By Gorman Gorman

May 29, 2009 8:44am

The Note, 5/29/2009: The Fight Within — Republican vs. Republican on Sotomayor

ABC News’ Jonathan Karl reports: Here is a sign of the political brilliance of the nomination of Judge Sotomayor to the Supreme Court: There is an intramural war among Republicans over how to take her on. The latest GOP salvos come from Peggy Noonan and Senator John Cornyn (R-TX) and are aimed at Rush Limbaugh, Newt Gingrich and the loud chorus of conservatives who have called for Sotomayor’s head. "Some, and they are idiots, look at Judge Sotomayor and say: attack, attack, kill," Noonan writes in The Wall Street Journal. A conservative activist told the New York Times, ‘We need to brand her.’ Another told me a fight is needed to excite the base. "Excite the base? How about excite a moderate, or interest an independent? How about gain the attention of people who aren’t already on your side?" More Noonan: "She is of course a brilliant political pick—Hispanic when Republicans have trouble with Hispanics, a woman when they’ve had trouble with women. Her background (public housing, Newyorican, Catholic school, Princeton, prominence) is as moving as Clarence Thomas’s, and that is moving indeed. Politically she’s like a beautiful doll containing a canister of poison gas: Break her and you die." Less eloquently, but more consequentially, Senator John Cornyn is saying much the same thing. On judicial matters, Senator Cornyn may be the most formidable Republicans in the Senate, and one of the most conservative.  But Cornyn tells National Public Radio he does not like to hear Newt Gingrich and Rush Limbaugh call Sonia Sotomayor a racist. Asked by NPR if he’s worried that comments like Limbaugh and Gingrich’s harm the confirmation debate, Cornyn said: "Neither one of these men are elected Republican officials. I just don’t think it’s appropriate and I certainly don’t endorse it. I think it’s wrong." That doesn’t mean Conryn will support her.  But he thinks the debate should focus on her legal views and her record. Even Sotomayor’s record on abortion (or lack thereof) is playing out well for the White House:  Just ask Barbara Boxer and Pro-life Catholic William Donahue. Despite all the hand-wringing about Sotomayor’s  unknown views on abortion, Boxer says she isn’t worried at all. From the Washington Post: Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), one of the Senate’s leading abortion rights supporters, said she will not specifically ask Sotomayor about Roe but said she has no reason to doubt Sotomayor’s position on the issue. "I feel as comfortable as I could possibly feel," Boxer said. And yet — Pro-lifer William Donohue Tells the Washington Times he likes Sotomayor too. "William Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, said Judge Sotomayor’s record has more bright spots than conservative Catholics can reasonably expect to get from an appointee of President Obama. "’If the Republicans are smart, they would not fight this one," he told The Washington Times in an interview Thursday.’" Remember Miguel Estrada? For all the concern about alienating Hispanic voters, Byron York reminds us that Democrats torpedoed President Bush’s nomination of Miguel Estrada to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals.  York: "It was precisely the fact that Estrada was Hispanic that made Democrats and their activist allies want to kill his nomination. They were determined to deny a Republican White House credit, political and otherwise, for putting a first-rate Hispanic nominee on the bench." Sotomayor:  another Scalia? The New York Times looks at the temperament issue, with some choice quotes from lawyers who have appeared before her court and call her "difficult", "nasty" and a "terror on the bench." "Her demeanor on the bench is an issue that conservatives opposed to her nomination see as a potential vulnerability — and one that Mr. Obama carefully considered before selecting her." Stylistically, she’s more Scalia than Thomas, known for tough, relentless and occasionally acerbic questioning.  To supporters, that’s a good thing. "Judge Sotomayor’s colleagues on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit say her tough and direct questioning reflects engagement and, sometimes, an effort to persuade her colleagues. Those qualities, coupled with a gregarious personality, they said, make her a powerful force behind the scenes, where she has used her mastery of the cases to change minds, improve opinions and forge consensus. "Those skills, some observers say, could make her an able politician on the Supreme Court and allow her to serve as an intellectual counterweight to Justice Antonin Scalia, a conservative who is known for his acerbic questioning." Stimulus:  Sluggish Start The New York Times reported a few weeks ago that only 6 percent of the $787 billion stimulus had been spent.  It seemed like an anemic number inconsistent with all the talk of "shovel-ready" projects and the need for a quick injection of federal tax dollars into the economy.  Now it turns out that the number — which the Times took directly from the White House’s figures on recovery.gov – was exaggerated.  It turns out the White House had over-stated the amount of stimulus spending by almost one-third, vastly over-stating how much money the Labor Department had spent on its unemployment trust fund. Michael Cooper in the New York Times: "The adjusted figures mean that the value of stimulus activity at that time was actually only $35 billion or $36 billion — less than 5 percent of the $787 billion package. "The Labor Department’s adjustment means that the graph on recovery.gov showing its spending to date — which had looked earlier in the month like a sharp inclined plane — now more closely resembles a particularly steep mountain, going up and then down." Jake Tapper spots a particularly glaring White House exaggeration. In it’s "100 Days, 100 Projects" report on the stimulus, the White House a "$27 million" project to "green retrofit" the Regency House public housing project in Washington, DC.  Tapper reports the actual stimulus money used in the project:  $59,000. Attention Republicans:  There must be a pony in here somewhere Gallup puts President Obama’s approval rating at an enviable 65 percent, but that is exactly where Jimmy Carter was at this point during his presidency. The Literary Doctor Howard Dean has two announcements today: 1) He’s written a new book, entitled "Howard Dean’s Prescription for Real Healthcare Reform:  How We Can Achieve Affordable Medical Care for Every American and Make Our Jobs Safer"; and, 2)  He’s becoming the chairman of the Progressive book club. Another day, another Czar.  Today the President will announce a new White House cybersecurity czar to coordinate the government’s efforts to protect government and civilian computer networks in the United States. "Now, cybersecurity will also rank as one of the key threats that Mr. Obama is seeking to coordinate from the White House," David Sanger and Thom Shanker report in the New York Times.  Sanger and Shanker report that there is more to this than meets the eye.  The White House announcement today will focus on defensive efforts.  The Pentagon also plans to create a new cyber command to coordinate offensive capabilities "as a deterrent or along side conventional weapons."   Think of it this way:  Computer hackers in military uniforms capable of taking down hostile computer networks around the world. "We are not comfortable discussing the question of offensive cyberoperations, but we consider cyberspace a war-fighting domain," said Bryan Whitman, a Pentagon spokesman. "We need to be able to operate within that domain just like on any battlefield, which includes protecting our freedom of movement and preserving our capability to perform in that environment." Gates:  Hero to the Left? How strange it is.  Defense Secretary Robert Gates — a life-long Republican, dedicated cold warrior, and the lone holdover from the Bush Administration -is the leading contender for Most Valuable Player in the Obama cabinet, especially among the left. Exhibit A — This  love-letter from Joe Klein in Time Magazine: "After a quietly impressive career in government that has spanned more than 30 mostly Republican years, Robert Gates is suddenly seeming almost, well, charismatic. He reeks authority. He is, according to several sources, the most respected voice in National Security Council debates. The President is said to love his unadorned manner. Much of which is attributable to the fact that, in the self-proclaimed twilight of his public career, Gates has emerged as that most exotic of Washington species — the bureaucrat unbound, candid and fearless. He tells members of Congress what he really thinks about their pet programs. He upends Pentagon priorities, demotes the military-industrial hardware pipeline and promotes the immediate needs of the troops on the front line. He fires high-ranking subordinates without muss or controversy .., His nonstop effort to reform the institution — abetted by military rebels who had been cast into the outer darkness by the powers that were — is a great untold story of the war on terrorism." More Klein: "When, in a recent conversation, I noted that he seemed gleefully outspoken these days, Gates offered a twinkly smile and said, ‘What are they going to do, fire me?’" Speaking of Gates, he’s not too wound-up about North Korea’s recent tests of a long-range missile and a nuclear weapon. "I don’t think that anybody in the administration thinks there is a crisis," Gates said. "What we do have, though, are two new developments that are very provocative, that are aggressive, accompanied by very aggressive rhetoric." "I do not think there is a need for us to reinforce our military presence in the South," Gates told reporters aboard his plane en route to a security conference in Singapore. "Whatever responses there are have to be multilateral." Kicker: "Politically she’s like a beautiful doll containing a canister of poison gas: Break her and you die."
   - Peggy Noonan on Sonia Sotomayor Today on "Top Line," ABCNews.com’s daily political Webcast: ABC News’ Jan Crawford Greenburg and George Stephanopoulos. Noon ET.
Follow The Note on Twitter: http://twitter.com/thenote

For up-to-the-minute political updates check out The Note’s blog . . . all day every day.

User Comments

The GOP is taking what should have been a sizable opportunity to restore some form of relevance and credibility upon their party and turning it into a disaster.
You cannot have people considered to be “leaders” of your party screaming hateful epithets like “Latina woman racist” about the president’s Supreme Court pick.

Posted by: matt | May 29, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am

The GOP Are a Disaster right now! if they dont wake up and stop this HATE There is going to be no GOP. They have already alienated almost every demographic

Posted by: Angie in Pa | May 29, 2009, 9:00 am 9:00 am

Judge Sotomayor does not support the rule of law. The United States Constitution is the basis for our government. She has openly stated that the apellate courts decide and should decide policy. We have three branches of government for a reason. Executive, Legislative and Judicial. Judge Sotomayor and justices like her would usurp the Legislative branch which is not the intended purpose of the Judiciary. Supreme Court justices are obligated to follow the rule of law themselves, fairly and impartially. Justice Sotomayor is not just indifferent fairness and impartiality but has declared her intent to do otherwise. Laws should not be made by judges but by legislature and if those laws conflict with the constitution the justices are right to vacate those laws. Justice Sotomayor believes that she should make rulings based upon her sex and her favored Latino culture. If rulings like that are allowed “Jim Crow” would be alive and well.

Posted by: Mr C | May 29, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am

I know that as a caucasion male (white man), I’ve never even come close to the life experiences that this woman has had.

Posted by: LongT | May 29, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am

A subperb American that ‘reflects’ the American I know….A subperb jurist that is reflective of that. A strong woman who has real strength that propelled her to the top! I am so proud of this Pick. BRILLIANT!

Posted by: tychisum | May 29, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am

This Judge Sotomayor is a person who supports abortion. I believe that abortion is just as much murder as
shooting someone or killing them with
some other kind of weapon.

Posted by: Tim Smithpeters | May 29, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Isn’t certainly says something about a person when they want to brandish an individual with a label before she is even asked a single question in front of Congress….Gingrich, Linbaugh, Coulter, and the Conservative righ-wing embarass themselves when they call her a hack, rascist, ultra-liberal, etc…I would bet most of them did not even read one opinion of Sotomayor prior to speculation of her nominiation and now proport they know enough about her to pin her with a label…They ought to be embarassed…but I am sure they are not for to be embarrassed would mean self-reflection and that is something Conservatives simply do not know how to do….

Posted by: indy_voter | May 29, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

First of all she’s a great pick…Pres. Obama is right.
Second of all I’m so sick of the abortion issues…The government shouldn’t tell a woman what to do with her body…there are all kinds of circumstances. If your child was raped would you really want her to have the baby? AND perhaps if we would preach birth control to these young people there would be no need for abortions. I love the way people like Gov. Palin say no birth control, abstain. Oh yes her daughter is a young unwed mother…and they have the money to help her raise it. The average person does not have money to raise their child’s child…

Posted by: Barb | May 29, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am

AND the GOP IS a Disaster….Instead of concentraing on the economy and working with this president all they have done is blast him from the minute he took office. They cannot understand that they lost and the American public is fed up.
I’m also tired of the gay rights issues. Let them get married…what is the big problem? If we would concentrate on important issues rather than abortion (Use birth control!) and gay issues we would be better off. No wonder other countries laugh at us.

Posted by: Barb | May 29, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am

this is a no win for anyone opposed to this lady. The Reps should go along with the Dems (or just be absent for the vote) on this one and let history determine what she stands for. If she turns out to be a great Supreme Court Justice, they can say “We did not oppose her appointment” and if she turns out to be a terrible SCJ, they can say “this is what the Dems wanted. Blame them”.

Posted by: whatashame | May 29, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

I think she has all the qualifications & duly deserves the appointment. It’s just too bad she has to endure a pack of religious cowards, ranting how someone should live their financial life, on choices dictated by religious tax-free loaders, who sponge off the public for their life’s existence.

Posted by: Atheistno1 | May 29, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Cooperation? Not in or with the GOP.

Posted by: Thinking | May 29, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am

We all knew the repubs were going to knock down anyone President Obama chose. That was a given.
What’s more disturbing is the way they are going about the knocking down. I have never seen a more nasty approach coming from supposed intellectuals. This is negativity at it’s worst! The repubs are going to pay for this and other nastiness in 2010 and after.

Posted by: js45601 | May 29, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Apparently, the Republican Party will not be satisfied until it only represents the rabid, extremist, lunatic fringe Right Wing.
Too bad it has become morally and intellectually bankrupt. It’s ironic, I guess, that the Party of Religion is also morally bankrupt. Apparently, it’s possible to be a good religionist and still have no morals or ethics.
Clearly, there is no connection between religiosity and ethics.

Posted by: Sammy | May 29, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Republicans are still “Stuck on Stupid”
I am so glad to see someone other than and an wrinkled up white man (awful sight to see) appointed… She is the most qualified and praise be to God, she will be confirmed…. This is “Change” we truly can beleive in.. By the way, Republicans, please get a message and a messenger!!!

Posted by: Obamaall theway | May 29, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

“Republicans” would one of you tell me What is your message? We hear you saying you oppose this, that, and the other, but what is YOU ALL’S MESSAGE?
Please advise!!

Posted by: Obamaall theway | May 29, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

I would like to see an Asian and more minorities on the Supreme Court!!!!
We are living in the 21st century!!!
Every level of government and the private sector should reflect America’s diversity!!!
I am proud to be an American!!!!
Diversity Rocks!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | May 29, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Ron – So do you think Justice Alito is racist also? He stated pretty much the same thought. Also, your not reading the full statement, that much is obvious.

Posted by: Try the truth | May 29, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

In the blogosphere there may be a lot of Republican hand-wringing about Sotomayor. But where it counts in the Congress, Republicans have no power to overturn this nomination and have stated no intention to filibuster.

Posted by: t961585 | May 29, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

I don’t like what Sotomayor said however it doesn’t make her a racist just stupid. The Repubs like Gingrich and Rush have been using hate to excite their base for 20 years and look where it has taken the country. Everyone, including members of their own party are sick of it.

Posted by: Giggles | May 29, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Democrats just fail to get. And we ain’t buying it. The republicans are not split at all over this issue. ABC News wishes their story was true.

Posted by: mojo | May 29, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

The reactionary party is doomed if they continue on this course.

Posted by: Ant | May 29, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

I’D LIKE TO SEE the Republicans, during the confirmation hearings, get hold of recordings of Kennedy, Schumer,TurbanDurbin, and other Dems.during the Bork,Thomas,Alito hearings and to play those recordings to Sotomayor as the Republican questions and comments for her to respond to.

Posted by: Ron | May 29, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

If the worry is that attacking Sotomayor will cause Hispanics to abandon the Republican Party, I’d like to know if blacks abandoned the Democrat-Socialist Party after their brutal attacks on Clarence Thomas.

Posted by: Ron | May 29, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

“Democrats just fail to get. And we ain’t buying it. The republicans are not split at all over this issue. ABC News wishes their story was true.”
Mojo, denial is NOT a river in Egypt…….

Posted by: SearamblerOne | May 29, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

The GOP cannot help but try to show who is the most right winger of all!
AS they devlolve further and further to placate their base, the further away from teh priciples of true conservatism and Reagan principles, they look like the fools they are.
Rush wants ratings, Cheney is trying to undue his legacy and Newt is in it for Newt. Everytime one of these opens their mouths, they send more voeters away from the GOP into the democratic party.
We need at least two strong parties in thie nation, but the GOP does not seem to be one of them.

Posted by: scott jeffries | May 29, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

One path is wide and goes over a cliff. The other path is narrow and does not. If some republicans want to take the wide path with the democrats, so be it. Human history will reveal the “political brilliant” for who they really are.

Posted by: Wayword1 | May 29, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

What do you expect Cornyn to say? He is a Bushie who needs Hispanic votes to be reelected.

Posted by: Dallas Texan | May 29, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

the only hate i see is comming from the left. the gop will be just fine by 2010. as the country begins to look more like california, and it will, so will the politcal fate of those who preach spend and tax policy. i actually laugh when someone from left comments on how the other party should change. as long as pelosi and reid are out there the gop will just fine and just in time.

Posted by: catman | May 29, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Best of luck to Sotomayor if the nomination goes through as it seems it will. It’s great that she’s the first Hispanic on the Supreme Court, but she has a lot of judicial challenges ahead of her. The US faces these domestic challenges but also international challenges. For instance, we should do more to address severe poverty overseas. The Borgen Project has good info on the estimated cost of ending global poverty:
$30 billion: Annual shortfall to end world hunger.
$550 billion: U.S. Defense budget.

Posted by: David | May 29, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

How to take on Sotomayor? How to take on Sotomayor? How about the same way you would any Supreme court nominee. Put her to the test and scrutiny you would any white male. Or are we going to continue down the road of low expectation bigotry in which the Democrats are famous.

Posted by: William | May 29, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Neat post SearamblerOne!

Posted by: Chuck | May 29, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

There is nothing but party politics showing up here today (and yesterday)concerning the Sotomayor nomination. The woman will be confirmed, not a lot of disagreement about that. Anyone have any thoughts on what is going to happen in Korea?

Posted by: Chuck | May 29, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Imagine the supreme court is all women. Except for one man, who is black and has cancer. Would you think the call for a white man be ‘racist’ then???? folks said, if a white guy said that, it would be construed as racist…uhhh, no. Not if there was not even one white man on the bench! Once again, republican fat boys speak without thinking.

Posted by: frank | May 29, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

I’d like to know if blacks abandoned the Democrat-Socialist Party after their brutal attacks on Clarence Thomas—well. Clarence Thomas attacked blacks so that’s not a good comparison. And he married a white women, while harrassing a beautiful black women, so really, not a good comparison.

Posted by: frank | May 29, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

The plight of the GOP can only be attributed to one influence; that of the “Penguin”, You don’t think W was calling the shots, do you??? What was once the the GRAND old party, is now gone! Intelligent leaders like Eisenhauer, Goldwater, Henry Cabot Lodge Jr., William F. Buckley (in my lifetime) to name a few, have now been replaced with pure Hacks. And they aren’t finished yet, they will soon get rid of some more, Collin Powell, for example. JUST THINK, the GOP is being influenced by the likes of community college dropouts, hmmmm

Posted by: Richard in Texas | May 29, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Judge Sotomayor spoke about her up bringing and experiences in a public housing project in New York and how it could posibly make her more reflective in making certain decisions that are better than a male white who hasn’t had those same experiences. It is only common sense for people to reflect on personal experiences when making decisions but that doesn’t mean that they will make bad decisions. It’s wrong for her to be labled a racist based on that one statement that she made.

Posted by: johnnylee | May 29, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Ron:
Clarence who? He does not represent the Blacks in this country!!!!
I am still waiting for a qualified Black like Thurgood Marshall to be on the Supreme Court!!!!
Where are the Asian on the Supreme Court?

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | May 29, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Dear “sisterdearest09″ …… They’re coming, and that’s what’s scaring the GOP’s pants off.

Posted by: Richard in Texas | May 29, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

me i checked the dumocrats won. the gop is doing just fine.with pelosi and reid in power there will plenty to go after in 2010. thats why we have these stories.by 2010 the rest of the country will look like california and these california politicians who are predominately democrats are in big trouble.sooner or later the lies do catch up with you.reverse descrimination is just beginning to catch fire.

Posted by: catman | May 29, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Gingrich: “If Civil War, suffrage, and Civil Rights are to mean anything, we cannot accept that conclusion,” he writes. “It is simply un-American. There is no room on the bench of the United States Supreme Court for this worldview.”
So, apparently, The Civil War, fighting to give women and blacks the right to vote, and ending discrimination are all made meaningless if Sotomayor is confirmed to the court. Amazing what one liberal justice replacing another can do to the world and history itself!

Posted by: sandy | May 29, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Yes, indeed. Keep the sheeple focused on the GOP while the Obama administration bankrupts them. Mainstream media reporting at its finest.

Posted by: Stacey | May 29, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

Mr. C
Your comment is inaccurate.
You obviously have not heard or read entire text of comments Judge Sotomayor made — that you have so clearly not comprehended.
You don’t like her… that is your right.
You don’t like Obama… also your right.
You don’t like any opinion that doesn’t agree with your own and will turn the words into something other than the truth in order to justify your dislike… that just makes you right… a right-wing ideologue, that is!

Posted by: dassis | May 29, 2009, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

“Judge Sotomayor does not support the rule of law. The United States Constitution is the basis for our government. She has openly stated that the apellate courts decide and should decide policy.”
Do a little research, Mr C – the appellate courts DO make policy. Honest! And guess what: everyone in the legal system knows this! When a lawyer cites a precedent for a case, where do you think that precedent came from? An appellate court ruling. Again, please do a little research before parroting the Rush non-factoids…..

Posted by: SearamblerOne | May 30, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am

I was a Republican, then a Democrat and then Independent…I’m not sure where I am right now but I can’t support BO. To be quite honest….I THINK THEY ALL STINK AND LIE AND CHEAT. Of all the millions of people in the world, is this the best we can do?

Posted by: Carol in Alabama | May 30, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

catman | May 29, 2009 4:29:12 PM
… “reverse descrimination is just beginning to catch fire.” …
_______________
What you refer to as “reverse discrimination” (spelled properly.) Is Really restraining the oppressor from inflicting the “painful bonds of discrimination” on “The Protected Classes!”

Posted by: bobj72 | May 31, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

“Democrats just fail to get. And we ain’t buying it. The republicans are not split at all over this issue. ABC News wishes their story was true.”
Mojo, you’re the one who doesn’t get it. Do you represent every Republican? If not, then please stop with the wild speculation. You do not represent me, or even the majority of Republicans. The GOP has been hijacked by angry zealots and armchair pseud-intellectuals who mindlessly attack everyone they can’t engage on fair grounds. *This* is why I can’t call myself a conservative anymore. The blind partisan loyalty gets us nowhere.

Posted by: Alex | June 1, 2009, 5:25 am 5:25 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.