By Caitlin Taylor

May 11, 2009 8:10am

The Note, 5/11/2009: Dollars and Sense — Obama seeks light touch in healthcare push

By RICK KLEIN Sometimes less is more. And maybe a lot less can mean a lot more. (We’re not just talking costs here.) Monday begins the active phase in President Obama’s healthcare push — the part where he puts himself on the line publicly. Having the stakeholders in one place, leading with sacrifice (or some version of it) is likely to provide some impetus to the No. 1 domestic agenda item out there. (And has there been more optimism around healthcare reform’s possibility than there is at this moment? Will it stick around?) This remains a delicate congressional fight, stuffed with buzzwords and the possibility of buzz-off moments. The few Senate Republicans who are willing to work with Democrats fear that House leaders will take the process over at any time — and that the president won’t be there to cut the deals that get the Senate to 60. The “public” option has crowded out the rest of the debate — and that whole part of actually paying for universal health coverage is being left for another day. It comes at a time of party mistrust. Through an accumulation of circumstances and coincidences, a sharp critique of the Democrats’ national-security policies is emerging, from Guantanamo to interrogation techniques. (No, the voices of 1996 probably aren’t the most effective for the GOP. But having Wanda Sykes mix it up with Rush Limbaugh only hammers the point home — everybody ready to hear about the “drive-bys,” again?)  It’s time for some presidential cheerleading — and a bit of nudging. President Obama holds an 11:30 am ET meeting on healthcare, with stakeholders who know each other all too well bringing some good news with them. Per the White House, the president plans to say: “We cannot continue down the same dangerous road we’ve been traveling for so many years, with costs that are out of control, because reform is not a luxury that can be postponed, but a necessity that cannot wait.” “It is a recognition that the fictional television couple, Harry and Louise, who became the iconic faces of those who opposed health care reform in the ’90s, desperately need health care reform in 2009. And so does America.” “That is why these groups are voluntarily coming together to make an unprecedented commitment. Over the next 10 years — from 2010 to 2019 — they are pledging to cut the growth rate of national health care spending by 1.5 percentage points each year — an amount that’s equal to over $2 trillion.” ABC’s Jake Tapper, on “Good Morning America” Monday: “The White House calls this a game-changer — the major industries in the healthcare debate coming together pledging to voluntarily cut health care costs by $2 trillion over the next decade. The White House says this means healthcare reform will happen this year.” Adds Tapper: “These healthcare industries are not doing this out of the goodness of their heart — they want a seat at the table, so they can fend off things in the healthcare plan as it’s being written.”

“There’s a very good chance, probably the best chance we’ve had in 15 or 16 years, to get actually get a healthcare plan through,” ABC’s George Stephanopoulos reported on “GMA.” “The fact that this group . . . has said they’d rather switch than fight is a huge difference.”

User Comments

Nope, I don’t trust them. The insurance industry should have a seat at the table, but they should also have duct tape across their mouth during negotiations. This isn’t a good sign, and if political figures are touting the industry’s ‘sacrifice’ (gag) as a good sign, healthcare reform is in real trouble. The industry is the problem, and while we’re at it we should tackle the pharma companies while we’re at it. They operate under the most obscene economic protections imaginable.

Posted by: Trust and you'll be trusted said the liar to the fool | May 11, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Why does he have to tread lightly?
He is all for socialism, so making us a socialized healthcare nation should be a task too large for his pea brain.

Posted by: MarkOne | May 11, 2009, 8:50 am 8:50 am

So the deal is we will keep on stealing but we will steal less.

Posted by: Keith | May 11, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Wait… he’s a socialist? Gasp. And a Muslim? Ugh. He has no birth certificate? Eek gads. Quick, someone get us a fat radio talk show host. We need to let the country know of this outrage.

Posted by: What? Really? | May 11, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am

I trust Obama. He’ll play them like a violin.

Posted by: Amy B Maine | May 11, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Here is how I know the “average” healthcare receiver is getting a FAIR SHAKE……When the health care and pharma industry is screamming bloody murder how unfair these changes will be to them and their profits!!!! Then I know it is TRUE REFORM for the rest of us AND I’LL BELIEVE IT WHEN I SEE IT..WE ALWAYS GET SCREWED OVER BY THE BIG AND POWERFUL LOBBYIST SLIME .
Mackie

Posted by: mackie | May 11, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am

He is all for socialism, so making us a socialized healthcare nation should be a task too large for his pea brain.
Funny, MarkOne……His brain capacity is quite a bit larger than his predecessor. The comics are all upset, he isn’t giving the material to talk about that the former did. But, if you become famous, you can.

Posted by: scentsofroses | May 11, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am

$2 trillion seems too high but if the captains of health care industry are in agreement than it is more believable.
Now I want to see what these reforms are.
Ryan

Posted by: Attract Prosperity | May 11, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

It’s another fight for Obama where moderates will dictate the process. Conrad and Baucus will be lobbied to death by the White House.

Posted by: matt | May 11, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Real Healthcare Reform
Changing Priorities, Incentives and the Rules of the Game; Creating an Electronic Health Record for Every Citizen Who Wants One
If you have the financial resources of Bill Gates or Warren Buffett you needn’t pay money to a health plan each month, since if you get sick or injured – even very seriously – you have more than enough money to pay all your medical bills yourself.
But those of us who have significantly less financial resources must find some other means of dealing with the thousands or even hundreds of thousands of dollars or more of medical expenses that we might incur should a serious illness or injury be our fate.
Enter the concept of “health insurance”.
Large numbers of individuals and/or their employers pay some money each month into one or another big pot called a “health plan”. Those individuals who remain essentially very healthy for many years and then suddenly die or perhaps leave a particular health plan for some other reason – if they have put more money into the pot than was taken out to pay all their medical expenses – wind up helping to pay the medical bills of those members of the health plan who become seriously ill or injured and incur a lot of medical expenses.
Many Americans covered by some form of health insurance don’t seem to fully understand or perhaps choose to ignore the fact that if they become seriously ill or injured, for the most part their medical bills will be paid by the members of their health plan who have remained healthy. Keeping members of a health plan healthy by preventing illness and injury is critically important, but is something not currently given the high priority and attention it deserves.
Some Americans believe that healthcare should become a “right” of every American citizen. If a nationalized single payer health plan were enacted, every American citizen who became ill or injured – for any reason whatsoever – and incurred significant medical expenses would for the most part have his or her medical bills paid by U.S. taxpayers. Many Americans oppose such a system for America recognizing that significant difficulties such as long waiting periods and rationing of care exist in such types of government healthcare systems that currently operate in other countries such as Canada and the United Kingdom.
For any health plan to work which has a large number of people pooling their money to essentially pay the medical bills of whichever members of the plan become seriously ill or injured, rules must be established as to when and how much money may be taken out of the pot e.g. “legitimate” doctor bills and hospital bills. Equally important is keeping track of the amount of money that is being put into the pot each month in premiums paid by health plan members or their employers. If too much is being paid out in expenses as compared with the amount being received in premiums, the pot will soon become empty and the health plan will go broke.
As previously mentioned, the monthly premiums paid by individuals or their employers go into a health plan’s big pot from which “covered” healthcare expenses are paid. But also from this pot are paid all the health plan’s administrative expenses including what may be big salaries and golden parachutes for CEO’s and other “healthcare executives” – individuals who may be paid to find technicalities of one sort or another in the health plan’s agreements so the health plan can deny or reduce payments, raise premiums, cancel insurance, or in one way or another minimize or exclude “bad risks” from the health plan. All such questionable business practices are done to enable the health plan to make a profit and remain in business.
Currently we are experiencing continual increases in healthcare costs that are unsustainable and which, if unchecked, will soon seriously threaten the future of the entire American economy. Healthcare costs must be controlled, but how? If a healthcare system made up of health plans is going to have a chance of both meeting the needs of health plan members and simultaneously develop the ability to keep costs under control, priorities, incentives, and the rules by which the game is played all must be changed.
The good news is that a lot of illnesses and many injuries are actually preventable. But how will prevention ever become a top medical priority when doctors, hospitals, and other providers get paid largely for diagnosing and treating illness and injury, not for preventing it?
Although health promotion and disease and injury prevention receive fashionable and socially acceptable lip service, the fact is that most of the participants in what should be more appropriately called our “sickness and injury care system” actually have no significant financial incentive whatsoever to spend any significant time and energy in genuinely promoting health and helping to prevent disease and injury.
Much to the contrary. Other than the actual members of a health plan – patients and potential patients – and their employers and perhaps the employees of some health plans, most participants in our sickness and injury care system – because of the way they are paid – have an enormous (if unspoken) financial incentive for massive amounts of disease and injury – much of which is preventable – to continue to occur in America. Strictly from a financial point of view, for those whose incomes come solely from the treatment – not the prevention – of illness and injury, the more illness and injury that occurs, the better. And if the illness or injury is serious and requires perhaps many expensive tests, multiple surgical procedures, and other very complicated prolonged treatment in an intensive care unit, so much the better; just as long as those unfortunate individuals who happen to be ill or injured are “covered” by “good insurance”, i.e. health plans that are reliable bill payers.
This is not to say that there are not some excellent very dedicated and hardworking doctors and other health professionals – although they are paid on a fee for service basis to care for illness and injury – who nevertheless attempt to essentially work themselves out of a job by making health promotion and disease and injury prevention a top priority with their patients.
It should also be recognized that some existing health plans – e.g. Kaiser and Group Health – combine insurance, doctors, and hospitals into a single entity in such a way that provides everyone – including all the health plan’s doctors – a real incentive to spend time and effort with patients on health promotion and disease and injury prevention as well as on early diagnosis and treatment.
But unfortunately the above examples represent only a small part of the sickness and injury care system that currently exists throughout America.
For the most part – because of the way they are compensated – the majority of doctors and other professional providers, acute care hospitals and long term care facilities, pharmaceutical manufactures and pharmacists, medical and surgical equipment manufacturers and personal injury and malpractice attorneys – among others – depend mightily on massive amounts of disease and injury occurring in America; and these participants in our sickness and injury care system would be significantly negatively impacted if a lot of the preventable illnesses and injuries were actually prevented. This must be changed.
Unless the incentives and rules are changed to give as many participants as possible a real financial stake in health promotion and disease and injury prevention, in early diagnosis and treatment, and in maximizing health and minimizing disease and injury, healthcare costs in America will never be brought under control. Making appropriate changes in the incentives and the rules of the game is the real task and challenge of “healthcare reform”.
What about financial incentives for individual health plan members? Should individuals receive a financial incentive to be healthy? It is well recognized that engaging in regular exercise, abstaining from tobacco, and eating moderately so as to maintain a reasonably normal body weight are all significant factors in helping to promote an individual’s health and wellness. These healthy behaviors can all be confirmed by simple tests performed or ordered in a doctor’s office. Why shouldn’t those individuals who practice these health promoting behaviors and comply with recommended immunization schedules and appropriate preventive screening examinations such as for colon cancer and breast cancer pay significantly less in premiums to their health plan each month than those who don’t?
To really reform healthcare we must find ways – through changes in incentives and the rules of the game – to actually prevent what is preventable, to maximize early diagnosis and treatment, and minimize disease and injury with all its associated cost. We must find ways for participants to be part of our “healthcare system” and not just a part of our “sickness and injury care system”.
Significant changes in the rules of the game for our legal system – tort reform – is also critically important so that the gaming of the system now being done by personal injury and malpractice attorneys and their clients can be ended and so that the exorbitant costs to physicians and other professionals for malpractice insurance can be dramatically reduced.
Truly transforming our “sickness and injury care system” into a “healthcare system” by making significant changes in the incentives and the rules of the game may seem to be a formidable task and one that probably has never really been done before on a large scale anywhere in the world. But it is a worthy task and a critically important task for the future of America and its people.
One significant part of this process is developing the capability of creating an electronic health record for every American citizen who wants one. We need a standardized framework that will allow every American citizen to have an individual electronic health record – a computerized medical record – that can be accessed by all the doctors who care for a particular individual, regardless of wherever on the planet the doctors or the patients happen to be. It would be like having your own personal online banking account that only you have the password to, but which you can share with the doctors who are caring for you, wherever you or they may be.
I applaud those who are using their energy and expertise to upgrade our deplorable current paper medical records system and bring medical records in America into the 21st century. Developing a standardized framework for an electronic health record – for every citizen who wants one – created by your doctor with your assistance, with proper security and safeguards – is something that our national government can and should do as a part of healthcare reform.
If done well, electronic health records will be transformational in helping doctors efficiently and effectively care for patients and will save an enormous amount of time, effort, and money which is currently wasted on needless and frequently inaccurate duplication. And having an accurate electronic health record for an individual will also facilitate appropriate health promotion and disease and injury prevention for that individual. Like the telephone and the computer, someday we will all wonder how we ever got along without individual electronic health records.
All this requires action, not just words. Now is the time for Americans and their leaders and doctors and other health professionals to step up to the plate and begin the process of transforming our “American Sickness and Injury Care System” into an “American Healthcare System” that is worthy of our great country.
Robert Westafer M.D.

Posted by: Robert Westafer | May 11, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Well, of course, the Health Care Industry will do all kinds of “wonderful” things to keep any and all teeth out of any Health Care Legislation that might come down the pike. And, naturally, everything they are proposing would be “voluntary”, have no oversight,and definitely no “punishments” for failure to perform. These fat cats have been feeding at the National trough for decades and they sure don’t want anything even CLOSE to the word “REFORM” to actually occur.
Given the newly discoved generosity of the Health Care Industry it will be interesting to see exactly how much of this BS gets swallowed by President Obama and how much he allows toward watering down any meaningful Health Care Reform.
The Health Care Industry is scared to death of any form of Government sponsored Health Care Program and they will do anything and everything to derail such an undertaking.
As in most instances, the amount of common sense which is applied to the making of corrections in our National Health Care Fiasco will determine the effectiveness of the changes made. Let’s all hope there is still some common sense “out there” that hasn’t been contaminated by politics and greed.

Posted by: Chuck | May 11, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am

This stinks! Whatever happened to the promise of health care for all-the same policy as for the government workers?? Obama is just hope and image: when it comes down to real meaningful change, he has clay feet! Look st the bail out fiasco-where the bonuses are still standing; the stress tests that the bankers where in collusion;the minor credit card changes in two years; and now the “health reform” where the industry will wield power. Obama charms us away, while he is bidding time and apathy for the plutocrats.

Posted by: dennis | May 11, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Single Payer representatives were not allowed a seat at the senate finance committee meetings last week hosted by Sen. Baucus. In fact when they showed up, those pesky bunch of doctors, nurses and health care professionals were hauled away in handcuffs. The only weapons they pocessed were the truth and their voices. Perhaps they needed coming bearing gifts, like the $400,000.00 Baucus received from the health care insurance industry and pharma.
They put a black face on the oligarchy and we are asked to beleive. Why are they afraid to allow single payer supporters(such as Dr. Marcia Angell) at the table? Why during the democratic debates wasn’t Dennis Kucinich give much air time(not only an HR676 supporter, but someone who has crucned the numbers, gathered the facts and know what he is talking about). Fact is,most of our elected officials don’t want change. They are only human and why would they stop a system that allows them to take hundreds of thousands in dollars to continue it? Nothing happens in politics by accident.It is estimated last year that 18,000 Americans died because of lack of health care, health insurance or rationed care by their insurance. With these changes that Obama announced what can we expect this year, 17,999.
Remember with our 2 party system when we vote out one party, we end up with the same bird, diiferent wing.

Posted by: Barbara Calder | May 11, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

This is a minimal-type problem created by the Pharmaceutical Industry; dropped off a RX for my Wife, calling for 15 tablets. Picked it up for only $3.85, however the RX Insurer (BC/BS) would ONLY Approve of 8 tablets for the month, but Approved a Re-Order for the additional 7 tablets for an additional $3.85. Say this happens maybe what, a million times a day? That’s an additional $3.85 Million/Revenue per day, or an additional $100.10 Million/Revenue per month!!! Just this one (1) SMALL RX type Idiocy adds up to $1.2 Billion Dollars Yearly, in UNDESERVED REVENUE! Now that’s ONE WAY the American people WITH INSURANCE are getting Ripped-Off and No One seems to care. I would BET if you could calculate insurance issues of this sort, for your RX Insurer, it would be “A Snap” to come up with $1 Trillion Dollars in Annual Undeserved Revenue. (And that could go a long way, toward providing RX Coverage for the 40%+ of those with No RX coverage!)

Posted by: bobj72 | May 11, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

We should all be on the same Health Care Plan that “OUR LEADERS” have or they should be on the same plan that the “AMERICAN PEOPLE” have. You will not see them coming to our plan,because, the one they and their Family’s have is 100% paid by the “American Workers” with no deductables attached. Why would they give up what they have to get involved in the “TRASH” they are pushing off on us? When it comes to any type of reform they are pushing there are 535 (plus family members} exceptions to their rules. When it comes to these programs they are excluded,because, what they have is far better than what they are trying to give us. How many of them have lost their paychecks, their pensions, their Health Care, and their homes. I have’nt heard of one of them yet. I assure you that you never will either. They are the “AMERICAN ELITE” no matter what else they may try and tell us. All of their garbage about the Democrates or screwing us or the Republicans are screwing us means nothing.They are equally involved.How much do you hear them say about what they are willing to sacrefice to give “Every American” health care coverage.You don’t and you won’t. It is alright to take away everything “WE” have, but, let’s not change “THEIR” programs.

Posted by: Don Park | May 11, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

The Healthcare Insurance Industry volunteers to give back $2 Trillion Dollars over the next 10 Years. They should come back with $1 Trillion Annually for the next 10 Years. This could provide for a Basic Moderate Healthcare Insurance Policy offering through HHS for Anyone who would be Uninsured. (This would be administered
Much like Medicare.) Average Local area pricing for services should be mandated as part of the program. And then have the Industry Healthcare Insurance Providers compete for the Private Healthcare Insurance offerings which would be made available to INDIVIDUALS and ALL EMPLOYERS in the marketplace. Both the Employers and Providers would COMPETE for “Better Healthcare Plans” to Attract Higher Quality Employees and a Greater Volume of Sales, respectively.
The extent and complexity of services provided would likely exceed the Basic Moderate Healthcare Insurance Policy offered through HHS for the Uninsured.

Posted by: bobj72 | May 11, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

This is not health care reform as we were promised: to have it reduced some by 2019? This won’t help me at at all, I who like many have no health insurance. We need REAL health care reform, single payer health care like the countries of Europe have and take for granted. I am disappointed in this meager effort. This is being worked on by people who have never been without health care and probably know no one who has been without either. Obama has seen how it is, he knows first hand, with his mother’s cancer. I hope he does not accept this very anemic effort at health care reform. I understand that for the meeting to discuss this the single payer people were excluded from the discussion altogether but the insurance companies were all there. They are the greedy SOBs who will stand in the way of true radical health care reform. Obama, you promised. Now let’s see you fullfill that promise. Not in the next ten years but in the next year.

Posted by: LibGirl | May 11, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

PRIVATE FOR PROFIT HEALTHCARE IS AN OXYMORON!
As congress debates fixing Americas current private for profit healthcare disaster, global embarrassment, and national disgrace. The question is not weather we will have a public option. But rather what kind of public option we will have.
America is the only country in the developed world that has a GREED DRIVEN! PROFIT DRIVEN! IMMORAL! UNETHICAL! PRIVATE FOR PROFIT! healthcare delivery system.
As a result, hundreds of thousands of you are needlessly killed by your healthcare delivery system in America every year. And millions of you are crippled and injured. America is the only country in the developed World that does not have a NOT FOR PROFIT, PATIENT PROTECTING, government managed healthcare delivery option for all it’s people.
America currently has the most costly health care system in the developed world. And the lowest quality of healthcare in the developed world. And the most dangerous, deadly, and FEARED! healthcare delivery system in the developed world.
America is the only healthcare delivery system in the developed World that does not cover all it’s people automatically. And America has the most difficult healthcare system to access in the developed World.
Contact your representative and tell then that a single payer, government managed healthcare option is a must for everyone that wants it. Tell them that you demand that the public option be the finest in the World.
Tell them it should be available to everyone that wants it as a HUMAN RIGHT! Tell them it should be the easiest to access in the entire world. Tell them it should have the highest quality, with the greatest patient protections in the entire world. Tell them coverage should be automatic for everyone that wants it unless they choose to opt out. Tell them it should be the most affordable in the World. And tell them that NO ONE in the public option is to be reported to a credit agency, or driven into bankruptcy for unpaid medical bills just because they got sick, for FREEK’EN SAKES!
Tell them, none of the requirements above are negotiable. Tell them, that we are prepared to remove them from office. Tell them, we will rain down the political FIRES OF HELL! on any of them that would betray the American people. Or continue to compromise the life, health, safety, and National security of the American people for the GREED DRIVEN, PROFIT DRIVEN! private for profit Healthcare Industry.
TELL THEM NOW! AND PASS THE WORD ON.
God Bless You
Jacksmith — WORKING CLASS

Posted by: jacksmith | May 11, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Three (3)simple Healthcare plans, using automobiles in the explanations, each of the three (3) provide choices;
1.) Government PLAN (Employer’s and/or The Uninsured Individual’s) – Basic Ford, Sedan, Coupe or Truck. Cost: Government subsidized, plus Employer’s and/or The Uninsured Individual’s “ability to pay.” [Gov't ESTABLISHES Plan Prices.]
2.) Government PARTICIPATION (Employer’s & Individual’s) – Any American Model; Economy to Luxury Vehicle. Based on Competively priced plans. Cost: Government Participation, with Employer’s and/or Individual’s “desire to pay.” [Gov't and Providers NEGOTIATE Plan Prices.]
3.) Employer’s & Individual’s OPEN PLAN – Employer’s and/or Individual’s Select ANY Available Vehicle, Worldwide; Economy to Exotic-Luxury Vehicle. Cost: Based on Competively priced plans at Individual’s “desire to pay.” [THE MARKET Determines Plan Prices.]

Posted by: bobj72 | May 12, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Zolpidem tartrate.

Zolpidem tartrate.

Posted by: Zolpidem. | September 1, 2009, 7:49 am 7:49 am

Carisoprodol hydrocodone.

Carisoprodol contraindications. Effects of carisoprodol. Carisoprodol 350mg patient information. Carisoprodol.

Posted by: Buy carisoprodol. | September 3, 2009, 6:35 am 6:35 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.