‘This Week’ Exclusive: Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen
Our exclusive ‘This Week" headliner Sunday: Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. I sit down with President Barack Obama’s top military adviser to talk Guantanamo, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran and more. If you have any questions for Adm. Mullen, email me here. Plus we’ll dig into the Obama-Cheney duel and all the week’s politics on our all-star Roundtable, with George Will, Donna Brazile and our own dueling columnists: David Brooks of the New York Times and E.J. Dionne from the Washington Post. See you Sunday morning. –George Stephanopoulos
Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Keep up the great work, George. MTP is in sight. Love Brooks and Dionne. That should be civil and informative.
Could u ask the Adm about torture policy and the negative impact of Gitmo? Has he sensed more cooperation among allies since Inauguration?
Posted by: tw | May 21, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
George, I love your show and watch it every Sunday as I respect the way you give both sides of any issue. However, I do not feel that the President should hav to answer to Mr. Cheney’s daughter. Did she run the country with her father?
Cheney is doing more the hurt the country with his rhetoric than he realizes. He is the one not making it safe. He broke the law…does anybody care? We cannot obey what we want and siscard what we don’t want. Intelligence people have all said the information we get from waterboarding is not reliable. They lie…even Sen Mc Cain agrees. Why is this man given so much credibility when he broke the law? I find this hard to understand. President Obama is doing a tremendous job trying to correct what has been ignored in the last several years. Let’s give him our support. I feel safe with him as no one can predict what will happen or if there will be another attack but it won’t be his fault…it will be Cheney’s by giving our enemies the idea that we are not safe.
Posted by: talmag | May 22, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
George I would ask Admiral Mullen, “Sir with the recent succesful test fire by the Iranians of their Sejil-2 missile and recent reports that suggest that Iran is only 2 to 3 years from aquiring nuclear weapons isn’t just a matter of when and not if, Israel strikes Iran whoose President has said on numerous occasions that he would like to see Israel wiped off the face of the earth.”
Posted by: Dwayne M. DuVal II | May 23, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am
adm mullen i had the honor of meeting you at the retiremnt of vice adm mcarthys retirement in feb of 2007 i have something i would like too send you, while on missouri i was tasked with putting togrther a cook book for then cdr macarthy and the crew of missouri i have a extra copy and thoughtyou might enjoy it. if you could send me a address i could ship it to i would be happy to send it dave elcess
Posted by: david elcess mscm ret | May 23, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
George, I would like for you to ask the panel “is it disrespectful for an Ex Vice president, to go on a debate “tour” with a new administration. Isn’t this in itself making our Country less safe? The media’s rationale is that he is “defending” his legacy. Shouldn’t that be left to history books? I find that EX vice president Cheney And his daughter is being Disrespectful to the office of the President of the United States. Please discuss this.
Posted by: tychisum | May 23, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
With a stategic President and a team around him with Mullens and Gates…I can sleep at night. I know our values and principles are the foundation of our great nation, and we are Standing on Something!
Posted by: tychisum | May 23, 2009, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
I get very frustrated when trying to find the time your program airs. There is no mention of time for May 24th. It seems the air time for your program jumps all over the place and never at a set time on Sundays. Help!
Posted by: Lola | May 24, 2009, 1:30 am 1:30 am
During law school as part of the moot court competition, I had to argue both sides of “don’t ask, don’t tell.” As a believer of equal rights for gays, it took a while for me to come up with an argument in favor of DADT that I could really argue persuasively. The argument, which I believe is valid and that I haven’t heard addressed, is privacy. Men and women sleep and shower in separate barracks because of the privacy and awkwardness involved in having coed facilities. This same issue would arise if gays shared facilities with straight people.
Could a straight woman feel any more comfortable being naked in front of a lesbian than she would in front of a man? How do your resolve this? Separate facilities for straights and gays? Wouldn’t that lead to demoralization and feelings of stigmatization? At least with DADT, you don’t necessarily know that the person showering next to you may be looking at you with the same interest that someone of the opposite sex might.
It seems to me that the principle that supports separate baracks and bathrooms for men and women would require the same for straights and gays, and this would like create a problem.
Posted by: Stephanie Green | May 24, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am
George, I enjoy watching your Sunday political round table. It is on top of my list “to do things” for every Sunday. I would like you to invite new faces to your Sunday round table. There are few people who has been on this round table for quite sometimes whoes analysis and comments on the serious issues that world is facing is very shallow and outdated.
Posted by: Javad Tayebi | May 24, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am
your show is bias and gives no meaning to fair and balance. why dont you rename it “FOX NEWS”. pathetic!
Posted by: Jerome Higgins | May 24, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Estradiol ivf level.
Luteal estradiol. High estradiol range.
Posted by: Estradiol level early pregnan. | August 31, 2009, 2:46 am 2:46 am