By Caitlin Taylor

Jun 9, 2009 1:29pm

Sotomayor: Crimebuster

ABC News’ Karen Travers, Ann Compton and Sunlen Miller report:


This morning in Washington, eight national law enforcement organizations announced their support for Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s nomination to the Supreme Court, including the Fraternal Order of Police, National Association of District Attorneys and the National Latino Peace Officers Association.
Sotomayor served as an assistant district attorney in New York City.


Vice President Biden headlined the event and thanked the organizations for their public support for President Obama’s first nominee to the nation’s top court.


“So you all are on the front lines. But as you do your job, know that Judge Sotomayor has your back as well.  And throughout this nominating process, I know you’ll have her back,” he said.


Biden, flanked by nine uniformed police chiefs, spoke about how Sotomayor’s work in the Manhattan prosecutor’s office and her experience on the federal bench have prepared her for a place on the Supreme Court.

“This is a woman whose lifelong commitment to law enforcement is just impossible to argue with; I won’t say hard to argue with, impossible to argue with,” he said.


The vice president cited her upbringing as the foundation for her work as a “tough-as-nails prosecutor” in New York City. Biden said when Sotomayor grew up in a public housing project in the Bronx, her mother would not allow her to play in the stairwells because it was too dangerous and she saw firsthand how crime can affect a community


“Remember the time frame in which she was growing up in the city, in the South Bronx.  And she used that experience.  She used that experience as a prosecutor and then as a judge to work with law enforcement to ensure that criminals, murderers, drug dealers, gang members and worst offenders would face justice and get what they deserve,” he said.


Joseph Cassily, president of the National District Attorneys Association, echoed Biden’s sentiment. 


“We’re very interested and excited that we believe that we have a Supreme Court nominee who has the sense of the streets and of the courtroom and understands how judicial decisions and judicial pronouncements out of the supreme court impact courtroom prosecutors,” he said.


Sotomayor’s former boss, Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau said she will be an “able champion of the law.”


Despite an injury yesterday that has her on crutches, Sotomayor continues her meetings with members of the Senate today on Capitol Hill. Unlike in her previous sessions, today the senators will come to her so she doesn’t have to hobble from meeting to meeting.


The law enforcement organizations announcing their support for Sotomayor were:
Major Cities Chiefs Association
Police Executive Research Forum
National Sheriff’s Association
National Association of Police Organizations
National Latino Peace Officers Association
Fraternal Order of Police
National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives
National Association of District Attorneys

User Comments

She takes into consideration both sides, the victims and those that committed the crimes. They both have feelings and families. Well, when you consider a murders sentence based on his families feelings, I think we are in trouble.

Posted by: Linda /Michigan | June 9, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Linda /Michigan:”She takes into consideration both sides,…when you consider a murders sentence based on his families feelings, I think we are in trouble.”
Apparently a number of police associations (at least some pretty non-trivial – the Fraternal Order of Police has over 2000 local chapters) do not agree with you.

Posted by: jhw539 | June 9, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Thanks but no thanks linda,
I think I’ll put her judicial record & all levels of law enforcement ahead of right wing (or left)slanted media and opinions.

Posted by: watching | June 9, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

It isn’t surprising to hear UNIONS speaking for its members. How many ACTUAL crime fighters are supporting her nomination?

Posted by: GinnyPub | June 9, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

“It isn’t surprising to hear UNIONS speaking for its members. How many ACTUAL crime fighters are supporting her nomination?”
How nice that you are so eager to smear cops because they support this nominee.
Typical right winger.

Posted by: Ryan C | June 9, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

It is not wrong to ask if the rank and file believe the same as the Union Bosses. Union members are free to think for themselves aren’t they?
Why are liberals afraid of freedom of speech for all individuals.

Posted by: WWW | June 9, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

“Why are liberals afraid of freedom of speech for all individuals.”
Yes from the right wingers who brought you the concept of the dittoheads, we have made up charges of free speech repression.

Posted by: Ryan C | June 9, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

“It isn’t surprising to hear UNIONS speaking for its members. How many ACTUAL crime fighters are supporting her nomination?”
FOP is the only union…..
1 out of 8 isn’t bad for your lame talking point

Posted by: actually | June 9, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Now, here’s a group of law enforcement peeps that are sure to get some new government money.. sometimes, I ask myself, how dumb does the government think that the general population is?
I know we aren’t all gullible and dumb, because of what I read here. Even the Obama apologists use good grammar, well thought out arguments and are smart and polite.. so why should they (government) think we are idiots?

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | June 9, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

tough-as-nails prosecutor – that comment reminded me of the nail comment (Grassely Tweet).. one aspires to be as tough as a nail, but no one wants to get hammered like a nail…

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | June 9, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

“Now, here’s a group of law enforcement peeps that are sure to get some new government money.. sometimes, I ask myself, how dumb does the government think that the general population is?”
I agree. I’m not sure that credibility comes from backing yourself up with people who get paid by you. (Yes, state governments pay a part of the bill, but so does federal).

Posted by: KR | June 9, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

I support her. She has all then needed requirements for the Supreme Court. She is a woman, she is Latina, she has a good personality, she is kind of cute. She has been a judge. She has seen the benefits of Equal Opportunity, so she can help bring those benefits to others. I plan on voting for her.

Posted by: Terry | June 9, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

She shouldn’t be taking anything “into consideration”, just interpreting the law. Period. And yes, I am Puerto Rican, just like her but that doesn’t mean I am for her. I don’t care what race, color, gender, religion, etc. or who supports her – does she know the law and can she be trusted to carry it out?

Posted by: Rican | June 9, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Crimebuster? Where is it proven she is a crimebusting anything?
Why don’t you so called journalist do the job you’re paid to do and INVESTIGATE this chunk of unfounded mishmash?
Sheriff Biden say so…….so you all lock step and print this without substance.
So long Fourth Estate!!

Posted by: American Infidel | June 9, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

I think the word that suits her is RACIST!!

Posted by: American Infidel | June 9, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

“I think the word that suits her is RACIST!!
Posted by: American Infidel | Jun 9, 2009 4:57:59 PM”
This projection by the right wing grows tiresome.

Posted by: Ryan C | June 9, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

To Linda in Michigan: The Supreme Court does not impose sentences! The District Court does. And federal senteneces are governed by the Sentencing Guidelines. Try again….

Posted by: tony smith | June 10, 2009, 5:12 am 5:12 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.