By Kate Barrett

Jun 2, 2009 7:15am

President Obama on Israel: ‘Part of Being a Good Friend Is Being Honest’

In an interview that aired last night and this morning, President Obama told NPR that in terms of the U.S. relationship with Israel, "part of being a good friend is being honest. And I think there have been times where we are not as honest as we should be about the fact that the current direction, the current trajectory in the region, is profoundly negative – not only for Israeli interests but also U.S. interests. And that’s part of a new dialogue that I’d like to see encouraged in the region."

Later today the president will fly to Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, where he will neet with King Abdullah, after which he will fly to Cairo, Egypt, to deliver a major address to the Muslim world. The Israeli-Palestinian peace process will be front and center on the agenda.

We're also told the president will discuss terrorism, oil prices, and Iran with King Abdullah. The president is expected to press Arab countries to formally  recognize Israel.

"I think that we do have to retain a constant belief in the possibilities of negotiations that will lead to peace," the president said. "And that’s going to require, from my view, a two-state solution that is going to require that each side – the Israelis and Palestinians – meet their obligations. "

The president as of late has been publicly expressing much more frustration with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel's settlement policy than he has with Bibi's Palestinian's counterparts.

"I’ve said very clearly to the Israelis both privately and publicly that a freeze on settlements, including natural growth, is part of those obligations," Mr. Obama said. "I’ve said to the Palestinians that their continued progress on security and ending the incitement that, I think, understandably makes the Israelis so concerned, that that has to be – those obligations have to be met. So the key is to just believe that that process can move forward and that all sides are going to have to give. And it’s not going to be an easy path, but one that I think we can achieve."

Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., and other Democrats in Congress have been expressing concern that the president's approach is not even-handed,

“My concern is that we are applying pressure to the wrong party in this dispute,” Berkley told Ben Smith of Politico. “I think it would serve America’s interest better if we were pressuring the Iranians to eliminate the potential of a nuclear threat from Iran, and less time pressuring our allies and the only democracy in the Middle East to stop the natural growth of their settlements.”

Berkely said that "when Congress gets back into session the administration is going to hear from many more members than just me."

“There’s a line between articulating U.S. policy and seeming to be pressuring a democracy on what are their domestic policies, and the president is tiptoeing right up to that line,” said Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y, told Politico. “I would have liked to hear the president talk more about the Palestinian obligation to cut down on terrorism.”

Laura Rozen at Foreign Policy last week reported that Netanyahu seems flummoxed grousing, according to an associate, "What the hell do they want from me?"

Netanyahu, looking for "loopholes and hidden agreements that have often existed in the past with Washington," writes Rozen, is confused that the Obama administration's opposition to settlements has no wiggle room.

- jpt

User Comments

I think it is high time we held the Israeli’s feet to the fire. I am a strong supporter of Israel but that does not mean we have to grovel to Bibi. I think Netenyahu is the biggest obsticle to peace in the region. He had ruined all that Rabin had put in place the last time he was Prime Minister.

Posted by: Michael | June 2, 2009, 7:58 am 7:58 am

The liar thinks everyone else should be honest. “Do as I say, not as I do.”

Posted by: Marijulie | June 2, 2009, 8:12 am 8:12 am

This is classic Obama. Any time he lies, he’ll say: “the teleprompter made me do it.”

Posted by: stevaleressence | June 2, 2009, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Right on Mr. President.

Posted by: Marion Vincent | June 2, 2009, 8:30 am 8:30 am

The state of Israel was imposed on the region by occupying powers. The most important thing in this whole controversy if for Israel to recognize the Palestinians’ right to their own separate state. Israel must stop the settlements which destroy Palestinian villages, land rights, and farms. Gaza and its refugee camps must be rebuilt to ensure health, safety, and freedom. This travesty of Israeli domination of this region must end, then and only then will the Arab states recognize Israel. No, I do not hate Jews, but they must also not hate the Palestinians.

Posted by: fuzzy | June 2, 2009, 8:36 am 8:36 am

M, Why? Does Israel lob rockets into palestinian territories for any other reason than for self defense. How would you like it if someone followed you around with a baseball bat, everywhere you went, not knowing if that person was going to hit you in the head with it at some point, I think you would grow tired of it and build a defense also.

