By Caitlin Taylor

Apr 15, 2009 8:48am

The Tea Parties

As thousands of voters make their way to "Tea Party" protests today, former House Majority Leader Dick Armey, R-Texas, whose conservative group "FreedomWorks" is part of these activities, weighs in on the importance of the protests in an Atlanta Journal-Constitution op-ed.

"Who is the leader of the conservative movement?" he asks. "Is it Michael Steele at the Republican National Committee, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, or even Rush Limbaugh? While they all may be movement leaders, today grass-roots activists across the country will answer the question —- the taxpayer tea party is the movement’s leader."

Armey says the tea parties "are the shot across the bow as taxpayers defend themselves against out-of-control government spending." Participants were let down by President Bush’s bailout of Wall Street and were then motivated by President Barack Obama calling for "his $1 trillion debt stimulus, followed by a $275 billion mortgage bailout. CNBC’s Rick Santelli had enough and called for a ‘Chicago Tea Party,’ inspiring folks to do the same in their communities…The tea partiers want to see the cash spigot turned off."

Santelli, as you may recall, was protesting the Obama administration’s housing plan, prompting a White House counter-attack.

Thomas Frank, author of "What’s the Matter With Kansas" — which claims the GOP have used cultural issues to secure support from middle-class and lower-income voters for a party that works against their financial interests — suggests the tea parties are bogus.

Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Frank says the tea parties were given new energy thanks to the "bonuses handed out a few weeks ago at AIG’s Financial Products division" which caused the public to fall "into the grip of a left-wing political malady that the commentariat quickly diagnosed as ‘populism,’ a word they often coupled with ‘mindless,’ ‘frenzy,’ and ‘fury.’"

Frank says that the conservative movement "has described itself as a rebellion of Middle America against elitist liberals; as a nation of Joe the Plumbers rising against interfering bureaucrats." But he suggests this is bogus, and that "the tea partiers’ stance on the issues is a little mysterious. But outrage is outrage, the party organizers probably figure; who will know the difference?"

Frank also notes that Armey, in an op-ed found at FreedomWorks’ website, denounced "former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee’s ‘small-minded populism’" after Huckabee said he favored "Main Street, not Wall Street."

"But this assumes that the interests of the two are not in alignment," Armey wrote, "that somehow, one group can only gain at the expense of the other – never mind that the jobs and livelihoods of America’s workers and small towns are tied inexorably with the larger economy. It’s a dark form of class warfare shrewdly masked by his sunny chatter."

What do you think?

- jpt

User Comments

While the symbolism and popularity of the Tea Party movement is inspiring and well-executed. The lack of medica attention does put somewhat of a hamper on the goals of the protest. Media personalities, like MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, put together 8-minute news features focusing on the double entendre of the word “tea bag”, do nothing but mock those who do not want to see their taxes go up. As much as protesters against the war get attention and access to those in higher office, this Administration appears more standoffish and set in their ways.

Posted by: Paulo Lim | April 15, 2009, 8:55 am 8:55 am

I think we will learn a lot from what the Joe-sixpack participant says about why he is there. Will he/she misstate Obama policy as a reason or not?

Posted by: comoannie | April 15, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am

I think the use of caricatures to motivate people to work against their own interest is fascinating. Liberals have traditionally used the Yachting Jetting Corporate Schemer as their villian d’jour while conservatives have traditionally used “Welfare Queens” and Illegal immigrants for similar purposes. In every case, a cartoon is drawn and everyone rails at the injustice portrayed in the cartoon while the actual reality of who’s profiting and who’s getting ripped off by government policy flies under the radar.

Posted by: Paul Dirks | April 15, 2009, 9:00 am 9:00 am

Oh please. The teaparties are getting a lot more attention, say, than the extremely high attended antiwar protests held all over the country during the previous administration.

Posted by: ICDogg | April 15, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am

The media is standoffish and set in their ways— a slobbering love affair I’d say.

Posted by: mory | April 15, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am

‘‘We, the People are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts — not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution.’’
— Abraham Lincoln

Posted by: Mark | April 15, 2009, 9:17 am 9:17 am

The constant mocking of the Teaparties is only energizing us to continue to stand up for what we beleive.The Government is not listening to us. The Government is spending our money. We are tired of bailouts, tax cheats, higher taxes and broken promises. Porky Projects, waste and an attack on our liberties by a govenment that ws to put its hand in every aspect of our lives. Please give us the same respect you give to a group like ACORN thats has 10 protestors on a corner pretending to be bi-partisan community organizers. Let us have our moment in the sun. Agree or disagree we have the right to fight for our principles.

Posted by: karen | April 15, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Tapper’s Post States: “As thousands of voters make their way to “Tea Party” protests today, former House Majority Leader D. Armey, R-Texas, whose conservative group “FreedomWorks” is part of these activities”
__________________________
Organizing them all is “part”?….

Posted by: Paige | April 15, 2009, 9:22 am 9:22 am

So basically, the GOP has no leader. Brilliant.

Posted by: lisa | April 15, 2009, 9:22 am 9:22 am

These “tea parties” are less a wave of populist anger at Obama than they are a bizarre and potentially dangerous push for conservative insurrection by none other than Fox News.
Didn’t they call Bush bashing “treason” only a few months ago? What about this incendiary political stunt?

