Rumsfeld’s Biblical Message-Laden Intelligence Briefs
ABC News’ Jennifer Parker reports: Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld prepared top-secret military intelligence briefs for former President George W. Bush with cover sheets featuring triumphant images from the Iraq war with "Crusades-like" Bible messages, according to an exclusive report in the latest June issue of GQ magazine.
The briefs, known as the Worldwide Intelligence Update, were prepared by Rumsfeld and often hand-delivered to Bush, and only circulated among a handful of Pentagon leaders and the president, according to GQ’s Robert Draper.
A March 31, 2003 brief cover-sheet depicted a U.S. tank roaring through the desert with a biblical quote from Ephesians: "Therefore put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand."
An April 7, 2003 cover sheet depicted an image of Saddam Hussein under a quote from the First Epistle of Peter: "It is God’s will that by doing good you should silence the ignorant talk of foolish men."
An April 10, 2003 brief showed the statue of Saddam Hussein being pulled down, an Iraqi child kissing an American soldier and jubilant Iraqi crowds with a quote from the book of Psalms: "Behold, the eye of the Lord is on those who fear Him … To deliver their soul from death."
At least one Muslim analyst in the Pentagon had been offended, GQ reports, and others worried that the biblical passages would inspire Islamic outrage within Muslim nations.
The cover sheets were the "brainchild" of Major General Glen Shaffer, a director for intelligence for Rumsfeld and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who reportedly told those who complained about the cover pages that "my seniors" appreciated them, including Bush, Rumsfeld, and former Joint Chiefs chairman Richard Myers.
GQ obtained the sheets from an unnamed government official who "was disturbed enough by these biblically seasoned sheets to hold on to copies," Draper reports.
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
Major General Glen Shaffer should be Court Martialed for violating his oath to uphold & defend the Constitution of the United States. Specifically, for violating his oath to uphold & defend Article VI and Amendment 1.
Posted by: Tyrone | May 17, 2009, 8:34 am 8:34 am
Like, the old dude was quoting from the Bible! OMG! Like, it’s so weird or something!
Posted by: WorldclaZZ | May 17, 2009, 8:49 am 8:49 am
As suspected, we lived under a theocracy under Bush that was intent on a holy war in the middle east.
Posted by: mk3872 | May 17, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am
Which is worse?:
Osama bin Laden kills approximately 4,000 Americans and causes hundreds of MILLIONS of dollars in damage in the name of ‘God’ and subsequently UNITES all Americans..
or
Bush sends 5,000 young Americans to their deaths in Iraq, of all places, and has spent hundred of BILLIONS of dollars and subsequently DIVIDES all Americans.. Oh, and also in the name of ‘God’
Posted by: Dave34102 | May 17, 2009, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Way to go Rumsfield!! we SHOULD BE QUOTING the bible and using it for everything in this sinful life!
that is what God said not me!!
GoD bless! and keep up the good work
Posted by: janice | May 17, 2009, 9:15 am 9:15 am
“that is what God said not me!!” –no, that is what a bunch of Jews said thousands of years ago when they didn’t know any better..
If he payed more attention to facts than folklore, then we might not be in this mess.
Posted by: Dave | May 17, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Lots of verses address the separation of church and state. A little scripture from the KJV Bible.
Mathew 24
Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.
Wherefore if they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the desert; go not forth: behold, he is in the secret chambers; believe it not.
Posted by: rightbehind | May 17, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Rumsfeld forgot “Thou shall not kill”
Posted by: dalidog | May 17, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am
I’m disturbed that military intelligence reports have a biblical theme. I don’t want biblically driven military policy. That’s just dumb. For those who can’t handle the separation of church and state, imagine that someone with a different interpretation of the Bible, one who strictly relied on the teachings of Jesus came into the position and started advocating “Turn the other cheek” as the theme after an event like 9-11. I don’t want someone justifying their decisions with the Bible, I want them justifying their decisions based on the cold, hard facts. Putting Bible quotes on a report just smacks of vanity and ego, if not the downright delusional belief that God must be on your side.
But what bothers me even more at an intellectual level is this sense of marketing strategy that lies behind these reports. What on earth do they need slogans for or graphics (beyond the normal graphs and charts)? Are not the officials of our government grown up and intellectually developed enough to make decisions without all the stupid bells and whistles you’d find on, say, an issue of GQ? Good lord. This just seems like a bubble-headed waste of time and money and the work of people who can’t defend their thesis with a logical argument. My god, if I turned in my college thesis with a graphic and a biblical slogan unrelated to the material on the front, I would have been laughed out of my seminar. These are intelligence reports not marketing brochures. Hopefully with the change of administration we have some grownups in office who don’t need pretty pictures to help them digest potentially dry information.
Posted by: JrzWrld | May 17, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am
WorldClaZZ, it isn’t weird – it’s worse. It’s completely irrelevant. It’s like if I, as a fan of 19th century literature, quoted Charlotte Bronte on the front of a report. Or if a philosophy fan quoted from Stoic beliefs. Totally irrelevant to the facts, no matter that many people live by the Bible’s teachings. This is military intelligence. It should be evaluated independently of one’s underlying beliefs based on fact. It’s about promoting America’s welfare for the long run and using its resources wisely, not glorifying a personal ethos.
Posted by: JrzWrld | May 17, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Where is Donald Rumsfeld? Has anyone seen him since he was suddenly removed?
Is it because this person is not presentable? Is it because Rumsfeld’s mental condition has devolved into obvious dementia or paranoia?
Posted by: Atanasia Robles | May 17, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
God, schmod…what about accountability? But I’ll guess the only focus here is who gets to sit with God on a golden pedistal. Let the others take care of themselves, hm?
Posted by: Lisa | May 17, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
I guess I never am ceased to be amazed at how oblivious top Bush administration officials were to how America was viewed or would be viewed by incidents such as thes. If nothing else it portrays arrogance….and that is a trait that seems to permeate Republicans….and until they rid themselves of it will keep them from gaining power anytime soon.
Posted by: indy_voter | May 17, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am
The Bush Administration was a cult in itself. Try and go back and listen to some of Bush’s speeches in the run-up to the war in Iraq. Very doomsdayish. Bush and friends were no more in touch with reality than the conspiracy theorists who spend their lives trying to find a link between the 9/11 hijackers and the US government.
Posted by: El_Pajaro | May 17, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am
And ABC doesn’t like it!
Posted by: LongT | May 17, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Amen! It is only godly men that will save this country. Rock on.
Posted by: BibleThumper | May 17, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
What we’ve know all along: God did it.
(Behold, the GOP is diminishing)
Posted by: newz4i | May 17, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am
So not only did the Bush administration squander America’s economic might, they also undermined its moral authority by turing a war into an idiotic schoolboy crusade.
Posted by: ryan | May 17, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
If you have a billion dollar defense industry, and heavy unemployment for unskilled labor, it is a recipe for attack on another nation. Iraq now has their Pearl Harbor. If no one attacks you, you can attack them under the flag of the holy cross. Our tax dollars flood the world with rifles, ammunition, and grenade launchers. We are sinners, and we will run out of warriors before the enemy does. We are weak, and fear complete victory and enslavement.
Posted by: Sister Sampson | May 17, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Bush’s war equaled Profits for corporations. And a huge debt to it’s citizens. Thousand of innocent men and women have died for their gain. They made another war, In the name of God, Bush , Rumsfeld, Cheney and the rest of the administration should be tried for treason.
Posted by: lssbigdog | May 17, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Does anyone still deny that Iraq was a “crusade”?
Posted by: JR | May 17, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Rumsfeld and his crew (Cheney, Bush) are SICK, SICK men.. and they led many of our American soldiers and God knows how many Iraqi lives to their deaths based on their “religious” crusade. How many atrocities have been committed in the name of God? I mean God is about PEACE.. and to slander what God’s message is, is an atrocity in itself. We need to quit playing God in our own country and throughout our World. God LOVES ALL PEOPLE!!!! WE ARE ALL GOD’S PEOPLE NO MATTER WHAT!!! Why are you cherry-picking verses out of the Bible that you sickly use to support your message and deeds of human life and destruction?? All I can say is this is psychopathic and sociopathic all at the same time.
Posted by: lulu | May 17, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am
The atheists, agnostics and secular humanists are still working hard to demonize Geo. Bush and his administration. While their darling is imposing debt on our country, and “spreading the wealth around” socialist philosophy that is unlikely for us to ever get out from under. Tell me one place where socialism, has ever worked outside academia, that is in the real world. The real problem with the left is that they hate God and want all reference to him removed. “The fool has said in his heart, there is no God.”
Posted by: Wilbur | May 17, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Dave34102 posted “Bush sends 5,000 young Americans to their deaths in Iraq…”
Please do not forgot how many Iraqis have lost their lives too; some place that figure at over 1 million.
Posted by: SamTyler1973 | May 17, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Wilbur posted “”The fool has said in his heart, there is no God.” ”
The fool has said “God told me to invade Iraq”.
Posted by: SamTyler1973 | May 17, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
JR asked “Does anyone still deny that Iraq was a “crusade”?”
The 20+% who still think Bush was the greatest. They post here all the time.
Posted by: SamTyler1973 | May 17, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
The founding fathers quoted from the same book and the presidents swore an oath in it. Whats new ABC?
Posted by: 1MANA55 | May 17, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
It’s a miracle that we are not currently living under a Christian-themed dictatorship and in open warfare with the entire Muslim world. Bin Laden could not have been happier if that had happened.
Posted by: billp | May 17, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
The founding fathers quoted from the same book and the presidents swore an oath on it to take office. Whats new ABC?
Posted by: 1MANA55 | May 17, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
re: “Biblical Message-Laden Intelligence” The text of this article state’s the quotes were on the cover sheet. Message-laden seems to imply quotes were through-out the text of the intelligence reports. True of false?
Posted by: WISDOM | May 17, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
1MANA55 posted “The founding fathers quoted from the same book and the presidents swore an oath on it to take office. Whats new ABC?”
Maybe this is also something that needs to be changed – taking the oath on the Bible.
BTW, 1MANA55. I find it funny how pro-lifer’s like you don’t mind that Bush believed that God told him to invade Iraq. Over 5000 Americans have DIED because of this. Maybe as many as a million Iraqis have died because of this. But their deaths don’t matter to pro-lifers like you. Life is precious while it is in the womb, but once out.. they are good for demented leader’s cannon fodder.
Posted by: SamTyler1973 | May 17, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Wilbur wrote: The atheists, agnostics and secular humanists are still working hard to demonize Geo. Bush and his administration.
———————Since when do atheists, agnostics and secular humanists think devils exist?
Posted by: Kenneth | May 17, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Historians will classify the current wars as religious wars. The status quo continues; nothing changed after 9/11.
Posted by: Kenneth | May 17, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Sara Palin also thinks God send us to war with Iraq. She is another religion nut that never need to be the presdient of the USA
Posted by: Sara Palin believe God send us to war with Iraq | May 17, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Don’t understand the point of this story other then for ABC to whip up anti-Christian rhetoric. Especially since at the same time you had Muslims quoting the Koran and beheading people on the internet.
Posted by: sas | May 17, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
It just validates the hypocracy that the entire world sees of the US. We can go invade another country in the name of God, but the invadees cannot defend themselves in the name of God. They are called “terrorists” and “militants” while our troops “heroes” and “freedom fighters”!!!!! It’s also exactly what the US does when it supplies Israel with weapons and bans weapons from being given to the Palestinians.
Posted by: outofmanyone | May 17, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
This is completely unbelievable that a religious war would be fought in THIS day and age on behalf of the American people! NONE of the serious allegations against Iraq were true. NONE OF THEM!! No WMD, no ‘underground laboratories’, no ‘biological weapons laboratories’, NOTHING! ALL OF THESE THINGS WERE FABRICATED. The Congress was even shown drawings of these FABRICATED facilities. NONE OF THEM EXISTED! WHO MADE THOSE DRAWINGS?! What is going on here is highly suspicious. The Congress has to investigate these right wing nut jobs immediately.
Posted by: Eric | May 17, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Absolutely correct, outof..
Truly frightening in retrospect. It seems we have learned nothing since the First Crusade in 1097. God Wills It!
Posted by: Steve Horton | May 17, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
The current “war on terror” is simply the new Crusade against the Islam. Many will say – Yes, but we didn’t started it, everything is because of 9/11! But the correct answer is – Yes, the US started this Crusade by staging a false terrorist attack on WTC! The evidence proving the US government involvement in 9/11 is just beyond overwhelming! The latest proof came from a chemical analysis laboratory in Copenhagen, Denmark which shows in abundance trace of nanothermite explosives in the dust collected from the site of WTC right after 9/11. The material was published at April 10, 09 and is available on the internet. Also recently there were an interview at Coast to Coast with the Danish professor, head of the chemical laboratory.
Posted by: Torbalan | May 17, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
…we now know that we are not governed by the most intelligent of our nation, they can’t even balance our nation’s check book!
Posted by: tror123 | May 17, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Torbalan – You’re using a widely rejected conspiracy theory to suggest that Muslim terrorists are victims….
That’s a tough sell buddy.
I guess the US hired a bunch of peace-loving Muslims in Afghanistan and Pakistan to pretend to be terrorist organizations as well..
Posted by: Dave | May 17, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
There is no god, it’s just us. Once you realize that, we will be stronger as the most intelligent animal on this planet.
Posted by: J. Sullivan | May 17, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
The current “war on terror” is simply the new Crusade against the Islam. Many will say – Yes, but we didn’t started it, everything is because of 9/11! ———————————————
Cheney provided beyond a shadow of a doubt that Saddam was behind the 9/11 attacks.
Posted by: Kenneth | May 17, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
sas wrote :Don’t understand the point of this story other then for ABC to whip up anti-Christian rhetoric.
You certianly don’t understand the point.
Posted by: Kenneth | May 17, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Air Force Pays Evangelicals to Preach About Terrorism
Wednesday February 27, 2008
If a military cadets asked you to arrange for speakers about modern terrorism, would you choose experts and scholars on the subject or evangelical Christians who make questionable claims about their past while proselytizing their religion? The sensible choice should be the first option, but I’m not sure that very sensible cadets are at the Air Force Academy where the second option has been enthusiastically endorsed.
Posted by: Kenneth | May 17, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
“There is no god, it’s just us. Once you realize that, we will be stronger as the most intelligent animal on this planet. J. Sullivan | May 17, 2009 2:41:30 PM” —-That is Absolutely correct.
“Cheney provided beyond a shadow of a doubt that Saddam was behind the 9/11 attacks. Posted by: Kenneth | May 17, 2009 2:48:41 PM” —-That is Abslutely INcorrect.
Posted by: Dave | May 17, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
we msut erase all religions if man is to become greater then ever.. we cant move forward until religion is done away with.
Posted by: real T here | May 17, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Dave – “I guess the US hired a bunch of peace-loving Muslims in Afghanistan and Pakistan to pretend to be terrorist organizations as well..” – Very correct statement from your side – both Al-Qaida and the Taliban are creations of CIA. If you do not know what is CIA ask just Google it!
Posted by: Torbalan | May 17, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
by Tyrone:
“Major General Glen Shaffer should be Court Martialed for violating his oath to uphold & defend the Constitution of the United States. Specifically, for violating his oath to uphold & defend Article VI and Amendment 1.”
NOT A CHANCE TYRONE!
HERE IS ARTICLE4; FIRST AMENDMENT!
“Free exercise of religion”
Main article: Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment
In Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963), the Warren Court applied the strict scrutiny standard of review to this clause, holding that a state must show a compelling interest in restricting religion-related activities. In Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), the Supreme Court retreated from this standard, permitting governmental actions that were neutral regarding religion. The Congress attempted to restore this standard by passing the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, but in City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997), the Supreme Court held that such an attempt was unconstitutional regarding state and local government actions (though permissible regarding federal actions).
*****
FREEDOM OF RELIGION IS A PERSONAL CHOICE, ONE THAT GOVERNMENT CANNOT TAKE AWAY FROM YOU….HOW YOU EXERCISE YOUR “BELIEFS” IS GUARANTEED BY THIS CLAUSE.
WHAT RUMSFELD DID WAS PERFECTLY LEGAL, AND NOBODY CAN DENY HIS RIGHT TO EXPRESS HIMSELF.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH!
Posted by: j | May 17, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
The greatest danger for the world peace, even the existence of the mankind, comes from the so called “neocons” in the US administration.
Posted by: Torbalan | May 17, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
The extreme conservatives of the Republican party must never ever be allowed to wield such power again! It is questionable whether we can survive this time around much less give them another chance to destroy the world in the “service of God” as most of them think is their calling.
Posted by: wa | May 17, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
j, The issue is that Rumsfield used religious ideals to influence actions of war.
Osama bin Laden used religious ideals to attack the U.S. and the Bush administration used religious ideals to start a war based on lies. The difference between the two is the flavor of dogma.
Posted by: Dave | May 17, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
“The greatest danger for the world peace, even the existence of the mankind” …is actually religion
Posted by: Dave | May 17, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
As is very convenient to refuse the existing “conspiracy” theories, the truth is the science doesn’t agree with the official story about the 9/11. Because of, whatever the Bush administration said is just that – a story! The existing evidence is overwhelmingly against the US government. That’s why out there there are thousands and thousands scientists, engineers, construction specialist and etc. who do not agree with the official story. Because of it is a Lie! I have tendency to believe the science than something said by a politician. Especially if the one who talks to me is a proven pathological lier!
Posted by: Torbalan | May 17, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
This just shows that you can justify ANYTHING to gullible people by using the Bible. People used the Bible in the past to justify slavery, and they used it during the last administration to justify an unjustifiable war – causing the murders of a million people and leaving our country in greater danger because of increased worldwide anti-American hatred.
Posted by: Mallory | May 17, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
One can only await for the briefs delivered to Obama. Koran? Marx? Alinsky? Or maybe just some Rev.Wright diatribes? Who knows….we do that that while this type of briefing might be a little unusual….because most government officials in the past quoted directly from the Bible in their speeches (listen to Eisenhower, Roosevelt, Churchill, Kennedy, etc.) They had nothing to hide and nor should they. The Bible is often referenced in Western civilization in speeches, plays, books, rhetoric, etc. Nothing wrong with that.
Posted by: Ed | May 17, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Dave,
“j, The issue is that Rumsfield used religious ideals to influence actions of war.
Osama bin Laden used religious ideals to attack the U.S. and the Bush administration used religious ideals to start a war based on lies. The difference between the two is the flavor of dogma.
Posted by: Dave | May 17, 2009 3:25:57 PM”
*************
Scripture quoted from the Bible is NOT DOGMA…it’s TRUTH….the WORD spoken by God Almighty CREATED EVERYTHING; therefore; it’s TRUTH…So, understanding the WORD of the Lord, and quoting scripture is not wrong….it’s only wrong if you quote it in the wrong context….Rumsfeld used scripture he believed applied to explain the events of war…God does NOT promote WAR by man….God used WAR that HE PLANNED to solve problems…that’s the only time WAR is good, when the Lord tells you to go to war, which i don’t believe was the case about IRAQ….just the opposite, i wrote President Bush a letter requesting that he NOT go into Iraq….that it would be 7 years of a death, wasted on a war that could not be won by Americans…..the Iraq war was all about Oil and Money…and nothing more.
…THE WORD of the LORD, IS NOT “RELIGIOUS IDEALS”…IT’S TRUTH.
***********************
“The greatest danger for the world peace, even the existence of the mankind” …is actually religion”
Posted by: Dave | May 17, 2009 3:28:18 PM
Dave, you need to understand the MUSLIM RELIGION is based on idealogical beliefs of their ALLAH…a MORTAL MAN who is not a GOD, but a false idol…so you are confusing/comparing the WORD/SCRIPTURE used by Rumsfeld vs. bin Laden’s use of a false god who told him to murder americans….THE TWO, RUMSFELD and LADEN CANNOT BE COMPARED BECAUSE THEY EACH BELIEVE DIFFERENTLY
…RUMSFELD’S BELIEF IS BASED ON TRUTH, (tho he may twisted the scripture to fit his belief)…THE OTHER bIN LADEN BELIEFS ARE BASED ON DECEPTION.
***********************
The problem of “religion” is the misconception that one’s “religion” expresses their BELIEF of GOD ALMIGHT,THE ONE AND ONLY GOD…a person’s belief which may or may NOT Reflect the one true God. Religion is a RITUAL ONE practices as WORSHIP. Therefore “religion” is not God Almighty….
GOD ALMIGHTY is the WORD spoken by Jesus Christ and the Prophets in the BIBLE…the 4 Gospels were inspired by the “Comforter” (Holy Spirit) sent to mankind BY Jesus Christ, after HE rose to take HIS Place at the Right Hand of God Almighty, the ONE AND ONLY TRUE GOD. At that time, Jesus Christ was given COMMAND of EVERYTHING God Almighty Created…
(this event is fulfillment of the scripture)…the ONLY WAY TO THE FATHER (GOD ALMIGHTY) IS THROUGH JESUS CHRIST>>>>meaning JESUS CHRIST MUST KNOW YOUR NAME….WHICH IS WRITTEN IN THE BOOK OF LIFE….GIVING YOU ENTRANCE TO HEAVEN….
Now, the BEST WAY FOR JESUS CHRIST TO KNOW YOUR NAME…is to PUBLICALLY express your Love, Praise and Devotion for Jesus Christ….for it is written, THOSE WHO PUBICALLY ACKNOWLEDGE LOVE FOR JESUS CHRIST ON EARTH; JESUS CHRIST WILL PUBICALLY ACKNOWLEDGE HIS LOVE OF YOU TO GOD ALMIGHTY….
So, Mr. Dave, and EVERYONE READING THIS>>>>>if i were you; i would watch what i PUBLICALLY announce about Jesus Christ…
Posted by: j | May 17, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Posted by: j | May 17, 2009 4:41:07 PM – “you need to understand the MUSLIM RELIGION is based on idealogical beliefs of their ALLAH…a MORTAL MAN who is not a GOD, but a false idol…” – The religion which is worshiping a mortal man and is based on a book written by mortals is called Christianity. Islam is based on a book called the Qur’an and it teaches to worship not a person, idol etc. but only the Allah. By the way Allah is not a personal name of the god of the Muslims. Allah is the Arabic word for God. If you read the Bible in Arabic you will see that instead of the word God, which is an English word, is used the word Allah instead. By the way the Allah is defined in the Qur’an the Allah is the all Almighty, immortal, who had no birth nor will have death. Also according the Qur’an Jesus was one of the prophets and arguable will return again. Also according to the Islam’s holy book, the significant of the prophet Mohammad is only in the fact that he is the last one in the long chain of the prophets, presumably the first one was Adam. The so devilish and scary Qur’an is actually the original, untouched and protected version of the Old Testament. And finally, the Qur’an is widely available book in every language, read it before to make comments.
Posted by: Torbalan | May 17, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
i would sure like a face to face debate with this gentlemen….he obviously has lost his way……i can prove to Ehrman, he has “faulty logic” …providing him with concrete evidence of what he cannot see or deny, but must explain!
…belief is knowing a thing in your heart, whether you can “see” it or not
…FAITH is acting on your belief, knowing it’s TRUTH…..that is what Major General Glen Shaffer was doing with his “coversheets”….knowing all the while Rumsfeld believed the war was a spiritual war of good v evil….with that understanding, i have to agree with Rumsfeld…he was to put on all the amour of GOD (WHICH MEANS “THE WORD”) AND STAND STILL. Evil cannot defeat the WORD…unfortunately the Bush Administration did not understand the scripture.
Posted by: j | May 17, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
Maybe if more people read the BIBLE and actually lived their lives according to it, the world would not be such a bad place. WAY TO GO!!
Posted by: Karen | May 17, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Perhaps Rumsfeld performed a miracle and turned back time on the Pentagon clocks?
Posted by: ghost | May 17, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
I thought that the Crusades were long gone hundreds of years ago. It’s beyond creepy.
Posted by: amber | May 17, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Karen,
Maybe if people stopped invading other countries because of greed, power, and apparently religion, the world would not be such a bad place.
Posted by: jockyoung | May 17, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
amber
I was just reading a book on the Crusades, and the language we are currently hearing from the Christian conservatives is remarkably similar. Unfortunately, some things never change.
Posted by: jockyoung | May 17, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
j
“God Almighty would NEVER tell anyone to murder another….”
Actually, he does fairly often in the Old Testament.
Posted by: jockyoung | May 17, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
“if i were you; i would watch what i PUBLICALLY announce about Jesus Christ…” –wow, I didn’t say anything about Jesus. However..
An ancient Jewish book about mythology is the last place one would find truth. But since we’re on the subject, lets look at facts. The new testament was written 70 to a 120 years after Jesus’s death. The gospel’s stories (which traveled by word of mouth for a few generations) do not match. The geneology from King David to Jesus is from his father’s side (no not the one in “heaven”). The first recorded human to be allegedly “resurrected” three days after his death was Osiris of Egypt.
Torbalan, the book with talking snakes, burning bushes and flying horses is still more believable than the Quran. (Yes, I’m an equal opportunity offender..)
Posted by: Dave | May 17, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
2 words………WAR CRIMINAL
Posted by: tychisum | May 17, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
There is not much that I would consider serious enough to take up arms to protect the liberties of this country, but protecting it from the Rumsfeld, Bush, and others of their ilk come pretty close. Anyone who condones the mixutre of any religion into the functioning of our gov’t is no better the those supporters of Iran or any other religious state.
Posted by: jim | May 17, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
I mean this looks goth, like Rumsfield was playing that Russian mesmerist, Svengolly, to Bush.
Posted by: amber | May 17, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Posted by: j | May 17, 2009 5:50:22 PM – I have no intention to argue with you. Since I have enough knowledge about the religions, history, sociology and etc, I can compare them for myself without to be misleaded by some some guys with “Jesus loves you!” bumper stickers. And after I read your last comment it is obvious that the only book you ever read is the Holy Bible! And you are right, the Almighty gave us eyes, but we can not see and s/he gave us ears which can’t hear. None is blinder than one who do not want to see and none is deafer than one who do not want to hear! And at last, when a Christian, especially an American Christian preaches peace and condemns Muslims as blood thirsty to me just sounds like to listen lectures about humanism from Dr. Mengele or Stalin!
Posted by: Torbalan | May 17, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Well now we know how they told GWB what to think say and do. It figures that he would fall for such amateurish manipulation. He was nothing but a puppet for Cheney and his advisors.
Posted by: iamwomaninMI | May 17, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
dave….
“The new testament was written 70 to a 120 years after Jesus’s death. The gospel’s stories (which traveled by word of mouth for a few generations) do not match. The geneology from King David to Jesus is from his father’s side (no not the one in “heaven”).”
AH YES!..but what is more miraculous is the blood line from King David was broken by King Solomon to Jesus Christ….that’s why the Virgin Mary conceived by God Almighty, because of King Soloman’s lust for women, there was no heir from Soloman…the Father destroyed Soloman’s temple….
The miraculous conception is proof that Jesus Christ is the SON OF GOD….interesting is the paradox…on EARTH…Jesus Christ is called the SON OF GOD….when Jesus Christ Returns from God’s Heaven…Jesus Christ is called the Son of Man…..the Universe is a paradox…get it?
Posted by: j | May 17, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Once again religion is used as an excuse to justify actions. By giving government briefings a “holy” mark, it encouraged the use of self-created (biblical) justifications. But this is not really suprising news. Those in the bush administration have been babbling on, religiously, forever.
Posted by: waysie | May 17, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Actually, Jesus never even called himself the “son of “God.” But I must admit, if there actually had been a virgin birth, he might have had a case. Although many animal species can have asexual reproduction regularly, it would be a bit if a surprise among humans. Even so, many a teenage mother has tried the claim!
Posted by: jockyoung | May 17, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
j
Every tribe or nation that has EVER gone to war, has done so thinking “God” willed it. It is the orginal human conceit, which has led to more human slaughter than any other idea in history.
Posted by: jockyoung | May 17, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
What hypocrisy!
Surly the Lord will visit justice on thee “leaders” ten fold for there collective blasphemy.
Posted by: Darryl the Contractor | May 17, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
this country was founded on freedom of religion among others … even the president (or former) gets to live out his beliefs!!!
Posted by: Milisia | May 17, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
j: Yes, Rumsfield is perfectly entitled to his religious beliefs, but on his own time and on his own dime. Making socially life altering decisions based on the bible for the rest of the United States on paid government time and with government resources funded by taxpayers is highly inappropriate and in direct opposition of the seperation of church and state. When organized religion is combined with government,an institution that lends itself easily to corruption, monsters are created out of men who feel they have an invisible friend by their side to justify the perpetration of attrocities on those with less power. It is arrogant to use and own god as a justification for violence, corruption, oppression, prejudice, hate, exclusion, or any of the many other deeds humans justify through invoking religion.
Posted by: S | May 17, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Germany has an arrest warrent for Rumsfeld for war crimes he planned and authorized. Rumsfeld belongs in prison with Cheney and many others in the Bush administration.
Posted by: AJ | May 17, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
I do not claim to be a liberal or conservative but I will say this whole religion and government thing has got to stop. Basing policy decisions on religion has no place in government. Obama’s speech to catholics today was just another example of wasted time and nonsense.
Posted by: NoReligionInGov | May 17, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
Rummie also seems to have forgotten, “That shalt not bear false witness”.
Posted by: B. Bear | May 17, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Any guy who can load a dishwater in the perfect manner as Rumsfeld’s wife said he could, and quotes the Bible is my kind of guy. Go get’em Mr Rumsfeld!
Posted by: Steve | May 17, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Rumsfeld is one of the worst war criminals of the last 50 years; a murderer by proxy who authorized torture and was responsible through negligence and arrogant misjudgment for the loss of a multitude of young American lives. If he is quoting the Bible, it should be from Hades. He deserves nothing less.
Posted by: J Robinson | May 17, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
Someone said cheney forgot . . . “Thou shalt not kill”
He also forgot . . . “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor”
Posted by: libertyrulz | May 17, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
What this article states and shows is how President Bush’s underlings manipulated him into doing “their will” by quoting certain Biblical phrases. When you prod an intellectually weak man with a belief that he was chosen by God to be President and that his actions are “Gods will”, well you can get him to do just about anything you want. When you place your life and the lives of others in a belief of the God myth well, you then have to accept that 9/11 was God’s will, his wonders to perform…..How’d that workout for us?
Posted by: MARCUS | May 17, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
i’ve been saying this for years, under george bush, we had right wing fundamentalist religious fanatics running the country… and right wing greedy war hawks propping their ignorance up… this is the definition of evil, these documents are frightening and revealing and need to be condemned!… bush WAS fighting a ‘holy war’!! with MY TAX DOLLARS and OUR CHILDREN’S LIVES!!… this is an OUTRAAGE!
Posted by: earth_not_flat | May 17, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
I don’t think everybody gets how foolish this was of Rumsfeld et al. (in addition to just being plain silly). This is just the kind of this Al Qaida needs to recruit people, by showing them evidence that the US *IS* a ‘crusader’. But then, the Bushies made quite a number of blunders (secret torture, ‘renditions’, etc); they made recruiting much easier for A.Q. than it should be. Why in DoG’s name add a religious dimension?! We gain nothing, and risk empowering the bad guys! Thanks, Rummy! Real smart!
Posted by: JC | May 17, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
the religious element was added because george bush was a born-again as well as many others in his administration…. of course, this shows the immorality of the bush/cheney war in iraq as well as many other of their policy decisions… how dangerous!
Posted by: earth_not_flat | May 17, 2009, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
“At least one Muslim analyst in the Pentagon had been offended, GQ reports, and others worried that the biblical passages would inspire Islamic outrage within Muslim nations.”
WHO CARES IF WE “OFFEND” THESE PEOPLE????!????
Posted by: Ryan | May 18, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am
They are selling the war to their constituants. To sell a war based on religion is very dangerous. If we dont learn from that lesson we will be doomed to repeat it. The only group that still supports the republicans are the religious extremists. Take away that group from the republicans and they will collapse…or maybe they’ll flourish when people realize the republicans have come to their senses.
Posted by: Dan Kolich | May 18, 2009, 1:39 am 1:39 am
AMEN Rumsfield! Separation of church and state is not nor was not what the liberal atheistic democratic party would have you all believe. It is NOT part of the constition. The constitution protects these types of faith expressions and guarantees the rights of the religous to practice their faith everywhere and anywhere without any law prohibiting them. The nonreligous were guaranteed that no one would make THEM worship in any state sponsored religion (ie a federally run denomination, because at the time several states had state sponsored religous faiths) There was absolutely nor is there any obligation to protect citizens from the exposure to another pesons expression of faith. It aint there people!!!!!! It is freedom OF religion not from religion.
Faith is a deep part of MANY (most) Americans get over it and start practicing all that left wing tolerance I keep hearing about.
Posted by: MrsPlasticman | May 18, 2009, 2:20 am 2:20 am
Ironic that a man that is pure evil quotes the bible.
Posted by: JB | May 18, 2009, 2:21 am 2:21 am
Hey Marcus – an intellectually weak man graduated from a better University than you probably went to with better grades than his democratic predecessors…. don’t believe everything the media feeds you honey.
Posted by: MrsPlasticman | May 18, 2009, 2:24 am 2:24 am
The bible-thumping inbreds who worship the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld trinity wouldn’t know TRUTH if it took the form of a talking snake and bit them on their self righteous ass.
TRUTH requires debate, analysis and opposition, which is specifically disallowed in religion.
FAITH, the fuel for religious nutters, means that you regard fairy tales as facts, no argument allowed!
Figure out the difference, you lot of befuddled hypocrites!
Posted by: GBIDA | May 18, 2009, 2:34 am 2:34 am
Hey MrsPlasticman,
The “intellectually weak man” you adore bought his way through Uni with family money. He subsequently took this “vast” knowledge and failed at business. He got elected President of the USA only because his father previously held the office, and if Americans crave anything, it’s “name brand recognition”.
As for W’s grades, I’d like for you to show that his were higher than, well lets say his opponent in his first presidential race. Or his predecessor. But you can’t. You’re just doing the Republican Two Step.
Posted by: GBIDA | May 18, 2009, 2:40 am 2:40 am
Thank you for sharing this. Amazing I didn’t realize how Rumsfeld worked – Woodward introduced us all to Rumsfeld’s snow flakes! But this? I’m stunned!
Question for the career staffers did Rumsfelds just send you snowflakes did he add suggestions and solutions? What were his solutions?
Bob Woodward can help by doing a aftermath of Bush. Possible title.
“The fight for Bush’s Legacy
I would write this Mr Woodward but I kill the English language but I’m good at research because I use google!
Posted by: Sam | May 18, 2009, 7:07 am 7:07 am
I find it interesting the people who are defending Rummy’s right to religious freedom. Their complete mis-interpretation of the bill of rights aside, I wonder how they would react if the religious messages included in these military briefs reflected another religion (Muslim, Buddhism, Judaism, Hinduism, etc)? I sure they would all be appalled!
Posted by: Jim | May 18, 2009, 8:11 am 8:11 am
MrsPlasticman said:
“It is freedom OF religion not from religion.”
Incorrect. Freedom FROM religion is an essential part of freedom OF religion. This doesn’t mean that the government outlaws religion; in fact, it means exactly what the US Constitution says: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”
Is there something about the “no law” part that confuses you?
As for Rumsfeld’s writing — he was a government official, and those reports were official government documents. Rumsfeld can thump bibles and shout hallelujah all he wants on his own time, but he has no business injecting his superstition into government reports. That’s where freedom FROM religion comes in.
So, “faith is a deep part of many (most) Americans …”? So what? No matter how many (most? which is it?) Americans suffer from this mental illness, it DOES NOT cause the first amendment of the US Constitution to endorse your fairy tales.
Posted by: GBIDA | May 18, 2009, 9:10 am 9:10 am
In response to “Jim” May 18th, 2009 8:11:21 a.m. – we would be appalled. Why? Our nation was not founded on Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, etc., it was clearly founded as a Christian nation, on biblical principles by mostly professing Christians; like it or not. We live in the United States of America. I do believe in religious freedom. I believe anyone in this great nation of ours can follow any religion they want, but in fact our original history; not the politically correct “rewrites,” clearly depict a nation founded on biblical truth. Good grief! Just visit our capital and read our original documents. Our founders would not have been one bit appalled at using biblical texts to make a point; matter of fact they almost ALL did. Now, this is where opponents of our history (oh, they wish it were not true so much that in their minds it isn’t) begin to tell us that these miss-guided founders were slave owners, slaughtered innocent native Americans, etc.; (I’ll bet you have that history right), to which we would agree with you. Those things were appallingly and not supported by the message of Scripture properly understood. Whether you like it or not, that is true. So give me bible verses! (Philippians 2:9-11)
Posted by: Bud Fennell | May 18, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am
In response to “Bud Fennell, May 18, 2009, 09:54:02 AM, our nation was founded by people escaping a regime that demanded conformity in religion. Those founders understood very clearly that state-sponsored religion is destructive.
Yes, we live in the United States of AMERICA, not the United States of Jesus, and in spite of the god trivia adorning the dollar and some hunks of rock, the real law — the Constitution — DOES NOT even once mention the word christian.
As for “biblical truth”, that’s a blatant oxymoron.
So you agree that the founders owned slaves and slaughtered natives. Then in the same breath you claim they created a nation based on christian religion. So, they’re “religious”, but they saw nothing wrong with slavery or slaughter? That’s called hypocrisy, but you know that already, since religion is nothing but the exaltation of hypocrisy.
You can have your bible verses. Enjoy to your heart’s content. But you do not get to impose your fairy tales upon others. And according to the US Constitution, neither do government officials, not even if he’s a Republican!
Posted by: GBIDA | May 18, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Considering Christianity and Islam are religions theoretically based on peace……….it’s amazing how violent both religions’ followers are.
The irony of Bush’s Christian Crusade in the Middle East is that Christians are leaving the Middle East. Since Bush, there are now fewer indigenous Christians in the Middle East.
Not unlike “abstinence only sex education”…………..it didn’t work.
Posted by: Sammy | May 18, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Sorry Bud, you are wrong. You might want to read a little about the religious beliefs of our founding fathers. You may be a bit surprised. I agree that people of this country should be able to practice any religion they want. That is not what is at stake here though. What I don’t agree with Rummy (or anyone else) using MY gov’t to foist their beliefs onto me. That is wrong, plain and simple.
Posted by: jim | May 18, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Of course Thomas Jefferson is not well liked by the conservative wing of the GOP or by those who foist their religious tyranny on the rest of us, but here are some Jefferson quotes anyway. Enjoy . . . . .
“Question with boldness even the existence of God; because if there be one, he must more approve the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear.” . . . . “The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit. We are answerable for them to our God. The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg . . . . Reason and free inquiry are the only effectual agents against error.” Instead of reading your bible, read The Jefferson Bible. It is far my enlightening!
Posted by: Jim | May 18, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
As more and more is revealed about the INSIDIOUS evil of “Born Again” theology and so-called biblical doctrine seeping into our government during Bush’s presidency, I am angry. How dare Rumsfeld imply that war and torture can be somehow justified by the military’s interpretation of “God” and supported by his “Word”. And in parallel, America withheld international money for access to birth control and instead spending millions on “abstinence only” programs, more unwanted children arrived on the planet to suffer – more is twisted Born Again logic. I recently asked an Evangelical why he was so opposed to extending unemployment benefits and food stamps. He replied that it took away the opportunity for churches and individuals to help spread God’s love. Fine. Spread your interpretation of “God’s love”. But America needs to realize exactly what is at stake by allowing zealots’ religious beliefs to seep into our public schools, Government agencies, international and military policy. It is the reason our forefather’s established a country based on separation of Church and State.
Posted by: CenterOne | May 18, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
I salute you Major General Glen Shaffer
Its idiots like these complaining that are the reason my kids can not say the “Pledge of Allegiance” in school or want to remove “In God we trust” from money or how about the Ten Commandments from our court rooms. I bet their the same sorry losers that voted “Darth Vador” into office.
Posted by: americanfree | May 18, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Thank God the far right relgious Administration is OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE The bible says Thou shall not Kill! And the Bush Adminstration killed 1000s
Posted by: Angie in Pa | May 18, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
Bud says the United States “was clearly founded as a Christian nation”.
Well, Bud, that’s what Religious Right activists and right-wing TV preachers want Americans to believe. But it is COMPLETELY WRONG, part of a campaign to create what Evangelicals call a “Christian Nation”. Read the U.S. Constitution: it is a wholly SECULAR document and contains zero references to Christianity or Jesus Christ.
In fact, the Constitution refers to religion only 2 times in the First Amendment, which bars laws “respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” and in Article VI, which prohibits “religious tests” for public office. Both of these Constitutional provisions are evidence that our country was NOT founded as “officially” Christian. This is America’s founding document, not personal religious beliefs.
But you know, the Founding Fathers did not create a secular government because they hated Christianity – many were believers themselves. However, they were also very aware of the dangers of a church-state union. Read a little history of the era. These men experienced first-hand what happened with church+state partnerships in Europe and in the early Colonies: oppression, tyranny, and evil in “God’s” name.
Posted by: CenterOne | May 18, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
BUSH TOLD CHIRAC: “Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East”
FROM THE ARTICLE “When God Spoke to Me”: …..During those private interviews, Jacque Chirac had purportedly confessed to the journalist some personal remarks regarding the faith of George W. Bush that seemed quite daunting. He told the journalist that the latter called him twice beseeching him basically, in the name of their common “spiritual faith”, i.e., “Christianity”, to join the collective effort of the coalition being formed to wage a preemptive war against Iraq. In his first telephonic call he reportedly said to Jacque Chirac: “Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East” and then added that “the biblical prophecies are being fulfilled”…..
Posted by: DICKERSON3870 | May 18, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
“Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man & his god, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of SEPARATION BETWEEN CHURCH AND STATE.”
Thomas Jefferson, Jan. 1, 1802
BAM!
Posted by: Thomas Jefferson | May 18, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
How about the idea that an evangelical President was getting briefed by his Secretary of Defense with Bible verses that would continue to justify a war against evil. or put more simply-President Bush was being manipulated by his two closest advisors who had a personal and financial reason to continue a war regardless of the cost in lives and budget deficits even to the extent of making loans from China that threatens our Sovereignty and freedom from foreign influence?
Posted by: Dave of Detroit | May 18, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
do you really understand what Jefferson meant?
“”Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man & his god, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of SEPARATION BETWEEN CHURCH AND STATE.”
Thomas Jefferson, Jan. 1, 1802
BAM!
***************
Sovereign Reverence, recognizes God
Jefferson recognizes that man cannot be separated from the “account” of God and none other…
Jefferson goes on to say, that the government shall legislate no law respecting the establishment of religion…meaning, no legislation can be promulgated slanted to any method of worship……..as in the government cannot declare the government is “Catholic” Protestant, Baptist…etc…..this is what Jefferson meant, isn’t it…this is the separation he meant, not that man could be separated from account of God.
Most misunderstood about Jefferson, in fact, Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, and specifically included the “creator” in the Declaration….which defines his thinking about his “account” to God for our nation.
BAM
Posted by: sydney | May 18, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Thomas Jefferson was a man of deep religious conviction – his conviction was that religion was a very personal matter, one which the government had no business getting involved in. He was vilified by his political opponents for his role in the passage of the 1786 Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom and for his criticism of such biblical truths as the Great Flood and the theological age of the Earth. As president, he discontinued the practice started by his predecessors George Washington and John Adams of proclaiming days of fasting and thanksgiving. He was a staunch believer in the separation of church and state.
BAM!
Posted by: Thomas Jefferson | May 18, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
By the way, sydney, your grammar is atrocious.
Posted by: Thomas Jefferson | May 18, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
The Lemon Test is used to examine a law to see if it has the effect of establishing a religion. The Court wrote:
In the absence of precisely stated constitutional prohibitions, we must draw lines with reference to the three main evils against which the Establishment Clause was intended to afford protection: “sponsorship, financial support, and active involvement of the sovereign in religious activity.”
Every analysis in this area must begin with consideration of the cumulative criteria developed by the Court over many years. Three such tests may be gleaned from our cases. First, the statute must have a secular legislative purpose; second, its principal or primary effect must be one that neither advances nor inhibits religion; finally, the statute must not foster “an excessive government entanglement with religion.”
Posted by: Thomas Jefferson | May 18, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
RUMSFELD AND BUSH KILLED AND WOUNDED THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE IN THE NAME OF GOD!
HELL IS THEIR NEXT DESTINATION.
Posted by: Juez7 | May 19, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
I like what I’m seeing…a lot of atheist comments that terrorism, undeserved violence, lying, etc. are intolerable in the U.S. government. A lot of god-fearers hold their leadership to a high standard that rejects only those actions which are unjustified by evidence of enemy attrocity.
I would suggest that there is much commonality in all of this debate — somehow it’s more fun focus on differences. But if our entire continent was ravaged and tens of millions of innocent civilians slaughtered, it seems that atheist and believer would both see that as a crime, and probably both would stand united to fight for our freedoms. I think the reason for the disgust with these scriptures is that the Iraq war already comes with so many unverified assertions and attrocities.
None of us admit that we all operate on limited knowledge. If the Bush administration was lying all along, Heaven help them. If they were acting in good faith (and much of their actions seem to be), Heaven help those who will not tolerate any attempt to maintain this country’s God-given freedoms!
Posted by: American Respect | May 20, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Me had typos!! They are corrected, below:
I like what I’m seeing…a lot of atheist comments that terrorism, undeserved violence, lying, etc. are intolerable in the U.S. government. Likewise, a lot of god-fearers hold their leadership to a high standard that rejects only those actions which are unjustified by evidence of enemy attrocity.
I would suggest that there is much commonality in all of this debate — somehow it’s more fun to focus on differences. But if our entire continent was ravaged and tens of millions of innocent civilians slaughtered, it seems that atheist and believer would both see that as a crime based on firm logic, and at that point probably both would stand united to fight for our freedoms and tolerate any personal reason for fighting that war. I think the reason for the disgust with these scriptures is that the Iraq war already comes with so many unverified assertions and attrocities. (no logic!) Had there been logic and evidence, then perhaps there would be more focus on the correctness of our leader’s war motivations, rather than a justifiable focus on their improper use of religion for war.
Many of us will not admit that we all operate on limited knowledge, including our top officials. If the Bush administration was lying all along, Heaven help them. If they were acting in good faith (and much of their actions seem to be), Heaven help those who will not tolerate any attempt to maintain this country’s God-given freedoms!
Posted by: American Respect | May 20, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am
Rumsfeld’s Biblical Message-Laden Intelligence Briefs … He’s an idiot.
Posted by: Ted | May 20, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
That is why you will never ever see another right wing evangelical in the white house again. Religion is going to be the destroyer of America if it is allowed to continue it’s rampage. It has damaged this country more than anything in our history. It has forced American against American, and has even been used politically to stir hatred and cause divisiveness. This should not be allowed to happen. This is a minority of people trying to internally ruin this country, and until people start denouncing it as the evil it is it will continue to erode this countries promise of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. RELIGION NO MORE!!
Posted by: Chuck | May 20, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
It’s so tiring listening to people claiming to be religious but doing the very things the Bible (or religious texts) prohibits.
That same hypocrisy exists for patriots who claim to be, but do the things the Constitution and Bill of Rights prohibits.
Being a church member doesn’t guarantee that one is ethical or moral, but there are many who use that membership to deceive people into thinking they are.
Posted by: Pat | June 11, 2009, 8:59 am 8:59 am