Intelligence Report: Pelosi Briefed on Use of Interrogation Tactics in Sept. ’02
ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was briefed on the use of “enhanced interrogation techniques” on terrorist suspect Abu Zubaydah in September 2002, according to a report prepared by the Director of National Intelligence’s office and obtained by ABC News. The report, submitted to the Senate Intelligence Committee and other Capitol Hill officials Wednesday, appears to contradict Pelosi’s statement last month that she was never told about the use of waterboarding or other special interrogation tactics. Instead, she has said, she was told only that the Bush administration had legal opinions that would have supported the use of such techniques. The report details a Sept. 4, 2002 meeting between intelligence officials and Pelosi, then-House intelligence committee chairman Porter Goss, and two aides. At the time, Pelosi was the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee. The meeting is described as a “Briefing on EITs including use of EITs on Abu Zubaydah, background on authorities, and a description of particular EITs that had been employed.” EITs stand for “enhanced interrogation techniques,” a classification of special interrogation tactics that includes waterboarding. Pelosi, D-Calif., sharply disputed suggestions last month that she had been told about waterboarding having taken place. “In that or any other briefing . . . we were not, and I repeat, were not told that waterboarding or any of these other enhanced interrogation techniques were used," Pelosi said at a news conference in April. "What they did tell us is that they had some legislative counsel . . . opinions that they could be used, but not that they would." Brendan Daly, a Pelosi spokesman, said Pelosi’s recollection of the meeting is different than the way it is described in the report from the DNI’s office. “The briefers described these techniques, said they were legal, but said that waterboarding had not yet been used,” Daly said. Daly pointed out that the report backs up Pelosi’s contention that she was briefed only once on “enhanced interrogation techniques.” Her name does not appear elsewhere in the report. "As this document shows, the speaker was briefed only once, in September 2002," Daly said. At the briefing, Pelosi did not formally register objections to the interrogation techniques authorized by the Bush administration. President Obama has said he considers such techniques to be "torture." According to the interrogation memos released last month by the Obama administration, Abu Zubaydah was waterboarded 83 times in August 2002. UPDATE: The report also details dozens of other meetings with members of Congress — though not with Pelosi present — where the use of waterboarding and other interrogation techniques was described. The Senate intelligence committee’s chairman and ranking member, Bob Graham and Richard Shelby, were given a briefing similar to the one with Pelosi and Goss on Sept. 27, 2002, according to the report. On Feb. 4, 2003, a briefing on “enhanced interrogation techniques” for Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., and Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV, D-W.Va., revealed that interrogations of Abu Zubaydah and Abd Al-Rahim Al-Nashiri were taped. In addition, that briefing “described in considerable details” the techniques used, including “how the water board was used.” A similar briefing the following day included Goss and Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif., who by that time had become the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee, when Pelosi moved on to become minority leader. The report is accompanied by a letter from CIA Director Leon Panetta to intelligence committee leaders that describes the way it was compiled: “This letter presents the most thorough information we have on dates, locations, and names of all Members of Congress who were briefed by the CIA on enhanced interrogation techniques. This information, however, is drawn from the past files of the CIA and represents [memorandums for the record] completed at the time and notes that summarized the best recollections of those individuals. In the end, you and the Committee will have to determine whether this information is an accurate summary of what actually happened. We can make the MFRs available at CIA for staff review.” UPDATE II (5/8/09): Speaker Pelosi’s statement Friday went slightly further, covering all interrogation techniques, not just waterboarding. And the top Republican on the House intelligence committee, Rep. Peter Hoekstra, tells me that the speaker has lost "credibility" on this subject.
Email
GOP Rap: 'Take America Back'
Afghanistan Timeline Realistic?
So….either Pelosi lied outright or she has a very bad memory.
Posted by: Crazy Pen | May 7, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Somebody has some explaining to do.
Posted by: Missy M | May 7, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Everyone back then was afraid to cross Bush. Even Pelosi. And newspapers such as the New York Times which reportedly is in dire need of bailout funds it doesn’t deserve.
Posted by: AspenFreePress | May 7, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Waterboard Pelosi. I am sure she will remember then.
Posted by: james at 37 | May 7, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
I guess since the republicans controlled the house, senate, the court, and the oval office she should have protested.
Posted by: rightbhind | May 7, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Pelosi should resign, immediately. It’s what the Dem’s would have any Repub do if the tables were turned. No free pass, Nan. Buh bye!
Posted by: BetsyRoss | May 7, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
“I guess since the republicans controlled the house, senate, the court, and the oval office she should have protested.” – rightbhind. Where have you been since 2006, rightbhnd? Congress has been in Democrat hands for the past 2-1/2 years!
Posted by: Publius | May 7, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
The Democrats were afraid to cross Bush? I guess I was reading news from another planet.
Face it, Pelosi and a host of others just plain lied about what they knew. Does that surprise anybody?
Posted by: TucsonWilly | May 7, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
look at the dems making excuses for Pelosi. Hypocrites! and she is the biggest of all.
Posted by: notanobamafan | May 7, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Didn’t we already know this?
Posted by: ellsbells930 | May 7, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
I voted Obama and I can tell you without a doubt that Pelosi and others are just flat out liars. Their memory is just fine but they think the Americans they represent are a bunch of stupid sheep. Might be right since we just keep voting them back in office. That’s why I have said several times, as much as I like Obama he needs to clean his parties house and not just everyone else’s. Pelosi is the bottom of the pit in my opinion.
Posted by: CAW | May 7, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Pelosi is just like most of the Democrats and Republicans! They will lie and do anything before owning up to their failures. Keeping their office and power is the only agenda they have! Observing and protecting the constitution of this nation is not in their realm of thinking or doing! Money and power is their only motive! The new world order of the Democrats is just as bad as the new world order of Republicans. My family does not trust or believe in any of them. Pelosi is at the top of list for liars and theives!
Posted by: stoltz61 | May 7, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Hmmm…I wonder where all the liberals are on this blog ? Seems like they all go in to hiding when one fo their own is caught in a bald faced lie but are the first to scream the loudest when a conservative is only accused of something wrong. Pelosi needs to resign as speaker. She is a total joke.
Posted by: Ladnarc | May 7, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
I’d love it if Pelosi resigned over this. She is part of the problem and needs to go. I’m an Obama voter.
Posted by: trevortb | May 7, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
“Their memory is just fine but they think the Americans they represent are a bunch of stupid sheep.” That’s the entire rationale behind socialism and every other totalitarian form of government, CAW. People are too stupid to make the right decision, so the role of government is to tell them.
Posted by: Publius | May 7, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Now you see the truth and the hypocrisy of some of the Democrats. They yelled and yelled and manipulated the American public and the majority of people bought it. How sad the American public was duped.
Posted by: Ace | May 7, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
look at the dems making excuses for Pelosi. Hypocrites! and she is the biggest of all.
Posted by: notanobamafan ————–Cant be talking about this Dem. I cant stand the lying witch.
Posted by: CAW | May 7, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Pelosi is a liar.!!!
Posted by: CW | May 7, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
“Everyone back then was afraid to cross Bush. Even Pelosi” – Posted by: AspenFreePress
Sorry but that tired old “Bush made me do it” excuse doesn’t cut it here. Perhaps Pelosi was afraid to speak out in 2002, when she first became aware of the torture, but that doesn’t explain why she lied about what she knew and when she knew it in 2009, after Bush has been gone since January.
Pelosi, just like everyone else in this world, needs to take responsibility for her own actions. When Bush lied, we were outraged. We should be equally outraged that Pelosi lied.
Posted by: About Us | May 7, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
We need term limits NOW !!!
Posted by: Ladnarc | May 7, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
PIGLOSI caught in her LIES – priceless !!
Posted by: PantsOnFire | May 7, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Democrats don’t lie! They just tell a different version of the truth.
Posted by: Firefox | May 7, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Term limits are the ONLY way to fix the problems with the politicians that are running our country.
Also: “PELOSI GO HOME!!!”
Posted by: term_limits_NOW | May 7, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
“But Bush… He scared us… we HAD to go along or, or….” Aw hell with it! This just shows how corrupt they both are! But as long as we re-elect the same old faces no matter how worse things get… These folks will continue to get away with their crimes and NEVER be held accountable by anyone! As long as we enable them, we are doomed to suffer from their crimes and suffer the fate that they have insulated themselves from on the backs of innocent civillians and the bank accounts of the American taxpaying public.
Posted by: hmn | May 7, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Pelosi is an embarrassment in a very embarrassing U.S. government. All those who voted for her should be lined up and slapped.
Posted by: disgusted | May 7, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Perhaps we’ll now see some Republicans finding that maybe there should be prosecutions. I’d say who cares what party they’re in. If they’re complicit in violations of the law, they need to pay. Period.
Posted by: Gus | May 7, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Pelosi is a liar & hypocrite? Like anyone had a doubt? And this is supposed to be news? The real news is why her moonbat district keeps electing her when they have many better people to send to Washington.
Posted by: Tyrone | May 7, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Look at the bright side. This will pretty much shut up the “charge Bush with war crimes” crowd. Instead of worrying about our former leaders, let’s turn our attention to those who are still in office and continue to lie!
Posted by: I like peanut butter | May 7, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
Pelosi, Dodd and Frank wouldn’t know the truth if it hit them in the face.
Posted by: Mack | May 7, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
Pelosi needs to resign.
Posted by: djn | May 7, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
Since the Dems control the House of Reps, they should show some guts and demand her resignation and vote in a new speaker. She is a digrace to the country.
Posted by: Ladnarc | May 7, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Of course Pelosi is lying, what else would a dishonest politician do?
Posted by: Bjohns | May 7, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Oh, and ABC news, for once try to be accurate in your reporting. Stating that “Abu Zubaydah was waterboarded 83 times in August 2002.” is a flat out lie. He was waterboarded no more than 4 times. They disgracefully count every time water was dripped on his face during a session as “waterboarded”.
Posted by: Bjohns | May 7, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Why did she make such a big deal of all of this? Why did she not just keep her mouth shut? Did she think the truth would not come out? Who is on the Senate Intelligence Committee? She has made a fool of herself and the Dems. At the very least she needs to step down from her job as Speaker, and give up her private jet. Had she kept her mouth shut we probably would not be talking about this right now. Wasnt she the one that was demanding an investigation? LOL
Posted by: J | May 7, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Who woulda known….
Of course Pelosi knew all along… she just kept telling the lie hoping no one would keep digging for the truth.
There are bad Dems. like there are bad Repubs…. and Pelosi is a bad Dem.
Posted by: not buying the bull | May 7, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Let me see if I understand today’s right wing hilarity- Pelosi needs to resign because she received one briefing?
Last week you were all arguing that no one in the Bush Admin should be prosecuted over the actual torture.
Posted by: Gary | May 7, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
How funny! Now, the liberal socialists are defending Pelosi.
Have they no shame? No sense of what is really wrong? I think not!
Posted by: dl | May 7, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Impeach her.
Posted by: Jon | May 7, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Lets face it most of the Government needs to resign!!!
Posted by: david | May 7, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
How funny! Now, the liberal socialists are defending Pelosi.
Have they no shame? No sense of what is really wrong? I think not!
Posted by: dl | May 7, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
“Did she think the truth would not come out?”
Posted by: J
Of course she didn’t think the truth would come out … and now that it has she KNOWS that the party will protect her. In her world, only those evil, heartless republicans will believe she lied. There will be no consequence to this. She’s an untouchable and she knows it and she knows her party condones it.
Posted by: Edit | May 7, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
” appears to contradict Pelosi’s statement.” nuff said.
Posted by: bob | May 7, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
A clear and present danger. Protect us from enemies both foreign and domestic. Foreign – terrorist(jihadist) and domestic – THE US CONGRESS, PRES., AND S. COURT. They are the domestic enemy of the people.
Posted by: George | May 7, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
C’mon. Give Nancy a break! How could you expect her to remember being briefed about interrogating folks who were planning to blow up a couple of American cities, including, perhaps San Francisco.
I blame Bush.
Posted by: TBB | May 7, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
Obama should distance himself from Pelosi and force her out. If he truly wants to be a bipartisan president he should use her as an example and kick her to the street.
Posted by: jim | May 7, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Pelosi lied? Not possible! Wasn’t this the very day when she had her face yanked up again, those bulging eye balls re-arranged and her brain got lobotomized because she needed a lift on her forehead as well? The woman cannot speak 3 words with any sense and she is way out of her league in the office she holds. She is dumber than a brick!
Posted by: dka | May 7, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Pelosi should be removes as Speaker of the House. The woman is a liar.!!!
Posted by: CW | May 7, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
Republicans waterboarding people is okay. Democrats knowing about it isn’t? The moral corkscrewism required to be a rightwinger in this country gets more unbelievable every day. Here’s a deal. Go after Pelosi, BUT prosecute everyone in the direct line of command who sanctioned waterboarding.
Posted by: Thinking | May 7, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
i don’t believe that whoever was briefing would detail that waterboarding was being done while pelosi was in the meeting. i’m sure they would have thought she would object. lets see the notes from the meeting.
Posted by: sickened | May 7, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Democrats who back Pelosi should be ashamed of themselves. There is no excuse for this women (at least I think she is a women).
Posted by: PaulR | May 7, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
Let’s put Pelosi, Rockefeller and other Democrats before one of their own “Truth Commissions,” then.
Let’s see just how much they “don’t remember” when they’re under oath, under penalty of perjury and the cameras are running.
Posted by: Good Lt | May 7, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
Pelosi is the poster child for democrats, and one of many reasons why their fortunes will plummet faster than the Dow last year. Besides being an idiot, she is nasty, spiteful and unable to collaborate.
Posted by: Bjohns | May 7, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
“Republicans waterboarding people is okay. Democrats knowing about it isn’t?”
Posted by: Thinking
I don’t think people have a problem with the fact that Pelosi knew about the torture — I think people are a tad outraged that she lied about knowing about it. Some of us think that it’s pretty bad when an elected official tells an outright lie.
Posted by: My two cents | May 7, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
I’m a Democrat, and I can’t stand Pelosi. Her obstruction of impeachment proceedings against Bush and Cheney, her arrogance, and her pursuit of a personal agenda to the detriment of the Party has left be with little good to say about her. If it turns out she lied, and it ends her political career, I won’t shed a single tear for her.
Posted by: Mark F | May 7, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
If Pelosi claims that she doesn’t remember, then she should be removed from office because she is to old to be Speaker of the House. The woman LIED.!!!
She should be removed anyway.
Posted by: CW | May 7, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
We need a President who is man enough to stand up to Pelosi. Obama certainly isn’t. I’m not sure if he is more afraid of Michelle or Pelosi.
Posted by: Jeff | May 7, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Is this story just rehashing what was already known? Fox isnt reporting it and I thought they would be on it like a fly onh you know what. I am a Dem and Obama voter and Pelosi, Dodd and liars on both sides of the isle need to go away. Im afraid we cant leave it to her Ca. voters because they just keep voting her back in. Lets bring charges to all of them and demand she and other pay the price one way or another.
Posted by: CAW | May 7, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Republican talking points for this month.
1) We should not prosecute ANYONE for torturing. And particularly not the Republican administration. It is traitorous to even suggest it.
2) We should condemn any Democrat who even knew we were using “enhanced interrogation techniques”.
Because knowing about it is immoral and doing it is not?
Posted by: Cognoscenti | May 7, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
He had water poured on his face 83 times. There is a difference. The left wants you to think he was waterboarded on 83 separate occasions. The actual number is probably below 10. The number 83 is arrived at because the CIA interrogators were required to count and time each instance of pouring water.
Posted by: Uncle Joe's Patriotic Taxpayer | May 7, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
O C’mon, give her a break. It was just a hiccup. It all depends on what the definition of “intelligence” is and whose “intelligence” you are talking about.
Posted by: Proud American | May 7, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
” Some of us think that it’s pretty bad when an elected official tells an outright lie.”
Hmm. Some of you didn’t seem to mind “Weapons of mass destruction”.
Posted by: Cognoscenti | May 7, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
How could anyone feel safe with that senile old lady having any substantial role in national security? She is either lying or she has dementia.
Posted by: frege | May 7, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
If Pelosi is the queen of liars then Obama is the king! He promised a responsible government that is transparent and will not leave debt on future generations but look at what he’s done! Thousands of billions of dollars in spending!
Posted by: levimarshall | May 7, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Let’s see. We have Thornberry and others claiming that there was no torture, that any torture was due to rogues, some of whom remain in prison for the use of torture because it was against the law? Of course, we have Cheney claiming that he authorized torture and that it was all good. But, if it was not being used, why did they inform Pelosi that they were using it? If they were using it, why did they put reservists in prison for doing what they were told.
It doesn’t make sense.
Posted by: hedonist | May 7, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
The Obama administration will never prosecute those who authorized torture. There’s too much political fallout on the Dem side! LOL!!!!
Posted by: John | May 7, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
“Pelosi is the poster child for democrats, and one of many reasons why their fortunes will plummet faster than the Dow last year. ”
Uh dude, maybe you didn’t notice just whose fortunes plummeted with the DO last year.
Posted by: Michael | May 7, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Cognoscenti: Try to stay on point!
Posted by: dl | May 7, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Pelosi knows that it really doesn’t matter if you tell the truth or not. The only thing that matters is “agenda”… Pelosi really is funny to watch while she’s lying… she’s worse than a little kid trying to be believed when caught at something!
Posted by: luvg-d | May 7, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Isn’t it interesting that Ms. Pelosi was absent from all the other briefings? Could it be that she knew darn well that this stuff was radioactive and made sure she didn’t go anywhere near it? It’s a lot easier to dispute the recollections of ONE meeting, as opposed to many. That woman is as sly as a fox, but not bright enough to pull this one off.
Posted by: Sleuth | May 7, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
We didn’t torture nobody. We just told Pelosi we did
Posted by: Gem Mcfarhar | May 7, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
“Cognoscenti: Try to stay on point!” Oh, he’s on point. Republican twisting in the wind is getting more and more amusing to watch. Your credibility drops more by the day.
Latest talking point: “Torturing people is not wrong. Having people tell you they did is.”
Posted by: Harold Broad | May 7, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
HA hah.
Posted by: DanDan | May 7, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
sorry but not only does the the liar pelosi need to be kicked out but all the old guards need to go ,dems and repubs,they almost sound the same any more ,only i think the repubs are not quite as communist now
Posted by: doug | May 7, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
I think you republicans will find many many Dem’s cant stand Pelosi, Dodd or anyone else that brings this country down and lies to the people they are supposed to be representing. Dem’s and Reps may differ on many things, but I believe we all want what is best for this country and having self serving lying politicians are not what anyone wants. I hope I’m right. If only the right and left could come together as one and demand justice and the removal of any representative that is caught outright lying no matter what side of the isle they are on, we might get somewhere. Wishful thinking?
Posted by: CAW | May 7, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Remember these people are trying to kill all Americans!! If you look at the training the encountered before the war the tactics on inerogaton seem to be a cake walk. What have their leaders done to captured Americans? They deserve everything that has happened to them. The contries that are crying fowl are the worst at prisoner living conditions than we ever thought about.
Posted by: LEde | May 7, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Piggy Pelosi is nothing but another lying democrat, just like Dumbama.
She should resign. She is a disgrace to the nation.
Posted by: Callie | May 7, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
I’m sorry but I thought when I voted for Obama he was going to be the president of “change”. I really didn’t know much about Pelosi, Frank and Reid before the election but are they not just “more of the same”? I don’t care if you’re dem or rep but a bad apple is a bad apple.
Posted by: Betsy | May 7, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
I have no problem with waterboarding. I think President Bush took every precaution, consulted attorneys, had doctors present just in case and saved many lives in the whole ugly process. This was the place we were in after 9-11. But to try to lay all this at the feet of the Republicans and declare no knowledge after the fact is despicable. Kinda like the dems that voted for the Iraq war and then spent the next several years not supporting it and trying to remove themselves from it. Not too honorable in my book
Posted by: Kary | May 7, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
One must remember tha every member of congress who was briefed, this was classfied information and even if they had objected it was not possibile to go public so basically the person is told what is happening but can do nothing about it.. So in the in end it DOES not matter that she was briefed… Get it folks? It does not mmatter as she couldnt have influenced the use or non use or torture
Posted by: John | May 7, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
War criminal! Impeach! Etc, etc…
Posted by: tony | May 7, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
One thing I’ll say about Nancy Pelosi, if she WERE ever waterboarded she’d still have that silly fake smile on her face. Oh what the heck, let’s waterboard her and see if that’s true!
Posted by: Brad | May 7, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
Well let’s see Henk,
She comes from the very liberal California and was put into office by….liberals.
So you tell me then why liberals all of a sudden have a change of heart about her???
Posted by: Angie | May 7, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
Hmm. Some of you didn’t seem to mind “Weapons of mass destruction”.
Posted by: Cognoscenti | M
well, I was pretty upset when I discovered that the whole wmd scenario was fiction. Maybe I’m old fashioned, but to me it doesn’t matter if it’s a republican or a democrat telling the lie. A lie is a lie and I don’t want anyone who lies working for me.
Posted by: My two cents | May 7, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
hey pelosi….give us our plane back…liars ride on the bus.harry reid is also against gay marriage where is PEREZ HILTON?lets us have that TRUTH CMMISSION….lets waterboard them all including barney frank and chris dodd. we want the truth.
Posted by: catman | May 7, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
The one thing that is for certain. Watching all of the appologists coming out of the woodwork. Excuse after excuse.
They have to get some more spoonfed talking points from comedy central, then they’ll be back with a new batch of propaganda.
Posted by: RT | May 7, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
Any more criminal charges against Pelosi and she’ll be qualified to be president.
Posted by: kim | May 7, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
Love it , love it . Not single hypocrate liberal defending Nancy Piglosy.There will more lies exposed, it is a matter of time but truth will prevail.I would to hear ONE liberal requesting her expulsion and prosecution.
Posted by: Frank | May 7, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
Barney Frank has requested a ‘variation’ of the traditional waterboarding be used on him. Use your imagination on that one.
