Obama Identifies $313 Billion for Health Care Through Medicaid and Medicare Savings
From Sunlen Miller and Sarah Tobianski:
Calling Medicare and Medicaid “one of the greatest threats to our federal deficit,” President Obama used his weekly address to announce savings in Medicare and Medicaid that the administration said will generate more than $313 billion over 10 years for funding health care reform.
The savings, coupled with a $635 billion “down payment” already outlined in the fiscal year 2010 budget would add up to roughly $950 billion toward paying for health care reform.
“I know some question whether we can afford to act this year,” President Obama said in the address, “But the unmistakable truth is that it would be irresponsible to not act. We can’t keep shifting a growing burden to future generations. With each passing year, health care costs consume a larger share of our nation’s spending and contribute to yawning deficits that we cannot control. So let me be clear: Health care reform is not part of the problem when it comes to our fiscal future, it is a fundamental part of the solution.”
The $313 billion savings is in large part made up of savings from three big areas: $110 billion from incorporating productivity adjustments and Medicare payments, $106 billion from reducing disproportionate hospital payments and $75 billion from better pricing of Medicare drugs.
“These savings will come from common sense changes,” Obama said in the address, “For example, if more Americans are insured, we can cut payments that help hospitals treat patients without health insurance. If the drug makers pay their fair share, we can cut government spending on prescription drugs. And if doctors have incentives to provide the best care instead of more care, we can help Americans avoid the unnecessary hospital stays, treatments and tests that drive up costs.”
As Congress gears up next week to write legislation, Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag told reporters on a conference call Friday night that the $950 billion price tag is “in the ballpark” of many of the proposals floating around Capitol Hill.
“[$950 billion] is roughly in the range of many of the proposals being discussed, so that we are making good on this promise to fully finance health care reform over the next decade,” Orszag said.
But he didn’t rule out that some additional costs might be necessary in the future.
“There may very well be some additional resources that are necessary, and we would work with the Congress to come up with them if they are, but we haven’t seen [them]. The committees are still writing the legislation. And the precise cost involved has yet to be determined. What we wanted to do was put enough specificity on the table to get in the range.”
The president, in his address, says that the identified savings underscores that securing quality, affordable health care for Americans is tied to fiscal responsibility.
“The savings are rooted in the same principle that must guide our broader approach to reform: We will fix what’s broken, while building upon what works,” he said.
– Sunlen Miller and Sarah Tobianski
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
The “savings” that the admin has identified all seem to do with forcing doctors to see more patients and get paid less per patient, paying hospitals the same without considering the differences in outcomes, and forcing drug companies to accept less money for drugs, which will lower their cash flow and reduce money available for R&D. The end result of all these “savings” will be a markedly reduced quality of care and will chase doctors and researchers away from the U.S. This is all being done in order to pay for the government health insurance option which will inevitably have not only lower quality, but rationed health care as well. Why do we think that after mis-managing Medicaid and Medicare all these years that suddenly the bureaucrats in Washington got smart and have learned how to save money while maintaining our level of care? Does the president or anyone on his team have a background of successfully managing a hospital or drug company? I am guessing not, from the policies that they want to implement.
Posted by: Jason | June 13, 2009, 7:31 am 7:31 am
Do you actually expect the intelligent citizens of this country to “believe” Obama when he has already spent unGodly amounts of our money already? Very good creative PR spin.
Posted by: Arlene | June 13, 2009, 7:41 am 7:41 am
This is a huge and substantial savings. Republicans need to stop with the petty bipartisanship and admit that fact.
Posted by: matt | June 13, 2009, 7:55 am 7:55 am
“This is a huge and substantial savings.”….I’m sorry but please explain how a plan to spend an additional $1 trillion is a “substantial savings”. 2+2=5. Stop spouting newspeak.
Posted by: Steve | June 13, 2009, 8:09 am 8:09 am
Chris Dodd’s wife is one of the persons working on this bill. She was also worked
for an AIG controlled company.
Posted by: CW | June 13, 2009, 8:13 am 8:13 am
According to the AP……”wife of Sen. Chris Dodd, serves on the boards of Javelin Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cardiome Pharma Corp., Brookdale Senior Living, and Pear Tree Pharmaceuticals, a financial disclosure report the senator released Friday shows.”……
Posted by: CW | June 13, 2009, 8:18 am 8:18 am
Obama is going to spend another trillion dollars by cutting the healthcare of the poor and seniors. This the change we can believe in? Outrageous.!!
Posted by: CW | June 13, 2009, 8:20 am 8:20 am
Obama said during the campaign that all Americans deserved the same healthcare insurance that politicians have in DC. Now he is telling us he is CUTTING benefits to the elderly and the poor. This is more BS.
Posted by: CW | June 13, 2009, 8:27 am 8:27 am
Another BO BS sales pitch…. 10 YEARS – - yeah right… 10 years.. long after he is out of office….. so far everything he has done hasnt done a darn thing…. so we are to belive that BO can predict 10 years out…..
Posted by: Vet1973 | June 13, 2009, 8:31 am 8:31 am
“…and forcing drug companies to accept less money for drugs…”
Aww, they haven’t been making enough megabucks already.
“…and will chase doctors and researchers away from the U.S.”
To where? -all those countries with already failed socialized healthcare?
“…have not only lower quality, but rationed health care as well.”
If it’s even true, it doesn’t seem to have dawned on some folks that rationed health care looks appealing compared to no healthcare.
I hope Obama fights hard to end this awful illness-for-profit system we have now.
Posted by: Skip | June 13, 2009, 8:38 am 8:38 am
All I have to say to many of you people is; you voted for him! Now you get to reap what you sew. You were so wrapped up with change because you didn’t like the way things were going a year ago that you threw everything to the wind and voted for him, even though everyone was demonstrating inadequacies with this man and his politics. Are you enjoying all your “Hope and Change”??
Posted by: J Kline | June 13, 2009, 8:39 am 8:39 am
Our doctor told me about this “trial system” he’d been part of in the 90′s. It allowed him to see patients for an amount of time that had been determined by the government as “appropriate” for the ailment. It didn’t take off as the experiment was so abysmal. Charges were much like a mechanic’s billing–oil change: $30, flu treatment: $20. What national program has the government touched that is a glowing,fiscally sound example to follow?