Posted by: matt | April 15, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am

I think the main image problem for the teabaggers is that their protest smells of sore loserism. They are not protesting against taxation without representation or some other assault on democracy. Indeed, we just held a rather well-publicized election. Instead, they are protesting that “we need to take our country back.” In other words, “we lost and we are mad and we can’t wait two years for the next election cycle.”

Posted by: Rick | April 15, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am

The tea parties are a waste of energy. What alternatives do they offer to spending to resolve the crisis. Crawling up into a ball? Look, no one’s taxes that I know have gone up (I don’t know anyone making $250,000 or more). So, what is the protest about? It is more sniping by Republicans and Conservatives….that is all they got. No solutions, just sniping at the President, who the majority in this country believes is taking the right measures to pull this country out of the doldrums that past Republican administrations and Congresses dragged us into. So, have your tea parties conservatives if you like but you are doing nothing to contributing to solutions to problems you and your ilk brought about on this country…

Posted by: indy_voter | April 15, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am

Thanks, Jake Tapper for sort of covering the tea parties and suggesting that they are bogus. I am not planning on attending one, but I strongly suspect that there is a real issue here.

Posted by: PETER CHIPMAN | April 15, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am

‘‘It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.’’
— Justice Robert H. Jackson

Posted by: Mark | April 15, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am

Karen- What exactly are you protesting? Do you even know are were you just looking for a reason to slam Obama?
Legit Tea Party protestors are also against the TARP bali-out under Bush/Paulson and the massive deficit spending created under that administration, as well.
Acorn has nothing to do with this. If you need a “Democratic” boogyman to your tea party – try moveon.org.

Posted by: Paige | April 15, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am

Paulo Lim:” The lack of medica attention”
Lack of media attention? FoxNews (which everyone frequently reminds me has among the highest ratings on the planet apparently) appears to be sponsoring them.

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am

The level of success and impact of the tea parties can be seen by the reaction of the American left and Obama supporters. It meanders between selective rage, “The tea parties are not grass-roots, but funded by corporate interests!!! It’s just astro-turf!!!” to childish Beavis & Butthead-like behavior, “Heh. They’re tea-bagging. Heh.”
If this truly was not a concern of theirs as they often claim, they wouldn’t be paying so much attention to it.
As for doubters who claim this is nothing but a reaction against Barack Obama, they should think again. Obama’s absurd tax and spend plans was the icing on the cake. The same people attending and supporting these tea parties are the same people who railed against wasteful spending during the Bush years such as, No Child Left Behind and the ridiculous medicare prescription drug plan to the Wall Street bailouts. Instead of things getting better, people see it getting worse and have responded as a result.
One also has to appreciate the irony of people who were spouting, “Jesus was a community organizer!” now pooh-poohing community organization.

Posted by: Jay | April 15, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am

These GOP tea parties drip with hypocrisy.
Where were these protesters LAST April, or the April before, or the April before… … … when the most incompetent President is US history was running up historic budget deficits, after being handed record budget surpluses when he took over in 2000?
It appears that the GOP has Selective Outrage Syndrome and needs some serious HELP.
Today’s Republicans are just a pathetic group of followers, who have zero ideas of their own.
I hope they relish being alone in their own little corner of America, because the next generation of Americans sure relishes Republican “leadership” being OUT of power and therefore OUT of their lives for the next couple of decades.

Posted by: Jan | April 15, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Most media has either ignored or ridiculed the protests. Mostly ignored. Or…’purposely muted on the subject’ may be a better way of putting it. Cmon, even those who detest those evil boogeymen conservatives can notice this. Can’t you? Anyway, I know my local Tea Party had no evil Republican men secretly pulling the puppet strings. Seriously, take off the tinfoil hats. Don’t try to belittle all 500 Tea Parties because a handful may have well-known conservative celebrities helping with them. You’re better than that.

Posted by: JJames | April 15, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Why are you covering a FOX promotion?

Posted by: Hagerty | April 15, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am

By characterizing the growing voices of discontent in this country as a group of Joe The Plumbers ( or those who must be destroyed) the MSM continues to define itself as nothing more than a propaganda machine for this administration. It is not just conservatives who are alarmed at this administrations policies and spending, it is Catholics (who in two short months have participated in two orchestrated nationwide protests and petitions), it is moderates, it is independents. Do you really think you can destroy them all?

Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | April 15, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am

When 500,000 left-wing radical protesters show up in San Francisco, New York and Washington DC makes front page news it’s called a glowing success but when 2 million tax protesters show up in 200 locations the MSM calls it a failure. Just because the tax protesters don’t want to create a hippy villa doesn’t mean they aren’t there.

Posted by: Tabtwo | April 15, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Where were the tea parties during Bush’s term, when the deficit was exploding?
Obama wants to return the tax rates back to what they were before Bush, closer to what they were during Reagan’s time. Were there tea parties to protest Reagan’s tax policies?
We are talking about a few percentage points in the tax rates, and only on the VERY WEALTHY! The “tea baggers” don’t seem to realize that the changes in the tax rates are not affecting them; they’re protesting in defense of the wealthy, who have reaping in the spoils of the economy for the past decades, while the middle class has fallen further behind.

