By Jennifer Parker

May 14, 2009 6:41pm

The Big Debate: Is US Safer Under Obama?

Washington rocked with a volatile mix of national-security storylines this week, including President Barack Obama’s stunning reversal on the release of photographs depicting detainee abuse, the clamor for torture prosecutions, and politics swirling over the Obama administration’s promised closure of Guantanamo Bay. Throw in a Taliban-prompted refugee crisis in Pakistan, controversy surrounding the administration Afghanistan policy and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in hot water over what she knew and what she did about harsh interrogations. With us to debate the Obama administration’s foreign and national security policy — Republican Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona and Democratic Sen. Jim Webb of Virginia. We also have a powerhouse "This Week" Roundtable lined up to debate all the week’s politics: ABC contributor George Will, James Carville, Democratic strategist and author of "40 More Years: How the Democrats will Rule the Next Generation", The Nation’s Katrina vanden Heuvel, Steve Schmidt, aka "The Bullet" — a Republican strategist and former senior adviser to Sen. John McCain’s 2008 presidential campaign and Liz Cheney, daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney and former State Department official for middle east affairs. You don’t want to miss this show. See you Sunday morning. –George Stephanopoulos

User Comments

Yes the world is safer under Obama..his approval ratings are very high in the Arab world and America is not as hated as it was under George I never made a mistake Bush..America is no longer the laughing stock of the world and the world has taken notice since Obama’s election and is looking to America for leadership again. President Obama is doing a fantastic job and has the potential to be the best president we have ever had. AMERICA IS SAFER UNDER PRESIDENT OBAMA!

Posted by: Stanley | May 14, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

I know Speaker Pelosi with come up, but instead of Minority Leader Boehner, how about finally having somewhere that show a clip from Fmr. Sen. Graham, who backs up Speaker Pelosi.

Posted by: CestWhat | May 14, 2009, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

I know you’re not there to grill Liz Cheney, but just please stop her when she goes on with her talking point.
Be prepared George. Please site the White House response to Al Gore in 2002 when he was publicly going out against the Iraq invasion. Double standard?
When Liz Cheney launches in the “ticking time-bomb” or “another 9/11 next Tuesday” situation, ask how imminent was this potential attack when Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was captured in Mar. ’03 but wasn’t tortured until Aug. ’03. So debunk Liz Cheney on that L.A.’s U.S. Bank Tower attack. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed wasn’t capture until Mar. ’03 but the Bush 43 administration said they had already uncovered that plot in 2002 and also that al-Qaeda had abandoned the plot since it would now be harder to hijack a plane since everybody on abroad would know what was going on and stop it à la United 93.
Also, Liz Cheney is big on this “Why would torture unless it was to save American lives” BS. How does she respond to recent reports that the Office of the V-P order torture because they were trying to get confessions that links Iraq with 9/11.

Posted by: CestWhat | May 14, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Yest it is safer at this time but it is the combination of what President Bush has done and what President Obama is doing! As much as I do not believe in war and have never believed in it, at different times of presidency and world crisis one cannot compare apple and orange and come out with a fair judgement nor we should instead of focusing on praising our leaders at the time they are doing their best while we provide them with the best guidence!

Posted by: RoseParvin | May 14, 2009, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Liz Cheney?
You couldn’t get the old man?

Posted by: doug | May 14, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

For some Americans,(they are in the minority thank God) if as president you speak harsh words to the muslim world and threaten them and call them names then that’s strength..For some Americans if you don’t change your mind on an issue even if you are wrong..then that’s strength..That is not strength..that is stupidity!. When you realize that you are going wrong you change course..that is commonsense! We have a president with commonsense and I support my president 100% because he is a thinker who can change his mind easily for the better and not allow foolish pride to cloud objectivity. Obama listens to his advisers and if what they say makes more sense than what he thinks..it easy for him to go along with his advisers advice..that is commonsense! The guy is honest and that’s is why he connects with most Americans and that is why his approval ratings are so high in this country and around the world..people gravitate to honesty. If some of you travel as much as I do you would understand that Obama is very popular around the world and the world respects him and believes that he would provide the kind of leadership that the world is looking to America for. Most people around the world don’t hate Americans..what they hate is the attitude of the previous government of “America is the best and you need to follow us and its our way or the highway” that attitude stunk and as an American I understood why the people in other countries felt that way..Since Obama..people’s perception are changing. America is part of the world(Obama’s philosophy)..America is not the World (Bush’s philosophy)..That’s the difference! I am a proud American but I understand why the outside world felt/feels the way they did/do

Posted by: Stanley | May 14, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

George Bush is the best president we ever had! And America was safer under Bush

Posted by: Stanley | May 14, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

I’ll ask again today, who is Liz Cheney all of a sudden, that we should care what she thinks? How is her opinion relevant or qualified above anyone else’s? She is the daughter of the slimiest man imaginable, where is her credibility? Good grief, doesn’t the Republican party have ANY women more qualified to hire as pundits? I guess I shouldn’t be surprised at the logic in the decision to use her, because the GOP pulled her out of the same pool of progeny-whose-names-are-their-only-possible-asset that they pulled Bush Jr. from. This is just another example of a handful of rich families banding together to keep the money and the power in their control and slide their hapless offspring into undeserved roles as the “leaders” of tomorrow.

Posted by: iamwomaninMI | May 14, 2009, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Why is Liz Cheney of all people being given a platform? ABC like other news outlets (more like outlet STORE) want to stir the pot to make more news. Lizzie is just trying to keep her monstrous father, albeit a father nonetheless, out of prison. He needs to pay for his war crimes though. Liz will have to do without daddy for awhile.
Cheney is a war criminal. Bush was a Manchurian Candidate. His ineptitude shouldn’t preclude him from prosecution, however.

Posted by: Brad | May 14, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

Just wondering. Does any remember “Yellowcake” How can anybody trust the C.I.A.? Nearly every one of Bush 43′s exit interview had him complaining about the poor work of the C.I.A. yet Speaker Pelosi is anti-C.I.A.?

Posted by: CestWhat | May 14, 2009, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

What kind of POTUS values “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” more then the Geneva Conventions?

Posted by: CestWhat | May 14, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

It doesn’t really matter since this is focused on the Bin Laden types of the world. What about saving us from our own stupidity. Islamic folks are the least of my worries. I would be much more worried about the collapse of our currency.

Posted by: Huh | May 15, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

It’s only a big debate if we are safer if you listen to disgraced Republicans, and the news media that are trying to stay relevant, even if it means stirring the pot, and creating unrest.
We are safer. It’s that simple.

Posted by: Brad | May 15, 2009, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Are there actually people who really believe that the “warm and fuzzy” feelings the US is giving these animals in the Middle East who have grown up HATING us,grew up learning the proper technique of beheading someone, who have no value of human life and who are training for our annihilation will change their point of view towards us? Come on! How naive are you?? I’m not saying we need to cause them undo harm or punish them for their beliefs, just that we need to be “real” and keep our guards up. Handing over our interrogation secrets and possibly photos to go along with them will do nothing but fuel their fire and give them new recruit material! Pres. Obama is making our defense weaker by the day! 100% To believe otherwise is to be very very naive in the ways of the world…. Its scary and dangerous how many people believe this.

Posted by: jamrad | May 15, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am

jamrad: what SPECIFIC facts do you have that President Obama is “making our defense weaker by the day?”

Posted by: EdDoc80 | May 15, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am

It is safer than prior to 9/11, because the former Preseident went on the offensive and has eliminated AQ’s top cadre of terrorists.
We will not know if Obama has made it safer until his term ends.
The fact is, there has not been a single terrorist attack on US soil since 9/11.

Posted by: J House | May 15, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

If America was so safe under Bush then somebody explain why the horrible day of 9/11 took place. He completely ignored terrorism until we were hit, and then somehow managed to convince so many of you only he could keep you safe?

Posted by: FedUp | May 15, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am

FedUp, Bush deserves blame for 9/11 but the only reason it didn’t happen under Clinton was because the lead hijacker told Bin Ladin they weren’t ready to attack yet.
He wanted them to attack during the Clinton ‘peace talks’ with Israel and Arafat. That is a fact.
The whole notion whether we are ‘safer or not’ is nonsense anyway.
If we are attacked before the end of Obama’s term, what will you say then?

Posted by: J House | May 15, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Ed, Let me give you specific facts-
1)The President has shown our hand to our enemy and has told them the limits of our methods to extract information from them.
2) The President has committed to a hard date for withdrawing US forces from Iraq, regardless the conditions on the ground
3) The President has done nothing so far to stop Iran from developing the bomb
4) NK has kicked out the UN inspectors and vows to test more ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons
Have these policies made us ‘safer’?
Have they strengthened America’s defense?

Posted by: J House | May 15, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

This country is going to get attacked this year. Obama is a disaster that is going to do great harm to this country and I think that is the plan. He will go down as the worste President we have ever elected unless he gets better on the job training.

Posted by: nookly23 | May 15, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

NO we are not safer. How can we be when we broadcast our top secrets to the world. There are things that should never be transparent and that is the bottom line. I think even Obama is now having second thoughts based on intel he is now getting briefed on and I hope he puts the Country first and not his reelection!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: lovingpolitics | May 15, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

We are going to need to prepare folks because the Gov as a whole isn’t getting it.

Posted by: NewAmericaNow | May 15, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Obama is already failing……….. the changes he has in mind effects all AMERICANS,
not just Democrats and not just Republicans…….
Your allowing yourself to be locked into Democrat against Republican.
As high as 70% of all American Businesses are Small Business……. you tax them and burden them more
than they are already, they will not expand and hire more employees or they may cut back on
the ones they have…………or prevent new Business from even starting.
When taxes are fair it promotes growth and HONESTY………
We are in danger of putting our Nation at risk for dishonesty and we will become a corrupt
Nation that is as corrupt as some of our leaders.
They are showing us how much they respect paying taxes……. aren’t they?
You only need to have 2 brain cells to rub together to see that.

Posted by: Nadine Ritter, DDS | May 15, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

I will believe that the world is safer when the U.S., China, and Russia and Saudi Arabia actually take part in the major conflicts that each contributes to. North Korea is a satelite of China and supplies arms to the Mideast, Russia is helping the Iranians build their nuclear facilities, Saudi Arabia openly finances Hamas and the Palestinians and we represent Israel-The U.S. cannot negotiate any meaningful settlements unless all the players involved are at the Table and that seems very unlikely-We are just going through the motions until the major contributors to the fray become the major players in the solution!

Posted by: Dave of Detroit | May 16, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Oh and by the way, I’m hearing the old “where else are the liberals going to go” mantra starting back up again. Don’t believe it.
Liberals don’t have to go anywhere. All we have to do is vote independent or stay away from the voting booth due to lack of reason to vote and let the democratic party fall due to lack of support from their base. Fear isn’t going to be enough next time.

Posted by: jan | May 16, 2009, 8:53 am 8:53 am

No, we are not safer will we ever be…it will always be a constant battle and fight regardless the president…these terrorists are cunning and do not require majority support to annihilate us…They are driven by hate…they hate our Western lifestyle, they regard it to be corrupt…pornography, women’s rights and so forth.

Posted by: phallon | May 16, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am

The question “Is the US safer under President Obama?” can only be answered “No”. The reason has nothing to do with our current president or any president to follow. Unless I’m mistaken, there have been no attacks on the US since 9/11. Therefore, no president, Republican or Democratic, could make the US safer than no attacks. The question should be “Is the US just as safe under President Obama as it was under President Bush?”.

Posted by: Rich | May 16, 2009, 9:29 am 9:29 am

I think Chaney was right, if we put the world population in prison camps (gulags) we would be totally safe.
What’s unfortunate is that Chaney had to leave office before completing his plans, prison camps for all and nuke the rest.

Posted by: gymo | May 16, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Actually check and at the exact same time Rahm Emanuel was calling Jon Huntsman, Jr. to offer the ambassadorship, David Plouffe mentioned Huntsman as the biggest fear for Democrats. The line that sticks out by Plouffe is that “Huntsman speaks a lot of truth”.
I have my doubts that Plouffe didn’t know about it…
At the very least, it’s a question I’d ask the next time Plouffe does a speaking engagement

Posted by: CestWhat | May 16, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

liz cheney? for real?

