By Jennifer Parker

May 6, 2009 12:22pm

Did Elizabeth Edwards Know When She Said This?

Elizabeth Edwards’ admission that she knew about her husband’s affair "days after" his presidential announcement back in 2006 puts this interview I had with the two of them in a new light.

It came just two days after Edwards announced his presidential bid.

And in the course of the interview I asked Elizabeth whether she had a veto over his decision to run:

I have to say, during the course of that interview there wasn’t a hint of tension between the two of them. They bantered easily – even playfully – about the campaign, and their political differences. I also frankly can’t believe they could have given an interview like this had they both known but I guess we’ve all been surprised by performances like that.

–George Stephanopoulos

Dec 30, 2006 Interview (aired Dec. 31)

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: The Senator and I have talked several times over the last few years and every time he talked about getting into the race, he said he was going to make the best decision for his family.

Did you get a vote?

MRS. EDWARDS: I probably could have vetoed it, but I didn’t. Part of it was my health, which is good now, and the other is whether or not we would support him and, of course, I have to say he was beside me every step of the way during my fight against cancer.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: You look great now.

MRS. EDWARDS: Thanks, I appreciate that. And that’s what a marriage is about. I’m with him in the fights that he has to undertake.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: How do you see your role in this campaign?

MRS. EDWARDS: The way I’ve always described it is that I’m a window, I mean, in a sense, another surrogate, somebody who believes in him and believes in what he’s saying and if I can reach out and talk to people.

I think there’s a big question about — and there may be spouses who don’t fall in this category, but how much difference a spouse actually makes, except that if I can talk to 200 people in a day that he didn’t get to talk to, that’s helpful.

EDWARDS: That’s a gross understatement. That was very humbling and I appreciate the humility of Elizabeth on that.

She is my most trusted advisor and always has been, always will be, and I care what she says about things. We disagree, you know. There are some serious things that we…

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Give me one issue.

EDWARDS: Not on camera, I’m not going there. But we know what they are and she is a strong willed woman. She may be sitting there looking meek and mild. She’s a very strong willed human being and is not shy about speaking her piece.

User Comments

leave the woman be…has she not been through enough?
Fact check things that matter in our lives

Posted by: oh really | May 6, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Mrs. Edwards knew of her husbands affair — knew voters would likely be turned off and not support him in his presidential bid. She stayed quiet and shares in some of the blame for deceiving voters.
Whether those primary votes would have gone to Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama — perhaps even changing the outcome of the democratic primary — we’ll just never know. We can only speculate.

Posted by: Arizona Mom | May 6, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Look if Elizabeth real wants to believe that John was “seduced” and he didn’t run after this woman like a highschooler let her. I am sure this is the only way she can cope staying with him.
To put all the blame on the other woman is she is only fooling herself.

Posted by: cissy55 | May 6, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Mrs. Edwards is a very good actress…

Posted by: thehillton | May 6, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

so what. what would you say? leave the woman alone.

Posted by: michaelette sanders | May 6, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

I believe that fidelity or infidelity in a marriage should stay in the marriage. Ms. Edwards is putting it into the spotlight but why? To sell her book? What about her children? Why badmouth her husband to the world? She chose to stay.She chose to support his campaign

Posted by: lotta | May 6, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Does any of this really matter, especially now? The affair ended the career of an otherwise good politician. Why are we talking about this private matter when we allowed the past administration to destroy this country during its eight year reign.
What I can’t believe is we’re discussing an old, tired story when the current financial crisis could bring the world to its knees; when over half a million people have lost their jobs in just the month of April. We need to move on to more important issues. http://worthanopinion/net
Jim Worth
Author, “Final Audit”

Posted by: Jim Worth | May 6, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

C’mon, 5 commercials before I could see the interview with Elizabeth Edwards? Maybe there was more…at 5 I disconnected. I know you need to get revenue to do this, but don’t turn it into TV.

Posted by: Sharene | May 6, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

C’mon folks, we have way too many important issues to think about now. Who care what she knew and when she knew it? Is that helping Joe Blow keep his job and house? I think not. Stick to the important issues people. Give the Edwards a break. They have their own problems and we have ours.

Posted by: Ron | May 6, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

One never knows what goes on behind closed doors! They (the Edwards) have to work out the situation and live with what they work out. Losing a child, having cancer, are hard steps to work through, and then infidelty is another. Like Elizabeth states each day is a new day. Smell the roses while you can.

Posted by: just me | May 6, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Elizabeth Edwards has A LOT on her mind, you know, cheating husband, dying & leaving really young children behind. I can live with it if she were fuzzy on the details.
Don’t be an ass (and I say that as loyal viewer). Leave the woman alone (and I say THAT as a lifelong Republican).
Use your power and influence to focus on something where you can make a positive difference, not on a sex scandal with an obsolete politician.

Posted by: wickedmess | May 6, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

I am still trying to get through all the advertisements…and some are repeats. This stinks.

Posted by: Rosemary | May 6, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

so sad that she kept it quiet. what a jerk he has turned out to be, so sad. shows you just never know…..

Posted by: KHC | May 6, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

My sympathy for Elizabeth in regard to that cheating no good is substantially waning as she continues to make disparaging remarks about one half of the “diddlying duo” and assessing all the fault to one person. Get a grip woman, you are making yourself look incredibly stupid. Why has there been no DNA test?

Posted by: Yankee | May 6, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Of course Mrs Edwards “knew”. Just like Hillary knew about Slick Willie’s proclivity for lusting after anything in a skirt & tight blouse. Let her peddle her book. All it proves is john edwards is a phony cad, just like bill clinton. You can always tell they are lying cause their lips are moving.

Posted by: jb | May 6, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

I didn’t see the interview with Elizabeth Edwards because of too many commercials. After 2 of them I just turn it off I thought I clicked the wrong button………..

Posted by: Caroline | May 6, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

ridiculous amount of commercials!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: joe | May 6, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

… some serious things that we…
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Give me one issue.
EDWARDS: Not on camera, I’m not going there.
======
George,
Sucker, stop interrupting people. If you had not interrupted this moron to give you an issue, he might have slipped it out.
Had that happened, HRC probably would have been the Pres.
Now, not only Iowans, you also owe the world an apology.

Posted by: two cats | May 6, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

I think it’s mostly the Hillary supporters who think that this issue is important. Had Edwards not been in the primaries — his voters would most likely have voted for Hillary — Edwards and Hillary were pretty close on most issues. It could have tipped the scales in the democratic primary and eventually the whole election. This is one of those little events that may very well have had a big impact on history.

Posted by: C'est la vie | May 6, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

It’s not fair to criticize Elizabeth Edwards for not revealing his affair when she found out. She was probably hurt. If your spouse wounded you in such a way, would you really want it broadcast around the world? As a Democrat I was livid at being decieved by him but everyone also needs to remember that she has a duty to protect her family first. She has the right to try and deal with the affair privately, like any other couple with children would/should want to do.

Posted by: Christina | May 6, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

I lasted through 10 30-second commercials before bailing out — I was curious to see how many would run, but now I realize it’s huge friggin waste of my time. Thanks, George. I’ll never follow any of your tweet links, ever, ever, ever again!

Posted by: joe | May 6, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

I think the fact that her book release and the investigation of her husband’s campaign expenses with the other woman coincide is a little suspicious. To be honest the only reason I was gonna vote for John Edwards the first time was due to a CSPAN townhouse – yest it was in someone’s house – that Mrs. Edwards held where she articulated quite well on health care. And no she wasn’t speaking of socializing it.
I really like her – even if he’s kinda swarmy.

Posted by: atlnative | May 6, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

am i the only one who thinks the news media are bending over backwards to protect john edwards by trashing his wife? how about the news media pointing the finger at themselves and asking the most important question…when did the news media get information about edwards’ affair and why did they wait to report it until after he was out of the presidential race?

Posted by: davidfrat21 | May 6, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

but, Christina, she didn’t protect her family! The Enquirer had been running stories about the affair for months before any legitimate news agency picked it up. In this Internet age, chances are the children were most likely privy to the rumors too.
Keeping quiet dragged the incident out longer then it had to. She knew of the affair and still publicly supported her husband’s presidential run knowing the Enquirer was on the story. Protecting the children would have been putting her foot down and refusing to support his run for president. That would have forced him to not put in a bid for president and in that case, the story would have been so trivial that most wouldn’t have paid attention. That would have protected the children.

Posted by: Mel | May 6, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

This video is not working. Keeps stalling on the ads.

Posted by: S | May 6, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Why the hell is this news? You’d think that she was the only person on earth that had a partner cheat on her. Either divorce the guy or get on with your life.

Posted by: noozreader | May 6, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Its good to see all of you are completely perfect and incapable of making mistakes and hurting other people. I know none of you have ever done that. Should John Edwards be held accountable for what he did? Yes. Was what he did wrong? You bet. Was he right to run for president? No way. He dropped out, the election went on, case closed. This is really a personal matter between the Edwards’. Human nature is complex. Who knows why people do what they do. Who’s to say John Edwards isn’t truely remorseful for what happened. Let these people deal with their own dirty laundry themselves. Everyone is seeing somebody else, physically or emotionally. Fact of life. You’ve all done it in one way or another, don’t lie.

Posted by: Ronnie James Dio | May 6, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

First of all the video isn’t working just the ad repeating over and over. The woman is very ill, she has children that will left behind, do you think that she wants to drag everyone through a divorce right now. I think she is making the best of a horrible deal for herself, bless that woman. Damn that man.

Posted by: Sharon | May 6, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

I will leave the woman alone if she keeps quiet about her family and the couple’s political life from now on. She can talk about her health and her fight against cancer but, by fooling ardent Democratic supporters and American people, neither she nor her husband deserves to be in the political spotlight any more.
In fact, she has yet to apologize to American people.
BTW, George, I am wondering when you are going to drop George Will from your Roundtable. He has caused a big controversy at Washington Post with his misinformation (or an outright lie?) about global warming. Now he is caught giving wrong information again at last Sunday’s Roundtable — see Washington Monthly’s “George Will Keeps Digging”. I enjoy quality analysis, conservative or liberal. This is what helps both our government and people make informed, sound decisions. However, George Will doesn’t seem interested in providing quality analysis. His ability to argue convincingly and forcefully just makes things worse for all of us.

Posted by: teddymaniac | May 6, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

I’m on my 9th commercial. This isn’t worth my time.
Regardless, I have to say I’m quite confused as to why this is being brought up now a year and a half later. And does it really matter?

Posted by: Rebecca | May 6, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

Seriously. WHO CARES what she knew and when. Let this family deal with their issues by themselves. I’d say we can all be better people and we should start by not scrutinizing others. How can you be a better person today? Not “what did so and so do wrong?”

Posted by: Scott | May 6, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Looks like Edwards is on his come back campain. Bet he runs for a new office soon. Bet he will be forgiven for what he did to his wife and win. After all a life of love is only worth the bed you sleep in if you are well, for him.

Posted by: Jim Rod | May 6, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Sorry, but Mrs Edwards knew full well the implications once this story had gotten out yet she went along with her husbands deceitfulness. This was about power and how to get it at any cost. I know people feel bad for her as do I. Cancer is a terrible thing, but that doesn’t mean she’s blameless because she’s not. Not only that he’s still lying, that kid is his and she most likely going along with that lie too.

Posted by: Sorry | May 6, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

As far as I know, Mrs. Edwards never gave a date as to when she knew, To some people days after could had been weeks. Leave her alone, we do not know what’s going on behind their walls

Posted by: lisa | May 6, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Look, people can call affairs private conduct, and for the most part they are….However, you cannot claim that a person deceiving the one person he has promised to love, honor and cherish doesn’t have relevance in the debate. It does. This guy is standing out there saying “trust me”. If your wife can’t trust you, then why should I???
Yes, things do happen in marriages that lead otherwise decent people to do bad things. The same holds true in politics — things happen. The question is, will you keep your integrity, your honor and your promises when those challenges arise??? An extramarital affair tells me a lot about what those answers will be.

Posted by: From TN | May 6, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

It’s surprising to see all these people saying “leave Mrs. Edwards alone”! We wouldn’t even be discussing this issue today if Mrs. Edwards hadn’t just released a book discussing this very issue!! And she’s making her rounds on the talk show circuit. Mrs. Edwards put it out there — she opened this topic up for discussion.

Posted by: Crazy Pen | May 6, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

I contributed money to both John Edward’s campaign runs. If I had know Elizabeth knew of the affair before his second run, I never would had contributed. How did either of them think they could keep it secret. You would think facing death you would just want to take care of your children. If he had not run the second time we may never had found out and his children would not have to be embarrassed.

Posted by: Ken | May 6, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Are we allowed to say that Elizabeth is a “stupid ####” for sticking by Edwards while he cheated donors of funds by giving them to his baby mama? Or are we only allowed to call Miss California that?

Posted by: Rick Cuevas | May 6, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Geez what some people won’t stoop to so that they can make a buck. I think both of the Edwards need to think about what kind of role model they are to their children. Both lied and are still lying re John being the father of that baby. So who would want to read a book of more lies? I don’t think either one of the Edwards are worth wasting time on.

Posted by: Janet P. | May 6, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

I love Ms. CA!! Why would you call Elizabeth a stupid ####? Stupid is her act. She’s getting away with it all… lying to everyone once again, through her new book and through public appearances, portraying herself and her husband as the ultimate victims of terrible tragedies, tugging on the foolish hearts of people who have been cheated on, and the cheaters too (which means just about everyone), hoping they’ll buy her book and her PR crap (which they will). She knew campaign money was being used to support her husbands’ affair, and she wanted us to make him President of the United States of America… the very same guy who we’re now supposed to believe is a helpless victim of a seducing woman (poor guy!). Hopefully, whatever evidence turns up will hold them both (Mr. and Mrs. Edwards) accountable in some way, and not for a stupid affair, but rather for deceiving millions of people! As for Rielle Hunter (and her fatherless child) why don’t we just call her Hester Prynne and force her and her daughter to wear an embroidered letter A on their bosom!

Posted by: RE | May 6, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

The oh so compassionate Democrats are so protective of women, unless of course… they aren’t Democrats.

Posted by: sherlock | May 6, 2009, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

It’s all a calculated move from Elizabeth. My empathy for her is lessen. As for John, I have no respect left for him.
What I don’t understand is when we want to hear the truth then, John would not talk and continued to lie and Elizabeth would stay silence about it also. Why now when it’s no longer matter and we no longer care? Why the book and the writing with the Time on her survival of this affair? What is she trying to do?
And another thing I don’t understand is why this woman mistress fell for John –he fools around while his wife is going through cancer treatment, what kind of a person does that to his wife and his family? The man has no regard for anybody else but himself.
What these 2 women had to go through to protect this guy is beyond my comprehension. It’s like they have no dignity and respect for themselves.

Posted by: michelle | May 6, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

So, George is saying the timeline is off. “Days” can mean a week or so.
It is obvious that she did not yet know about the affair when this interview took place. Does George want kudos for having the last interview with Elizabeth before she found out? Or, is he saying that she didn’t find out until the National Enquirer broke the story that all the networks refused to air?
George, if you are being coy at inferring something by this article, please be more specific and say what you mean to say.

Posted by: Mongo | May 6, 2009, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Good grief! What difference does it make? I am conservative and there is no way I would have voted for Edwards, but I feel tremendous sympathy for Mrs. Edwards and I don’t even like her.
None of us knows what we would do if faced with a similar situation. And none of us knows the pain that she is in and will probably stay in until the day she dies.

Posted by: deedee | May 6, 2009, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Poor, poor Puritanical and Innocent long suffering without sin Elizabeth Edwards makes me want to vomit!! She should be held accountable for lying to a nation of people who continued to contribute money to his campaign as a result of her campaigning on his behalf. She’s more pathetic than the rest of them put together, because she claims to be holier than thou and because she has this holier than all perspective! She makes me sick!

Posted by: re | May 6, 2009, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

How dare you try to deflect the blame from John to his wife. I am appalled. You must sleep well knowing you marginalized cheaters, whilst demonizing those struggling with cancer. Have you NO shame?

Posted by: sybilll | May 6, 2009, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

I think John Edwards is a terrible, awful human being for what he did to his wife and his children….and what he could have done to his party. However, I do not feel sorry for Mrs. Edwards. First, she has written a book about the events so her response to them is fair game. Second,it is almost like she is trying to rehabilitate him in some way. She says she thinks that the affair was a one night stand. Either that is unbelieveably naive (come on, the woman started working on his campaign after this “one night stand” and months later he was caught leaving her hotel room at 2:00am after he was there for at least a couple of hours) or she once again is trying to sell us a bill of goods.
This debate continues to be relevant because voters need to decide whether or not they want honorably people serving in public life of whether they are going to continue to tolerate liars b/c what they lied about was only “private conduct.”

Posted by: From TN | May 7, 2009, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Sorry for the typos….I meant “this debate continues to be relevant because voters need to decide whether or not they want honorable people serving in public life or whether they are going to continue to tolerate liars b/c what they lied about was only “private conduct”.

Posted by: From TN | May 7, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Dear Sybilll, I sleep very very well, thank you. Besides, who knows, maybe Mrs. Purity Elizabeth is to blame (at least partly) for the affair. Sex is a part of life honey, and he wasn’t gettin any, regardless of the reason. People are only human. But, it’s okay for her to lie to a nation (THIS IS A HUGE DEAL!), and now she wants people to buy her book and sad story about how “she” was victimized while she calls an innocent child an “it” (the only truly innocent party in this tragic tale, and maybe her own kids). But, I’m sure that Mrs. Purity sleeps well in the nice comfy home her husband has provided. Look, we all suffer in different ways, and we will all die eventually, but that does not absolve anyone of thier sins and responsiblities no matter how much they suffer from denial. In her unreality, she can continue to play the victim to anyone who will pay enough to listen. She is not the only woman in the world to have been cheated on, and you can trust that she has long since gotten over it, she is now only making money off of her situation. It’s one thing to truly be a victim of cheating, or to have honestly made a mistake and have an affair, but she’s clearly milking it. This makes her lack of integrity worse??

Posted by: re | May 7, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Obviously they were deeply uncomfortable with the probing questions you were asking. And now you’re surprised? Pleazzzzze. You feel betrayed. Just admit it.

Posted by: MyPomPomsAreBlue2 | May 7, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am

First let me say, that I feel sorry for all of the children involved..and I hope Mrs. Edwards recovers…however, she is a nasty piece of work…she was the real brains behind that campaign..make no mistake. Remember when she brought up Liz Cheney’s being gay on national tv, saying she was so compassionate for the Cheney’s and indicated that they must be so ashamed…again, I repeat..she is a nasty piece of work….

Posted by: Xango | May 7, 2009, 2:28 am 2:28 am

Elizabeth Edwards has been through alot. She seems a very admirable woman.
However, during the primaries she took on the role of a politician, at least by proxy. She was a proxy politician with very crucial knowledge that could have affected the whole primary process.
For me, the current discussion should not be about denigrating, or scorning EE, but should be about whether we were, in just one other of many instances, due to her silence, denied a true and honest process.

Posted by: Just Me | May 7, 2009, 3:23 am 3:23 am

I laugh at the people who write “leave Elizabeth alone, she has been through alot”. She wrote a freakin’ book! She is on a book tour! We forgot about her and her BreckGirl husband, but she keeps reminding us what a phony couple they were. A guy lecturing us on poverty asking $90,000 for a speech on poverty! Just go home, take care of your health and your children, divorce your herpes sore of a husband, use your law license to help others, but please stop asking us to respect your privacy when you keep talking about yourself for profit.

Posted by: karen | May 7, 2009, 5:58 am 5:58 am

Can we invoke a moratorium on future Dem lawyer power couples? Between the spin from the Clintons, Edwards and Obamas, I have had enough.
The Edwards are basically the poor man’s Clintons. The only advantage he ever had over Bill was that he actually made him some money, though in the most reprehensible fashion — using junk science to con gullible juries. His mark on the world will be that his specious lawsuits againts OB physicians caused C-section rates double – without any reduction in cerebral palsy.
This one ain’t hard to figure out. Their marriage was a complicated business arrangement. They were surely devoted to each other after a fashion, but he is attractive and she was plain and overweight. I am sure she tolerated a little discreet cheating. When the Rielle affair broke, it caused her public humiliation, which broke the code.
While I have mixed feelings about Elizabeth – and you have to temper your judgement to respect the pain that a dying woman is going through – I cannot summon the words to describe my contempt for John. He is the worst kind of Boomer — sanctimonious, preening, sleazy, disingenuous. How about that promise to send those kids from Green County to college? Never mind. How about fighting for the little man behind the walls of a 28K square foot house? How about continuing to deny his paternity of the child? I hope Rielle moves heaven and earth to make him take a paternity test to expose again what a lying weasel he is.
The media fell for Edwards – thought not as hard as they fell for Obama. Now that he is disgraced, they are kicking sand on his grave with the fury of a spurned 6th grade girl. What is terrible is that his awful left wing populism is now the currency of the Obama admin. So while he is personally disgraced, his bankrupt, outdated ideas live on…

Posted by: JohnBoy | May 7, 2009, 6:32 am 6:32 am

If you have an illness, you get a free pass on defrauded the American public, is that right? It is according to Democrats. So I guess if Hilter had cancer, then you would have to ‘leave him alone’ as well.

Posted by: Not Surprised | May 7, 2009, 7:27 am 7:27 am

It’s so simple with these two.
“Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

Posted by: Neil | May 7, 2009, 7:34 am 7:34 am

This is a bogus couple that ran a bogus campaign. JE swindled millions of dollars tricking foolish people sitting on a jury. The American people can be fooled and tricked so easily by these liberal democrats. The preach a false doomsday message(as if they care)(Al Gore and global warming, non-factory asbestos), then they try to make their subjects feel guilty, then it’s off to the bank to cash their checks. Stupid Americans!

Posted by: martin | May 7, 2009, 7:52 am 7:52 am

Anyone who believed John Edwards’ words the moment they tumbled from his smarmy mouth are willfully blind suckers of the worst kind.
Insincerity was so clearly, transparently dripping from every oily pore of this slugs body the mind reels that any breathing, think person could buy his brand of BS.

Posted by: Dan | May 7, 2009, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Sociopaths and narcissists are attracted to political life. The American public should learn how to spot them early in the election process….we cannot depend on the media to help us. Apparently they are not psychologically sophisticated enough to make obvious distinctions.
The Sociopath Next Door should be required reading for all voters.

Posted by: amitabha | May 7, 2009, 9:02 am 9:02 am

You are definitely correct, Dan, Sociopaths and narcissists are drawn to the admiration and power of political life. The Congress is filled with them and that is the main reason nothing is accoomplished there. It has become worse over time. I just told a friend last night that Congress needs to have a psychiatrist, psychologists and support groups in order to function. Help !!!

Posted by: Ron | May 7, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

I am appalled that EE is making the rounds on TV, magazines, radio, etc to promote her book on “the affair”. Why isn’t she protecting her children who don’t need to go through this publicly?
It seems neither of these people put their children nor family first. The children need protection from these parents who parade all of this in the public. I feel really sorry for these children, the older one and the two younger ones- they don’t deserve to suffer any more.

Posted by: catherine | May 7, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

I guess Elizabeth Edwards did not see the Oprah episode when Oprah revealed that she had had an affair with a married man. The funnier thing is that Elizabeth Edwards is due to appear on The View next week. This is funny because Barbara Walters was on that Oprah episode when she too revealed an affair with a married man, and not just a regular married man, but with U.S. Senator Edward Brooke!!! What will Elizabeth Edwards and Barbara Walters talk about, will they compare notes? If EE refuses to call Hunter by her name, what will she call Barbara? This is priceless!

Posted by: re | May 7, 2009, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

I was a Field Organizer for Senator John Edwards during the Iowa Caucus. There I campaigned for the causes that Senator Edwards championed. He may be morally flawed like everyone else in the world but he was right about the issues and took up issues that other Democrats were afraid of. Poverty has been a lost word in the Democrats lexicon for years until Senator Edwards brought the issue to the forefront of the national debate. His run for president, forced Obama and Clinton to move to the left on the issue of the economy, health care, corporate interest and corporate greed, and the issues of lobbyist influence. I am very proud and thankful for Senator Edwards to champion these issues and forcing the other leading candidates to stake out issues that they would not have if he had not run. While he may have been destroyed politically, his mark on changing the debate on the issues did not. If I had to do the experience again, I would have.
By the way, Clinton and Edwards were not close on the issues before Iowa. It was not until after his exit did Senator Clinton take the more populist stance in attempt to capture his voters. He was way to the left of her on the issues and his supporters were in the group that wanted “change.” Exit polls of Edwards supporters showed that they identified Obama as their second choice preference by a good amount over Clinton. If he was not in the race, President Obama would have won Iowa by an even larger margin. Senator Clinton lost to Senator Obama fair and square. Her lost was predetermined by the stances she took and the campaign staff she surrounded herself with. Clinton supporters need not to look to Senator Edwards as a excuse for losing but to themselves for the campaign they run and the excellent campaign that Obama run.

Posted by: JAB | May 10, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Am I the only one commenting who has read EE’s “Resilience” cover-to-cover? I was amazed by her willingness to share such intimate details and feelings. To hear the ugly jabs by Donaldson and Roberts was particularly upsetting. In the words of EE, I now have a “new reality”–about EVERYTHING!

Posted by: CRT | May 11, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Let me get this straight — John Edwards made millions being a slick trial lawyer who twisted words and manipulated juries, yet he is seduced, against his aw shucks we’re just normal folk character, by four little words, and it was his first affair — right. I have four words for Elizabeth Edwards – please stop your lying.

Posted by: Connie | May 18, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

There are millions of women in America who are cheated on. I would rather read an honest book about their journeys than a book written by a woman who lives in a sprawling mansion, has millions in the bank, who uses her personal trials to pursue public attention. I am so tired of the Elizabeth Edwards pity party. So he cheated on you, are you really surprised? Do you really believe it was his first? I mean, really, look at yourself. And I don’t just mean physically.

Posted by: mphsnme | May 18, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

When one of the millions of women in America who are single handledly raising children, battling illnesses,and dealing with a cheating husband, who go to work every single day, writes a book about how to deal with life’s adversities, I will read it. I might even write the book myself. But I have no interest in reading a book written by a woman who has millions in the bank, lives with her husband in a 35,000 square foot home on 100 acres (that would be like me living on one end of the block and he on the other), whose husband cheats on her (and Elizabeth no one believes it was just one time, stop lying), who does not work, just sits back and smugly and spitefully in interviews tries to destroy the woman her husband slept with because he didn’t get it at home. Elizabeth stop looking at the other woman and look at yourself. If a man wants to cheat he will. And no little videographer is going to undo a slick trial lawyer with four little words. Please.

Posted by: Connie | May 19, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.