By Jennifer Parker

Jun 21, 2009 9:58am

Graham: Obama ‘Timid and Passive’ on Iran

In an exclusive interview with me on “This Week” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., slammed President Barack Obama for being “timid and passive” in his response to the Iranian government’s deadly crackdown on election protesters.  


Graham told me Obama is “moving in the right direction” with his remarks Saturday — the president’s strongest condemnation yet of the Iranian government.


“He’s certainly moving in the right direction, but our point is that there’s a monumental event going on in Iran and you know, the president of the United States is supposed to lead the free world not follow it,” Graham told me on “This Week” Sunday.


“Other nations have been more outspoken so I hope that we’ll hear more of this because young men and women taking to the streets in Tehran need our support. The signs are in English. They’re basically asking for us to speak up on their behalf.” Graham told me, “I appreciate what the president said yesterday. But he’s been timid and passive more than I would like and I hope he will continue to speak truth to power.”
 
Graham added, “Any time America stands up for freedom we’re better off. When we try to prop up dictators or remain silent it comes back to bite us.”


He urged the president to do “the right thing” and “stand up” with the protesters in Iran.


“This [Iranian] regime is corrupt. It has blood on its hands in Iran. They’ve killed Americans in Iraq, innocent Iraqi people, now they’re killing their own people. Stand up with the protesters. That’s not meddling, it’s doing the right thing,” Graham told me.


But in an exclusive “This Week” interview, Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., argued the president is walking a “very delicate path” with Iran.

“He’s the president of the United States. He’s not a member of the Senate or a columnist. He’s got a very delicate path to walk here. I think he’s been strong. You don’t want to become, you don’t want to take ownership of this,” Dodd told me. “The worst thing we could do at this moment for these reformers, these protesters, these courageous people in Tehran, is allow the government there to claim that this is a U.S. opposition.”


Dodd added, “This is 1979 all over again. These are remarkable people doing remarkable things…I think it’s clear to them that we stand as a nation behind their efforts.”


House Republican Leader Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, argued this week that the U.S. should move immediately toward tougher sanctions against Iran and stop all gasoline sales to the country. But Dodd, a top member of the Senate Foreign relations Committee, argued any international pressure must focus on curbing the Iranian nuclear threat.


“This government is very fragile in Iran right now and obviously we’re deeply concerned about the security of our country and our allies with the possibility of [Iran] developing and having a nuclear arsenal. That’s a tremendously high priority for us,” Dodd told me.


“You want to put the pressure on, and we have collectively with the international community,” he said, “I suspect after the events of last week you’ll see more of that, additional pressure being put on it to make sure that we not only see that these protesters and demonstrators who are seeking justice in their country will achieve that goal, but also that the near-term issue of dealing with nuclear weapons will also be dealt with. That’s a very delicate path for the president to walk.”


–George Stephanopoulos

User Comments

Lindsay Graham – a perfect example of the insanity that the republican party has become.

Posted by: jan | June 21, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Re healthcare conversation with Sen. Dodd and Sen. Lindsey. Sen. Lindsey states if we had putlic health care, the government would be making the decision regarding who gets treated. Aren’t the insurance companies doing that now in order to insure their bottom line profits? I support a health care plan for all those who not have insurance. Jane Escobar

Posted by: Jane Escobar | June 21, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

If Pres Obama does what the old Republican guard wants, perfect example of how the world came to hate us..tell other nation’s what/how to do it/as if we know it all (arrogance). If would listen to Republicans, the Ahmed..regime would run with it and make the U.S. the issue…

Posted by: Sylvia | June 21, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Graham added, “Any time America stands up for freedom we’re better off. When we try to prop up dictators or remain silent it comes back to bite us.”
Egypt anyone? Who have we propped up there for years? How long have you been speaking out about the democratic elections and crackdowns there, Senator? Yeah, thought so.

Posted by: Camille | June 21, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Delicate line? Damn straight! The CIA overthrew the legitimately elected government of Iran in 1953, and the Iranians have not forgotten that– although to judge from the US Congressional response, we have. Don’t believe me? Google “Mossadegh,” the name of the prime minister we deposed. If we even look like we are interfering with current events, we delegitimize them. We can witness, but we *can not interfere* if we want this revolution to succeed.

Posted by: JeannetteHP | June 21, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Obama is the President of the United States and Iran is a country of its own for God sake. Give this guy a break. The Repulicans want to critise this guy left and right but the fact is he is a million miles a head of them. What do this Senators want him to do? Take airforce one to Iran and remove that crazy guy from office.Do they think talking tough is gonna change Iran?

Posted by: Mark | June 21, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Beat your chest Phil Graham! It worked so well over the last 8 years.

Posted by: Bravebrick | June 21, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am

I think he is pursueing the right directions. If we were to take the GOP’s hardline stance in support of the demonstrators, we may be playing right into the regimes hands.
Our severe criticism could lend support that the uprising and opposition leaders are the puppets of America. Even at the opposition rallies, they have been chanting “death to america”.
A nation voted. We do not know if they there was fraud or not, nor the extent. By supporting freedom of speech and to gather in groups, we are supporting freedom without meddling in the internal affairs of a soverign nation. if we are too open in our criticims, then we risk uniting the people behind the Supreme Leader in their distrust of the US. We have to be careful.
The rallies indicate deep fissures in the government. I think we should let events there follow their own course and to weaken the theocrats hold on power. We screwed up with uninlaterial support of the Shah, lets not do it again.

Posted by: scott jeffries | June 21, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Graham risks nothing; Iranians risk everything. Some of us have a friend or two in Tehran and Graham is making a mockery of their struggle. Clean up the RNC’s sex problems and leave the world to the grownups.

Posted by: Josh j. | June 21, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Oh, yeah, read everything that is said for the next two weeks as, “Don’t talk about Ensign, Craig, or our other 30 sex scandals of the last 20 years.” Nothing shouts its virtues louder than Hypocrisy.

Posted by: Josh j. | June 21, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am

why would anyone listen to these old – out of date republicans- the party of bush, cheney,rumsfield, palin, “bomb bomb iran” mccain,lieberman, lieberman graham , mcconnell bohner,cantor and on and they are the party of no and have lied and lied and lied! They are responsible for the mess we are in. Run from them.!

Posted by: 1369 | June 21, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

I think that I agree with Senator Dodd. The President is taking the middle road. Coming out in support of Democracy, but not taking ownership of the movement. In the end, the fate of Iran is in the hands of the Islamic oligarchy. And Ahmadinejad is their hand-picked man. So, we can do little except watch as the protest is either crushed or turns into a civil war. If it turns into a civil war, then the USA will have to take a more definitive position. Presumably, for freedom. My personal hope is that it can still be resolved peacefully between the various factions.

Posted by: Tom | June 21, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am

There they go again.Kill them,kill our young people,bomb Iran. I have had enough of these arrogant damn fools.Thank heavn we now have a President that can think.
RTA

Posted by: R .Armstrong | June 21, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Why Graham is wrong as per Layman’s perspective?
1. Pictures shown about Iran on newspaper does not demonstrate Iran govt. brutality as it can caused by the drug high members of rallys who are causing destruction. US has no proof that it is caused by govt and I see more public on road than government official. Whom should US talk to as no one seems to be in control?
2. Everything seems to be preplanned, rallys, destruction etc. How can someone gets million people on road immediately after election results were declared? It takes months to prepare for big rallys.
3. Twitter cannot be relied as People can lie on twitter
4. US crackdown on people who cause public destruction so how it is different from Iran govt crackdown on people who are causing public destruction.
Situation need to be calm down to work with Iranians, you can UNITED STATES MAY END UP SUPPORTING WRONG CAUSE, SO, Mr. GRAHAM SHOULD keep his mouth shut.

Posted by: Tim | June 21, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Obama is so smart not to bark same old meaningless puffery as others before him. He was elected to lead, so let him. He has info we don’t, and the Iranian clerics, see the difference & have no clue with whom they’re dealing. We voted for “different”-remember? At least I did.

Posted by: DORIS JARRELL | June 21, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Whatever happens in Iran is none of our business. The Ayatollah of Iran is the Supreme leader and makes all the decisons. The fight for the pretend presidency is a power struggle between Ahmajenedad and Mousavvi.
Which ever of the two is President of Iran the country’s diplomacy will not change.
(America) needs to stop telling other countries how to do things. All sabre rattling from a U.S. President can accomplish in Iran, would be to allow the Ayahtollah to blame the whole counter revolution on we the people.
We (C.I.A) messed with their government in 1953 replacing an American friendly SHAH with an elected official. Then again in 1973 after the revoulution we accepted the Shah into our country.
If you bother to read recent remarks made by the current Ayahtollah, he said
” if the gatherings do not stop, then the blood shall be on their (protestors) own hands.”
Do you think he meant they were going to shoot thenselves?
He is blaming the peaceful protestors for orders he is giving troops to fire upon them.
Hezballah troops are being called in to do some of the dirty work.
Open your eyes Mr. Graham.
Look for WE THE SHEEPLE* coming soon, to a blog site in your neighborhood.
Simple plain talk, everyone can understand. Not Republican, Not Democratic, Not Libertarian. Just a place where Americans can easily and quickly get the real story on Corporate America, its hold on the Government and what phrases , stand alone government health insurance really means, put into plain and simple terms.
We all deserve Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of happiness, on an even playing field.
SECREG_756

Posted by: SECREG756 | June 21, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

I thought the Republicans stated we the US should not be a “Nation of Nation Builders” and That “We should not Police the World” I recall hearing that a long time ago……

Posted by: hbrown | June 21, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

The president is doing the right thing…sitting back and observing what’s happening before taking action.
Where are the so sayers when we had US citizens in New Orleans on top of their rooftop crying for help? Where are they when US citizens are losing jobs, homes and many do not have healthcare and we do not have a fair imigration law? This is where the outrage should be.

Posted by: Dot | June 21, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Think Smart,
How dare the Republicans voice opinions. They should sit silently, like Obama is doing with the Iran situation. This is a DICTATORSHIP, Democrats only.

Posted by: Charlie C | June 21, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

What are these BOJOS talking about the international pressure and nuclear threat? These folks are clueless on dealing with crisis management and seemed to be very excited when they were called for interview.
1. House Republican Leader Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio – U.S. should move immediately toward tougher sanctions against Iran and stop all gasoline sales to the country (FOLKS Iran is a part of OPEC cartel. Watch the gas prices at your local gas station)
2. Chris Dodd – any international pressure must focus on curbing the Iranian nuclear threat. ( Yeah right. Chris Dodd do you really think What was not done before election can be done in this chaos? )

Posted by: Tim | June 21, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Interesting.. Henry Kissinger is saying the President is handling this correctly. George W. Bush’s top negotiator with Iran, Ambassador Nicholas Burns says the same thing! As have others, so if those who KNOW Iran believe this is the right course who is Graham to thinks he knows best? The Repubs are amazing! You know darn well, if the Pres. had come out stronger they would have jumped on that. We are NOT the worlds police. The Iranian people have to do this for themselves! If they succeed, their leader can’t be seen as a US puppet. We did that once and that’s how we got here!

Posted by: Try the truth | June 21, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Graham must really miss Cheney & Bush since he seems to want Obama to start another war with Iran which GWB would probably already have done. He loved the name the “war president”. The problem I see here with the GOP is that Obama is too d— smart for them. I think Obama is doing exactly what the leader of another country should do, keep his nose and country out of a civil disturbance. I didn’t see anyone come to our rescue when GWB cheated Gore out of the election in 2000 with the help of the SC. Where were our votes and rights then? Right where the Iranians’ vote is now, up the creek without a paddle. It’s there problem to solve, not ours.

Posted by: Ron | June 21, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Charlie C—”This blog is full of mindless sheep..following in line behind their shepard.” yeah you’re a lost sheep, off to FOX and Limbaugh you go. they will tell you your opinion and you don’t have to think on your own ot listen to alternative viewpoints (FOX and Limbaugh hang up on people who don’t share their views). it good for you that ABC doesn’t act in the same immature fashion. but if you want to puppet the right-wing mantra here you have every right.

Posted by: Paul Wall | June 21, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

The ridiculous posturing we have seen from Republicans like Boehmer, McCain, and Graham, jumping on the bandwagon to criticize the President’s response to events in Iran, just fritters away whatever credibility these politicians might still have. Thank God some in Washington are listening to the sage advise of Iran experts.

Posted by: Esther | June 21, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Obama is flat out wrong about Mousavi. Mousavi does not abide by the current regime’s ideology. To say that Mousavi & Ahmadinejad hold the same views is just shows Obama’s complete lack of understanding of the situation.

Posted by: david | June 21, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

I don’t understand Senator Lindsey Graham & other reppublicans that have spoken out about president Obama not being aggressive enough with his address to the leaders of Iran.
Have they not learned anything?
Why would any American want to give amunition to powerful Irnaians to blame these riots on the U.S?
Have these Republicans forgotten that there are millions of us around the world as well as millions of Americans that believe the American President was selected & not elected in 2000?
Stop plying polotics & do what is best for these brave iranians who are risking their lives for freedom.
I wish the Iranian people safety & hope.

Posted by: Gary | June 21, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Nothing could be more stupid in my opinion than the US identifying itself with the protestors in Iran when you cannot not look in a glass bowl and tell the outcome of all this. Caution is definitely the best approach and what about MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS.

Posted by: JOHN | June 21, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

Mr. Graham the president did his job with his speech recently. His way is to wait and see like he did with the captain who was taken prisoner. He worked quietly and efficiently. The people of Iran know he supports them and he has made an impression on them. Just look at the signs “Yes We Can” and “Change”. They like him and want to be friends with America. I’d say he did his job and does not deserve any criticism from anyone republican or democrat.

Posted by: talmag | June 21, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

I suppose if Senator Graham is using names like timid and passive we should at least acknowledge his authority. What was it we used to say on the playground? It takes one to know one.

Posted by: PJBurns | June 21, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Where was the Republican outcry for involvement in Myanmar to support protesters there? I smell opportunistic opposition here. Shame on Republican’ts.

Posted by: PJBurns | June 21, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Phil Gramm is right. Obama has been weak and passive – an now Obama is irrelevant.
Instead, Obama has been swatting at flies, and stuffing his face with ice cream.

Posted by: One_American | June 21, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Lindsey Graham is right. Obama has been weak and passive – an now Obama is irrelevant.
Instead, Obama has been swatting at flies, and stuffing his face with ice cream.

Posted by: One_American | June 21, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Senator Graham is a South Carolinian generational racist.If you have ever listen to this man sense Obama has been president, he has not agreed with him on anything.This man speaks like an uneducated idiot. I was born and raised in North Carolina a few miles from the north and south Carolina border. And have traveled extensively through S.C. and s.c. is a very poor state, and need help for its people. And this idiot turned down the stimulus money that would help S.C.
Graham you need to shut your idiotic southern speaking big mouth.

Posted by: robert moore | June 21, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Graham please do America a “BIG FAVOR”
“SHUT-UP”

Posted by: robert moore | June 21, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

[Subject] = Demenstration in Iran
[message] = When George Bush won the election over Al Gore. There was massive fraud in Florida. His brother was Governor at the time. The Democrats were ahead with the popular vote. The conservative Supreme Court led by Justice Scalea robbed the American voter of the election. If there had been demonstrations in the United States at the time, Then maybe we would never been given false information to lead us into the
Iraq war and inherited the largest national debt in history. The issue of national health care is on the table in Washington. The polls show the American people want a single payer plan by 72%. Butthe drug industry,Insurance and AMA lobby will again buy are Congress and Senators to rob the American people of their real choice. All you main stream media reporters can talk about is where we going to get the money to pay for the single payer plan. When Bush an Chaney lied to us, to lead us into Iraq you never mentioned money. The Washington media talking heads always seem to know what the American people want but you underestimate their intelligence. They know your really working for the rich and powerful because if you told the truth you would not have a job.

Posted by: gerry | June 21, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

I support Sen. Dodd’s remarks and feel
the Republicans may be “posturing” too much. But Mousavi and his wife’s participation in his campaign appear to
support women. To me this is a big
difference between the two.

Posted by: Cynthia Rapak | June 21, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

thank god mccain was defeated! he and this guy would have us bombing iran today and at the same time bombing N.Korea. Pense,Lieberman mcain and graham are the four horsemen n Run from these old out of date reublicans

Posted by: 1369 | June 21, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Like we really need to listen to the Republicans. If we did what they wanted we’d just give ammunition to Ahmadinejad and he’d be able to say the protestors are a tool of the US. Republicans are really stupid. They failed our country in both domestic AND foreign policy, but now they’re ‘big experts’. If we listen to them we just will get more failure. These right wing dumb-balls never learn. They just keep spouting the same tired garbage that put us all in the dumps we are in today. I wish Linday Graham would just dry up and blow away. He is wrong on everthing he thinks and stands for and we don’t need or want his advice.

Posted by: JL | June 21, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Those who are barking like chihuahuas, screaming that President Obama has not protested against the Iranian election enough — I don’t think our scheming president (in contrast to our unthinking, cowboyish former president) ever wastes his voice. The bottom-line is, none of us in the West has any sway over Iranian politics, and the louder we are, the more likely that we are giving the Iranian authorities excuses to blame the west for all their troubles, and the less likely that they will feel comfortable enough to think about a more conciliatory approach to deal with us. We keep forgetting that our loud official protests have had only limited effects on a limited set of countries. We’ve got to learn from how ineffectively we’ve dealt with China since its crackdown on protesters in 1989. We surely have to make our stands clear but we have to be able to sway and make sure we keep accumulating cards in our hands, too. In the long run, a more constructive relationship between us and those authoritarian regimes is more likely to make them feel secure enough to liberalize and democratize.
Those who keep accusing Obama of being weak may want to recall what he did with the Somali pirates. I really don’t think it’s helpful to judge his actions and his words through a cowboy’s lens.

Posted by: teddymaniac | June 21, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

It is great to see that so many people understand that this is a time when we need to work quietly and effectively instead of making wild threats against any faction in Iran. President Obama understands that it is the people of Iran who have to make changes. It is their country and we should not force an issue which could lead to another war where only the people of Iran could be hurt. President Obama is once again showing his understanding of the situation in being subtle.
As for quoting Graham on anything, it is absurd journalism. He represents South Carolina, the most anti american government in this hemishere. This attempt to incite another war is just a ploy to keep the focus on international politics instead of cleaning up the wholesale corruption for which South Carolina exists to promote internally and throughout this nation.
Ignore Graham, please.Support the wisdom of Obama.

Posted by: Neuromni | June 21, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Why in the world would any Republican have a problem with the election results in Iran? The voters voted and the supreme constitutional authority appointed a president. What the heck do they think happened here in the US in 2000? You can’t criticize what your own process.

Posted by: Ray Riley | June 21, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Did everyone really forget the type of election we had in November 08, with bought votes and with people brought in by the bus-full for registering to vote?
How is this any different from what is going on in Iran?
As much as I feel for the people in Iran, the US can and should not police the whole world: first of all, it shows arrogance, second, we can not afford anything anymore.

Posted by: a.matai | June 21, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

President Obama you keep doing your job and let the uncouth Republicans continue to chase their tails!!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | June 21, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

OMG! Proof that the GOP are war-mongers! When will they stop looking for excuses to “get into a war” without thinking of the consequences! So quick to jump in there in areas where they don’t belong. Thanks to Bush we got into a war we should never have gotten into and here the GOP is trying to do it again. My dad once said (he’s a GOP supporter) that the only time we get this country going is when we go to war – that’s so ‘old school’ and the GOP needs to figure that out! Get real GOP – your days are numbered.

Posted by: Rita | June 22, 2009, 1:30 am 1:30 am

He goes the “apes” beating their chest…. their “punnie” little chest. Lindsay Graham, talking tough and “selling wolf tickets” don’t work. Thank God President Obama is our President right now…or our military will be on their way to Iran. Never mind being smart about it. Hey, Lindsay, Pence and McCain and all the other idiots, the U.S. has One President…. and it’s not any of you, so shut up and let the president do his job.

Posted by: tychisum | June 22, 2009, 3:05 am 3:05 am

I agree with George Wills on the matter of Obama holding off on commenting about Iran. The Republicans forget after Bush Sr. bombed Iraq and urged it’s citizens to rise up against Saddam and then Saddam crushed them.

Posted by: Ron | June 22, 2009, 5:32 am 5:32 am

It is not surprising to learn that those, who want President Obama to “fail”, are urging him to get involved in the Iranian internal affairs so that they may have something to run on in the next presidential campaign/election. The president has the history on his side that meddling in the Iran affairs has not helped United States of America very much. So, let us give him the benefit of the doubt. When the old ways of dealing with the Iranian government does not work, then let him try a new way.

Posted by: Dr. Sidney Okolo | June 22, 2009, 6:19 am 6:19 am

Not only Lindsay Graham, but also John McCain, who brought this thought in an interview that “It’s not even about Iran, it’s about ideals as the leader of the free world”.
For conservatives, they would probably love nothing more than the Iranian protestors to fall on the swords of their oppressors, like their calls for the people to rise up, without caring about the consequences, like the Kurds in the 1990′s and the Hungarians in the 1950′s.
It’s never been about the people of Iran, it only been about their ideals.

Posted by: casualsuede | June 22, 2009, 8:41 am 8:41 am

It’s funny how deep red conservatives want the government out of their lives, but meddling in the lives of the rest of the world.
The truth is that they will say anything to counter our President, they would betray their own ideals.
The people of Iran are going through THEIR OWN revolution. This should be something that true doctrine conservatives should be proud to let happen, but instead they want to meddle and drive the situations as the self-proclaimed “Leader of the free world”.

Posted by: casualsuede | June 22, 2009, 8:55 am 8:55 am

Healthcare – we are already rationing healthcatre in this country, the Ins Co decide if your treatment is covered and how much they are going to pay. Its called “capitation”. What we used to have was a “fee-for-service”, you go to the Doc, you (or Ins) would pay the Doc. There were no kickbacks, no discounts for insured patients, it was your decision to see the Doc and your course of treatment. Now with capatition, youi and the Doc will submit a course of treatment to the Ins Co and hope they approve. And on Graham, all he does is complain, why do we care to listen to him? More people approve of Obama yet they repubs are continuing to be against public opinion. What? Are they going to tell us that we must trust the repubs because we don’t know any better? Thats what it sounds like. NO, never trust a politician, what ever party they belong to!

Posted by: raggmopp | June 22, 2009, 9:10 am 9:10 am

There is nothing that Obama can say publicly regarding this issue that will serve the interests of the United States or the people in Iran wanting freedom. Obama should keep his mouth shut like he is doing.

Posted by: RichM | June 22, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am

“The signs are in English.”
Yes, come to think of it, I’ve noticed that since DAY ONE.
There has been this incredibly obvious collusion with the western media that has had only one interest which has/had been abundantly clear since the days BEFORE this election even started. Definitive and preponderant propaganda that has shaped this story through planning from the start.
Nazi fascism couldn’t have had a better start with their revolution. Except that this revolution HIGHLY EXAGGERATES the pluralism of support.
For this to succeed, the world AND Iran would have to completely subdue democracy through the entitlement and arrogance of propaganda entirely. An achievement that would in itself be a stunning evolution in the capacity of propaganda to actually both purporte democracy while denying it to the majority.
It wouldn’t be the first time that the internationally community forced a new election until it got desireable results (and when I say desireable, this would of course be the desire of hive-mind societies like the U.S. to have this determined on their behalf by the media or and of the government and/or AIPAC).

Posted by: Dave | June 22, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Gotta side with Graham on this one. The Islamic regime that has held tyrannical control over Iran for the past 30 years is one of the biggest obstacles toward peace in the middle east. By not encouraging the pro-democracy protesters, Obama is doing the mullahs a pretty big favor.
“You can’t separate peace from freedom because no one can be at peace unless he has his freedom.” Malcolm X, Malcolm X Speaks, 1965

Posted by: Silly Me | June 22, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Talk is easy and cheap. And just what, specifically, would Graham recommend?
Specifics, not more glittering generalities. As hard as it may be, the President is right to wait this out.
Tipping our hand only supports the propaganda about US interference. And, more importantly, where is the evidence
that the opposition leaders are truly democratic? If they were, the religious leaders would never have allowed them to run.

Posted by: BachisBest | June 22, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

HE STAYED OUT AT THE BEGINNING AND WHILE THE IRANIAN PEOPLE ARE GETTING THEIR HEADS KICKED IN HE’S GOING TO SEND A STRONG PROTEST THAT ” IT’S NOT NICE TO DO THAT ,SHAME ON YOU ”. DAMN THAT WOULD REALLY IMPRESS ME .BULLYS AREN’T IMPRESSED BY INACTION THEY REGARD THAT AS A SIGN OF WEAKNESS .DO YOU THINK THE DEMONSTRATORS APPRECIATE WHAT OBAMAS ”NOT” DOING.WHAT THE LEFT THINKS ”HISTORY IS ONLY A NEWS CYCLE ”WHETHER YOU LIKE HIM OR NOT BUSH KEPT THE U.S. FROM BEING ATTACKED AGAIN.DO YOU THINKTHAT 9-11 WAS THOUGHT UP ON THE DAY BUSH WAS ELECTED OR MAYBE THE PREVIOUS ” 8” YEARS MIGHT HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH IT. AFTER ALL EVERYTHING OBAMAS IS DOING IS STRAIGHTENING UP THE LAST ”8” YEARS ,RIGHT .YOU CAN’T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS ,LETS LET HISTORY PLAY OUT BEFORE YOU ANNOINT OBAMA TO SAINT HOOD .

Posted by: joe castro | June 22, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Lindsey Graham wouldn’t know the difference between “timid and passive” and “cautious and calculating” if his life depended on it. Then again, maybe he DOES, and just chooses petty and foolish bickering because he’s a republican. Iran needs to be handled CAREFULLY… NOT Texas-Bush style!

Posted by: Troy Street | June 22, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

senator lindsey Graham you want the American president to be part of the fight on Iran and you were the same people who counseled president George Bush not to support the former reformist presdent Mohammed Khatami during his time in office Senator i found that hypocritical America has no diplomatic mission and influence on the ground in Iran so how can America change things on the ground? do you want president Obama to be a toothless dog in this case or do u want his word to be used by the Mullars to crack down on the protesters.

Posted by: bignkeng | June 22, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Sen. Lindsey Graham demonstrates again how the Republicans earned their well-deserved minority status. The mindless knee-jerk reaction advocated by Senator Graham is what got America into an unnecessary and extremely costly war in Iraq. It seems the senate might fair better with fewer Republicans.

Posted by: Giftedroot_1 | June 22, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Senator John Mccain and lindsey Gra

Posted by: bignkeng | June 22, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

It is apparent most Republican politicians either care only for their own party or are too dumb to be entrusted with leadership of our country. They still do not comprehend how bad they have been for our country in the last 8 years.
President Obama is on the right track. He knows the Republican static is best ignored.

Posted by: msgijoe | June 22, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Weak presidents apologize and appease dictatorships. Obama will go down in history as a weak politician, not as the strong leader of the free world, which is what we need right now.

Posted by: Robert | June 22, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

So should the US support Mousavi? People seem to forget he was a staunch supporter of the Ayatollah Khomeini and very anti America. If the president did come out more strongly Graham would be screaming that Obama was supporting an Islamic extremist. What we’re seeing in Iraq is the supporters of one extremist bashing on the supporters of another extremist. Sorry but yes Mousavi is also an extremist. He’s simply not the extremist in power at the moment.

Posted by: Oliver WH | June 22, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

David,
He has more of an understanding than you do and big mouths like Rep. Lindsey Graham and other senators that say he should stand for “truth and democracy” want to some how pigeon hole him and do political posturing for the 2012 election. Since when does the GOP care about the situation in Iran? A year and half ago he said that Iran was a ‘failed stated and used scare tactics to try paint all Arabic nations as a breeding ground for Al- Queada . Now that we have a chance for true dialog with the middle east… Here comes rock mouth … espousing sentiments that made other countries hate us in the first instead of taking a wait and see aproach. I think the senator is talking out of two sides of his mouth. The President is taking a wait and see approach which is what he should do and focusing on Domestic issues. If there is another attack on this country which the GOP would love then we attack with full force. not the other way around

Posted by: Angela | June 22, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

it is quite simple, president obama is CORRECT in his careful response and approach to the iranian election debacle.senator graham and mccain are typical neo con republican idiots! every time mccain opens his damned mouth i am glad i voted for mr.obama and that mr. obama is president and mccain is not!! 8 disastrous years of republican lead cowboy foriegn policy is way too much. just look at where our country is now after bush and cheney,s neocon policies!!no more!!!wake up and wise up america,vote neocon warmongers out of office,they are just too dangerous to america and to the world!

Posted by: no neocons | June 23, 2009, 2:09 am 2:09 am

I have a story chi flat irons, one mother says she’s aware something is very wrong, but she doesn’t want to hear about it because she just wants to “be with her children and see them grow up happy.” I tell her runescape gold, “But, if we don’t stop this, your children may not get to grow up at all.” so basically, she’s using her kids as an excuse for her own inability to face reality.

Posted by: chi hair straightener | June 23, 2009, 3:30 am 3:30 am

Are McCain, Pence, Gramham and all the other idiots…claim the President should take a stronger stance in Iran…
Are they just STUPID????
We are already involved in two wars already and we have plenty of stuff to keep us busy here at home…
Just because the Iranians use English in their signs doesn’t mean they want our involvement… dingalings!!!It simply means they are very aware that the world is watching…The young college people are internet savvy.
Our involvement has not been requested nor is it wanted.
This is just yet another assault on our intelligence by the GOP…

Posted by: theafalcon200 | June 23, 2009, 6:07 am 6:07 am

Lindsay Graham needs another job, because he’s being totally irresponsible in the one he holds now. What does he want us to do? Bomb, bomb, bomb IRAN? That’s one of the reasons we did NOT elect a Republican as President and the Rep. Party is falling to pieces. Not a one of them has a lick of common sense or enough intelligence to shut up. Now take your foot out of your mouth Mr. Graham and go home!

Posted by: Renee S. | June 23, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am

hi.i’am from Eran.as a person who lives in such a …country i have the same belief of senator graham.

Posted by: from iran | June 23, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.