Posted by: osmond | May 17, 2009, 8:36 am 8:36 am

Clinton kept the country safe for 7 1/2 years after the first wtc bombing, without resorting to the ‘special methods’ that Republican keep pushing. Stop pointing that out with Bush as if e did something special!

Posted by: Christian E. Sveum | May 17, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

Get the Cheyney mini mouthpiece off that round table. There is no chance of meaningful debate with her harsh, abrasive trumpeting of the outrageous policies of the Bush/Cheney administration. We voted them out. Send her packing with the dastardly pack.

Posted by: jkrnmaine | May 17, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Katrina is right that the furor over Pelosi is an organized effort by the architects of the torture policy to redirect attention away from the essential issues. But Pelosi has done little to help counteract this. She should have clearly stated her version of the facts at the outset and used every subsequent public statement to hammer away at the essential message: torture was wrong, had made us less safe, …
That’s what the apologists for torture are doing so well. Having successfully diverted the discussion they use every opportunity to reiterate the position that the techniques used were effective, saved lives and kept us safe.

Posted by: Carp | May 17, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Not only did Clinton keep us safe for 7 1/2 years, too, he warned the Bush administration about Al’Quieda and Bin Laden, before 9/11.

Posted by: Christian E. Sveum | May 17, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

What a sad lineup today! Carville is the best you can do? He’s nothing but a Clinton apologist and a Scooter Libby defender. Today’s guests are just so many leftovers from the Cheney/Bush administration that George Will had to step up with some balancing common sense. Of course we love it when the Cheneys and Rush and Gingrich are out there as the desperate face and voice of the GOP, but it’s the national media’s business-as-usual distraction from the real issues. George S. where were you and the national media when this nation was being lied into war with Iraq? Where were you when the Cheney bunch ignored the real threat in the summer of 2001? Where were you when warrantless wiretapping and torture were being committed and our troops were being sabbataged by no-bid contracters? Get on the real issues – health care, banking and SEC regulations, the meltdown of the American middle class and gosh, if you want to try and dig some really important issues, let’s get on why this new administration isn’t going after the lawbreaking/constitution-crumbling/election-fixing politicalizing of the Cheney administration’s justice department? Let’s get at the release of the minutes of Cheney meetings with energy corporations to set the nation’s energy policy. Let’s find out how billions and billions of dollars for defense-spending disappeared into thin air while veterans went without care and veteran’s families were hassled trying to get services for their injured soldiers.
Looking at your lineup today just illustrates why the national media, print as well as broadcast, is becoming so irrelevant, the younger generation is better off getting its news from the Daily Show,progressive radio and blogs, the Onion and Steve Colbert. How sad that the once powerful press has been so bought-off and domesticated, that it can no longer do the vital mission our nation requires.

Posted by: furiouswatcher | May 17, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am

I always appreciate hearing the full range of viewpoints on the round table segment of this show, but I will not watch any future episodes that have Liz Cheney as a guest, not because of her views, but because she rudely tried to monopolize the conversation. She consistently interrupted everyone in to inject her opinion every 2 seconds, like a bull in a china shop. I kept thinking ‘for pete’s sake will you please just shut up for 2 seconds?’ I have experienced this on the McLaughlin group, but never on this show. The problem was amplified by the fact that the political composition of the round table was imbalanced with 3 from the right and 2 from the left. With Ms. Cheney it was like 5 from the right and two from the left. I don’t have a trouble hearing civilized conservatives stating their case. I have a big problem with blowhards monopolizing the airwaves. Shame on George Stephanopoulos as the host for allowing this boorish behavior to happen on his watch.

Posted by: mantral | May 17, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am

time will tell

Posted by: armybrat | May 17, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Very brave to have Liz Cheney on as a guest. She held an office in both Bush administrations talke about nepotism. Since the Cheney’s feel the US and Irag are all safer becuase of their administration why don’t they get a summer house in Bagdad. Cheney ran the gov’t his way and his daughter did not fall from the tree. I had 8 yrs of em I don’t appreciate seeing them get a voice now.

Posted by: Susanne | May 17, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am

A new low in the roundtable this week. I look forward to this segment to get above the “talking points” level of discourse, but Ms. Cheney, Ms. Vandenheuvel and Mr. Schmidt don’t seem to have any ability to get to the meat of a matter, only to work constantly to stay on message.
Mr. Carville tends that way as well, but will make the intellectual leap to original thought if pressed.
Fortunately, Mr. Will doesn’t take the bait (as much), and offers original, personal thought on the day’s issues. Someone such as he, from the left, would be quite refreshing.
Please seek out people on all sides of issues who can bring new analysis to the table, not just the approved message from a particular camp. At this point you are only adding to the noise level.

Posted by: Ed Ploy | May 17, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

I would like to know what “genius” chose to put Lynn Cheney on this panel?
This is a HUGE bias being added to what should be a logic based commentary. George Will states that the Bush-Cheney administration is gone and we should move on yet we have a party at the table who has an agenda to have her father’s arguement front and center. He is a possible defendant if this was ever tried as a crime. With this logic you would have a child of Charles “Tex” Watson included in the panel on a show about the Manson family or the Tate-LaBianca murders. Cheney isn’t about “national security” she is about “domestic security”, protecting her OWN homefront not ours.

Posted by: Melinda | May 17, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am

You have to be kidding me!! Are we safer than we were under the former President? The answer to the question is a resounding YES! Since November, have we heard from Bin Laden? Nope. We finally have a gentler president leading us to no longer be viewed as the bully as the world. The angry old man club is finally gone and we are safe. Perhaps we should follow the President’s lead and be kinder and gentler to the rest of world and to each other. As for the comment “Obama is the worse President we ever had?” Let us look at what he has done in the short time he has been in office. He has done much more than the last sitting president in eight years. Unless you count that the last sitting president lead us to an nonsensical war, a recession, lost of jobs, hatred, and making us the laughing stock of the world. He was not making us a healthy country but rather, like him, a an angry country. Give Obama a chance. Moreover, if you have a job, be thankful that you have it. If you lost your job, blame the former President not this one.
He is only cleaning up a mess that was left from the previous administration.

Posted by: Migestpi | May 17, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

You have to be kidding me!! Are we safer than we were under the former President? The answer to the question is a resounding YES! Since November, have we heard from Bin Laden? Nope. We finally have a gentler president leading us to no longer be viewed as the bully as the world. The angry old man club is finally gone and we are safe. Perhaps we should follow the President’s lead and be kinder and gentler to the rest of world and to each other. As for the comment “Obama is the worse President we ever had?” Let us look at what he has done in the short time he has been in office. He has done much more than the last sitting president in eight years. Unless you count that the last sitting president lead us to an nonsensical war, a recession, lost of jobs, hatred, and making us the laughing stock of the world. He was not making us a healthy country but rather, like him, a an angry country. Give Obama a chance. Moreover, if you have a job, be thankful that you have it. If you lost your job, blame the former President not this one.
He is only cleaning up a mess that was left from the previous administration.

Posted by: Migestpi | May 17, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Liz Cheney was a train wreck! She completely ignored the show’s format and insisted in interrupting and talking over others. I like This Week because it is typically marked by civil debate and thoughtful dialogue. This sounded more like one of those other ‘news hours’ where it’s always a free-for-all. Please don’t have her back unless she promises to follow the rules and, if she breaks them, make her wear an Obama ’08 t-shirt for the rest of her earthly days.

Posted by: JaneB | May 18, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Will terrorism even matter if we just destroy ourselves? What happens when we totally crash economically? Who will take over? The national debt is currently estimated to be $11,226,807,380,955. Now let me ask have you ever heard any politician of any stripe address how we are going to mitigate the debt? Occasionally some one will talk about reducing deficit spending, but that won’t cut it if that ever incresing principal still looms. Obama and his out of control earmarking pork barrel congress are taking us down the tubes and the media is not pushing the issue. Am I the only one with the guts to address the issue?

Posted by: Ed Taylor | May 21, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.