By Kate Barrett

Jun 19, 2009 3:55pm

House Dems Unveil Health Care Plan

ABC News' Z. Byron Wolf Reports: Senators aren’t the only ones drafting health care reform legislation. House Republicans unveiled their plan earlier this week. And today, House Democrats from three Committees proposed a “draft text” that looks similar to the version being considered in the Senate HELP Committee. At a press conference, Democrats in the House unveiling their own draft health care reform plan today sounded open to anything to get health care reform passed, but what’s in their draft does not look open to much at all. Rep. George Miller, who chairs the House Education and Labor Committee said “THIS year will be THE year… If there's one thing that is off the table it is saying no to health care reform,” Miller said. But in the House Democrats’ plan are the very things that, for Republicans, are non-starters: For starters, a public health insurance plan, an expansion of Medicare, and a mandate to make employers (as well as individuals) contribute to the health care of their employees. “Today health insurance for most American families is one big surprise. You go to use it and you find that it’s not what you think it is,” said Miller of the need for a public alternative to serve as a reliable counterweight to the market. “I think there's a lot of misinformation about public option. A lot of people think it’s going to be a government takeover,” said Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif, who chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee. He said the insurance market is “dysfunctional” and only with a public option can there be a level playing field. “We want people to be able to choose their plan. Just like federal employees,” Waxman said. “One of the choices will be a public plan that will be on a level playing field. A choice. No mandate for anybody to be in it,” Waxman said. Several of the Democrats at today’s press conference said their plan was an “American” plan and that it fostered choice by allowing Americans to choose a public option as opposed to a private one. What remains to be seen is how much the House Democrats’ plan, which bears striking resemblance to the Senate plan offered in the Health Committee there by Democrats, would cost. Just one part of the Senate Health Committee version got a $1 trillion estimate over 10 years by the Congressional Budget Office even before the addition of a public insurance option and was predicted to leave tens of millions of Americans without insurance. Miller said the House version would cover up to 90 percent of Americans – a similar number. But Miller did not yet have a CBO estimate for how much the House Democrats’ bill would cost. The ranking Republican on Waxman’s Energy and Commerce Committee, Rep. Joe Barton, who in March at a White House summit pledged to work toward bipartisan health care reform said what Democrats were proposing was not bipartisan and would not ultimately pass Congress. “Democrats didn’t include us,” said Rep. Joe Barton, R-Tex, shortly after the press conference where House Democrats announced their plan – it was the first he had seen of the plan too. “They didn’t want out input and had apparently a pre-conceived notion that they wanted to nationalize healthcare and spend trillions of dollars in this econ situation that we don’t have and um that created a bill that has very little chance to ultimately succeed.” See more of Barton’s interview with ABC News' Jon Karl on World News tonight. Text of the House Democrats’ draft can be read here.

A summary of the House Democrats' plan is here.

User Comments

Why do I have that familiar feeling that when ever I read something like this I’m about to get screwed?

Posted by: LongT | June 19, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

The whole problem with the health care INDUSTRY is insurance companies. We don’t need more types of insurance, we need plain and simple health care. We shouldn’t have insurance companies deciding on our health care. They are in it for a profit ! They are not in it to provide health care, but to deny health care and make money !

Posted by: fuzzy | June 19, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

fuzzy; Agreed, but that’s the problem isn’t it; the congress and the insurance industry are pardners in the fleecing of the public. I’m convinced of it.

Posted by: LongT | June 19, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Well, if a “bipartisan” bill meant they couldn’t do what they said they were going to do, why should they listen? I doubt the Democrats were materially consulted on matters such as the invasion of Iraq etc.
That said, it’s just good manners to hear the other guys’ ideas, but most of these guys have been saying the same thing for months.

Posted by: T | June 19, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

T, “I doubt the Democrats were materially consulted on matters such as the invasion of Iraq etc.” Huh! They also voted to go to Iraq. Check out the vote. The left side of the isle just wants people to forget about that.

Posted by: LongT | June 19, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

I don’t know who’s to blame, the medical community or the insurance community but, I recently had a major operation, 1 day in intensive care and 4 days in hospital, the bill was over $274,000. Now, let’s repeat that a few tens of thousands of times per year and you know what, it gets to be REAL money for someone.

Posted by: JR | June 19, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Just 20 years overdue. This will save a lot of families with insurance from bankruptcy.

Posted by: name | June 19, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

“They also voted to go to Iraq. Check out the vote. The left side of the isle just wants people to forget about that.”
And the right side want you to forget that they lied to get that approval.

Posted by: JR | June 19, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

This is the problem here , they want to sell it for a trillion dollars which is an abomination. The truth is that it will cost more. It will have poor oversight because the Gov has never been managed properly, too much bureocracy and too many “scratch my back and I scratch yours”. People will flock and overload the system, the chances to get good healthcare will be diminish.And more important, nobody has taken the appropiate time to examine the pros and cons. Just like the bail out this bill is going to be shovel down the taxpayers throat without proper consent of the people.

Posted by: Frank | June 19, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

I’d like the members of congress opposed to this bill to give up their “poorly run” government provided health care and sign up for a private, profit based policy that the rest of americans are stuck with. Profiting off sick people such as accepting credit cards at the hospital is a tell of health care’s primary focus: corporate profits.

Posted by: 92F150 | June 19, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

25 cents of every dollar spent on healthcare goes to process the billing to settle claims between hospitals and insurance companies. A true single payer plan would reduce costs 25% by ending this practice. – ITWARZ

Posted by: ITWARZ | June 19, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

“I doubt the Democrats were materially consulted on matters such as the invasion of Iraq etc. ‘
Well, they VOTED for it — so I guess that means they were “materially consulted”. You libs all seem to conveniently forget that vote back in Oct. 2002.

Posted by: Get Real | June 19, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

I know a lot of House Dems and a few Senate Dems who support a single payer plan have compromised to support this plan and get it passed. What have the Repubs compromised on in order to get reform through? Nothing – because they seem to care more for political posturing than addressing America’s healthcare crisis. I am not a Dem and I am sure there are some Repubs who care about more than sloganeering, but so far I have not heard from them.

Posted by: Mark from atlanta | June 19, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

I read this article a few days ago…..”WASHINGTON (AP) — The wife of a senator playing a lead role on a national health care overhaul sits on the boards of four health care companies, one of several examples of lawmakers with ties to the medical industry. Jackie Clegg Dodd, wife of Sen. Chris Dodd, serves on the boards of Javelin Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cardiome Pharma Corp., Brookdale Senior Living, and Pear Tree Pharmaceuticals, a financial disclosure report the senator released Friday shows.”

Posted by: CW | June 19, 2009, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Government ran healthcare? One only needs to look at the way Medicare, Medicaid and the VA is ran to know that Washington doesn’t have a clue. As a former VA employee, I KNOW that the employees that work for the VA are paid A LOT more than the private sector. Why? The unionization of federal employees would be my best guess.

Posted by: mom | June 19, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

force the drug companies to charge us no more than they charge Canadians.
Give us equal health benefits that congress has. Lets see our congress say we are not equal to them.

Posted by: edward maisel | June 19, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Does the Rep. party want some cheese to go with their whine? The American people want health care!! They need to get onboard and quit being the party of NO!!

Posted by: Jim | June 20, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

“25 cents of every dollar spent on healthcare goes to process the billing to settle claims between hospitals and insurance companies. A true single payer plan would reduce costs 25% by ending this practice. – ITWARZ”
LOL….ONLY IN A WORLD WHERE THAT SINGLE PAYER DECIDES WHAT THE COST STRUCTURES & COVERAGES WILL BE. You actually think there will be complete agreement and acceptance of a govt mandated cost & coverage plan?
Our govt, who cant write a bill and then explain how the language of it changed and how everone vote don it but didnt catch it!
Our govt, whose Treasury dept cant even READ the LAW where it pertains to the IG in charge of TARP oversight!
Our govt …that cant control the fraud in Medicare, Medicaid, & SS.
Our govt, who get blasted left & right for mistakes and holes in the medical coverages we give our Vets!
Take a REAL look at the actual implemeantations in the systems already in use in the world. NOT the fantasy stories, but the real workings. The real costs. Many here have touted the Swiss system.
Funny thing though, they never mention the Swiss system has pre-existing condition clauses. The govt only pays 25% of the costs and therefore for a family of four, the cost per month for reasonable coverage is still over a $1000 US dollars! AND they only have a population of about 7.5 Million people, a far cry from our estimated 340-350 million!

Posted by: Mike_C | June 20, 2009, 1:35 am 1:35 am

There is no thought given to incrementally fixing the system, which is the only serious way to approach the problem. This would allow for course corrections on parts of programs that aren’t working as advertised. We are being told that everything is a disaster, everything an emergency, and if we don’t sign on blindly to all of it now the world will end. Pretty much what we were told about the bailouts and stimulus bills. Guthrie said it best “Some will rob you with a six gun and some with a fountain pen.”

Posted by: Dudley T | June 20, 2009, 8:21 am 8:21 am

The USA is not 1st in anything-health care-education-business-etc-get over it-43 million people without health care-who do you think picks up the tab for this?
Health care costs will go up 9% this yerar-did you get a 9% raise?

Posted by: derni | June 20, 2009, 8:42 am 8:42 am

I can’t believe how “quasi news” that ABC has become. To promote your views as if the reporting was objective and balanced leaves the uninformed, who count on you for BOTH sides of the health care issue so shamefully propagandized that I am furious, both at your reprehensible conduct and the poor ignorant souls who trust you. You aren’t journalists anymore, merely mouthpieces who hide behind the misconception that journalism is what it once was. Edward R. Murrow must be flipping in his grave. Shame on you. Your country needs you to hold your ideals and principles to the highest of standards.

Posted by: D | June 20, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

we see chris dodd at the senate hearing pushing health reform.dodd got a sweetheart deal on two mortgages,slipped the aig bonuses into the stimulus bill, that no one in congress read.first he denied it,then he admitted doing it.now we find he falsified documents on his irish cottage,saying it was worth less than it actually was. congress and the president must condone this behavior,because dodd is still there.does anyone out there actually believe a word this man says??? and the fact that he is presenting this so called reform, should be a BIG red flag. do we need to get hit in the head with a brick, DUH!!!!!!!!

Posted by: patricia | June 20, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

One question. If this proposal of govermant insurance is so good why house of congress and house of senate try on them self first for two years President Obama promase us the same health insurance they have,but the first thing they did on this proposal was exclude themself.We are not stupid what we ask is affordability and choices.We are not asking for a massive goverment buracracy,we are American and we deserve better quality of health insurance for us and our kids

Posted by: rachele c | June 20, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Insurance isn’t the problem with healthcare. Insurance keeps the costs down. Malpractice, nurse shortage, high wages (ultra-sound tech $57 hr.),labor shortages. Where has the US education system been negligent in not training for healthcare? Why is it so hard for someone to get into nursing school? Whywere they bringing in nurses from Philloppines rather than training our own. Not to mention the cost of providing care for 30 million illegal aliens that ALL of us subsidize in high medical costs.

Posted by: Gregory | June 20, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

RachalleC, we have the best quality health care in the world. What’s missing is more people that pay and a broader safety net for those who can’t.

Posted by: Gregory | June 20, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

The CBO estimates the Democrats plan will add up to $1.6 trillion or more to the deficit over the next 10 years and only cover 13 to 14 million of the 50 million without insurance. The plan would subsidize these people to the tune of $6000 per person by 2019. Where is this money going to come from? Answer, You and me with the Democrats openly proposing big cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, higher taxes and sky rocketing deficits that will lead to inflation that will hurt people the elderly on fixed incomes the most. The U.S. debt currently with Medicaid and Medicare is $57 trillion, $11 trillion in Social Security, $11+ trillion in the current budget. That is about $80 trillion in the hole and growing by the day. Moreover, state like Ca and NY are going bankrupt due to the enormous costs associated with Medicaid, which sounds a lot like the “public option” the Democrats are proposing.
A government takeover of the health care will inevitably lead to higher (costs deficits and taxes) and lower quality of care. Than to solve the “problem” (that government created in the first place), politicians will impose even higher taxes and rationing of health care. The goal of the Democrats health care take over is to suck as much money out of our pockets as possible so the government has control of our money and how it is spent. The ugly truth is that the poor and elderly on Medicaid and Medicare will be forced to bear the brunt of this with our Medicare premiums going up and services being cut in order to help pay for the health care costs of the uninsured. Think about it. The money has to come from somewhere.
Given the government’s mismanagement of Social Security and Medicare (that are going bankrupt) how is it that anyone can trust the government not to make an even bigger mess of health care is beyond me. I guess if you like sky rocketing deficits, higher taxes, run away inflation and some bureaucrat making life and death decisions on who gets what health care if any, a government take over of health care as proposed by the Democrats is for you.
A better way to bring down the costs of health care and cover more people is to get government out of the way of the free market. Give the health insurance industry the option of providing a wide range of insurance coverage based on people’s needs and ability to pay. Another way to lower costs is to reign in the ambulance chasers with tort reform laws that will lower the cost of malpractice insurance. Medicaid and Medicare are going bankrupt and instead of cutting their costs by reducing the amount of reimbursement the government pays for services just get rid of them and replace them with tax credits and some form of government subsidies for people with low incomes to help them pay for their choice of insurance. That alone would save trillions of dollars

Posted by: ray | June 20, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

demi,
What govt program has ever done what it said it was going to do for LESS money than projected?
You people are living in a pipe dream if you really beleive a govt rn program is going to deliver quality and a better cost!
Remember something, thanks to the “spend like no-one in the history of the planet” mentality of this administration, there is no way to cover the costs of this boondoggle … EXCEPT for Obama to break that big promise about raising taxes on those under 250K.
Opps, he already DID break that promise!…. so what the hell, we will just tax everyone into oblivion. Don’t worry, LOL, when you dont have any money left at all, you will still have ObamaCare!

Posted by: Mike_C | June 20, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Just curious as to why ‘everyone’ is totally ignoring the money that would be saved by taxpayers and hopsitals if we simply deported all the illegal ailens that are receiving billions of dollars in healt care, paid for by US taxpayers? Only in America. Yes, deportation would be costly, but far less costly than what we pay for hospitalization and incarceration. All this while hospital bill are causing many Americans to go bankrupt. Something is wrong with this picture.

Posted by: BJ | June 21, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

GOV RUN HEALTH CARE HAS ABOUT AS MUCH A CHANCE OF SUCCESS ASA GOV RUN GM. DUH.

Posted by: Jimbo | June 21, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.