Apr 20, 2009 3:01pm

Today’s Qs for O’s WH – 4/20/2009

I interjected in an exchange between White House press secretary Robert Gibbs and another reporter today, so I’ve included their exchange (with my interruption) as well as my own.

JENNIFER LOVEN, AP:  The $100 million target figure that the president talked about today with the Cabinet, can you explain why so small?  I know he talked about — you know, you add up 100 million and 100 million, and eventually, you get somewhere, but it would take an awfully long time to add up hundred million (inaudible) in the deficit.  Why not target a bigger number?

GIBBS:  (Smiling) Well, I think only in Washington, D.C. is a hundred million dollars…

LOVEN:  The deficit’s very large.  It’s not a joke.

GIBBS:  No, I’m…

LOVEN:  The deficit’s giant.  $100 million really is only a step.

GIBBS:  But no joke.

LOVEN:  You sound like you’re joking about it, but it’s not funny.

GIBBS:  I’m not making jokes about it.  I’m being completely sincere that only in Washington, D.C. is $100 million not a lot of money.  It is where I’m from.  It is where I grew up.  And I think it is for hundreds of millions of Americans.

LOVEN:  The point is it’s not a very big portion of the deficit.

TAPPER:  You were talking about an appropriations bill a few weeks ago about $8 billion being minuscule — $8 billion in earmarks. We were talking about that and you said that that…

GIBBS:  Well, in terms of — in…(CROSSTALK)

TAPPER:  …$100 million is a lot but $8 billion is small?

GIBBS:  Well, what I’m saying is I think it all adds up just as the president said, just as Jennifer was good enough to do in her question. If you think we’re going to get rid of $1.3 trillion deficit by eliminating one thing, I’d be — and the administration would be innumerably happy for you to let us know what that is.

LOVEN:  Why not try to get a bigger number so you can get a…

GIBBS:  Well, let me explain sort of what has happened.  Let’s walk through this so that everybody understands this. The president has laid out cuts, large and small, in both the administrative costs and in the program costs of the federal budget. Some of the examples that we were — we provided you all will add up. For instance, the Department of Veteran’s Affairs either cancels or delays 26 conferences that can be better or more effectively and more cost effectively done by video conferencing that saves almost $18 million.

A lot of these administrative things will add up.  This is a short-term goal to come back with over the course of the next few weeks to identify further administrative savings that secretaries haven’t already both identified and eliminated.

The president has also proposed savings on a much larger scale. The president has proposed ending the bank middle man for college loans, saving $94 billion over a ten-year period of time.  The president has attacked, in his budget, the subsidies that we provide insurance companies to provide the same Medicare coverage — private insurance companies the same type of Medicare coverage that’s already being offered at a savings of over $200 billion.

Jennifer, the reason that the president can stand up with the backing of the Congressional  Budget Office and talk about cutting the deficit in half over the course of four year’s time is because there are cuts that are large, student loans and Medicare Advantage, as well as small. This is the part of the president’s promise and proposal to go line by line through the federal budget deficit.  Will we enumerate programs that don’t work that we’re going to eliminate in the future? Yes.  Some of those cuts will be large.  Some of those cuts will be small.

But we’re not going to put ourselves back on a path toward fiscal sustainability if we don’t look at each and every item in this federal budget and make some of the cuts that are necessary to get us on that path.

**

TAPPER:  On Friday, the Obama administration was dealt a — a legal setback in another case in which it was arguing the state secrets argument, even though the judge was asking the administration to comply with his order that only under very tight, regulated way would — would these documents be able to be shared with the plaintiff’s attorneys.

I guess my question is, this is now the third time the administration has invoked state secrets, even though still on the campaign Web site and on the campaign trail the president criticized the Bush administration for invoking it too often.

What do you say to the people who voted for President Obama, expecting a different take on the state secret argument, based on what President Obama said on the campaign trail, who are disappointed with the fact that you guys keep invoking the same argument, in fact, in some cases, even taking it a step further?

GIBBS:  How taking it a step further?

TAPPER:  My understanding is in — not the case with the Islamic charity, but in one of the other cases, there was — the administration was asking for more blanket authorization to invoke what they believe to be state secrets than…

GIBBS:  Well, I — I should familiarize myself with that particular instance that I’m not aware of. The president and the legal team here have and will continue to evaluate and use in a judicious way the notion of protecting state secrets and ensuring that we balance the necessary need for transparency, but also understanding that there are things that can and should be protected for national security reasons…

TAPPER: We’re talking about a FISA judge, though. I mean, we’re not talking about sharing it with — with, you know, the front row here.  We’re talking about sharing it with a foreign intelligence judge.

REPORTER FROM THIRD ROW:  Or the third row.

TAPPER:  Or the third row, right.

GIBBS:  Once you get much past the third, it’s definitely downhill from there.

(BOOING)

GIBBS: Come on, guys.  It’s Monday.  You guys are a little (inaudible) today?  It’s just a joke, all right?

REPORTER IN SECOND ROW:  Let the record show the second row has not been mentioned.

GIBBS:  Just you wait.

(LAUGHTER)

GIBBS: All right, let’s…

TAPPER:  This is the FISA judge we’re talking about sharing it with.

GIBBS:  Right.  Well, look, again, we’re — in each of these cases, the — the — the team and the president have to make a judgment based on — based on national security. And let’s build a little — I want to bring in these OLC (Office of Legal Counsel in the Justice Department) memos. The president, as you guys have heard and read, the president thought about and struggled with this decision for quite some time, many weeks.  As the litigation worked its way through the process, as extensions were needed and granted, the president weighed this argument of national security.

The — one of the determinations that was made, as you heard the chief of staff make just this weekend, that many of the techniques described in these memos have been widely written about.  They were fairly — fairly detailed in their description in a recent New York Review of Books article.  And, in fact, in some of these instances, the Bush administration declassified portions of these techniques for transparency reasons.

But, in each of these situations, the legal team wi
ll weigh what is in the best interest of the national — national security of the United States and balance it that — with that needed transparency. I would — what I would tell either our supporters or our detractors that the president understands the seriousness of both of those arguments and will weigh each to ensure that we’re upholding what protects this country with what also underscores our values.

– jpt

User Comments

thanks, Jake (and J. Loven), for providing a little “reality-based” feedback to the scale of these proposed cuts.

Posted by: vinman | April 20, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Why didn’t you guys ever go after any of the Bush press secretaries with such aggression? I don’t remember any terrier like action from 2001 through 2009 re Prez Bush, and now you guys are jumping into each other’s questions and engaging in chest thumping.
Question: why the sudden chest hair growth and war paint?
If only you had been so assertive in the preceeding nine years as you feel obligated to be in the first ninety days of Obama’s presidency.
Incredible.

Posted by: Kira | April 20, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

This is simple for me. WE DON’T TORTURE! EVER! What’s so hard to understand about that? It’s like rape or stealing. It’s wrong, and everyone knows it. Torture is just flat wrong, and I have a hard time giving ANYONE a pass for that. This information MUST be released and heads MUST roll, to protect our democracy.
Oh, and we know EXACTLY what qualifies as torture . . . anything not in the Army Field Manual. Duh . . .
I don’t understand how writing a legal opinion is more criminal than carrying out torture, or asking for the opinion to be written so you can order torture be carried out. ALL OF THESE PEOPLE INVOLVED IN THIS CONSPIRACY ARE GUILTY OF TORTURE. ALL of them.
Who got punished for Abu Ghraib? Some little peons were the fall guys/gals. That was NOT right, and I really think the lawyers who wrote the requested legal opinions are the least of the guilty in this.
And btw, why were those peons put in jail over what they did at Abu Ghraib, when these memos clearly allowed for what they did? And why is it the CIA can get away with torture under these memos, but military members, like those prosecuted for Abu Ghraib, can’t? Is it because CIA agents identities are secret and military personnel’s aren’t?

Posted by: Teri B. | April 20, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Unlike other days, you can’t blame Gibbs today. You can’t make chicken salad out of chicken “waste.” Even a seasoned PR pro has trouble trying to put a happy face on this one. Trying to brag about cutting 100 million in this budget is like Donald Trump bragging that he cut back his personal budget by buying a bottle of Poland Spring water one time instead of Fiji water. Hey, he saved – what – three bucks!!! WOOOO – let’s tell the world!!

Posted by: Obama, the second coming | April 20, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

$100Million is about 1/8 of what Obama raised for himself in campaign contributions, and $50Million less than he raised in Sept of last year.

Posted by: MayBee | April 20, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Question: why the sudden chest hair growth and war paint?
If only you had been so assertive in the preceeding nine years as you feel obligated to be in the first ninety days of Obama’s presidency.
Incredible.
Posted by: Kira | Apr 20, 2009 3:15:48 PM
____________________________________
Bush was right up there w/ Nixon as far as being ridiculed and questioned harshly by the media. Don’t blame Jake just because you – somehow – didn’t notice! What Obama is getting is a picnic compared to what Bush endured! Who are you kidding?

Posted by: Obama, the second coming | April 20, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Thanks Tapper for asking some tough questions! Someone needs to do it, even if there is no REAL answers to them!

Posted by: Justme8811 | April 20, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

“$100Million is about 1/8 of what Obama raised for himself in campaign contributions, and $50Million less than he raised in Sept of last year.”
Hmmm the RNC has raised about $25M the 1st Q with Cantor himself raising about a million.
I guess they didn’t know that they were not supposed to fundraise during times of economic crisis.
Better run off and let them know maybee.

Posted by: Ryan C | April 20, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

lee:
re: ‘Ever serve in the military?’
Cheney, Bush ( don’t give me his N.G,. ‘service)
and most of the neo-cons responsible for Iraq didn’t serve, as well most of the House & Senate..
your ‘point’ is what?.. if you haven’t served in the ‘real military’ in combat your not entitled to an opinion that’s different from yours…. amazing how the ‘real americans’ are always threatening to take away constitutional rights
from the rest of use, because ‘they know better’.. your faith in American is just a thin veneer if your so afraid of free conversation……

Posted by: Dewde | April 20, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Let’s see-
1)Clinton is compromised by Israel when they find out about his affair with Monica Lewinsky through a covert telephone tap in the oval office. Try to have Jonothan Pollard sprung, but Drudge ‘outs’ Clinton-Lewinsky before they can.
2) Bush is compromised by Israel by his own beliefs and the neocon cabal in DOD and the WH, as well as the cover-up of the Harman affair’ in order to get the wiretap law approved.Takes Saddam down at their pleasure.
3)Obama continues cover-up of ‘Harman affair’, installs committed Zionists like Biden and Rahm in his cabinet.
I’d say Israel is consistently effective in its efforts to influence the highest office in the U.S.

Posted by: J House | April 20, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

I guess they didn’t know that they were not supposed to fundraise during times of economic crisis.
=========
???
I said no such thing.

Posted by: MayBee | April 20, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Jake:
here’s a few ideas I would like to see you and ABC pursue.
- What does it say about America over the last 8 years, that after Sept 11 and the destruction of the symbolic ‘Twin Towers’, that they have yet to rebuilt and most likely not be rebuilt for some time to come…
- Why are comments by people like Michelle Bachman, about ‘armed insurrection’ against the federal government just laughed off, in light of the rising paranoia and frantic gun buying..
maybe many have forgotten about T. McVeigh,
Terry Lynn Nichols, Eric Robert Rudolph, Bobby Frank Cherry and those that murdered doctors for running abortion clinics.
- How about a comparison of what was accomplished in the first three months of Reagan’s 2 terms, Bush 1, Clinton’s 2 terms, Bush’s (2) 2 terms, and Obama’s first 3 months with a little background on what was happening at the time.

Posted by: Dewde | April 20, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

And I was all excited about Obama mentioning budget cuts.. I like it when the reporters press The Brother Gibbs.. very entertaining (and I do think it is funny).

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 20, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Please, Jake, get the story…
Is the White House, in concert with the former Bush admin and AG Gonzalez, covering up a Justice Dept investigation into whether a US Congresswoman and Intel committee ranking member, Jane Harman, committed a crime, in order to enlist her help in getting the NSA wiretap law passed?

Posted by: J House | April 20, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Great question again Jake.. glad you asking the tough ones.
But you do know that Gibbs is only allowed to give out snippits of what is really going on, and he can never give out the truth, whether its good or bad.
The white house press corps, is a really not a good source to get the real news…. what we need are reporters that are not afraid to go after the real story.
Nothing against you Jake… its just that you know as well as I do, that you are never going to get a straight answer or a truthful one from Gibbs.
But you are doing a great job with asking of hard questions… and putting Gibbs in the corner.

Posted by: curious | April 20, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

If Obama committed to withdrawing from Iraq at the same pace he’s committed to cutting the federal budget, he’d be able to announce two soldiers and a Marine would be home by Christmas.

Posted by: bgates | April 20, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Question for the W.H. press corps.. ‘.would you consider the Gibbs’ daily presser.. to be a form of torture? Do you ever suffer from PTSD after such ‘briefing’.. it’s ok to tell us.. we can keep a secret.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 20, 2009, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

The president has proposed ending the bank middle man for college loans, saving $94 billion over a ten-year period of time. The president has attacked, in his budget, the subsidies that we provide insurance companies
That’s the problem, all the middle men between the government and us. Rather than this wasteful mix of public and private efforts, we should have the government provide all services. Imagine the efficiencies if the brightest minds and best ideas in all industries were consolidated into the government.

Posted by: bgates | April 20, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

heh, bgates.

Posted by: MayBee | April 20, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

The federal government spends almost $1 billion per year funding a woman’s “right” to choose to kill her unborn child. Eliminate federal spending on abortion would save 10 times the amount discussed in this video. Protect innocent life = $1 billion in savings per year.

Posted by: BJS | April 20, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

I am usually someone who cries about the “liberal media” on a daily basis.
Jake:
You made me proud of the media today.

Posted by: D. Advocate | April 20, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

I’m grateful to ABC and Mr. Tapper for asking some tough questions of the Obama administration. As a conservative, I’m used to seeing the MSM run cover for Mr. Obama instead of asking tough questions. I commend ABC for their objectivity. There is certainly none left at CNN or NBC.

Posted by: r j ross | April 20, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

$100,000.00? Obama’s “European Vacation” with 500 staff, 300 secret service, private kitchen and food, beautician for Her Majesty Michelle, etc. probably cost three times that.
But then if he’d only send letters dissing the United States it wouldn’t have carried the same weight.

Posted by: Panther Goodshaft | April 20, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

the 100 million is a pittance. Obama has been promising foreign dictators a billion here and a billion there, starting with Pakistan.
He does not include these pledges in his budget and they are not counted in the current debt and deficit numbers.
This is another dog and pony show to give the media a sound bite that counters the tea parties.
I am also sick and tired of hearing the Obama admin, including Gibbs claim they want to cut the deficit in half by some date.. when the first thing Obama did when taking office was to multiply the deficit over and over again, and then he wants credit for cutting half of that. Likely he will not cut that in half by reducing spending. They will raise taxes, and have already started doing so. They will cite this pitiful example of attempted reduction as an “we tried harder than anyone has ever tried before”.
Hang on to your wallets. He will use them to reduce the Obama deficit. He firmly believes he owns us now. What we thought was ours is now for him to confiscate.

Posted by: MNM | April 20, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Good to see some people willing to ask even the most basic questions of our President. I don’t know how Obama and company can honestly put this forward as fiscal restraint given all their spending. They must know most of the media will give them a pass to even attempt such a feat. We need more honest and intelligent reporters like you on the beat.

Posted by: David | April 20, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Folks,
WE FINALLY have real reporters asking real ,important questions. Tapper and J. Loven thanks for asking the tough questions.

Posted by: Pete | April 20, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Wait until the Medicare population hears that Obama is going to take away their choices in how they receive their Medicare benefits! Advantage enrollees
will be thrust back into the agonizing
original Medicare plan and cost sharing will skyrocket for them. One in four
medicare enrolles are on those plans.
This is the change you voted for America!

Posted by: Reilly | April 20, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Mr. Tapper, Thank you for pursuing your question in a determined, but fair manner.

Posted by: KLH | April 20, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Mr. Gibbs is correct. $100 million dollars is a lot of money where I come from, too. But so is $4 trillion. And I’m not so ignorant that I don’t know the difference.

Posted by: warren | April 20, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Jake Tapper is the remaining reason to tune in ABC.

Posted by: voter2 | April 20, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Thank you, Jake. Now if only more reporters would follow your lead. It’s about time for some critical thinking … and reporting. Thank you again.

Posted by: George | April 20, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

We know Jakes gets a little fiesty at times but the AP too? Way to go, both of you!

Posted by: david | April 20, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Gee Jake,
You’d better go easier on the Obama administration. If you don’t, they’ll give away your seat in the press room to a correspondent from People Magazine. After all, the public wants to know about Bo’s first visit to the groomer, which vegetables the President won’t eat, and where Mrs. Obama buys her false eyelashes. The White House wants to keep the voter fat, dumb and happy, reading puff pieces, so we don’t know how much debt we are ringing up every day.
I suggest if you want to keep your place, ask Gibbs for Mrs. Robinson’s opinion of the decor in the family quarters.

Posted by: Mary | April 20, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Gee Kira, you must’ve never’ve watched a Bush press interview. Hell they even made up fake stuff about him!
And Teri B., inform yourself a bit. You have no idea what Abu Ghraib was about. Were ‘terrorists’ being tortured? Who did what and why? You suffer from a paucity of information and an abundance of bile.

Posted by: Livermoron | April 20, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

This guy Gibbs makes Scott McClellan look competent.

Posted by: jinsd | April 20, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

This is the third or fourth instance that I have noticed where Jake pursues an adult response. Since this is a rarity in the media, I congratulate him, I will bookmark this site and take ABC off of my blacklist.

Posted by: Amdog | April 20, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Jake,
Thank you… It as seemed for way to long that the mainstream press has been turing their backs to what has been going on… Very refreshing to see a reporter ask a tough question when interviewing a democrat….
It is absolutely nuts whats going on with the spending…Just as much of I concern is how the policies that are being rammed through are going to change this country forever…
Somebody has to be keeping them honest and ask the tough questions..
Keep up the good work

Posted by: Tim | April 20, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Wow, aren’t you afraid you’ll be beat down by the left for asking a valid question? Oh, $100M is a lot to me too, but $8B is a much bigger number. If Gibbs is not embarrassed having the call the American public stupid every day, then he really is just plain old anti-American. The joking around has to stop. It really isn’t funny, and it never has been. With a few more good reporters you never know what could happen. It would be shocking if the sheepies had to face the real facts.

Posted by: MotherRedDog | April 20, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Is the press actually trying to get some answers from the administration? Nice try.
Course then there’s the “why didn’t you go after the Bush press secretaries? Cmon, did you ever watch them eviscerate Tony Snow, or smack on Ari Fleischer. Scott McClellan doesn’t count since he was a clown.

Posted by: mike | April 20, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Thanks for asking real questions. I hope a little bit of your intelligence wears off on the other reporters in the room, and maybe they will also start asking decent questions. I am tired of the puffball questions, (and puffball answers). You have consistently asked good questions.

Posted by: Spadad128 | April 20, 2009, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Sic em, Tapper.

Posted by: steve | April 20, 2009, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Who would have thought that ABC could still have a real reporter if they keep it up they might still be around for the conservitive come back

Posted by: steve | April 20, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Amdog, Jake has been the only adult in the room more than a few times. The man leans left, but with the pen and pad, he puts it aside and does his job. He held the Bush admin’s feet to the fire, and I have zero problem with that, because he does the same with the Obama admin. In other words, HIS JOB. Thank God for him, and the few others like him, who don’t take the spin from any of them up there, that’s what the media is supposed to be: a watchdog.

Posted by: bikermailman | April 20, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

It’s the new math, Jake. Whatever piddly amount Obama “cuts” from spending will be heralded as monstrous and easily overcoming the $1.85 trillion dollar deficit.
The willing useful idiots will buy it and think Obama is doing a great job.

Posted by: drjohn | April 20, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Hopefully someone will ask Obama about the $140 billion he promised the WMF. Where’s the accountability?

Posted by: drjohn | April 20, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

This cost cutting announcement is the equivalent of a company holding a company meeting to announce they have cut their annual overhead expenses by a whole $10 by eliminating coffee stir sticks from the cafeteria. This administration is such a joke. It makes me wonder whether they are doing things like this just for kicks.
Keep up the good work, Tapper.

Posted by: Frankie | April 20, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

@Kira – are you serious? They were ALL over W. Bush for the most part (except for Fox News)…the thing is W. and his guys didn’t care what the media or public asked. They did what they were going to do anyway.
@Tapper – Good line of questioning. Keep up the good work, whether they be Dem or Repub…Keep going after the facts and the truth and give us the knowledge to hold our government accountable!

Posted by: Will R. | April 20, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Obama Administration = Penny Wise, Pound Foolish

Posted by: Frankie | April 20, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Hey I know one thing we can cut to save a trillion dollars… cut President Obama.

Posted by: jgr | April 20, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

Those two deserve to sit in the front row…. great job. PLEASE, keep up that kind of work.

Posted by: denise | April 20, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Mr. Tapper,
Why do we continue to let all politicians frame the arguments/answers? One problem is deficit spending. The greater net result of which no one seems to want to discuss is the debt. Our debt servicing is higher than just about anything else in the budget except for entitlements. And we have not even seen the results of the continuous printing of money over at Treasury. Just wait until the inflation hits and the foreign purchases of our bonds shy away.

Posted by: cabrerski | April 20, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Barack Obama…”fractions of a penny” wise, trillions foolish?

Posted by: James_Richmond | April 20, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

The words sound good, but not a whole lot of substance. I hate it when they do stuff just for the political show.

Posted by: Chris | April 20, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Tag-team work from Tapper and Loven. Way to go, gang! And congrats to all the posters who quickly reminded Kira that there is no truth to the canard that BUsh’s press secretaries never faced tough questioning– an idea way beyond ridiculous. And perhaps we should remind Kira in addition that Tapper was not on the WH beat during the Bush administration.
Gibbs is a joke, but as another poster said, today must have been extraordinarily difficult for him because he was being forced to defend the indefensible. It would be amusing if it weren’t so sad that the president actually thought that asking his cabinet for budget cuts totally 100 million would impress the public who are being asked to swallow budgets and deficits in the trillions. Trust me, mr. president, we understand about the zeros involved and know full well that these budget cuts are minuscule, not even significant enough to be symbolically useful.
Maybe Gibbs has problems with the whole zeros thing, since as Tapper nailed him to the wall by pointing out, today we are talking about 100 million, which he wants to spin as substantive, but when we were talking about spending/wasting 8 billion (another set of zeros, Mr. Gibbs), that was, according to Gibby, too small an amount to be a deal-breaker or for people to be worked up about.

Posted by: moderate | April 20, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Gibbs is so creepy and smarmy. Seeing him pinned down with his own words is a beautiful thing.
He should be fired immediately for his incompetance.

Posted by: paul | April 20, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

OH, and Ryan_C, your attempt to smackdown MayBee was misguided. She never suggested that fundraising was wrong– she simply was presenting figures for comparison’s sake to put the budget cuts in perspective. I liked Lou Dobb’s perspective (Okay, he’s a crazy loon, but sometimes on economic issues he gets it where the WH doesn’t)– the percentage of the budget represented by this cut is so small that you can’t even round it up to 1%, so if you are rounding, it’s 0% of the budget.

Posted by: moderate | April 20, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Mr Tapper,
I appreciate your integrity. There are too many members of the 4th estate that do not look for the truth. If the emporer has no clothes, history will record that fact along with the dupes that promoted the charade.

Posted by: KC | April 20, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Excellent job as always Jake!!! This administration is filled with creeps, liars and frauds… I applaud you for continuing to demand accountability from them at the daily pressers… Gibbs is an idiot and although I didn’t think it was possible, you make him look even more stupid, over-matched and over-his-head every day… Thanks again for some real journalism!!!

Posted by: Delaware Vol | April 20, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

That was almost like…………….journalism!

Posted by: Jacknyc | April 20, 2009, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

So when Gibbs brought up the OLC Memo’s just released. Why no follow-up about the memos Cheney has asked to be released. They purportedly discuss the results of the so-called “torture”. So much for “transparency”. I suppose as long as the current administration continues to tell us how honest and transparent they are, we’ll believe them. Hmmmm, although, a long time ago I learned that honest people don’t go around telling others how honest they are. They may be sellin’, I’m not buying!

Posted by: Donald Palmer | April 20, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Great job by both reporters!

Posted by: niknak | April 20, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Tapper, you don’t disappoint. We need another Woodward and Bernstein. Maybe you and Ms. Loven will fill the bill. Keep hitting them with what I see to be very reasonable, non-sycophantic questions. You can teach Chuck Todd a thing or two.

Posted by: hillary fan | April 20, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Mr. Tapper,
Nice work! thank you!

Posted by: kvnmnnng | April 20, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Thank you for being a standard, Mr. Tapper. You seem to be the only one in the MSM who is fighting for the truth to prevail. God bless you!
Great job as well to Ms. Loven!

Posted by: crystal | April 20, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Jake has done a great job for ABC. It is nice when you see a guy like this in the media today. An actual reporter….
I have no idea how he leans or what his position might be….just good reporting. Pretty refreshing to see these days.
Thanks.

Posted by: Caleb | April 21, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Well, the recent buzz word “disingenuous” fits perfectly here. With a straight face Obama is trying to sell us on his fiscal responsibility. Jake and Miss Loven, great job for calling him on it. Other media figures who we all know really love Obama, do your boy a favor and stop him. Your adulation is causing him to make serious mistakes with these unconscionable deficits. Please wake up and smell the red ink, before it’s too late.

Posted by: evanpastor | April 21, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Wow! A reporter asking a tough question and not accepting spin, I applaud you Jake. I will sign up for your blog! Please keep up the good work. This “TEA PARTY” RIGHT WING RACIST, Independent loves it.
THANKS

Posted by: Carol | April 21, 2009, 12:46 am 12:46 am

It’s a sad state of affairs in the media, that such a simple and logical question is so rare and deserving of praise. But I DO THANK YOU for questioning bad policies and political-spin when you see it. Keep up the good work. Maybe this will spark other reporters to be more fair, inquisitive, and rational.

Posted by: David Ngo | April 21, 2009, 2:30 am 2:30 am

$100 million works out to .00037 of 1% of the Øbama budget or in plain English, thirty-seven hundred-thousandths of one percent. Think of it as a CEO that gets a $100 million bonus then skips his Starbucks coffee for one day. In the grand scheme of things, it’s BS.

Posted by: Jim S | April 21, 2009, 2:41 am 2:41 am

Sean – right on! I’ve been thinking the exact same the last few weeks…you can see it in their eyes and voices, but they haven’t been able to take it out of the press conferences and start writing about it!

Posted by: eric | April 21, 2009, 5:15 am 5:15 am

Jake has been asking the hard questions lately. Thanks Jake

Posted by: Frank | April 21, 2009, 7:48 am 7:48 am

Good to see the tide start to turn and the smoke and mirrors being exposed. Actually, this was real unbiased journalism. Now if they would expose that the “tax cut” for 95% of Americans is merely a decrease in the withholding rate. They still owe the same taxes as tax rates have not changed. This will come to light next tax season when people don’t get their refund and actually owe more.

Posted by: FighterJock | April 21, 2009, 8:10 am 8:10 am

Thank you Jake for actually being a reporter. Hopefully ABC will not fire you for asking real questions. If Gibbs thinks 3 billion is nothing, then let him send me 1/1000 of it, I could do a better job of getting into the market. Good job you have won a supporter

Posted by: Proud to be American | April 21, 2009, 8:12 am 8:12 am

Jake very good, MS Loven also. I primarily watch fox news, but Jake I am rapidly becoming a fan of yours. 8 Billon is small, and 100 Million is large, I love that analogy Jake. Keep at em, we need more like you

Posted by: Big Papa | April 21, 2009, 8:18 am 8:18 am

I’ve got to hand it to you. Finally some tough questions are being asked. From the outside it seems as though this administration has had a pass so far.

Posted by: Mike | April 21, 2009, 8:23 am 8:23 am

Mr. Tapper,
Keep up the good work. Be as tough on the Obama Administration as everyone was on the Bush Administration. We need some honesty in journalism.
I think people are getting tired of the blatant media partisanship on BOTH sides.
JB

Posted by: jb | April 21, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am

Thanks Jake. You’re the ONLY reason to watch ABC. Certainly not Gibson.
Too bad it’s tough to get my tv off fox. Maybe you should think about a promotion?
I’ll be certainly keeping an eye and ear out for you now.

Posted by: Mike jeffries | April 21, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am

I apologize in advance to not knowing much about you. I have pretty much given up and stopping watching/reading any mainstream media. I was thrilled to see you & Jennifer Loven put Gibbs feet to the fire comparing the $100 mil budget cuts to the $8 bil in earmarks.
You are true journalists. Continue to watch out for Americans!

Posted by: Annemarie | April 21, 2009, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Real Journalism lives!!! Good job guys.

Posted by: Alan | April 21, 2009, 9:29 am 9:29 am

Finally a reporter who knows how to keep a spin jockey on point. You deserve the anchor.

Posted by: Bobby Orr | April 21, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am

They should get a Gibbs guy that looks like Dana Perino.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 21, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am

I’ll add to the thanks to you Jake & Ms. Loven! How about asking Mr. Gibbs about the AP chart or the $6 a year for a family making $60,000? I’d love to hear the President’s response to that as well.
Keep up the hard hitting!

Posted by: pbeez | April 21, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Shouldnt such questions have come during the campaign?
Ordinary Americas were asking them, but unfortunately we have to carry funny signs and have “teabag” jokes made at our expense before someone listens up.

Posted by: Bob22 | April 21, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Kira
How does one get a 38% approval rating unless someone in the media “goes after them”. You appear to have slept thorugh the Bush years. The dems won the WH, Senate, and Congress. Not sure what else you want.

Posted by: Bob22 | April 21, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Great Work Jack!
You were professional and courteous,but not sychophantic and called them out on their hypocrisy in cutting waste vs. spending earmarks.
Keep it up!

Posted by: Hugh Akston | April 21, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am

So…
America, next time someone asks you what difference does it make that a candidate has never RUN anything, what will your answer be?
People who opposed Obama weren’t just being pissy. There are real consequences to experience, associations, and past actions.

Posted by: Bob22 | April 21, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Very encouraging to see you holding the administration, and Gibbs, accountable. I don’t envy you’re having to sit and listen to his smarmy spin on a regular basis.
Thanks for the good work.

Posted by: rob | April 21, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Jake Tapper
…will soon have his own wildly successful talk show on Fox, yet another host to beat Maddow and Olbermann by 600% in the ratings…

Posted by: Bob22 | April 21, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Thats right the Administration is now going to slash the budget by buying all their pencils Crayons in bulk at Sams Club, all their furniture a Ikea, Nancy Pelosi will have to fly coach with Southwest Airlines. I sure am glad that Obama is on top of this, he should have this deficit thing cleared up in a couple of hundred years.

Posted by: jeckelmyhyde | April 21, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Way to go Jake and Jennifer.
Thanks for simply doing your job. You’re part of a decreasing number who actually challenge the administration and ask tough questions.
On a side note, Gibbs, the Prez, and the administration make a joke out of everything that is serious.
Quite inappropriately of them.

Posted by: llr | April 21, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Thanks for HONEST reporting by a member of the MSM!!
We are sick and tired of more of the same talking points by the reporters that have been in the tank for Obama from the get go.
The MSM is a “has been” for THAT reasone alone. If there will be a come back in the MSM it will be due to the JAke Tappers and Ms. Loven’s that havent pledged their allegiance to a CAUSE…

Posted by: Moshe | April 21, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Go ghet ‘em! FINALLY, some intelligent and substantive questions from a couple of representatives of the Fourth Estate. ’bout time!

Posted by: geoff5505 | April 21, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

The Obama Doctrine revealed:
1. People can relate to a million, so a million sounds big.
2. People cant relate to a billion, or a trillion, so it sounds small.
3. Americans are stupid- we can make $100 (million) sound bigger than $8 (billion). You stupid voters, everyone knows $100 is bigger than $8.
4. Quick – pass trillion dollar stuff before someone figures it out.
5. Is Hugo Chavez and Daniel Ortega free for dinner? Perhaps they’d be willing to serve as the Community Organizer Czar.
ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES

Posted by: Bob22 | April 21, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am

@Kira – are you serious? They were ALL over W. Bush for the most part (except for Fox News)…the thing is W. and his guys didn’t care what the media or public asked. They did what they were going to do anyway.
And you don’t think that this Administration is doing exactly what they want to? Most of these questions should have been asked prior to nov, 2008 but never were, CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN. Well we got it. The only hope for this country is in the next 2 elections, is to vote out the incumbent, no mater what party they are, get new blood as the founding fathers intended this was never set up to be a profession.

Posted by: bien | April 21, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am

FOX reporters will not be my only source for news. I will now make it a point to include Jake Tapper in my source for news. I would have asked the same questions!

Posted by: Jenny | April 21, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am

The Obama Doctrine (continued)
Foreign Policy and National Security
1. If I can get elected when one of my main influences was a US terrorist, Bill Ayers, stupid America voters wont bat an eye when my Presidential foreign policy will be modeled after the likes of Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, Achmed Achmedinejad (sp)and Daniel Ortega.
2. Intellegence gather is a pain, especially when I realize it is problematic at best. Lets out all the memos. That’ll put a stop to intellegence alltogether. No intellegence, nothing to take resposibility for. Stupid American voters – they’ll buy it, especially if I keep talking about all the stuff that some other president had to make a judgement about.

Posted by: Bob22 | April 21, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am

We are sooooo screwed. No surprise though.

Posted by: DZ | April 21, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Obama Doctrine (continued)
Taxes
1. Stupid American voters dont know the difference between withholding and tax due. If I lower withholding, I can claim a tax decrease for everybody.
2. To make up the diffence, I can raise the tax on rich. They in turn, will raise the prices of the goods they sell. The stupid American voter will pay it, and blame Wall Street for inflation. Quick, pass confiscatory taxes on executive salaries before stupid American voters figure out that inflation is a goverment-created direct tax on the poor. They can take public transportation to the Acorn rallys.

Posted by: Bob22 | April 21, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Thanks Jake! It is refreshing to see someone who is considered to be a member of the MSM ask questions and challenge this administration – you know, what “real” journalists are supposed to do. Keep up the good work!

Posted by: Jennifer | April 21, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am

What Mr Gibbs failed to understand is that the questions that Jake and other journalists asked him, are many of the issues the american people have in mind.But is up to him to mimic and compete with the talents of the great Red Skelton.

Posted by: MFB | April 21, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Teri B. — where have you been for the last 8 years? Bush’s press secretaries fed the sharks every day with their own flesh. The MSM were relentless.
Jake and Loven… I don’t watch the MSM or pay for any papers other than the WSJ. I gave up on all of them years ago. I appreciate you doing your job, it is a rare thing to see any longer. It will take more than just this episode to win back anything resembling an ounce of trust from me but it is a first step.

Posted by: cmdprompt | April 21, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Thank you Jake and Loven for asking these questions. I’ve watched many of Gibbs news conferences and Gibbs is a smart a*s. He thinks he’s cute with his answers but he’s only showing his arrogance towards anyone who ‘dares’ ask a decent question! He thinks we are all stupid and don’t realize what a tiny, tiny, TINY, percentage of the deficit $100 million is. Then, he goes on to describe the types of ‘cuts’ that these agencies are making and the cuts themselves are a joke. These ‘cuts’ are things that should be looked at constantly during their budget review process. Instead, they simply increase their budgets (9% this year) and move on. Thanks again for asking the questions that the average American would like to ask if they could be in the room.

Posted by: jw | April 21, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

I don’t know HOW Gibbs every got this job. If he was the PR spokesperson for my company, I would have fired his arrogant butt after his first press conference. He is smirky, can’t answer a question without offending not only the questioner but others in the room, and thinks each question is a joke to be made fun of. He is a real liability to the Obama Administration. How long will it take for them to realize this?

Posted by: Jerry | April 21, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Kira says: “Why didn’t you guys ever go after any of the Bush press secretaries with such aggression?”
You are joking, right? Where were you the last 8 years? Liberals have very selective memories

Posted by: JamesJ | April 21, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am

After the press conference, did they have a chef and pizza flown in?

Posted by: JamesJ | April 21, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Jake and Jennifer are paying the price today for their excellent questions yesterday.
At his presser, the president just unformed them both they won’t be getting questions today.

Posted by: mad | April 21, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Yes, this is what we the people would like to see from more of the White House press corps. Thanks!
Another way to put the $100 millon in perspective. It is the equivalent of reducing the price of a $35,550 car by $1.

Posted by: Dan | April 21, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Thanks for asking (and persisting) with a question many of us have been scratching our heads about.
It is so rare anymore to see anyone asking any real questions and persisting when Gibbs tries to blow them off.
We would use more of this kind of examination of policy.

Posted by: Deb | April 21, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Careful Mr. Tapper or ABC will do to you what they do to their only other real reporter John Stossel. Stossel has been asking real questions about things for years, but when he has leaned on the Dems, his stories get relegated to fluff sections, or only allowed on his blog page.
Don’t believe me? Go read his blog page and see if you can remember any of his hard hitting stuff ever making it to the prime time news.

Posted by: John Kirkland | April 21, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Thank you for your great work, Mr. Tapper.
Why do “savings” always get placed in 10 or 15 year chunks, and deficit, in one?
“Student Loan middle men…$94 Billion over 10 years”. Let’s discuss budget debt addition over 10 years too! Oh, that’s right, President’s budget only shown for 5. (10 years is TOO scary)
Does student loan amount figure in “Life of Loan servicing”? Gibbs will “get back to us” on that.

Posted by: Tapper Fan | April 21, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Gibbs comments in closing about going through the Federal budget line item by line item? Are you kidding me? Congress rammed this down our throats without anyone having the time to review it. I have yet to see a press conference or video of the President in the Oval Office carefully reviewing the budget line item by line item, so you know for sure that it hasn’t happened. They should have Gibbs face backwards during the pressers since he talks out of his rear end anyways!

Posted by: tfred | April 21, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Jake,
All we ask out of our journalists is to be the watchful eye of the public. Be aggressive and a truth seeker but still respectful. You have done both so many times and it looks like it comes naturally to you. I wish others would emulate you. Please don’t change whether you are facing a repub or a dem.

Posted by: JT68 | April 21, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

We must try to wrap our minds around how enormous a $4 trillion federal deficit is and how insignificant a $100 million reduction in spending really is. This reduction is spending equates to 0.0025%. In otherwords, if the debt were only $4,000.00, the equivalent payment would be 10-cents. No matter how big you think $100 million is, it is totally and utterly insignificant against the $4 trillion deficit.

Posted by: BJS | April 21, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Wow Jake,
You better be careful. You’re acting like a real reporter in a free press America. The administration may not like you asking questions that actually speak to the concerns of thinking Americans. But still, putting my cynicism aside for the moment, it’s was encouraging hearing you and Jennifer today.
GB

Posted by: G Bryan | April 21, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Jake, you need to be at Fox. I’ll bet the libs at ABC are not very fond of your straight forward, unbiased approach toward the Barry team.

Posted by: Steady | April 21, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

I saw the fraud who know occupies the White House coming from a 100 miles away during the campaign. Why didn’t the rest of America?????? The fact that Barry is now in the White House is a prime reason why uniformed 18-24 year olds should NOT be permitted to vote. Look at the disaster they have inflicted on our country!!!!

Posted by: Steady | April 21, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Wait! How dare you ask such pointed questions from the Barry Bunch.
Out! Out! Both of you!

Posted by: Dan | April 21, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Jake, did you burn your PRAVDA membership card? Congrats, you are the only real journalist in a room full of Maobama apparatchiks.

Posted by: Mr. Big | April 21, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

What is really “funny” about this 100 million “cut”….most of it is over a 10-15 year period…so that means is is really more like saving 5 cents from a budget of a family earning 50,000 a year NOT even $5.00 as has been stated!!!

Posted by: caseofblues | April 21, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Jake, Thank you for asking the probbing questions that you do. You are one of the few that ask real questions, ones the people want answered, not the easy fluff pieces. Keep up the good work. And thank you for posting this so we how were not privy to the conversation to read and know how it went.

Posted by: Labasit | April 21, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

I mistakenly thought journalism was dead at ABC. Tapper at least is a serious journalist until the top brass at ABC rein him in.

Posted by: John R. Smith | April 21, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Bravo Zulu!

Posted by: Joao | April 21, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Jake,
You should’ve used the visual that I read about elsewhere using a common yardstick. If the budget represented the yardstick, a $100M cut would not represent an inch, a half-inch, a quarter-inch, an eighth-inch, or even a sixteenth-inch. I would represent 1/1000 of an inch, or about half the diameter of a human hair. Ouch!

Posted by: coffeetime | April 21, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Jake:
Great Job! I loved the fact that you held his feet to the fire. If ABC ever muzzles you, I’ll look for you on Fox News.
Keep up the good work.

Posted by: Dan | April 21, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Jake….I real journalist! at last!

Posted by: Gene | April 21, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Great work jake; keep pressing these guys, we are not going to accept their spin……..

Posted by: gregb | April 21, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Excellent work, Jake. But keep an eye out – I think that’s Soros sneaking up behind you with a syringe and a black bag for your head. Run!

Posted by: T. | April 21, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Impressive reporting – Concise, on point, non-agenda driven and from an informed viewpoint.
You sure you work for ABC?
Well done Jake (ouch, it hurt a little to say that).

Posted by: Tim_CA | April 21, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

Thank you for attempting to convince the Obama administration to “come clean,” Jake. It’s about time that their feet were held to the fire (whoops–suppose that would count as torture).

Posted by: judithod | April 21, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Where were you guys during the 8 yrs of the Bush administration when questions were neither asked, nor answered?
I’m glad you guys are pressing Obama on this now, as the press should, but where were you guys when all this crap happened during the last 8 years? Did you just happen to realize things now? What took you so long?

Posted by: Newbie | April 21, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Mr Tapper
My hat is off to you. I hope that you will continue to ask challenging questions of the ‘annointed one’ and the rest of the HILL mob (Dems and Reps) who are trying to spend this great country into oblivion. Please dont bend to your bosses who will surely rake u over the coals for your actions.

Posted by: Chuck | April 21, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

Not exactly Tony Snow is he?
Well done, Mr. Tapper!!

Posted by: Doug | April 21, 2009, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

About time someone did some real reporting and ask the questions that need to be asked as opposed to being another White House mouth piece. Good Job Jake! Is this the change we were promised? They can keep it….

Posted by: Dennis | April 21, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Newbie…..jeez, obama has only been in our sights for 3 months and you are so touchy….wait for the heat after a year of this moron!

Posted by: cbtexan | April 21, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Gibbs is just a weak McClellan. Keep asking the “pertinent” questions Jack.
ps. Does Helen Thomas smell like mothballs?

Posted by: ryukyu | April 21, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Keep up the AWESOME work Jake!

Posted by: Nick | April 21, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

It’s about time that someone asks some real questions. No more puffballs for the bumbling press secretary.

Posted by: Quack | April 22, 2009, 9:15 am 9:15 am

…I was kind of forgetting what real journalism sounded like. I actually had to smile. 8 billion was tiny, but 100 million is huge. Some of that Bush Logic might be creeping in.
Okay. That’s enough.
PS. But, thanks for showing us what real journalism looks like again. We needed more of you guys on Bush’s watch. But, its better late than never, I guess.

Posted by: WY | April 24, 2009, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

Wow Steady you said exactly what I’ve been thinking since November-about the “brainless” children who are allowed to vote! Great job Tapper, keep up the “real” reporting!!

Posted by: Ann | May 29, 2009, 1:27 am 1:27 am

I actually bookmarked Mr. Tapper because lately, he is the only journalist with enough balls and common sense to ask legitimate questions and seek an actual answer…that is until he gets the boot from the Obey Fan Club.
Keep it up Tapper!!! You’re really on a roll.

Posted by: KJW | June 22, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.