Gates Seeks More Humane “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”
ABC News' Luis Martinez reports: On the flight home from a day trip to Europe to attend the EUCOM change of command ceremony, Defense Secretary Gates made some news about the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell law. He told traveling press that Pentagon lawyers are exploring ways to make the law more flexible until it’s changed, a challenge given that Gates said the law “is a very prescriptive law, it doesn’t leave a lot to the imagination or a lot of flexibility.” Gates told reporters that he talked with President Obama last week about “how to achieve his objective, which is changing the policy” and making preparations for it while the administrations moves forward with asking Congress to change the law. Gates said he also discussed the topic with top military commanders who were in town last week for a regularly scheduled meeting. Said Gates, “One of the things we are looking at is, is there flexibility in how we apply this law?” He laid out the scenario of a gay servicemember who is outed against his or her will by a third party, possibly by blackmail or a jilted relationship. ” He asked rhetorically, “does that force us to take an action? I don’t know the answer to that. I don’t want to pretend to. That’s the kind of thing we’re looking at – seeing if there’s a more humane way to apply the law until it gets changed.” Note: Quotes in this story have been gathered from reports filed from traveling press accompanying Secretary Gates.
Email
Obama: 'Now Is the Time For Common Sense Action'
Romney Takes Aim at Conservatives
The law is the law. Secretary Gates states, “seeing if there’s a more humane way to apply the law until it gets changed.” This law is not humane and was never meant to be. Just do away with the stupidity and create laws that actually protect our soldiers.
Posted by: ArmyOfOne? | June 30, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
This poor sick Republic is sailing down the sewer at warp speed.
Posted by: rplat | June 30, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
I always thought the whole “Don’t ask, Don’t tell” rule was a complete cop=out. I think the public and the military is (for the most part) mature enough to accept open gays and lesbians in the military. The whole rule should be abolished. I think there should be rules of proper conduct for both straight people and homosexuals but I think that to be dismissed simply on the basis of your sexuality and not your conduct is absurd.
Posted by: veela | June 30, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
Iran, Afganistan, North Korea, Iraq, Hammas in the West Bank, …
So glad the President has more pressing matters for our Secretary of Defense.
Posted by: Sam | June 30, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
“This poor sick Republic is sailing down the sewer at warp speed.”
But at least it doesn’t have a demented skipper at the helm and remember who steered us into the sewer in the first place, you neo-con nit-wit.
Posted by: JR | June 30, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
I am all for gay rights! I think they should have a right to marry, adopt kids, ect. But as an Army wife I understand why they have dont ask dont tell. Its there to protect gay service memebers not hurt them. Maybe further on down the road things will change but there is a purpose
Posted by: FYI | June 30, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
What’s wrong with them serving in our military?
If you are brave enough to have to deal with our governments erratic foreign policy then great. Thanks for our service.
Posted by: Chris | June 30, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
“your” not “our”
Posted by: Chris | June 30, 2009, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
The US military needs to grow up like Britian and Austrailia…our closet allies…not to mention the rest of Europe. Are these counties military forces weaker because they opening let gays serve in the military? I heard some Republican on TV make such a statement a while back. I wonder how their armed forces feel hearing something like that? Remember discrimination can be again ANY group. Whites, blacks, asians, jews. No one wants quotas or special rights here; just the right to serve the country as part of the American fabric.
Posted by: sanetexan | June 30, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Gates needs to explain how it’s “humane” to be forced to lie to other people about oneself? Is he actually serious?
He sounds like he doesn’t even understand the damage this idiotic and frankly bigoted policy has done to thousands of troops in the Armed Forces.
We’re throwing out highly decorated, exemplary gay soldiers and recruiting former white supremacists, people accused of felonies and people who haven’t even graduated high school now. It’s stupid. It’s un-American. It’s time to stop the nonsense.
If Gates doesn’t even understand what the hell he’s talking about perhaps Obama should appoint someone who does.
Posted by: Ryan | June 30, 2009, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Gays have been in the military since the begining of time. They are already there now, they have been. People are people.
Posted by: Stephanie | June 30, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Welcome to the 21st century. Adapt.
Posted by: Lenny | June 30, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
That policy should have been destroyed long ago. How about we allow people to join the military based on their commitment and patriotism, not their sexual orientation. As if a homosexual man or women is less deserving to be in the military.
Posted by: agnosticsocialist | June 30, 2009, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
Just an honest straightforward question – will this then mean that gay/lesbian service personnel will have separate barracks and showers from heterosexual?
Posted by: Peter | July 1, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am
To quote RL, “the purpose of a military is to kill people and break things”. It’s not a social experiment.
How does adding OPENLY gay people to the mix help the purpose? Fully integrating women caused and continues to cause many problems for commanders, even though many women are stellar performers.
Adding OPENLY gay people will worsen the problems, geometrically. Gay people have always served, and will continue to serve, many heroically. A special burden of their service is silence on their sexuality. Everyone has burdens… some bear them better than others…
Let’s have the best most efficient military service…
Pardon me for speaking truth to political correctness…
Posted by: Terry | July 1, 2009, 12:46 am 12:46 am
The lessons of courage, integrity, honesty and selfless service are some of the most important characteristics of normal stable individuals serving in our military to protect our country, but to have someone with the courage to deceive and try to change the code of values are not being honest with their motives to serve in our military for our country.
Adding OPENLY gay people will worsen the problems in our military. We don’t need the burden of unstable individuals in time of war.
We need to have the best most efficient and stable military…
Pardon me for speaking truth to political correctness…
Posted by: Carlos | July 1, 2009, 2:21 am 2:21 am
how are gay people unstable? What scares me are the openly gay being targeted for violence by their fellow service members. You know those same “great” soldiers who I’m supposed to revere, and respect………are those the same guys who abuse fellow women soldiers (and civilian personnel) working in Iraq?
Posted by: dk | July 1, 2009, 2:36 am 2:36 am
Aren’t the arguments against gays in the military the same as the arguments against having minorities serve with white soldiers? Does anyone still have a problem with that? Are US soldiers and sailors less understanding/enlightened than Australian, Canadian, or British members of the military? Or do Americans soldiers and sailors need to be protected from gay people?
Posted by: Craig | July 1, 2009, 3:48 am 3:48 am
Obama is for making it illegal if you don’t hire a transgender person because of their orientation. Obama wants to make it illegal for religious organizations too not to hire a transgender person.
Obama is the gift that keeps on giving for trial lawyers.
Will the new policy of gays in the military also apply to transvestites.
Obama wants a workplace discrimination law that will force companies to hire transvestites.
Transvestites make the work place an uncomfortable enviornment with sharing bathroooms with your natural opposite sex.
The american people choose to give the far left unlimited power.
Thanks to Ted Kennedy’s 1965 law which allows for massive legal immigration and open borders this nation is now a permanent one party system.
Half the children under 5 are non white and that will keep growing and growing.
Yet Sotomayor and Obama judges will keep affirmative action forever in colleges and universities even for non citizens.
The politics in this country are like south africa.
When you look at the changing demographics and the polls dems are set to have 65 dem senators after the next election.
How can a republican ever win the white house again with the huge growing hispanic population in the southwest.
Posted by: Seth | July 1, 2009, 4:47 am 4:47 am
Seth, what is your point? If republicans can’t lead anyone other than “white” people then they have no right in the White House….
Posted by: dk | July 1, 2009, 5:01 am 5:01 am
Well I guess If they over-turn Don’t ask, Don’t Tell All of the Military Servicemembers better get use to Having A Fashion Show every weekend.
Posted by: KWOLF443 | July 1, 2009, 5:09 am 5:09 am
It seems that finally gay people will be protected from the American troops they serve with, and that such horrible people who care more about discrimination than they do their county will finally get what they deserve.
Posted by: Nathan | July 1, 2009, 5:31 am 5:31 am
The military can only initiate an investigation if a person actively engages in a homosexual activity (marry someone of the same gender or attempt to copulate with one of the same gender). Just stating that you are gay is not grounds for expultion. It is in place to provide good moral and discipline. Congress instituted the policy, and only Congress truly has the power to repeal it. Blame them if you don’t like the stated policy.
Posted by: NeilCell | July 1, 2009, 6:35 am 6:35 am
The opposition to gays in the military has always come from the old white men in the military as well as the closet cases. They want to defend their macho identites from the stereotype of gays. Any association with gays , they presume, would allow others to question their sexuality. Foolish primal male fear. What must our enemies think about US soldiers who are afraid of gays?
Posted by: KsDevil | July 1, 2009, 8:36 am 8:36 am
Seth, you seem terribly, sadly, insecure about people who are different than you.
And THIS, after the last eight years, is a real hoot:
“The american people choose to give the far left unlimited power.”
Posted by: Peter | July 1, 2009, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Of course there have been gays in the military since the beginning. There has also been an ‘unwritten rule’ that they just kept quiet about it! Those of you that see nothing wrong with them being openly gay, just stop and think for a few seconds with your brain and not your heart. Would you like to have no-sex restrooms? Before you answer, be advised that most military facilities have no privacy stalls! I don’t think I would be comfortable sitting on a toilet with a lady sitting on the next one. Personally, I don’t care what kind of lifestyle you live, I just don’t want it pushed in my face!!!
Posted by: Greyghost | July 1, 2009, 9:17 am 9:17 am
Seth
That is the Republican’s problem, not ours. Everyone gets to vote.
Posted by: jock59801 | July 1, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am
“”the purpose of a military is to kill people and break things”. It’s not a social experiment.”
So if gay people are willing to kill and break things, too, why do you have a problem with that?
Posted by: jock59801 | July 1, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
“Personally, I don’t care what kind of lifestyle you live, I just don’t want it pushed in my face!!!”
Greyghost, you’re confusing “shoving in your face” with MERELY EXISTING.
People’s comfort zones are pushed when they KNOW they are around gay people…that’s YOUR issue, not the gay man that happens to be next to you.
Posted by: Peter | July 1, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
So, our servicemen are mature enough to handle deadly weapons and to be put in a position to legally kill other human beings, but they can’t handle being in the company of someone who is gay?
That’s a sad statement about where we are in terms of our collective intellect evolving.
Posted by: Peter | July 1, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
I am a retired First Sergeant with 23 years active duty. It will place additional strain on PTSD and overstressed soldiers attempting to prevent or observing soldiers having sex in large hundred man showers and barracks and dormitories with small double end-to-end bunks or even in some cases small single end rooms for NCO squad leaders. These are our young vulnerable soldiers, as older higher ranking soldiers either can afford to move off base or have wives and children and dogs and cats in family housing. I remember one night a large group of us coming back to our quonset hut from the village one night after a night of drinking in South Korea. One of our soldiers was obviously femine/gay however we embraced him and protected him. However, after that night of drinking, a drunken soldier took advantage of him and had sex with him, in front of my young 18 year old eyes. Needless to say, that did nothing for my sense of professionalism, morale and well-being. That was a visual that I will never forget and I’m 65 years now. It gave me PTSD to observe something like that – and in the chain of command, who is in charge of who?
Posted by: Cary | July 2, 2009, 7:00 am 7:00 am