By Kristina Wong

Jun 15, 2009 7:13pm

President Obama on Protests in Iran: “It Would Be Wrong for Me to Be Silent”

"It is up to Iranians to make decisions about who Iran’s leaders will be," President Obama said this afternoon, underlining "that we respect Iranian sovereignty."

The president added, however, that he is "deeply troubled by the violence I have been seeing on television. I think that the, the democratic process, free speech, the ability for people to peacefully dissent, all those are universal values and need to be respected."

Mr. Obama said the US "will continue to pursue a tough direct dialogue between our two countries and we’ll see where it takes us.  But even as we do so, it would be wrong for me to be silent about what we’ve seen on the television over the last few days and what I would say to those people who put so much hope and energy and optimism into the political process, I would say to them that the world is watching and inspired by their participation regardless of what the ultimate outcome of the election was."

The president said the disputed election would not change his belief in greater diplomatic efforts with Iran.

“I have always felt that, as odious as I feel some of President Ahmadinejad ‘s statements (are), as deep as the differences that exist between the United States and Iran on core  issues,  the use of tough hard headed diplomacy, diplomacy without illusions, is critical when it comes to pursuing a core set of national security interests," the president said. “We will continue to pursue a tough direct dialogue between our two countries.”

He added that the United States had no observers watching the election so he could not comment on allegations of fraud. He noted that the Iranian government promised an investigation, and said he hoped it would be done fairly and without any further violence.

- jpt

User Comments

“We will continue to pursue a tough direct dialogue between our two countries.”
We started a “tough” direct dialogue with Iran? Must’ve missed it…Was it when he said Iran has right to nuclear energy?

Posted by: tjp612 | June 15, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Hey Obama..
“It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one’s mouth and remove all doubt”

Posted by: beedubya | June 15, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

When?
Where?
How can I see this speech?

Posted by: Charissa | June 15, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

“…the world is watching…” This is embarrassing.

Posted by: paul | June 15, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Again Obama is showing the leadership that I expect from our president. I too regret the violence occurring in Iran. I wish the government was not dominated or controlled by the religious leaders of that country. That is just too bad. We can just thank Thomas Paine and Jefferson for helping insure the separation of church and state in our constitution, it is probably the only reason we are the great nation we are today.

Posted by: JMikey54 | June 15, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

PLEASE HELPPPPPPPPPPPP All Iranians…
We need your help against dictator.
We would not forgive however don’t help us. Help for the god’s sake. They are killing innocent young boys and girls.

Posted by: ardalan | June 15, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

ooooh they are so scared that the pacifist nations are watching…note to obaama…weve watched them build a nuclear arsenal…obviously that did not scare them.this is what happens when you have a weak backbone….oh wait nationalized healthcare will fix a weak backbone.

Posted by: catman | June 15, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Yeah Obama – You run right over to the U.N. and get that dreaded “strongly worded” paper that will scare those bad ol’ Iranians into submission. That’ll teach ‘em!

Posted by: Jon | June 15, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Some of the comments left here definitely show just how ignorant Americans can be.

Posted by: JV | June 15, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Yeah Obama – You run right over to the U.N. and get that dreaded “strongly worded” paper that will scare those bad ol’ Iranians into submission. That’ll teach ‘em! – Jon
—————————-
And your suggestion would be? Of course you don’t have one, all you can do is bash! This is a sovereign nation, all we can do is watch, did you have this suggestion when South Africa was going through it’s changes? Most likely not. Sad for you!

Posted by: try the truth | June 15, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Obama says: “We will continue to pursue a tough direct dialogue between our two countries.” Since when has the Obama admin talked directly or toughly to Iran?

Posted by: Jason | June 15, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

By all means, let’s start another mide-east war. The two we have haven’t lasted too long, haven’t been too expense, too bloody, or heartbreaking. Are you Neo-cons serious?

Posted by: BBear | June 15, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Dear Fellow Americans,
Do we not have a big pile of our own problems to take care. Let’s Iran take care of their own elections and we focus on our own problems. Have we not learned enough in Iraq, what happens if we interfere in others affairs.

Posted by: USA | June 15, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Jason -Because you don’t hear about it, it doesn’t mean it hasn’t happened! Do you expect all conversations that have happened to be public? If so, you really should discuss the whole torture thing with Buhsh & Cheney!

Posted by: try the truth | June 15, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

It’s the Democratic primaries all over again, but Obama seems to have flip-flopped. Now the voices of the people should be heard, then the voices of Democrats, and their votes, were ignored. He’s on the right side this time, but he has absolutely no credibility.

Posted by: Keith | June 15, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

JV says: “Some of the comments left here definitely show just how ignorant Americans can be.”
Yeah, there are a few people on here that could be thought of as ignorant, I choose to define them another way. Idealistic to the point of irrationality.

Posted by: Jason | June 15, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

USA – I agree! This is something Iranians have to do for themselves! Just like S. Africa!

Posted by: try the truth | June 15, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

It’s the Democratic primaries all over again, but Obama seems to have flip-flopped. Now the voices of the people should be heard, then the voices of Democrats, and their votes, were ignored. He’s on the right side this time, but he has absolutely no credibility.

Posted by: Keith | June 15, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Is the liberal view of seeing the world through the lens of victims, classes, genders, and race distinctions a failure when it comes to understanding how to restrain the sinful natures of men? I would say, yes. Until liberals have a broader understanding of mankind, I do not have much hope for sensible leadership in our nation.

Posted by: Ordinary Sadie | June 15, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

I’m sure Israel is watching closely. If the violence spreads to other cities the greater the danger is that the radical regime in Iran will do something stupid to engage in an external conflict to rally the Iranian people to fight a common enemy. No wonder the US defense department has advised the US naval forces in the area to do all it can to avoid being drawn into a skirmish.

Posted by: MBell_TX | June 15, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Try the truth, this is when we need public statements that are tough on our enemies and supportive of the protesters. The protesters being beaten in the streets don’t deserve soft diplomacy right now, they deserve the support of the American people through the President.

Posted by: Jason | June 15, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Man, obama is a coward!! Take a stand! Any stand, but take one!! What does Obama believe in?? What a coward.

Posted by: Barry-the-chicken | June 15, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

People with no ideas hurl stones at the President, because they have no ideas.
So far the response from the American government has been reasoned and measured – support for peaceful demonstration, condemnation of violence against peaceful demonstrations and support for an inquiry into the legitimacy of the election.
What did the extremists on this forum expect – and who cares?

Posted by: danita | June 15, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

well,well, iraq is looking like a bastion of freedom and a fine example of a young democracy in that hell of the middle east!!!
GREAT Job BUSH!!!! He was right!!!!!!!!

Posted by: larosa | June 15, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

“…wrong for me to be silent?” No senator. Wrong for you to be president. Bad. Wrong. Why did it HAVE to be you? The clever dog that caught the big car.

Posted by: factis | June 15, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

“I think that the, the democratic process, free speech, the ability for people to peacefully dissent, all those are universal values and need to be respected.”
But on the other hand….Obama indicates he will continue dialogue with (and implicit recognition of) Ahmadinejad (as a legitimate head of state).
Hope and Change! Hope and Change! Hope and Change!
Yes We Can! Yes We Can! Yes We Can!

Posted by: tjp612 | June 15, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

“It would be wrong for me to be silent”"”" AFTER being silent for three days while Iranians are being gunned down in the streets by their own government… What a COWARD!

Posted by: Horse Rider | June 15, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

So far the response from the American government has been reasoned and measured – support for peaceful demonstration, condemnation of violence against peaceful demonstrations and support for an inquiry into the legitimacy of the election.
People with no ideas hurl stones at the President, because they have no ideas.
What did the extremists on this forum expect – and who in their right mind cares?

Posted by: danita | June 15, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Now this statement of his is really gonna change minds. Wow. So effective.

Posted by: Jon | June 15, 2009, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Horse Rider – It’s the Iranians time, not ours! What do you want, a third war? Think of what happened when the Shah (whom we propped up) was over thrown. That is their country, this is their time, if we interfere whomever succeeds will not have the respect. Where you this outraged when S.African’s fought for their independence?

Posted by: try the truth | June 15, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Not so long ago, we had a hotly disputed election in our own country. Both sides wanted to insure that the election was fair, accurate and reflected the will of the people. One side prevailed, the other did not. So, whatever our differences are with Iran–and there are many–at least we can, today, relate to each other from the perspective of average citizens who want their respective voices heard.

Posted by: csa2 | June 15, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

“….inspired by their participation regardless of the outcome…..” Amazing…students are being beaten and murdered in the streets and President Obama is inspired by their participation. They’re willing to rally and protest and possibly be murdered to experience democracy which we take for granted every day! I don’t believe we should get involved militarily, but our President needs to develop a backbone and call evil for what it is. These students are looking to America to at least show support for what they are doing. How will Iran ever develop into something other than an extremist Islamic regime if outsiders don’t support what these brave young people are doing?

Posted by: MLM411 | June 15, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

“Now the voices of the people should be heard, then the voices of Democrats, and their votes, were ignored.”
PUMA was a myth and is still a myth.
Obama won the nomination by getting far more popular votes, pledged delegates and Super Delegates.
But hey the right wing doesn’t have any new ideas so why not recycle and attack from last year.

Posted by: Ryan C | June 15, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

“To those who cling to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent, know that you are on the wrong side of history; but that we will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist.”
— President Barack Obama, Inaugural Address 2009
Hmmmmm.
President Obama added that the United States had no observers watching the election so he could not comment on allegations of fraud. He noted that the Iranian government promised an investigation, and said he hoped it would be done fairly and without any further violence.
Okay?

Posted by: roscoe | June 15, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

“AFTER being silent for three days while Iranians are being gunned down in the streets by their own government… What a COWARD!”
Yeah! Why didn’t he tell the terrorist to bring it on when it came to American troops in Iraq…which the terrorists then obliged to the tune of several thousand dead Americans.
That’s true blue right wing bravery right there!

Posted by: Ryan C | June 15, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Yeah Obama – You run right over to the U.N. and get that dreaded “strongly worded” paper that will scare those bad ol’ Iranians into submission. That’ll teach ‘em!

Posted by: Jon | June 15, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

“Yeah Obama – You run right over to the U.N. and get that dreaded “strongly worded” paper that will scare those bad ol’ Iranians into submission”
Because acting like a tough guy and sending OTHER people to die just to look tough is a right wing fascination.

Posted by: Ryan C | June 15, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

yellow belly prez has spoken. yawn.

Posted by: mary | June 15, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

These people are demonstrating in the streets for a voice, a basic we take for granted…they are willing to die for this…their courage is truly amazing.

Posted by: phallon | June 15, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

We waited three days for that? Get that man a teleprompter and let’s try this again.

Posted by: Texan | June 15, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Friends! Don’t forget that Bush Stole Elections in 2000 from Al Gore with the help of Catherine Harris. Perfection does not exist, so, it’s time to live with the reality.

Posted by: USA | June 15, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

I have been expecting another speech from Mr. Obama about how it’s America’s fault and we have it all coming.

Posted by: young_voter | June 15, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

It seems for Obama, the image of people demonstrating-for any reason-is more important than a fair outcome to an election. In other words, just making noise is fine, but supporting a righteous attempt at a measured attempt at democracy is really not his concern. (Just like he unconstitutionally fired an attorney general recently).

Posted by: lura | June 15, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

“It seems for Obama, the image of people demonstrating-for any reason-is more important than a fair outcome to an election. In other words, just making noise is fine, but supporting a righteous attempt at a measured attempt at democracy is really not his concern. (Just like he unconstitutionally fired an attorney general recently).”
Lura- There are several accurate distinctions to draw here, but it seems you have the willingness to look at them. What we in the west see with the protests is anger at an injustice of not giving weight to the voices of the people of a nation. The counting irregularities, the rushed count, and the statements after the election looked targeted to exacerbate the protests we are seeing. We are looking for an accurate count and record of the voting. It also looked like our commercial media syndicates, with heavy Israeli influence, as well as the early statements of Mousavi were aimed at either creating or exacerbating the situation. So we can no longer pick sides about that. Here in the US we have to constantly deal with sitting in a majority and accomodating and respecting the minority sentiments again and again, whatever side we might find ourselves on from time to time. We can’t do that for you over there, you will have to figure out how to do that for yourselves.
Also, the AG firing was not unconstitutional, he filed the appropriate letter so we have a history of his reasons, and can use that to judge his actions accordingly.

Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | June 15, 2009, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Jason | Jun 15, 2009 8:10:36 PM- No, it’s the Iranians issue! They are a sovereign nation, I know some of us Americans forgot what that means (Iraq) but it is their time to make the choice. No matter who comes out on top, WE have to deal with them! We pushed for elections for the Palestinians, what happened, they elected people who we considered terrorists, then we said, ok, you had free elections and we don’t like who you elected so we’re not dealing with you! It’s hypocritical!

Posted by: try the truth | June 15, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

“It would be wrong for me to be silent”….but then he said basically nothing.

Posted by: Elder Jane | June 15, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Man, obama is a coward!! Take a stand! Any stand, but take one!! What does Obama believe in?? What a coward.Posted by: Barry-the-chicken—————
What is your issue? No matter the out come of this, our President has to deal with whomever is in power! Can you not see that? This isn’t our issue, it’s the Iranians, what if countries had taken a stand when Bush stole the election from Gore, would you be saying the same thing if other countries had chimed in?

Posted by: try the truth | June 15, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Up until today there was nothing to comment on. It is basically an Iranian issue not ours. We could make it an Iran against the US issue, but I fail to see how that will help.
I Guess we could have a knee Jerk reaction again, but the GOP is not in power, so good luck with that.
Sure am that you are not the one to make the decision.

Posted by: Thinking | June 15, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

===”It is up to Iranians to make decisions about who Iran’s leaders will be,” President Obama said this afternoon, underlining “that we respect Iranian sovereignty.”===
But it isn’t up to the Iranians. It is up to the Mullahs.

Posted by: Axey | June 15, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

But it isn’t up to the Iranians. It is up to the Mullahs.
**********************
I would say it is up to the Iranians and the Mullahs. It sure is not up to us.

Posted by: Thinking | June 15, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

===I would say it is up to the Iranians and the Mullahs. It sure is not up to us.
Posted by: Thinking | Jun 15, 2009 9:53:39 PM===
I think you, and Obama, are wrong to say it is up to the Iranians. But I’m not arguing it is up to us. Just stating a fact about who decides the election in Iran.

Posted by: Axey | June 15, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Gore lost, fair and square.

Posted by: tanarg | June 15, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Jason:”Try the truth, this is when we need public statements that are tough on our enemies and supportive of the protesters.”
It is so refreshing to have leadership in the Whitehouse who understands the reality of the cultural situation in the Middle East.
No, the various Iraqi factions did not greet us with roses and live in harmony in Iraq. And no, coming out and explicitly endorsing the protesters would not be in any way helping them. It would be akin to Bin Laden giving a sincere endorsement of John McCain on election eve 2008…

Posted by: jhw539 | June 15, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

lura:”(Just like he unconstitutionally fired an attorney general recently).”
? The Constitution says nothing about attorney generals, Obama fully complied with current law, and it was an inspector general not an attorney general.

Posted by: jhw539 | June 15, 2009, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

President Obama on Protests in Iran: “It Would Be Wrong for Me to Be Silent”
He just as well as have remained silent.

Posted by: Entourage | June 15, 2009, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

AS an Iranian I offended by Obama’s remark…What a lame statement. What did he mean that negotiations will go one??? will go on with which government?
This is typical Obama, talking from both sides of his mouth. He left the door open for Ahamdinejad..this is crazy!
By the way, Laura has been doing a great job reporting on her twitter!

Posted by: Amir | June 15, 2009, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

It is so refreshing to have leadership in the Whitehouse who understands the reality of the cultural situation in the Middle East.
Posted by: jhw539 |
——————-
What reality are you alleging he understands?

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | June 16, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Amir:”What did he mean that negotiations will go one??? will go on with which government?”
Quite simply, the one that controls the supplies of weapons to terrorists and the active nuclear research program – Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. This is the reality of international politics; we’re done meddling with your internal affairs. (Although as an Iranian, you must realize that the Supreme Leader is ultimately the only voice that matters – for all matters of international discourse, he makes the final call.)

Posted by: jhw539 | June 16, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Amir and Laura- well if you two are on the ground over there, why don’t you keep us posted on what’s going on? It’s as difficult for us to get real-time reports in as it is for you to get them out. We’re all excited about what’s going on, the movement to open Iran, etc. We just don’t want to see any of you in the line of fire. There are a lot of ways to affect positive changes for your nation peacefully, from the inside. Life is long and youth is short.

Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | June 16, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Foghorn Leghorn:”What reality are you alleging he understands?”
To quote myself, “…coming out and explicitly endorsing the protesters would not be in any way helping them. It would be akin to Bin Laden giving a sincere endorsement of John McCain on election eve 2008…” The people with guns may be sympathetic to young Iranians, but they unequivocally hate the US.
You can add to that the point I just made about at the end of the day, the US has to deal with the government “that controls the supplies of weapons to terrorists and the active nuclear research program.”
I missed in the earlier thread – what is your specific proposal of what you want Obama to do? Now that he’s come out with an official position like you insisted was necessary earlier, is it not incendiary enough to satisfy you?

Posted by: jhw539 | June 16, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Exactly what is Obama to do Iran is a sovereign state, it would be unethical of Obama to meddle into the political affairs of another nation just because some of its citizens don’t like the results.
Some of you acting as if Obama should send in the troops and put the other guy in power. In case some of you did not notice the USA has a lot of problems of their own, Obama was elected to fix those problems not babysit the world governments.

Posted by: SJ | June 16, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

SJ:”it would be unethical of Obama to meddle into the political affairs of another nation ”
Don’t think Obama is a saint – this isn’t a matter of unethical, it is a matter of not possible. Every time the US even breathes on Iran’s internal affairs things get worse. Some analysts still blame the Bush administration for undercutting the 2003 protests by coming out strongly in their favor (rallying the armed power base to stand together against the Great Satan and put down that revolt).

Posted by: jhw539 | June 16, 2009, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Obama’s remarks are wise enough, you cannot decide for the people of Iran, but u can empower them with the right words; this is what Obama has done!

Posted by: Austin Chuks | June 16, 2009, 2:06 am 2:06 am

I can see from the posts in this thread that so many of us know how events are playing out in Iran. Though, there are some that still believe that with an Executive Order, President Obama can change the course of events in Iran.
From demostrations and Rallies held in Tehran, it is obvious that the Iranians are not taking the brazen fraud that characterized the elections with kids gloves.
Ayatullah Ali Khomeini himself knows that he is sitting on a keg on gun powder which may lead to his ouster as the Supreme head of Iran if he is not seen to be on the side of the truth.
The Iranian revolution of 1979 that ousted the Shar is still fresh in everybody’s memory.
With Ayatullar Akbar Rafsanjani on the opposing side and who is seen as the backbone of Mir-Hossein Mousavi, Ali Khomeini knows that he needs to thread gently on the slippery ground lest he trips.
President Obama has done the right thing. Don’t take sides with the Gladiators but be seen to be on the side of People. This is divine wisdom.

Posted by: Dare Nigeria | June 16, 2009, 4:39 am 4:39 am

Dare Nigeria says: “President Obama has done the right thing. Don’t take sides with the Gladiators but be seen to be on the side of People. This is divine wisdom.”
Wow. Divine wisdom. Really.

Posted by: Jason | June 16, 2009, 6:40 am 6:40 am

DRUDGE SAYS: “ABC TURNS PROGRAMMING OVER TO OBAMA; NEWS TO BE ANCHORED FROM INSIDE WHITE HOUSE”
Nothing, I repeat NOTHING ABC ever reports again is to be given any credibility. It is now an official propaganda arm of the ministry of public deceit.
ABC is now state run media.

Posted by: no duh | June 16, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Maybe impossible for him to remain silent… regardless of the issue at hand… is a more accurate statement. I haven’t come to expect silence from the POTUS. The guy is windier than an onion sack.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | June 16, 2009, 9:00 am 9:00 am

“I think that the, the democratic process, free speech, the ability for people to peacefully dissent, all those are universal values and need to be respected.”
Um… Iran does not have a “democratic” process, or free speech, or the ability to peacefully dissent. Thier “democratic” process is for public consumption. It has nothing in common with what a democratic process is. They do not have freedom of speech. If you speak out against the government, your going to jail. The TV is showing what they do with peaceful dissent.
Our President has to be extremely careful here. He cannot give any credibility to this regime. By talking with them, he gives them credibility, and undermines the people of Iran who are against thier regime.
Is there any question that the Iranian “democratic process” is corrupt? Then call it out Mr. President. Show the people of Iran that you support their ability to choose their government.
His statement was not very good, possibly even detrimental to the opposition in Iran.

Posted by: KR | June 16, 2009, 9:05 am 9:05 am

The POTUS should be careful what he wishes for.. we know this guy from his past exploits.. he’s a known entity.. the pig in the poke guy.. he could cause internal strife..

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | June 16, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am

“It is up to Hitler and the German people”. Gee, I think I remember reading about some British guy saying something like that in the 1930′s.

Posted by: afloatinasea | June 16, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am

KR, I beg to differ. Iran operates a Democracy. There is freedom of speech and that is why you could see Mir-Hossein Mousavi addressing a protest rally yesterday. The people that are reported to have been killed in the protest were reported to have attacked a Military outpost.
Their kind of democracy may not be like the US however,since the Iranian revolution of 1979, they have tried to have a semblance of Democracy.

Posted by: Dare Nigeria | June 16, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am

KR, I beg to differ. Iran operates a Democracy. There is freedom of speech and that is why you could see Mir-Hossein Mousavi addressing a protest rally yesterday. The people that are reported to have been killed in the protest were reported to have attacked a Military outpost.
Their kind of democracy may not be like the US however,since the Iranian revolution of 1979, they have tried to have a semblance of Democracy.

Posted by: Dare Nigeria | June 16, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am

I missed in the earlier thread – what is your specific proposal of what you want Obama to do? Now that he’s come out with an official position like you insisted was necessary earlier, is it not incendiary enough to satisfy you?
Posted by: jhw539 |
Yesterday you stated that POUTS should say nothing and that by doing so he was communicating that he did NOT approve of the election. Hours later he made a statement correctly rejecting your advice and made it clear that the Iranian elections and subsequent violence are a distraction and will not change his approach to negotiations.
Your response to his statement was that it’s nice to have a president that understands the reality of the middle east which by your subsequent response appears to mean he knows he can’t change their government and that he has to negotiate with MA.
The obvious followup is…Now that we have a reality based approach to Iran, what do you hope to gain from negotiations and what do you expect to gain? And while you are at it, what do you think Iran hopes and expects to gain?

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | June 16, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am

“Iran operates a Democracy. There is freedom of speech and that is why you could see Mir-Hossein Mousavi addressing a protest rally yesterday. The people that are reported to have been killed in the protest were reported to have attacked a Military outpost.”
I’m sorry, I have to disagree. The media clamp down isn’t freedom of speech, foreign media being told to stay in their rooms is not freedom of speech.
Last election the government chose who could run for office, telling most of the opposition candidates they could not run. That’s not democracy. Their election is a ruse to both the people and the world to give the impression that there is elections and they are honored. In the end, the regime powers, those Mulahs behind the scenes, decide the election. If you want to call that a democracy, then I feel you have a far lower standard on what constitutes a democracy that myself.
The more proper term is a Theocracy. They seek this facad of a democracy to give themselves credibility with the western world. However, it is anything but.

Posted by: KR | June 16, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Obama must be cautious about his remarks as he has to deal with whomever is elected. Of coure, he feels this election is fixed but what can he do? The people need to respond and they are. The young people want to be liked and they know that people hate their country. They want change and Obama’s speech is what spurred on the ones who feel surpressed. He took his life in his hands by going over there and speaking and I am proud of him. Only the people can make change happen. They want to be friends with America and we hope this happens, if not now, in the future. We should pray for all of them.

Posted by: talmag | June 16, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am

“They want change and Obama’s speech is what spurred on the ones who feel surpressed.”
Attributing the protests to Obama’s speech is beyond a stretch, its pretty close to dillusional. This isn’t the first time Iranians have protested their government around elections. One would have to forget that to think Obama is somehow “spurring on” the protests.
“He took his life in his hands by going over there and speaking and I am proud of him.”
I guess you are saying it was dangerous for him to go to Cairo? US Presidents go to Egypt regularly, didn’t realize it was a badge of honor and pride, enduring something a kin to a soldier on a battlefield.

Posted by: KR | June 16, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Actually, I have read some expert opinions that the democracy in Iraq is becoming a big motivator in Iran for reform. The Iraqi democracy is becoming a huge influence in Iran.

Posted by: KR | June 16, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Read up on Reagan and Poland. That is how you handle a situation like this. One does not break silence with more silence.
“(T)he torch of liberty is hot. It warms those who hold it high. It burns those who try to extinguish it.” ~ Ronald Reagan

Posted by: WhereWasThePress | June 16, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am

“Their kind of democracy may not be like the US however,since the Iranian revolution of 1979, they have tried to have a semblance of Democracy.”
The US is a Republic and Iran is a theocracy because for the last 30 years it has been run by mullahs. Thank Jimmy Carter for helping to run the Shah out. The Shah was far from perfect, but the mullahs have worked hard to supress and repress and put the cultured society of Iran back to the Stone Age.
There is no democracy in Iran. You are kidding yourself.

Posted by: ConservativeWoman | June 16, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am

The thing about this situation is that the leadership will gain more through becomming more open and democratic. It’s not like North Korea, where they have miles of fascist/communist ranks with nothing else in their minds besides an anti-US propaganda poster from 1942. The leadership in Iran just needs a little enlightenment on healthy management of civilian politics. The leadership in Korea needs an enemy.

Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | June 16, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.