Posted by: Jessica | April 15, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

“Initial response to grassroots appeal: It’s a bust”
That’s a typical headline that accompanied the 3,000 houseparties held in support of Obama’s stimulus plan on Feb 9th. Lets see if the teaparties can surpass that “poor showing” and still get glorified press.

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Attending my first “protest” today in Albany, NY! Can’t wait. I’m fed up w/ high taxes (note, it’s high taxes, not the necessary taxes we should be paying) and wasteful spending, not to mention the huge deficits this spending promotes!! And it’s not just us conservatives going! One of my more liberal friends (who votes green) is one of the biggest promoters of the Albany event! Took my by surprise, really! It’s not a left or right issue! Everyone should be upset at higher-then-need-be taxes and wasteful spending by our government, which has been overreaching for years, under both Republican and Democrat control! Live Free or Die!!

Posted by: Obama, the second coming | April 15, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am

Rosa Parks? One person protesting.

Posted by: Bill | April 15, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Tabtwo:”when 2 million tax protesters show up in 200 locations the MSM calls it a failure.”
Um, when did that happen again? Maybe it’ll happen today – it should with the publicity FoxNews has been giving the “FNC Tax Day Tea Parties” (as they subtitled them on one of Beck’s shows talking them up). But at the moment you’re living in a fantasy land. 200 locations with 10,000 people average at each has not happened.

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am

The Anti-tax TEA Parties are more about anticipated tax increases to pay for the projected $22 Trillion deficit spending than they are about the current tax code. Recent polling addresses the existing tax code. Consequently, current polling misses the mark about why people are participating.
Thinking tax payers have concluded that Congress must raise taxes in order to pay for the huge increase in spending. While the House has as yet to take up these measures, they’ll have to between now the end of summer as the new Fiscal Year approaches. It is this recognition of reality that motivates TEA Party participation by folks across the country.

Posted by: Larry | April 15, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am

I migrated from a country where we had taxation up to 80%, so I had enough and migrated to US. I think many people here will do the same.
When you pay 80% to government by force, that’s called slavery.. and what to get back from government that we can not do it ourselves.

Posted by: frieda | April 15, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Oh please. The teaparties are getting a lot more attention, say, than the extremely high attended antiwar protests held all over the country during the previous administration.
Posted by: ICDogg | Apr 15, 2009 9:03:22 AM
_____________________________________
Seven people recently attended an anti-war rally up here last month. All of the Albany area media outlets covered it like they were walking on the moon for the first time!
The MSM is trying to downplay these tea parties and it won’t work w/ the people! As Pew research pointed out recently, about half this country is POed w/ the direction we’re going. Give it time, and that will grow. I guess we’ll just have to prove it starting w/ the 2010 elections! That, the MSM won’t be able to ignore! There are a lot of fed up people out there. Ignore us at your own peril!

Posted by: Obama, the second coming | April 15, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Obama the second coming:” I’m fed up w/ high taxes ”
To put it in context, can you state a time in the three generations when taxes were lower? Certainly not under Reagan at any time (at least if you’re rich – the current far lower capital gains tax more than offsets the higher top bracket rate for the top 5% of earners in the US).

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

I find it humorous and more than a little confusing. What exactly are the “commonfolk” protesting? 95% of Americans are getting a tax CUT. Only those above $250,000 are paying more, and that is a relatively small increase.
I also find the selective memory amusing. Where were all the protests during the 8 years of the largest increases government spending ever implemented, and that done in some pretty creative ways to keep it out of the budget and out of oversight and review. Where was the political theater then?

Posted by: rubyg | April 15, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am

I find these tea “parties” both funny and scary at the same time. Very few protesters have gotten anything right. There’s the “tax and spend” theory that is spouted off. Last time I checked, most of us are getting more money from the TAX BREAKS Obama just gave. Socialism you say? Well tell us you don’t want to use the fire departments, police departments, roads, public schools, medicare, or social security ever.
I have seen very little from the right when Bush put forth the tax cuts for the very rich costing us 4 trillion. Why would I want to give the rich who pay no taxes or people like Bernie Madoff tax breaks? At least the money this time around is going to the American people and not big business who rob us blind. FOX news is setting a dangerous precedent by promoting these parties instead of simply reporting on them. I feel that this stunt will come back to bite them in the end.

Posted by: Michael | April 15, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am

“As Pew research pointed out recently, about half this country is POed w/ the direction we’re going. Give it time, and that will grow.”
In reality, the number of people who think the country is headed in the right direction has been skyrocketing ever since Obama was elected. It’ll take a while for him to get the country set on a better course, but the polling is showing a very clear trend – people think he’s leading us towards the right direction. The REALITY and FACTS are the exact opposite of what you are trying to imply. From Pew:
“In October, only 7% said they were satisfied with the way things were going, while just 12% said the country was headed in the right direction. Since then, both assessments of the state of the nation have shown improvement, but the increase has been far greater in the percentage saying the country is headed in the right direction. By early March, 41% of Americans said the country is headed in the right direction.”

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am

These tea parties are fake, where were the tea parties for the last 8 years?? A report from the Bureau of Public Debt of the annual federal debt outstanding at the end of the last 8 years:
09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86

Posted by: Common Sense | April 15, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am

It’s hard to understand why these same protesters weren’t outraged when the Bush administration put the cost of the war in Iraq off the budget so we wouldn’t see how much debt we were piling up to finance a war of choice, undertaken on false premises, and with no plan for ending our commitment.
It would be great if the protesters also expressed their concern about the tax shelters used by corporations and the wealthy to avoid paying their fair share– the share that would help us address our public needs, like education, healthcare, and energy independence.

Posted by: NER | April 15, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Unlike the days of Walter Cronkite and Douglas Edwards, today everybody over the age of 8 has a camera-phone that can memorialize what’s going on. So no matter how hard you shriek “PAY NO ATTENTION TO THOSE TAX PROTESTERS!” through the dino media, the world is going to know what really happened through millions of citizen photographers and Generation Y with its Binkie Phone Cameras.
Hoist by your own technology, kids. Heh.

Posted by: Appleby | April 15, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Larry:”Thinking tax payers have concluded that Congress must raise taxes in order to pay for the huge increase in spending.”
“Thinking tax payers” are also keenly aware of the decimation of revenues – and human lives – that would result from allowing the economy to fall into a deflationary spiral. You do not put a chemotherapy patient on a diet because they are a couple pounds over weight as you hit them with the toxics. Slashing government spending and raising taxes (both are necessary to dig out of the hole left by the spend-and-borrow Republican years) in a recession would be catastrophic. Increased economic activity increases revenue without tax rate increases.

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am

You can’t blame the Republicans for wanting a voice. Since they don’t actually hold very many seats in government–after they got booted out of Washington by the busload the last two election cycles–they might as well get together, have some tea, and complain.

Posted by: Skip | April 15, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Why are the dems and the lib media so afraid of these tea parties? They are hoping against hope that they will fail. What part of protesting taxation with no representation don’t you like and why would you mock it?
I already know and it all has to do with criticizing the Boy Wonder.

Posted by: Patricia | April 15, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Appleby:”the world is going to know what really happened through millions of citizen photographers and Generation Y with its Binkie Phone Cameras.
Hoist by your own technology, kids. Heh.”
Which is why the Big Lie technique – such as the guy who claimed they’ve already had a 2 million strong showing at 200 sites – is falling flat. There should be a strong turn out today, but after all the insane exaggerations already thrown out it HAS to be well documented to be believed. Tea partiers just have no credibility left.

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Patricia:”What part of protesting taxation with no representation don’t you like and why would you mock it?”
You nailed it in a nutshell. We’re scared of the almost cliche’ Orwellian double think of you people. YOU HAVE REPRESENTATION, WE JUST HAD AN ELECTION, AN ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE COORDINATED TODAY’S PARTY’S. Yet you are protesting taxation with no representation… Do you see the issue? Probably not, but for most it is frankly un-nerving to see the sci-fiction concept of double think displayed so literally in reality.

Posted by: jhw539 | April 15, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

“The tea parties are a waste of energy. What alternatives do they offer to spending to resolve the crisis. Crawling up into a ball? Look, no one’s taxes that I know have gone up (I don’t know anyone making $250,000 or more). So, what is the protest about?”
Hey Indy_voter, any of your friends smoke? If so, their taxes are about to rise because the US Senate voted 66-32 to approve a major expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)which is to be funded by a regressive tax on cigarettes and other tobacco products. Liberals just aren’t getting it…these protests aren’t just about taxes, they are about the Constitution being trampled on, there about a Congress and Senate who are apparently out of touch with a large segment of their constituents. We’re mad as hell and we aren’t going to take it any more.

Posted by: Mike Kearns | April 15, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am

The left doesn’t like these tea parties because at the heart of the left wing philosophy is early 20th century “Wilsonian style fascism” also called “progressivism” or simply “a belief in big government over individualism” By the way, it’s not just democrats. Teddy Roosevelt was also a “progressive”. So was Bush, Nixon and others. It’s all a matter of degree.

Posted by: jscottu | April 15, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

These tea parties are nothing more than organized temper tantrums by people who are angry because their political views are becoming irrelevant and they are out of power. They simply are angry that Obama won. PERIOD.
If they were TRULY angry about government spending, they would have been out protesting with this kind of zeal during the past 8 years, when the Republican-controlled Congress and White House were spending like drunken sailors. But they weren’t, were they??
HYPOCRITES.

Posted by: jkh | April 15, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am

To put it in context, can you state a time in the three generations when taxes were lower? Certainly not under Reagan at any time (at least if you’re rich – the current far lower capital gains tax more than offsets the higher top bracket rate for the top 5% of earners in the US).
Posted by: jhw539 | Apr 15, 2009 10:00:52 AM
_____________________________________
I’ve been thinking taxes were too high overall for the past 30 years since I was a kid. This came from learning bout the American Revolution, and then seeing what we had become in this way.
After finally working my financial life into something decent (still well below the $250,000 threshold), I’ve learned more about how our government taxes and spends and spends and spends and spends, and the wasteful things it spends it on (like most – not all – of the pork projects, and excessive welfare, which I saw first hand when working for my local Department of Social Services years ago). Frankly, I’m more upset w/ the spending our government does than the taxes as they are right now. However, I’m against them going up, which they will in 2011 for the many rick people that thankfully pay lots of taxes so the rest of us don’t. I’m not one of those class warfare people. I’m glad people can get rich, and I’m thankful many choose to invest their money in businesses. And when these rich folks are allowed to pay a lower tax rate, they have more to invest in – say – the multi-billion dollar company that pays me a decent salary and provides me w/ the opportunity to provide a good life for my family! You see, I benefit from the rich getting a tax break! Now, is it nice to get a little tax break of my own? Sure. As of 4/1, my wife and I saw an extra $20 in our bi-weekly paychecks, totally $80/month. Sure, that’s dinner a couple times out so I’m happy. But that won’t help IBM or GE employ more people. I can only do so much w/ this $80. It’s not nothing – thousands of us spending that $80 certainly helps. But when someone gets an $80,000 tax break, then they can start to really do things! Make that an $800,000 tax break, and that helps even more. A rising tide raises all boats!

Posted by: Obama, the second coming | April 15, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am

These tea parties are nothing more than organized temper tantrums by people who are angry because their political views are becoming irrelevant and they are out of power. They simply are angry that Obama won. PERIOD.
_______________________________________
While you might be right to some degree, did it ever occur to you that these “temper tantrums” help motivate people, and helps to organize them so their political views become relevant again, and – perhaps – helps their candidates win future elections? This is how it all starts!
I remember before 2004, the Democrat party was irrelevant. SNL was making fun of them. Everyone was! They were way out of touch. But – what happened? They got mad as hell (mostly at Bush, and to some degree, for good reason), they organized, raised money, and made changes in elections starting in 2006. Think that can’t happen the other way? You’d be a fool who doesn’t study history if you do!

Posted by: Obama, the second coming | April 15, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am

For the record, no one is “scared” of these tea parties. Nothing will come of them. I hope you get the release you need with your temper tantrum. I bet there’s no one in that group that wouldn’t vote for Reagan if he were alive today yet their taxes were much, much higher then. The fact of the matter is that the people protesting have no idea what they’re protesting. They just don’t like Obama. We liberals find it very amusing but are we afraid of it? If that makes you feel better, then go ahead and believe it.

Posted by: Scott | April 15, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

I bet there’s no one in that group that wouldn’t vote for Reagan if he were alive today yet their taxes were much, much higher then.
___________________________________
Pick up a history book dude! Compared to the taxes we had under Carter before him, they were incredibly lower!!

Posted by: Obama, the second coming | April 15, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am

I’ve had it with taxes.
Not just income taxes, I’m talking ALL the taxes combined.
Income, property, sales, cigarette, fuel, all the taxes/fees on my phone, cable and power bills.
The government even taxes tax.
So I have had it with ALL taxes.

Posted by: Kate | April 15, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Tea bag..all contrived and politically a silly joke. The right simply cannot accept defeat. And the defeat has finality written all over it. If the money spent buying tea bags to toss on a tarp on the mall in DC were contributed to the poor..or the tea bags given to people in need..homeless shelters…the the GOP and the right might crawl its way back to credibility. Alas..that ain’t gonna happen.

Posted by: larry | April 15, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

“during the past 8 years, when the Republican-controlled Congress and White House were spending like drunken sailors.”
=======================================
I was unhappy then. Spending is so much more out of control now that “drunken sailors” doesn’t even begin to describe it.

Posted by: mad | April 15, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am

this is a corporate backed stunt.. nothing grass roots about it… also, you wrote “thousands of voters” in your first sentance… how do you know they are “voters”… why not use the word “people”?

Posted by: zelda | April 15, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am

This morning on GMA, Chris Cuomo had a piece on the teaparties. He said that according to a WH spokesman, the President doesn’t even know about the planned tea parties. Does anyone believe that? I don’t. Especially since they had baracades up in front of the WH for the groups. They said he has plans of his own. I assume it is the Wednesday night cocktail party.

Posted by: Maria | April 15, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am

When you start a bogus war and leave it off the books – sooner or later y’all have to pay for it.
Didn’t Osama bin Laden teach you anything on 9/11?

Posted by: Hector Nachos | April 15, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am

When Bush was re-elected in 2004 a bunch of places in my area held “Funeral Marches for Democracy” protests. Lots of people thought it was silly given that we just had an election, but I don’t recall anyone on the right getting quite so worked up about people exercising their right to protest. People need to calm down. “Tea Party” isn’t a perfect historical analogy given our functioning democracy, but the name stuck. Deal with it.
Also, just because someone’s individual tax rate went down doesn’t mean that they shouldn’t care about where the money to pay for trillion dollar deficits will come from. The idea that one shouldn’t care just because someone else is paying for it (for now) is pretty short-sighted, since we know tax rates impact the entire economy, and it just sounds selfish. People can disagree on what’s fair, but that’s democracy.
Everyone needs to calm down. The Tea Parties didn’t invent dissent (which is still patriotic!), and they didn’t invent hyperbole and vitriol to get one’s political point across. It’s not astroturf, it’s not paranoid crypto-fascism. It’s just democracy. Keep breathing.

Posted by: Matt | April 15, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am

COMMON SENSE…your point is on, and under the current administration and congress, it is suppose to triple in 10 years….do you want that?…you want your kids paying for that?…i think not…This is not an Obama bashing event….It is a government bashing event…stop spinning like keith and rachael….if you want to pay more in taxes, i will gladly send you my increases and you can pay the tab….that way you can ‘feel better about yourself’ since you will be handing over more of your personal money to these idiots in DC….(notice i never used a party affiliated)…logic trumps emotions every time….

Posted by: TJ | April 15, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Everyone needs to calm down. The Tea Parties didn’t invent dissent (which is still patriotic!), and they didn’t invent hyperbole and vitriol to get one’s political point across. It’s not astroturf, it’s not paranoid crypto-fascism. It’s just democracy. Keep breathing.
Posted by: Matt | Apr 15, 2009 11:28:12 AM
______________________________________
God bless you!!!

Posted by: Obama, the second coming | April 15, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Liberals like Thomas Frank because his argument is convenient for their purposes. He finds it impossible to imagine that ordinary Americans would be convinced by conservative economic policy, so he thinks the conservative elites must be using cultural issues to hoodwink ordinary conservatives into voting against their economic interest. This is bogus. Many ordinary Americans, like myself, are absolutely convinced by conservative economic policy and do *not* think that a government-by-redistribution is in anyone’s interest.
Now Frank is confronted with evidence that conservatives do actually care about economic issues…and he has no way to explain it. Thus he implies that they must be economic liberals, or at least confused. Tea party participants are not objecting to executive bonuses. They’re objecting to a Washington that is leading this nation to ruin because it’s addicted to spending.

Posted by: Tim | April 15, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am

I think too many taxpayers are really a bunch of ignorant fools who allow themselves to be manipulated by these GOP opportunists. How foolish they look before the world wearing cowboy hats, waving their Made in China American flags, reciting mindless GOP rhetoric without a clue as to what they are parroting.
They are totally oblivious to the fact the FY01 federal budget spending equaled $17,216.68 per household and that by 2009, President Bush increased federal spending to an extraordinary $32,942.90 per household! Further, the majority of Bush’s excessive spending increases occurred during the years Republicans controlled Congress: 2002- 2006! A Cato Institute article from April 1, 2003 pointed out that Bush not only enjoyed the luxury of a GOP controlled Congress, but Bush had not vetoed a single spending bill in 3 years in office–that where spending was concerned, Bush was more like Carter than Reagan. Another Cato article points out government spending grew by 33% under Bush’s first term–BTW the Cato Institute is an ultra-conservative think tank.
President Bush’s FY09 federal budget taxed each American household $18,286.74–while running a budget deficit of $14,656.16 per household!! President Bush increased discretionary spending by an unparalleled 44% during his 8 years in office–by comparison, President Clinton increased discretionary spending by a paltry 0.1%. Yet, despite President Bush’s scandalous out-of-control spending, his racking up a record deficit and national debt that will take generations of Americans decades to pay off–not a peep outta these uninformed American taxpayers–or any of the so called outraged fiscal conservatives–including Rush Limbaugh et al.
So when I see these flag waving taxpayers bray about government spending I thing people really need to get informed about their government… the time for discussion on government spending needed to happen several trillion dollars and two wars, several homeland security and many social policies ago. Until people get informed and involved they will continue to be nothing more than pawns and stooges for these GOP opportunists.

Posted by: socalgal59 | April 15, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am

republican tea baggers. the GOP proves once again that it is little more than a joke.

Posted by: Charles Kushner | April 15, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am

I think alot of you on the left, or those in favor of higher taxes and bigger government regardless of party, are missing the big picture here….The Tea Party in KC is celebrating American freedoms, individualism and charities…Since charities are now under attack from DC….Folks are bringing canned goods for Harvestors, paper products for a homeless shelter….How strange it is that this type of “community activism” gets attacked by the left, when 54% of American just voted for a lifelong community activist to be our President….Hypocritical?!

Posted by: TJ | April 15, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am

Are these people’s taxes going up? I don’t think so, did these people vote in NOV., if so the representatives from their districts are in Washington DC, they have representation.
Do they really want he states they live in to cut services, since states cannot run a deficit budget nor print money like the fed govt, maybe they do not understand that a lower number of police and fire personnel leads to a higher crime rate and more out of control fires in neighborhoods. And socialism, hum, guess they didn’t appreciate the highways they drove in ON either, that was paid for with public money for eh benefit of all.

Posted by: MARIO | April 15, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

hey everybody tj twist the facts, the charitable deduction for higher income levels is being lowered, but if you ar egivign to charity, it should be for more than the tax deduction

Posted by: MARIO | April 15, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

I know taxes suck, but I’m more worried about being unemployed than paying taxes. That’s what’s wrong with these “tea parties”. Millions are out of work, and these folks are worried about being “jacked” on their taxes?! What are these people smoking?!

Posted by: Gerald Shields | April 15, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

MARIO…good try….if tax deductions are decreased for those that give to charities, charitable contributions will fall….human nature…yes, we should give to help the less fortunate, and by stated facts Republicans give far more than Democrats….but logic tells us giving will lowered if one cannot deduct it….again, you are missing the point…we are celebrating these things that have made America great….also, please use spellcheck….

Posted by: TJ | April 15, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

I know taxes suck, but I’m more worried about being unemployed than paying taxes. That’s what’s wrong with these “tea parties”. Millions are out of work, and these folks are worried about being “jacked” on their taxes?! What are these people smoking?!
Posted by: Gerald Shields | Apr 15, 2009 12:05:27 PM
==================================
So, Gerald, do you want to pay more taxes or do you think we are already taxed too much? If you want to pay more, I will send you my tax bill of nearly 20K last year and I didn’t even make 80K. I know Bush was in the WH, but the dems controlled congress and it comes to a point where ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!! And if we back down on this, what will be next

Posted by: DJ | April 15, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

It’s not just about taxes.
It’s about out-of-control spending.

Posted by: Cindy | April 15, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

A couple of statements from this thread sum up these tea parties nicely:
“This is not an Obama bashing event….It is a government bashing event”
“They’re (tea party participants) objecting to a Washington that is leading this nation to ruin because it’s addicted to spending.”
\\===///
I (as I suspect many/most taxpayers) am not opposed to paying my “fair share” but what I (we) are opposed to having the money that we work hard for being recklessly “re-distributed” by politicians (of both parties) for political purposes rather than the common good. This is not new, the problem is that this reckless spending is unprecedented and is unsustainable (and without end in sight).
The U.S. debt to U.S. GDP ratio has held pretty consistently around 40% (the debt has increased, but GDP has grown as well). Under the budget that has been submitted for deliberation by Congress, the U.S. debt will double again in 5 years and triple in 10 (estimates from Congressional Budget Office). The debt-to-GDP ratio will double to 80%+. This is not sustainable in an economy as large as ours as the interest payments will consume ever-increasing portions of the U.S. budget, resulting in more borrowing (think Argentina). It’s a death spiral. Couple this spending with unfunded entitlements and changing demographics (e.g., retirement of baby boomers) and the economic picture is not good at all.
Those of us who understand these economic realities are outraged at the blatant irresponsibility of members of our elected class, regardless of party affiliation. Obama supporters and the MSM equate these protests as anti-Obama and rush to dismiss them. We all have a stake in the future of the economy, it’s unfortunate that many citizens are so grounded in ideology and hero worship that they are unwilling to see the big picture for what it is.

Posted by: tjp612 | April 15, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

TJP612….Well Said!!!!

Posted by: TJ | April 15, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Seriously, I cannot believe the craziness this has spawned, and yes, spawned is a good word. Where were these people 8,6,5 and even 4 years ago? Why were they not ‘protesting’ then? I understand the outcry over bailouts and high taxes, but what ARE these people protesting? Where is the ‘tea’ supposed to go? Who is ‘pushing’ tea on them? I guarantee that if you were to ask 10 different people at the same ‘party’ today, you would get ten different reasons why they are there and what they are protesting. People sees this a way to protest Obama’s ‘socialism’–BTW, Mao was a communist, not a socialist, and really the American people need to pick up a book or at least look at Wikipedia to know that these ideologies are two different things!
Some people are there because they see the government ‘bailing’ everyone out with their tax money–who? CEOs, CFOs, big business–the same people who are at the top of the Republican food chain? C’mon, get a clue.
Protest failed tax policies which force middle class Americans to pay more in taxes, while the top 1% who hold 90% of the wealth get huge tax breaks and offshore tax shelters, who can afford high price attorneys and CPAs who do know the tax code intimately and can ‘find’ the loopholes. Protest the fact that the reason people need so much ‘charity’ right now is because of the failed polices of the Bush Administration. In other words, do your own research and quit gobbling down the tv crack Fox News and other cable and talk radio shows are shoving down your throat.

Posted by: SJB | April 15, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

SJB, homework needed on your end as well it looks like…AIG, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were in the pockets of Frank, Dodd, Obama (and others, list too long to mention)….not every successful person is a Republican…John Kerry or Edward Kennedy ring a bell…they don’t have chump change lying around….you people are easily missing the point and upset that some Americans are choosing to voice their opinions…Is that not a Right given us by the Founding Fathers….You don’t have to agree, but to bash because you perceive to see yourself on the other side of the isle is a bit shallow….I know folks from the two major parties and independents participating today…seems to once again be an American issue….

Posted by: TJ | April 15, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

It would be nice to have a liberal media, one that would have talked about the anti-bank protests last week.
Apparently, the pro-rich protests are much more worthy of coverage.

Posted by: Flash Override | April 15, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Let’s see, Bush wasted 11-plus trillion dollars on the Iraq war. Where were the tea protestors then? Why did they not protest Bush giving Chenney’s company, Haliburton, government contracts without going out to bid for the most responsible bidder. Umm, just a thought.

Posted by: MissPalin1964 | April 15, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Hell Jake, nobody cares what I think. What do YOU think? Can you call a spade a spade? Or do we have to pretend to be “fair and balanced” despite overwhelming evidence that this movement is a fig leaf for trickle down economics?

Posted by: BBaptiste | April 15, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

BBaptiste…i assume you are in favor of ‘trickle up poverty’….enjoy….

Posted by: TJ | April 15, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Heck, I’m a democrat, can I go if this tea party includes property taxes?

Posted by: Greg | April 15, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

socalgal59, if you think that the data you cite is news to conservatives, you should stop assuming that conservatives are ignorant hicks in cowboy hots. We *know* that Bush spent too much, just as we *know* that Obama is spending even more! That’s the point. As one person said below, this is not a bash-Obama event but a bash-big-government event. You might start actually reading some conservative websites or blogs before you hoist up your caricature next time.
And Gerald, yes, it’s better to have a job. But raising taxes is a job-killer. Could it be any more obvious? Take money out of the private sector and the private sector has less money to hire and invest. The government is never going to be as efficient at job-creation as the private sector.

Posted by: Tim | April 15, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

It’s simple: Obama made too many promises on his way to the White House.. you cannot blame him.. don’t hate the player.. hate the game.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 15, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Some of his supporters voted for him because they thought he would stop the war and cut spending.
Guess what?
Those people don’t even know he continues and creates another war and…
asks for more money.
If you tell them and their reactions are,,,ohhhhhh????.. we did not know..

Posted by: cilla | April 15, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

I agree with Cilla. This is one of the many reasons that I didn’t vote for Obama. He’s a politician and he’ll say ANYTHING to get in office. He doesn’t care that we are hurting. Our children and grandchildren will be punished with the stupidity of raising taxes!!!!!!

Posted by: Becky White | April 16, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Miss Palin 1964, you and the liberal media bashed Bush ALL the time. You didn’t have to have a tea party. Besides Obama is spending MORE than ALL the previous presidents put TOGETHER!!!!!!!

Posted by: Becky White | April 16, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

When Bush and the Republicans were in control I did not like them racking up debt either. To double the national debt is just not good… but to double it again could imperil us. The Tea Party is about having “Had Enough!” Obama has proposed RECORD deficit spending ($1.7Trillion)the deficit in 2008 was about $600 billion. THAT is why the infuriation. Remember statistics– to double from 5T to 10T in debt hurts, to double to 20T cripples. We need to get back to the balanced budget of the Republican Congress and Clinton in the ’90′s. From what I hear many Democrats who voted for Obama are raging mad (everyone from my brother-in-law to Jim Cramer). Am I right that there is some disappointment among Democrats out there about what Obama has done?

Posted by: Berry | April 16, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am

I am appalled at the denigration of the conservative moment as something just on an emotional level without substance. Nothing could be further from the truth. The conservatives understand the core values of America and what made it into the country that, at least for now, is the greatest country on the planet. Up to this morning I had given ABC the benefit of the doubt that they had not bought into base liberal prejudice but the almost total absence of coverage of one of the largest peaceful protests in American history has convinced me otherwise. It wasnt even MENTIONED in the opening top stories on Good Morning America. That having been said GMA has lost a couple of faithful viewers that have watched for decades. God Bless America and the conservative movement.

Posted by: Ron Bair | April 16, 2009, 9:02 am 9:02 am

“one of the largest peaceful protests in American history”
Only in your dreams, my friend.
That said, and being about as left as it gets, I’m nonetheless increasingly disturbed by the coverage of these events by the liberal online community.
Despite the fact that these ‘rallies’ have been covered wall to wall by the corporate media, and despite the fact that a good portion of the people there are crazies (birthers and other conspiracy theorists, with a hefty chunk of out-and-out racists and even some jackbooted ###-#####), and despite the fact that they were promoted by well funded right-wing PR firms, the fact remains that there were alot of ordinary Americans out there because they are upset with their government for bailing out the banks.
What in god’s name is wrong with that?
The final straw this morning was watching a liberal blogger asking people at one of these things why they don’t just get over it because they lost the election.
Electoral politics is not and has never been the be all and end all of democracy. Democracy means voting, for sure, but that is the least important part of democracy.
Getting involved in rallies, hearings, council meetings, direct action. These are the wellsprings of democracy, and denigrating them in the name of democracy is simply absurd.

Posted by: Flash Override | April 16, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am

It seems like the media has little understanding of these tea parties. I attended our local community tea party that was organized by an ordinary citizen a nobody who was fed up with Big Government both Democrats and Republicans, no money was spent, no important speakers, it was cold and snowing but well attended anyway. We are fed up with spending future generations money, with more government programs and for the first time in my life I attended a protest and I am writing to express my view and others like me.

Posted by: JoAnn Jeppsen | April 16, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

We know that the Republicans started off this spending spree…so then, why did the Left complain (and still are)? But then it accelerated once Nanny State Pelosi and crew took over.
Why is it that Republicans spending taxpayer money is somehow evil, but Democrats spending it is like manna from Heaven?
Hypocrisy of the highest order.
Someone in politics costing us $1.00 of our money isn’t going to get our attention…spending $100.00 certainly is. And I don’t care if you’re a (working) Republican or Democrat it makes you feel like your climbing up a hill of mud, and that those in power are doing everything they can to keep you from moving ahead.
Why? So they can enforce their ideologies on the entire country by enlarging the entitled classes who are bound to support them so they can stay at home all day, watch TV and smoke weed and drink.
And, if these RINOs think they’ll get my vote next time around because they brought home some pork, they’re wrong. I just hope enough of us feel that way.

Posted by: RR GOP | April 17, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am

ABC news is so not news! Will they ever see the whole picture? I am a conservative and i am tired of how the left media portrays us.

Posted by: Carol Shell | August 25, 2009, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

When will ABC ever learn. They need to look at their ratings! They are a part of the leftist media. I am a conservative from Missouri and I am tired of the left calling names and down playing my beliefs. I don’t care how a media leans but I expect fair representation to both parties and let the viewers decide.

Posted by: Carol Shell | August 25, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.