By Jennifer Parker

May 10, 2009 10:16am

Edwards Staff Had Affair ‘Doomsday’ Strategy

During our Roundtable discussion on "This Week" we discussed Elizabeth Edwards’ candid interview with Oprah about her husband’s affair.

ABC contributor George Will suggested former Sen. John Edwards was irresponsible to campaign for the Democratic Party nomination.

"Think about what a tragedy it would have been if he had won?" Will said.

I’ve talked to a lot of former Edwards staffers about this. Up until December of 2007, most on Edwards’ staff didn’t believe rumors about the affair.

But by late December, early January of last year, several people in his inner circle began to think the rumors were true.

Several of them had gotten together and devised a "doomsday" strategy of sorts.

Basically, if it looked like Edwards was going to win the Democratic Party nomination, they were going to sabotage his campaign, several former Edwards’ staffers have told me.

They said they were Democrats first, and if it looked like Edwards was going to become the nominee, they were going to bring down the campaign.

–George Stephanopoulos

User Comments

Clearly we should impeach Kennedy, Roosevelt, and Eisenhower. Death is no excuse and affairs outside of marriage are far more serious than invading countries not responsible for attacking us and devising and implementing torture policies.
Gotta keep those priorities in proper order, you know?

Posted by: jan | May 10, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

“A lot of former Edwards staffers”.
More irresponsible anonymous sources. When will real journalists reappear and these blow dried air heads stop disseminating whatever the corporations want you to believe. If you can’t name the source or give a good reason for witholding their names, you don’t use the information.

Posted by: cleveyucks | May 10, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Not good enough–if the news broke after the nomination and before the general–WE would have been doomed. I am beyond thankful that these selfish people did not have the opportunity to become leaders in the party.

Posted by: Mea | May 10, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am

If a man can’t keep a sacred vow to his wife and family to be faithful, how can he be trusted to keep his sacred vow to uphold and defend the Constitution?
I know it will sound too simple to some but honoring your word is what character and integrity is all about. It really is that simple. While I’d prefer John Edwards was CinC over Obama right now (who also allegedly cheated on Michelle) there are much better choices, none of whom made it beyond the primaries unfortunately.

Posted by: Oh Please | May 10, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Oh yeah. Thomas Jefferson too.

Posted by: jan | May 10, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Edwards did a good enough job of sabotaging himeself. He was arrogant and vain enough to think the press wouldn’t find out and they always do. So Elizabeth Edwards is out there now practically blaming Rielle Hunter for the affair and reffering to the baby that very likely is John Edwards’ baby as “it”. Meanwhile The Enquirer is reporting that Hunter may allow the baby to have a DNA test to see whether the baby is Edwards’. Why Elizabeth wrote a book over this is beyond reasoning. If she wanted to undergo some kind of therapy, she should have gone to a therapist. Maybe in some kind of twisted way, Elizabeth is trying to revive her husband’s career. As harsh as it may sound, her terminal cancer doesn’t make her immune from aiding and abetting an image of the all-American happy family knowing full-well that both she and her husband were scamming the electorate.

Posted by: Steamboater | May 10, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am

Should we add George Washington to the impeachment list as well? It would appear a possibility that he had an affair and since we’re currently carefully sorting through and shunning all potential sin and sinners…
…Perhaps we should erase Washington and Jefferson’s signatures from the constitution as well? Clearly if they they were morally unfit and unworthy to uphold and defend the constitution they were also unfit and unworthy to sign it…

Posted by: jan | May 10, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

After all, if we’re going to point fingers we might as well be thorough.

Posted by: jan | May 10, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am

I think we’re missing the point here. It’s not about the affair, that was just the “bullet”. The important point here is that Edwrdas’ own staffers were not his supporters. I know many managers who have built organizations under them that are fundamentally not behind the mission. Those managers, AND the people under them, collectively and individually, are doomed to fail. We should be critical of Edwards for the affair, perhaps, but more so for his leadership abilities. And we also need to see his staff for what they are: political weasels that glom onto things not because of the mission but because of the position. They are just as despicable, and if I were them, I would be “anonymous” too.

Posted by: AngelaBoston | May 10, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

John Edwards is an idiot, period.

Posted by: Steve | May 10, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

It a no brainer why John Edwards wife didn’t leave him. INSURANCE If she is dieing of cancer where would her health care expences come from?
80% of the people that have insurance maybe happy but ask the people that do not have insurance feel about there insurance.

Posted by: dewdah | May 10, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

I am wondering why Clinton’s affairs during his Presidential campaigns didn’t get treated this way. What makes Edwards different from the Clintons?

Posted by: mrs. ruby | May 10, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

This whole story is illogical. If your man is unelectable, get out of the campaign now. Don’t wait to shoot him down at dawn. Unless you need the job and the money, I don’t see why anyone would prostitute themselves in this way.

Posted by: Mr. Sampson | May 10, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Overall, I think this is yet another indicator/reminder of how far to the right the country has gone under republican leadership and how stupid we, as a people, are.
You can’t really fault him for staff that isn’t loyal and I really wonder, if his staff didn’t think he was the best person for the job, why they went to work for him in the first place?
We just spent 8 years with what some, not me, would consider moral leadership. At this point, I think I would rather vote for a heathen. They can’t be any bigger liars than the so-called “christians”.

Posted by: jan | May 10, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Well said Steamboater!

Posted by: Old School Woman | May 10, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

What I’m wondering is why Democratic adulterers are treated so very differently from Republican adulterers. McCain, Giuliani, Gingrich…why aren’t their political careers over?

Posted by: SalmonGirl | May 10, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

If you are willing to lie to the person you say you most love in the world… you morals, and integrity are in the dumper. I am so thankful he didnt win. And for the record, we all know that baby is his. Why would he have bothered to go see it at that hotel several times. I bet money he is shutting up Rielle HUnter by telling her be quiet and when Elizabeth dies we will be together. He is a jerk. We dont need another jerk as president.

Posted by: Wendyful | May 10, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Oh please God let this all end. Men for the most part are not marriage material. But what else do we have to choose from? The pain they inflict is severe and long lasting, I know.

Posted by: Sick of all of this | May 10, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

the reason the other men didnt get shafted is because they admitted they were jerks in the last marriage when asked about it except edwards and the clintons..they denied denied till they couldnt deny nomore for the sake of moving up the ladder for hillary >>
she played the marriage lie card just long enough to stay up there somehow>> the only good thing out of the clintons lies is they have a great daughter!
edwards wife shouldnt drudge up old wounds to us the public because she chose to stay with him no matter what its a lose situation for her because she will not live long enough and she didnt need to go out showing her kids the anger she has for her husband to their kids and oprah and the model chick tara need to quit thinking all women need to keep hearing about this over and over again because we are all tired of them telling us we needed to know >>again>>> we could care less about palins daughters almost husband levi side of the story but we had to listen to that dysfunctional families story so we could maybe feel sorry for them ( not ! ) taras just mad that the palins are smart enough to keep that dysfunctional family out of their lives as much as possible>> see they try to live functional and everyone brings them down for not wanting the dyfunctional family to hang around them!! i am sad this happened to edwards wife and children but enough is enough >> he found out his wife was dying and he fell in love with another woman and had a child with her and maybe not in the proper way case closed>> he may of gone around it the wrong way completely the wrong way but it happened so time to leave them alone now and let her pass in peace with what she feels she has left in her own dignity>> overwriting on this issue and over analyizing on their family imperfections is just sad > he should of said im sorry i fell in love with someone way before you passed away>> i am a jerk but apologize and mean it and get on with life and leave them alone already! his career is over and giving him more tv time just might think we should let them revise it ( not )….

Posted by: pat | May 10, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

I campaigned for John, I contributed to his campaign with money as well and I felt betrayed. He was selfish and irresponsible! The fact he had the affair is non of my business but the way he misled all of us, covered up and denied was arrogant and awful. It shows his lack of character, oh well…most politicians are liers anyway! Look at Polosi now? She is horrible too.

Posted by: James_Chgo | May 10, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

In a society where marriage vows are really not taken all that seriously it can be argued that extramarital affairs do not reflect all that strongly on a candidate’s ability to conduct foreign or domestic policy. It can also be argued that, from a political point of view, EVERYONE takes those vows seriously when the extramarital affair involves a person with whom we disagree — Craig, Foley, Edwards,Clinton etal.
Certainly, if extramarital excursions are not material to a leader’s ability to perform his public duties, it should logically follow that simply admitting to them should be relatively cost free. But no matter how immaterial extramarital activities are (or should be), lying is and will always be material to the way the public views a leader.
And in the end, a politician who willfully places himself in the middle of a blatant lie betrays weaknesses even more devastating than dishonesty. He openly displays contempt for those he would lead, and stupidity of the highest order.

Posted by: mrdon | May 10, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

This is the least credible report I’ve ever heard. Maybe George is just guilty that his former boss was screwin anything that walked and wants to beleive the Edwards folks had higher standards. His inner circle knew, and they hoped it wouldn’t come out. This story is a lie.

Posted by: Republocrat22 | May 10, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Wall of text! For the love of god. If you’re going to make a point, use a freakin comma or period every now and then.

Posted by: JohnyWood | May 10, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Give me a brake folks. Yes, Edwards is guilty. I’m partly blind, but not that blind to know he hurt his beautiful wife the most. His wife is fighting the biggest battle of her life for any women. To rip her emotional feelings, what little she has left away was the biggest disgrace of his life. As for politics and life in general. People have extra affairs everyday. Some folks get caught, and some as we type may still be having under the table affairs. I’m willing to bet you, some of those folks who are sitting around saying “what a disgraced for this to happen” maybe themselves having an extra affair. This happens all the time. Beautiful women and drinks or handsome men and women needs. I’m sure we have not heard the last of extra affairs. But, I hope we heard the last of scum’s hurting your love one, mainly, when they are down and out.

Posted by: Pedro | May 10, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Sorry, I do not buy this story. If indeed the staffers were going to sabotage his campaign, then they did a lousy job of it because the news broke after the election. Edwards could have well been the VP.
All that said, it does not disqualify Edwards from the VP nor does it excuse his behavior. Personally, I have lost a lot of respect for him. Gingrich, McCain, Giuliani and the other adulterers are all cut from teh same cloth.

Posted by: HISHONOR | May 10, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

First of all, I agree with other posts here regarding the validity of the report. Secondly, you George have lost a ton of credibility for your constant habit of inviting a majority of GOP or right wing pundits and observers on your show. This seems very troubling since they clearly lost the last two elections and poll numbers show how out of tune they are with the country. Ergo your staff and show are also out of touch with the very people you profess to serve. Very disappointing from a man that I once admired.

Posted by: Donnygull | May 10, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

If a man of power does not have the personal self control to keep the sacred vow he made to his wife in the presence of God and Family, then he needs to be smart enough to cover his @ss and make d-a-m-n sure he doesn’t get caught.

Posted by: Jolat | May 10, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Edwards was unfaithful to is wife – then tried to cover it up- then tried to say that he had the affair while his wife was in remission- like somehow thats ok because she was in remission- then it came out that the cancer had returned and was now incurable- he tried to justify it but you cant. He is full of himself – His arrogance is obvious. It seems that Hunter did pursue him, but he could have and should have walked away. It seems he also told his wife it was short affair and over, but then he went back for more. Elizabeth has to do what she feels is best- but the choices are horrible. Hunter and John should both be ashamed of themselves- affairs are never good but his wife has very limited days left and instead of enjoying the short remainder of her life – she has to deal with this nonsense!

Posted by: Angela | May 10, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

SalmonGirl said “What I’m wondering is why Democratic adulterers are treated so very differently from Republican adulterers. McCain, Giuliani, Gingrich…why aren’t their political careers over? ” Maybe you need a history lesson… what about Clinton & Kennedy? (And Gingrich took some major hits for his affair(s)). It’s not about Republican & Democrat. I’m just trying to figure out why some candidates of either party get slammed while others don’t.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | May 10, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

More likely D.C. insiders versus outsiders.
Clinton was an outsider. Jimmy Carter who didn’t have an affair was also an outsider and he was attacked without much mercy for anything and everything.
I’m trying to figure out how a person cheating on his wife should be declared an enemy of the state and have his career destroyed while the people who devised and implemented torture are invited on all the A-list talk shows and suffer no penalties. Should we call it twisted values?…

Posted by: jan | May 10, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

He is not the first ,won’t be the last ….Making a big deal out of this is crazy…..She think he is any different then any other man being handed this on a silver platter and you think a normal human will say No thank you?????????

Posted by: NH voter | May 10, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

I agree with many of the comments above.Before Clinton got elected, he had an affair with Jennifer Flowers and lied about it to his wife and the public too. In fact, Clinton was a serial cheater. Seems like no one worried so much then about the character of the presidency. Hmmm? Perhaps the difference is here that Hillary used Bill and Bill used Hillary to get where they are. And Elizabeth has cancer which was thrown into the occasion.
And what about Edwards/Hunter love child? The baby girl is the spitting image of him. It would show more character if he would own up to the fact that he fathered this child and shows some responsibility toward that child’s future. People make mistakes, but they should own up to them.
Of course, Obama said he wouldn’t want his daughters saddled with a mistake if they had an unwanted pregnancy so they should just kill the babies before they are born. That shows real character too. Get rid of the little creature. At least Reille took responsibility and allowed her daughter to be born. That to me shows she has some character at least.

Posted by: Fran | May 10, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Hillary Clinton would have won the nomination if Edwards had not run. Edwards took votes away from Clinton.

Posted by: Sally J | May 10, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

oh please, who says they are “sacred”? because a guy in a funny hat says “so help you god”? I could care less where he parked his “car”, i’m more concerned with the actions taken that actually mean something (like oh…invading a country that was literally insignificant). Fran, better to be non existant than to be born, abused, destroyed mentally and then a drain when they later get incarcerated.

Posted by: rayhagermanniraqvet | May 10, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

The problem Edwards had was lying about the affair.
The Clinton problem wasn’t the affair, but lying about it, under oath, during a deposition in a sexual harassment case.

Posted by: Charlie | May 10, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

the people who devised and implemented torture are invited on all the A-list talk shows and suffer no penalties. Should we call it twisted values?…
Jan,
The interrogation techniques you refered to where devised long before President Bush took office. Those actions you refer to as torture are also used on our Aircrew and Special Forces at SERE school.
Me and my buddies do not believe we were tortured so perhaps your perspective needs a little adjusting.

Posted by: David | May 10, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Jan is looking more and more like John Edwards’ sockpuppet. Who would actually defend this man at this point? What he has done to his supporters is indefensible. What he has said about his child in the press is going to haunt her for the rest of her life.

Posted by: w3 | May 10, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

What great character these lackeys showed! They were prepared if necessary to sabotage Edwards’s campaign for the sake of their party (not their country), but they didn’t mind taking his money in the meantime. Then, later, they tell Steffi that they weren’t really complicit in Edwards’s cover-up because they had a “doomsday scenario” all along. Profiles in courage, all.

Posted by: E. O'Neal | May 10, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Bush/Cheney were the first to make them official state policy. Need I remind you that we have participated in prosecuting former national leaders for very similar things, latest coming to mind being Milosevic. I assume you approved of prosecuting Milosevic. Is that incorrect?
Attempts to impress me with the military thing which I have heard before from other sources won’t work. Neither does attempts to change terminology and setting. I guess you think “those actions” were the military’s idea of weekend entertainment or lack of anything better to do?
My perspective is just fine. Your’s on the other hand…

Posted by: jan | May 10, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Loving someone does not mean mapping out every single day of your life and theirs with excruciating exactitude…
If you love someone, you love someone. Period. This does not guarantee a house of a certain square footage; children together of a certain IQ level, or any of the things the mind would like to cling to as security. And for each year “married” (as Elizabeth Edwards claims to be), one does not earn “points” toward some type of future security. If you want that type of guarantee, join a customer loyalty program for a free toaster…
If you love someone, that love is everlasting, no matter the forms your lives take. Perhaps after 20 years your beloved wants to join the priesthood…move to Fiji… tattoo their whole body. Is this “betrayal”? If you love someone, it is effortless. If you try to force an ideal of marriage on someone– now THAT is effortful. Love and anger are mutually exclusive.I think Elizabeth Edwards is in love… with the idea of security; with the idea of marriage she cooked up herself. But not with John Edwards.

Posted by: J. Ouyang888 | May 10, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Jan,
Perhaps you forgot the Bataan Death March, or the treatment the Vietnam POW’s recieved. I believe those were Official State Policies that actually can be defined as torture.
But if you need a Democratic State example; Winston Churchill permitted much harsher techniques than water boarding for Nazi prisoners.

Posted by: David | May 10, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

George.. if you are going to write articles worthy of the National Inquirer, why don’t you start investigating a person by the name of Vera Baker (the woman that everyone says Obama had an affair with)??
ABC has become ridiculous and have lost all credibility with the stories they come out with. Don’t you have anything better to report?

Posted by: mjl | May 10, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Jan,
Milosovic was guilty of commiting genocide not waterboarding. No one died at Gitmo.
You need help if this is what you believe to be a fair comparison.

Posted by: David | May 10, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Apples and oranges/Strawmen/Whatever you want to call it…
Bataan Death March-were we the marchers or the marchees? Hmm… Let.me.see…
Vietnam POWs-did the U.S. torture McCain and the rest of them or was it the North Vietnamese?
Winston Churchill-was he an American? Oddly enough, I thought my history books said he was the British Prime Minister?
Like I said. Apples and oranges. Strawmen of your own making. My perspective and my education, thank you very much, is just fine.

Posted by: jan | May 10, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

I guess you think “those actions” were the military’s idea of weekend entertainment or lack of anything better to do?
No Jan, I think those were the Military’s way of preparing me to deal with techniques the enemy might try to force information out of me.
The treatment was not pleasant for sure but did not come even close to the definition of torture.
I can assure you that they left no detrimental effects, actually they left me with an improved level of confidence not only in my abilities but also in the abilities of our interrogators.

Posted by: David | May 10, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Apples and oranges/Strawmen/Whatever you want to call it…
You were the one that brought up Milosovic.
Hypocrosy, thy name is Jan
And by the way we were the Marchers (many of whom died) in the Bataan Death March,

Posted by: David | May 10, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

They way many of Hillary’s campaign workers performed, I’d swear they deliberately sabotaged her campaign.
Also, if it’s such a “tragedy” that an adulterer could win the Democrat nomination, then why didn’t any of you in the media look into Vera Baker?
You all went to Alaska and were tipping over the Palin’s garbage cans looking for dirt. Meanwhile an attractive, mid level Obama campaign worker abruptly quit the most important election campaign in the history of the universe right when history was being made. She was the only person to quit Obama’s campaign for crying out loud! And she flew the coop to live in isolation on a puny Caribbean Island, instead of being an important part of history and cashing in on her hard work the way Obama’s other staffers have done.
Think about that! You Liberal media activists all flew to Alaska in the beginning of Winter to harass the Repub candidate, when you could have flown to the sunny Caribbean to ask Vera Baker if she and Obama were having an affair.
No story there!
The media did such a pathetic job vetting Obama, that you can say they never even bothered to vet the guy. Instead, they chose to cover up for him and take out his opponents for him.

Posted by: OxyCon | May 10, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia charged Milošević with crimes against humanity, violating the laws or customs of war, grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions and genocide for his role during the wars in Croatia, Bosnia, and Kosovo.
Definitions.
“Crimes against humanity, as defined by the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Explanatory Memorandum, “are particularly odious offences in that they constitute a serious attack on human dignity or grave humiliation or a degradation of one or more human beings. They are not isolated or sporadic events, but are part either of a government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. Murder, extermination, torture, rape, political, racial, or religious persecution and other inhumane acts reach the threshold of crimes against humanity only if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice. Isolated inhumane acts of this nature may constitute grave infringements of human rights, or depending on the circumstances, war crimes, but may fall short of falling into the category of crimes under discussion.”
“The law of war (also law of armed conflict, LOAC) is law concerning acceptable practices relating to war.”
And last but NOT least that quaint, antiquated law that we used to observe but which we ignore now because some apparently think we are so superior that we are entitled to make or change laws unilaterally.
“The Geneva Conventions consist of four treaties formulated in Geneva, Switzerland, that set the standards for international law for humanitarian concerns. These four treaties are the basis for humanitarian law across the world.
They chiefly concern the treatment of the wounded, civilians, shipwrecked and prisoners of war. They do not affect the use of weapons in war, which are covered by the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 and the Geneva Protocol on the use of gas and biological weapons of 1925 (The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees is also referred to as “the Geneva Convention”, but it is not part of these four).”

Posted by: jan | May 10, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Charlie said “The Clinton problem wasn’t the affair, but lying about it, under oath, during a deposition in a sexual harassment case.” But that is the point… Clinton not only lied about his many affairs under oath, but started lying before he was ever elected President. And yet, he still got elected. The Democratic party was thrilled to have him. So why is/was John Edwards being treated as though he murdered someone (although that very issue hasn’t stopped Edward Kennedy from being elected to the Senate)?

Posted by: ellsbells930 | May 10, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

OxyCon,
The prisoners at Gitmo do not fall under the provisions of the Geneva conventions.
Actually firing squads are permitted for personel operating in the manner that they were found in.
So if a law does not apply how are we ignoring it?

Posted by: David | May 10, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

I thought I was showing restraint to you in my replies, David. It would seem that was a waste of time.
Maybe they never heard of the Bataan Death March in the big city schools, however I was educated in small city schools where the teacher student ratio was much more favorable and where both parents and teachers actually cared how well their students did.

Posted by: jan | May 10, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Oops,
the last reply was for Jan
Sorry, OxyCon

Posted by: David | May 10, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Jan,
You asked if we were the Marchers or Marchees, so I assumed you were not familiar with the Bataan Death march
You compared Milosovic to President Bush and then complained when I gave examples that were outside of the U.S.
I was educated in Small town schools as well. Hypocrosy is not related to where you got your education.
Exactly what crimes against humanity does waterboarding fall under by the way.

Posted by: David, | May 10, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Jan,
The prisioners at Gitmo are classified as unlawful combatants.
The Geneva conventions were meant to protect LAWFUL COMBATMANTS.
Regardless of their classification waterboarding is NOT torture.
Every year I have to receive training on the Law of Armed Conflict.
I also received the treatment that the Gitmo prisoners received.
So which one of us has more credibility in this manner?

Posted by: David | May 10, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Waterboarding is torture. It is immoral. It is a crime.
It is extremely unfortunate that you clearly see nothing wrong with it and crystal clear that we aren’t going to come to anything that resembles common ground. Bye David.

Posted by: jan | May 10, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

I meant matter not manner in the final word of my last post

Posted by: David | May 10, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Jan,
“Waterboarding is torture. It is immoral. It is a crime.”
Just saying something is a crime or immoral does not make it so.
Jan; again, I recieved the treatment so which one of us has more credibility on this matter?

Posted by: David | May 10, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Goodbye Jan,
Just try to remember who is protecting your right to free speech.
And I will try to remember that even speech I disagree with is worth defending.

Posted by: David | May 10, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Funny, Bill Clinton’s staffers,like Mr. Stephanopoulous, never thought that way about his affairs.

Posted by: Jeremy | May 10, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

The ol’ “you won’t agree with me so your family couldn’t possibly have had and/or lost any service members over the years” argument. Um hmmm. Right.

Posted by: jan | May 10, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

It seems that my post with a link regarding the Bataan Death march was deleted.
so her is an excerpt from the link:
“The march, involving the forcible transfer of 75,000 American and Filipino prisoners of war[1] captured by the Japanese in the Philippines from the Bataan peninsula to prison camps, was characterized by wide-ranging physical abuse and murder, and resulted in very high fatalities inflicted upon the prisoners and civilians along the route by the armed forces of the Empire of Japan. Beheadings, cut throats and casual shootings were the more common and merciful actions — compared to bayonet stabbings, rapes, disembowelments, numerous rifle butt beatings and a deliberate refusal to allow the prisoners food or water while keeping them continually marching for nearly a week (for the slowest survivors) in tropical heat. Falling down, unable to continue moving was tantamount to a death sentence, as was any degree of protest or expression of displeasure.”
Jan, made a comment about whether we were the marcher or the marchees. Well I think that too many people are forgetting history and need to be reminded of what real torture is like.
That is PERSPECTIVE Jan

Posted by: David | May 10, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

What a bunch of liars . Many of them had to know and all of them had to suspect and none of them would have sunk his campaign .

Posted by: nat turner | May 10, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

The ol’ “you won’t agree with me so your family couldn’t possibly have had and/or lost any service members over the years” argument. Um hmmm. Right
No Jan,
My arguement is that I have direct experience in the matter and a much deeper investment in the outcome of the discussion.

Posted by: David | May 10, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

By the way Jan,
Bill Clinton was president when I went to SERE School.
Is he guilty of implementing torture
Be carefull how you answer.

Posted by: David | May 10, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Edwards is an idiot but this also shows just how disloyal and backstabbing democrats are. They took a paycheck from Edwards while planning to ruin him. We have some of those people in the White House now and the rest of the weasles are on MSNBC.

Posted by: robtr | May 10, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

David, you’d consider it torture if our enemies were doing it to us. Stop being such a hypocrite. Only Bush and Cheney made torture military policy.

Posted by: Harold Broad | May 10, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

“I also received the treatment that the Gitmo prisoners received.” And it obviously had an effect on you.

Posted by: Martin H | May 10, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

In 1901, an Army major was sentenced to 10 years at hard labor when found guilty of the criminal act of waterboarding a Phillippino insurgent. In 1968, a U.S. soldier who had been photographed assisting in the waterboarding of a North Vietnamese prisoner was court-martialed in a military court and “drummed out of the Army”.After World War II, Japanese officers who inflicted waterboarding were prosecuted as war criminals by the United States. The legal charges included:
Specification 5. That between 1 April, 1943 and 31 December, 1943, the accused Yukio Asano, did, willfully and unlawfully, brutally mistreat and torture John Henry Burton, an American Prisoner of War, by beating him; and by fastening him head downward on a stretcher and forcing water into his nose.
(Thus, in an American court, was waterboarding cited as a crime of mistreatment and torture.)
In an international court, Japanese who committed waterboarding were executed for it.

Posted by: Just saying | May 10, 2009, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

This story reeks of CYA. The staffers don’t want to be accused of being either complicit or oblivious.
Hence the doomsday scenario……

Posted by: mad | May 10, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

“David”, I am still in the military, and on active service.
I find it hard to believe you were, or are.
You are a shame to the fighting men of our country.

Posted by: Hawk | May 10, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

The Bataan death march was not torture. It was reprehensible, but it was a deliberate act of military attrition. It was not willful application of pain in order to gain information. It doesn’t make it right. It was just never torture.

Posted by: Hawk | May 10, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

If you cheat in a marriage you are a cheat in everything else and can’t be trusted.

Posted by: Marshgirl8380 | May 10, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

I was a Field Organizer for Senator John Edwards during the Iowa Caucus. There I campaigned for the causes that Senator Edwards championed. He may be morally flawed like everyone else in the world but he was right about the issues and took up issues that other Democrats were afraid of. Poverty has been a lost word in the Democrats lexicon for years until Senator Edwards brought the issue to the forefront of the national debate. His run for president, forced Obama and Clinton to move to the left on the issue of the economy, health care, corporate interest and corporate greed, and the issues of lobbyist influence. I am very proud and thankful for Senator Edwards to champion these issues and forcing the other leading candidates to stake out issues that they would not have if he had not run. While he may have been destroyed politically, his mark on changing the debate on the issues did not. If I had to do the experience again, I would have.
By the way, Clinton and Edwards were not close on the issues before Iowa. It was not until after his exit did Senator Clinton take the more populist stance in attempt to capture his voters. He was way to the left of her on the issues and his supporters were in the group that wanted “change.” Exit polls of Edwards supporters showed that they identified Obama as their second choice preference by a good amount over Clinton. If he was not in the race, President Obama would have won Iowa by an even larger margin. Senator Clinton lost to Senator Obama fair and square. Her lost was predetermined by the stances she took and the campaign staff she surrounded herself with. Clinton supporters need not to look to Senator Edwards as a excuse for losing but to themselves for the campaign they run and the excellent campaign that Obama run.

Posted by: JAB | May 10, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

It’s nice to think that these anonymous staffers would have been looking out for their political party and presumably the general public by not having such a fatally flawed candidate advance to one of the two potential presidential contest winners. However, it sounds a little self-serving to me that they claim this now. Presumably, they didn’t tell Edwards about this and continued to cash paychecks from his campaign. If this is true, they should have gone to Edwards and told him to drop out or they’d break the story. Continuing to work on his campaign while planning to betray him was dishonorable towards Edwards and led to his donors wasting their money.

Posted by: Jill | May 10, 2009, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

What about the contributors?
Was it okay with Edwards’ campaign operatives to raise money for what was clearly a doomed campaign, or did they disclose their terminal doubts about Edwards before people sent their donations?
Who benefited from the donations? Not Edwards. The disloyal campaign rats, that’s who. It paid for the ad buys and their immense commissions. It paid their salaries and expenses.
So the idea was, keep raising and spending money, and then sink the campaign if it looked like they were going to win? These are “loyal Democrats?”
What awful people. I hope none of them are running our lives now in Washington.

Posted by: Vail Beach | May 10, 2009, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

How can John Edwards even look her in the eye, or she in his? The very fact that he can do this proves to me what a two-faced liar politician he is. And as for his wife…. it must be the money.

Posted by: Rick in SB | May 11, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

A public life can be disastrous to a relationship and vica-versa. The Edward’s are hardly a new event, just another link in the chain of human fraility that marks the world and disappoints all of us. I pray that they can forgive each other and start anew. Otherwise, a one time event can have lasting consequences to a very nice family!

Posted by: Dave of Detroit | May 11, 2009, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Yeah, Democrats are a real classy group.

Posted by: Mike | May 11, 2009, 1:18 am 1:18 am

The thing that was so damaging about this affair is the the Edwards put forth that they were the perfect and devoted couple, recovering from earlier tragedy, having adorable children, and then standing up to her cancer diagnosis and treatment as a team. Back when there were many Democratic candidates in the early primaries, I found myself rooting for him. Nobody was really surprised when Bill Clinton’s dalliances came to light, but what a kick to the stomach to hear of his affair, given the seriousness of her cancer. He seemed so earnest and good natured. What a waste.

Posted by: Carol Wright | May 11, 2009, 1:38 am 1:38 am

Carol Wright – so Clinton’s affairs were okay because we all knew he was a sleezebag? But Edwards’ wasn’t because you thought he was a nice guy? Either affairs are wrong or they aren’t. And as much as I think both men are losers because of it and adultery is a really big sin, I’m not getting all the fuss considering a murderer is revered as a “saint” in the Senate.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | May 11, 2009, 6:37 am 6:37 am

You’re right, George! these men should be hailed as heroes for being “Democrats first” and vowing to sabotage John’s campaign if it looked like he might win! I’m sure that they also took the time to return all the money that Americans contributed to help John try to win the nomination—not knowing that a group of people were going to insure that didn’t happen because of scandel! Because THOSE are real democrats! They should have a democratic ‘hall of fame’ for those guys! Keep taking money for a lost cause—REAL DEMOCRATS!

Posted by: Winch41 | May 11, 2009, 7:01 am 7:01 am

Mea wrote:
“If a man can’t keep a sacred vow to his wife and family to be faithful, how can he be trusted to keep his sacred vow to uphold and defend the Constitution?”
Um, George Bush was loyal to his wife, so clearly there is no correlation between the two.

Posted by: Greg | May 11, 2009, 7:09 am 7:09 am

It really is that simple. While I’d prefer John Edwards was CinC over Obama right now (who also allegedly cheated on Michelle) there are much better choices, none of whom made it beyond the primaries unfortunately.
Posted by: Oh Please | May 10, 2009 11:21:42 AM
Whatever your name is you need to be ashamed of yourself for suggesting that Obama Cheated on the First lady. Did you get the news from your usual right wing faux blogs? your fear tactics never worked and won’t work again, Edwards has been caught with his pants down, may be you want people to share with him in his guilt, you are the perfect couple. EDWARDS AS A BETTER CIC? HHAHAHHAHAHHA LOL!!!

Posted by: benjamin | May 11, 2009, 7:25 am 7:25 am

benjamin, look up vera baker- there are many who’ve suggested this. The media chose not to follow the story- they were too busy looking for Palin’s baby’s birth certificate and sifting through her trash- meanwhile we’re stuck with a CinC who’s naive and inept, dangerously so.

Posted by: Oh Please | May 11, 2009, 7:51 am 7:51 am

Sounds like an excuse.

Posted by: Television Spy | May 11, 2009, 8:53 am 8:53 am

You GOP really are somehting else. After 8 years of one right-wing party disaster after another, you have the audacity to fling poo around when a democrat is discovered to be infidel. Nobody ever said the right or the left were perfect… but one must admit that you folks on the right had NO PROBLEM backing what history will recall as being the number one dismal unqualified leader of all time. No one can contest that the GOP super-majority rule is exactly what pushed forth and pressured through the amateur policies that led to this nations dismal state we are not crawling out of. And certainly nobody can deny the almost 1 million lives needlessly lost in your blood sport wars.

Posted by: Rick in SB | May 11, 2009, 9:20 am 9:20 am

The most interesting part of the story is that its Edwards’ own staff who presumably would have blown the whistle on him(they now claim).Must have been that the shills at the NYT,WaPo and Network TV were too understaffed to cover the story, what with all of their important investigative reporters up in Alaska going through the trash of Sarah Palin’s hairdresser

Posted by: Joan | May 11, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am

WHY is Elizabeth still trying to protect John by insisting that he made ONLY THIS ONE mistake and that it’s all the fault of Ms. Hunter!!! This man is the main culprit and he has made more than just one mistake. A humongous mistake by John, compounded by Elizabeth’s supporting his candidacy, even when she became aware of the adultery. She has shown that ambition trumps everything and trying to shove blame only on Reille Hunter shows the true character of both John and Elizabeth. All of us should face the truth and the facts, even as she is fighting for her life, one should not live in a make-believe world. John is the true despot and low-life character in this tragedy and trying to cover his acts as a one-time error only discredit the both of them totally.

Posted by: Karen | May 11, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am

My Heart broke as I watched John Edwards leave the campaign in December!
HE was always my choice and I campainged for him tirelessly!
It broke again; when I found out he had this horrible affair! It broke again when I saw Elizabeth’s pain On Oprah!
This is such a sad thing. It happens all too often when women clearly DO NOT RESPECT THE HOME AND MARRIAGE OF ANOTHER WOMAN!!
BUT the blame clearly belongs to John Edwards and I think he has owned that to the best of his ability for now; Do I believe it is over..
NOT ON YOUR LIFE!
Too bad and very sad ordeal for everyone but especially Elizabeth and her Children!

Posted by: sillyphylly | May 11, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

It is a shocking and sad fact that Americans owe the National Enquirer a large thanks for its willingness to break the story over a period of months when all other media enterprises, supposed watchdogs for the public good, sat on it all. We live in interesting times and the old media is heavily tarnished.

Posted by: John Clawson | May 11, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am

John oh John! Why hast thou cheated on thy wife? Has thou no shame? Thy sins has been made manifest by the national enquirer..Oh what revalation! Thou wantest to be president but thy wife canst trust thee..then why does thy frontal lobe decieved you to believe that the country would trust thee..Oh corrupt imbecile..thou foolest thine self. John oh John, Why hast thou cheatest on thine wife!

Posted by: Stanley | May 11, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am

We have never been able to legistlate morality nor should we; however, I don’t think the state of his marriage is what is in question here. As with the embarrassment of the Lewinsky debaucle, the problem comes in what he said AND did afterward. He impugned the reputation of Rielle Hunter (not that that was real hard to do do, I mean really, read about her), then he gave her money. The is money which was donated by his constituents in order to promote his political agenda and his election campaign, not donated to pay his inamorata & her household. That was money to pay for TV ads, mass mailings & other menthods of information dissemination. Because Ms. Edwards is so ill, I am inclined, as are many, to dismiss her culpability in this. After all, she didn’t have the affair, lie about it, accept money & questionably disperse the money; she is engaged in the battle of her life just to survive. He on the other had entered into the situation based on that bottle-blond tossing off the near Paris Hiltonly moronic “You are so hot” line & fell into the proverbial sack with her & carry on an extended affair, in all likelihood fathering a child. He needs to pony up & provide for his families, mentally as well as fiscally, quit lying to the people who donated money in an effort to put him the the White House & shut up.

Posted by: Jan | May 11, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am

The more she speaks out, the less sympathy I feel for Mrs. Edwards. The day she called Reille Hunter’s baby an “it” … “it doesn’t look like my children” shows she her own lack of emotion/empathy for a child who didn’t ask to be brought into this controversy.

Posted by: Get Real | May 11, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

My husband asked why I thought this situation has affected people the way it has. I think that we, Americans, are looking for a strong person to move us through the very dangerous world in which we live. We want this person to be credible & directed & not have private matters that will divert him or his attention. This person has to be of above the usual problems of the world. If he says something, the rest of the world, including the world leaders should be able to know that our president, our leader, means what he says & is prepared to meet the demands of the job. If these guys have to worry about who is going to crawl out of the wood work with whatever indiscretions, he or she cannot devote themselves to the job at hand. If he/she lies about it, then how is the rest of the world expected to take what he says as the truth. Mr. Edwards lied & lied & lied- how could anyone trust him. Honestly, I’m just very disappointed & bet a lot of Americans are.

Posted by: Jan | May 11, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

“David, you’d consider it torture if our enemies were doing it to us. Stop being such a hypocrite. ”
Harold,
No I would not consider it torture; however, if I were a lawful combatant the treatment would be against the Geneva Convention.
“Only Bush and Cheney made torture military policy.”
No Harold,
As I stated before the techniques were in place long before President Bush took office.
He was merely the first President to have the techniques leaked to the extent that they became common knowledge.
“And it obviously had an effect on you.”
Martin H,
As I also stated previously the effect was actually beneficial in improving my confidence to be able to withstand harsh interrogation techniques.
“The Bataan death march was not torture. It was reprehensible, but it was a deliberate act of military attrition. It was not willful application of pain in order to gain information. It doesn’t make it right. It was just never torture.”
Hawk,
Acquiring information is not always a goal of someone using torture. Some people use torture because they enjoy hurting people.
“I find it hard to believe you were, or are.
You are a shame to the fighting men of our country.”
I am an Air Force pilot who will deploy sshortly to Iraq for a year to train the Iraqi Air Force I will try to keep your sentiments in mind while I am there

Posted by: David | May 11, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

This is ridiculous.

Posted by: chicago office space | May 11, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Don’t you all know Edwards cheating on his wife was all Bush’s fault! Geez you would think after 8yrs you folks would have caught on.

Posted by: Don't swine flu me Bro! | May 11, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

I think the difference between Edwards and Bill Clinton is that with Clinton, we knew what we were getting – he was a sex addict. Edwards was trying to present a persona that he then did not live up to, and then it makes people feel betrayed. I believe that is the true problem. Nobody really cares about Newt’s foibles because we’ve never trusted him anyway.
And whoever upthread is spreading rumors about Barack Obama, may karma prevail in your life. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Posted by: trrish | May 11, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Personally I think THE EDWARDS should refund every nickle to their supporters. I say THEIR because she not only knew and helped cover it up but was Edwards PitBull!!! I never want to hear about these 2 again!!!!! SHUT UP AND GO AWAY

Posted by: lovingpolitics | May 11, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

I’m going to point out that we don’t know that the baby is his so how anyone can say that he should take care of both of his families is sort of bizarre; not to mention getting the cart before the horse.

Posted by: jan | May 11, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

I said it yesterday and I just twittered a response again today: Complete BS — fantasyland — not true.

Posted by: Joe Trippi | May 11, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

I had previously admired Edwards for dropping out of the race due to his wife’s cancer. I was quite touched by it, and without knowing anything else about him, put him on a pedestal. whether or not what george S. says is true, ive got a really bad taste in my mouth now for John. makes me wonder if he stood by his wife during her illness for her or for “looks”. honestly, he is responsible for continuing the affair, its not like he was forced into it. and has he apoligized to Elizabeth or his kids??? and here she is admitting that shes trying to cover his butt. she might as well be his momma. what a discrace. she should donate all the proceeds from her book to a battered women’s shelter, because she is being abused just the same.

Posted by: Juanita | May 11, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

This Edwards’ thing gets worse by the minute. First we have Edwards lying; next his wife, who is struggling with cancer supports him in running for President, knowing that he is lying; and finally his staff prepares themselves to sabortage him if he wins, while pretending to support him. I mean the deception is non-ending. I think they all should be doing some serious soul searching. I think that they all did the public a grave misjustice. It was all of their responsilbilty to be forthright with the public. The staff should have gone to Edwards and told him of their suspicions and asked him to come clean. And then the media should have been told so that the public could have been informed and allowed to make an informed decision. Who knows, somewhere at the beginning of all these lies, the public might have been forgiving and accepting of Edwards. Everyone has weak moments, but to continue to lead the public down a long road full of lies destroys trust.

Posted by: lwba | May 11, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

“In 1901, an Army major was sentenced to 10 years at hard labor when found guilty of the criminal act of waterboarding a Phillippino insurgent. In 1968, a U.S. soldier who had been photographed assisting in the waterboarding of a North Vietnamese prisoner was court-martialed in a military court and “drummed out of the Army”.After World War II, Japanese officers who inflicted waterboarding were prosecuted as war criminals by the United States. The legal charges included:
Specification 5. That between 1 April, 1943 and 31 December, 1943, the accused Yukio Asano, did, willfully and unlawfully, brutally mistreat and torture John Henry Burton, an American Prisoner of War, by beating him; and by fastening him head downward on a stretcher and forcing water into his nose.
(Thus, in an American court, was waterboarding cited as a crime of mistreatment and torture.)
In an international court, Japanese who committed waterboarding were executed for it.”
David – I guess if I were you I would have ignored the above post as well. But I think some of us would like to read your response, if you have one. Also, allow me to point out a small difference between what you experienced in SERE school and what the Gitmo detainees and Abu Ghraib/CIA Black Site prisoners experienced.
First of all, I’m assuming you volunteered for SERE school? No volunteers at Gitmo, buddy. My understanding is that a large percentage of them were guilty of nothing more than being unpopular with their neighbors making that American reward money just a little too tempting.
If you volunteered for it that makes all the difference in the world just by itself. But there are more differences, you knew it was coming, had a chance to prepare, possibly even knew and trusted the people that did it (maybe, maybe not). A buddy of mine got gassed during Basic. He knew it was coming, was wearing a gasmask, knew what he was supposed to do – hell they taped the damn thing so you could buy a video of it afterwards. He still said it sucked and he didn’t want to do it again. Which I think is normal. And that still doesn’t compare to an actual poison gas attack.
I’m going to presume that there is a BIG difference between undergoing… let’s call it a “treatment” under controlled circumstances adminstered by your instructors at a “school”, and undergoing the same “treatment” in a legal blackhole adminstered by your guards after multiple rounds of other “harsh interrogations”. Surely we can all agree that there is a difference. And if you can’t tell the difference between training and torture… I just hope you’re never put into any kind of situation where you’re dealing with POWs or other brands of “detainee”. This whole debate makes me sick to my stomach.
We’re bringing up the Bataan Death March for perspective now? That’s the standard? As long as we’re doing better than the Bataan Death March we’re still the shining city up on the hill for the rest of the world?

Posted by: James | May 11, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

James,
I brought up the Bataan Death March (along with the treatment the Vietnam War POW’s received) after Jan made the following posts:
“the people who devised and implemented torture are invited on all the A-list talk shows and suffer no penalties. Should we call it twisted values?…”
to which I replied :
The interrogation techniques you refered to where devised long before President Bush took office. Those actions you refer to as torture are also used on our Aircrew and Special Forces at SERE school.
Me and my buddies do not believe we were tortured so perhaps your perspective needs a little adjusting.”
followed by her reply
“Bush/Cheney were the first to make them official state policy. Need I remind you that we have participated in prosecuting former national leaders for very similar things, latest coming to mind being Milosevic. I assume you approved of prosecuting Milosevic. Is that incorrect?”
I could have listed several other Official State sponsored torture policies including Adolph Hitler.
I did not see a link that confirms the examples you gave but giving you the benefit of the doubt, prosecutions of soldiers acting w/o or against orders do not serve as precedent for declaring all of the activities they perform illegal.
At least one of the examples you used included a beating applied.
Again the treatment and protection given a “lawful combatant” is different than an unlawful combatant.
I will, however agree to some extent that having techniques applied in a training environment might be considered less threatening. I can assure you that the realism that is produced in SERE school is unlike any other training program anyone is likely to experience. One tends to forget that it is only training in those conditions.
If waterbaording was the worst thing that some jihadi terrorist did to me if I were unfortunate enough to be captured, I would be grateful.
Perhaps Daniel Pearl would agree with me if he were still alive. In the event that you were unaware Khalid Shiek Muhommed was one of the Gitmo prisoners that is reported to have been subjected to harsh interrogations. He also admitted to chopping off Daniel Pearl’s head.
He provided the location of the remains to confirm what he had admitted to.
I think that you are putting a very wide description on what constitutes torture but that is your right and we are just going to have to agree to disagree on that.

Posted by: David | May 11, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

sounds like a bunch of made up stuff fit for ‘the Globe’

Posted by: dmjakers | May 11, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

I think we should send all detainees to Jan’s town ( as long as it’s far away from me!)
David- I can’t Thank You enough for your service! Some people are truly ignorant about our country’s safety and why we are so safe!
John Edwards?- A Stupid,stupid, selfish man. He not only cheated on his loyal and faithful wife, he cheated his children.
The Mistress? – Who cares.
Elizabeth Edwards?- I think she has handled it pretty well. Maybe her book is her voice in all of this mess. She has terminal cancer, whatever happens after she is gone, she has her thoughts and feelings in writing. I have not read her book, but her children will always have her words and see her strength. Some women will do what they feel is best for their children. Their family has already been through a terrible tragedy with the death of their son. Maybe she had enough forsight to know her children needed a bonded family as she battles her disease instead a nasty divorce. That is strength, bravery, and love.

Posted by: DebbieB | May 11, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Juanita said ” I was quite touched by it, and without knowing anything else about him, put him on a pedestal” Well, there’s the problem, putting a politician on a pedastal. None of them would get to where they are without doing something either illegal or immoral.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | May 12, 2009, 6:45 am 6:45 am

Juanita said ” put him on a pedestal”
Well after criticizing Bush for eight years we have BHO who is on the pedestal. Let me take it back he is on pedestal on the world stage. Soon we will have world tour of his concert. There will be fashion lines after his name. He already has collector plate and coins among other to his name.
Fidelity has been around for thousands of years even before ten commandments and Edward is not the first or the last one to succumb to that. It will happen again and again except expose’ will be selective and after all we will become banana republic with moral values of a republic and bumbling which will result in more regulation and censorship and politician will proclaim transparency but forget after election. The whole political machine is corrupt and power corrupts more.
Welcome to twenty first century of electronic media with facebook and twitter to boot.

Posted by: VJ | May 12, 2009, 7:31 am 7:31 am

I am amazed how quickly you all got off the topic, which is that Edwards’ own staff was ready to turn on him. There is no integrity in politics anymore!

Posted by: algebra | May 12, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am

What a joke this is. You did not blow the whistle on Clinton in 1992 because you believed in him but for your own advancement. As you so clearly said in your book: “…I didn’t want to throw away what he could achieve as president and I could achieve by his side…” It was all about you. And now you sit in judgment of others with a holier than thou attitude. What a joke.

Posted by: Linda | May 12, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Debbie B.
Thanks for the support. I don’t hold a grudge against Jan or anyone else that disagrees with my views. I understand that it is nearly imposssible for them to walk in my shoes.
And I am not minimizing the loss of any family or associates that she may have experienced. It is just a little different when it is you (along with the other military members) that is being counted on to prevent the next 911.
And no, my ego is not quite big enough to prevent doubts from occuring from time to time about what I do.
After I told my girls about my deployment orders they were upset and crying. My 6 year old asked me
“What if they (the Iraqi soldiers I will be working with) don’t like you.”
I told her that I will make them like me.
Then she asked me: “are you going to die.”
I told her I was too tough for that
Like most Americans all I want is my kids to have the same opportunity and perhaps a little better life than I had.
There are two things that are likely to prevent that from occuring.
1. Another 911 attack and 2. misfortune strikes in Iraq and it turns out that I am not quite as tough as I need to be.
Thanks again and God Bless

Posted by: David | May 12, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

All I can say about John Edwards is, he better not waist our time running in 2012 or 2016 election. The way I see it he is done!
On the other hand someone mention about Obama cheating on Michelle, it is pretty damn rude for you to be saying that, and if it is true than maybe you should back that up with something, otherwise it is rude!!!!!

Posted by: Republicans are Clueless | May 12, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

This is absurd on so mandy different levels. Edwards should’ve had the integrity and insight to have kept things under control. The skeletons in his closet were still growing. I thought everyone learned the Bill Clinton, Gary Hart, lesson. He should’ve stayed home.
How could his staff work for and against him at the same time?
This is a grain of grit, that fouls the slick that keeps the machine running well.
Its time Edwards surrender his sword.

Posted by: hb | May 14, 2009, 5:26 am 5:26 am

What if he had won? We do not need our country having to revisit the Clinton drama at this particular time in our world. Edwards should be ashamed he didn’t step aside IMMEDIATELY. And as sorry as I am for his wife, I have to wonder if she was as hungry to be first lady to the extent of being willing to hide the matter. That is so sad.

Posted by: Bryan Beal | May 15, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

I think it was good that his staff would have sunk his campaign if it looked like he would have won the nomination. Blind loyalty to your boss should never outweigh your convictions. A true Dem would not have wanted McCain to win because of Edwards’ affair scandal and that is what would have happened. We had just finished 8 years of a Repub prez who had caused great harm with his policies. A Dem win was an absolute necessity to try to fix all Bush’s messes.
My sympathies to Elizabeth Edwards predicament two days after her husband announced his prez run when he told her he had a one-night stand. What wife in love with her husband wouldn’t have wanted to believe that is all it was? My best wishes for her and her family. I read her interview with Oprah. She is one classy, honest lady.

Posted by: Lydia | May 18, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

I agree that extramarital affairs are no indication of a politician’s effectiveness, as history has borne out. What bothers us emotionally is that we want our leaders to set a good example for us and our children, by keeping their commitments, eschewing selfish desires, and sacrificing their own needs for the greater good. It is not supposed to be “typical men,” but extraordinary individuals who gain the honor of being voted into office. We put a huge amount of trust in them, to protect our quality of life and to improve the future for our kids. Any wise candidate should know this.

Posted by: Julie | May 30, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.