Once Opposed to ‘Forcing’ Americans to Get Health Insurance, President Obama Now Says His Thinking Has ‘Evolved’
It was once a major bone of contention between then-Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and then-Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-NY, as they campaigned for the Democratic presidential nomination. Clinton's health care proposal required Americans to have health insurance, similarly in theory to how drivers are required to have car insurance. Obama's didn't.
"Senator Clinton is arguing that the only way to get every American covered is if you force every American to buy health care," Mr. Obama told Iowa reporters in November 2007. "And unfortunately she hasn't told anybody how she would enforce this mandate."
During a contentious debate in Las Vegas, Nevada, Mr. Obama said "the only difference between Senator Clinton's health care plan and mine is that she thinks the problem for people without health care is that nobody has mandated — forced — them to get health care. That's not what I'm seeing around Nevada. What I see are people who would love to have health care. They — they desperately want it. But the problem is they can't afford it."
He underlined again during the debate: "I don't think that the problem with the American people is that they are not being forced to get health care."
But during his interview with Diane Sawyer, President Obama said that while "mandates are an example of… something that I was resistant to during the campaign… this is an area where people have made some pretty compelling arguments to me that if we want to have a system that drives down costs for everybody, then we've got to have healthier people not opt out of the system. And I think that you have to be careful to make sure that there's a waiver. So that if we haven't made health care affordable yet, you're not punishing people, not only because they can't afford health care, but — now giving 'em an additional fine."
The president said that "any program that we put in place, I think there will be some phase-in period. So that we can calibrate and adjust to make sure that there really is affordability there before we start trying to penalize people. But I think my thinking on the issue of mandates has evolved. And I think that that is typical of most people who study this problem deeper."
– jpt

Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
This just points out the absurdity of the Obama admin’s declarations that everyone can keep their current insurance and doctor if they so desire. He is stating now that eventually everyone will be forced to have health insurance, and that it will have to be insurance that complies with government rules on coverage, etc… What this means is that inevitably private insurance will become less affordable as more employers dump people from employer health care plans into the public plan. This will eliminate choice and in the end we will end up with a national health care system just like the UK and Canada where only the wealthy can afford to see a doctor or have a surgery immediately by paying cash. There is even a likelihood that we will someday end up with a system where doctors are forbidden to see patients outside of the national health care system. This will not end well, which is why we must stop it in it’s tracks right now.
Posted by: Jason | June 24, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am
I hope this doesn’t mean Obama is also inching closer to Hillary’s ‘garnish their wages’ idea for funding universal health care.
Posted by: Dan Cleary | June 24, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am
In other words, he’s a liar.
What a shock.
Posted by: Chad | June 24, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Look out China, we’re gonna give you competition in the communist department. Obama=communist.
Posted by: notanobamafan | June 24, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Obamaspeak:
evolved=lied
Posted by: mary | June 24, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
1 more step towards single payer.
Posted by: chris | June 24, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am
I read a book once about a society where every person had an implant that would “eliminate” them when they ran out of time. You had to keep earning time to avoid being eliminated. People who were running out of time went around killing other people and stealing their time.
Now THAT’S a universal health care plan I can get behind!
Wait a minute. That’s what Obamacare will be, only the time you have left will be determined by your govt healthcare professional. If you’re overweight, unproductive or a drain on the system, your benefits will be denied and you won’t survive.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | June 24, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Surprise, surprise.
Posted by: crystalinWI | June 24, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Ronald Reagan once signed legislation liberalizing California’s abortion laws. Later, when running for president, Reagan promised to appoint anti-choice federal judges. Sometimes politicians change their minds — sometimes because of conviction, sometimes because it is simply impractical to follow a certain policy.
If people who don’t like the idea of having to buy health insurance, why aren’t they protesting at their state capitols? Most states require drivers to get at least liability insurance.
Posted by: Alex | June 24, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am
I don’t really understand this. Right now, the only affordable health insurance is through health plan through one’s job or in a lot of cases full-time job. My position is about to go part-time, where full health benefits are not included, and my plan is not affordable with only receiving half my income, so I have to look for other job options. I already have other bills I’m obligated to pay that I’m worried about once I only have half my pay, I shouldn’t have to worry about those bills, plus not being able to afford health insurance at the same time, too. I don’t know what the answer is, but whatever the system is now, it’s not the right one.
Posted by: Rebecca Jill | June 24, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Anytime the words “Government” and “Forces you” are in the same sentence, that’s never a good thing. I would think Americans of all political stripes could get behind that!
Posted by: Obama, the Second Coming | June 24, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Just curious, but how is any of this legal? Where in the Constitution do the feds have the authority to force me into a health plan? Oh, wait, I get it. This is like Star Wars. The Emperor will “make it legal”.
Posted by: Matthew | June 24, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Alex, or anyone else who wants to find out more about Alex’s take: Google “Adamantly pro-choice? Ronald Reagan and abortion in 1967 Mark Kilmer” and click on the FreeRepublic link for a timeline of how Reagan signed this bill.
I think you are skewing this to your advantage. It doesn’t sound to me like Reagan was Pro-Choice and then changed his mind.
And if Obama’s position is so “understandable,” then why did Mitt Romney get raked over the coals for changing his abortion stance?
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | June 24, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am
Matthew:”Just curious, but how is any of this legal?”
The Constitution established Congress and the states have empowered it successively to its current state. It sounds like there is 200 years of history you’re missing out on.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 24, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am
“Anytime the words “Government” and “Forces you” are in the same sentence, that’s never a good thing.”
The government forces me to pay to support the army! The government forces me to pay to support my local fire department! The government forces me to pay to support the roads! The government forces me to pay to support universal education!
If you hate government so much, just head off to some utopia without one. Maybe Somalia. Enjoy your solitary, nasty, brutish and short life.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 24, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Traffic Cop Timmy:”Wait a minute. That’s what Obamacare will be, only the time you have left will be determined by your govt healthcare professional.”
As opposed to your caring, for profit HMO pre-approval department.
Your fear is actually pretty humorous considering the US has lower life expectancy than most of the nations where the government is ‘determining’ the “time you have left” rather than a for-profit insurance bureaucracy (you died waiting for that pre-approval? Excellent – that’s money saved for the profit!).
Posted by: jhw539 | June 24, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am
jhw539 – “the US has lower life expectancy than most of the nations where the government is ‘determining’ the “time you have left” rather than a for-profit insurance bureaucracy”
I suspect life expectency has little to do with health care decisions made by the govt. Life expectency in war torn countries is pretty low. Life expectency probably has more to do with other factors.
“As opposed to your caring, for profit HMO pre-approval department.”
I’ve never had a problem with an HMO procedure being approved in a timely manner. I’ve been in HMO’s for about 30 years. I know these problems exist but percentages I think are low. Tragic nontheless when people need help.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | June 24, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
“I suspect life expectency has little to do with health care decisions made by the govt.”
That said, I don’t trust our govt to make my healthcare decisions, especially when I’m a senior citizen or a “fetus.” I would however, trust my State to make these decisions. I’d have much more influence at a State level.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | June 24, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Everybody knows that life expectancy has to do with how many generations removed you are from Adam and Eve.
That’s why people used to live like 600 years. And now they only live 60.
Don’t trust thinkers like Obama.
Government health care will make you die.
According to one study, 100 out of 100 patients in Canada, in spite of their “great” health care system, died.
Died!
Do you want that to happen to you?
Posted by: borneo | June 24, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
I don’t even trust my state to make health care decisions or the “doctors” that they “license.”
I do all my own medical procedures.
Individual freedom.
Don’t trust “doctors,” many of whom are Democrats and RINOs and even foreigners… to help you with their big words and smart ideas.
Posted by: borneo | June 24, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am
IF you do decide to go to a hospital, you should try first building one yourself.
Many people do not realize that many hospitals are subsidized by government funds. Nearly all of the medicine they give you is in some way funded by taxes. And the roads and water that they use are socialist.
Every person should build their own hospital. And then, if you don’t build one, that’s your personal decision.
But don’t expect me to pay for your decision if you do not have your own hospital.
We really need to get back to basics.
Posted by: borneo | June 24, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
jhw539: “It sounds like there is 200 years of history you’re missing out on. ”
200 years of history that I apparently never learned in 17 years of public education. Curse me for depending on the government for my education. Only now that I’m off the education assembly line am I learning what I really need to know. Maybe it’s time for “the People to alter or to abolish” the bloat that our government has become.
Posted by: Matthew | June 24, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
I’m with this chap from Borneo. There is really nothing individual about everything. We should share cars, too. You know, since we all share the street and all. And we should share tvs, too, since those tvs are brought to our house on the street.
Posted by: Bo | June 24, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
“That said, I don’t trust our govt to make my healthcare decisions, especially when I’m a senior citizen or a “fetus.” I would however, trust my State to make these decisions. I’d have much more influence at a State level.”
Given states history of having policies regarding eugenics and forced sterilization that’s quite a gamble.
Posted by: Ryan C | June 24, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Don’t blame public education for your own misspent life!
Public education is great. But it requires discipline on behalf of the student to achieve its aims.
It’s really sad that people resent the sacrifices that millions of Americans make every day…. so that they can have access to education, information, clean water, safe roads, cutting edge research, a stable society….
Instead of waking up and saying, “Thank you, America! For giving me a better chance than anyone in the world…” You complain about how America held you back?
It’s bananas.
Posted by: borneo | June 24, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Sharing cars is a horrible idea. That’s why I have one for me. One for my wife. And one for each of my three children.
Posted by: borneo | June 24, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Ryan C:”CIGNA HealthCare denied the request, but later reversed its decision after Sarkisyan’s supporters, including members of the California Nurses Association, protested outside CIGNA’s offices in Glendale. The company said that it made an exception in her case.
But the delayed approval came too late, Nataline died a few hours later. ”
Awesome work by that pre-approval officer. He/she added a good $150k to CIGNA’s profit; this sort of performance (requests approved versus requests denied or withdrawn) is carefully tracked and a key component come employee review time. Remember, losing a form can be the difference between a low profit year and a great profit year!
Posted by: jhw539 | June 24, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Traffic Cop Timmy:”I suspect life expectency has little to do with health care decisions made by the govt. Life expectency in war torn countries is pretty low. Life expectency probably has more to do with other factors. ”
Why are you guessing? Insurance companies and their actuaries are intensely interested about this issue, there are fact available (the US is fatter, Europe smokes more, etc).
Posted by: jhw539 | June 24, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
“Awesome work by that pre-approval officer. He/she added a good $150k to CIGNA’s profit; this sort of performance (requests approved versus requests denied or withdrawn) is carefully tracked and a key component come employee review time. Remember, losing a form can be the difference between a low profit year and a great profit year!”
That is what slays me.
I get the feeling that people screaming about the government making their medical decisions have never had to do deal with their insurance company more than their monthly premium and copay for a doctor visit.
Posted by: Ryan C | June 24, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
This really disappoints me. The truth is, the insurance companies are part of the problem and for most people, standard insurance is a poor value when you figure in what you pay for premiums, payments and deductibles …. many people, even couples with children, often do better financially by dropping their insurance and paying for medical visits as they go.
We’ve been conditioned in our society to believe that we have to have health insurance just in case something catastrophic hits – but for most people, those catastrophies never hit, or if they do, people can just pay cash (lots of people have medical savings accounts to plan for such things).
Seems to me that the system would be far more efficient if our country reduced our reliance on health insurance, increased the number of free-clinics or government-sponsored clinics, encouraged more tax-free medical savings accounts and instituted a voucher program similar to Sweden’s, where if a person does need medical services and can’t afford to pay for it, the government covers it, but it comes out of that person’s Social Security.
Mandating health insurance just seems overly intrusive and out of touch with reality.
Posted by: Silly Me | June 24, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
“Seems to me that the system would be far more efficient if our country reduced our reliance on health insurance, increased the number of free-clinics or government-sponsored clinics, encouraged more tax-free medical savings accounts and instituted a voucher program similar to Sweden’s, where if a person does need medical services and can’t afford to pay for it, the government covers it, but it comes out of that person’s Social Security.”
I like this.
“Mandating health insurance just seems overly intrusive and out of touch with reality.”
Mandates always seem to rile our rebellious nature.
I understand the economics of it (spread the risk) but I agree that it comes off as overly intrusive.
Posted by: Ryan C | June 24, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
I think it is not the American way to have your newscast for Obama in the Whitehouse and leave out all ads and comments against the proposed healthcare plan by those who believe it is not feasible to provide the care for everyone. We have the best already and we need jobs in our country so that each person can pay for their own. Please remember there are other alternatives.
Posted by: Bryant | June 24, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Bryant:”We have the best already ”
We spend two to three times as much as every other first world nation. Is our system, which results in the same or lower life expectancy, two to three times better than every other first world nation? In what way?
Posted by: jhw539 | June 24, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Well, Jake… is anyone going to tell the truth about what a boondoggle the Massachusetts health care system is on tonight’s show? How about pressing Obama on these facts on how well Massachusetts is doing:
Overseers of Massachusetts’ trailblazing healthcare program made their first cuts yesterday, trimming $115 million, or 12 percent, from Commonwealth Care, which subsidizes premiums for needy residents and is the centerpiece of the 2006 law.
….. The largest share of the savings will come from slowing enrollment. (rationing) An estimated 18,000 poor residents who qualify for full subsidies, but who forget to designate a health plan, will no longer be automatically assigned a plan and enrolled and thus could face delays in getting care. (bureaucratic rationing)
The board also eliminated dental coverage for the poorest residents enrolled in Commonwealth Care, roughly 92,000 people who currently are the only ones in the program who receive that care. (rationing) Regulators said that would save $10 million. Dental coverage was retained in the budget approved by lawmakers last week, and now it falls to the governor to decide its fate.
Also hanging in the balance is the health insurance status of 28,000 legal immigrants whose Commonwealth Care coverage was dropped in the budget lawmakers approved for the fiscal year that begins July 1. (rationing) Governor Deval Patrick has until Monday to decide whether to veto any of that budget, which set aside $116 million less for Commonwealth Care than he proposed.
….. But Kirwan said the $115 million in cuts the Connector Authority board approved yesterday were merely to deal with shrinking state revenues and the rapid growth in enrollment in Commonwealth Care, which has 177,000 members and was projected to grow to 212,000 in the next year.
….. Patrick Holland, the Connector Authority’s chief financial officer, said enrollment spiked during the last three months, from 165,000 to nearly 177,000 members, because so many workers are losing their jobs and, with that, employer-provided health insurance.
The progress of the Massachusetts healthcare initiative is being closely watched in Washington, where Congress is crafting national legislation to extend coverage to more Americans. The Massachusetts law, cited as one model in the national debate, requires nearly everyone to have health insurance or pay a tax penalty.
….. Leaders of Health Care for All, one of the state’s largest consumer groups, said the changes will be especially hard on residents whose first language is not English and who have difficulty understanding the complex enrollment paperwork. (bureaucratic rationing)
….. Much of the rest of the $115 million in savings, $32 million, comes from slowing payments to the managed-care health insurance companies that won bids to offer insurance through the Commonwealth Care program.
Posted by: Sadie | June 24, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Lastly, Jake..
When’s the last time anyone in the establishment media described a 12% cut in a government program as “trimming”? Much smaller cuts, or even reductions in projected spending that are actually increases, have usually been accompanied by descriptive adjectives like “slashing,” “stripping,” “slicing,” “gutting,” etc. But there is apparently no cow more sacred than state-run health care, so a 12% cut is only “trimming.”
Two other points:
1. The $32 million in “slowing payments” looks like a cash-flow gimmick that saves no long-term dollars. But it does reduce capital available at the managed-care companies, who will have to consider how cavalier the state is about paying its bills on time when quoting premiums for future coverage.
2. We can only hope that “The progress of the Massachusetts healthcare initiative is being closely watched in Washington.” If it is, people will reject what President Obama and Congress are proposing, which in many ways, including the odious penalties for not buying insurance, mimics the Massacusetts mess.
Posted by: Sadie | June 24, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Hey Borneo, did I say I resent my country? Of course not. Did I say my life has been misspent? Absolutely not. As someone who has spent a few years actually living among those who truly are poor in “developing” countries, I cannot help but love this abundant land which is the United States. God bless her, for she has given me the chance to live a life of my choosing, a life of opportunity known only to a relative handful of people throughout history.
I just recognize the source of greatness which is America, and that is the protected liberty and sovereignty of the individual with as little government oversight as possible. National health care will not promote liberty, it will engender dependence.
Posted by: Matthew | June 24, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Here in Holland the health insurance is privatized and works pretty bad, i have to say. Everyone is forced to pay 70 euro per month, and then we are attended by “house doctors” at the neighborhood clinic, which are almost nurses and don’t understand about any problem you have. They deny you to consult the specialist in order to save money. I wonder where is MY money going to!
Posted by: Rafael Saraiva | June 24, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Let’s just say, a lot of us out here have had our opinions of Obama “evolve” too. And it is not in his favor. His concern is for the rich and powerful Wall Street investment banker crowd who finance his campaign and those of Washington politicians.
Posted by: Denise | June 24, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Is anyone really suprised by this change from Obama? He said waht he thught people wanted to hear inorder to get elected and now everything is changed. Typical politician – only this is change we cannot afford in any way, shape, or form.
Posted by: mj | June 24, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Mr. Obama makes words feel so unimportant. Lying becomes evolving.
Posted by: young_voter | June 24, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
The Dictator’s thoughts are slowly
being revealed as the sham that was
candidate Obama becomes clearer!
2012 can’t come soon enough!
Posted by: reaganfan | June 24, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
Here are some questions I wish ABC would ask Obama:
1) You’ve made quite a bit of fanfare about your anti-smoking bill, but what plans if any do you have to recoup the loss of tax revenues from tobacco? What sort of provisions will you be making, if any, to subsidize tobacco farmers?
2) Do you think the slow-but-steady flourishing of Democracy and Democratic principles in Iraq has anything at all to do with the fervor we see in in the streets of Iran, and do you have any thoughts about your predecessor’s passionate belief in the possibility of real (not sham) Democratic Arab nations and what they could mean to the world? Any chance at all that Bush’s moves in Iraq are now encouraging Iran? What about your troops in Afghanistan? Any word for them?
3) You keep talking about the deficit you inherited, but Congress allows or disallows spending and you voted for all of President Bush’s bills and have added a projected deficit of about 9 Trillion dollars to our future, do you have any projections on when or if you will ever stop spending money?
4) Where are the jobs that our enormous stimulus package was supposed to provide, and is a “jobless recovery” under Obama better than any “jobless recovery” we have ever seen before? When you cut spending on things like Missile Defense and then hear about unemployment rates in the private sector and NoKo aiming nukes at Hawaii, do you ever rethink your defense-spending cuts?
5) Why do you keep firing Inspectors General, without adhering to the rules-for-firing same which you, yourself had a hand in writing during your brief time in the Senate? Do you think Inspector General Walpin is senile? Why did you try to get rid of him so quickly and so quietly? What about the sudden resignation of AmTrak’s Inspector General? Inspectors General are charged with making sure that that government monies are appropriately applied and accounted for; how is it under your administration they’re being ticked off one-by-one if they ask questions or, it seems, try to do their jobs?
6) Who is funding your healthcare astroturfing campaign and what do you think of the curious connection between ACORN and ACORN International’s changing its name?
Posted by: Sadie | June 24, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Before the political piggies force this on the American guinea pigs, I suggest:
That they rid themselves of the GOLDEN CARE they receive and strap on this monster they are going to force on their constituents.
After they do a full term in office with this system and it doesn’t kill them first…….then the people can “VOTE” on whether they want to pay for it!!
Or is this “TOO” simple foe the progressives to comprehend?
Posted by: American Infidel | June 24, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Denise,
I’m with you. It’s become far to clear that Obama is about protecting the Wall Street boys. President Obama, Ben Bernanke, and Tim Geithner are beholden to the richest and most powerful on Wall Street. My opinion of Obama has “evolved” too.
Posted by: Krystal | June 24, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
“2012 can’t come soon enough!”
Another potential GOP opponent for Obama just self immolated.
Posted by: Ryan C | June 24, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
American Infidel:”That they rid themselves of the GOLDEN CARE they receive and strap on this monster they are going to force on their constituents.
After they do a full term in office with this system and it doesn’t kill them first…….then the people can “VOTE” on whether they want to pay for it!!
Or is this “TOO” simple foe the progressives to comprehend?”
Uh, that was Obama’s original proposal. Republicans flat out won’t accept it – it’s the government option the right refuses to allow.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 24, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Sadie:”Who is funding your healthcare astroturfing campaign ”
What a joke. The polls clearly show widespread support for health care reform and as Obama’s massive internet-based small donor haul shows, his online support is real. Heck, even niche candidate Ron Paul has an impressive, unpaid, sincere online ‘army.’
The only whiffs of astroturfing have been the McCain’s setup that awarded points for posts and kept score towards prizes.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 24, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
“Who is funding your healthcare astroturfing campaign”
A better question is who is funding against it.
Like Newt Gingrich being funded by coal companies to lobby against cap & trade.
Check out America’s Health Insurance Plans
Posted by: Ryan C | June 24, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Krystal and Denise. Right on! While my opinion was not “forced”, it has certainly “evolved”. Obama and Washington are focused and friendly with the fat cats on Wall Street.
Posted by: eric | June 24, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Heaven forbid the President should be influenced by logical argument!
He should just stubbornly stick to EVERYTHING he ever said and refuse any input.
Right wingers are daft.
Posted by: danita | June 24, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Two Questions….
1. Exactly WHAT will be the “penalty” for NOT joining a healthcare plan? I have known two young couple in the past few years who were very healthy and chose not to carry health insurance for a couple of years to help them boost their savings to buy a house. After they achieved thier goal, they got back into a plan where one of them worked. Will the gov’t “punish” people who make a choice similar to this?
2. After establishing this the “best thing for the people”, what is to stop the gov’t from then deciding for you other issues that are in the “best interest of the people”?
Posted by: Mike_C | June 24, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
===Uh, that was Obama’s original proposal. Republicans flat out won’t accept it ===
Are you kidding? You are going to blame republicans if this thing fails aren’t you? Even though democrats can do anything they want? You know the twins from ME will do that much, if not actually more. Republicans don’t have the votes to stop anything.
Posted by: Axey | June 24, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Not too worry Mike C, Barney Frank will make sure that young couples will be able to purchase those houses regardless on whether they can afford them or not and just stick it the responsible tax payer later on Every Day is Christmas in Washington DC….HERE WE GO AGAIN……
Posted by: Parallex View | June 24, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
WHEN ARE WE GOING TO START WEARING GOVERNMENT SPONSORED GPS CHIPS BENEATH OUR SKIN? NOT FUNNY.
Posted by: Jimbo | June 24, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
ANY HEALTH CARE PLAN THE FED COMES UP WITH WHICH I HOPE IS ZERO, THE PLAN SHOULD BE AT LEAST TEST MARKETED BEFORE DUMPING THE WHOLE THING ON THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER. WHY IS OBAMA IN SUCH A RUSH TO BANKRUPT OUR COUNTRY? AMERICANS WENT GAGA OVER OBAMA IN THE CAMPAIGN. WHEN ALL THE DUST HAS SETTELED THOSE AMERICANS ARE GOING TO FIND THAT THEY HAVE BEEN TAKEN FOR A RIDE!!
Posted by: Jimbo | June 24, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
I am willing to pay more in taxes to teach people like Jimbo how to use the caps lock button, anyone else in?
Posted by: Ryan C | June 24, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
Yeah evolved after hammering Hillary on the same thing. Obama please say as you said so many times during the debates I agree with Hillary or Hillary was right.
Posted by: rachel | June 24, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
Jimbo . . .
Bush already bankrupted the country and sold it off to the Chinese in debt bonds in order to finance his holy war – remember when God was talking to him?
Catch up boy, you’re falling behind.
Posted by: danita | June 24, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
Mike_C | Jun 24, 2009 3:55:40 PM Exactly WHAT will be the “penalty” for NOT joining a healthcare plan?
—
One of the penalties/fines being put forth in “drafts” is 2% of gross annual income. Figure it out taken from your take-home. No “insurance” in return. This is punishment for disobedience.
And I’m sure other politicians are thinking that’s too low…
Posted by: Eyes Open | June 24, 2009, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
His Thinking Has ‘Evolved’.
I believe that used to be called ‘flip-flopping’…or was that just for McCain?
It’s amusing to watch the Obama Cult defend everything he does and doesn’t do no matter what.
Posted by: Tobias | June 25, 2009, 5:46 am 5:46 am
YES, I WAS NOT HAPPY WITH THE SPENDING UNDER GB’S WATCH ESPECIALLY THE FIRST BAILOUT. IN HIS DEFENSE, HE HAD 911, AND NATIONAL DEFENSE AS A PRIORITY. HE ALSO HAD A SPEND HAPPY CONGRESS. HOWEVER, DOES THAT MEAN OBAMA HAS TO GO APE OVER MORE OUT OF CONTROL SPENDING? THE OBAMA STIMULUS IS NOT WORKING AND HAD NO CHANCE OF WORKING. STIMULUS SHOULD HAVE HAD INCLUDED MUCH MORE STRESS FAVORING THE PRIVATE SECTOR. THE PRIVATE SECTOR IS THE ONLY ENTITY THAT CAN CREATE ECONOMIC GROWTH. FED’S MAKE WORK PROGRAMS ARE JUST ABOUT AS VALUABLE AS BLOWING F RTS IN THE WIND.
Posted by: Jimbo | June 25, 2009, 6:20 am 6:20 am
Mandatory does Obama have room in prison for those that will protest his health plan. Screw this president I hope he gets voted out in a landslide. I hope his plan fails. I hope this SOB president fails. I hope Ted Kennedy fails. If Health Insurance becomes mandatory then I hope Americans just break the law. Screw the don’t break the law rule. That requirement is against my human rights.
Posted by: JJ | June 25, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Please enlighten me..is there even one campaign promise obama has kept. Next he will tell us that we can’t keep the plans we have, what doctor we can see, what medical care we can get.
I still can’t figure out why the single payer plan was not even considered. Just watch he will evolve away from public option too.
Him and Bush gave all our money to the banks, we are in the worst recession ever, it is predicted housing is going to continue to tank, we will barely be able to pay for milk for our children let alone continue to support this president and his rich cronies.
Posted by: Deborah | July 8, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Jimbo, Bush had a war, Katrina and 9-11 expense but Obama has tripled the spending in six months without any of that.
Posted by: Bonnie Wheeler | July 30, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
I live in Massachusetts and work full-time for the state of Connecticut. Mandatory–forced-insurance is a loss of personal freedom. You don’t have to be a right-wing ideologue or a Leftist nut to know this. If I don’t carry insurance, despite my health or my views on medicine, the state fines me thousands of dollars each year! This is not progress; this is an attempt to take our hard-earned money away from us and give it to the state and the insurance companies. The only exemptions are for financial hardship–as it is defined by the state of Massachusetts–and religious beliefs. I didn’t vote for Obama because I knew he would let the insurance companies, politicians like Deval Patrick, and Hillary Clinton, and other sell-out tools and stoodges influence his decisions. And when America was in its frenzy of adulation and I refused to support him or McCain, I was told I was cyncial. Well, I’d laugh if this wasn’t all so serious and sad. America needs to wake up and see who’s really running this country.
Posted by: Dee | July 31, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm