone worse. (I say worse….because I at the very least want a leader who can properly speak English and at the most I want a leader that Im confident with..even with all the bumps along the way) I get that we are all in a free fall. I get that we have anger issues and I also get that we like to blame everyone except ourselves. What I also get is that if you can not offer up a BETTER solution, then the one proposed, your screaming and yelling will fall on deaf ears. How about putting all that energy into looking at ways to turn this sinking ship in another direction. Im not a financial wizard, I dont know what the best course for us to take will be, but at least I can say without a doubt…Im at the point where Im willing to try anything..anything….as long as it is drastically different then what we had in the past. New century, new ideas and hopefully a much better US of A!
Posted by: Michelle | April 2, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Gee.. some people are still in “Election mode”! Oh.. my…
Go Obama!
Posted by: Tanya | April 2, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
jackieb:”Do you understand that this job crunch we are in now took a long, long time to come down.”
I agree. I supported Obama during the campaign and continue to. But there is no need to lionize him. He is intelligent and sincere in his efforts to do what is the best for this country – but most of our past presidents can claim that too. His skills working Congress are just average, but he excels at clear communication of policy.
Overall, he’s obviously a solid good president but has not (yet) earned a ranking of great. I stand by my original opinion that he only looks great since he is following a scandalously incompetent president (crammed down our throats by the Fundamentalist Republican Party), but hope to see him excel in time.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 2, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
I feel comforted by the Obama administration’s response to North Korea’s potential missle launch.
“Uh there’s nothing we can do”.
Posted by: ross | April 2, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
As of right now, the DOW, NASDAQ and S&P 500 are all higher than they were on January 20th.
I thought everyone was supposed to be going Galt?
………………Jan. 20…..Today
DOW………….7949……..8056
NASDAQ………1440…….1618
S&P 500………..805………843
Posted by: Joe the CEO | April 2, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Michelle – Some people are still angry because Obama won the election. They are still in “Election Mode”. They will never have anything good to say about Obama… Even when he is doing great. Pay it no mind!
Posted by: Tanya | April 2, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
This is no suprise. No one in their right mind would ever accuse Obama of not being a smooth and efficient communicator. However, it should be noted that settling a verbal dispute between 2 people in the same room AND ratifying current global financial laws in order to regulate the actual practices of 6 billion people is something completely different. This isn’t even news is it?
Posted by: hmm | April 2, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Joe the CEO:”As of right now, the DOW, NASDAQ and S&P 500 are all higher than they were on January 20th.
I thought everyone was supposed to be going Galt?”
Cause and effect I say. Getting idiots who mistake entertaining literature for a government structure out of the workforce can only help productivity and profits.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 2, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Not surprising since Obama and his administration have such expertise in the area of taxes.
Posted by: riley | April 2, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Sarah Palin mocked Obama’s community organizing experience but I think he called on it very well on an international stage. Community organizers get this kind of nattering all the time and it’s their job to refocus the energy on a common goal rather than have it wasted hissing and spitting like two cats fighting over territory. It’s not “kum by hya” but rather very astute statesmanship.
Posted by: Karen | Apr 2, 2009 11:56:48 AM
_______________________________________
I agree Karen.Sounds like our president is showing his ability to bring opposing ideas together.This man( our president) is a very gifted man.This is a moment once again where I am proud to be an American and proud that I did my part to help him get elected.
Posted by: TV | April 2, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Soon after Mr. Obama helped to resolve the problem,
=================
Thanks for the more details, Jake. Would it be correct to say the argument was ended, but the problem not resolved?
I’m also having trouble understanding the sourcing. Most of this is from an Obama administration official, except for the part about how heated the exchange got. Am I reading that right?
Posted by: MayBee | April 2, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
jhw539: I have to agree that history will tell us all the complete story. You are right. Nevertheless, this man inspires me to my core. And he inspires the rest of the world as well, they don’t look down their noses at us so much anymore which is a relief when I travel. We, as a country made a good decision to try a different course… that’s what all of us who came to America do – many of us came from strife…. and now here in this incredible country, we have a voice. Unlike many other countries where the people have no voice for fear of the consequences…. and so, to all those people posting on this blog today, vive la différence…. be American and keep on arguing …that in itself is our American privelege! As for me – I have better things to do :-)
Posted by: jackieb | April 2, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Simple fact for all the GOP wingnuts….
Our President impresses where ever he goes and whoever he meets because he has the intellect to build consensus. The rest of the world and 65% of the American people get it. It is you bitter losers who follow Limbaugh and the rest of his ilk and the GOP naysayers in Congress who have lost their way. Sadly, if you are so disgusted with the direction America is heading there is no where in the world that would be willing to take you….well maybe Mexico or Guyana.
Posted by: hilodave | April 2, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
jhw539:
So Bush had control of the senate for the first 6 years and that is why we are in the position we are in? 2000 repub 50 seats democrats 50 seats 2002 repub 51 seats democrats 49 WOW and no real filibusters except the threat of filibustering the oversight Bush asked for in 2005 on fannie/freddie (God what an idiot he was to ask for oversight right?) oh yeah and a jr senator from IL received $110,000 as a thank you for blocking oversight but hey Obama inherited this economy he had nothing to do with it right. The reality is the democrats voted with Bush on both the wars and the additional funding…they could have filibustered every vote but they didn’t so to say the democrats aren’t equal in the blame is just plain ignorant unless you don’t know that all Bush / Obama can do is sign a bill into law or veto it.
Posted by: mike | April 2, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
2008=Humanity Won!!! Yeyyyyyy!!
For the first time in 8 years I am REALLY proud of my country.
Godspeed President Obama
Posted by: margoharris | April 2, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
I have said it many times before…..and I say it now….
President Obama will do alot for this Country and even for the rest of the World……
reports like this prove it.
Posted by: Gina in Racine, Wi | April 2, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
dd22-
When you’ve finished making your bet, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.
Posted by: Political DisEase | April 2, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
SO PROUD OF OUR PRESIDENT KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK PRESIDENT OBAMA!
Posted by: Angie In PA | April 2, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
That was QUALITY LEADERSHIP: President Obama is full of it. That is why we the people, chose him to lead us and our GLORIOUS country,
The United States of America.
A country born to lead mankind.
I feel very proud of President Obama.
Posted by: Tariq Ahmed | April 2, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
I find this story very weak. Big deal, a supposed argument between two leaders got contained. How often has that happened? If Bush had used some sort of chatty diplomacy nobody would have ever reported on it. The media continues to push Obama in our face all day long. What should be the focus is what imprint does the US have on any communique that comes from the G20. I get the impression that the world would like to proceed with their own agenda and let the US president stay in the shadows. I am sure the Obama administration will deflect what went wrong, and enhance what little gains came from this group.
Posted by: Susan | April 2, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
The reason they like him over there is because they know O*AMA can’t say no, he’s a puppet on a string. He can’t even talk without help, remember the party he gave where he thanked himself.LOL I wish they would LOVE him so much they just couldn’t let him go, KEEP HIM, let him steal all your money we’re broke!!!!!!
Posted by: countrygirl_74 | April 2, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
The reason they like him over there is because they know O*AMA can’t say no, he’s a puppet on a string. He can’t even talk without help, remember the party he gave where he thanked himself.LOL I wish they would LOVE him so much they just couldn’t let him go, KEEP HIM, let him steal all your money we’re broke!!!!!!
Posted by: countrygirl_74
——————-
A week ago, you people said that they were going to hate Obama and that the success he saw in Europe during the campaign was all gone.
Try another lame excuse.
Posted by: Stan | April 2, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Hates on Board Make sure You Listen to Limbaugh, Fox News and Glen Beck Today so you can Repeat their Lying Garbage!
Posted by: Angie In PA | April 2, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
No losers, they can’t keep him b/c he is OUR president and some of the very uneducated don’t know what they are talking about. The largest REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH came under the Administration where the middle-class and poor got paid less and sent more of their sons and daughters to fight in his dirty war. While the richest 1% got a tax break in wartime. Go have your little tea parties and cry me a river, but you better stop using your SOCIALIST FIRE DEPARTMENT, SOCIALIST POLICE DEPT,AND SOCIALIST PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM.
Posted by: J. Johnson | April 2, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
@countrygirl_74
You said: “remember the party where he thanked himself”.
Actually, no I don’t, as it didn’t happen. What I do remember is a teleprompter malfunction that caused the person who followed Obama to the podium to start reading Obama’s speech again which started with thanks to that person – after which Obama stepped back to the podium and jokingly thanked himself for the invitation, which made people laugh. That tiny part is the only thing you hear about in the so-called “liberal” media, without any context.
New Rule: Dittoheads who repeat demonstrably false GOP talking points without actually bothering to find out what really happened, need to go away.
Posted by: Jack Frost | April 2, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
THE DOW IS SOARING
Thanks President Obama!
Posted by: Angie In PA | April 2, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
The GOP is only interested in regaining power, they have done nothing to help any of the current crises. Obama has already showed he is a ‘doer’ and not ‘an empty suit’ or ‘puppet on a string’ as his critics have harshly tried to charactize him
Posted by: MaxMAN | April 2, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Sigh, and now we are suppose to care what Bangladesh, Iran, Iraq and Thailand think.
Posted by: Joseph Chamers | April 2, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
“New Rule: Dittoheads who repeat demonstrably false GOP talking points without actually bothering to find out what really happened, need to go away.”
But that’s the funniest part.
The puffed up right winger parroting what they heard while claiming they are critical thinkers.
I mean that is high comedy!
Posted by: Ryan C | April 2, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Wow. Interesting account…I felt like I was there! Thanks for sharing that with us, Jake!
Posted by: Tanya | April 2, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
“No losers, they can’t keep him b/c he is OUR president and some of the very uneducated don’t know what they are talking about. The largest REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH came under the Administration where the middle-class and poor got paid less and sent more of their sons and daughters to fight in his dirty war. While the richest 1% got a tax break in wartime. Go have your little tea parties and cry me a river, but you better stop using your SOCIALIST FIRE DEPARTMENT, SOCIALIST POLICE DEPT,AND SOCIALIST PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM.”
——————————
A – men!
Posted by: don | April 2, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Obama belongs on the worlds stage – Bush was nothing but a walking fart joke.
I’m proud of my President and the work he’s doing.
Posted by: Jilli | April 2, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
What a nightmare. Sarkozy want to take concrete steps to specifically list tax havens – i.e. places for tax *cheats* to hide their money – so that they may possibly be sanctioned and what does Obama do? What any self-respecting president of the USA would do: the bidding of the wealthy tax cheats, by helping morals-bereft China water down the requirement. Why? because listing tax havens might hurt some Chinese banking centers. So for our prez, protecting Chinese banking centers is more important than protecting the taxpaying public by listing and ultimately shutting down tax havens. Now, what were those GOP blowhards complaining about??
Posted by: eichler1 | April 2, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
You can tell the ones who are gulping the kool-aid , keep covering up for your messiah. He was and still is a big joke. I guess you like the way he is bankrupting this country. People looseing their jobs and homes—–I guess that makes you all very happy!!!!!
Posted by: countrygirl_74 | April 2, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Obama does our country proud and anyone who refuses to admit it? Needs to grow up and realize that while we may not always agree, we are always Americans.
Posted by: Deanna | April 2, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
CHESTER
AMENT TO THAT!
Posted by: Angie In PA | April 2, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
President Obama has made us all proud to be Americans! How wonderful to have competent, intelligent leadership. Our standing in the world is back. We are respected again. Let’s see, yesterday it was the Russians, today he brokered an agreement with the Chinese and the French. It amazes me how the critics just don’t get it, and are not appreciative of the great leader that we have in President Obama.
Posted by: Millie | April 2, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Don’t hate on our President while he’s overseas and we are at war. Remember repubs?
Posted by: American | April 2, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
> The word “note” — as in “we note the
> OECD has today published a list” –
> doesn’t necessarily carry any weight.
The word *necessarily* is used advisedly here.
I’m a member of the Technical Advisory Committee of the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts.
We use “note” to convey: Most of the committee agrees this is a good idea, but we couldn’t reach consensus.
Posted by: Toon Moene | April 2, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Remember 9-11? How about 9-12? That was the last time we saw so many united to help one another. But BUSH for BRAINS
didn’t take long to alienate most of the
world in the name of Haliberton.
Proud of our country & our leader!
Posted by: BuriedInTheBibleBelt | April 2, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
world consensus and transformational change doesn’t happen over a single meeting, kudos to Sarkozy for trying, but kudos to Obama too, for recognizing that these problems will have to be solved slowly and steadily. I am proud of my president.
Posted by: aaron | April 2, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Uh oh, the DOW has gone liberal and housing sales are up! The economy has a liberal bias.
Posted by: bubba | April 2, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
+1 to Chester!
Posted by: Mac | April 2, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
I am so proud of my President Obama.
Posted by: sachet | April 2, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
here it goes
Posted by: elaine | April 2, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Finally a president America can be proud of.
We love our new president, President Obama.
Posted by: clearly | April 2, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
How many will die of heart attack this day.
Obama has succeeded where BUSH / CHENEY failed
Posted by: IDIKO | April 2, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
How is this not a lead story?! We’ve been deprived of being the role models and adults in the room for so long… can we please celebrate our born-again competence?!
Posted by: Nicole | April 2, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Fianlly a president who acts and speaks in an intelligent manner and who people can respect. God Bless Pres. Obama…I am so proud of him and his wife too!
Posted by: Barb | April 2, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Obama’s actions are reminiscent of his character in Harvard Law School, when he habitually played mediator and peacemaker to his bickering colleagues. This is not a bad thing, when dealing with a bunch of world leaders. Dubya was incapable of thinking on his feet at those meetings.
Posted by: Muggsy | April 2, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Obama refereed a watered down position, deferring to his Chinese creditors (politically savvy but actually against
our interests) but he comes away looking like a superb master of compromise and diplomacy. Israel is plutzing (trembling at the knees).
Posted by: mystic | April 2, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Off topic some….
But on Michelle Obama’s touching the Queen…
BIG DEAL!!!
I believe the Sr. George Bush threw up on someone, and Dubya grabbed Merkel of Germany’s shoulders to “massage” her…
I am sick of hearing that she inappropriately touched the queen…
Posted by: ShellyAmber | April 2, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Gee, Nicole, maybe it’s not a lead story because of the RANK incompetence of 1) his transition team, 2) the congress, 3) the soviet style manhandling of the economy, 4) the blatant disregard for tax payments in ALL of his team, 5) his gross violation of campaign finance regulations, um…take your pick…
or, you could be really pleased that he used his voice to quell a disagreement. You people want “peace” when there is no peace…the issue still STANDS, weirdos…he didn’t “fix” it. But, haha, be PROUD. You are as partisan as the people you claim to loathe.
Posted by: Diane | April 2, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
I’m sorry, but is any one listening to GOP opinion anymore? I think not. HAHAHA! Go back to your mobile homes, crack open a beer, and get back to small thinking. It suits you. Leave the BIG thinking to the SMART people. Again, dems are left to clean up the mess GOP insists on leaving every time they are in office. Obama is what he says, a true peace maker, full of priceless ingenuity. Anyone that can’t see that is, well, just plain stupid.
Posted by: Reslishing the destruction of GOP | April 2, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
This is from the October 25, 2008 edition of The Australian newspaper… the last year of Bush’s presidency… in an article about Paul Rudd, Prime Minister of Australia:
“Informed sources have confirmed the discussion took place on a speaker telephone with a Rudd staffer taking notes.
After the President explained the pressure from Europe for a G7-brokered action on supporting the credit sector and reforming regulation, Rudd immediately insisted the G20 was the solution.
Rudd was then stunned to hear Bush say: “What’s the G20?”
Posted by: VICK | April 2, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Finally!
A true diplomat as president!
Posted by: Ginny | April 2, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
according to a source?? oh please.. that’s BS talk for let’s make up a story and make Obama look like the golden God he is….
so how do you all feel about the newest trillion dollar budget the democrat control senate/house is trying to pass.. i think this is their 3rd major budget they are trying to pass since Obama’s election. i mean is ANYONE concerned about this??? is ANYONE thrilled about more decision making from a corrupt government on passing a major budget that will end up bringing us worse in Debt? the moment that Obama signed his 747 Billion dollar stimulus, the blame for the previous administration debt stopped that day. Obama owns this latest debt and he is the first president in US history to increase the national debt within the first month of his presidency.. pretty scary.
Posted by: jaj | April 2, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Not the Messiah, but certainly the closest thing we´ve had to a Super Hero since god knows when. At the very least it´s refreshing to have a Grown-Up-In-Chief moderating spats between world leaders and forging consensus, instead of insulting and dividing the world further. Count me among those those who are proud of our prez and his brilliant, endearing family.
Posted by: Jake | April 2, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
You’ve got to be kidding me. He sends two world leaders into time out and takes credit for being a peacemaker? That’s so ridiculous, when he’s screwing everything else up in a big way, making our country vulnerable to socialism, terrorism and on the verge of losing its sovereignty. Pray for our country and pray for President Obama…that we might not be an OBAMA-NATION.
Posted by: Lisa | April 2, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Mike-The reality is the democrats voted with Bush on both the wars and the additional funding—-
you are correct. it was a democrat majority that voted to approve the IRAQ war. of course they flip flopped once they realized a few years later that this was not popular and to keep them in power, they switched sides to protect their ass/seat.
Posted by: jej | April 2, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
I will say this…..
The British are finding out just how “GHETTO” these two are.
Barry….The I-Pods are for family in Kenya. There….you are BIG man!!!
Here….you areBIG embarassment!!!
Posted by: American Infidel | April 2, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
VICK-This is from the October 25, 2008 edition of The Australian newspaper… the last year of Bush’s presidency… in an article about Paul Rudd, Prime Minister of Australia:
“Informed sources have confirmed the discussion took place on a speaker telephone with a Rudd staffer taking notes.
After the President explained the pressure from Europe for a G7-brokered action on supporting the credit sector and reforming regulation, Rudd immediately insisted the G20 was the solution.
Rudd was then stunned to hear Bush say: “What’s the G20?..
of course “according to an informed Source”..
well did you know that according to a source Obama spends most of his day in a fetal poosition because he is so scared to speak without his TOTUS (telepromtor-you know that thing that makes him sound so smooth and so well prepared).
Posted by: jaj | April 2, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
If I read the comments by the conservatives, I cannot but conclude that their aggression has bereft them of their power of discrimination. America has a enormous problem it continues to glorify ignorance and anger.
Posted by: Johan Sterk | April 2, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
All this Queen talk..well get this.. The Queen loves her iPod..almost as much as her Corgies. She has an iPod that can hold up to 100,000 songs, so Obama did his research on a gift that he knew she would like. I didnt even know the Queen was up on all the technology out there (I was given this info by my brothers wife who is British, and the Queen loving her iPod is common knowledge in England). ALso abouyt Michelle touching the Queen, actually in the video of said touching..the Queen put her arm around Michelle, becasue some person wanted a picture of both of them, Michelle put her arm around the Queen..ONLY AFTER the Queen touched her. What would you have liked Michelle to do, push her arm away and say “Im sorry Im not allowed to touch you”..yes, because that proper etiquette
Posted by: Michelle | April 2, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Obama pushed the Chinese version over our ally, France, and he probably offered another $500 billion of our money to the IMF.
Posted by: BWR | April 2, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
freedom55- it is obvious that you are not well informed.. SOS DEMOCRAT Hillary Clinton’s first trip was to CHINA.. why? to beg the Chinese to keep buying our debt. her first trip was to CHINA. figure it out…
Posted by: jaj | April 2, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Wow! There’s not enough room on this blog for the HATERS. President Obama, thank you for putting America back in the role of leading the world.
Posted by: Tina | April 2, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Ooops, I was trying to proof read my post and actually posted it accidently..sorry for the grammer :)
Posted by: Michelle | April 2, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
glad we finally have a leader instead of a puppet of the far right. Obama is starting to prove he is presidential.
Posted by: rob | April 2, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Bush could not have pulled this off. Not in chance! What a wonderful difference an election makes. Our President Rocks!
Posted by: Marcelisa | April 2, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Hey buddy, the Dow Jones just broke the 8,000 point threshold today for the first time in two months; the S&P and NASDAQ are now higher than when Obama took office; the markets are starting to regain confidence because leadership is actually being displayed on housing and market stimulus measures for once.
When the markets dip, its the Obama Depression; when they rise, we all offer a sacrifice to his High Majesty George for his brave interventions. Did I read the script right? Ha!
Posted by: Eric | April 2, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
As an outsider (Canadian)viewing these post, it is very hard for me to understand how Republicans feel that President Obama is not doing a great job. First and formost, Obama can speak properly Secondly, Obama has vision. Compared to your last President, this is a 1000% improvement. Unfortunately to many are blinded by idioligy.
As an outsider, I see the demise of the Republican party. There ideals are outdated, there view points on civil liberties are out dated and there perception of the world is distorted behond belief.
I have visited your country numerios times. I have family from California to New York to Ohio to Florida. The amount of Americans who have never travel outside the US is amazing and frighting at the same time. For you to truely understand your country, you must understand the rest of the world. Something that many posters haven’t done.
Good Job Obama and the rest of the G20 reps.
Posted by: Nolies | April 2, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Well Golly “Gee”, Diane, I don’t remember stating that I “loathe” anyone or anything, nor using the word “peace” or proclaiming we had in some way achieved it?
The words I used were “adults”, “role models” and “competence”. *yawn* Substituting in words and distorting statements to which you don’t agree, doesn’t work anymore… didn’t you get that memo on November 4th?
For all the criticism and blame you throw at our 70-something day long President, you seem offer no alternatives or suggestions… typical.
Posted by: Nicole | April 2, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
“As an outsider, I see the demise of the Republican party. There ideals are outdated, there view points on civil liberties are out dated and there perception of the world is distorted behond belief.”
Yeah, and the real funny part is most ‘conservatives’ in America would cry themselves to sleep if they saw how socially liberal conservatives in Canada are, and probably die of heart attacks if they read the liberal platforms!
President Obama is doing everything that he can be asked of right now, and I think he’s doing a great job.
Posted by: Eric | April 2, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Mr.Tapper, you are a real jerk! It is PRESIDENT OBAMA! He is the President of the United States whether you like it or not. You have to respect him.
Posted by: Sylvia | April 2, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
I told you he could part the Red Sea. He is the Chosen One. Now bow down and kiss his feet. Or at least get your hands on one of his pens after he signs a bill into law.
The problem is that Obama is not the chosen ones. The idiots around him just make him look like a genius.
Posted by: Mia | April 2, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
“Mr.Tapper, you are a real jerk! It is PRESIDENT OBAMA! He is the President of the United States whether you like it or not. You have to respect him.”
What? It says ‘President Obama’ in the first paragraph.
Posted by: Eric | April 2, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Atta girl Nicole… You are so right.. er.. correct! Those on the right twist and manipulate words in order to force an extreme position. They’ve done it for years… Thanks for standing up to it.
Posted by: Violet | April 2, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Of course everyone has a liberal bias. No one wants Americans to fail. Only the ones who think they can pimp Reagan over and over again and not make people want to vomit.
Posted by: Mia | April 2, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Del writes:
“As Brit I don’t why there so any anti-Obama people out there when it is clear he is the smartest and most repected President in the history of your young country. Sarkozy was made to look like a man with little man sydrome illogical. He has forge new relations with China and Russia in a few hours! The only thing his critics put on him the problems clearly created by Bush.
I know America is full of ignorant people who think Fox news is viable source of news, but America hasn’t had it as good.
American has it’s mojo back. Yeah baby baby!”
To which I reply, “Thanks, Mate, we appreciate that!”
It’s been a rough 8 years with Dubya, but now the worm has turned. Just to let you know, I’ve never voted for a Bush, and have worked phones for Kerry in ’04, and donated $$ to Obama’s campaign in ’08. Even shook hands with Bill Clinton once.
I know things have been tough in the UK too, as many Brits got caught up in the real estate bubble. They partied hearty for awhile, but then crashed and burned, as bad as us or worse.
America as a culture sometimes gets a little too full of itself, but remember, all of us one way or another (with the exception of Native Americans), can (proudly) trace our roots back to some other country, mostly from Europe or Africa, some of us 1st or 2nd generation immigrants, others with ancestors who crossed the pond in cramped, leaky sailing ships dating back to the 17th & 18th Century. Me, my roots as an American go back to Colonial times, pre-7 Years War era. I’m part Swiss German, French, Dutch, English, Irish & Mexican Spanish.
Every country one time or another screws up, to varying degrees of FUBAR-ness. France had its Napoleon, Germany had its Hitler, China had its Mao, Russia had its Stalin, Japan had its Tojo, and Britain had King George III. Now we’ve had our turn with G.W. Bush. Sorry about that! But with Obama, we’re trying as best we can with the smartest guy we could find, the result of a long and hard fought election cycle.
We hope he does well, in spite of any drivel you read/hear from those sore loser GOP-ers.
Posted by: Steve in Phoenix AZ | April 2, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
What is the problem with all of you Palin supporters? Do you think she would have been able to have a conversation with any of the other World Leaders?
John McCain would have been sleep!!
President, yeah I said PRESIDENT Obama became President because he is just what this country needs!!
Posted by: MJJM | April 2, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
It’s good that he was able to step in and smooth this situation over. Unfortunately, I think that the intervention should have gone the other way around. I’d like someone to take the President off into a corner and explain to him the basics of economics.
Obama is putting this country into an absolutely crushing level of debt, one that makes even the big-spending George Bush look thrifty. There’s essentially now no way that we can get out from under this debt without a lot of pain.
On fiscal issues, his leadership has been absolutely awful. He’s making our situation much, much worse by trying to kick the can down to the next generation.
Posted by: Joe | April 2, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
I’m glad we have a real statesman in the presidency. A person who is intelligent, cultured and who deals with people and problems as an adult. He is representing us very well in Europe and in the rest of the world. I’m glad I voted for him.
Posted by: Voter | April 2, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
The President (U.S.) as a referee..interesting..
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 2, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
For those clapping yourselves on the back… did you notice that the United States is no longer the leader of the world as it was before Obama went to Europe. This marks the end of our Super Power status. This is a sad day for America. Obama is a disaster.
Posted by: SA | April 2, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
The Obama administration official described this compromise as a “meeting in the middle.” The word “note” — as in “we note the OECD has today published a list” — doesn’t necessarily carry any weight.
Moreover, any sanctions are “future-oriented,” the senior official said, meaning there are as of now no actual sanctions.
In other words this is just a load of diplomatic BS that Obama’s fans will try to use as some great diplomatic triumph. In the end their final agreement was some harsh language that results in nothing and the status quo remains, and all parties look strong. This is just what Obama does best; flowery words, no actual substance.
Posted by: Matt | April 2, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Reading the remarks of SA makes me wonder if SA is actually reading the article or just assuming what SA wishes would be true. President Obama is the first leader of the free world who the rest of the world respect and can work with. President Obama is exactly the man we need right now to be running things in America. When the markets where falling the fascists where blaming it on the president. Now that they are rising where are the fascists? Hiding out and hoping for the fall of America. Patriots? No way.
Posted by: mark | April 2, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Sometimes the goals of two or more adversaries aren’t as far apart as they seem. People tend to get caught up in side-issues that involve particular ways of achieving their goals rather than the goals themselves.
It’s not surprising that President Obama, who’s well known for valuing communication skills, was able to sort out this disagreement. This is one of his strengths, one of the reasons we elected him.
Well done, U.S.A. Well done, President Obama.
Posted by: DoTheMath | April 2, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
“President Obama is the first leader of the free world who the rest of the world respect and can work with. President Obama is exactly the man we need right now to be running things in America.”
So what exactly did Obama accomplish with this little diplomatic show? What changed? What great breakthrough did he make? This whole story is such a joke. What’s sad is the fact that you can’t see that Obama talked China and France back into nothing more than the status quo. THE PROBLEM REMAINS in case you missed that.
Posted by: Matt | April 2, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
I would recommend that Matt read the remarks from the leaders of the rest of the G20 countries. To a person they give credit to OUR president, President Barrack Hussein Obama, for leading the G20 on the road to global prosperity. No other president has ever been accepted and respected by world leaders as much as President Obama. Americans can once again hold their heads high and proclaim that we are being lead by a man of morality, strong-character and ethics.
Posted by: mark | April 2, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
“President Obama has made us all proud to be Americans!”
speak for yourself, most Americans were proud of their country long before Obama came around. You’re sounding like a phony “fair weather” patriot.
Posted by: nick | April 2, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
So basically the only non Obama source says there was a “heated” disagreement. Everything else is from the Obama administration. Also if Obama stepped between the two in the account Tapper used, was there another account? Seems to be since Tapper felt the need to mention this was just one account.
Posted by: Zaggs | April 2, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
SA,
Did you just crawl out from under a rock or something? This has got to be one of the most ignorant things I have ever read…
“For those clapping yourselves on the back… did you notice that the United States is no longer the leader of the world as it was before Obama went to Europe.”
Bush took care of whatever standing we had years ago. Looks like the President has taken a firm step in restoring our standing. It’s about time.
Posted by: Jimbo2K7 | April 2, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
I see a lot of sore losers out there still. Bitterness. I see a lot of hope and hard work as well. I’m so pleased with Obama so far. He’s a great man and what we needed. We are very fortunate. I think I’m done trying to convince all those bitter people. Instead, I’m going to enjoy life and work hard and support the President when I agree, the best I can. No, I’m not bowing down. He’s an elected official. Let’s hold him accountable, but let’s also support him when needed. What a great day. We finally saw someone answer questions with thoughtfulness and intelligence. He spoke to Americans and others with such a humble, yet positive demeanor.
Posted by: Matt | April 2, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
… such negativity & partisanship… particularly from the GOP side (why do you want the country & President to fail)? We have been failing miserably for the past 8 years, we (AMERICA) deserve some success & respect. Aren’t we ALL AMERICANS!? BTW, Yes “they” are laughing behind closed doors… however I’m afraid that “they” are laughing at America & Americans in general, also our failed domestic & international policies, they are not laughing at our current President, they are laughing with him. “They” however are also laughing at how the main stream media can easily manipulate & divide sooooooooooo many of “US” sooooo easily!
Posted by: Efrain | April 2, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Uh, Joe! Just remember that Obama didn’t start out with zero debt thanks to that idiot Bush. He would not have been able to mediate anything because he doesn’t speak english. Bush came into office with a surplus and left us with a huge debt. Obama has been in office for 3 months. MORON!
Posted by: roxsteady | April 2, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
I am pleased that President Obama has kept his focus on the larger picture of cooperation and has been able to keep the dialogue open. Though some posts have decried what they view as empty language, I see it differently. This was a one day meeting, and the language of the compromise leaves the issue on the table for further dialog, diplomacy, and negotiations. The concern was not swept under the rug, was not ignored, and was not voted down. More than one day will be required to deal with issues that are complex in nature. I applaud President Obama. Well done.
Posted by: Heartfelt | April 2, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Again Mark,
What exactly has Obama accomplish over there? There’s a HUGE difference between words and actions. This little diplomatic stunt was little more than a save-face situation for two of the parties, and an oportunity to look good for the other.
Honestly, some of you act like he just walked on water or something.
Posted by: Matt | April 2, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Honestly this is the most logical response I’ve seen so far. My only beef is that some people act like New Jesus just walked on water.
“Though some posts have decried what they view as empty language, I see it differently. This was a one day meeting, and the language of the compromise leaves the issue on the table for further dialog, diplomacy, and negotiations. “
Posted by: Matt | April 2, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
i hope he fails toooooooooo
Posted by: jeremy | April 2, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
What’s the deal with the “thumbs up” in the group photo? Can he be that naive?
“In Bangladesh, Iran, Iraq and Thailand the ‘thumbs up’ sign is traditionally an obscene gesture, equivalent to the use of the middle finger in the Western world.”
I guess he’s not well versed in international relations…
Hey Sigh, in case you didn’t know it this meeting took place in London where a thumbs up means the same as it does here in America. And he is an American president who is representing America, not Iran or Iraq or any other country where the thumbs up is a gesture of disrespect. Therefore, giving the thumbs-up is appropriate and not at all naive. Your comments are just symbolic of the President Obama haters who will grasp at anything to be critical. To you I give TWO BIG THUMBS UP! Take that anyway you like!
Posted by: Don | April 2, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Apparently conservatives want the United States to be hated abroad. Working with other nations is un-American I guess.
Posted by: Tony Rocky Horror | April 2, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Good for Sarkozy!! The idea that ANYONE _IN_ China could get away with being a TAX CHEAT is… Hello? (TOTALITARIAN DICTATORSHIP) ridiculous.
But the Chinese want to be able to take advantage of European, American, & other Western CHEATERS evading their countries’ taxes.
The USA (with the insanely, morbidly greedy (not to say “treasonous”) neo-Confederates & entitled Neo-Cons ruling US government, Congress, the media, acadamia, AND now the Obama administration as well – all united under the banner of “FREE MARKET CAPITALISM” (which of course means quite the opposite, the ability of BIG PLAYERS to RIG and FIX the markets, i.e. monoopoly CONTROL of every market they can sink their teeth into)), will almost certainly defer to the China agenda, i.e. “TAX CHEAT HAVENS FOREVER!” lobby.
Posted by: Lj | April 2, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Thanks Mr. President!
Posted by: American Woman | April 2, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
So proud of our wonderful President Obama and Mrs. O. They have been exemplary in their representation of our country in Europe. The rest of the world loves them. What a refreshing turnaround from Bush.
I am one PROUD AMERICAN!
Posted by: Karen D | April 2, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
I find it interesting how sensitive conservatives have become when it comes to etiquette. Really, I had no idea you were so concerned with offending brown people the world over with the thumbs up sign.
And not to mention, touching queens. Who knew you guys were such sticklers for international relations? It’s quaint.
Posted by: OreIda | April 2, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Roxsteady: If your kid just maxed out his credit card, do you reward him by giving him a new card w/ twice the credit limit and encourage him to max it out again, or order him to pay down his credit card debt first?
Posted by: Kevin | April 2, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
So The One has finally done something productive in his life?
Good for him.
Posted by: malclave | April 2, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Obama leaves the country and the stock market rallies ..amazing. I hope he stays out!
Posted by: Obamatron#22434 | April 2, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Hey Matt,
The US is still a superpower, but our influence in the world was diminished with bush and co. This started much further back than this weekend. Read something other than talking points. I suggest “The Post-American World” by Farheed Zakaria.
Posted by: joey | April 2, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
“Good for Sarkozy!! The idea that ANYONE _IN_ China could get away with being a TAX CHEAT is… Hello? (TOTALITARIAN DICTATORSHIP) ridiculous.
But the Chinese want to be able to take advantage of European, American, & other Western CHEATERS evading their countries’ taxes.
The USA (with the insanely, morbidly greedy (not to say “treasonous”) neo-Confederates & entitled Neo-Cons ruling US government, Congress, the media, acadamia, AND now the Obama administration as well – all united under the banner of “FREE MARKET CAPITALISM” (which of course means quite the opposite, the ability of BIG PLAYERS to RIG and FIX the markets, i.e. monoopoly CONTROL of every market they can sink their teeth into)), will almost certainly defer to the China agenda, i.e. “TAX CHEAT HAVENS FOREVER!” lobby.”
WOW LJ. This is the first time I have seen someone accuse President Obama of being a capitalist! the truth is that before this administration NO ONE suggested that the tax havens should be closed. Finally we have a leader who is not beholden to BIG MONEY and will go after the fat cats who hide their ill-gotten gains in off-shore banks. Time for the tax cheats to pay up. And before you fascists start SCREAMING about the nominees who had tax troubles I will say that they should be held accountable and made to pay what they owe. And their actions are in no way equatable to the person who knowingly stashes millions and billions off-shore to avoid paying taxes. These are the people who cost this country BILLIONS in tax revenue every year and we finally have a president who is going to put an end this.
Posted by: mark | April 2, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
“Obama leaves the country and the stock market rallies ..amazing. I hope he stays out!”
Stupidity… overwhelming..!!
Posted by: Eric | April 2, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Sounds like some of you are the benefit of this socialist president.
Steal from the productive and give to the unproductive.
Thieves and laziness are not virtues.
The only skin he wants in the game is the the skin to enable him spread the wealth around.
When all of your liberties are gone as a result of supporting this president, you shall be the new slaves and he shall own you.
Less Government (Corrupt)
More Freedom (Responsible)
More Personal Responsibly
Stand up for the constitution
Posted by: Mad as H... | April 2, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
I don’t like Obama. But as I watch him do this stuff, I can see the value in his ability to be a consensus builder around the world. He does not posture and god knows we have had so much of that in the past by so many leaders. I am beginning to see what he is all about. The professor with a brain. The academic at the tenure party with the good wife that is sharp and confident. He is the package and if the stock market keeps rising and we can get things controlled and start hiring Americans again to make america strong and solid again, well I don’t care if he uses his thumbs up or his middle finger for that matter. If he can ready this ship to sail again, I am ready to say I was wrong about him.
Posted by: swoosie | April 2, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
“Steal from the productive and give to the unproductive.
Thieves and laziness are not virtues.”
What a stupid thing to say.
Posted by: Eric | April 2, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
If there is anything I wish you right wingers would do, it would be to stop over using the campaign buzzwords in every single post.
I don’t even have to read them, they always say the same things: the messiah, kool-aid, liberal bias, socialist, Marxism, kum-ba-ya, clown, sheeple, WAKE UP AMERICA, teleprompter, empty suit, etc. Get some new talking points, please!
This all out limbs flailing, temper tantrum meltdown you all are engaged in is, well, bizarre.
And another thing, I’ve never seen anyone refer to the President as the messiah except extreme right wingers and Farraconvict. Consider your source folks.
Posted by: Beau | April 2, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
That is what leaders do. President Obama is good for our country and that in turn is good for the world. Our markets are now higher than when he took office and consumer confidence is on the rise.
The vitriol from the right is juvenile and moronic. You can taste the latent racism in their words. Mostly you can feel their fear they express as hatred.
These last years have exposed the right to be simple minded and full of anger at anyone not like them. Let them go on their way as humankind becomes more tolerant, more intelligent and more liberal. Just as George Washington hoped for.
Posted by: Paul | April 2, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
He should have joined up with Sarkozy against Hu Jintao. At least it’d show China that the world is still controlled by the West, not the East.
Good job Sarkozy. It’s a shame Obama from our nation had to intervene before you could finish the job.
Posted by: sethstorm | April 2, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Sarkozy is hardly moral. There is a little postage stamp called Monaco stuck to the soft white underbelly of France. No income tax, 50 billionaires. Europe is riddled with tax havens, every country has a few favorites. When tax revenues fall, the hue and the cry goes up. Hong Kong is not a tax haven as much as it is a real capitalist financial center that the whole world depends upon. Sarkozy was trying to win votes at home, but the French are ready to elect somebody new. Even his pretty wife can’t stand him anymore.
Posted by: nanse1n | April 2, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
And, to you Mad as H,
The problem is, we’ve had socialistic (is that a word?) programs in place for a long time. Government roads, libraries, public parks, police, firemen, and I don’t know about you, but I really like the garbage collectors. Without them, we’d go all 3rd world country pretty quick in the summer time.
You guys seem to want all of these things for free. Nobody likes to pay taxes, but everyone wants the police to protect them, their garbage picked up, interstate highways to drive on, etc. Taxes provide these services. Property taxes, etc. Our taxes pay for our elected officials awesome insurance, and I don’t see any neo-con politicians turning that down. I think you guys are blowing the socialism stuff completely out of proportion. It’s been this way for a long time, and it didn’t seem to bother any of you until Obama became the other candidate.
Posted by: Rene | April 2, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
I am so proud of the way that President Obama and first lady Michelle are representing themselves and our country to the world. God bless and watch over them both. I know that I would have been one disapponted Democrat if McCain had won the election, but I don’t think I would have been so bitter and angry as a lot of the posters have been, I think that four years and hopefully eight is such a long time to have your blood pressure up and have anger in your souls, it’s really not good to live like that.When I pray, it’s for the President and his family and all of my fellow Americans and our country, I have to live my life as an optimist and with love in my heart.
Posted by: Terry | April 2, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
President Obama did the right thing here.
Face up to it, America-the criminal former administration made this disaster and squashed any positive sentiments the rest of the world had about it with their illegal policies. The wars were PAID by China and they now have a say in this economic recovery, too. So for all you laid-off right-wing hackers/lobbyists guess what? Your hands are covered in the destruction of America’s standing at home and abroad.
You just want America to fail. I can only surmise it is due to the fact that America ranks 38th in education. But Bush was good at one thing: helping terrorists recruit others. Thanks. “Mission Accomplished”.
Posted by: Gary | April 2, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Obama, you are the man! Keep up the good job of restoring our image abroad.
Posted by: Sidiki Trawally | April 2, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
President Obama is restoring America’s ability to lead and stature in the world much faster than I thought possible. Good choice America. Damn good choice.
Posted by: zia | April 2, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
I like the obama-haters here. It’s hilarious! In the relentless effort to hate Obama, they are now defending the socialist of all socialists – the president of France! (didn’t we hate those frogs last week?) And why? because Obama was interfering in Sarkozy’s attempt to pressure China into what? Regulating Markets!! ahh, the pillar of conservative values!
So many posters are so nakedly without values. They just despise blindly.
They ought to support China since their commitment to unregulated markets is so… Ron Paul. But instead, their racism kicks in and they beat their chests and root for the white guy. Certainly not for their president.
Posted by: jack | April 2, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Very nice. Guess Dr. Krugman will find some fault with this and his face will be plastered all over Newsweek again. Um, in my humble opinion, SCREW KRUGMAN!
Posted by: clay r. | April 2, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Geez, Obama … you’re making us proud to be your neighbour.
Jonny C
Posted by: JonnyEmm | April 2, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
This is the supreme advantage of once again having a president who is brilliant enough to think on his feet. According to multiple senior sources, Bush spent many such occasions as a weak if not passive player largely to his inability to even understand the issues at hand. But at last those days are over. Finally, the American Presidency is filled by a leader with the intellect to be up to the task. Once again, American can actually lead.
Posted by: ElodieStClair | April 2, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Not being an American I have been a bit of a fence sitter and have over time felt supportive of both Republican and Democratic Presidents at different times. However, since the election campaign of ’08 and political activity since the election of President Obama I feel now I can sit firmly in the Democrat camp for several reasons. Not the least being the absolute stupidity and degeneration of many GOP supporters. Intelligence and the ability to rationalize seems to have deserted the Republican party that I used to hold in some regard. Reading many posts here today yet again confirms my suspicions that the current Republican party and many of their supporters have lost their way, their integrity and their common sense. Beau @ 4.29 is exactly right.
Posted by: Eva | April 2, 2009, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Factory orders are now beginning to climb higher than expected at 1.8 percent; the Dow Industrials are surging today over 8,000; the S&P and NASDAQ indexes are now higher than when Obama entered office; construction spending and pending home sales figures are rising…
Isn’t socialism awesome?!
Posted by: Ry | April 2, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Lets face it, China and its leaders are very smart. They take, take, take until [you] SLAP THEIR COLLECTIVE HANDS and draw a line in the sand. They pirate software and intellectual property and then claim “oh we are trying SO hard to stop this”, devalue currencies, turn the other cheek for quality control in favor of profits, exploit their billion Chinese people using the carrot and stick ( prison / death ), censure all media, hack into US govt computers to steal anything they can and are ALWAYS trying to steal technology through shadow companies. They DO NOT want to prevent tax cheats or close tax havens as it is against their own best interests. WE MUST GET INDEPENDENT CONFIRMATION THAT THEY ARE PLAYING BY THE RULES OR THEY WILL SKIRT LAWS.
Posted by: bruce | April 2, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
“Factory orders are now beginning to climb higher than expected at 1.8 percent; the Dow Industrials are surging today over 8,000; the S&P and NASDAQ indexes are now higher than when Obama entered office; construction spending and pending home sales figures are rising…
Isn’t socialism awesome?!”
HA!
Posted by: ace_pilot | April 2, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
“”Thieves and laziness are not virtues.”"
Who is lazier than a Republican? Not a thought in a head unless borrowed from Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity or Glen Beck.
Too lazy to think…
Posted by: Alecia Raniba | April 2, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
God Bless President Obama.
Posted by: Anna | April 2, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
JMart is reporting that indeed, WH aides did call a press briefing to make sure everybody knew about Obama “breaking up” this dispute.
Posted by: MayBee | April 2, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
If you’ve read “Highlights” as a child, you know that Bush is “Goofus” to Obama’s “Gallant,” and the GOP can’t stand it. They want to conveniently forget that of the last eight years, six of them were controlled by a GOP Congress (to rubber stamp everything Bush did). Like children, they will never take responsibility for anything they’ve done.
Posted by: Mary | April 2, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
I’m very proud of my President today. This is the kind of leadership the world needs. These men are the leaders of the world, and Obama not only fit in, but showed true leadership in a room full of leaders.
America will not only recover economically, we will be stronger than ever. USA, USA, USA!
Posted by: Brian | April 2, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
I love how the debate on this thread is, how great is obama??
“Oh he’s not that great!”
“Oh yes he is, he is!”
When was the last time we had that argument about Bush?
Posted by: SeanF | April 2, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
This one story basically sums up the most important reason for electing Obama. Here is a clear example of him doing something that Bush couldn’t do, and that McCain wouldn’t do anymore.
Posted by: Mark Kraft | April 2, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
I’m thrilled to have a President who’s able to form a grammatically correct sentence and walk and chew gum at the same time. Our Pres is all about class, intelligence, dignity, gravitas, charm, elegance, style, charisma, and good temperament. For once, the electorate have done themselves proud. And credit the Dem regulars who chose the right nominee.
Posted by: steve | April 2, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
mary u have ur dnc/media matters points down pat!but hey ur getting paid min.wage ,so i suppose u better…really?blue states must be awesome then!i guess cali isnt on the verge of bankruptcy,and NY isnt trying to raise taxes on everything but the amount of microbes on your body?yeah lets do that!lets go that route!you dems are brilliant!
Posted by: GeldontheHUGE | April 2, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
It is fortunate the United States has a President with some intelligence, insight, vision and character … something sadly lacking in Prescott Bush’s selfish, lying offspring.
Posted by: Darryl | April 2, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
Wow, we have a President that can make peace not war.
Markets are up, we’re taking the lead in the world again. Repubs are sooooo frustrated that their ideas have been shown to be more bankrupt than AIG. But Obama’s not going to bail them out. R.I.P. Reaganomics and cowboy diplomacy.
Posted by: SanityMan | April 2, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
To win the dead-enders, like Gelding, over, Obama would have had to torture Hu Jintao into making the agreement.
Posted by: WHainey | April 2, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
The naysayers’ comments are quite laughable. You only reinforce that this country seriously needs education reform…being educated obviously missed the boat with you.
Posted by: Sally | April 2, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
President Obama and First Lady Mrs. Obama are making us all proud! I wouldn’t pay a lot of attention to the idiots posting here. They were around before the 2008 election and Mr. Obama still won anyway and their numbers are shrinking faster than a snowball in …. Prediction: Americans will make sure that President Obama is returned to the Oval Office for a second term. We can help the sore losers by supplying pacifiers for the ones who are not already sucking on their thumbs! Waaaaaaa! Waaaaaa!
Posted by: Bussta Brown | April 2, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Blessed are the peacemakers.
Posted by: Juna | April 2, 2009, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
Is there any question now what a difference a real leader can make?
Can you imagine McCain pulling that off? If you can, you live in an alternate reality from the rest of us.
Posted by: Yael | April 2, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Everyday I am glad that I voted for President Obama. It is so wonderful that he can represent us to rest of the world instead of the crazy people posting here who can’t think beyond the nutty screaming fearfullness of the radio show entertainers.Where were you all when the Republicans put our lives and our money at risk? Yelling all crazy about something else. Everyone I know is relieved that there is a fair minded and able person directing our country.Deal with it crazies. No, I don’t care about Acorn or the hand signals or the tax havens or salary caps or communism or birth certificates or Mrs. Obama’s mood or Queen Elizabeths feelings or unborn babies or what happens to your guns, or patriotism. I just care about me, my family and friends and my money.
Posted by: Linda Hartinian | April 2, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
I am proud of Mr. Obama. He reminds me of my brother, who as a kid on the playground, was the peacemaker whenever two of his playmates got into a spat with each other.
Posted by: Dianna | April 2, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
tears, I love this President with all my heart. Anyone who finds fault with him, would find fault in a Saint.
How anyone can say anything negative about this man is mind boggling. He is an incredible human being.
Posted by: lin | April 2, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Sigh… I love it when the leader of the free world talks peace to me…
Posted by: wcgmilf | April 2, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
So … what President Obama just did with his intervention was to help the Chinese keep loopholes for people who don’t want to pay taxes. That’s what
tax havens are. Nations like France, the U.K. and of course the US are loosing billions because of these loopholes.
And I thought that paying taxes was patriotic. It’s the same as with the
AIG bonuses. Please don’t be angry when you hear that a CEO transferred his company to the Cayman Islands or Monaco. That’s what President Obama
just agreed to.
Posted by: gelsomina | April 2, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Macao is a smuggler haven for all kinds of Illegal things.
Posted by: James Wilson | April 2, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
“The Obama administration official described this compromise as a “meeting in the middle.” The word “note” — as in “we note the OECD has today published a list” — doesn’t necessarily carry any weight.”
“Moreover, any sanctions are “future-oriented,” the senior official said, meaning there are as of now no actual sanctions.”
So Obama helped the Chinese and French
“appear” to accomplish something when in reality nothing concrete was accomplished at all.
This can only be considered a success to liberals and people who deal in “thoughts” and “emotions” instead of actions and reality.
Probably the same reason all the liberals posting here call Obama a “saint” and “Great leader” even though he has lied or broken just about every campaign promise he made:
(no lobbyist,no earmarks,transparency,troops out of Iraq,no middle class tax increases,no signing statements)…on..and…on…and…on
Obama throws truth and accountability out the window while his sheep stay on bended knee.
Posted by: Baxter Greene | April 2, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Gelsomina, were you there? You have no idea what Obama even said to either man. He basically told them to try and reach consensus. He would never get directly involved in taking sides. You know nothing of diplomacy. Oh, I guess we know why, now don’t we. Why don’t you go wonder where Cheney keeps his money? It’s certainly the reason he keeps the fear-mongering going. He wants attention off of his finances. Brian Ross should try and follow that money trail.
Posted by: Mary | April 2, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
I’m proud or my President for the first time in over a decade. I can feel the people of the nation, no, the world are so happy that the United States is taking the moral leadership of the world. Think of it, Barack Obama’s father was Queen Elizabeth’s subject in a third world colony. Now he and his wife are meeting with her equally and in friendship.
Posted by: SanityMan | April 2, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Nolies, you do not need to travel outside of your country to know how to treat others, or have empathy. I live by the Golden Rule: “Do Onto Others, as You would have them Do onto You. I firmly BELIEVE, if we ALL LIVED by this Rule, what a BEAUTIFUL HEAVEN ON EARTH, WE COULD ALL HAVE!
Posted by: eARTHIE | April 2, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
If this had been Bush, he would have pulled both leaders together and after ignoring both their opinions, given his own and told them to take it or leave it, or maybe said something like about his views being America’s views and they’re either with America or against America!
LOL….what a difference an articulate leader makes. Thank God!
Posted by: Chris | April 2, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Mary, please read the article.
Sarkozy wanted to close the tax loopholes, the Chinese didn’t. Now we have “sanctions” that are “future-orientated”, which means that there are no sanctions, and we have a list of tax havens that “doesn’t necessarily carry any weight.”
As I said, it’s the same tragicomedy as with the AIG bonuses. First the administration writes an amendment into the stimulus bill that allows AIG to pay the bonuses, and then the President is shocked that bonuses were paid.
It’s going to be the same with the tax havens.
Posted by: gelsomina | April 2, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
It needs to be remembered that China operates by a somewhat different set of rules. Corruption is rampant throughout the country and the ‘government’ understands and recognizes this. This corruption is their form of capitalist economy in a way. To keep corruption in line, the government rules with an iron fist that would not be tolerated in any democracy in the world, as in handing down death sentences on very flimsy evidence.
With this in mind, obviously the Chinese cannot wholly agree and cooperate with a western style ‘rule of engagement’. As example, Macao is a giant money laundry and they know it, and place their own limitations and restrictions on it that are, to the west, as unacceptable as the corruption.
It is rather amazing that Obama took note of the east meets west mindsets and was able to find some common ground. Hats off to him.
Posted by: RJ | April 2, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
I am from the Caribbean and there a number of offshore banks in our jurisdiction. I want all to note that the total sum of money dealt with in our offshore banks is very meager compared to the quantum of this crisis.
AIG, Leham brs, Citi, JP Morgan, WaMu, and all the institutions associated with toxic assets are all on Wall and Main st. Where was Madoff? G20 leaders are looking for red herrings.
SAD!
Posted by: Nolram | April 2, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
I see that Obama’s community organization skills is turning out to be one of his greatest assets. He can negotiate different points a view and build a consensus. I hope Sarah Palin enjoys eating her own words.
Posted by: Robert | April 2, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Lin wrote: “I love this President with all my heart. Anyone who finds fault with him, would find fault in a Saint. How anyone can say anything negative about this man is mind boggling. He is an incredible human being.”
Linda Hartinian wrote: “It is so wonderful that he can represent us to rest of the world…”
SanityMan wrote: “Wow, we have a President that can make peace not war.”
I wonder if you (and others) will feel the same way should President Obama sell out our sovereignty in the name of compromise and peace where we must answer to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Court of Justice (World Court).
Posted by: James Danley | April 2, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Never poster here before, but just thought I’d point out some things.
One: The G-20 summits do accomplish important things, but very, very slowly. Always slowly. Nations are like big 18-wheelers, not small zippy sports cars. So anyone trying to turn this meeting of the world’s leaders into a “It’s just the same old b.s. P.R. thing” is half right, but also half wrong.
Something *was* accomplished, and what was accomplished, though it may not be enough yet, was actually good. So that is, by definition, a good thing.
Two: The only hatred I see being spewed forth here is by self-described conservatives (example: “Just wait till we conservatives pull all our money out of the banks,” etc.), which is really a shame, because you people should be rooting for our country and all the countries of the world to pull out of the mess we’re in (a mess we’re in due to conservative policies, I might add), since this mess affects you, too.
Three: Obama’s breaking up of the argument between the French prez and the Chinese prez was an example, yet again, that what Obama has been saying and demonstrating since before he started running for office – that he wants everyone in this country to actually work together instead of brow-beating each other with their own petty differences of philosophy – is actually true, and not just pleasant hyperbole.
Four: Any conservatives claiming that Obama is a bully are just flat-out projecting what they, and their former leader, did 24/7 for the past eight years.
Thank God we on the left actually beleive in fair-play, even when it’s tempting not to, even when those on the right haven’t displayed any such principle in well over twenty years.
All right. Nothing too profound here. Anybody who wants to, feel free to rip it apart; it’s what you do. (But when you’re done doing that, why don’t you try actually doing something, anything, positive with your time, if only for a few minutes. You might find you’re a happier person because of it.)
Posted by: Alec Scott | April 2, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Biggest tax haven: AIG
All the people whining about bonuses are missing the big picture.
Its not class envy = its about a system that is designed to make some people ridiculously rich by making many more ridiculously poor.
Its not a bug, its a feature.
Posted by: Flash Override | April 2, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
I like Obama but in this time my focus goes to Hu Jintao: he (like all chinese) is very smart, didn’t accept OECD list, in fact they only want to preserve tax heavens….what Obama’s charm use for? for nothing..please give me a break with the charm¡¡¡¡ (sorry my english)
Posted by: Italo | April 2, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Bush would have threatened them both with his gun a blazin’!
He’d have then turned and tried to open a locked door! lmao
Posted by: Gus | April 2, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Online GOPers are angry that Obama didn’t side with the FRENCH?
What happened to the freedom fries?
Posted by: say waht? | April 2, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
The USA schools the world again. Obama is a master with novices. The USA can again assert its world dominance.
Posted by: nonein2008 | April 2, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
sylvia…Well that’s where your wrong..I do not HAVE to respect Pres. Obama, but I SHOULD respect the office of the Presidency as we live in a DE.MOC.RA.CY..you know Freedom of Speech without fear of recrimination….
Posted by: Parallax View | April 2, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
alex scott…Don’t want to appear to be rude but…..LOL
Posted by: Parallax View | April 2, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
President Sarkozy is famous for his lack of patience.
He gets fired up – and unbecomingly rude – at the slightest sign of disapproval from whomever.
He suffers from a ” Napoleonic complex”.
He is quite unpopular in his own country, even to some of the people who voted for him.
Posted by: Frenchy | April 2, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
I love it how all the Republicans are taking the French point of view rather than the Chinese.
Posted by: marvin | April 2, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
Can u imagine George Bush breaking up this fight? John A. McCain? Sarah Palin?
…..
Now, Hu was fighting?
Posted by: Michael Lent | April 2, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Peter, this country has been socialist for at least 90 years. These policies have been supported by both parties since the time of FDR. So why do you throw that word around to scare people? He’s doing what is needed to keep as many people as possible employed.
Yes, it’s been a lot of debt. He’s said that government has to step back once we’re on the right track again though. You may not believe him, but he’s never said he would continue to spend like this forever.
And I think it’s unfair for you to criticize him in isolation for stomping on the Constitution. What part do you think he’s broken? I can’t think of any part that hasn’t been violated multiple times by recent Presidents with no action by Congress or the Supreme Court. There’s certainly no comparison between the violations by Obama compared to Bush.
Posted by: Mello | April 2, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
Nothing funnier than hearing Republicans and conservatives talk about Obama stomping on the Constitution. Republicans have never seen a Constitution they didn’t want to stomp on. Illegal wire tapping, holding people without charges, legislating for one sick woman, allowing undocumented workers to come into the country in order to break the unions, etc. etc. etc. Obviously not all of these examples are constitutional questions, but they are good examples of what Republicans were about for more than eight years…oh and don’t forget Nixon! Republicans have made a tradition out of stomping on our Constitution and other laws. I mean really, even their leader Rush Limbaugh gets the two confused. I wouldn’t be surprised if a good majority of Republicans didn’t know what the Constitution is.
Posted by: Phil | April 2, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
This is a good man, just let him do his job.
Posted by: Shell | April 2, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
For those conservatives who have reluctantly conceded that this was an achievement (even if ‘it was his first as President blah blah’), ask yourself: “What does this tell me about the temperament of our President?” And “How does this President’s temperament compare with the last Republican President’s?” These ‘little’ things don’t happen in a vacuum. They reflect instincts built into a character developed over a lifetime. Conservatives, thank you for (finally) conceding, even if unintentionally, that our President is a great man.
Posted by: Poyda | April 2, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
Just remember that those tax havens in China were created by foreihn nations for “free trade”. China merely perpetuated their existance…largely under the demands of the Brits, Portuguese, etc. And the French created the Seychelles; the Brits Jersey, Barbados, Labuan; etc.
I think Obama told Hu that the US was a non-OECD and was reining in US banks using offshore accounts, as well as cracking down on States like Connecticut and Wyoming. So he needed to realize that it wasn’t simply an OECD initiative and that China was essential for this to work against Switzerland, Bahrain, and other havens.
Posted by: cinnamonape | April 2, 2009, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
I bet they are glad we have a president that can put more than 2 words together to make a sentence.
Posted by: Ed | April 2, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
pter- well said!
Posted by: Dave Norman | April 2, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Well said Pter! Bravo! Post more.
Posted by: Rob | April 2, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
Jake – You may want to update this.
In his press conference, Sarkozy, himself, described how Obama acted as diplomat to gain consensus.
This isn’t just “WH Spin”.
Posted by: Tom | April 2, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
Terry and Phil – You both make great points on this “socialism” being thrown around. Good points indeed.
Posted by: Rob | April 2, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Wow, how refreshing to have a president with a brain, that understands how to work with, not against, people, to get things accomplished.
Oh, and you “conservatives”. This is your mess we’re dealing with — so don’t act all high-and-mighty. You’re like the kid who breaks his toy, demands that you fix it, and then tells you you’re fixing it wrong.
Luckily, the Repubs are quickly becoming a regional party, and I really think they are done nationally, which is just dessert after sticking us with Dubya for eight miserable years, leading to this…oh, but he’d be a great guy to have a beer with, right, Repubs?
Posted by: gee | April 2, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
While I agree that this isnt a big deal in and of itself it does show that the US is still in a unique position in the world. This is a hard thing for conservatives to grasp because on average they tend to be revisionists or just plain ignorant of history. The acrimony between Europe and Asia is pronounced. Two centuries of colonialism and institutional racism dominates the dialogue. The US and Canada dont have this history. We are Europeans who left Europe for many of the same reasons that Asia takes issue with. In a way we have a shared history with Asia. We have a strong bond both culturally and financially. Sadly these were nuances lost on the last administration. This administration has a different worldview and more importantly a different view of America. As a nation we are at our best when we aren’t reactionary or self indulgent. This is especially true when dealing with the Chinese. They believe that to show anger is to show weakness. You may not agree with Obamas policies but I think most can agree that his patience and even temper serves the nation well in matters of state.
Posted by: uberlefty | April 2, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Remember how much the Republicans loved the French President, because he was said to be conservative.
Ha Ha conservatives, looks like you can’t pick ‘em.
Every day Obama does something I like, from the Lilly Ledbetter law to the family planning clinic help to the stem cell research.
relatives of mine, just got a loan from a bank, repayable at only $300.00 a year from their tax refunds. Thanks Obama, for the stimulus package. A local plumber already has their check to fix their drainage lines.
Posted by: sharonb | April 2, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
I am so proud to have Obama as our President.
Posted by: cincyr | April 2, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
So “conservatives” are in favor of Sarkozy’s plan to regulate world financial markets with an international body????
— I swear if Obama said lower taxes you folks would demand that he raise them.
Posted by: case | April 2, 2009, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Poyda, I’m with you. I thank the universal conscienceness for Barack Obama. He’ll make mistakes, he’s human, not like the monsters that ruined 40 years of the US’/International diplomatic negotiations because of two STOLEN elections.
My biggest issue is that the Repubs are master hypocrites in every possible way. And, they have the FOX Network as their very own information manipulators. Good thing FOX is “Fair ad Balanced”. Geez, they treat their audiences like uneducated idiots, which I’m afraid the majority of their viewers (who believe) are.
Got off on a tangent there, sorry.
Posted by: Nancy | April 2, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Barack Obama is making proud nearly on a daily basis. I have a strong sense he may turn out to be possibly the best president the USA has ever seen. It’s rather comical to see Republicans and conservatives try to tear him apart by grasping at straws that don’t exist. It’s just a shame we can only keep him for 8 years really. But maybe by the time Obama’s 8 years are up, other Americans will understand how this country should lead. By example!
Posted by: Sean | April 2, 2009, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
President Obama is doing a great job. Way to Go Barack!!
Posted by: Rev. Ike | April 2, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
I LOVE OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He is making me PROUD!!!!!!!
Posted by: Jason | April 2, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Congratulations Jake. Absolutely the very best American -dignified & precise reporting Jake. A job very well done. From a group of 84 in Canada.
Posted by: Ione | April 2, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
How different to have a Prez who doesn’t look like a fool all the time. Or say the wrong thing, or come across as ignorant.
Republicans… you are all on your own. There is a new world view and your views are obsolete and have no place in these new beginnings.
Posted by: butterfly73 | April 2, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Don’t you just love it when Republicans in Congress claim that Obama is a socialist, and here this bunch of hypocrites gets all their medical insurance and pensions paid for by the American people! And they’re against Universal Health Care for us? Something tells me that the Republicans are so out of touch with reality right now. They have no message, no real leaders.
Look who they have now…Palin, Cantor, Limbaugh, Hannity…all kooks!
Posted by: ccvc | April 2, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
WOW. We are witnessing a political genius. This is a Republican nightmare. He is doing EXACTLY what this independent expected of him. Thank you MR PRESIDENT.
Posted by: Patrick | April 2, 2009, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
Intelligence has returned to the White House. This is so refreshing on a daily basis. This man is working hard to restore America. He is WORRIED about Bin Laden… making the necessary decisions to keep us truly safe, not NATION BUILD. THANK GOD FOR BARACK OBAMA.
Posted by: Patrick | April 2, 2009, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
I wonder if there is video of that anywhere; Good job, if that is what happened.
Posted by: Dana Fang | April 2, 2009, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
Yes, let’s all hail our great Messiah, The One. Never mind that daily he is eliminating your freedoms. For heaven’s sake, how could anyone so charming be doing anything so bad? It is sad, for when you wake up, it will be too late. Does anyone here have any familiarity with Revelation. Well, that is just a ridiculous question, isn’t it?
Posted by: Diana | April 2, 2009, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
Yes, our President is smart. Yes, he has many personal skills. But I believe his greatest asset is his sense of equality. I suspect this comes from his unique “story”. He spent a lifetime learning how to live with others, how to find a place, and, thanks to the teachings of his mother, his grandfather, and his grandmother, he had a good foundation so that, when he had to make his own life and his own place, he completed the task by living in the world, reading not just words of the straight and narrow but also words of others, studying many philosophies, many ideas. So, while many can have an excellent formal educational opportunity listed on their resumes, not too many have the personal education, self sought, figured out, and assimilated into the whole.
I am grateful that we had the good sense to choose this man, who seems the right man for the right time in our history. Godspeed, Obama.
Posted by: TJ | April 2, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
“Yes, let’s all hail our great Messiah, The One. Never mind that daily he is eliminating your freedoms. For heaven’s sake, how could anyone so charming be doing anything so bad? It is sad, for when you wake up, it will be too late. Does anyone here have any familiarity with Revelation. Well, that is just a ridiculous question, isn’t it?”
What freedoms are you talking about? Elaborate please?
Posted by: ace_pilot | April 2, 2009, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
we havent had anyone of intelligence to represent the great us of a in a long time i feel good.
Posted by: deschl | April 2, 2009, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
The naysayers are amazing. They wouldn’t recognize “taking our freedoms away” when they saw it. Where were they over the last 8 years?
Posted by: TJ | April 2, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
Why are the die-hard Republicans the only ones who like to call the President The Messiah? I swear, you would think they were in love with the man or something.
Posted by: Ry | April 2, 2009, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
from the comments,i understand most of america know quit little about china
Posted by: welly | April 2, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
Factory orders are now beginning to climb higher than expected at 1.8 percent; the Dow Industrials surged 213 points today over the 8,000 threshold; the S&P and NASDAQ indexes are now in the green, higher than when Obama entered office; and construction spending and pending home sales figures are now rising.
The economy clearly has a liberal bias.
Posted by: Eric | April 2, 2009, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
We got the president we deserve, no he is not the one.
Big deal, what he did is what he supposed to do, he just it does better than anyone else.
Posted by: lee226 | April 2, 2009, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
Oh G o d. You ‘The One’, ‘Messiah’ people are too much.
And the Oscar goes to…the Republican Party of the United States of America, for best leading actors in the Comedy of Errors of the Year!
Posted by: Brianna | April 3, 2009, 12:04 am 12:04 am
I’m an American who has parents that are both European and Australian nationals and I also import from China to the USA. I’m surprised that I haven’t seen anyone comment on Jintao’s need to “save face” against Sarkozy’s aggressive posturing. I think President Obama may have helped Sarkozy and Jintao to accommodate each others unique cultural/political needs. Whatever transpired, it did require a very strong and uncommon intuitive insight on our Presidents behalf. Very nice.
Posted by: Chris | April 3, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Can you IMAGINE George Bush doing this? Bravo President Obama!
Posted by: Paul | April 3, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Yet another example of why I am so proud to have Barack Obama as our president. Bravo, Mr. President. This is the kind of leadership we need.
Posted by: Laura | April 3, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am
I’m Very Proud of President and the 1st lady as well as Hillary Clinton…
An Joe Biden, for staying Low Key, doing things behind the scenes, that’s a very good thing.
So Far Joe Biden is Gaffe Free
Posted by: O. | April 3, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Does this mean the killing will stop?
Troops come home? Investigations into bush crimes will start?
Posted by: And | April 3, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am
>> ERIC said: “the Dow Industrials surged 213 points today over the 8,000 threshold…”
Yes, and new UNEMPLOYMENT figures will be released tomorrow and are expected to be as high as 700,000 for March — making it the highest number in 26 YEARS.
>> “…And construction spending and pending home sales figures are now rising.”
Uh, hate to point this out to you, but it was EXISTING home sales that went up a bit, but NEW home sales are actually DOWN. And most real estate economists still believe the housing market hasn’t even hit the real bottom YET.
Tell you what, Eric — get back to us tomorrow when those unemployment numbers come out and then we’ll see how much you want to crow about numbers. The only reason the market was up a bit today was because China announced it would be expanding a bit in terms of foreign goods purchases — in short, commodities were up, but NOT any real stocks — which means the ONLY reason the market blipped today was because the country that is freakin’ HOLDING OUR DEBT decided to break it’s piggy bank a bit.
But considering they think we’re already spending waaaaay too much on the stimulus bill, don’t count on China doing much more buying when THEY are the ones now seeking a one world currency that will favor them.
Posted by: Creative Mind | April 3, 2009, 1:12 am 1:12 am
TJ, what freedoms did you lose under Bush?
Under President Obama, the AIG employees who received bonuses are being harassed and receiving death threats. And Congress is trying to punish them by taxing 90% of their contractually guaranteed retention bonuses–which by the way is unconstitutional. Now there are some Americans who are really losing freedoms.
I can’t wait until you who are so blinded by President Obama’s charisma and articulate speech wake up one day realizing that you won’t receive health care treatment because you smoke or eat the wrong foods; you will have to pay much higher prices for energy due to the Administration’s cap and trade policies; and your children or grandchildren will be REQUIRED to serve a year or two in Americorps or another similar service organization.
Posted by: James Danley | April 3, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am
This is amazing. The guy can’t do anything right in the eyes of repubs. First dude has no experience ….. wait till he meets some of these tried and tested world leaders ……. ok. He arrives at “school” and not only he does convince most people that he belongs but also shows the “tired and tested” titans how to play ball i.e., get things moving.
Posted by: sideline | April 3, 2009, 1:33 am 1:33 am
Well, for James Danley, per Chuck Baldwin of the Constitution Party (of which I neither voted for or am a member of):
Following are examples of freedoms which President Bush and his fellow Republicans in Congress have already expunged (as reported by the Associated Press):
FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION: Government may monitor religious and political institutions without suspecting criminal activity to assist terror investigations.
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION: Government has closed once-public immigration hearings, has secretly detained hundreds of people without charges, and has encouraged bureaucrats to resist public records questions.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH: Government may prosecute librarians or keepers of any other records if they tell anyone that the government subpoenaed information related to a terror investigation.
RIGHT TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION: Government may monitor federal prison jailhouse conversations between attorneys and clients, and deny lawyers to Americans accused of crimes.
FREEDOM FROM UNREASONABLE SEARCHES: Government may search and seize Americans’ papers and effects without probable cause to assist terror investigation.
RIGHT TO A SPEEDY AND PUBLIC TRIAL: Government may jail Americans indefinitely without a trial.
RIGHT TO LIBERTY: Americans may be jailed without being charged or being able to confront witnesses against them.
Who’s your fascist now?
Posted by: Henry Giltfelow | April 3, 2009, 1:36 am 1:36 am
So Henry Giltfelow which of the Rights were you denied??
Posted by: James Danley | April 3, 2009, 1:47 am 1:47 am
The Repubs would have us believe McCain or Palin or maybe even Jindal would have done a better job and that’s why they are really, really scary.
Obama is a phenom. He’s doing things no president has ever done before. He’s writing the book. Forget about Washington, Lincoln, Roosevelt. This guy is smoking us all.
And still the Repubs are telling us he’s a disaster, or like Limbaugh, wishing for a disaster.
Don’t forget, these are the guys who were telling us Palin is more qualified than Obama.
Posted by: ricland | April 3, 2009, 1:50 am 1:50 am
“He (President Bush) even had the same type of tyrannical clause granting him the ability to suspend all other branches of the government, and the constitution, in times of national crisis.”
So when did President Bush suspend the other branches of the government or the Constitution?
President Obama is using extortion to force private companies to retroactively adhere to strings attached to federal bailout money they previously received. President Obama actually threatened withholding any future bailout money if General Motor’s CEO didn’t resign. And Treasury Secretary Geithner says there may be more CEO’s forced to resign.
Oh!
And now we have learned that President Obama provided ACORN with a list of donors to his campaign who contributed less than $100. Something he legally refused to make public. HOWEVER not making the list public and subsequently giving the list to ACORN is a violation of election laws.
Posted by: James Danley | April 3, 2009, 2:02 am 2:02 am
Oh, I get it James Danley. As long as government perverts the constitution, and it doesn’t pertain to you as an individual, you’re scott free. The constitution is interpreted on an individual, case by case basis. See, I wasn’t briefed on that part. I thought it encompassed Americans as a whole, my fault entirely.
Posted by: Henry Giltfelow | April 3, 2009, 2:06 am 2:06 am
“Yes, and new UNEMPLOYMENT figures will be released tomorrow and are expected to be as high as 700,000 for March — making it the highest number in 26 YEARS.”
Yeah, and that isn’t an unexpected development either. Do you think employers are going to start rehiring at a moment’s notice while they’re still laying workers off? Trends show steady drops in unemployment claims figures always follow some time after the markets begin to rise. That’s a symptom that can’t be reversed as quickly, so just wait.
And way too much, this budget? DId you cry about Bush’s last fiscal budget too? 3.1 trillion dollars was the total figure, if I remember. Included no war spending, no natural disaster funding, but it had billions in subsidies to oil companies.
This one is a 16% increase, and includes funding for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, it includes disaster relief, a SIGNIFICANT increase of funding for the VA (support the troops and all), healthcare and education spending, and removes billions in subsidies to oil corporations.
I don’t understand why the GOP will fund hospitals, infrastructure, police and education in Afghanistan and Iraq, but not for their own constituents. What did Americans ever do to them?
Posted by: mnLIT | April 3, 2009, 2:09 am 2:09 am
I’ll need a source for that ACORN charge, sir.
Posted by: mnLIT | April 3, 2009, 2:10 am 2:10 am
“So when did President Bush suspend the other branches of the government or the Constitution?”
What, like Habeas Corpus?
Posted by: mnLIT | April 3, 2009, 2:15 am 2:15 am
The republican party would have had a volcanic eruption cover us in 10 feet of ash, just to make their fiscal responsibility point, wouldn’t they Mr. Jindal.
Posted by: andy griffith | April 3, 2009, 2:16 am 2:16 am
mnLIT,
Jesus could land on the heads of these people, Obama’s birth certificate in hand, ready to leave all the cars and airplanes un-manned for the great battle or whatever, and these people would NEVER concede they were wrong. I’m talking the LORD could beat them with his Jesus stick until they were blue in the face, and Obama would still be some kind of commie socialist, with no vault birth certificate, or whatever mortal sin Obama has committed this week, whatever that is.
Posted by: Andrea | April 3, 2009, 2:21 am 2:21 am
mnLIT, prior to the most recent Supreme Court ruling last year–which overturned the previous Supreme Court ruling during WWII–foreign war prisoners did NOT have a right to Habeas Corpus. So President Bush was acting within the law!
Posted by: James Danley | April 3, 2009, 2:33 am 2:33 am
mnLIT
Spot on my friend. It seems they will do whatever their government tells them to, until their government gets a free ride, and they’re left holding the bag. Bush is okay. He rode into the heavily guarded,gated community of the Texas sunset. And, I am absolutely all for human rights and democracy, but don’t you think it’s more prudent to have your own house in order, before you go rearraning someone elses?
Posted by: Stan the other man | April 3, 2009, 3:40 am 3:40 am
There have been violent detractors against all of histories great men. I prefer to spend my time watching our real-time history unfold instead of arguing over smaller minded ideas. Presently, not a single person can say that they’ve ever accomplished what our President has accomplished in short order. You’re missing the boat, the election is already over. I’ll form my ideas and debates just before the next election. It takes oodles of brains to create Obama’s calm charisma and spontaneous, nearly surgical, responses; certainly, most people can see that he can use them. I am also confidant thus far that Obama has acted with altruistic intent instead of for the typical political ego.
Posted by: chris | April 3, 2009, 4:33 am 4:33 am
Still, Obama does have a lack of inexperience and leadership.
Posted by: anonymous | April 3, 2009, 5:55 am 5:55 am
A President Indeed!
Posted by: sngeorgia | April 3, 2009, 6:36 am 6:36 am
One might assume that something may have been lost in the translation.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 3, 2009, 7:47 am 7:47 am
>> mnLIT: I’ll need a source for that ACORN charge, sir.
Sheesh, so much for a free and open press. I posted a link that would take you to the story, but I just checked back and noticed that someone moderating this board took it down — I assume because it took you to someone OTHER than ABC News.
So, to answer your question more generally, simply Google theses 4 terms words: Obama, Acorn, donors list, investigation. That will call up various news articles from just the other day giving you the lowdown. But suffice to say, a whistleblower has come forward and already given sworn testimony that the Obama election team coordinated efforts with Acorn with regards to revealing it’s donors list, and thus knowingly and willingly wbroke Federal Election Laws.
Posted by: Creative Mind | April 3, 2009, 8:18 am 8:18 am
I am extremely impressed with President Obama’s ability to act with such speed on any and every issue that has come across his desk. He is superfast, super intelligent, and I am having hopes that he will fix the “financial situation” and “America’s reputation” in no time…Go President Obama!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Aprilspointofview | April 3, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Andrea and others, you are so blinded by President Obama’s charisma that you fail to HEAR HIS WORDS. Back during the campaign, on July 2, 2008, The One said the following: “We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded.”
So President Obama wants a civilian national security force the size of our military–1.2 million men and women– with a budget just as large–the 2009 U. S. Military Budget is reported to be $515.4 billion (some estimate the true budget is actually over $700 billion).
ASK YOURSELF: What are the national security objectives that require having a civilian national security force that large? And require spending that much money to fund it?
WHATEVER THEY ARE, if it requires 1.2 million men and women and over $500 billion to go out and promote and enforce “them,” “they” must be something that the vast majority of Americans aren’t readily willing to accept.
Posted by: James Danley | April 3, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Admit it America…we love it when the rest of the world loves us. It’s an ego thing. Thanks for making the right decision America. I love you with all my heart.
Posted by: Iraq Vet | April 3, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am
MayBee: You can’t seem to give our president a kind word…wonder why? Let me tell you something….Mr. Judd Gregg says Obama will ruin our children’s future….well it is already ruined and was ruined by the lack of action by the republican party. No steps were taken by that adminstration in the last two years to stave off any thing of this nature. The economy was ignored…our childrens’s future is ruined but not by Obama. They were the ones who took away the sanctions and let the banks run amuck and gave no attention to the job losses or the housing situation. All this was going on for over a year and did not start with Obama’s presidency. They are blowing smoke to cover their inaction. What a laugh. If the potty mouth Rush is their symbol of the future…God save us.
Posted by: talmag | April 3, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Talmag, you seem to forget that the Democrats had control of both Houses of Congress since January 3, 2007.
The Bush Administration specifically warned Congress in 2005 and 2006 of the looming problems with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and how that would effect the overall economy. The Republican controlled Senate Committee voted out of committee a bill that would have addressed the situation. BUT due to the threat of a Democrat filibuster the Republicans chose to keep the bill in committee (a procedural move to make it easier to bring up again). It was the Democrats who refused to address the problem–specifically Rep. Frank (D-MA) and Sen. Dodd (D-CT) denied there was a problem–until the middle of last year.
Posted by: James Danley | April 3, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Why does James Danley conveniently neglect to include the fact that it has been the republican mantra of “DEREGULATION,” the REPEAL of the GLASS-STEAGLL ACT & the implementation of Phil Gramm’s GRAMM-LEACH-BLILEY ACT that brought us to such catastrophic financial devastation?
Posted by: clueless James | April 3, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Actually it was the Democrats who forced the mortgage companies to loan to individuals who could not possibly pay back the loans. Even Barack Obama was instrumental in helping ACORN extort money out of loan companies (they filed lawsuits which eventually were settled; and threatened additional lawsuits) forcing them to give loans to those who could not pay back the loans. It was the Clinton Administration who threatened heavy fines on mortgage companies that wouldn’t lower lending standards.
It was the government’s interference in the free market that brought down the economy. And the federal government continues to push the Auto Industry into making cars that the American people don’t want.
Posted by: James Danley | April 3, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Hey James: the democrats tried to get things passed but the republicam president vetoed them. You can spin this all you want, the controls were removed from the banks by the republicans. The republicans did not speak up as they do now to the president and demand that things be done to help stop the bleeding of the economy. If they had suggestions, their own president did not listen to them. Now they want Obama to listen to them. The put out a package with a nice cover and said the rest of the package will come next week….why put it out in the first place without the solutions? They increased the spending and some honest republicans admit they went too far so don’t give me the democrats caused this problem. Face what is actually the truth and let’s get on with fixing it.
Posted by: talmag | April 3, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Hello ~
Regarding reader comments on Tax Havens:
The point is, no matter where one lives on this planet, we are all, and especially the middle class, we are all facing serious consequences from the way our Financial systems and Capiltal-ism has been functioning till now.
Conclusion: Banking; Financial systems; Capitalism; our Economies – they all need to be changed and improved so that we all benefit and profit and not just a small group of us; or one country or some countries….
So, lets stay smart, stay united and not divide & ruin our selves….
This is the Time to re-make the World. As it should be….
:)
JS
Posted by: JS | April 3, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
What about Delaware ????
Posted by: pfuuu | April 3, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
OMG, the man is a genius. How did we ever get by without him. Who would have ever thought of that? Say that we “Note” the list. I stand amazed.
Posted by: Joe Shrimp | April 3, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
…..all this and he guarantees auto warranties too…where does he find the time? My Hero
Posted by: Diana | April 3, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
I have something to learn by the actions of President Obama, the French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Hu Jintao, President of the People’s Republic of China – we need to put our egos away and find a common solution.
My crystal ball broke years ago. But I know what I am going to do! I am going to be more actively involved with my community and government. I will probably be working until I am 80, so I hope they are ready for me.
Posted by: MadPlanter | April 3, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Capitalism is not to blame for this current economic crisis, the federal reserve and currency manipulation by central banks are to blame.
it is amazing how short sighted and easily mislead most are. we have not had free market capitalism in this nation for years. the federal reserve has constantly manipulated it by chaning interest rates and currency supplies. read Thomas Woods’ new book Meltdown for a laymans understanding of why government/central bank manipulation of markets will only lead to tyranny and opression. Thne try Hayek or Mises when you are ready for a true understanding of liberty, free markets, and unrestricted free market capitalism where the market is the regulator. there is no other impartial regulator and this is the only system where people are free.
Posted by: encroaching government | April 3, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Can you IMAGINE George Bush doing this? Bravo President Obama! Man o man that n.i.g.g.e.r. from the ghetto South Side of Chicago, the corrupt Democratic Machine is really something isn’t he!
Posted by: TI | April 3, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Here’s the irony. Americans would probably be much better off if the two had walked out of the conference, and nothing got done. But, oh sure, bravo. Well, I’m off to look for three more jobs so our 4% of the population can save the rest of the miserable world who won’t save themselves. Ciao, now.
Posted by: Jester | April 3, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
@ eichler1
Obama is an elitist and a liar. I’m going to give your president every bit of respect you gave mine.
Posted by: Joe Plumber | April 3, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Pure class; it’s the small things that define a mans character and this was one of them
Posted by: Tyler | April 3, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
America again has a leader who acts like one.
Posted by: SadistiX | April 3, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
“Capitalism is not to blame for this current economic crisis, the federal reserve and currency manipulation by central banks are to blame.
it is amazing how short sighted and easily mislead most are. we have not had free market capitalism in this nation for years.”
Free market capitalism is inherently unsustainable. It’s a system where property is power, and all life revolves around competing for it. It rewards selfishness and penalizes compassion. As in any competition, you don’t get ahead by helping others, and somebody is eventually going to get ahead. Chances are extremely high that it will be someone very selfish. Somebody is going to operate successful business, amass more property than others, and thus have more power to run more successful business. It snowballs.
Soon we find ourself in a situation where Person A has complete ownership over something Population B needs to survive. Ultimately, this means that Person A gets to make all the rules and Population B has no choice but to live by them.
Suddenly, there’s no more free market.
Posted by: SalmonGod | April 4, 2009, 2:49 am 2:49 am
SalmonGod, no offense but you are completely wrong about the Free Market.
In the Free Market prices rise as demand increases or supply decreases. Prices drop as demand decreases or supply increases. When prices get too high the Free Market corrects itself as people cut back on purchasing. When prices get too low the Free Market corrects itself as people see the bargin and begin purchasing again. It’s just that simple.
However, when outside sources interfere with the Free Market (i.e., government forces a company to produce a particular product; forces extra costs in producing a particular product; or sets price controls) it will effect the Free Market process. Sometimes it is for the public good and safety. Sometimes it is nothing more than meddling for the sake of being able to control. Regardless, the Free Market is then a LIMITED Free Market.
Now then what you are describing is NOT the Free Market but the INDIVIDUAL. The Free Market is not selfish or greedy. It is the Individual who may be selfish, greedy or even a criminal. It is the Individual who is or isn’t compassionate.
In a FREE society there will always be the Have’s and Have Nots. That’s because no two INDIVIDUALS are alike. Some individuals are driven to succeed (some may even be obsessively driven). Some individuals are satisfied to live modestly and be able to save a little above all of the expenses. Some individuals are lazy. Some individuals THINK of themselves as victims and depend on others. Some individuals ARE victims and HAVE to depend on others. Some individuals ARE victims but in spite of that are driven to succeed on their own. And there are many others who fall in between the above categories.
Some individuals are compassionate–regardless of which of the above categories they fall. Some individuals are just plan selfish, greedy OR EVEN A CRIMINAL–regardless of which of the above categories they fall.
Don’t confuse the Individual’s free will with the Free Market.
Posted by: James Danley | April 4, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
“Now then what you are describing is NOT the Free Market but the INDIVIDUAL. The Free Market is not selfish or greedy. It is the Individual who may be selfish, greedy or even a criminal. It is the Individual who is or isn’t compassionate.”
The free market is competitive. Competition is naturally egocentric. Competition is about winning for oneself. Thus, it naturally favors selfishness. Not that competition (being an abstract concept) is selfish, rather it rewards selfishness. Thus, free markets grant power to the selfish. Selfish people will naturally use their power in order to gain more power. Thus the free market destroys itself.
Unless rules are put in place that prevent anybody from ever getting ahead, which in itself is a contradiction of capitalism’s core principles.
The ideal of the free market is logically impossible.
And the idea that freedom and inequality are incompatible is inherently contradictory, and flies in the face of history. First of all, inequality means freedom only for a few, therefore not a free society. Then there are modern historic examples of successful anarchist societies, but they were all torn down by imperialistic invaders. There’s also the fact that over 98% of human history is indigenous (Civilization as we know it hasn’t been around for very long), and indigenous cultures enjoyed huge amounts of freedom, equality, sustainability, and a relative lack of violence compared to “civilized” cultures.
Posted by: SalmonGod | April 4, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Sorry, “Joe the Plumber,” but you know NOTHING. In what way is Obama an elitist? Go ahead – look the word up, and then try to give me an example of a way in which he’s acted that way. Know why you can’t do it? Because you’re spouting off garbage someone smarter than you made up.
I couldn’t stand “your president”, but I ALWAYS hoped he’d succeed for the sake of this country. This country would be better if people like you would leave it.
Posted by: Alfred Roman | April 4, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
SalmonGod, you are attributing human traits to a concept. The Free Market has no emotion, it has no feelings, it is incapable of judgment. It is a concept! It is the humans within the Free Market system who chose to be selfish or compassionate. It is the humans within the Free Market system who chose to act responsibly or not. In a FREE society it is not the responsibility of the government to dictate compassion or force people to act responsibly. It is the government’s responsibility to indict, prosecute and convict those who BREAK THE LAW, not who fail to meet a compassion test or who fail to meet a test for acting responsibly.
Our founding fathers wrote the U. S. Constitution so that the federal government would “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.” The federal government is responsible for allowing an equal playing field, not guaranteeing everyone will succeed equally. We still (at least for now) believe in the Individual’s right to self-determination: By virtue of that right they freely determine their OWN political status and freely pursue their OWN economic, their OWN social and their OWN cultural development.
Posted by: James Danley | April 4, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Kudo’s to Obama’s PR firm…..
of course their objective has changed…
they GOT him elected….their job one right now is to keep his numbers from falling….
Making him look like a HERO [now who excatly relayed this story?????]
“not a white house staffer”….hhhmmmm….
I’m sure someone sidled up and heard the WHOLE thing…..ya…thats it
Posted by: J Moore | April 5, 2009, 2:44 am 2:44 am
“SalmonGod, you are attributing human traits to a concept. The Free Market has no emotion, it has no feelings, it is incapable of judgment. It is a concept! It is the humans within the Free Market system who chose to be selfish or compassionate. It is the humans within the Free Market system who chose to act responsibly or not.”
You’re misinterpreting. Yes. Free Market is an abstract concept. Yes. It’s people who make decisions.
But Capitalism is a concept which sets forth principles by which society operates. In other words, it’s a way of life. When I grow up in a society which operates in a certain way, it has a very strong effect on my world view.
I’m not saying that Capitalism is some conscious entity that’s actively trying to poison my mind. I’m saying that just as a desert raises people who value water, capitalism raises people who value property. You’re born into a world where every idea, place, and thing is owned by someone. To have ANYTHING, even the necessities of life, you have to get it from somebody else. The only way to do this is by trade. If you have nothing to trade, you have to sell yourself and/or your labor. You can’t rely on generosity, because people who give up their property freely give up their own market presence and eventually have nothing to give. Some people have far more than they could ever possibly need, but they didn’t obtain it by being generous.
Thus, unless you’re born wealthy, you’re born a wage slave. You find a person/entity who owns tons of property. They tell you what to do, and hopefully you’re able to find a master who can/will offer a decent livelihood in return.
Keep in mind that it’s extremely unlikely, as discussed earlier, that this master is a generous person. You’re selling yourself to him. You are living life by his rules in exchange for the right to live. This person has absolutely no reason to have interest in designing those rules to your advantage. He will give you what you need in order to serve him.
Of course, you have freedom to quit at any time (ignoring the likelihood that you’re bound to a contract), but then what? How do you support yourself?
How this resembles an equal playing field or any kind of self-determination must be far beyond my comprehension.
“In a FREE society it is not the responsibility of the government to dictate compassion or force people to act responsibly. It is the government’s responsibility to indict, prosecute and convict those who BREAK THE LAW, not who fail to meet a compassion test or who fail to meet a test for acting responsibly.”
You nailed it. Right on the head. Remember that property is power, and it’s most easily obtained by the selfish. It naturally follows that any government, no matter how well-meaning in its original creation, will become populated with wealthy, selfish people. The wealthy have the time and resources to pursue government influence for their own ends, while their (wage) slaves hardly have the time or resources to even figure out what’s really going on in politics because they’re too busy working for their right to exist.
The only way to avoid this consolidation of power is if society enforces a limit on the accumulation of wealth, and somehow ensures that nobody ever finds a way around that limit, thus gaining enough power to remove it. Not likely. Not to mention completely contradictory to free market ideals.
It’s funny you so enjoy referencing the founding fathers also, because many of the most famous of them were extremely critical of their own ideas. I won’t write a dissertation here on the characters of people like Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, or Andrew Jackson. If you’re interested in truth, you will take the initiative to read up on history you weren’t taught in high school.
Suffice to say that most of the highly regarded founders of the U.S. wholeheartedly admitted that their institutions where highly vulnerable and could easily be turned on the very people they were created to protect, if those people were not extremely vigilant and even occasionally violent. Andrew Jackson is an especially striking example of this, as his presidency was marked by a heated battle with a bank which he saw as growing too large, gaining too much political influence, and threatening the long-term freedom of the nation. How very Un-Laissez Faire of him.
But then, he couldn’t live to fight banks forever, and we all know much gigantic power they wield today. Naturally, wealth consolidates and freedom disintegrates, even if it begins as a free market.
Posted by: SalmonGod | April 5, 2009, 3:34 am 3:34 am
SalmonGod, while I agree with much of what you wrote I totally disagree with two of your comments:
(1) “Thus, unless you’re born wealthy, you’re born a wage slave.”
To take that comment literally would mean that there really is no such thing as the “American Dream.” However, the proof is in the pudding! There have been millions of Americans, and even thousands of legal immigrants, who have LITERALLY gone from “rags to riches.” The vast majority of these individuals stayed true to their roots and spread their new found wealth to the needy. And many of these individuals opened the door for others to do the same, either by example or personally mentoring and nurturing them.
(2) “The only way to avoid this consolidation of power is if society enforces a limit on the accumulation of wealth, and somehow ensures that nobody ever finds a way around that limit, thus gaining enough power to remove it.”
TO LIMIT WEALTH IS TO LIMIT IDEAS AND THE ENTREPRENEURIAL SPIRIT! So much of the technology we use today was created as a way to make money–discovering or developing more efficient methods or products to sell to customers who want to improve their lifestyle or make their work more efficient.
Now there is ONE aspect of the latter comment that should be considered: Term limits for Congress! So many of our Representatives and Senators have made careers out of public service. Many have accumulated wealth on the backs of the taxpayers and have far too much power.
Posted by: James Danley | April 5, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
“To take that comment literally would mean that there really is no such thing as the “American Dream.” However, the proof is in the pudding! There have been millions of Americans, and even thousands of legal immigrants, who have LITERALLY gone from “rags to riches.”"
I think you’re blowing this way out of proportion. Sure, some people pull it off, just like some people survive plane crashes… against all odds. With so many billions of people in the world, there will be those who break the mold. But in the larger picture, I guarantee it’s a very small percentage. I bet for every person who pursues their dreams with dedication and manages to achieve a better life, there are 10 more people who work their fingers to the bone every day their entire lives and never achieve anything. They’re too busy scraping a day to day existence from the bottom of the barrel.
Besides, you’re talking about the *American* Dream. Well what about the rest of the world? The U.S. only contains about 4.5% of the world’s population, and our success rides on the subjugation of other nations… even continents. I suggest you read up on the CIA’s “Dirty Wars” in South America for a good starting point on that subject. We basically turned most of South America into a slave economy. It’s not conspiracy theory. Knowledge of these actions have come straight out of the CIA itself in courtrooms, declassified documents, and the remorseful confessions of their own operatives. Plus, I work for U.S. Customs. I SEE it with my own eyes in paperwork every day. They ship enormous amounts of clothing here through free trade agreements like CAFTA for measly cents, which are then sold over here for literally hundreds of times the price for the profit of American businesses. Several of these countries like Honduras, Peru, & Argentina were forced into these situations under the looming presence of death squads trained & funded by U.S. interests.
That’s the true nature of our American Dream.
“TO LIMIT WEALTH IS TO LIMIT IDEAS AND THE ENTREPRENEURIAL SPIRIT! So much of the technology we use today was created as a way to make money–discovering or developing more efficient methods or products to sell to customers who want to improve their lifestyle or make their work more efficient.”
So you are literally telling me that preventing the power hoarding of a selfish (as you no longer seem to be arguing that point) minority of society and the subsequent subjugation of the majority is an obstruction of progress?
Not only do I find this sentiment disturbing, but I would argue that the profit motive hinders progress more than encouraging it.
For example, you know why we don’t have clean, renewable energy yet? It’s because fossil fuels are such a steady source of profit, while nobody’s figured out how to charge for wind and sunshine… yet!
How about software? It’s noteworthy that many open source (i.e. anarchist!) software developments outperform their commercial alternatives, but that’s just a side note. Software, once written, is essentially an unlimited resource which offers humanity enhanced knowledge, power, and cultural enrichment. Imagine how humanity could benefit if ALL software was free! There’s technically no reason it shouldn’t be so, except for the profit motive.
How about pharmaceuticals? Third world countries can’t afford most brand name medicines. At the same time, pharmaceutical companies have been pushing more and more aggressive intellectual property laws in this industry, so that nobody can make cheaper generic alternatives for the poor. So millions perish in the third world due to curable illnesses, because giant pharmaceutical corporations refuse to allow the expendable poor to cut into their profits.
Here’s one that will hit closer to home for most people, as sad as that is. So many people complain about how stagnant Hollywood, the music industry, or video games are. They keep pushing out the same ideas and content over and over again. We all know it’s because executives insist on producing work which has generated profits in the past, regardless of what new and worthy ideas are available to them. They have no reason to take risks – no reason to pursue progress, because of the profit motive.
How about today’s housing situation? So many people are being forced out of their homes, but for what? So they can sit empty and rot in negligence? What good does that do anybody? How is this progress? These people are being cast off like garbage by our society for no other reason than they’re not generating profit, and property owners have no reason to share with those who do not offer them profit. Did you know that banking officials have admitted that 2/3 of the homes they repossess are being kept off the market in order to keep prices artificially high? So much waste in the name of profit! But this doesn’t count, you say, because it’s counter to free market ideals! They’re not adhering to the principles of supply and demand! But it’s their property. Do they not have the freedom to refuse to sell it? If we restricted their freedom to do as they please with their own property in order to enforce free market ideals, is that still a free market? Heck, is that even capitalism anymore?
Now what would happen if we cast off the profit motive? Do you honestly believe that people would just slump to the floor and waste away in pools of lethargy? Of course not. Instead of doing what generates profit, they would dedicate their lives to doing what matters to them. Priority #1 would be ensuring the means of survival.
There’s a lot of people going hungry in the world. At the same time, did you know that 2/3 of the food on grocery store shelves gets thrown out? Look up Freeganism, Dumpster Diving, and Food Not Bombs – entire social movements built on nothing but the wasted nourishment of capitalism! Did you know that many farmers are actually paid EXTRA to produce at less than their capacity so that agro-businesses can maintain scarcity and keep their prices up?
I guarantee that this mockery of human need would not continue in the absence of a profit motive.
Look up the Spanish Revolution of 1936. It’s a fantastic historical example of anarchist principles effectively put into action. The entire nation cast off government and capitalism. They managed to not only maintain effective infrastructure and livelihood, but improved productivity in some sectors and even defend against violent fascist invaders for a couple years through simple de-centralized, collective organizing.
As for progress, all of technology stands on the shoulders of scientific giants who operated not for profit, but for a love of knowledge. Plus, do you honestly believe that people would stop trying to improve their lives just because they’re not getting paid for it? I find the notion ridiculous
“Now there is ONE aspect of the latter comment that should be considered: Term limits for Congress! So many of our Representatives and Senators have made careers out of public service. Many have accumulated wealth on the backs of the taxpayers and have far too much power.”
Of course I agree with you, but as long as society operates on capitalist principles, this isn’t going to change. They got there by the power of their wealth, and the power of their wealth will maintain this status quo. A massive popular movement may change things temporarily, but eventually people will falter in their vigilance and wealth will move in and reinstate its position of power.
Posted by: SalmonGod | April 5, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
“…there are 10 more people who work their fingers to the bone every day their entire lives and never achieve anything.”
Many of the “10 more people” exhibit intregrity, dedication and sacrifice much in order to provide for their families. For many, the sacrifices they make is reciprocated by the love they receive from their children. That love is HARDLY “never achieve anything.”
Life is not fair. If it was there would be no physical or emotional pain, there would be no sickness, there would be no death. So the best we can do is live our lives in spite of the hands we are dealt.
In a Free Society under Capitalism and the Free Market, those who are dealt–metaphorically speaking–lesser hands CAN improve his or her lot in life, and possibly improve the chances that his or her children are dealt better hands, through hard work and determination. Individual entrepreneurship thrives!
In a Socialistic Society the government uses social welfare programs to promote universal employment and health care. It is nothing more than pure wealth redistribution–punishes success and promotes complacency. There is little incentive for individual entrepreneurship.
A Communistic Society has a similar economic system of a Socialistic Society but adds political control. The Party controls nearly all aspects of (in theory) a class-less society, with everyone being equal and all property is owned by everyone collectively, not by individuals. The people are slaves of the Party. Individualism is practically non-existent.
In a Totalitarian Society the regime in power controls every aspect of public and private life. The regime deals the hands and determines who will succeed in life and who will be slaves to the regime.
IN SPITE of the faults it may have, I prefer a Free Society under Capitalism and the Free Market. I believe an individual has the God-given right to self-determination.
Posted by: James Danley | April 5, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
“Many of the “10 more people” exhibit intregrity, dedication and sacrifice much in order to provide for their families. For many, the sacrifices they make is reciprocated by the love they receive from their children. That love is HARDLY “never achieve anything.”"
When they get to see their children… if their children don’t spite them for never being around… if the experience of growing up practically without parents doesn’t leave them emotionally dysfunctional…
“Life is not fair. If it was there would be no physical or emotional pain, there would be no sickness, there would be no death. So the best we can do is live our lives in spite of the hands we are dealt.”
Yes. Those things are a given. This is why life should be cherished and equally valued, because we all face those realities (I was about to say equally, but I changed my mind). Instead, 90% of the world is forced to spend the majority of their lives scampering to support their lives – never truly living.
A study by the World Institute for Development Economics Research at United Nations University reports that the richest 1% of adults alone owned 40% of global assets in the year 2000, and that the richest 10% of adults accounted for 85% of the world total. The bottom half of the world adult population owned barely 1% of global wealth.
“In a Free Society under Capitalism and the Free Market, those who are dealt–metaphorically speaking–lesser hands CAN improve his or her lot in life, and possibly improve the chances that his or her children are dealt better hands, through hard work and determination. Individual entrepreneurship thrives!”
Just because a handful of people manage to improve their status doesn’t mean it’s possible for everyone, or even possible for many. Remember that if you’re not wealthy, you’re forced to live your life according to rules written by the wealthy for the sake of reinforcing their status. You also seem to be speaking from a very American perspective. America is the most powerful nation in the world, and it’s no surprise that we enjoy some social mobility. In most other places, attempts to improve one’s social status are frequently met with violence, such as death squads in South America.
Take it even one more step further and consider that it takes a measure of selfishness to accumulate wealth. Seriously, when 10% of the world’s population owns 85% of the wealth, how does that top 10% live with that knowledge? I make less than 30k/yr, and I have trouble supporting two kids in a 3 bedroom apartment. Then I think about the fact that something like 5 1/2 billion people have it worse than me! I still haven’t figured out how to live with that! It’s incomprehensible! I KNOW I’m not better than all those people. When I think about it, desiring more for myself is like spitting in the face of all those people, and it’s really really hard for me to respect anybody cold-hearted enough to actually want to get rich.
“In a Socialistic Society the government uses social welfare programs to promote universal employment and health care. It is nothing more than pure wealth redistribution–punishes success and promotes complacency. There is little incentive for individual entrepreneurship.”
Am I really expected to believe that taking some resources away from a handful of selfish people who have more than they could possible need in several lifetimes of extravagance and giving those resources to a majority of people who cannot even afford their basic necessities is punishment?!?!
“A Communistic Society has a similar economic system of a Socialistic Society but adds political control. The Party controls nearly all aspects of (in theory) a class-less society, with everyone being equal and all property is owned by everyone collectively, not by individuals. The people are slaves of the Party. Individualism is practically non-existent.”
FYI, I’m not communist either. So I won’t even bother critiquing this, since we’re in agreement.
“In a Totalitarian Society the regime in power controls every aspect of public and private life. The regime deals the hands and determines who will succeed in life and who will be slaves to the regime.”
Isn’t this what I’ve been describing as the end result of any advanced capitalist society?
“IN SPITE of the faults it may have, I prefer a Free Society under Capitalism and the Free Market. I believe an individual has the God-given right to self-determination.”
Faults? I think the unnecessary deaths of hundreds of millions (by impoverished denial of food, shelter, and medical care or overwork or war for profit or I could go on) and economic subjugation of billions (wage slavery) should be seen as more than merely a “fault” of the system. I guess the saying is true. “The death of one is a tragedy. The death of a million is just a statistic.”
You and I must have very different definitions of freedom and self-determination, because I don’t see either of these as features of a system which inherently promotes inequality and the conversion of human lives and life’s necessities into commodities.
And FYI, I don’t support any of the systems listed above. I’m an anarchist. I’m against all systems of social hierarchy or illegitimate authority. The core of all of society’s flaws can be traced back to the concepts of property and authority, which are interdependent concepts and inherent in all of the systems you listed.
Property is authority, and authority is the means of defending property. This applies to any society which recognizes either concept. The only free society is one which abolishes both, and don’t try to tell me that such a thing is impossible or has never existed. Indigenous cultures operated without these ideas for roughly 98% of human history, and some still manage to do so today, though authoritarian and property-oriented cultures which are inherently imperialistic have largely eradicated them.
Posted by: SalmonGod | April 6, 2009, 2:19 am 2:19 am
“The only free society is one which abolishes both (property and authority), and don’t try to tell me that such a thing is impossible or has never existed. Indigenous cultures operated without these ideas for roughly 98% of human history, and some still manage to do so today, though authoritarian and property-oriented cultures which are inherently imperialistic have largely eradicated them.”
The society that you seem to be advocating has been around longer than mankind itself. You are describing the Ant World. But even that is not “perfect” because the Ant World is part of the larger Animal Kingdom, which is nothing more than the survival of the fittest. And ants have their own natural predators.
The Human Race is incapable of surviving in a system that is modeled after the Ant World. That’s because in addition to our Inalienable Rights–Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness–God (I suspect you will now say that you are also an atheist) gave humans the gift of Knowledge and the ability to think and reason. Ants were not given these attributes so they survive well enough–unable to complain–with the tools that God gave them. Inevitably some individuals will decide that they are not happy living like an ant and they will either revolt or leave the community. Either way, there will be millions of other individuals who will join them. And the Human “ant world” system will be destroyed.
My own personal opinion is that our time here on earth is just a preparation for the hereafter–an eternity WITH God or an eternity FROM God. As humans, we naturally see, hear, taste, touch and smell based on our humanity. All of our thoughts and emotions are based on our humanity. But God sees things from His perspective. And we humans are incapable of understanding His perspective. I strongly believe that God allows tragedies and disasters to happen because He wants us to use these experiences to grow closer to Him here on Earth. And our reward will be an eternity with Him when our humanity is done.
Posted by: James Danley | April 6, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am
“The society that you seem to be advocating has been around longer than mankind itself. You are describing the Ant World. But even that is not “perfect” because the Ant World is part of the larger Animal Kingdom, which is nothing more than the survival of the fittest. And ants have their own natural predators.”
An ant? That’s what my office managers try to turn me into – a single-minded worker drone devoid of all individuality. You’re telling me that a culture lacking property and authority is some kind of brainwashing dictatorship? And survival of the fittest? Isn’t that one of the mantras of capitalist competition?
And you’re saying we can’t survive without property and authority? Then how did we get where we are? The human race is roughly 200,000 years old, and the first civilization (Sumer) didn’t appear until like 7 or 8 thousand years ago.
Of course, if you’re the young earth type, then this discussion is already over. I respect Christians as much as anybody else, but you just can’t reason with “I’m right because the Bible says so.”
“The Human Race is incapable of surviving in a system that is modeled after the Ant World. That’s because in addition to our Inalienable Rights–Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness–God (I suspect you will now say that you are also an atheist) gave humans the gift of Knowledge and the ability to think and reason. Ants were not given these attributes so they survive well enough–unable to complain–with the tools that God gave them. Inevitably some individuals will decide that they are not happy living like an ant and they will either revolt or leave the community. Either way, there will be millions of other individuals who will join them. And the Human “ant world” system will be destroyed.”
No. I’m an agnostic. There are legitimate reasons to consider intelligent design, but anybody who claims to know the truth of creation (religious or atheist) must be blind to the diversity of ideas in the world… or just that arrogant.
And ya… I’m pretty sick of living in the ant world. Sure our demographics are a little better than theirs. We have 1-2% of the population ruling everyone else. For ants it’s probably more like .001% (a single queen), but it’s still not good enough for me. I know the world can’t be perfect, but actively making it worse is inexcusable. I cannot imagine any good reason to support an institution which wastes life, challenges freedom, and promotes inequality.
We CAN do better. I don’t even believe we have to go back to the Stone Age. If people stop wasting, hoarding, and laying claim to the earth’s resources, and we all exercise freedom from indoctrination and slavery… impossible under Capitalism. Communities will regulate and organize themselves to provide all their needs and more, and they’ll live more fully and freely in the process.
There are plenty of examples if you only bother to look. Enough people recognize the potential for such a life and are willing to act on it. We saw it in the American Revolution, the Spanish Revolution, and Greece in 2008. Many places and aspects of the internet operate peacefully and productively by anarchist ideals. We saw it in the Native Americans, many of whom still struggle to bring back their peaceful, free, and sustainable ways of life.
I just don’t understand how you can state these ideals of life and liberty, admit to constant horrors enacted by our societies directly counter to those ideals, be shown alternatives which didn’t have these problems and upheld your ideals, and continue to shrug it off and support the continued atmosphere of oppression we’re all forced to live in. It doesn’t make any sense.
“My own personal opinion is that our time here on earth is just a preparation for the hereafter–an eternity WITH God or an eternity FROM God. As humans, we naturally see, hear, taste, touch and smell based on our humanity. All of our thoughts and emotions are based on our humanity. But God sees things from His perspective. And we humans are incapable of understanding His perspective. I strongly believe that God allows tragedies and disasters to happen because He wants us to use these experiences to grow closer to Him here on Earth. And our reward will be an eternity with Him when our humanity is done.”
I hope you’re right, for your sake. I’d hate to live my life according to a single idea only to find out in the end it was wrong. What a wasted life that would be. Personally, I think it’s terribly reckless and tragic to bank the only life we can be sure of on the hunch that there might be something else.
There’s good evidence to support reincarnation, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to treat death like a reset button whenever I’m frustrated with my situation. This life is the only thing I can be sure of, and I can’t possibly justify taking any chance which might waste my life or anyone else’s.
Posted by: SalmonGod | April 6, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
“We saw it in the Native Americans, many of whom still struggle to bring back their peaceful, free, and sustainable ways of life.”
While Native Americans had no concept of land ownership they did have a concept of territorial rights. They fought wars over territorial rights long before the appearance of the White man from Europe. Some tribes even took slaves as spoils of their victories. And some tribes had a caste system. It may have been a much simpler life, but I wouldn’t call it a perfect lifestyle.
“Communities will regulate and organize themselves to provide all their needs and more, and they’ll live more fully and freely in the process.”
This works fine for ants and other insects. But for humans? Human emotions, wants and needs are individual desires and not collective desires. I’m sorry but unless every individual is completely brainwashed to conform (which in and of itself would destroy any semblance of freedom) I don’t see it working. Jealousy is a human emotion. Eventually someone will complain about someone else being treated differently and before you know it the community will no longer work smoothly and turmoil will result. Anger is a human emotion. Eventually someone will express anger over something. In due time that anger will fester and it is inevitable that someone will act on that anger and cause bodily harm or death.
“I’d hate to live my life according to a single idea only to find out in the end it was wrong. What a wasted life that would be.”
With all due respect, it sounds like you are already wasting your time on a single idea for all of society.
Now as for the specific context in which you made the comment, I prefer to look at it the other way around. Should it turn out that there is no God then I have lived a good life adhering to my Christian principles–certainly not a waste of life. BUT if I live my life breaking every Commandment and not adhering to God’s Word, and then upon my death come face to face with God and discover I must live in Hell for eternity, than that WOULD be a wasted life that I had lived.
Obviously we will never agree on what is best for all mankind. But I have thoroughly enjoyed this discussion nonetheless.
Posted by: James Danley | April 6, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Obama is a Sign of the World Entering Islam
He is a sign that Islam victory awaited. And he was selected with the concept of Islam to become president. Old concept of form from which they have abandoned the concept of Islam that is replaced is that he take and what would he give. Thus, he ignores personality profile and the focus on important national issue for the people of the United States.
Posted by: Muhsin Faisal | April 17, 2009, 3:38 am 3:38 am