Posted by: Eagle Eye | June 2, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am

Eagle Eye, Israel did return lands at one time and did rebuild Palestinian structures. This did not the cease the actions of the Palestinians. They continued to car bomb and commit terror on Israel. Arabs refuse to accept any peaceful resolution with Israel, their religion will not allow it. How else do you deal with this type of mentality?

Posted by: Dan from Texas | June 2, 2009, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Let’s be honest, POTUS.. this region is going to hell in a handcart..

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | June 2, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am

… but, it’s not your fault.. I forgot that part…

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | June 2, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am

===So the key is to just believe that that process can move forward and that all sides are going to have to give. ===
At least he’s consistent in his hope and change theme.

Posted by: Axey | June 2, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am

===I think Netenyahu is the biggest obsticle to peace in the region.===
Of course the biggest obstacle couldn’t possibly be the actual terrorists in the region that want to see Israel wiped off the map. It has to be Bibi.

Posted by: Axey | June 2, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Obama seems alittle impatient with Bibi.
BO doesn’t know what to make of a world leader that isn’t full of kool-aid.
The big question–will Obama bow again to the Saudi king? He bowed out of respect.
So if he doesn’t bow that will look disrespectful to the Saudis. If BO does bow–the WH will just deny it again.
Believe Obama not your lying eyes!

Posted by: max | June 2, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Bibi doesn’t like the taste of the kool-aid… POTUS is laying it down, but he ain’t pickin’ it up!

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | June 2, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am

There is only one way to have honesty in the Middle East negotiations – have Rangle, Pelosi, Murtha, Dodd and Geitner handle them. Then they wil be above reproach.

Posted by: jamescbuilder | June 2, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Israel has never been a democracy—they parade around acting like it –in truth they are no different than south africa was with the apartheid–they need to grow up and stop with the extreme behavior–stop expanding those settlements and get on with the process of returning what is and never has been yours–(and it was not legitimately taken) it was stolen with US Arms….

Posted by: tommboy | June 2, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

The U.S. should do something to help the inhabitants of Gaza City.. this is the crucible for future militants.. it might be worth any investment, in time and money, in relation to any hope of regional security.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | June 2, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Everything obie does is a disaster, god help Israel.

Posted by: NO surprise here | June 2, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

“stop expanding those settlements and get on with the process of returning what is and never has been yours–(and it was not legitimately taken) it was stolen with US Arms….”
Spoken like a true student of history. What history do you know of the land between Jordan and the Med Sea?

Posted by: KR | June 2, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am

I think it’s time we put our money where our mouth is and stop giving ANY aid to Israel unless it stops building & actually works towards peace. Israel has to admit that they took this land, they are an occupying force and they are, in some ways, no better than the bullies they escaped in Germany.

Posted by: Sharon | June 2, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am

” think it’s time we put our money where our mouth is and stop giving ANY aid to Israel unless it stops building & actually works towards peace. Israel has to admit that they took this land, they are an occupying force and they are, in some ways, no better than the bullies they escaped in Germany.”
Amazing. Do you know the history of that land? Do you know that the inhabitants of that land, Jews and Arabs, argue over the ownership of that land dating back 3,000 years of recorded history? The Jews, through the Tora, show documented and holy claim to that land, while Arabs argue the same?
Truth be told, they have both laid claim to that same peice of land for 3,000 years. They have fought wars, enslaved each other, and ran insurgencies against each other for 3,000 years. What you just said only takes history back about 100 years. Just going back a couple hundred years and you have Palestinians kicking Jews out of thier homes.
Their only hope is co-existance. Your saying get rid of one. Yup, 3,000 years of history says that will solve it. Nice in depth thinking.

Posted by: KR | June 2, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Honesty is always a good idea – like being honest about ear marks, about getting out of Iraq, about what the Wall Street Fat Cats are doing with TARP, about reducing the national debt, about tax cheats in the Treasury, about donors in high posts, about closing Gitmo, about gay marriage rights…I’m afraid selective honesty is a recipe for problems. I voted for you Mr. President. But, you best be careful about preaching honesty.

Posted by: kelly | June 2, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am

The pr game seems to have been won by the Palestinians, if reading some of these comments is any indication.

Posted by: Axey | June 2, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Why do I get the succinct feeling the second holocaust is just beginning?

Posted by: Seymour | June 2, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am

“Honesty” back at ya from Israel:
Israeli Government Press Director Daniel Seamen reacted to this Obama administration statement by saying: “I have to admire the residents of Iroquois territory for assuming that they have a right to determine where Jews should live in Jerusalem.”

Posted by: TobB | June 2, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am

“Honesty” back at ya from Israel:
Israeli Government Press Director Daniel Seamen reacted to this Obama administration statement by saying: “I have to admire the residents of Iroquois territory for assuming that they have a right to determine where Jews should live in Jerusalem.”

Posted by: TobB | June 2, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Lets throw Israel under the bus, then we wont have to worry about anything again. The Muslims will be happy, Iraq will have its atomic weapons to lunch against the rest of the west and Pres. Obama will blame Bush for everything.

Posted by: Lizzie | June 2, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Why do I get the succinct feeling the second holocaust is just beginning?
posted by Seymour:
You have not seen anything yet, Pres. Obama gave the green light to Iraq and told Irael to stand down from defending itself.

Posted by: Lizzie | June 2, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am

” have to admire the residents of Iroquois territory for assuming that they have a right to determine where Jews should live in Jerusalem”
Wow, excellent response. For liberals who don’t know, Washington DC was within Iroquis territory when settlers came to America. Thus, Washington DC, who displaced Native American Indians, telling the Jews where they can live. Very creative response. Shows how they debate under the long tooth of history when it comes to thier situation.

Posted by: KR | June 2, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

===Israeli Government Press Director Daniel Seamen reacted to this Obama administration statement by saying: “I have to admire the residents of Iroquois territory for assuming that they have a right to determine where Jews should live in Jerusalem.”===
OMG! I love it.

Posted by: Axey | June 2, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am

sorry, LAUNCH

Posted by: Lizzie | June 2, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am

I’m curious to know what country has borders that have *not* been set either against their will or against the will of their neighbors.

Posted by: MayBee | June 2, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

“Somebody’s gotta pay Ben.” Obama turns Netanyahu, he becomes a hero in the eyes of the Arab world; thus advances his political career with the liberal side of our political system…Problem is it is at the expense of an allies, Somebody’s gotta pay Ben..The best thing Israel has is Netanyahu right now…

Posted by: Parallax View | June 2, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Todays joke is tomorrows glowing ember.

Posted by: American Infidel | June 2, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

ran insurgencies against each other for 3,000 years KR
seems to me I remember that the Israeli underground groups (considered ‘terrorists’ by the British) , pre partition, had a very aggressive insurgency against the British, which included blowing up hotels……

Posted by: postman | June 2, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

I think that Israel should let Obama playing ping-pong with himself. He has much more concern in the domestic and economic problems of the US. Israel can keep with hers independent policy for 3 years and pray for Obama political crashing in the ballot. Not only because ME affairs but because of Obama’s failure in huge domestic problems and international ones. Israel can function well with out US back up in military aid and UN voting aid. I would say that more than Israel wants to buy American planes and missiles the US (security industry) wants to sell her. Especially in such bad times. Israel on the other hand donates to the US its most advanced military and scientific developments and knowhow that cost at least the amount of annual value that of the US loans to Israel.
The US needs the trust of Israel for playing free in the Arab’s political environment. With out that trust the Arabs won’t lean on the US. And what the Arabs states altogether can devote for the US? Oil, oil, oil and Oil again….. Well, and more illegal immigrants. Bon appetite, America.

Posted by: AbeBird | June 2, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Todays joke is tomorrows glowing ember.
Posted by: American Infidel
that sounds very Cheney, Bush and Ms. Condi,
aka ‘the mushroom cloud’..

Posted by: postman | June 2, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

KR
so your saying that all Americans currently living in America right now are illegal immigrants with no claim on the land…… that colonials took away the country from the Indians….
dude , you are the history man of the right-wing, thank you for that very perceptive analysis…..
imagine America robbing and killing to get it’s way, so glad that never happened to anyone else other than the native americans…….

Posted by: LOL | June 2, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Let Israel fend for themselves. They want to hit Iran’s nuclear facilities? Great. But don’t expect us to come in and help clean up after.

Posted by: Doug | June 2, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Postman, can you please name the “hotels” that the Jewish “aggessive insurgency” blew to the British occupation of Israel?
Let me remind you, Jewish underground warriors DIDN’T attack British civilains and families of the Brit’s soldiers. They also DIDN’T attack “HOTELS” but on part of ONE hotel, “King David” hotel, a Jewish hotel in Jerusalem. In that part of the hotel the British located their MAIN occupying headquarter. That was legitimate action, heroic action and the Jews warned the British 20 mins before the explosion occured. The very fact that the British prefered not to believe to the Jews played against them !!!!!!!

Posted by: AbeBird | June 2, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

“so your saying that all Americans currently living in America right now are illegal immigrants with no claim on the land…… that colonials took away the country from the Indians….”
I didn’t say anything and my opinion on colonization of America wasn’t expressed. My Grandmother was in Indian so I have some of my own insight that you probably don’t want to hear.
That doesn’t matter. Not sure what motivated you to turn something on me. I pointed out that Israel’s response was well done. Their response questions our moral authority to tell Jews where they can inhabit in their country when we ourselves displaced people for our own. No where did I give my opinion on the matter.

Posted by: KR | June 2, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Doug, what “clean after”?
Did the US cleaned after Israel blew Saddam Houssein nuclear reactor?
When Israel will decide that she can no longer wait for Obama “decisions” she will act in any move that will serve her interests. The US should not agree and we don’t care if you will oppose. It’s Israel business especially when Obama modify the crisis. Obama has no knowledge and experience virtue and I hope that he won’t lead the ME for another war. He better centralize his efforts to rescue US economy.
We won’t call you, don’t call us!

Posted by: AbeBird | June 2, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

abe
re” That was legitimate action, heroic action”
everyone who blows something up seems to think of it as a ‘legitimate, heroic action’..
guess it always depends on who’s getting blown up at the time whether it’s justified or not….
sounds like something Al Queda would say..
so it’s OK to blow up something/someone as long as you give a warning a short time before the explosion.. thanks for the clarity

Posted by: postman | June 2, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

abe:
the fringe parts of the ‘pro-life’ movement in America thought it was ‘legitimate, heroic action’ to murder Dr. Tiller

Posted by: postman | June 2, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Some attitudes seem to be all take and no give. Whose I wonder?
Let’s see a little give and take.

Posted by: danita | June 2, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

“so it’s OK to blow up something/someone as long as you give a warning a short time before the explosion.. thanks for the clarity”
This plays into the debate of legitmate targetting. The IRA targetted British military and government in their attacks. Jews (and Arabs) attacked government occupation forces.
The Islamic extremists in 9/11 attacked civilians in New York, and the Pentagon. Most people don’t talk about the Pentagon, it strikes less of a cord then the towers falling. If the 9/11 attackers had attacked military bases or, say a harbored aircraft carrier, the response may not have been the same.
Plays into a true debate. If terror targets government/military, is it acceptable? Or is the tactic of terror unacceptable?
Generally speaking, the outrage comes from the targeting of civilian gatherings and structures when it comes to terror.

Posted by: KR | June 2, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

I’ve seen some tv footage of some right lunatics, some extremist jews in Israel and extremist arabs in other countries.
And I’ve seen footage of just decent folks in Iran, Israel .. . you name it.
Let’s work on behalf of the decent folks, not those extremist whack jobs.
Give and take.

Posted by: danita | June 2, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

KR
re” Plays into a true debate. If terror targets government/military, is it acceptable? Or is the tactic of terror unacceptable? ”
good points by you,
it really gets murky when a ‘legitimate’ target sits right in the middle of a heavily populated civilian area,,,, how many civilian deaths are worth the price of the target, is even a consideration for the attacker….

Posted by: postman | June 2, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

postman , I answered to your groundless accusations, that’s all.
Not “everyone who blows something up seems to think of it as a ‘legitimate,… “, you can operate your brain and think for a while. The British were occupiers as they acknowledged themselves. There wasn’t any dispute in that issue. The British failed to accomplish their mandate duty to help the Jews building their state in the land of Israel, as decides in the League of Nations in 1920 and 1922. They helped the Palestinian Arabs to create their state in the land of Palestine, called ‘Trans Jordan’ until 1947 and then Jordan, but failed at the time to fulfill the other part that they well obligated to: To let the Palestinian Jews creating their own state in the western part of Palestine. That attitude is the cause of the conflict.
As for the blowing up of the British main headquarter in Palestine, it was legitimate as far as the conflict was alive. It is legitimate for the Palestinian Arabs to attack IDF post every where they want, but it is not legitimate to attack purposely civilians, as they usually do.
I hope that you understand the difference.

Posted by: AbeBird | June 2, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

“Let’s work on behalf of the decent folks, not those extremist whack jobs.
Give and take.”
We always have. We have given billions in aid to Israel, Egypt, Palestinians, Jordan, Lebenon, and Syria over the years. Our nation has ALWAYS had a stance of co-existance. Unfortunately, large portions of the populations in question demand all or nothing. Jew extremist point to the Bible and the promise land between the Jordan river and the sea, while Palestinians do the same. (Actually, Palestine claims areas inside Jordan, Egypt including the Suez Canal, Syria, and Lebenon). Under the table, none of those Arab countries want an established Palestinian state because that state would lay claim to portions of other nations, not just Israel. They prefer Israel to exist and take the brunt of Palestinian anger. As long as they are concentrating on Israel, they aren’t focusing on the Arab neighbors.

Posted by: KR | June 2, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Abe:
you can justify whatever you care to on behalf of Israel, I am not anti Israel,
I am making the point the the same tactics regardless of the side that uses them are still the same tactics……
if you want to adopt the ‘it’s OK when we blow up somebody attitude’ thats on you…
blowing up a building is blowing up a building,
whether it’s in Israel, Africa, or the United States

Posted by: postman | June 2, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

“how many civilian deaths are worth the price of the target, is even a consideration for the attacker….”
Exactly. Timmothy McVeigh was targetting the ATF in his bombing, in his mind a legitmate target. He even expressed remorse when he learned there was a day care in there. In his mind, he was only going after the ATF. But his tactic was indiscriminate, which is what garnered the label terror.
Colatoral damage is an unfortunate constant in warfare, probably always will be. Where you disect it is in its intent and its intended target. The vast majority of terror attacks are designed to send a message, one of fear. If it is designed to diminish the capability of a foreign or occupying government, it is at last half legit.
There is one commonality however. Using the civilian population as camoflauge is against the rules of warfare and thus, subject to summary execution. All of these terror acts have this in common, making all of them illegal in international law, thus on that basis should all be treated the same.

Posted by: KR | June 2, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

“none of those Arab countries want an established Palestinian state”
Since when did you start speaking on behalf of Arab countries KR?

Posted by: danita | June 2, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

“Since when did you start speaking on behalf of Arab countries KR?”
Two good friends of mine years ago were Jordanian. The explained to me in depth their views of the Israel/Palestinian issue. It also makes logical sense. The PLO tried to overthrow both the Egyptian Government and the Jordanian government in the last 40 years. Look it up. 60% of the population of Jordan is Palestinian. It would be logical that a Palestinian state would be a threat to them. Also their claim of what is Palestinian territory occupied by Jordan, Egypt, Lebenon, and Syria, and it’s not too hard to figure out.

Posted by: KR | June 2, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

“seems to me I remember that the Israeli underground groups (considered ‘terrorists’ by the British) , pre partition, had a very aggressive insurgency against the British”
So did the Palestinians, attacking the British for just as long. Thats why the British threw up their hands and left. They occupied that land and realized it was futile to hope for peace there. Even when the Romans occupied that land, Arabs and Jews had numerous uprisings against them.

Posted by: KR | June 2, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

So basically no one gave you the right to speak on behalf of arab countries except for your ‘two friends’.
Please don’ pretend to speak on behalf of arab governments. It’s important to deal with truths.

Posted by: danita | June 2, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

“So basically no one gave you the right to speak on behalf of arab countries except for your ‘two friends’.
Please don’ pretend to speak on behalf of arab governments. It’s important to deal with truths.”
Truth is the PLO tried to overthrow the government of Jordan and Egypt in the 60′s and 70′s.
Truth, I have two Jordanian friends who lived there during that time and still live there.
Truth, Palestinians claim that their lands are occupied by Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Egypt.
Truth, the surrounding Arab countries have not recognized a Palestinian state.
Logical conclusion, they do not want one because it would be a threat to them, also repeating the words of people who lived there.
Just because I take these facts and come to a conclusion doesn’t mean I am the authority on the matter, but it doesn’t mean your right and I’m wrong. If your response is only to try and discredit me because I’m not an Arab government, then you don’t have a response to what I am saying.

Posted by: KR | June 2, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

So postman, you’re not for “blowing up buildings”? very smart. So you give advantage to those who seek to bomb “buildings” in America, then you not let America to defend herself. Terrorists, especially Islamic fanatics, don’t play according to your rule. If a person pass you in the street and spit on you or slaps your face, what would you do? What would you do if he is repeating his behave for 365 days a year and for 100 years? Would you consider you legitimate right to defend yourself? And now, if that entity decides to cut you apart from now and then, what would you do then?
Israel always agreed to concessions. The Arabs didn’t, even before the creation of the “Palestinian people”. The “Palestinian People” (called before the “southern Syria inhabitants) don’t accept the right of the Jews for sovereign state in the ME. As the Muslim Arabs did chase, kill and make the ME Christian flee the area, so they dream to do the same for the Jews. Let not forget that Palestine is the occupier’s name of the land of Israel, and Jews always settled through history on their land under more than 30 different occupiers. Arabs conquered Palestine only for few decades in the mediavel time. the last 400 hundred years only the Muslim Turks and the Christian British occupied the land, until Jordan occupied the “west bank” in 1948 against the US resolutions. 19 years later, before a real “Palestinian people” was born, Israel was obliged to conquer the “west bank” (and Gaza strip) because of the Arab coalition intended to invade Israel.
Israel didn’t occupy the “west bank” from the “Palestinian” but from Jordan. Arafat trying to cope King Houssein of Jordan in 1970 “black September” failed and then he consentrated in smashing Israel. The Arab Palestinian don’t talk about peace but about ruining Israel and creating the “Big Palestine” from the desert to the sea” !!!!

Posted by: AbeBird | June 2, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

You stated “none of those Arab countries want an established Palestinian state”.
This is not the position of Arab governments.
This is only something you are stating from whatever your particular bias might be. Guess work is not what is required.

Posted by: danita | June 2, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Again Obama bowing to Arabs. Dont you feel sick to your stomach? Guess what Obama get ready for your reward for catering to terrorists demands. The same stab in the back they gave George Bush and all other Presidents before you.

Posted by: lookforananswer | June 2, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

“You stated “none of those Arab countries want an established Palestinian state”.
This is not the position of Arab governments.”
Danita, the Arab states are demanding that Israel recognize a Palestinian state, something they know they will not do. Lets lay this out a little further. The Arabs know that the Palestinians want one result, no more Israel. That all of the territories that is modern day Israel/Palestine become just Palestine. Many Jews have the opposite view. Their faith says that land belongs to them with no compromise. Thus if either recognizes the existance of the other, they nullify their claim to what they deem is their land.
Now, Arabs know this well. So they get people to focus on the impossible, Israel recognizing a Palestinian state. King of Jordan just put out this exact talking point. So why not just get all of the Arab nations, and the world, to recognize a Palestinian state? They don’t need Israel’s permission to recognize a Palestine anymore than Germany needed Serbia’s permission to recognize Kosovo. Whats stopping them? They entire arguement hinges on Israel making that decision, it would be like us demanding Serbia recognizing Kosovo.
The conflict with Israel gives them a necessary distraction from having to do just that. It’s calculated and intention, and it removes them from being in the fray.

Posted by: KR | June 2, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Arab countries helped to make the Bush family even richer through Carlisle and other oil interests. Oil speaks louder that ethics in some circle.
And I’m tired of hearing this nonsense about President Obama ‘bowing’ to the Arab countries.
Extremists are extremists whether jewish, arab or someone like yourself. The majority of people are just normal, decent folks trying to get along, raise and support their families and have a decent quality of life.

Posted by: danita | June 2, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Abe:
I’ll try again,….
Israel has the right to do whatever it thinks is necessary to defend it’s own interests.
Israel is NOT the only country or people who take that position.
Each country or people justifies their actions based on what they consider to be ‘right’ for them.
You have a pro Israel perspective, someone else might be pro Palestinian…
You both believe that the ‘right’ is on your side, and do so passionately.
What you believe for your side, is what someone else believes about their side.
The Irgun blew up a building because they believed in their cause and it was the right thing to do.
Are you suggesting that only the Israelis would be capable of coming to that kind of conclusion, acting, by whatever means on their own behalf in their own best interest?

Posted by: postman | June 2, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

danita , most Arabs hate Palestinian Arabs. The “Palestinian” problem was for 60 years the issue that Arab countries cultivated in order to mislead their own citizens from the real problems of the Arab countries. Each time that opposition was emerged in some state the government accused it by claiming that they play for Israel favor and preventing the citizens from dealing with the “real problem” – Israel. That’s why you don’t see even today real oppositions in Arab countries.

Posted by: AbeBird | June 2, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

AbeBird . . ..
Again, don’t presume to speak on behalf of contemporary Arab countries, or Arab peoples in 2009. Give them at least the decency of letting them speak on their own behalf, not put your understanding in their mouths.

Posted by: danita | June 2, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

postman, I understood your claim at the first time. I think that you don’t understand mine.
I think that Arab Palestinian has the right to attack Israel’s targets as they wish. They mainly attack civilian targets in purpose, although they can do so against military targets. They want to break the will and coherence of the Israelis. But they fail time and again. Israelis are uniting against any foreign intervention in their local affairs. Obama should know that either or he will fail in that matter.
Israel (and the ‘Irgun’ for that matter) reacts by hitting terror targets, trying as much as possible, to hurt Arab civilians.
The difference makes the point. For many evidence we all know that the majority of the Palestinian Arabs don’t tend to accept Israel’s right to exist. They translate the Roman occupier name’s “Palestine” as their own asset. They think that they are Mouhammad messenger in combating the Judeo-Christian invaders to the “Dahr El-Islam” (land of Islam where Muslims are ruling for now before occupying the land of wars, the land of Gentiles = “Dahr El-Harb” (literally = ‘Land of the sword’). Israel is located in their midst of their land of Islam and it’s their historical – belief burden.
What I want to emphasize is that what ever Israel will do in order to promote the peace the Palestinian Arabs will do less and will blame Israel for the next crisis. The Hamas and even the Fatah (PLO, PA) exercise their tactics that is called “the stage program” (1974), in order to defeat Israel in stages of wars/terror attacks and peace talks combined, as the do until these days.

Posted by: AbeBird | June 2, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

“Again, don’t presume to speak on behalf of contemporary Arab countries, or Arab peoples in 2009. Give them at least the decency of letting them speak on their own behalf, not put your understanding in their mouths.”
Danita, go read about “Black September”. Read how the PLO has been a threat to the neighboring Arab nations for decades. Don’t have to speak for the Arab governments to read the history books.
And with your logic, since none of us are an Arab government, we cannot talk about it.
We bring up these points because it is important to understand them in context with our President and what he says. If you don’t research a little history, how can you have an educated opinion on this matter? Talking in great plattitudes is great, but it is meaningless. Our President is stepping on toes and its important to understand how and why. Not for criticism, but for our own education and knowledge.

Posted by: KR | June 2, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

What I love the most about these blogs..is that current history always begins in the year 2001.. it is the line of demarkation.. prior to this date, all was well.. you have to go back before most of the commenters were born to find a similar eight year history of disaster (as 2001 to 2009)!

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | June 2, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Just of note from the Roman occupation of Israel/Palestine.
The Romans called it Palestine but appointed a Jewish King. Most likely a political move by the Romans to get the two factions to hate each other more than Rome. It’s interesting because even the Romans 2,000 years ago understood that keeping them fighting each other rather than fighting Rome benefited Rome. Seems like today the only difference is there is no Rome occupier, but the calculus is the same. If they are fighting each other, they aren’t fighting us.

Posted by: KR | June 2, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

The Romans were experts in transforming captive populations into denizens of Rome… they were better at colonialism and imperialism than the U.S.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | June 2, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

” they were better at colonialism and imperialism than the U.S.”
Was this in jest?
I ask because when people pin “imperialism” or “hegemony” on the U.S. it usually has nothing to do with the definition of imperialism or hegemony.
Hegemony – leadership or predominant influence exercised by one nation over others, as in a confederation.
Imperialsism – the policy of extending the rule or authority of an empire or nation over foreign countries, or of acquiring and holding colonies and dependencies.
What I find is people use only a portion of these definitions to justify using the entire word description. Reality is our nation has great influence economically and militarily to support its interests, not unlike any other nation. Ours is just bigger, which in and of itself makes us a villain somhow. Every nation uses its elements of national power to support its interests. Even Obama has quoted to say the same thing. Does this mean Obama is an imperialist? Does it mean he is going to propagate US hegemony?
Of course not. But he is going to promote US interests which is what every President does, and has done.

Posted by: KR | June 2, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

I meant to say that you are mistaken. Arabs, as a whole in high percentage, hate the Israelis, the Jews and Israel. The exact percentage might be changed in the edges, but still Arab populations in the ME reject the very notion that Jews have right to live in their national home in Palestine (the Roman occupier name for the Land of Israel). That’s why many among them even don’t call Israel by hers name but by a nickname: “The Zionist entity”.

Posted by: AbeBird | June 2, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

“President Obama on Israel: ‘Part of Being a Good Friend Is Being Honest’”
Israel on Obama: ‘With friends like Obama, who needs enemies?’

Posted by: Veritas | June 2, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

KR…
Thanx.. finally, someone can decipher my Tongue-in-cheek buffoonery.. you are probably too intelligent to blog here..

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | June 2, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

..maybe:
coerced subjugation by MNC influence over local governing bodies
avuncular methodologies for gleaning resources from lesser organized countries
formation of multinational regional organizations with big brother states having greater say-so than less powerful, needier nations

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | June 2, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Veritas,
goddess of truth, a daughter of Saturn and the mother of Virtue
obama/israel.. i like it..

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | June 2, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

abe:
re: ‘it’s their historical – belief burden.”
I do understand your point, your comment
pretty much summarizes the entire mid east conflict, …no matter who offers what, ”it’s their historical – belief burden” that gets in the way eventually…..
it is an unending tragedy

Posted by: postman | June 2, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

cool

Posted by: andrew phillips | June 2, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

All sides, and I mean ALL sides. have been building towards this stalemate for decades now. No one can back down, no one can be seen to giving in. And far to many political stands in nations all over the world are based upon what THEY can get out of the dilemma. The Arab world needs to consider the fact that the even the most moderate wishes for a Palestinian state involve a geographical boundary that precludes the Palestinians from ever living in a viable, forward looking country. Israel needs to realize that while they him and haw about a solution, the longer term worries such as water and poverty slip further and further behind in their own backyard. All sides need to take a deep breath, stand WAY back and take a good long hard look at what would work. What would be a viable solution for not only Israel, ALL the Palestinian people and the region as a whole?

Posted by: Gary Tucker | June 3, 2009, 2:31 am 2:31 am

Rep. Shelley Berkley is another U.S. politician who seems to have placed her loyalty as an American second to her loyalty (as a Jew), to Israel.

Posted by: Dutch | June 3, 2009, 8:45 am 8:45 am

love

Posted by: mikayla | February 15, 2010, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.