By Evan Harris

Jun 13, 2009 8:37am

More Details Emerge In President Obama’s Firing of Inspector General

It was Wednesday evening and Gerald Walpin was pleading for his job.

Just a few hours before, at around 5:20 pm, Walpin — , Inspector General of the Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) — was driving on a highway when he had received a phone call from Norm Eisen, special counsel to the president for ethics and government reform, informing him that President Obama no longer had confidence in him and wanted him to resign.

Walpin had an hour to make up his mind as to whether he was going to resign or have the president seek his suspension and termination, as indicated in email from Walpin to Eisen obtained by ABC News.

(A White House official tells ABC News that on Wednesday afternoon, "Walpin was informed, as a courtesy, of the president's decision to replace him. Mr. Walpin asked for time to consider resigning. He was told the decision to replace him was final, but for logistical reasons having to do with preparing the Congressional notifications, he could call back within the hour if he chose to resign.")*

In that email, as well as other documents surrounding Walpin's termination obtained by ABC News, a picture emerges of an ambitious and aggressive inspector general whose actions repeatedly offended officials of the US Attorney's office, to the point that the Republican-appointee in the US Attorney's office filed an official complain against the Republican-appointed Inspector General.

Walpin — appointed to his job under President George W. Bush — wrote to Eisen that "Congress intended the Inspector General of CNCS to have the utmost independence of judgment in his deliberations respecting the propriety of the agency's conduct and the actions of its officers. That is why the relevant statute provides that the President may remove the IG only if he supplies the Congress with a statement of his reasons–which is quite a different matter than executive branch officials who serve at his pleasure and can therefore be removed for any reason and without notification to Congress."

Walpin told Eisen that he took "this statutorily-mandated independence of my office very seriously, and, under the present circumstances, I simply cannot make a decision to respect or decline what you have said were the President's wishes within an hour or indeed any such short time."

Walpin had just issued two reports that were very critical of the actions taken by the Corporation for National and Community Service.

"It would do a disservice to the independent scheme that Congress has mandated–and could potentially raise questions about my own integrity–if I were to render what would seem to many a very hasty response to your request," Walpin wrote. "I heard your statement that this request that you communicated on behalf of the President and the timing of our reports and disagreement with the CNCS Board and management are 'coincidence,' as you put it on the phone, but I would suggest there is a high likelihood that others may see it otherwise."

Walpin said that he suspected that "when presented with the circumstances I have just discussed, the President will see the propriety of providing me additional time to reflect on his request. If however he believes that my departure is a matter of urgency, then he will have to take the appropriate steps toward ordering my removal, without my agreement."

The latter scenario is the one that played out, with President Obama informing congressional leaders of his decision in a letter stating that “it is vital that I have the fullest confidence in the appointees serving as Inspectors General. That is no longer the case with regard to this Inspector general.”

In a follow-up letter, White House counsel Greg Craig — responding to a letter of concern about Walpin’s termination from Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa — noted that Lawrence Brown, the “Acting United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, a career prosecutor who was appointed to his post during the Bush Administration, has referred Mr. Walpin’s conduct for review by the Integrity Committee of the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency.”

Craig said that the White House was “aware of the circumstances leading to that referral and of Mr. Walpin’s conduct throughout his tenure and can assure you that that the president’s decision was carefully considered.” He noted that Walpin’s termination “is fully supported by the Chair of the Corporation (a Democrat) and the Vice-Chair (a Republican).”

As we detailed yesterday, Walpin was criticized by Acting US Attorney Brown for his handling of an investigation into the use of AmeriCorps funds by a community group called St. HOPE Academy, founded by Kevin Johnson, former point guard of the Phoenix Suns, who was elected Mayor of Sacramento last November and is an ally of the president’s.

In that April 29 letter from Brown to Kenneth Kaiser, chair of the Integrity Committee for the Counsel of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, the Acting US Attorney wrote "to express my Office's concerns about the conduct" of Walpin in the handling of the Johnson case.

"In our experience," Brown wrote in the letter obtained by ABC News, "the role of an Inspector General is to conduct an unbiased investigation, and then forward that investigation to my Office for a determination as to whether the facts warrant a criminal prosecution, civil suit or declination. Similarly, I understand that after conducting such an unbiased investigation, the Inspector General is not intended to act as an advocate for suspension or debarment. However, in this case Mr. Walpin viewed his role very differently. He sought to act as the investigator, advocate, judge, jury and town crier."

In April of this year, St. HOPE Academy agreed to pay a $423,836.50 settlement — $72,836.50 of which would be paid personally by Mayor Johnson.

Brown expressed chagrin that US Attorney's office learned about the investigation into Johnson and St. HOPE through articles in the Sacramento Bee, and he said they found Walpin's comments surrounding the investigation unprofessional.

"Moreover, we considered the IG referral somewhat unusual in that it was accompanied by a letter from Mr. Walpin explaining that he viewed the conduct in this case as egregious and warranted our pursuing the matter criminally and civilly," he wrote.

On August 25 Brown's office met with Walpin and two investigators and "expressed our concerns that the conclusions in their report seemed overstated and did not accurately reflect all the information gathered in their investigation." For example, Brown wrote, Walpin's office had not actually done an audit to establish how much AmeriCorps money was actually misspent.

The next time Brown heard from Walpin's office, Brown wrote, was through the Bee a from a press release in which Walpin advocated to have St. HOPE, Johnson and Gonzales placed on the list of parties suspended from receiving federal funds — a serious move that Brown suggests his office did not know about until reading it in a press release.

On September 26, Brown said, the then-US Attorney McGregor Scott "emphatically informed Mr. Walpin that under no circumstance was he to communicate with the media about a matter under investigation and that his acts "were hindering our investigation and handling of this matter."

Ultimately the US Attorney's office determined that "a significant portion of the AmeriCorps grant funds were appropriately expended." They concluded that Walpin's investigation was wanting. For instance, Walpin's referral of his investigation to the US Attorney's office concluded that St. HOPE AmeriCorps members performed no tutoring," but the principal of an elementary school told the US Attorney's office that wasn't true, that St. HOPE AmeriCorps members had performed tutoring at his school. Upon further investigation, Brown wrote, the US Attorney's office found that Walpin had received a similar statement from the principal "but did not include it in their report or disclose it" to his office.

Walpin "overstepped his authority by electing to provide my Office with selective information and withholding other potentially significant information at the expense of determining the truth," Brown concluded.

In his official response to Brown's complaint against him, Walpin referred to the Inspector General Act of 1978 which asserts that the IG has the duty to "[a]ssume a leadership role in any and all activities which he deems useful to promote economy and efficiency in the administration of programs and operations or prevent and detect…waste in such programs and operations."

"IG offices are not intended to shy away from communication to the public through the media," Walpin wrote.

He disputed that he hadn't informed the US Attorney's office that he was considering asking the Corporation for National and Community Service to have Kevin Johnson and St. HOPE suspended from receiving federal funds. "The only thing that the United States Attorney's Office did not know was whether and when the Corporation would act."

As for the exculpatory testimony of the principal, Walpin said he found it irrelevant since the principal had told them that he had not "physically observed members on a daily basis…conducting tutoring."

-jpt

* This post was updated with the White House official's added context.

User Comments

Kevin Johnson and this AmeriCorps group had to return half of the grant money. Walpin was on to something big, and that would look bad for the President. They had better fire Walpin, fast!

Posted by: myprivateocean | June 13, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am

Why is the NYTimes not reporting this?

Posted by: Peter | June 13, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am

“…Walpin was on to something big…”
Yeah, his big mouth, which he apparently couldn’t keep shut while he was doing his job.

Posted by: Skip | June 13, 2009, 9:15 am 9:15 am

It sounds like he was a difficult person to work with.
It also sounds like, for all their problems with Walpin, Brown really did have a problem on his hands with Project Hope. Odd that even now he seems to kind of want to brush that aside.
I don’t know. On the one hand, I don’t want to say nobody should ever be fired. On the other hand, with so much stimulus money floating around out there, I want someone who will be a fierce advocate for the taxpayers.
Patrick Fitzgerald was/is a pain too. His press conference when he arrested Blagojavich was very unprofessional. Yet people admire his grit and desire to go after people.
Is Walpin a Patrick Fitzgerald-type or just a loose cannon?
I know what the taxpayer-side of me thinks.

Posted by: MayBee | June 13, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am

It sounds like Walpin was a thorough and passionate IG. Of course, the current administration would want him gone.

Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | June 13, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Having been on many investigative committees, Walpin went too far. He was not following the chain of command and in the Federal govt that borders on insorbodinate (grounds for dismissal). He can be the lead investigator and make recommendations but going to the newspaper, putting out statements that was way overboard and needed to be fired. Rules need to be follwed and Walpin clearly was acting on his own authority.

Posted by: Renegade | June 13, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am

How much of the federal funds had to be returned in the face of these investigations? Federal funds returned to the U. S. Treasury is a clear indication that something is rotten. There seems to be intrusion into the independence of the IG, unless Obama’s letter to Congress clearly establishes why the IG was removed. Transparency and accountability are the watchwords.

Posted by: benvictor | June 13, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Looks like Obama needs to make more Kool-aid. More & more I see peoples cups empty.

Posted by: Mr.Smith | June 13, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

benvictor-
In Jake’s earlier reporting, he said
****In April of this year, the new Acting Attorney General, Lawrence Brown, settled the case, requiring St. HOPE Academy to pay $423,836.50 — $72,836.50 of which would be paid personally by Mayor Johnson.****
There was obviously something wrong.

Posted by: MayBee | June 13, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Ultimately the US Attorney’s office determined that “a significant portion of the AmeriCorps grant funds were appropriately expended.”
___________________________________
That looks like “spin” from the US Attorney’s office. From a taxpayer point of view, I read it as a confirmation that a portion of AmeriCorps grant funds were inappropriately expended. The IG did his job.

Posted by: Ms Trish | June 13, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am

Walpin is just an example of career bureaucrats who acquire power and arrogance by being in Washington all their lives supported by tax payers and practically accountable to no one other than a network of friends. That is why I advocate term limits or if they are tenured (permanent) a rigorous post tenure review every 3-4 years. It is very difficult to get rid of a nonperforming career bureaucrat and over the years Washington has accumulated 1000s of them Change is not as easy to come by.

Posted by: gjkotw01 | June 13, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Gerald Walpin is a Kenneth Starr clone who was the head of the Federalist Society Litigation Project to take down Bill Clinton along with Ted Olsen, Kenneth Starr, etc., and funded by Richard Mellon Scaife.
He followed the Ken Starr model against Johnson including leaks to the press, criminal referrals, etc. After his scheme to take down Johnson failed, he issued an unsolicited “Starr” report to Congress to both cover his butt for his improper actions and to further smear Johnson, including with a dubious sex charge! They had to get rid of him. He’s crazy and dangerous.

Posted by: Mary | June 13, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Let’s get the facts straight. Walpin was not a career bureaucrat. He was a lawyer in the private sector for many years according to AP, which along with Mr. Tapper’s ABC seems to be the only media interested in following this story about possible corruption in the precincts of Lord O of Chicago.
If the USAttorney’s office is taking sides against Walpin, so be it. Perhaps he stepped over some line, although going outside a chain of command to go public against wrongdoers has a long tradition. When it’s done by the likes of Richard Clarke, the media love these people.
There has got to be a tremendous amount of wrongdoing when the contractor has to return half the money. Firing the watchdog seems like a Chicago-style move to me. No one should be surprised at a political hit against someone who embarrasses a friend of Lord O’s Chicago mafia.

Posted by: Peter | June 13, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am

This whole thing would look a lot better for the President if he had articulated his reasons in the letter to congress more than ‘because I said so’. Maybe he did, I haven’t seen the letter from the President giving his reasons to congress.

Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | June 13, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Mary: Gerald Walpin is a Kenneth Starr clone who was the head of the Federalist Society Litigation Project to take down Bill Clinton along with Ted Olsen, Kenneth Starr, etc., and funded by Richard Mellon Scaife.
________________________________
That’s the reason, eh, for Walpin’s firing?! It’s all about politics!

Posted by: Ms Trish | June 13, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Expect to see many more such firings of those that interfere with Obama’s personal agenda.
And expect to see left wing media outlets continue to ignore Obama’s dictatorial actions as he decimates those that oppose him.
And expect to see venues, like this, where we can discuss it, dry up.

Posted by: Chuck | June 13, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am

An inspector general is NOT given the mandate to be investigator, indictor, judge and jury. An inspector general is subordinate to the Justice Dept. An inspector general’s is to investigate thoroughly, report ALL findings of the investigation to the proper authority — NOT the media — and after that to go on to the next assignment. Walpin got to big for his britches. Oh, I’m sorry, it was his HEAD that swelled with self-importance.

Posted by: nanameow | June 13, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Kevin Johnson was using the Americorp grant for personal use – i.e. paying the people who wash his car, run his personal errands, etc.
Mr. Walpin evidently felt that the US Taxpayer should not be supporting Mr. Johnson’s lifestyle.
President Obama is looking for someone who will wink and look the other way for the abuses and mis-uses of US taxpayer monies that is being funneled into Americorps and look askance at his unethical plans for Americorp.
If one scours the internet one can find more in-depth and informative articles.

Posted by: Lavenia | June 13, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

“(T)he IG has the duty to “[a]ssume a leadership role in any and all activities which he deems useful to promote economy and efficiency in the administration of programs and operations or prevent and detect… waste in such programs and operations.”
It was purely a political firing. Walpin was doing his job and doing it too well.
Jake, still no mention of the Michelle Obama angle?

Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | June 13, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am

This report is “he said, she said”. Clearly something was improper with Johnson in Sacramento, since more than $400,000.00 had to be returned. But it would be helpful if ABC, and any other newspaper, would report on the statutes and precedent regarding the role and behavior of an IG and its relationship the IG relationship to the justice department in reporting an incident. Then we would be in a better position to determine if the IG was or was not out of line; or if, Obama is out of line.
Personally, I don’t trust Obama when it comes to oversight of anything having to do with his campaign contributors and any community based organizations, who are basically federally funded subsidiaries of the Democrat Party.

Posted by: Mike H | June 13, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Why, oh why, would the President bother get entangled with this for relatively minor reasons–even if you can trace a path through some associate of his and then to his doorstep? What’s so important that any president would cover this up, regardless? Doesn’t make sense.

Posted by: Philip2 | June 13, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Oh, I’m sorry, it was his HEAD that swelled with self-importance.
Posted by: nanameow
He must have been infected by the disease that is common in this administration. Except that he actually saved the tax payers some of their money.

Posted by: flopez | June 13, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Perhaps I am not understanding what happened, which is entirely possible since no one seems to be terribly forthcoming with information, but it sounds as if this is politically motivated. The impression I get is that Walpin was trying to get things done and both Democrats and Republicans were more concerned with protecting their cronies.
If the situation is anything like it sounds, Walpin needs to turn whistleblower and expose everything he knows about these people who are standing in the way of promoting justice.

Posted by: paul | June 13, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Jake, you’ve left out the part about the repayment of $400K. Who pays back $400K if they’ve done nothing wrong? Come on man, you’re better than that.

Posted by: Lincoln | June 13, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

I am a progressive liberal Ill admit up front. After reading what is known, it appears that the fired IG inspector did in fact find improper payments made. His primary error, as with any employee who works for a manager — if your job is to find ‘dirt’ do it, then keep your agreements when hired, to give same to your manager to handle within the law. Clearly the Inspector violated his hiring agreement to stay within channels when he finds wrongdoing. Its not up to the inspector to say ok now I decide to take this public ….
So as in ANY corporate structure, he was let go. I find it hard to believe how he thought it would go any other way ?

Posted by: SEREN | June 13, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Clearly the Inspector violated his hiring agreement to stay within channels when he finds wrongdoing. Its not up to the inspector to say ok now I decide to take this public ….
So as in ANY corporate structure, he was let go. I find it hard to believe how he thought it would go any other way ?
Posted by: SEREN
Perhaps he thought he could use the same “channels” Obama has used to take ownership of Chrysler and GM. If only he had been a Tsar of some kind.

Posted by: flopez | June 13, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

This guys sounds like a jerk. I find it interesting that he ran to the wingnut noise machine as soon as he was fired, it shows that he is not independent, he is a wingnut.

Posted by: Milton | June 13, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Walpin was a wingnut operator who executed a political hit on Johnson. Read the report he sent, unsolicited, to Congress after they decided to refer him to the ethics board for unethical behavior. It’s nuts. A real sleazefest. This guy was not operating as an IG. He was operating as a political hit man. He also broke all of the rules of his job to execute the hit. That makes him incompetent, insubordinate and dangerous.

Posted by: Mary | June 13, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Walpin’s investigation is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Kevin Johnson and his St. Hope operation. Allegations of malfeasance and large pay-offs to make it all go away have accompanied this guy since his days in Phoenix and a 200k+ settlement he reached with a 16 year old girl over alleged sexual misconduct.
Prior to running for mayor, he was featured in a Sac Bee investigation that revealed he was cited 73 times for serious code violations on a large stable properties he acquired through redevelopment funds (most through forgivable loans) …properties that largely sat vacant…all at taxpayer expense.
St. Hope is repaying nearly a million to the local school district for failure to pay rent and other fees for its charter school operations and owes the state nearly a 100k in fines for using uncredentialed teachers.
Recently, the Bee acquired the letter of resignation from St. Hope’s former executive director, a letter which makes serious allegations of obstruction of justice (among other things) while the Walpin investigation was underway: the deliberate deletion of emails from Johnson while under federal subpoena. I would hope US Attorney Brown is a worked up over this allegation as he is over Walpin’s discussions with the press.

Posted by: sac citizen | June 13, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

When can I seek the resignation of this adminstration. I never had confidence in him.

Posted by: Gina | June 13, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Anybody smell am interesting ” read” in the next few months? Should be timed just about right for the bloom coming off the Obama rose.

Posted by: ralph | June 13, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

To sac citizen | Jun 13, 2009 2:01:03 PM
___________________________
Very informative. Thank you. Jake, are you doing any investigative work wrt Johnson and St. HOPE?

Posted by: Ms Trish | June 13, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

it’s “all about politics”???
ya, that’s why both democrats and republicans have said this guy is unhinged.
those bush appointees are really well-known for attacking fellow republicans for the benefit of the democrats.
puhleez. get a grip.

Posted by: jim | June 13, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Are you folks all brain dead? The IG is not an idiot. He clearly and wisely sensed that Professor Moriarty’s administration would do nothing and quash any attempt to discredit, nevermind fine and prosecute, one of his crooked perverted lackeys. The only alternative was to go to the media. I’m just surprised and pleased that the Bee (and Tapper) picked up the Gauntlet. Look for Gibbs to accuse The SacBee of being a British Tabloid at his next press conference,

Posted by: hughglass | June 13, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Funny how the big story is not the misused $400,000 that had to be returned, but how the whistle-blower blew the whistle!
Re-direction anyone?

Posted by: myprivateocean | June 13, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Sounds like they have him cold since they chose to fire him immediately and not pressure him to resign. He is trying to kick up some dust around it to salvage any remaining political viability he may have within the Republican party. It’s telling, though, that members of his own party are actively supportive of his firing.

Posted by: iamwomaninMI | June 13, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

IGs are created by Congress to be independent of Justice Department. By their nature they investigate misuse of the government money. He found misuse and money had to be paid back. Any criticism by political appointees who can be replaced by Obama without cause has to be taken with a grain of salt. The IG criticized the performance of the leaders of Americorp as well as the AG. Obama violated the law by not telling Congress the cause of the removal.

Posted by: PaulV | June 13, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Employees at this level should resign if asked.. they have greatly (and will) benefit from their public sector careers.
Given a soft landing option and the benefit of experience that will no doubt easily translate into a private sector job.. what’s the big deal.. resign, reap your rewards and move on to the next teat….

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | June 13, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Do not drown in unimportant details and decoy nonsense put out by Obama. The man did his job and exposed fraud. The crooks were friends of Obama. Obama fired him in retaliation. THATS the Bottom Line. Anything else is SPIN. I think this is an Impeachable Offense. Chimpeach Him.

Posted by: Dennis | June 13, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Culture of Corruption
Just because Obama doesn’t stretch his face like Pelosi or bore us to death with his speeches like Reid, Obama is just as corrupt as both of them.
How is that Hope and Change working out for you. The only Change is that Obama is far more corrupt than GWBush.
Where is the outrage from Congress? Bush fired USAttorneys, who serve at his pleasure. The IG serves under Congress.
The Media?? We gave up on them doing the right thing. They just bend over for Obama, like Matthews.

Posted by: JoeS | June 13, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Guys, read the whole story, and you’ll find out that:
1) The AG’s investigation determined that much of St. Hope’s funding had been used properly. They did find improprieties at St. Hope, but no clear evidence these improprieties were intentional (as opposed to sloppy).
2) Said improprieties were similar to those of other agencies receiving Americorps funds, but Walpin made no effort to publicly expose or seek charges against those other agencies; and
3) The big brouhaha in the press happened to coincide with Johnson’s mayoral election.
Walpin is about as “independent” as John Bolton. His loyalty was to the Republican Party, not his job. He politicized his office in order to try to skew an election against a democratic candidate. Period.
Like a lot of folks, I first heard about the situation on the Rush Windbag radio program. For well into his first hour Thursday, El Rushbo repeatedly compared Walpin’s firing to the firing of the attorneys general by the Bush administration. The comparison is apt, although not in the way Rush intends. The attorneys general were fired by Bush for NOT politicizing their offices in order to skew elections. Walpin kept his job (under Bush) by following the party’s “politicize everything” strategy, and the hens have come home to roost after his party lost the big one.
And I have to echo the sentiments of others: if this is a party-line, politically-motivated firing, why are Republicans also glad to see this guy go?

Posted by: desimondo | June 13, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

What a surprise, basically same old scams Obama used with his pal Ayers and their education foundation, Rezko and his real estate deals, etc.,etc.

Posted by: buckaroobonsai | June 13, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

It’s odd: earlier, the White House cited Gerald Walpin as a respected legal authority to support one of its judicial nominations.
Now, they depict him as an ultraconservative wingnut.
They can’t have it both ways.

Posted by: Sal | June 13, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Jake I always get the feeling you walk on both sides of an issue.

Posted by: no duh | June 13, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

If Michelle instigated the firing as she runs Americorps, this is only 10,000 worse than Watergate and is impeachable.

Posted by: no duh | June 13, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Michelle obviously has gotten her husband involved in a most illegal affair in the firing of an Inspector General, Mr. Gerald Walpin, who uncovered multi million dollar corruption in the largest hog project in Obama Corp, being run by Obama cronie, Mayor Kevin Johnson.
IG Walpin found that the money was a double dipping scheme in which programs were being paid for twice.
The net findings were that Obama’s b-ball buddy was using your money to have high paid people wash his car among many, many other Johnson royal trappings.
In the final conclusion, Michelle Obama had a law enforcement officer fired just like the Nixon White House did in the massacre which occurred then during impeachment hearings.
This Inspector General who found criminal embezzlement in millions of dollars, is exactly what Barack Obama was doing in small scale in the Chicago projects and in large scale in his 300 million illegal funds dry cleaned into his campaign from the Middle East, and the double dipping by ACORN for vote fraud, this once again from Axelrod Inc. is finding a way to pay millions of dollars to cronies illegally by funding the operations twice.
It has now come to the tone of not what Michelle Obama knew, and when did she know it, but it has come in her manipulations of Barck Obama in the sense of “what did Barack Obama know and when did he know it?”
This is now a criminal cover up in that Michelle has forced by her blundering, Barack Obama to fire an Inspector General, who found massive criminal money fraud in a money operation which was benefiting Obama supporters.
There is absolutely no doubt whose hands were on this, i.e. Michelle’s, as she shook up the White House and volunteer (interesting volunteers who earn 6 figures directing slaves working for peanuts.) corp, by having people “replaced and aloha and behold, by the next week Barack Obama is then firing the one person in government actually enforcing the law in showing the massive money fraud of Axelrod Inc.
This affair demands Congressional hearings as Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton combined came nowhere near what Muchelle Obama has done, what David Axelrod has been up to and what Barack Obama was forced into doing in firing a law enforcement officer of the federal government.
This is but a long list of growing criminality of Barack Obama. This time though the Obama supporters have the wife, Michelle Obama, to thank for bringing this down on her husband’s head in placing this in the impeachment category.
There can be denial in the double dipping of funds in graft by Barack Obama, but there can be no denial in Michelle Obama removing people, installing people, moving people, scaring people, into Obama corp in only one week, and the next week the chief law enforcement officer who discovers fraud is then publicly ruined by Barack Obama and fired by him.
Michelle Obama is running this and has just run Barack Obama into impeachment hearings.
There is no doubt about any of this as it is all on record in the press. Michelle Obama is behind this and Barack Obama covered this up at the direction of his wife.

Posted by: no duh | June 13, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Jake Tapper is the new Woodward and Bernstein. He is a pitbull. This is what journalism is supposed to be.

Posted by: Kara | June 13, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

It is amazing what you can see when the light is turned on. If this article is any indication as to how and why things take so long to get done in Washington, we have a long way to go. As wonderful as this article was, you could have reduced it to at least 1/2 the time and accomplished more. What part of ‘your fired’ does Walpin having difficulty understanding? Unless he wanted to extend this so that more light could be shed on this subject. As the world turns. And we wonder why the world laughs at us.

Posted by: John Merritt | June 13, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

J. Merritt:
According to the Inspector General Reform Act of 2008, co-sponsored by Obama, inspectors general do not serve at the president’s pleasure and therefore cannot be fired without 30 days notice and written cause for the decision sent to Congress.
Funny, Obama also cosponsored S.R. 511 defining a NBC, but ignores that too.

Posted by: no duh | June 13, 2009, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

This is just the tip of the iceberg, and it will go precisely nowhere. Meanwhile, Karl Rove will testify about the perfectly legal firing of 8 US Attorneys.

Posted by: mike | June 13, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Obama is corrupt.

Posted by: Mainer1776 | June 13, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Do you smell something? It smells like the “culture of corruption” to me.

Posted by: jjsmith | June 13, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

It’s the Chicago playbook.

Posted by: Peter Williams | June 13, 2009, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

When Obama admin. officials were notified via a complaint immediately filed by Sen. Grassley, that 30 days notice and a letter to Congress is required to terminate an IG, they instead put Mr. Walpin on 30 days leave. After Walpin had filed his two reports about millions in double-dipping embezzlement, they wanted him O-U-T and pronto.

Posted by: no duh | June 13, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Both Stuart G. Axenfeld and Stuart G. Axenfeld signed the spectal report to Congress. I wonder if anyone has ask them what they think. Hint Hint Jake.
By the way have any of you read the report? Its on th IG page. Along with the letters. I think the USAG is not telling the whole truth

Posted by: Mike in Houston | June 13, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Thanks for the news Jake. To all the naysayers who claim you are controlled by Obama, I guess this proves different. And yes, Obama should be investigated for this (in my dreams).

Posted by: KLarry | June 13, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Kind of sounds like he was fired for doing his job too well.

Posted by: sexygop | June 14, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am

The illegal and criminal firing and crucifying of a United States Inspector General by Barack and Michelle Obama (violating Obama’s own law he cosponsored) is really a story about how US Attorney’s Office prosecutors under Obama cherry pick what they will prosecute…and they don’t like that being exposed.
The synopsis is Obama crony, Kevin Johnson of the NBA was head of St. Hope Academy, a sort of quasi charity getting federal funds. Johnson in 2008 was running to be mayor of Sacrament, California, at which time Mr. Walpin was doing an exhaustive investigation of Johnson in uncovering Johnson had employees costing taxpayers hundreds of thousand of dollar running errands for him like washing his car.
Mr. Walpin was zealous in this investigation and turned it over to the US Attorneys who declined to prosecute Kevin Johnson. So Mr. Walpin went public stating the $400,000 dollar “payback” by Johnson could be refunded to him so it was a SHAM in protecting the taxpayer–it was double dipping embezzlement. It is a major felony when involving almost a half a million dollars. Martha Stewart went to prison on zealous prosecution for that kind of money and not being allowed to pay it back. But, Obama’s people like Acorn get busted regularly and just get to pay back or say oops and all is well (like Tom Daschle, Tim Geithner, Kevin Johnson, etc.)
This is what really got Mr. Walpin into “trouble” as then acting US Attorney Lawrence Brown who is a Kevin Johnson supporter decided that that Mr. Walpin talking to the press in California before the mayor race was “misconduct”.
Walpin started talking to the press exposing that the entire US Attorney’s office was not prosecuting Kevin Johnson……..and the complaint to the FBI was Lawrence Brown covering career prosecutors for not doing their job.
Talking to the press about prosecutors not enforcing the law is what appears to be Mr. Walpin’s crime.
This is a growing trend among US Attorneys in key positions like Patrick Fitzgerald who only prosecute who they want like Scooter Libby, Lawrence Sinclair or Rod Blagojevich while people like Kevin Johnson, Rahm Emanuel and Barack Obama get a pass.
At this point, the Obamas apparently panicked which is really bizarre since Barack Obama himself cosponsored a law which protected Inspector Generals from exactly what Obama did. By law, Congress must be notified of any firing of Inspector Generals, the express exact reasons for that firing and it must be 30 days BEFORE THE INSPECTOR IS FIRED.
Obama’s White House Counsel, Norman L. Eisen, ignorant of Barack Obama’s own bill to prevent such a thing, fired off a stunning email to Mr. Walpin, ordering him to resign within one hour or he would be fired.
Inspector General Walpin was stunned by this illegal act and promptly informed the White House that if he did such a thing, it would cast a doubt on his integrity, so he declined. The White House response was to illegally fire Mr. Walpin immeditately.
Obama then sent a letter to Congress, stating the shadowy Brown FBI investigation as “the reason” Mr. Walpin was fired. Remember, this is a turf complaint of a US Attorney protecting his group’s inaction, and, Mr. Walpin is INNOCENT of everything. He has done nothing wrong, but spoken to the press and disagreed with the US Attorney’s office about letting an embezzlement case go unprosecuted.
Republican Senator, Charles Grassley who cosponsored the protection act immediately protested Obama’s illegal actions and reminded Obama he sponsored the same bill.
The White House lead counsel, Gregory Craig, then responded with putting Mr. Walpin but on 30 day suspension UNTIL he was fired (for enforcing the law), despite the fact that the Brown complaint, the basis of the firing, had not even come to a hearing.
Greg Craig is the guy who got assassin John Hinkley Jr. off on insanity charges for trying to murder President Reagan.
Greg Craig is the guy who represented Teddy Kennedy in the William Kennedy Smith rape case which twice raped that poor girl who received no justice.
Greg Craig is the guy who represented Cuban communists in ripping Elian Gonzalez out of American freedom and returning him to being brainwashed to Castro’s Cuba all at the point of full auto weapons.
Greg Craig is the guy who represented crook UN Sec. Kofi Annan in the Saddam Hussein bribery money dump that eventually bought Obama his senate seat and bought Obama his mansion.
Greg Craig is the guy who represented two Bolivian thugs who were granted asylum in the United States while being charged for mass murder in their own nation.
Gregory Craig has been involved with everything illegal in this world except O J Simpson and Vladamir Putin murdering someone with Polonium 210 and this is the guy Barack Obama has heading the White House counsels office giving him legal advice.
Craig and Eisen BOTH broke federal law, which includes their spokesman, Barack Obama, who went public in not only firing Inspector General Walpin, but smeared his reputation.
This is huge criminal violation of subverting the independence of the Inspector General’s office. It sends a chilling message to every Inspector General in they either allow cronies to embezzle money or they will be fired and ruined by the person sitting in the White House.
Dan Rather made a huge splash with oft repeating the “high crimes and misdemeanors” leveled against Richard Nixon. The fact in this is Barack Obama and these two White House lawyers and the petty charges by a US Attorney in trying to silence a United States Inspector General is not misdemeanors, but high crimes and felonies.
Barack Obama not only broke his own law knowingly, but he shattered the United States Constitution, he twice took an oath to uphold.
This is real impeachment criminality. Mr. Walpin was just doing his job and was sabotaged and destroyed by Barack and Michelle Obama, with their legal teams, to cover up incompetence, cronism and crimes.

Posted by: no duh | June 14, 2009, 1:40 am 1:40 am

Bill Hawks wrote: “Why are the perps still paying back $423,836.50 if this is no big deal?”
Excellent remark. And why is paying back tax evasion amounts like Geithner and Daschle and Sebelius, and embezzlement by Johnson, all Obama associates, always some remedy from the crime committed? When shop lifters are caught they can put back the merchandise but they still do the time.

Posted by: no duh | June 14, 2009, 3:33 am 3:33 am

And what about the May 28, 2009, resignation of acting United States Attorney for the District of Colombia?
Did United States Attorney Jeffery Taylor also do his job too well?

Posted by: Bill Hawks | June 14, 2009, 3:33 am 3:33 am

and Mr. Walpin had exposed that the $400K “payback” was a sham in that Mr. Johnson could be refunded to him = double dipping embezzlement. The US Attorney would not prosecute (as they cherry pick), Walpin exposed that, and that along with the cronyism is why he’s being persecuted for doing his job “too” well.

Posted by: no duh | June 14, 2009, 3:56 am 3:56 am

no duh, I agree with your points but Congress won’t investigate this, or impeach Obama. Democrats will circle their wagons and protect him, along with most of the media. This story is just a blip on the Obama corruption radar screen.

Posted by: Texas Libertarian | June 14, 2009, 6:36 am 6:36 am

As I understand this story, American taxpayer money was misused. An American citizen appointed to make sure American taxpayer money is not misused found the misuse and made that misuse known. As a result of the findings of the person protecting the taxpayers’ interest, there was an order for the misuser to repay a large amount of money.
As a result of his efforts to protect the American taxpayer, the person appointed to make sure the taxpayers are not being ripped off is fired.
This is insanity. How can any American defend the firing?

Posted by: pagar | June 14, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am

CNCS/Americorps sounds like a big old slush fund for Obama supporters.

Posted by: mbs | June 14, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am

He must have been a real good American for Obama to fire him. Obama does not want loyal Americans to hold positions. He wants people that will destroy our country if they get a chance We messed up allowing this fruitcake to get elected to the Presidency.

Posted by: barefootboy | June 14, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

No no duh, this is called in the media world, “walking it back”. When you can’t get anything on the president’s impending firing, you make it look like or you interpret the scraps you have left as the president not giving congress their purview. Jake knows you obama haters need red meat…because basically who else would want to read his poor man’s chip reid reports.
“under no circumstance was he to communicate with the media about a matter under investigation and that his acts “were hindering our investigation and handling of this matter.”"
how hard is this for you folks to understand. why would obama stand behind a sloppy attention whoring IG when he is clearly hurting his AG’s case?

Posted by: Manamongst Hussein | June 14, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am

and yes I do enjoy the sarcasm…I only wish that I could picture Kara as someone other than a deranged cat lady.
Ten bucks it’s Darragh Murphy or Harriet Christian…lol
“There is no doubt about any of this as it is all on record in the press. Michelle Obama is behind this and Barack Obama covered this up at the direction of his wife.”
You care to co-sign this illustrious theory?
Obama haters these are the people that agree with you…
LOL

Posted by: Manamongst Hussein | June 14, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am

WH Counsel Greg Craig’s claim that the Acting U.S. Attorney is a Republican appointee is false. Acting USA’s hold their positions by operation of the Vacancies Reform Act, not through any kind of appointment, political or otherwise. Brown is the First Assistant U.S. Attorney in the office; it’s a case of the career deputy automatically becoming the Acting when the appointed U.S. Attorney leaves.
So. No political cover there.

Posted by: Antonio | June 14, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am

As I understand this story, American taxpayer money was misused. An American citizen appointed to make sure American taxpayer money is not misused found the misuse and made that misuse known. As a result of the findings of the person protecting the taxpayers’ interest, there was an order for the misuser to repay a large amount of money.
As a result of his efforts to protect the American taxpayer, the person appointed to make sure the taxpayers are not being ripped off is fired.
This is insanity. How can any American defend the firing?

Posted by: pagar | June 14, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Mr Walpin you dared to criticize our Dear Leader and you were fired. Change we can believe in EH ?? Didnt you know that Oprah proclaimed Obama as “THE ONE” – translation- he is above the law, he is divine and must be worshipped. Too bad for him but we have only one GOD to worship and it certainly isnt Barack Hussein Mohammed Obama !!!

Posted by: jimbo | June 14, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am

You are all forgetting something…these charges against Mr. Wolpin were brougt up by a republican
and is supported by the chairman and vice chairman, a democrat and a republican. I am sure if this were not a genuine misstep by wolpin….the republicans would love a chance to jump on it. He also did not present all the facts to the committee holding back what he decided to keep from others. I think a full investigation is necessary and we will see where the facts fall.

Posted by: talmag | June 14, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am

All of you are a little too partisan to read news properly. Read all of the above and stop complaining about non-issues please.

Posted by: David | June 14, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am

I am glad to see President Obama is cleaning house of the partisan Republican appointed so-called public servants to replace them with true public servants.

Posted by: karen | June 14, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

Bush was investigated for firing US Attorneys who refused to investigate voter fraud. Will Obama be investigated for firing of an Inspector General who recovered over $400,000 in wasted or misspent Federal grant money from Obama’s friend?

Posted by: Road Warrior | June 14, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

How many of you dumbos supporting Obama read this statement?
“In April of this year, St. HOPE Academy agreed to pay a $423,836.50 settlement — $72,836.50 of which would be paid personally by Mayor Johnson.”
The bottomline is, St.HOPE is stealing tax payers money and Walpin caught them. But Kevin Johnson is an Obama supporter, so Walpin is getting the boot.

Posted by: Zhaoyang | June 14, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

A quick Web search reveals, from the DoJ itself, that Lawrence G. Brown was appointed Acting U.S. Attorney in 2008, after the U.S. Attorney for the district, McGregor Scott, resigned. He would remain in that post until August, 2009, unless a presidentially appointed was installed before then. If someone else were so installed, he would revert to his post as First Assistant in the office.
So technically, he was appointed to his present post during the Bush Administration. I’m not aware that First Assistants are political appointees, however. So the Bush link appears too weak to lean on. This former newspaper reporter also wonders whether the August 2009 date has any relevance to what Mr. Brown has determined. Perhaps zero connection. Perhaps somewhat more than zero.
[The DoJ release noted that Mr. Brown's law school honored him as "the Distinguished Alumni of the Year." It's one alumnus and one alumna and two or more alumni and two or more alumnae.]

Posted by: Alfred J. Lemire | June 14, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Mr. Walpin went public stating the $400K+ dollar “payback” by Johnson could be refunded to him so it was a SHAM in protecting the taxpayer–it was double dipping embezzlement. It is a major felony when involving almost a half a million dollars.

Posted by: no duh | June 14, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Well struck, no duh.
Pretty simple. Good guy uncovers corruption, attorney knows bad guy is connected and tries to bury it, good guy says screw it and tells the press. Power hungry mouthpiece over steps his bounds and cans him. Kinda like a GM CEO I know.
Well done, Messiah. Is this the CHANGE you spoke of?…lmao…

Posted by: Idaho Libertarian | June 14, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Idaho:
Good post but you forgot to mention that wife of stated mouthpiece was all up in his grill about canning good guy because he was blabbing about her involvement in the corruption. That just about sums it up. HopeyChangey09

Posted by: mary | June 14, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

The purpose of having an Inspector General is to be independent of political influences. Whether the U.S.Attorney was a Republican appointee, or anyone else involved is a Republican or Democrat is totally irrelevant.
The U.S.Attorney’s office concluded “a significant protion” of the funds were appropriately spent. That’s nice – a portion was misspent. Who made the determination as to what was “significant.” I use to think ALL of these types of funds must be appropriately spent, or is that too much to hope for today.
It is quite apparent the IG did do his job – the settlement proves it. The agreement is to repay $423,836.50. That doesn’t seem very insignificant to me.
Left out of the story are the terms of repayment of the $350,000. I think I heard it was over 7 years and was being repaid without interest. That hardly makes the value of the money being repaid equal to $350,000. I wonder what the “present value” of that might be?
Sure glad President Bush didn’t fire someone under those circumstances. I wonder what the press would have said. No I don’t.

Posted by: Concerned Oner | June 14, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Johnson is an “Obama Wanna-be.” He’s part of the “hood” protected, corrupt. How is it that Americans have become so mentally lethargic to have elected someone like Obama. Regardless, Walpin your integrity is appreciated.

Posted by: Ed | June 15, 2009, 3:46 am 3:46 am

Can a man who, at the age of 29, “fondled” a 16-y.o. girl be trusted? That person is Mayor Johnson. He paid off the family $230,000.

Posted by: Independent | June 15, 2009, 4:08 am 4:08 am

Good riddance to another corrupt “crusader” whose grandiose posturing (“I answer only to Congress” -what a load of crap) and failure to perform (he did not conduct an audit before ####### his “case” in the press) is typical of the kind of appointees of the failed Bush administration.
Desperate to find something on Americorps, he deletes evidence that partially exculpates the subject of the investigation.
That is exactly what corrupt prosecutors do – not independent investigators.
The whining liar should be fired.

Posted by: Peter Wimsey | June 15, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Whatever happened to “truth seeking” whether it be liberal or conservative infractions? The liberal “good” and “conservative” bad emotional arguments are so very tired. “Where is Obama’s birth certificate?” “Bush, Cheney, Carlyle Group” The idea that every appointee is a partisan or idealogue is absurd, but it sure makes it easy to attack someone..these ad hominems are easy to toss out and don’t require any critical thinking. Perhaps there were improprieties and his request for removal is political…I just wish that news and media would get back to real investigative reporting rather the 20 second soundbites and articles that lean left or right as found on Fox and MSNBC. Whether it is the Bush Administration or the Obama Administration, Jake seems to be one of the few willing to ask the questions that should be asked. I guess asking the public to use the same reasoning and critical thinking is too much.

Posted by: Steff McKee | June 15, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Tobarefootboy: put on some shoes and get into the real world. Come in from the country and realize that while Obama is not perfect he is better than what we had and has achieved more in a short time than any other president. Remember he did not give out the first tarp…it was President Bush who swore we needed this a all got on board to save America. What he is spending needs to be spent and yes, he will have to put a stop to it soon. As for the automakers mess…he is trying to save thousands of jobs and small companies who rely on these companies for business. How can you say he is unamerican? And to those who criticized him taking a trip to New York…you don’t ever mention the fact that he has not taken the allowance to all presidents to fix up the private quarters by saying they will spend their own money and possible keep much of the things that are there. They also refused the money for the white house dishes so let’s get real here, folks.

Posted by: talmag | June 15, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

I bet that Obama did not discharge the IG. Some bureaucrat fired him. I did not vote for Obama but i do not think he is that dumb.
Cmadams

Posted by: charles Adams | June 15, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

In 2008, Senator Obama endorsed and signed a bill which stated that Inspector Generals would be given 30 days notice, if they were being terminated. I certainly don’t possess Obama or his administration’s math skills, as witnessed by their accounting for the budget, however 1 hour’s notice of termination certainly doesn’t equal a 30 day notice.
This is all about the misuse of “AmeriCorp” funds. Inspector General Walpin got the goods on Obama’s basketball playing buddy, Mayor Johnson, for which he was quickly punished by his firing. Add this incident to the many lies Americans are being told about transparency in this administration.
Stop drinking the kool-aid and wake up America! Witness the actions, NOT the rhetoric!!

Posted by: thinkin'thing | June 15, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

“I did not vote for Obama but i do not think he is that dumb.”
Think again! Looks more and more like Obama broke the law. Not that anyone will hold him accountable. Fascism rocks!

Posted by: Stacey | June 15, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

President said today to find a billion dollars in waste and fraud in the medicare and medicaid programs that would be used to pay for health care. If this is how he intends to find waste and fraud, we are in trouble. Politics are politics and the rule of “you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours.” Some things never change regardless of party. I have worked under the Inspector General system in DoD and DoJ and they are in fact independent, or suppose to be. If his facts were faulty, that is what courts are for.

Posted by: Bob HH | June 15, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Obama makes Bush look good.

Posted by: roger | June 16, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Wow, is ABC in the tank for Obama or what? Kevin Johnson is a good friend of Obama. Mr Wolpin was doing what Inspector Generals are SUPPOSED to do; protect taxpayers interests. Mr Johnson misused funds, and Obama is using his politic power to squash someone who didn’t do what he was told.
No Inspector General has ever been fired for no reason. This is abuse of power. Wolpin has prosecuted Republicans. He is not partisan because he goes after criminals who happen to be Democrats.

Posted by: David | June 16, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Talk about a hack job. Wolpin was fired because he was going to suspend Obama’s buddy Kevin Johnson from receiving funds because he’s a crook. Obama protecting he crooked friends, big surprise.

Posted by: Bob | June 16, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Apparently Karen only sees what she wants to see. This story is a fantasy. Mr Wolpin is one of the best IGs we have. He went after Obama’s buddy, Kevin Johnson.

Posted by: Lewis | June 16, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Uh… The reason why Kevin Johnson paid that $450k was because Walpin used bureaucratic means to prevent the city of Sacramento from receiving stimulus money. There was no admission of guilt, and if you had read Tapper’s story you would she that it was an arbitrary amount because there was no audit done to determine how much money was lost; Walpin essentially extorted the city.

Posted by: ES Blofeld | June 16, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Chicago’s rules have taken over and have replaced honesty, ethics and fair treatment of all concerned parties. What’s next Mr. President? Cement and a five gallon bucket to eliminate your enemies. You, your administration and party are a disgrace to democracies.
God save our country from the worst of the worst.

Posted by: Albert Bulklock | June 16, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

I read these comments and I wonder how stupid can people be? Yes, he blocked kevin johnson from getting funds. Because Kevin Johnson was found to be a criminal. He was doing his job.
Americore and the entire chain of command was replaced with progressives loons and they just want to ignore the fact that Kevin Johnson misappropriated 800K of taxpayer dollars.
I find it odd that democraps will chide a “greedy CED” for having a party, but if Kevin Johnson used taxepayer money for illegal campaign contributions it must be the big bad republicans being mean. What a bunch of fools.

Posted by: carl | June 16, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

re: the pitbull — I hope you are right; America needs this kind of fearless devotion to the truth in journalism.
It might be amusing to see what would happen if all reliable, honest journalists quit their posts and took up residence in the blogosphere. Re-establishing the old BBS networks would effectively bypass the internet kill switch, and using other means of transmitting data could make this truly grassroots.

Posted by: Buzzkill | September 6, 2010, 8:26 am 8:26 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.