By Lindsey Ellerson

May 22, 2009 5:28pm

Obama Signs Credit Card Bill, Says Consumers and Lenders Need to Act More Responsibly

ABC News’ Karen Travers and Z. Byron Wolf report:

In a late afternoon Rose Garden ceremony, President Obama signed the “Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act,” or credit card bill of rights, and said card holders and card companies need to act responsibly when it comes to taking on and managing debt.

“We’re not going to give people a free pass, and we expect consumers to live within their means and pay what they owe, but we also expect financial institutions to act with the same sense of responsibility that the American people aspire to in their own lives,” he said.

The legislation passed Congress this week with overwhelming bipartisan support, a response to the groundswell of frustration nationwide at the confusing and perhaps deceptive rate hikes and fees levied by credit card companies for the slightest late payment or no reason at all.

The president was joined on stage for the signing by a dozen members of Congress including Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., and Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., chairman and ranking member respectively of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

Obama stressed that he does not excuse or condone consumers who have acted irresponsibly with their credit cards but noted that even responsible users have been hit with higher costs, when card companies increase rates or require card holders to pay down debt with the lowest interest rate first instead of the highest.

Obama said he wanted to be clear that the credit card companies do provide a valuable service, but they too need to act responsibly.

“We don’t begrudge them turning a profit,” the president said. “We just want to make sure that they do so while upholding basic standards of fairness, transparency and accountability.”

According to statistics from the Federal Reserve, credit card debt in the United States has increased by 25 percent in the last 10 years and reached $963 billion in January 2009. The average amount of credit card debt among families was $7,300 in 2007.

At the Rose Garden ceremony, Obama did not mention one controversial element of the bill – an amendment that gave states the power to allow loaded concealed weapons in national parks and shelve a long-standing National Park Service rule against weapons.

– Karen Travers and Z. Byron Wolf

User Comments

Way to go President Obama
Can’t wait to read all the wrongheaded remarks from the NO-P (Party of No)

Posted by: Omentum | May 22, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

“We’re not going to give people a free pass, and we expect consumers to live within their means and pay what they owe, but we also expect financial institutions to act with the same sense of responsibility that the American people aspire to in their own lives,” said the man who is quadrupaling the already-outrageous federal deficit.

Posted by: mesquito | May 22, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

THe Oh NO! Party strikes again. I’ll take the GOP (as sorry as that sounds) to the DNC anyday. I’m going to miss my rewards rebates.

Posted by: Kitty | May 22, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Practice fiscal responsibility at home. It’ll never happen in Washington DC.

Posted by: mad | May 22, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

I agree with mesquito. A reprimand from a President and Congress that do anything but live within their means and or budget? This Bill does not curtail interest rates. The Credit Card Companies can increase interest rates to 50% or even 75% if they want. The real issue and has been the real issue for the past two decades. The American spendable income is lowered. Wages have not only not kept up with Inflation, the wages have decreased on average. Prices are inflationary and the insurances we are forced to pay are covering less and less making us responsible for out of pocket expenses and deductibles. 1. We are paid less. 2. Insurances charge more and deliver less. 3. Financial, Insurance, and Retail corporations have no limit or caps on obscene profit. We have a crisis and next thing you know we are deeper in debt. This is wrong all wrong. We must fire every one in Washington. Every One! Vote for the candidate with the least amount of money spent on a marketed campaign. Vote for a candidate on issues and not charisma. Look at what you get when you do? It started with Reagan and has gotten progressively worse since.

Posted by: Clancy 49 | May 22, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Just act as responsibly as your government has acted for the past 80 years – pile on debt and spend like there is no tomorrow. Lesson learned.

Posted by: Wendy | May 22, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

I love it – mesquito and Omentum can only find fault in a law that is clearly in their own personal favor. Let’s completely deny the fact that this is law not only long overdue, but long over LOOKED by the Right Wing. It must be shotdown simply for being a good idea from a Democrat!
You two are TRULY Republican!

Posted by: Penner | May 22, 2009, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

mesquito, Obama didn’t do it by himself. Why don’t you ask your god GW Bush.

Posted by: Danny | May 22, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

The only thing I’ll be worried about frankly is to walk into a National Park–I mean what if I run into Cheney on a hunting expedition.

Posted by: Danny | May 22, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Yes by all means spend responsibly like Obama.
He has some nerve.
At least most of us know where our money is going–unlike the bill he signed.

Posted by: max | May 22, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Obama will not touch guns.
He is terrified of losing his popularity.
Once that is gone he is toast–and so is his money and power.

Posted by: ross | May 22, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

So when is Obama going to put a limit on how much we can borrow?
He thinks we are idiots totally incapable of free choice.

Posted by: lester | May 22, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

I hope Obama will continue with the self-righteous lectures.
I hope he keeps saying one thing/doing another.
The people Obama thinks are idiots (the American people) are waking up.
Look at California.
Obama is to arrogant to see the warning signs.

Posted by: millie | May 22, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Our President and Congresss should “act more responsibly” when it comes to passing a credit card bill that also allows guns into our National Parks. Obama should have rejected this bill until the gun provision was removed.
What a sham of legislation this is.

Posted by: Cassandra Washington | May 22, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Allowing Guns into the national parks was a bad idea I think!!!
Unfortunately this will mean that we will all have to carry guns when we go for a hike!!! I mean listen everyone has a primordial fear of running into a psycho on the trail, this will make it likely that the psycho will also be well armed if you do run into him, so the burden of protection yourself and your family is squarely on your shoulders!!! That was not a good idea at all!!!!

Posted by: wa | May 22, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Don’t you just love being lectured by this guy?

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | May 22, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

How long before the kooks start killing the wild life in the National Parks. I love how this law was passed with a credit card law. How stupid our government has become. We should be outraged but it doesn’t matter what we think. Time for us to implement layoffs in washington,

Posted by: emw511 | May 22, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Wow, some folks are waxing apoplectic. Look folks- concealed carry permits require money, time and effort…and the percentage of folks with one who end up performing crime is less than a percent- whereas the population in general has a criminal inclination rate of like 7 percent. So you will BE SAFER with armed AMERICANS nearby. They only want to be able to defend innocence if attacked. WHy do you freak out at your own heritage? It is like suicidal wackiness!

Posted by: charlie | May 22, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

So, Mr. President, when will there ever be a bill that is allowed to have the five day comment period you promised? This one didn’t, just like the ones that came before. Guess it was an “emergency” measure like that rushed stimulus package.
And I must couple my frustration with the president and his lecturing with even greater frustration at Congressional Republicans who inserted that ridiculous rider about the concealed weapons in national parks. It has nothing to do with credit card reform and it is a bad bad idea to boot. So why on earth did Tom Coburn propose this amendment, why did the Democratic leadership allow it to be passed, and why did the president sign the legislation with that silly amendment included?

Posted by: moderate | May 22, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

This is crazy!

Posted by: oscar | May 22, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

As a person with 800+ credit score and who pays in full each and every month, this is just one more thing “the man” has done to lower my lifestyle. At this point I am going to stop using credit cards because I will not get stuck for the irresponsible financial behavior of the loosers he wrote this for.

Posted by: CG | May 22, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

Mr. President, please stop blaming the people for the financial mess in this country. Blame the homeowners, blame the credit card holders, blame average Joes and Janes for trying to keep themselves and their families afloat. Let’s put the blame for all this where it belongs…greedy investors, banks, credit card companies, corporations, and financial houses. Everyone of these SOBs got billions in bailout money from the same people you’re blaming. Enough, people elected you, not these greedy slime bags. And what the people get?…13 bucks. I voted for you, but let’s not start looking more and more like the guy you replaced. You either represent the people’s interest or the slimebags interest. You can’t serve two masters. So far…the slime bags seem better represented.

Posted by: Jake | May 22, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

I am deeply puzzled by apologists for credit card companies and business
practices as usual just because they have been meekly accepted for so long. As many have pointed out, we as consumers have a basic sense of fairness that has been violated for the past several decades by such practices as 1) contracts we cannot read without highly specialized legal degrees, 2) suddenly changing the terms of contracts, 3) sudden and significant increases in fees and interest rates when we have fallen on hard times, and 4) sudden and significant increases in fees and interest rates through no fault of our own.
If cc companies were reasonable, there would be an intelligent business person at the other end of the phone line would come to reasonable terms with us when we are in financial trouble. Instead we get polite or impolite idiots trained to read scripts that either defer or ignore us. We are simply referred back to the terms of the contract, and there is often no central responsible person who can modify or make exception to these terms.
While we cannot make a single mistake, cc companies can be as capricious as they like–and what can we do about it? We could take our business elsewhere. Really? What about the unreasonable fees to close or transfer our accounts to another card? How different are other cards out there for people who are already in financial difficulty? Unless you have excellent credit, you will get just as usurious a deal elsewhere.
While it may be reasonable to penalized for our individual financial transgressions–it is absurdly unreasonable to be continuously punished for just a few mistakes. Human behavior is inherently flawed–even the most responsible of us occasionally misses one payment in 5 years.
Why would you set up a system so unforgiving unless you are intending to prey upon this natural human tendency with malicious intention. This is not how reasonable people treat one another

Posted by: ben | May 22, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

The problem with blind trust in the free market is the assumption that cc companies will freely disclose information necessary to the consumer to make informed decisions, will freely explain the terms of their contracts, and will not collude so that there are reasonable alternative opportunities for consumers with less than perfect credit scores.
Excessive faith that the market can do no wrong is stupidity. This is why we need government regulations to make sure there is a fair playing field for consumers who have little negotiating power on a one-to-one basis with any given company.
This is the business model we have come to accept simply because it is the status quo–and there are so few exceptions. We have changed the status quo. It is not the end of capitalism–just hopefully the end of sheepish acceptance of such monstrous business practices.
Of course responsibility goes both ways. You cannot point the finger in just one direction. Apologists are correct in that we have not been “forced” to rack up excessive debts. There is a lot of individual responsibility involved–including those of us who buy into the need to live beyond our means, who wouldn’t read the contract even if it was in plain English, and who are not disciplined enough to manage their own finances. But this is a minority.
According to the 2009 Consumer Financial Literacy Survey, by the National Foundation for Credit Counseling(NFCC), 70% of Americans pay their bills on time and have no debts in collection. Of the remaining 30%,
20% sometimes miss a payment but have no debts in collection. So it is truly only a minority who get in over
their heads and end up defaulting and going into bankruptcy. I know of people in this latter category, and
they should not have received credit cards in the first place–one is mentally ill. Perhaps with this
legislation, credit card companies will be more selective in offering their services–like a reasonable and responsible bank would with a loan.

Posted by: ben | May 22, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

I have to agree- this is crazy. My CC company sent me a notice that as of 4/10 my interest rate will go from 0.079% to a variable rate of .149% over prime rate. I have never been late on a payment and it is highly unusual to carry a balance for more than three months, and I have always paid the interest plus a chunk on the outstanding balance. In other words, the CC company has done pretty well with me as a client. So why am I being punished for those who can’t control their impulse buying?
As far as guns in the Nat’l Parks, it should not have been wrapped around a bill regarding credit cards; it’s too important an issue on its own. AND IT’S ABOUT TIME! Those who worry that now psychos will have guns in the parks should know that they ALREADY HAD THEM! As far as worrying about the wild life being shot up, poachers, etc. those things are already happening, and most often the game is taken for food. Believe it or not, some people still live in the mountains and depend on game to live. And, whether you accept the facts of life or not, thinning out herds (or other types of game) in an area is healthy for the herd when natural preditors have been eliminated in one way or another. It’s why state parks allow hunting during specific times of the year. If you don’t believe this, ask your local conservation officer.
Allowing law abiding citizens to carry firearms for their safety and protection make all the sense in the world. Guns keep the potential preditor(and I don’t mean bears and mountain lions) honest. As a gun owner with a carry permit, I am safer and you, by extension, are safer as well; you as a park visitor are in less danger than if I were unarmed because that “pscho” never knows if he will eat the business end of a .45 if he tries to attack someone. If you don’t think there was a rationale for allowing firearms in the Nat’l Parks, look up some of the crime statistics (robbery, rape, aggravated assault, assault with a deadly weapon and the list goes on). It’s the same story as in the cities, suburbs and rural areas- the police can’t be everywhere and neither can the Park Rangers.

Posted by: DoubleE | May 22, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

I only hope I am not penalized with additional fees for not incurring any charges or late payments.

Posted by: deanbob | May 22, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

any one seen polosi ? cant believe she isnt spewing republican hate any more she must be hiding in the top secret bunker oops used to be top secret bunker under bidens residence , i mis her coming out and saying im outraged

Posted by: i_dream_of_a_jeannie | May 22, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

This bill does nothing in my favor, Penner, as I don’t carry a balance on my cards and have never had to worry about “surprise” charges because I actually read the cardholder agreement that gets sent in the mail every couple months. And when the bankcard companies start piling on annual fees, cutting back on rewards programs, and adding per use fees to every debit card transaction to make up for lost income it will work against me and many others. The Party of D’oh once again tries to compensate for the mostly self-inflicted problems of the few by picking the pockets of the largely responsible many.

Posted by: Publius | May 22, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

This bill is a joke. It contains little that actually benefits consumers. Making the terms readable is like putting warning labels on cigarette packages. The addicted do not care what the small print says. If these clowns wanted real reform they could bring back some sensible usury laws. That would help people. This bill does nothing but blow smoke.

Posted by: MadJayhawk | May 23, 2009, 1:28 am 1:28 am

I never heard Bush trying to protect the American consumer. Did he ever?

Posted by: garcia | May 23, 2009, 1:47 am 1:47 am

Without a cap on interest rates, this bill is “just words” and another photo op for our president.

Posted by: babs | May 23, 2009, 2:43 am 2:43 am

I only hope I am not penalized with additional fees for not incurring any charges or late payments.
Posted by: deanbob | May 22, 2009 10:53:18 PM===========Actually you will be. When Chase upped my interest from 11.0 to 29.99% I pulled and paid off the card. I then planned revenge. I kept the card open, did not close the account. I charge 10 to 20$ every month and pay off every month. Revenge because it costs them more to process my payment. In the same month I had the card paid off-balance to zero- they charged me 1.00 for a zero balance, and never sent me a bill. Fortunately I kept the account open and checked on the internet. If I hadn’t checked, I would owe them $40 with the $39 late payment, plus they ruin my credit. Now I make certain I have at least a $10 balance and pay it every month. After this story it is my hope many of you will understand this bill is just blowing smoke to protect the predatory credit card companies and does nothing for the consumer. These are predatory credit practices and nothing in this bill stops it. The working tax payer is still expected to bleed for the wealthy.

Posted by: Clancy 49 | May 23, 2009, 6:59 am 6:59 am

wa said: ” I mean listen everyone has a primordial fear of running into a psycho on the trail, this will make it likely that the psycho will also be well armed if you do run into him, so the burden of protection yourself and your family is squarely on your shoulders!!! That was not a good idea at all!!!!”
wa, the ‘psycho’ will not have a concealed carry permit anyway, he will have some untraceable gun he bought off the street (or a knife, or a machete, or some other weapon). This law will not change THEIR behavior, except to possibly act as a deterrent. This law allows responsible gun owners to be able to defend themselves from the ‘psycho’. And the burden of protecting yourself and your loved ones is ALWAYS on you, you should NOT count on the authorities to be there at the exact moment when a bad situation arises. Please, educate yourself…..

Posted by: SearamblerOne | May 23, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am

When I became disabled my income was cut in half after a few months of no income. A year later I went a few more months with no income. Needless to say our savings soon dried up while the bills pilled up. Our credit card bills were around $20,000. Every week we got offers for zero interest cards so we took advantage of them. It took about 5 years but now I can pay off the bill every month. It can be done, you just have to try.
I hate riders which have nothing to do with the original bill. In this case it needed to happen, I just don’t like the way it happened.
Forest or city, one is about as dangerous as the other and I carry a .45 in both places.

Posted by: Oonogil | May 23, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Ben writes: “I am deeply puzzled by apologists for credit card companies and business
practices as usual just because they have been meekly accepted for so long.”
****************************************
Ah….the victim mentality rules the day. We all have a constitutional right to a credit card with a low interest rate and help when we get in financial trouble????? If you can’t pay the bills…..don’t buy the frills on credit.
On a least three occasions over the last 5 – 10 years I have had a late payment fee added to one of my CC accounts. I call the company up to have the fee removed. They balk and I immediately tell them I want to close the account. The fee gets removed. Am I serious about closing it?? Right on skippy…….I can get another one in a heartbeat.
If you get sucked into the debt trap….please don’t blame the CC companies…….look in the mirror. Ever seen how much CC debt gets wiped out by bankruptcy and uncollected accounts? If you did you might understand why CC’s are high interest and fee driven ventures…..they are risky to any lender.

Posted by: socialism101 | May 23, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Is it a good thing that Americans have almost a trillion dollars in credit card debt? Is it?
If the answer is no, then doesn’t it make sense to offer credit card paydown incentives?
This reform bill is much ado about little. Besides focusing on incentive based credit card debt paydown programs, the right to OPT OUT when a bank makes a change in terms is not in this bill.
They came up with a “compromise” Opt out option, but even that aspect was not intelligently written.

Posted by: Alessandro Machi | May 23, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

if you pay your balance in full each month, why are you even reading this…
directing payments to balances with higher rates does help people (i.e. senseless people taking out cash), for one thing…
not charging the default rate for one day late is a big help for the morons who depend on mail or cant figure out how to work a pc (or if “i didn’t get my statement” – look online tard, you know you have a payment due)…60 days b4 the default rate applies is wonderful, actually.
i thinks its hilarious it doesn’t cap interest rates…how about don’t borrow money if you cant pay it back in a timely manner…or how about don’t borrow it if you have a crappy rate?
as a supervisor at major cc issuer, i can see that this will help millions, but it wont help people who don’t carry a balance (DUH) or that use their cards incredibly irresponsibly…such as those who take a 1000.00 cash advance then call and bitch about the interest – you knew what you were doing, but you did it anyway
so, regardless of how good/bad/etc you may think it is…it’s still 100% more helpful than ANYTHING BUSH DID for the consumer…that ownership society thing didnt work out so well…

Posted by: djm420 | May 23, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Consumers and Lenders acting responsibly.. POTUS, you are in the U.S. of A.!!

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | May 23, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

yeah, I want to hear from a CC “Supervisor”, as if your opinion matters. The attitude you present is amazing considering you wouldn’t have a job if people did what you suggested, and left their loved ones to die from lack of medical treatment, lost their business because an emergency happened, paid for their children’s tuition, or paid to bury someone who died unexpectedly.
How dare these people complain about the credit card rate, is that what you are saying?

Posted by: Alessandro Machi | May 23, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

I am very happy that some of the greed of credit card companies is being reined in with this bill.Before anyone feels sorry for their profit margin, remember that beside the interest and fee they charge the user, they also take a percentage of every purchase you make from the store’s profits. In reality everything we buy is more expensive because of credit card usage.
The amendment about loaded guns in national parks is a bad idea for the simple reason that many campers are also drinking alcohol. We’ll be hearing about angry drunks with lethal weapons shooting each other or innocent people. We’ll be hearing about half-drunk campers or panicky types mistaking something moving as a wild ani mal that is endangering them when in fact it is a person hiking. The mistaken identity problem happens a lot amongst hunters already. The woods is looking a lot less friendly today.

Posted by: Lydia | May 23, 2009, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

I would love to hear Joe Biden’s opinion on this bill being passed..
The former Senator from Delaware, The Usury State.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | May 24, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am

CC companies start charging a monthly fee to make up for loss money – Responsible people dump their cards – CC companies up monthly fee to make up for loss – More responsible people dump their cards – only the irresponsible people are all that is left with CC – CC companies “banks go bankrupt” – markets crash.
We have seen this before. “Let’s make it so anyone can get a Home” This will not end well trust me.
Obama has no idea what he is doing.

Posted by: countdowntotheend | May 24, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Doesn’t go far enough!

Posted by: LongT | May 24, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Alessandro, is the world so black and white? victim mentality versus personal responsibility? As you can see from the
rest of my post, I think there are many ways of looking at this issue, and there is plenty of blame/responsibility to go around. Your strawman arguments that there is no constitutional
right to a low interest credit cards and to financial aid is irrelevant.
Nobody has claimed or inferred such rights. Personally I find it
more difficult and less efficient to live without one–though I use
cash and debit whenever possible. But try going on a road trip
without being able to book a hotel in advance, try renting a car or flying. Try buying a house. I’m not saying we have a right to any particular financial activity–just that our society is heavily dependent upon this structure which relies upon building a financial credit history in part through our use of credit cards. You can’t ignore this reality and argue that people should not use credit cards.
Also you assume that those who get into financial trouble are all
buying “frills” they cannot afford. As others have pointed out, some
people only use large cash advances as a last-chance loan when they
are in dire straits after losing a job or suffering a major unavoidable
health problem.
If such people are initially willing and able to pay the already high rates, but later find themselves drowning in fees and even higher rates, why would you assume they are automatically being fiscally irresponsible?
But if cc companies prey on such people by waiting for any small misstep to royally screw them–as I argue they do, then I find such behavior morally corrupt.
I don’t care if you’re unsympathetic
to such people–the problem exists and we deserves fair and reasonable
rules to play by and to keep unscrupulous lenders in check.
Your sympathy for the poor cc companies who eat bad debts is misplaced–instead of inferring a link, why don’t you look up how much CC debt gets wiped out by bankruptcy? Under Bush and the Republicans, legislation pushed by cc companies made it much more difficult to declare personal bankruptcy. You assume that these debts are the reason
for extraordinary fees and interest rates, but why don’t you question
the premise that cc companies are entitled to extraordinary profits
in the first place?

Posted by: ben | May 24, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Thats rich! You telling us to spend responsibly?!
Pot, meet Kettle.

Posted by: texaskelly | May 25, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Ben writes: “Also you assume that those who get into financial trouble are all
buying “frills” they cannot afford. As others have pointed out, some
people only use large cash advances as a last-chance loan when they
are in dire straits after losing a job or suffering a major unavoidable
health problem.”
****************************************
No, Ben I don’t assume this but you and I both know that CC abuse is generally driven by “materialistic” wants in a society that promotes buy now and pay later. But even if your premise is correct, what right does an individual who gets into dire straits have to say “It’s not my fault I borrowed the money, so I get a break”? This sense of entitlement in the USA is killing the country. Bad things do happen to good people…..and Americans are very very generous to help those in need. What you are promoting is forced assistance from private industry to those in need.
I have been in the bankruptcy arena for many years……I have seen both sides of the issue. I am no fan of CC companies nor most large businesses…..but I can tell you that CC abuse is primarily a greed/want driven problem. As far as your argument about congress making it harder to file bankruptcy, that is a myth……it may be harder to file a Chapter 7 now if your income level is high enough, but bankruptcy filings in Chapter 13 are still available. In many of those cases CC debts (that are unsecured obligations) are generally paid at a very low percentage of what is owed.

Posted by: socialism101 | May 25, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

I will provide some basic pieces of knowledge. When you put something, on a credit card, the bank that backs your credit card pays the merchant and you are getting a loan from the bank and must pay back according to the terms of agreement of the card. A credit card’s terms is the contract you agree too when you apply for the bank’s card; it is really a simple truth, read the terms and yes even the small print, if you agree sign away if not don’t apply. If you do apply, do not cry later when the terms of the contract are enforced.
To the person that wants to roll back the debt, why not return everything you ever bought on a credit card in mint condition and get a refund to your card. You bought the stuff, used the stuff, and now must pay for the stuff.

Posted by: jennifer silver | July 5, 2009, 2:58 am 2:58 am

That’s going to make me credit and debit card efficient.

Posted by: Tom Matthews | August 22, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.