In CNBC Interview, President Obama Attacks Fox News Channel

Freedom of the Press goes two ways Mr. Obama..you should be celebrate it not criticize it for without it you would not be President…

The president has harsher words for his critics than he does, you know, actual enemies of our country.

Worst. President. Ever.

Good grief! I’ve seen sophomores in high school show more maturity. This behavior is embarrassing for someone holding the highest office in our country.

Personally, I think Fox is far too kind.
Obama is MUCH worse than what Fox says.

What incredibly thin skin this man has. George Bush had ever network (not TV Station, incidentally) there is, including Comedy Central and the Travel Channel, undermining his credibility at every opportunity.
Bush never complained, never whined like a 6th grade school girl. Obama can’t show a sliver of the class, nor dignity that Bush showed on a daily basis.

I didn’t realize Fox was a “real” news channel….I thought it was more like those scripted reality shows….
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
No, scripted would be Obama’s speeches. Regardless, for not being “real”, Fox and Limbaugh sure do seem to be a thorn in his side.

I think Tapper needs to look up attack in the dictionary and rethink the headline on this article.

“First of all, I’ve got one television station entirely devoted to attacking my administration.”
_____________________________________
Hmmmm …. I suppose it’s better than something John McCain could say today:
“First of all, I’ve got at lest six broadcast and cable networks entirely devoted to attacking my campaign, my VP pick, etc. etc. ….”
With all due respect, Mr. President, you get 90 percent positive coverage out there. Probably more than any President since the media went after Nixon. Stop complaining!!

Obama the Second Coming:”First, while you are right to think its absurd that Obama will kill fox, why is it you liberals ALWAYS misinterpret pure, honest (well, mostly) disagreement and debate as being “disconnected from the actual issues,” etc.”
He stated the president could “take away Fox News’ license” for their critical reporting. This absurd fear is not based in any reality whatsoever and yes, it has nothing to do with the issues the majority of Americans care about.
“You libs always want to act like we’re out-of-touch and disagreeing for disagreement’s sake. But we’re just trying to have an honest debate! ”
Trying to have an honest debate? By making up some fantasy about Obama shutting down FoxNews for critical report (that is what my comment was specifically in regards to)?
An honest debate means sharing the same facts. When anyone comes into a debate shouting a conclusion and refusing to provide any verifiable facts from reality they it is just not possible to have an honest debate. We can have different opinions but an honest debate requires sharing the same FACTS. Even you agree that “you are right to think its absurd that Obama will kill fox,” so I’m not quite sure what to make of your vehement agreement.

=== Probably more than any President since the media went after Nixon===
Obama has had more coverage, the majority of it positive, than either Clinton or Bush at the same time in their presidencies.

” When anyone comes into a debate shouting a conclusion and refusing to provide any verifiable facts from reality they it is just not possible to have an honest debate”
Hmmm…that sounds like just about every single Barney Frank held hearing!

” changing gears on the war on terror”
jlw….you lost your Obama Administration Reference Chart didnt you!
Remember there is no longer a war on terror. It’s now called “overseas contingency operations”!

Fox News
Lou Dobbs
Rush Limbaugh
Jim Cramer
Rick Santelli
These are the news/media people who President Obama has criticized while in office. Did I miss any?

What’s shocking is that the mainstream media has stood silently by as Obama has put hundreds of legal auto franchise holders out of business.
If Bush had gone in and decided who should remain in business and who should be forced out – the media would have been all over it. But now, the media is largely silent – only Fox news is telling the stories of these car dealerships and the financial consequences they are facing because of Obama’s decision.
And now, Obama is asking for formal authority from Congress to decide when a business should be forced to close. Again, if Bush had done this, it would have been big, big news.
Thank you Fox News for doing your job. I wish more would follow suit.

C’est Moi:”What’s shocking is that the mainstream media has stood silently by as Obama has put hundreds of legal auto franchise holders out of business. ”
Right. Because they were in great shape and would be turning a profit today if only Evil Obama hadn’t personally shut them down…
Or maybe they and thousands of others would all have closed with the bankruptcies if the administration hadn’t stepped in. Which scenario has more support from reality?

“Or maybe they and thousands of others would all have closed with the bankruptcies if the administration hadn’t stepped in. Which scenario has more support from reality?”
The truth is we WASTED billions trying to prop up those companies! Both administrations should have left things alone and allowed those companies to go chap 11. In the end, the only real difference (besides Obama deciding to give the tax payers an ownership stake) is the fact that Billions were wasted.
jlw is correct, neither Obama OR Bush put those guys out of business, the auto companies and the UAW screwed themselves on that one!

“Again, if Bush or any other president had done this, we’d all be outraged.”
“The Bush administration said it would lend $17.4 billion to General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC, buying them a few weeks of financial relief but leaving the biggest decisions about the industry’s future to President-elect Barack Obama.
Under the White House plan, the companies are required to extract enough financial concessions from workers, suppliers, dealers and other stakeholders to demonstrate their long-term viability by the end of March.”

“Now is is a possibility? Please provide any basis in REALITY for that absurd suggestion.”
You cannot be this naive. The government take over of the auto industry is based in REALITY. Talk to profitable Chrysler dealers who lost their dealerships, taken away by the President’s “Automotive Task Force”.
“Is the Rightwing really this disconnected from the actual issues and facts that mainstream America is dealing with right now (health care, the economy, changing gears on the war on terror, North Korea, Iran)?” Posted by: jhw539 | Jun 17, 2009 11:55:09 AM
First of all, everyone who disagrees with Obama is not “Rightwing”. That is a red herring/strawman that allows you to dismiss what people say.
While I agree that North Korea and Iran are hotspots (and Obama has looked weak on both fronts), there has been no reason to fasttrack health care other than to try to take advantage of all the purposefully overload of crisis opportunities.
If you are not concerned with the blending and blurring of lines with the government and various industries including the press, than you are either purposefully ignoring the trends and/or you agree with Obama that government should be running everything. In either case, I will be unable to sway you on this comment board.

“Many of these dealership were strong companies yet their franchise licenses were stolen by the administration”
“In a tough automotive market, Chrysler’s sales have fallen faster than any automaker — down 46 percent through the first five months of the year.”
“For the year, Chrysler, Jeep® and Dodge U.S. sales decreased 30 percent (1,453,122 units) compared with total 2007 sales (2,076,650 units). Total sales were significantly affected by the industry’s largest reductions in fleet sales, 63 percent for December and 31 percent for the year.”
Strong and profitable dealers?

I will stipulate that all cable news sucks when it comes to actual news.
You watch them for the personalities discussing the events of the day.
If you want news, you go online.

On the GM side, you simply have WAY, WAY too many dealerships and models. This was going to have to happen no matter which course was taken. No doubt many of the Pontiac delaerships may indeed have been successful, but the thats true of each model line. 7,000+ dealerships was just unsustainable. Some had to be cut loose.

Are you nuts? GM and Chrysler were going bankrupt. And you’re surprised none of the franchisees are saying “Yeah, we suck and should have been shut down”?
Posted by: jhw539
Again, many of these dealerships were strong enough and diversified enough to still turn a good profit despite slow sales. The manufacturer’s problems do not necessarily reflect on the auto dealers.
These dealers were forced to stop selling these brands while other dealerships were allowed to continue selling — there was no appeals process, no fighting the system in this situation. How can you possibly defend that? If all dealerships were closed, it would be one thing. But selective elimination is another thing completely.
Look at it this way, what hope do these auto manufacturers really have of turning around when many of their top-selling dealerships have been closed. I’m no business wiz, but I’d think the goal would be to sell more cars, not fewer – so you stick with your strong selling dealerships.

Any news station that is not questioning the actions and words of the incumbent President (no matter which party he belongs to) is not doing their job.
And if I was Fox I would quote Obama’s words in an advertisement. Fox could not get any better endorsement than from the President who is afraid of Fox News. You know Obama must be watching Fox daily, if not hourly.

Ryan,
Have you ever been in the car business?

“It made excellent business sense. ”
Posted by: jhw539
You are saying that based on nothing but blind faith. If the administration had released facts and figures showing exactly why certain dealerships were selected for elimination over others, I might agree with you. In the absence of those facts, however, I’m going to side with the only folks who are presenting facts and figures – those dealerships who have come forward with facts to support their position.
I agree that some dealerships may have had to close — but the process needs to be fair and consistent. It was not. Dealerships were given no avenue to appeal or fight the decision. They were placed under gag order and the administration did not release anything to the media to support its decision. I actually like Obama, but something about this whole selective dealership shut-down just doesn’t sit right with me. And surprisingly, the only news station telling the stories of these dealers is FOX News, which Obama is now criticizing. Again, something doesn’t sit right with me.

Sally J:”And if I was Fox I would quote Obama’s words in an advertisement. ”
I’d love to see that advertisement.
(opening banner) FoxNews: Fair and Balanced
(scare still of Obama with extra shadows and a slight green tinge with the voice over) “I’ve got one television station entirely devoted to attacking my administration… you’d be hard-pressed, if you watched the entire day, to find a positive story about me on that front.”
(deep voiced announcer) We hate Obama just as irrationally as you do. FoxNews, the Republican station.

He obviously has never been in the car business, nor does he understand anything about how the franchises work. He only blindly spews the king’s talking points and throws in personal digs for good measure.

C’est Moi:”If the administration had released facts and figures showing exactly why certain dealerships were selected for elimination over others, I might agree with you. ”
The automakers are partially government owned at the moment, but they are being operated and run as private businesses (and I predict by 2012, they will be fully private again). As a partial owner, I am glad they did not take the incredibly foolish move of providing their competitors with detailed sales and demand information localized down to such a level. That sort of targeting information is proprietary and valuable for a reason.

FOX News has been in Obama’s sights for a long time, probably because they do not promote the “company message.” I don’t think there’s ever been a president who has singled out an individual network, and tried to polarize public opinion against it.

jhw:
The competition with each other cuts into their margins, resulting in less money for advertising and promotions and an overall neglect of the brand.
Whose margins? Perhaps you haven’t noticed the rather large number of new dealerships being built in the last 10 years?
The point is that it’s not the dealers fault that the companies cannot provide a product that the public wants. THAT is the main reason they are now Chapt 11. Name one GM or Chrysler car that can compete with a foreign model? Do you want to drive a cobalt, neon, caliber? Sure, the new malibu is nice…but in the past, it was total crap. The cobalt is just as bad as the cavalier was. The only quality product these companies offer are trucks/SUVs. The dealers are the only ones purchasing these products. As far as service work, once a franchise is pulled, they can no longer offer warranty work…which is a rather large revenue source for a dealer.
As far as the minimal wait for a test drive/video games for kids…
Sure, that’s all nice and great…but when it’s a week before the dealer can look at your car when it’s broken down…what are you going to be saying then? ‘At least I don’t have to wait for a test drive?’ Woo hoo! Yes, it happens. A good friend of mine was a service writer for a toyota store and I worked at a mazda store for some time. I’ve been told that it would be a week before they could even look at my car. Yep, fewer dealers are a GREAT thing.
Perhaps you should step back and look at the big picture. This will probably do more damage to these companies than good, imo. This country is all about convenience. When it’s a pain to get your car serviced at a GM or Chrysler store or the only one within 100 miles is a little ‘shady,’ people will start going with other brands. When there were mulitple dealers, you had options. You could spend a day visiting several dealers looking at quite a lot of inventory and get your best price. Competition is a good thing (and remember, the manufacturers already have their money because the dealers have paid for these cars).
Perhaps you can present a more logical reason as to why this makes sense…because, as I see it, they are only hurting themselves and the lives of thousands of people.

“So, why isn’t the firing of the Inspector General , Gerald Walpin, news worthy
Posted by: Gregg Donat | Jun 17, 2009 2:10:55 PM”
If you look to the left you can see the latest on that.

Sally J:”And if I was Fox I would quote Obama’s words in an advertisement. ”
I’d love to see that advertisement.
(opening banner) FoxNews: Fair and Balanced
(scare still of Obama with extra shadows and a slight green tinge with the voice over) “I’ve got one television station entirely devoted to attacking my administration… you’d be hard-pressed, if you watched the entire day, to find a positive story about me on that front.”
(deep voiced announcer) We hate Obama just as irrationally as you do. FoxNews, the Republican station.
———————
And, you’re worried about “socialism” when you have a “Republican Station”? What is up with that statement? Fidel, and any other “dictator” — did u get your dose of your ‘channel’ today?

The only other president I remember complaining about the media was Nixon. Nixon viewed the media as the enemy. I can’t understand why Obama would even mention Fox News when he has the rest of the media in his lap. Seems awfully Nixonian to me at any rate.

Perhaps that is not Fox’s fault..
Fascists do not tolerate dissent.
Posted by: tjp612
if you had any clue as to what ‘fascist’ actually means, your comments would not be so moronic.
All you hear from Republicans is nonsense and faux outrage at everything and anything… how come you see them on all the news channels and Sunday show all the time…?
Even some Dems express their dissent with Obama’s policies…. guess you missed that..
You represent exactly what Obama refers to, a lot of hate rhetoric with no substantive solutions…

“if you had any clue as to what ‘fascist’ actually means, your comments would not be so moronic.”
fas-cism: [fa] shizzem: noun; dictatorial movement: any movement, tendency or ideology that favors dictatorial government, CENTRALIZED CONTROL OF PRIVATE ENTERPRISE, REPRESSION OF ALL OPPOSITION, and extreme nationalism.
Moronic, no. Open your mind and eyes. It’s real and it’s here.

tjp612
btw: men in black,.. FEMA re-education compound coming to your neighborhood

“btw: men in black,.. FEMA re-education compound coming to your neighborhood”
Good one…very thoughtful and deep…

“of course, just post a dictionary meaning..as if that somehow fits 2009 America…”
It has begun, Terse, it has begun…

“Posted by: tjp612
I believe in the power of the individual
the right wing murderers are definitely showing
‘the power of the individual’
talk about repression

Speaking of crazies, what did barrack tells you to think next?
Posted by: ReallyMeanIt
he told me to think for myself and get educated on the issues so that I won’t fall for the lies and distortions of the ‘right wing’ fanatics and their stooges in the congress… the Republicans

Obama obliquely refers to FOX News saying, “…I’ve got one television station entirely devoted to attacking my administration.” On the other hand, FOX News is the highest rated cable news network.
This must cause him considerable irritation.

I guess the “Deity” takes umbridge
when all of the media don’t fawn over
him, bow and scrape, and kiss up to him!
How dare anyone question any of the
policies or decisions of the Great Obama and his aides.
NBC, ABC, CNN, The New York Times, La
Times etc are an embarassment to
Journalism!
But wait here’s what the “Deity”
has to say about these institutions
which are firmly embeded in his hip
pocket:
I think that, actually, the reason that people have been generally positive about what we’ve tried to do is they feel as if I’m available and willing to answer questions, and we haven’t been trying to hide them all.”
Yes and the questions he’s willing to
answer from these sham news
organizations consist of
“Mr President where are you taking
Michelle to dinner and what are you
both wearing”! UGH.

Even if Fox News is biased, so what? Don’t we have free speech — especially on cable?
And can anyone point me to a single public interview or speech where Bush himself ever complained about the media? I can’t remember any.

===What do you expect from the likes of Ann Coulter and Karl Rove, etc., objectivity????
Posted by: BachisBest | Jun 17, 2009 3:56:31 PM===
Don’t know. I’ll have to see if Lanny Davis, Bob Beckel, Susan Estrich, Kirsten Powers, Geraldine Ferraro, Mort Kondracke, Mara Liasson, Dennis Ross and Juan Williams say. That isn’t counting Shepard Smith, Geraldo Rivera (God, y’all’s side please take him), Bill Hemmer, Steve Harrigan, Greg Palkot, and a host of other reporters that have worked for major news organizations other than Fox.
I’ll go over to MSNBC and see what Keith Olbermann is saying. Or Rachel Maddow. Objectivity? I don’t think you are looking for a cable channel that is objective. You are looking for one that doesn’t allow conservative view points.

Way to much to expect CNBC to ask him specifics about these “attacks” and defend himself. The man never speaks in specifics, is constantly constructing straw men and shooting them down. He speaks in vague platitudes, he doesn’t SAY anything, he just insinuates things.
Fox actually irritates me when the follow the approved MSM stories, but they do cover stories that the rest of the media will not. Obama has violated contract law and broken his oath to protect and follow the constitution.
If Bush had fired people in private industry, taken over segments of these same industries, approved DHS memos targeting average citizens of the opposition party, …. the outrage would be deafening.
One more thing, he is on my TV CONSTANTLY, and it’s usually on FOX NEWS. I seldom saw coverage of George directly addressing the nation. I’ll never forget the MSM griping about how he should address the nation on the Iraq war. When President Bush scheduled an address, they refused to run it.
The left has zero integrity, they have most of the cards but that’s not enough, they want them all. Zero tolerance, zero dissenting voices, shut down talk radio, it’s “hate speech”. I am so SICK of this one sided, stacked deck.

When President Bush scheduled an address, they refused to run it
Posted by: Katie Jo
your FOX network does the same.. the point?

If FOXNews is the only negative news outlet BO has to live with, he should consider himself lucky. Bush had all the network stations, CNN, MSNBC, all the major newspapers, like NY Times, Washington Post, LA Times, etc., Hollywood and the European press against him from the minute he took office – only talk radio and FOXNews were fair to him.
BO needs badly to man up!

So are you suggesting that most Iraqis are longing for the good ol’ days of Saddam?
Posted by: tjp612
the war was a mistake ..
the estimates of Iraqi civilian dead from the pre-emptive war vary from 50,000 to 100,000, or more.., all those dead might ‘long’ to be alive in the good old Saddam days…

After reading these comments, I believe that FOX news groupies, Republicans and Conservatives have nothing else to do with their time but attack and go grade school with name calling in any forum they can find freely open for comment. School yard bullies never win. This should have been learned after the election and the antics that came from the Republican camp….the people said NO to that kind of thing. It is time to learn and time to grow up.

Barry, the cowardly little prince, cannot handle criticism.

NBC,CNBC and MSNBC owned by GE = State run television.

“On the other hand, FOX News is the highest rated cable news network.”
And even then it has less than half the viewers of the worst rated network news.

===And even then it has less than half the viewers of the worst rated network news.
Posted by: Ryan C | Jun 17, 2009 5:42:56 PM===
You are comparing apples to oranges.

“You are comparing apples to oranges.”
Very true.
Network newscasts are about the news of the day.
Cable news shows are about who can shout louder.

Are you at all aware that the implied endorsement of your news agency along with all the other so called main stream news agencies by President Obama is really a slam on your integrity as a news agency. You have just been told you have no integrity in your reporting. Didn’t think that was what being a news agency was all about. Always thought you were suppose to help the public understand what was going on not shade it so the President thinks your great.

Did you realize that the implied endorsement that President Obama gave your news agency along with the other so called “main stream” news agencies while he was attacking Fox was really an indictment of your integrity as a news agency. I always thought that the job of a news agency was to report the news not shade it so the President thinks your great.

Did you realize that the implied endorsement that President Obama gave your news organization along with that for NBC and CBS while attacking Fox was really an indictment of your integrity as a news agency? I always thought that the job of the news reporters was to report the news-all the news good and bad. Seems like you have forgotten that in your rush to be liked by the President.

Fox News does what responsible journalists should be doing. Reporting the facts, it is funny how they are the only real news source that investigates and backs-up their findings. The media that is all “warm and fuzzy” w/Obama reports only what Obama wants out there.Where are these journalists on issues like ACORN corruption, the firing of Mr. Walprin, and the back door $$ going to fund the released terrorists. Come on this is real news that is fully backed up. What is Obama afraid of? Why won’t he give an interview to the Fox Network? Is he afraid of having to give an explanation?
Real journalists investigate and report, network news just reports.

“Real journalists investigate and report, network news just reports.”
Then there’s a 3rd category in which an organization just makes up the news.
That’s where FoxNews falls in.

Poor, poor Bawack, just can’t understand why all the media isn’t buying into “hope and change”. Thank the heavens for Fox, that’s all I can say. The fourth estate is supposed to be keeping our elected officials accountable, not driving around trying to find a motel room. Jake Tapper, you are the one bright spot in a sea of submission and groveling so intense it boggles the mind. Two planeloads of press for “date night” in NYCity, but the latest scandal with the firing of IG Halpin will be history by tomorrow if the MSM has their way. The MSM protection of Obama used to be just shameful, now it’s bordering on criminal.

This is a shameless example of sensationalism and exaggeration in the news. Nowhere in this story did the president “attack Fox News Channel” via CNBC. What are you trying to instigate here, cbs? Unbiased? I think not.

I was looking for a story on the ABC News blogs about the stunning announcement that ABC will devote prime time coverage from the White House and then an additional hour for a separate “town hall” type meeting…….I guess it is hard to cover your own shortcomings.
Jake, leave OBC..the OBAMA BROADCASTING NETWORK……..you will shine away from this journalism joke.

…….This is a shameless example of sensationalism and exaggeration in the news. Nowhere in this story did the president “attack Fox News Channel” via CNBC. What are you trying to instigate here, cbs? Unbiased? I think not.
Posted by: Lisa | Jun 17, 2009 8:22:18 PM
=——
I hope you’re new reading this particular blog, otherwise I would call you naive if you just realize this is to instigate. I used to read this guy’s posting every opportunity I had, only to find that he’s always looking for a negative story to rile up the haters on this site. It’s too bad people cannot really express themselves more freely where we could really find out what’s in someone’s mind.
I would have loved to hear what this guy really thinks of this particular president.

What Obama attacked FOX Channel sounds like SOOOOOOOO GREEDY. Thanks to the greedy President, American journalism has totally death. Nowadays, CBS, NBC, CNBC, CNN and NY/LA Times have been being depraved to JUST PR Dept. of Obama with Liberal Party. Thank you God for FOX NEWS CHANNEL HAS KEPT ON FAIR & BALANCE AND ABC TRIED TO BE NEUTRAL POSITION.

I think Obama may be getting uncomfortable with what’s being reported about ACORN.

Don’t worry, our president can bask in the glow of ABC’s week-long informerical about his “health plan.”
Talk about losing all journalistic intergrity. ABC says it’s a debate; between who? Debate is two opposing sides. Yet, the networks refuses to run an ad of the opposing view and then having the audacity to say that ABC’s policies is not to run “advocacy advertising,” yet the informerical is advocacy advertising.
I digrees.
The president needs to realize this isn’t a popularity content. Not everyone is going to agree with him. I thought that’s what makes America America. The fact that we are free to question government and voice our disagreement with government.
I don’t think many of you realize how bad this may become. I honestly see hades of state run media (well, it’s voluntary right now.) And even more, some don’t care. May be you don’t understand how detrimental this can be. This isn’t an issue about Fox News and the favorite party line about them being Republican-favored. When I hear this, it’s obvious that it’s not understood the difference between a commentator and a journalist.
I used the think that the media’s role was to question the government – look at the Bush years – even the second part of the Clinton years, when the shine wore off. I never thought it would be like this and have a president complain about it. Do you know (or even care) how this looks to the rest of the world? Oh, the president can’t take criticism or even have hard questions asked by the media. God forbid, if something happens. Who is going to be there to ask the hard questions, and will it be allowed.
Journalists today are nothing more than star-struck and it really shows, and it’s pathetic and laughable at the same time. It’s frightening to know that there’s really not many news outlets looking out for the general population. They are cheerleaders for the current administration.
What’s the saying, “Pride cometh before Fall,” or the other “What goes up, must come down.”
Think about it.

Frankly, I am rather tired of Mr. Obama’s love to be seen and heard. He should have learned by now that the American Voter likes to hear from their leader (…not their “Czar) when he has something to say which warrants our attention. Mr. Obama speaks in platitudes….while the nation calls out for specifics! I hope that Sawyer and Gibson don’t throw him all softballs during the so-called “Healthcare” debate..debate? ..what debate? I would like to know the composition of the 46 million of Americans who have no health insurance, for example. ARE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS INCLUDED IN THAT NUMBER? ASK OUR LEADER FOR A BREAKDOWN. As far as “preventive” medicine is concerned, your sister organization TIME is out this week with a big discussion of that topic describing what the Cleveland Clinic is doing…..it is a 1100 bed hospital….surely not all 1100 beds are filled with folks requiring some sort of preventive medicine. While it is nice that pre-diabetics meet the hospital dietitian to “learn how to cook,” and their employees have their health club and gym memberships paid…that’s a nicety not new to American business organizations. Suffice it to say that the drumbeat of “preventive” medicine will not…and should not…overcome the true focus of health care in all its forms…..to make sick folks well again. The President should be enrolled in a good smoking program right now….that’s not preventive medicine…that’s an effort to eliminate something we all know to be not a good thing………..so, Diane and Charlie….no softballs, please. It is time for Obama to do something he often fails to do….SPELL IT OUT…DEFINE YOUR TERMS….NO PLATITUDES ON THIS SUBJECT.

The good ol boys and girls and Obama haters are still moaning,groaning and complaining.Obama spoke nothing but the truth.Some of you have been filled with nothing but hate when posting your comments since Nov.4th. And some of feel so entitled don’t you? Why didn’t Barack do it this way,why did he do this,why didn’t they get their dog from a shelter,why did he and Michelle do a fist pump, RIDICUOLOUS The man told the truth.Has nothing to do with thick skin,the man told the truth and some of you have been used to shady,shiesty politics in the Whitehouse until you can’t accept a president that will be TRUTHFUL when speaking about your beloved FOX NEWS

Thank you FOX !!!

A President attacks a news organization that questions his administration. The same President attacks private individuals and private companies for not following his guidance. I wonder in which of his mentioned 57 states of the Union does Fox have the largest viewership? If someone wants to receive the daily DNC talking points all one has to do is watch: NBC, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, et all.

Jimmy Kimmel interview. Czar’s watching…beware

I remember that during the campaign, Barry said that if it weren’t for the Fox Network, he would probably be ahead by another 3 points in the polls. He was probably right.
But, what he should have said, is that if the other networks and the NY Times and Washington Post had been doing their jobs and reporting reality, he never would have even gotten the nomination. Why in the world did the Mainstream Media of this country decide that it needed a Marxist, inexperienced, community agitator as the leader of the free world? Why?

President Obama attacks FOX news? PLEASE! Fox news has nothing positive to report on the president. From the day he ran for office he was criticized by FOX news. They have nothing on him so they make up things. Lets see, we have Sean Hate Hannity who is surely intimidated by Obama’s intelligence so he calls him arrogant. Rush Limbaugh (their favorite) who turns red and holds his heart because a black man is in charge. Ugly betty Ann Coulter, who cant even quote her own words from her book because she don’t know what’s in it. I don’t think she wrote. FOX news is a racist station. Remember these are the same people who praised Sarah Palin for holding her hate rallies. Now they organized little Tea parties just to get heard. Face it FOX, Obama is here to stay. Hope he’ll be here another four years. I am a true American and don’t judge anyone especially by the color of their skin. Obama lover!

There is something to be said about CLASS or the lack threreof. President Busch was attacked by every major or minor network during his presidency. I don’t recall that he ever commented.

When is the media going to stop covering for this imposter we have in the whitehouse. As much as they lied about President Bush. they are lying even more for Obama. I am ashamed and can not bring myself to call this man preident

gee, I wonder why 98% of the comments on CNN, are critizing Obama for Crying about Fox news.
I have almost ;had it with all of the media outlets. Every station has a definate political stance. Shame really. What is your political views CNN? Are you really un-bias, or just another lap dog, devoid of any news intergerty?

That’s misfortunate incidents