Posted by: EGBOK321 | June 13, 2009, 8:39 am 8:39 am
Show me the money first.
Posted by: JBG | June 13, 2009, 8:42 am 8:42 am
Just quit apologizing. It’s getting old now.
Posted by: LongT | June 13, 2009, 8:47 am 8:47 am
“All I have to say to many of you people is; you voted for him! “….Some of us were just smarter than the rest of you.
Posted by: Veteran38 | June 13, 2009, 8:50 am 8:50 am
So he going to TAKE away $200 billion in expected reimbursements to hospitals over the next decade… so how are the hospitals going to pay for utilities, fix/maintain/buy equipment… keep employess…. what actully happens.. hospital cuts services and lays off personnel…. it’s happening in our town right now… this is all smoke and mirros…. take funding from one pot and put in in another and pretend all is well…… BO is an idiot… bottom line… the more the government give aways there are the lazier people become…. its called the “FREE-LOADER Factor” the government likes to ignore…
Posted by: Vet1973 | June 13, 2009, 8:55 am 8:55 am
Stand up and be counted congress before this fool destroys us all. This country is spiraling down the sewer at warp speed.
Posted by: rplat | June 13, 2009, 8:56 am 8:56 am
I’ll believe it when I see it.
Posted by: LongT | June 13, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am
There will be no “choice”. The plan is to slowly move to a one payer, government controlled system with no private insurance. Those that are in doubt, only need to search the Internet for video where democratic leaders had stated such.
Posted by: Michelle | June 13, 2009, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Sorry, I just can’t stop laughing! Somehow King Barry has found all this extra money just laying around in the Medicare/Medicaid fund. No one else ever saw this before! Wow, what a mighty messiah we serve. He is truly all knowing!
Posted by: sexygop | June 13, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am
I work in the healthcare industry now and the cuts that we have seen already in Medicare reimbursements will put 2 of the 4 large companies in our part of the business in bankruptcy with in 12 months.. We are in home care and part of the solution of reducing costs by keeping patients out of the ER and hospitals and improving their quality of life at home. But they continue to reduce reimbursement to the point where we can no longer offer these patients the service they need and be profitable. Anyone that thinks this is about the patients is smoking crack… It’s all about politics and the dollars period. It will take companies folding and no one to provided the needed services thus increasing Part A Medicare costs for these morons to see that they have went to far. Then it will take years to fix it… I have been in this business for over 20 years and have yet to see one policy or law come from CMS (Center for Medicare Services) or Congress that promoted better care for the people needing it. They simply don’t care about the patients period… I have seen it over and over. It’s not just the Dem’s the Rep’s have done the same thing in their administrations also. It’s all about who has the best lobbiest’s in Washington and contributes the most dollars to the parties. If you don’t believe that your blind…
It’s politics as usual in this country and Obama’s promise to change that is as empty as most of his promises will be. Just look how the votes have gone in congress since he is in office? Along party lines… Business as usual… How can you try to promote change and pick a VP that is part of the partisan problem for many many years… Politics will never change here unless their is another party of the people to wake up both Rep’s and Dem’s… But there is no chance for that to happen with the money wrapped up by the existing two parties..
So dig in, hide our wallets, hide your earnings, and hide anything you can, we are about to be taxed in so many hidden ways that most gullible Americans will not even know they are being screwed… That’s what the administration is counting on… Just keep printing money… See what out dollar will be worth down the road…
Posted by: Gary | June 13, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am
…”FREE-LOADER Factor” the government likes to ignore…”
Yes but you’re ignoring the ‘greedy swine’ factor where huge corporations exploit people for huge profits. Unfortunately not everyone can stay healthy and when they’re really sick they can be really desperate, so there is a big potential to make money.
Posted by: Skip | June 13, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am
How much money has he spent now?
Posted by: Irishrose | June 13, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Michelle wrote:”There will be no “choice”. The plan is to slowly move to a one payer, government controlled system with no private insurance. Those that are in doubt, only need to search the Internet for video where democratic leaders had stated such.”
==================================
If you like the confusion and spending 25% of your money on paperwork for thousands of individual networks, most of which become out-of-network if you cross a state line, go on opposing single-payer health insurance.
I sure hope single-payer happens – it will reduce the % of our healthcare money we throw away on paperwork and profits by about 30%, based on the experience in EVERY other high income company.
But I don’t think it’s so clear. You claim “democratic leaders had stated such”, but that’s a gross exaggeration. Kucinich said it. Edwards caved when pressure was put on him and he backed away from it. The rest, just like the Republicans, are bought and paid for by the millions of campaign contributions from the health industry and big pharma- money that comes from charging patients extra to cover it. Even the head of Johns Hopkins Hospital, America’s #1 hospital, said Congress, bot parties, was controlled by the health industry in a recent PBS roundtable discussion.
Note that “private” insurance used to be almost exclusively non-profit until the for-profits, with their leverage from life, property, etc. insurance, drove the non-profits out of business then jacked up their premiums.
Finally, note that I have retirement insurance for life that will be jeopardized if we go to “single-payer”. But it will be so much better for America and for the competitiveness of American companies that I’ll willingly take the hit.
Posted by: The_Mick | June 13, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am
I wish he would have just targeted the stimulus money, made it substantially smaller, and left some room for trying to implement changes now without adding to the budget.
I know I’ve said it a million times, but let’s look at California. The MediCal patients are the people most over using hospital emergency rooms. MediCal (the Medicaid system) doesn’t reimburse doctors enough, so not enough doctors participate. Therefore, people go to the emergency room because they are right in the neighborhood and everything can be done under one roof.
The emergency rooms get over burdened, and when real emergencies come in, they have to treat them. Again, the MediCal system does not pay the emergency rooms enough to cover the cost of actual treatment. So emergency rooms- especially in poorer urban areas- are closing.
Simply squeezing doctors and hospitals has not been the answer in California. It’s added to the problem.
Posted by: MayBee | June 13, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am
The greatest threat to our national deficit is this administration.
Posted by: dragoon70056 | June 13, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am
This will be the shortest and most painful presidency since Jimmy Carter. It will take quite a while to undo the damage.
Posted by: pauldia | June 13, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Since we are turning into a socialist country… What they need to do is make it a LAW that everybody HAS to purchase health insurance… just like you HAVE to purchase car insurance….. and make it mandatory that EVERBODY gets a physical once a year…. they CAN base what you pay on your income so everybody can afford it… I could care less about people who CHOOSE to live a un-healthy life style… smoke-drink-do drugs etc, and those who choose not to purchase health insurance – I HAVE LEACHES in my family… everytime a new taxypayer funded government benifit comes out…. they are filling out the paper work to collect on it…..
Posted by: Vet1973 | June 13, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am
So by cutting medicare and medicaid, is that going to help anybody at all? It will force the elderly, who are ,mostly on fixed incomes, to shell out even more money that they don’t have on medications that they need. Obama needs to go out and see what real Americans go through on a daily basis instead of his “spoon fed” American supporters for the democratic spin on things.
Posted by: Scott | June 13, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
The American healthcare system is a crime against humanity. Every year thousands of Americans WITH INSURANCE go bankrupt or die because of delayed treatment or denied payment. Every year 60% of all bankruptcies in America are due to healthcare debts. Most of these people HAVE INSURANCE!
Do you get it or no? Having insurance solves nothing!
The ONLY solution is universal coverage. If you start screaming “socialism” please read again my first 3 sentences until you wake up. Do you ever hear of anyone in Canada or Europe complaining that they need a system just like America? You want a choice? Fine, go out and buy your insurance on top of the universal coverage. I’m sure any insurance company will be happy to take your money. Just don’t expect them to pay.
We already have the best hospitals and doctors. The government isn’t going to take over the hospitals and doctors or eliminate any choice. With universal coverage you will see any doctor or go to any hospital. The only difference will be the bill is already paid from your tax dollars. How big a tax bill? First, remove the insurance company’s obscene profits, then reduce it again when more jobs are created because employers don’t have to pay for healthcare. General Motors alone pays $10 billion yearly to retired employees for healthcare. Regardless, this is the price you pay to live in a civilized world. You don’t pay the police a copay when you call 911. The fireman doesn’t ask what insurance you have.
Universal coverage is the only solution.
Posted by: Tikbalang | June 13, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Nice of ABC to help thier boss BO by making a major headline for every BO Saturday radio address…. funny I dont remember ABC or the other major outlets doing this to help out any other President push thier agenda on the American public….. nothing like free advertisment…. hey BO when are you going to raine in the salaries of these media executives…. oh yeah… dumb question… they work for you ow..
Posted by: Vet1973 | June 13, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Tikbalang:then reduce it again when more jobs are created because employers don’t have to pay for healthcare. General Motors alone pays $10 billion yearly to retired employees for healthcare. Regardless, this is the price you pay to live in a civilized world. You don’t pay the police a copay when you call 911. The fireman doesn’t ask what insurance you have.
=========================
The point about insurance company profit is a valid one. Japan, for example, has non-profit insurance companies.
However, employers will still have to pay for employee healthcare, it will just be through taxes. So they won’t be off the hook.
GM is a bad example. They are paying for retiree health benefits because their employees reject the available government health care, Medicare. They wanted something more generous, so GM has to pay for it.
Also, their employees often retire with medical benefits well before the rest of us are eligible for retirement benefits from the government.
GM is more of cautionary tale for our government (if we over promise & have a shrinking tax base) than an example of the need for universal coverage.
Posted by: MayBee | June 13, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Savings??? Translation??? Cuts.
Posted by: Parallax View | June 13, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
This bad news to the current medicare and medicard comes at a time when the key health care player Sen. Chris Dodd and his wife make huge sum of money from health care industry, huge donation from Fanny Freddie for his political campaign. His vacation home in Ireland is said to worth 660 k dollars.
Posted by: austin | June 13, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am
It wont be long until we here in the once great USA are reduced to slaves of BO’s new communist party
Posted by: almost a slave now | June 13, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am
I guess if you give someone $1000 and they spend a little on food and some more on illicit drugs, or they go out and steal if you don’t give them anything, that’s a better situation for the national balance sheet than giving them $1000 to visit a a doctor’s office or emergency room to get a little attention for their troubles, and dividing the $1000 between trained physicians, nurses, healthcare professionals and medical industries companies?
Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | June 13, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am
so let me if I get this correctly they’re going to expand the medicare program to cover 50 million more patient and at the same time cutting funding to the same program
YEAH THIS WILL WORK.. LOL if anything it will speed up the demise of medicare.. lets face it if they tell us it will cost 2 trillion for health it will end up costing 4 trillion..
Posted by: blake | June 13, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am
for obama to say save, like jobs saved medicare saved, when all he does is spend spend spend is outragious
Posted by: i_dream_of_a_jeannie | June 13, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
How can he say this with a straight face?
“We can’t keep shifting a growing burden to future generations.”
Yes, we can!
Si se puede!
Obama is burying our children and grandchildren in debt. This latest health care money “saved or created” is more smoke and mirrors.
Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | June 13, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
So that’s the secret! – “We will fix what’s broken, while building upon what works,” he said. – This Administration must, absolutely MUST be held accountable for this disingenuous crap. The CBO says we can’t afford it so the WBO (White house budget office)invents some new numbers. This is a bold-faced lie and the President should be held accountable for it.
Posted by: N'erdowell | June 13, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
I found a reciept for some medication I bought in the 1980′s. I was in college, had no job, and payed $2.50 at the pharmacy. I’m allergic to most medications, and recently had to purchase the same EXACT medication. If I didn’t have insurance it would of cost me over $300.00 for the same medication. Let’s put that in perspective: if a gallon of milk in 1980 ran $2.50 and now ran over $300.00, what would you think about that? That’s about a 20,000 % increase. President Reagan deregulated our pharmaceutical companies, as soon as he took the caps off, those companies began the shake down of American consumers that continues to this day. More power to Mr. Obama for trying to right this shady Republican wrong.
Posted by: BuyAmerican2012 | June 13, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Some on you guys don’t get it. To cover the costs, there is a new tax of $2000 per person. $8000.00 per family. Doctors will be paid at 3/4ths of current fees. That down from the $27 in New York already. The country will lose 100,000 doctors within a few years. Welcome to 3 months waiting lines. Why should doctors only earn what a school teacher earns?
Posted by: Heavenislikethis | June 13, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Obamas brownnoseing media network- since you seem to have the inside scoop of what the presidents plan is- why don’t you share the future of changes coming the rest of us….. you people slay me- it is a catch 22 in this country- NO ONE will EVER be the right president- when did the attitude in this country turn so vile? will this country EVER come together again????? I pray for intelligent life on other planets- it sure is not on this one!!!!!
Posted by: Thomas | June 13, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
in reading these letters i always wonder what amount of lobbying is going on what an incredible amount of money is being spent by drug co.,insurance co.,hospitals ,doctors trying to hold onto all the dollars they have cheated the average american out of . keep going Mr.Pres. YEAH FOR YOU!
Posted by: david barber | June 13, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
I would prefer he fix Medicare and Medicaid first. With 56TILLION in unfunded Medicare and Social Security, these are too big to ignore.
If we cna fix these, then is plenty of money left of over for all us to have the same health plan as Reid and Pelosi.
We cannot spend money we do not have. Borrowign from the Saudi’s and Chinese is not the way forward. its a way into debtor’s oblivion.
Posted by: scott jeffries | June 13, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Health Care Reform is the greatest threat to the Federal Deficit!
Posted by: Bill | June 13, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
How convenient that the money shows up at a time when there is a push to spend. The priority should be paying off the deficit in a hurry, otherwise we have an economically unhealthy nation that will get sicker. Accountants are the craftiest people on earth. They have their own language that never makes common sense. They can show a profit, they can show a surplus, they can show a balanced budget based on what the master wants them to show. You simply have to tell them what to do. They can also make the deficit disappear on the books with a stroke of the pen, a little twist here and little turn there. Remove all toxic assets and amount owed and calculate projected revenues from the stimulus working as desired and voila you have a trillion of unspent money for the pet program you want to shove down the throats of tax payers.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | June 13, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
This savings is wonderful. It goes hand-in-hand with the 2 billion new jobs he has created.
Posted by: flopez | June 13, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
“pet program you want to shove down the throats of tax payers.” – The majority of Americans voted for Obama and his health reform proposal. Thats democracy. It is the corporations who are trying to shove the current medical system down the throats of taxpayers.
Posted by: Mark from atlanta | June 13, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
“pet program you want to shove down the throats of tax payers.” – The majority of Americans voted for Obama and his health reform proposal. Thats democracy. It is the corporations who are trying to shove the current medical system down the throats of taxpayers.
Posted by: Mark from atlanta | June 13, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Tikbalang – You said “You don’t pay the police a copay when you call 911. The fireman doesn’t ask what insurance you have.”
You are 100% wrong, the police and firemen are not paid by the federal government or through insurance. You pay for their services through your property taxes, sales taxes and other state and local taxes.
Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 13, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
We should focus on incentives for more domestic ownership of medical and pharmaceutical companies that produce exportable goods off of our health-care dollars, and on securing the products rights and arranging taxable profits and financial arrangements from other nations who benefit.
Why should a foreign (socialized?) pharmaceutical company be able to use our private health-care dollars to develop their products? Why should a foreign (socialized?) supply company be able to buy up a domestic corporation after the development of the products has already been funded by our, private funds?
Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | June 13, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Of course, we’ve likely missed the boat on most of those opportunities, seeing as the Europeans have nothing left to milk out of us besides a direct tax for power.
Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | June 13, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Someone once observed that the perfect is the enemy of the good enough. Almost any change is better than the sliding board we’re now on. (There are other proposed changes not mentioned in the report, such as streamlining medical records on the internet.) Drug companies boast about all the profits they plow into research, but most of it is research to find a drug that imitates the effects of a profitable drug now protected by a patent. Jiggle a few atoms on the molecule, you know? (In the trade they’re called “me too” drugs.) I wouldn’t complain too much about borrowing from China and Japan to fund this. That’s how we’ve paid for the wars in the ME since 2002. Or about taxes either. Personal income tax might rise from today’s 35% all the way up to Clinton’s 39% — or even Reagan’s 90%. The rich remained rich and the rest of us didn’t do too badly.
Posted by: Robert Maxwell | June 13, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
truthbetold – healthcare reform may be needed but there is no way that the Federal Government has the money to pay for it.
The debt of the Federal Government is currently $11,375,626,420,309.63 (as of 11 June 2009). Of this ammount here is how it breaks down:
Intergovernmental Holdings Debt $4,265,045,427,725.93
SSA: Federal Old Age & Survivors Insurance Trust Fund $2,244,656
OPM: Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund 705,023
HHS: Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund 317,045
DOD: DOD Military Retirement Fund 247,499
SSA: Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund 211,735
DOD: DOD Medicare Retirement Fund 127,349
HHS: Federal Supplemental Medical Insurance 63,006
DOE: Nuclear Waste Disposal Fund, DOE 43,782
DOL: Unemployment Trust Fund 38,141
OPM: Employees Life Insurance Fund 35,773
OPM: Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund 32,979
HUD: Federal Housing Administration – Liquidating Account 20,051
FDIC: Deposit Insurance Fund 17,589 DOL:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 16,198
OPM: Employees Health Benefits 15,631
Treasury: Exchange Stabilization 15,102
DOS: Foreign Service Retirement & Disability Fund 15,030
Other Programs and Funds 121,198
The Public Debt (amount owed to pay interest and bonds is $7,110,580,992,583.70
With this much debt (and growing daily) where do you propose that the government get funding for healthcare? Two quotes which need to be remembered both by the government and all citizens of this country:
“I place economy among the first and most important virtues, and public debt as the greatest of dangers. To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt.”
– Thomas Jefferson
“Until the National Debt is paid off, the other problems facing our country will remain unsolved. Compound Interest is the ‘Eighth Wonder Of The World’ and it can bring a nation to its knees.”
– — C. Morgan Cofer
Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 13, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
I voted Democrat because I love the fact that I can now marry whatever I want. I’ve decided to marry my horse.
I voted Democrat because I believe oil companies’ profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene but the government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn’t.
I voted Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of spending the money I earn than I would.
I voted Democrat because freedom of speech is fine as long as nobody is offended by it.
I voted Democrat because when we pull out of Iraq I trust that the bad guys will stop what they’re doing because they now think we’re good people.
I voted Democrat because I’m way too irresponsible to own a gun, and I know that my local police are all I need to protect me from murderers and thieves.
I voted Democrat because I believe that people who can’t tell us if it will rain on Friday can tell us that the polar ice caps will melt away in ten years if I don’t start driving a Prius.
I voted Democrat because I’m not concerned about the slaughter of millions of babies so long as we keep all death row inmates alive.
I voted Democrat because I believe that business should not be allowed to make profits for themselves. They need to break even and give the rest away to the government for redistribution as THEY see fit.
I voted Democrat because I believe liberal judges need to rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe kooks who would never get their agendas past the voters.
I voted Democrat because my head is so firmly planted up my a$$ that it is unlikely that I’ll ever have another point of view.
And remember a Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don’t own.
Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 13, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Obama Identifies $313 Billion for Health Care Through Medicaid and Medicare Savings
____________________________
Sorry. I have as much faith in THAT as I have when I hear the number of jobs “saved or created” bit.
Posted by: Ms Trish | June 13, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
People seem to think that just because the government spends tax payer monies it is all for a good cause. Who defines a good cause? Politicians. Who benefits from selling a so called good cause? Most gullible Americans bought the Iraq war as a good cause, congress approved it and 6 years later and several brave men and women lost, are we spending any less on wars? Yes most of the intentions are good but if the past 8 years have shown that government cannot operate anything well without creating a massive deficit. The war in Afghanistan is going for a longer time and it is now escalating and spilled over to neighboring countries like Pakistan. Pakistan just got 7.5 billion dollars for military and non military spending. Health care on the surface is a great cause and there is no reason why any American should not receive decent health care but it has been complicated. If only the government ran health services (instead of subcontracting it to the insurance companies) like it does for the Veterans and the defense, we could have universal health care or at least cover the uninsured. But instead it lets the private sector run the health care and the private sector runs it for profit which simply means that it provides as little care as possible for as much money it can get for providing the little care by having high deductibles and co-pays. It should be available to every citizen and affordable to everyone. Currently it is not affordable leaving some 40 million without insurance because they just don’t have the money and another several million who can afford it but don’t want to get it because it is outrageously expensive and does not cover much. So those who make it a partisan issue are living in a La La land. As an independent who supported Obama and who wants his healthcare plan to succeed would like to say knowing how things unfold in this country and all the greedy middle people and executives who will eat up the tax payer funds to have a plan that will work is a tall order and that all the checks and balances must be in place and the enforcement of good business practices should be uniform and above board. So we the people no matter what the party affiliation should be vigilant or we end up with the consequences of engaging in war and not finding WMDs or worse not finding Osama after 8 years and billions spent finding him only to end up with a mounting deficit, lost brave men and women in uniform a shoe thrown at our president a person from a country which we were told was going to be our best friend after we deposed and executed their tyrant. Results is what we should measure our success not costly these grandiose plans that fail to serve the purpose for which it was intended.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | June 13, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
What we need to do is start taxing big business. If they don’t hire Americans, let them pay fines and higher taxes. Start taxing imports to even the playing field. Hopefully, all big business will leave, with their criminal mind set of ripping off the consumer and hiring slave labor. Our kids would then have a chance at making our country great again! Just for the record, almost all cures for diseases were discovered by middle class men and women who dedicated their lives to finding those cures, NOT by BIG CORPORATIONS who would rather steal your last dollar then cure anything!
Posted by: BuyAmerican2012 | June 13, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
BuyAmerican2012 – you suggested “What we need to do is start taxing big business.” I wonder, where do you think “big business” will earn those additional taxes of which you speak? Will they get another job, like me? Hardly!! They’ll have to raise the prices of any products or services they are in business to make or provide, which means YOU AND I pay those “taxes.” Of course, since the increased prices we pay aren’t called taxes, the Dems can pat themselves on the back for generating revenues from the blood, sweat and tears of my labor, while telling me that “Big Business” is the bad guy, not them.
Posted by: Fiercely__Independent | June 13, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Fist of all, the marginal tax rate has never been 90%. It was 70% before Reagan took office and he lowered it to 35% during his tenure. This did allow the growth that we saw during the 80′s and 90′s – something that we will never see again if we raise the marginal rate much higher.
Small business in the last 30 years have increasingly been set up as pass through entities – that is – they pay tax as if it were the personal earnings of the owners. Prior to the 80′s, most businesses were incorporated, and received different tax treatment. Right now, the top rate for corporations is 35%.
What you will end up doing by raising the marginal tax rate (after a point), is forcing small business to pay far more tax than larger ones. This would start a large movement for everyone to incorporate – if they last that long. Its like turning our businesses upside down, and the biggest loses will be the employees. Most businesses are hanging on by a thread these days. This could really make things a lot worse.
There’s a lot more to changing tax code than sticking it to the wealthy, etc. Obama knows better yet he still won’t keep quiet about this even though we are in the middle of a recession. He may get his reform – but at what cost to this country?
This is so quick and dirty ….. I really wish they would shut up in Washington until they had something non-destructive to say. Just because the stock market is even for 2009, don’t think we are even close to being out of the woods. If the Treasury does not stop or slow their printing of dollars, we could end up with inflation that will drive the recession back again to the levels last fall.
Fix the economy, Washington, before you continue to mess with it further! I cannot believe how stupid, reckless, and irresponsible these people are.
Posted by: Jon F | June 13, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Buy the way – I thought we were supposed to wind-down the Iraq war? That would save a ton of money over ten years – and a whole lot of American lives.
Obama’s been in office 6 months. Or is he going to pull a Richard Nixon on us and “forget” to draw them down?
Oh yes, and what about the Alternative Minimum Tax? This now hits about 80 million middle class taxpayers – and is grossly unfair.
I hear all these campaign promises – and now all I see is ways to spend and spend and tax and tax. I certainly don’t see life getting much better for anyone right now.
Posted by: Jon F | June 13, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
I know what Big Business did for me! I live in a ghost town that once was teeming with small businesses. Try to find anything today that’s made in America. They eliminated small businesses, chose slave labor abroad over hiring Americans at home, and they have money and your kids money already in their pockets.
Posted by: BuyAmerican2012 | June 13, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
We’ve been commenting on this type of number for months now.. 31 billion per year isn’t even worth mentioning .. we spend in trillions, save in billions .. the administration should give the public a bit more credit.. we don’t buy into their imaginary, projected, miniscule savings claims..
.. even if the savings are realized, they mean nothing ..
Obama threads the needle each day by realizing that old or high tax bracket people won’t vote for him anyway and minorities and young people and lower income people will .. guess who will always draw the short straw..
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | June 13, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
When it comes to numbers obama seems to be lost, if he says it will save money hang on to your wallet they guy is clueless and lost. 2010 thats when change you can believe in starts.
Posted by: john | June 13, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
The president and the congress are steeped in unreality. Taxing the drug manufactures will only increase the price of drugs. All the money is being borrowed so future generations will getting stuck with the bill. Our political leadership has to learn to enforce our current laws, like immigration, and stop making new law to curry favor with special interests. That will go a long way toward solving our medical system problems.
Posted by: Joseph Conigliaro | June 13, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Common sense is very uncommon….
which sort of undercuts the whole sentiment of this thing…
I would say – with regard to both the government and healthcare industries.. Common sense is next to nil… both are bloated bureaucracies with no incentive to reduce cost or spending.. both are totally subsidized by those who have little or no choice other than to maintain these burgeoning entities with large chunks of their personal resources….
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | June 13, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
I could swear it’s $314 billion not $313 billion.
Posted by: Lisa | June 13, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
First thing to start reducing medical expenses/cost government is to cease ASAP any new people into the country, close the borders and stop the anchor babies epidemic.
Posted by: Dot | June 13, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Washington pumps $1 triollion in stimulus, but has not dealt with the speculation in oil. The speculation costs may offset the money pumped in. And what good does this do for economic recovery? Why isn’t Washington punishing those who caused the economic mess? Not only not punishing, but letting them do it all over again? Was there really an election? Because the same old crap is going on.
Posted by: deanbob | June 13, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
President Obama talks about Medicare and
Medicaid being a threat to our deficit,
what about IRAQ and Afghanastan they are
costing one BILLION per DAY, where are our priorties ?
Posted by: TRS | June 13, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Is Obama now going to name someone a healthcare “CZAR” ???
Posted by: CW | June 13, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
The people of the United States, over 70% of the people (according to a recent Lake Research Poll), understand the need for a single-payer health care system. That is to say – over 70% of voters in the United States prefer a government-run health care system. So why do Republicans always stand in opposition to the people? Why do Republicans always side with corporations over the quality of the health care system?
Here is the difference between a Republican and a Democrat – when Profit and Quality Health Care are on the table, the Democrat will always choose Quality Health Care, whereas the Republican will always choose profit.
Here’s a question – What is more profitable – a chronically ill person or a cured person?
The fact is – Profit and Health Care simply do not mix. Corporations are not necessarily concerned with your health, because they are necessarily concerned with their profits.
It is as simple as that.
But, when the Democrats try to overhaul a hugely dysfunctional system in order to provide Quality Health Care to all American Citizens – the Republicans just say:
“Well, we’d like to provide quality health care for everyone, but it could hurt corporate profits, therefore some of you Americans need to die.”
They are a very sick and morally obtuse bunch, and they deserve the minority status they have recently earned.
Posted by: Anthony | June 13, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
He’s cutting medicaid/care from the poor and elderly. I don’t know if this article mentioned that. I’m sure Obama didn’t.
Posted by: PALGP | June 13, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
CW, he has already named a health care czar. Her name is Nancy Ann DeParle and she has extensive ties to the health care industry. When she was appointed in March, the WH said she did not require a waiver, but that she would recuse herself from any decisions related to companies with which she had ties. As Politico is the most recent (decidely not right wing) source to report about, that will be difficult. She has made 5.8 MILLION dollars in the past 3 years from health care companies, 2.3 million of that in the last 14 months.
Here’s a taste of how many companies she has connections to that should trigger conflict of interest problems (the following is quoted from the Politico website):
The official overseeing White House health care reform efforts earned more than $5.8 million in the past three years from her work for major medical companies, according to a personal financial disclosure and other public records.
The disclosure statement filed by White House health czar Nancy-Ann DeParle, released this week, shows that from the start of last year until her appointment this March, she pulled in more than $2.3 million from her positions on the boards of six firms likely to be significantly affected by the health care reforms that she’s championing.
And in 2006 and 2007, DeParle earned at least $3.5 million from director’s fees and stock sales and awards from health care firms, according to a Chicago Tribune analysis of securities filings.
In the days after her appointment, she stepped down from the corporate boards of Cerner, Medco Health Solutions, Boston Scientific, CareMore Health Plan and Legacy Hospital Partners, as well as from her post as managing director of a private equity firm that controlled some of those companies and a variety of other health care firms, according to the White House filing, which also shows that she resigned last July from the board of DaVita.
Posted by: moderate | June 13, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Anthony: The “Republicans” are to Obama as the “terrorists” were to Bush. In both cases they are conveniently chosen “enemies” used to manipulate us. You can’t choose whole groups of people and make them into the entirety of evil that you must fight. Sorry, but he is just manipulating us – and to say all Republicans are bad is falling for his nonsense.
70% of Americans want health care reform. This does not by any means say they want government run health care. There is a big difference – so please don’t draw conclusions where there are none to be drawn.
The bottom line to all of this is there is way too much divisiveness and hatred between the left and right of this country. Its got to stop – or our politicians will all use it to walk all over us and use us like children. Things are never that black and white – and we need to get beyond that to make informed decisions.
If we don’t, those decisions will be made for us despite what we feel. We’ll regret that more than anything.
Posted by: Jon F | June 13, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
We’re up to $55 TRILLION in unfunded promised Medicare benefits. $313 billion is one half of one percent of that amount (0.5%).
Not that you can trust any number Obama comes up with. For him, it’s all about spin to fool the sheeple. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has become such a thorn in Obama’s side (due to more accurate cost estimates/savings) that the White House (Ministry of Propaganda) has decided to just come up with its own rosy numbers to fit the desired template.
There are no savings, just higher current costs and higher unfunded promises (not to mention a loss of doctors and a deterioration of services). Which means much higher taxes on the middle class. Count on it.
Incidentally, notice how Obama never talks about middle class tax cuts anymore? As slick as Obama is, even he knows he’d be laughed at with that line these days.
Posted by: Jenn | June 13, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
And I definitely agree with you about how this will affect small business. Good comments.
Posted by: Wanda | June 13, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
President Obama said, “If the drug makers pay their fair share, we can cut government spending on prescription drugs.”
I’m confused…if I’m purchasing a prescription drug, why, in a “free market” economy, does the drug maker have a “fair share” portion to pay for my drugs? If I buy a computer, the computer manufacturer is not required to pay a “fair share” portion of the cost of my computer; supply and demand sets the price.
Perhaps it’s because our economy is becoming less “free market” and more “centrally planned”.
Also, notice the President’s use of the word “fair”, a vague and very subjective term that allows him to define it any way he wishes, and at the same time prompts the listener/reader to formulate his/her own perception of “fair” in his/her mind. Definitely a wordsmith.
Posted by: MikeO | June 13, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
“I’m confused…”
“…Also, notice the President’s use of the word “fair”, a vague and very subjective term that allows him to define it any way he wishes…”
There’s a big difference between computers and drugs. One you can really use for a lot of things and the other, if you’re really ill, you need to survive. But it’s convenient for health insurance companies who dodge the sick and pharmaceutical giants who think it’s fair to gouge huge profits from the sick, to keep you confused that they are the same.
Posted by: Skip | June 13, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
The biggest threat to the deficit is Obama and the Democrats.
Posted by: JustMe | June 13, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
There is no reality to any of the math from Washington. They pull numbers out, profess them as real, and a month or two later pull-out some new number. Unemployment was supposed to be capped at 8% with all the spending and bailing-out. Instead we are already at 9.4% and 16.4% when you count those who have quit trying. Washington and Wall Street are scratching each others backs.
Posted by: Lynne | June 13, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Depending awfully heavy on ARRA, isn’t he? If he “depends” too much on it, hospitals, especially small rural hospitals, will be forced to shut down. Then what? We all die because we can’t get help soon enough?
Posted by: jan | June 13, 2009, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Upon research I discovered that my country the United States of America does not have the highest standard of living in the world as perpetuated by Rush Limbaugh and other Republicans who are bent on misleading people. The Scandinavian countries have the highest standard of living in the world. Now,If healthcare and Education are rights and not priviledges in these countries and all of their citizen recieve both.. automatically..why is it so difficult to have a healthcare system that is affordable and accesible to all citizens of this great country. I’ll tell you why! Because if Obama is successful in healthcare reform then the AMA, and the drug companies would not be able to rip off Americans as they have been doing. These two entities are supporters of the Republican party and the Republicans know quite well why they want healthcare reform to fail..no more easy money in their pockets vis a vis lobbying..why thousands of citizen do not have access to or can afford healthcare. Those of you who are constantly being outwitted by the Republican party and their opposition to healthcare reform..I feel deep sorrow for you and wonder if you understand what true patriotism is..it also involved being concerned for you fellow citizens..those who are not fortunate to access and afford healthcare. Healthcare ought to be a right and not a privilege for citizens of this great country. President Obama, I wish you the best and I am praying for you and my country as you pursue healthcare reform.
Posted by: Stanley | June 13, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
In other fantasy news, Obama said that trillion dollar deficits are manageable, “Sotomayor is not racist like white people,” and Nancy Pelosi is not vindictive.
Posted by: Me | June 13, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Obama can spend 950 billion in health care and the result will be the same or worse — people would cry that they don’t have enough coverage.
Posted by: Julie | June 13, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Stan I dont have a crystal ball and neither do you but I can tell you this whatever Obama’s plan is its just going to create more problems and debt. Its all he does really. Look at the ‘cap for executive pay’ thing. If he hadnt bailed out the companies why would they have to cap pay? He created that problem too by pushing bailouts instead of being against them! Obama is the problem not the answer!
Stanley we already have healthcare for all if you go to the hospital or a doctor they wont turn you away. You just have to pay the bill. They do have payment plans yknow.
Stanley healthcare is affordable to all already! We already have ‘charity care’ and even illegal immigrants can get it? Why punish companies? Why punish doctors? Just because some people cant or dont want to pay their bills? Hey thats the American way. Why support Obama blindly if he is leading us into a path of more unemployment and higher taxes and gas prices? Dont you see the folly Stanley? Since when does the government help anyone but themself to our money or a third of our paychecks?
Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | June 13, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
Do you also realize if the doctor or surgeon is the government and he accidentally leaves a scalpel in your head during the brain surgery you wont be able to sue them for malpractice either? How do you like those apples?
Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | June 13, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
If you believe Obama wants to pass this bill to bring the national debt and deficit down I got a bridge in brooklyn I’d like to sell you.
Posted by: johnqpublic74 | June 13, 2009, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Yeah Obama REALLY cares about poor people! Thats why he slathered money on GM, Chrysler, AIG, etc etc. He cares about poor people not big business yeah sure!! LOL- A poor person can call 911 and get an ambulance ride to the same hospital as me, get the same doctor, the same care, the same bill. Maybe they dont have health insurance maybe they do. Most people dont heck I dont. The answer is not to put the USA a trillion more in debt to try to fix it I’m sorry. It will just mean less doctors, less jobs, more unemployment. Why doesnt Obama take the $1 Trillion and give it to each U.S. citizen as a healthcare bonus on our taxes? Because he and his government cronies wouldnt make the money they can pushing this bill/plan through thats why! His response to the 10% unemployment in this country so far has been like Marie Antoinette “Let them eat cake” and throw money to just big business so far so why should I believe otherwise?
Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | June 13, 2009, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
Here is the difference between a Republican and a Democrat – when Profit and Quality Health Care are on the table, the Democrat will always choose Quality Health Care, whereas the Republican will always choose profit.
—————————-
Here’s a little story. Three men looked at a field. The first said he would take the money and make the field fertile. The second said he would buy the field, make it fertile, sell the produce and give a share to the owner. The third said not to give him the money or the field, that he will choose to make it more fertile than the other two just because that’s the right thing to do. Which one of the three do you think is most likely to get the job done?
Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | June 14, 2009, 1:03 am 1:03 am
-Great idea for ranking. I wondered the same thing as Nick. Should angel investors be included in the broad category of venture capital? Or is this just a list for Venture Capital Fund bloggers?
Posted by: acertar.net | June 14, 2009, 3:41 am 3:41 am
I would hope that everyone in Congress and the Obama administration (who support this new system) will sign a pledge to give up their current coverage and use the new one exclusively, as if they were regular joe sixpacks or jane sixpacks.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | June 14, 2009, 7:13 am 7:13 am
“I would hope that everyone in Congress and the Obama administration (who support this new system) will sign a pledge to give up their current coverage and use the new one exclusively, as if they were regular joe sixpacks or jane sixpacks.”
Yup, yup.
It’s time to call, e-mail and write our Congress Critters and ask them if they will be the first to switch to the “new” system.
Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | June 14, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Imaginary numbers from a man known for his accuracy so far right?
ROFL this is the guy who wants to use numbers from somewhere else than the CBO that he doesnt like. I am sorry to say this President will say anything and destroy EVERYTHING to make America socialist. YES lets call it what it is. HE TOOK over GM he wants to take over CITI. He is breaking laws and NO one is calling him on it. The supreme court chickened out of Chrysler. ITS ALL UPSIDE DOWN PEOPLE and this is the most destructive maniac we have ever had.
Posted by: ChicagBob | June 14, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Just remember there is no place in the Constitution that the Legislative branch or the Executive branch is given the power to provide health care to the citizens.
Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 14, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Sandcrab, the “Necessary and Proper” clause of Art. I of the US constitution gives the Congress power to provide health care to US citizens and also in connection with the federal taxing and spending power.
Posted by: Dr. X | June 14, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
ONE OF THE MAIN REASONS OTHER COUNTRIES WITH SOCIALIZED MEDICINE (WITH SKY HIGH TAX RATES AND POOR RESULTS)IS THAT THEY SPEND ALMOST NO MONEY FOR DEFENSE. GUESS WHAT COUNTRY IS COVERING THEIR BUTTS???
Posted by: Jimbo | June 14, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
The Cons who skipped the Pres election waiting for an Obama disaster are scoring touchdowns. I thought that these cons were nuts and still do. But their prophecy was right on. I only hope that this country can survive after these airheads are gone.
Posted by: Jimbo | June 14, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
ONE OF THE MAIN REASONS OTHER COUNTRIES WITH SOCIALIZED MEDICINE (WITH SKY HIGH TAX RATES AND POOR RESULTS)IS THAT THEY SPEND ALMOST NO MONEY FOR DEFENSE. GUESS WHAT COUNTRY IS COVERING THEIR BUTTS???
***************************************
You nailed it Jimbo! There are many in this country who now openly call for a “European style socialism” (without the high unemployment they will then naively add). I think if the USA put the heat on Europe to provide for its own military defense, they might trun even further away from socialism.
This is a very dangerous world. When the US goes further down the slippery slope it has been on since LBJ’s “great society” our status as a military superpower will wane in proportion.
Posted by: socialism101 | June 14, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Dr. X – I beleieve what you are refering to is the following from Article 1 Section 8 “To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.”
This says nothing about healthcare and “necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution” refers to what is actually in the constitution not what people think is in the constitution.
Once again I ask where in the Constitution is the Legislative branch or the Executive branch given the power to provide health care to the citizens.
Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 14, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
socialism 101 . . .
The country that is currently covering the U.S. ‘butt’ (and hence the rest of the world’s butt) is China. Without China’s financial backing the United States and its military are gone.
Apparently the ‘knowing how to spend’ just isn’t enough.
Posted by: danita | June 14, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
If everyone who can would simply run somewhere everyday, as fast as they can, for at least 1/8 of a mile, regardless of age, healthcare costs would nosedive.
Posted by: Yes1fan | June 15, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am
How come when Bush was in office he asked for many of these same cuts in Medicare and the left screamed bloody murder. Now that they are in power it is OK to make these same cuts. The left needs to get there head out of that dark place and understand that the governments first task is finacial responsibility. Until the debt of the federal government is seriously reduced we cannot spend additional dollars. If an expenditue is not a responsibility of Congress under Article 1 of the Constitution then it should not be made.
Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 15, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
How come when bush was in office he wanted to arrest the elderly for buying medication in Canada? He had lots of great plans for the American middle class as we’re finding out!
Posted by: BuyAmerican2012 | June 15, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
One sure way to save money for Medicare would be to cover retirees living overseas who can get much cheaper medical care in the country they live in, rather than running to the US every time they have an illness.
Posted by: Gail Rooney | June 15, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Try reading other news stories on this same subject. Like the fact that the “disproportionate” payments that are going to be cut are to hospitals that serve the poor. Small part of it all, but I’ll bet that affects a LOT of people who voted for him…expecting roses, getting thorns.
I had the morbid pleasure of presenting this little plan of his to my co-worker, who worships him and believed he would make everything wonderful, split up corporations and beggar the rich. We work for a program that helps the impoverished elderly get heathcare and support. She particularly busts her behind to walk these people through the insanity that is Medicaid. The program has been hit hard by cuts already.
Oh, yeah, happy days are here. Just keep reading the positive spin…like the fact that at least the elderly won’t outnumber those “paying the tab” for much longer.
Posted by: Eyes Open | June 15, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
why are we not seeing the rich pay taxes
on there 5 home-They pay less on 5 houses than we do a 60,000 home who makes 250k except ceo-etc.i worked 40 years never came close to 250k in 6 years the plant sup.plant managers etc.
Had a very good job.we are leting the world come over here on work visa no one
follows them -They do not want to give up there citizenship from spain etc.They
get grants to go to school good jobs -
Posted by: gabby6030 | August 9, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm