By Jennifer Parker

Jun 21, 2009 10:24am

Graham: ‘Government-Run’ Health Care Won’t Pass Senate

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told me that the U.S. Senate will not “go down the government-run health care road” despite a new poll showing 72 percent of Americans want a government role in health care — and are willing to pay higher taxes for it.


“The reason you’re not going to have a government run health care pass the Senate is because it would be devastating for this country,” Graham told me Sunday in an exclusive “This Week” interview.


“The last thing in the world I think Democrats and Republicans are going to do at the end of the day is create a government run health care system where you’ve got a bureaucrat standing in between the patient and the doctor.  We’ve tried this model — people have tried this model in other countries.  The first thing that happens — you have to wait for your care.  And in socialized health care models, people have to wait longer to get care and the government begins to cut back on what’s available because of the cost explosion.”


Graham cited a Congressional Budget Office estimate of the draft Kennedy-Dodd health care bill costing $1 trillion to cover one-third of Americans.


“The CBO estimates were a death blow to a government run health care plan, Graham told me, “The finance committee has abandoned that. We do need to deal with inflation in health care, private and public inflation, but we’re not going to go down to the government owning health care road in America and I think that’s the story of this week.  There’s been a bipartisan rejection of that.”


However Graham left the door open on a co-op proposal floated by Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D.


Debating Graham on “This Week” Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., who is filling in for Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., as the Obama administration’s point person in the Senate on the health reform legislation, argued the public option isn’t dead, despite widespread opposition from Republicans and some Democrats in Congress.


“I’m delighted to hear Lindsey talk about the possibility of having something like a co-op and non-profits,” Dodd told me, “I happen to support a public option, I don’t think you can bring down costs without it.  If there isn’t some competition out there to drive down the overall cost — costs have gone up 86 percent since ’96, 1996.  Forty-five percent might stay the loan, increase in health care cost.  The American average working family can’t afford this.  A family of four now it’s $12,000.  We’re being told in 20 years, it could be half the gross income of a family spent on health care premiums.  That is just unacceptable.”


Dodd blasted Republicans for labeling the public option as “socialized medicine.”


“No one I know is for socialized medicine. We’re going to develop a U.S. plan, not a Canadian or a U.K. plan, one that meets our needs in our country.  It’s designed for Americans, by Americans, that isn’t socialized medicine.  But you’ve got to drive down these costs.  We need quality, accessible health care in bringing down those costs are absolutely critical, or we’re going to bankrupt the country.  It’s unsustainable.  That’s why we’re at the table,” Dodd told me.


–George Stephanopoulos

User Comments

The glaringly obvious reply to this would be to vote Mr. Graham and other like minded people irregardless of party affiliation out of office at the first opportunity.

Posted by: jan | June 21, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am

I certainly can agree with Senator Graham that the Republicans will be in lock step against any useful Public Option. But maybe we Dem’s can peel a few of them off with compromises, while still maintaining the efficacy of the plan. The patients on a ventilator right now though and if we lose any more Dem’s, it’s curtains.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

How can Sen. Graham sit there with his fully paid goverment health ins. and say to the american people that they do not deserve the same health care plan if they wish. What a piece of work!!

Posted by: Deab | June 21, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am

It was reported that the New York Times ran a survey which showed that 57% of those polled favored a tax increase to pay to health care reform. However it is my understanding that over 50% of Americans do not pay Federal income tax. Is the survey fatally defective and misleading ? Does the survey just confirm that Americans would like someone else to pay for health care reform ?

Posted by: Frank | June 21, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

We are not asking for Canadian and UK style health care plan in the U.S…we want reforms and why does Germany’s health care system work so well? What are they doing right? And Frances? The houses have been discussing health care reform for eons and have come up with nothing, nilch…they do not want to take the time to fix it…they can’t be bothered…and we get stuck payer higher employer sponsored premiums, deductibles, co-pays and are receiving less coverage and lower ceilings…just takes one car accident on ice…and boom everything is lost…and these folks have the nerve to receive the best government sponsored health care insurance money can buy and the average American family is paying $800-1000 a month for subpar insurance…

Posted by: phallon | June 21, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am

“The reason you’re not going to have a government run health care pass the Senate is because it would be devastating for this country,” Graham (said) Sunday in an exclusive “This Week” interview.
No, the reason is a bunch of very well-off, fully government-insured politicians are being obstructionist and thinking about their next re-election campaign instead of doing what the majority of Americans want them to do……..

Posted by: SearamblerOne | June 21, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Frank, perhaps Americans are swapping their $800-1000 bucks a month for taxes…receiving a higher ceiling on coverage.

Posted by: phallon | June 21, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am

I would be interested in who were the 72% polled who favored Government Health care.As I have never been polled by anyone, I would like to know just who are voicing opinions that others would use to justify government health care. Remember, Medicare/Medicaid are broke- we really need another entitlement program to destroy any chance our grandchildren will be able to pay off the debt we are leaving them. I am against Government Controlled Healthcare just look at England and Canada. Long waits for care ie 4 months or more for an MRI in England. If you want it sooner, than you pay out of your own pocket. Canada decides how many of each kind of operations are permitted each year and you go on waiting list. Might be this year, maybe the next or even the year after. IS this the care we want-rationed care. Seniors find that many medicines and operations are denied them because of cost effectiveness base on their age. IS this what we really want.

Posted by: Beth | June 21, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Interesting that kool-aid poisoned partisans (GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS) chide Graham, but give the arrogant aristocrat Duke Christopher Dodd (ascension to Senate provided by father) a complete pass on the negative aspect of socialized medicine.
Just who in their right minds, wants another screwed up government bureaucracy? DEA, IRS, FBI, CIA, NEA??????

Posted by: Rural Americans | June 21, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am

We need a government option for health care like we need to become another sad sack European social welfare country.
I disagree with Graham on several issues but this one he is right and this notion that government will be more efficient is utter nonsense. We will have rationing and worse care. Just ask your doctor.
Since when has the government done anything well.
Wake up America! Wake up George and stop being so biased on your own show and start looking at facts which is something liberal hate. Facts and reason are their enemy as no honest reasonable person would look at this issue and decide the government could fix it by running it.

Posted by: Sam | June 21, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Wow… The demagogy is incredible…
“…where you’ve got a bureaucrat standing in between the patient and the doctor”
First of all, this guy has a Government health plan for himself and his family. To be consistent, he should give that up immediately. Second, insurance company bureaucrats stand between me and my doctor right now. And their role is to make sure I DON’T qualify for anything, because that is how they make a profit. Vote this hypocritical politician out of office.

Posted by: Jack Certer | June 21, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Beth -
I know people who favor a public option for health care and none that favor that have taken the time to study its real impact.
Who are these 72%? Good question. I don’t believe it. No one has ever asked me but I do know a few things about polling and if they let me conduct the poll and write the questions and determine who participants are selected…I could create an entirely different result.
The only polls that matter are conducted in November and the Democrats have decided that have a mandate when they clearly don’t as they picked up a few % points in the last two elections due to an unpopular war and a descending economy…not because America wants another government program to interfere in their lives.

Posted by: Sam | June 21, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Thank God the Democratic Pi-Polar party of the socialist Republic of the Insane won’t get another Government freebe. I have news for the dems, you are going to take a beating in the next two elections. I am a registered independant and voted for Obama. On behalf of my family, let me offer my most sincere apologies! It woon’t happen again and I won’t be fooled by the next slick talking used car salesman that spends my money so foolishly.

Posted by: Susan | June 21, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Wake up America…Vote these creeps trying to turn our country into another lousy European Socialist pile of excrement out of office.
Their systems have failed.
We will too if we copy them.
Who in their right mind would copy failure?

Posted by: Sam | June 21, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Does anybody really think that the public health care plan is going to be the same one the congress people get?
It will be like a welfare plan- foreign doctors, dirty little clinics,procedures and tests denied for arbitrary reasons after months of waiting and you have to wait 6 month for all that! I would rather pay $800 in premiums than $800 in taxes for that..taxes will keep going up and benefits will keep going down and pretty soon they will be telling us that the program is running out of money (probably because they stole it- like they did social security money). Intelligent people won’t want to go into medicine- this is such a nightmare

Posted by: teri | June 21, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Susan,
I am a democrate and I could’nt see myself fro for this slickster again. Your :)

Posted by: Teresa | June 21, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

The British and Canadian papers online are filled with almost daily examples of the horrors of nationalized health care. Americans are so stupid and insular that they don’t bother to read anything but our Obama worshiping media. We are so used to choice and options and the best care in the world that it is going to come as a huge shock to be told that it will be three weeks before you can see a GP about those chest pains, and an additional 6 months before you can see a cardiologist. Waiting lists, inadequate care, and government bureaucracy are the standard in these countries where the feds dictate what you get. The naive idea that we’ll keep all the wonderful doctors we have and it’ll all just be “free” is asinine. Wake up, America. Lindsay Graham is correct.

Posted by: JohnO | June 21, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

IF WE DON’T HAVE A PUBLIC OPTION IN HEALTH CARE, PRICES WILL ONLY CONTINUE TO GO HIGHER, COMPANIES THAT NOW PROVIDE HEALTH INSURANCE WILL NO LONGER BE ABLE TO PROVIDE THIS TO THEIR EMPLOYEES AND THERE WILL BE MILLIONS MORE WITH OUT INSURANCE AND DRIVING UP PRICES EVEN FURTHER. MAYBE YOU AND YOUR FAMILY WILL BE THE NEXT.

Posted by: bob wright | June 21, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Teresa post time Jun 21, 2009 12:20:29 PM
Must be a lobbies for the insurance industry.

Posted by: bob wright | June 21, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Mr Graham, 72% of americans want health care reform and are willing to pay extra for it. Stop saying it will be like Canada and England because it won’t. The people will have a choice, a fact that you try to avoid. This plan can be worked out and this is the time to drop your anger at losing and do something worthwhile.

Posted by: talmag | June 21, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Linsay Graham is Mr. Scrooge at his best. Gone completely from this man is integrity, concern for his fellow man, or any shred of decency he ever displayed before becoming a moron during the Bush administration. Republicans better get a clue that they caused failures time and time again for improvement in health care. They have stood in the way while accepting large donations from health industry and big pharmaceutical lobbyists who want no changes made to their hold over the American people.

Posted by: ThinkSmart | June 21, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Deab – You said “How can Sen. Graham sit there with his fully paid goverment health ins. and say to the american people that they do not deserve the same health care plan if they wish.”
First off if you knew anything you would know that healthcare for Congressmen is not 100% paid for by the government.
Don’t know what Senator Graham has for a health plan but I can say that as a member of Congress he has access to any of the plans used by all Federal Government employees. Since passage of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1983 members of Congress have been required to utilize the Federal Employees Health Benefit (FEHB) program for health insurance. If a member of Congress has any health insurance other than that provided through FEHB then they have paid for it out of their own pocket, not the government.
Based on this data we can say that what Senator Graham has for his healthcare is not a public option government run health plan it is access to government negotied group insurance plans. It is insurance provided through one of several insurance palns to choose from which is available in the state he lives in. If you desire to see the plans available then just Google FEHB.
If the government were to open these plans to the public the monthly premiums for a family plan would roughly be between $425.00 and $1300.00, for an individual the monthly premium would roughly be between $177.00 and $550.00. One of the differences in the plan costs is the level of benefits provided and the amount the patient pays when receiving healthcare. To me this would be a viable option as the government would not have to make a large outlay to open these plans to the public and they already negotiate the cost and benefits each year with the plan providers.
1. What do you think the monthly premium for a family should be?
2. What do you think you should have to pay out of your pocket when you visit a Doctor?
3. What do you think you should have to pay out of your pocket for a months supply of a generic drug? A brand-name drug?
4. What do you think you should have to pay out of your pocket for a visit to a hospitial?
5. What do you think you should have to pay out of your pocket to have an X-ray performed on your rib cage?
6. What do you think you should have to pay out of your pocket for a dental check-up and cleaning? How many per year should be covered by insurance?
7. What do you think you should have to pay out of your pocket to vist an optromitist for an vision exam? How much do you think the insurance should pay for eyeglasses? How many pair per year? Should they pay for no-line bifocals? Custom tinted lenses?

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 21, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

What about the other side of Healthcare, you guys afraid to go agianst Obama. Guess I won’t be watching ABC anymore

Posted by: T Oberlin | June 21, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

It seems to me that we already have government run health plan which is run by the insurance companies as representatives of the government! I have good insurance but do I have any say so in my health care?
Can I choose acupuncture instead of surgery? Can I get a massage instead of 30 Valiums? Am I paying for all the uninsured people from the United States and other countries whether I like it or not?! Is my insurance premium higher because of all the costs that are NOT paid by poor people who can not afford insurance and go to the emergency for everything from a cut on their arm to a heart attack? SOMEBODY DO SOMETHING – WE ARE ALL BLEEDING TO DEATH!

Posted by: Debbie | June 21, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

My correction, it’s bob’s post time Jun 21, 2009 12:20:29 PM who must be working for the insurance industry. Many posts here are from lobbies who are trying to sway public opinion against a public run option. Don’t let them get away with this.

Posted by: bob wright | June 21, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

I can appreciate (not like) how politicians like Chris Dodd are non responsive to questions. Like most, Dodd offered no specifics, detail or remedy other than to repeat “we must reduce cost”. Heck, we’ve known that for decades.
To have a press related panel repeat the same thing? Geesh George, who are you inviting to chair the panel? Maybe your panel should include those in the trenches: from the blue collar auto worker to corporate CEOs.
Lets see the facts and start a national dialog on resolutions:
In short… Doctors can earn as little as $110K annually – hopefully most are earning more. Yet, at $135 for a fifteen minute office visit, medical facilities are earning $540 per Hour. A single doctors insurance is still relatively low at about $80K annually.
Where the heck is the money going?
George, the show, your guest and panels are digressing. The subject matter has become a rant of ill-advised content. If your guest can’t come to the table with facts and suggestion, where’s the entertainment or more “the education”?
Will you ever simply call a politician “Non-Responsive” and move on. Your audience does and for them its “changing channels”. And then what? So much for those advertising dollars.

Posted by: West-Coast-Greek | June 21, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Wonder why George never mentions that the Democrats push things like gun control and amnesty for illegal aliens that the vast majority of Americans don’t want. Oh, I forgot. George S was on Clinton’s staff. Could he be a little biased? Left version of Rush Limbaugh. Rush is man enough to admit it. Why isn’t George?

Posted by: Oonogil | June 21, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

CLEVELAND (my home), DETROIT, CHICAGO, WASHINGTON AND BALTIMORE AMONG OTHERS HAVE BEEN IN THE CRAP PILE FOR YEARS, YEARS AND YEARS. GUESS WHAT POLITICAL PARTY HAS BEEN IN CHARGE OF THOSE CITIES FOR YEARS, YEARS AND YEARS?? NOW THESE INCOMPETENTS ARE IN CHARGE OF THE FED. ANY BETS ON HOW SUCCESSFUL GOV. RUN HEALTH CARE WILL BE? DUH!!

Posted by: Jimbo | June 21, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Be very, very careful what you wish for; the ‘poor’ do not pay for healthcare – at least in Arizona – it is free fer nuttin. The wealthy have access to ‘only the best.’ It’s going to be the middle class that, as usual, takes it in the shorts with, not only higher and higher and higher taxes, but minimal care, as well.

Posted by: pepina | June 21, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Beth, perhaps UK and Canada’s health care isn’t one to opt for…but France and Germany does not have the issues you mentioned…why are they capable of taking care of their citizenry without rationing( I have relatives who live there so don’t bother to tell me otherwise).

Posted by: phallon | June 21, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Well, if Sen. Graham is so sincere about not wanting “government” health care, then he should give up his own health care which is paid for, guess who…the government. He has the best health care that government and taxpayers can pay for, but he wants the average American not to have the same? Such hypocrits these Republicans are. All of them should give up their health care benefits that taxpayers and the government pays for before they deny any American health care coverage.

Posted by: Jake | June 21, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Jake – You said “Well, if Sen. Graham is so sincere about not wanting “government” health care, then he should give up his own health care which is paid for, guess who…the government. He has the best health care that government and taxpayers can pay for, but he wants the average American not to have the same?”
Go read my earlier post and get educated, you are 100% wrong on this statement. Get educated before you go making incorrect statements.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 21, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Senator Graham said: “the first thing that happens is you have to wait for your care.” Senator Graham obviously doesn’t have to go to a hopsital when he needs health care if it thinks American’s don’t have to wait for health care. I’ve waited over 2 hours many times for health care in both an emergency room and a Redi-Med. Besides, I think people who don’t currently have health care, would be happy to wait for their care rather than not have any care. Some Senators are too lofty to understand the people.

Posted by: Rebecca | June 21, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Tell Sen. Graham to give up his government and taxpayer paid health benefits if he has any integrity. All these Republicans want to deny the average American the same health care coverage that he and his worms all enjoy at the expense of the government. Such hypocrits, they don’t pay or pay very little for their health care coverage, but heaven forbid if others can have the same freebie.

Posted by: Jake | June 21, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Universal health care with little paperwork not universal health insurance will become viable only if the government provides it and runs it as a non profit entity but that would mean stopping wasteful spending that will equal to the savings required to support the government healthcare plan. If that means cutting the salaries and the plush benefits of senators like Graham so be it.

Posted by: gjkotw01 | June 21, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

JohnO: And the USA, you surmise for profit is better? Sorry but it’s all about the bottom line…faulty equipment services many of us, $50.00 bucks for a bed pan, $20 bucks for a bar a soap…yep we’re getting quality…work behind the scenes…less staff more patient work load, can’t find a working blood pressure cuff…yep quality one can count on…

Posted by: phallon | June 21, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Yes, a government administered and overseen Public Option that challenges the private providers is the best way to get to Universal coverage at an affordable cost. Absent a single-payer system which cannot pass Congress. Fortunately, Post the Lehman Brothers debacle, people want government to regulate more not less. So we’re in a position where Universal Healthcare might actually get done. But we’re not out of the woods until the final passage vote.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

We have roughly 300 million Americans. The claim is that there are 45 million — 15% — with no health insurance. This leaves approximately 255 million Americans, or 85%, with health insurance.
According to a 2006 ABC News-Kaiser Family Foundation-USA Today survey. It was found that 89% of Americans were satisfied with the quality of their own health care.
Don’t need a public option, the federal government needs to demonstrate to the public that they can sucessfully operate Medicare which they never have in all of the years they have been funding it. Once this is shown and we can get an idea of the true cost (I don’t believe it is anywhere near what the folks in Congress are telling us, way higher) then a informed decision can be made.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 21, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

For those of you advocating government run health care here is an Associated Press story.
“PHILADELPHIA — A newspaper says a common surgical procedure for the treatment of prostate cancer was botched at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Philadelphia 79 percent of the time.”
Not my idea of healthcare, no thanks to government run healthcare.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 21, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

Is you want a free ride medical plan, get a job where that’s provided. I don’t want medical treatment at a public hospital, because the care I’d receive would be minimalist. I know, from experience. I take a back seat to those wanting their public care abortions, their public care drug detox, their public care HIV treatments, etc. My feeling is if Ted Kennedy wants public-this and public-that all expenses paid, he can start by turning the Kennedy compound at Hynannis Port into a public housing facilty —- high end of course —- and run medical tests for the poor and needy there —- followed by a day of sun on the beach for visitors to heal their poor arthritic bones. What Kennedy wants is for the public to pay for the poor. He would never take the poor in himself. Up yours, Mr. Chappaquiddick, should’ve been in prison for life but bought out the D.A. with his family name and money.

Posted by: Rob | June 21, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Gov run healthcare works in Canada and the UK.
Rather than try to come up with a new one by a healthcare owned congress we should copy ones that work. They are not perfect but can be improved after being started.
Cut out the millionare middlemen receiving billions of dollars in pay and bonuses.

Posted by: phybrr | June 21, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Thank you, Senator Graham!
This Health Care boondogle is just an attempt to grab resources from the private sector. It needs to end now.
Create some public health urgent cares for people who don’t have insurance, on a trial basis, and see what kind of quality care they get.. then if it’s a huge success, expand it. But don’t require or mandate people to have health insurance.. that’s not right in a free country. And don’t fiddle with people’s private insurance. Allow Medicare to be totally optional for those that have private insurance.. that will save millions!

Posted by: Linda | June 21, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

The standard Republican response to health care reform is “do you want goverment buearocrats between you and your doctor” fact is I prefer the govorment over my HMO whose sole purpose is to make money. Senator Graham seems to be happy with his govorment health insurance.
I ama a capitalist by any measure but I think it is ignorant for our country to believe that all industries should be ruled by profit. Socialism is cast around as if it were some abomonation. Innovation in the private sector is driven by profit. Innovation in the public sector is driven by needs. Necessity is the mother of invention. We don’t need profit in war, health care or energy in order for us to have innovation. If you are a republican you are most likely christian. Greed is a sin. Those who defend health care for profit are sinners. Heath care is a basic human right.

Posted by: Mike D | June 21, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

George Will’s hypocrisy knows no bounds. He decries a public option and single-payer plans for healthcare but loves his Meidcare – a single-payer, public plan. If he were true to his Conservative, free-market beliefs; he would drop his Medicare coverage and opt for a private plan. Perhaps he would then understand the plight of the 70% of Americans covered or not by private insurance.
As a self-employed American, my wife and I pay $14,000/year for HSA plans that require additional deductibles of $3000 each. We shell-out up to $20,000 before our benefits take effect. I guarantee that George Will’s premiums would be over $2000/month plus deductibles.
I have worked in Sweden and Finland and know a bit about their systems. They have single-payer insurance that is funded through taxes. Everyone has health coverage from cradle to grave. They also have private insurance available for those who want to pay for private care. They do not have waiting lines for urgent care. They may have to wait for a hip replacement, but that is rarely an emergent procedure. The GOP flatly lies about programs provided by most European governments.
Perhaps George Will should venture outside the boundaries of the US and his insular world to see how others live.

Posted by: Wayne | June 21, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

I think anybody that has lived in this country for any amount knows there are no free rides. But that isn’t what we want. Just a little fairness is what we want. That’s all. I just don’t want to be mortar sealing up the joints of the private health care pyramid.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

The glaringly obvious reply to this would be to vote Mr. Graham and other like minded people irregardless of party affiliation out of office at the first opportunity.
Posted by: jan
Yes, and fortunately Obama has created 2 billion new jobs, additionally. So finding a new job would not be a problem.

Posted by: flopez | June 21, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Congress and Senate work like snails…they haven’t come up with any reforms in how many years?

Posted by: phallon | June 21, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

News to all those saying health care in Europe and Canada is socialized health care. None of you critics lived in any of those countries. You are a lying set on no good people who repeat garbage.
I know as a fact that English person living in any other country WILL return home for medical treatment. That’s a fact!
Any congressional person who is against universal health care should give up their’s immediately and includes Graham.
They should pay out of their own pockets and not a penny from tax payers.
The ignorance of Americans who are brain washed by certain sectors or negative media is a huge mistake. All those against health care are the ones who are in good health but wait a few years and they’ll be crying for medicare assistance.
I hope you all are saying at least half million to pay for your own because in less than ten years; there will be no medicare for you to rely on. Good going ignorant, selfish evil-dores! Good going!
I have health care through my job but I know people who have similar plans that does not cover one half the expence. You would think paying 800 monthly should cover you; think again but then, wait until you are truly in need then you’ll wish you lived in England or Canada.

Posted by: Otto | June 21, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

I challenge Sen. Graham to surrender his government-sponsored health care plan and then try shopping for a plan in the public sector. I guarantee you he’d be denied coverage.

Posted by: Larry Brimner | June 21, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

The glaringly obvious reply to this would be to vote Mr. Graham and other like minded people irregardless of party affiliation out of office at the first opportunity.
Posted by: jan
Fortunately, Obama has created 2 billion new jobs, so finding new employment should not be a problem.

Posted by: flopez | June 21, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

I think that one of the worst things happening in the private health care insurance system now is that benefits are spiraling down as costs are spiraling up. If it continues this way then a family will be buying a plan with no real coverage.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

George S. is an idiot. I will forget the This Week, ever watching it! And then technical side of the ABC is a web of confusion. I do not need to be politically programed by George!

Posted by: Andre Rezos | June 21, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

I am totally OK with the US Senate’s heath-care plan for everyone, that’s what we are debating, right?

Posted by: JoeFromSanFran | June 21, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

As part of the new heath care overhaul, the government ought to subsidize various health insurance pools that greatly promote prevention and better disease management. I believe, instead of larger government run health insurance, the government ought to subsidize private health insurance pools. Perhaps big profits could be awarded to these health insurance pools that create effective health education programs.
I was visiting my aging parents, they changed health coverage, and an agent came by to their home to update their Medicare supplement insurance. There should be an added incentive for these health insurance companies to promote prevention and better disease management. This way, there would be an incentive for health educators to be sent to patients’ homes as well as the agent.
Let us subsidize health insurance companies to make home health care visits from nurses, nutritionists and health educators with competitive monetary rewards. They could be given monetary incentives for health professionals to bring pamphlets and perhaps DVDs to drop off with patients and their family members. Nutritionists could drop off coupons to healthy foods and healthy foods cookbooks to family members to make the visit worthwhile. These health professionals could be the initial people for new clients to see before the agent closes the deal with patients.
Perhaps after an initial trial period, an audit could be done to see which health care provider caused the most clients to lose weight or quit smoking. Then, the government could make another competitive very lucrative award, to these health care providers.
This way money could be awarded on a competitive basis to help reduce overall health care costs through prevention and better disease management. Yet the government would not be the sole provider of health insurance with all the trappings like the Republicans have been pointing out. Then perhaps the Democrats and Republicans can both sign onto this idea by promoting competition in the private sector with lucrative subsidies. Thus find better ways for patients to take better care of them selves and reduce overall health care costs for all.

Posted by: dave in des moines | June 21, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

JoeFromSanFran:
No, that’s not quite what we are debating. If you could imagine the health care your Senator would have if they were living under a bridge. That’s closer to what is being debated.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

So Obama is making ‘secret drug deals’ with the drug manufacturers and having closed meetings like the Bush administrationwith big oil to get his Health Care bill passed and this is ok??? He had these same type meetings with the coal industry too! I am sure he had other secret meetings with the auto manufacturers. What ever happened to ‘government transparency’ Mr Obama? He is such a liar and a fool and quite a big spender on all the wrong people and things. I am sure Hitler and Stalin also had many ‘secret meetings’ too! Obama is a liar and says whatever he thinks the democrats want to hear!I have an answer! Outlaw tobacco and legalize marijuana! Plain and simple. 1. It will create jobs in America and cigarette companies can retool to sell pot. Open coffeehouses and sell it in general at liquor stores and outlets (while taxing it) 2. It will improve the healthcare of the USA as many millions less people a year will die from cigarette smoking. No need to retool the healthcare system. 3. It would cut the profits of Mexican and other drug cartels by like 50% (just like GM)!!!! Its really that simple people it will save the USA billions and law enforcement can concentrate on real drugs and drug dealers who sell cocaine, crack, and heroin etc. The problem is states and municipalities make too much money busting people for plain old pot and will fight it tooth and nail!

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | June 21, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

If Mr Dodd really wants to reduce costs he must deal with Tort reform which is killing health care between high malpractice insurance premiums and the practicing of defensive medicine. But he refuses to address that.
The Medicare Hospital Fund Will Be Insolvent By 2017…I think all savings that can be gotten with regards to Medicare should be used to try to keep it viable.
For anyone who knows the facts about Medicare and Medicaid knows that the costs of these programs are so far above what they were projected to cost that one would have to figure that a public option that is suppose to cost $1 trillion will likely cost $5 trillion and the further we go out (20 or 30 years) the bigger the difference between actual and projected. Of course in 30 years this country will be bankrupt and meaningless with the Democratic Socialized Medicine plan.
In regards to the “public option”…Any plan backed by the Treasury and our tax dollars will kill any private insurance. Any public plan that pays doctors and hospitals at or close to Medicare/Medicaid rates will kill private insurance. And for those who don’t know, when Medicare and Medicaid pay providers their low reimbursement rates the cost not paid is passed onto those with private insurance…Americans who pay taxes and work for a living.
When there is no longer private insurance that’s when health care as we know it is dead and many of us will be dead because of that coverage.

Posted by: PhillyMatt | June 21, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

I’m glad that the Rebulicans and some of the Democrats in the Senate are beging to pay attention to two of my favorite quotes.
“I place economy among the first and most important virtues, and public debt as the greatest of dangers. To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt.”
– — Thomas Jefferson
“Until the National Debt is paid off, the other problems facing our country will remain unsolved. Compound Interest is the ‘Eighth Wonder Of The World’ and it can bring a nation to its knees.”
– — C. Morgan Cofer

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 21, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

“Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told me that the U.S. Senate will not “go down the government-run health care road” despite a new poll showing 72 percent of Americans want a government role in health care — and are willing to pay higher taxes for it.”
So much for a government “for the people, by the people” I guess. Does any American still believe America is a democracy?

Posted by: hosfac | June 21, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

I’m just glad that the Republicans have re-discovered the virtue of economy. It was apparently quite lost during the 4 trillion dollars that W. ran up. Alas, if there is a weapon the country can buy, they will certainly be more than happy to pony-up for that.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

“Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told me that the U.S. Senate will not “go down the government-run health care road” despite a new poll showing 72 percent of Americans want a government role in health care — and are willing to pay higher taxes for it.”
So much for a government “for the people, by the people” I guess. Does any American really believe that America is still a democracy?

Posted by: hosfac | June 21, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

The President claims health care costs will kill businesses yet he pans to tax businesses to pay for his health plan and that is on top of the having the 2nd highest corporate tax rate in the world. So if health care costs don’t kill business he’ll make sure his tax plan does.

Posted by: PhillyMatt | June 21, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

We should call the Republic plan for health care what it really is–passive eugenics. They are apparently totally fine with private industries deciding which American citizens are worthy of care and condemning the sick and the weak to inevitable unnecessary illness and untimely death. Why we have sheepishly put up with this vile situation for so long is beyond me.

Posted by: Michele | June 21, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Well, if the plan is done right. It should help reduce the cost of health care insurance that employers provide to employees. This should help employers. Also, with Universal coverage, it will mean better preventative care. Which also should benefit employers with employees taking less sick days.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

“Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told me that the U.S. Senate will not “go down the government-run health care road” despite a new poll showing 72 percent of Americans want a government role in health care — and are willing to pay higher taxes for it.”
So much for a government “for the people, by the people” I guess. Is there any American who still believes that America is still a democracy?
And you can talk smack about the poll all you wish, but just because it doesn’t reflect your opinion, doesn’t mean it’s invalid. I wouldn’t mind a government run health plan if it’s functional and it’s not going to cost me anything. The whole reason I don’t have insurance is because if I did, I couldn’t afford to use it. It’s outrageously expensive and the deductable is so high, any medical issue I had, except cancer or an organ transplant, would come out of my pocket 100% anyways. And as strange as it sounds, everyone I know (except 1, who works at a hospital) is in the same boat I am.

Posted by: hosfac | June 21, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Yes, that about describes the Republican health plan to a tee. Passive-eugenics. Or in other words, they wait long enough all the chronically ill people will die. Leaving just those that have good health care insurance. They are quite brilliant, the little aristocratic buggers.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

Senator Graham
is sweating bullets- living in his ‘Plantation style nether world of Laissez Faire economics’ of the deep south- which now has NO political clout.
guess what Lindsay- A Public Plan is coming LOL.

Posted by: Peter in CT | June 21, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

We can’t afford government run health care. We just don’t have the money. It costs too much money to run……………………………………………….what, you want to start another useless war? It will cost trillions? Yes yes yes, always plenty of money for that. Let’s give non-bid contracts to a company the V.P. use to run. We have money to burn for this. Nothing to too much for a needless war!

Posted by: SamTyler1973 | June 21, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

The Republicans are so far off base on this issue, and they are too stupid to be able to tell. We WILL have Government health-care in this country, with or without them (preferable without) because that IS what real civilized societies do for their people. I love how they point to Canada and Europe, claiming that their HC systems are “failures” yet, the people there are OVERWHELMING satisfied with their healthcare. People here pay exorbitant amounts and are STILL not satisfied. This is the status quo the GOP are defending. What a bunch of hypocritical morons, with their “government run” coverage for them and their families. Gee- it works ok for them, doesn’t it? Oh, and by the way, the only “bureaucrat between me and my doctor” are the insurance companies who refuse to pay for anything.
Your days are numbered, GOP members.

Posted by: Lola | June 21, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Actually, we can’t afford not to have a government plan that competes with the private plans. Because, the private health insurance plans have proven that they cannot contain their own costs.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

I like when ABC says “Key Republican” or “Key Democrat” in the article title, because the legislator in question is a relative nobody whose name many would not recognize. For my part, I think a strong national government-run insurance option is the only thing that is going to work to bring the insurance and pharmaceutical industries into check. Their insane greed, price-gauging and multi-layered tactics to control the practice of medicine and the availability, effectiveness and safety of treatment in this country must be stopped. I know our government is far from perfect, but someone must regulate them and protect the interests of the common good; if not the US government, then whom? The unfathomable amount of money involved means that they cannot be expected to regulate themselves ethically, period. Anything but a nationalized, transparent public health plan will be inadequate to even make a dent in the corruption in these industries.

Posted by: iamwomaninMI | June 21, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

JohnO: I guess the U.S. papers take a different daily slant: WE NEED REFORM, U.K. and Canada are brethren…what of the other European countries such as Germany and France…their health care system is great..I guess it is easier to lump all socialized medicine countries into one pot..but the countries that do have successful universal care…we should at least analyze theirs and decide if some aspects would take root well here…and besides it is coming…it’s a matter of when…I think the voting public has had enough of the issue not being tackled!

Posted by: phallon | June 21, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

like when ABC says “Key Republican” or “Key Democrat” in the article title, because the legislator in question is a relative nobody whose name many would not recognize. For my part, I think a strong national government-run insurance option is the only thing that is going to work to bring the insurance and pharmaceutical industries into check. Their insane greed, price-gauging and multi-layered tactics to control the practice of medicine and the availability, effectiveness and safety of treatment in this country must be stopped. I know our government is far from perfect, but someone must regulate them and protect the interests of the common good; if not the US government, then whom? The unfathomable amount of money involved means that they cannot be expected to regulate themselves ethically, period. Anything but a nationalized, transparent public health plan will be inadequate to even make a dent in the corruption in these industries.

Posted by: iamwomaninMI | June 21, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

There isn’t nationalized health care to the degree some are thinking. But what might come out of this, is a government plan, that helps with competition. I mean, I certainly agree a single-payer system where the government is the payer is best. We have to be realistic though, no such plan could pass Congress. Nor is there any politician, at least at the senior level, currently advocating such a plan.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

To all those who are calling for him to give up his gov’t insurance, that is ridiculous… that’s the same as you calling for me to give up my employer’s insurance. I work there and that is part of the package. He works there and that is part of his compensation. Your employment doesn’t offer insurance? Time to get another job that does.
This entitlement “they owe me” attitude makes me sick.

Posted by: Haywire | June 21, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Haywire – Couldn’t have said it better.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 21, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

I figure government owes me something. They’ve certainly been taking money away from me and funding things that I would never approve. If government isn’t good for anything but taking, I won’t them to go away and go away now.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm


The Republicans are so far off base on this issue, and they are too stupid to be able to tell. We WILL have Government health-care in this country, with or without them (preferable without) because that IS what real civilized societies do for their people. I love how they point to Canada and Europe, claiming that their HC systems are “failures” yet, the people there are OVERWHELMING satisfied with their healthcare. People here pay exorbitant amounts and are STILL not satisfied. This is the status quo the GOP are defending. What a bunch of hypocritical morons, with their “government run” coverage for them and their families. Gee- it works ok for them, doesn’t it? Oh, and by the way, the only “bureaucrat between me and my doctor” are the insurance companies who refuse to pay for anything.
Your days are numbered, GOP members.
Posted by: Lola | Jun 21, 2009 2:57:33 PM

Lola… you apparently do not understand that there are a lot of independent thinkers who actually care about the future. Throwing everyone that disagrees with you platitudes and generalities shows your ignorance and arrogance. BTW: you should research the Canadian and UK health system before making a blanket statement about entire populations approval of their health care systems, as you are WRONG.

Posted by: bob | June 21, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

What an amazing display of overt prostitution. Gramham and his like minded collegues don’t give a damn about the American people. They are protecting their Johns. It is time to get them all out. Republicans and Democrats who value their campaign coffers above our interests.

Posted by: Herban Goddess | June 21, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

I certainly support a Public Option. Without one, it’s just a beautiful birthday cake for private insurer’s. And there is absolutely zero possibility of getting to Universal coverage without a Public Option. And, even then, the Public Option can’t be neutered by the private insurance companies. In other words, not allowed to be competetive with them.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Excuse me but where are we going to get all the doctors this plan will require? How long is the American public willing to wait for an appointment? Think about it.

Posted by: Frank | June 21, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

A vast majority of Americans support a public option. Only the far right idealogues and the insurance industry oppose it. Folks – get off your ideological band wagon and support what works. We all know our current system is broken and dysfunctional and men, women and children are dying because of it.

Posted by: Mark from atlanta | June 21, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

The rich won’t have to wait for health care. They never have. And the poor won’t mind waiting because without it many will certainly die. See, the rich don’t quite understand, if they can’t have the best of everything they wonder why anyone might take something tattered and mend it.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Somebody commented “The British and Canadian papers online are filled with almost daily examples of the horrors of nationalized health care. Americans are so stupid and insular that they don’t bother to read anything but our Obama worshiping media. We are so used to choice and options and the best care in the world that it is going to come as a huge shock to be told that it will be three weeks before you can see a GP about those chest pains, and an additional 6 months before you can see a cardiologist. Waiting lists, inadequate care, and government bureaucracy are the standard in these countries where the feds dictate what you get.” I read Canadian papers everyday, along with BBC web. I don’t see what the person who made the comment see at all. All I see is another piece of propaganda- never mind propaganda- the comment is an outright lie. I know a poll isn’t a vote- but the American people just got treated the same way by a demagogue as the Iranian people have been treated all this week. Finally a chance to stand up and say, yes, we care about our disadvantaged neighbors and if we must, we’ll pay a bit more tax. That’s glorious because it takes the country into the ranks of a modern, industrial society and puts it back up front where it belongs. This senator, this representative of the “people” knows the truth; nobody is so stupid as to miss the stats that say all the other countries with health care are surging ahead in life expectancy and overall health- not just the upper crust. He’s lying to everyone and you all know it! Or maybe he is that stupid? Or maybe in someone’s back pocket? Just plain sick to hear because whatever the reason, he and those like him, with their own selfish interests at heart, are literally willing to let people die. That is happening right now.

Posted by: awakeonplanetearth | June 21, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Yup, what ever happened to the ideas of competition and good ol fashioned capitalism? Guess Mr. Graham doesn’t believe in these! Maybe he’d better stay home next time…forget running! Some of will never vote for anyone who stood against such Americana!
Wake up, Mr. Graham! We are watching!

Posted by: cokids | June 21, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

What makes any sane person think that the government can manage health care. Look at what the government has done to Social Security, Medicare, Public Housing, and now AIG. With this kind of a track record they have proven that they aren’t even capable of successfully operating the local burger stand. To start with where will the money come from and not cause an increase to the government debt any more than it is? In his first 132 days in office Obama has increased the debt of the government by 694.2 Billion dollars. At this rate he will increase the debt of the Government by 1.9 Trillion dollars in his first year alone and 7.6 Trillion dollars by the end of his 4 year term in office. If he is elected for a second term with the same rate of spending then the government debt will increase by 15.3 Trillion dollars. Since the debt owed by the Government was 10.6 Trillion dollars when he took office an additional 7.6 Trillion will almost double the debt in just 4 years to 18.3 Trillion dollars and at the end of his second term it will have increased to an unthought-of 26 Trillion dollars. The interest alone on this amount of debt will consume more than half of the entire federal budget. This does not even include what Obama wants to put into healthcare which has been estimated may actually cost upwards of 1.6 Billion dollars. This is money that the Government does not have and cannot conceivably have without raising taxes to the point where everyone in the country will be paying a much higher tax rate than they are currently paying. No matter how you want to put it any healthcare reform will require government involvement which will lead to required government spending so the money is an important issue, if it’s not there then healthcare will have to wait until such time as it is available. Obama promised change but this is ridiculous he makes all who came before him look minor on their spending while in office. Time to stop spending and do what should have been done long ago, cut spending which is not specifically authorized in article 1 of the constitution.
There is NO money for healthcare, there is NO money for education reform or any other dreams in the upcoming budget. Look at what the government has done to Social Security, Medicare, Public Housing, and now AIG.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 21, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

Somebody commented “The British and Canadian papers online are filled with almost daily examples of the horrors of nationalized health care. Americans are so stupid and insular that they don’t bother to read anything but our Obama worshiping media. We are so used to choice and options and the best care in the world that it is going to come as a huge shock to be told that it will be three weeks before you can see a GP about those chest pains, and an additional 6 months before you can see a cardiologist. Waiting lists, inadequate care, and government bureaucracy are the standard in these countries where the feds dictate what you get.” I read Canadian papers everyday, along with BBC web. I don’t see what the person who made the comment see at all. All I see is another piece of propaganda- never mind propaganda- the comment is an outright lie. I know a poll isn’t a vote- but the American people just got treated the same way by a demagogue as the Iranian people have been treated all this week. Finally a chance to stand up and say, yes, we care about our disadvantaged neighbors and if we must, we’ll pay a bit more tax. That’s glorious because it takes the country into the ranks of a modern, industrial society and puts it back up front where it belongs. This senator, this representative of the “people” knows the truth; nobody is so stupid as to miss the stats that say all the other countries with health care are surging ahead in life expectancy and overall health- not just the upper crust. He’s lying to everyone and you all know it! Or maybe he is that stupid? Or maybe in someone’s back pocket? Just plain sick to hear because whatever the reason, he and those like him, with their own selfish interests at heart, are literally willing to let people die. That is happening right now.

Posted by: awakeonplanetearth | June 21, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

How can there be no money for anything? Best I can tell bills are still being passed, taxes are still being collected, and all goes on pretty much since it did from the beginning. It’s hard not have money when the government ownds the printing press.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

I now know that Obama will not get health reform. It will be soo watered down. That it will not make a difference. Between the Rep’s and Dems fighting Obama also. You can kiss reform goodbye. IT AIN’T GOIN TO HAPPEN. NO WAY NO HOW.. AND IT WILL BE BUZZ AS USUAL.. AND WE CAN FORGET DON’T ASK DON’T TELL REFORM THAT’S OUT ALSO. I AM SAYING GOODBYE TO THE PRESIDENT THAT OBAMA COULD HAVE BEEN. AND I AM TELL ALL OF YOU THAT AS I VOTED FOR HIM THAT OBAMA WILL BE A ONE TERM PRESIDENT. JIMMY CARTER ALL OVER AGAIN.. THE DEMS DON’;T HAVE THE ##### TO DO WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE. AND OBAMA IS LOSING HIS. GOODBYE TO A GREAT PRESIDENT THAT COULD HAVE BEEN. RIGHT NOW AS IT STANDS. IT’S ALL OVER… WE ARE DONE…

Posted by: Gregory | June 21, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

I would like to comment on this morning show!
Everyone thinks Congress is going to be paying for health care. Not true. Congress works for the American people and 76% of the American people want a public health care system.
What Congress forgot was, it is not their opinions. The people WANT IT! So congress should be doing their best to deliver it.
By the way those scare tactics about Americans waiting to be seen by a doctor or dentist, WE ALREADY DO. Just ask any woman who tries to get in to see her Gynecologist or her Childs Pediatrician. Why do the Republicians always have to lie about an issue that’s not putting money in their pockets. 76% of the American people want a public health care system. Congress works for us not themselves. It is not their opinion that counts it is the American people’s opinion that counts here. Congress is not paying for this health care bill. We The People Are! It’s time to find out which Senators are going to stand up for Americans and those who are going to just put more money in their own pockets. Any Senator who does not vote for public health care should be fired, recalled, laid off, their insurance taken away, no pensions, shammed, and never again be allow to represent anyone or any state ever AGAIN!

Posted by: Janet Wolfbauer | June 21, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

How can anyone balk at a publicly funded health care system on the grounds that they don’t want a government bureaucrat standing between them and their doctor? The alternative we enjoy now is an insurance company bureaucrat standing between patient and doctor. I’ll trust the government over an insurance company anytime.

Posted by: sirach | June 21, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

I tried argument about the National Debt to my college economics professor when Reagan was running up two trillion dollars worth. He felt it was irrelevent unless the country is unable to pay the interest payments. Then, of course, it’s Katie-bar-the-door.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Tom – Most of what they are spending is beyond the revenue they will take in, we cannot live constantly in debt, the interest alone will eventually kill us. Yes the government owns the presses but the problem is when they print more money it actually devalues what we have in our pockets so printing money is a bad thing as it will lead to inflation.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 21, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Whenever I see the name “Baucus” I think of Jim Backus as in Mr. Howell the rich guy from Gilligans Island. Comparitively I bet since he is a member of the democratic Obama administration and architect of a $1.6 Trillion dollar Government Healthcare plan I imagine him spending recklessly and throwing money at every little problem much like Mr. Howell or Mr. Obama for that matter.

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | June 21, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

what do yall think is a good salary for a doctor?

Posted by: tiger | June 21, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Janet Wolfbauer – You said “Congress is not paying for this health care bill. We The People Are!”
Please tell me where this money is comming from. Remember that the budget for this year is already in the hole (planned spending exceeds planned revenues) so there is no money in the budget for healthcare.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 21, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Tiger:
That would be anything he can charge and the patient will still pay the bill.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

i meant what would be an appropriate salary for a doctor…….per year…. ?

Posted by: tiger | June 21, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Graham purports to tell 72% of the population what kind of medical insurance it’s going to get? So what if 72% of Americans want a government option Excuuuuuuuse me! The truth is if there is a government insurance option insurance companies will have to really insure people otherwise people will go to the government plan. The people want REAL health insurance. Wake up and stop acting like a bunch of insurance company skin heads! – ITWARZ

Posted by: ITWARZ | June 21, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

Tiger:
That would depend upon specialty, the demographics of the patients in the area, cost of labor for staff and supplies, and probably many other things.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

tom, please just answer the question……for a family medicine doctor.. im not asking the question based on what currently is the case……im asking what you think SHOULD be the case

Posted by: tiger | June 21, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

how about for a family medicine doc in arizona…..what should they make per year?

Posted by: tiger | June 21, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Tiger – That would vary greatly around the country. If we factor in the amount of student loans and the cost of setting up a practice which has to paid off over the years I would expect anywhere from $200K in a lower cost of living area to $700K in a high cost of living area. Unfortuently there is not a one answer fits all for this question as we all know that it does not cost the same to live in all areas of the country.
As an example I sold a 30 year old house in Southern California for over $500K a few years ago, I moved to Southeastern Wshington and bought a new, bigger house on a larger lot for under $250K. If I’d have stayed in California the house I have now would have cost over $700K,

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 21, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Sandcrab1612:
The money comes from the magic money fairy. Currently, that’s Tim Geithner. Where do you think it comes from?

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

so do u think that 200k-700k is an appropriate salary for a fam med doc, tom? sandra?

Posted by: tiger | June 21, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Tiger:
That would be great for Virginia? With no significant health problems, that is. I don’t know about your locale? E-mail Senator McCain he might know.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Don’t we, the voters, deserve the same health care that the elected politicians?
Mr. Graham and the rest in D.C.need to listen to the citizens or be voted out.
Other countries, Germany, France, Canada, etc. can afford health coverage for their citizens, but the U.S. can’t seem to come up with money. Stop the money spent on wars and payouts to other countries and that would save a bundle. It’s time America took care of its own.

Posted by: Picbodo | June 21, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

The government doesn’t tell me who my doctor can be, the insurance company does. The government doesn’t tell me what hospital I can go to, the insurance company does. The government doesn’t tell me what procedure I can have, the insurance company does. The government doesn’t tell my doctor how to treat my condition, the insurance company does. Capitalism, is this capitalism really? Freedom, to do what? Whatever the insurance company wants me to do. Graham is not my senator, why is he telling me and my neighbors what we are going to get? – ITWARZ

Posted by: ITWARZ | June 21, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

“We are so used to choice and options and the best care in the world that it is going to come as a huge shock to be told that it will be three weeks before you can see a GP about those chest pains, and an additional 6 months before you can see a cardiologist. Waiting lists, inadequate care, and government bureaucracy are the standard in these countries where the feds dictate what you get.” Posted by JohnO, and an outright lie. I read Canadian papers, watch bbc on the net- don’t see any of that- and have Canadian friends who get better care than American friends. That’s fine on a site like this- it happens all the time. But when a representative of the “people” spouts similar lines, that’s a different think. The man isn’t so stupid that he doesn’t know the US is falling behind in health, longevity and cost of delivery- he must know all that. Yet, for whatever reason or special interest, he’s willing to deny health care to the citizens of the United States- and in such a directly confrontational manner that he sounds like and acts very much like an Iranian leader we’ve all come to know so well in the last week or so. Unbelievable.

Posted by: awakeonplanetearth | June 21, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Maybe if we call our request for a government option a defense contract, maybe then Supreme Leader Ayatollah Graham will vote for it? – ITWARZ

Posted by: ITWARZ | June 21, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Maybe there’s value to the absence of term limits after all. It seems many of our Senators and Representatives want to be in office more than just the 4 years Obama will get. Either that, or they’re waiting for a SWEETER deal!!

Posted by: Fiercely__Independent | June 21, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Picbodo – If the government were to open the plans used by Congress to the public the monthly premiums for a family plan would roughly be between $425.00 and $1300.00, for an individual the monthly premium would roughly be between $177.00 and $550.00. One of the differences in the plan costs is the level of benefits provided and the amount the patient pays when receiving healthcare.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 21, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

ITWARTZ:
Certainly, our current health care system is Capitalist. It’s got to be, Capitalists or their minions are making all your health care decisions aren’t they?

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Freedom, freedom to have any type of health insurance plan Lindsay Graham says I can have. The founding fathers would be proud. – ITWARZ

Posted by: ITWARZ | June 21, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Lindsey Graham, a Senator living off of the public, is against a public plan?
He only makes $174,000 per year with built in pay raises, unless refused. His staff pay is $2.5 million.

Posted by: Paul | June 21, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Lindsey Graham doesn’t have to worry about it. He’s got the best health care in the U.S.A., government provided (and partially taxpayer funded) through the very kind of public option he wants to deny to everyone else.
We may have to vote them all out to get across the idea that there are millions hurting who need real reform in the health care system, and the only real reform will include a public option.

Posted by: JAB | June 21, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

You can whine about Lindsey Graham if it makes you feel better. But his constituency is all that matters to him. He figures, if he gets re-elected then he has done the right thing for them. If he gets tossed, then he made a mistake.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

The 72% of people who don’t mind paying higher taxes are the same people (50%) who don’t pay federal taxes. Typical democrat voter, vote for someone else to pay. BTW, are illegals also covered?

Posted by: Discreettool | June 21, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Health care reform will happen because it is an issue of “access”; ask any lower middle class how they have been refused treatment by providers because they have no insurance. Insurers are only available for some of the employed and sometimes one does not qualify for medicaid or medicare and are left without any treatment when unemployed. This is the evil, the evil of lack of access and the greed of insurance companies. A government option is essential. I wish one could have a government option for car insurance!

Posted by: veronica | June 21, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

We need single payer health care! What is wrong with you people?
Our system is so great that not a single country with it, Canada, Germany, France, would trade it for ours. 20,000 US citizens die each year for lack of health care. 50% of bankruptsys are medical cost related. Medicare costs more because it subsidizes the Health Care Ins Industry by taking the least profitable most expensive patients. That of course would be if the Ins companies would take them anyway, all they want is “healthy” low cost people, who they deny claims for just to weed out the non-persistent who want what is due.
Single payer would of course be cheaper as anyone with any sense could see. But if you need proof look at Taiwan, which is roughly half of ours and they get 100% coverage.
Then there are those great commercials. Nobody tell you the narrator was an ex-CEO of one of the largest Health Care companies. Why is he an ex? Well he was found guilty of defrauding the govt and ousted, with a $100 mil severence of course. They are spending 500 billion on lobbying 2009 alone, and there are idiots out there who gobble up the kool-aid.

Posted by: W.Lively | June 21, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

No I just have the insurance company standing between me and my doctor. At least I get to vote for the politician

Posted by: Thinking | June 21, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

If you want health insurance get a job or buy it. BC/BS (and many other insurers) offer affordable plans. Stop asking other American’s to pay for it. The fact that the country is trillions in debt, the dollar is in free fall, interest rates are on the rise and inflation is on the horizon means nothing to you “everything should be free” crowd. How selfish…

Posted by: Discreettool | June 21, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

veronica:
If you need single-payer health care you’ve got two choices. One, convince a lot of Congressman, Senators, and the President of that. Two, go some place where they have single-payer health care.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

I’m sorry. It’s W.Lively that wants single-payer. Well, actually I want single-payer too. I wonder whether Secretary Geithner would give up paying the cash fairy if that one happened.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

This is from the New York Times survey quoted in this commentary:
“Nearly 6 in 10 said they would be willing to pay higher taxes to make sure that all were insured, with 4 in 10 willing to pay as much as $500 more a year.”
Higher taxes mean a whole lot more than $500 a year! Perhaps we are looking at 10 times that for an average income family.
This totally supports the notion that Americans have no idea of the costs of health care or insurance. The average employer pays over $12,000 a year per employee – and that is probably not for top coverage as many are expecting.
I really think people need to wake up. If we are going to have government options or paid health care – then we need to realize that this is not a cheap proposition. And no – “other people” are not going to pay for it – we are. Do you really think you can have the people earning over $250K pay for everything in this country? Think again – especially if you want this recession to end in the next 20 years.
Why do you think the Congress has been agonizing over this so much? It is because the costs are high and they are aware of that. The American people are obviously not aware. If we go for a national plan, then people can’t sit there and scream about how much this is going to take from their paycheck. It will cost all of us dearly.
So before we start committing to pay for all of this, lets really think hard if the government is going to be the best entity to make our medical care happen. Its really easy to say – “yes, government!” when it’s free or close to free ($500 a year). But when you are paying lots of hard earned money for this stuff – you might want to give it a few more minutes thought.
The bottom line is that none of this is going to be cheap – so we’d better all be on the same page about the costs and what to expect in return.

Posted by: Jon F | June 21, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

12,000 dollars per year per employee. Yes, and that’s probably just covers the office party.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

What a weaselly Senator. As long as he gets his, let the rest eat cake. Pure evil and greed.

Posted by: Paul | June 21, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

In January 2008, my company changed to a “high deductible health care system” where insurance picked up everything after $3,000/year. The company picked up the cost of this insurance(lower cost to them) but I was responsible for the first $3000/year of medical expenses for the family plan. Previously, we used to contribute 20% towards our health insurance. I took this same payment rate (~$250/month) and put it into into a “health care savings account”. If I didn’t spend it, I kept it.
I became acutely aware of the cost of medicine and shopped around for better deals on prescriptions, generics, etc. I also saved several hundred in excessive testing. I decided for myself the amount of med services that I wanted (not some beaurocrat). All the money that I used to pay in “co-pays” came out of the health savings account. I ended the year with ~ $2,000 left in the account and only needed another 1,000 to get up to the deductible limit. So this year my deductions monthly deduction is reduced to less than $85. Seems like a good program to me!

Posted by: Jim | June 21, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Already the rest of Americans are paying for it. The poor don’t pay for health care because they don’t have the money and they won’t have the money. Don’t you ever get it.
Americans spend $8000 per living individual for health care per year, currently.

Posted by: Paul | June 21, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

From WE THE SHEEPLE*
Q-Who does not benefit from a government run health care program?
A-Corporate run, for profit, health care giants. Big Pharma. Companies, insurance companies hire to negotiate fees with doctors. The users and after market companies. Companies who outsource medical advice. The afore mentioned are the biggest losers if a stand alone government health care industry is put into place.
Seventy two percent (72%) of Americans polled were in favor of a stand alone Government run health care plan.
Q-If the Government offers a health plan, are American citizens going to be forced to drop what they have and take the government plan?
A-NO
Q-Can they keep the plans they already have?
A-Yes
Over the last 20 years, increases in health care have exceeded inflation and SHEEPLE’s income.
Health Insurance Companies and their immeadiate after market subsidiaries will lose the monopoly they currently enjoy if an alternative source of coverage is introduced. Alternatives play an important role in keeping prices honest.
From WE THE SHEEPLE*
SECREG_756

Posted by: SECREG756 | June 21, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

I dont want Dodd, Pelosi, Reid, Kennedy running health care. If it passes make Congress search individually for their own insurance. They will repeal the law in a year.

Posted by: will | June 21, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

“Mr Graham, 72% of americans want health care reform and are willing to pay extra for it. Stop saying it will be like Canada and England because it won’t. The people will have a choice, a fact that you try to avoid. This plan can be worked out and this is the time to drop your anger at losing and do something worthwhile”
since 50% of Americans don’t pay Federal Income Tax, that means only 22% of TAXPAYERS supporting it.
you want healthcare? get a effin job and pay for it yourself. You REALLY want the dipsh1ts who run the post office and the IRS to run our healthcare?
1 TRILLION dollars to cover 1/3 of Americans?
Why don’t we just solve this problem like we did with car insurance? pass a law that we HAVE to have it in order to enter the hospital?
its really easy to sit around on Sunday mornign tv shows and bitch about the price of healthcare going up 86% in the last 20 years, but notice noone wnats to really break down WHY its risen so much. take the next step and try to find out WHY its going up so fast.
2 likely reasons: lawyers and insurance. ask a doctor, they’ll tell ya. ITS THE INSURANCE, stupid.
what industry pays more in lobbying at the federal and state level than ANT other? is it Defense contractors? no. is it doctors? no. its the insurance industry. these are the ones who are screwin it up for everybody.
Look at AIG. these clowns were actually selling insurance to Wall Street traders that their shaky subprime mortgage derivatives wouldn’t tank.
WHO THE HELL SELLS INSURANCE ON STOCKS? TO WALL STREET, AND NOT THE INDIVIDUAL INVESTORS? WHERES THE INSURANCE FOR OUR 401KS?
Riddle me this:
whats the difference between AIG and Bernie Madoff?
A: 500Bn in lobbyist influence.

Posted by: Todd | June 21, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Citing a poll a deeply flawed as this NY Times poll is shows either incompetence or a willful disregard for the truth. I will leave it to others to figure out which one is the truth, but neither one of them reflects favorably on AP.

Posted by: Badger | June 21, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Irregardless is not correct.
Just “regardless” please
Here’s to hoping that this Government Run Health Care Bill/Tax never gets through, and Obama has only four years to ruin the country.

Posted by: JRS | June 21, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Hmmm. Ruin this country? Sounds like something someone would say who doesn’t have to worry about health insurance themselves. Why are these people afraid of competition with the gov. as an option? Afraid it might make their fat cat donors from insurance companies have to actual provide affordable and decent coverage.
And the last time I check isn’t medicare government health insurance? Even though it has it’s flaws it seems to work pretty well. Oh thats right the far right is against Medicare too. They would love to get rid of it. So remember that when you vote in the next election people.

Posted by: Mark | June 21, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

SearamblerOne is right
No, the reason is a bunch of very well-off, fully government-insured politicians are being obstructionist and thinking about their next re-election campaign instead of doing what the majority of Americans want them to do. Not to mention how many Politicians may be in the pockets of some insurance companies and large medical facilities. Even the President Of the United States can not tamper with “PAY TO PLAY”. The country may never see a reformed health plan. And they darn sure don’t want that to happen through the hands of President Obama!

Posted by: Pedro Dixon | June 21, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

At every press conference, reporters should ask members of congress who speak out against the public option to please refuse their gov’t run health plans and seek private insurance. Seek a commitment from each one, whenever they are in front of a microphone. Come on, reporters!

Posted by: kta | June 21, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

I take exception to the notion of “european Socialist pile of excrement” as I was born and grew up in a European country that provides excellent and affordable health care to all of it’s citizens – Germany!
Clearly those who oppose health care reform in this country are ignorant and totally clueless, and I doubt they have ever actually been a patient in a country where health care is a basic human right rather than a privilege. Scare tactics of waitlists for MRIs and other procedures are total and utter BS!!!
The US health “care” system ranks 37th in the world, not exactly something we can write home about or take pride in. We have no problems funding wars and having the government run our military!
Personally I would like to know how much those we elect to represent our best interests and oppose reform get from insurance companies!

Posted by: ChrisB | June 21, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Pedro Dixon- Ex Sen. George Mitchell
was a member of the board of directors
for an Insurance Company.
UnumProvident was the most sued and heavily fined insurance company in America.
Influence peddling is just one of the many tools used by insurance companies.
Corporations have SHEEPLE right where they want them. Under their collective corporate feet.
Mitchell is currently active in the Obama presidency.
Plain talk. Simply put. With out the bi-partisan rhetoric.
SECREG_756

Posted by: SECREG756 | June 21, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Why would the Republican politicians want change the current health care fiasco if that would mean less money in their pockets?..wake up America! The drug companies and Health Insurance companies are supporters of the Republican party..there are a lot of lobbying(which by the way is sanitized corruption). Anyone who believes that Lindsay Graham and the others care about poor and middle class Americans and the fact that health care is inaccessible and unaffordable..I have a bridge to sell to you in Brooklyn.

Posted by: Stanley | June 21, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

I say Health care for all like in the Scandinavian countries which has the highest standard of living in the world. If they can provide health care for all of their citizens (and the citizens are satisfied) then we can…its as simple as that.. You can call it socialize medicine if you will but health care ought to be a right for every citizen and not a privilege. All the Republican and Democrat politicians are fully covered along with their family members..quite frankly I don’t think most of them care too much about the average American(poor/middle class). Wake up Americans! Find out those who truly care and vote the others out of office..its that simple.

Posted by: Stanley | June 21, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Once the government takes over your health care, they will take over your lives. Thank you Sen. Graham for an encouraging word.

Posted by: jules | June 21, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

We all complain about the cost of ‘health care’ going up, but who complains when a new procedure or drug is developed (after millions of dollars invested) to cure a disease or treat Grandma’s congestive heart failure? Who treats their bodies like a rental car, and then expects the hospital staff to fix their obesity, diabetes, and bad joints like magic? Medical care in America worked when the patient and the doctor didn’t have government or insurance companies in the way; doctors and hospitals did plenty of charity care, patients paid any way they could (even with livestock) and communities banded together to pay for life-saving treatment for someone who needed it. Adding employer-paid insurance (to circumvent government wage controls) took the patient out of the payment loop; regulations on what had to be covered (usually by states) forces premiums higher. I have to pay for maternity coverage for an employee who had a hysterectomy! We could stop doing medical research and that would slow the increases in costs; but we could also reform the medical malpractice lawsuit abuse and solve the same problem. Get government out of the way and costs will go down and quality will still go up (see the PC industry for an example.)

Posted by: spudmom | June 21, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

If the Scandinavian countries which have the highest standard of living in the world can provide health care for all of their citizens so can we..Its that simply! Aren’t we the richest country in the world? What happen to the concept that health care ought to be a right and not a privilege for citizens of any country?

Posted by: Stanley | June 21, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

The Republicans are right!

Posted by: Stanley | June 21, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

“people have to wait longer to get care”….well you know something is better than nothing and for many of us nothing is what we get. I would be willing to wait a bit longer for medical care if it was something I could afford. And I do not expect FREE medical care, I pay my bills and I work FULL TIME TO SUPPORT THIS COUNTRY. But sadly I can’t afford it, nor can I afford private insurance. So guess I will have to continue to go without. Until I really need it and have to go to the ER and not be able to pay the bill.

Posted by: Mary | June 21, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

here is a thought….those of us who do work fulltime and have taxes taken out to give free medical care to children, seniors and the disabled YET we cannot have access to healthcare insurance ourselves.
My employer nor my husband’s offer healthcare insurance as a benefit. We can’t afford a private plan as due to our age (50 and over) the cost would be in excess of a grand a month with a high deductible.
Yet a portion of our income supports others healthcare.
Why don’t I get a choice? Why do those asses in Washington (who have coverage BTW) get to make the choice FOR ME? Who are THEY to tell ME what I WANT or what I NEED.
I don’t expect a free ride when it comes to healthcare but I would appreciate having a choice, something I do not have right now. Yet my payroll taxes are good enough to help support others with their medical needs.
Give me SOMETHING I CAN AFFORD so I am not left on the streets if I get ill or injured.

Posted by: Mary | June 21, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

and another thought – anyone ever wonder who pays for prisoners healthcare? Even those who commit crimes against society get MEDICAL CARE they need.
PRISONERS…..yet I am not given the consideration, from the ##### in Washington DC, to be given something as basic as affordable healthcare.
Even PRISONERS get medical care….I can’t believe this. Guess if I ever get sick or injured I’ll go to the ER, not pay the bill, and listen to the insured ones ##### when their rates go up

Posted by: Mary | June 21, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Graham ignores that he and his family, and all members of Congress, are currently well covered with government managed healthcare insurance. We want nothing more not nothing less that Congress has provided for itself

Posted by: nusurfer04 | June 21, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

nusurfer04 – You said “Graham ignores that he and his family, and all members of Congress, are currently well covered with government managed healthcare insurance. We want nothing more not nothing less that Congress has provided for itself.”
The government does not manage the healthcare insurance for Congressmen, they provide access to a group of plans from which the Congressmen can choose.
If the government were to open the plans used by Congress to the public the monthly premiums for a family plan would roughly be between $425.00 and $1300.00, for an individual the monthly premium would roughly be between $177.00 and $550.00. One of the differences in the plan costs is the level of benefits provided and the amount the patient pays when receiving healthcare.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 21, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

72% want a government option – but less than half said they would be OK with paying (in taxes) up to $500 a year for it.
Sorry – those number speak volumes. It costs 5 or more times that to supplement Medicare!
Clearly people are saying they want a public option and have no idea of how much they will be asked to pay. If they knew what this is really going to cost them they would think twice.

Posted by: Jon F | June 21, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

Posted by: bob wright | Jun 21, 2009 12:39:03 PM
Ooooooooooh!!! Anyone who has a different opinion than you is *gasp* PART OF THE CONSPIRACY! Has been bought off by *gasp* BIG PHARMA! Mouths the *gasp* PARTY LINE! Works for the *OHMIGOD* INSURANCE INDUSTRY!
Get real and stop being ignorant. Who are you, Alex Jones?

Posted by: Ryan | June 21, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

George, you and ABC are being so
disingenuous using polls of adults instead of registered voters.
Of course a poll of voters would be favorable to what amounts to free health care for many people. There are 220 million adults and 10% of them are non-citizens. It would be no wonder if they support government-run health care, given that most of them come from countries where government controls that industry.
Then there are the 65 million people that are probably not too well tuned into public affairs given that they have never voted in their lives. Do you think they might like the idea of something for nothing?
Real political polls of voter paint a different picture, where people are evenly split about the issue, and the support for a public plan has been in decline like the support for most Obama’s bad ideas, along with his own poll numbers.
Maybe ABC and other media outlets will become honest one day, and use the same kind of polls that political campaigns use. Of course those polls are not automatically favorable to left-wing ideas!

Posted by: Jenny Ling Po | June 21, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

People have NO IDEA what is about to happen if the Dems vote for government run healthcare. It will turn out to be just as big a fiasco as everything else the government has tried to do in the past several months (Bush included)……they say jump and we say how high! Wake up, America. Take your country back, NOW!

Posted by: Nancy Brandt | June 21, 2009, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

For all those people wanting a government run health care plan: Who is going to be rendering your care? ACORN Drs? Most Drs are going to hang up their stethescopes. The government will be paying them less than Walmart workers.

Posted by: Cathy | June 21, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Graham and his kind of thinking need to GO – VOTE HIM OUT OF OFFICE NOW! Standing in the way of progress! Sore loser.

Posted by: Kiki | June 22, 2009, 1:35 am 1:35 am

Someone wrote, “The British and Canadian papers online are filled with almost daily examples of the horrors of nationalized health care.”
And the American papers have lots of reports of health care horror stories happening HERE, under our current non-system. Health care costs are rapidly becoming the number 1 reason in this country for bankruptcy. Millions of people are one accident or major illness (like cancer or a stroke) away from complete and total financial ruin. Pretty sad commentary on the state of health care for the supposedly ‘best country in the world’…..

Posted by: SearamblerOne | June 22, 2009, 8:27 am 8:27 am

Quote “What Congress forgot was, it is not their opinions. The people WANT IT! So congress should be doing their best to deliver it. ”
My kids want candy for breakfast.

Posted by: Haywire | June 22, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am

“The reason you’re not going to have a government run health care pass the Senate is because it would be devastating for this country,” Graham told me Sunday in an exclusive “This Week” interview.”
No, it would just be “devastating” for your re-election campaign since you are bought and paid for by the HC industry.

Posted by: Padma | June 22, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am

“Mr Graham, 72% of americans want health care reform and are willing to pay extra for it.”
2 issues… that not being address here at all
1. These “surveys/studies” NEVER ask 3 keys points.
- Are you currently paying income taxes?
- How much more in taxes are you willing to pay to support healthcare?
- Do you support govt plan if it will become like SS in regards to running up deficits?
2. We never hear REAL numbers in this discussions. I.E. – family of 4 with a working mom & dad earning $xxK per year are currently paying $yyK per year for thier healthplan. Under the new government plan they would pay Z for EXACTLY the same coverage! And they would pay W% more in taxes to help support the overall plan.
Until you actually begin to hear politicians talk in these details people, you have no idea what your getting or how much your really paying for it.
As far as all this BS about what Congressmen and other govt employees get for coverages, try to remember one thing. ALL US tax payers are paying in to support plan. Just as we are all paying to allow military families to shop at commisaries and get the healthcare plans they get.
Your completely delusional if you really think any “public option” is going to be close to what these other benifits are.
Until you can see the details of this thing and have a glimpse of how your own situation will be work, the rest is all BS rhetoric.
In my view, That is WHY rushing through thing is incredibly irresponsible! We have already seen how rushing things “to avoid a catastrophe” does not work! Can you imagine how many holes such as the AIG bonus hole in the “Stimulator” will occur something as big and complex as helthcare?
Work through it…oh by the way DEMS & REPUBS…NO SUMMER BREAK…WORK ON THIS!
Then when its to a point that Americans can compare wether it really is going to help people, then we can have the YEA or NAY votes.

Posted by: Mike_C | June 22, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Didn’t he also say government sponsored health insurance would be horrible because of the poor care and the long wait times? As though the uninsured don’t have that now.

Posted by: Jeff | June 22, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Graham was going to be against a public option no matter what. His words are meaningless. Vote him out.

Posted by: Steve | June 22, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Contrary to many comments here, Mr. Graham is not on gov healthcare. His employer is the federal government and like many employers, it provides him with an insurance plan from a private insurance company. If you really want his plan, why don’t try and see if you could get a job or get a job with the federal gov. you can’t just get entitlement to healthcare plan like his just because you exist within the borders of this country and provide no effort. the only people here vying for a gov plan, are those who don’t pay enough taxes. you could do a poll of inner city and guaranteed 100% will want gov healthcare, in fact they will want anything free out of gov they can. if they were paying high taxes already, they wouldn’t want to pay more to pay for the healthcare of others who may or may not take care of their body, get obese, etc.

Posted by: seandoc | June 22, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

I am Canadian and some of the comments posted here about the shortcomings of teh Canadian healthcare system are comical. The key question one should ask Canadians is, would you get rid of the Canadian system in favour of the US system. The answer is a resounding YES. Our system is not perfect, but we prefer it over yours.
To us, having a world class health care system is a right, not a privilege.

Posted by: Tony | June 22, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Speak for yourself… I am indeed asking for a French, British or Canadian style health care system for this country. People in those countries receive BETTER care with far less money spent per patient. Longer lifespan, better outcomes, more streamlined, less redundancy.
Mr. Dodd is right that neither Senator Dodd nor Obama for that matter are asking for anything of the sort. Still, I strongly support the incrementalist approach of the public option as the best possible outcome we could actually expect.
Insurance Premiums paid past 12 months: $8000.00. Trips to the doctor: one.

Posted by: Brad | June 22, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

What?! So many against socialized health care not realizing what we have now is basically a monarchy health care! EVEN EUROPE IS PAST THE MONARCHY PHASE OF CONTROL!
With government health you can vote idiots out. What can you do about the IDIOTS running your current health plan? Hell, you can’t even switch(Thus Not Free Market) unless you get a different job or want to pay a hell of a lot more.
So, what do you do about the idiots and bureaucrats in the insurance companies standing between Patient and Doctor now.
Republicans hate facts. These are true. It scares them, makes them run in fear.
The American papers are full of the horrors of our current system(people being dropped from health ins. before a big operation/surgery or after a cancer diagnoses, having to sue, wait in court, generally dying before the case is settled). If republicans weren’t so insular and listening only to Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity and read the news instead, they’d have a clue. Even if Europe’s is terrible it’d be NICE TO HAVE AN IMPROVEMENT! Ours is very terrible.

Posted by: Joey | June 22, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Hey Rob, why you hatin’ on small businesses?
It’s hard to get good insurance, incredibly expensive, and then there are reports from every major insurance company about patients getting dropped in case of something major. It’s hilarious, catastrophe health insurance that gets cancelled in the case of a catastrophe!

Posted by: Joey | June 22, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

The only way this country is going to get serious about healthcare is for the citizens to unite and pass a law the ends all healthcare coverage for local, state and federal employees.
NO TAXES USED FOR GOVERNEMNT WORKERS HEALTH INSURANCE.
NO more tax dollars should be used to fund government employee’s healthcare from the president of the US to the lowest mail clerk or teacher.
Put an end to taxpayers funding senators’ FREE health insurance, force them to buy it on the open market and they will come around to creating a non-profit healthcare system similar to civilized countries.
As long as these freeloaders can get by having the rest of us subsidizing their program, nothing will be done.
Any senator who refuses to create a low cost single payer plan that sets limits on what medical costs and fees the doctors and companies can charge should be singled out as people who must be excluded from the freeloader benefits they now enjoy.
Why should taxpayers be subsidizing such people as we now do?
These hypocrites enjoy massive benefits at our expense and give us nothing but destroyed systems robbed them for their own pockets and always at great loss to the people of the US.
Case in point: social security. The government has stolen so much money from SS that the system is near bankruptcy. Thieves are the problem, not taxpayers.
The same will happen to any healthcare system unless we place very strict controls over our own governments ability to undermine the program.
Who ever heard of non-negotiated prices for bidding on medication as we got with the ever corrupt Bush administration? What a joke! That’s guaranteed profits for medical companies without fear of have to negotiate for contracts. NO REAL business person would have agreed to such a plan. ONLY corrupt senators bought by lobbyists.
Despicable beasts.

Posted by: basementfrog | June 22, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Simple math: If the overwhelming majority of Americans want a public plan option, then the overwhelming majority of the negatrons on these blogs are probably insurance company and pharmaceutical industry employees. Don’t be fooled by these shmucks and DON’T LET THEM SWAY YOUR OPINION. They’re scared to death of losing their huge profits and couldn’t care less for the health of citizens. We should have had universal single payer health care 40 years ago. CRUSH THE NEGATRONS!!!!!! Vote Linseed Graham out of office!

Posted by: Marvin8 | June 22, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

“…where you’ve got a bureaucrat standing in between the patient and the doctor”
I want the government standing between the insurance company and my wallet and over the head of the medical industry.
Please help, I can’t get decent medical coverage in America.
I actually had to send my Japanese wife back to her country (my doctor’s idea) to get medical treatment the Blue Cross turned her down. It was for a brain tumor.
PS She pays $20 per month for medical insurance.
When she broker her arm recently and needed an x-ray, it cost her $3 and the emergency room doctor cost her $10. The setting and cast cost $5.
Don’t tell me we aren’t getting screwed here by heartless medical and insurance theives. Vampires.

Posted by: basementfrog | June 22, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

basementfrog – You said “Put an end to taxpayers funding senators’ FREE health insurance”
You aree wrong on this issue, the Congressmen do not have FREE health insurance. Their employer is the federal government and like many employers, it provides him with an insurance plan from a private insurance company. Congressmen have been required to get their health insurance in this manner since passage of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1983. In this case the federal government utilizes the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) plan to provide a choice of different private insurance plans to choose from, The federal government as the employeer pays a portion of the monthly premium and the Congressman as the employee pays the remainder. The Congressman is responsible for any copays or deductable payments when service is provided by a healthcare provider.
The governments only other involvment with the FEHB is to negotiate rates and benefits for each plan once a year. If you want to get educated just Google FEHB and go to the site and see what the differnt plans are.
If the government were to open these plans to the public the monthly premiums for a family plan would roughly be between $425.00 and $1300.00, for an individual the monthly premium would roughly be between $177.00 and $550.00. One of the differences in the plan costs is the level of benefits provided and the amount the patient pays when receiving healthcare. To me this would be a viable option as the government would not have to make a large outlay to open these plans to the public and they already negotiate the cost and benefits each year with the plan providers.
I wish that the left would get educated before you go making statements like this regarding benefits which are paid to members of Congress.
let me educate you a little you probably are under the belief that members of Congress do not participate in Social Security. Once again you would be wrong, federal government employees hired after 1984 and ALL members of Congress no mater when they were first elected are required to participate in Social Security. These same people also participate in the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) which is where they receive their retirement benefits when they retire. The employee has the Social Security (and Medicare) withheld from his check just like you do every pay period. Additonally they have an additional sum witheld which goes into the FERS retirement fund and if he chooses he can have an additonal sum witheld and placed in the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP), The TSP operates similar to a 401k and has sveral funds which the employee can choose to have his money held in (many federal employees lost money when the economy collapsed as the TSP is mainly in stocks).
The actual retirment for a Congressman is determined by a formula which looks at his salary for the highest three year period prior to retirement and then uses a formula which uses his age at retirement and number of years served. To achive retirement the employee must have a minimum number of years (just like the rest of the world) and have a minimum number of years served (just like the rest of the world).
Once again if you want to learn more Google FERS and TSP which should get you to the proper pages on the internet, none of this is hidden data it is there for anyone to read.
If we were to have term limits for Congressmen; 2 terms (12 years) for Senators and 4 terms (8 years) for the House then the retirement payouts would not be that great for retired Congressmen.
Now something you probablly don’t know. Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, during the phase-in period of Social Security, Congress was able to grant generous benefit increases because the system had perpetual short-run surpluses. Congressional amendments to Social Security took place in even numbered years (election years) because the bills were politically popular, but by the late 1970s, this era was over. For the next three decades, projections of Social Security’s finances would show large, long-term deficits, and in the early 1980s, the program flirted with immediate insolvency. From this point on, amendments to Social Security would take place in odd numbered years (years that were not election years) because Social Security reform now meant tax increases and benefit reductions. When revenues exceed expenditures, as they have in most years, the excess is invested in special series, non-marketable U.S. Government bonds, thus the Social Security Trust Fund indirectly finances the federal government’s general purpose deficit spending. It is also interesting to note that the Supreme Court has established that no one has any legal right to Social Security benefits. The Court decided, in Flemming v. Nestor (1960), that “entitlement to Social Security benefits is not a contractual right”. In simple terms, the decision means that since no one has any legal right to Social Security benefits, Congress can cut or eliminate benefits at any time.
The Trust Fund is regarded by some as an accounting trick which holds no economic significance. Others argue that it has specific legal significance because the Treasury securities it holds are backed by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. government, which has an obligation to repay its debt. It is important to note, however, that while the Treasury guarantees the interest and principal payments it makes to the Social Security Trust Fund, the benefit payments made from the Social Security Trust Fund to American retirees have no guarantee at all. The Social Security Administration’s authority to make benefit payments as granted by Congress extends only to its current revenues and existing Trust Fund balance, i.e., redemption of its holdings of Treasury securities. Therefore, Social Security’s ability to make full payments once annual benefits exceed revenues depends in part on the federal government’s ability to make good on the bonds that it has issued to the Social Security trust funds.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 22, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

AMERICA’S NATIONAL HEALTHCARE EMERGENCY!
It’s official. America and the World are now in a GLOBAL PANDEMIC. A World EPIDEMIC with potential catastrophic consequences for ALL of the American people. The first PANDEMIC in 41 years. And WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES will have to face this PANDEMIC with the 37th worst quality of healthcare in the developed World.
STAND READY AMERICA TO SEIZE CONTROL OF YOUR NATIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM.
We spend over twice as much of our GDP on healthcare as any other country in the World. And Individual American spend about ten times as much out of pocket on healthcare as any other people in the World. All because of GREED! And the PRIVATE FOR PROFIT healthcare system in America.
And while all this is going on, some members of congress seem mostly concern about how to protect the corporate PROFITS! of our GREED DRIVEN, PRIVATE FOR PROFIT NATIONAL DISGRACE. A PRIVATE FOR PROFIT DISGRACE that is in fact, totally valueless to the public health. And a detriment to national security, public safety, and the public health.
Progressive democrats and others should stand firm in their demand for a robust public option for all Americans, with all of the minimum requirements progressive democrats demanded. If congress can not pass a robust public option with at least 51 votes and all robust minimum requirements, congress should immediately move to scrap healthcare reform and demand that President Obama declare a state of NATIONAL HEALTHCARE EMERGENCY! Seizing and replacing all PRIVATE FOR PROFIT health insurance plans with the immediate implementation of National Healthcare for all Americans under the provisions of HR676 (A Single-payer National Healthcare Plan For All).
Coverage can begin immediately through our current medicare system. With immediate expansion through recruitment of displaced workers from the canceled private sector insurance industry. Funding can also begin immediately by substitution of payroll deductions for private insurance plans with payroll deductions for the national healthcare plan. This is what the vast majority of the American people want. And this is what all objective experts unanimously agree would be the best, and most cost effective for the American people and our economy.
In Mexico on average people who received medical care for A-H1N1 (Swine Flu) with in 3 days survived. People who did not receive medical care until 7 days or more died. This has been the same results in the US. But 50 million Americans don’t even have any healthcare coverage. And at least 200 million of you with insurance could not get in to see your private insurance plans doctors in 2 or 3 days, even if your life depended on it. WHICH IT DOES!
Contact congress and your representatives NOW! AND SPREAD THE WORD!
God Bless You
Jacksmith – WORKING CLASS

Posted by: jacksmith | June 22, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

jacksmith – You seem passionate on this issue so let me ask you some questions>
1. What do you think the monthly premium for a family should be?
2. What do you think you should have to pay out of your pocket when you visit a Doctor?
3. What do you think you should have to pay out of your pocket for a months supply of a generic drug? A brand-name drug?
4. What do you think you should have to pay out of your pocket for a visit to a hospitial?
5. What do you think you should have to pay out of your pocket to have an X-ray performed on your rib cage?
6. What do you think you should have to pay out of your pocket for a dental check-up and cleaning? How many per year should be covered by insurance?
7. What do you think you should have to pay out of your pocket to vist an optromitist for an vision exam? How much do you think the insurance should pay for eyeglasses? How many pair per year? Should they pay for no-line bifocals? Custom tinted lenses?

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 22, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

Why do people incessantly keep bringing up Canada and Great Britain? Nothing even remotely close to either of those models is on the table. I tire quickly of the quick catch phrases of “socialized medicine” which have no base in the reality of what is being discussed. I wish Lindsey Graham and the other opponents would talk about the realities of what is being bounced about the halls of Congress and quit unethically throwing out “hot” distortions to fire up the base and trying to scare the masses. Lindsey, tell you what, I will trade my health care for yours any day!

Posted by: Jerry | June 22, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

THE UNITED STATES IS THE ONLY WESTERNIZED NATION WITHOUT ANY GOVERNMENT HEALTH CARE PROGRAM. GERMANY HAS A SYSTEM THAT RUNS PERFECTLY AND COVERS EVERYONE. ARE WE NOT AS CAPABLE AS THEY ARE OF MANAGING A HEALTH CARE SYSTEM? WE SEEM TO FIND MONEY FOR CORPORATE BAIL OUTS AND ILLEGAL ATTACKS ON SOVEREIGN NATIONS BUT CANNOT TAKE CARE OF OUR OWN CITIZENS. WAKE UP. RIGHT NOW WE HAVE TO WAIT MONTHS TO SEE A DOCTOR AND SOME MINIMUM WAGE EMPLOYEE AT AN INSURANCE COMPANY DECIDES WHAT TREATMENT YOUR INSURANCE WILL COVER WHILE THE CEOS OF THESE COMPANIES TAKE HOME MILLIONS OF OUR DOLLARS. INSURANCE COMPANIES ARE ONLY MIDDLEMEN THAT RAISE COSTS. HEALTH CARE SHOULD NOT BE RUN FOR CORPORATE PROFIT.

Posted by: ANNA | June 22, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

ANNA – How about answering my questions above?

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 22, 2009, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

when asked about the New York Times poll and that 72% said they wanted the health care, come to find out 48% were democrates. So what does that tell you? Do you ever hear George or the new york times say anything negative about anything that Obama wants? The health insurance that we get from our employer will be taxed as income to pay for this and they don’t tell you that only about 16,000 of the 50,000 so called uninsured will be covered and the real cost will be more like 2 trillion. How many of them are illegal to begin with. The hospitals can’t turn anyone away and we pay for plenty of the illegal right now. Yes, I think that the politicians should give up their cadillac insurance and some of their other perks. The problem with everything that Obama wants is that it has to be done right now and no one will have time to really think it thru, it’s nuts, the bailouts and the stimulus really went well didn’t it! I think he should slow down, the people have waited this long, what’s a little longer? But no, he said, I EXPECT CONGRESS TO PASS IT THIS SUMMER! I think he believes his own press, he thinks he’s the king!

Posted by: Guard 20 | June 23, 2009, 1:34 am 1:34 am

Mr. Graham..you are not supporting our president’s health care plan because you don’t want him to succeed in this area or any other for that matter. To say at this early stage that it won’t pass, is wrong. The plan has not been put together yet, so your mind is made up. We need a health care plan to help us escape the stronghold of the insurance companies and his plan gives us choice. Your health care is guaranteed and fine but many others are at the mercy of these insurance companies. I watched my daughter fight cancer and the insurance company and I hate them for the pain they caused her. If she had a choice, things would be different. You are not speaking from reality but from bitterness. Many are out of work or have pre-existing conditions and cannot afford the extra fees or cannot get insurance at all. I think, if you are as religious as you say, you could relate to the problems of many and not your own personal vendetta.

Posted by: talmag | June 23, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am

I am a physician and to claim that “bureaucrats” will run a government sponsored health plan and interfer with a person’s health care is ludicrous. The private insurers have an impenetrable bureaucracy that makes anything the government can do look like amateur hour. Time to put the private insurers out of business and have Americans health care be the best it can be.

Posted by: Alan | June 23, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

I’m one of those 71%. If the government run health insurance is defeated, Then those politicians that are bought by the health care industry with hefty contributions, will pay dearly at the voting booth.

Posted by: John Q Public | June 23, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

If the public does not wish to have a public option, then let the public make the decision. Not the politician. With out the public option, it’s common sense. there is no option.

Posted by: John Q Public | June 23, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

There seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding about public health care among some people. It’s not mandatory. It’s optional. If you don’t want it, you can stick with private insurance. Who will pay for it? Taxpayers will, just as they pay for Lindsay Graham’s. We may have to raise personal income taxes all the way up from their current 35% highest bracket to Clinton’s 39% — or maybe even Reagan’s 90%. (The rich managed to say rich.) Federal revenue should have been raised during the 5 years of prosperity under G. W. Bush, instead of borrowing from China and elsewhere. We are a debtor country to Mexico now and are operating out of a financial hole. I forget when all taxes became an evil Democratic plot.

Posted by: Robert Maxwell | June 23, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Dodd. Yea, that’s a guy I listen to for sound financial advice. Why not bring in Farney Banks as well?

Posted by: Rider1A | June 23, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

We elect morons like Lindsey Graham who tells the 75% of American who want some form of National Healthcare that IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN?!!! Uh, where’s democracy???? OH! Other countries…
And if this moron once more says, “we don’t want some bureaucrat standing between you and your healthcare”, I will reach through the television and throttle him!
ATTENTION MR GRAHAM!!! (AND THE REST OF CONGRESS BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY THE INSURANCE/BIG PHARMA INDUSTRIES)… THERE ARE ARMIES OF HIGHLY COMPENSATED, HIGHLY BONUSED INSUROCRATS STANDING BETWEEN EVERYONE AND THEIR HEALTHCARE! I deal with it every day… my sole job is to determine IF THE DOCTOR CAN EVEN SEE YOU. Across this formerly great land of broken industries,we employ thousands of low-paid women in healthcare who spend YOUR HEALTHCARE DOLLARS playing a sadistic game of hide and seek for treatment authorizations.
WE NEED A SINGLE PAYER SYSTEM NOW. Or we can just wait until all Americans go bankrupt, lose healthcare, become a nation of have/have nots. Then we have anarchy and rebellion. Maybe that *might* get the attention of congress.

Posted by: Patricia Duffy | June 23, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Why not have a standardized, universal plan, with a reasonable co-pay for every visit; enough to deter unnecessary visits and procedures, but not enough to deter neccessities. Has anyone considered the savings of bypassing insurance companies? Wages, fringe benefits, elaborate properties, greedy CEOs, and profits to boot, just to mention a few of the things that premiums go toward besides the intended healthcare costs. How nice if we could just have a huge pot of savings that went only toward actual costs instead of paying for all these other things first. What if drug companies stopped advertizing to the public, on tv, mag’s, etc, and rather only notify physicians who prescribe these drugs. How much would that reduce the price of drugs????????????

Posted by: Red | June 23, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Republicans like Sen. Graham receive health care benefits paid for by tax payers – is socialism just for the rich and well connected. Look, Graham said the Public Option would mean we have to wait in lines… SO WHAT… at least I would be ALLOWED TO GET IN LINE… right now we can wait forever but our doctor will not do any procedure until we pay cash in advance because we are not insured. My wife’s medication is $400 a month, and the insurance company in Texas said we only qualify for the high-risk pool which for her alone is about $700 a month… I AM willing to pay more in taxes for public healthcare.

Posted by: WhatsUpDoc | June 23, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Republicans like Sen. Graham receive health care benefits paid for by tax payers – is socialism just for the rich and well connected. Look, Graham said the Public Option would mean we have to wait in lines… SO WHAT… at least I would be ALLOWED TO GET IN LINE… right now we can wait forever but our doctor will not do any procedure until we pay cash in advance because we are not insured. My wife’s medication is $400 a month, and the insurance company in Texas said we only qualify for the high-risk pool which for her alone is about $700 a month… I AM willing to pay more in taxes for public healthcare.

Posted by: WhatsUpDoc | June 23, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

Amazing how some people on this board don’t even think $3Trillion for the public plan is too expensive. How high does the deficit have to go before some of you people start to realize the government is spending too much money? This is getting ridiculous.

Posted by: Little Big Tiny Small Guy | June 24, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Robert Maxwell – You said “Taxpayers will, just as they pay for Lindsay Graham’s.”
WhatsUpDoc – You said “Sen. Graham receive health care benefits paid for by tax payers”
You are both wrong on this issue, the Congressmen do not have FREE health insurance. Their employer is the federal government and like many employers, it provides him with an insurance plan from a private insurance company. Congressmen have been required to get their health insurance in this manner since passage of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1983. In this case the federal government utilizes the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) plan to provide a choice of different private insurance plans to choose from, The federal government as the employeer pays a portion of the monthly premium and the Congressman as the employee pays the remainder. The Congressman is responsible for any copays or deductable payments when service is provided by a healthcare provider.
The governments only other involvment with the FEHB is to negotiate rates and benefits for each plan once a year. If you want to get educated just Google FEHB and go to the site and see what the differnt plans are.
If the government were to open these plans to the public the monthly premiums for a family plan would roughly be between $425.00 and $1300.00, for an individual the monthly premium would roughly be between $177.00 and $550.00. One of the differences in the plan costs is the level of benefits provided and the amount the patient pays when receiving healthcare. To me this would be a viable option as the government would not have to make a large outlay to open these plans to the public and they already negotiate the cost and benefits each year with the plan providers.
I wish that the left would get educated before you go making statements like this regarding benefits which are paid to members of Congress.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 24, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

If every congressman’s healthcare is the same as what they propose to inflict on the rest of us, a more careful plan might be forthcoming. And while they are at it, how about revamping the congressional retirement benefits. It’s time they all marched to the tune they are composing for us.

Posted by: Tin Angel | June 24, 2009, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Mr. Graham…it is easy for you to condemn the health plan…you have yours and it is paid for by us. No one will take it away or say you cannot have a certain procedure. Why is it wrong for the general public to ask for the same rights? You are not only anti-health care for all but anti-Obama. That is what is really driving you if you can say at this point it will fail. Thanks for your so called Americanism.

Posted by: talmag | June 25, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am

Please! Please! I am from South Carolina and I voted against Lindsey Graham!! Will anyone in another state please take Graham away from us! Graham has done NOTHING to help South Carolina or this nation the entire time he has been in the Senate. He got re-elected because the Republikkkan base in South Carolina are so ignorant (high drop out rate) and racist (guns and bibles) that they vote against thier own self interest. We have the highest unemployment, least educated and highest drop out rates in the entire country and many are poor and can not afford health care and yet Graham is using the tired socialist mantra to feed the base! Disgusting!!

Posted by: john copeland | June 25, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Mr. Graham, I think I know of a way to reduce health care costs. I think we should cut out the health care for the Congress and Senate and let them go out and get their own just like the rest of the country has to do. Let’s see how they feel when they have to pay out for services and then fight for what they need. They seem to be out of step with reality. We are spending anyway in the emergency rooms and if people had health care, we could save on this service alone. Besides, the plan Obama has put forth would be over a period of ten years not one year as indicated by some. I think if they had to get their own insurance…we would be hearing a different tune.

Posted by: talmag | June 25, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Tin Angel – You said “And while they are at it, how about revamping the congressional retirement benefits. It’s time they all marched to the tune they are composing for us.”
Congreemen do not have the retirement plan that you seem to think that they do. Federal government employees hired after 1984 and ALL members of Congress no mater when they were first elected are required to participate in Social Security. These same people also participate in the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) which is where they receive their retirement benefits when they retire. The employee has the Social Security (and Medicare) withheld from his check just like you do every pay period. Additonally they have an additional sum witheld which goes into the FERS retirement fund and if he chooses he can have an additonal sum witheld and placed in the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP), The TSP operates similar to a 401k and has sveral funds which the employee can choose to have his money held in (many federal employees lost money when the economy collapsed as the TSP is mainly in stocks).
The actual retirment for a Congressman is determined by a formula which looks at his salary for the highest three year period prior to retirement and then uses a formula which uses his age at retirement and number of years served. To achive retirement the employee must have a minimum number of years (just like the rest of the world) and have a minimum number of years served (just like the rest of the world).
A Congressman (or federal employee) can receive no more than a maximum of 80% of his final salary when he retires. This maximum is not achieved unless the employee has an extraordinary number of years of service (have seen some employees with more than 50 years of service) or has taken a paycut in the years prior to his retirement (transfered to another location at less pay etc.)
The stories you hear about Congress men making more after they retire than when they were in office just don’t happen every day. The retirement paid will increase each year by a small amount as it is tied to legislation passed each year which indexes it for Cost of Living Increases. A Congressman who is receiving more than when he was in office would obviously have to have served a number of years and then lived a considerable time after leaving office (remember he can start at no more than 80% of his final salary so all increases would have to be through Cost of Living Increases which would take quite a few years to achieve).
If you want to learn more Google FERS and TSP which should get you to the proper pages on the internet, none of this is hidden data it is there for anyone to read.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 25, 2009, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

In his book “A Second Opinion”, Dr Arnold S Relman describes the evolution of the commercialization of health care and why it hasn’t worked to keep costs down. Specifically, he mentions Kenneth Arrow’s article “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care” from the American Economic Review of 1963 which gives a pellucid view as to why health insurance is unlike any other “commodity” of the free-market.
For one, the relationship of supply and demand break down since the demand for health services is not regular or predictable. Two, the supply of services does not simply respond to the desires of the buyer. What that means is physicians are the ultimate informed consumers of health care. Although a patient can voice their opinion or insist on a specific treatment, the physician is the person who will be ordering the types and number of tests, procedures and prescriptions.
Three, there are limitation on who can enter the provider side of the market due to high start up costs and education, licensing and so forth. And finally, there is significant insensitivity of prices in the health care system. No hospitals or doctors are actively advertising lower prices or clearance procedures! Simultaneously, a majority of patients don’t actively seek out those price reductions. There aren’t many individuals who are willing to risk monetary savings for assumed quality of service.
Thus, we shouldn’t expect to see many changes by trying to alter the current system a little here or there, or going as far as implementing cumpolsory health insurance. Let me include this caveat: by no means am I saying that single-payer health insurance is the answer to all of our problems. There are many other reasons why health care costs are continuing to rise and are hard to control (ie. how health care is administered). However, as Dr Michael Ybarra states, “administrative costs make up 7% [of health care costs]. [Accounting] for $168 billion dollars annually”. The significance of this number is shown when compared to Medicare’s 2% administrative costs.

Posted by: mentalpestilence | June 26, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am

With millions uninsured in this country and mass unemployment what choices do they have now. Seems most republican senators and congressmen stick to the same ol argument of threatened rationed medical care or long waits at clinics etc etc. But the facts are that it is better to have a turn in the waiting line or see a mandated Dr than not having any health care at all…Greedy health insurance companies manage to reap in good profits along with paying millions in bouneses as well as giving out millions in political contributions to keep things the way they are..me I think they should all go belly up its time for a change and all politicians who still favor the same ol same ol should be thrown out of office. The rich and powerful will always have good health care so why are they so concerned about us getting the same thing…greed…

Posted by: Tony Dockery | July 1, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am

Tony Dockery – Nice as healthcare for all sounds, where in the US CONSTITUTION is the federal government given the responsibility to provide healthcare for all?

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | July 5, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

What I can’t figure out about you so called conservative thinkers is that you all fail to remember that our economy has done about the same or worst but never better under the osmosis of the Republican party. The Bush administration implemented a surge alright, but the only thing that successfully surged was our national deficit. The question is not rather or not we need national health care reform, the question should be what do we have to do or give up to make it work.
A nation with misplaced priorities is a nation destined to be doomed. We can ensure that all Americans have access to health care if we get rid of the miscellaneous spending:

Posted by: Kory Hines | August 3, 2009, 1:42 am 1:42 am

DEABSHEEPLE POSTS,- How can Sen. Graham sit there with his fully paid goverment health ins. and say to the american people that they do not deserve the same health care plan if they wish. What a piece of work!!
SEN.-Graham says things like that because he is a paid off CORRUPTED POLITICIAN. His incentive to have a G.R.H.C.P.arrive DOA is to make his CORPORATE MASTERS happy. To you the SHEEPLE who are uninformed. GIANT corporate CEO’s have bought most of our CROOKED politicians and own them lock stock, and pork barrell. Politicians, are similar to GIANT Corporations. Politicians exist to be re elected. GIANT CORPORATE CEO’S exist only to serve themselves and shareholders. And the only way to get re elected is to have the support of GIANT CORPORATE CEO’s. In return for sitting up, rolling over , and stooping and pooping on demand, AMERICA’s politicians, recieve large donations from GIANT CORPORATE CEO’S. Of course SEN. GRAHAM is two faced. Accepting the best health coverage the government can provide for him and his family. Then turning around and proudly saying, whats good for me, is not good for the SHEEPLE of the great UNITED STATES.
A partial list of politicians who have had their opinions bought and paid for
by the M.I.C.or other lobbyist groups. And this group is not part specific-ALL CROOKED CORRUPTED POLITICIANS- GRASSLY, CANTOR, BAUCUS, WEINER, BOEHNER, GRAHAM and many many more.
SECREG_756

Posted by: SECREG_756 | September 1, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

I dont like Senator Lindsey “AMNESTY” Graham, nor do I like Senator Dodd. I think they are BOTH MORONS!
How any sane American can think that these guys, or any other politician can run a trillion dollar health care business (check the 2000 page house plan) effeciently is incredibly laughable!
These guys cant lead ants to a picnic let alone manage the health and welfare of 300 million Americans.
If this does pass the Senate. My vote will be against anyone in the senate or house who voted for it.
Its a disaster waiting to happen. Its a power grab by the government.
Its a disgrace.

Posted by: Harry | November 8, 2009, 9:17 am 9:17 am

well bob, how much do you think you should have to pay for your healthcare. Have you looked at the estimates for Social Security, by 2037 more paying out in benefits than payroll contributions coming in to cover it, sounds like a well run gov’t program. Why not some well thought out reforms such as forcing medical schools and universities to increase their admission and graduation rates for doctors. More doctors in our healthcare system increases competition and access to physicians. Also, why not capping what they charge for tuition so people aren’t graduating with 300k, or 400k in debt. How about gov’t paying tuition for Dr’s in exhange for 3-5 years of service and gov’t supported clinics. How about a VAT tax on tobacco, alcohol, items and using that to help fund insurance for families at or below poverty level. How about having states change their laws so that insurance companies across the country can compete with one another, instead of this fuedal type system we have now where basically a few insurance companies in each state monopolize the system. Maybe its just easier to not think to deeply on the issue and educate one’s self,and instead give more money and control to the gov’t to decide our healthcare for us, after all the gov’t does soooo many things very cost effectively and with so little corruption, waste and fraud.

Posted by: saint | November 8, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

If they are really that sure a public option for that would cover about 2% of over 200 million people is going to destroy every private healthcare insurance company in the US, then why not stop there? The post office is sure putting UPS and FedEx in a bad spot, and you know those mailman are just waiting for the day when they can rule over every package in America! WHAT A JOKE, IT’S JUST ABOUT POWER POINTS

Posted by: Graham | November 8, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

any person with an education should know that a survey is never correct. there are so many errors in it. the problems can vary in many ways: asking only self proclaimed democrats/republicans, phrasing the questions in favor of the answer you want :ex. Do you support Obama’s healthcare plan? if not, why do you oppose healthcare? questions like that can confuse the public because yes, people do want healthcare but they dont want obama’s healthcare, but since that is not an answer, they go for obama’s. It also depends on the “class” they talk to, if the person is hardworking and earns a living for themselves, they would probably say no. but for some1 living off the welfare system and they live to get money from the government; of course they are going to say yes.
All im saying is dont trust what the surveys say. Most news sources support obama and will do anything to get things his way, find the facts yourself, dont get them from biast locations.
Graham FTW

Posted by: jordan | November 9, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

When they said that 72% are in favor of it that is wrong it is currently 46% it goes to show how far liberal media will go to lie to you. Also i encourage anyone who reads this to support their leaders and to vote this senator Graham back. He is one of the few that is actually representing the people of this great nation.

Posted by: Arod | January 13, 2010, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Hi,for deciding any health care plans we have to take public opinion first.And personally i agree with government running health care policy.
angelina carrera

Posted by: Health Plan | August 7, 2010, 1:01 am 1:01 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.