By MichaelJames

Apr 18, 2009 3:21pm

White House Uses Cautious Language on Iranian Prisoner Roxana Saberi

PORT OF SPAIN, TRINIDAD — Asked if the conviction of American journalist Roxana Saberi by an Iranian court constitutes a setback to U.S.-Iran relations, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said ON CAMERA that he "would echo the statement that Secretary Clinton put out on this. The president is deeply disappointed at this news. His thoughts and prayers are with her and her family. And I think we will continue to express the concerns that we have through the Swiss to the Iranian government, and make sure they underscore and understand our deep concern for these actions."

Yes, but is it a "setback?" the reporter pressed.

"Without getting too far into it, I think what we think is important is that the situation be remedied," Gibbs said, "and that without getting too deeply into that, I will leave it at that."

Experts say the cautious language Gibbs and other officials of the Obama administration are using is so as to not make Saberi an even bigger target than she already is. They almost certainly fear that any language elevating her case publicly to what it is privately could make her more of a pawn in the already tense relationship between the U.S. and Iran.

Denis McDonough, director of strategic communications at the White House’s National Security Council, added today that he spoke about the matter with President Obama this morning.

"I think that he saw it as a real setback and real disappointment for the family in particular," McDonough said. "He was very struck by how difficult this must be for the family. He underscored our belief that she is wrongly charged. She is an American journalist who has just been practicing journalism."

McDonough added that the U.S. would "be making our views on this particular case known through our intersection with Tehran which is run by the Swiss."

- Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

User Comments

She is such a beautiful young woman..

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | April 18, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

I pray for two things:
First, for Ms. Saberi’s health and safety; and
Second, that the right-wing noise machine,unlike its conduct in the Capt. Phillip’s incident, can keep their mouth’s shut long enough to let moderate Iranian officials secure Ms. Sabeir’s early release.
Finally, another good post, Jake. You’re having a good day.

Posted by: R. Wood | April 18, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

she is a journalist, she knows the ropes.. but she may get hung by one now..

Posted by: Breaking News | April 18, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

R Wood define “moderate Iranian officials”. You probably include Khatami or Rafsanjani – hah, tools and two-faced players of the Supreme Council and Khamenei. And also out of luck, Khatami had to drop out of running for Prez again. Is your hope in Mousavi, good luck, he’s either a stooge or a token and probably alienated the poor with being against potato giveaways and the elitist mullahs for being mushy on attacking Jews.

Posted by: robert b | April 18, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Obama is so weak. There is no hope for her while he is in office. Hopefully in 4 years when Obama is thrown out she will have a chance.

Posted by: BarryG | April 18, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

What a lark? Thinking right wing “noise” is what might harm her???!!!
Just like with Haleh Esfandiari, Iran tweaks the sensibilities of liberals, journalists, and women by detaining a representative of “tolerance and compassion” and charging her with treason for little cause. Sounds like they know exactly who the target is and how wimpy the response.

Posted by: robert b | April 18, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

TO: robertb-”moderate Iranian officials”=an influential clerical or govt. person- unknown to us and not necessarily a friend of the west -who doesn’t want to nuke anyone or see his own country nuked. What you right wing noise makers don’t seem to understand, and what this post points out, is that right-wing demagoguery makes Ms. Saberi a bigger propaganda prize. At some point, in Iranian eyes, her release, is perceived internally as a loss of national pride to the extent that any “moderates” keeps silent. Make no mistake, I hate what these people stand for and what they have done. Nor am I suggesting we ignore this. I am simply suggesting that strongly worded back-channel diplomacy and respectful moderation of press coverage is in Ms. Saberi and her family’s best interest. And does not compromise the U.S. ovederall.
The rest of us learned this lesson in the 1980′s with the Beirut kidnapping of Terry Anderson. However, if you Bushies feel so strongly that our response is “wimpy”, you should have the courage to directly communicate to the Saberi family that you are willing to extend her incarceration, or worse, to satisfy your political agenda.

Posted by: R. Wood | April 18, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Ohh, so it was because we NEVER mention Alexandr Solzhenitsyn and Andrie Sakharov’s name, kept it hush-hush that they were released.
Ooh, it was because we worked so QUIETLY to deal with the emigration of Soviet Jewry from their oppression.
Ooh, it was because the Helsinki human rights organization NEVER PUBLICLY worked to make Soviet leaders accountable to their promises of reform.
Was it then a mistake for the Nobel Prize to be given to Shirin Ebadi for her brave work for justice and human rights in Iran?
Is it foolish to bring up Iran at forums and describe their nonsensical positions on everything from the Holocaust onward?
Should the president of Columbia University, no right wing noisemaker he, have insulted Ahmadenijad by bringing up the failings of the regime?
Should the American audience held their mmocking laughter when Mahmoud went on to claim there are no homosexuals in Iran?

Posted by: robert b | April 18, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

That’s ridiculous.
In fact, Reagan did negotiate behind the scenes – too far behind the scence, and sold arms to Iran in order to free hostages. (Admittedly in a complicated Iran Contra scheme).
But for every hostage released they captured more. But that was minor compared to the havoc and horror these Iranian backed terrorists wreaked on Beirut and the counteractions where Saddam was backing Maronite Christian falangists, and Druze and PLO changed sides daily is baffling to this day.
Asking for justice is NEVER the wrong thing to do.
As I said earlier, it is not real agents or conservative businessmen that they are enslaving , these are progressive women journalists. I guess we should leave it to you whether to abandon them to Mahmoud’s tender mercies.

Posted by: robert b | April 18, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Nicolas Sarkozy recently summed it up: Obama is weak, inexperienced, and badly briefed. Ms. Sabeir is wise not to expect much from Obama.

Posted by: Linda | April 18, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

“…if you Bushies feel so strongly that our response is ‘wimpy’…”
Take note: anyone who feels that way is, ipso facto, a “Bushie.” All others are delighted with our response.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | April 18, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

robert b: You submitted two well written, articulate posts. (Is your real last name Bolton or Feith?) However, none of your arguments address the issue of how to best ensure Ms. Saberi’s earliest release and at the same time protect larger U.S. interests. You make the assumption that only public and loud condemnation is effective. The truth is that the actual release of the two Soviet dissidents and other political prisoners you mentioned was accomplished by serious, hard-ball but quiet diplomacy. This is the heart of my argument which you intentionally ignored. Linda’s post is a good example of the problem. She and her neo-con ilk, are ready to throw this young women under the bus for political gain. There is a time for vociferous public condemnation and military responses. There is also a time for quiet, effective, talk. This is one of them.
Finally, your inference that I believe Ms. Saberi is less deserving of help because she is a progressive woman journalist is quite offensive. You get the last word, it’s a beautiful night here in the northwest and I’m headed outside to look at the stars and say a quiet prayer for the Saberi family.

Posted by: R. Wood | April 18, 2009, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Since, as the President put in his ‘welcoming’ speech to the Iranian people, the Iranians are just like us and have similar hopes and dreams for their families, they will be understanding about this situation and do the right thing….not.
Those rose colored glasses seem to be getting thicker.
Now, if we can get those pesky North Koreans (who, incidentally, are like us too and share the same hopes)to bring back the UN nuclear inspectors and give up their nukes…
I took a business siminar once…it was called ‘Hope is NOT a strategy’.

Posted by: J House | April 18, 2009, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

on terry anderson I’ve read his bio. gee it was ap and journalists that kept him in the news. I noticed no pattern lesser knowns got held a long time too. if anyone was good at quiet and soft talk it was terry waite the mediator they kidnapped him too!!!! oh and betancourt another negotiator with farc spent five years with 3 continents sending envoys for her relaease. my answer is still don’t hold back and play hardball good cop bad cop and mean it!!!

Posted by: robert b | April 19, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Nice positions BO and the Democrats are getting into. The Afgans pass a law that deprive women of their rights (can’t leave the house unless the husband approves it). The Iranians put an American woman in jail for doing her job. Bo is for religious equality, race equality, sexual orientation equality …. what the hell happened to gender equality? Pelosi is a wacko, so no expecations there. Where the hell is Hillary?

Posted by: USA-NC-08 | April 19, 2009, 8:30 am 8:30 am

Why do we have the outcry that American Iranian Roxana Saberi was jailed after a “show trial”, where she was not allowed to present a full defense when we do the same exact thing to Charles Lynch here in the USA.

Posted by: James | April 21, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.