By Caitlin Taylor

Jun 1, 2009 3:33pm

Cheney Backs Gay Marriage

ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: Former Vice President Dick Cheney’s media blitz continued today — this time with Cheney placing himself to the left of President Obama on a key social issue. Appearing at the National Press Club, Cheney answered a question about gay marriage by coming out in favor. “I think that freedom means freedom for everyone,” Cheney said, The Huffington Post’s Sam Stein reports. “As many of you know, one of my daughters is gay and it is something we have lived with for a long time in our family. I think people ought to be free to enter into any kind of union they wish. Any kind of arrangement they wish.”  Cheney stated his position in a roughly similar way during the 2004 campaign, though he couched his position by pointing out that President Bush made administration policy — and he favored a constitutional ban on gay marriage.  But the issue has gained new currency in recent months, as state after state moves to legalize gay marriage. Some prominent Democrats — including former President Bill Clinton, who said last week that his view on gay marriage is “evolving” — are moving away from their opposition to gay marriage.  President Obama remains personally opposed to gay marriage.

User Comments

Yeah, and Obama’s also against abortion too!

Posted by: S | June 1, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Who cares what Cheney thinks? This evil person needs to fade away.

Posted by: William J. LePetomaine | June 1, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

This is Major. One by one they will all come around. Its time to be on the right side of History!

Posted by: Scott | June 1, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

I like Cheney but do you seriously think he would be for this if one of his own wasn’t gay? I don’t think so!

Posted by: Robert | June 1, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Robert: I agree. If he didn’t have a gay daughter he very well might be against gay marriage. That is a pattern we see over and over with conservatives. If they have a gay child or gay sibling, it completely changes how they view gay issues and how they think gays should be treated. Gays aren’t the immoral, unpleasant, subhuman monsters who deserve to be treated like second-class citizens. They’re just people trying to make their way in the world like everyone else.

Posted by: Kip | June 1, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

Robert that’s a silly comment. How does anyone form an opinion. I think Cheney is very American and not very LOVE THE WORLD. Probably as a result of his close attachment to the global realities that only a high up gov official is held responsible for. I commend him for having the stuff to stand up for a non cookie cutter GOP view. “All that we are is a result of what we have thought.” – Buddha

Posted by: Ha! | June 1, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Yeah, Robert. Seeing the positives (people who love other people, happy families) and the negatives (discrimination, being condemned, and pain) up close and personal can change people’s minds. It is one thing to rail about people you don’t know, but to tell your own son or daughter that you think they deserve for their love to cause them pain? Only a cruel, selfish parent would do that.

Posted by: Will | June 1, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Cheney was against gay marriage before he was for it. I wonder what his stand will be tomorrow and will the other GOP spokesperson, Limbaugh, allow his statement to stand?

Posted by: JR | June 1, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

He was against gay marriage before he was for it?????? You people are way to funny…and Obama has always been against gay marriage, so what…..

Posted by: Boxcar | June 1, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Cheney is only playing Political games!

Posted by: Angie in Pa | June 1, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Robert, I echo your comments.

Posted by: Sick of all of this | June 1, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

If he had a son who wanted to have two wives would he be in favor of that too?

Posted by: Gary | June 1, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

If freedom is for everyone, then, why hate crime laws that seek to make it a criminal offense to criticize homosexuality? Apparently, Cheney wants freedom for homosexuals and liberals, but not for his fellow conservatives, which makes absolutely no sense at all!!!!!

Posted by: denn84116 | June 1, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

As for Cheney I don’t care. He has a right to his view. As for Gay ” Marriage” I say NO! Marriage has and always MUST be between a man and a woman! If they want a union of some sort so be it. But a marriage is between two individuals that naturally can produce offspring. If for some reason the man and woman cannot have children due to reason not of their doing then they still can call it marriage. Those that choose to have a union or a legal partnership of some sort can do so if they must. They can set this agreement up in any manner they so deem. The need to call it a marriage is not needed. The agreement they have can and should have all the same wording as a marriage other than calling it a natural marriage. IT IS NOT! Those that want this change are not doing it for any other reason other than spite! Have your unions, Have your partnerships, or what ever But leave marriage out of it. It is not the same thing.

Posted by: P | June 1, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

No! to gay marraige and lifestyle.

Posted by: Jake | June 1, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Gary If he had a son who wanted to have two wives would he be in favor of that too? …….and if he did that would be called supporting your children no matter what….last time I looked that was a favorable quality in a parent, some of you should try it. You guys would trash Cheney either way anyway.

Posted by: Boxcar | June 1, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

P, In that case all marriarges that do not produce offspring should be banned. Any sterile or elderly couples should also be denied the right to Marry. You can’t have it both ways. Either everyone should be allowed to get married, or no one should. Seperate but ‘equal’ doesn’t seem to work very well, ie different water fountains, sitting at the back of the bus, not being able to vote, etc etc. Besides what religion tells you, state 1 reason as to why gay people shouldn’t have the same right to be married. They’re human too, right? Do they not bleed? Do they not weep? Gay people are just like everyone else and deserve the same rights and protections.

Posted by: Lex | June 1, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Well…it’s a little late for him to do something about it seeing as he had eight years as VP to make this an issue. And denn…it’s not a criminal offense to criticize homosexuality. Anyone can criticize anyone or thing they want to within reason. It is criminal to attack someone based on protected classes such as race, sexual orientation, etc. And yes that applies to all. If someone is attacked because they are white, or straight that can, and has been, prosecuted as a hate crime.

Posted by: R | June 1, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

every one is entitled to equal protection under the laws of the United States. Marriage is one of those rights.

Posted by: scott jeffries | June 1, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

This must have both sides scratching their….uhhh….heads. The Cheney haters and the Cheney lovers….neither will know how to respond. Gotta love it!

Posted by: Funnyfunny | June 1, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

Throwing hate Cheney’s way when Obama has stated that he is against gay marriage and the last time I looked he is currently in office….not Cheney.

Posted by: Boxcar | June 1, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

i agree with you, R. it’s very convenient for Cheney to support gay marriage now when he has nothing to lose. if he had any intestinal fortitude he would have made his remarks while in office. that said, i hope his comments will be considered by those who value his opinion.

Posted by: Paul Wall | June 1, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

JR | Jun 1, 2009 4:35:44 PM—and will Cheney be forced to apologize to Limbaugh?

Posted by: Paul Wall | June 1, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

I think people ought to be free to enter into any kind of union they wish. ========================================
….and the rest of society has the freedom to legislate and discriminate against those unions….That is what Cheny really meant….

Posted by: indy_voter | June 1, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

I think people ought to be free to enter into any kind of union they wish. ========================================
….and the rest of society has the freedom to legislate and discriminate against those unions….That is what Cheny really meant….

Posted by: indy_voter | June 1, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Scott, i think you proposed the ideal solution to this issue.

Posted by: Paul Wall | June 1, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

LOL, why id being in support of Gay Marriage make Cheney “to the left of President Obama”. This is a guy who owns a military supply company and is amongst the most hawkish in Washington.
Just goes to show how stupid the whole “left vs. right” invention of the media is. Politics is about loads of unrelated issues. Gay marriage has absolutely no relation to foreign policy whatsoever. Pretending supporting one foreign policy view means you should support another social policy view is ridiculous.

Posted by: Trey | June 1, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Cheney’s position in support of gay marriage was unsurprisingly expected. Not allowing it is an inconvenience for a member of his family.

Posted by: Giftedroot | June 1, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Personally I don’t care for either Chenny or Limbaugh.Maybe they can go hunting together this winter I know the hunting is good in Wyoming.

Posted by: butch-40 | June 1, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Now he is for after being against because His daughter is Gay…… but if she weren’t…………

Posted by: tychisum | June 1, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

What other ex-VP keeps standing in the wings yapping his gums about policy? Help me out here, I cant remember any.
Cheney needs to go duck hunting. Who knows, he might get lucky and actually hit one….duck, that is. I wish Rush would go with him.

Posted by: tendergroins | June 1, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Cheney get criticized for saying: “I think that freedom means freedom for everyone. As many of you know, one of my daughters is gay and it is something we have lived with for a long time in our family. I think people ought to be free to enter into any kind of union they wish. Any kind of arrangement they wish.”
Wonder what the critics would say if his views, concerning this matter, were as conservative as Obama’s?

Posted by: Percy | June 1, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

“If he had a son who wanted to have two wives would he be in favor of that too?” Probably so…since most heterosexual men I know have had a second wife after they divorced their first one. That’s why they’re so hot on the “sanctity” of marriage.

Posted by: FranklyMyDear | June 1, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

So, when he was in charge he was against it. But now that he’s on the losing side he’s for it? This is all very interesting.

Posted by: FedUp | June 1, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Who cares what Cheney has to say about anything. He is an old gomer with a bad legacy.

Posted by: BikernAz12 | June 1, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Finally, the man utters a thought that isn’t straight out of the bowels of hell. I’m willing to give a guy credit when he’s right. It doesn’t change how wrong he is on torture, guantanamo, or Iraq, or make him less corrupt today than he was yesterday, but I for one am willing to give him a solid F-PLUS now.

Posted by: dantheguy | June 1, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Cheney actually says something that makes sense… he’s still going to hell anyway. You can’t make up for a million dead people.

Posted by: WI, WI | June 1, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Why do rebublicans only want gay rights when they find their child is gay, and only want government regulation in banking when they loose money, and only care for the rights of challenged children when their own child is challenged. This is a political party with no empathy. They would rather create policy that damages the quality of life than stand up to the perverted religious zealots of this country.

Posted by: vissionquest | June 1, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

In the name of progress, we should replace the word marriage with the civil union in all government documents. It should solely represent the contractual relationship between two or more entities that receives all rights that were previously allocated to the marriage contract. We need to strip away any restriction on gender, race, age, or quantity otherwise you are being a hate monger and discriminatory. “Marriages” would then be performed within your religious institution of choice with their bylaws dictating what constitutes a marriage for them. If its the Catholic church, then it’s a man and woman. If it’s the Mormon fundamentalist church, then it allows polygamy. If it’s the Evangelical Lutheran Church, then it’s allows same sex marriage.

Posted by: John | June 1, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Even a broken clock is right twice a day guess its Cheney’s turn. That said where is Mr Obama’s action on the Military s ridiculous “Don’t ask don’t tell policy? I never thought I would say this but this Obama makes me miss the decisive actions of Jimmy Carter. By the My Cheney how about you show some spine and oppose don’t ask don’t tell! The spouses brave men and women who put themselves in harms way deserve equal protection and benefit from the military regardless of orientation

Posted by: Rick | June 1, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Let’s see now, it’s okay if Cheney mentions he has a gay daughter publicly when speaking about gay issues, but if someone else mentions it publicly (especially while running for POTUS) it’s outrageous, out of bounds and disgusting and the GOP gets it’s pantyhose all knotted up.

Posted by: Bill | June 1, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

He said the same thing in one of his debates with VP wanna be Edwards. Goldwater was also for gay civil rights although gay marriage wasn’t an issue in his era.

Posted by: Cassandra Washington | June 1, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

It’s the kinder, gentler Darth Cheney. Under a Cheney presidency there would be a little wedding chapel for gay marriages at Gitmo right next to the waterboarding rooms.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | June 1, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Good for Cheney! Better late than never I say. And for all of the homophobes saying we must protect the sanctity of marriage… get over yourselves!! If you really want to protect the sanctity of marriage then outlaw divorce. What is so sanctimonious about a divorce rate that is greater than 50%?

Posted by: JW | June 1, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

How can a Vice President be quiet for 8 years and all of a sudden wants to talk. And people say they like this guy. I’m not a democrat or a republican, but this guy is an idiot. He didn’t stand up and talk when he was in office and its time for him to shut up.

Posted by: DJDAZ05 | June 1, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

when it come to his family he is very reasonable. Does limbaugh agree with his master?

Posted by: Joe the Plumer | June 1, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

What this shows is that Cheney is willing to support something when it affects him personally.
But, he’s willing to compromise whatever integrity he had left for political gain.
He allowed his support for his own daughter to take a backseat to manipulating Bush into getting us involved in a profit-generating war for himself and his cronies.

Posted by: Chris | June 1, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

I think he is being too “free” with the word freedom. Basing policy decisions solely on the idea of freedom can be dangerous. Do we give child molestors more freedoms to do what they want?

Posted by: sangradouro | June 1, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

I find it ironic that Cheney has begun to change his tune. His daughter must have encountered some sort of discrimination or controversy. But what I find most ironic in the whole scheme of things is that straight people cannot seem to hold on to their own marriages. 50% of marriages fail. And they think they are the authority and expert on the matter. When in fact, nothing could be farther from the truth, religious or otherwise. If heteros could make the divorce rate shrink then that would give them some ground on which to make a case. They are just afraid that we can do “marriage” better than they can, which is probably true. We do a lot of things better, prettier, more elegant, and more glamorous.
Another way to look at this issue is to see how much more the economy would be stimulated if we were allowed to spend the money on getting married. There are proven studies that show significant economic advantages to states and the federal government if gay marriage were legalized.
Nevertheless, there is no one and I mean no one who can or should tell me who I can or cannot marry. God is my judge and I rather like it that way. Seek your own soul’s salvation before trying to infringe upon mine.

Posted by: Douglas | June 1, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Will someone pleae shut this nimrod up/Eight years he said nothing and now WOW like what he has to say anyone listens to.

Posted by: Me | June 1, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

I can’t believe anybody would call Cheney very American.

Posted by: jonnie | June 1, 2009, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

First he admits that Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11 and now this. He confuses me when he makes sense. I prefer to think of him as wholly evil, but apparently even he has parental warmth and occasional flashes of logic.

Posted by: LadyintheDark | June 1, 2009, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Alright, this is going to be short and I will not check on this. Meaning if you reply to it I won’t answer. I used to post on here, but I got booted for posting against the POTUS. I am posting on here to say if you want to find a place where you can post without being booted for posting against a particular political figure .

Posted by: countryplowboy | June 1, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

what’s with abc.com? Iv’e had nothing but problems getting on the comments? Everything I’ve tried to post never shows up.I’lll stick to the other networks.

Posted by: bayou salado | June 2, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am

So Chaney is supporting gay marriage for the reason of “Freedom”. Well Chaney is not a good messenger for promoting freedom around the world. Most of the world hated us in large part because him and his rethoric and his approach of bomb now and be concerned about the aftermath later. He manipulates the American public w his sensational, fear-mongering rhetoric, twists and fabricates things and the denials of the situation on the ground. If Chaney had his way even more we’d be at war in Iran and in N Korea now as well and it would be too much for us to handle. He’s trigger happy w military power and acts as if there’s a purely military solutions to everything all the while sell us out to the big oil and miltary industrial complex special interests and essentially telling people to burn oil like it’s as abundant as water… Bomb people to keep it flowing and in the mean time the US still uses as much oil as ever. Very imbalanced and makes American look like a selfish/wasteful empire and breeds resentment around the world along w our sleezy-permiscuous Hollywood/MTV pop culture. Now the man who’s message is essentially we’ll bomb you into freedom and democracy has a new message for the developing world to promote freedom… Have freedom and democracy in your country so you too can have “gay marriage”… read: Freedom without responsibility or standards. I’m sure that will play well among the general population in Pakistan and around developing world. He sends a message of a morally corrupt, greedy, wasteful America that’s abusive & bullying with it’s power.

Posted by: jk | June 2, 2009, 1:26 am 1:26 am

So Chaney is supporting gay marriage for the reason of “Freedom”. Well Chaney is not a good messenger for promoting freedom around the world. Most of the world hated us in large part because him and his rethoric and his approach of bomb now and be concerned about the aftermath later. He manipulates the American public w his sensational, fear-mongering rhetoric, twists and fabricates things and the denials of the situation on the ground. If Chaney had his way even more we’d be at war in Iran and in N Korea now as well and it would be too much for us to handle. He’s trigger happy w military power and acts as if there’s a purely military solutions to everything all the while sell us out to the big oil and miltary industrial complex special interests and essentially telling people to burn oil like it’s as abundant as water… Bomb people to keep it flowing and in the mean time the US still uses as much oil as ever. Very imbalanced and makes American look like a selfish/wasteful empire and breeds resentment around the world along w our sleezy-permiscuous Hollywood/MTV pop culture. Now the man who’s message is essentially we’ll bomb you into freedom and democracy has a new message for the developing world to promote freedom… Have freedom and democracy in your country so you too can have “gay marriage”… read: Freedom without responsibility or standards. I’m sure that will play well among the general population in Pakistan and around developing world. He sends a message of a morally corrupt, greedy, wasteful America that’s abusive & bullying with it’s power. He doesn’t have any faith. When President Obama talks about “not the politics of fear, but of hope” he is talking about people like Chaney.

Posted by: jk | June 2, 2009, 1:30 am 1:30 am

you know obama is for gay rights. he just can’t say it.
just like stem cell research, it’s not about ideology, it’s about fact.
fact is that equal rights are for everyone, pursuit of happiness.

Posted by: Mdn | June 2, 2009, 1:32 am 1:32 am

By calling homosexuality a lifestyle, anti-gay bigots can convince themselves that what we’re talking about is some kind of fashion statement. Get used to it folks, being gay is not a lifestyle choice. Who would choose it in such a hateful world? Think about it — what would make you, an anti-gay marriage hetersexual, feel like making love or falling in love with another man (or woman)? When did you choose to be heterosexual? Do you find it difficult to resist your urges to be affectionate with the same sex?
Relegating gay couples to anything less than equality is bigotry. NEVER accept anything that’s separate but equal.
Nothing Cheney has to say interests me. He’s lied to me enough. I no longer listen to him.

Posted by: Lifestyle? | June 2, 2009, 2:39 am 2:39 am

I don’t understand the hang up everyone has with the word “marriage”. One side says they want to be married like everyone else. The other says no way BUT you can have “civil unions” which permit the same rights as married hetero sexual couples. I would love for side A to explain why that isn’t good enough and for side B to explain the difference…….
are you both so hung up on one word that you can’t figure out you’re on the same side and solved the problem?

Posted by: dk | June 2, 2009, 2:42 am 2:42 am

Cheney for president in 2012

Posted by: winston | June 2, 2009, 4:43 am 4:43 am

Lex, the fact is they (man and woman) naturally can have off-spring! This is not having it both ways this is the way it has been and this the way it will be no matter. It is sad that people want to force something to happen that naturally does not.
Man and man cannot produce children neither can woman and woman.
If a man and woman could have had children in a normal sense but find themselves unable to does not change the natural FACT that they could. YOU can’t make a rock and an apple produce an orange naturally. So gay marriage is NOT natural and can not produce natural off spring! Marriage is only for a man and a woman. All othe arrangment are done legally through the courts. NOT CALL marriages!

Posted by: P | June 2, 2009, 6:17 am 6:17 am

Cheney should be hung by the neck until he is dead for war crimes. He is evil to the core and a disgrace to our nation.

Posted by: James B. | June 2, 2009, 7:10 am 7:10 am

From a legal point of view, gays as well as polygamists should be able to wed.However, marriage should retain it’s historical meaning.The gay movement has went from equal rights to trying to redefine marriage.Every other movement has been able to have it’s own points of idenification.Most forms lists partner as the same as a husband or wife.What this movement is saying that there should not be listed genders ,that we should have only check human.Until a man can check woman ,he is denied a freedom because he feels like a woman. If this movement would move on,maybe those of marriage would like to be united under the same called celebration.

Posted by: mike | June 2, 2009, 7:35 am 7:35 am

“…..do you seriously think he would be for this if one of his own wasn’t gay? I don’t think so!”
I agree. It reminds me of the situation last fall with Bristol Palin. Before the world found out she was a pregnant unwed teen, Republicans denounced teen pregnancy and often blamed the parents for failure to BE good parents. After the world found out, they were all OK with it, saying it was ‘normal’ and a lot of families went through it and it should be a personal family matter. The message is, unless ‘it’ happens to one of their own, they are against it. Once ‘it’ does happen to one of their own, they are for it. Hypocrites…..

Posted by: SearamblerOne | June 2, 2009, 8:09 am 8:09 am

Cheny appears to be getting ready to run for president. What a joke. He just lost the republican vote. What a moron.

Posted by: mojo | June 2, 2009, 8:11 am 8:11 am

Did someone say something? Nah I didn’t think so.

Posted by: WyoCowbow | June 2, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Notice in the quote he said,”union”, not marriage. I knew I liked him for some reason.

Posted by: Joe Eckhardt | June 2, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Powell needs to ask Cheney what he said about Powell–IS HE REALLY A REPUBLICAN.

Posted by: LOWES4321 | June 2, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

I just cannot understand how people who preach love, forgiveness, justice and so many good things–turn this issue into something hateful, unforgiving, and want the law to reflect their opinions. How about live and let live–I can’t believe I’m saying this, for the first time I can remember I agree with Cheney about something.
First time for everything I guess.

Posted by: Larry | June 14, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.