By MichaelJames

May 30, 2009 3:01am

Obama Says Political Games Are at Play, With Some Painting Distorted Picture of Sotomayor

From Sunlen Miller:


In his weekly address, President Obama calls on Congress to “avoid political posturing” and to move with speed to put his Supreme Court nominee, Judge Sonia Sotomayor, on the high court without delay.


“I hope the confirmation process will begin without delay,” Obama says in his address, “No nominee should be seated without rigorous evaluation and hearing; I expect nothing less. But what I hope is that we can avoid the political posturing and ideological brinksmanship that has bogged down this process, and Congress, in the past. Judge Sotomayor ought to be on the bench when the Supreme Court decides what cases to hear this year and I’m calling on Democrats and Republicans to be thorough, and timely in dealing with this nomination.”

Amid criticisms already mounting from the right over his choice, the President addressed those critics, and specifically their picking over of some comments made by Sotomayor in the past.


“There are, of course, some in Washington who are attempting to draw old battle lines and playing the usual political games, pulling a few comments out of context to paint a distorted picture of Judge Sotomayor’s record,” Obama said. “But I am confident that these efforts will fail.”


The president said Sotomayor’s judicial decisions over her 17-year record on the bench speak “far louder than any attack.”


“As a fellow judge on her court, appointed by Ronald Reagan, said recently, ‘I don’t think I’d go as far as to classify her in one camp or another. I think she just deserves the classification of outstanding judge,’” Obama said, referring to comments made by Second Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Roger Miner.


-Sunlen Miller

User Comments

Who cares about law & justice when you can have empathy? This candidate for the Supreme Court must be OK because she is from a minority group, evidently a major qualification.
It’s not bad enough that the whole country is dumbing down at a rapid rate but now we can dumb down the Supreme Court as well.
Anyone see the movie, ”Idiocracy” ???

Posted by: Terry | May 30, 2009, 3:11 am 3:11 am

everyman’s culture colors how they see, speak,listen & judge the world around us. I’m glad a Latina will be echoing my view.

Posted by: Irene | May 30, 2009, 3:29 am 3:29 am

As long as ”empathy” & membership in a minority group are major qualifications for a Supreme Court justice, why not go further, in the interest of equal treatment & fairness.
Shouldn’t we have a pygmy on the Supreme Court, to have empathy for short people, a group sociologists will tell you, suffer from discrimination?
What about American Indians? Eskimos? Fat people? How about transsexuals?
Let’s expand the Supreme Court to several thousand justices so everyone can get their share of ”empathy”?
Oh, I forgot illegal aliens – surely they need ”empathy”……
We can expand this concept to the IRS as well – I mean, why should any minority who has suffered from lack of empathy & discrimination pay taxes?

Posted by: Terry | May 30, 2009, 3:56 am 3:56 am

While important, the debate on the qualifications of this candidate are far less important than the serious threats developing all around the world, all of which are being poorly handled by the Obama administration.
Is Obama preparing us for acquiescing to N. Korea as a nuclear power? It would seem so by remarks made by Gates recently. And this has implications for other rogues states, namely Iran & Syria who receive technical assistance & support from N. Korea. Are we accepting a nuclear armed Iran? So it seems.
And Pakistan? Imagine the Taliban with atomic bombs ……
Compared to these developments, the choice of a Supreme Court justice are of no importance.

Posted by: Terry | May 30, 2009, 4:33 am 4:33 am

“But what I hope is that we can avoid the political posturing and ideological brinksmanship that has bogged down this process, and Congress, in the past.”
Wow. Says the man who voted nay on the cloture motion for Justice Alito.

Posted by: scott | May 30, 2009, 7:34 am 7:34 am

I wonder if the people posting here or anywhere for that matter are real sometimes, how can grown people be so simple and blind? The comments about her belong Latina are only being stressed and blown up by the media, and right wing lunatics. I never heard the POTUS mention the word “Latina” or Hispanic” once in articulating her qualifications. All they said is she has more experience at the time she was chosen to sit than any sitting “Supreme” when they were chosen. In fact she has more than any judge who sat in the last 100 YEARS! Why not mention that in all of your ditto head comments. Also no one said the supreme court must be representative of the population, but if it does not have to be why complain when another group enters? Remember justice is SUPPOSED to be blind. One more thing Rush talking about racism, that is so rich, talk about Orwelean! Republicans need to realize that “unofficial” racism is not a winning party policy anymore.

Posted by: Truth | May 30, 2009, 7:41 am 7:41 am

Truth or dare, the American people are seeing hypocrisy at work in the Obama administration. The derisive way Obama goes after his opponents is setting a very bad precedent of the presidency. “Do as I say not as I do” and “Wasn’t me” sum up his presidency so far. Opacity is being touted as transparency.
It is bizarro world when Rush calls someone on a racist statement and he is right. Imagine if another SC candidate had said that due to the richness of his experiences as a white male, he would make “better” decisions as a judge than any minority, male or female.
Meeeeep! Thank you for playing, I hope you enjoy the parting gifts.
The double standards are astounding.
Obama needs to cool his jets. I find the push for expediancy to be chilling. That is how we saddled our children and grandchildren with crushing debt. No time to think, it’s a crisis! You can read the bill later. Pass it! Pass it now!
Nope, I hope Sotomayor’s nomination is given the time and consideration that they need to determine if she is qualified (on many levels) to be the next SC justice.

Posted by: Skittles | May 30, 2009, 7:59 am 7:59 am

Anyone think it would be best for the president and the White House to simply keep quiet and let the GOP implode?

Posted by: matt | May 30, 2009, 8:17 am 8:17 am

Yet again, Obama drags out the straw men. What a crutch! Name names for once.

Posted by: chris | May 30, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am

SoSo speaks her mind and heart and the President makes retractions on her behalf.
SWEET!!!
SHE…..said it and many other things that make her unseatable. Barry is wasting time pushing this latina onto everyones docket!
CASE DISMISSED!!

Posted by: American Infidel | May 30, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Wow this was all covered earlier in the evening. See some of you still choose to ignore it! Funny as some of you show faux outrage, you are doing exactly what the President is speaking about! “There are, of course, some in Washington who are attempting to draw old battle lines and playing the usual political games, pulling a few comments out of context to paint a distorted picture of Judge Sotomayor’s record,” Obama said.
But he also said, since it looks like many of didn’t read the post!”I hope the confirmation process will begin without delay,” Obama says in his address, “No nominee should be seated without rigorous evaluation and hearing; I expect nothing less. But what I hope is that we can avoid the political posturing and ideological brinksmanship that has bogged down this process, and Congress, in the past. Judge Sotomayor ought to be on the bench when the Supreme Court decides what cases to hear this year and I’m calling on Democrats and Republicans to be thorough, and timely in dealing with this nomination.” What part of rigorous evaluation and hearing don’t you get? Newt your other leader doesn’t want it to get there, why? He’ll be once again proven wrong and an out and out liar!

Posted by: Try the truth | May 30, 2009, 8:52 am 8:52 am

BO is so disapointing..
It’s not only that he uses straw men, it’s that he’s a giant liar…
Economic numbers are down, the economy shrunk, and unemployment is up…but he’s out there making speeches saying that his stimulus package is working and , and that the economy is doing fine…
…and the people that don’t pay attention to the news (or are too stupid) are buying it…Whether they think their neighbor’s life is going to improve, or their own life will (it won’t)…

Posted by: regretmyvote | May 30, 2009, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Preparation for 2012?

Posted by: LongT | May 30, 2009, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Truth wrote: “All they said is she has more experience at the time she was chosen to sit than any sitting “Supreme” when they were chosen. In fact she has more than any judge who sat in the last 100 YEARS! Why not mention that in all of your ditto head comments.”
So NOW “more experience” is better. Why wasn’t “more experience” better in last November’s election?

Posted by: James Danley | May 30, 2009, 9:20 am 9:20 am

What’s the Rush, Obama? It’s not as if she can take the bench tomorrow, after all. Take time, do it the way you guys did Clarence Thomas. Drag her through the mud. Heck, “Bork” her. Remember that, right?

Posted by: Get Real | May 30, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am

Sotomayor is an amazing role model and will be a great SCOTUS justice!

Posted by: Enrique Perez | May 30, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am

It’s past time for Obama to stop telling congress what to do . . . does he recall that we have 3 separate branches of government. Furthermore, if anybody is playing politics it’s him . . . why do you think he appointed this woman. Wake up people, before you lose it all.

Posted by: rplat | May 30, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am

HAHAHAHAH “games” Ole BO should stop playing his “Political Games” his nominee deserves the SAME treatment that the Democrats give to republican nominees….

Posted by: Vet1973 | May 30, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

There is a compelling article titled,
Pravda Mocks US Descent Into Marxism at Breakneck Speed that is posted at gatewaypundit.
It was posted on 5/29

Posted by: Michelle | May 30, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am

It’s past time for Obama to stop telling congress what to do . . . does he recall that we have 3 separate branches of government. Furthermore, if anybody is playing politics it’s him . . . why do you think he appointed this woman. Wake up people, before you lose it all.
Posted by: rplat | May 30, 2009 9:54:46 AM
***************************************
Yeah, the nerve of a President to ask something of congress. Well, that is just unheard of???? They ALL play politics.

Posted by: FedUp | May 30, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Since she appears to hate “white” males, does that mean she hates the US Constitution which was created by “white” males? AND based on that, will she IGNORE the constitution in her rulings..?

Posted by: Vet1973 | May 30, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Jake, how about an update on the analysis of her actual record, you know, reality:
“In an eleven-year career on the Second Circuit, Judge Sotomayor has participated in roughly 100 panel decisions involving questions of race and has disagreed with her colleagues in those cases (a fair measure of whether she is an outlier) a total of 4 times. Only one case (Gant) in that entire eleven years actually involved the question whether race discrimination may have occurred. (In another case (Pappas) she dissented to favor a white bigot.) She particulated in two other panels rejecting district court rulings agreeing with race-based jury-selection claims. Given that record, it seems absurd to say that Judge Sotomayor allows race to infect her decisionmaking.”

Posted by: jhw539 | May 30, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Obama’s right. We should just skip the review all together. I mean, he wants her in, why should we question his judgment? Just like his promise to allow 5 days of public review and comment on new bills before he signed them. We already decided not to hold him to that promise, because he decided we need to rush everything through without review at all. This way we can get things done. Who cares if they are right or wrong. Progress is the most important thing here, who care about the long term consequences anyway? Our children can worry about that.

Posted by: common_sense | May 30, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am

It’s past time for Obama to stop telling congress what to do . . . does he recall that we have 3 separate branches of government. Furthermore, if anybody is playing politics it’s him . . . why do you think he appointed this woman. Wake up people, before you lose it all.
Posted by: rplat | May 30, 2009 9:54:46 AM
***************************************
Yeah, the nerve of a President to ask something of congress. Well, that is just unheard of???? They ALL play politics.

Posted by: FedUp | May 30, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

BO seems to forget, he isn’t a “KING”, He works for US, and we have every right to voice our opinions and take a very critical look at his nominee.. BO is the one who should stop playing the Political games… we have the right to disagree with his choice…. and to have his lackeys denigrate and threaten people who choose to disagree isn’t very Presidential looking….

Posted by: Vet1973 | May 30, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

We know the Republican Party loves spotlighting lackeys like Clarence Thomas, Alberto Gonzales and Michael Steel so they can say they are for the advancement of minorities but the truth is that they will try to destroy any minority that attempt to advance the true meaning of the American dream. Ms. Sotomayor will make a fine addition to the U.S. Supreme Court and it’s about time and Barack Obama is a fine president. My question is why would any minority what to be a part of the Republican white is always better club?

Posted by: V. Brame | May 30, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am

I cannot believe this empty suit for a president. He urges Congress not to play political games, when he’s the master of it. He sends up a nominee who’s made from the same mold as he, then he tells the rest of the country to just rubber stamp her nomination? I think I have heard it all.

Posted by: Gina | May 30, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

This is not a political game. This is about choosing a good judge and not some bigot with political connections.

Posted by: Keith | May 30, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am

If Ms Sotomayor has better wisdom than a white male, then lets confirm her and move her into the Chief Justice position. She’s obviously more brilliant than everyone else there.

Posted by: Gina | May 30, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Why do liberals label minorities not in the Democratic party as lackies? Do you hear non-democrats calling President Obama a lackey?

Posted by: deanbob | May 30, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

The more the GOP attacks, the more people they drive away. People like the moderates and independents, who they sorely need to shore up their shrinking ranks. They are playing with political dynamite by attacking this woman. They risk alienating the fastest rising voter block in the nation. Sure, it plays well to their base. But isn’t the base, by definition, already on board with the GOP? Frankly I hope they continue the attacks. It’s helping to drive them into political oblivion and obscurity. If they continue, they will be nothing more than a fringe party on the outside of the national political scene……

Posted by: SearamblerOne | May 30, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am

V.Brame,
Why did/do liberals try to personally destroy minorities in the Republican party? If you would, please, start with Clarance Thomas. Then move on to Condi Rice, Alberto Gonzalas, Michael Steele. After you are done explaining the problems liberals had with these Republican minorites, we’ll move on to the some others your party attempted to destroy.

Posted by: jennifert7 | May 30, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am

People like the moderates and independents, who they sorely need to shore up their shrinking ranks.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Well then, you can’t be feeling too good about the upcoming re-election campaigns for Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, Murtha and Frank, cuz they ain’t moderate or independent and some belong to their own little culture of corruption.

Posted by: jennifert7 | May 30, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am

No DeanBo, non-Democrats don’t call President Obama a lackey they call him a racist, Socialist, terrorist and worse. Clarence Thomas, Michael Steel and Gonzales are lackeys. Everyone knows it even them.

Posted by: V. Brame | May 30, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Jennifert7, I never heard anyone attack Condi Rice. The others have no self respect why should anyone else respect them?

Posted by: V. Brame | May 30, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am

“In a Senate speech, Obama said the decision to vote against Roberts ‘was not an easy one for me to make.’ He said he was impressed with Roberts when the two met, but found that he seemed to side with ‘those who were dismissive of efforts to eradicate the remnants of racial discrimination in our political process.’ He added that Roberts ‘seemed dismissive of the concerns that it’s harder making it in this world and in this economy when you’re a woman rather than a man.’”

Posted by: jennifert7 | May 30, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am

If you disagree with Obama your playing Political Games

Posted by: ging | May 30, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am

I as an Independent see the Democrats losing a lot in the next few elections. LOL The power of the Independents will show in the next few elections.

Posted by: Obama Drama | May 30, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

” Clarence Thomas, Michael Steel and Gonzales are lackeys. Everyone knows it even them.”
I thought they were tokens, not lackeys….

Posted by: SearamblerOne | May 30, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

And if you disagree with the Republican Party, you are a racist, Socialist, terrorist liberal who wants to make the country unsafe. On most political blogs, the word INDEPENDENT is code for closet Republican.

Posted by: V. Brame | May 30, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am

“The more the GOP attacks, the more people they drive away.”
Why do you care? You hate the GOP.

Posted by: Stacey | May 30, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Tokens, lackeys and more. How about pond scum?

Posted by: V. Brame | May 30, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Question: Why the rush? As a democratically elected congressional body, it is the legislators responsibility to do their duty. After all, they’re there to conduct the people’s business; not the other way around. Simply because the President may think that the nominee is most qualified, doesn’t mean he’s got a free ticket to appoint Sotomayor to the 3rd most important branch of our government. Due diligence must be excercised and congress must ask Sotomayor the tough questions. The arrogance of this President to think that he can just appoint and fill the judicial seat without respecting the legislative process is simply unbelievable. Congress does not and should not be sheeped by this President as they do not answer to him. The legislative body answers to the people and states they represent. Again, what’s the rush? The judicial seat is not yet vacant. Mr. President, go fly a kite.

Posted by: Mike | May 30, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Speaking of playing political games:
“Sen. Barack Obama said he would vote Monday to filibuster Judge Samuel Alito’s confirmation to the Supreme Court, but he conceded the effort would be futile and criticized Democrats for failing to persuade Americans to take notice of the court’s changing ideological face. “

Posted by: jennifert7 | May 30, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

The arrogance of this President to think that he can just appoint and fill the judicial seat without respecting the legislative process is simply unbelievable. Mike
what evidence do you have that Obama is trying to ‘not respect’ or eliminate the legislative process for confirmation?
just curious about your ‘facts’

Posted by: Oh Yeah | May 30, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Jake, as I say on your other blog about how the White House retracts her comments…it seems a wise Latina should be able to retract her own comments. Not somebody else who didn’t make the comments. — This from somebody who knows a thing or two about a wise Latina.

Posted by: nicole | May 30, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am

yeah, legitimate concerns are just games. everyone should just shut up and play “follow the leader”, like good little children. Bah! If the Senate approves this abominable choice for the Supreme Court, our liberties will take a back seat to the agenda of diversity and social justice! Those evil white founders didn’t really know what they were saying when they wrote the Constitution.. we need a Latina to interpret their true intent because she has special, diverse, cultural experiences which make her somehow better. Bah Humbug!

Posted by: linda | May 30, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

The king of game playing is telling people to stop.
Why is it that he says something and no one is allowed to question anything.
That isn’t how our government works. That is why we have different branches..oh yea he want to be the ruler

Posted by: sue | May 30, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Oh…all this Obama-bashing…PUHLEASE! Republicans are such big crybaby sore losers. The republican party is a complete MESS now, and that is not the fault of Obama..
Bush put people in posts who fit his (Cheney’s) personal ideology, so what gives?
The debt? All Bush’s fault, sorry, nice try republicans, not Obamas…the solution? What would republicans do different? Give more money to the “poor” rich victims of the economy and slave the rest of us, through higher taxes, less rights, less assistance in any way shape or form, down with education, down with any form of advancement. Leading us to the true less-freedom country.
Obama tries to fix the mess that Bush created, and they cry “socialism!”, Obama tries to make things equal under the law and they cry “socialism!” AND “RACISM” AND “PERSECUTION”.

Posted by: StAugustine0419 | May 30, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am

You people need to stop LYING about being an “independent”.
Now EVERYBODY wants to claim to be an “independent”. You people are just republican sore losers that to0 ashamed to admit being part of a party that is a complete laughing stock of the entire planet.
Independent…..YEAH RIGHT.

Posted by: Phil | May 30, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Okay don’t rush. Sonia Sotomayor will still be the next member of the Supreme Court. Just as the right could not stop Barack Obama from becoming the President of the United States, they will likewise not be able to stop Ms. Sotomayor from taking her place on the bench and in history. Take your time.

Posted by: V. Brame | May 30, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Maybe the democrats should take that to heart. Uggg Chicago Politics read about it.

Posted by: Steve | May 30, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Poor Obama. I’m sure he’s thinking, “This isn’t how things worked in Chicago.” Throughout his life he has always gotten his way with no worry of dissent from the many sycophants around him. Now he looks like the petulant child that he is, whining when he doesn’t immediately get his way. A true indication of a leader. NOT.

Posted by: Jenn | May 30, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Now, from what I can tell Obama started the political posturing by nominating this person to begin with so how is opposing and/or questioning his judgement political posturing? It is simply a very poor use of his judgement, again.

Posted by: Bob | May 30, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

We need to let the “Wise Latina Woman” present her wisdom and quit letting the President or Democrats or Republicans do the job for her. Let’s watch and learn for ourselves.
Signed,
Wise Latina

Posted by: nicole | May 30, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Did the people calling this President arrogant sleep thru Bush?

Posted by: FedUp | May 30, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

O

Posted by: sexygop | May 30, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

To those that are saying the right wingers are the ones dwelling on the “Latino’ or “Hispanic” aspect of Sotomayor – - -SHE was the one that made the ethnic emphasis in a speech and shown bias in her rulings. Obama is the one that is doing the politcal posturing – - how astute – - to nominate not only a female – - but a minority as well ! ! No one dare criticize, else they be labelled a racist, bigot or whatever. Memories are brief by the left – - remember the castigations and aspersions against Thomas, Alito, etc.? They pale in comparison.

Posted by: Reeba | May 30, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Please! Clarence Thomas was questioned on charges he sexually harassed a co-worker just as Bill O’Riley did. HE was the one who brought race into it to get himself off the hook.

Posted by: V. Brame | May 30, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

“Obama Says Political Games Are at Play”, You mean kinds like giving the UAW a payoff, or giving red meat to your base in declassifying a selection of interrogation memos while not declassifying the evaluation memos? The Obama administration is one big game known as “BUNKO”.!

Posted by: pauldiia | May 30, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Those that thought Clinton was slick, are now seeing a president that uses his power to bash anybody that doesn’t agree with him including private citizens. Obama opposed and fought hard against the appointment of the last supreme court appointment. So was he playing politics? I always thought that Clinton was the most arrogant president, but Obama has him beaten by a mile because he won’t even allow dissenters a voice. Why does the process to appoint any candidate need to quick? Has anybody noticed that everything about Obama needs to be quick including passing bills that nobody has read.

Posted by: Susan | May 30, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

President “Just words” Obama didn’t try at all to paint a distorted picture of Justice Roberts or Justice Alito. Nah, he didn’t play any political games where those two were concerned.

Posted by: jennifert7 | May 30, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

I guess it’s only OK to mplay politics if you’re a democrat. What a hipocrite.

Posted by: dave c | May 30, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

be wary of this man he wants to push everything thru without looking at it. He did a wonderful job on the stimulus nobody read it and look at the pork in it. Socialists jam everything down your throat as fast as they can then you are stuck with garbage.

Posted by: Johnq | May 30, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Oh give me a break…and the democrats weren’t political with any of George Bush’s court nominees. Shumer was viscous and Obama wanted to filibuster Roberts. When will American’s WAKE UP to the tyranny that is happening right under your eyes…..or is American Idol or baseball more important than your freedoms? Remember the story about the frogs in the boiling water and what happened to them…

Posted by: butterflylady | May 30, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Obama thinks no one and i mean no one should question him on anything he says or does…We as the people of this great nation are not allowed to go against the almighty Obama…

Posted by: whatif | May 30, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Give me a break! All you people do is rag on President Obama ALL the time about EVERYTHING non-stop.

Posted by: V. Brame | May 30, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

It’s kind of like Pelosi dismissing the media on her waterboarding approval. “I have spoken, so blindly obey!!”

Posted by: obama=socialsim | May 30, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Should we ignore a racist statement when it was uttered by a Supreme Court nominee? Obama said she didnt word it correctly. Should we take her ability to word things correctly into consideration for someone who will “word things” for a living?

Posted by: zeke | May 30, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Obama thinks no one and i mean no one should question him on anything he says or does…We as the people of this great nation are not allowed to go against the almighty Obama…

Posted by: whatid | May 30, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

It doesn’t matter what President Obama says there are people here who will smear him for it. Same people almost everyday, with the same personal agenda to smear the president.
It reminds me of the story of the little boy who cried ‘wolf!’ over and over again until people just didn’t listen anymore.

Posted by: danita | May 30, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Nothing is being taken “out of context”!
The president is a flat out liar.
Sotomayer did make the racist statement
about Latinas being able to come to a
better conclusion than White Males.
What part of that statement was taken
out of context?
Sotomayer did say that it was ok to
legislate from the bench.
She even caught herself and tried to
make light of her remark.
What part of that comment was taken
out of context?
Her decision in the New Haven Conn
Firefighters case clearly ignored the
racist decision denying the firefighters
there well earned promotions!
The only one distorting things here is
the president who seems to think he
is a god who must be obeyed blindlessly
and never questioned!
Enjoy it now Mr President you’ll be
voted out in 2012! Count on it!

Posted by: reaganfan | May 30, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Re: “SHE was the one that made the ethnic emphasis in a speech and shown bias in her rulings.”
She hasn’t shown any bias in her rulings. She rules based on the law. You just don’t like the law.

Posted by: bubbles | May 30, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Sotomayor is a member of La Raza, a radical hispanic activist group getting federal funding fron the U.S. La Raza translates to “The Race”
Their ideology is “Everything for The Race, NOTHING for the rest.
She is not fit to serve on Any COURT IN THE LAND. Anybody trying to spin this blatant travesty is either a complete ignoramus, or evil.

Posted by: badger | May 30, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

badger:”Sotomayor is a member of La Raza, a radical hispanic activist group getting federal tax dollar funding from the U.S. La Raza translates to “The Race”
Their ideology is “Everything for The Race, NOTHING for the rest.”
What nonsense. The National Council of La Raza has never used, and publicly and unequivocally has rejected the motto “Por La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada.” Please cite your baseless slander.

Posted by: jhw539 | May 30, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

She will be approved but it is nothing but another campaign promise being completed. Lets omit that the administration is playing the political game at a different level. In instead of this issue we should be concern with his willingness to get chummy with our enemies and alienate our friends.

Posted by: William | May 30, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

The conservatives believe the courts belong to them? I hope you don’t feel this way Jake?

Posted by: Robert | May 30, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

I think the first play in the “political game” was when Obama selected Sotomayor based on her favorable demographics. Hypocrisy seems to be his specialty.

Posted by: paul | May 30, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

This guy can’t do anything right. I never thought I’d see the day when this great country would fall for an idiot like Obama. God help us.

Posted by: CJ | May 31, 2009, 2:03 am 2:03 am

INCOMING>>>>>
There seems to be a rather large right wing presence on this ABC blog. Does anybody know what happened to the Main Stream Media’s Liberal bias? Well, at least, ‘Google Alerts’ gets it right!
Could it be that the reason why Conservative extremists do not understand that their slander & lies hurt other people, is that 90% of them can not accurately define “empathy”.
In practice, this would indicate that the term ‘Conservative Empathy’, is an oxymoron.

Posted by: SirScud | May 31, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

of.. Painting Distorted Picture..
“Surely all art is a lie,”

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | May 31, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

..everyone is begging for mercy, but no one knows the meaning of the word..

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | May 31, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Distorted pictures, I would say the pictures can not be more clear….
Norman Thomas Quote:
“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of ‘liberalism’ they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.”
Sotomayor quoted Thomas on her year book: ( a guy that ran 5 consc years for P of Socialist Party ) ” I am not a champion of lost causes, but causes not yet won ” I would say she got a good shot at her dreams now. She will have an very active agenda.
She will be pushing a active liberal agenda just like Obama is. Bye Bye, private industry, Wall street and free America. Just get used to it folks. Obama is painting a gruesome distorted picture just yesterday talking about GM, to the applaud of liberal slobbering bozos. He is in charge of GM and he wanst small cheap car for all americans periord! SEE? Liberal fast toward socialism agenda.

Posted by: ariaeye | June 2, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.