Today’s Qs for O’S WH
TAPPER: I want to follow up on two of Jennifer’s* questions. One, when it comes to the director of the White House Military Office, Mr. Caldera, does the president have any concerns that this decision he made that he took responsibility for indicates a lack of judgment that might make him improper to keep holding that post?
GIBBS: Well, as you mentioned, Mr. Caldera took responsibility for this. I think it’s been characterized that the president was furious upon learning of — of this decision. And that’s why he’s asked the deputy chief of staff to undertake a review in order to understand how the decision was made and to ensure that it doesn’t happen again. And based on that, we’ll take steps from there.
TAPPER: So — OK. And then the other question about Arlen Specter, some Democrats — less than two weeks ago, Specter, when he was arguing that he was going to stay a Republican, was talking about how he was the only thing standing between an onslaught of big Obama spending programs — that’s a quote — and — and passing into law. Because he was the 41st senator, he’d block it.
Now he is a Democrat. Is the president at all concerned that maybe there should be competition for that seat? I mean, there’s been talk that Governor Rendell is going to work to keep other Democrats out of the primary so that Specter runs unopposed. I’m sure if the president has an opinion about whether he should run unopposed or not, but is there concern that a "better" — quote, unquote — Democrat would be better for that seat?
GIBBS: Well, let me — let me just repeat what the president told Senator Specter this morning, that he has the president’s full support, that he’s thrilled that he’s switched parties and is a Democrat, and we look forward to working, as we have on the recovery and reinvestment plan, with Senator Specter.
I think Senator Specter has said in his statement today that he’s not automatically going to be a vote for any party. We’ve talked about it a lot in this room, that the president will reach out to members of either party or any party to gain their support, understanding that he’s not likely to get 100 percent support from anyone at any time. But I think the decision he made to represent his constituents in Pennsylvania is one, obviously, that we support, and we support Senator Specter.
* Jennifer Loven of the Associated Press
– jpt

Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
2nd question regarding the Dem primary is a very good one Jake.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 28, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Undertaking a review on the flyover = hoping people forget about it. Obviously, asking Caldera about his choices won’t take a week.
Specter is beholden to Obama now. There’s no way Rendell holds off other Democrats or Obama campaigns for Specter if Specter doesn’t vote the way Obama wants him to.
Obama’s already told some Blue Dogs he’s keeping track of them.
On the other hand, Specter has already shown he’s willing to vote for Obama’s spending.
Posted by: MayBee | April 28, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Sure Ryan, you dont like any questioning about the flyover huh.
President Barack Obama has ordered an internal review to determine how the decision was made to send of one of his official airplanes on a low-flying photo op past the New York City skyline.
White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Tuesday that deputy chief of staff Jim Messina will lead the review. Gibbs said the point is to determine “why that decision was made and to ensure that it never happens again.”
Gibbs said Obama was “furious” when he heard about the incident. Obama has called it a mistake.
Posted by: the Truth | April 28, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
“Undertaking a review on the flyover = hoping people forget about it. Obviously, asking Caldera about his choices won’t take a week.”
I am guessing his resignation is accepted within a week.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 28, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
“Sure Ryan, you dont like any questioning about the flyover huh.”
I try not to relive outrage for the sake of being outraged.
Right wingers apparently feel otherwise.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 28, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Nothing here to blame on W or the Rs so let’s just move on. Right Ryan?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | April 28, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
“Nothing here to blame on W or the Rs so let’s just move on. Right Ryan?”
Not at all.
Feel free to use the AF1 story to salve the wound that Specter defection is causing.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 28, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
MayBee:”Undertaking a review on the flyover = hoping people forget about it.”
I doubt it. Obama probably just doesn’t want to make a knee jerk decision without any information. If Caldera called the NYPD and got a hearty, “Sounds fine here – give ‘em a good show!” back, and then let the mayor’s office know and was told “No problem here,” then that is very different than if he just sent a fax and never had a dialogue.
