Grassley on Schumer Health Care Plan: It’s “Obnoxious”
ABC News’ David Chalian Reports: </p
A key Senate Republican attempting to achieve a bipartisan health care reform bill indicates that there are some clear red lines over which his fellow Republicans will likely not cross.
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, said one “public option” compromise floated by his Democratic colleague Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) appears to be a non-starter for most Republicans. The key component of the Schumer proposal is to create a public option, unlike Medicare, that is self sustaining by paying out its claims from funds raised by patient premiums and co-payments.
“I think he’s putting some ingredients in there that are going to make it just as obnoxious to people in my party as they whole concept of a public option,” said Sen. Grassley on ABC News’ “Top Line.”
“And you know why we don’t want a public option. We think that it’s going to control costs, it’s going to be an unfair competitor. It’s a back door to single payer like Canada has and that’s a road to denial and delay of health care or rationing, whatever you want to call it. And middle class of American won’t stand for that,” he added.
On Wednesday, Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-ND), proposed an alternative to the public option by calling for the creation of nonprofit cooperatives, owned and operated by their members, to compete with private insurers. The proposal was met with apparent interest as a possible compromise by Sen. Grassley.
“The reason why it’s helpful to have cooperatives is because in a lot of states, there’s only one or two health insurance companies, even though we have 350 nationwide, each state has a limited number. . . and they tend to control the market. And this would give some competition,” Grassley said.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told Huffington Post that she would not have the votes to pass health care reform in the House if it does not include a public option.
At her weekly press conference, Speaker Pelosi also said that the Conrad cooperative proposal would not be seen as an acceptable substitution for a public plan among her Democratic members.
Sen. Grassley also defined what has to happen in the shaping of health care reform policy in order to get many Republicans on board with the plan. His three red lines: No public option, no employee mandate to either provide insurance or pay a penalty, and nothing that leads to rationing of health care.
“If those three things are taken care of, we can have a bipartisan plan,” Grassley said.
Read all of the health care tea leaves here:
Politico’s Jonathan Martin also dropped by “Top Line” with his take on how Creigh Deeds demolished his Democratic competition in Virginia and the strategy behind President Obama’s health care road trip.
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
“It’s obnoxious” as is Schumer himself.
Posted by: Trajan | June 11, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Obama now wants ideas from Republicans – but he is not willing to work with them ad invite them to the table for bi-partisan discussions. He is putting out a challenge and then will steal their ideas. Chicago politics at an American scale.
Posted by: American Voter | June 11, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Obama now wants ideas from Republicans – but he is not willing to work with them ad invite them to the table for bi-partisan discussions. He is putting out a challenge and then will steal their ideas. Chicago politics at an American scale.American Voter
———————-
Where have you been? He’s invited them to the table, included their ideas and they still vote NO! The Repub idea of bipartisanship has been either do it totally our way or we’ll vote NO, then whine we weren’t heard! That is Chicago Politics, being practiced by the GOP
Posted by: Try the truth | June 11, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
American Voter, by the way, what are the Republicans ideas? We haven’t heard any, all we hear is complaints about whatever the Dems put out there! What are the Repubs ideas?
Posted by: Try the truth | June 11, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
How can Obama say that this isn’t socializing medicine, allow me to explain. So at first it won’t be socialized because the majority of health insurance will be private. What happens though when the masses hear that their health care they pay for out of their own personal money is being taxed once already. That money is paying for someone else’s health care. So they are paying twice for medical insurance. So they drop their private insurance. Next the businesses drop that benefit because why would they want to supply it and go through the HR costs to do so when the government does it already. How can Obama say that he is helping competition when government medical insurance would be free, all co-pays would be free and private insurance would still need to pay. Everything sooner or later becomes government medical insurance and yet he wants to say that is not socialized medicine.
Posted by: FastFacts | June 12, 2009, 5:26 am 5:26 am
This will be the last straw to destroy our country. We need to remember nothing is free and given to us without loopholes, the cost to us is first and up front but loss of freedom, choice and our health will be gone forever. The government ran SS and MC and MC into bankruptcy and cannot handle a socialist ins plan. Look at other countries where people are denied up to date medicines and treatment, they then die, wake up America this is not a good thing, read between his rhetorical lies
Posted by: Marie | June 13, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am
Re: “The government ran SS and MC and MC into bankruptcy…”
Actually the “lock box” was stolen for tax cuts for the rich and to bail out banks. MC/MC for their part are at the mercy of a political rate-setting process which forces them to pay too much for expensive procedures.
Re: “where people are denied up to date medicines and treatment, they then die”
I don’t have any hard data on this, but I’ll bet far more people die being shuttled around to different doctors and hospitals for insurance reasons, than are saved by the latest medical wizardry.
Mortality rates in America have stagnated for decades and are beginning to worsen.
Posted by: B. Mull | June 14, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Grassley, Lugar and other Republican Senators are in the back pocket of the Insurance Industry and the AMA. Some would cause this a conflict of interest. Because of this large influx of cash over a period of time, they have no credibility regarding the Health issue and should excuse themselves from participation in this debate to avoid the appearance of corruption.
Posted by: Stephen Graber | June 22, 2009, 3:23 am 3:23 am
Medicare for everyone if by far the most practical and efficient health care system we have today. The administration cost for Medicare per year per patient is $400 per year and $1400 per year for our present insurance industry. Medicare for everyone is 30% less than any insurance industry. Medicare for everyone will cost you less and anyone who argues differently are trying to rob you of your hard earned dollar.
Posted by: Stephen Graber | June 22, 2009, 3:43 am 3:43 am