By Caitlin Taylor

May 21, 2009 1:20pm

Facsimile Constitution Gets Starring Role in Presidential Speech

No, that was not an actual copy of the Constitution behind President Obama as he spoke today.

A spokeswoman for the National Archives confirms that just like in the movie National Treasure, the document on display today was a facsimile.

The klieg lights in the room were way too bright and harsh for the Constitution, which is usually seen just by dim candle-lights, as seen here.

facsimile 2 Facsimile Constitution Gets Starring Role in Presidential Speech

So the facsimiles were brought out for this event.. The impact of President Obama speaking in the echo-filled chamber with the words "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERCA" etched in marble behind him were not accidental.

- jpt

User Comments

Can the President really stand in from of the ‘Constitution’ and really defend undefinite detention without trial?
After all, he was supposed to have taught const. law.

Posted by: J House | May 21, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

The question remains, to what extent will Obama actually honor and respect the Constitution with his presidential decsions?

Posted by: kat | May 21, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Indefinite detention without trial does not offend agains the constitution at all when applied to combatants, either lawful or unlawful. (See, e.g., the 400,000 Germans imprisoned without trial on US soil until the end of hostilities in 1945.)
Obama found it offensive only during the campaign; now his policy cannot be distinguished from that of the president who made us safe. That is a good sign altogether, although it does reveal a certain very unattractive hypocrisy.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | May 21, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Oh, now he’s a strict constructionist. That’s strange. He makes the exact opposite argument about following the Constitution on every other issue.
Theatrics and atmospherics aren’t enough. We know what the Constitution says, and we know what Obama really thinks of it.
The Constitution is not supposed to be a suicide pact, although under Democrat rule, it is evolving into one.

Posted by: jordan | May 21, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Well we Know the Last President and Aministration Didnt Up hold The Constitution They shredded it!

Posted by: Angie in Pa | May 21, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

That’s perfect…it’s becoming very evident that the Constitution that Barack Obama follows is a facsimile of the “real” one as well based on his view of what the Constitution should be…
“But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH, and of more basic issues such as POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC JUSTICEin society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that RADICAL. It DIDN’T BREAK FREE from the ESSENTIAL CONSTRAINTS that were placed by the FOUNDING FATHERS in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally THE CONSTITUTION IS A CHARTER OF NEGATIVE LIBERTIES.”
- Barack Obama 2001

Posted by: tjp612 | May 21, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

The Constitution is a pesky constraint on what needs to be done… There is much meaning in keeping the lights dim on it.
Great blog Mr. Tapper!
You are one of the few journalists who actually fulfills the responsibilities of your job!
WJP

Posted by: william john perry | May 21, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Obama is on the ropes. After back pedalling on most national security matters he resorts to using theatrics to distract from his reversal. Am I comfortable with this? After all, nothing has changed from the Bush policies, except for the rhetoric. Still, I do not trust this man because he will seek refuge with and try to assuage his base on the extreme left if cornered. Remember, of all the senators, Mr. Obama’s record (such as it is) puts him among the most radical in his thinking. His recent actions with regard to the domestic economy confirm this view.

Posted by: jcarob | May 21, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

GREAT job on reporting this! I noticed it from the photos posted that the lights were too bright for that room, I have been there! So I dug for a story, yours is the only one! Thanks for reporting the facts.

Posted by: Jason E. Smith | May 21, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Tapper said:
“The impact of President Obama speaking in the echo-filled chamber with the words “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERCA” etched in marble behind him were not accidental.”
Wow, keep up that ace reporting there, Jake.

Posted by: Glenn | May 21, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Well we Know the Last President and Aministration Didnt Up hold The Constitution They shredded it!
******************************************************
And hopefully, it’ll be returned to its former state before being systematically torn up.

Posted by: kat | May 21, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

“..we have our Secretary of Defense William Gates…”
Someone here said it was nice to have a President who could read a speech.
LMAO

Posted by: drjohn | May 21, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

It’s ironic to have a Constitution there since Obama has run roughshod over it.
That the Constitution is phony is an appropriate metaphor.

Posted by: drjohn | May 21, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

“Well we Know the Last President and Aministration Didnt Up hold The Constitution They shredded it!”
Name four examples.
NOT YOUR OPINION.
Facts.

Posted by: drjohn | May 21, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Obama must be totally frustrated.
His only experience is brainwashing college kids and voting present 130 times in the Senate.
Making real life or death decisions to protect a nation–above his paygrade.

Posted by: max | May 21, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

“Obama is on the ropes.”
On the ropes?
He’s incredibly popular, the American people are happy with his work so far and his oppositional face is a bloated talking head who is despised by most of the country.
“Remember, of all the senators, Mr. Obama’s record (such as it is) puts him among the most radical in his thinking.”
Not that was the right wing talking point using only the national journal’s latest rating, in which Obama missed 33 of the 99 key votes they used to make the liberal/conservative assessment.
Previous ratings had Obama not even in the top 10 of liberal Senators.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

“The question remains, to what extent will Obama actually honor and respect the Constitution with his presidential decsions?”
He’s already blown away property rights, kat. It’s a violation of the Fifth amendment.
As for national security, he has almost completely and totally adopted Bush’s policies.
That either means those who scream that Bush violated the Constitution are dead wrong, or Obama is as wrong as Bush allegedly was.
It also means that Obama was entirely dishonest with his supporters.

Posted by: drjohn | May 21, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

So now the Constitution is used as a prop? Great. Very subtle. How about just follow it instead of posing with it?
I find this sort of symbolism, along with his attempts to link himself to Lincoln, to be very disturbing. It reminds me far too much of things that were done regularly by people like Saddam Hussein and Juan Peron to lend a false air of credibility and importance.

Posted by: paul | May 21, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

He’s incredibly popular, the American people are happy with his work so far and his oppositional face is a bloated talking head who is despised by most of the country.
He is fortunate thus far to have a mostly complicit press who carry his water for him and not only fail to report accurately, they intentionally shield him. It is the most dramatic dereliction of duty ever on the part of the media.
On national security, he is Bush.
No one points it out beyond these ethereal walls.

Posted by: drjohn | May 21, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

“Well we Know the Last President and Aministration Didnt Up hold The Constitution They shredded it!”
Name four examples.
NOT YOUR OPINION.
Facts.
TORTURE
TORTURE
TORTURE
VP-NOT IN EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Posted by: watching | May 21, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

“”Well we Know the Last President and Aministration Didnt Up hold The Constitution They shredded it!”
Name four examples.”
It used to be name 1 example.
I guess drjohn knows of the easy 3.

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

I find this sort of symbolism, along with his attempts to link himself to Lincoln, to be very disturbing. It reminds me far too much of things that were done regularly by people like Saddam Hussein and Juan Peron to lend a false air of credibility and importance.
can you say “MISSION ACCOMPLISHED”?

Posted by: really | May 21, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Obama needed a teleprompter to acknowledge 4-5 members of his administration.
And he still got Robert Gates’ name wrong!
It’s no wonder why Obama chose gaffe prone Biden to overshadow his own mistakes.

Posted by: lester | May 21, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

“As for national security, he has almost completely and totally adopted Bush’s policies.”
Yes closing Gitmo, outlawing torture and shifting our focus military focus to Afghanistan from Iraq are all Bush policies.
The lesson as always? Right winger lie.

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

dr.john
re: On national security, he is Bush.
if Obama starts a needless war for political gain, then you’ll have something to compare him to Bush.

Posted by: TR 7 | May 21, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Previous ratings had Obama not even in the top 10 of liberal Senators.
It’s funny how you accuse others of lying with “previous reports.” It sounds like you have a degree from the University of Saul Alinsky.
My “previous reports” all have Obama off the left wing scale.
Including the four times he voted to let newborns die.

Posted by: drjohn | May 21, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Name four examples.
*********************************************
Read your fourth ammendment rights on privacy rights and on cruel and unusual punishment. I’d like to give you an example of one cited by Sy Hersch and Salon– women detainees who were forced to watch the unspeakable violations of their sons.

Posted by: kat | May 21, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

this is reporting?
who in their right mind thinks the original constitution would ever be used? please – get a job

Posted by: and | May 21, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

ohblahblah standing in front of the constitution….subtle. Surprised he didn’t scratch his cheek with his middle finger (again) when he mentioned for the umpteenth time the previous administration in this speech.
Odd how he speaks of adhering to the rule of law..now. Might want to ask the Chrysler preferred stock shareholders, and further the Chrysler dealership owners about how much jugears respects the rule of law.
As for jugears vs. Cheney:
kid, meet Grownup.

Posted by: 2Brixshy | May 21, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

A facsimile constitution for a facsimile President.

Posted by: bubbles | May 21, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

How can you compare obama to Bush
a-He respects and Upholds the LAW And Constitution
b- He Has ended the Torture
c- He wants to Shut down Gitmo a Experiment that has Ruined our Good name
d He Hasnt started a Lying Illegal War
One last Thing He hasnt Had a Terriost attack happen on His watch !

Posted by: Angie in Pa | May 21, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

“Previous ratings had Obama not even in the top 10 of liberal Senators.
It’s funny how you accuse others of lying with “previous reports.”"
Because the right wing is lying when they use the talking point of Obama being the most liberal in the Senate.
Sorry if the facts and my pointing them out upset you so

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

“Yes closing Gitmo, outlawing torture and shifting our focus military focus to Afghanistan from Iraq are all Bush policies.
The lesson as always? Right winger lie.”
Keep dreaming, Ryan.
Maybe you missed it, but yesterday Gibbs said the decision to close Gitmo was “hasty.” Today Obama said NOTHING of a dealine to close Gitmo.
Outlawing torture? The Bush administration gave up waterboarding in 2005. Obama is waiting for a report from the panel he created for alternative interrogation techniques. Just as with warrantless wiretaps and rendition and indefinite detention, Obama will go back to most of the EIT’s used aleady once the panel “recommends” it.
Iraq has been shutting down for some time and it was always Bush’s plan. More emphasis was already happening in Afghanistan.
Do you think Obama will really invade Pakistan if it falls to Al Qaida?
You’re fast and loose with facts, Ryan, and quick to throw that liar thing around. Yet it’s clear that you do that when you are losing the debate.

Posted by: drjohn | May 21, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

“kid, meet Grownup.”
I feel the same way.
The cowardly infantile mentality of Cheney looking to defend his legacy at the expense of our cherished values vs the President of the United States making the case of American values being paramount.

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

This is from NPR
“The National Journal is out with its 27th Annual vote ratings and it ranked Sen. Barack Obama as the most liberal Senator in the entire Senate. (His first year he was 16th, and last year he was 10th.) But he wasn’t alone in his shift to the left. Sen. Hillary Clinton was 16th herself in 2007 after being 32nd in 2006.”

Posted by: drjohn | May 21, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

“The cowardly infantile mentality of Cheney looking to defend his legacy at the expense of our cherished values vs the President of the United States making the case of American values being paramount.”
Ah, yes, the name-calling, the innuendo, all free of facts.
As I have repeatedly said- liberals believe that thinking something makes it true.

Posted by: drjohn | May 21, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

President Obama speaking in the echo-filled chamber with the words “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERCA” etched in marble behind him were not accidental.
****************************************
My it is clear that you are not trying to reach me.
What some people pass off as reporting. That is all you can come up with out of a 50 min relational speech and a 35 min redo? I would be embarrassed.

Posted by: Thinking | May 21, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Cheney made the better case!

Posted by: Lisa | May 21, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Since you are a child, I will hold your hand drjohn.
“Today Obama said NOTHING of a dealine to close Gitmo.”
Did Bush ever make any mention of closing Gitmo? No.
That would be a difference in policy.
“Outlawing torture? The Bush administration gave up waterboarding in 2005.”
President Barack Obama took a major step toward undoing the interrogation and detention policies of the Bush administration on Thursday, issuing four executive orders that lay out an unequivocal path to closing the Guantanamo Bay detention facility, constructing a new legal and policy architecture for terrorism detainees, and ending the CIA’s so-called “enhanced interrogation” regime.
That would be a difference in policy.
“Iraq has been shutting down for some time and it was always Bush’s plan.”
The draw down of troops came about because of domestic political pressure from Obama and the Iraqi government.
Bush’s withdraw plan is very similar to what Obama put forth 2 years ago.
“More emphasis was already happening in Afghanistan.”
Not nearly to the degree that Obama seeks to do.
Again this is a change in policy.
So drjohn assertion that Obama’s and Bush’s national security polciies are the same is false.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

“The National Journal is out with its 27th Annual vote ratings and it ranked Sen. Barack Obama as the most liberal Senator in the entire Senate. (His first year he was 16th, and last year he was 10th.)”
Thanks for demonstrating the lie that Obama was the most liberal Senator based on his record.

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Dear partisan water carriers,
The endless debate of who’s worse: Bush or Obama is meaningless to millions of Americans. The answer is BOTH are horrible. I acknowledge that Bush was terrible. I didn’t vote for him. He’s gone. But his policies and shoddy governance remain, now at the hands of Obama and company.
LET’S NOT REPEAT HIS MISTAKES!!
Obama needs to answer to what is right and what is Constitutional, not be weighed against Bush and merely be equally or slightly less corrupt and incompetent. The fact that comparison to Bush is your only defense of him is PATHETIC and incredibly alarming.

Posted by: paul | May 21, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

I agree with Thinking that the report is deprecating by the way it highlights a Constitution facsimile with no information whatsover about Obama’s speech, as if it were irrelevant. It’s to be expected as Mr. Tapper is a good employee of ABC.

Posted by: kat | May 21, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Obama Didnt Nationalize any Banks If I remember correctly That was Bush and Paulson on their Knees Begging Congress for the Bailout the Tarp Before Obama took Office I belive the Socialism Of Nationalizing Banks Happened On Bushes Watch As well As 911!

Posted by: Angie in Pa | May 21, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

“President Barack Obama took a major step toward undoing the interrogation and detention policies of the Bush administration on Thursday, issuing four executive orders that lay out an unequivocal path to closing the Guantanamo Bay detention facility, constructing a new legal and policy architecture for terrorism detainees, and ending the CIA’s so-called “enhanced interrogation” regime.”
Cut and paste, no doubt from some communist website.
And total crap.
Policy architecture for detainees?
Holding them indefinitely without rights at Bagram?
Expanding rendition?
Want to take a bet on Gitmo closing on January 21, 2010?
When will ALL US troops be out of Iraq? Or will Obama simply change the designation of 50-60,000 troops to “non-combat” and let them stay?
Wanna bet?

Posted by: drjohn | May 21, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

“Obama Didnt Nationalize any Banks If I remember correctly”
Obama won’t let them pay the TARP money back. Now he wants to control the compensation of all financial services, not just those of bankers.
Obama took 8% of Chrysler and is calling all the shots. He will soon own 50% of GM.

Posted by: drjohn | May 21, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Re: “I agree with Thinking that the report is deprecating by the way it highlights a Constitution facsimile with no information whatsover about Obama’s speech, as if it were irrelevant.”
That’s because it is irrelevant. His actions don’t match his words. Moreover, I think it’s fitting that a facsimilie constitution was his backdrop, as he is continuing his predecessor’s unconstitutional policies.

Posted by: bubbles | May 21, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

The thing I noticed most about POTUS was his almost scolding presentation at certain points.. like, remember, I am not just an inexperienced politician, I am the POTUS.. very stern.. probably the only part of this that wasn’t carefully staged.
Like he loses his fake cool and resorts to an animal backed in the corner attitude. I never thought that a non-entity like Cheney could smoke POTUS out of his hole.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | May 21, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

“Bush wanted to shut down Gitmo too but could not find a suitable alternative”
ROFLMAO!
Bush wanted to close Gitmo?
The only discussion dealing with Gitmo and closing it happened last summer when Bush was being used like a pinata on the issue.
The “Decider” passed the buck to Obama.

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Thanks for demonstrating the lie that “Obama was the most liberal Senator based on his record.”
From the National Journal:
“The ratings rank lawmakers on how they vote relative to each other on a conservative-to-liberal scale in both the Senate and the House. The scores are based on the members’ votes in three areas: economic issues, social issues, and foreign policy.”
HOW THEY VOTE, Ryan. It seems to me that that’s a measure of one’s record, but perhaps not in your bizarro world.

Posted by: drjohn | May 21, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

“Yoo hoo, three guys were waterboarded. They did not force confessions out of them. They got intel”
Kat is probably referring to Abu Gharib.
You know when the Bush admin blamed those despicable actions on soldiers as a few bad apples.
Now Cheney says he is doing defending torture polcies to protect the little guy, where was he then?
Oh yeah more than happy for the few bad apples to take the fall for his admin’s appalling policies.

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Yoo hoo, three guys were waterboarded. They did not force confessions out of them. They got intel.
Come on, kat, get yourself some facts. Don’t go Ryan on me.
***************************************************
Listen to Cheney. He’s certainly conceeded in his defense of torture that more “three guys” were waterboarded. The facts are intractable and emerging everyday. I’d suggest you wakeup from the sleep walking.

Posted by: kat | May 21, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

“Bush wanted to close Gitmo?
The only discussion dealing with Gitmo and closing it happened last summer when Bush was being used like a pinata on the issue.
The “Decider” passed the buck to Obama.”
NOW EVERYONE PLEASE PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT RYAN SAID
Thank you!
Capitol Hill Blue, May, 2006:
“President Bush says he would like to close the detention center in Guantanamo in Cuba, but is waiting for a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on whether inmates can face military tribunals.”
Paying attention Ryan?
THOSE ARE THE SAME MILKITARY TRIBUNALS THAT OBAMA NOW FINDS APPROPRIATE. BUSH KNEW THIS YEARS AGO.
Ryan, you really should leave this for the grown-ups.

Posted by: drjohn | May 21, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

“He’s certainly conceeded in his defense of torture that more “three guys” were waterboarded.”
Quotes, please. Citations.

Posted by: drjohn | May 21, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

“HOW THEY VOTE, Ryan. It seems to me that that’s a measure of one’s record, but perhaps not in your bizarro world.”
And one’s record is usually more than 1 year’s rating in which you missed 33 of the 99 votes used to determine that rating.
So we have Obama ranked on the liebral scale as 16th, 10th and then when he missed a 3rd of the votes used for the ratings, first.
Based on that right wingers claim Obama has the most liberal record in the Senate.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Posted by: Ranger | May 21, 2009 2:47:27 PM
We’e talking Gitmo. And official policy.
kat has a tendency to conflate up her facts. I am not defending Abu Ghraib. Not a chance.

Posted by: drjohn | May 21, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

I thought It was Bush who Gave the First Bailout to Chrysler Just Like Bush and Buddies Gave the First Bailout to AIG

Posted by: Angie in Pa | May 21, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

“Right wingers lie”
Let me help you with this sentence frament:
“Right wingers lie awake at night wondering how 53% of voters could be hood-winked by this fraud.”
There you go.

Posted by: tjp612 | May 21, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

“I am not defending Abu Ghraib. Not a chance.”
Because the disgusting policies instituted at Abu Gharib are somehow beyond pale but the disgusting policies at Gitmo are a-ok?

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

“Based on that right wingers claim Obama has the most liberal record in the Senate.”
If not Obama, then who? Let’s be honest, it’s not a stretch to believe he’s in the top 5.
It’s too bad there wasn’t a “Senators most qualified to be President” ranking. Would be curious to see where The Big O would rank…

Posted by: tjp612 | May 21, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

tip
No Right Wingers probably Lie Awake at Night Embaressed By the Fact their President Destroyed this Countries Name, Lied About a War, Broke the Law, Had a Terriost attack on His Watch,And Blew the Goverment up. Not to Mention got us in the Worst Financial Mess oh and Nationalized the Banks And Did I Mention Failed to Keep the People Safe with 911 And Killed 1000s Of our Men and Woman based on False Intelligence poor right wingers!

Posted by: Angie in Pa | May 21, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

“He’s certainly conceeded in his defense of torture that more “three guys” were waterboarded”
What was most surprising about Cheney;s speech?
The explanation of what terror he felt and how that directed his future policies.
The US tortured people because 5 deferrment Cheney got scared.

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

“Right wingers lie awake at night wondering….”
Oh goody a new game!
I see Angie has already submitted hers.
Now for mine.
Right wingers lie awake at night wondering….how bad is 2010 going to be with Steele at the helm, Rush as the face and the base continuing to shrink even as it becomes more shrill.

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

The Whole Problem With Cheney is He Knows He and Bush and The Whole Bush admin Failed on Keeping us safe Because 911 Happened on their Watch So the Man went off the Paranoid Deep End acting Irrational And Please One right Winger tell me Bush/Cheney was Not aware Of Bin Laden I beg of you! They were Not Aware of Bin Ladens Threat?

Posted by: Angie in Pa | May 21, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

It is ironic that the President stands in front of the ‘Constitution’ and at the same time defends indefinite detainment without trial for some of the Gitmo prisoners.

Posted by: J House | May 21, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Simply amazing that Obama has the nerve to accuse others of fearmongering in order to keep GITMO open.
That is exactly what he did to rush through his $700 billion stimulus bill(that no one read) and put the next generation in tremendous debt.
And all to support his agenda.
To take over banks and the auto industry that he says he doesn’t want to run.

Posted by: millie | May 21, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

Posted by: Angie in Pa | May 21, 2009 3:07:23 PM
Angie, it’s fascinating watching some of you foam at the mouth entirely absent of facts.
You guys would like nothing better than do imprison Bush basd only on your opinions for the crimes of offending you misinformation.
Were it really as you insist, there would be commissions and trials.
I am one who has repeatedly called for hearings so that the truth would come out. It would vindicate Bush, and you can bet that Obama won’t be allowing any such hearings because it would indeed vindicate Bush and make painfully obvious that Obama is walking in Bush’s shoes.
You can rant all you want but it doesn’t make it any different.
There won’t be hearings and there won’t be any “Truth Commissions.” I’d love to see them.
You lefties are here posting your opinions and that’s great, but you’re excruciatingly short of the truth when you make assertions of violations of the law. If you were right, trials would be happening.
You’re wrong. Get used to it.

Posted by: drjohn | May 21, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

“They weren’t policy, Ryan, and to suggest that they were is pretty low, even for you.”
Yeah better to blame guardsmen then the cowards in the Bush admin like Cheney
How low of me.
On May 7, 2004, International Committee of the Red Cross Operations Director Pierre Krähenbühl stated that the ICRC’s inspection visits to Coalition detention centers in Iraq did “not allow us to conclude that what we were dealing with… were isolated acts of individual members of coalition forces. What we have described is a pattern and a broad system.” He went on to say that some of the incidents they had observed were “tantamount to torture”
Rather interviewed Army Reserve Staff Sgt. Chip Frederick, a participant in the abuse, whose civilian job was as a corrections officer at a Virginia prison. Frederick stated, “We had no support, no training whatsoever. And I kept asking my chain of command for certain things … like rules and regulations,” says Frederick. “And it just wasn’t happening.” Frederick’s video diary, sent home from Iraq, provided some of the images used in the story.
Sgt. Ivan Frederick sitting on an Iraqi detainee between two stretchers
In the diary are listed detailed, dated entries that chronicle abuse and names, for example,
They stressed him out so bad that the man passed away. The next day the medics came in and put his body on a stretcher, placed a fake I.V. in his arm [to suggest he died under medical care] and took him away. This OGA (other governmental agency) [prisoner] was never processed and therefore never had a number.
—Ivan Frederick
and, “MI (Military Intelligence) has been present and witnessed such activity. MI has encouraged and told us great job [and] that they were now getting positive results and information.”

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

DR JOHN
I beg of you to deny Bush/Cheney Knew Nothing about Bin Laden his Prior attacks and His threats to the Us, And dont give me Its Clintons Fault 911 Happened 8 Months after Clinton Left Office are you telling me Bush was Clueless about Bin Laden?

Posted by: Angie in Pa | May 21, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

“Right wingers lie awake at night wondering….how bad is 2010 going to be with Steele at the helm, Rush as the face and the base continuing to shrink even as it becomes more shrill.”
Not worried about it at all. Looking forward to 2010.
tjp612
a.k.a. “self described expert in macroeconomics”

Posted by: tjp612 | May 21, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

“Right wingers lie awake at night wondering….how bad is 2010 going to be with Steele at the helm, Rush as the face and the base continuing to shrink even as it becomes more shrill.”
Ryan, you are as wrong about this as you have been wrong about pretty much everything this afternoon.
But please, continue to believe what your wrote. I will not try to disabuse you of the notion.

Posted by: drjohn | May 21, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Nothing like standing in front of the very document Obama is trying to usurp and destroy!! How picturesque!! Hows about we park a terrorist in the Lincoln Bedroom and see if Barry is keen on the idea of his new roommate!
Just consider that the chickens have come home to roost for Barry and this can be chalked up as another broken promise to the Far Left Tweekers!
“Happy Days are here again……..”

Posted by: American Infidel | May 21, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

“And I kept asking my chain of command for certain things … like rules and regulations,” says Frederick. “And it just wasn’t happening.”
Sort of makes my point, huh, Ryan?
How many times do you need to slam your head against a wall before you realize that it hurts? You’re really making me wonder.

Posted by: drjohn | May 21, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

DR JOHN
I am Simply asking Bush was The President Bush Knew of Bin Laden and His Threats It took years For Bin laden to Plan that Attack why did Bush Ignore the warnings?

Posted by: Angie in Pa | May 21, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

Were it really as you insist, there would be commissions and trials.
******************************************************
And the momentum is certainly there. I think there’s a gathering national conscience, and inevitably, some hard to take truths will emerge. Despite efforts of media denial, substantiation and more details should follow on undeniably heinous methods and rationales. Like Cheney utilizing torture in 2002 to create a fabricated Hussein and Al Qaeda link, despite CIA denial. Then there’s the torture coercion involving detained mothers in Iraq forced to watch the violation of their sons. Sy Hersch wrote about it in 2004 and it’s been circulating through various sources faily recently, Salon to name one. I wrote about this earlier, but it was taken down. So were the ones about Cheney’s five deferrments. I guess I shouldn’t anticipate a more courageous turn in the editing.

Posted by: kat | May 21, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

“Ryan, you are as wrong about this as you have been wrong about pretty much everything this afternoon.”
Because Steele has done just a fab job so far?
Rush is not the face of the party as 1 GOP elected official after another apologizes and kisses his ring?
And GOP self id is not at its lowest point in decades?

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

“Sort of makes my point, huh, Ryan?”
Actually it makes my point.
The admin was demanding info will providing no legal structure with which to obtain it.
They created the situation, then ignored it until it went public.

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

“The President Bush Knew of Bin Laden and His Threats It took years For Bin laden to Plan that Attack why did Bush Ignore the warnings”
Terrorism and responding to it were a low priority for the Bush admin.
Which is why they so overreacted in the wake of 9/11.
They had to cover up their incompetence with a veneer of resolve.

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Did anyone understand Obama’s talking about Congress as coequal branches (assuming he meant coequal with the executive branch).. I wasn’t sure what the point was.. is he saying that he respects Congress’ opposing his wishes? Is it a Constitutional point of some sort? Are we sharing blame, like Congress could somehow be expecting to become one of these as yet undefined obstacles to his great society initiative?

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | May 21, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

We should all thank them for keeping up that “veneer of resolve” for 7 1/2 years and while we rightwingers ourselves made a lot of rude comments over Clinton’s incompetence in the road to 9/11, the record shows very little from White House insulting his predecessor unlike the approach from the supposed cool Prez we have now.

Posted by: robertb | May 21, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

So for eight years Clinton does nothing:
Ryan C’s Intelligent Side
Reagan supported and armed Saddam …if you care to look a little further back, you can go find involvement in the mid-east by America and European nations, that involvement plays a major role as causation for the 9/11 and other events

Posted by: Prof | May 21, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

So much liberal misinformation, so little time.
Bush couldn’t do squat for Chrysler, AIG, et al without a complicit Pelosi/Reid Congress. POTUS doesn’t hold the purse strings, Congress does.
Let’s say Bush knew date certain that 9/11 would happen on that day, and from those airports (he didn’t, but I’ll play along with your fantasy). What would the left’s reaction have been if he:
Had the jetliners shot down before the impacts?
Closed air travel prior to 9/11?
Prevented the hijackers from boarding the planes when the only crime up till then was that some had overstayed their visa?
Profiled 18-40 year old muslim men and subjected them to extra scrutiny before they could board an airliner?
Inquiring minds want to know!

Posted by: Junk Science Skeptic | May 21, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Angie in PA: Bush certainly was briefed by Clinton’s team (several of whom he kept on staff). Bush inherited Clinton’s stance towards al-Qaeda as a legal problem. On 9/11, Bush (and lots of people) realized that this is in fact a War on Terror, and not a Legal Action on Terror. Confronted with dead Americans, Bush decided to fight back. On the whole, that decision was wise. Did he, and his generals, and some prison guards, make mistakes? Sure. Humans are human.

Posted by: Lightduty | May 21, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

The Constitution was fake just like the President standing in front of it.

Posted by: Dave | May 21, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Isn’t it amazing that supposedly Obama taught Constitutional Law,and now he Works on Trashing the Constitution!
This Moron has No Business running America !

Posted by: Doug Rose | May 21, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Does newly-appointed SecDef Bill Gates have any comment on the president’s speech?

Posted by: Dude, Where's My TOTUS? | May 21, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

J House wrote: It is ironic that the President stands in front of the ‘Constitution’ and at the same time defends indefinite detainment without trial for some of the Gitmo prisoners.
===
I agree somewhat, but how does the Constitution apply to citizens of other countries, taken on foreign soil? From there, it’s not much of a stretch to say we can fine coal plants in India for EPA violations.

Posted by: Lightduty | May 21, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Light damages the real document. It’s only common sense to pull out the fake.

Posted by: Rocker | May 21, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

“Bush certainly was briefed by Clinton’s team (several of whom he kept on staff). Bush inherited Clinton’s stance towards al-Qaeda as a legal problem.”
Richard Clarke begs to differ.
Washington, D.C., February 10, 2005 – The National Security Archive today posted the widely-debated, but previously unavailable, January 25, 2001, memo from counterterrorism coordinator Richard Clarke to national security advisor Condoleezza Rice – the first terrorism strategy paper of the Bush administration. The document was central to debates in the 9/11 hearings over the Bush administration’s policies and actions on terrorism before September 11, 2001. Clarke’s memo requests an immediate meeting of the National Security Council’s Principals Committee to discuss broad strategies for combating al-Qaeda by giving counterterrorism aid to the Northern Alliance and Uzbekistan, expanding the counterterrorism budget and responding to the U.S.S. Cole attack. Despite Clarke’s request, there was no Principals Committee meeting on al-Qaeda until September 4, 2001.
The January 25, 2001, memo, recently released to the National Security Archive by the National Security Council, bears a declassification stamp of April 7, 2004, one day prior to Rice’s testimony before the 9/11 Commission on April 8, 2004. Responding to claims that she ignored the al-Qaeda threat before September 11, Rice stated in a March 22, 2004 Washington Post op-ed, “No al Qaeda plan was turned over to the new administration.”
Two days after Rice’s March 22 op-ed, Clarke told the 9/11 Commission, “there’s a lot of debate about whether it’s a plan or a strategy or a series of options — but all of the things we recommended back in January were those things on the table in September. They were done. They were done after September 11th. They were all done. I didn’t really understand why they couldn’t have been done in February.”

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

“I agree somewhat, but how does the Constitution apply to citizens of other countries, taken on foreign soil”
So the concept of natural rights belonging to all human beings was just a bunch of hooey?

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

The real Constitution was rolled up in Sandy Berger’s socks…

Posted by: gridlock | May 21, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

On May 21, 2009, the RNC tweeted an out of context quote from Barack Obama regarding a flaw in the constitution. The “fundamental flaw” Barack Obama was referring to was slavery.
2010 is gonna be fun.

Posted by: Ryan C | May 21, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

“No, that was not an actual copy of the Constitution behind President Obama as he spoke today.”
It sounds like you mean it _was_ a copy of the Constitution, just not the original Constitution.

Posted by: Steve | May 21, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

What difference does it make what was posted….Obama and his ilk have little regard for the Constitution anyway….
Too bad he didn’t take time to study it some while he was there.

Posted by: Gary | May 21, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Obama would look more suited talking in front of Mao’s Little Red Book.

Posted by: sigh | May 21, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

The teleprompter also told him to forget the defense secretary’s name.
And Islamic radicals were arrested in NY today for plotting to bomb synagogues, which was perhaps a more appropriate and inconvenient backdrop for yet another meaningless speech that changes nothing.
It’s been a long day. Give the guy a break, Jake.

Posted by: Good Lt. | May 21, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

PLASTIC TURKEY! FAKE CONSTITUTION! What’s the difference?
Fake, fake, faker!
Bush and Barry have a LOT more in common than the Obamatons will ever admit.

Posted by: Paul in Iowa | May 21, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

You don’t need the constitution to know this government is borrowing and wasting way too much, taking away too much freedom, and threatening too many industries and on and on.

Posted by: Ron | May 21, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

“PLASTIC TURKEY! FAKE CONSTITUTION! What’s the difference?
Fake, fake, faker!”
Man, hard to believe that idiots are still trying to claim, long after it was debunked, that the turkey Bush had was plastic. I guess to some people it doesn’t matter how much evidence there is proving them wrong.

Posted by: Mark | May 21, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Does the One do ANYTHING that is not staged for his political enhancement?

Posted by: old gray mare | May 21, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Ryan_C, does the DNC pay you by the post or by the word? Just wonderin’.
You wrote a post containing some sarcastic questions about the Republican Party, to which I will gladly supply some serious answers. Your first question: “Because Steele has done just a fab job so far?” Well, yes, actually, he has. contributions to the party outpaced contributions to the democratic party since the beginning of the year. His speech in Maryland yesterday was masterful and laid out an excellent blueprint for the Republican party going forward. I’m not overly worried about the circular firing squad some republicans insist on forming after electoral defeats such as we have suffered of late– both parties tend to do that at such times and both tend to recover from the impulse eventually.
Next you suggest, once again, that the Republican Party is “led” by Rush Limbaugh: “Rush is not the face of the party as 1 GOP elected official after another apologizes and kisses his ring?” To which I reply, well, no, Rush is NOT the face of the party. A face, perhaps, but not THE face. He is an important part of the party, whether you approve or not, but he is far from the driving force or the guiding light. The Republican Party is a vibrant, diverse organization with room under the tent for Rush and Newt and all the Bushes and Crist and Guiliani and McCain and Palin and Powell and Jindal and Snowe and Schwarzenegger and ….. need I go on?
Republican elected officials sometimes seem willing to kiss Rush’s ring? Yep, and Democrat elected officials sometimes seem willing to kiss up to Kos and Soros with equal enthusiasm. It’s part of how you play the game, yes?
Finally, Ryan points out: “And GOP self id is not at its lowest point in decades?” Well, yes, it is, but a lower percentage of people self identify as Democrats, too– admittedly not as few, but the direction for both parties is downward. More and more people are self-identifying in such polls as independents, actually.
Thanks for the show of concern, Ryan, but the party will be fine.

Posted by: moderate | May 21, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Whoop! And here I thought Obama calling his Secretary of Defense “William Gates” rather than his REAL NAME of Robert Gates, was going to be it for the bad news coming from The Clown’s speech.
Oh, and the speech sucked, too. Cheney should have run against him in 2008: he wold have whooped Obama’s arse.

Posted by: James Marsden | May 22, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

The greatest commonality we share is ethical misconduct of the middle/core bureaucracy. An unjust judicial system is a feeding trough for unethical lawyers & fiduciaries (It’s an industry). In our case, it’s WFBank. My family was prey for the (ex-?)current system. State agencies allow the abuse. Try and file criminal charges against a court officer, executor or trustee and see where it gets you. 1. Pressure authorities to prosecute ethical misconduct as the felony it is. 2. Extend `grand jury’ rights to civil justice sector & be given the same rights as the criminal `grand jury’. Allow the public to present testimony & evidence to credible groups (Ex. Community & watchdog groups, etc.) These groups of laypeople would be able to allow indictments of criminals from -us denied justice. My q.’s; How to stop the abuse?

Posted by: Laird | May 22, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Cheney 2, Obama -1

Posted by: MeMyselfAndI | May 22, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

As we approach this Memorial Day and honor the memory of those that have fallen in the cause of freedom, it breaks my heart to see such a corrupt and insidious man at the head of the greatest country ever to exist. To think that my friends died fighting the very type of liberty robbing government encroachment that he wants to impose, makes my stomach hurt.

Posted by: Hitter | May 22, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

It’s time to start the impeachment of this President before he destroys our Republic. HELLO?

Posted by: Lorraine | May 22, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Funny!! How symbolic of the man now occupying the White House, not real just an empty suit.

Posted by: bravo116 | May 22, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

The Revolution is coming…

Posted by: Domino | May 22, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Man you Rebublicans at Heart are not even letting Obama get started. You are the ones who are the discrace to the country.
Still captivated by the crooks who just left the whitehouse. Let this guy at least let the water come to a boil before he puts the ingrediants in.
You could not let Obama do anything and say a good thing about him, your mind is already set, and that’s dangerous, but when George was in you didn’t say much, and he was the one who put us in this mess, why don’t you say soething about BUSH?

Posted by: Joe | May 22, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Lest we forget… hugh humm (had to clear my throat) who’s to blame??? Or at least in part, keep in mind this was a BI-PARTISAN effort to make homes more affordable, they on the HILL are all to blame…
The current mortgage crisis came about in large part because of Clinton-era government pressure on lenders to make risky loans in order to “make homeownership more affordable for lower-income Americans and those with a poor credit history,” the DC Examiner notes today. “Those steps encouraged riskier mortgage lending by minimizing the role of credit histories in lending decisions, loosening required debt-to-equity ratios to allow borrowers to make small or even no down payments at all, and encouraging lenders the use of floating or adjustable interest-rate mortgages

Posted by: King, Jeffrey | May 22, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Obama is going to use the cameras for as long as he’s in the White House. I’m just hoping that his followers don’t buy what he just did. Anyone who can’t see thru what he’s doing should be slapped silly, then slapped for BEING silly!

Posted by: Karen | May 22, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

It’s funny math to believe that an increase in gas milage to 35MPG along with an $1800 increase to the cost of a car will provide a savings by a decrease in gas purchased. WE all know that once the FEDERAL & STATE governments loose tax $/gallon WE will at least see a a coprresponding increase in TAXES. SAVINGS, I don’t think so. WHAT ABOUT TRUCKS THAT GET <10MPG???

Posted by: Ron Tanski | May 22, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

To Jeffrey King who suggests that we at least let Obama bring his water to a boil before we criticize him.
Unfortunately, the ingredients he wants to put in the pot are us and our money. Let’s stop this cookout before it goes any further.

Posted by: joseph | May 22, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Hey Jeffrey King,
How do you expect us stand by to “Let Obama get started” when that Socialist is trying to RUIN our economy. It seems he is even worse then probably another one of your heroes, Jimmy Carter. We are going to be in a BIG mess that hopefully someone else will fix in 3 1/2 plus years.
You are also DEAD Wrong about calling Former President Bush and Vice President Cheney “crooks who just left the whitehouse”. You must be a big time LIBERAL and are eating up the fact that he is trying to tear down the good that made this country the GREATEST ever.
I will pray for you and your kind.

Posted by: Chas | May 22, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Um … Obama is far from constitutional. Im not saying bush and his cronies were though. Bush, Biden, Cheny, Obama, none of them are Constitutional.
So why is Obama giving speeches in front of the document he (as well as Bush) has declared war on in all but words?

Posted by: Andrew | May 22, 2009, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

When I was growing up, I read stories about Robinhood and his Merry Men. I thought it was just a fairy tale. But lo and behold, he is real. Take from the rich and give to the “poor”. Now it is Obamahood and his Merry Men, Women and Inbetweens. Let’s be Frank about that. Theft is theft no matter who does it. But to be polictical correct, theft is named taxes.

Posted by: White | May 22, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Does it not say we can form a new government when ours gets to where it is now? It is time to form a new government. Well, get back to the original one founded by our forefathers.
I wrote my Congessman and told him the Republican party better make some extreme changes to the far right. If not I am joining the Constitutionalist Party..pure and simple next election.

Posted by: Jaime | May 22, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Must be nice to be young, living off the fat of the land, someone else serving in the military to keep your sorry butt free. Keep going to school, living off your relatives and the government, but someday the party will be over and you won’t be so happy about the collosal deficit spending Obama and team have dumped on Americans.

Posted by: not born yesterday | May 22, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Unfortunatly the presidents approach will likely prove highly efficient, as there seems to have been a dramatic shift from concious, fact based interpretation of policy to what essentially amounts to an extension of the department of defense’s novelly coined phrase “shock and awe”. We stand blank faced with our jaws dropped as mighty blasts rock the very foundation of society and all we can do is watch in amazement as we try to desipher the greasy context that is obama politics.
Longed for are the days of honesty. For better or for worse, please give it to me straight. Let me know where I stand, so that I may navigate, independant of state.

Posted by: Charlie | May 22, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Obama is the most arrogant, self centered president in the nation’s history. The only thing he knows how to do is blame Bush. I also resent him being referred to as “brilliant”. It doesn’t take a “rocket scientist” to go through law school. I had a law professor tell us this country was being run be “C” students. I think he was being to kind, because I’d give them a “D-”.

Posted by: David K. Wright | May 22, 2009, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Did anyone notice that, as Obama spoke, his words echoed in the background? Everything he said just bounced off the facsimile Constitution and echoed! Ironic, isn’t it – all his rehetoric REALLY ringing hollow? And, did you notice his teleprompter leading him down the “Newspeak” path of Orwell’s “1984″? Of course, Obama’s version of Newspeak should be updated to “Gnu-speak”. Google “gnu” (a.k.a wildebeest)and you’ll quickly connect the dots to see that “gnu-speak” is nothing but a bunch of eloquently-delivered “bull.” Oh yeah, forget that the gnu is really an antelope disguised to look kind of bullish…Obama is also disguised – as a teleprompter pretending to be an orator. I’m just sayin’…

Posted by: Jay | May 22, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

This picture of him using the constitution is a big jump from the one I keep on my desk top Sen Harkin Steak-fry in Iowa during the primary last Jan. Obama forgot to put his hand on his heart “First impression are lasting impressions” It is one of the reason I don’t trust this Son of Soros. ” if you don’t stand for something you will fall for anything”
Dee, Az

Posted by: Dee smith | May 22, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Leading the unknowing, blind follower by blending lies and demogoguery with the truth and delivering it with pompous import and a big voice, it’s a common tactic used by Mussolini, Hitler, Lenin, Kruschev, Chavez, Ortega, Che Guevera, Fidel – as the saying goes, you can put lipstick on a pig…..

Posted by: Craig | May 23, 2009, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Hey Jeffery King… let’s at least jump off the cliff before we decide whether it a smart thing to do or not. After all maybe there will be something we will see on the way down that will make it worth while! We may survive it. Why not try it first without thinking about it. HOw bad can it be? You already know what it’s like to not jump so why not give jumping off a cliff a chance before you criticize it.
Critical thinking, what’s it good for!

Posted by: JSteale | May 23, 2009, 2:16 am 2:16 am

OBAMA IS A HABITUAL LIAR…HE IS ALSO INCOMPETENT. WHEN HE SAYS SOMETHING AND GIVES HIS WORD HE CHANGES IT AND LIES. IF THE LEADER OF OUR NATION LIES THEN STANDS NEXT TO THE SYMBOLS OF OUR FREEDOM HE KNOWS HES PUSHING THE LIMITS OF POWER. HE HAS DESECRATED THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE WHEN HE WENT TO THE 20 PT CONFERENCE IN EUROPE.
PELOSI IS IN TROUBLE SHE WENT TOO FAR THINKING HER POWER WAS ABOVE THE PEOPLE AND THIS GUY MAKES ME TWINCH EVERYTIME HE SPEAKS ITS HOTAIR NONSENSE LIES AND HE JUST DOES WHAT HE WANTS…WELL MAYBE WE CAN IMPEACH HIM…HE WILL SELF DEFEAT THIS COUNTRY IS GODS COUNTRY NOT OBAMAS…AND IN TIME HE WILL SELF DEFEAT….
US ARMY RETIRED HARD

Posted by: John Reardon | May 23, 2009, 2:42 am 2:42 am

I perdict 2010 will be the telling point in the Obama presidency. If the republicans win 10 to 12 seats Obama is a bad president, If the dems win 2 to 5 seats that means only that he has everyone snowed.

Posted by: raymond | May 23, 2009, 7:43 am 7:43 am

I’m tired of everyone blaming everyone else. We are in a real mess and need to find a way to get the government to listen. No matter how we got here we need to work together to find a way out. I don’t understand why everyone sits back a watches while Obama continues to surround himself with crooks, controls the press and makes America look foolish around the world. My Father and Brothers fought for this country and now we’re just handing it over to a government where both the DEMS and REPUBS seem determined to destroy what they fought for. I have great fear for my Grandkids future. IS THERE ANY HOPE.

Posted by: Roxie | May 23, 2009, 8:46 am 8:46 am

Love all the remarks. I sat in awe at Cheney’s speech. I actually felt like I was sitting at the grown-ups table as he spelled out “in detail” what the Bush administration accomplished and why. Our poor country has a leader now who has no clue the future impact he has dumped on us. Tax and spend is no solution. Sadly, the news media has a love affair with this idiot and it turns my stomach. What a pompus, arrogant goofball!

Posted by: Wales | May 23, 2009, 9:02 am 9:02 am

When are the REAL people going to run for president? What can u expect from a community organizer, or a cheer leader?

Posted by: seymour | May 23, 2009, 9:31 am 9:31 am

To All
Our political aristocracy, controlled and subsidized by world bank directors, has systematically sandwiched in laws and policy over the last sixty years to destroy this republic by the end of 2009. The confident arrogance in which they lie and mislead citizens is a ruse to sway focus from obvious results of the “FINAL” impending bills in congress at this time.
After inception of the “FED” and many years of slipping into office corrupt leaders, enactments started to befall us with Eisenhower’s “No examining Treasury Books”. From there it escalated through every Presidency until Obama who is pulling it all together by rushing, via coercion, “sight unseen” bills past the few honorable representatives left on Capitol Hill. None dare call it treason.
The bottom lines are verifiable through googling specific topics and scrutinizing both comments and facts from the many sources available. While we still can.
1. Total destruction of “Free Enterprise” as a productive means of economic stability and solvency of the Dollar. Check out the “Already used AMERO” to China and the negative effects of NAFTA and Supply side Economics.
2. Socialistic values that impede; quality product & education, enhanced skills levels, job promotion, freedom of choice, etc. perpetuated by government supported unions.
3. Containment of the sick, elderly and destitute inclusive of “Flu Victims”. FEMA Camps & Bush Bills of 2003 and 2007. Note the blatant disregard of the Constitution by Bush, quickly followed by Obama.
4. Be concerned of the many subversive factions on American Soil, supported by taxes, which are expanding with chaotic potential to further support Chaney propaganda.
We already have an alternative Government; it’s named the CFR, and has been on our payroll for many years. It is comprised of all the supporters of corruption for decades.
The FBI may be the only department left to incarcerate the tyrannical powers to be and their “Oath Violating” dependants in congress. We can only hope.

Posted by: Exposure | May 23, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Standing in front of a fake Constitution
is hipicritical. This present Adminis-
tration has totally disregarded the
Constitution and what is stands for.
They have broken the rules in the
House of Representatives and the Senate,
by bypassing the Republican members and
their recommendations.56% of Americans
(a majority)want our freedoms back. This
is a Democracy not a banana republic.

Posted by: Linda | May 23, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Hey Jeffrey King, the democrats are the ones to blame for this mess! Democrats forced banks to lend money out willy-nilly to anyone who had a pulse! Get your facts straight. I was intigued by Obamas’ “lets come together” during the first ten minutes of his administration. I wanted to support him! However, he has done nothing but embrace the looneys on the left and their(read his)agenda! He will go down in history as the most unsuccessful president of all time! Taxes on top of taxes! Give me a break! Where are we now? Three TRILLION? My God man get a grip! I bailed on Bush when he signed the first 900 BILLION! If we don’t stop this, we’re toast! It may be too late already!! What, we’ll just say we don’t owe it? Hello WAR with China? We’ve just borrowed our way into third world! Ever wonder how it was in Rome when they slipped into oblivion? Just watch the next twenty years if we don’t stand up and reverse out of control entitlements and bailouts of businesses weiged down by union workers. Let ‘em fail! That’s Capitalism and that’s the way it works! Don’t just swallow this nonsense! What about the BILLIONS given to GM? They still went under! Where’s the money? Where is ALL the money!!!! Billions to ACORN? Where’s the money!!!!!

Posted by: D. Douglas | May 23, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am

Why would Obama stand in front of a document he is trying to shred?

Posted by: Beth | May 23, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Those are great comments. I’am afraid of something, probably should not write what it is. I am afraid that Mr. Obama will worm himself in a constituional loop hole (as he has been doing for the last five months) and will legally make himself a dictator. He is sly, deceiving, being deceived, and without conscious. I also believe He does have power over him from the pit of hell. This country probably will not have the opportunity to have a democratic election in 3-1/2 years. May God help us!!!!!

Posted by: Anonymous | May 23, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Linda, we are not a democracy or a banana republic (yet). We are a constitutional, representitive republic. I know that you have been taught all your life that we are a democracy, but it ain’t so. That’s most of the problem, we have people voting who are not qualified. Voting is a privlige not a right.
Seymour, we had a real person run in the last election. His name is Ron Paul.

Posted by: Ray | May 23, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

My father and daughter fought for this great country and I was very proud of this country. Now with what Obama is doing to this country is a crime. Why can’t something be done to stop this madness. When he did his speach in front of our Constitution that our country was founded on and fought for, it makes me sick. I write to congress and the senate every week with nothing being done to change things. What is wrong with everyone. I use to watch the TV stars and liked watching their talent, but now they are using that to make the American public change values and what we have stood for. I know longer watch them or the news shows. I watch Fox news because they are the only ones reporting the truth.

Posted by: Gloria Ure | May 23, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Hypocrisy so blatant it is sickening to any right thinking American. He has sworn to uphold and he is doing all he can to ignore it. I respect the Office of President, but I do not respect him. He has lied, misinformed, manipulated, and brazenly dealt in cronyism at its worst. He would make a great community organizer,not so a President.

Posted by: Roy Faubion | May 23, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

President Obama is changing our country and not for the better. We must ban together as a country and let our politicians know that we do not like the path they are taking us on. I am so ashamed of our media and our Congress. They just sit there and go along with the destruction of our country. I hope History judges Pres. Obama and this Congress harshly. They will richly deserve it. I cry for my country and feel so sad that so many Americans have been deceived and they just follow the Liberal drumbeat. I hope we wake up before its to late.

Posted by: captj72 | May 23, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

A facsimile of a real President in front of a facsimile of the real Constitution. Were the styrofoam columns from the convention not available? All show, no substance, except for a voracious appetite for other people’s money. When does the campaign end???

Posted by: Mae | May 23, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

It is about time that people figured the great imposter out. There is a lot to learn about him and I doubt he is even a naturalized citizen…. He is a phony and he will ruin this country. To stand in front of the constitution he has mocked is a shame..He is not qualified under the constitution to be president as he has not shown his birth certificate and refuses to do so. Congress comitted treason when they did not challenge his qualifications.

Posted by: Bob Velon | May 24, 2009, 2:40 am 2:40 am

To Dee Smith – Thanks, I had forgotten the ‘no hand over the heart’ thing with Harkin. Isn’t that just perfectly typical? No flag pin, no heart felt oath, Obama’s only loyalty runs to Woodrow Wilson amd Karl Marx, if not worse. The comments on Jakes’s page should be seen as a warning shot over the bow of the Democrats & Republicans alike. God Bless Jake for being one of the few mainstream media people who actually seem to be interested in what the silent majority really believe. We are no longer silent. A fascist takeover of the United States is finally bringing us out of the woodwork. Did you see that apparatchik Durbin on Meet The Press, trying to outwit Newt Gingrich today? A fool like Durbin can’t stand up to the truth. Unfortunately, I live in Illinois and this communist organizer is still, somehow, in the Senate, and that ACORN organizer is in the White House! My god! DUMP DURBIN. Oust the Democrats. Slap the Republicans to their senses. Get this usurper and his minions OUT of power before it’s too late.

Posted by: Craig | May 24, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

It sounds like we all no where we want to go.They question is how do we all get on the same path to join together.The crooks in goverment only care about mass numbers against them , with the worry of being dethroned.I ask every one to make a list of all there reps and email,call and write to the I started this about a year ago when after reassesment my property taxes went up $2100.00 in a year.I love this country and belive in its past values and future greatness as tho founders wrote it.

Posted by: Sean | May 24, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am

People , the elections are coming soon. We don’t have much time.We have to start an independent party and vote the democratics and republicans out of office. BAN THE TWO PARTY SYSTEM Our country Is In severe danger. Our party needs to not contain politicians.

Posted by: tom | May 24, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

I think we have awakened a little late. we can call, email and fax our representatives and senators all day and nothing will change. I think that the majority are on the same page to destroy the republic so many fought for. I seriously think the only way to regain control by the people is to refuse to send them the one thing that fuels there energy, OUR MONEY!!!! they can pass all the bills stimulus etc. but without the support of our taxes to fund THEIR agenda they can do nothing.

Posted by: mayday | May 24, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Sean Hannity and others claim Obama’s policies leave us more vulnerable to terrorist attack. Not so! There will be no attack on America during this administration’s tenure. Extremist’s are acutely aware that they should not incur our ire at this time. They can feel confident that our president will do more harm to our nation than they ever could. It would be counter-productive to their cause to galvanize our people’s focus on them, when they have such a wonderful ally in the White House!

Posted by: Sam Gardner | May 24, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

I LOVE YOU PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!! It gives me hope!

Posted by: veteran4justice | May 24, 2009, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

I loved the post by “Wales”. I thought that I was the only person that got nauseated every time I heard Obama talk. Just once I would like to hear him say what he means and mean what he says. His “sayings” and “meanings” seem to be direct opposites when viewed in the light of his “actions”.

Posted by: Darrell | May 24, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

I agree with Bob Velon, congress comitted treason when they failed to verify this Muslim’s American birth certificate. That can only mean HE HAS NONE! so, how do begin, and complete, the absolutely total impeachment of all politicaians in office at that time, as well as any (newly elected) whose election was tainted by inaccurate voter registration numbers turned in by Acorn “volunteers” both Democrat and Republican?

Posted by: David Wootton | May 26, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am

Sam Gardner hit the bulls eye. Destroying us from within is a lot easier than elaborate terrorist attacks that cost money. They may be sick but they are not dumb.

Posted by: alice winter | May 26, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am

A lot of people have compared Obama to FDR or JFK. Actually he reminds me of LBJ. In the 1964 presidential election, Johnson won by a landslide. One of the reasons for this was that he said we would never get us involved in Vietnam, as Goldwater felt that we should be. After the Gulf of Tonkin resolution, I delighted in hearing liberals say,”I voted for Johnson but I elected Goldwater. LBJ antagonized his liberal base by being hawkish on foreign policy, while ticking off conservatives with his left-wing social programs. Remind you of somebody? He also had numerous battles with Congress. LBJ of course did not seek a second term. He left the political battlefield in disgrace and humiliation. His vice, Hubert Haratio Humphrey was delegated to carry the ball, which he promptly dropped.When Nixon ran against Humphrey, the Republican party was divided, pretty much as it is now. As Yogi Berra used to say, “it’s de ja vu all over again.”The GOP needs to pick a strong candidate to beat Biden in 2012

Posted by: William Schamroth | May 26, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

I think it’s up to each of us to look first at our local city and county leaders, and then our state leaders… and we need to re-assert our states’ rights. We need to repeal amendment 17 and start holding our US reps accountable to the state again. No more national campaigning and lobbying at the federal level.

Posted by: Mieke | May 26, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

Why the hell do conservative commentators, Hannity, Oreilly, Beck, et al have Karl Rove, architect of the Republican disaster (amnesty anyone?) of 06 and 08 on their shows. Beats the hell outa me. And I am a bedrock concservative.

Posted by: old soldier | May 27, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Obama is taking advantage of our nation of ignorance that is wrapped in apathy and instant gratification. How can the conservative party of wisdom get through that?

Posted by: teresa | May 27, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Glenn He can wrap himself in whatever he wants. Does not change a thing. He nominates racists, he appoints tax dodgers, His friends were questionable, he cannot remember where he lived. His land bought in a deal. His birth certificate is questionable. A certification IS NOT a true Birth Certificate. He is changing our country to suit his rich backers / voters. What has he really done for the poor. Seeing he gave away millions 250.00 seems a pittance. For sick people it doesn’t even pay for 2 months medicine. Seems to me the citizens are taking a royal one. No matter how you look at it. To me payback is payola. He tells stories. People believe him. When all my brothers and sisters see finally they are just a pawn they will see for themselves. We are nothing to him. The ones he cares about are the ones he owes. Now they are taking Car co.? Moon disease is running rampant. Actually I really have not decided who he is working for. It certainly cannot be me. So I figure it cannot be you either. God bless our country and our troops.

Posted by: Judy | May 30, 2009, 2:33 am 2:33 am

Cialis best price buy online.

Buy cialis. Cialis how it works. Purchase cialis online. Cialis.

Posted by: Cialis. | August 9, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.