In hindsight it is obvious, but if the local authorities did not predict this reaction, who should have?
Reality matters, not just going from the gut to make the headline writers happy.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 28, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
I thought Specter was a democrat. He has always acted like one (not The One).
Posted by: jim | April 28, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Dem. Senator Kent Conrad just told us that everyone will be getting a tax hike soon. He also tell us that this tax-cut/welfare in the stimulus will be over soon and those taxes will be going up.
Although I find it hard to imagine that Obama will do anything to cut his massive welfare increase.
He programs will however lead to higher unemployment and therefore the extra welfare dollars will be required .
They intend to pass Health Care reform tomorrow and now need to pay for it somehow, and don’t know how.
EVEry country with National health care runs an average 10% unemployment because it is an impossible program to run with out privare competition.
Obama is destroyiing the country and our way of life.
But hey, those union supporters sure are making out.
OBAMA just handed 40% of GM to the UAW and then handed 55% of Chrysler to the UAW.
Posted by: MNM | April 28, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Jake could you ask Gibbs tomorrow if it is true that the Telepromter has swine flu and will not be attending Obama’s prepared speech tomorrow. How will Obama get by?
Posted by: jwr | April 28, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
“I think it’s been characterized that the president was furious upon learning of — of this decision.”
When will Mr. Transparency let us see the manifest for that flight?
Posted by: drjohn | April 28, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
OBAMA just handed 40% of GM to the UAW and then handed 55% of Chrysler to the UAW.
And reduced stockholders to 1%. THis is the stuff of Hugo Chavez.
Communism you can believe in.
Posted by: drjohn | April 28, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
“EVEry country with National health care runs an average 10% unemployment”
The truth is there are quite a few countries with nationalized health care that have lower unemployment than the US to say nothing of below 10%, among them Canada, UK, Ireland, Denmark, Sweden, Switzerland, Norway, Portugal, Brazil, Peru, Austrailia, New Zeland.
France and Germany are slightly above the US in unemployment but they are below 10%.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 28, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
drjohn:”OBAMA just handed 40% of GM to the UAW and then handed 55% of Chrysler to the UAW.
And reduced stockholders to 1%. THis is the stuff of Hugo Chavez.”
Welcome to bankruptcy. GM owes more than it is worth. Stockholders are lucky to get 1% (I got 0% last time I held a company that failed).
Posted by: jhw539 | April 28, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
drjohn:”When will Mr. Transparency let us see the manifest for that flight?”
When will we see the manifest for the 2004 VC-25 flight over Mt Rushmore? It’s been 5 years – what are Republicans still hiding? I assume you’re also after that?
Posted by: jhw539 | April 28, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
MNM:”Although I find it hard to imagine that Obama will do anything to cut his massive welfare increase.”
Could you please cite SPECIFICALLY a couple examples of his “massive welfare increase”? Just to get the debate grounded in reality. Thanks.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 28, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
“In a memo obtained by CBS 2 HD the Federal Aviation Administration’s James Johnston said the agency was aware of “the possibility of public concern regarding DOD (Department of Defense) aircraft flying at low altitudes” in an around New York City. But they demanded total secrecy from the NYPD, the Secret Service, the FBI and even the mayor’s office and threatened federal sanctions if the secret got out.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 28, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Concerning Obama, welfare and the “stimulus” package:
“In a paper written with Katherine Bradley, Rector said that under the stimulus measure, ‘the federal government will pay 80 percent of cost for each new family that a state enrolls in welfare.’
“The policy goal of moving families to self-sufficiency has been largely replaced by a system that rewards states for increasing dependency.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 28, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
“In a paper written with Katherine Bradley, Rector said that under the stimulus measure, ‘the federal government will pay 80 percent of cost for each new family that a state enrolls in welfare.’
Who is Rector?
Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation.
Oh, well then we can ignore his opinion when it comes to welfare.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 28, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
“A major public policy success, welfare reform in the mid-1990s led to a dramatic reduction in welfare dependency and child poverty. This successful reform, however is now in jeopardy: Little-noted provisions in the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate stimulus bills actually abolish this historic reform. In addition, the stimulus bills will add nearly $800 billion in new means-tested welfare spending over the next decade. This new spending amounts to around $22,500 for every poor person in the U.S. The cost of the new welfare spending amounts, on average, to over $10,000 for each family paying income tax.”
Unless those provisions were not enacted–and as far as I know they were–there you have it.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 28, 2009, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
“Oh, well then we can ignore his opinion when it comes to welfare.”
Apart from making an ad hominem attack on Rector, can you offer any substantive response to the analysis? Do you believe that it is in some way incorrect? If so, can you explain how?
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 28, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
“Apart from making an ad hominem attack”
Pointing out he is from the Heritage Foundation is ad hominen attack?
Geez I know their reputation has suffered in recent years but that badly?
Posted by: Ryan C | April 28, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
“Currently [pre-stimulus], welfare recipients are limited to a total of five years of federal benefits over a lifetime. They’re also required to begin working after two years of government support. States are accountable for helping their needy citizens transition from handouts to self-sufficiency. Critically, the funds provided to states are fixed appropriations by the federal government.
“Through a little noticed provision of the stimulus package that has passed the House of Representatives, the bill creates a fund for TANF [Temporary Assistance to Needy Families] that is open-ended — the same way Medicare and Social Security are.
“In the section of the House bill dealing with cash assistance to low-income families, the authors inserted the bombshell phrase: ‘such sums as are necessary.’ This is a profound departure from the current statutory scheme, despite the fact that, in this particular bill, state TANF spending would be capped. The ‘such sums’ appropriation language is deliberately obscure. It is a camel’s nose provision intended to reverse Clinton-era legislation and create a new template for future TANF reauthorizations.”
Anyone care to respond on the merits?
Muster up some courage: defend the massive welfare increase if you like it, but don’t deny that it has occurred.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 28, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
“Pointing out he is from the Heritage Foundation is ad hominen attack?”
No. Saying that his opinion can therefore be ignored is.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 28, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
“No. Saying that his opinion can therefore be ignored is.”
Oh, I just thought it was a good rule of thumb.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 28, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Times of London:
“Douglas Besharov, author of a big study on welfare reform, said the stimulus bill passed by Congress and the Senate in separate votes on Friday would ‘unravel’ most of the 1996 reforms that led to a 65% reduction in welfare caseloads and prompted the British and several other governments to consider similar measures.
“Though some researchers have questioned the true impact of Clinton’s ‘workfare’ reforms, they were wildly popular with millions of US taxpayers tired of subsidising what many saw as a generation of slackers.
“Despite dire warnings that reduced benefits for single mothers and deadlines on entitlement would create a social calamity – one liberal senator warned at the time that children would be ‘sleeping on grates’ – the 1996 reforms cut welfare rolls from more than 5m families in 1995 to below 2m a decade later without a discernible increase in hardship.”
I await a substantive rebuttal from someone–any one.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 28, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Not a rule of thumb, a fallacy:
“An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument.”
If you had a response on the merits, I assume you would have presented it by now.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 28, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Michael Barone:
“Repealing Welfare Reform
February 17, 2009
“That’s what the stimulus bill has done, to a considerable extent, argues Mickey Kaus, in high dudgeon. I think he’s right and that this should be a big issue as time goes on. Welfare reform, starting in the states, culminating with Bill Clinton’s signing of the federal bill in 1996, was one of the great policy successes of the last generation. It improved the lives of welfare’s intended beneficiaries just as the welfare system as it came to be in the late 1960s and early 1970s degraded them.”
Any rules of thumb about Barone and Mickey Kaus? Any support for a contrary argument?
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 28, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
“Times of London:”
Hmmmm silly me, I just realized that hyena is posting opeds from a month and a half ago.
That Specter thing must really hurt.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 28, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
“Any rules of thumb about Barone and Mickey Kaus?”
Yeah Micky Kaus is as liberal as Arlen Specter is conservative and he has an obsession with welfare reform.
But I am guessing the Specter thing hurt real bad if you’re posting stuff from a month ana half ago.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 28, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
“Not a rule of thumb, a fallacy:”
Ad-hominem is only a fallacy in pure logical reasoning, but that’s not what this comment board is necessarily intended for. In a courtroom for example it is absolutely standard procedure to try and discredit a hostile witness. Besides you guys do it all the time.
Posted by: Skip | April 28, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
In a memo obtained by CBS 2 HD the Federal Aviation Administration’s James Johnston said the agency was aware of “the possibility of public concern regarding DOD (Department of Defense) aircraft flying at low altitudes” in an around New York City. But they demanded total secrecy from the NYPD, the Secret Service, the FBI and even the mayor’s office and threatened federal sanctions if the secret got out.
NOOO Obama didn’t have a clue. Something is up here and he needs to tell us who was on board and being paid off with this flight.
Or what was so important that they knew they would scare NYC’ers but did not care?
Posted by: MNM | April 28, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
The Buck Stops At Mr Caldera.
Posted by: BigGator5 | April 28, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
“From the DHS slanders right wingers file:…..”
And your point is?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | April 28, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
I firmly believe that, when you strip everything tangential away, right-wing ideology is based on the twin principles of Fear and Greed.
Posted by: Skip | April 28, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
“I firmly believe that, when you strip everything tangential away, right-wing ideology is based on the twin principles of Fear and Greed.”
One out of three children aged 6 to 11 fears that Ma Earth won’t exist when they grow up.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | April 28, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
“Yet you have no answer for why Obama forced the NYC flyover in spite of being aware that it would cause a panic.”
Because I highly doubt Obama was even aware of the photo op.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 28, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
Obama took credit for ordering the pirates to be taken out but doesn’t take credit for his plane’s flyover. Hmmm. Seems a little suspicious to me.
Posted by: Jeff | April 28, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Ryan C, I am a democrat but have to admit that your endless rants blaming everything on right wingers is getting old. Give it a rest before you become irrelevent.
Posted by: PaulR | April 28, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
“Ryan C, I am a democrat but have to admit that your endless rants blaming everything on right wingers is getting old. Give it a rest before you become irrelevent.”
Well I am sorry to disappoint you Paul.
Feel free to ignore my posts.
Posted by: Ryan C | April 28, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
“I think I’ll knock off for a beer right about now.”
Me too! ‘See’ you all later I’m sure.
Posted by: Skip | April 28, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Spector is moving from the minority party to the majority party in a personal power grab.
He’s just being a politician.
Posted by: mad | April 28, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Jeff, do you have a quote for that? I must have missed Obama taking credit for rescuing the ship captain, and I can’t find it anywhere on the internet.
Fascist Hyena, where in the stimulus did it cut the work requirement from TANF? I must have missed that too…doesn’t seem to appear anywhere on the internet either, not even at Heritage or other right wing shills.
(for those who are wondering, the stimulus set aside funds for any state that experiences a dramatic increase in caseloads due to the Bush depression – which is not really that likely due to the onerous requirements to apply in most states)
The reason the far right is trying to push welfare right now is that they were fairly successful in getting the media to convince people, quite contrary to the facts, that welfare was something non-white people got, and they are trying to stir up the racists.
Posted by: Flash Override | April 28, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
They should move Caldera up the ladder..he’s taking responsibility for something..
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 28, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
Good riddance Spector! McCain and Snow leave next. We need real Americans, not socialist sympathizers! Our tea parties showed how we are taking back America with real Americans. Wait and see! God bless!
Posted by: James | April 29, 2009, 3:28 am 3:28 am
James
Well, you are taking back SOMETHING, but I don’t think it is America. That would take more than a few “tea parties.” You would have to like, you know, win elections and stuff.
Posted by: jock59801 | April 29, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm