Climate Bill Hanging By Thread in House
ABC News’ Jonathan Karl reports: The nation’s top Democrats – including President Obama, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and former Vice President Al Gore — are scrambling today to get the votes to pass a sweeping energy and climate bill in the House. “We don’t have the votes yet,” a top House Democrat tells ABC News. “There are a lot of concerns from the left and the right, but we think we’ll get there.” Speaker Pelosi hopes to have a vote on the bill tomorrow, or possibly Saturday, but she is unlikely to call for a vote until she is sure the bill will pass. Pelosi cancelled a planned visit to Capitol Hill by Gore this afternoon. Instead of addressing the entire Democratic caucus, Gore is working the phones from Tennessee, talking one-on-one to the two dozen or so Democrats who are still undecided. Gore’s call list includes liberals who think the bill has been watered down too much – as well as nervous moderates who are concerned about Republican attacks that a vote for the bill is a vote to hike energy taxes. Democratic leadership aides say Emanuel and the president are also calling undecided Democrats today. The vast majority of Republicans will vote against the bill, deriding it as a “cap and tax” bill that will raise the energy costs of all Americans. If Pelosi, D-Calif., pulls off a victory on this – and she says she’s optimistic – the bill moves to the Senate, where the fight will be even tougher.UPDATE: Republicans are using Gore’s involvement to press moderate Democrats to come out against the bill.
"How is a Democrat sitting in a swing district going to tell their constituents with a straight face that they were undecided on whether or not to support a national energy tax until Al Gore or Nancy Pelosi convinced them it was the right thing to do?" Ken Spain, a spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee, said in a statement. "The cast of characters forcing this vote are putting dozens of Democrat House members into a position they won’t be able to defend come 2010."
Email
Can Mitt Romney Win Conservatives Back?
Possible Contraception Compromise in D.C.
Even the CBO shows it will raise electric rates which amount to a tax so for the Democrats to claim they are not for raising taxes is a bunch of bull.
Posted by: toby hill | June 25, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
What the hell are the Dems thinking? Biggest tax increase in history during one of the worst recessions. They all need to be voted out.
Posted by: Mikey | June 25, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Hey middle class..what ya thinking now? LMAO
Posted by: Obamas brownnosing media network | June 25, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
This is why they presented all the hub-bub
about health insurance this week to pass this bill while everyone was concentrating on the stupid health bill. the old bate and switch. what a flim-flam.
Posted by: hkdakota | June 25, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
what are the dems thinking? merely about their left of the left constituents. eco nuts who want 4.50 a gallon.bailing out unions while you and me suffer, pushing govt health care on everyone EXCEPT UNIONS AND CONGRESS. BY THE WAY WARREN BUFFET SAID YESTERDAY THAT THERE NO ECONOMIC BUMP DUE TO THE STIMULAS. im sure the obamabots will be out here ranting about how if you dont support cap and trade your a racist and this is all bushes fault.
Posted by: catman | June 25, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
If ABC gets it way we will have climate change taxes and socialized medicine and compulsory union dues IF we can get a job. If we aren’t registered as Democrats, it is likely we wont be able to get a job or health care!
The totalitarian regime is taking root aided by the major networks. Can I have a free infommercial in prime time too?? What I am saying is no less radical than what they are close to pushing through.
Global Warming is a FRAUD! Do the research! Even Al Gore’s guru on the subject says he was wrong!
THink for yourselves people. You are being lied to to get your tax money and give people power over you.
Posted by: Dave | June 25, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Other than the Heritage Foundation hysterics, estimates for the per household cost range from $100 a year to $180 a year. The cap of 2.5 cents a kWh violation cost for electricity both takes away fear of an energy crisis type bubble and also irritates the irrational environmentalists who think another massive energy bubble would be good.
After the spike in energy prices and the resulting economic damage under the Bush administration, I have a lot of trouble accepting the argument that the free market should be just left alone. The time to get people moving towards using less is 10 years before the next crisis.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 25, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
jhw539…if i remember correctly you work for, not own, an engineering firm the owners of that firm rely on the free market to bid on work that keeps you employed at the highest wage possible, the free market brought us 4.50 a gallon because we refuse to dril our own oil. it was the same free market that brought us 2.00 a gallon. obamas energy plans arent cost justified if gas is cheaper than 4.50 a gallon. i know how the watch is made unlike most folks and i would rather deal with free markets than a government or working for a government. would you rather be paid at a govt sanctioned pay grade or would you rather be compensated for what you really are worth given your hard work and education.
Posted by: catman | June 25, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
catman:” would you rather be paid at a govt sanctioned pay grade or would you rather be compensated for what you really are worth given your hard work and education.”
? What does this have to do with encouraging an efficient infrastructure BEFORE the next time our buddies in the Middle East turn off the taps or China outbids us and sends our economy into convulsions?
Energy carries a large external cost that is not accounted for in the prices paid. For the market to work, energy prices should reflect their true cost. Do you think we’d be spending trillions trying to stabilize the Middle East if we weren’t slaves to their energy sources? Why is that money paid for out of income taxes, rather than allowing the true price signal to be transmit to the market for market optimization?
Posted by: jhw539 | June 25, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
jhw539…another point..most of te increases in gas prices are directly tied to the decline in the dollar. opec etc contracts are denominated in dollars. when the dollar tanks the saudis and the chavezs have to charge more as their purchasing power in dollars declines. as much as i didn t care for busn, i cant lay in the increase in energy costs at his feet. its the strenghth or the weakness of the dollar. these deficits have the effect of weakening the dollar which will lead to increased oil costs which affect all forms of energy production and manufacturing etc.
Posted by: catman | June 25, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
jhw539: Ditto ‘catman’. As well, you may find the WSJ opinion on A14 today interesting. Britain’s Taxpayer Alliance has crunched those numbers for the carbon-cutting emissions program in effect there for the past few years, let’s not bank on our stats from Heritage Foundation only.
Posted by: jonec1200 | June 25, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
jonec1200:” As well, you may find the WSJ opinion on A14 today interesting.”
Would that be the OPINION right under Karl Rove’s most recent screed?
Thanks, I’ll just remain stuck looking at facts and reality.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 25, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
What are these people thinking about?? High cost of gas? In Europe it’s over $8 a gallon and they seem to live quite well. And what good will it be to have low gas prices and no tax on carbon emissions if our children won’t have a planet to live on? People see what’s happening with the climate but, Brother, you ain’t seen nothing yet! Get ready to roast !!
Posted by: MotherEarth | June 25, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
539, how do you feel about domestic oil drilling?
Posted by: hkdakota | June 25, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
mother earth… have you been to amsterdam lately? europes economy is much worse than ours. i am not naive enough to think that humans can change the envormental mess we have as long as there are 5 billion peole on the planet. china and india are the biggest culprits in true global warming. in fact more damage is done to the atmosphere by methane gas coming from cows than even remotely generated by automobiles. CARBON emmissions from coal fired plants in china and india can be traced to glaciers in north america. we will probably nuke each other before climate change does us in. i would trade a few dead seaguls for keeping people employed in the US.
Posted by: catman | June 25, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
hkdakota:”539, how do you feel about domestic oil drilling?”
My cynical side tends to come out on that issue. Overstating it a bit for fun, we should do it after everyone else is sucked dry. It would be foolish to squander what hydrocarbon resources we have left at this point when it is still incredibly undervalued and squandered carelessly. In thirty years, our oil deposits will be worth 10 times what they are now and could fuel another century of American dominance. Right now, they’d just get blown out the tailpipe of a soccer mom driving a tank out to get a latte at Starbucks.
Leave them in the ground. I want something left for my daughter.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 25, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
“God help us please don’t let this pass. People are already struggeling enough”
Right – and we saw with the $5 / gallon gas under Bush how FABULOUS it is to hide the true costs and volatility of energy prices from the market. A 2.5 cent/kWh tax phased in over the next 8 years that encourages efficient use of energy (from home insulation to appropriate cars) is going to hurt those people so much more than a 20 cent a kWh price spike that hits over the course of a few months.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 25, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
How’s that Obama thing working out now?
Tax, tax, tax. Spin, spin, spin. Got to love the New America that the Obamabot fools voted for.
Are you proud of America yet, Michelle?
Posted by: Sam Adams | June 25, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Consumers should see their utility bills drop by 7% in almost ten years. This helps build and expand nuclear power plants. Many in business are fully supporting this.
Posted by: Hege321 | June 25, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Higher energy taxes, less domestic production, lower standard of living while China and India get to whoop-it-up. Great plan Dems!
Posted by: Todd | June 25, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
“The National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration has created a task force to advance the use of cap-and-trade regulatory schemes for fisheries.
The “Catch Share Task Force,” announced yesterday, includes 16 NOAA advisers and fisheries experts to shape a system for setting strict catch limits and distributing total catch shares to commercial fishers, usually based on their historical catch. Fishers can then buy and sell their shares” From Scientific American.
Don’t you CONservatives like clean air, water and an abundant supply of fish? You do a pretty good job about talking about the the debt left to future generations what about a decent environment? Oil supplies are not infinite nor is the bounty of the waters…conserve and plan now!
Posted by: Hege321 | June 25, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
The current clean-energy dividend legislation will not make U.S. businesses less competitive in the global market. On the contrary, few pieces of legislation can have a more profound effect on the U.S. economy than the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. The bill will break our dangerous reliance on foreign oil, make our nation the leader in clean energy technology and cut down on factors that accelerate the deterioration of the atmosphere. The clean energy dividend system would limit carbon emissions and require companies that produce or use carbon energy to buy carbon emission credits from the government or an open market.
The revenue generated by auctioning carbon allowances can be used to finance public projects and put millions of Americans back to work transforming our homes, buildings and transportation needs for new energy efficiency standards with jobs that can’t be shipped overseas.
We cannot compete in the 21st century with a 20th century mindset.
Amy F. Isaacs, Americans for Democratic Action
Posted by: Hege321 | June 25, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Somebody cut the thread Now!
This bill should be DOA.
It will hurt seniors the most with
higher electricity costs and gas
prices at the pump.
Many Americans struggling to pay their
Mortgages will be devastated by the
Sky High electric bills and increased
gas prices from this bill.
Tell the President, Harry Reid and
Nancy Pelosi to stick their
Liberal Agenda where ther sun don’t
shine! 2012 can’t come soon enough!
Posted by: reaganfan | June 25, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
there were only going to tax the rich. was that a lie then. with this energy bill that taxes all of us big time. sure makes it look that way. I see you dont care about the people.
Posted by: paul | June 25, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
ere’s some things this writer conveniently left out:
The DRAFT version of this Bill was 648 pages long!! Now the bill is over 1,100 pages long!!! Is congress going to be asked to push this bill through as quickly as possible again? The draft version was unbelievable in what our legislators were attempting to do. In addition to CO2 limits, it controls what kind of light bulbs you can buy, it places taxes on far more industries than just CO2 emitters, it takes our tax money and allows government to buy up private land (while our government is in debt??), it takes our tax money and funnels it to foreign governments for their global warming schemes. This is the kind of bill that deserves defeat and the sponsors should be removed from office for wasting their time on and our tax money on. It was created by Waxman and Markey, both are career politicians who hold their on personal agendas above the people they are supposed to represent.
Posted by: Phil4us | June 25, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Waxman’s Economy Killer
by Steven Milloy
READ THIS ARTICLE…
Posted by: KHR22 | June 25, 2009, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
Globalwarming is a fraud. Look at Al Gore’s own movie. CO2 rises 800 years AFTER temperature. And it less the .0001%. The only reason CO2 goes up is the enzemes need for photosynthsis don’t work at higher temps. If you look at Al’s graph you will also see that temps go down at the Industrial Revoution and the build up for WW2. If Al was right you would see an increase in temps at those points. They don’t.
Posted by: eric | June 26, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am
“Make no mistake, this is a jobs bill,” Mr. Obama said, arguing that the bill would “create incentives to spark a clean energy economy.”
Make No Mistake this is a Snow Job!
This bill will impact seniors and low
income people the most by raising
their home heating costs, gas prices
at the pump and their electric bills.
Just Say No to the Dictator, Obama!
2012 can’t come soon enough!
Posted by: reaganfan | June 26, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Glad to see some conservatives on here. Don’t watch the right hand, watch the left hand. We must vote these pathetic people out who are only in it for themselves. They could care less what Americans want, all they care is about power, money and greed!!
Posted by: sporttam | June 26, 2009, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Hey DEMS, just call your buddies over at ACORN. I’m sure they can rustle some phony votes.
Posted by: Robert | June 29, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm