May 20, 2009 7:13am

Gingrich: Pelosi ‘Disqualified Herself’ From Being Speaker

ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich today flatly declared that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi should be replaced in the wake of her allegation that the CIA lied to her about harsh interrogation techniques. “She really disqualified herself to be speaker,” Gingrich, R-Ga., told Diane Sawyer on ABC’s “Good Morning America. “I think the Democrats should get a new speaker.” Pelosi’s allegation “basically smears” the U.S. intelligence community, Gingrich said, leaving her “disqualified” to be behind only the vice president in the presidential succession order. Leaving her in place, he said, is “very dangerous” for the country. Pelosi’s office called Gingrich’s suggestion “ludicrous,” and noted that no Democrats are calling for Pelosi to be ousted. The comments build on an argument Gingrich lays out in his weekly newsletter, sent to supporters Wednesday morning. “The case against Nancy Pelosi remaining Speaker of the House is as simple as it is devastating: The person who is No. 2 in line to be commander in chief can’t have contempt for the men and women who protect our nation. America can’t afford it,” Gingrich writes. “Speaker Pelosi has damaged America’s safety. . . . America is losing ground because of Nancy Pelosi’s contempt for those who defend her. Democrats owe it to their country and our national security to replace Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House.” For more on this topic, watch ABCNews.com’s "Top Line," live at noon ET. Today’s guest: Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, who has offered sharp criticisms of Pelosi’s continued leadership. Watch HERE live at noon.

User Comments

But George Tenet is “worthy?” Hehe. Newt needs to get him a job! He left in shame from government office. He’s still stucked! Angry. George Tenet DID lie to the American people, and pleeeeze, does he really think the CIA told the Democrats or “anybody” that they was backing the BUSH administration to Torture our Captives! Newt Gingrich, you can go back in your “hole” now, and practices what you preach. Nancy told the truth. They Didn’t brief her about their plans to Torture.

Posted by: tychisum | May 20, 2009, 7:37 am 7:37 am

I’m no fan of Pelosi, but Gingrich lecturing anyone on honesty and ingegrity is laughable. He was leading the charge for Clinton’s impeachment for the Lewinsky affair while he was cheating on his wife. The Repubs should neuter Newt. He has no credibility and doesn’t help their cause.

Posted by: T | May 20, 2009, 7:37 am 7:37 am

Newt’s just mad he got caught with poor ethics and had to resign the speaker position so he wants to see Pelosi do it as well. His time is past.

Posted by: Lawyer | May 20, 2009, 7:39 am 7:39 am

Can anybody image that Pelosi is anywhere in line to be President? She is a lying pandering politician who is so partisan, she would lie about her involvement in approval of EITs and blame the CIA. She needs to be removed as speaker immediately as she doesn’t have enough personal integrity to have that position.

Posted by: brian | May 20, 2009, 7:39 am 7:39 am

The previous administration had contempt to spare for the CIA professionals whose analyses it twisted to suit its foregone conclusions, and endangered them (with Mr.Cheneys right-hand man taking the fall for him and going to jail in the Valerie Plame scandal). Mr. Gingrich was possibly the most hypocritical (e.g., his multiple affairs while hounding Clinton over Lewinsky – this distraction tangibly weakened our national security), partisan and dishonest (e.g., 22 bounced checks) speaker in history. Why then listen to him?

Posted by: libertyjustice33 | May 20, 2009, 7:41 am 7:41 am

‘m no fan of Pelosi, but Gingrich lecturing anyone on honesty and ingegrity is laughable. He was leading the charge for Clinton’s impeachment for the Lewinsky affair while he was cheating on his wife. The Repubs should neuter Newt. He has no credibility and doesn’t help their cause.
***********************************************
Totally agree, A pot calls a kettle black! Boy
the GOP is really gasping for air these days.
LOL

Posted by: spacerook1 | May 20, 2009, 7:57 am 7:57 am

Pelosi disqualified herself when she declared illegal aliens the “true patriots” and proposed giving all of them amnesty and citizenship and allowing each of them to bring in 10 relatives. (A little over a year ago) Thank God most House Democrats and Republicans alike showed no support for the idea.
Plain and simple, the lady is dangerous. She has no idea what she is doing beyond worshiping Obama and opposing anything any Republican proposes.

Posted by: Oonogil | May 20, 2009, 8:00 am 8:00 am

I get a laugh out of Democrats who, instead of trying to defend Pelosi — an impossible task — they prefer to attack Bush. bush is no longer president — a line used by Dems whenever bubba was attacked after he left office — so let’s hear why a brainless half wit like Lala Pelosi should be kept on.

Posted by: Walter | May 20, 2009, 8:03 am 8:03 am

Line me up with Machod. Pelosi should step down and eventually will. If not for this fiasco it will be for something equally flamable. Come on folks this is a stupid person. I would have liked to have been in the room when she met with Assad a couple of years back, the Syrians were probably thinking “Holy Allah”, “is this woman actually in a position of responsibility in the U.S. Government”?

Posted by: Dave | May 20, 2009, 8:05 am 8:05 am

So let me get this straight. If Pelosi didn’t defend herself, you’d be calling for her to step down. She did defend herself and your calling for her to step down.
brian, why I don’t like Pelosi, I wonder why you are all so ready to go after her and not Bush & Cheney who thought of, carried out and lied about torture! She may have known, but they are ones who made it happen.

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 8:07 am 8:07 am

Many of you are correct. Bush is no longer the President. Sooo since he authorized the torture, he should be brought up on war crimes! You call it deflecting, huh? Bush and Cheney BROKE THE LAW! Both the US law and International law! Bush LIED to the nation, “We do not torture!”, remember that? But all your interested in is if Nancy knew!

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 8:12 am 8:12 am

It is really comical that all the libs on here can do is argue about Gingrich’s qualifications??? I hate to breake it to you but it is Pelosi’s reputation and qualifications that are in question here.

Posted by: billy bob | May 20, 2009, 8:12 am 8:12 am

Why does everyone assume that Pelosi is being untruthful? Has the CIA ever told the truth about anything? CIA operatives are paid to lie, that is what a spy does. The CIA certainly lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Most of the good information we have had about terrorists probably comes from other organizations – like the FBI.

Posted by: Tony Justin | May 20, 2009, 8:15 am 8:15 am

When did the Bush Administration lie about torture?
Clinton lied to the American people about his affair, big difference.
Liberals are funny.

Posted by: Mofo | May 20, 2009, 8:15 am 8:15 am

Many of you are correct. Bush is no longer the President. Sooo since he authorized the torture, he should be brought up on war crimes! You call it deflecting, huh? Bush and Cheney BROKE THE LAW! Both the US law and International law! Bush LIED to the nation, “We do not torture!”, remember that? But all your interested in is if Nancy knew!
Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009 8:12:04 AM
— Show us the laws that were broken. Dont you wonder why bush has not been tried and convicted if what you are saying is correct??? Could it be you are WRONG????

Posted by: billy bob | May 20, 2009, 8:15 am 8:15 am

Machod, Bush did mess this country up with 8
years of his cowboy rule.+++++++You have no
debate on this one
*********************************************
Machod:But the fact remains, even the POTUS’ own
liberal party is giving him fits,———–That’s
why it’s a democracy, get it, Democrat=Democracy
as opposed to Republican=Republican Guards.
*********************************************
Machod:and at this rate, it will only take Obama 4
years to screw up what Bush did in 8! ——-It’s
easier now that Bush wrote the book on it. I hope
they close that book soon!
*********************************************
Machod: Let the whining begin!——–Actually
it should be paraphrased “Let the wining begin,
since the GOP are hold the sour grapes.

Posted by: spacerook1 | May 20, 2009, 8:15 am 8:15 am

Gingrich and Pelosi are of the same ilk. They have both used their position as Speaker to promote partisan politics of the worse kind. For Gingrich to criticize Pelosi really takes unmitigated gall. It is really dreadful to think that Gingrich was, and Pelosi is, in line for the Presidency after the Vice President.

Posted by: BachisBest | May 20, 2009, 8:15 am 8:15 am

One can talk about Newts problems all day long, but the fact is the guy is sharp, very smart. I believe he has learned from his mistakes, and I would love to see him run for President. As for Pelosi, her mouth is too big. I recall when she lambasted Bush in January on national TV, blaming him for the whole mess on the economy, when in fact it was Barney Frank, and Chris Dodd who missed the boat. She needs to take a slow boat to China.

Posted by: Steve | May 20, 2009, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Gingrich is just the lastest lame GOP voice to try to bring division and devisivness into the mix. A childs game to take out a competitor so they can slip one of their own into the position. Getting tired of the GOP ranting and raving and attacking while holding no cards.

Posted by: waysie | May 20, 2009, 8:17 am 8:17 am

Nancy Pelosi along with Harry Reid are an embarrasment to the country. Both need to be ousted next voting cycle.

Posted by: Steve | May 20, 2009, 8:24 am 8:24 am

I hope the Democrats keep Pelosi as Speaker. She is confused and incompetent and just what the Democrats need to push Obama’s socialist agenda. So far, we have double-digit unemployment in some major states and key commodity prices are rising. By the way, Democrat voters, how’s that “hope and change” working out for you? When national unemployment is over 10% and when inflation is climbing to double-digits (thanks to over $2 trillion in “stimulus”) will you still be bitterly clinging to Obama’s bogus “hope and change”?

Posted by: Patrick C. | May 20, 2009, 8:24 am 8:24 am

Newt is no longer in office–am I correct?–let’s look to the future, Dems,and stop ranting about the past. Because of republicans, your sorry butts are safe. And, much as I hate to admit it, your Nancy OK’d the “techniques” but is now denying it. In other words, she wishes there had been another terrorist attack due to sloppy interrogating by the US.The woman must be bipolar.

Posted by: sifto77 | May 20, 2009, 8:26 am 8:26 am

Pelosi has shown herself to be untrustworthy and incapable of taking responsibility for her actions. (Lying to save her political skin). The Dems will not do anything to remove her. She will not step down.
“Power corrupts, Absolute power corrupts absolutely”

Posted by: Frank | May 20, 2009, 8:26 am 8:26 am

You libs can never accuse Newt of endangering American sons and daughters lives because he trashed the CIA–any mistake he made pales in comparison to this traitorous woman.

Posted by: sifto77 | May 20, 2009, 8:30 am 8:30 am

I can’t take any more of Reid and Pelosi–they both ought to resign and in a hurry! She’s been a thorn in the Dem’s side ever since she took office and started bashing the Bush Administration for everything but the weather. No, wait. She’s blaming him for Global Warming too!!!

Posted by: Scotty | May 20, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am

Spacerook – It’s easier now that Bush wrote the book on it. I hope
they close that book soon!
The fact is, the democrats, especially liberals are the ones keeping this chapter open. Whenever a lying liberal gets caught with their pan-suit down (Pelosi), or rant like a slobbering fool (Franks), they play the Bush blame game. It’s now time for democrats to take charge of the game. The ball’s in their court now. Democrats can do one of two things. Either aid and abet Obama in his quest to deliver on his empty promises and at least satisfy their own party. Or, they can start packing now, because after the antics of late from BOTH sides of the aisle, 2010 and 2012 elections won’t be too friendly to the current encumbents. And as far as I can see, at this point, the liberals have far more to lose.

Posted by: Machod | May 20, 2009, 8:34 am 8:34 am

He has it right!

Posted by: Joe | May 20, 2009, 8:38 am 8:38 am

Pelosi should have been gone long before now. She never has been good for America

Posted by: aircav | May 20, 2009, 8:38 am 8:38 am

Having had an affair is quite different than calling the CIA liars, and George Tennent was a Clinton appointee, and stole and destroyed records on behave of the Clintons, not Bush. It should scare people just as much that Biden is second in command, as it does Pelosi is third. What a scary bunch of poloticians we have in charge right now. What the heck were you people thinking? We’re all going to be driving smart cars and eating humus.

Posted by: srcamachonj | May 20, 2009, 8:40 am 8:40 am

So the GOP has ‘turned the corner’ and is now ‘looking forward’ – with Newt leading the charge? Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!! I swear, a good comedy team could not come up with this stuff……

Posted by: SearamblerOne | May 20, 2009, 8:43 am 8:43 am

We have been over this before

Posted by: Thinking | May 20, 2009, 8:43 am 8:43 am

WOW!
And some of my GOP friends consider Newt Presidential Timber..one might ask how the Christian Cons Right feel about the man given his sordid other life that seems to be in high intensity spotlight now. If this is the GOP attitude and design this style of attack politics move over GOP go the way of the Federalists and Whigs..wonder if he tried to join today they would even consider ABRAHAM LINCOLN for a GOP CARD?

Posted by: ed jones | May 20, 2009, 8:45 am 8:45 am

“He was leading the charge for Clinton’s impeachment for the Lewinsky affair while he was cheating on his wife.”
Gingrich was leading the charge to impeach Clinton NOT because he was having an affair, no one cared who about that, it was because Clinton “LIED” about it, and was caught in his lie.
Pelosi isn’t in hot water because she either knew or didn’t know about the EITs; its because in her partisan zeal she “LIED” about knowing and was caught in her own lie.
Turns out she isn’t even a very good lier because she can’t remember what she said from one news conference to another, and she apparently forgot they get recorded.
Bush and Cheney didn’t lie about EIT’s, because in the interest of National Security and your safety, THEY DIDN’T SAY ANYTHING.
Do you see the difference?

Posted by: GLSnj | May 20, 2009, 8:46 am 8:46 am

Newt is not on trial here. Pelosi is the one in question. I know it is hard for democrats to focus but just this once, try and zero in on the real problem. She needs to be removed.

Posted by: Polly | May 20, 2009, 8:47 am 8:47 am

Bush didn’t lie, he did what he believed was necessary to put an end to the threat that continued to come from Iraq. Weapons were found, just not in the volume that Saddam said he had them. And we had stocks were at an all time high of 17000 in Oct. 2007, right before the Dems took over both houses and decided they needed to do something to mess things up so they could win the White House. You can believe all the rhetoric you want, but look back at the facts. If we could have been getting some type of substative legislation out of the house for the past 2 years, instead of 18 attempts to bring the Bush adminitration up on impeachment charges, and outlawing light bulbs, maybe we wouldn’t be sitting where we are now.

Posted by: srcamachonj | May 20, 2009, 8:48 am 8:48 am

pelosi is flat out lying, dems seem to forget that the dems have had control since 2006, and what has changed with anything gitmo? torture (joke) nothin compared to what the terrorists do to our guys, but the water boarding was known about then as well and didnt stop. so dont tell me this woman 2nd inline to be president was not kept up to date and aware of what was happening and when. never mind that these terrorists are not even covered under the geneva(sp) convention! since they hide/dress like cowards amoung civilians. the amnesia from the late clinton years is astonishing as well when all your favorite dems where saying iraq had wmds and we needed to do something. in comes bush and all of a sudden there is somebody that is gonna actually do something about it and all the dems take a giant step back and let the media do the dirty work of smearing the country. our military has done an outstanding job! yet many of you want to blame them for killing civilians when its the very terrorists in gitmo that were car bombing crowed markets in iraq. they were no soldiers there those were blantant attempts at controlling the iraqi civilians. so dam it if we got to waterboard a few of them then so be it. rest assurd if it were your families in jepordy you would be the first to say do it or something worse to get the needed info. as for the gitmo easy fix the only good terrorist is a dead terrorist. many of you rather kill babies then them though right!

Posted by: simmie | May 20, 2009, 8:50 am 8:50 am

exactly,….Newt Gingrich continues to Newt the republic party

Posted by: watching | May 20, 2009, 8:50 am 8:50 am

P. Should stick to her family wineries and God forbid she should go outside and do some physical work while she’s at it. She’s got hired underpaid minorities to do the job.
Is P. Good for anything I wonder?

Posted by: terrie | May 20, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am

What was done, was not classified as torture at the time, and it saved thousands of American lives before it did. If you’d have know people that died on 9-11, or if it had been your child, or father, or mother, perhaps you would look at this through different eyes. I don’t see anyone wanting to take Clinton or Reno to court for decimating our intelligence services and passing rules that made it against the law for them to communicate to each other, which led to the lack of responce to all the separate signals as to what led up to 9-11.

Posted by: srcamachonj | May 20, 2009, 8:54 am 8:54 am

Why do democrats defend Pelosi by putting down others?

Posted by: Kendle | May 20, 2009, 8:55 am 8:55 am

GLSn – No, on Monday Nov. 7th, 2005 Pres. Bush stated in Panama City that the nation is at war with an enemy “that lurks and plots and plans and wants to hurt America again. And so, you bet, we’ll aggressively pursue them, but we’ll do so under the law.” Bush, who spoke to reporters during a brief visit to the capital of Panama, also asserted, “We do not torture.” Washington Post

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 8:55 am 8:55 am

srcamachonj – Yes Bush did lie, he said we do not torture, read my above post and it’s been considered torture what they did since 1948! Do some research!

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am

First off, the GOP went after Clinton for committing perjury, he committed a felony, and admitted it in front of the whole nation, yes his lie was about sex but given that he lied about it in a sexual harassment suit it was a big deal. Second republicans don’t think Nancy should be prosecuted for not saying anything or approving torture, we don’t think anybody should be prosecuted. All we’re saying is that she’s a hypocrite for not doing or saying anything about this until she could gain from it politically. Nancy has already lied about this subject and has offered no proof while the CIA has not been caught in a lie and has offered proof for their side of the story so saying that the CIA is lying and acting like it’s ridiculous to think it’s Nancy is just partisan crap.

Posted by: Tenface | May 20, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am

It is so sad that Gingrich thinks he is God and has the gall to criticized Peloski when he has such a disgusting history himself. I think he is forgetting that the times are new now, and the Republican ways are over. In other words their right wing control of keeping things hidden,and their control with torture towards others are over. He is going to bring some criticism towards the new administration to try to avoid what the CIA has done. I think Newt is pro-war not pro-peace, and he is probably supported by the NRA, after all they made big bucks off wars. Obama’s goal is peace and respect from other countries and towards them too.

Posted by: clever516 | May 20, 2009, 8:59 am 8:59 am

My grandfather was a veteran of the second world war. He landed in Normandy and fought his way right to the end. He also beat up prisoners, ‘torturing’ them for information far worse than anything done today. I’m sure waterboarding is a lot less traumatic than getting your teeth knocked out with an entrenching tool. Prisoners in war are always tricked, tormented, pressured and tortured for information by all sides that have any sense of self preservation. Happily during a real shooting war the lawyers stay far away from the front lines, so we are not afflicted with their prattle.
Nancy is a scatterbrained liar and has the leadership qualities of a chicken. She agreed with the torture at the time but is unwilling to confront the destructive anti-American insane left of her party. She would rather dump on the CIA than offend this disgusting rabble. Now that she has crippled our intelligence gathering ability, I hope that the first nuke goes off in the Bay area.

Posted by: Jim | May 20, 2009, 9:01 am 9:01 am

Make no mistake, had Nancy been a republican she would have been already gone. Politics today has all these “voices”, both Democrat and Republican, injecting their opinions into every situation that occurs which makes these wonderful inflamatory headlines for all of us to comment on yet bogs down the jobs that we elect these people to do.
There are responsible memebers of Congress who will eventually do something, at the least she will be less effective but more important is the fact that her voters one day will look around and see that their tax paying neighbors, who have fled the state of California because of extreme taxation, will elect someone else to represent them.
Nancy then will be at liesure to raise her grandkids and enjoy the wonderful retirement plans that we fund for her.

Posted by: david | May 20, 2009, 9:01 am 9:01 am

Are people really thinking that it’s impossible that the CIA lied? How depressingly naive.

Posted by: Dave | May 20, 2009, 9:04 am 9:04 am

I think a little water isn’t really torture,with all the big hoopla they really should’ve practised some torture,maybe behead a few of’em with dull kitchen knives on video,oh,wait a minute,that’s what they did to our people,oh yeah,civilians.You people need to grow up,waterboarding isn’t really torture.

Posted by: Frank Mason | May 20, 2009, 9:05 am 9:05 am

what i dont get is everyone forgets that of the three guys waterboarded, one of them was directly responsible for 9-11 and the deaths of over 3000 americans that day, and he had information they were able to extract to prevent a second wave from hitting L.A. So all those who think these techniques are so bad, what you are realy saying is that it is preferable to let hundreds if not thousands of americans die in an attack we could have prevented with a little persuasion. i would prefer we gut the terrorists if it saves one american life. but this is the liberal way, befreind and protect your enemies, sell your allies down the river. pelosi needs to resign, she lied about what she knew, and in her position this is unacceptable. so all you liberals who think youre always right, your side could never lie, grow up and face reality

Posted by: steve | May 20, 2009, 9:07 am 9:07 am

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich is absolutely correct. Pelosi’s immaturity and lack of substantial character has come out. She wears nice cloths and has a nice hair do, but that only qualifies her to be a J.C. Penney’s catalogue model, not Speaker of the House.

Posted by: Jack | May 20, 2009, 9:08 am 9:08 am

The CIA, black planes, snatching people away in the night,oooohhhhh.
Get real, could they have lied? Maybe, except the meetings were with other people also, that said they didn’t. The only one that says she was lied to is Pelosi, and that was only after she got caught lying herself. So don’t be so blinded by your partisan beliefs that you refuse to understand, ALL our politicians are lying, and care only about keeping power and milking us of as much tax money as they can.

Posted by: srcamachonj | May 20, 2009, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Tenface – and Bush lied about torture! Nov. 5, 2005! Which is worse? I’m no Pelosi fan, in many ways she does more harm than good, but stop looking only at her. Bush & Cheney broke laws! They made the decisions and lied about them. Where is your outrage with them? Talk about being a hypocrite!

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am

Are people really thinking that it’s impossible that Pelosi lied? How depressingly naive. I mean shes a carrer politician. its a requirement they tell a certain number of lies a day.

Posted by: steve | May 20, 2009, 9:12 am 9:12 am

We the sheeple. If it wasn’t so frightening, it would be funny. The world is not scared of us anymore. I feel totally vulnerable now that this administration is in office. 4 more years is a long time to wait.

Posted by: Kathy | May 20, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Pelosi is so bad that she has become an asset to the Republicans. The more she screws up, the more her staff has to compensate for, the more they have to compensate for, the less Obama poison legislation gets done. That’s a good thing. 9000 pork items in the stimulus program really helped most Americans see thru their duplicity. Expensive, but a very valuable lesson. As unemployment exceeds 10%, inflation approaches 15%, oil returns to $125 a barrel, tax increases choke business and job creation, doctors decide to retire because they don’t get paid enough, and everyone realizes that no one qualifies for mortgage assistance, the Socialist revolution will die hard and fast. Then again, if Iran nukes Isreal or another 9/11 happens first – it will die even faster. Hopefully, the electorate will be more careful next time about voting in another duplicitous fast talker.

Posted by: Gary | May 20, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Tony you make a great point
“Why does everyone assume that Pelosi is being untruthful? Has the CIA ever told the truth about anything? CIA operatives are paid to lie, that is what a spy does. The CIA certainly lied about weapons of ”
Of course why do the media always assume that anyone who opposes a democrat is always lying. In those cases its tar and feather first .. seek the truth never

Posted by: Fred Flynt | May 20, 2009, 9:19 am 9:19 am

I find it interesting and rather sad, that when confronted with actual statements, the date of those statements and rules of law, many of you are so blinded with your bias that you are only interested in who knew, not who perpetrated these acts! Here’s an analogy you may be able to understand. A drunk driver plows into anther car killing people, but the police go after a person who was at the bar who may or may not of spoken with them because they feel that person should have know they were drunk! That’s what Newt is asking and your falling for it hook, line and sinker!

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 9:20 am 9:20 am

What was done at the time was not classified as torture, it was classified after the fact. Once the techniques were decided to be torture, they were stopped. Everyone that was aware of the situation at the time, signed on including Pelosi, but once it could be used as a political hammer to hit her opponents with, she did, and got caught talking out of the side of her mouth Also, these people are not POW’s so they are not entitled to the same rules and rights of POW’s, they are terrorists, that have no other agenda than to kill as many of us as they can, only because they hate what we represent.

Posted by: srcamachonj | May 20, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am

The ones that didn’t know about the waterboarding were those of us that didn’t need to know, because then the enemy would know and could prepare for it. Pelosi is not in trouble because of what she knew, or when she knew it. She’s in trouble for standing up all self rightious and asking for criminal investigation, and then lying about the fact that she was involved in it. It’s never the act, it’s the cover-up.

Posted by: srcamachonj | May 20, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am

bythetruth posted the laws and conventions signed by the United States on the subject of torture at 8:48 AM today and still some of you are saying “at the time it was done it was not torture” in reference to “enhanced interrogation techniques” (EIT).
If the Lord of heaven and earth came down and pointed out that EIT was torture you would still disagree.
Torture or EIT was and is still illegal by domestic and international law. Saying it was done to “protect us” does not change that fact. That is the lie.
No matter what Congress (Pelosi or anyone else) new or didn’t know torture is wrong. Gingrich and others in his company are creating a diversion to take our eyes off the ball.

Posted by: George | May 20, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am

Can we be clear about something… Newt was ACCUSED of ethical violations. By the left. Who was trying to smear him. And he was COMPLETELY EXONERATED. A minor point… but to some of you who keep slandering the guy… READ YOUR HISTORY!!!

Posted by: D Mac | May 20, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am

srcamachonj – It was classified as torture. Can you produce the link or statements stating that it wasn’t? Also, they are “accused” terrorists. And since this was Bush’s self stated “War on Terror” wouldn’t that make them POW’s?

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 9:29 am 9:29 am

This is news? Please! Let us know only if any of the GOPer is doing something constructive for the country.

Posted by: teddymaniac | May 20, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am

Is Newt running for President already? “The person who is No. 2 in line to be commander in chief can’t have contempt for the men and women who protect our nation.”
Oh please. She might deserve to be sacked for clumsy spinning, but she has not shown any more contempt for the men or women of our nation than the Republicans did when they lambasted the commander in chief for his clumsy attempt to kill Bin Laden in 1998 (their infamous choice to defend Al Quaeda by publicly and viciously deriding Clinton’s “Monica Missiles” attacks).
And isn’t Newt the guy whose approval rate bottomed out below 30% (although at the start of Clinton’s term his approval rating was about the same as Pelosi’s now)? Pelosi may need to go, but only because her ability to contain weak political attacks is starting to look wanting. Allowing the debate to shift from the guys who secretly tortured people to a he said-she said over whether she knew about it is just clumsy.

Posted by: jhw539 | May 20, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

I believe next election is going to be quite a sweep, hope it’s not to late by then. I also hope the GOP doesn’t make the same mistake and make so many concessions to the Dems to try and be bi-partisan only to get hacked in the neck again. The far left socialist agenda doesn’t work, look at California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Rode Island, and all the other liberal controlled states, they are in the worst shape, and have their hands out for federal bailouts.
Come on people, go to the tea parties on July forth, and take back your rights.

Posted by: srcamachonj | May 20, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Let’s see, Pelosi is just nuts. Bush is a war monger, Newt is a cheater, Clinton was impeached, half of the cabinet has “Tax Issues” and Obama wants to spend us into oblivion. I say it’s time to not only get rid of Pelosi but make a clean sweep of the whole lot of them in both parties!
I’m wondering if we have any decent, honest people in this country anymore.

Posted by: Connie | May 20, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am

George – Thank you! Facts, laws and common decency seem to confuse many people here. They get distracted by the “shiny object”! Have a good day!

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am

All this depends on whether or not you consider waterboarding “torture”. I’ve seen worse things happen at frat parties. When these methods are used, the subject is wet and scared but still alive and in one piece. Compare this to what happens when the terrorists catch our guys.

Posted by: Frank | May 20, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Ok, if you want to bring Bush up on war crimes, How about bringing Clinton up on war crimes for failure to prevent 9/11?? While he was busy getting hummers in the oval office?

Posted by: try the real truth | May 20, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Newt Gingrich is not one of my favorite people. In fact, I really can’t stand him, he’s a liar and a chat, but he’s right about Pelosi. She’s very dangerous and is only concerned about her party and herself. She is not the right person for the job (and probably shouldn’t even be in politics, but then again half or more of them shouldn’t, Dems and Reps alike). It’s scary to think she is even a potential replacement for President if something should happen to 1 and 2. It’s scary enough that Biden is 2nd in line, but this? It’s insanity. I’m not an Obama fan, but just pray nothing happens to him because the results could spell disaster. Where are all the young smart people? Oh yeah, they have real jobs.

Posted by: That one guy | May 20, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Bush lied. He’s gone. Cheney lied. He’s gone. Gingrich did other things. He’s gone. Nancy lied AND did other things. She should be gone too.

Posted by: S. Adams | May 20, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am

try the truth, you make some excellent points. Sad to say some choose to ignor the truth when it doesn’t agree with their point of view.
In the Scripture God called that “hardening of the heart”. So far no one that I’m aware of has quoted the Bible in an attempt prove that torture is acceptable. What the supporters of torture can’t seem to understand is that resorting to it actually makes us less safe.

Posted by: George | May 20, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am

The Dems have got themselves into a pickle. They supported Bush when it was politically acceptable. Then had to turn on him to keep the hard left happy. Now they want to burn Bush, but realize they’re to close to the fire. That’s why we have Pelosi lying and caniving. What a silly woman she is! Not a leader, but a back bencher and a fool!

Posted by: WhamBam | May 20, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am

D Mac:”And he was COMPLETELY EXONERATED. A minor point… but to some of you who keep slandering the guy… READ YOUR HISTORY!!!”
No, no he wasn’t. He admitted to lying during the probe for dodging taxes (huh, guess it’s not only Democrats who have a problem paying taxes?) on a partisan college course and agreed to pay US$300,000 for the cost of the investigation. He was found to have displayed “intentional or … reckless” disregard of House rules by the committee and the special investigator found he’d violated federal tax law and had lied to the ethics panel in an effort to force the committee to dismiss the complaint against him.
Ultimately, he paid up to the IRS and was not criminally charged – is that what you mean by “COMPLETELY EXONERATED”?

Posted by: jhw539 | May 20, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am

To those defending Pelosi by indicating that the milk can is calling the swill bucket sour, I can only point out that the swill bucket is still certainly sour, no matter how much your own political persuasions color your vision. Diane Sawyers pretense that a republican house member’s view of the CIA should be equated to the SPEAKERS distrust, shows which side of the RED-BLUE divide she lives on. Newt makes an intellectual case that Pelosi is NOT qualified to be third in line. Ad hominem attacks against Gingrich, or unsound arguments by false comparisons do not change the validity of Gingrich’s rational. Pelosi is in fact unfit to serve as speaker.

Posted by: Russs | May 20, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Pelosi is a disgrace to the democrats, the congress and the country she should be removed and rebuked in the strongest way possible. She appears to be mentally unstable or on drugs.

Posted by: grossecaisse | May 20, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

It’s really not that difficult, people.
Pelosi lied with regard to knowing about enhanced interrogation techniques, and the C.I.A. lied to Congress about the extent to which the techniques were used. That’s the uncomfortable truth for everyone. Both sides are lying, and they’re doing it for very obvious reasons.
Pelosi is attacking the C.I.A. now because she has lost the faith of her constituents since it has become known that she authorized waterboarding. The C.I.A. is attacking her because there is a lot more to the enhanced interrogation story that they don’t want us to know.
She’s a politician and they’re the C.I.A.! These people are all professional liars. Stop picking sides and wake up to the sad fact that your government is less than trustworthy.

Posted by: gb8898 | May 20, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

How typical of liberals to try to make themnselve look good by making others look bad focussing on what errant Republicans have done in the past. Focus on the “now” which is Pelosi. She is corrupt, dangerous, inept and must go.

Posted by: Ellie | May 20, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Pelosi has done nothing but continue the LONG-STANDING liberal tradition of demeaning our service men and women.
Liberals in power hate our military, capitalism, and America in general. Yet somehow, the idiot masses keep voting these people in office because they actually believe they ware going to make their lives better with more gov’t.

Posted by: Dave124 | May 20, 2009, 9:49 am 9:49 am

try the real truth:”How about bringing Clinton up on war crimes for failure to prevent 9/11?? While he was busy getting hummers in the oval office?”
FACT: Bush was president for 9 months when 9/11/2001 occurred. It was his job.
FACT: When Clinton attempted to kill Bin Laden in 1998, Republicans literally took to the floor of the Senate to deride his “Monica Missiles” and sent a clear political message they would not allow him to purse national security interests without paying a political price. The closest thing Bin Laden had to an active ally in the government in the late 90′s was the Republican party, who through their shortsighted partisan vendettas ultimately worked to prevent Clinton taking further action against him.
Please join us in reality.

Posted by: jhw539 | May 20, 2009, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Anyone remember Trent Lot? Comments at a birthday party for Strom Thermon led the Dems to demand his resignation. How does a private birthday party with a vague comment interpreted as racist by those who are the most racist compare with this, a vastly more serious comment pointed at likely innocent people. If we don’t police these rogue politicians we are in deep trouble. Mexico’s current troubles are due to past appeasements of evil. Pelosi appears willing to lie to the nation and bear a false witness against innocent people. She should be required to resign from congress.

Posted by: Kevin | May 20, 2009, 9:49 am 9:49 am

ironchefofmunchies:”Pelosi CALLED THE CIA LIARS! Do you not think she should be held to account for that?”
Thanks for my morning laugh! Oh noes! The CIA, our official dirty tricks guys, were called *liars*! Gasp!

Posted by: jhw539 | May 20, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Pelosi is a liar. Biden is a buffoon. Obama is a child. Reid is a whiner….These are the people leading our great country…We have all gone insane! These people will attempt to destroy our great country by FOLLOWING europe down its path to mediocrity. Change…Yes we can!

Posted by: Please! | May 20, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Newt Gingrich, as usual, spoke rashly. The facts that have been subsequently released show that the CIA cannot even document the meetings having happened or not! Speaker Nancy Pelosi has handled the situation quite well. Former Speaker Gingrich should keep talking, as it just gets funnier!

Posted by: John Hoffman | May 20, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

Connie, EXACTLY, I say dump them all and start over, like 3 election cycles in a row, starting at home and working our way through Washington, and keep getting rid of them until they get rid of the lobbyists and start doing what’s right for the people.

Posted by: srcamachonj | May 20, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

Have you noticed that no other Democrat who was a part of these briefings has spoken up to corroborate Ms. P’s version of events? Doesn’t that seem odd?

Posted by: spiffeb | May 20, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Speaking of torture. I spend 30 days in the Navy brig run by US Marines. We would have welcomed waterboarding as something cool and refreshing. The Marines do worse things to each other just to break up the boredum!

Posted by: grossecaisse | May 20, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am

The media is intentionally using Newt to try and discredit the Republican party by making him the ‘poster boy’ again.
Newt is right about Pelosi and has every right to speak out about it, but why doesn’t the media interview elected Republican officials about the issue?

Posted by: J House | May 20, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am

Nancy Pelosi hates the Republicans so much she’s looking to do damage whenever she can. All of a sudden the tables were turned by Cheney who reminded the public she bought into it. Rather than own up, her hate forced her to deny she was briefed, because owning up meant she was part of the deal. Her disconnect is so great that she probably didn’t even realize she was lying. Waterboard her and the results will show she thought she was telling the truth. I mean, she doesn’t lump herself in with the evil Bushies on a gut psychological level. She needs a psychologist for Bush derangement syndrome. As for Newt, when he was speaker, his mistake was he didn’t smile while he was sticking it to them. He needed to learn that from Bill Clinton. Hate does strange things to people and Newt was and Nancy is caught up in it. Newt appears to be recovered. Ms Former Speaker will have to recover after she steps down.

Posted by: Rudy | May 20, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

This is what counts as journalism? Giving a former Speaker of the House a platform for which he can air his grievances and smear the opposing party?

Posted by: Jon | May 20, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

spiffeb:”Have you noticed that no other Democrat who was a part of these briefings has spoken up to corroborate Ms. P’s version of events? Doesn’t that seem odd? ”
Have you noticed that Sen. Bob Graham (retired) spoke up last week to corroborate Pelosi’s version, and as support pointed out that the low level staffers in the meeting would not have been there if such sensitive issues were discussed in detail? Or how the CIA has as attending at least one of these briefing a staffer who was explicitly banned from attending?
Doesn’t it seem odd how the right wing is lying and exaggerating to try to make this into a big scandal?

Posted by: jhw539 | May 20, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am

I realize that Pelosi is getting the heat because she is Speaker of the House, but some other members of Congress have recently come forward to question the CIA account of the “briefings” they said members of Congress were given.
Why aren’t they being pilloried by Gingrich and company? They appear to back her up on the quality / content of the briefings.

Posted by: George | May 20, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Why do democrats defend Pelosi by putting down others?
Because that’s their only means of defense. For years whenever a Democrat does anything wrong their defense is to deny, deny, deny, and attack the accuser. The Democratic party has always been a bunch of anti-American Socialist liars and hypocrites. Now Hussein Obama is trying to shove their Socialist agenda down everyone’s throats. Real Americans won’t stand for that but nobody ever accused a Democrat of being a real American.

Posted by: Ron | May 20, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am

grossecaisse: I hear this line of thought all the time, as if waterboarding is just a bit of water splashed in someone’s face.
If that’s the case, how effective can it possibly be as an interrogation technique? It’s either useless splashing or it’s more than that, in which case… you know the rest.
We should also bear in mind that the S.E.E.R. training we put some of our soldiers through was originally implemented to prevent them from giving FALSE CONFESSIONS under duress. The techniques we use at Guantanamo were actually designed by communists during the Korean War to extract false confessions from U.S. soldiers.
Yet people somehow think it’s the perfect way to gain real intelligence from captives.

Posted by: gb8898 | May 20, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am

The evolution of Pelosi’s lie:
1) I knew nothing, wingnuts!
2) OK, I knew something, but I didn’t know what!
3) OK, I knew it was waterboarding, but I didn’t know they were actually going to use it.
4) OK, I knew they already had used it after I signed off on it from previous briefings that I for some reason failed to attend, but my staffer didn’t tell me everything I needed to know, even though they did.
5) IT’S BUSH’S FAULT!
6) The CIA LIES ALL THE TIME TO ME!
This, ladies and gentlemen, is the Democrats’ idea of “an adult” running the Congress. This is their idea of competence, integrity and honesty.
No wonder the first 100 days and many more to come have been and will be an economic, employment and national security disaster. By the way, Iran just tested a long-range missile.
All that talking Barry’s been doing – that tough, smart diplomacy – sure looks like it has them shaking in their boots, doesn’t it?

Posted by: Good Lt. | May 20, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Newt had an affair. That is not against the law. Clinton LIED to a grand jury. That IS against the law.
There is no comparison, brian!

Posted by: pf | May 20, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am

jhw539 – have to say I missed the Bob Graham statements. Even so, I would have expected more speaking out if Ms. Pelosi stated something that many involved agreed with.
I don’t think we should make this a partisan issue at all – to your statements about ‘right wing lying and exaggerating’. I think the same discussion would/should be happening if the current speaker was republican. Don’t you?

Posted by: spiffdeb | May 20, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

Pelosi is a moron. That the Democrats think she is the best qualified Democrat in the House for the job of Speaker says all that needs to be said about the Democrats in general. LOL!

Posted by: loldemocrats | May 20, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

Like tychisum says Nancy told the truth because she told it in so many ways it has to be the truth

Posted by: whichone | May 20, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

Hey Newt do us all A favor Disqualify Yourself from the Media shut it up go away!

Posted by: Angie in Pa | May 20, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Oh, and here comes the “socialist” and “real American” posts. The ones that have nothing to do with the topic, but are brought up when the “Do as I say not as I do” Repubs can’t debate the facts! A real American should be outraged that the previous commander in chief broke US and International Law! A real American would use the tools that we are blessed with, unlimited access to information not just what the government wants us to know. You should try using it instead of spouting of your very old talking points and showing your true self by the way you refer to OUR PRESIDENT. As much as I didn’t care for Pres. Bush or his policies, as you see from my posts I was always respectful because He was my President and with that office he did, no matter how much I didn’t like him deserve my respect. Maybe you should try it!

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am

Bush lied. He’s gone. Cheney lied. He’s gone. Gringrich lied. He’s gone. Pelosi lied. She should be gone.

Posted by: J. Madison | May 20, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am

Baja_ha, At 8:48 today, try the truth posted the laws and conventions on torture. Read them, then you’ll know what the law was and is.
Note that Ronald Reagan signed the UN convention on torture and made a firm statement against the use of torture.
You can google this all for yourself.
Furthermore it has been posted on numerous other posts before. Those who have their minds made up (hardening of the heart) choose to ignor the truth.

Posted by: George | May 20, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Democrats dont fire and dont press fellow democrats to step down!
Bill Clinton should have been forced out of office. Senate democrats aggressively protected him anyway.
Yes, I agree that Pelosi does not speak and behave in a way that should be for the 3rd highest position in the country.
But I suspect that a democrat in office can only be thrown own of office by other democrats if that person murdered atleast 10 people. If it was less than that, the democrats would not throw the person out.
Republicans always bash each other and throw each other out. McCain especially love to dis his fellow republicans whenever he got the chance.
Rules and procedures are very different for democrats and republicans. A republican can say something fairly harmless, and democrats would call for jail. Whereas a democrat can say the same exact thing or even something 100 times worse and its okay.

Posted by: Dennis | May 20, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

spiffdeb:”I think the same discussion would/should be happening if the current speaker was republican. Don’t you? ”
At the time of the briefings, the speaker WAS a Republican (Hastert). Where is his statement for the record?
And there was no indignation when the Republicans launched their attack on Clinton’s Monica Missiles, implicitly accusing the CIA of lying to provide Clinton a context to distract from his ongoing impeachment.

Posted by: jhw539 | May 20, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Baja_ha – He did break the law! Go back, I posted it. Be careful what you ask for. Newt is not doing Pres. Bush & VP Cheney an favors. Do you think they will investigate her and not them? Think about it!

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Water boarding is not torture!! I know many of you want to hang onto this notion. Water boarding is a technique to simulate the act of drowning. Due to the position of the person being water boarded it is impossible to actually drown. This process is very similar to having a tazer on someone. It hurts like hell, but once the process of water boarding or tazing is stopped all pain and discomfort stops. Within seconds you return to the same physical state you were in prior to the techniques being used.
****************************************
How do I know this information, because I have endured both and many others in training while in the military.

Posted by: tortured soldier | May 20, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Dennis – Yes Dennis, that whole “Iraq has WMD” was fairly harmless. It only killed 4000+ of our service men and women, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi’s and started this whole mess.

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

AFineMess:”People keep deflecting the topic, which is Pelosi’s culpability and integrity. If it makes you feel better to point your finger at the Bush camp would you then agree to bring Pelosi up on charges if team-Bush were too? I doubt it. You’d find another reason to back her due to your bias.”
Amazing. You see no problem making Pelosi, who was the minority whip and then minority leader at the time, EQUALLY culpable as the administration who sanctioned and execute the torture program based on the he said/she said accusation that she was told about it? Talk about blind bias.

Posted by: jhw539 | May 20, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

you that defend Pelosi from Newts comments are a joke….read the Constitution….that part about line of succession……President Pelosi? not a chance!…we would be doomed…..do you think for a moment that the CIA would be loyal to her…..they are human and we know how humans react…..besides…she would close them down…she has already stated that!

Posted by: Bryon | May 20, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

The former speaker of the house from Georgia in the 1990s as a short memory. He was trying to bring Clinton down while doing the same thing with a younger woman. He is a total hypocrite and reminds me of the archaic Dixiecrat’s in his philosophy. Not the segregation I’m sure he covers that up fairly well. At the downgrading of another political party or political purposes is idiotic.

Posted by: rusty lawson | May 20, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Just because someone you believe to be a hypocrite brings up an issue, it does not mean the issue has no valid basis. Please use your brain and separate the two issues. Pelosi clearly has stepped in it and is pathetic quite independently of Gingrich. Using Gingrich’s behavior to justify Pelosi’s is the kind of voter intelligence that produces idiots for leaders.

Posted by: sam | May 20, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am

try the truth.
You wouldn’t know the truth if it hit you in the head with a 2by4. You and others who are repeating the media’s distortion of what happened and is happening in our country is typical of their liberal education. In the past it was called indoctrination. I would venture to guess half of the posters on this sited were young children at the start of the Gulf War that was ended by a cease fire. If you all think that President Bush invaded Iraq unlawfully you are mistaken. Saddam Hussein did not comply with the cease fire conditions. The repeating of innuendos and misrepresenting what happened does not mean it is the truth.

Posted by: gator | May 20, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am

This is just one of a long list of things Pelosi has done as Speaker and she should be removed before she does any more harm. What Newt has to say about it is beside the point. Pelosi has lied, misled the country, minipulated, and used her position for her own gain. She is an joke even without Newt’s help. Get her out of there.

Posted by: clark9902 | May 20, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Ron, I’m not sure you know the difference between a fact and an opinion.
FACTS: By definition these are statements and events that can be proved or disproved.
OPINION: By definition these cannot be proved or disproved.
Saying that torture is illegal can be proved or disproved by looking up the laws and conventions.
Saying that Obama has a socialist agenda is an opinion. Calling Pelosi a liar on this issue is an opinion because there is nothing but hearsay to prove otherwise.
If you are going to say that something is a fact, then you must be able to prove it. If you cannot prove it then it is opinion.

Posted by: George | May 20, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am

pelosi and her unholy triad need to be gone now – after breaking the law she thinks we are all stupid – get out and take your friends (if you can call them that) with you – gov heading for control of airwaves – Double, double toil and trouble;Fire burn, and caldron bubble.

Posted by: Del | May 20, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Live Free or Die – when you start out the way you did says more about what your lacking than I. That said, there is nothing retroactive when it was already illegal to torture! Your the one changing the facts. And if in your world Nancy is as guilty as the lawyer, what about Bush and Cheney who requested and rubber stamped it?
————-Ron – I’ve been posting facts, links and statements that can be verified. You are spouting ignorance and hysteria. Your not worth replying to, do to your irrational statements. I was waiting for the “birth certificate” idiocy. It has been already been shown to be untrue, numerous times! Take your head out of your butt and get some fresh air!
Ok, gotta go, have things to do! Have a good day all!

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am

a) Pelosi SHOULD step down or be ousted, but the statement about the CIA is only one in a long and distinguished list of reasons why.
b) Newt should NOT be leading the charge…a current, sitting senator should.
c) Bush should not even come up in conversation. The former administration should NOT be an excuse for any president. Who is running the show RIGHT NOW? Not the former CIC.
d) The one fact that many people overlook is that this is NOT an issue of RIGHT and LEFT, but rather RIGHT or WRONG…and BOTH sides have been doing US an injustice by being self-serving and power-hungry.
Pelosi and her antics are just a symptom of the BIGGER virus that is infecting our country.

Posted by: gfreely | May 20, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Posted by: tychisum
“They Didn’t brief her about their plans to Torture.”
This is the problem, a person is a making an absolute statements, like the one above with ZERO first hand knowledge. Unless and they live and breath in Washington and Pelosi’s office, this person just shows blind support and calls everyone else liars….hmmmm, sound familiar.

Posted by: Laughing | May 20, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am

‘scuse me, but did not Pelosi ask for the documents to be released? … to prove her point? If they had the goods on her, the docs would be public already. So she is correct, and the Repugs are on the hook, swallowing the line and sinker too. And didn’t the Bushies, after pushing the CIA for pre-ordained intelligence, blame the CIA for a failure of intel on WMDs, hmmmmm? So who falsely dissed the CIA? Why, ythe Bushmen, of course!

Posted by: keeemosabe | May 20, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Live Free or Die and gator, I hope you listen to what you said. You just condemned your own words.
I’d say you’ve been brainwashed to believe that invading Iraq was necessary. Now that’s an opinion because it can neither be proved nor disproved.
But the issue here is torture and what was contained in the briefings and Newt Gingrich’s opinions about Nancy Pelosi.
FACT: torture is illegal.
OPINION: If the one many of us call “the way, the truth, and the life” told you that waterboarding is torture and therefore illegal, you would reject it and want to crucify him because you have been brainwashed to believe that it’s okay because it’s being done to “protect us”.

Posted by: George | May 20, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am

The left is destroying this country. It seems that only a civil war can stop the collectivists from finishing us off. It’s no coincidence that everyone’s buying up all the ammo.

Posted by: CorruptLeft | May 20, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Have you noticed that LIBERAL and LIBERTY have the same root? I conclude that if you are against liberal ideas you must be against liberty.
“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, with LIBERTY and justice for all.”

Posted by: George | May 20, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am

..and Newt should know of what he speaks…..

Posted by: MrRex | May 20, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Speaker Gingrich states “It is illegal to lie to Congress.” Why is it not illegal for Congress to lie to the American People? (Ex. Social Security will be there for you when you retire). It is past time to clean House (and Sen ate).

Posted by: mtwdo | May 20, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Don’t hold your breath for Pelosi to step down. In the past 20 years when has any democrat ever stepped down for any scandal no matter the size? Republicans are the only ones who ever step down (sometimes rightfully so) almost always at the behest of incessant media calls for it however, on pathetically weak premises – Gingrich’s book deal anyone? Vs. Hillary and Gore’s? Good grief, what a difference! (Why was a previous post like this deleted?)

Posted by: A Difference | May 20, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am

George,
You continue to call it an invasion it was a continuation of the Gulf War. The UN and other countries supported the Gulf War because Saddam had invaded Kuwait.
Democrats always support and defend those in their party no matter what they have done. President Clinton lied to a grand jury and the liberals defended him and continue to do so to this day. So much for standing up for truth.
If you bring in the one we call “the Way and the Truth and the Life”, how can you defend those who support killing unborn children and are indignant about waterboarding.

Posted by: Gator | May 20, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Regardless of what you think of Newt, what he says is correct.
Pelosi is a danger to the safety and security of this nation.
She should be waterboarded just for kicks, and then tried and imprisoned.

Posted by: Kelvin | May 20, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Newt should do the nation a favor and shut up. He had his chance. He shot his wad. Time for him to fade into the background………ala Bob Dole.
Newt is a has been. Time for him to give it a rest. It’s rather sad to see burned out folks struggling to stay important. Say good night, Gracie………I mean Newt.

Posted by: Sammy | May 20, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Gator, the UN and other countries did support the Gulf War. Our invasion of Iraq after 9/11 was not a continuation of the Gulf War unless you want to concede that President Bush took us there to avenge his father.
The UN and other countries did support our incursion into Afghanistan after 9/11. Going into Iraq was a distraction.

Posted by: George | May 20, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am

As someone who despises both democrats and republicans, I can only shake my head in awe. Pelosi’s defense is the CIA lied to me? She has come up with SEVEN versions of her story – why not tell the ‘truth’ to begin with? And all you pro-left types posting here say is: Bush, Cheney and Newt are nogoodniks so what Nancy did was OK! BULLPOOP! A lie is a lie NO MATTER WHO SAID IT! The woman IS a disgrace – I dont care how many woman that Newt slept with while married, were talking the safety of our nation here – Pelosi needs to go!

Posted by: Mike in MD | May 20, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

CorruptLeft:”The left is destroying this country. It seems that only a civil war can stop the collectivists from finishing us off. It’s no coincidence that everyone’s buying up all the ammo.”
And it is no coincident that your post read like a quote from the letter Jim Adkisson wrote before murdering two and injuring 7 at a “liberal church” event. Look it up.
Why is it that all the people who have murdered based on their extremist political beliefs for at least the last 30 years in this country are right wingers? From McVeigh to Rudolph, it’s rare but very consistent.

Posted by: jhw539 | May 20, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

The fact that democrats are not asking her to step down reinforces the fact the left hates this country and will do anything for power. A 2 year old could tell you she needs to go after watching her news conference. (And I use the word “NEWS” loosely.)

Posted by: Darrell | May 20, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am

This is a win-win for the right, if Pelosi goes, we win, if she stays she will consistantly make a fool of this administration even more than it already is!

Posted by: Darrell | May 20, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Heya Gator,
Those are the only tactics they have. Their hero has taken away any bragging about anything he has done, because it’s all bad for everyone. They seem to think they will escape the deliterious effects of his “bounce off the wall” policies and dictums. I wonder when it will sink in to them? They have to support leaders(??) such as Clinton, Frank, Dodd, Reid, Pelosi, et.al. because “That’s all they have.”
It gives one an insight as to exactly why they are so angry all the time. Anyone who, or who supports anyone who, is an advocate of partial birth abortion (or its real term “infanticide”) or its twin abomination “allowing a child who managed to survive an abortion to die due to no medical intervention” (manslaughter) must have tremendous conflicts haunting them.
You can present these misguided unfortunants with fact after fact (Gulf War, etc.) but you are wasting your time. It does not fit into their template. But I suppose we must continue trying……
Ta-Ta

Posted by: Youssarian aka: TexasSlim | May 20, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

pelosi is an embarasing despot. She is an expensive Speaker with her jet trips home and self serving conduct. Her lack or integrityor or just plain lying disquify her as a public official. Unfortunately she is just another modern politician who lacks integrity. Harry Truman where are you when we need you?

Posted by: Clipper | May 20, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

All this brouhaha over Pelosi is only to obscure the facvtr that waterboard torture was used…NOT to protect American lives,,, But to show a false link between al Qaeda and Saddam…for political purposes, which by Bush’s own standartds was indefensible. Bush’s only ddefense to using torture was to protect American lives, but it was not used to that purpose. Waterboarding was used for political purpose. Defend that if you can.

Posted by: keeemosabe | May 20, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am

George, note the word temporary.
“A ceasefire (or truce) is a temporary stoppage of any armed conflict, where each side of the conflict agrees with the other to suspend aggressive actions. Ceasefires may be declared as part of a formal treaty, but they have also been called as part of an informal understanding between opposing forces.”

Posted by: Gator | May 20, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Many Dems also agree with Newt on this one. Obama probably would wish Pelosi into the cornfield if he could.

Posted by: Pups McCann | May 20, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am

You folks do not have to go after Newt, he is very intelligent, but he is not black. You do not have to destroy him as he is no threat to you if he is as incompetent as you so state. Or is something not quite right here?

Posted by: Youssarian aka: TexasSlim | May 20, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Dems: I know you just LURVE Obama, he’s the sun, the moon, and the stars to you. But how can you defend Pelosi??

Posted by: StephenRex | May 20, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am

It takes one to know one is my response to those who think Newt should keep quiet because of his ethics investigation in the 90s. She’s just as crooked now as he was then if not more so. I wouldn’t trust Pelosi with a kitchen knife, nevermind the defense of the nation.
I’ve named her infamous press conference of last week “The Old Lady Tap Dance.” To the tune of “Let’s Do Again” the lyrics are “Let Me Read It Again” as though we aren’t literate.

Posted by: Barry O | May 20, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Let’s stop using the word “torture” to describe harsh questioning.
Have you undergone any of these techniques? I have, as did every member of my flight crew, in the Navy’s SERE (Survival Evasion Resistance Escape) school. The only one I personally did not experience was the waterboarding (thanks goodness) but some of our class did. No, it was not a fun week, but no one came out of it injured or mentally scarred for life.
And yes, some of the harsher techniques (such as waterboarding) could be quite persuasive. But let’s not confuse the relatively benign methods our people use with real torture, as was practiced by the Viet Cong or by Saddam Hussein and his sons, and as is still being carried out in various despotic regimes around the world.
Even so, our people have used remarkable restraint in our treatment of detainees. They obviously recognized that waterboarding was serious business, since it was used on only three individuals. Curious, isn’t it, that the Obama administration refuses to release any documents that would indicate what the effectiveness was. Are they afraid that a large majority of Americans would think it was well worth it to put pressure on terrorists?
And let’s not quibble about the Geneva Conventions and Constitutional rights for these people. As non-uniformed combatants who have targeted civilians and attacked from behind civilian cover, they are not covered by the Geneva Convention, except to note that their actions constitute war crimes. And since they are not US citizens, and are not being held on US soil, the only legal rights they have are those which our Supreme Court has magnanimously granted them. Thie arguments against “enhanced interrogation” are all matters of ethics and comfort level, which are inherently subjective. Attempts to argue against the legality are nothing but political theater.
It’s pretty presumptuous of you to look back with 20-20 hindsight and judge the decisions of people, privy to information you don’t have, who were simply doing their level best to ensure the safety of the United States, and yet still exercised a helluva lot more restraint than any of our enemies would have (or ever have in the past.)
Pelosi DID have the information, and was all in favor of harsh interrogation while it was politically expedient for her to appear so. For her to backtrack now, and to slander devoted and patriotic public servants as part of an attempt to cover her slimy trail, is beneath contempt.

Posted by: p3orion | May 20, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Ah, no, waterboard touture was used not to connect Bin Laden to Hussein, it was used to find out what they meant when they kept saying “soon you will know what is coming next, and it will make the towers look like nothing”. I would have used Liam Neison tactics from “Hostage”, and then used Lector tactics if that didn’t work. I don’t believe we’ve had any accusations of decapitation, or shipping body parts and video’s to family members that I know of, like they do!

Posted by: srcamachonj | May 20, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am

George–what do you call Obama’s agenda–just government control over everything? Robin Hood and the Merry Thieves? or simply “spreading the wealth to lazy people”?

Posted by: sifto77 | May 20, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Yes, Newt had an affair. It was NOT with a 21 year old intern his daughter’s age. He also knew her name unlike Mr. Clinton. He shouldn’t have had an affair but he did and he married the woman. Clinton didn’t know the child’s name that was performing oral sex on him in the Oval Office. A little difference there but both are still sin.
Torture? Bull corn to that! Torture is when a person’s head is cut off with a knife. Torture is when innocent civilians are blown up by terrorists barbarians. If water boarding stops any terrorist attack on our soil, drown them for all I care. My children and grandchildren’s lives are worth a million terrorists.
Apparently being liberal means having not one ounce of COMMON SENSE! Enough of this stupidity.

Posted by: C CROW | May 20, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

p3orion,
That was very well put, now watch what happens.

Posted by: srcamachonj | May 20, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Her credibility is shot. She is a vindictive amateur politician with very little to show to her constituants back home. She is all about me me me!!

Posted by: jrm | May 20, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Until its proven that she falsified her knowledge, there is no need for her to step down…
Innocent until proven guilty… or did we throw that out the window?
I am no fan of Pelosi, but right now its only he said, she said and thats not enough to oust a person from their position.
Someone is not telling the truth…. but until its proven who it was… no one should lose their job.

Posted by: lm | May 20, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Try the truth.
You apparently didn’t read my post or didn’t understand it. I don’t care about EITs, I’m fine with them, I don’t think anybody should be prosecuted, the left is the one crying about it. All I’m saying is if the left cares about this SO much they should start with their house. When did Bush lie about EITs? or for that fact WMDs? Congress had ALL the intel on Iraq before they voted. If the Dems had ANY proof at all about Bush lying they’d have gone after him. Oh and you can keep Nancy she’s doing just fine where she is.

Posted by: Tenface | May 20, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am

pelosi needs to go. It is one thing as a congresswoman to get away from using such harsh words as Lie – but as third in line for the Presidency and to be able to pull the legislature together and be a leader who is losing respect on both sides of the aisle – she cannot and does not now get that respect. The Speaker must be a statesman (woman) and refrain from such disgusting behavior.

Posted by: diane k. | May 20, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am

While I do not care for Pelosi, I find it amusing the Gingrich would questions ANYONE’S credibility. This is the man who engineered the disastrous Republican takeover of our government and left office in disgrace. Of course, this whole Pelosi thing is simply a distraction from looking at the perpetrators of the detainee torture program and from Cheney’s big mouth as he digs the whole deeper for the GOP.

Posted by: DaveM | May 20, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Sawyer is an awful interviewer…her biases are so obvious.
Her dismissive bearing is too much to watch

Posted by: Bill | May 20, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Nancy needs to go, so I don’t have to look at her creepy snake eyes whenever I turn on the television.
Go away Nancy! You are an embarassment to this country.

Posted by: wytshus | May 20, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am

It’s very interesting to see the Liberals on this board attacking Newt Gingrich rather than considering the substance of what he’s saying. It’s clear that political discourse for many has regressed to the point where they are ‘rooting for their team’ rather than actually examining what their team is doing- sort of like rooting for a sports team and actually being happy that they got away with cheating because they won the game- the only difference is the sports team won’t take away your freedom. It’s become obvious that there are many people posting on this message board who don’t care what Pelosi, Obama, etc. do to them, as long as their side wins- their immediate reaction was to attack Gingrich, with no discussion whatsoever about what Pelosi has done. Be careful- the sheep that you think you’ve been looking at is actually your reflection.

Posted by: Frank NYC | May 20, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Also, simply accusing Pelosi of any number of wrongdoing is just toxic partisan rhetoric. She has absolutely nothing to prove to anyone. The responsibility of proving wrongdoing would fall on an ethics committee and would require some evidence.

Posted by: DaveM | May 20, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Apparently every Republican who thinks government-endorsed torture in the name of national security is “no big deal” has forgotten that the government has labeled many of them as domestic security threats. Please think on that for a minute.
All these people down in Guantanamo are in the same boat: labeled a certain way by our government. That’s not to say there aren’t actually terrorists being held there, but we can’t ignore the hundreds who have already been released without charge.
If you’re all waterboarded, will you take it like men since it’s in the name of national security? Will you consider it your patriotic duty to be punished the same way folks did in ’1984?’ Are you loyal to this county’s ideals or are you loyal to the government?
I ask this in all seriousness, as I am also considered a “right-wing extremist” by the government. But since I don’t support torture or an intrusive government, I guess I’m not welcome in the Republican Party anymore.

Posted by: gb8898 | May 20, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

The Repubs are in a process of, shall we say “reorganization” and “reevaluation”, no question. But let’s face it, there is little doubt that a double standard exists. Yes, Newt was tossed out — by his own party — basically for writing a book. Hillary did the same thing but remained a senator while her self-serving drivel was applauded far and wide by the lunatic left. My goodness, if Pelosi, Reid and Biden were Republicans they would have been comedic fodder for every late night show and talking head commentary on television. No worries about Pelosi, however. The Republican Party will be bringing people back into the tent as they paint the Democratic Party as the party of Pelosi and Reid. Those two are so despicable and disliked it will work like magic. That is why Democratic efforts are already underway to move Nancy off the Speaker’s spot.

Posted by: BlueCaddy65 | May 20, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Libs are an incredible group as a whole. They continue to try to re-write history. Yes, Newt had an affair; no crime. Yes, Clinton had lots and lots of affairs; no crime. Clinton was not impeached because of his numerous affairs; his lack of morals; his lying to the Country. He was impeached, and properly so, for undeniably committing perjury; a crime. Newt’s Contract for America was flawless.

Posted by: arsii | May 20, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Live Free or Die, the legal opinion of 2002 was incorrect. The law of the land says that torture is illegal, we have signed the UN convention on torture (Reagan signed it). Those are the facts. These cannot be changed by a legal opinion.

Posted by: George | May 20, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

I wish someone would finally correct the record on Clinton….he lied in court…this is purjury, which is a felony, it is illegal for the president in this country to be a felon. So gingrich did what he was required to do…which is impeach the felon. It had nothing to do with sex, but the Demo spin doctors mounted a massive campaighn to make it about sex…
Clinton should have been impeached and should have been forced out of office in shame!

Posted by: Kevin | May 20, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

arsii – Finally a Repub who respects the truth! Look, I do like Bill, but your right he lied. Thing is it should never have come to that. No other sitting Pres. has been questioned about his sex life, but the fact is he lied. Ok, so now George Bush lied. He broke US law and International law. I have posted the exact laws earlier. Why is Nancy more guilty than Pres. Bush or Cheney? If one of you can answer that, I welcome it. In my world if Nancy is lying, which has not been proven, she should step down. If Bush and Cheney have been lying which is proven, by their own statements they should be prosecuted. Right?

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Diane Sawyer is an absolute moron, the quote she had cherry picked from Hoekstra’s letter is out of context and is not a blatent acusation…Pelosi specifically & directly accused the CIA of lying to congress on a regular basis. Hoestra was commenting on one sepcific incident & more importantly HE WAS NOT SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE….she is. She goes. Diane Sawyer is a tool of the democrat party, no more no less, no cred.

Posted by: Joes | May 20, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

“now watch what happens.” What do you mean, srcamachonj?

Posted by: p3orion | May 20, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Gator, on April 6, 1991, President Bush declared a cease fire, Kuwait had been liberated, the cease fire was negotiated and signed. On June 8, 1991 there was a Victory Parade in Washington.
12 years later George W. Bush ordered the invasion of Iraq. This had nothing to do with the invasion of Kuwait, therefore it is a different case—new war.

Posted by: George | May 20, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Pelosi disqualified herself when she declared illegal aliens the “true patriots” and proposed giving all of them amnesty and citizenship and allowing each of them to bring in 10 relatives. (A little over a year ago) Thank God most House Democrats and Republicans alike showed no support for the idea.
Plain and simple, the lady is dangerous. She has no idea what she is doing beyond worshiping Obama and opposing anything any Republican proposes.
Posted by: Oonogil | May 20, 2009 8:00:19 AM
**************************************
I have only one argument with your statement. She does not worship Obama, she wants to control him.

Posted by: american-american | May 20, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

So if waterbaording is SO effective, why was it “needed” 83 times in a month on one person and 266 times on two people? And how was the “truthful” admissions separated from the “false” ones? Any false intel obtained would overwhelm any truth by leading to wild goose chases. The only thing they wanted was the one “admission” that Saddam and alQaeda were in cahoots. Once that was obtained, the mission as accomplished. Is this any different from what Iran or the Ruskies do and we can see as corupt justice…and condemn so thoroughly?

Posted by: keeemosabe | May 20, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Facts are facts. Panetta is right. Pelosi disqualied herself. The media blonde attacking the messenger (Inquiring whether Gingrich is qualified to raise the issue) is only another example of how the MSM is desperate to avoid the facts.

Posted by: left coast independent | May 20, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Time for Nancy to step down as speaker, PERIOD.

Posted by: Rezz909 | May 20, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Being caught in a lie while blathering about the need for a “truth commission” demonstrates how vacuous this silly woman really is, but it won’t cost her a job.The Democrats don’t have enough integrity for that to happen and they are plainly impervious to shame or embarrassment. The Prevaricator in Chief will shortly appear from behind one of his Styrofoam Greek columns and explain to his media groupies that its OK.Prosecuting Republicans for their role in a bi-partisan policy,but patting Democrats on the head, is one of the many changes we can believe in.They will smile and nod and deliver a new set of love poems to this truly magnificent transformational figure in our midst.Its how ObamaWorld works, at least until 2012.

Posted by: Diana | May 20, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Joes – FYI the reporter said lying, Nancy said misled. She didn’t “specifically & directly” accuse the CIA of lying. Still wondering why no out rage at Pres. Bush lying on 11/7/05 in Panama City? Say what you want about waterboarding, it’s torture, how many of you could stand it? Hannity said he’d do it for charity, still hasn’t happened. Jesse V got him on that one, did you guys see that interview? An ex navy seal and as I state before, John McCain, and ex POW says it’s torture. Yet none of you even let that phase you. Stop the Rush talking points and imagine if it was your son or daughter, oops forgot the Repubs not as a whole, but still don’t allow their children to enter the military if it means they actually may see battle. Take care, your talking to a woman who’s boyfriend served. He is missing 3 of his 5 fingers, he was tortured. He was a graphic artist. He served his country. When Abu came out, thats when he lost his fingers. Wake the heck up!

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Clinton lied under oath, which is why he was impeached. Perjury is grounds for impeachment. Accept it and move on.
But that fact should make it clear to everyone why Bush and Cheney consistently refused to give testimony under oath. Perjury or the 5th Amendment apparently would have been their only options.

Posted by: gb8898 | May 20, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

The Contract with America was designed to “overthrow” the President. The Republicans were not happy that George H. W. Bush had lost the election and decided to investigate the newly elected president and his wife adnauseum in an attempt to discredit them. When nothing seemed to stick, up popped the Lewinsky affair and that gave them a hook to bring him down.
Had the Republicans actually had the national interest at heart all along, the earlier investigations would have ceased when it was determined there was nothing to them.
They kept looking instead of governing, found it, milked it for all it was worth. To bad Bill Clinton gave them something. Yes, he lied. Can we go on?

Posted by: George | May 20, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

So if waterboarding is SO effective, why was it “needed” 83 times in a month on one person and 266 times on two people? And how was the “truthful” admissions separated from the “false” ones? Any false intel obtained would overwhelm any truth by leading to wild goose chases. The only thing they wanted was the one “admission” that Saddam and al Qaeda were in cahoots. Once that was obtained, the mission was accomplished, unless they just liked to torture for torture’s sake. Is this any different from what Iran or the “Ruskies” do which we can readily see as corrupt justice…and condemn so thoroughly? So, again is waterboarding really effective if needed 83 times a month on one person?

Posted by: keeemosabe | May 20, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Give me a break. Calling what was done to a few detainees torture is laughable when you consider they wouldn’t think twice about sawing off their own daughters head for talking to the boy next door un-escorted.
Lucky for us, announcing the methods used against a few detainees have likely caused the death of many would-be terrorists as they go through their training camps. You can be sure those camps now include the very techniques we used to be able to use against them.

Posted by: JohnB | May 20, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Live Free or Die- If Nancy is guilty, Pres. Bush and Cheney are more so! They ordered it. Water boarding so you know, was not the only method used. You watch Faux News, I saw the interview there! One of Pres. Bush’s peeps admitted that they water boarded after the person gave them info and went on to tell the other methods they used. You can do the research, will be good for you. I’m tired of giving the facts and you Repubs ignore and go to the whole name calling thing! Your in the minority, guess what the rest of us did the research and voted intelligently! Pres. Obama wasn’t given the election because his brother was a Gov. and he received lesser votes. Pres. Obama didn’t win the Presidency because he scared Americans with, what if! Your guy George was full of smoke and mirrors. Now people do research, doesn’t bode well for you Repubs as we see in elections and polls!

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Bobo – No, you are by not sighting any facts or links. I’ve posted them, you?

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

“[T]hey are “accused” terrorists. And since this was Bush’s self stated “War on Terror” wouldn’t that make them POW’s? ”
“Try the truth,” don’t throw around terms (like POW) that you obviously don’t understand. The Guantanamo detainees are NOT considered POWs, because they do NOT meet the legal requirements spelled out in the Geneva Conventions. Although we have extended certain rights and privileges to them (too many, in my book) this was done as a courtesy, not as a recognition of any legal status.
By the way, earlier you mentioned having listed the exact laws Bush et al had supposedly broken, but I don’t see that anywhere. Care to post it again (if you can)?

Posted by: p3orion | May 20, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Pelosi’s resignation is long past due…She is a disgrace and has no clue..She out and out lied about what she knew about torture, but they keep on letting her lie.

Posted by: MJ | May 20, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

So JohnB, if they wouldn’t think twice about “sawing off their own daughter’s head” it’s okay for us to do it? That sounds to me like we are taking the low road.
So much for the “Golden Rule”.

Posted by: George | May 20, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Hey why is everybody getting on Newt? If anybody knows when it’s time to step down as speaker, he does.

Posted by: runnerin1 | May 20, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Can’t the democrats find someone better for Speaker of the House? I mean she backed herself into a corner on this one calling for an investigation and then when she knows she might be summoned she backs down. It boils down to this folks she knew about the “harsh interrogation” techniques and did NOTHING about it until it became popular to speak out against it. Wow I know it’s a lot to ask, but how about some honesty please!

Posted by: nnmayo | May 20, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

…please remind us what Peolosi’s qualifications are? Might want to do a DNA-reference check on Pelosi and Goebbels, they both have the spin-gene.

Posted by: mikeinfxbg | May 20, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Pelosi ,Gingrich aside ,needs to resign from the Speakers office Now .She is a disgrace and is the most phony fixed smile Harridan I have ever seen .She is clearly a LIAR on national Security regarding what this idiot knew and needs to go NOW!

Posted by: Nate | May 20, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Newt is correct on this one, but he has disqualified himself as a conservative leader. When he trashed Rush Limbaugh, he lost my support. When an apology comes from Newt, I may reconsider. Now he is only a smarmy wannabe.

Posted by: William | May 20, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

We need term limits for Congress. The politics as usual are really getting old. That goes for both parties!! THEY ALL LIE!!!!! Don’t be so blind and think that they don’t. It’s so obivious by people defending Pelosi, Obama, Biden, Bush, Cheney…Sorry, but they all lie. Get your heads out of the sand.

Posted by: will | May 20, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

p3orion- Stop Cherry picking the Geneva Convention! Read the all of it! We declared war on Terror! If you label one a terrorist and capture them under that guise… oh, dear forgot, I understand it, remember, your part of the party that doesn’t LIKE education. I have a good one! So in your world, one can be held without proof of wrong doing or intention, without legal counsel. That is not what our country was founded on! You do realize that could be used against you. In the Bush Admin. you were unpatriotic if you disagreed with the Pres. one could be labeled an enemy combatant, with NO PROOF! I’ve read it, I know. So technically all of you on here, who say the these things about our Pres. could be labeled as such and taken away. One could only hope!

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Just ask yourself this:
How many Republicans remain in their post after found to be committing illegal acts, regardless of whether they are actually convicted or not?
How many Democrats remain?
It looks like at least one political party knows how to police their own in order to keep some semblance of integrity….

Posted by: Originalist | May 20, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

This is not about honesty or integrity, except for the fact that neither of thos character traits can be found in MS. Pelosi. This is about her crippled ability to lead a nation that will not follow her as a leader given her remarks. Censure is in order here.

Posted by: Ken | May 20, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

Yes, she needs to go, willingly or not! She’s inept and a liar. She can’t lead when she starts accusing the CIA of lying which is exactly what she’s doing. She’s bringing down the Dems, so if they leave her in, fine, they’ll pay the price for her and Reid and Biden shooting off their collective stupid mouths.

Posted by: Mary | May 20, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

srcamachonj – Yes Bush did lie, he said we do not torture, read my above post and it’s been considered torture what they did since 1948! Do some research!
* So then by your logic other people should be brought up on charges of torture since the same “harsh interrogation” techniques are USED ON OUR OWN people first?!

Posted by: nnmay | May 20, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

For those of you who have been drinking the KoolAid for too long, waterboarding IS NOT torture!! Torture is defined as “the act of inflicting excruciating pain, as punishment or revenge, as a means of getting a confession or information, or for sheer cruelty.” Waterboarding is not painful, nor does it maim or harm the body. It is a purely psychological interrogation technique. I would much rather be waterboarded than have my head cut of like Daniel Pearl. But we are the bad guys?? I don’t understand your logic. I wish that our military could be as ruthless as those we are fighting rather than having to be politically correct, it would have saved hundreds, if not thousands, of lives.
At least Bush and Cheney did what they believe was right for the country and its people, in order to protect them. They didn’t sell out to popularity or a poll.
Wake up people, before it is too late.
Now let the personal attacks on me begin…..

Posted by: Originalist | May 20, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Speaker Pelosi is a ture american hero!! Not only is she the first woman speaker of the house, but she is smart brilliant, and beautiful. the only one in congress with a higher IQ than her is President Obama. we need to keep our smart persons in the congress!!!

Posted by: FemJoy | May 20, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Just ask yourself this:
How many Republicans remain in their post after found to be committing illegal acts, regardless of whether they are actually convicted or not?
How many Democrats remain?
It looks like at least one political party knows how to police their own in order to keep some semblance of integrity….
* Are you kidding me?! The names Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and Charles Rangel come to mind to name a few! Congress definitely needs term limits.

Posted by: nnmayo | May 20, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Originalist- May we try it on you so you know what it is like to feel like your being drowned? Are you saying Jesse Ventura, ex navy seal and John McCain are lying when they say it is torture? While the death of Daniel Pearl, who for some reason you all point at (talking points?) was awful. Because they do it, makes it right for us? Have you checked to see how many detainees are missing? Most likely not, what happened to them? Maybe dead from water torture? By the way that wasn’t the only means they used, do some research. Oh, that’s right , party of no education. Sorry, my bad! (sarcasm intended!)

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

“Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich is absolutely correct. Pelosi’s immaturity and lack of substantial character has come out. She wears nice cloths and has a nice hair do, but that only qualifies her to be a J.C. Penney’s catalogue model, not Speaker of the House.”—
Posted by: Jack | May 20, 2009 9:08:23 AM
Absolutely correct! LOL, a JC Penney catalog model…I’d love to see her doing that, not making a fool of herself in front of Congress and the American people!

Posted by: artemis133 | May 20, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Femjoy: You should really go back on your meds. I’m no fan of W, but I find the thought that Pelosi – a brainless, vain, power-hungry incompetent is in a position of power to be scary indeed. She – or her advisors – has mis-handled this situation, and she comes off looking like a dolt. NOT good for the country or the democratic party. She needs to step back – and quickly.

Posted by: Mike | May 20, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Jimmy- yeah, she’s just plain stupid and is now speaker of the house! You?

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

Look who’s talking? Gingrich is the formerly disgraced house majority leader who had to step down from his leadership post because he was screwing his aide while majority leader. His extremist views is what made his republican party turn quickly into a minority party. Your time has come and gone Mr. Gingrich. Whether you like it or not the elected house majority leader Nancy Pelosi is not subservient to the CIA. The question is who are the primary suspects? Who designed it? Who ordered it. This is why we need an independent council. Neither party nor the president could do so objectively. The A.G. must appoint someone that both side respects. We are a democracy. Gingrich is a bomb thrower, a political terrorist. The republicants are now doubling down on fear and division. You have no plan for America but to oppose, accuse and slander the democrats. I rebuke you and all that you stand for Mr. Gingrich!

Posted by: JediRock | May 20, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Lets cut out all of the garbage about gingrich, its not about him, its about Pelosi.
You all know dam well that shes is lying, she knows what she was told, but she need que cards to read to the public on what she says happened. If you were accused of something and you were truly inocent, would you need que cards to defend yourself?
When she had gotten the cards out of order and she could not read them she got all flustered. She is clearly fabricating her story and lying for all its worth.
Pelosi is no good for America, I don’t know whether she actually hates the US or if shes just being self serving so that she can garner more power and riches.
She needs to go and we need someone with the counrtries best intrests at heart.

Posted by: Rephoto | May 20, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

[Originalist- May we try it on you so you know what it is like to feel like your being drowned? Are you saying Jesse Ventura, ex navy seal and John McCain are lying when they say it is torture? While the death of Daniel Pearl, who for some reason you all point at (talking points?) was awful. Because they do it, makes it right for us? Have you checked to see how many detainees are missing? Most likely not, what happened to them? Maybe dead from water torture? By the way that wasn't the only means they used, do some research. Oh, that's right , party of no education. Sorry, my bad! (sarcasm intended!)]
In response – Yes, I have been waterboarded as part of my SERE training. It wasn’t pleasant, but didn’t leave any lasting harm.
I am aware of the other minor techniques that were used; again, nothing that I haven’t encountered in SERE training. It is you libs who have latched on to the waterboarding, thus the reason it is addressed.
Since you know so much, what are the numbers missing? You, nor anyone can point to anything that shows people missing. This is a pointless argument that you bring up to infer guilt. Show some proof about anyone missing (real proof, not some BS organization or individual saying his friend disappeared).
It is obvious that I am the intelligent one, because I do not fall for some BS yellow journalism story. I check the real facts. Anyone can make stuff up and post it on the internet, that doesn’t make it the truth.

Posted by: Originalist | May 20, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Electrical Engineering. Intelligence is not a requirment for an elected official. All you have to do is promise the underclass that you will give them something for free.
The freebies is what will implode the US.

Posted by: Jimmy | May 20, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Bye Bye Nancy – the country deserves better.

Posted by: AtlasObjectivist | May 20, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Pelosi is the best life insurance Obama and Biden can possibly have.

Posted by: Mark Carlton | May 20, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Finally a voice of reason. Newt 2012!

Posted by: the Dude | May 20, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Finally a voice of reason. Newt 2012!
Posted by: the Dude | May 20, 2009 1:29:25 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
He’d make a good VP but, we need a stud to run for Pres.

Posted by: Jimmy | May 20, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Originalist – How about you look them up! Go thru the comments, I have been posting facts, figures, and links which all of you (Repubs) have ignored. I don’t think some of you, maybe not you, but other (Repub) posters would pass a 3rd grade comprehension test! Here is my question. Are Jesse V. and John McCain lying? They both say it’s torture. Are they lying? I almost drowned as a child, I will never forget that. You have had it done in a controlled and lets not kill one of our own arena.
Obvious your the intelligent one? If that makes your night go for it! I had my masters by 22! Was raised Repub, did the research found the lies, with a boyfriend that was tortured after the pics from Abu came out. Don’t talk to me. You have no clue! Question, where did you serve? Or did Daddy and Mommy have enough pull to keep you stateside, Bush junior?

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

I read it time and time again from the liberals that the US is a DEMOCRACY. It is NOT. It is a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC. A huge difference, but I guess facts are not that important if there is an agenda.

Posted by: Harryb | May 20, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

No Democrat ever does. No honor and no integrity. It’s all about the power and holding onto it. Cowards they are.

Posted by: She Won't Step Down | May 20, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Democrats know they can’t defend the lunacy coming from Nancy Pelosi, and the Left in general. Instead they choose to make personal attacks. Straigh outta’ Alinsky if you ask me. Rules for Radicals, $11.00 at Amazon if you didn’t know. This is Pelosi and Obama’s play book, and the sheeple don’t even see it.

Posted by: Lucy | May 20, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Porkchop- And still not one fact, just your biased vitriol! You know what that means, right? If not use Webster’s tired of teaching the unteachable! Yes, the tax cut, smaller gov’t. worked so well! Gov’t grew bigger under Bush as did the deficet. Say what you may about Obama, he’s attempting to get us out of the mess YOUR GUYS created! But you won’t see that, your too busy being rude and obnoxious with nothing to back you up! Now, I have to go and interview my 3rd possible employee. You? Oh, that’s right just an angry repub that doesn’t want anyone else to succeed because you, yourself can’t! Sad!

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

PELOSI…PACK YOUR BAGS AND LEAVE.

Posted by: K | May 20, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Way to go Originalist!!!!
Winner by unanimous decision!!!
Go home “try the truth” you have been pwned!

Posted by: DCHobbs | May 20, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

I was in Iraq twice. I fought in Fallujah and Ramadi, I guess that gives my service away…
I have been to Abu Gharab on several occasions, after the scandal. I have dealt with hundreds of detainees, and have no doubt the vast majority were guilty of at least trying to kill Americans.
Jesse Ventura is a Libertarian and publicity seeker, McCain was trying to be popular and win the vote. I say that their opinions are skewed because of the circumstances they have put themselves in.

Posted by: Originalist | May 20, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

What’s scarier than Pelosi being 2nd in line is know that Biden is 1st!

Posted by: Robert | May 20, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Sith430 said “arsii – Finally a Repub who respects the truth! Look, I do like Bill, but your right he lied. Thing is it should never have come to that. No other sitting Pres. has been questioned about his sex life, but the fact is he lied. Ok, so now George Bush lied. He broke US law and International law. I have posted the exact laws earlier. Why is Nancy more guilty than Pres. Bush or Cheney? If one of you can answer that, I welcome it. In my world if Nancy is lying, which has not been proven, she should step down. If Bush and Cheney have been lying which is proven, by their own statements they should be prosecuted. Right?”
A couple of things. But 1st, thanks for the recognition.
I’m not sure what previous posting you are referring to wherein you post laws broken. And, posting the laws does not equate to proof of anything. To say he broke US and International law, is your opinion both as to the meaning of the laws, as well as your understanding of the facts. Take waterboarding. NOT TORTURE. Scarry as hell, but no injury is incurred in conducting it, and each of the people administering it has had it done to themselves in training. Interantional law (actually, treaties, as there really are no “international” laws) apply to military combatants, not terrorists who do not wear a uniform or have a governmental leadership.
Second, what did Bush lie about? Don’t you dare say weapons of mass destruction. He MAY have been WRONG about WMDs, but so was everyone else. That is not a lie. We may never know the truth about the existence of WMDs.

Posted by: arsii | May 20, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Oh, Sith430. Also, Clinton was the first President sued for sexual harrassment. The questions about sex with subordinates is mandatory in such a case.

Posted by: arsii | May 20, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

“In the Bush Admin. you were unpatriotic if you disagreed with the Pres.”
Hmmm….didn’t see that, but I do hear that I am now an extremist worth being watched by DHS. Under who’s administration did that come out? Also, which president is “keeping score” (his own words). They may not be labeling people “unpatriotic”, only “extreme” and “dangerous”. I true originalist and conservative finds that it is his duty to question the government, just not to falsely accuse.
BTW, do you even know what an “originalist” is? I believe in, and am sworn to defend, the Constitution; not a government. The Constitution was always meant to be a document of constraint, not and enabler of government. You would think that someone who purports to be a Constitutional professor would know that. I wonder if he ever read the Federalist Papers. Have you?

Posted by: Originalist | May 20, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

People, don’t you think it’s time for another party to be established. The two knuckleheads (repubs and dems)both seem inept and self serving. Remember, it’s congress that created the financial crises along with those greedy wallstreet bankers. Does anyone realize that last year the people in congress got richer when the rest of the country suffers. It’s time for a change alright. Time to throw all those bums out.

Posted by: Mike | May 20, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

But the overall point is don’t we deserver better than Pelosi? It seems she lied. She backtracked off the CIA the next day to blame the Bush administration. Obama’s agenda moves us forward, but Pelosi impedes that progress forward and focuses too much on the past. They beat the Republicans – stop trying to run up the score and start trying to run the country.

Posted by: MST | May 20, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Why does it take 266 waterboardings on 2 detainees in a month to get or force the desired? statements? Just a question. How about a straight answer, if y’all are capable.

Posted by: keeeemosabe | May 20, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

“Mr.Cheneys right-hand man taking the fall for him and going to jail in the Valerie Plame scandal” Posted by: brian | May 20, 2009 7:39:38 AM
That right there proves you are a moron with no actual grasp of the facts. Scooter was indicted for changing an account of a story. It had nothing to do with the Idiots Plame. Mr. Valerie Plame was exposed as an abject liar after saying Cheney ordered him to Nigeria, LOL! What a typical inflated liberal ego!
I guess If you repeat a lie often enough…

Posted by: Will C. | May 20, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Originalist:
You, like most people, seem to believe the fact that these people are in custody means they must be guilty. Yet hundreds of detainees have been released without charge because they were simply unlucky people handed over to us by Afghan bounty hunters in exchange for money. On top of that, hundreds of detainees have in fact died while in U.S. custody, and many of the deaths have resulted in charges against the interrogators.
The people charged often argue that “classified military information” was withheld from the court, information which could have proved them justified in their harsh interrogations. It is withheld because it would implicate the higher-ups in the military and intelligence communities.
“Enhanced interrogation techniques” is a euphemism for “torture that leaves no physical evidence.” That we inflict it upon some of our own soldiers is not something of which we should be proud. We charged Japanese soldiers during WWII with war crimes for, among other things, waterboarding our prisoners of war.
The SERE program itself was designed to help our captured soldiers withstand the barbaric interrogation methods of communists during the Korean War and after, and the Office of Legal Counsel under President Bush acknowledged that the CIA’s interrogation techniques came directly from the SERE program.
When we use those same methods on prisoners in our custody, we render ourselves no better than the monsters who tortured our men over fifty years ago.

Posted by: gb8898 | May 20, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Most if not all liberals lie all the time. Why? Because they are communists.

Posted by: Richard C Hamilton | May 20, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

“I get a laugh out of Democrats who, instead of trying to defend Pelosi — an impossible task — they prefer to attack Bush.”
That’s because Bush is the Torturer. If you didn’t know it, you’d think that Pelosi was the one who had some in the Justice Department rewrite the laws on torture. Nice subterfuge my flailing Republican friends, but the core remains the same….THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION AUTHORIZED TORTURE. If they hadn’t done that, Pelosi’s name wouldn’t be mentioned now.

Posted by: GEORGEWNIXON | May 20, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

If believing in constitutional, limited government makes me an extremist, I’m good with that. If being a veteran makes me a threat, OK then. And if believing in the Second Amendment makes me dangerous, well that depends on who’s asking and in what way.
For those of you like Try The Truth who have never served in the military, in the oath taken by Originalist and me and every other service member we promise to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”
NOWHERE do we declare allegiance to any specific politician, except as provided for in that document.
It’s obvious that most Democrats in Congress and the Obama administration hold the Constitution in disdain except when it can be twisted to their purpose with imaginary “penumbras” of rights, or notions that it is a “living document” (which means it has no meaning beyond whatever they can cram through some friendly court.) The question is at what point does this disdain constitute an active threat to Constitutional government.

Posted by: p3orion | May 20, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

“We charged Japanese soldiers during WWII with war crimes for, AMONG OTHER THINGS, waterboarding our prisoners of war.” — posted by gb8898
Correct, GB, waterboarding was among other things. NO ONE was charged for conducting the simple type of waterboarding as practiced in the SERE program or by the CIA. The waterboarding for which some Japanese officers were indicted was a bit different.
Some prisoners were waterboarded until they drowned. Others died of water intoxication after having gallons of water forced down their throats. Still others were forced to drink water and then their abdomens were jumped on until their bowels burst. Medical personnel were not in attendance as with the Gunatanamo interrogations, for the simple fact that the Japanese didn’t care if the prisoners died.
These are quite different things from what our people have done; only those who don’t care are confused by the fact that the procedures share the same name.

Posted by: p3orion | May 20, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

For those who have undergone waterboarding, such as the SERE survivors, can you answer me this: If a prisoner were PROMISED he would have no lasting ill-effects, nor would he drown, would it make any difference to him once the procedure were applied?
I ask because everyone always says that YOUR experience was under “controlled” conditions. Wouldn’t the CIA be doing the same procedure under “controlled” conditions? Or conversely, how does anyone know the CIA was “uncontrolled” in its application? What would that look like, anyway?
I’m just full of questions, and here are my last ones: Do US military go through any “torture” training exercises that produce lasting ill-effects or death?

Posted by: NDSue | May 20, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

I guess one of the underlying questions that needs to be answered is does anyone care that terrorists were tortured? HELL NO! give me a shovel, a water board, whatever. I would torture the crap out of these pieces of dung in a heartbeat if it meant keeping America safe. I could CARE LESS if Bush and Cheney knew about this so called torture. And if you dumb ass libs care so much then you should totally be for getting rid of Pelosi because just looking at her face is a form or torture!

Posted by: backtobasics | May 20, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Pelosi needs to go! The hollow eyed hippie from the left coast has really stepped in it this time and her true colors are really showing now. Man, it’s a scary thought that she “could” be President, but then again she probably wouldn’t be any worse than what we got now!

Posted by: Lone Gunman | May 20, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Fascism is alive and well in the democrat party. Don’t expect them to kick out Pelosi. After all, they still have KKK member Robert Byrd as one of their senators.

Posted by: American | May 20, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Aside from accidents that may occur from time to time, no, US military members do not undergo any exercises that produce lasting ill effects. Nor, generally do detainees.
Part of the problem is, they know it. I’m sure the knowledge that American interrogators will not intentionally allow a detainee to come to permanent harm has much to do with why it took so many waterboarding sessions before Khalid Sheikh Mohammed gave up useful information. No one ever said the guy wasn’t tough.
Most of the other techniques (loud music, sleep deprivation, cold and heat, humiliation, intimidation, and the like) are more in the way of psychological pressures. Yet because they amount to more than asking questions across the table from a prisoner and a court-appointed attorney, some people (like Pelosi) more interested in smearing Bush than in discovering the truth have labeled the whole program “torture.”

Posted by: p3orion | May 20, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

trythetruth, if you really want to do as your namesake implies, ask yourself why all the other dems on that committee are not coming out to defend Pelosi. Perhaps it is political, but then the whole thing is political isn’t it. The dems want to punish Bush and Cheney because they hate them for whatever reasons. I do not want to see anyone prosecuted or punished, however, if we are going to do it, thyen we must include those that were aware and said nothing until it was politically expedient for them to speak up. Honestly those people are even more despicable than the ones thought to be perping the crimes. So Pelosi is lying in order to perpetuate the myth that dems were in the dark. BS, they knew just like everyone else but they were just as complacent as the repubs. Let’s move on. You leave Bush and Cheney alone and we leave your liars and cheaters alone.

Posted by: Loren | May 20, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Some please get up and the change the channel back to “Leave It To Be@ver”. There are Dems in the room and we sure don’t want them finding out about the real world.

Posted by: Mike_C | May 20, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

CIA Director Leon Panetta maintains that she was fully and accurately briefed!
Why is he saying that she was fully briefed? Panetta has no allegiances to the previous administration.

Posted by: Mike_C | May 20, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Loren- I was with you until the end. Of course you don’t want to see anyone prosecuted, that would mean Bush and Cheney! You are trying to hold Pelosi more responsible for possibly knowing than those who ordered it! People have been coming to her defense. I for one say investigate! Full fact finding, for all. Not just her. If she lied, she needs to step down. If Bush and Chaney broke the law, they need to prosecuted. You wouldn’t have an issue with that would you?

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Mike_C – Your right, and that needs to be investigated. But, why all the vitriol on what Nancy knew? You say she lied, so did Pres. Bush! He stood there and said “we do not torture” Not one of you has been able to give a reason why she is more responsible than our ex leader! He lied to the American public and the world and ordered an illegal act, both domestically and internationally. (I already posted the laws for both, he broke them) Why no out rage with him and Cheney?

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Being an American, my only concerned is about this great country. We as a nation want to go after each other’s party whenever a mistake is made instead of correcting the problem it doesn’t matter if it is a Republican or a Democrate. We as a country must start correcting the problems before it is to late. I personally think Pelosi made a mistake that some action should be taken. It doesn’t matter what happen 4 or 20 years ago it only matters what happens in the present.

Posted by: steve | May 20, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

can someone please wake up????
Tourture of terrorists? So?
Pelosi? Like she will be voted out of her district in San Fran…
In fact, Americans don’t even know what congress does. They keep blaming Bush, and now Obama etc… when the country’s undoing has been directly through congress. they are the ones wanting to get re-electd without making the tough choices need to continue the country’s former greatness.
We need mandatory turnover in congress!

Posted by: vlad | May 20, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Forget about it Newt. Only you and Republicans can do worng and be forced to resign in humiliaton. Liberals can do no wrong. They can lie cheat steal and get free passes. Hey one blue stained dress is not worthy of a presidential resignatin but one speaker of the houses affair is worthy of him being discredited and forced to resign. Until we get a grip that Liberals are in fact domestic enemies then we will allow them the double standards!

Posted by: Spanman | May 20, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Good grief people… folks are so blinkered by ideology that they can delude themselves from believing simple fact.
1) Valerie Plame was NOT ‘outted’. She was not an undercover agent. And if she was concerned about her ‘cover’, then her husband shouldn’t have been writing NYT Op-Ed pieces (in which he lied) about his CIA-sponsored trip. There was no crime involved, just a crass political attempt to undermine a critic (Mr. Wilson) by pointing out that that critic was, in fact, lying in the pages of the NYT – that is, of course, until Scooter Libby obfuscated during the investigation, making the only crime perjury, which itself is dumb, because there should have been no investigation in the first place. The next time some lib brings this up, I am going to puke. I’ve been watching the revisionist history/total disregard for fact in the coverage (and now conventional wisdom) over this affair, and it is simply disgusting.
2) ‘Torture’ is a legal term, carrying specific meaning. Waterboarding is NOT torture under the law- and Congress has had ample opportunity to define it as such. It may be morally reprehensible, for which I agree, but it is NOT torture under the law. Hence- Bush did NOT lie when he said we weren’t torturing. Like with Scooter Libby, there was no crime here- UNTIL Madam Pelosi lied about it, accused the CIA of lying to her, and now there IS a problem here. The problem, though, is that we now know that Ms. Pelosi’s seemingly high moral stance, was actually disgustingly craven political opportunism- and you want to talk about politicizing national security, well, there you go…

Posted by: Colby A | May 20, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Newt’s “crime” — whatever it was — wouldn’t even show up on the radar screen today when compared with such Democrat ethical stalwarts as Nancy Pelosi, Charles Rangel, Barney Fife, Barack O’Rezco, Chris Dodd, Hillary Clinton, Sandy Burglar, Franklin Raines, Kent Conrad, Harry Reid, etc, etc, etc, not to mention ACORN, the corrupt unions, the greedy termite trial lawyers, and the rest of the part of “vote for me and I’ll steal your neighbor’s money and give it to you.”

Posted by: Eric Arthur Blair | May 20, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Colby A- First off waterboarding is torture, please link your source that says it is not besides faux news. Also, that is not the only method they used, you know that right? If not look that up! How did Nancy Pelosi saying she wasn’t told, which hasn’t been proven yet to be a lie a crime? She didn’t say it under oath? Are there new laws I don’t know about? As for facts I’m tired of posting them, they are ignored. As far as I’m concerned there needs to a full fact finding. It needs to include Nancy, Pres. Bush, Cheney and others. But for some reason people on here only want Nancy investigated? Why? Oh, that would be because she didn’t break the law and they did! Not only my opinion but legal scholars and many around the world!

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

How can she disqualify herself when she was never qualified in the first place?

Posted by: Insider | May 20, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

As far as all the BS of “lying” goes, please people grow up already. EVERY president has lied to the people. There are ALWAYS national security issues that are denied and lied about. We can go back and start asking what Clinton REALLY knew about Bin Laden, why didn’t his administration kill or capture him….etc. Do you think Eisenhower was honest with the public about intelligence issues of the day when questions were asked? Do you think he told the truth about our capabilites to ALL our allies of the day ? Please stop trying live in your dopey Utopia where we are the ones on the hill in white robes who never do anything outside our high moral standing. It is not real & it never has been, no matter what political party was in power.
When Obama leaves office, do you people really want the opposition to sit there and demnd investigations and trials for any controversial decisions he makes?

Posted by: Mike_C | May 20, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Colby A | May 20, 2009 4:12:19 PM
“Waterboarding is NOT torture under the law- and Congress has had ample opportunity to define it as such. It may be morally reprehensible, for which I agree, but it is NOT torture under the law.” …
________________
The ONLY PROBLEM is… The rest of the Universe says; “IT IS!”
The next in line for “Demonization”, is probably one Lt. Col Yvonne Bradley, AF Legal Counsel assigned to represent a Gitmo Detainee. Reported today, the Lt. Col. essentially says; “Waterboarding as torture is “the least of the tactics” compared to some tactics employed by some of the Gitmo Interrogators.
She further asserted; “razor-like scaples were routinely scheduled to “be taken to” the genital area of Detainees, making multiple small incisions.
I ask, besides being predatory…what have we become?

Posted by: bobj72 | May 20, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Remarkable how many of the commenters who hate Gingrich completely fail to address THE ISSUE. Can you legitimately have someone who demonstrably lies about our intelligence agencies by second in line for the Presidency? This is not about Gingrich or Bush or Cheney or any of the other people that the Democrats love to have their “1984″ style 15 minutes of hate. It is about whether Pelosi is qualified to assume the Presidency as she is Constitutionally second in line to do.

Posted by: student1776 | May 20, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Try the Truth,
I think its time to prosecute everyone in congress, the past presidents and the past congresses for all that they have done wrong or is perceived to have been done wrong. That will really help our country get out of the mess we are in at the present time. We need to spend millions of dollars in investigations of congress the past presidents and our present administration. We need to spend time that could be used to solve the immense problems that our young people will be confronted with in the future. This partisan bickering and trying to get the other party will be the downfall of our country.
I am a 76 year old who has been through many things in my life and I have never been so disappointed by the American people.

Posted by: Gator | May 20, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Mike_C – some on this board are already demanding investigations of Pres. Obama, where have you been? Also, 3 finger, how dare you make light of his plight! He was an artist! Oh, and don’t pull out the 9/11 families. 2 cousins in the towers, alot of friends and a childhood friend that was a fireman! I’ve buried more dead from that day than you will ever know! As for my BF, he fought for his country because he loves it and believed we are the ones many aspire to be. He is a man of honor. He was tortured, he saw no honor in his torturers, he doesn’t see it in those that ordered it here either. They are no better.

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

This guy(Gingrich)disqualified himself from public office & any connection with any self respecting human being.I wish he would crawl back & get under the rock that he crawled out from under.

Posted by: john carlos | May 20, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

newt needs to shut up and go back to cheating on his wives.

Posted by: Rick | May 20, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Gator- Sir, bless you! You have seen alot. With all due respect, your disappointed in the American people? Why? Because for once we actually want to hold those who hold and held office to the standards they swore to protect, the Constitution. Is it alright to throw Pelosi under the bus for possibly knowing but not those who ordered it? As far as I’m concerned there needs to be a Truth Commission, let the chips fall where they may. Both Dems and Repubs, including our previous Pres. and VP. If that is not agreeable than lay off Nancy, she may have lied, but if your going after her for a lie, go after those who ORDERED AND LIED ABOUT IT!

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

pelosi has broken no laws. she has done nothing wrong. and evidently the record keeping of the cia leaves a lot to be desired. reports are coming in from all sorts of people in congress that the cia records do not match what really happened.

Posted by: Rick | May 20, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Hey people, let’s not attack Newt, he needs to feel relevant. We all know he follows the do as I say not as I do Repub mantra! Let’s keep it on point, why is Pelosi more responsible for possibly knowing than those who ordered it! If you notice when that is asked over and over the Repubs start on the name calling, Acorn, socialist, birth certificate rant and that’s rather entertaining! Not one can pull up a link or article of support. You know they are sitting at the computer foaming at the mouth! Take pleasure in that on this wonderful spring day!

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Waterboarding is not torture. It is an effective interrogation technique.
Or perhaps U.S. military students at Navy S.E.R.E. school (and probably AF S.E.R.E.) have been tortured by staff for decades.
Maybe ‘try the truth’ should link a source where Nancy reveals that Americans are being “tortured” in a military training school.

Posted by: Insider | May 20, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

It all depends on what your definition of torture is. For me, hearing libs continue to whine about Bush is torture. So is hearing all of their lib theory crap. Waterboarding gave us intel and saved lives according to FACTS. GOOGLE “brooklyn bridge waterboarding” and learn. Only three guys were waterboarded, THREE!!!!, and those three helped kill thousands of people. You libs need to get in a time machine and go back to a time more suited to your cause – the late 60s and acid trips. Don’t go back too far however to WW2, otherwise you will change history and we will all be speaking German.

Posted by: Sane | May 20, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Rick- YOU STATED FACTS! Oh, dear…I can even find the links to support what your saying. Be ready for the name calling! That’s all they know! :)

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

insider,
be careful, bring the facts into this discussion is a form of torture according to most liberals!

Posted by: Mike_C | May 20, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

None of this would be happening if Speaker Pelosi hadn’t been pushing to investigate the previous administration. If history repeats itself mistakes will be made in the future. We could probably spend 75% of our time investigating wrongdoing in our government. In the past democrats and republicans worked to solve problems not play the gotcha game. I have been registered as a democrat, republican and independent. I vote today as an independent who views both parties as being too partisan. I don’t like people citing the UN or International law because both entities stand by and let events like Darfur happen without any response. What happened to the UN workers who were raping children? You don’t hear about that in our media. They let the Oil for Food program become a vehicle for fraud and corruption. Enough for today.

Posted by: Gator | May 20, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Mike_C – Thank you for dialing it down a notch. For those who want pictures, he’s not a freak show! He’s a US Marine who served his country well. Do a few clicks with your mouse, his story was featured in a major newspaper. Shame on you!
Mike we have talked more than you can imagine. Hoping to have a dialog here. He is a man of honor. He believes in all that is good with our country, he accepts the bad but believes we need to be better than those we engage. We are the United States of America, we are what most countries aspire to be. It disheartens him that we are no better than those that did this to him. That the Pres. he didn’t agree with but went back to the military, and considered his CIC was no better than those that did this to him. He knows, nothing would have changed what happened to him. He just wishes we were better than those that did it. Can you understand that Mike? Thanks.

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Try the truth-
I’m happy to address the legal question of whether waterboarding is or is not ‘torture’ under the law. But before I do that, one of your subsequent questions indicates that you don’t seem to understand the distinction between morally reprehensible behavior, and what is legally considered torture – the question is whether waterboarding is, under law, torture, not what we personally think of it (and again, I find it reprehensible). As such, your observation that:
“For all of you saying waterboarding is not torture, I guess John McCain a POW that was tortured is lying then? They have medical personnel standing by because oh, ones heart can stop… But in your world thats not torture so maybe we should try it on you!”
is COMPLETELY irrelevant. We’re not talking about whether it SHOULD be legally considered torture, but whether it legally IS torture. That would seem to be an important distinction, when you’re point is that Bush ‘lied’ because he said we weren’t torturing people. Since waterboarding is NOT legally torture, the litany of terrible consequences you mentioned is, again, irrelevant.
As for sourcing the supposition that waterboarding is NOT torture, I will decline spending the time writing a full legal brief on this important subject, and merely point out that the US statutes relating to torture are silent on waterboarding. Moreover, I would point out that, as confirmed by the current AG in a recent 6th circuit filing, torture is a specific intent crime, for which waterboarding clearly falls short.
Bobj72- What is legal or illegal is, apparently unbeknownst to you and many liberal legal ‘experts’, a subject of AMERICAN jurisprudence. What the rest of the world thinks on the subject is irrelevant, unless we in the US have ratified such foreign laws (as with the Geneva Convention, which also doesn’t consider waterboarding torture).
And Truth- I was very careful not to accuse Pelosi of a crime- rather, I stated that there was now a “problem” as far as she was concerned. Of course, I do believe that, if the AG office so desired (ie if she were a Republican) some way would be found of defining her statements as a crime, but that is a different matter…
Anything else I can help you with?
To summarize, I’ll try to simplify since logical, coherent thought seems difficult for libs at times:
1) Waterboarding is bad
2) Torture is illegal
3) Waterboarding is not torture
4) So, waterboarding is not illegal
5) So, Bush did not lie when he said we were not torturing
6) Pelosi knew we were waterboarding but pretended she didn’t
7) Pelosi is a craven scum, disguising crass political opportunism beneath taking high-minded moral positions
8) The entire Valerie Plame affair was ridiculous, and everything you think you know about it is wrong.
Finally- I’m opening the floor- please tell me one instance, one at all, where President Bush actually lied. One. Please. I’m so damned sick of hearing “Bush Lied” that I’m dying to hear of one actual instance.

Posted by: Colby A | May 20, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

And don’t come at me with WMD’s, unless you are prepared to accuse every other western leader of lying, as well as every in-the-know Democrat in Washington, all of whom came to the same conclusion based on the same facts. Please. Try harder?

Posted by: Colby A | May 20, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

MST asked “Why does it take 266 waterboardings on 2 detainees in a month to get or force the desired? statements? Just a question. How about a straight answer, if y’all are capable.”
Because the interregators were not allowed to torture the terrorists, which could have gotten answers a lot quicker. They had to settle on waterboarding because it is NOT torture.

Posted by: arsii | May 20, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

I have to listen to “Bush Lied” constantly. Thats a serious accusation- care to back it up?
I can do that for Pelosi. I can do that for Obama (20 times over without breaking a sweat, actually- we can start with his anti-earmark pledge, move on to no lobbyists, and go from there…).
So if its going to be ‘common wisdom’ that Bush lied, but Pelosi is great, and Obama is a saint- well, lets put it on the table, shall we?

Posted by: Colby A | May 20, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Arsii- just to back you up- these terrorists are well-trained in torture. They’ve even got handbooks, that go into detail on how to rip people’s eyeballs out, rip off fingernails, etc.
You are right- waterboarding is NOT torture, specifically because it does NOT cause lasting physical harm- and the terrorists know that from their extensive education on REAL torture, like cutting off heads…

Posted by: Colby A | May 20, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

Colby A- Your words -there was no crime here- UNTIL Madam Pelosi lied about it, accused the CIA of lying to her, and now there IS a problem here.—–If there was no crime until then, what are you saying? I posted US law and international law earlier, waterboarding would be and is torture. Go back and look. Waterboarding is not the only method they used, I’m sorry you feel a man who was tortured and his experiences are irrelevant(McCain). Good to know you support our troops. If you read my earlier post that included the statutes and what the law says, without “empathy” water boarding is torture! Threw the empathy in because you guys are already gearing up over one word!

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Colby – that was breathtaking. Bravo.

Posted by: NDSue | May 20, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Sorry Nancy, but this Democrat wants you to resign. Independent of what the CIA says, it was obvious from your manner you were lying.
Clinging to your power will only benefit the repubs in the long run.

Posted by: Rennly | May 20, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Is it wise to have a Speaker who is so easily misled?

Posted by: Ignax | May 20, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

What would have been President Bush’s motive for doing something he knew was illegal unless he believed it would work?
If he thought it wouldn’t work, did he want it done just because he’s secretly a sadist?
If he’s a sadist, why would he only have it done to 3 people?
This stuff knocks around my head when people make accusations against him. If he broke the law, what would have been his motive? Isn’t that usually an important factor in a court of law?

Posted by: NDSue | May 20, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Don- If Pelosi is lying which HASN’T been proven, gee the CIA doesn’t have the notes she requested be made public, she should step down. Either way, she didn’t nothing illegal. Plain and simple. But the ones who ordered this should be held accountable also, Pres. Bush and VP Cheney, lied, “we do not torture” and ordered what is against the US law and International law. I already posted it, so don’t ask go look! Also, because we attempted to change the meaning of the laws without once again including other counties who made this agreement, doesn’t make it rigt!

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Pelosi is such a disgrace to the Democratic Party. I for one as a Democrat am ashamed to have her represent our party as speaker. I believe that she should step down. I believe she is nothing but a liar who would do anything to save her own skin.

Posted by: Moni56 | May 20, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Pelosi is the Republicans best friend as was Gingrich the Democrats best friend. He resigned and she should asap.
She has lost what little credibility she had. She is an anchor around the Dems neck.

Posted by: gwobama | May 20, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

The only respectable thing I have heard about Pelosi during this, is that she questioned if they were not going far enough during interrogations. That tells me she is more reasonable than she portrays herself as being for all of the totally irrational left wing nuts who vote in her district… but she denies this, so she should be removed, because if ‘they lie all the time’ she should have scrutinized them more.

Posted by: rambo | May 20, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Newt, I am a strong supporter of yours, and believe that you should be President. However, you did make a comment in the article that didn’t make sense to me. You stated that being only second in line to the Presidency, she should excuse herself from being speaker if she doesn’t believe in the men and women protecting America. Why not, the number one person, Barack Obama, does not believe in the men and women protecting this Country, why should Pelosi? Keep up the good work Newt!!

Posted by: Confused | May 20, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

NDSue – Be careful, as Nixon said if the President does it, it’s not illegal! We know how that went! A President does not have supreme power! You all accuse Pres. Obama of attempting that, look at the last 8 years, our constitution as Pres. Bush said “was just a piece of paper” He tore it up because of the “war”. My BF took an oath to protect and defend that “piece of paper”. You repubs tell us Dems that we don’t have a clue, go online, see all news and opinion sites, I have said today many times if Pelosi lied she needs to step down. Why hasn’t ONE Repub said if Pres. Bush lied, which has been proven, I posted it, he should be prosecuted! This is about right and wrong! If the Dems are lying, have at them! But, the same goes for those who ordered it. You can’t have it both ways!

Posted by: try the truth | May 20, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Try the Truth – Quit yelling! I was asking questions, and not accusing anyone of anything. And you addressed me but didn’t answer my questions. If everything you say about President Bush is true, WHAT was his motive? Why only 3 people?

Posted by: NDSue | May 20, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

‘m no fan of Pelosi, but Gingrich lecturing anyone on honesty and ingegrity is laughable. He was leading the charge for Clinton’s impeachment for the Lewinsky affair while he was cheating on his wife. The Repubs should neuter Newt. He has no credibility and doesn’t help their cause.
***********************************************
If Newt had to go, shouldn’t Pelosi also go. For the country its more serious to lie about the CIA than to cheat on your wife. Both things are disgusting, but i guess its 10 years since newt did it and he has suffered enough from that now. no need to bring that up.

Posted by: jan | May 20, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

An article about waterboarding appeared in the Washington Post on Sunday, November 04, 2007. The writer, Evan Wallach, includes the following:
“Here’s the testimony of two Americans imprisoned by the Japanese:
‘They would lash me to a stretcher then prop me up against a table with my head down. They would then pour about two gallons of water from a pitcher into my nose and mouth until I lost consciousness.’
“And from the second prisoner: ‘They laid me out on a stretcher and strapped me on. The stretcher was then stood on end with my head almost touching the floor and my feet in the air. . . . They then began pouring water over my face and at times it was almost impossible for me to breathe without sucking in water.’
“As a result of such accounts, a number of Japanese prison-camp officers and guards were convicted of torture that clearly violated the laws of war. They were not the only defendants convicted in such cases. As far back as the U.S. occupation of the Philippines after the 1898 Spanish-American War, U.S. soldiers were court-martialed for using the “water cure” to question Filipino guerrillas.”
So is waterboarding torture? Is it illegal? It appears so.

Posted by: George | May 20, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

I support libertarian/conservative values meaning i would hold my breath and vote for the GOP no matter what because dems are socialist inspired. but i dont’ understand why Newt are so aggressive here. It’s gold for any party that the opposition has such a clueless leader. she is becoming a drain on her party and the GOP can only benefit from that.

Posted by: jan | May 20, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

An article about waterboarding appeared in the Washington Post on Sunday, November 04, 2007. The writer, Evan Wallach, includes the following:
********************************
listen here “George” americans do not use the Japanese form of waterboarding which is much more cruel and excessive. are you not paying attention?

Posted by: jan | May 20, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Okay, Jan, how is what the two soldiers described different from the “American waterboarding technique?” The article was not confined to just what the Japanese did. BTW, I am paying attention.
I figured someone would find something wrong with the quotation. I was not disappointed. I almost didn’t post it because I had a feeling that “excuses would continue to be made.”
Let us know what the American way is. To me the American way is not do it.

Posted by: George | May 20, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

One thing I noticed today. At about 10:00 this morning this discussion turned noticeably sour. I left to go to work, came home and for the most part, it still is. Wonder why?

Posted by: George | May 20, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Jan, if you had read the whole quote, you would have noticed the reference to American soldiers using the technique on Filipino prisoners we had taken during the 1898 Spanish-American War. That was before WWII—must have the “American way” of waterboarding that time that was illegal.

Posted by: George | May 20, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Read “The Great Explosion” by Eric Frank Russell.
There is no honor among career politicians. Fire them all.

Posted by: Jubal Harshaw | May 20, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

can you BELIEVE all the WILD-EYED LIBERALS on the internet these days?…HOW do their comments always get to the top of the heap?…the internet was a lot better before liberals figured out how to use it
Gingrich is RIGHT ON…pelosi should have been gone the same day she blasted U.S. Intelligence

Posted by: johninlongmont | May 20, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Off with her head.

Posted by: PC Bullbuster | May 20, 2009, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Aw, Come on folks….Leave Pelosi alone!She’s the gift that never quits giving for the Republicans. Between her, Dirty Harry, Biden and the laugh-master himself, Obama, they’re gonna make some super campaign ads for the Republicans in 2010. Back off and let’m roll.

Posted by: PuddinStick | May 20, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Pelosi is an embarassment to every U.S. citizen. She is obviously lying. It makes no difference what Bush did or didn’t do. This is about Pelosi and lying and lying to cover up the previous lie. They’re really all corrupt, Dems. and Reps. So stop trying to defend either side and start realizing we need to get rid of all of them. Vote them all out. Term Limits by us.

Posted by: jose wasabi | May 20, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

I tend to stay down the middle with my political views. However I think Newt has some meat to his ideas than most on here are giving him. The majority of you are just pulling the ol ad hominem and attacking the messanger and not the message. It is if some of you think he might just be onto something so in an attempt to protect pelosi and more importantly to you the democrat party you attack newt instead of his ideas. This is a sign of empty rhetoric and the losing end of a debate.

Posted by: Level Headed | May 20, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Reading these comments I am amazed to see the statements such as “pot calling kettle black”. He(pot)was ousted was isn’t the Pelosi (kettle)? I find it interesting that only GOP offenders are the ones ousted but not the Dems who you all are saying are doing the same things “pot calling the kettle black”. I say if it is good for the pot it is good for the kettle.

Posted by: shirley | May 20, 2009, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Billy Bob: “That’s why it’s a democracy, get it, Democrat=Democracy as opposed to Republican=Republican Guards.”
That’s funny. After I stopped laughing though, I thought you might actually be serious, and then I became sad because you children are no longer being taught the basic principles of our wonderful country. I suppose though, if you were, you would never have supported a candidate who annexes banks, fires and replaces CEOs of private companies, forces states and banks to take TARP money so he can pull their strings later, etc. I had no love loss for Bush spending like a drunken Kennedy, but Obama’s motto should be “I spend more money before 9:00am than most presidents spend all day.”
And because your school isn’t doing it, I will – the US is not a democracy. It is a republic, specifically, a representative republic.
Jeff.

Posted by: Jeff | May 20, 2009, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

Who appointed George Tenet? Oh that’s right, Bill Clinton

Posted by: Jim | May 20, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Wait until the recordings come out. The politicians are mostly lawyers, you don’t think a Republican one wouldn’t have done CYA? As far as the CIA, Civil Servants don’t care about the politicans. Only the political appointees who are usually on somebody’s G spot but too incompetent to win an office. Same with the CIA, wouldn’t you think they would have done CYA?

Posted by: Calvin Hobbes | May 20, 2009, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

NO DEMS are asking for her to step down?Hmmmm that’s odd..I always thought they were so fair, and believed in our country..What Nancy did is almost what Spy’s do, they give away US intelligence..and Nancy is putting a shadow over the CIA..
THIS has NOTHING to do with the BUSH Administration at all.. HE is out of office now, and Nancy and the dems will somehow some way find a reason to blame someone else for their own IGNORANCE.. While she is being replaced…maybe we could find a replacement for Biden as well..He might as well be working for the enemy.. It doesnt matter if any Dem’s are asking for her to step down, IT is the CITIZENS of this Country who dont want an idiot liar like her to represent us anymore. We deserve someone intelligent in her place.

Posted by: REBEL4USA | May 20, 2009, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Newt is right, Pelosi stepped way over the line on this one. Obama and the Democratic Senators seriously need to rethink there position. This comes down to whether or not these homers Democratic Senators will dump this woman. She is a liar and they backing her up. I’m waiting for all these low life’s to be remove come 2010 and 2012.

Posted by: Best2U | May 21, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

I think Newt is right about this one. He’s angling himself for a 2012 Presidential run, granted. However, he is right in calling for Speaker Pelosi to resign.

Posted by: American Government | May 21, 2009, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Newt is right, get her outta there! She is the problem and Obama is the solution!!!

Posted by: shera | May 21, 2009, 1:37 am 1:37 am

To all who immediately discount Gingrich because of his role in President Clinton’s impeachment: please, please, *please* remember that there is a legal and a moral issue to keep separate about the past. The President lied under oath. No matter that it was about an affair, and no matter that Gingrich himself was just as morally bankrupt; Article II of the Constitution simply demands that a president or vice-president “shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” You can still debate whether lying under oath is a “high crime” or a “misdemeanor,” but the question is NOT whether an affair is a removable offense.
No one here wants to rehash the past, but you simply cannot discount what Gingrich is saying here because of his role in the impeachment. If he’s wrong, then he’s wrong. If he’s right, then he’s right.
It should be worrisome that Speaker Pelosi is second in line to helm our country, *especially* after the wiggling she’s doing to give a clear answer about what she did or didn’t know. “The CIA lied to me” is NOT going to cut it.

Posted by: malibite | May 21, 2009, 2:07 am 2:07 am

Pelosi’s office called Gingrich’s suggestion “ludicrous,” and noted that no Democrats are calling for Pelosi to be ousted.
This is a pretty damning statement about the entire Democrat party.

Posted by: Bela Pelosi | May 21, 2009, 2:12 am 2:12 am

pelosi leading all the other America haters toward big democrat election losses in the future.

Posted by: Jack Kennedy | May 21, 2009, 5:21 am 5:21 am

Instead of the partisan bickering, perhaps we should just use the ruler of competent administration. Nancy Pelosi is a synchophant along with Harry Reid. Out of touch with reality and living in the fever swamps of the extreme left (San Francisco…) By the time a person becomes the speaker of the house it is assumed that they have risen above only having a perspective that includes their petty ego, very local orientation and overwhelming partisan motivation. Sorry, she doesn’t rise to the level which the job requires. She’s a small pollywog in a very big pond. Someone with more capability (and common sense) is needed in the job.

Posted by: Eddy | May 21, 2009, 6:26 am 6:26 am

i notice that not 1 liberal can deal with the very important point that an elected politician stood up in fromt of the media and made a claim that our intelligence services, tasked with the mission to protect america, blatantly lied.
this is fundamentally wrong on so many levels it is impossible to list and explain them. not that most would understand. here are a few: pelosi is made out to be some grand, pure leader in other countries of the world thanks to her statements about bush. she helped push the perception about a lying president. the media ate it up and repeated it over and over, with no evidence. now she says the cia lies. that will be used to discredit the cia the world over also, thereby undermining our ability to gather intelligence. this plays right into the hands of our enemies.
it is very simple: if the cia did lie, there are other ways for congress, who has oversight, to deal with it.
a cornered politician, especially a high ranking one, caught with multiple stories, makes a comment that is meant to deflect attention and blame with no basis other than to save themselves is exceedingly dangerous.

Posted by: infinitewisdom4u | May 21, 2009, 7:30 am 7:30 am

Why is it that whenever a Democrat gets caught at this the only response is “well they all do it”??? The whole point here is that she lied and is making an American Institution look bad for her own gain PERIOD!

Posted by: Jman | May 21, 2009, 7:46 am 7:46 am

NEWT-THE-NAFTA-MAKER. Still full of himself and will do so as long as people will give him a TV showing and a mic. He is one of the causes of 32 consecutive years of trade deficits – along with his friends, the “moderate” Republicans.

Posted by: jr | May 21, 2009, 8:16 am 8:16 am

I ask myself these days… What country am I living in now?
This is what happens when you allow the wolves to gaurd the hen house. We are all in trouble. There is an anti-American in the White house and he is following his “rules for radicals” agenda. We deserve what we get! God Help Us!

Posted by: Scared Patriot | May 21, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am

I agree Libs. It’s Bushes fault Pelosi lied to the country!

Posted by: Mike | May 21, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am

Drudge just dropped the link to this article. What gives Matt?

Posted by: Mark | May 21, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am

War crimes? The President’s responsibility is to protect the nation. Imagine, If a sitting Prez did not use every tool at his disposal to protect. What crimes of ommission would the Prez be guilty of if he allowed the sacrifice of an entire U.S. City? All of this anti-bush sentiment is actually a testament to the job he did. instead of worrying about your safety. you are secure and now free to spew your liberal agenda. Seriously we are talking about waterboarding while at the same time obama is directing attacks wiping out afghani and pakistani villages. How many terrorist does that create? No. waterboarding three people that a village never met is more enraging than the killing of a loved one. Is obama a war criminal…No he is protecting the U.S. All this other B.S. is political and not based on U.S. security interests

Posted by: Brian | May 21, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am

Is obama a war criminal because he is directing air raids on afghani and pakistani villages? Doesn’t that create more terrorists than pouring water on someone’s face? (answer is no obama is not a war criminal and no waterboarding does not create more terrorists).
Problem with liberals is it is okay as long a democrat is doing it. the other problem is your rationales. ie waterboarding is torture and against our values, but somehow wiping out villages is keeping with our values.

Posted by: Brian | May 21, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am

only half the country thinks socialism is better than capitalism.
The identity of america has been lost.
No more land of the free. it is the beginning of the great nanny state.

Posted by: Brian | May 21, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am

The only problem with Gingrich’s comments is that the former head of the US Senate’s Intelligence Committee, Bob Graham, who is famous for having kept a running and detailed diary of everything he did in office, backs Pelosi’s story. He says that his datebooks prove the CIA didn’t give him 3 out of the 4 briefings they claimed (a fact the CIA has now confirmed) and at the 4th they never mentioned waterboarding at all. (Sad to say this story has been on NPR but not say, ABC News)
With his independant confirmation of her story, and given the scandals involving those who were running the CIA at the time (Google Kyle “Dusty” Foggo-the CIA’s 3rd in command under Porter Goss who is currently doing 3-5 in federal prison) I’d say Pelosi wins the credibility battle

Posted by: Mikegalleher | May 21, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am

I live in Washington DC and have spoken with people who personally have met Nancy Pelosi. It is an open secret that she is a bit odd and not the sharpest tack in the box. What’s sad is that people take her seriously. Even sadder is that a major political party would give her a position of such prominence.

Posted by: ramjetrth | May 22, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Nice job Mr. Klein. Do you often take a 100 percent disabled vets post off your website? It was well written, but had information that is on the web.
If people are interested, look up “Odinga-Sen. Obamma- Kenya- 2006. Violation of the Logan ACT”.
Also look up Nancy Pelosi doing likewise during her visit which wasn’t sanctioned by the Bush administration either!
That’s why the Logan Act was put into place. To prevent people from usurping our President in global affairs, etc.
I had two extremely articulate posts, BOTH have been removed.
The liberals really do hate veterans and active duty military. READ THIS WHILE YOU CAN! Because… POOF..it won’t be here long!
Then Sen. Obamma campaigned for his cousin Odinga, who “is” in bed with Islamist, to try to oust a sitting President on his trip on 06. It’s in a major US newspaper and in the African Press International (API).
Things are coming undone for him quickly. He’s calling active duty and veterans names, because we are informed.
Doesn’t that make anyone a little queasy?
Sorry, but I’m sick because I took care of hero’s during Vietnam. I believe our agents who’ve kept us safe since 9-11 and our troops, are hero’s, not liars and right wing extremeists. I think the TERRORISTS are the bad guys!
Go ahead, pull my post.
Brainwashing works, but not all the time. It’s not working. The liberal media isn’t getting their way…

Posted by: FemaleVet | May 22, 2009, 4:05 am 4:05 am

Now how long will she be able to serve. Oh that’s right, forever. Please, someone vote her out before she becomes worse than she already. Please. I don’t thank I can stand another year, month, or day watching her idiot smile. Bring back someone like Newt…please

Posted by: aggie1989 | November 17, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.