Watchdog: Federal Regulators Engaged in “Inappropriate” Backdating At Thrifts Like IndyMac
ABC News’ Matthew Jaffe reports: The Treasury Department’s Inspector General announced Thursday that they had found "inappropriate" backdating of cash infusions at six thrifts, including the failed IndyMac, marking the latest blow for a government agency already battered by backdating problems. "We reviewed the circumstances surrounding the backdating of capital contributions to prior periods at six thrifts and concluded that the backdating of these transactions was inappropriate for all six thrifts," Treasury watchdog Eric Thorson said in a report. In two instances, the watchdog concluded, federal regulators at the Office of Thrift Supervision knew about the backdating and signed off on it. "We consider these matters very serious and find it alarming that such high level OTS officials were not only aware of the backdating at two thrifts, but either directed or authorized the thrifts to backdate the capital contribution," the IG stated. "For one thrift, the OTS Senior Deputy Director directed the regional office to instruct the holding company to contribute capital and backdate the transaction," Thorson said. "For another thrift, IndyMac, an OTS regional director authorized the backdating of the transaction." By backdating capital infusions, institutions like IndyMac made themselves appear more well-capitalized than they really were. In doing so, they managed to avoid being forbidden from accepting brokered deposits, a key source of funding. In the case of IndyMac, by putting a capital infusion on its balance sheet for a quarter even though the infusion wasn’t made until after the quarter ended, the institution looked to have a better capital position than it really had. IndyMac’s failure eventually cost the FDIC over $10 billion. Sen. Chuck Grassley, the ranking member on the Finance Committee, called Thursday’s report "disturbing." "This report paints the disturbing picture of a regulatory agency being much too cozy with the industry it’s supposed to be regulating," the Iowa lawmaker said in a statement. "It’s completely unacceptable that the Office of Thrift Supervision allowed itself to become a party to misleading depositors and investors about when the thrifts received additional capital. The agency needs to make sure this doesn’t happen again and hold the appropriate people accountable." Thursday’s report is only the most recent blemish for the OTS. The agency’s director John Reich resigned at the end of February. In his place, Scott Polakoff was then named as acting director, but in late March, Polakoff was placed on leave by Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner pending a review. — Matthew Jaffe
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
Is this the same thing as ‘cooking the books’.. if so, what do we do to punish the guilty parties?
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | May 22, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am
See Michael Crittenden’s story today in Dow Jones. They can defame the fomer acting director of OTS, yet couldn’t even find time to interview the guy and ask him directly if he did it? Obviously very thorough work. This IG has issued about three releases now on the same subject w/r/t OTS, yet isn’t curious at all about whether other agencies have done/allowed the same thing. Investors rely on corporate SEC filings, these were regulatory reports. Further the downstreaming of holding company capital was ordered to strengthen the banks and further protect the deposit insurance funds – not to mislead investors. Still further it appears this happened 6 times out of approximately 160,000 (average 2,000 banks, 4 filings per year, 20 years) such filings over the life of the agency. And OTS instituted procedures months ago to ensure it doesn’t happen again. They’ve about beat this horse to death – maybe it is time to move on to something else.
Posted by: Thomas T | May 22, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm