Obama To Navy Grads: No Choice Between Security and Ideals
ABC News’ Yunji de Nies and Sunlen Miller report:
President Obama delivered his third commencement address of the graduation season at the United States Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md.
“This class is about to become the latest link in a long, unbroken chain of heroism and victory,” the president told the graduating class of 1036. “Of all the privileges of serving as president, I have no greater honor than serving as your commander in chief."
Speaking at the Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium, the president said that at a time when too few citizens answer the call to service — especially during a war — these men and women should be honored, in addition to those who have done so in the past.
“As we near Memorial Day, we pay tribute to all those who have given their lives so that we might live free, including those aboard that navy helicopter who were lost this week in the waters off California. We send our prayers to their families and all who loved them.”
Describing a culture that is leaning more toward chasing “outward markers of success” like “titles and status materialism and money, fame and popularity” Mr. Obama said the graduates have shown that they have embraced the virtues that the United States needs right now — “Self-discipline over self-interest. Work over comfort. Character over celebrity.”
“After an era when so many institutions and individuals acted with such greed and recklessness, it is no wonder that our military remains the most trusted institution in the nation,” Mr. Obama said, “And in a world when so many forces and voices seek to divide us, it is inspiring that this class came together and succeeded together, from every state and every corner of the world.”
Largely avoiding politics, the president made only a brief mention of his speech yesterday at the National Archives in which he responded to the recent debate over the administration’s policy on Guantanamo Bay, detainees, and larger national security issues.
“I went there because as our nation debates how to deal with the security challenges that we face, we must remember this enduring truth: the values and ideals in those documents are not simply words written into aging parchment, they are the bedrock of our liberty and our security. We uphold our fundamental principles and values not just because we choose to, but because we swear to. Not because they feel good, but because they help keep us safe.”
The president said that the midshipmen’s pledge today as they become officers is the pledge to protect both the nation’s security and ideals. He, in turn, promised the graduates that he would not send them into war without the proper resources.
“And, today, this is the promise I make to you. It’s a promise that as long as I am your commander in chief, I will only send you into harm’s way when it is absolutely necessary, and with the strategy, the well-defined goals, the equipment and the support you need to get the job done.”
Amid scattered applause, the president said that this included the promise to bring the Iraq war to a responsible end and defeat al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
“We will also ensure you can meet the missions of today, which is why we’ve halted reductions in Navy personnel and increased the size of the Marine Corps. And we will ensure you can meet the missions of tomorrow, which is why we’re investing in the capabilities and technologies — the littoral combat ships, the most advanced submarines and fighter aircraft — so that you have what you need to succeed.”
The president recalled the Bravery of the U.S. Navy off the seas of Somalia last month with the pirate situation and the USS Bainbridge. The president said that after Captain Phillip was freed, he spoke to a number of the Navy SEALS who were there, as well as the skipper of the USS Bainbridge.
“The extraordinary precision and professionalism displayed that day was made possible, in no small measure, by the training, the discipline and the leadership skills that so many of those officers learned at the United States Naval Academy,” Mr. Obama said. “The success of that day belongs not only to a single commander or a small team of SEALs. It belongs to the many. It belongs to all the sailors — officers and enlisted, not on one ship, but several — who diligently stood their watch.”
The president -– not famous for his gift-giving ability -– may have brought a gift that at least pleased the midshipmen.
“All midshipmen on restriction for minor conduct offenses are hereby officially absolved,” the president joked amid cheers. “I did say minor.”
Former campaign rival, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., was in the crowd with his family to watch the graduation of John “Jack” Sidney McCain IV, a forth generation graduate of the academy in the McCain family. The president made no mention of his former campaign foe or his son at the McCain family’s request.
– Yunji de Nies and Sunlen Miller

Email
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Romney Makes His Case to Conservatives at CPAC
“Describing a culture that is leaning more toward chasing “outward markers of success” like “titles and status materialism and money, fame and popularity…”
Hmm…was he describing the professional political class?
Posted by: tjp612 | May 22, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Obama’s “ideals” call for the deconstruction and destruction of the US.
Of course he would pick that over security, so for him it is no choice.
As he proceeds to hand off GM to his union supporters, loaded with yet another 30 Billion US taxpayer dollars, bringing us well over 100 billion total. As he and Geithner set up a “shell” company to pay the debts of GM, the taxpayer is blithely unaware of this corrupt form of robbery, now institutionalized by the Obama administration.
The liberal Washington Post phrases all this in such a pretty way that you think it is just fabulous.
Keep bending over folks, the new cap and tax bill should pass today, WRITTEN BY LOBBYISTS WHO WILL GAIN FINANCIALLY, and it will cost families up to $2000/year in energy and other costs.
Lets tack on that new price for a car going up 1600-7000 based on new auto standards.
Lets wrap it up with the new union owned automakers sending the jobs to China and Mexico.
So all the billions we paid as taxpayers was simply a special interest payment to secure Obama power, and the AUTOWORKER JOBS WERE LOST ANYWAY.
Obama literally stole the company from the investors, gave hundreds of billions in taxpayer dollars to the autocompanies, and then wrapped it in a bow AND GAVE IT TO THE UNIONS WHO GIVE HIM MONEY AND SUPPORT IN ELECTIONS.
Obama needs to go to jail. The public would never tolerate this but his Obamedia skews the reporting to cover for him.
Oh, by the way, on D-Day he will be in Germany apologizing for our part in WWII.
Obama was raised in indonesia, traveled frequently to the mideast, bowed to the saudi king in a manner that seemed second nature, as though he had done it before and often.
This poseur does not have the best interest of the US in mind. He is dangerous and you kool aid drinkers better wake up.
Posted by: MNM | May 22, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Barack Obama, November 10, 2007:
“As President, I will end the war in Iraq. We will have our troops home in sixteen months. I will close Guantanamo. I will restore habeas corpus.”
Two outright lies and a promise he has no clue as to how to keep.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | May 22, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
In 2007, Obama said, “That’s easy. Close down Guantanamo.” On Thursday, he said, “Let me be blunt: There are no neat or easy answers here.”
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | May 22, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Describing a culture that is leaning more toward chasing “outward markers of success” like “titles and status materialism and money, fame and popularity” – Obama
——-
Didn’t Obama just describe himself here? Has he no sense of irony?
Posted by: OxyCon | May 22, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Can Obama get an idea across without trashing Americans in the process?
Great to hear he told people headed to war that there’s no choice to be made between security and values. Spoken like someone who’s never had to face the moral vagueness and uncertainty in the cold, hard reality of the physical world.
The individual pursuits of happiness are precisely what these midshipmen will be defending. Why trash it?
All they need to hear from Obama is “I will never tie your hands behind your back. I will be loyal to you and support you and never sacrifice you or your welfare for politics or my ego. I will believe the word of my troops over that of the enemy or it’s propaganda arm, the media.”
He’s still living in another dimension. These are people who have been trained for four years to internalize the John Paul Jones spirit:
“Give me a fast boat, for I intend to go in harm’s way.”
No more lectures on values and principles please. The last people who need such lectures or reminders are the U.S. military. That’s why they’re they’re the must trusted institution.
Posted by: jordan | May 22, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
MNM – You must lead a very sad life with all that anger in you…or just may just enjoy wallowing with Rush and the boys.
Posted by: tunetowngirl | May 22, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Headline: ??????????????????????????
Posted by: Parallax View | May 22, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Gotta love the Brownshirt tactics of Falwell’s right wing school.
Liberty University has revoked its recognition of the campus Democratic Party club, saying “we are unable to lend support to a club whose parent organization stands against the moral principles held by” the university.
“It kind of happened out of nowhere,” said Brian Diaz, president of LU’s student Democratic Party organization, which LU formally recognized in October.
Diaz said he was notified of the school’s decision May 15 in an e-mail from Mark Hine, vice president of student affairs.
According to the e-mail, the club must stop using the university’s name, holding meetings on campus, or advertising events. Violators could incur one or more reprimands under the school’s Liberty Way conduct code, and anyone who accumulates 30 reprimands is subject to expulsion.
Hine said late Thursday that the university could not sanction an official club that supported Democratic candidates.
“We are in no way attempting to stifle free speech.”
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.
Posted by: Ryan C | May 22, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
“Oh, by the way, on D-Day he will be in Germany apologizing for our part in WWII.”
Ahh yes the right wing lie created by one blog picked up by others that even the lunatics at free republic doubted.
Posted by: Ryan C | May 22, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
“In 2007, Obama said, “That’s easy. Close down Guantanamo.” On Thursday, he said, “Let me be blunt: There are no neat or easy answers here.””
Fascist hyena parroted Byron York everyone, let’s give him a hand!
Oh course its clear from context (not provided by York of course) that Obama is stating the question of his position on Gitmo is easy and he stated his position.
He did not claim that closing Gitmo would be easy.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.
Posted by: Ryan C | May 22, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
ryan c…That’s like calling the kettle black, “right wingers lie.” Please direct your attention to the topic above, “Pelosi wants to move on……” They all lie at one time or another, even liberals/liberal politicians such as yourself: Machiavelli’s The End Justifies the Means. Just depends on which side of the fence you sit on whether it is a lie or the means…Geez do I have to do all the thinking around here!!!!
Posted by: Parallax View | May 22, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Ryan C wrote, “The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.”
—————————————
Unlike left wingers, who NEVER lie, and speak nothing but the gospel truth.
Posted by: tony | May 22, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Obama is a way better spokes man then bush could ever been and the american public is really aboard with him , and you right right wing head-cases lost the election with your go at it alone mentality,and he is not apologizing to anyone, after the last eight years with the guy all of you voted for twice , how could President obama make any mistakes and it will be pure joy at seeing that blowhard Rush fail at seeing the president fail Obama/Biden 2012. Semper fi to all the navy/marine graduates at the naval academy today.
Posted by: KWOLF443 | May 22, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Obama lies. Pelosi lies. They must be right wingers.
Posted by: Cryan | May 22, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
ryan c…There you go again, trying to justify the means..lying is lying the same definition applies toward dems and repubs..try to find a better tag line cause this one just isn’t working anymore..people are basically fed up with both liberals and conservatives spin
Posted by: Parallax View | May 22, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
“Obama is stating the question of his position on Gitmo is easy and he stated his position. He did not claim that closing Gitmo would be easy.”
I’d like to earn a million dollars this year. I’m not claiming it will be easy.
Posted by: tjp612 | May 22, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
How gracious would it have been for Obama to mention the McCain family’s four generations of service in the Navy?
Posted by: Mondo | May 22, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
The greatest commonality we share is ethical misconduct of the middle/core bureaucracy. An uncaring and unjust judicial system has converted law to one which is damaging the general public. At present, it operates to ensnare the most vulnerable people in a growing industry. It’s a feeding trough for unethical lawyers and other “fiduciaries” appointed by the courts to protect, many of whom nothing more than predators. Courts set up various parties to exploit deaths, taking advantage with the dissolving and breakup of families. It’s quite an industry, court officers feeding income to state officials with a few select others thrown in. Try and file criminal charges against a court officer, executor or trustee and see where it gets you.”
Posted by: laird | May 22, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Excellent, detailed coverage of the event. Thank you for doing some journalism!
Posted by: Lightduty | May 22, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Nice to have a commander in chief who didn’t go AWOL. How could any military person keep a straight face when the wimpy daddy’s boy spoke? And Cheney had 5 deferments so he wouldn’t have to serve. No wonder they had no problem sending our kids to die.
Posted by: Ron | May 22, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Gotta be in the military to go AWOL Ron…
Posted by: Parallax View | May 22, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
“ryan c…There you go again, trying to justify the means..lying is lying the same definition applies toward dems and repubs”
I didn’t mention Republicans or Democrats.
In fact, debating lying politicians is a waste of time.
I am talking about the right wing media and the right wing parrots it that chat here.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.
Posted by: Ryan C | May 22, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Obama:“And, today, this is the promise I make to you. It’s a promise that as long as I am your commander in chief, I will only send you into harm’s way when it is absolutely necessary, and with the strategy, the well-defined goals, the equipment and the support you need to get the job done.”
=======
What he won’t be able to control are his political rivals back home accusing him of doing these very things for their own partisan gains.
He’ll also have to hope partisans in Congress don’t vote to cut funding for his war when they’ve tired of it.
Posted by: MayBee | May 22, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
1. “I’ve heard occasional speculation that I’m a different man after 9/11. I wouldn’t say that, but I’ll freely admit that watching a coordinated, devastating attack on our country from an underground bunker at the White House can affect how you view your responsibilities.”
2. “The first attack on the World Trade Center was treated as a law- enforcement problem, with everything handled after the fact: arrests, indictments, convictions, prison sentences, case closed.”
3. “By presidential decision last month, we saw the selective release of documents relating to enhanced interrogations. This is held up as a bold exercise in open government, honoring the public’s right to know. We’re informed as well that there was much agonizing over this decision. Yet somehow, when the soul searching was done and the veil was lifted on the policies of the Bush administration, the public was given less than half the truth.”
4. “It’s hard to imagine a worse precedent filled with more possibilities for trouble and abuse than to have an incoming administration criminalize the policy decisions of its predecessor. Apart from doing a serious injustice to intelligence operators and lawyers, who deserve far better for their devoted service, the danger here is a loss of focus on national security and what it requires.”
5. “We had a lot of blind spots after the attacks on our country, things we didn’t know about al Qaeda. We didn’t know about al Qaeda’s plans, but Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and a few others did know. And with many thousands of innocent lives potentially in the balance, we did not think it made sense to let the terrorists answer questions in their own good time, if they answered them at all.”
6. “On his second day in office, President Obama announced he was closing the detention facility at Guantanamo. This step came with little deliberation, and no plan. Now the president says some of these terrorists should be brought to American soil for trial in our court system. Others, he says, will be shipped to third countries; but so far, the United States has had little luck getting other countries to take hardened terrorists.”
7. “The administration has found that it’s easy to receive applause in Europe for closing Guantanamo, but it’s tricky to come up with an alternative that will serve the interest of justice and America’s national security.”
8. “If fine speechmaking, appeals to reason, or pleas for compassion had the power to move them, the terrorists would long ago have abandoned the field.”
9. “It’s worth recalling that ultimate power of declassification belongs to the president himself. President Obama has used his declassification authority to reveal what happens in the interrogation of terrorists. Now let him use that same power to show Americans what did not happen thanks to the good work of our intelligence officials.”
10. “To the very end of our administration, we kept al-Qaeda terrorists busy with other problems. We focused on getting their secrets instead of sharing ours with them. And on our watch, they never hit this country again. After the most lethal and devastating terrorist attack ever, 7- 1/2 years without a repeat is not a record to be rebuked and scorned, much less criminalized.”
Posted by: Leadership Versus Celebrity | May 22, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
“To the very end of our administration, we kept al-Qaeda terrorists busy with other problems. We focused on getting their secrets instead of sharing ours with them. And on our watch, they never hit this country again. After the most lethal and devastating terrorist attack ever, 7- 1/2 years without a repeat is not a record to be rebuked and scorned, much less criminalized”
We were able to close the barn dooor after the horse got out and dammit we will not apologize for that!
Cheney is a moron.
Posted by: Ryan C | May 22, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Let’s pray for our future mid-shipmen. Burdened with the indecisions from the Commander-in-Indeciding!
Posted by: Mphilly | May 22, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Two great lines from Cheney’s speech:
8. “If fine speechmaking, appeals to reason, or pleas for compassion had the power to move them, the terrorists would long ago have abandoned the field.”
9. “It’s worth recalling that ultimate power of declassification belongs to the president himself. President Obama has used his declassification authority to reveal what happens in the interrogation of terrorists. Now let him use that same power to show Americans what did not happen thanks to the good work of our intelligence officials.”
Posted by: tjp612 | May 22, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Obama is right on the money. We do not have to choose between protecting the nation and living by our ideals. They are inextricably tied together. Anyone who tells you that they are mutually exclusive is dangerous.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 22, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Ryan C Then I’m I too assume that you are saying not all Republicans are “Right Wingers” and not all Democrats are “Left-Wingers,” something the majority of people believe. This is a good thing, it is the people that put so much credence into both the right wing media and left wing media that are taking apart both parties and leaving moderates out JUST MY OPINION. And you have now earned you name in upper caps..But it is NOT a waste of time debating lying politicians, how else will we discover if they are fit for public office??? Know thy enemy…
Posted by: Parallax View | May 22, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
7. “The administration has found that it’s easy to receive applause in Europe for closing Guantanamo, but it’s tricky to come up with an alternative that will serve the interest of justice and America’s national security.”
————————————–
Bravo, Mr. Cheney! Great truth to that statement. With BHO, it’s all about making nice with Europe and being loved.
A typical Blame America First Leftist!
Posted by: SunnyR | May 22, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
We uphold our fundamental principles and values not just because we choose to, but because we swear to. Not because they feel good, but because they help keep us safe.”
==========
I’d like to explore the idea that our fundamental principles keep us safe.
I’ve always thought the principles in our Constitution keep us safe from the government, but not so much from our fellow citizens or citizens of other countries.
We actually have a pretty high crime rate, especially compared to more despotic, less free countries. There’s certainly no gang crimes or terrorist attacks going on in say, North Korea.
At least many of President Obama’s supporters are willing to say they believe it is more important not to do EITs than to stop a bomb plot in LA. That’s the price of a free society, they say.
Would that President Obama would be willing to state as much.
Posted by: MayBee | May 22, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
President Obama
Thank you for telling our brave men and woman you wont send them in harms way unless absolultley necessary, at least we know our men and woman wont be killed because you fail to pay attention to intelligence or you dont have some sort of revenge thing
Posted by: Angie in Pa | May 22, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Did Obama tell them that he wanted America to surrender and now wants to fight a undefinable war in Afghanistan since he has no clue.
Posted by: woe | May 22, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Obama is a fool in over his head….
Posted by: Lumberman_63 | May 22, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Did the President who promised to take the troops out of Iraq tell these grads that they don’t need to worry about a trip to Baghdad?
Posted by: Shawn | May 22, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
The Obama Doctrine articulated today:
“And, today, this is the promise I make to you. It’s a promise that as long as I am your commander in chief, I will only send you into harm’s way when it is absolutely necessary, and with the strategy, the well-defined goals, the equipment and the support you need to get the job done.”
We should demand this kind of pledge from every person who serves as Commander-in-Chief. What parent with a child in the military would settle for anything less?
Posted by: hopesprings52 | May 22, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
At least Obama has not invaded any countries for absolutely no reason. Bush lost 5000 Americans in Iraq in addition to the 3000 that were killed on his watch on 911.
Posted by: Jim Bob | May 22, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
I generally support Obama on his stance in national security but I disagree with his notion that there is no choice between our security and our ideals. If there is genuinely no choice, these naval graduates would not have to agonize over the proper thing to do when faced with that choice. It’s the lack of putting thought into action that leads us to compromising our principles. Mr. Obama should be saying that there is often a conflict between our security and our ideals. To deny the conflict is to paint the picture as black and white.
Posted by: t961585 | May 22, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
I’m sure the troops in Iraq are comforted by their Commander in Chief who thinks they are fighting an unnecessary war.
Obama in every speech is pompous and self-righteous.
Why didn’t he come right out and blame Bush for creating such a mess for him.
Or remind the grads of how he was born in a log cabin.
What a self-absorbed jerk.
Posted by: riley | May 22, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Posted by: t961585
=========
Yes. Exactly.
Posted by: MayBee | May 22, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Refreshing to see that the Navy grads weren’t high on kool-aid like the Notre Dame grads.
Maybe because their life actually depends on the rationality of Obama’s decisions.
He has cut the defense budget and seems view the terrorist as victims.
Do they really trust this president?
Posted by: max | May 22, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Benjamin Franklin stated it eloquently – “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” – Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759. Basically, it is easier to surrender one’s ideals and to say that the ends justify the means, but to do so means you have to give up a piece of your humanity and your patriotism.
Posted by: DaveM | May 22, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
“Ryan C Then I’m I too assume that you are saying not all Republicans are “Right Wingers” and not all Democrats are “Left-Wingers,” something the majority of people believe”
You got it.
Posted by: Ryan C | May 22, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
DaveM- do you think Benjamin Franklin would have gotten queasy over belly slaps and sleep deprivation?
Didn’t he come from the days of tarring and feathering and putting people in stocks in the town square?
Posted by: MayBee | May 22, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
“He has cut the defense budget”
Defense budget is up 4%.
Why do people lie about something that is so easily verified?
Posted by: Ryan C | May 22, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Didn’t he also reassure the naval graduates that they wouldn’t be sent into an unnecessary war? Funny that it wasn’t mentioned.
Posted by: kat | May 22, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Describing a culture that is leaning more toward chasing “outward markers of success” like “titles and status materialism and money, fame and popularity” – Obama
—————–
Obama just described himself.
Has he no sense of irony?
Posted by: OxyCon | May 22, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
“do you think Benjamin Franklin would have gotten queasy over belly slaps and sleep deprivation?
Didn’t he come from the days of tarring and feathering and putting people in stocks in the town square?”
The indefinite detention and waterboarding may not have been looked on as kindly given how the colonist viewed impressment.
Posted by: Ryan C | May 22, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
But I will note that even Benjamin Franklin’s quote acknowledges there are choices to be made. He certainly didn’t indicate it was a false choice.
Posted by: MayBee | May 22, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Every time I hear President Barack Obama speak I become more proud to be an American secure in the knowledge that I did the right thing in November 2008, when I voted for him to be President of the United States. And, I’m reminded of the garbage called our government that was in power for 8 years before President Obama was elected.
Posted by: Caliguy55 | May 22, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Torture is a Criminal choice. Sending men and women to a war based on lies, many to their deaths is A CHOICE/ A choice to lie and create war without justification or Our Security. Good example that these find young men and women will now have. A “principled” commander in chief.
Posted by: tychisum | May 22, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
DaveM- The Franklin quote is not a kind of sentimentality, it’s more along the lines of a natural law.That the ‘protector’ who must take the law into his (or their) own hands quickly becomes the tyrant follows as night to day. To surrender one’s ideals is not to give up a ‘piece’ of your humanity, but the whole of humanity.
Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | May 22, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
What is this thing with newly elected presidents and the U.S. Navy? I see many parallels between Obama and Clinton. Both came from poor backgrounds. Both achieved high academic educations. Both chose to become democrats. Both came from questionable political “nests”. Both would rather give a “talk” than get dirt under their finger nails. In a sense, I must admit, they’re smarter than I.
Posted by: LongT | May 22, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
This man is a liar. I don’t listen to anything he says anymore.
Posted by: bubbles | May 22, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Amazing – the midshipmen were not permitted to wear their ceremonial swords for graduation! What a slap in the face! That says more clearly than anything else that he has no trust in our troops. An incredible insult to the Navy and it’s traditions.
Posted by: Lou | May 22, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
I wonder why Obama did not acknowledge the McCain family’s four generations of service in the Navy? It would have been the gracious and kind thing to do.
Posted by: BabyRuth | May 22, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
obama never served, and was proud of it.
Now he is endorsing a belief that military vets., are our largest source of potential trouble makers. His only use for the military will be to enforce his domestic leftist dreams.
This was just a photo op., he his never ending re election campaign.
Posted by: LL | May 22, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Does any one of you believe that he firmly believes what he just said?
Posted by: Jack | May 22, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
Garbage ?
Posted by: d | May 22, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
Obama – NO
Jack – YES
Posted by: d | May 22, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
NO ! (he just wants us to believe it).
YES ! (he believes we will belive it).
Got caught up in the moment and hit the enter key to soon earlier.
Posted by: d | May 22, 2009, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
He didnt say anything about john and his family at their request. Im suprised at some of your comments on not being in the service, didnt bother you that our last 2 clowns didnt serve either, least we forget.
Posted by: ED | May 22, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
I think if waterboarding is out on the table and is so important then the country should no the where abouts and the goings on of our special forces.I mean if were not allowed to know what they do then why is this so important?I’m pretty sure what they do is sometimes not legal.
Posted by: jason Bourne | May 23, 2009, 1:30 am 1:30 am
More lies!!!When will the rest of the
nation take the blinders off their
eyes. They follow him like the Pied
Piper. Stop listening to the music
and stand up for your rights and freedoms that are being destroyed.
Posted by: Linda | May 23, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
His pandering has no limit or degree of shame.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | May 23, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Wonderful speech. I like hearing a President pledge to not send troops into war unprepared or under-supplied, and only to send them if there is no other alternative. We should expect no less for those who risk their lives for us, whether they be in the armed services or our police and firemen.
Posted by: Lydia | May 23, 2009, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Lydia, I must ask— when you say, “Wonderful speech. I like hearing a President pledge to not send troops into war unprepared or under-supplied, and only to send them if there is no other alternative,” have you ever heard a president pledge to send troops out unprepared? Have you ever heard a president suggest he intended to put people in harm’s way for no good reason? Of course not.
They all plan to use American force judiciously, but different people face different circumstances and make different difficult decisions on when, where, and how to use military force. I have no problem with President Obama’s words, but they are no different from the words of past presidents, nor do I believe his actions will be dramatically different in this regard, either.
Obama’s willingness to increase troop strength in Afghanistan shows that he will use force when necessary, which is a good thing. Waiting to see if he’ll commit troops to Darfur (not that I’m advocating it, but given his previous statements, it seems a logical place for him to use military force).
Posted by: moderate | May 24, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm