May 6, 2009 5:10pm

Afghan Ambassador Says U.S. Definitely Behind Civilian Casualties; Seeks Better Intel Sharing with Pakistan

As leaders of Pakistan, Afghanistan and United States met today at the White House, we spoke to Afghanistan’s ambassador to the U.S., Said T. Jawad, about the worsening security situation in the region and what his delegation hopes to achieve from these meetings.

You can listen to the Podcast on iTunes or by clicking HERE.

Jawad says Afghanistan is in dialogue with the U.S. and Pakistan to improve intelligence gathering and security.

"We are seeking very clear attainable objectives in the area of intelligence exchange, improving security, enhancing trade and transit in Afghanistan. These talks are about getting very very specific measurable objectives set forward and then working together to achieve them and also measure our accomplishment on how far we are coming so, all of this talk, what we are seeking, is a very clear objectives, better mechanism of exchanging information, mechanism to measure deliveries of those objectives being set by Afghanistan with the assistance of the United States," Jawad says.

Jawad says one of the specific things they are looking at it is enhanced communication about activities on the Pak-Afghan border. In Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas, large parts of the porous border are controlled by Taliban supporters that move easily between the two countries.

"We have to make sure that the information is exchanged in a manner that they are live and actionable and second, develop mechanism that we can act upon right away when this kind of information is available on a trilateral basis, if not trilateral then at least between Afghanistan and Pakistan, for instance, establishing joint border crossing monitoring systems so if there is any suspicious movement across the borders then the information will be shared right away and there will be capabilities to act upon a larger area, both on this side and the other side of the border," he says.

Jawad said Afghanistan and Pakistan share military intelligence but that it’s not very timely.

"This kind of mechanisms are in place but they are not live and timely. The objective is to establish… mechanisms or joint commissions that could verify the information and act on it quickly. Right now it’s usually exchanged through the usual procedures and processes that sometimes make it difficult or impossible to act upon by the time it’s received and verified by different sources," he says.

The leaders met in the backdrop of increasing violence by the Taliban in Pakistan and civilian casualties rise in neighboring Afghanistan. The International Red Cross confirmed today that it was U.S. bombing that killed more than 100 people, mostly civilians, in an Afghan village yesterday.

"Our security forces, initially the police forces, were conducting a military operation and then later on when they come under heavy attack they asked for assistance from the Afghan National Army forces and the National Forces include actually military trainers and soldiers from the international community and the United States. And later on, an air strike was called, which caused severe damage to a village, and many civilians were killed overall," Jawad says.

Jawad says more precautionary measures need to be taken to prevent such attacks.

"And any time civilians are killed, it’s a tragedy. Everyone loses. The poor Afghan civilian getting killed is the prime victim but also the international community that’s fighting terrorism in Afghanistan has the prime objective of keeping the civilians safe and on their side. So we are asking once again to come up with better measure to prevent any kind of death to the civilians, which are our most important ally in the war against terrorism in Afghanistan and in the region," he says.

Presidents Hamid Karzai and Asif Ali Zardari will return to the White House tomorrow to continue the talks. Jawad says specific benchmarks will be discussed in breakout sessions about economic development and intelligence gathering.

You can listen to the Podcast on iTunes or by clicking HERE.

Jake Tapper and Huma Khan

User Comments

Who cares if Obama killed scores of innocent women and children? He’s popular!

Posted by: Chuck | May 6, 2009, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

War is hell.

Posted by: mad | May 6, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

How are we going to defeat Al Queda and Taliban if we don’t take it to them in Pakistan? Is it realistic to believe that Pakistan, with an infiltrated intelligence service and a weak leader, can defeat them? And we are going to rely on them to get the job done? This is headed for disaster.

Posted by: Sigmonde | May 6, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Just be glad we are using Air Strikes and just a few Terrorists..opps, I mean civilians get bombed.
It could be worse , we have not unleashed our pu36 Explosive Space Modulator on them yet….

Posted by: Deadman's Curve | May 6, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

So we are asking once again to come up with better measure to prevent any kind of death to the civilians, which are our most important ally in the war against terrorism in Afghanistan and in the region,” he says.
===========
I would consider using interrogations for information– perhaps even harsh interrogations.
It can’t be easy to explain to dead or injured Afghan citizens that we are willing to risk their lives so we don’t have to feel bad about belly-slapping an AlQaeda guy.

Posted by: MayBee | May 6, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

“We’ve got to get the job done there and that requires us to have enough troops so that we’re not just air-raiding villages and killing civilians, which is causing enormous pressure over there.” – Barack Obama, Criticizing Bush on Afghanistan, August 14, 2007

Posted by: Stacey | May 6, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

By what authority is he conducting these strikes? What is the basis, if any, for his immunity to charges of war crimes?

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | May 6, 2009, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Mr. Obama should be investigated immediately for war crimes. Perhaps we need a special prosecutor in the Hague, or maybe in a Spanish Court. An international warrant for his arrest should be issued so that if he ever travels abroad he can be arrested. Mr. Holder should immediately give a legal opinion on how these raids can continue an not constitute a war crime. Should more civilians be killed, Mr. Holder should be charged and be disbarred in state courts for his advice.

Posted by: Tery | May 6, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

It’s a tragedy when democracy succeeds to such a point that the man-haters and power-haters actually take over, only to discover why men are men and why power is power. It has always been good manners to cause good men to insist on running the business of the state, not hatred or exclusion. But we are, actually, gentle creatures, and sad that we can only wish you luck when there really is no other way to help.

Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | May 6, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

We now know, of course, that Messrs. Bybee and Yoo are entirely innocent of any crime. But what about Mr. Obama? Who will defend him, and on what basis? The silence is deafening.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | May 7, 2009, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Clearly, though, the taliban threat and the threat from Mexico are the same in the sense that they are happenning at the same time, they both have drug trade and cash as major contributors, they are both organizations of a similar kind, in that they are organized without institutions, they are both present dangers, they both operate on a foreign language and mindset, they both run on the contrary to social order, our usual meathods seem not creative enough to deal with, defeat, or mitigate with either, they both come at the most inopportune time. One threat draws resources from the other, and they are, together, the worst possible combination of threats, being both the nearest and the farthest and requiring more or less equal kinds of resources. They both rely on a similar recruitment resource and approach. Any of these few of the many similarities (or differences) should be investigated for possible and creative strategic causes and solutions. Maybe another way to look at it is, the enemy is our customer. Our strength is in finding out, surveying, discovering the mind of the customer. If our corporate business strategic pros can be enlisted for our security fronts, there is no way we can loose.

Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | May 7, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am

While the potential for extraordinary tactics in certain cases should not be excluded, also, the potential for in-depth professional marketing surveys at the border and at Guantanamo should be seriously considered.

Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | May 7, 2009, 1:32 am 1:32 am

The most important thing to the anti-war BO supporters is that he does not torture.

Posted by: ross | May 7, 2009, 7:14 am 7:14 am

Obama needs to stop “just air-raiding villages and killing civilians, which is causing enormous pressure over there.”
Just using Obama’s own words from Oct 2008 describing the US actions under GW Bush.

Posted by: carl | May 7, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am

When Bush did this the MSM eagerly showed the results.
Now conveniently, the MSM is ignoring the horrible aftermath of Obama’s raids.
They won’t hesitate to show pictures of CIA interrogations.
Hypocrites.

Posted by: max | May 7, 2009, 9:31 am 9:31 am

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
Margaret

Posted by: Margaret | August 29, 2009, 2:07 am 2:07 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.