Posted by: BenQ | May 7, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Pelosi is either stupid or a liar. Was she too busy Bush bashing to bother with issues of national security? I would have thought that less than a year after 9/11 that if the CIA and the executive branch approached our elected officials to discuss what they deemed to be important national security issues that she would have made the time. These people need to stop grabbing sound bites and do their job. They need to attend the meetings for the committees they are on or resign. They need to read the legislation or publically aknowledge that they couldn’t be bothered to read the legislation.
Nancy Pelosi needs to clear it up for us. Is she lazy and stupid or a liar?
Posted by: Judy | May 7, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
she should be imprisoned for war crimes. hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaahhahahahahahahahahaha. where are all the liberals?????where they always are when the truth comes out….not present
Posted by: catman | May 7, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Pelosi needs a full exorcism along with the legion of her followers.
These people are destroying the Republic with there antics. They act like anarchists. Watching this tragedy unfold you can’t but wonder how people could vote for creatures this vacuole or greedy? Bit by bit there making the bill of Rights irrelevant. De-facto if not de-jure. Statue by Bill by Court Law.
JMO
Posted by: Revnant Dream | May 7, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
It appears that the current administration wants Americans to focus more on what President Bush may have done wrong and less as to what is actually going on right now.This doesn’t surprise me in the least. After all isn’t Pelosi ok with the torture and killings of the unborn every day? Most Americans at least felt safe when Bush was in office. He will one day go down in history as one of the greatest Presidents that America has ever had. God Bless him and his family, we miss them!
Posted by: R. Pfau | May 7, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
“Republicans waterboarding people is okay. Democrats knowing about it isn’t? The moral corkscrewism required to be a rightwinger in this country gets more unbelievable every day. Here’s a deal. Go after Pelosi, BUT prosecute everyone in the direct line of command who sanctioned waterboarding.”
Posted by: Thinking
First of all, the President has already stated that the CIA officials who actually performed the waterboarding will not be prosecuted. However, he did say that those attorneys that provided the opinions may be prosecuted, and left open the question of whether those that ordered the waterboarding (members of the Bush administration) will be prosecuted. First of all, this is pure political farce – emphasis on both “political” (that is the motive behind these threats of prosecution) and “farce” in that this is a big joke – the threat of prosecution is being applied so unevenly it is laughable. The attorneys – who did not order and did not perform the waterboarding – but opined on the legality may be prosecuted. Yet, members of Congress – who are charged with oversight (remember they were briefed with the specific purpose of oversight and have the power of the purse) are not investigated? If the attorneys are subject to prosecution, so should our dear Madame Speaker. Apart from being a shameless liar, she is much more culpable than anyone who offered his opinion on the legality. Bottom line – this threat of prosecution is being used as a political weapon – both to intimidate the Bushies and to placate the far left of the Democrat party. President Obama shamelessly used the threat of prosecution for his own political gain – not for any valid purpose – one of many Pandora’s box’s he opens that he will be unable to close.
Posted by: Average citizen | May 7, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Nancy Pelosi needs to clear it up for us. Is she lazy and stupid or a liar?
Posted by: Judy | May 7, 2009 8:03:58 PM
There is no question here folks.
Nancy is a liar. She had a big news conference two weeks ago, stared into the camera and lied, and lied and lied.
Obama’s DNI confirms such.
Posted by: the Truth | May 7, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Nancy Pelosi lies? Boy, I didn’t see that one coming.
Posted by: jpk | May 7, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Let’s be fair and open-minded. Maybe she has a good explanation for the apparent contradiction.
Posted by: Glad it's spring | May 7, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
I’m an independent. Politicians from either party today do and say whatever fits the moment often point fingers at anyone close by to separate themselves from their lies.
Mr. Obama, its time for the transparancy in government you spoke about during the primary. You’ve been in office just over 100 days and you’ve had enough appointments in contraversy to last your term. See that Nan clears off her desk, packs up her things, is searched for items that belong to the speaker’s office, turns in her parking pass and is escorted promplty out of Washington without a severence check.
Nancy, you need to learn about truth. You could start out by re-examining the spelling of your own name. It should read, “Pa-lie-si” or “Pa-louse-si.”
I now wonder how the media may put a spin on Nancy’s statements. Perhaps her press secretary will explain that there is a difference of what she said and what she really meant. Kind of another Joe Biden swine flu statement moment.
Posted by: allan | May 7, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
Nobody seemed to mind when she was funneling money to her husband’s company. Why would you think they will care about this one?
Posted by: Barb | May 7, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
The report supports Pelosi’s story.
They told me what they intended to do, but I didn’t believe that they’d actually do it.
Yep. Pretty good story. “I’m really, really dumb” is a better line than “I’m a liar”.
Posted by: Charlie | May 7, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
karela – The Bush administration WAS being open about the enhanced interrogation techniques when the CIA briefed the Senate Intelligence Committee about EIT in 2002. Our elected officials were briefed, but the information was classified as top-secret so the general public was not. That was a security call … why alert the terrorists as to how you’re going to interrogate them?
Bottom line is that Pelosi was briefed. She knew about the waterboarding, didn’t object, lied about knowing about it when asked.
Posted by: Get Real | May 7, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
Let’s waterboard Pelosi to see if she tell the truth………
Posted by: Frank | May 7, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
I think Nancy Pelosi is about to be voted off American Idol. We’re now down to three rock stars. Who will go next week?
Posted by: Paula | May 7, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
“”Their memory is just fine but they think the Americans they represent are a bunch of stupid sheep.” That’s the entire rationale behind socialism and every other totalitarian form of government, CAW. People are too stupid to make the right decision, so the role of government is to tell them.”"
What do you think the last 8 years were? Have you not heard about the anything the Bush admin did to trample rights? Such as politicizing the DOJ and kicking out people who disagree, forcing relgion on people (military, iraqis afghans), warrantless wiretapping, keeping tons of innocent people on terror watch lists, etc etc etc.
They allowed companies to gauge everyone (CC companys), destroy all forms of regulation agencys, gblahlbahlbah
(all those things kinda sound like one of the 20 bad -ist words you guys use)
I dont wanna hear you whine about Obama trying to give some poor people a little extra help
Posted by: hdtv information | May 7, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
You guys also realize she prob woulda been thrown in jail or something (i dont know the punishment but something along those lines) for leaking secret info…. sorta illegal
Posted by: hdtv information | May 7, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
Most ethical congress evah!!! MY butt! LIAR. and a bad one at that.
Posted by: horserider | May 7, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
There could be a completely logical reson behind her story. She might have been stone cold drunk and doesn’t remember a thing from the day before or three days after the briefing. I would buy that one.
Posted by: CraigT | May 7, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
I’m surprised that this was even reported. I didn’t know that conservatives were allowed to work for mainstream media outlets. Heads will roll over this story. But, of course, not Nancy’s.
Posted by: S Rose | May 7, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
According to Geneva CAT ‘convention on torture’, like the term soldier, enemy combatant is also DEFINED. In CAT torture is described as with ‘evil intent’. Anyone who thinks our people had ‘evil intent’ when they were actually trying to save lives just doesn’t understand the difference and is only making a PC argument against their hated party. Bush wasn’t our smartest president but he did what he did to protect our country. Pelosi and her ilk do what they do to protect their power and position.
Posted by: Jupiter | May 7, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Caught!
Posted by: Michael | May 7, 2009, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Pelosi should be held accountable for this blatant lie. How can this woman be trusted from this point on is beyond me. She is a serial liar (seems harsh but it is true).
Posted by: Pups McCann | May 7, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Pelosi and Obama are stupidly endangering the American people with their idiotic ideology. Will it take 100s or 1000s of American lives for these nitwits to see the light? I sure hope not…
Posted by: Bjohns | May 7, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
For all you Pelosi supporters saying she was “afraid of Bush” or “only had 1 briefing.” Those are b.s. excuses.
IT IS HER JOB to stand up for what she believes in, not what is politically or personally advantageous. If I believe that waterboarding is an unconstitutional and unnecessary torture, then I would at that exact moment of the briefing contest it.
She probably did forget, I’ll give her that. But if she thought it was a big deal, it’s her responsibility to make a big stink. She didn’t. So the only conclusion any objective person can draw is that she now objects because of political, not ethical reasons. That is the only variable that has changed, folks.
Posted by: Danny J | May 7, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
A prominent Democrat tells an outright lie on camera to the entire nation they’ve been hired to protect and defend. SHOCK AND AW!!! HAHAHAHAHA SHE’S A WALKING PUNCHLINE.
Posted by: Ha! | May 7, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
I am a liberal. I have no problem with anyone Republican or Democrat being investigated and if need be going to trial for crimes against humanity. Who every ordered, changed our laws to so-call allow it needs to be on trial. If Nanacy is invloved then she should be part of it. This should not be about polical parties it should be about being Americans and as Americans we are not the bad guys and the people who make us the bad guys because of their stupidity or evil ways need to be prosecuted to the fully extent of the law. This is just plain evil
Posted by: JerryAn American | May 7, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
The point here is not whether or not waterboarding was against the law. At the point in time that it was being used, there was no law governing it’s use, as it was not defined as torture. The problem for everyone here, is that Pelosi, and others on the Democrat side, have come out against it when it was able to score them political points, yet they were fully aware that it was going on, years before they spoke out about it. If people like Pelosi, Rockefeller, and others, felt so strongly about it, then why did they wait for years after they knew about it, to say anything? That is the issue here, not it’s legality. The legality of it can be debated for years, but I don’t see an end to that discussion in our lifetimes.
Posted by: Brad | May 7, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
I think Pelosi should step down now. And I voted for Obama.
Posted by: FedUp | May 7, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
This confirms what I have been suspecting [actually what we've all known] all along! The leadership of both parties was privy to the aggressive interrogation tactics. I think we as Americans need to come to three conclusions here:
1.) In the confusion after 9/11 [I honestly was waiting for the next attack any day after] we jumped the gun and resorted to questionable techniques bordering on torture.
2.) These techniques were refined over time and made less inhumane and only employed rarely.
3.) Pursuing criminal charges against Administration officials or those privy to their activities [i.e. Pelosi] would be devisive and misirable.
Let’s move on and never torture again.
Posted by: Joe C. | May 7, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
Well lets take a long look at that Briefing list of Dems that were briefed and to this day keep lying about it:
Nancy Pelosi
Bob Graham
John Rockefeller
Jane Harman
Harry Reid
*Full Committee
John Murtha
Evan Bayh
Russ Feingold
Diane Feinstein
Carl Levin
Barbara Mikulski
And this is just the list being briefed prior to 11/16/06 **** They have known for a very long time well before the election.
Posted by: Nitewinde | May 7, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
Disgusted wrote: “Perhaps we’ll now see some Republicans finding that maybe there should be prosecutions. I’d say who cares what party they’re in. If they’re complicit in violations of the law, they need to pay. Period.”
I am a progressive Democrat who supported Obama and I agree with you 100%. There was never any reason why Pelosi took “impeachment off the table” except for personal, political reasons – in my book. Now it’s a little more clear to me, and I feared this was coming.
Posted by: madisonhack | May 7, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
If Pelosi knew and didn’t act she must face whatever legal consequences the law dictates. Hopefully some Republicans will then wake up and realize that this is not a partisan issue. Let’s get everything on the table and have a judge or an independent panel look at the evidence.
@Jupiter
Forget about the Geneva Conventions for a moment and take a look at the UN Convention Against Torture.
@Brad
“At the point in time that it was being used, there was no law governing it’s use, as it was not defined as torture.”
That is flat out wrong. The US has prosecuted waterboarding several times in the past. Look it up.
Posted by: El_Pajaro | May 7, 2009, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
I quit the GOP over the torture issue. I couldn’t stomach all the people speaking and writing on behalf of the GOP who were pro Torture. (Admittedly, I’ve had a lot of other issues, but torture was the final straw.)
One thing I’d like to point out to the Pelosi apologists. Not only has she lied about knowing about the torture, but she didn’t object to it. Not one letter of protest with the White House or the CIA. Not one.
At the very least, she should resign her position as Speaker of the House and apologize to the American People. If the people in her district care so little about integrity, ethics, and morals to reelect her, that’s their call.
And yes, I do support a full investigation of torture by the CIA at Guantanamo and the secret sites and a fresh investigation of Abu Ghraib, with full accountability top to bottom, including prosecutions where indicated. If Obama wants to pardon the CIA interrogators who used torture, that’s his privilege as POTUS. If he wants to pardon Bush, I won’t b scandalized. But I’m pretty sure he needs to nail the hides of the OVP boys to the wall.
Posted by: Marcos El Malo | May 7, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
the docs and conversations were classified, a bit hard for her to come out publically now wouldn’t it have been? A nice tidy little catch 22 Cheney had going
Posted by: xUSH | May 7, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
We were not, and I repeat, were not told that waterboarding or any of these other enhanced interrogation techniques were used…well, maybe a little.
Posted by: munsey | May 7, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
Pelosi lied.
Cheney’s memo will prove that EDI saved lives.
Obama is an idiot.
Posted by: verner | May 7, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
The Dems and Repubublicans who knew about these items had no recourse to follow, there was no authority to go to to fight classified documents from the President on this issue as Cheney made all this stuff up, there was no check and balance as there is no precedent and its certainly not supported by the constitution. They couldnt talk about it at the time nor during the election. The only reason people can talk is Bush was so bold about it and Obama declassified stuff.
Posted by: Folly Jolly | May 7, 2009, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
This whole business was NEVER about torture. It has always been about Obama trying to stick it to the Bush administration.
Talk about Amateur hour.
Obama is a laughing stock. His weakness has not only completely demoralized the CIA, it has made our friends and allies doubt his ability to lead.
God help us if we get hit again.
Posted by: verner | May 7, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
“Bush ‘administration’ officials buttonholed Congressional leaders, swore them to secrecy, forbade them to consult with staff, and told them that DOJ attorneys had concluded that these techniques were legal.”
So there can be no congressional oversight of the intelligence agencies, because they are too secret? I see. I suppose Bush also told her to say “We were not, and I repeat, were not told that waterboarding or any of these other enhanced interrogation techniques were used”?
Posted by: munsey | May 7, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
God help us if we get hit again.
I mean like we did under bush cheney that is, I am dipping my fingers in my pudding right now, mmmm
Posted by: verner | May 7, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
“Pelosi and Obama are stupidly endangering the American people with their idiotic ideology. Will it take 100s or 1000s of American lives for these nitwits to see the light? I sure hope not…” — Bjohns
You mean like the thousands that died in Iraq, Oh wait I am not bright
Posted by: verner von holmo | May 7, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Ofcoarse she knew!!! Washington is soooo full of hipocriates….
Posted by: yea right | May 7, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
For all you Pelosi supporters saying she was “afraid of Bush” or “only had 1 briefing.” Those are b.s. excuses.
IT IS HER JOB to stand up for what she believes in, not what is politically or personally advantageous. If I believe that waterboarding is an unconstitutional and unnecessary torture, then I would at that exact moment of the briefing contest it.
She probably did forget, I’ll give her that. But if she thought it was a big deal, it’s her responsibility to make a big stink. She didn’t. So the only conclusion any objective person can draw is that she now objects because of political, not ethical reasons. That is the only variable that has changed, folks.
..
Lets say shes not afraid she was gagged by state secrets smarty, how does she stand up, get charged as a traitor for opening classified info up. You see this why you Just Say No’ers don’t get any credibility from ANYONE except your fellow circle j’ers
Posted by: dean verner | May 7, 2009, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
“Republicans waterboarding people is okay. Democrats knowing about it isn’t? The moral corkscrewism required to be a rightwinger in this country gets more unbelievable every day ”
Are you missing the point on purpose?
Democrats knowing about it THEN but DENYING it NOW is the problem.
It’s a repeat of the whole Iraq war scenario. The Democrats who voted for the authorization to invade Iraq provided over a dozen rationales that HAD NOTHING TO DO with “faulty intel” on WMD, ALL of them referring to UN and US legislation and actions PRIOR to the election of George Bush.
President Bush was following US policy on Iraq established by Congress and the
Clinton administration in 1998 and still in effect when he took office. He received strong bi-partisan support for his decision to invade Iraq UNTIL no WMD were found lining the streets of Baghdad.
THEN, as the 2004 elections rolled around, all those other rationales given to us by Congress were somehow no longer relevant as Democrats stumbled over each other in the rush to absolve themselves of ANY responsibility for the invasion.
The “moral corkscrewism” required to be a Democrat has been unbelievable for the last SIX YEARS.
Posted by: tournefort | May 7, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Wait for it.
Wait…
“I don’t recall.”
Of course.
There has never been a bunch of greater and outright corrupt liars and thieves as there has been in the U.S. government in the last 10 years. Democrats and Republicans are two sides of the same disgustingly corrupt self-serving coin. All have failed the American people, and all should be swept out of office for the devastating mismanagement they are responsible for.
Impeach Pelosi’s @ss for lying to the American public, to whom she serves, and for her dereliction of duty in upholding the laws of the constitution.
Wake up and open your eyes America!
Posted by: dotmafia | May 7, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
The problem is not that they had to keep this information secret at the time briefed.
The problem is that there is no reason to LIE now and the DEMS involved have made a conscious decision to LIE about wether they were ever briefed at all !
That is what makes a LIE a LIE, when you LIE and know your LYING is bad enough but to know your LYING and still LIE after getting caught is just crazy.
Gee, what does a Dems tell there kids when they Lie and get caught ?
Posted by: Nitewinde | May 7, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
The problem is not that they had to keep this information secret at the time briefed.
The problem is that there is no reason to LIE now and the DEMS involved have made a conscious decision to LIE about wether they were ever briefed at all !
That is what makes a LIE a LIE, when you LIE and know your LYING is bad enough but to know your LYING and still LIE after getting caught is just crazy.
Gee, what does a Dems tell there kids when they Lie and get caught ?
—
She’s been consistent and so have the others. No one LIED except Bush and Cheney
Posted by: verner von smallp | May 7, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
Why does CNN persist in repeating…ad nauseum…old news and commentary related to old news??? If you have nothing new to offer about anything, go back to comicstrips……they worked for newspapers..
Posted by: just joe | May 7, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Pelosi is nuts…how anyone could vote her back in is beyond me
Posted by: fred | May 7, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
When is the left and right going to learn that GOVERNMENT is NOT all-powerful unless we allow them to be. Pelosi is yet another example of our corrupt politicians that have been living on our dimes for far too long. TERM LIMITS!!!
Posted by: TERM_limits_IMMEDIATELY | May 7, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
She either lied or is senile. Either way, time for the crazy hippy to go.
Posted by: Drathaar | May 7, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
Pelosi lied so she should be tried…..
Posted by: boxcar | May 7, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
So its okay to shoot three pirates in the head to save one man but we can’t pour some water over some guy’s head with a doctor present to save millions?
Anyone confused?
Posted by: Jason | May 7, 2009, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
The more Pelosi denies knowing, the more the CIA will leak info to prove otherwise. Obama already threw the CIA under the bus so they’re not going to be so kind to anyone that supports him. Obama can make it all go away by admitting that he made a mistake by releasing Top Secret CIA information and then resign.
Posted by: t. hill | May 7, 2009, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Wait a minute—Pelosi KNEW??? Knock me over with a feather!!
Can’t wait for those show trials…
Posted by: Chris | May 7, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Pelosi lied so she should be tried…..
If the AG thinks she should be tried then yes. However since we know absolutely Bush and Cheney lied I guess you admit they should be tried. Funny how things happen that trap just say noers .. “empathy”, “briefed on tactics … not that she was briefed they were used on anyone”
Posted by: verner smothers | May 7, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
So its okay to shoot three pirates in the head to save one man but we can’t pour some water over some guy’s head with a doctor present to save millions?
Anyone confused?
…
so must be ok to abort babies as they become serial killers, I think your ARE confused
Posted by: verner ill | May 7, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Pelosi DID lie. So did Bush and Cheney, and they ALL need to be prosecuted for TREASON against the USA.
Let the chips fall where they may…
I’m a Democrat.
Let’s see if the Republican HYPOCRITES are willing to put Bush and Cheney UNDER OATH.
Bets???
Posted by: Arn Gunnutes | May 7, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
“So its okay to shoot three pirates in the head to save one man but we can’t pour some water over some guy’s head with a doctor present to save millions?”
Of course it makes no sense. Since when did democrats ever make sense? This whole concocted controversy is about one thing and one thing only – democrats and Obama cowtowing to the lunatic left.
Posted by: Bjohns | May 7, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
Let’s see. My recollection on lying about anything as important as torture? I don’t seem to recall!
Unethical, power hungry, arrogant beyond Human belief, self serving = Politician
Posted by: Rich Monk | May 7, 2009, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
“Well lets take a long look at that Briefing list of Dems that were briefed and to this day keep lying about it:
Nancy Pelosi
Bob Graham
John Rockefeller
Jane Harman
Harry Reid
*Full Committee
John Murtha
Evan Bayh
Russ Feingold
Diane Feinstein
Carl Levin
Barbara Mikulski
And this is just the list being briefed prior to 11/16/06 **** They have known for a very long time well before the election.”
Nitepost.
Thats allot of people who should be investigated on what they knew and when they knew it.
Posted by: Pups McCann | May 7, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
All you Obama voters saying that Pelosi has to go: AIN’T GONNA HAPPEN. All she has to do is go home to her district once or twice a year, march in the Gay Pride parade with the founder of NAMBLA, make some noises about some day supporting gay marriage, and she’s set for life.
Now, here’s a question for you Obama voters: how many of you would vote against a Democrat in YOUR congressional district to reduce Pelosi’s power as Speaker?
Posted by: richard mcenroe | May 7, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Pelosi knew about the waterboarding? WHO CARES! Everyone knoes she is a blundering FOOL. All you people (including Obama) who believe we TORTURED these two nice Muslim men have no idea what REAL torture is. I’m sure if you traveled to some other countries and inquired about it – you’d find out.
Posted by: Motney | May 7, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, can’t get fooled again.
I will not be voting democrat in this next election even though I am a democrat. Very unsatisfied with the fact they are no different than the republicans. No different.
Madam Speaker, that goes double for you.
Posted by: Carrie | May 7, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Our leaders are supposed to be stronger than we are, especially when their conscience is involved. WHy did they say NOTHING!?! Shame on all of them!!!!!
Posted by: matrushka | May 7, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Firefox posted “Democrats don’t lie! They just tell a different version of the truth.”
And Republicans don’t lie, they simply can’t recall anything.
Posted by: SamTyler1973 | May 7, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
To be fair we should interview the Americans who were taken prisoner….what? what did you say? Oh Americans weren’t taken prisoner? They all had their throats slit? Okay nevermind lets get back to pouring water over a terrorists head making him uncomfortable. You lefty kooks probably will argue the water was the wrong temperature and that was torture.
Posted by: Jason | May 7, 2009, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
I love the right wing nuts. So, pelosi is bad because she knew it was going on, but Bush and Cheney are not bad for DOING IT! Right!
Posted by: SamTyler1973 | May 7, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
Well, well, well… Looks like “Stretch” Pelosi’s chickens have come home to roost…. What else could we expect from a disgusting, revolting trick like her heiness…. She makes me want to PUKE!!! Let her be the next subject to be WATERBOARDED!!!! The absolute LEAST that should happen to her is she is stripped of the position of “Speaker of the House”…
Posted by: Delaware Vol | May 7, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
I don’t know why anyone would be surprised about this revelation of Peloski. She is nothing but a publicity hound, loves to spend taxpayer’s money without any accountability. The woman is in love with herself, that she has herself convienced, that she is good for the country! It is scary thinking that she is the Speak of the House, and has such control over Obama.
Posted by: mim | May 7, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
“Bush and Cheney are NEXT…
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! – Arn Lunatics”
Here’s a plan for the SCOLAR Arnie – write your congressman/woman and senators and demand that they start impeachment proceedings forthwith on President Bush and Vice President Cheney. Now hurry, there isn’t much time!
Posted by: Bjohns | May 7, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
No Sammy Boy, what we did to the terrorists is the least that should have been done to them… What she is, is a HYPOCRITE and she is a pathetic one at that…. There’s a good reason that she was voted the most partisan member of the House, and this would seem to solidify that vote—right Chief???
Posted by: Delaware Vol | May 7, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
She’s going to use the Reagan defense. “I don’t recall”
Posted by: Jim Bob | May 7, 2009, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Bush was very smart, he just wasn’t cool enough for Hollywood. He wasn’t elected to “act” but to actually “do his job” which was to protect America! Now, how are Americans going to feel if we are attacked again and this was even an issue!
Posted by: R. Pfau | May 7, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
<<>>
No anger. Just stating FACTS.
Bush and Cheney committed TREASON, and we should INVESTIGATE it and LEARN the TRUTH, right?
Sincerely,
NRA Gun Nut(e)s
Posted by: Arn Gunnutes | May 7, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
One by the name of Hillary Rodham Clinton wrote THE book of not recalling.
Posted by: McFly | May 7, 2009, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Hang em all – if they wrote about it, asked about it, forced it, knew about it, were briefed about it – hang em (metaphorically) Dem, repub, indi, whatever, they all go down. Is this a nation that respects rule of law or not? I seem to remember the repubs in apoplexy about a president lying under oath and how the republic would crumble if the rule of law was not followed…where’s that crowd now…
Posted by: Hang Em All | May 7, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Democrats and Republicans are the same. I am happy I voted Nader/Gonzalez.
Posted by: Ken | May 7, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
Now we know that she is guilty too. Everybody shoulddrop the partisan politics immediately. We are talking about War Crimes here. The only way we are going to get to the bottom of this is if there is a full-fledged investigation that has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with the law. It is clear now that Obama will do everything he can to stop it, and on a certain level that is understandable, considering how many other things are currently falling apart. But we are going to have to decide if we are going to be a country that is governed by laws or one that is governed by politics. When this is all over, we will know where we stand.
Posted by: Joe | May 7, 2009, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
a citizen:”People need to wake up – are you happy with our governement? ”
That’s a good question. Actually, yes I am. It’s made up of greedy, often inept, clearly flawed people and has been for centuries. But our country is the best in the world, the most prosperous free nation the world has ever known, and that is BECAUSE of our government not in spite of it.
Posted by: jhw539 | May 7, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
i hate that congress is blaming obama for not prosecuting they can do it them self if they wanted to. obama and anyone elected after 2004 are the only ones with clean hands
Posted by: steve | May 7, 2009, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
She was not along:
Nancy Pelosi
Bob Graham
John Rockefeller
Jane Harman
Harry Reid
John Murtha
Evan Bayh
Russ Feingold
Diane Feinstein
Carl Levin
Barbara Mikulski
Note: In all cases Staff members were also in the room
Joe
Posted by: Joe Smith | May 7, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
Welcome to Reality,
Please list all the Terrorist groups that comply with the Geneva Convention.
Posted by: Nitewinde | May 7, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
The problem in Wash. is that too many of their decisions are politically motivated, if they were against torture and the war they should have stood up and said so, they didn’t then because it wasn’t politically popular, but when it did become politically popular to be against the war, suddenly they have amnesia about their vote for the war and their approval of so called torture. If you have a conviction stand up for it, period. Most people applaud that even if they don’t agree with you.
Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | May 7, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
This is why impeachment was “off the table.” I want her and everybody who went along with this to resign. And I am a liberal.
Posted by: Joanne | May 7, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
The Waterboarding issue is over. This issue was brought up by Her Majesty The Liar Piglosy. Now that the truth is out..hmmmm..let’s go for the WMD lies//LMAO. Waterboarding was nothing but a political scam to keep our eyes away from the main issues such as the monstruos budget that the Obama Administration has created nothing more.
Posted by: Frank | May 7, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
Opps, found the staffer names from the first briefing with Speaker Pelosi.
Staff Members: Tim Sample and Michale Sheehy were also in the first briefing with Nancy and Porter Goss (does his name ring a bell for anyone….)
FOIA releases can be very messy for everyone…
Joe
Posted by: Joe Smith | May 7, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Those who were paying attention years ago, knew that she was briefed in 2002.
That was the beginning of the speculation that no flags were raised by Democrats concerning Bush administration behavior due to blackmail manipulation of Democrats based on evidence collected via warrantless wiretaps, oddly passed by many a Democrat. Brought to painful light in 2006 when few Democrats were found to have a pair. Trust no one, and throw the bulk of them out. This is a democracy of, by and for the people, NOT of by and for the corporation.
Posted by: Mike Flagg | May 7, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Nitewinde,
That is exactly why we are not terrorists. Because we don’t torture. That is why we are/were respected. Because we don’t torture.
And as Americans, I think all of us should be interested in making sure our laws are upheld.
This is not a Dem Rep issue. This is an American issue.
Posted by: Welcome to Reality | May 7, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Ah, good ol’ JHW here to try and switch the focus. Alinsky tactics at their best.
Here’s the issue, Libs:
Pelosi lied. Yes or no? If yes, she needs to be
Babble on all you want about the
Posted by: AJsDaddie | May 7, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
“prosperous free nation…because of our government not in spite of it.” UHHHH NO The spirit of INDIVIDUALITY AND FREEDOM is what makes this Country great, NOT THE GOVERNMENT..IT’S THE PEOPLE..
Posted by: Parallax View | May 7, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
Ah, good ol’ JHW here to try and switch the focus. Alinsky tactics at their best.
Here’s the issue, Libs:
Pelosi lied. Yes or no? If yes, she needs to be prosecuted and at the very least voted out of her job.
Babble on all you want about the waterboarding itself. That’s a DIFFERENT ISSUE. Try to focus on one thing at a time (I know it’s difficult).
Pelosi lied. Tell us about how outraged you are, or take your self-righteous anger to someone who cares.
Gz, it’s like talking to a room full of ADHD kids full of Mountain Dew…
Posted by: AJsDaddie | May 7, 2009, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
I have been a big support of Speaker Pelosi in the past but if this is true she needs to resign immediately. I hate to lose her but if she has not been honest and if she did not speak out against torture there is not other choice for her.
America needs to get this all out in the open so we can move forward.
Posted by: Andrew-PV | May 7, 2009, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
I think we should get better civics education in this country! Our Constitution is not the most specific document and the intent of the framers is debatable for a much of it. But there is ONE item plainly defined within it in black in white — that is the definition of Treason in Article III Section 3.
It reads “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”
Both Republicans [my party] and Democrats should read this before making idiotic accusations against anyone. Our framers expressly defined Treason in our Constitution because of the history of abuse and misuse and ever-changing nature of the meaning of the word back in England — especially under the Tudors and Stuarts when Parliament would often issue Bills of Attainder to bring down and execute their political enemies for treason!
Be careful.
Posted by: Joe C | May 7, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
Welcome to Reality,
DEMS have made this a issue.
This is just more PROOF ALL our LAWS have been upheld and there has been NO TORTURE by the USA.
Seems its you and other DEMS that have a problem dealing with that.
Hey,its the same problem Nancy Pelosi has so your in good company.
ALL the LYING DEMS is a AMERICAN issue absolutely.
DEAL WITH IT ~
Posted by: Nitewinde | May 7, 2009, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
So many American’s goal even though supporters of Demo. in 2010 is to get rid of Nancy Pelosi who is lack of leadership and liar.
Posted by: Get rid of Pelosi | May 7, 2009, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
AJ’s Daddie – so by your logic then, all previous administration members need to be prosecuted. Am I reading that correctly – Con?
Posted by: Hang Em All | May 7, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
Waterboard Pelosi. I am sure she will remember then.
Posted by: james at 37 | May 7, 2009 6:36:36 PM
========================================
THAT IS A GREAT IDEA, PLEASE GO FAR.
Posted by: Sharon | May 7, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
Joe Smith, it’s really sad to see you get so full of righteous indignation over ‘Democrat’ representatives who may or may not have been briefed on torture, yet I’m sure you were one of the most fervent defenders of the administration that actually circumvented the law and ordered people to be tortured. How can you fail to perceive what a bold face hypocrite you, and anyone else who defends torturers yet now gloats about ‘Democrat’ being briefed on it, show yourself to be? I think the lot of you should be locked up in Gitmo and waterboarded until you understand that it is indeed torture and decided un-American!
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 7, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
In all actuality this is probably the least of Pelosi’s sins so I am willing to give her a pass on this one. I am sure there are many more skeletons hiding in her closet and with the next administration if she is still there I am sure they will all come out and she can be prosecuted for them.
Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | May 7, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
Be careful what you wish for.
Posted by: Tia | May 7, 2009, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Nitewinde – are you out of your tree? This is proof of WHAT? It’s proof that A the president asked for torture to be legal. B. JD lawyers made it “legal” contrary to the constitution, the geneva convention, and our moral understanding and advancement. That does not make it NOT torture. Again – are we a nation of laws, the Rule of Law or not? I seem to remember the repubs in apoplexy about the rule of law when a president lied under oath about a blow job – where are those same voices now? Calling for abrogation of the Rule of Law, while calling those that demand it be upheld traitors…wake up and behold your hypocrisy
Posted by: Hang Em All | May 7, 2009, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
“Pelosi lied. Yes or no? If yes, she needs to be prosecuted and at the very least voted out of her job.” –AJsDaddie
Brilliant, and what of the war criminals that actually AUTHORIZED and ORDERED the torture? Can we now send them to the Hague where they belong?
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 7, 2009, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
This whole thing is a joke. Water Boarding is not tourture. It was necessasary to save lives. Get over it. It only happened to 3 of the most hardened terrorists to save american lives.
Posted by: Peter | May 7, 2009, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
Peter – than I guess you won’t mind if I come over and do it to you 136 times – great, see you in an hour! Rule. Of. Law.
Posted by: Hang Em All | May 7, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
“Brilliant, and what of the war criminals that actually AUTHORIZED and ORDERED the torture? Can we now send them to the Hague where they belong?”
Let’s try this again. I know it’s hard to be a Democrat these days, but please, do your best. Try not to play the “switch the subject” game.
Do you think Pelosi should be thrown out of Congress and possibly prosecuted for lying? Most (all?) Republicans and alot of Democrats seem to think so.
How about you?
Bonus points: answer the question without using the words “Bush”, “Cheney” or “BOOOOOSH DID IT!”.
Posted by: AJsDaddie | May 7, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
“This whole thing is a joke. Water Boarding is not tourture. It was necessasary to save lives. Get over it. It only happened to 3 of the most hardened terrorists to save american lives.” –Peter
Peter,
1st they came for the homosexuals, but I was unconcerned because I am not gay. Then they came for the gypsies, and I though they are trouble makers and we are better off. Then they came for the Jews and I though they are not so many and I am not one of them. Then they came for me.
Point being does someone in your family or you yourself have to be tortured before it is wrong when ANYONE is tortured?
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 12:00 am 12:00 am
TIA,
Just because DEMS “NOW” say waterboarding is torture don’t make it so.
And i dare you to quote to us anywhere in the Constitution that says it is torture or in the Geneva Convention.
We train are Military with Waterboarding and that never bothered DEMS nor did anyone call it TORTURE.
Posted by: Nitewinde | May 8, 2009, 12:03 am 12:03 am
Nitewinde – so I’ll pose to you the same opportunity – i waterboard you 136 times at my leisure, with you restrained and NOT ABLE to say stop, like they can when they train our military with “waterboarding” Tis a bit different when you are tied down by people who AREN’T like you, who DON’T think or look like you, and would PREFER you were dead anyway. Additionaly – THEY VOLUNTEERED for that service / training…
Posted by: Hang Em All | May 8, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am
indeed
;)
Posted by: Hang Em All | May 8, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am
Nitewinde – Question – Rule of Law – should America abide by it at all times, yes or no? If you answer yes, slap yourself. If you answer no, I’ve a plane ticket to Saudi Arabia for you…
Posted by: Hang Em All | May 8, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am
This is exactly why we NEED a special prosecutor to drag everybody in , get the truth as to who authorized, ordered, supervised and knew about the violation of both US & International law by the use of torture. The partisan gotcha is irrelevant. We as Americans have been demeaned by these acts…Justice for ALL
Posted by: Andrew | May 8, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am
“And i dare you to quote to us anywhere in the Constitution that says it is torture or in the Geneva Convention.”
Actually, I always find it amusing when people bring up the Geneva Convention, as if there’s a section in the GC about dealing with covert terrorists that fly airplanes full of civilians into buildings full of more civilians.
But I digress.
It’s been a good discussion. Later.
Posted by: AJsDaddie | May 8, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am
Thank you Andrew, a competent analysis at last.
Posted by: Hang Em All | May 8, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am
People…we’ll deal with Pelosi’s memory problems later.
Don’t take your eyes off the ball…who AUTHORIZED torture.
Posted by: RationalThinker | May 8, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am
Actually, I always find it amusing when people bring up the Geneva Convention, as if there’s a section in the GC about dealing with covert terrorists that fly airplanes full of civilians into buildings full of more civilians.
How about Human Rights? We have never (before) sunk to the level of our enemies and I find it disgraceful that America has allowed a pack of religious zealots to so profoundly shake her core beliefs that we’re now actually having the discussion ‘Is waterboarding torture?’ It is in fact pathetic and cowardly.
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am
Of Course she knew!!!! She was For it before she was against it!!!!
Posted by: Indiana Mark | May 8, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Pants on fire!!
Posted by: jjgidds | May 8, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am
Is this report going to be made public?
Posted by: wmholt | May 8, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am
The problem is not democrat or republican, it is *all* of them. None have our interest at heart before their own. For their complicity in the Wall Street fraud they should feel the sting of impeachment for they surely feel no sting of shame. Pelosi disgraces the office more than most.
Posted by: WAKEUP | May 8, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am
Pelosi, D-Calif., sharply disputed suggestions last month that she had been told about waterboarding having taken place.
“In that or any other briefing . . . we were not, and I repeat, were not told that waterboarding or any of these other enhanced interrogation techniques were used,” Pelosi said at a news conference in April. “What they did tell us is that they had some legislative counsel . . . opinions that they could be used, but not that they would.”
Brendan Daly, a Pelosi spokesman, said Pelosi’s recollection of the meeting is different than the way it is described in the report from the DNI’s office.
“The briefers described these techniques, said they were legal, but said that waterboarding had not yet been used,” Daly said.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
the report said that the techniques were legal but weren’t going to be used.
Pelosi says she was told the techniques were supposedly legal but weren’t going to be used.
Will someone clue me in on what is the controversy?
Posted by: stevie | May 8, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am
If Pelosi lied, does it make Bush’s and Cheney’s torture program any less illegal?
Throughout the Bush administration, wasn’t Congress merely informed about what Bush was going to do anyway, even if there were objections?
Didn’t Bush and Cheney also threaten anyone who told with arrest and conviction for leaking secrets?
Didn’t Bush and Cheney also threaten members of Congress not to talk with their staffs and aides, so members of Congress couldn’t even find out the legalities of Bush’s policies?
Didn’t Jay Rockefeller write a letter to himself by hand and put it in his own safe documenting what Cheney had threatened him with?
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am
1. If the reference in the article is complete, it says Pelosi was “briefed”. It doesn’t say WHAT she was told.
2. She should be investigated along with every other powerful politician — both parties — involved with this.
3. For AJsDaddy and your obsession with “Should Pelosi be prosecuted?” If an investigation shows that she broke the law, of course. What law do you think she has broken here? Or do you think being Nancy Pelosi is illegal?
Posted by: strangelet | May 8, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am
She didn’t know about torture because there never was any torture. Water boarding and insects are not torture. Pelosi cannot be prosecuted for lying about something that never happened. Let’s moveon, what do you say? Its not like this is about sex or even sexual harassment.
Posted by: Cecil | May 8, 2009, 12:39 am 12:39 am
Things are looking really bad for Obama on this one….
Things are looking bad for Obama because the Speaker of the House was briefed on the Bush Administration’s use of torture? Wow! Wishful thinking or willful ignorance?
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am
“This whole thing is a joke. Water Boarding is not tourture. It was necessasary to save lives. Get over it. It only happened to 3 of the most hardened terrorists to save american lives.” –Peter
Waterboarding is illegal. It’s settled law. Waterboarding costs lives. Every authority, except Cheney, agrees that it’s torture and unnecessary. The professional interrogators in the CIA and FBI agree that waterboarding produces lies, not truth.
The CIA destroyed 92 tapes of interrogations, so I wouldn’t count on only 3 people were waterboarded. We know that at least 98 detainees were murdered. These were people who were never convicted of anything. They were taken into custody through dragnets, at marketplaces.
I find myself wanting to say, “Why do you hate America so, that you would create so many enemies for us with these barbaric medievel practices?”, but that “Why do you hate America” line was stupid when you were saying it, and there’s no excuse to perpetuate the stupidity that ran us these last 8 years.
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am
At the briefing, Pelosi did not formally register objections to the interrogation techniques authorized by the Bush administration.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ok. Why would Pelosi object if she was led to believe that they weren’t being currently used? Was the intention of the briefing to solicit a rejection of the future use of an “EIT” that supposedly had was given legal justification but was not previously used?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No offense but it sound like a lot of “he said”, “she said”.
I supposed that means the statue of limitations for accountablilty regarding single briefings on single topics for Senator Pelosi is at least 5 to 6 years.
Posted by: stevie | May 8, 2009, 12:48 am 12:48 am
JaneC,
Why is it not possible to have Pelosi share in the blame? Do you think Bush & Cheney invented these interrogation techniques? Lives were saved because of these techniques. Maybe Pelosi deserves part of the credit instead of part of the blame.
Posted by: a better world | May 8, 2009, 12:52 am 12:52 am
Gomer Pyle: SUPRISE,SUPRISE, SURPRISE ! Or How about HYPOCRITE, HYPOCRITE, HYPOCRITE ! Will Nancy Botox put herself under oath and testify before her own “Truth Commission” Kangaroo Court ? She can then tell everyone how CIA “operatives” should be sent to jail for doing what she authorized. And encouraged.
Posted by: JohnnyD | May 8, 2009, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Pelosi didn’t lie. The people who wrote the report lied to implicate everyone ELSE.
Posted by: plaidsportcoat | May 8, 2009, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Let’s, for argument’s sake, say that Pelosi was told what Bush and Cheney were doing.
We know from the letter that Jay Rockefeller wrote to himself and stored in his own safe that Cheney threatened him about talking to anyone, his own aides included, with arrest and prosecution for spilling state secrets.
If Pelosi was briefed on what Bush and Cheney were doing (and not, as she says, what they said was legal for them to do, waterboarding, but weren’t doing and would tell her if they decided to), what is she guilty of?
Bush and Cheney were threatening members of Congress with violating the state secrets act during a time of war, not asking them if they could torture but telling them what their lawyers said they could do.
WHAT’S THE CRIME that Pelosi broke, if Bush and Cheney did tell her that they were actively waterboarding detainees?
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am
I agree with Jane C. Saying Nancy Pelosi was briefed does not inform exactly what and how she was briefed. The Bush administration covered their butts real well and they of course would try to drag the Democrats into providing them cover. But that doesn’t mean Pelosi was told everything that was going on. And I certainly would believe Pelosi over any reports that were written during the Bush administration in their desperate attempts to cover their war crimes.
Posted by: Debra | May 8, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am
That ABC news would run this story tells you that even the Lapdog press smells blood. Nancy is no long above reproach. Or the law.
Posted by: JohnnyD | May 8, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am
I didn’t know, I didn’t know… well, except for that briefing… and that one… an oh yeah, that one too… but I within minutes of hearing those, I erased them from my memory as if they didn’t happen. Hey, MSM!! I’m a Democrat. You’re not supposed to criticize us!
Posted by: Fiercely_Independent | May 8, 2009, 12:59 am 12:59 am
JaneC,
Where is Jay Rockefellers letter?
We HAVE the Briefing list, NO ONE has Jay Rockfeller’s letter don’t you wonder why that is ?
Posted by: Nitewinde | May 8, 2009, 12:59 am 12:59 am
Debra: Spin, Spin, Spin. She said first she was not there, but now she admits she was. She was told, but now not told enought. What’s the excuse next week ?
Posted by: JohnnyD | May 8, 2009, 1:01 am 1:01 am
“Where have you been since 2006, rightbhnd? Congress has been in Democrat hands for the past 2-1/2 years!”
Which is relevant to what happened in 2002, HOW, Publius?
Posted by: Cal | May 8, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am
Somebody named “A Better World” posted: “Why is it not possible to have Pelosi share in the blame? Do you think Bush & Cheney invented these interrogation techniques? Lives were saved because of these techniques. Maybe Pelosi deserves part of the credit instead of part of the blame.”
1. Only the Commander-in-Chief could order these techniques (torture, let’s call it what it has been deemed in US law). The CIA required the Commander-in-Chief come up with a legal authority because the CIA knew it was illegal, yet the CIC demanded it be done.
2. It didn’t save lives, not that that is relevant. We could drop atomic bombs on Pakistan and N. Korea right now, and that would surely save American lives in the future, but it’s ILLEGAL. Don’t you understand that concept? This discussion has happened already. Waterboarding is a capitol offense–We execute waterboarders.
3. If Pelosi did something illegal, I’m more than happy to include her. But what did she do? She had no authority in ordering the waterboarding. She and everyone in Congress was threatened with criminal prosecution if they discussed anything Bush and Cheney told them about during the entire 8 years of their administration. DON’T YOU RECALL THAT? I do.
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 1:04 am 1:04 am
“So its okay to shoot three pirates in the head to save one man but we can’t pour some water over some guy’s head with a doctor present to save millions?”
More like, pour water down some guy’s throat and stop JUST before he’d die from drowning, in order to save NO ONE. There was not a single attack thwarted, not a single life save, by torturing these prisoners. The purpose of torture is not to save lives. As George Orwell famously said, the purpose of torture is torture.
Posted by: Dan | May 8, 2009, 1:06 am 1:06 am
“That ABC news would run this story tells you that even the Lapdog press smells blood. Nancy is no long above reproach. Or the law.”
Gee Johnny, even if Ms. Pelosi did lie to the press, she wasn’t under oath so no laws were broken. How about the folks that authorized torture? Are they above the law or reproach?
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 1:08 am 1:08 am
Shades of Scooter Libby… maybe Martha Stewart… naw- Pelosi will keep going like the everready energizer, with full Dem. support, until she implodes…
Posted by: Bob | May 8, 2009, 1:11 am 1:11 am
I’m a little more concerned about what might happen to Americans under Obama’s new Patriot Act. Did you know that your emails and phone conversations could be listened to, you could be rounded up and falsely imprisoned and Obama doesn’t want any oversight or review of your arrest unless your email or phone conversation was made public which it never would be because then he could claim that making it public would be against the law. This is overreaching beyond belief and the abuse of power that could ensue is downright scary, but hey, the rights of Al Qaeda are a lot more important right?
Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | May 8, 2009, 1:12 am 1:12 am
I find it amusing how the Righties make comments here about how the Democrats are hypocrites. Have they actually read any of the comments from stated Democrats? Like me, most people identifying themselves as Democrats here are calling for Pelosi’s head over this if it is true. She should be prosecuted right along Bush and Cheney.
Posted by: Dan C | May 8, 2009, 1:15 am 1:15 am
Did you know that physicians were ordered to be on hand for waterboarding if the tortured died, as in drowned, so that their throats could be cut, tracheotomies?
Torture and murder.
Bush and Cheney threw rule of law out the window and became judge, jury and executioner over all people in the world.
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am
I’m surprised ABC is running this headline about Pelosi lying… I guess they figure they have to… But let’s see if it lasts for more than half a day…
Posted by: Bob | May 8, 2009, 1:17 am 1:17 am
Only weak minded fools think enhanced interrogation methods are criminal. You may not like it, but these techniques save lives. The only damages they cause are temporary pain and the only people who suffer are terrorists. People that want to murder you and me.
Posted by: Jason | May 8, 2009, 1:20 am 1:20 am
“No dumb a#s with obama and chrysler”
The Chrysler bankruptcy has nothing to do with this story, but I don’t see how that’s going to adversely affect Obama. The company was already going belly up and the administration stepped in to help save 100s of 1000s of American jobs. God forbid the president actually try to save American jobs! He should just let those union scum starve right? I mean sure we can afford to spend billions fighting an unnecessary war or cutting taxes for the top 1%, but those union workers wanting to make a living wage?!?!?!?!
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am
To all those who believe waterboarding is not torture, then are you saying it is OK for other countries to perform the technique on U.S. troops?
You can’t have it both ways.
Prosecute Bush and his crew, Impeach Pelosi and everyone else you had anything to do with this! THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!
Posted by: Wake Up | May 8, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Well we’ll see just how much Pelosi or any of the other “Holier than Thou” Democrats will push for an investigation. As Cheney said “if you’re going to let information out you need to let everything out the good and the bad”.
Posted by: miami hurricane | May 8, 2009, 1:22 am 1:22 am
Say it ain’t so, Nancy.
Posted by: jjgg5 | May 8, 2009, 1:29 am 1:29 am
Man Jason, you ever read 1984? You’re the poster boy for the Orwellian “Good Citizen”! First of all, let’s cut out the double speak. When translated to English you just said:
Only weak minded fools think torture is criminal. You may not like it, but torture save lives. The only damage torture causes is temporary pain and the only people who suffer are terrorists. People that want to murder you and me.
I want you to read that paragraph over and over again until it sinks in what a nimrod you’ve become. Turn off the El Rusho and FauxNews and join us in the reality based reality.
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 1:29 am 1:29 am
Somebody who calls himself Bob said: “I’m surprised ABC is running this headline about Pelosi lying… I guess they figure they have to… But let’s see if it lasts for more than half a day…”
Where is this headline that you claim says Pelosi is lying? The headline I see is: Pelosi Briefed on Use of Interrogation Tactics in September ’02.
That’s precisely what Pelosi herself has said. What else she said was that she and the others present, including Porter Goss, were told that the White House said that it had memos from the OLC that said the “harsh interrogation tactics” it wanted to use which included waterboarding was legal. The White House then said, according to Pelosi, “So we can use them if we want.” Pelosi responded, “We’ll see about that, should you decide to do that, which you have said you haven’t yet decided, but will inform us, Congress, should you get to that point.”
Pelosi also said that when she and Goss were leaving the White House, Goss said, “You can bet if they’ve got OLC saying that it’s legal, they’re already doing it”, to which Pelosi replied, “That’s not what they said in there, and I got a clear understanding with them that they would inform us if and when.”
Goss, when asked about that conversation said, “I don’t recall.”
Pelosi didn’t order the waterboarding, the torture, and does anybody doubt that Bush and Cheney would have paid any attention had she objected? Does anybody doubt that Bush and Cheney threatened Democrats with arrest and prosecution? We saw Bush and Cheney threaten for ourselves!
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 1:31 am 1:31 am
Are you capable of meaningful debate on the issue? Until you acknowledge that water boarding can be an effective method of interrogation then you have nothing to contribute. These methods are not common and widespread. They are used selectively by the CIA to interrogate terrorism suspects.
Posted by: Jason | May 8, 2009, 1:37 am 1:37 am
CHANGE?
Posted by: R. Pfau | May 8, 2009, 1:40 am 1:40 am
The Bushies briefed people in Congress not because they respected their views as a co-equal branch of government, but in case they got found out later by the public, they wanted to have a way to try to change the subject from who did it to who knew about it. Being briefed is not the same thing as being asked for permission, and it wouldn’t matter if it was because members of Congress don’t have the power to give people permission to break the law. Let’s not fall for this bit of misdirection. The fact is that those Bushies who were behind the torture policies need to be prosecuted – that’s the real issue here.
Posted by: UncleJimmyJoe | May 8, 2009, 1:43 am 1:43 am
Machod – not to rain on your gloating, but here’s a little civics lesson. The Speaker of the House is a member of the Legislative branch not the Executive branch and as such is not part of the Obama administration.
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 1:47 am 1:47 am
She planned to point it to The Republican but she did not know it will backfire to her.
Posted by: cilla | May 8, 2009, 1:48 am 1:48 am
Somebody who calls himself Jason said: “Are you capable of meaningful debate on the issue? Until you acknowledge that water boarding can be an effective method of interrogation then you have nothing to contribute. These methods are not common and widespread. They are used selectively by the CIA to interrogate terrorism suspects.”
You honestly have no ideal what the US is all about, much less able to call yourself a patriot.
Rule of law guides this and all other issues. It is against the law, and for good reason. It’s settled law, has been for more than half a century. The debate took place already, and all experts in the art and craft of interrogation say the same thing: “It’s torture, it’s NOT reliable, and when you waterboard a subject you will get whatever the subject thinks you want to hear.”
What is relevant, what keeps getting missed, is that Bush and Cheney ordered torture to get FALSE INFORMATION from subjects.
All of the interrogators have reported that their goal was to find a link between 9/11/01 and Saddam Hussein. Before Bush began the war in Iraq. Bush was looking for a justification to attack and occupy Iraq. That means he knew what he was telling the American people, about Saddam Hussein having WMD was a lie.
Those are war crimes, by Bush and Cheney, and everyone down the line of that administration.
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 1:50 am 1:50 am
You’re not understanding the point of why Bush and Cheney reversed engineered the SERE program. It wasn’t to get the truth. It was to get false confessions. WHY? False confessions to what?
All of the experts on interrogation have said the same thing about waterboarding: The only information you will get from it is what the person being waterboarded thinks you want to hear.
The interrogators have all said the same thing: They were instructed to get a link between 9/11/01 and Saddam Hussein.
This all happened BEFORE 3/19/03, when Bush began the war in Iraq.
That means that Bush knew his rationale for going to war was bogus. Saddam didn’t have WMD and Bush knew it. Bush wanted to be able to say, “Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11/01″, and that was the reason for the “enhanced interrogation techniques”, aka (to normal human beings) TORTURE.
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 2:02 am 2:02 am
Avery ROFL!!! If you were intelligent enough to click on the link you would see I didn’t create it. Thought I would type in the words since you would be offended by the image. By the way why are you so offended? ROFL!! You are too funny!
Posted by: Dave | May 8, 2009, 2:03 am 2:03 am
“Um…the UAW, which now runs Chrysler with Obama, only employs about 60K.”
You’ve also got to count the suppliers who make the parts, the truck drivers who deliver the cars, the lunch counter operators who feed the workers, the dealership owners and sales people, the people who work in the finance, marketing, and HR departments. Many more than just the 60K UAW jobs are on the line.
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 2:04 am 2:04 am
Waterboarding and other harsh interrogation methods yield information of varying quality. Sometimes they produce falsified information to satisfy the interrogators. But you can also produce useful information with these techniques. That is why it is used selectively. Clearly there are circumstances in which the threats to national security warrant aggressive interrogations.
Posted by: Jason | May 8, 2009, 2:07 am 2:07 am
Dave,
I’m not really offended and as you can see I can snark right along with the best of them. What really gets my goat is that for 8 years we had a war criminal who lied us into an unnecessary war, lied to us about torture, lied to us about wiretapping, and lied to us about our economy but all I here from a bunch of willfully ignorant Conservative/Fascist is “Nancy Botox Lied!”, like a bunch of children on a playground. Then I run across a literal hokey pokey song about it. So I say the nabobs want to act like children, I will treat them like children.
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 2:17 am 2:17 am
Somebody named Jason said: “Waterboarding and other harsh interrogation methods yield information of varying quality. Sometimes they produce falsified information to satisfy the interrogators. But you can also produce useful information with these techniques. That is why it is used selectively. Clearly there are circumstances in which the threats to national security warrant aggressive interrogations.”
I see the rule-of-law-argument cuts no ice with you, so we’re back to your making insupportable claims.
So I will take your insupportable argument and ask you, if waterboarding was so effective, why was Abu Zubaydah subjected to it 83 times, and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed subjected to it 182 times? Wouldn’t once have been enough? And if once wasn’t enough, why stop at 83 times and 182 times? Osama bin Laden is still at large, as is his second in command, Ayman al-Zawahiri. Maybe the 183rd time would have worked to give them up.
War crimes were committed in your name and in my name. You may not have lost anyone you love to an act of terror, but I have. I know that your way of looking at the world is responsible and allowed for the Bush and Cheney takeover of our government. I won’t let that ever happen again, if it takes the last ounce of breath in my body. I won’t let the bullies in the US ever let this happen again, and drown out the voices of reason and rule of law.
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 2:20 am 2:20 am
This hateful politician was “briefed”, approved torture then, openly lied to the American people. If Obama had a shred of decency, he would remove this lying old lady from her position. Since Obama and the gang lie too, then there will be no action against her. I see only a few liberals rushing to her defense with the usual “Well, Bush…”. The rest are hiding. We need to ask Jane Harman about this too. Let’s catch her in a lie too then remove her too.
Posted by: Mihann | May 8, 2009, 2:21 am 2:21 am
I think Pelosi took impeachment off the table because she knew she’d be exposed as the collaborator she was. The Democrats have some housecleaning to do.
Posted by: Jim Nauseam | May 8, 2009, 2:22 am 2:22 am
“Clearly there are circumstances in which the threats to national security warrant aggressive interrogations”
No sir you are dead wrong. In the 230+ years of this great nation we’ve had Red Coats march on Washington and burn the White House to the ground and we DID NOT TORTURE. We had Japanese Zeros destroy or cripple nearly our entire Pacific fleet and we DID NOT TORTURE. We stared down nuclear annihilation from a communists super power and we DID NOT TORTURE. What makes a bunch of 7th century rejects such an existential threat that we must resort to torture now? I suspect JaneC is correct in saying Bush/Cheney wanted false statements as an excuse to go to war with Iraq … period. Your poor rationalization falls short in the face of actual history.
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 2:26 am 2:26 am
“This hateful politician was briefed, approved torture then, openly lied to the American people.”
Mihann, nobody has said that Nancy Pelosi approved torture. These are the sort of made up facts and hyperbole the Conservative/Fascist used for 8 years to drive this country off a cliff. Stick to what’s said in the story. Simply the Speaker may have been briefed that the Bush Administration used torture. Nobody has said she approved of it.
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 2:32 am 2:32 am
I’m going to repeat this, because Bush and Cheney want you desperately not to realize this:
Bush and Cheney reversed engineered the SERE program, a program that trained a particular group in the US military to provide false information to the enemy in the event of their capture and torture. “Enhanced interrogation techniques”, waterboarding, TORTURE of detainees (people not convicted of anything) wasn’t to get the truth. It was to get false confessions. WHY? False confessions to what? What sense does that make?
All of the experts on interrogation have said the same thing about waterboarding: The only information you will get from it is what the person being waterboarded thinks you want to hear. To make it stop. They will tell you anything. Desperately. Whatever they think it is that you want to know.
The interrogators have all said the same thing: They were instructed to get a link between 9/11/01 and Saddam Hussein.
Now, if people who are waterboarded will say anything to get it to stop, wouldn’t they have made up some connection between 9/11/01 and Saddam Hussein?
Whatever the waterboarded told the interrogators, the FBI checked out. The FBI hunted down every last lead, and found NOTHING.
This all happened BEFORE 3/19/03, when Bush began the war in Iraq.
That means that Bush knew his rationale for going to war was bogus. Saddam didn’t have WMD and Bush knew it. Bush wanted to be able to say, “Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11/01″, and that was the reason for the “enhanced interrogation techniques”, aka (to normal human beings) TORTURE.
Bush and Cheney were so desperate to hurry the US into war in Iraq that they felt they could retrofit the reason. Once inside Iraq, they would TORTURE detainees (Abu Ghraib and other prisons inside Iraq, Afghanistan and the CIA’s secret prisons) with the reverse engineered SERE techniques for a FALSE CONFESSION of a link between 9/11/01 and Saddam Hussein.
War crimes. Committed in our names. By Bush and Cheney, and Rumsfeld, and Rice, and Tenet, and Bybee, and Yoo, and Bradbury, and Gonzales, and Feith, and Wolfowitz, and Carbone, and Addington, and Libby, and Zelikow, and Negroponte, and Liz Cheney, and Rove, and Hughes, and Matalin, and who else?
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 2:39 am 2:39 am
I don’t see a good reason to put words in my mouth and say that I don’t respect the rule of law. Nor is it justified to classify me as a far right conservative that unquestioningly supported the Bush Presidency.
Most reasonable people will acknowledge that, during time of war, certain national security issues can take precedence over the rule of law. Its not an ideal situation by anyone’s standards. But a practical issue where a President should reserve a right to put the nation’s security first and protect human life. I’m not arguing that harsh interrogation methods ought to be widespread. My argument is that in certain circumstances protecting human life takes precedence over legal procedure and the rights of terrorists. I believe it is possible to use these methods responsibly to stop terrorism without doing irreversible damage to our respect for universal human rights or the rule of law.
Posted by: Jason | May 8, 2009, 2:40 am 2:40 am
Avery. I can tell that hokey pokey did get your goat. You along with your fellow Liberals/Democrats would have Bush hung if you could. All I have seen from the rest of the people hear are either request for her to resign or apologize. Indeed, there are some crazy comments and the funny “Hokey Pelosi” but understand we are in a different world now. A world where the threats and attacks on America have or will increase. The thing that gets me is do you have any military experience? I love hearing all these people give military opinions about the “unnecessary war” and how they are overnight military intelligence analysts or what I like to call “armchair intelligence analysts”. You know that the CIA doesn’t just focus on one area of the world each day. They look at threats to the U.S. from all parts of the world and even possible future conflicts. My point is that you have to look at the Iraq War from the standpoint of a strategic nature. Having a forward deployed base in a hotspot for terrorist activity helps to keep those who are committing terrorist type activities at bay. Just like if you were a criminal and a police officer moved in next door to you. You would be uncomfortable and would act on your best behavior. Same principle applies here. Yes, it might not have been the popular war in many minds but there are areas where you have to be open to other possibilities not just character bashing. Even though I might not agree with all your opinions just like you don’t agree with mine or many on here, the one thing we have in common is that we are Americans and defending each other is in our best interest together. Therefore, if the waterboarding helped to gather information that saved you and I or any member of your family then you have to take that into account. I bet everyone on here would not agree with an interrogation technique that caused true physical harm. Just keep an open mind.
Posted by: Dave | May 8, 2009, 2:42 am 2:42 am
Dave – You suggested that a Democrat “keep an open mind?” LOL!!!! Thanks! I needed a laugh before running out the door to go to work!
Posted by: Fiercely__Independent | May 8, 2009, 2:45 am 2:45 am
Pelosi is a joke. Whether you’re Democrat or Republican, you should be at least smart enough to recognize that without being partisan. God save this country. Or better yet, let its empire expire and its status as a superpower slide into the big ” ” hole.
Posted by: chris | May 8, 2009, 2:52 am 2:52 am
Somebody named Jim Nauseum said: “I think Pelosi took impeachment off the table because she knew she’d be exposed as the collaborator she was. The Democrats have some housecleaning to do.”
That’s possible.
It’s also possible that she took impeachment off the table because she knew she couldn’t get Republicans to go along with impeachment and there weren’t enough votes with just Democrats. Or, that it might look like political retribution (Republicans would certainly make a lot of noise that it was), and turn off voters (dumb, dumb, dumb people who vote for Republicans or as Independents) come the 2008 election, and we’d be stuck with Republicans in power for another 2-4-8 years.
It doesn’t change one fact, and that is that Pelosi had no power to stop the torture. Bush and Cheney threatened anyone and everyone who dared to cross them with arrest and prosecution of violating state secrets act.
Certainly you recall that? And that Cheney and the NSA have been spying on Americans? Members of Congress, too?
I have no problem with looking at Democrats’ part in this, if any. I don’t know anyone on the left who has a problem with it, either.
What’s your problem with it? How come the right stands in the way of investigating the Bush administration?
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 3:03 am 3:03 am
Yes, you did. You said that I’m one of the peole responsible for the “takevover” of federal government by Bush and Cheney. You called conservatives bullies and said that I have no respect for the “rule of law” argument.
Lol.
At least be honest.
Posted by: Jason | May 8, 2009, 3:07 am 3:07 am
I swear conservatives, if the news or your party told you to argue for dropping a nuke on Mexico you would fight for it, even if it meant you would be blown up with it.
Which, if you didn’t catch the metaphor, allow me to spell it out…
By torturing people, whoever they are, we are giving up our ideals as a nation. I’m not talking about Republican or Democrat ideals, but American ideals. We are supposed to be the leader in this world, so lets lead it in the right way.
I am an independent who happened to vote for Obama because I was sick of watching what your party was doing to this country.
And yes, I am sickened by anyone who knew about or performed torture, whether they be Democrat or Republican.
ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL. AND ALL WHO HAVE PARTOOK IN THE ACT OF TORTURE, OR EVEN KNEW ABOUT IT, SHOULD BE PROSECUTED.
Posted by: Cant Beleive It | May 8, 2009, 3:24 am 3:24 am
“Just keep an open mind”
Wow! Dave, that is the 1st cogent, rational, and intellectual thing I’ve heard a Republican say in a LONG time. I distinguish between Republicans and Conservative/Fascists and I’m actually glad to see there are a few Republicans left. There’s a lot I’d like to say about your post, which has lots merit, but first I’d like to ask why wasn’t such an argument put forth before the run up to the war in Iraq? I’d argue that the level of discourse by that point had been driven so far into the toilet by Conservative/Fascist screaming “treason” at every critique of the very same administration that nearly botched Iraq beyond repair that intelligent debate was and has been impossible ever since. This is why I lash out at them in the same spirit that the Philosophes had to lash out at the Fundamentalists Conservatives of the 17th century, with satire and withering critique, in order that rational thought may supersede fear and superstition. Now I think your idea of a base in the middle east to “drain the swamp” has merit, but Saddam Hussein was controllable and not a threat. Besides, he was a secularists and would brook no quarter with a charismatic religious figure like Osama. Also, there were better options, we were already in Afghanistan. We should have finished the job with the Taliban and setup shop there. Now we are at war on two fronts and Osama is still at large. In fact, alive or dead, taking our eye off of Osama to overthrow Saddam has made him bigger than Saladin! On torture, you are just wrong. George Washington refused to torture during the revolutionary war and the English once bloodied surrendered in droves. Ike refused to torture during WWII and once broken the Germans surrendered to the Americans because they were afraid of what the Soviets would do to them. Colin Powell refused to torture and during Gulf War I and the Iraqis surrendered nearly en mass. I guarantee you that because of the way the prisoners at Abu Ghraib and Gitmo and Bagram were treated, we will be fighting muslim extremists for the rest of our lives. Simply, they have no incentive to give up. They see us as no better than the Taliban. That is a HUGE strategic mistake. I may not be a military man, but every great military commander we’ve ever had understood this. There are several other points I’d love to discuss with you rationally and seriously, but this is already a bit long winded.
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 3:25 am 3:25 am
Jane. Have you seen how women are tortured in Iran for some of the most insance sentences? They are stoned to death! The women is put into about a 4×4 box and then put on her knees. Next the box is filled with past her shoulders with just her head sticking out. From there you can imagine what happens next. Yes, stones are thrown at the women’s head until she is killed. This is torture!!! I think you need to really look at what happens around the world and know that some of the barbaric acts that are committed will NEVER be changed by talking to anyone. Just like your position of not wanting to at least understand another viewpoint except your own hardened mentality. The U.S. as a whole is a great country and does abide for the most part by the laws which govern this nation. I’m sorry you love bashing our country so much. I feel sorry for you.
Posted by: Dave | May 8, 2009, 3:32 am 3:32 am
Somebody named Dave said: “I’m sorry you love bashing our country so much. I feel sorry for you.”
Get it straight, Dave: I’m bashing a criminal administration that committed war crimes in our names, against the laws of our own country and the world.
I will gladly bash you and anyone else who continues to support and defend the criminal Bush/Cheney administration, a gang so corrupt and bereft of morality that they have shredded the Constitution and ensured the annihilation of the middle class of our country by creating an economic meltdown from which we will never emerge.
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 3:44 am 3:44 am
Nice job Mr. Klein!
Setting my home page to ABC news.
My home-town newspaper, the Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel (aka Sun-Sentinel-Fishwrap), passed up the Pelosi headline for this one:
“Overwhelmed KFC halts grilled chicken giveaway”
Posted by: harry | May 8, 2009, 3:49 am 3:49 am
Jane. I am glad to see that you recognize Sharia law as a problem and that it doesn’t fit into our society. Look at what is happening to England. We can agree on that. What are you defining as barbaric from the U.S.? Who even said I am defending Bush/Cheney? I believe many members of Congress did approve the Iraq War, whether willingly or unwillingly. They could have easily opposed and spoke out then. I just mentioned that you and the Liberals/Democrats would have him hung which totally contradicts your beliefs and your beliefs for torture.
Posted by: Dave | May 8, 2009, 3:54 am 3:54 am
Dave, once we entertain the notion that some laws can be ignored for “a greater good”, then there is no longer the rule of law.
This notion, that some laws can be ignored, is an imaginary creation of your own mind.
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 3:55 am 3:55 am
Somebody named Dave said: “Jane. I am glad to see that you recognize Sharia law as a problem and that it doesn’t fit into our society. Look at what is happening to England. We can agree on that. What are you defining as barbaric from the U.S.? Who even said I am defending Bush/Cheney? I believe many members of Congress did approve the Iraq War, whether willingly or unwillingly. They could have easily opposed and spoke out then. I just mentioned that you and the Liberals/Democrats would have him hung which totally contradicts your beliefs and your beliefs for torture.”
What are you talking about?
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 3:59 am 3:59 am
Just exactly who is the criminal here?: Nancy Pelosi, or the torturers?
Saying she was “briefed” isn’t nearly specific enough when culpable officials in #43′s administration clearly would like to exonerate themselves by distorting the facts, and diverting attention from their crimes to their “respected colleagues on the other side of the aisle”.
We’ll never know what she was told, when she was told it, or who told her. The veil of secrecy in the national interest trumps our right to know.
One way or another, most of the American Public got suckered in by the Bush Administration; no surprise to me that Nancy Pelosi could have been hoodwinked too.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have been demonized by the Far Right since 2006. It’s all part of the politics of personal destruction that have brought us to gridlock in the Congress, and have set us against each other.
The shame does not rest on Nancy Pelosi’s shoulders.
Posted by: Pat Henry | May 8, 2009, 4:00 am 4:00 am
“I just mentioned that you and the Liberals/Democrats would have him hung which totally contradicts your beliefs and your beliefs for torture”
I don’t want to see the Bush/Cheney hung. I want to see them tried for war crimes and if found guilty imprisoned, the way we deal with all criminals. I would not have them waterboarded or made to stand in stress positions or sleep deprived until they offered up false confessions. Why try to label Liberals as the hypocrites? We weren’t the ones screaming “treason” and while Bush/Cheney shredded the Constitution!
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 4:01 am 4:01 am
“Simply the Speaker may have been briefed that the Bush Administration used torture. Nobody has said she approved of it.”
Please! Quit quoting Nancy’s lies!
“Oh, I saw, but did not know!”
If sweet Nancy was “briefed” on torture methods and did not denounce the torture methods that she saw at the time, this makes her equally as guilty. It is sad that she openly lied to the American public. She should be removed from office.
Posted by: Mihann | May 8, 2009, 4:02 am 4:02 am
Change, huh? I didn’t vote for him, but I didn’t want him to fail. I was sincerely hoping for “Change.” But I guess this is another case of spit in one hand and wish into the other and see which one fills up first.
How naive can this guy be? Did he think that these people, who were not ashamed of being in on these meetings, wouldn’t keep tabs on every Dem in the seat next to them? Now suddenly the names are floating around the AG won’t prosecute, but will use some back door bar association punishment instead? I wonder how many of those committee members are lawyers too…
Posted by: Monica McLaughlin | May 8, 2009, 4:04 am 4:04 am
Jane. You have valid points; however, at what point is enough enough? Do we just sit back and take every beating, bombing, and attack on America? If we do this then yes you are right there will be no constitution or America. At some point good men do have to stand up and protect the citizens including you. The U.S. was acting as a great nation leading up to 9/11 and still is. After 9/11 we are facing a new enemy. Remember these aren’t individuals who care about humanity or you and I. I guess based upon your assessment we just sit back and take every attack and talk to them nicely. What would you do please explain?
Posted by: d | May 8, 2009, 4:04 am 4:04 am
“If sweet Nancy was briefed on torture methods and did not denounce the torture methods that she saw at the time, this makes her equally as guilty.”
No fool, if she was briefed, by definition the administration did not seek her approval. Furthermore, the briefings were classified and if she has denounced them, she would have been arrested for leaking classified information. This was a classic CYA maneuver that Conservative/Fascists have used since the days of Nixon to try and inoculate themselves from prosecution. How long will you be a tool for rapacious liars who lead you around by the nose, getting you worked up by hollering “Abortion”, “Gay Marriage”, or “2nd Amendment”?
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 4:11 am 4:11 am
“After 9/11 we are facing a new enemy”
D,
Maybe, but they are no more powerful than any of the enemies we have had in the past, in fact less so. And through it all we have managed not to torture. This should be no different.
Another point is that many of the people that were tortured were NOT EVEN TERRORISTS. Just remember, if they can torture someone they can torture you too if they absolutely wanted to. It’s a terrible door to open and does not keep us any safer. In fact, it makes us even less safe.
Posted by: Wake Up | May 8, 2009, 4:11 am 4:11 am
“I guess based upon your assessment we just sit back and take every attack and talk to them nicely. What would you do please explain?”
Dave, how come whenever conservatives can’t win an argument on reason or logic they resort to hyperbole? I don’t think there was a single person left/right/center that didn’t think we should go after OBL on 9/12. What we didn’t sign up for was torture, illegal spying on Americans, or made up facts to get us in a war to benefit Exxon and Chevron. We know how to win wars without stooping to the same level of our enemies, we’ve been doing it since this nation was founded. Why are 50 – 100 thousand Islamic fundamentalists such an existential threat that we have to give up our morals? Why do you hate America so much?
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 4:18 am 4:18 am
I know everyone here likes to argue, and that that is part of the fun of it, but this is a serious matter.
I hope that we all can agree that the law should be upheld.
If we can’t come together in some way NO ONE WILL BE PROSECUTED. I believe these people broke the law, whether it be Pelosi or the Bush crew. Either way, whether I’m right or wrong, we need an investigation to figure out what happened and who should be held responsible.
THIS IS AN ISSUE WE NEED TO COME TOGETHER ON, and that issue is making sure that NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, NOT EVEN RICH POLITICIANS
Posted by: Come Together | May 8, 2009, 4:20 am 4:20 am
Avery Davis, fool she’s the one who said she had no idea, are you drinking the liberal kool-aid so bad you actually think Pelosi was worrying about violating laws if she had said she knew????? I hope you aren’t considered a smart liberal because it’s not looking good for your party if you are. So now the excuse for liberals lying is it will violate federal law?? Wow oh wow liberals have hit a new low to protect their own.
Posted by: Dan | May 8, 2009, 4:26 am 4:26 am
J,
Yes. You are correct but I would like to add that the rules of engagement have changed and no matter how we act or try to save lives during a war/crisis we will always be seen in a negative way. Many of the terrorists just don’t agree with our beliefs and ideals. They don’t follow any laws or try to adhere to ethical standards. You are probably correct in that some might not be terrorists but maybe they were in the wrong place at the wrong time. If not, then yes they should be treated fairly. The ones who were water boarded were known by all to be some of the most wanted. The lines are so drawn now that everyone is out to get everyone and America is going down hill fast. I’m not saying we have to tout that we are the best or better than anyone else but we both can agree that keeping our way of life is one that all work hard for. In my mind this should not have been released to the public since most do not understand or agree with the military why the majority do. This could have been handled by the administration in away that kept our security interests a priority and stopped any problems or unlawful acts from those in charge.
Posted by: Dave | May 8, 2009, 4:30 am 4:30 am
“THIS IS AN ISSUE WE NEED TO COME TOGETHER ON, and that issue is making sure that NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, NOT EVEN RICH POLITICIANS”
CT, this is a wonderful sentiment and one that I shared with you until very recently. You see I’ve resigned myself to the fact that Conservative/Fascists are not interested in coming together. They see anyone who doesn’t march in lock step with them as enemies. In fact, they declared war on Liberals over 30 years ago. Don’t forget about the Permanent Republican Majority they tried to institute not too long ago. They were willing to sabotage the political system and destroy the Republic as we know it, so they could shovel taxpayer money to their corporate financiers in the form of no-bid contracts, tax breaks, and deregulation. You should think of these Conservative/Fascists as dangerous radicals. Coming together with them is akin to pardoning Osama himself. They must be destroyed, then we can work with sensible Republicans to get us out of the crater they have driven our nation into.
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 4:31 am 4:31 am
Dan, no liberal with a brain is defending Pelosi. Just like no Republican with a brain should be defending Bush and is crew.
THIS IS WHY WE NEED AN INVESTIGATION.
To find out who is GUILTY and who needs to be PROSECUTED. (not yelling at you, I just feel strongly about this.)
Posted by: James | May 8, 2009, 4:32 am 4:32 am
Avery,
Agreed, but not all republicans are conservative radicals like you see on Fox. A lot of the time they are just dangerously uninformed.
Posted by: Come Together | May 8, 2009, 4:35 am 4:35 am
“you actually think Pelosi was worrying about violating laws if she had said she knew?”
I think she was worried about being thrown in jail by the Bush administration, and why shouldn’t she be? These are the guys that were spying on American with impunity and arguing that the president had the power to disappear ANYONE in the world who he deemed a threat. I suspect you were one of the useful idiots chanting “treason” whenever a public figure disagreed with the president, so the fact that this is not coming out until now is as much your fault as Speaker Pelosi’s.
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 4:38 am 4:38 am
Avery. You are being funny again. I am making the same assessments you and Jane are making about me. Anyway those are kiddish games. Thank you! Thank you! I never thought I would hear you say Islamic fundamentalists. I agree with you there but it is more Islamic radicals who don’t care about innocent civilians. We did have that problem with Hitler but again going back to my comments about the rules of engagement back then we would just destroy entire areas without taking into account who was there. Today, we try as best as we can to prevent this. If our ROE’s weren’t so politicized then it would be different. Our troops almost have their hands tied behind their backs. So that is why they pose such a threat. We have to treat them just like any person when they don’t have any respect for the common person just to look good in the public eye. You think I hate America? Wow!!! I am in disbelief that you can’t tell from my comments where my love is for the country and our citizens. Have to sign off for now. Thanks for a good discussion. Same to you Jane.
Posted by: Dave | May 8, 2009, 4:42 am 4:42 am
“They don’t follow any laws or try to adhere to ethical standards.”
Dave,
Either did the Nazi’s, who were the worst enemy we ever faced, and we didn’t torture them.
The America we fought for is one with values, one that considers people innocent until proven guilty. These men may have been terrorists, but the fact is they never even got a trial, so who really knows. I could say that you are a terrorist (not that I think you are) and if enough people were scared enough to believe me they could torture you too.
That is not the America I fight for
Posted by: James | May 8, 2009, 4:46 am 4:46 am
Avery Davis, you actually believe Bush would throw an elected official in prison? You’re kind of off the deep end on that one, unlike you guys we aren’t going to throw someone in prison or try shutting them up like liberals are with talk radio. Also, didnt almost every liberal/socialist vote to go to war in Iraq? Obama didnt vote to go (he didnt vote on much as a senator) but he did say “I support this”…I guess we know where he stood back then and that was running for president some day. How many other liberal/socialist knew about this is going to be the question, also how is something torture when our own troops go through it? You make it sound like the way the Japanese tortured back in World War 2, but then again sounding by your logic you would DEFEND the Japanese of world war 2 more than you would the Bush administration, I’m sure somehow in your mind its America’s fault, why do people like you hate America so much?
Posted by: Dan | May 8, 2009, 4:49 am 4:49 am
Dan,
Every time you write liberal/socialist you make yourself sound like a talking head for a political party. Think for yourself.
Posted by: Brian | May 8, 2009, 4:53 am 4:53 am
Somebody named d said: “Do we just sit back and take every beating, bombing, and attack on America?”
If you are speaking of 9/11/01, we didn’t sit back the first time the WTC was attacked, and our interrogation methods and criminal justice system worked just fine. The perpetrators are sitting in prison and it didn’t require torture to get the mastermind, Ramzi Yousef, to confess or give up the name of the moneyman behind it (his brother-in-law, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed).
Our foreign policies, which have always been driven by conservatives and their interests (especially so since oil was discovered in the Middle East) and for the benefit of corporations, are what has gotten us into this mess. While our foreign policies are a little saner during Democratic administrations, they are still geared for the benefit of corporations and the very prosperous, with no regard for the individual American citizen. We’re never to worry our pretty little heads over the adventures our government engages in in other countries. We’re just to “go out and shop”.
And do we ever. Our shopping has put our own citizens out of work while keeping dictatorship regimes in place, and despots employed around the world who are all too happy to exploit their own citizens to keep costs down for US corporations.
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 4:58 am 4:58 am
James, lets compare the Nazi’s to Terrorist when the Americans were fighting them. When an American troop is captured by the Germans they were treated good if not better than German troops were when they got captured. Germans wore uniforms and didnt hide behind women and children with fake civilian cloths on, the Germans had a piece of ground they were fighting for. When terrorist capture Americans they either get killed by some kind of torture or they get their heads cut off and put on a video. There’s a huge difference between the enemy and these enemies aren’t going to talk for the heck of it and if you consider it torture to get information from some guy to protect American lives then you are no better than the people who “torture”
Posted by: Dan | May 8, 2009, 4:58 am 4:58 am
Brian
If you would think for yourself you would notice I was using it as a mocking tool for one of your liberal allies Avery Davis (who I notice you didnt say the same thing to him, so it sounds like you are a talking head) I think its time you think for yourself.
Posted by: Dan | May 8, 2009, 5:00 am 5:00 am
“You think I hate America? Wow!!!”
I’m using the same hyperbole tactic you use when you say Liberals want to coddle terrorist and do nothing when we are attacked. Of course that’s crazy! So, I hold up a mirror and give you the same craziness back. I don’t think anyone here hates America, but I think some of the ideas expressed here are dangerous enough to do what terrorist could never accomplish. That is transform America from that glorious beacon of hope into a world striding behemoth loathed by most and feared by all. If we as a nation agree it’s ok to torture people under certain circumstances, slowly but surely torture will become the norm. If we say it’s ok to preemptively attack a nation simply because we suspect they may be a threat, global dominance will become the only game in town. You’ve got to get beyond the fear of 9/11 man and understand yes it was horrible, tragic, and frightening, but we are AMERICANS! Not a bunch of thumb sucking cowards who will stoop to cowardly tactics when times get rough. Come on man, where’s that “rugged individualism” and “personal responsibility” you Republicans use to care about so much about?
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 5:02 am 5:02 am
Dan, sorry, didn’t notice that. Had nothing to do with not thinking for myself though. There’s just a lot of comments on this board and you didn’t include Avery’s quote in your comment.
Posted by: Dan | May 8, 2009, 5:03 am 5:03 am
Avery,
Thank you for your last post. That’s what it is all about.
Posted by: Brian | May 8, 2009, 5:06 am 5:06 am
I love the justifications for torture.
Look, if I thought someone was going to kill me who wasn’t a terrorist, I couldn’t just kill them. Even if someone killed a friend of mine, or a family member, I still couldn’t kill them under the law. I would be charged with murder.
Torturing someone because you think they might harm you, or invading a country because you think they may harm you is the same thing: Illegal (or at least it should be)
Posted by: Frank | May 8, 2009, 5:10 am 5:10 am
Dan,
It is not false. They beat them ultimately because they were scared of them. They were scared that the Jews would take their jobs, scared that the Jews would cause their families to starve. They were not scared of them like someone in the sense that they thought they would take over (just like I don’t think any American is scared that the terrorists will take over), but they were scared of them in the sense that they thought the Jews would change their way of life…which is the same reason why we are fighting against the terrorists (at least that’s what Bush has said). So, really, it is the same.
Posted by: Brian | May 8, 2009, 5:15 am 5:15 am
Avery Davis, Heres the thing, if our own troops can stand being waterboarded how can some guy who is masterminding killing tons of Americans not take it? To some this is torture, to others its not. You’re making it sound like they are giving some guy an erection, taking a glass tube and breaking it inside his penis so he slowly bleeds to death (like the Japanese did during world war 2).
Posted by: Dan | May 8, 2009, 5:19 am 5:19 am
Brian, so they were scared of them taking a plane and crashing it into buildings and killing thousands of Germans( that is something the Germans left out of that propaganda movie I watched though)? If the terrorist were interested in only coming over here and changing our way of life and opening up business that would compete with other business and not stealing planes and crashing them into buildings…I don’t think anyone would care they were here. So yes it’s a different thing.
Posted by: Dan | May 8, 2009, 5:23 am 5:23 am
Dan,
You are completely missing the point. Fear in all forms corrupts. I hope that helps.
Posted by: Brian | May 8, 2009, 5:25 am 5:25 am
I bet you won’t hear this on the mainstream media. Pelosi should be fired but the Dems will keep her anyway. Heck, most of the Dems should be fired anyway…so corrupt!! From the mess of the sub-prime mortgages,overspending out tax dollars..chicago thugs..etc etc etc.
Posted by: Bandy | May 8, 2009, 5:25 am 5:25 am
Avery Davis, I thought we were having a good conversation going with some good points but your liberal/socialist views finally popped out and you had to resort to name calling because you have nothing else to resort too. I’m sorry the three major news networks and the hundreds of people in Hollywood like Michael Moore aren’t enough that you have to resort to name calling to try and minimize people like Rush and Fox News. It’s disappointing; I thought I was actually for my first time in my life having a thoughtful and enlightening conversation with a liberal/socialist. You’re hanging to far to left of that rabbit hole for you to understand any good logic and for that I’m sorry.
Posted by: Dan | May 8, 2009, 5:29 am 5:29 am
Brian
So its alright for your party to use fear?
Posted by: Dan | May 8, 2009, 5:31 am 5:31 am
Dan
NO, it’s not. And believe me, all I’m asking for is an investigation. If Dems or Reps broke the law then they should be prosecuted just like you or I would if we broke the law.
My problem is with any government official thinking and acting like they are above the law.
Personally, I think that there is something bigger here that is yet to be discovered and we’re just scrapping the surface.
Posted by: Brian | May 8, 2009, 5:34 am 5:34 am
If there is any water boarding to be done, Cheney should be 1st in line since he doesn’t believe it is torture…
And Pelosi should definitely NOT resign… A briefing does not allow a vote…it is what it is… a briefing…
This briefing took place under a Republican administration and Congress that continues to deny anything resembling torture…
Bush assured us that the US does not torture… all the while, Dictator Cheney was having laws rewritten to make sure torture is lawful…
Pelosi has not said or done anything worse then the appalling stuff I have heard come out of Republicans…like Congresswoman Bachmann or Senator Shelby, or Senator Bond… Or, Senator Inhofe…
This is just another desperate move by the Grand Obastructionist Party…
Posted by: theafalcon200 | May 8, 2009, 5:44 am 5:44 am
Sorry…
This is just another desperate move from the Grand “Obstructionist” Party…
It’s pathetic…
Posted by: theafalcon200 | May 8, 2009, 5:46 am 5:46 am
Avery Davis
Heres the thing, ITS NOT TORTURE. I know you think it is because the mean ole republicans and Bush were doing it to get information that saved thouands of lives….but ITS NOT TORTURE. I explained what torture was, this was no where near it. This guy was so badly tortured he recieved a lawyer, a place to live, three meals a day. For trying to kill a bunch of Americans, I think we got the raw end of this deal.
Posted by: Dan | May 8, 2009, 5:47 am 5:47 am
theafalcon200,
I voted for Obama too, but you are making us all look like idiots with your Olberman talking points of “Grand Obstructionist Party”
You sound like the conservative republicans when they call us socialists
Posted by: Brian | May 8, 2009, 5:47 am 5:47 am
Dan, you may not think it’s torture, but the fact is we have prosecuted others for performing the technique on our troops.
Posted by: Brian | May 8, 2009, 5:49 am 5:49 am
“I thought we were having a good conversation going with some good points but your liberal/socialist views finally popped out”
Dude, we weren’t having a conversation, I was schooling you. The reason I resort to name calling is because it’s about the only level of argument that makes it past the FauxNews reality filter … and it makes me feel better. But hold on to your hat my man, I’m about to blow your lid … I am actually a liberal socialists! And you know what, in America that’s O.K. I know Sean Hannity has you all worked up about the word socialism, but it’s all around you every day. Don’t freak out dude, but chances are … you’re a socialist too! You ever drive anywhere that’s not a toll road? Socialism. Did you ever attend a public school? Socialism. You ever have to use the police or fire departments? Socialism. You ever go visit a national park, museum, or monument? All socialism! Don’t take my word for it, go look it up. Now Conservative/Fascism, that’s something you should really be concerned about!
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 5:57 am 5:57 am
If anyone should resign it should be Judge Jay Bybee…
Posted by: theafalcon200 | May 8, 2009, 6:00 am 6:00 am
“Heres the thing, ITS NOT TORTURE. I know you think it is because the mean ole republicans and Bush were doing it to get information that saved thouands of lives….but ITS NOT TORTURE.”
OK, I’ll bite. Why ISN’T waterboarding torture? I mean they called it torture during the Spanish Inquisition, and during the Salem Witch Trials, and during the Revolutionary War, WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, but why isn’t it torture now?
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 6:08 am 6:08 am
Avery Davis, Uh oh, more name calling from a liberal/socialist. I know it’s hard when your points don’t stand up to the opposing view but there’s no reason to name call it only makes you look like your getting owned, and for the record I never listen to Hannity because I think he resorts to name calling a little too much and my style is more of logic and facts because they make more sense than having to resort to name calling. Also, if you have to say you were schooling someone then you really weren’t because if you truly were you would know that everyone else could see this and they would already know it. It’s a shame too, I’ve never ran into a liberal/socialist yet who doesn’t name call, and you would think with how smart they think they are that they would never need to name call. I’m sorry Avery but I just can’t seem to get down to your level of intelligence either, you make it really hard with such hard hitting lines as “I was schooling you”.
Posted by: Dan | May 8, 2009, 6:12 am 6:12 am
Avery
I’m just trying to figure out how doing this to your own constitutes torture? I can see how it constitutes Harsh integrations but how torture?
Posted by: Dan | May 8, 2009, 6:16 am 6:16 am
After reading thorough many of these messages it stands to reason that we need good honest people running our government. Rep or Dem, where are we going to get good people that are honest Americans and want to do for this Country first, the rest of the world next. As for the Bush term, sure he made mistakes, but remember congress both first and second term went along with him and voted “yes” for the war. It was not a mistake, however it could have been handled in a better way. As for our politicians, both parties, it is time to weed out the bad one. What is wrong with the American people when they keep sending the same trash to run our Government. I am now a conservative voter, and I see Obama as bad as the lying representatives of our government. He does not care about the people in the USA, only about himself. He is as guilty as the rest of them. We do need term limits and then things might change. Polosi, Dodd, Reid have to go. As leaders they are walking backward and are useless in running anything. If I were boss, I would fire everyone of them and make them write a resume as to why they should come back. They do it in the private sector, whey not the government. Elections are not enough, they are croocked, i.e, Acorn and Obama. It is time to turn America back the people and “We need a Change we can Trust in”, not what we have now.
Posted by: Ronald Fiskum | May 8, 2009, 6:24 am 6:24 am
brian…
Hey,,, I like Olbermann and Big Ed and Maddow…etc
I happened to think that “Grand Obstructionist Party”… is a great fit… a little out dated in this fast paced media frenzy, but still a great fit… Since the GOP has decided to take a stance of opposition to everything this President want to do… the guy can’t get a break…on anything he does…
And from what I have seen conservative Republicans have called us a lot worse than just Socialists…
Posted by: theafalcon200 | May 8, 2009, 6:27 am 6:27 am
“I’m just trying to figure out how doing this to your own constitutes torture? I can see how it constitutes Harsh integrations but how torture?”
There are 2 separate ways to look at this Dan.
1) Yes, we torture our own troops. They are GI (Government Issue), meaning Uncle Sam literally owns you for the duration of your service. Also, we want our soldiers to be tough SOBs, so they’re tortured in many ways mentally, physically, you name it. That doesn’t mean it’s ok for the government to grab a civilian and do the same to them.
2) It’s one thing to be waterboarded by your drill Sargent who’s trying to demonstrate to you what torture is like, but something completely different to be tortured by hostile strangers who you’re not sure, but seem like they want to kill you.
Your rational is faulty. We do torture our service men to make them tough, to break them down, to instill fear which (strangely) if applied correctly can make one more fearless, but that doesn’t mean it’s ok to yank someone out of jail and do the same thing to them. Our service men consent to torture to make them better soldiers, that doesn’t mean it’s not torture.
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 6:30 am 6:30 am
Seems to me that if you are at a meeting and suddenly there is talk about something a little out of the norm – like say, oh…I don’t know, say the use of waterboarding on suspected terrorists – there is a mental block on whether or not anyone said they were doing it or not doing it.
I mean, wouldn’t you ask “so are you guys actually doing this to someone?” (I know I would)
And, when they answered I might be inclined to go ahead and jot it down.
Of course, in Pelosi’s case she does get a little tripped up on those pesky details from time to time. When I hear her speak I wonder how she ever made it to congtress at all much less to the the Speaker’s position. Was everyone else absent that day?
Regardless – that is probably my right wing nastiness coming out – it is this kind of behavior from the leadership in Washington that inspires us to be so confident that they aree looking out for us.
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | May 8, 2009, 7:03 am 7:03 am
If the Obama adm. wants to go after the lawyers that advised the previous adm., then they need to go after Pelosi, and others that knew about this and refused to voice their objections.
She lied, and continues to lie about everything, she is a disgrace to Ca.
Posted by: bobc | May 8, 2009, 7:12 am 7:12 am
“I mean, wouldn’t you ask “so are you guys actually doing this to someone?” (I know I would)”
Go back and read JaneC’s comments. She’s got links to an interview with Pelosi where she says she was ensured that no one was being tortured (at the time) and that the White House would consult with congress before anyone was actually tortured.
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 7:14 am 7:14 am
I am absolutely not surprised.
Posted by: LongT | May 8, 2009, 7:17 am 7:17 am
“If the Obama adm. wants to go after the lawyers that advised the previous adm., then they need to go after Pelosi, and others that knew about this and refused to voice their objections.”
Sure they should, that is the honest approach. The question is how many times would your head spin around should Gonzales, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice and Bush actually be indicted?
Posted by: Avery Davis | May 8, 2009, 7:18 am 7:18 am
Politicians! Don’t you love them? I mean Barney, Chris, Chuck, and Arlen?
Posted by: LongT | May 8, 2009, 7:20 am 7:20 am
I say we should waterboard her to get the truth out of her
Posted by: rikicad | May 8, 2009, 8:01 am 8:01 am
Avery Davis : Stop it. Your arguing with people suffering from psychotic disorders.
What characteristics are associated with psychotic disorder?
Some of the characteristics associated with psychotic disorders include delusions, hallucinations, bizarre behavior, incoherent or disorganized speech, and/or disorganized behavior.
Delusions are described as false, inaccurate beliefs the person holds onto even when he/she is presented with accurate information.
Like believing Saddam had something to do with 911.
Like Bush wasn’t lying about Iraq.
Like torture isn’t illegal.
Soon it will be murder is ok.
You do know over a 100 prisoners died in our custody.
I can’t wait to see the right defend those.
To believe those things you have to be suffering from some mental illness.
The facts don’t back up there delusions.
Posted by: langx | May 8, 2009, 8:12 am 8:12 am
Seems like the overnight conversation here moved away from the primary subect matter. Pelosi KNEW!!! Pelosi and her “High Liberal Moral Standards” DID NOT speak out, YET we have liberal pukes defending her and wanting to crucify the Bush Administration.
I have said it here MANY times, She is The Typical Liberal. Do as I say, Not as I do!!!
Then we have people like Avery saying its Ok to “torture” or soldiers to prepare them for what they may face, yet its unacceptable for us to use these methods to try to gain or verify information. Once again the hypocrisy of liberals comes through.
For all of those of you who buy into the BS that these methods do not work, WHY do you think we train our soldiers in what to expect. WHY does the enemy use it if its ineffective? Yuo constantly hear the usual suspects hear running off at the mouth with this “study” or some report that says this stuff never works, YET in the real world, it’s used.
Anyway, if you liberals want to string up the previous administration over this, you had better have room for the Pelosis during your “trials”.
Posted by: Mike_C | May 8, 2009, 8:19 am 8:19 am
het cognoscenti – you are right the weapons of mass destruction – I am just as upset at Clinton for telling us the same thing Bush did.
Posted by: jamescbuilder | May 8, 2009, 8:24 am 8:24 am
Back in 2002, the GOP had a solid lock on the White House and the Congress. Bush didn’t want any leaks and wanted “victory” in Afghanistan while he planned the invasion of Iraq. If Pelosi knew back then, she should have said something to other members of the House and the Democrats should have petitioned George Bush and the American people. But the mindset back then was vengeance for 9/11 and most of America was very angry at Saudi Arabia where most of the hijackers came from. So – Bush and Cheney had free reign and control back then. It is primarily their fault in this.
Posted by: Bob | May 8, 2009, 8:27 am 8:27 am
Back in 2002, the GOP had a solid lock on the White House and the Congress. Bush didn’t want any leaks and wanted “victory” in Afghanistan while he planned the invasion of Iraq. If Pelosi knew back then, she should have said something to other members of the House and the Democrats should have petitioned George Bush and the American people. But the mindset back then was vengeance for 9/11 and most of America was very angry at Saudi Arabia where most of the hijackers came from. So – Bush and Cheney had free reign and control back then. It is primarily their fault in this.
Posted by: Bob | May 8, 2009, 8:27 am 8:27 am
Back in 2002, the GOP had a solid lock on the White House and the Congress. Bush didn’t want any leaks and wanted “victory” in Afghanistan while he planned the invasion of Iraq. If Pelosi knew back then, she should have said something to other members of the House and the Democrats should have petitioned George Bush and the American people. But the mindset back then was vengeance for 9/11 and most of America was very angry at Saudi Arabia where most of the hijackers came from. So – Bush and Cheney had free reign and control back then. It is primarily their fault in this.
Posted by: Bob | May 8, 2009, 8:28 am 8:28 am
Since lying is a huge deal to democrats and liberals alike (claiming Bush lied), I expect to see Pelosi hung with a new rope.
My advice to Pelosi is to keep a stiff upper lip.
Posted by: grey | May 8, 2009, 8:28 am 8:28 am
I think Pelosi just needs to be FIRED,
She knows what happen Did she ever tell
the press that her husban won’t give his emmployee’s minum wage in US Samoa, Oh she forgot to tell him,just like she forgets that her jet fuel cost $120,000.00 per trip.
Posted by: George Berger | May 8, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am
I wish Pelosi would grow a pair and stop all this nonsense. She makes Democrats look bad.
Posted by: Waysie | May 8, 2009, 8:40 am 8:40 am
*
Off with her head! Ooops that’s what the people she really represents would do. Fact is, she is a disgrace, a self serving crook and her being a liar is just a given. When this lie is born out she has to be impeached.
Posted by: BERT CONVY | May 8, 2009, 8:40 am 8:40 am
It continues to amaize me how the luny left continue to to protect Ms. P. Who cares if she said anything against it at the time, the problem is she continues to lie through her teeth about knowing it happened and the stupid left believes her.
Posted by: dsimms | May 8, 2009, 8:52 am 8:52 am
Nancy Pelosi is a brilliant woman.
If she knew of these interrogation tactics back in Bush’s first term, she obviously approved.
Maybe they aren’t torture. She didn’t get worked up over them then. Infact, I don’t recall any congress member getting worked up then.
By her inaction, she has just pardoned the entire Bush Administration on the issue.
Finially, we can put this stupid debate to bed. Waterboarding isn’t torture. We can move on.
Posted by: Jen | May 8, 2009, 8:55 am 8:55 am
Oh darn, I had just had an eyelift the day before I was told that and you know how the pains meds work on a memory!
Posted by: david | May 8, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am
KEEP A STIFF UPPER LIP NANCY!!!
Posted by: Spring | May 8, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am
One might ponder on just how extensive the briefing was. The use of the word briefing indicates that you get some information, but not necessarily all. A brief is supposed to be just that–brief.
Regardless of what she knew and when she knew it, torture is illegal. What she knew and when she knew it doesn’t change that fact.
Posted by: George | May 8, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am
LANGX
No one in the Bush adm ever said Saddam had anything to do with 9-11. Try finding it, you can’t.
What lies? A lie is saying something you know isn’t true like Pelosi. Clinton even said they had WMDs but that’s not a lie.
If what we did is torture why aren’t the Dems going to prosecute.
You are right about the murder. The Obama has made it OK. Bullets in the head of three pirates to save the life of one American is Ok but keeping a real terrorist up for 4 day to save the life of thousands of Americans is not.
Prove 100 died in our custody that weren’t already wounded. You saying it doesn’t make it true.
Posted by: dsimms | May 8, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Good reporting. Thank you!
Posted by: Lightduty | May 8, 2009, 9:14 am 9:14 am
Polosi needs to step down. She is a liar and caught at it.
Posted by: Jim Rod | May 8, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am
Another comment! Obama has sent 20,000 troops to Afganistan with out EQUIPMENT. Sounds like he is worse than the previous.
Posted by: Jim Rod | May 8, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Maybe she wasn’t against it because (as even Obama admitted) waterboarding lead to arrests and stopped a terrorist attack in LA.
Posted by: mike | May 8, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Posted by: Ladnarc
We need term limits NOW !!!
Agree with you 100%.
Pelosi and the rest of those clowns work for us. Not the other way around.
Posted by: Roman | May 8, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Geez, don’t these politicians have anything better to do than rake up old muck! Frankly, Pelosi is incompetent but she knows that if she harps on old stuff she won’t have to “fix” social security, Medicare, illegal immigration, health care, nat’l debt, economy, antiquated infrastructure, education, etc. (fill in the blanks about our rotting society.) We would be better off if these bloodsuckers stayed on their many “vacations.”
Posted by: jonnie36 | May 8, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am
She was briefed….not consulted. A distinction that seems to escape most people. And when she’d been briefed she couldn’t discuss it with anyone because it was classified. This is nonsense. As ever the Obama haters and pro torture crowd come out from under their rocks in attempt to transfer the blame for this disaster elsewhere than it belongs.
Posted by: john | May 8, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am
everybody here would torture if their child was being raped somewhere and they needed that info. If you wouldn’t torture for that then you are heartless.
the fact that she lied about it is what is wrong the witch.
Posted by: former BO supporter | May 8, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am
She should know better lying doesn’t ever ever work because it will come back and bite you in your derriere and really hurt you and your family.
How would like your grandma being caught lying in front of God and everyone because up to this point you thought she would never lie and she has always taught you never to lie and look she did it without even thinking twice.
I think this really reflects badly on her because she could very well be our President if something were to happen to our Vice President she would be next in line and she has been caught red handed lying.
She needs to leave and leave TODAY!!!
Posted by: Carol | May 8, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am
After Obama Burned The CIA With The “Memo Release” You Can Be Sure That The CIA Is Not Going To Go Quietly Into The Night – LOL – This Is Just The Beginning – All The Hypocrisies And Lies That Have Been Hidden Away By The Democrats Regarding Interrogation Will Now Start To Magicly Appear – I Can’t Wait – To All Of You Hard Working Men And Women At Langley – Keep Up The Good Work – Most Americans Are Extremely Grateful – Thank You
Posted by: Frank Caponi | May 8, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am
I would like John to get into the hands of the Talban and tell them that we don’t torture so they shouldn’t! I’m sure it will stop them dead in their tracks! The leader of the Democrats have lied so much they can’t remember what lie they told where! They have to be briefed/consulted on all kinds of classified stuff. The point being here is if she doesn’t have the guts, intergity to tell the truth, why is she there? This is just another example of wanting to stay in a power position and stay with the in crowd, at the cost of the country. one of the biggest surprise is that ABC actually let the story out. Remember, the Media lies for Obama and America Dies!
Posted by: Ron | May 8, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Truth always has a way of surfaceing, the truth can not be hidden forever.
Posted by: as if | May 8, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am
Now, who here did not know Chairman Pelois was a liar? The woman can not speak without lying but that is ok because she is a dem and that is par for the course.
Posted by: kabookey | May 8, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am
To mainstream Democrats, Nancy loses nothing. They still put the blame squarely on Bush’s shoulders. However, Nancy hails from San Francisco. This is a goldmine of opportunity for any primary challenger. This will scar her in her home district permanently. She won’t be able to go home after this. Politics is not for the faint of heart.
Posted by: Sean O'Brien | May 8, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Your statement below is torture John. The house and senate leak left and right so save the bs about not being able to anything. She could have proposed legislation to stop these things without ever admitting they exist. Again your explaination of her lies is what is real torture. Dunking someone in water is not torture. For them is prolly the only bath they had.
****
She was briefed….not consulted. A distinction that seems to escape most people. And when she’d been briefed she couldn’t discuss it with anyone because it was classified. This is nonsense. As ever the Obama haters and pro torture crowd come out from under their rocks in attempt to transfer the blame for this disaster elsewhere than it belongs.
Posted by: john | May 8, 2009 9:57:50 AM
Posted by: kabookey | May 8, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am
I keep reading from the liberal apologists that Pelosi “couldn’t” object because the info was classified. That is utter BS and anyone who has ever worked in such an environment knows there are channels. What, do you think folks who work in classified areas can harrass, intimidate, and violate civil rights of their employees because it’s “classified?” You people watch too many movies. It’s just like any other job, idiots!
It’s just that you people can’t remove yourselves from Obama’s nuts or Pelosi’s teets long enough to realize they are JUST AS CORRUPT as Bush and the rest.
Our Gov needs a FRESH start, and that AIN’T gonna happen by voting in a Chicago-style corrupt politician like Obama!
Posted by: AFreedom | May 8, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
If the other attendees at the meeting in question concur with the CIA’s version — and the CIA’s version specifically states she was informed that the the techniques were used, I would be hard put to believe Pelosi’s version. Given the CIA was suspicious of politicians who might dissemble in the future, the agency would have a strong incentive to lay it all out.
Posted by: jack | May 8, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am
She was briefed….not consulted. A distinction that seems to escape most people. And when she’d been briefed she couldn’t discuss it with anyone because it was classified. This is nonsense. As ever the Obama haters and pro torture crowd come out from under their rocks in attempt to transfer the blame for this disaster elsewhere than it belongs.
————————————-
john,
First of all, she could have easily discussed this with anyone else who was involved. They ALL had security clearances and she could have put her own protests on record in classified briefs. What do you think all these documents that Obama is releasing are? They are just reports and other documentation of the time that were classified.
Your arguement hold no value at all.
I am not try to transfer blame at all either, quite the opposite in fact. I am holding your feet to the fire as it were and demanding that you apply your so-called principals to Democrats as well as Republicans.
My point is that its people like you who have been screaming for months that you want the previous administration hung out to dry on this issue that NOW want to make excuses for others from your side of the political aisle instead of applying the same outrage and condemnation to them.
Once again, the Liberal Motto rises up to blot out the sun….
“Do as I say, Not as I do”
Posted by: Mike_C | May 8, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am
You have to be naive to believe that if we don’t do things to them they will respect us and our troops. Ask Nick Berg or Danny Pearle. And a bunch of others.
Where is the usual investigation of Ms Pelosi – what did Nancy know and when did she know it?
Posted by: Heimes | May 8, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am
John wrote:
“She was briefed….not consulted. A distinction that seems to escape most people. And when she’d been briefed she couldn’t discuss it with anyone because it was classified.”
Yep, CIA breifings to Congressmen are classified. So are State Dept briefings, etc., etc.
The question is, WHY DID SHE REPEATEDLY LIE ABOUT KNOWING??!!
Posted by: OttoDog | May 8, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am
“I want her and everybody who went along with this to resign. And I am a liberal.”
JoAnne– She. Will. Not. Resign. Now who will YOU vote for to lessen her power?
Posted by: richard mcenroe | May 8, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am
This is different…..DIFFERENT…..when Bush lied that was BAD! BAD I say….when Pelosi or Frank or Dodd do it…well it is okay! Understand….shame on Bush and pass to Pelosi!!! When Obama lies he is doing it for the good of all of us. Right!!! It is okay. When Bush lied
it was for national security. When Obama lies it for national security?????
Posted by: Badboy | May 8, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
In 2004 I was a battalion commander in Iraq as such I was personally responsible for 612 American lives. We captured many enemy combatants most were fed, clothed, given medical attention, shelter, and protection. Occasionally one of these guys lied to us or attempted the injure those guarding him/her. One prisoner had over $50,000 in cash on him when he was captured. His explanation was he had just sold his car. Those who failed to cooperate with us and had timely information that would protect the lives of my soldiers were immediately turned them over to the ISF. Everyone involved understood that they were about to be beaten within an inch of their lives. Call it torture if you must but I brought 611 of our nation’s finest young American men and women home. Sadly, I lost one soldier in a non-combat related traffic accident. What most Americans fail to understand is that if one of our enemies could get inside your home he would kill you, your spouse, your children, and probably your dog. We are dealing with really bad people.
Posted by: John | May 8, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
THIS WOMAN should be removed as Speaker, she’s an embarassment.
Posted by: Ron | May 8, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am
I personally don’t like Pelosi. I believe she is a weak leader who didn’t stand up and fight Bush and Cheney while they had their way with this country. Whether or not the article is true, she should be replaced for not being more forceful as a leader.
Posted by: leftyintexas | May 8, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am
“What most Americans fail to understand is that if one of our enemies could get inside your home he would kill you, your spouse, your children, and probably your dog. We are dealing with really bad people.”
Thank you John…for bringing this to the real point!! Also, thank you for your service. I too stood on the wall as a younger man…most people just don’t get it! Thanks again….
Posted by: proud Ind.. | May 8, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am
Pelosi certainly has no trouble opening her mouth about how the INS goes after illegal aliens. In her own words, Its “unAmerican”. So do you think if she really thought this was so outrageous a form of treatment she would not have spoken up at all??? She was a member of Congress and as such had ability to have her feelings on this matter put on the record. Classified yes, but on the record.
Guess what, she knew then the same as she knows now. These kinds of things, while grotesque indeed, are sometime required! While it would be nice to have our morals alone be the guilding light for everything we do, we live in a real world with many varied threats to our way of life.
For everyone out there who wants all these investigations and such, becareful what you wish for. You may find someday down the road that a classified memo gets released showing that this administration authorized such treatment in a specific circumstance. Will you all then stand up and scream for heads to roll if its the Obama administration that allows this to happen?
Posted by: Mike_C | May 8, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am
Well, let’s see the full report and the minutes of the meetings! Then, we should begin the investigation and the prosecutions from Bush, Cheney right on down to anyone who authorized torture and administered torture. No excuses.
Posted by: Debbieqd | May 8, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
I’m calling for Pelosi’s resignation letter today. That no good LIAR. Resign NOW Pelosi. Nothing but LIES I say.
Posted by: Tim | May 8, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am
Well, I was wrong. I check some of those left-wing blogger sites and they are all abuzz defending Pelosi, saying there is not proof, etc. I’m smelling hypcrisy. Are you?
Posted by: Patrick | May 8, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
John,
You have my heart-felt thanks for your service to this country.
You are dead on in regards to what you said. I have family members in Iraq now and have lost family members during their time in the military. It is indeed amazing at times how those who enjoy the freedoms this country provides fail to realize what it really takes to protect what we have.
It is easy to sit back and be critical of others who have the incredible responsibility of keeping the country safe. Most of these are the same ones who screaming how we were not doing enough to protect our country in the immediate aftermath of 9/11.
You have lived the situation that others here love to claim they would handle differently. The say they would allow other people to die rather than use any means available to save those people. I often wonder if they were put in with a group like your soldiers, what they would really do when faced with it.
Their “heroine” Pelosi could not even muster the stomach to go on record as being against this. Yet here they are trying to find excuses for her, rather than standing by their so-called morals.
Anyway, THANK YOU again for your service to our great country!
Posted by: Mike_C | May 8, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am
I’m a liberal – yep here I am. I don’t like Pelosi. Never have. I’ll be the first person to admit she’s a crook and needs to go. Said that a year ago, too.
Posted by: Matt | May 8, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Uh, according to the CIA, Pelosi wasn’t briefed on waterboarding until 2004. And the first briefing on interrogation techniques in 2002 was 35 days after waterboarding began.
It helps if you actually, you know, READ THE DOCUMENTS, guys.
Another failure of American journalism.
Posted by: JM | May 8, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
“Roberts, R-Kan., and Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV, D-W.Va., revealed that interrogations of Abu Zubaydah and Abd Al-Rahim Al-Nashiri were taped.”
Wrong. Rockefeller’s name has an “*” next to it in the CIA document. The footnote reads: “later individual briefing to Rockefeller,” which means he wasn’t there at that time, and no other time is given.
Learn to read, ABC.
Posted by: JM | May 8, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am
What I don’t get is just how much attention pouring some water over someone who personally had a hand in killing 3,000 Americans has gotten!
And savior Obama, peace be upon him, has released memos TO THE ENEMY showing what our techniques are. Most of those techniques relied on the ILLUSION of much greater dangers – they weren’t REALLY going to drown, just feel like it. They weren’t REALLY going to get bitten by insects and caterpillars, but they were led to believe they would.
So now our enemy knows what techniques were used, and now all they have to do is just think “hmm, if I hold out, I know they will only subject me to something which SEEMS worse than it really is – I can handle it!”
Were these techniques uncomfortable? Sure. Did they produce great anxiety & fear? You bet. But did they produce any permanent injuries, or death? Nope.
Do you think that if an American soldier is caught by the Taliban or Al Quaida, the worst thing they’ll do to them is pour some water over them or put them in a room with a caterpillar? haahhahaha
Contrary to what some of you bleeding hearts think, there are some things the general public does NOT need to know – ESPECIALLY when it comes to matters of National Security. If you wish to know that information, then apply for a job, go through a background check, and get cleared for a “need to know.”
Posted by: AFreedom | May 8, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Here are some big differences between water boarding and what our enemies do.
When terrorists use blow torches, electricity, knifes, and all sorts of goolish things to torture innocent people for the sake of spreading terror why do so many on the left treat such outrages with a yawn?
But when the CIA uses water boarding on a very few select cases to secure time-sensitive information to help ensure we don’t suffer another catastrophic attack then the left goes bonkers. Not to mention that the bad guys who have undergone water boarding only end up suffering temporary discomfort – nothing in comparison to the real definition of torture.
I’m all for an honest debate on the issue, but the double-speak used by Pelosi and other far-left liberals reeks with hypocrisy.
Posted by: Patrick | May 8, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Not only did you guys not read the documents, you didn’t read the letter accompanying these documents, which says:
“This information, however, is draw from the past files of the CIA and represents [memoranda for the record] completed at the time and notes that summarized the best recollections of those individuals. In the end, you and the Committee will have to determine whether this information is an accurate summary of what actually happened.”
I’m looking forward to ABC’s retraction.
Posted by: JM | May 8, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
I wouldn’t be surprised if Pelosi had been briefed on the use of waterboarding, but I’d be even less surprised if, as the CIA report disclaims, the recollections of CIA personnel is inexact.
Posted by: plooger | May 8, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Here goes Pelosi’s another trip to her native country Italy, even if she has no problem to get an air force jet to fly her and coworkers like Jay Rockfellor, Diana Feinstein, jane Harman etc to make such ‘fun’ friendship visit.
Posted by: austin | May 8, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Ah, I see ABC has finally updated the story.
Nice work, guys. Better luck next time.
Posted by: JM | May 8, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Okay, it’s time to hold Pelosi accountable for her bold-facing lies.
Another thing, we need to get rid of that notion that Abu Zubaydah was waterboarded 83 times in August 2002. That’s false. The number “83″ refers to “pours.” Everytime water was poured….that’s the count. It’s a big difference.
Posted by: cfpjlobo | May 8, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
In 2002-2008 Pelosi did what she should have done. She listened to the briefing. Correctly determined that none of the techniques being used constituted torture, were important for national security, and were legal. Where she stayed was in 2008 when she realized characterizing these interrogations as torture would allow her and her party to use and eager media to skewer the repubs and gain political capital. She, like most pols, have no problems selling out their nation, the truth, their grandmothers, pastors or anything else for a donation or a vote. I am only saddened when I hear self-proclaimed “intelligent” people buy into all this torture nonsense.
Posted by: Sog | May 8, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
did any of you actually read this report? of course not, otherwise you’d know it proves NOTHING. abc get a factchecker or ombudsman STAT please.
Posted by: moocow | May 8, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
moocow,
What does it have to prove? She knew, she did not protest it.
CASE CLOSED!
Posted by: Mike_C | May 8, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
“Uh, according to the CIA, Pelosi wasn’t briefed on waterboarding until 2004. And the first briefing on interrogation techniques in 2002 was 35 days after waterboarding began.
It helps if you actually, you know, READ THE DOCUMENTS, guys.
Another failure of American journalism.”
————————————
JM,
What difference does it make WHEN? 2002, 2004…who cares? She did NOT go on the record stating she thought this was wrong.
She could have informed anyone from the leaders (Gephardt) of her party in 2002 who also had access to this information (in 2004 SHE was the minority leader!!!), to the Speaker of the House at the time (Hastert), to the leadership at CIA, to anyone in the White House chain of command who was also involved in the briefings.
Has anyone seen any documented evidence that she opposed this? Obama has released a bunch of formerly classified documents, do you think he would have withheld anything that would have shown she was against this from the start?
Posted by: Mike_C | May 8, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
We should torture…lop heads off or any other device at our disposal if it means combating this enemy who is fantical and NUTS!!! Pelosi is a liar and sell out. Obama, Frank, Dodd and all the rest are sell outs…pigs…oh yeah and Arlen Spector too! When the Repub’s regain control this spineless jellyfish will flop back the other way….pathetic!!!
Posted by: Badboy | May 8, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Our enemies must laugh their asses off daily, as fully half our population convulses in self loathing.
Posted by: Brad | May 8, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Somebody who calls himself Brian said: “Dan, you may not think it’s torture, but the fact is we have prosecuted others for performing the technique on our troops.”
We have EXECUTED others for performing the technique on our troops.
If Dan doesn’t think it’s torture, I offer him the opportunity to be waterboarded.
I will arrange it, just give me your name, address and a safe word. No kidding.
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Jane, Please provide links for when the US prosecuted others for ONLY waterboarding. I do know that there were Japanese soldiers who were prosecuted for war crimes, but waterboarding was the LEAST of the things they did. Now, you may think that waterboarding is “torture” but some Japanese soldiers bound their prisoners’ hands and feet, kept them motionless for weeks on end over top of bamboo seedlings. Being as bamboo grows really fast (about a foot per day for some species), the trees actually grew THROUGH the prisoners bodies because they couldn’t move off the stumps.
Oh, and there were the times the Japanese locked prisoners in a room and set it on fire.
Or what about the wonderful times where they used techniques from waaaaay back in Japan’s history – like lining up several prisoners in a row and using Samurai swords to see how many heads they could lop off w/ one slice of the blade (you know how sharp those Samurai swords are touted to be).
But yeah, compared to these examples – waterboarding is torture!!
Posted by: AFreedom | May 8, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
“We have EXECUTED others for performing the technique on our troops.”
————————————-
JaneC,
Who ? When ?
By the way, care to address John? since you yourself have had how much expereince in ANY real world situation like this?
Posted by: Mike_C | May 8, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Somebody who calls himself John said: “What difference does it make WHEN? 2002, 2004…who cares? She did NOT go on the record stating she thought this was wrong.”
1.) She couldn’t go on the record without violating the law. Do you forget that Bush and Cheney were threatening everyone with arrest and prosecution for violating state secrets act.
2.) She wasn’t actually told that this is what Bush and Cheney were doing. The headline on this story isn’t news and it’s nothing that Pelosi has denied: Pelosi Briefed on Use of Interrogation Tactics in September ’02.
That’s precisely what Pelosi herself has said. What else she said was that she and the others present, including Porter Goss, were told that the White House said that it had memos from the OLC that said the “harsh interrogation tactics” it wanted to use which included waterboarding was legal. The White House then said, according to Pelosi, “So we can use them if we want.” Pelosi responded, “We’ll see about that, should you decide to do that, which you have said you haven’t yet decided, but will inform us, Congress, should you get to that point.”
Pelosi also said that when she and Goss were leaving the White House, Goss said, “You can bet if they’ve got OLC saying that it’s legal, they’re already doing it”, to which Pelosi replied, “That’s not what they said in there, and I got a clear understanding with them that they would inform us if and when.”
Goss, when asked about that conversation said, “I don’t recall.”
Pelosi didn’t order the waterboarding, the torture, and does anybody doubt that Bush and Cheney would have paid any attention had she objected? Does anybody doubt that Bush and Cheney threatened Democrats with arrest and prosecution? We saw Bush and Cheney threaten for ourselves!
You’ll have to excuse me now while I tear myself away to go have root canal, which is only marginally more attractive than trying to reason with conservatives who have no interest in truth or rule of law.
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
JaneC, If someone kidnapped your child and buried them alive with only two hours of air were captured and would not give up the information required to save your child’s life, would you ok water boarding if you thought it would save your child’s life. Tell the truth. To me the greater moral question has always been is the saving of innocent lives a higher moral value than water boarding a person who has information that can save innocent lives. I vote for saving innocent lives, maybe yours or your child’s even.
Posted by: kay | May 8, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
In 2004 I was a battalion commander in Iraq as such I was personally responsible for 612 American lives. We captured many enemy combatants most were fed, clothed, given medical attention, shelter, and protection. Occasionally one of these guys lied to us or attempted the injure those guarding him/her. One prisoner had over $50,000 in cash on him when he was captured. His explanation was he had just sold his car. Those who failed to cooperate with us and had timely information that would protect the lives of my soldiers were immediately turned them over to the ISF. Everyone involved understood that they were about to be beaten within an inch of their lives. Call it torture if you must but I brought 611 of our nation’s finest young American men and women home. Sadly, I lost one soldier in a non-combat related traffic accident. What most Americans fail to understand is that if one of our enemies could get inside your home he would kill you, your spouse, your children, and probably your dog. We are dealing with really bad people.
Posted by: John | May 8, 2009 11:13:07 AM
John Thank you for your service. I do understand. Thank God for people like you that are willing to toe the line to protect us all.
Posted by: Don't swine flu me Bro! | May 8, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Kay, I agree with you saving innocent lives should trump any moral qualms about water boarding a terrorists in order to save innocent lives. Apparently Pelosi came down on the side of saving innocent lives at the time, which I commend her for. Problems is, she is now either a liar or senile and thus is not qualified to hold office and should resign.
Posted by: Terry | May 8, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Water boarding a terrorist that will save innocent lives versus Not water boarding a terrorist that will allow the death of thousands of innocent people. Seems to me the people railing against water boarding could be charged with second degree murder or at minimum, sued by the survivors for wrongful death.
Posted by: gary | May 8, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Jane,
Learn to read! John did not post that, I did. John is the US serviceman who has actually commanded soldiers in the field and had to deal with these life & death situations against these kinds of people for REAL. Not the dream world where you are.
“1.) She couldn’t go on the record without violating the law. Do you forget that Bush and Cheney were threatening everyone with arrest and prosecution for violating state secrets act.”
Your ignorance about how this all works reveals how little you really understand. OBVIOUSLY she could not run to tree tops and shout it. She could have kept classified documentation on her understanding of what was going on. The fact she did not do this tells you she had no real issue with it!
You obviously dont have any understanding of how this works. Lets see, I know this is a difficult if not impossible thing for you to do, but lets apply common sense here. Why would anyone brief a bunch of congressmen/women on things we were NOT going to do?
Are you often in the habit of telling your kids about things you wont do? Does your boss at work call you into a confidential meeting to inform you of things the company is not going to do ?
The subject here is not if Bush/Cheney ordered it or not. The subject is that she knew and made no record of being against it. Even in your comments, you have NOTHING that says she is against it!
Now in the months, we have been treated to that “fake outrage” that Democrats are so good at. So if this is so outrageous now, why was not it then?
Posted by: Mike_C | May 8, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
If you lower yourself to your enemies’ level, you become the enemy. Period. Now that this precedent has unfortunately been set, next time it will be American citizens who will be tortured and held with no recourse. Crazy, you say? The Bush administration had orchestrated legal ruling saying that it was “legal”. It was just never used, but probably would have been. This nation has always been a beacon of morality and fairness to the rest of the world. Because of these issues, we are no better than any other country that tortures. And please don’t get on your emotional high horse about 9/11 and the deaths of our brave service men and women. For this discussion, those tragedies are irrelevant. All the torture in the world will neither bring them back or justify these actions. There will always be bad people in the world.
Posted by: DaveM | May 8, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
The title of the article is very black and white, but the contents are very grey. This is more infotainment than investigative journalism simply because most readers don’t bother to read the whole article.
Posted by: dp | May 8, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
So which is it pelosi your an idiot and don’t understand briefings or your a liar?????????????????
Posted by: lovingpolitics | May 8, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Hillary Clinton was crucified for not remembering the specifics on whether she was shot at or not and paid the price during her campaign. What price will Pelosi pay for her lying and lack of memory?
Anyone in congress not calling for her head is just as guilty as her. And yet they want to put Bush officals on trial for their involvement in all this.
And NO, I am a registered Independent.
Posted by: vnvet69 | May 8, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
If you lower yourself to your enemies’ level, you become the enemy. Period. Now that this precedent has unfortunately been set, next time it will be American citizens who will be tortured and held with no recourse.
Posted by: DaveM | May 8, 2009 2:05:37 PM
When have captured American soldiers not been tortured? Sure you keep taking the high road no one else give a damn. The rest of the world is laughing because so many people are in a tizzy because we made some Jihadist Community Coordinator think he was drowning or in a box with a bug.
Posted by: Don't swine flu me Bro! | May 8, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
DaveM,
In case you had not been keeping up on events for the past couple of decades, Americans have been facing this treatment LONG before the previous administration. LOL..the next time? Where have you been pal ?
The first sentence is great rhetoric, but thats all. Let me guess if your in fist fight and the other guy kicks you in the groin, you dont like it, but you wont “stoop” to his level. Even though after that, his pounds the crap out of you. While your “utopia” is great thing to aspire to, the real world has real threats that have to be dealt with. It will be interesting to see just how many American lives President Obama is willing to sacrifice for this “high moral ground” if he is faced with situation where “stronger” methods are required. How do you think people will remember him if thousands die and it becomes known that we did not do everything we could have to save them? You liberals want to always play Monday morning QB with this stuff. Guys like John do not have your luxury. He has to deal with these kinds of people daily knowing that it could be the next one who decides to kill 2 or 3 of the men under his command. Maybe you would like to be guy from his unit who dies because of a lack of valuable intel from a captured terrorist.
Many of you liberals should also consider that by bringing all this to full light and our “proclaiming” that we will never torture, has now made it even more difficult to gain info from these people. They have nothing to fear now! Sometimes you do not need to employ a specific tactic, but merely have the threat of its implementation available to you. Now thats is gone!
Posted by: Mike_C | May 8, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
please …we want a truth commission, bring it on as i think you will find more lies on the left. in addition the right is out of power and the left has the most to lose. thats why obama doesnt want the TRUTH COMMISION HEARINGS…because pelosi and reid will be proven liars.
Posted by: catman | May 8, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
“Most reasonable people will acknowledge that, during time of war, certain national security issues can take precedence over the rule of law.”
This wasn’t about national security, it was about generating false evidence of Iraq being involved in the 9/11 attacks. Bush and Cheney desperately wanted that information, even though they knew it wasn’t true, and were willing to torture to get it.
Posted by: Cal | May 8, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
What wrong with water boarding to terrorist like Al-qaida No.2 Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Nothing wrong with that. These terrorists will cut your throat with un-sharpened knife if they got you. They will bomb your city if they have a chance. Why those politicians are talking about moral even they don’t have 1% of moral in their life time. I have no doubt some of democrat know about water boarding on Al-qaida terrorists. They won’t be told you what they know without torture. Bush administration did it for American peoples. If Obama think water boarding is torture and immoral and then he must stop bombing on innocent children, women and men in Pakistan and Afghanistan. The children skin were burning from white phosphorus chemical bomb it was used by Alliance troops. It is worst then water boarding on Al-qaida terrorist. Killing innocent peoples are criminal. I support water boarding on Al-qaida terrorists. I do not support bombing on innocent civilian.
Posted by: 90yearsoldman | May 8, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Wouldn’t it be great, that if any politician that talks on TV, Radio or the floor of the House or Senate, had to take an oath ” to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help me God”.If they lie they are proscuted to the full extent of the law. I’ll bet nobody there will say a word! All those in the White House should be included too
Posted by: savage24 | May 8, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Pelosi et al: Liars, RESIGN!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: sunshine484848 | May 8, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Let us now consider the “Pelosi Factor,” which is living a lie, that everyone know is a lie, with the liar, Pelosi, being unaware that the lie offends. The Pelosi Factor (PF) makes one immune to Truth. The PF has a protective shield against Honesty and an early warning radar system which detects and destroys any simlance of incoming Ethics or Morality. One can easily recognize the PF: notice how their lips quiver, their voice shakes, and their eyes dart as these PF experts attempt to master their trade: the art of deceiving.
Posted by: Percy | May 8, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Somebody who calls herself kay said: “JaneC, If someone kidnapped your child and buried them alive with only two hours of air were captured and would not give up the information required to save your child’s life, would you ok water boarding if you thought it would save your child’s life. Tell the truth. To me the greater moral question has always been is the saving of innocent lives a higher moral value than water boarding a person who has information that can save innocent lives. I vote for saving innocent lives, maybe yours or your child’s even.”
If you call for saving innocent lives, then you would want to go with methods that work, are tried and true, and not waterboarding.
I’ve put links to You Tube of interviews with experts, like SERE trainers, former CIA interrogators, etc., but ABC doesn’t allow them. Go to You Tube and search for these keywords, then click on the top clip on the list that comes back:
A former Army interrogator and SERE instructor explains why waterboarding SERE trainees isn’t the same as the CIA’s waterboarding, and volunteers to waterboard Sean Hannity. He says he will get Hannity to say that Countdown with Keith Olbermann is his favorite show as proof that people will say anything when tortured to get it to stop. The clip is the 2nd down from the top of the page you will get when you search You Tube with these keywords: countdown keith olbermann mike ritz sere instructor sean hannity torture waterboarding waterboarded charles grodin groden 4/27/09
Here’s an interview with former CIA bureau chief Tyler Drumheiller talking about how waterboarding does not work. This clip is at the top of the page you will get when you search You Tube with these keywords:
hardball chris matthews cia tyler drumheller chief european operations torture waterboarding cheney gitmo abu ghraib
Here’s former CIA operative Bob Baer talking about how waterboarding gets the tortured person to say what he thinks the torturer wants to hear, and that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, waterboarded 183 times in one month, is now “almost brain dead”, and talks specifically to your question, “Is it worth trying?”. This clip is at the top of the page you will get when you search You Tube with these keywords:
keith olbermann countdown hardball chris matthews torture program memos bob baer CIA waterboarding khalid sheikh mohammed brain dead
A clip about doctors being on hand during the torture, in case the detainees died while being waterboarded (drowned), a doctor could cut his throat, perform a tracheotomy. The clip is at the top of the page you will get when you search You Tube with these keywords:
countdown keith olbermann jonathan turley cia torture waterboarding physicians doctors doctor physician memos steven bradbury 4/27/09
Here’s an interview with retired Army General Jean-Paul Baptiste on the subject. The clip is at the top of the page you will get when you search You Tube with these keywords:
jean-paul baptiste countdown keith olberman secret torture documents cheney waterboarding bush administration 4/24/09 part+4
There is no gray area–Waterboarding is torture and it’s a war crime, it’s the law, and it’s been settled law for decades. The clip is at the top of the page you will get when you search You Tube with these keywords:
countdown keith olbermann torture waterboarding settled law 4/23/09 peggy noonan glenn beck sean hannity
The purpose of the waterboarding was to get false confessions to links between Al Qaeda and 9/11. The clips are at the top of the pages you will get when you search You Tube with these keywords:
hardball chris matthews sheldon whitehouse kit bond senator saddam hussein 9/11 iraq al+qaeda torture waterboarding los+angeles+plot 4/27/09 CIA army+field+manual
keywords: hardball chris matthews patrick pat buchanan lawrence o’donnell guantanamo bay gitmo torture waterboard waterboarding 4/27/09 memos interrogator testimony
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Somebody who calls himself Mike_C wants to know who and when we executed anyone for waterboarding.
The International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE), aka the Tokyo Trial, which was the far eastern counterpart to the Nuremberg trials.
I’ll give you an online citation, but in real life there are other places you can learn about it. Politifact got involved because when John McCain made the claim, Cheney unleashed his dogs to try to destroy him. Politifact found McCain to be accurate (of course).
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2007/dec/18/john-mccain/history-supports-mccains-stance-on-waterboarding/
Politifact interviewed R. John Pritchard, the author of The Tokyo War Crimes Trial: The Complete Transcripts of the Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East. They also interviewed Yuma Totani, history professor at the University of Nevada-Las Vegas, and consulted the Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, which published a law review article entitled, “Drop by Drop: Forgetting the History of Water Torture in U.S. Courts.”
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Somebody who calls himself Mike_C said: “By the way, care to address John? since you yourself have had how much expereince in ANY real world situation like this?”
I do not address unknown and anonymous people’s unverifiable claims made on the internet. For all we know, you (Mike_C) could be ‘John’, sock puppeting.
Your account of what Pelosi has said is inaccurate.
1.) She couldn’t go on the record without violating the law. Do you forget that Bush and Cheney were threatening everyone with arrest and prosecution for violating state secrets act.
2.) She wasn’t actually told that this is what Bush and Cheney were doing. The headline on this story isn’t news and it’s nothing that Pelosi has denied: Pelosi Briefed on Use of Interrogation Tactics in September ’02.
That’s precisely what Pelosi herself has said. What else she said was that she and the others present, including Porter Goss, were told that the White House said that it had memos from the OLC that said the “harsh interrogation tactics” it wanted to use which included waterboarding was legal. The White House then said, according to Pelosi, “So we can use them if we want.” Pelosi responded, “We’ll see about that, should you decide to do that, which you have said you haven’t yet decided, but will inform us, Congress, should you get to that point.”
Pelosi also said that when she and Goss were leaving the White House, Goss said, “You can bet if they’ve got OLC saying that it’s legal, they’re already doing it”, to which Pelosi replied, “That’s not what they said in there, and I got a clear understanding with them that they would inform us if and when.”
Goss, when asked about that conversation said, “I don’t recall.”
Pelosi didn’t order the waterboarding, the torture, and does anybody doubt that Bush and Cheney would have paid any attention had she objected? Does anybody doubt that Bush and Cheney threatened Democrats with arrest and prosecution? We saw Bush and Cheney threaten for ourselves. We remember what Jay Rockefeller did, the letter he handwrote and placed in his safe for insurance after Cheney briefed him on illegal surveillance techniques being employed and threatened Rockefeller not to tell anyone.
Posted by: JaneC | May 8, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
She is so useless. Cowardly, deceitful and so self important. What a waste. I wish she and all of congress would slide into the ocean for all the good they do. The owners of the country own them, the president and us, a notion that’s not a good thing at all.
Posted by: remoran | May 8, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
I swear conservatives, if the news or your party told you to argue for dropping a nuke on Mexico you would fight for it, even if it meant you would be blown up with it.
Which, if you didn’t catch the metaphor, allow me to spell it out…
By torturing people, whoever they are, we are giving up our ideals as a nation. I’m not talking about Republican or Democrat ideals, but American ideals. We are supposed to be the leader in this world, so lets lead it in the right way.”
Posted by: Cant Beleive It
———————————–
Would you call it torture if a cow get clubs in the head then then get its head cut off?
If you say that is torture then you’ll be surprised to know this had been done thousand of times a week to get beef to your dinner table.
The libs fail to realized that it’s the INTENT that defines what is torture.
Posted by: reallymeanit | May 8, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Pelosi and all the liberals are bold faced iars. What this country needs is more unemployed politicians starting with OBAMA!!
Posted by: Dan | May 8, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
It’s only going to get worse folks. All we can do is sit back and watch. :(
Posted by: Peggy Sue | May 8, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
what a shocking piece of Journalism, the author should be sacked for trying to mislead the readers.
their is nothing new in the article which said she knew that water boarding was going to be used.
Posted by: Boo | May 8, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
JaneC,
A lie is a lie.
Posted by: a better world | May 9, 2009, 12:00 am 12:00 am
Somebody who calls himself A Better World said: “A lie is a lie.”
I could be glib, crack wise and say that you’ve got such an economy of words, and I await your next syllable.
But I don’t think this is anything to be glib about.
Those of you who think Pelosi is lying, that she knew about the torture, support the torture, so you should be loving Pelosi if she’s lying. Her silence let your beliefs fluorish, and let torture be committed in all of our names.
But you don’t love her. And that makes your position now all the more suspect.
I don’t believe she’s lying, and I’ve explained why, but it doesn’t matter. If she’s lying, then I (and I suspect everyone else on the left) say, “Throw her to the wolves, too.” We on the left aren’t wedded to Democratic politicians. We’re very angry with them for letting you on the right get away with bankrupting the country, war crimes, and destroying the Constitution.
Let’s have an investigation. Why don’t conservatives join us on the left in calling for a thorough investigation, and let’s get to the bottom of it?
Posted by: JaneC | May 9, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am
What do you expect, Boo? This is after all ABC (American Broadcast Conservatives).
Posted by: Rob | May 9, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
I’m a democrat. But, I can’t wait to help vote Pelosi and Reid out of office. Also I voted for Obama. But’ I want make that mistake again. I thought change would be better. But, going down the self destructing road of socialism is not change for the better. If you don’t believe it ask the people of North Korea, Cuba or Venezuela.
Posted by: john | May 9, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am
I see comments suggesting that torture is okay because we assume those that are being tortured are bad guys. And that because these bad people would hurt our children or those we cherish, somehow makes torture the right thing to do… ???
As an American citizen…as a wife and mother… When I found out that now ex-husband had been sexually molesting my daughter from my first marriage… while I worked nights at the Post Office…
I can tell you that I was not allowed to torture this person…
He apparently started molesting her at only six years old…
I was enraged… as a victim of child sexual abuse myself, I had vowed that it would not happen to my daughter…
I was guilt ridden, that I had not been able to keep my daughter safe and that it had happened within my own home,,,right under nose…was the greatest of betrayals…
I would have loved to torture this man who had violated my child’s body and innocence…as he who would also force me to relive my own childhood drama…
I found myself wishing for my own brand of ustice for such a crime…
But again…
I am not allowed to torture even someone that has forcibly taken something so precious from my own child, in my own home, in my own country…
There are laws in place that I would have to break or in this case rewrite in order to serve my own desire to punish my ex husband in a way I see fitting…
Believe me it ran though my mind…
to be able to extract certain details from him…and to make him feel pain as I imagined my little daughter’s confusion at someone she was supposed to be able to trust…violating her in such a cowardly fashion.
But what would that then make me…???
And would it then give my daughter back her innocence…?
I take solace in the knowledge… that what goes around, comes around and not being a religious person…
I feel that I must turn this burden over to a higher power than myself…
I will not become as lowly as he has shown himself to be.
Posted by: theafalcon200 | May 9, 2009, 6:17 am 6:17 am
The Speaker had “classified” briefings…
“Classified” usually means that once being briefed, there are legal restrictions as to what can be discussed…
This is a non issue… Pelosi did not break a law… or rewrite the law to make something legal that goes against the laws of the Geneva convention…
Posted by: theafalcon200 | May 9, 2009, 6:32 am 6:32 am
If they are going to investigate some on President Bush’s council for the interrogation flap, why not include Pelosi? As the top Democrat on the House Intelligence committee she was responsible enough to raise a flag at the mere mention of these interrogation techniques. Yet she never hesitated to throw any Republican in Bush’s cabinet on the fire for any vote involving the Iraq war. What a hypocrite, what a liar and she now leads the House in congress.
President Obama and the other senior Democratic leaders in congress should look at her removal from the Speaker of the House position or risk their political careers.
As a registered Independent, I expect the truth from both political sides.
Posted by: vnvet69 | May 9, 2009, 8:08 am 8:08 am
To “theafalcon200″…With all due respect, you seem to have missed the point, which is not that she should have spoken up then (at the time of the briefings) but that now she says she was never told about the waterboarding and other “enhanced” techniques.
She is either lying or really doesn’t remember. In either case, she should not be holding down her present job because she is; (1) a liar, or (2) has some rather serious mental problem if she is unable to remember a CIA briefing that many others (both Republican and Democrat) do remember and which was extremely important.
So, of course, she should not have spoken publicly at the time about the contents of the briefing but she certainly should not be saying she was never told — which, quite obviously, is not true.
Posted by: aprilmay | May 9, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Shocking…another liberal lie exposed.
Posted by: politicaldookie | May 9, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
First of all…Pelosi was neither the author nor did she authorize the CIA interrogation memos. She had little power to do anything about them because said incidents occurred earliest 2002/2003. Certainly, many politicians on either side of the issue “knew” about what was going on, directly…possibly indirectly…to the fullest extent, I’m sure we’ll never fully know. But either way, Pelosi was NOT the Vice President and did not order nor authorize such interrogation techniques…We know that Rumsfelt was one of the ones who DID pass on memos that did openly acknowledge and condoned the use of harsh interrogation tactics, even torture. Even if Pelosi knew about it, I doubt she was in a position to do much of anything about it…and it’s so obvious…There are several people in the Upper Eschelons of the Bush Administration that don’t want to see wealth spread around, but they will spread around the blame. So, the logical point being, Vice President Cheney abused his executive powers and authorized cruel and unusual punishments/interrogation tactics and that’s it. He’s the one to blame, end of story…who gives a rat’s patootie who knew what when…the ultimate person to blame is the person who authorized such tactics and is in charge.
Posted by: s | May 9, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Utterly amazing- she was caught lying red-handed… and she’s still lying.
Pelosi says she was told the Bush Adm. was considering using water-boarding and other techniques “in the future” only. So that means that she was not told “they (EITs) were being USED (yet)”.
But even this lame hair-splitting BS that is at odds with the CIA memo dated to 9-4-02 that says Pelosi received a “briefing on EITs (enhanced interrogation techniques), including use of EITs on Abu Zubaydah, background on authorities and a description of particular EITs that had been employed.”
Of course, she raised no objection to any of it for almost 5 years- until she was Speaker in 2007 and the antiwar left raised it as an issue. Suddenly she’s against it, and/or “knew nothing”. And obviously willing to lie to the whole country to create a more favorable reality.
Apparently Obama and Pelosi forgot something: the CIA KILLS people… it’s in their job description.
Did Pelosi and Obama think these killers were going to meekly take one for the team… when the team captain is a lying, incompetent, arrogant nebbish with no real-world experience and who told them they need to kiss his ring? – please
Pelosi is a Machiavellian, no-talent hack who’s made a lot of enemies. Going to be hard to BS her way out of this one.
Posted by: Reaganite Republican Resistance | May 9, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
JaneC- “Bush and Cheney were threatening everyone with arrest and prosecution for violating state secrets act.”
========================================
–I’ve found most your way of thinking are amiss or distortions. First of all, Bush and Cheney were not threatening everyone or prosecution or violating.
Did you forget how many innocents American citizens had lost by the TERRORISTS ON SEPT. 11, 2001 ???????
=======================================
“Pelosi didn’t order the waterboarding, the torture, and …….”
– pelosi was not in Commender-In-Chief
so that she couldn’t do it.
I hope so you open your eye ASAP.
Posted by: Unhappy w 'Apology Tour 09" | May 9, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
According to the above report on the intelligence memos released, Zubaydah was waterboarded 83 times in August.
And Pelosi is trying to say those briefing her just happened to leave that out?
I’m sure she would have raised all kinds of hell if they briefed her as she said…that it was only a possible technique, then she found out later that they had actually used it prior to her briefing.
What a liar! …but then she’s a Dem.
Posted by: LibsRLiars | May 9, 2009, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
The white house’s release of the memos was successful in generating a rehashing of “the torture issue” in the media and at the water cooler. I think this is by design, to keep us diverted from the latest powergrabs in the upcoming queue.
Among them are the cap & trade energy tax, the free choice act (free choice?!), and single-payer health care – not to mention new TARP gyrations and ongoing budgetary fiascos.
Before we expend intellectual energy on debating small stuff like waterboarding, we ought to restore our governnment to its intended form. We need to click Un-Do in a huge way, both in policy and personnel.
Whether we are trying to abate the overreaching federal monster in Washington, the politician interested mainly in keeping his job (as we all are), or the true powermonger – Term Limits is not the answer.
An electorate that understands and embraces the principles outlined in America’s founding documents, and then voting for the like-minded candidate is what is needed.
Private property, State’s Rights, the Four Freedoms, and protecting the Right’s of the Individual (not the Collective) above all.
If conformance to these principles was the litmus test that had been applied for the past 100 years to all elected
posts, appointments, and legislation, we would ALL be living in a better country today.
Keep your eye on the ball folks; we’re all in this together no matter who your dog was in the last race. Waterboarding is the least of our problems.
Posted by: Bob-B, MI | May 10, 2009, 9:00 am 9:00 am
I am a registered Democrat and consider myself a liberal, for the most part. I think that if indeed Pelosi or any Democrat is involved in this, she/they should be held accountable. Granted, knowing is not the same as giving orders, but keeping silent makes the Speaker and whomever else, guilty of complicity with the illegal (not to mention immoral) practices of the Bush administration. What we need is the truth, no matter whom it involves.
Frankly, if Pelosi goes, I can’t say I will miss her. She can even take Harry Reid with her.
Posted by: penderlou | May 10, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
No, this was not an intentional diverson — but it does illustrate how utterly stupid Obama is.
The fascist pig has got a fight on his hands.
How could any of you here have voted for such a sleazebag? What were you THINKING?
Posted by: tanarg | May 10, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
No, she didn’t break the law — she’s just a liar. But then you liberals like people in Congress and the White House to be like that; after all, you fell for Obama, the Liar-in-Chief, as low a scumbag as has ever crawled out of any stinking moral cesspool on the planet.
Posted by: tanarg | May 10, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
obama and his whole criminal cabinet
should be thrown out of office waterboarded and put behind bars.
Posted by: joe r | May 10, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
By focusing on what Pelosi knew about the Bush administration’s use of torture of which was boisterously supported by Republicans, ABC can effectively ignore that the Bush administration is responsible for the torture, and began long before informing congress.
Once informed, the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee expressed opposition to the CIA. The Dems were vehemently against the torture, though they had no way of stopping it.
This is no more than an attempt at deflection from the real culprits who brought shame on America — the morally bankrupt neocons in the Cheney/Bush administration.
Posted by: Jack | May 11, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Can we move out of blame and onto concern for our troops? What happened to crossing the aisle for the good of the country. Keeping up the search for someone to blame and denigrate is senseless. If you want to continue to weaken our country, then keep both sides fighting each other. You cannot sink just half of a ship.
The next step in this debacle will show photos which will be used by our mutual foes. It will inflame our enemies and make their resolve stronger to rid the world of all unbelievers.
I am all for making a combined effort to get all of the cheats and liars out our government. Maybe we do need another party that unites us in the fight to get our integrity back.
Posted by: margee | May 11, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
…and Pelosi is how close to the presidency?
Posted by: JB | May 13, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am
No, margee, we can’t “move out of blame”. Letting crimes go unpunished encourages the repetition of those crimes. That’s especially important when the crimes are this heinous. We can’t just let torturers get away with their war crimes.
Posted by: Cal | May 13, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Nancy Pelosi lies about not knowing about waterboarding – and her approval. She was just on television – she is so obviously in a mess it is obvious she lies. She is stuttering = hey what comes around goes around. She is so obviously going to have to resign. Accusing the CIA of not telling the truth. HA HA watch her be kicked out by her own party. She is bringing the Democrats down, and well, they are not going to put up with her anymore. Bye Bye Nancy – LOL. Hey Nancy – ‘what comes around goes around’……your big mouth has buried you!
Posted by: MA resident | May 14, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am
WATCH THE NANCY PELOSI NOSE GROW – body language tells all. Wish someone can do body language reading on television….she is a liar and needs to Go!!!!!!”Duh I was there and I agreed but I don’t agree now”. Maybe she can say she did not listen? Like I did not inhale…..Can’t take it back Nancy…
Posted by: MA resident | May 14, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Pelosi lied?? What about Hillary Clinton and “ducking sniper fire”. She is now Secretary of State.
Shows what kind of administration we now have.
Posted by: Willy | May 14, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Obama needed Pelosi to win the presidency. He can now throw her under the bus….
Posted by: Karen | May 14, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Since Cheney decided to rewrite laws and twist up the constitution to make “enhanced interrogations”, in other words…torture legal…
Even if Pelosi was briefed what was she really going to do…
This briefing was classified and some of it still is…who was she really going to tell???
This is just a desperate attempt by Conservative Republicans to distract by dumping blame on Pelosi…
And to all those trying to justify torture…
George Washington had to deal with the moralities of torture… and set the bar high for future generations…until Cheney…
” In one egregious incident, at the battle at Drake’s Farm, British troops murdered all seven of Washington’s soldiers who had surrendered, crushing their brains with muskets.
writes historian David Fischer,
“The Americans recovered the mutilated corpses and were shocked,” wrote Mr. Fischer. The British commander simply denied responsibility. “The words of the British commander, as much as the acts of his men,” wrote Mr. Fischer, “reinforced the American resolve to run their own war in a different spirit. … Washington ordered that Hessian captives would be treated as human beings with the same rights of humanity for which Americans were striving. The Hessians … were amazed to be treated with decency and even kindness. At first they could not understand it.” The same policy was extended to British prisoners. (posted in the New York Times by Thomas L Friedman in March 2005…
So it is very American “not” to support torture…
Posted by: theafalcon200 | May 15, 2009, 6:54 am 6:54 am
Congratulations to the Democrats.
They have gathered the largest group of sleazy politicians ever assembled in one place at one time.
Posted by: Rasputin3.14 | May 15, 2009, 7:26 am 7:26 am
The democrats lied on the TARP funding, lied on the knowing tha AIG bonuses were being sent, lied after they voted for clinton to take out saddam, lied after Bush got in claiming he somehow changed the briefs they got under clinton to make the regime change bill THEY passed, and now, since the CIA cannot publicly respond, Pelosi calls them liars.
The democrats will get Americans killed on our soil, with their politcal antics, just wait and see – agents in the CIA are bailing, and have had to take out personal insurance since 1995 because THEY KNOW the politicans are POLITICAL TRAITORS to the USA – after okaying and demanding the job from the CIA – they THROW THEM UNDER THE BUS.
Next time, when the BUS BLOWS UP and the cia agents are laying on the streets blocks and miles behind the explosive fireball, and WE’RE ON FIRE – don’t come crying to lyin’ Nan, YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.
Posted by: DangerCrats | May 15, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am
“appeared to contradict” Pelosi’s statement? If this was a Republican, that would have read simply “contradicted” – in this subtle fashion ABC News – another darling of the Democrat party, shifts the facts.
Posted by: B. S. Davis | May 15, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Sometimes you wonder how these things get started. Take this big flap in the news about what House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was told about prisoners being tortured by American officials, and the fact that a growing number of Republicans are saying she concurred with the practice. How damned convenient for them that she was once briefed by the Bush Administration.
Now, remember: Nancy Pelosi didn’t torture anyone. Nor did she ORDER torture to be committed. Nor did did she WRITE a memo that authorized it. Nor did she make any CLAIMS that what was being done in America’s name wasn’t torture. IT WAS THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION THAT DID THOSE THINGS. The blame rests solely upon those who wrote the memos, ordered the torture to commence, and who actually performed that torture. But you wouldn’t know that if you listened to the news.
Focusing upon Pelosi is like blaming a bystander for witnessing a car wreck. Peter King, for example, who’s the top Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee, said that if Pelosi failed to object to the torture techniques at the time she was briefed, then — now, pay close attention to this neat twist of logic — she was “an ENABLER” and “an ACCOMPLICE.” Republicans say that any probe into torture should be broadened to include what Pelosi knew and how much influence she had in shaping the Bush administration’s controversial policies. Can you appreciate the chuztpah it takes to make such a statement? Do you catch a whiff of blackmail in the air?
People who do bad things to other people, regardless of their motives, are rarely found to be fountains of honesty. And when they descend from their self-appointed high places to explain themselves, they not only tend to blame others for their actions but also rush to find accomplices where none exist.
What you’re seeing is a distraction, pure and simple, one which was purposely orchestrated by the brain trust of the Republican Party. They want to divert your attention away from what really happened and, instead, keep you busy pondering some other crappy little details that don’t amount to a bead of sweat on a gnat’s behind. It’s another form of “bait ‘n switch,” except here the Republicans are successfully switching the public’s attention away from some terribly rotten bait that came right out of their own bag several years ago, but which is now stinking up the ship of state. They keep pointing in other directions as the source of the smell. And the media, which should know better by now, is stupidly falling for the switch and is performing as their salesmen. In a word, it’s shameful.
Posted by: Howard Lauther | May 17, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am