The popularity of this President hinges on one thing – whether the stimulas plan starts stimulating jobs.
Spin your hearts out telling us all the wonderful benefits of this plan – but it is all about jobs.
At some point someone is going to stand up and say “the Emperor has no clothes.”
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | June 23, 2009, 7:38 am 7:38 am
What a typical move from an unabashedly anti-Obama news outfit. Check your own freaking poll; the president is still at 65% approval.
Posted by: matt | June 23, 2009, 7:56 am 7:56 am
With the stimulus not doing anything for the unemployed and the private sector still notably absent – people are losing faith in what can be done for this economy.
Posted by: Bob | June 23, 2009, 8:08 am 8:08 am
Everyone who helped put this ‘report’ together must be dizzy over all the spin.
Do the republican talking points rule their world? Ummmm Yes.Jake and Cokie are just icing on this poorly made cake.
Posted by: Patrick in Chicago | June 23, 2009, 8:10 am 8:10 am
The positive things about Obama? He’s not on continual vacation and he’s not stupid.
On the other hand, he hasn’t revoked Bush’s policies. Instead he’s continued and/or reinforced Bush’s policies. He’s given money away to the banks, Wall Street, etc. while treating blue collar industry like they were lepers. He’s flip flopped 180 degrees on almost all of his campaign positions/promises.
It seemed obvious to me that he was setting himself up to be a mediocre president but it appears that even that was more credit than he’s earned to date.
Posted by: jan | June 23, 2009, 8:10 am 8:10 am
Of course he’s approval ratings are dropping. He is charge now and is being held responsible for all the misery people are feeling at the moment.
Posted by: Technology Slice | June 23, 2009, 8:34 am 8:34 am
America is waking from it’s hopey changey slumber…it’s about time.
Posted by: mary | June 23, 2009, 8:39 am 8:39 am
But, but, but he’s too big to fail!
There’s no reason to panic. When Obama’s approval numbers get too low, Congress will vote him an emergency popularity poll stimulus bill.
With the newly infused trillions of positive popularity numbers they will “save or create” three or four million positive approval rating votes and all will be well.
Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | June 23, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am
America is getting the kind of government it has earned.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | June 23, 2009, 8:46 am 8:46 am
This is what happens when you spend more in 5 months than any other president in their entire term(s). Including Bush and both wars.
Did that spending reverse job loss? No. Did that spending create jobs? No. Unless you count those 25 cops.
Did that spending raise wages/income? No.
Just last week 150 people lost their job at my (small town) company, the rest of us all received an 11% pay cut.
Now gas prices are on the rise, big time.
Posted by: Makayla | June 23, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Polls dropping are not a problem. Policy results are what matter. People tend to be stupid about how the economy works (note Bush Sr’s unjust dismissal in 1992). Obama has until 2012 for the economy to show recovery, and that is about the right time frame for the stimulus (well, the 65% of it that was spending – funny how Republicans now call all the tax cuts “spending”) to be deployed and yield benefit.
But yeah, health care is dead. The health care industry is a trillion dollar business and has bought too much of Congress – including some Democrats and almost all Republicans – to be brought to heel.
I wish someone would answer the question how we can afford to NOT have national health care and to continue forcing our businesses and citizens to spend two to three times what every other first world nation spends for similar results.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 23, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am
Here is an early assessment of stimulus spending. See the charts in the article.
Excerpts…”Remember that if the stimulus funds were disbursed according to job losses, that each job loss would lead to a state getting $800 in stimulus money.”
…”it doesn’t seem right that Washington and Idaho are getting over $10,000 per job loss while 18 states are getting less than $100 per job
loss.”
Posted by: MichiAnn1 | June 23, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am
“Polls dropping are not a problem. Policy results are what matter. People tend to be stupid about how the economy works (note Bush Sr’s unjust dismissal in 1992). Obama has until 2012 for the economy to show recovery”
The policies are not as popular as the president. Obama has one more year on the economy or the Dems will get smoked in 2010.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | June 23, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am
uh-oh not good for the One… what to do?? time for the family to adopt a kitten!
Posted by: jaj | June 23, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am
MichiAnn1:”Remember that if the stimulus funds were disbursed according to job losses, that each job loss would lead to a state getting $800 in stimulus money.”
That would be an atrociously inefficient way to do it. You want to spend money where it will have the largest impact to create future jobs, not throw it on the grave of a typewriter factory.
And I bet that silly article also calls the $288 billion in tax cuts “spending.” (Although I’ll readily agree that $70 billion odd – almost 10% of the bill – insisted on by Republicans was stupid – NO ONE thinks cutting taxes on the upper middle class will have any stimulative effect.)
Posted by: jhw539 | June 23, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Tapper you forgot to say
ooooogeeeeeyyyy booooogeeeyyyyy
Posted by: Omentum | June 23, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Time for a shirtless photo to accidently get published.
Something big, something shallow to distract from his dropping poll numbers.
Maybe go back on the campaign trail?
Posted by: bailey | June 23, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
“NO ONE thinks cutting taxes on the upper middle class will have any stimulative effect.”
I think artists, restaurant workers, the travel industry, what’s left of the car industry, local and national retail shops and stores and many others whose jobs depend on discretionary spending would heartily and earnestly disagree with you.
Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | June 23, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
OBama is a disgrace:
Obama’s approach to Iran, including his assertion that the unrest there represents a debate among Iranians unrelated to the United States, is an acknowledgment that a U.S. president’s words have a limited ability to alter foreign events in real time and could do more harm than good. But privately Obama advisers are crediting his Cairo speech for inspiring the protesters, especially the young ones, who are now posing the most direct challenge to the republic’s Islamic authority in its 30-year history.
This is the most despicable, self-serving, and arrogant spin I’ve seen yet from this White House, and that’s saying something. Obama gave a speech, and suddenly the people of Iran discovered that they’re being ruled by tyrants? Never mind that two weeks passed between the speech and the uprising, and that the very obvious trigger for the unrest was the incompetent manner in which the mullahs rigged the election for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Never mind the fact that this President took a full week to even sound like a watered-down Nicolas Sarkozy, let alone the leader of the free world.
Posted by: the Truth | June 23, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Obama and the WHouse must be in full panic mode.
Popularity is all he has.
And without Obama the Democrats have nothing.
No popularity no power.
Posted by: max | June 23, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am
Concerned in OH:”So I guess during that week of silence from the WH ”
The Iranian election was on June 12th, results announced on June 13th. Protest began building immediately that point. Obama made the following statement TWO days later, on the 15th:
“I think that the democratic process, free speech, the ability of people to peacefully dissent – all those are universal values that need to be respected… we believe the Iranian people and their voices should be heard and respected.”
Based on REALITY, saying that Obama was silent for a week is not just a typical right wing exageration, it is an easily exposed lie.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 23, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
He’ll be fine.
Everybody except for a few whackos wants public health care.
The GOP knows that if the dems succeed at healthcare reform, it pretty much means the dems will be popular for a while.
So they are hitting Obama with everything they have to try to thwart healthcare reform.
If you spend as much money and energy as the GOP is spending on campaigning against a single individual, it’s going to have an effect.
If you look at the polling, what has happened is that they have succeeded in consolidating their base…. now, the Republicans are trying to work on the “mush heads” (their special name for independents). The presumption being that they are “Mush Heads” and that some scary ads are going to turn them against the president.
But it won’t happen.
Posted by: borneo | June 23, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
WhereWasThePress:”I think artists, restaurant workers, the travel industry, what’s left of the car industry, local and national retail shops and stores and many others whose jobs depend on discretionary spending would heartily and earnestly disagree with you.”
I doubt that. The AMT revision has no immediate impact and won’t even be noticed until next April. There is no debate about its non-stimulative nature among economists on both sides of the issue.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 23, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Concerned in OH:”So I guess during that week of silence from the WH ”
The Iranian election was on June 12th, results announced on June 13th. Protest began building immediately that point. Obama made the following statement TWO days later, on the 15th:
“I think that the democratic process, free speech, the ability of people to peacefully dissent – all those are universal values that need to be respected… we believe the Iranian people and their voices should be heard and respected.”
Based on REALITY, saying that Obama was silent for a week is not just a typical right wing exageration, it is an easily exposed lie.
Posted by: jhw539 | Jun 23, 2009 10:14:06 AM
LIES.
Obama sat on his hands, and yea, he made the above extremely weak statement while Iranians died in the streets in the middle of last week.
THE FIRST TIME HE GOT ANYWHERE CLOSE TO ACTUALLY TAKING THE SIDE OF DYING DEMOCRATIC PROTESTERS WAS ON SATURDAY – A FULL WEEK LATER.
STOP WORDSMITHING AND COVERING OBAMA’S BEHIND. OBAMA’S PLAN WAS TO KEEP TALKS ALIVE BY NOT ATTACKING THE MULLAHS. THAT WAS HIS PLAN, YOU CANT REWRITE HISTORY.
HE IS A DISGRACE.
Posted by: the Truth | June 23, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
A single, unsourced attribution from the Washington Post claims:
One senior administration official with experience in the Middle East said, “There clearly is in the region a sense of new possibilities,” adding that “I was struck in the aftermath of the president’s speech that there was a connection. It was very sweeping in terms of its reach.”
Yet somehow this now becomes “privately Obama advisers are crediting his Cairo speech for inspiring the protesters.” The alleged comments of a single anonymous source get wildly exaggerated and the right wing two minute hate is off!
“This is the most despicable, self-serving, and arrogant spin I’ve seen yet from this White House, and that’s saying something. Obama gave a speech, and suddenly the people of Iran discovered that they’re being ruled by tyrants? Never mind that two weeks passed between the speech and the uprising, and that the very obvious trigger for the unrest was the incompetent manner in which the mullahs rigged the election for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.”
Posted by: jhw539 | June 23, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Why are fools and fanatics always so certain of themselves, but wiser people are full of doubts?
Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | June 23, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Hmmmmmm looks like ABC CBS and NBC cannot protect this loser any longer.. the Marxist regime is falling on its face… Obama will not say anything on Iran, because he, like the Iranian president believe protest is a form of low level terrorism…read the new Obama questionare from the pentagon that the aclu is suing over.. lets hear the kos kiddies cry now..
Posted by: Obamas brownnosing media network | June 23, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Yet somehow this now becomes “privately Obama advisers are crediting his Cairo speech for inspiring the protesters.” The alleged comments of a single anonymous source get wildly exaggerated and the right wing two minute hate is off!
“This is the most despicable, self-serving, and arrogant spin I’ve seen yet from this White House, and that’s saying something. Obama gave a speech, and suddenly the people of Iran discovered that they’re being ruled by tyrants? Never mind that two weeks passed between the speech and the uprising, and that the very obvious trigger for the unrest was the incompetent manner in which the mullahs rigged the election for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.”
Posted by: jhw539 | Jun 23, 2009 10:21:51 AM
OBAMA’S PEOPLE LEAKED THIS TO WAPO AS A TRIAL BALLOON. YOU REALLY THINK OBAMA DID NOT APPROVE? SERIOUSLY, YOU NEED TO CUT BACK ON THE KOOLAID PAL.
Posted by: the Truth | June 23, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
the Truth:”LIES.
Obama sat on his hands, and yea, he made the above extremely weak statement while Iranians died in the streets in the middle of last week. ”
What? You call it a lie and then acknowledge that it is truthful and accurate? Is this more right wing critical thinking?
“YOU CANT REWRITE HISTORY. ”
No, you can’t. I invite anyone interested who may be getting distracted by the right wing noise machine to do a quick bit of research themselves. Look up google news’ timeline feature. It makes following the evolution of stories like this quite simple.
Obama’s measured response is documented and closely follows the approach laid out by Reagan’s response to the Solidarity revolution (look up some of Reagan’s speeches during that event and it’s pretty clear Obama’s team has read them closely) in Poland or Bush Sr’s masterful handling of the ’89 fall of the USSR.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 23, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
the Truth:”, he made the above extremely weak statement while Iranians died in the streets in the middle of last week. ”
And for the calendar impaired, Obama made those statements on June 15th, which was a Monday – not the middle of the week. Another bit of DOCUMENTED REALITY that appears to have a liberal bias.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 23, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
the Truth:”LIES.
Obama sat on his hands, and yea, he made the above extremely weak statement while Iranians died in the streets in the middle of last week. ”
What? You call it a lie and then acknowledge that it is truthful and accurate? Is this more right wing critical thinking?
STOP LYING. IT DOES NOT WORK HERE. PEOPLE ARE INTELLIGENT ON THIS BOARD.
OBAMA DID NOT CALL ON THE IRANIAN GOVERNMENT TO STOP KILLING ITS OWN PROTESTING CITIZENS UNTIL TWO DAYS AGO – SATURDAY AFTERNOON – AND THAT WAS ONLY AFTER CONGRESS FORCED HIS HAND WITH THE RESOLUTION ON FRIDAY.
STOP TRYING TO REWRITE HISTORY – PEOPLE ON HERE ARE NOT SHEEP, GO GET A NEW TALKING POINT FROM ORGANIZING FOR AMERICA/AXELROD.
Posted by: the Truth | June 23, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am
I doubt very seriously there is much in regards to his policies that Obama and I will ever agree on, but I knew that during the campaign because I was paying attention. We all know that is not true for most voters. Now that he is in office and the consequences of his policies are becoming reality, not just flowery rhetoric, more people are beginning to take note. The other problem, imo, is he in our faces way, way too much trying to “sell” us. Similar to the sales person that follows you around the store, the car lot, (“this offer is good only for today, so hurry up and sign here”) etc., to the point you begin to question what the “catch” is. Sometimes people just need to sleep on it. He is not giving people that opportunity and they are now becoming suspicious of his policies, his inexperience and lack of governing capabilities. Sell, sell, sell!!!!
Posted by: jennifert7 | June 23, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am
It took a couple of years for Americans to realize that Jimmy Carter was a disaster, I suspect that Obama’s shelf life will be even shorter. He has blown trillions of dollars with little to show for it and has, thru his appointment of incompetents to CIA and Homeland Security, put our country in great danger.
Posted by: Ron | June 23, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Tennessee has TennCare. It has been a costly debacle from the beginning. The difference in what was promised vs. what was delivered became painfully apparent not to long after its implementation. Does anyone wonder why Tennessee, which had consistently been a bellwether state for a very long time (excepting the very questionable Nixon/JFK election) voted so overwhelmingly against Obama?
It could have been the high growth from being a low tax State. It could have been the knowledge gained from watching just how expensive State health care gets and how fast it grows.
Either way, Tennesseans knew what Obama was selling was snake oil. You can’t tax your way to growth and you can’t provide health care for “free.” Those of us with health coverage saw a very substantial increase in taxes (about 12% based on the sales tax increase), but at least the covered folks were contributing to their own care through the “regressive” sales tax.
One day, too late I’m sure, people will discover the simple truths in life. Rewarding bad behavior breeds more bad behavior. Punishing hard work will produce less hard workers.
I know liberals believe that everything they need to know they learned in kindergarten, but apparently they forgot what they learned in pre-school.
The anti-Obama crowd is coming unglued.
Six months ago, they wanted to nuke Iran and waterboard the survivors…
Now they are weeping big salty tears for the Iranians and gnashing their teeth over Obama’s diabolical desire to be a good father to his daughters for an hour. Obama has been busier than any president I can remember. In fact, he seems to work TOO much.
What an irony, especially since the last president spent more time on vacation than any president in history.
You can’t entirely blame the Obama-haters, though. They are fed a steady stream of highly-tested, focus-group smear points. Meanwhile, the REAL focus of the GOP is not on helping Iranians….
It’s on KILLING our health insurance plans so they can with the 2012 election.
The anti-Obama crowd is coming unglued.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Nah, it’s the indies who are now detaching themselves from the man’s policies.
Not so, Jenn. That’s the hope, of course, that the GOP can infect independents with their smears. And you cannot blame them… I mean… the insurance industry is paying them big bucks to stop health care reform.
The polling numbers on the public option overwhelmingly favor Obama.
Their last chance is to attack Obama personally, and hope that this will undermine the public option.
It’s cynical. And it’s potentially disastrous. But the insurance companies stand to lose billions from Obama’s health care agenda. Right now, the average person is forced to shell out 10-20,000 dollars a year or suffer the consequences…. and once the public plan goes into effect…. that’s an end to the lucrative insurance racket.
They know this. And the GOP leadership believes that if they can “win” this one, they might have a shot in 2012.
Of course, it’s bad for the American people. But you have to understand that politicians are mere men, and the GOP, when faced with the prospect of permanent minority status is taking drastic action to prevent this possibility.
So to answer your claim. Independents aren’t defecting. The GOP is shoring up its base with increasingly hysterical antics… and hoping that the modest shift they create in the polls will be interpreted as a trend. Which might give them a little bit of traction in the coming days, when they try to get “equal” representation for what’s essentially an extremely marginal position: Protecting Health Insurance.
It’s textbook PR strategy.
The “stimulus” was a SCAM, a swindle, a boondoggle. The story we were fed to accept its passage defies all logic.
It is absolutely akin to what the Bushies did to invade Iraq. That too was something that that administration wanted going in to office and they sold the Americans a bill of lies to falsely tie it to the 9/11 crisis.
The Scamulus package was a load of pork and waste that the lefties wanted for years, and they lied to scared and desperate Americans to tie it in with the economic crisis. It has NOTHING to do with fixing the economic crisis and will only make it worse in the long run, just as Bush’s invasion of Iraq had nothing to do with terrorism and has only made matters worse for years to come.
People are waking up to Obama just as they did to Bush. It can’t happen too soon.
Posted by: paul | June 23, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Not to give out free advice… but I think the GOP got the pacing on the attacks wrong.
If the dip in support for Obama bottoms out before he gets to work on his health care plan… which there are strong indications that this is the case… the inevitable uptic will magnify what is apparently an immensely popular plan… helping both of them out, particularly as a corrective to any sway these attacks might have had on independents.
Before, I said that politicians are men, and the democrats are no different. They know that they stand to gain personally in power and influence by delivering the goods on health care reform.
The difference is that their ambitions are in better harmony with the public good in this regard. As I’ve said before, the GOP is taking a real gamble here. And maybe they will pull it off. If you asked me 10 years ago whether or not some maniacs with box cutters could bring down the WTC, I would have said it was a longshot. But still, the odds are against the GOP…. even if they do think they are on a holy mission to stop the man they have elevated to a devil.
And one likes to think that, if occasionally, the bad option wins out over the good option…. over the long haul, the good is gonna win out this time.
ABC is in danger of tanking with the public. As for Obama, today he said:
“Keep in mind the stimulus package was the first thing we did, and we did it a couple of weeks after Inauguration, and at that point nobody understood what the depths of this recession were going to look like,” Obama said. “If you recall, it was only significantly later that we suddenly get a report the economy tanked. It’s not surprising then that we missed the mark in terms of estimates of where unemployment would go.“
Duh…
1. Keynesian economics do not work, even if they have a ‘neo’ camouflage.
2. All of the other crap he has pulled and plans to pull has made the everyone nervous.
3. Nobody is going to invest (except at high interest rates) or hire (unless it’s a government job) or expand until they know the rules of the game.
4. I’ve never seen so much ineptness at understanding the concept of studying consequences when making policies. Sheesh.
Posted by: Sadie | June 23, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Losing some support?
The numbers actually show that 90% of Americans have at the minimum – some concern over the deficits… Please tell ABC to use better reports. I repeat 90%!!! Hello? If that is not a majority, I do not know what it is!
Posted by: Sadie | June 23, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
“Losing some support?
The numbers actually show that 90% of Americans have at the minimum – some concern over the deficits.”
And yet the same poll asked people to rank issues of importance, 24% said the deficit, 35% said unemployment.
When asked what should be the top priority, job creation and economic growth was 1st, and spending/deficits tied with health care for a distant 2nd.
When asked who was most responsible for those deficits, 49% said the Bush admin, 21% said Dems in Congress, 7% said GOPers in Congress and 6% said the Obama admin.
When asked if people were confident in Obama’s set of policies and goals for the economy, 46% said quite confident or extremely confident. and additional 25$ stated they were somewhat confident.
Posted by: Ryan C | June 23, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
I guess people have finally figured out they aren’t going to get those free houses and free gas, and Muslim terrorists still want to kill us.
Don’t think that poll numbers, no matter how low they get, will affect the agenda of this administration.
They must have been setting up some kind of workaround to get what they want done in case they lose the majority in Congress with the next elections. The accountability angle evaporating with all these ‘czars’ and firings of IGs seems to indicate that.
The popularity of this President hinges on one thing – whether the stimulas plan starts stimulating jobs.
Spin your hearts out telling us all the wonderful benefits of this plan – but it is all about jobs.
At some point someone is going to stand up and say “the Emperor has no clothes.”
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | June 23, 2009, 7:38 am 7:38 am
What a typical move from an unabashedly anti-Obama news outfit. Check your own freaking poll; the president is still at 65% approval.
Posted by: matt | June 23, 2009, 7:56 am 7:56 am
With the stimulus not doing anything for the unemployed and the private sector still notably absent – people are losing faith in what can be done for this economy.
Posted by: Bob | June 23, 2009, 8:08 am 8:08 am
Everyone who helped put this ‘report’ together must be dizzy over all the spin.
Do the republican talking points rule their world? Ummmm Yes.Jake and Cokie are just icing on this poorly made cake.
Posted by: Patrick in Chicago | June 23, 2009, 8:10 am 8:10 am
The positive things about Obama? He’s not on continual vacation and he’s not stupid.
On the other hand, he hasn’t revoked Bush’s policies. Instead he’s continued and/or reinforced Bush’s policies. He’s given money away to the banks, Wall Street, etc. while treating blue collar industry like they were lepers. He’s flip flopped 180 degrees on almost all of his campaign positions/promises.
It seemed obvious to me that he was setting himself up to be a mediocre president but it appears that even that was more credit than he’s earned to date.
Posted by: jan | June 23, 2009, 8:10 am 8:10 am
Of course he’s approval ratings are dropping. He is charge now and is being held responsible for all the misery people are feeling at the moment.
Posted by: Technology Slice | June 23, 2009, 8:34 am 8:34 am
America is waking from it’s hopey changey slumber…it’s about time.
Posted by: mary | June 23, 2009, 8:39 am 8:39 am
But, but, but he’s too big to fail!
There’s no reason to panic. When Obama’s approval numbers get too low, Congress will vote him an emergency popularity poll stimulus bill.
With the newly infused trillions of positive popularity numbers they will “save or create” three or four million positive approval rating votes and all will be well.
Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | June 23, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am
America is getting the kind of government it has earned.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | June 23, 2009, 8:46 am 8:46 am
This is what happens when you spend more in 5 months than any other president in their entire term(s). Including Bush and both wars.
Did that spending reverse job loss? No. Did that spending create jobs? No. Unless you count those 25 cops.
Did that spending raise wages/income? No.
Just last week 150 people lost their job at my (small town) company, the rest of us all received an 11% pay cut.
Now gas prices are on the rise, big time.
Posted by: Makayla | June 23, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Polls dropping are not a problem. Policy results are what matter. People tend to be stupid about how the economy works (note Bush Sr’s unjust dismissal in 1992). Obama has until 2012 for the economy to show recovery, and that is about the right time frame for the stimulus (well, the 65% of it that was spending – funny how Republicans now call all the tax cuts “spending”) to be deployed and yield benefit.
But yeah, health care is dead. The health care industry is a trillion dollar business and has bought too much of Congress – including some Democrats and almost all Republicans – to be brought to heel.
I wish someone would answer the question how we can afford to NOT have national health care and to continue forcing our businesses and citizens to spend two to three times what every other first world nation spends for similar results.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 23, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am
Here is an early assessment of stimulus spending. See the charts in the article.
Excerpts…”Remember that if the stimulus funds were disbursed according to job losses, that each job loss would lead to a state getting $800 in stimulus money.”
…”it doesn’t seem right that Washington and Idaho are getting over $10,000 per job loss while 18 states are getting less than $100 per job
loss.”
Posted by: MichiAnn1 | June 23, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am
“Polls dropping are not a problem. Policy results are what matter. People tend to be stupid about how the economy works (note Bush Sr’s unjust dismissal in 1992). Obama has until 2012 for the economy to show recovery”
The policies are not as popular as the president. Obama has one more year on the economy or the Dems will get smoked in 2010.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | June 23, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am
uh-oh not good for the One… what to do?? time for the family to adopt a kitten!
Posted by: jaj | June 23, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am
MichiAnn1:”Remember that if the stimulus funds were disbursed according to job losses, that each job loss would lead to a state getting $800 in stimulus money.”
That would be an atrociously inefficient way to do it. You want to spend money where it will have the largest impact to create future jobs, not throw it on the grave of a typewriter factory.
And I bet that silly article also calls the $288 billion in tax cuts “spending.” (Although I’ll readily agree that $70 billion odd – almost 10% of the bill – insisted on by Republicans was stupid – NO ONE thinks cutting taxes on the upper middle class will have any stimulative effect.)
Posted by: jhw539 | June 23, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Tapper you forgot to say
ooooogeeeeeyyyy booooogeeeyyyyy
Posted by: Omentum | June 23, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Time for a shirtless photo to accidently get published.
Something big, something shallow to distract from his dropping poll numbers.
Maybe go back on the campaign trail?
Posted by: bailey | June 23, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
“NO ONE thinks cutting taxes on the upper middle class will have any stimulative effect.”
I think artists, restaurant workers, the travel industry, what’s left of the car industry, local and national retail shops and stores and many others whose jobs depend on discretionary spending would heartily and earnestly disagree with you.
Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | June 23, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
OBama is a disgrace:
Obama’s approach to Iran, including his assertion that the unrest there represents a debate among Iranians unrelated to the United States, is an acknowledgment that a U.S. president’s words have a limited ability to alter foreign events in real time and could do more harm than good. But privately Obama advisers are crediting his Cairo speech for inspiring the protesters, especially the young ones, who are now posing the most direct challenge to the republic’s Islamic authority in its 30-year history.
This is the most despicable, self-serving, and arrogant spin I’ve seen yet from this White House, and that’s saying something. Obama gave a speech, and suddenly the people of Iran discovered that they’re being ruled by tyrants? Never mind that two weeks passed between the speech and the uprising, and that the very obvious trigger for the unrest was the incompetent manner in which the mullahs rigged the election for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Never mind the fact that this President took a full week to even sound like a watered-down Nicolas Sarkozy, let alone the leader of the free world.
Posted by: the Truth | June 23, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Obama and the WHouse must be in full panic mode.
Popularity is all he has.
And without Obama the Democrats have nothing.
No popularity no power.
Posted by: max | June 23, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am
Concerned in OH:”So I guess during that week of silence from the WH ”
The Iranian election was on June 12th, results announced on June 13th. Protest began building immediately that point. Obama made the following statement TWO days later, on the 15th:
“I think that the democratic process, free speech, the ability of people to peacefully dissent – all those are universal values that need to be respected… we believe the Iranian people and their voices should be heard and respected.”
Based on REALITY, saying that Obama was silent for a week is not just a typical right wing exageration, it is an easily exposed lie.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 23, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
He’ll be fine.
Everybody except for a few whackos wants public health care.
The GOP knows that if the dems succeed at healthcare reform, it pretty much means the dems will be popular for a while.
So they are hitting Obama with everything they have to try to thwart healthcare reform.
If you spend as much money and energy as the GOP is spending on campaigning against a single individual, it’s going to have an effect.
If you look at the polling, what has happened is that they have succeeded in consolidating their base…. now, the Republicans are trying to work on the “mush heads” (their special name for independents). The presumption being that they are “Mush Heads” and that some scary ads are going to turn them against the president.
But it won’t happen.
Posted by: borneo | June 23, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
WhereWasThePress:”I think artists, restaurant workers, the travel industry, what’s left of the car industry, local and national retail shops and stores and many others whose jobs depend on discretionary spending would heartily and earnestly disagree with you.”
I doubt that. The AMT revision has no immediate impact and won’t even be noticed until next April. There is no debate about its non-stimulative nature among economists on both sides of the issue.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 23, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Concerned in OH:”So I guess during that week of silence from the WH ”
The Iranian election was on June 12th, results announced on June 13th. Protest began building immediately that point. Obama made the following statement TWO days later, on the 15th:
“I think that the democratic process, free speech, the ability of people to peacefully dissent – all those are universal values that need to be respected… we believe the Iranian people and their voices should be heard and respected.”
Based on REALITY, saying that Obama was silent for a week is not just a typical right wing exageration, it is an easily exposed lie.
Posted by: jhw539 | Jun 23, 2009 10:14:06 AM
LIES.
Obama sat on his hands, and yea, he made the above extremely weak statement while Iranians died in the streets in the middle of last week.
THE FIRST TIME HE GOT ANYWHERE CLOSE TO ACTUALLY TAKING THE SIDE OF DYING DEMOCRATIC PROTESTERS WAS ON SATURDAY – A FULL WEEK LATER.
STOP WORDSMITHING AND COVERING OBAMA’S BEHIND. OBAMA’S PLAN WAS TO KEEP TALKS ALIVE BY NOT ATTACKING THE MULLAHS. THAT WAS HIS PLAN, YOU CANT REWRITE HISTORY.
HE IS A DISGRACE.
Posted by: the Truth | June 23, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
A single, unsourced attribution from the Washington Post claims:
One senior administration official with experience in the Middle East said, “There clearly is in the region a sense of new possibilities,” adding that “I was struck in the aftermath of the president’s speech that there was a connection. It was very sweeping in terms of its reach.”
Yet somehow this now becomes “privately Obama advisers are crediting his Cairo speech for inspiring the protesters.” The alleged comments of a single anonymous source get wildly exaggerated and the right wing two minute hate is off!
“This is the most despicable, self-serving, and arrogant spin I’ve seen yet from this White House, and that’s saying something. Obama gave a speech, and suddenly the people of Iran discovered that they’re being ruled by tyrants? Never mind that two weeks passed between the speech and the uprising, and that the very obvious trigger for the unrest was the incompetent manner in which the mullahs rigged the election for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.”
Posted by: jhw539 | June 23, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Why are fools and fanatics always so certain of themselves, but wiser people are full of doubts?
Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | June 23, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Hmmmmmm looks like ABC CBS and NBC cannot protect this loser any longer.. the Marxist regime is falling on its face… Obama will not say anything on Iran, because he, like the Iranian president believe protest is a form of low level terrorism…read the new Obama questionare from the pentagon that the aclu is suing over.. lets hear the kos kiddies cry now..
Posted by: Obamas brownnosing media network | June 23, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Yet somehow this now becomes “privately Obama advisers are crediting his Cairo speech for inspiring the protesters.” The alleged comments of a single anonymous source get wildly exaggerated and the right wing two minute hate is off!
“This is the most despicable, self-serving, and arrogant spin I’ve seen yet from this White House, and that’s saying something. Obama gave a speech, and suddenly the people of Iran discovered that they’re being ruled by tyrants? Never mind that two weeks passed between the speech and the uprising, and that the very obvious trigger for the unrest was the incompetent manner in which the mullahs rigged the election for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.”
Posted by: jhw539 | Jun 23, 2009 10:21:51 AM
OBAMA’S PEOPLE LEAKED THIS TO WAPO AS A TRIAL BALLOON. YOU REALLY THINK OBAMA DID NOT APPROVE? SERIOUSLY, YOU NEED TO CUT BACK ON THE KOOLAID PAL.
Posted by: the Truth | June 23, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
the Truth:”LIES.
Obama sat on his hands, and yea, he made the above extremely weak statement while Iranians died in the streets in the middle of last week. ”
What? You call it a lie and then acknowledge that it is truthful and accurate? Is this more right wing critical thinking?
“YOU CANT REWRITE HISTORY. ”
No, you can’t. I invite anyone interested who may be getting distracted by the right wing noise machine to do a quick bit of research themselves. Look up google news’ timeline feature. It makes following the evolution of stories like this quite simple.
Obama’s measured response is documented and closely follows the approach laid out by Reagan’s response to the Solidarity revolution (look up some of Reagan’s speeches during that event and it’s pretty clear Obama’s team has read them closely) in Poland or Bush Sr’s masterful handling of the ’89 fall of the USSR.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 23, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
the Truth:”, he made the above extremely weak statement while Iranians died in the streets in the middle of last week. ”
And for the calendar impaired, Obama made those statements on June 15th, which was a Monday – not the middle of the week. Another bit of DOCUMENTED REALITY that appears to have a liberal bias.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 23, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
the Truth:”LIES.
Obama sat on his hands, and yea, he made the above extremely weak statement while Iranians died in the streets in the middle of last week. ”
What? You call it a lie and then acknowledge that it is truthful and accurate? Is this more right wing critical thinking?
STOP LYING. IT DOES NOT WORK HERE. PEOPLE ARE INTELLIGENT ON THIS BOARD.
OBAMA DID NOT CALL ON THE IRANIAN GOVERNMENT TO STOP KILLING ITS OWN PROTESTING CITIZENS UNTIL TWO DAYS AGO – SATURDAY AFTERNOON – AND THAT WAS ONLY AFTER CONGRESS FORCED HIS HAND WITH THE RESOLUTION ON FRIDAY.
STOP TRYING TO REWRITE HISTORY – PEOPLE ON HERE ARE NOT SHEEP, GO GET A NEW TALKING POINT FROM ORGANIZING FOR AMERICA/AXELROD.
Posted by: the Truth | June 23, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am
I doubt very seriously there is much in regards to his policies that Obama and I will ever agree on, but I knew that during the campaign because I was paying attention. We all know that is not true for most voters. Now that he is in office and the consequences of his policies are becoming reality, not just flowery rhetoric, more people are beginning to take note. The other problem, imo, is he in our faces way, way too much trying to “sell” us. Similar to the sales person that follows you around the store, the car lot, (“this offer is good only for today, so hurry up and sign here”) etc., to the point you begin to question what the “catch” is. Sometimes people just need to sleep on it. He is not giving people that opportunity and they are now becoming suspicious of his policies, his inexperience and lack of governing capabilities. Sell, sell, sell!!!!
Posted by: jennifert7 | June 23, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am
It took a couple of years for Americans to realize that Jimmy Carter was a disaster, I suspect that Obama’s shelf life will be even shorter. He has blown trillions of dollars with little to show for it and has, thru his appointment of incompetents to CIA and Homeland Security, put our country in great danger.
Posted by: Ron | June 23, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Tennessee has TennCare. It has been a costly debacle from the beginning. The difference in what was promised vs. what was delivered became painfully apparent not to long after its implementation. Does anyone wonder why Tennessee, which had consistently been a bellwether state for a very long time (excepting the very questionable Nixon/JFK election) voted so overwhelmingly against Obama?
It could have been the high growth from being a low tax State. It could have been the knowledge gained from watching just how expensive State health care gets and how fast it grows.
Either way, Tennesseans knew what Obama was selling was snake oil. You can’t tax your way to growth and you can’t provide health care for “free.” Those of us with health coverage saw a very substantial increase in taxes (about 12% based on the sales tax increase), but at least the covered folks were contributing to their own care through the “regressive” sales tax.
One day, too late I’m sure, people will discover the simple truths in life. Rewarding bad behavior breeds more bad behavior. Punishing hard work will produce less hard workers.
I know liberals believe that everything they need to know they learned in kindergarten, but apparently they forgot what they learned in pre-school.
Posted by: Novanglus | June 23, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
The anti-Obama crowd is coming unglued.
Six months ago, they wanted to nuke Iran and waterboard the survivors…
Now they are weeping big salty tears for the Iranians and gnashing their teeth over Obama’s diabolical desire to be a good father to his daughters for an hour. Obama has been busier than any president I can remember. In fact, he seems to work TOO much.
What an irony, especially since the last president spent more time on vacation than any president in history.
You can’t entirely blame the Obama-haters, though. They are fed a steady stream of highly-tested, focus-group smear points. Meanwhile, the REAL focus of the GOP is not on helping Iranians….
It’s on KILLING our health insurance plans so they can with the 2012 election.
Posted by: borneo | June 23, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
The anti-Obama crowd is coming unglued.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Nah, it’s the indies who are now detaching themselves from the man’s policies.
Posted by: jennifert7 | June 23, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Not so, Jenn. That’s the hope, of course, that the GOP can infect independents with their smears. And you cannot blame them… I mean… the insurance industry is paying them big bucks to stop health care reform.
The polling numbers on the public option overwhelmingly favor Obama.
Their last chance is to attack Obama personally, and hope that this will undermine the public option.
It’s cynical. And it’s potentially disastrous. But the insurance companies stand to lose billions from Obama’s health care agenda. Right now, the average person is forced to shell out 10-20,000 dollars a year or suffer the consequences…. and once the public plan goes into effect…. that’s an end to the lucrative insurance racket.
They know this. And the GOP leadership believes that if they can “win” this one, they might have a shot in 2012.
Of course, it’s bad for the American people. But you have to understand that politicians are mere men, and the GOP, when faced with the prospect of permanent minority status is taking drastic action to prevent this possibility.
So to answer your claim. Independents aren’t defecting. The GOP is shoring up its base with increasingly hysterical antics… and hoping that the modest shift they create in the polls will be interpreted as a trend. Which might give them a little bit of traction in the coming days, when they try to get “equal” representation for what’s essentially an extremely marginal position: Protecting Health Insurance.
It’s textbook PR strategy.
Posted by: borneo | June 23, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
The “stimulus” was a SCAM, a swindle, a boondoggle. The story we were fed to accept its passage defies all logic.
It is absolutely akin to what the Bushies did to invade Iraq. That too was something that that administration wanted going in to office and they sold the Americans a bill of lies to falsely tie it to the 9/11 crisis.
The Scamulus package was a load of pork and waste that the lefties wanted for years, and they lied to scared and desperate Americans to tie it in with the economic crisis. It has NOTHING to do with fixing the economic crisis and will only make it worse in the long run, just as Bush’s invasion of Iraq had nothing to do with terrorism and has only made matters worse for years to come.
People are waking up to Obama just as they did to Bush. It can’t happen too soon.
Posted by: paul | June 23, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Not to give out free advice… but I think the GOP got the pacing on the attacks wrong.
If the dip in support for Obama bottoms out before he gets to work on his health care plan… which there are strong indications that this is the case… the inevitable uptic will magnify what is apparently an immensely popular plan… helping both of them out, particularly as a corrective to any sway these attacks might have had on independents.
Before, I said that politicians are men, and the democrats are no different. They know that they stand to gain personally in power and influence by delivering the goods on health care reform.
The difference is that their ambitions are in better harmony with the public good in this regard. As I’ve said before, the GOP is taking a real gamble here. And maybe they will pull it off. If you asked me 10 years ago whether or not some maniacs with box cutters could bring down the WTC, I would have said it was a longshot. But still, the odds are against the GOP…. even if they do think they are on a holy mission to stop the man they have elevated to a devil.
And one likes to think that, if occasionally, the bad option wins out over the good option…. over the long haul, the good is gonna win out this time.
Posted by: borneo | June 23, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
When will the farce end?
Posted by: Michelle | June 23, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
ABC is in danger of tanking with the public. As for Obama, today he said:
“Keep in mind the stimulus package was the first thing we did, and we did it a couple of weeks after Inauguration, and at that point nobody understood what the depths of this recession were going to look like,” Obama said. “If you recall, it was only significantly later that we suddenly get a report the economy tanked. It’s not surprising then that we missed the mark in terms of estimates of where unemployment would go.“
Duh…
1. Keynesian economics do not work, even if they have a ‘neo’ camouflage.
2. All of the other crap he has pulled and plans to pull has made the everyone nervous.
3. Nobody is going to invest (except at high interest rates) or hire (unless it’s a government job) or expand until they know the rules of the game.
4. I’ve never seen so much ineptness at understanding the concept of studying consequences when making policies. Sheesh.
Posted by: Sadie | June 23, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Losing some support?
The numbers actually show that 90% of Americans have at the minimum – some concern over the deficits… Please tell ABC to use better reports. I repeat 90%!!! Hello? If that is not a majority, I do not know what it is!
Posted by: Sadie | June 23, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
“Losing some support?
The numbers actually show that 90% of Americans have at the minimum – some concern over the deficits.”
And yet the same poll asked people to rank issues of importance, 24% said the deficit, 35% said unemployment.
When asked what should be the top priority, job creation and economic growth was 1st, and spending/deficits tied with health care for a distant 2nd.
When asked who was most responsible for those deficits, 49% said the Bush admin, 21% said Dems in Congress, 7% said GOPers in Congress and 6% said the Obama admin.
When asked if people were confident in Obama’s set of policies and goals for the economy, 46% said quite confident or extremely confident. and additional 25$ stated they were somewhat confident.
Posted by: Ryan C | June 23, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
I guess people have finally figured out they aren’t going to get those free houses and free gas, and Muslim terrorists still want to kill us.
Don’t think that poll numbers, no matter how low they get, will affect the agenda of this administration.
They must have been setting up some kind of workaround to get what they want done in case they lose the majority in Congress with the next elections. The accountability angle evaporating with all these ‘czars’ and firings of IGs seems to indicate that.
Posted by: Cal | June 24, 2009, 3:50 am 3:50 am