What Do You Think About Health Care Reform? Let Us Know…
ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: As ABC News announced this week, Diane Sawyer and Charles Gibson will be moderating a conversation with President Obama next Wednesday evening about health care reform. The goal is to include divergent viewpoints from audience members and experts alike, challenging the president to answer questions from various stakeholders who agree and disagree with his proposals. So what would you ask the president? ABC News has been reading your questions submitted HERE and is partnering with Digg.com — engaging their 36 million user community — to learn more about what questions people have about how to mend the nation's health care system.
To submit a question, click HERE. Leave your questions in the "comments" field. Digg up the questions you like and bury the ones that just don't cut it. Charlie and Diane will ask the president at least one of these submitted questions.
Tune in to ABC for “Questions for the President: Prescription for America” on Wednesday, June 24th at 10 pm ET, and “Nightline” at 11:30 pm ET, and see if your question was asked. And we’re planning on asking some of the other questions the next day on ABCNews.com’s political Webcast, “Top Line.”
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Name me one thing that the Government operates efficiently other than the military, and you want to give them responsibility for health care?
Posted by: Jim W | June 18, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Medicaid is causing New York and California to go bankrupt and President Obama wants to pass another government run health care program? Unbelievable
Posted by: Mary | June 18, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Anyone but the government. Ask that Ron Paul guy. He seems to always get it right.
Posted by: Huh | June 18, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
We just had a panel discussion on health care reform at the local library. 30 people showed up and the crowd was in favor of single-payer universal health care or at the very least a strong public plan option competing with private plans. People need health care not health insurance, and reform done right will correct the problems of high infant mortality and shorter life span compared to other wealthy countries.
Posted by: KatDoyle | June 18, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
So President Obama are going to cut the hell out of Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement to hospitals and providers by over 400 billion AND raise another 700 billion in taxes in order to put through a “public option” which will destroy our current health care system? All so only a fraction of the 15% of the uninsured population can have free health insurance. Sounds like a really great idea! To heck with the other 85% ?you”ll fall in line with socialized Obamacare when the government run crap outbids and thus drives private care out of the market entirely. Then EVERYONE will have coverage but no doctors to take care of them because without any “skin in the game” aka profit, the doctors will just leave the game.
It”ll be so great. Shortages of providers, long long waiting lists, cuts in basic care, denials of basic care, preventative care, medicines, decisions on health care made by political favoritism and who the government deems of “worth” to society. Sounds like hell to me.
A few questions ABC should be asking President Obama are:
The CBO has determined that the government option is going to result in 1 to 3 trillion dollars of extra debt yet only cover a third of the uninsured. Is this an acceptable price to pay for so little return?
Most economists are saying that the higher deficits that this plan represents will cause inflation to rise making the dollar worth half its current value. Is this ok with you?
Many are predicting that there will be a shortage of doctors available to meet the rising demands of millions of more people who would be insured under the plan and that some physicians will retire rather than receive lower compensation for their services. Is this ok with you?
Will your plan result in government rationing of health care for start of life, end of life, and chronic medical conditions?
In that another government run health care plan, Medicaid, is causing States like New York and California to go broke, how do you plan to prevent another even bigger government health care plan from bankrupting America?
*********
Posted by: Timothy | June 18, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
OBAMA STYLE HEALTH CARE REFORM WILL NOT ONLY NOT WORK, IT WILL PUT US TRILLIONS MORE IN DEBT CAUSING FINANCIAL CHAOS AND COULD EASILY SINK CURRENT PROGRAMS SUCH AS SOCIAL SECURITY, MEDICARE AND MEDICADE. NOT IF, BUT WHEN SS GOES UNDER OR GIVES RECIPIENTS PENNIES ON THE DOLLAR, THE SENIORS WHO VOTED FOR OBAMA ARE GOING TO LOOK PRETTY STUPID!!
Posted by: Jimbo | June 18, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Social Security, Medicare,Medicade are disater programs that are sucking dry every taxpayer in this country, analyst tell me not to bother collecting social security when I retire in 20 years. MORE Government control just spells more taxes and more bureaucratic red tape. Having Government option healthcare is not the answer.
Posted by: 2nfer | June 18, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
INTERESTING TO NOTE THAT EVEN THE DEMS IN CONGRESS ARE GETTING NERVOUS ABOUT SUPPORTING OBAMA’S HEALTH PROPOSAL. I THINK THAT THEY ARE BEGINNING TO REALIZE THAT IT COULD BE THE BEGINNING OF THE END OF THEIR TIME ON THE HILL – AND THEY WOULD BE RIGHT!!!!
Posted by: Jimbo | June 18, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
I am a 57 year old Black female, currently unemployed, w/ a college degree. My annual income averages when things are great is usually less than 18,000 per year. I haven’t had insurance since 1995 or health care since my children left for college. I have not been to the dentist, got my eyes examine for new glasses, had a mammogram, pap exam. I have had extremely painful shingles 4 times in the last 18 mos for which I never sought medical attention. I don’t qualify for medicare, medicaid, because I am not old enough & I don’t have and children under the age of 18. My employers, when I had one, did not offer it. So, what about all the other people like me that has fallen through the cracks? I recently went to a Dr. through a subsidized program, but I don’t go often as needed because I can’t afford the co-pay of $16.00.
So health insurance, or even health care is important, but will people like me be able to afford it?
Posted by: Zenola Sherman | June 18, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
We do need health care refore. The
Health Insurance Companies are crooks.
The only want the people that are healthy and decline the people who are
not. They don’t want to pay for drugs
you must have, they make you take generic drugs and still don’t want to pay for them. My Insurance is $800 a
month and I’m in good health but because
I was taking Evista for my bones they raised my Insurance $200.00 and refused to pay for the prescription because they
say I have bone lose. They are Crooks.
Posted by: Cecelia Lucido | June 18, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
This government is not for the people rather it is in spite of the people. If the government wants to help those who need health care then find a way for those who need it, that are able bodied, to work for it, and leave the rest of us alone.
Posted by: Bill | June 18, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
NO ONE IS DOING NOTHING ABOUT MEETING THE NEEDS OF THE PEOPLE.NOT EVEN THE MILITARY HEALTH CARE SYSTEM IS EFFICIENT IS A TOTAL DRAMA. STILL WAITING FOR SOLUTIONS TO COME AND WE DON’T HAVE THEM. JUST SHOOT THE HEALTH CARE SYSTEM AND LET IT DIE.
Posted by: MARCO HERNANDEZ | June 18, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
The only workable health care is Kucinich’s plan, which is to include all citizens and residents in the risk pool and make the Federal Government the insurer for all basic health care. Because of the size and nature of the risk pool the premiums would be small, perhaps as low as ten dollars a year per insured. That would also mean being able to get rid of Veterans’ Health as a separate item, and all other public health care plans. They would just become part of the pool. That in itself would save trillions. This is the way many industrialized countries do it, and by taking the burden off the employers and employees it would stimulate economic growth. Any plan that include private insurers will be a disaster, and just another burden on the economy.
Posted by: E.A. Costa | June 18, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
The government should keep their incompetent mitts OFF our health care! These people are total bozo’s who screw up everything they touch! NO THANK YOU!! How about passing Tort Reform instead? That will bring down the cost of health care by BILLIONS PER YEAR!!
Posted by: Sunnyr | June 19, 2009, 2:46 am 2:46 am
I don’t see what the right wingers are complaining about. We already have a screwed up health care system now courtesy the GOP. So why they are so adamantly opposed to health care reform when millions go without health care and multiple hundreds of billions are wasted in corporate fraud, waste, inefficiency, etc…I guess as usual the Republicans like failure and want more of it. They don’t mind the government running the military or the FBI or Homeland Security, but suddenly they say the government can’t be trusted to create a new healthcare plan? Where is their logic? Where is their wanting the best for America?
Posted by: JL | June 19, 2009, 2:59 am 2:59 am
Don’t like the fact that you don’t allow cut and paste. How are other bloggers going to cite you.
Some people go too far in efforts to cut down plagiarism.
pbbbth
Posted by: khille | June 19, 2009, 7:04 am 7:04 am
I’d like to know if the Congress and the President and his family are going to have the same healthcare as the rest of us little people.
Posted by: ctmom | June 19, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am
JL
Because just as with the bailouts the Dems are going to spend trillions on healthcare and still millions of people will not be covered.
And where do you get the idea that the GOP ruined healthcare?
Posted by: ctmom | June 19, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Why am I forced into Medicare at age 65 if I have comprehensive private insurance? Why can’t I opt out of Medicare without being penalized? Why should the taxpayers pay my medical costs instead of my private insurance plan when I reach 65?
Also, why can’t the law require coordination of benefits up to 100% of allowable charges when people are covered by two health insurance plans and are paying two full premiums? (Dental insurance allows this type of coordination of benefits).
Also, why are hospitals allowed to bill non-insured patients up to 300% more for the same procedure than what gets charged when there’s insurance coverage? That is inherently unfair.
Posted by: linda | June 19, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Look at medicare, medicaid, the VA, and social security and the incompetence, waste and bureaucracy that those programs exhibit. When is the last time that the government has run any program efficiently or within budget; or has built a project on time or within budget projections? Why is this program going to be any different?
Posted by: Ksmith | June 19, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Look at medicare, medicaid, the VA, and social security and the incompetence, waste and bureaucracy that those programs exhibit. When is the last time that the government has run any program efficiently or within budget; or has built a project on time or within budget projections? Why is this program going to be any different?
Posted by: Ksmith | June 19, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Polls show the most popular health care reform among Americans is a single payer system. Why is single payer not being considered?
Posted by: bp | June 19, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
State Senator Obama in 2003 said he supported single payer but “we had to win back the White House, Senate and House before we could do it.” Well, the Democrats have won back all three and now President Obama is not considering single payer but instead is bowing to the insurance industry. Why is single payer not being considered?
Polls show the most popular health care reform among Americans is a single payer system. Why is single payer not being considered?
Posted by: Marian Drake | June 19, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
- State Senator Obama in 2003 said he supported single payer but “we had to win back the White House, Senate and House before we could do it.” Well, the Democrats have won back all three and now President Obama is not considering single payer but instead is bowing to the insurance industry. Why is single payer not being considered?
- As Congress works on health care reform they are finding the cost of covering everyone is exorbitant. Indeed, it no longer seems possible with the CBO estimating that the most robust plan would leave 36 million uninsured in ten years. Under single payer everyone would have access to health care and it would be affordable because $400 million in insurance costs would be no longer in the equation. Why is single payer not being considered?
- Polls show the most popular health care reform among Americans is a single payer system. Why is single payer not being considered?
- Aren’t you just going to pour hundreds of billions into a failed system? Hospitals have more billing agents to deal with the insurance industry than nurses, often one administrator per bed. Your proposal does nothing to end the waste of the insurance industry because you have taken single payer off the table. Why not put single payer first since it puts patients before the insurance industry?
- President Obama has said that he would support single payer if the U.S. were starting from scratch. Well, it is looking more and more like the U.S. needs to start from scratch. The Congress is divided on key issues, the public health option looks unlikely, isn’t it time to consider single payer?
- How will you prevent the public option, if it passes, from being the place where all the chronically ill, high risk patients go while the private insurance industry cherry picks the low cost patients thereby increasing their profits? Isn’t single payer the only fair way to provide health care access for all?
- Candidate Obama promised to change Washington, DC so that the corporate powers did not control policy, well on health care President Obama is doing the opposite. He is letting the corporate powers – the insurance, HMO and pharmaceutical industries — run health care. He has insurance company representatives speaking first and last at his White House health care meeting. At the same time single payer is not being considered by Obama. Why is single payer off the table? Are the corporate powers still in charge?
Posted by: jeff hopkins | June 19, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Why not Pass this law:
Only every United States Citizen, and legally acknowledged alien worker, along with the worker’s dependents, receive health insurance coverage. The cost is 10% of the each worker’s gross wages, matched by the worker’s employer. This amount is paid into a fund: either paid into a public HHS insurance “Health Bank” or into a private “Health Bank” providing workers’ freedom to chose. Both the private and public “Health Banks” credit this insurance coverage to workers while receiving unemployment benefits. US citizens without work who receive welfare support get insurance coverage, the costs shared by all “Health Banks” public and private, but no illegals do. The public fund determines appropriate doctor compensation and appropriate price for pharmaceuticals. The private funds can do whatever they like, that is pay more or less for service. Foreign nationals who come to the US for medical treatment work out deals with the facilities privately and pay what is agreed upon. No skin off of US citizen teeth. Not complicated, not unjust, and in my opinion, workable,
Posted by: Al | June 19, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Mr. President, Single Payer Health Care is truly the only real way to solve the health care crises. Let’s get rid of these money hungry insurance companies. There should be no profit for health matters. Doctors deserve fair compensation but why should there be a company looking for profit at the cost of a persons health. That is not what I would call morally right. Once again I call out your choice of word ‘CHANGE’ let us not go azlong with the same failed programs that only make a few rich and leave all the others either suffering financially and or in dire need of health care. Now is the time to push for HR 676 Single Payer Healthcare
Posted by: Michael W Sachs | June 19, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Why is single payer not being considered?
- Polls show the most popular health care reform among Americans is a single payer system. Why is single payer not being considered?.Is it because the insurance lobby so is strong and so imbeded in the media that we citizens have no voice in our democratic government anymore, what ever happened to “WE THE PEOPLE”?.President Obama has said that he would support single payer if the U.S. were starting from scratch. Well, it is looking more and more like the U.S. needs to start from scratch. The Congress is divided on key issues, the public health option looks unlikely, isn’t it time to consider single payer?.Aren’t you just going to pour hundreds of billions into a failed system Why not put single payer first
Posted by: Theodore Morse | June 19, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
`WHY ISN’TSINGLE PAYER ON THE TABLE!
Posted by: LADONNA HARRIS | June 19, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Given the recent CBO report based on an analysis of Senator Kennedy’s proposed healthcare reform bill, it is obvious that no “public option” can solve the healthcare crisis in America. As long as the private insurance industry is involved in our healthcare, it will not be affordable, will not cover everyone, and will not be equally distributed–all basic goals of President Obama’s reform campaign. Why then is single payer, the only type of reform that can fulfill all three goals, being kept off the table?
Posted by: Suzanne Cowan | June 19, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Why is the president giving up on single-payer health coverage? It’s not rationing, rather providing the basic human necessity. You can counter those who say rationing won’t preclude those wealthy enough for extensive coverage from buying it. Insurance companies can raise their rate in kind.
Posted by: Richard Egenriether | June 19, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
HR 676 is the way to go. It’s shameful that in the U.S. many many people are forced to have car washes and other fundraisers to help sick, financially-devastated people get the medical care they need. Healthcare not Warfare. Divert the funds being eaten up by the military industrial complex to a single payer system.
Posted by: Autumn Munday | June 19, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
State Senator Obama in 2003 said he supported single payer but “we had to win back the White House, Senate and House before we could do it.” Well, the Democrats have won back all three and now President Obama is not considering single payer but instead is bowing to the insurance industry. Why is single payer not being considered?
Aren’t you just going to pour hundreds of billions into a failed system? Hospitals have more billing agents to deal with the insurance industry than nurses, often one administrator per bed. Your proposal does nothing to end the waste of the insurance industry because you have taken single payer off the table. Why not put single payer first since it puts patients before the insurance industry?
Polls show the most popular health care reform among Americans is a single payer system. Why is single payer not being considered?
Posted by: rqb | June 19, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
I voted for Pres. Obama because in 1993 he said he would support a SINGLE PAYER Health Insurance System. NOW is the time !
I will work to defeat any politician who stands in the way ! They all have gover45nment insurance provided by taxpayer money ! We should too.
Posted by: Susan Olmsted | June 19, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Ask the president Why we can’t have the same health care he has. Ask the president why he wont support single payer
Posted by: Theodore Morse | June 19, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Why single-payer option is off the table? That is the only plan that makes sense!
Posted by: Anna Potempska | June 19, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
I think this is a joke. The proposal at this very moment doesn’t even offer the gov. the ability to become competitive given negotiating prices is currently off the table re the public option idea. What the h is the point then? This is simply cowardice and insulting to the electorate – are we to be assumed as that stupid?
And even if a public option adjacent to the current 1500+ payers IS adopted w/the power to negotiate prices, how does this save me the overhead costs as a provider in managing claims from all of these payers? Does ANYbody out there truly understand the amount of administrative overhead that is required to file and manage the claims for all of the different insurance payers/co’s?
And I also think that the data used from focus groups to create the idea of the public/private plan idea (the research done by the Celinda Lake group for the Democratic leadership several years ago) was, to any cognitive scientist, highly flawed in that it interprets what likely was the public’s preference for retaining a choice of PROVIDER and SERVICES offered to a choice of INSURANCE PLAN. Since the Lake Group has refused to disclose the specific questions asked (press and researchers at leading universities have asked for the questions used and they have consistently either ignored the requests or simply refused them), we tax payers have no MEANINGFUL and measurable evidence upon which to base (and therefore trust) the proposed plan/idea re healthcare reform.
I want the congress to act with courage for a change and I don’t care whether or not it works in a bi/tri/or no-partisan manner. I want a healthcare solution that works like all of the rest of the industrialized world so we can get on with restoring the economy – I support ONLY a single payer publicly financed healthcare plan (HR676 S703) akin to what my sister had in Canada. I cared for her there under that system (as well as for other family in our system in America) and it was MUCH better than the privatized system in America. I know – I have FIRST hand (not the friend telling another friend or relative) experience.
And get the isurance industry out of the discussion and put ALL ideas on the table.
While I’m here, ABC has been INCREDIBLY deficient in its coverage of healthcare reform – failing to even cover the MDs and attorneys who were at the senate healthcare hearings and sent to jail by sen. Baucus for speaking out about the senate’s refusing to consider HR676. SHAME ON ABC for its longtime of censure on this. If you are that concerned about ratings, you need to fix this NOW.
Posted by: LjR | June 19, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
If you truly want to get a fair picture here, limit comments to ONE comment per commenter.You ARE aware, I take it, that people with lots of time on their hands will come here (particularly the conservative right wing crowd) and spend hours posting over and over and over the same thing resulting in the all too frequently skewed news reporting we hear from the major networks.
Learn from the best of these types of sites – such as the Change.gov type of sites where they are getting smarter about how to suss out all of that extremist detritus.
Posted by: LjR | June 19, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
For health care, single payer is the best way to go. And the cap on social security should gotten rid of.
Posted by: Mike Cremer | June 19, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
want to have the president address the single payer matter and to remind him to do his homework before addressing the american public.
Posted by: Novella Adoue | June 19, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Found my posts. I retract the above comment re apparent deleting by ABC of my posts thus far. Too bad I could not simply remove it. Perhaps the site manager will do that for me.
Posted by: LjR | June 19, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Single payer system is what the majority of the people want. Health care is already rationed here because many people are unable to afford it. I believe the health industry estimate is that 60 people a day die from lack of health care in the U S. If 60 people a day were dying from swine flu this country would be in up in arms about it.
Canada has an excellent system; their people love it and the scare tactics presented here are a fraud. Canadians are healthier, spend way less than we do to run their single payer system, live longer, and are happy enough with their system to have voted the man who brought it to pass in Canada “the most admired person in Canadian history”. If you don’t believe they are happy with it, look up Canadian area codes and use that area code with your own number and call some Canadians and ask them about their health care system. They pick their own doctors, and insurance companies only sell policies on “extras” that aren’t covered by their system.
Stop listening to scare mongering and listen to people who are using single payer systems. Watch Michael Moore’s “Sicko” to see what you are missing and check out Physicians for National Health Care who support single payer. Only a third of the U S physicians belong to AMA, which is simply a social and lobbying group.
Insurance and drug company greed pays equally greedy politicians to keep us in line and keep themselves rich.
Posted by: DMCrane | June 19, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
QUESTION FOR OBAMA: IS A PUBLIC OPTION BEING CONSIDERED?
My feeling is we need a public insurance option.
Incompetence of Private Insurance: Look at what the private insurance companies have done to insurance the last 20 years. If you get sick – they drop your insurance. They have monthly costs which are out of sight and rising. The upper echelon folks make millions of bonuses for denying needed care to those of us pions with the insurance. The exclusions on policies are unbelievable.
Public insurance MUST BE AN OPTION!
The PRIVATE INSURANCE COMPANIES ARE OUT TO MAKE MONEY AND DENY CARE! Profit not care of the people is where our present insurance companies are.
It has nothing to do with what doctor and patient need – IT IS WHAT THE INSURANCE BEAUROCRAT WILL ALLOW. The private guy gets more money if he denies your care.
Posted by: Richard Brisco | June 19, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
I was bankrupted by health care costs when I had very expensive private insurance coverage. Now I have medicare and have better coverage than $1,000 a month from United Healthcare Utah gave me when I was self employed contract lobor. Every test or medication change had to be weighed on the profit/loss scale by a low level bean counter working for the corporation and not my well-being or health. Medicare has never questioned my doctors orders for tests or medication or referral or a surgical procedure or an emergency. Medicare is the best system we have for providing coverage for the poor, the elderly, and the disabled. All government employees have great single payer coverage like we, the poor and disabled have. There must be at least a choice for all of us. If the private sector and corporate capitalism work so well then a little competition won’t hurt them.
The private insurance companies have wormed their way into Medicare and increased the price to me the consumer and you the tax payer. Private insurance companies should have no place getting a bite out of our tax payer dollars for health coverage. Medicare works very well without the disadvantage of what is euphemistically called “Medicare Advantage”–the only advantage is to the corporation; it is the taxpayers loss and thus should be called the “Disadvantage Plan.”
Posted by: Peggy Pendleton | June 19, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
I’m getting really tired of reading the same unfounded reasons for not having a national health care system.
Maybe medicare and medicaid aren’t efficient but they are also not losing as much money as the money being paid to those getting rich in the health insurance industry.
And maybe medicare and medicaid can’t operate at a profit because the only people eligible are those too costly for the insurance companies to cover.
And as for including social security in this discussion, you obviously don’t know that the government has taken millions if not billions out of the ss fund and put it into the general revenue to help keep the national debt from getting what they then considered unacceptable. (Of course it didn’t fix the problems since they didn’t change how they spent the tax dollars.)
So everyone who wants to stop a national health care system because of a reason they heard from a politician ought to find out if it’s true before they repeat it. Everyone of the above things has been said so many times that a lot of misguided people are now spreading these untruths.
If you want to ask some questions why not ask:
1. What’s the estimate for how much money is wasted in medicare, medicaid and social security AND how much was paid to life insurance executives in raises and bonuses in the same time period?
2. If life insurance companies were to start selling life insurance to the people eligible for medicare and medicaid what would coverage cost, what would the co-pays be and what would be covered?
3. How much money has been taken from Social Security and how much would that money be worth now if it had been left in their system?
Before I change my mind about a national health care system I want these questions answered truthfully to the American voters. And I’ll know if they are true because I’ll do the research to check.
Posted by: Susan | June 19, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
Government inefficiency is such a tired conservative argument. We have police and fire departments and pulic libraries whose costs are “socialized”. These are highly efficient entities. Not to mention the FDIC which has successfully shut down 35 banks since the beginning of the year. The point is, for every tired story about government inefficiency, there is an equally tired story about private sector inefficiency (enron, worldcom, citi, etc). The private health care system we have is bases on “the market”. The market has failed because 47M Americans are left without health insurance. We need Single Payer healthcare and we need it now!
Posted by: UHCHMO | June 19, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
I’ve been reading various proposals and watching the hearings. It still seems to me that a Single Payer plan like HR-676 is the only plan being offered that not only would provide affordable access to health care for ALL citizens, but is also the only economically sustainable plan.
We really need to have the CBO provide us with a fair and equitable evaluation of single payer and compare to other plans being offered. Will you ask for that?
We simply cannot afford to not get this right this year. Too many more citizens will suffer and die.
Posted by: SarahLee | June 19, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
WHY IS SINGLE PAYER OFF THE TABLE WHEN VIRTUALLY EVERY POLL INDICATES TWO OUT OF THREE AMERICANS PREFERS THAT SORT OF SYSTEM?
Posted by: William White | June 19, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Single payer must be given more consideration in the overall scheme of health care reform. Our health care system has disintegrated due to a pyramid style of monopolies, with the insurance industry at the peak.
Currently, all levels of medical care suffer as a result of corporate medical care. Simply because corporate medical care can be spun to appear as a free market, it does not make the continuance of it the correct direction for our country. It is failing us now and will continue to do so.
There is no free market as long as monopolies exist. Break them up and give Americans singlepayer!
Posted by: UHC Supporter | June 19, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
WHY DOES OUR SOCIAL SECURITY RAISES HAVE TO BE TAKEN AWAY FOR 2 YEARS WHEN YOU GAVE BILLIONS TO WALLSTREET AND OTHERS? ALSO WHY IS SINGLE PAYER INSURANCE BEING TAKEN OFF THE TABLE WHEN WE NEED AND WANT IT.
Posted by: Mary Gardner | June 19, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
WHY DO WE HAVE TO LOSE OUR SOCIAL SECURITY RAISE FOR 2 YEARS WHEN YOU GAVE BILLIONS TO WALLSTREET AND AIG TO PARTY WITH.
Posted by: Mary Gardner | June 19, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
I am a physician and I believe we should have a national health system based on single payer financing. It means everybody in and nobody out and it means that patients make medical decisions with their medical provider, not insurance administrators.
I’m wondering
1. Why does President Obama believe that it is acceptable to subsidize the purchase of private insurance when private insurers profit by denying and restricting health care?
2. Who does President Obama believe should not have health care, since he admits that his plan is not universal?
Posted by: Dr. Margaret Flowers | June 19, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Where is this “change” I voted for? Obama, you’ve let me down. End the war. Give is our government back and end corporate control. I don’t see much of any difference in your government vs. Busch’s government.
Posted by: chuck | June 19, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Sadly, I think they will only mESS IT UP. Leave it alone.
RT
Posted by: John Davis | June 19, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Mr. Obama used to say he supported a single-payer health-insurance system: the Democrats control the White House and both houses of Congress, and President Obama is very popular–I’d like him to explain why he isn’t using his popularity and position to push for the single-payer approach. This is the only approach that can succeed, and it’s favored by a majority of Americans–so why is he letting healthcare industry lobbyists dictate what we can and can’t do? Any half measure or “compromise” is doomed to fail.
Posted by: Joe | June 19, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
I read this post today by a blogger who has done some homework & makes the case for single-payer as the most conservative option:
It’s too radical NOT to enact a single-payer system. It’s too radical NOT to make healthcare non-profit. It’s too radical NOT to ensure everyone is covered regardless of their life situation.
A public option added to the convoluted and unethical for-profit multi-payer mess is NOT what the uninsured and underinsured need.
President Obama, you agree that single-payer is what’s needed. Why aren’t you listening to the majority who want this and acting on behalf of all those who elected you?
Posted by: Teresa | June 19, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Until we remove the “for profit” out of healthcare we will never have “true reform”. President Obama, the American people, WE the people have your back! We want a single payer system and NOTHING less will do. The private/public system does NOT work and is too expensive and will keep health costs too high.
Every other country of our wealth has national health plans for its citizens, why can’t America have a single payer system?
Have you read the study put out by the Institute for Health and Socio-Economic Policy that states that a single-payer plan would create more jobs than were lost in the entire year of 2008? That it would bring jobs that would not leave the USA and reduce costs enough where the single payer program would be able to pay for itself?
Posted by: M.J.T.A | June 19, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Single Payer is off the table because taxpayers of the USA like to get ripped off?
It’s beyond laughable that the corporate health insurance companies are offering to reduce
their possible profits.
Oh, that’s really believable!
Over and over again, the corporate health insurer representatives say,
“Americans don’t want single payer.”
It’s the old marketing technique,
“Say it enough times for it to sink in.”
Polls show that even the majority of doctors want it, besides the rest of us who have been exploited by the heartless health insurance companies.
There have been countless studies proving single payer is the most economical system.
I don’t understand why business’s are not publicly endorsing single payer.
Workers who would like to work for a small business, could, and still have coverage.
Businesses would save money.
Posted by: Gabrielina | June 19, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Why not let the states take care of this? Why does everything you propose require federal laws?
Posted by: Brian | June 19, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
President Obama,If a single payer bill like H.R. 676 or Senator Sanders’ bill reached your desk,would you sign it?If Medicaid for all would cost 50% less to administer than 1400 separate insurance providers why not eliminate the middle man?Thanks for adressing this issue.
Posted by: Kurt Gubrud | June 19, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Will economies of scale work on our soon-to-be universal health care policy? What problems do you think we would face politically and administratively? If private contractors are part of this plan, is there any monopoly or oligopoly detection system? Will accounting records of public hospitals/doctors be available to the public?
I hope you may answer those and thank your for your time.
Posted by: Doran A. Chan | June 19, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
When are we going to realize that our current drug prohibition policies are a complete failure and stop wasting massive amounts of tax dollars and throwing huge numbers of people in jail, and instead try a different approach? Let’s learn from the successes in Portugal and the Netherlands.
Posted by: Dave W. | June 19, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Why is Single Payer health care system for all off the table? It could give good medical care for all Americans and save all of us billions of dollars – and we could choose our own doctors.
Posted by: David Hartsough | June 19, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
President Obama,if a single payer health care bill like H.R.676 or Senator Sanders’ bill reached your desk would you sign it?
If Medicaid can administer health care for 46% less than 1400 private insurance entities why is single payer not the only cost effective option?If everyone participated in the same system wouldn’t costs be spread out more economically ?Thanks for adressing the health care issue.Good luck!
Posted by: Kurt Gubrud | June 19, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Why is Single Payer Healthcare system for all off the table? It could mean affordable and good health care for all Americans and save us all billions of dollars and we could all choose our own doctors.
Posted by: David Hartsough | June 19, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
It’s so simple. Take the profit out of health care. Anyone who wants private insurance can still pay for it.
There’s no other way to real reform. Greed is the only real opponent of Single Payer Health Care, and we’ve seen where greed takes us, on Wall Street and in the Private Insurance business.
Posted by: Suzanne Benning | June 19, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
why is single player health care off the table?
Posted by: TheRockObama12 | June 19, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
ALL government agencies should be held accountable! We cannot just throw up our hands and say the government cannot do anything right. We ARE the government. So many of us WITH INSURANCE have been ruined financially because insurance companies are in the business of collecting premiums and DENYING CLAIMS. It is SHAMEFUL that US citizens are DYING at the hands of the PROFIT TAKERS in the medical industry. If we cannot accomplish single payer health care, then we need public funding of all election campaigns so we can get some representation for ourselves for a change.
Posted by: Caryl | June 19, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
In 2003, Mr. Obama supported single-payer as the way to provide universal health care in America. Why does he as President now fail to support single-payer? Thirty percent of the cost of medicine to the American public is directly attributable to the private health-insurance companies. Why not cut them completely out of the picture, which is what single-payer would do?
Posted by: Dan Raphael | June 19, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
We have been suckered into compromising on health care when Clinton tried to reform it more than a decade ago. My father was taking pain medicine for his bone cancer. One day his insurance company called to say he had used up his allotment of medicine for the year. Nobody from the insurance company came to see what his condition was like, they just made a financial decision and didn’t care if my father was going through torturous pain. My mother had a stroke. Her private health insurance only allow her a week in the hospital and she had to move to a facility even if the doctors and nurses didn’t think she was ready to move. The building she lives in has an assisted living section, but it was not on the insurance companies list of places she could go. As a result her sister who she lives with couldn’t visit her because the place was too far away. When are these private insurance companies going to stop getting in between my family and our doctors?
Posted by: Julian Kernes | June 19, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
Why do you encourage policies that ignore the US Constitution and our Bill of Rights ?
Posted by: Joseph Godfrey | June 19, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
WHY I VOTED FOR PREZ O BANA
Candidate Obama promised to change Washington, DC so that the corporate powers did not control policy, well on health care President Obama is doing the opposite. He is letting the corporate powers – the insurance, HMO and pharmaceutical industries — run health care. He has insurance company representatives speaking first and last at his White House health care meeting. At the same time single payer is not being considered by Obama. Why is single payer off the table? Are the corporate powers still in charge?
Posted by: VIRGINIA SMITH | June 19, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
President Obama, why not simply open the federal employees health benefit plans to all at 110% of the full premium, the same as is paid by dependent children of federal retirees after the child turns age 21 under “continuation of coverage”? It makes not sense at all that dependent children are booted off the federal continuation of coverage plan at age 25 when many are still in college seeking advanced degrees and when they are currently paying 110% of the premium. The government pays nothing toward continuation of coverage, so what is the necessity to end it at age 25. This would seem to be instantly solvable by Executive Order to simply eliminate the mandatory end of coverage as such enrollees will naturally move on to other coverage as they gain employment and need their own family coverage plan.
Posted by: Thom Bouis | June 19, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Question:
What stands in the way of the obviously superior sigle-payer system, used hppily on other countries, except the timidty of the congress and the President?
Howard Zinn
Posted by: howard zinn | June 19, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
What stadns in the way oft he obviously superior single-payer system, used happily in so many countrie, except the timidity of Congress and the President?
Posted by: howard zinn | June 19, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Health care reform can probably be achieved through applying best practices throughout all hospitals. It is a good low-cost first step.
Posted by: Tyrone | June 19, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
Whatever they do, don’t model it after VA health care.
Posted by: Dave Kisor | June 19, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
What stands in the way of adopting the obviously superior single payer system, used happily in many countries–except the abject tmidity of Congress and the President?
Posted by: Rowland Scherman | June 19, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
I have a question for the President. I know several attorneys who specialize in various areas of law, from corporate to estate planning, to criminal and civil issues. All of them agree, DOMA is unconstitutional.
So why Mr. President, as a former Constitutional Law professor, do you still insist on perpetuating such a blatantly discriminatory law?
Posted by: Tony Pelliccio | June 19, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
I’m 77, pay for Medicare AND SUPPLEMENTAL HEALTH INSURANCE FOR A TOTAL OF $403.00 PER MONTH. lAST HOSPITLIZED IN 1989, i HAVE PAID FOR A LOT OF CHARITY CARE OVER THE YEARS. I DON’T KNOW WHY I SHOULD BE FORCED INTO A PROGRAM WHERE I, AT MY AGE, MIGHT HAVE TO WAIT TOO LONG FOR A DR. APPT., OR TO BE ADMITTED TO A HOSPITAL IN AN EMERGENCY…WHAT IS YOUR PLAN FOR SENIORS LIKE ME/?????
Posted by: Inezz | June 19, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Why is single health payer now off the table?
Posted by: Margaret T.M. Petkiewicz | June 19, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
I’ve got good coverage, with a reasonable co-pay. Something I’m hearing that most people do not have.
If putting the whole country on a “single payer” plan will reduce costs, and cut out “corporate medical” then that is what is required.
Some companies have already be shut-down by this recession, the “medical corporations” will also have to “go by the wayside” (more people out of work, but they should be able to be retrained for other occupations).
A lot of people that do medical billing paper pushing will have nothing to do (look at Canadian health care). It could save lives, trees, the environment.
Please explain why the turn around on Mr. Obama’s views on instituting single-payer health care in this country.
Posted by: Robert Curzon | June 19, 2009, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
I’m 77 and was last hospitalized in 1989. Health insurance, including Medicare is $403.00 each month. I”ve paid for a lot ofcharity care over the years. At my age. I don’twant to want months or even ,weeks to see a doctor OR TO BE ADMITTEDTO AHOSPITAL , AT MY AGE. what are your plans for seniors like me??
Posted by: Inezz | June 19, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Why do you violate the constitution?
Posted by: Paul | June 19, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
Mr. President:
Why have you changed your mind about single-payer health insurance?
Single-payer is what this country needs. It is the one thing that would actually work!
Please don’t turn your back on your country!
Help us all get “single-payer health insurance”!
Posted by: Barbara | June 19, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
Why have you given in to the insurance companies by supporting a public/private option in Obama’s plan? Without a true single payer system, this option will fail and the insurance companies know it just as well as you do. Their phony grumbling and offer to save 1.5% in costs per year is disgusting, but it is even more disheartening to see good people in good organizations pretend to favor health care reform by saying they support a “public” option. A single payer plan is already in the form of a bill in Congress and has 93 co-sponsors. Have you even read HR676 and what it will do to cover everyone and save money? Shame on you good people for giving in to the insurance and pharmaceutical lobbyists and shame on Gov Dean and Pres Obama.
Posted by: cj montgomery | June 19, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
back in 2003 President Obama supported single payer but said before it could happen the democrats needed to win the white house, senate, and house well that has been done so why has President Obama reneged on his support for single payer.
Posted by: Bgarcia | June 19, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Why are we spending this country into a hole that we can never get out of? If everyone adopted the Dave Ramsey Total Money Makeover plan, everyone would be giving to worthy causes, have money stashed away for an emergency, and start wealth building. It seems as if this is a smart idea to me. That is my idea.
Posted by: Keldridge | June 19, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Mr. President your many speeches in recent weeks have shown your warmth, candor, and humor but i must ask, Will Joe Biden follow the guidelines set forth in the the Boland amendment? Also, Where are the billions of dollars misplaced during the reconstruction of Iraq? Bashar al-Assad has nothing to worry about for at least another decade while he is on friendly terms with John Negroponte. Right?
Posted by: iiiears | June 19, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Why can’t we have a single-payer health care system like every other civilized country on earth does? Health care should not be a for-profit venture. No one should be refused for pre-existing conditions or for lack of money or coverage.
Posted by: felinefix | June 20, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am
Our present system of health care in the USA says that the quality of your health care should always be based on your economic success’. As humans, if we do not get the health care that we need at the proper time, our health fails more and more! So which is more important.. the health of the citizen’s or the economic success of the health care industry? You have put the successes and profits of the insurance and health care industry way above any priorities towards a system of ‘single payer’ that would help insure the uninsured. My question to the president would be: Are all of the citizens of this country, really, just ‘consumers’ to you?
The new definition of ‘obama’ may just become…failing to keep your promises!
Posted by: William W Haywood | June 20, 2009, 12:43 am 12:43 am
Considering the institutionalized discrimination against gay and lesbian citizens (DOMA, dont’ ask, don’t tell), what guarantees will there be that gay and lesbian citizens will not be discriminated against in any health care system administered by the federal government?
Posted by: TJ | June 20, 2009, 12:46 am 12:46 am
The democrats are notorious for getting nothing much done because they are trying so hard to play “nice” or “fair” whereas republicans just go after what they want and make no apologies – and often get what they want as a consequence. Will you stop acting like a “wimp” democrat and actually get something done or will you keep tippytoeing around on: health care, gay rights, ending these wars, the obscene gap between rich and poor, the corruption in government and business, etc. etc.
Posted by: Louisa | June 20, 2009, 12:54 am 12:54 am
If FedEx, UPS, and the USPS can coexist and compete, why can’t Aetna, HealthNet, Kaiser Permanente, and others coexist and be competitive with a Federal Health Insurance (FHI) that is based on a flat 4% (single) or 7% (family) income tax (premium)? The template of FHI administration exists in Medicare. An example of a plan is HealthNet High Option FEHB. Total premium, employee contribution and government contribution, for a family is about $12,000/yr. Deducting insurance company admin costs, overhead, and profit of 40% gets the cost of care down to $7,200/yr.. Health-insurance companies could continue, as before, to cherry-pick customers and keep the big accounts. (Politics is the art of the possible.) Ways to cut costs and make this possible for 7% include Government negotiation of prescription costs, the simplified billing of FHI, and FHI getting the same billing rate as insurance companies (approximately 67% discount–not 1/3rd off–2/3rds off; that’s what they really get).
Restructuring the private health-care system (still private) would enable additional cost savings. ER’s for emergencies, Urgent Care for urgent care, clinics for colds, flu, immunizations. More nurse practitioners and more physician’s assistants to free up physicians’ time for patients who really need them. This program eliminates inappropriate ER visits for colds and chronic conditions that cost Federal or State governments or force hospitals to embed those costs in the care of other patients.
Everyone, including the Senators and Congressmen in the pockets of the health-insurance industry, who is against universal health care has good-to-excellent health insurance for free or for modest premiums.
Posted by: Mike Carpenter | June 20, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am
I would like to ask President Obama this: Are there good reasons for refusing to consider single-payer health care? If so, would it not benefit him, and us — those who once believed strongly in his promise — if he were to look us straight in the eye and tell us exactly what those reasons are? If his argument is cogent and substantial, then he will have reaffirmed our faith. And if those reasons are couched in spongy rhetoric, crumbling logic and mealy platitudes, what choice have we but to believe he has caved in to the influence of the monied status quo?
Posted by: Parris ja Young | June 20, 2009, 3:40 am 3:40 am
I’d like to know why isn’t single-payer universal health care on the table? It’s time for Socialized healthcare for the US.
Posted by: dandelionsalad | June 20, 2009, 5:12 am 5:12 am
I would appreciate learning what the function of insurance companies is, with regard to the delivery of health care services and how a “for profit” industry can cost less than a single-payer system, which is the proven model for health care in the remaining industrialized world. If the patriots in Congress would finally agree to subscribe to the Medicare, Medicaid system and refuse financial contributions from lobbyists representing the heath care services industry the enigma would be quickly resolved and it would be single payer.
Posted by: Jerry Lieberman | June 20, 2009, 9:04 am 9:04 am
Please tell me why Congress gets a conscious about spending whenever it concerns things that benefit American Citizen? What are people supposed to do for healthcare when they get old? I would prefer a NON-PROFIT government-run insurance plan any day! Right now you can’t even get healthcare if you have a pre-existing condition. So how does that make our system the best in the world. What a joke! If you would like to see what I mean, I challenge anyone that has healthcare right now to take a minute and find out just how much you have to pay for coverage–IF YOU CAN GET IT! I BELIEVE IT WILL BE A RUDE AWAKENING FOR ANYONE AGAINST NATIONAL HEALTHCARE!
Posted by: egrets11 | June 20, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am
the only way a government can control costs is by wielding great purchasing power to get concessions on the price of drugs, physician fees, and hospital
services; the only way they can control administrative costs is by providing a simplified service, yes, the Medicare model (with a 3%overhead), and not allowing private insurance to cherry-pick patients(some of them operating with 30% overheads), the cost passed on to us with a single payer plan. don’t trust the insurance industry to be regulated and mandates only insure the industry, not the patients.
Posted by: Betty | June 20, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Nobody wants the govt to manage health care. Just the insurance. Independent, state-licensed, private sector health care delivery. One single insurance company.
We already pay for everyone. If you’re really against single payer, why aren’t you also against treating people in emergency rooms if they have no insurance? Start yelling about that, I beg you!
Posted by: Amy | June 20, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am
As a State Senator, Mr. Obama came out unequivically for Single-Payer. Now he says that if we were starting over, he would advocate for that.
But with the system as dysfunctional as if is, why not start over with Single-Payer?
Posted by: Neal Madnick | June 20, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
When your plan is in operation, will it be legal for a citizen to purchase medical services with his own money if the medical bureaucracy has said that such treatment was not cost effective or otherwise refused? Will there be any consequences for the provider for engaging in this cash, out of the system, transaction?
Posted by: Michael Kerner | June 20, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
- As Congress works on health care reform they are finding the cost of covering everyone is exorbitant. Indeed, it no longer seems possible with the CBO estimating that the most robust plan would leave 36 million uninsured in ten years. Under single payer everyone would have access to health care and it would be affordable because $400 million in insurance costs would be no longer in the equation. Why is single payer not being considered?
Posted by: Lise Nau | June 20, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
When more than 70% of the public wants single payer healthcare, why is there even a discussion about whether to have it or not? The question should be what is the best way to transition to a single payer system.
Should part of the discussion also include public financing for our elected officials in order to give them the independence to vote for what their constituents want?
Posted by: Brenda | June 21, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
If the bill that is sent to you by congress is nothing but a rerun of the Medicare part D, where the patient gets stuck withe the bill and the insurance and drug companies make out like bandits, will you veto the bill?
Also, if it is little change from the status quo, will you veto it.
There MUST be a public plan available.
Posted by: Grover | June 21, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Someone has proposed a system of regional health care co-ops instead of a public health insurance option, which sounds to me just like what we’ve got now, only all chopped up into regions. How could a network of for-profit co-ops be better than having a public health insurance system?
Posted by: Susan Williams | June 21, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
All of you are so afraid of “Bankrupting” America to provide healthcare to the 60% of our country who can’t afford it and have to pay more that medicare, medicaid, or insurance companies, that only the weathiest or privelidged employees with healthcare coverage enjoy don’t say too much about the trillions of $$$ spent on the department of offense that’s getting nowhere in TWO (COUNT”EM) Two wars that we are not winning and Haliburton is getting fat off of.
Why can’t we support our btroops by bringing them hoem and supply healthcare for all the same way as lees fortunate countries do, like uh, CUBA?
Posted by: Duane Teschler | June 21, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
If ‘socialized’ medicine, paid for by the taxes of US citizens is so horrible, Why do senators and congressmen continue to get it?
They don’t seem to complain about cost or rationing or beauracracy.
If it is not good enough for us, how come it’s good enough for them?
They never seem to accept anything but the best for themselves.
Posted by: Sylvia Aronson | June 21, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
I am tired of obstuctionist legislators who have their own very nice health plan deciding what is right for me. Why can’t we have a national voter referendum on this? To many key folks in Congress and the Senate are beholden to the big biz healthcare lobby $$$.
Posted by: dgwemst | June 21, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
When will the CBO do a side-by-side cost comparison of H.R. 676, S. 703, and the public/private health insurance exchange? Until we get that, there is no way to talk rationally about the subject. I believe that
E.A. Costa had it right on June 18: “The only workable health care is Kucinich’s plan, which is to include all citizens and residents in the risk pool and make the Federal Government the insurer for all basic health care. Because of the size and nature of the risk pool the premiums would be small, perhaps as low as ten dollars a year per insured. That would also mean being able to get rid of Veterans’ Health as a separate item, and all other public health care plans. They would just become part of the pool. That in itself would save trillions. This is the way many industrialized countries do it, and by taking the burden off the employers and employees it would stimulate economic growth. Any plan that include private insurers will be a disaster, and just another burden on the economy.”
Posted by: Sally G | June 21, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Patients are sick and tired of being ripped off, and therefore we are taking action ourselves, as we have lost all hope and faith of the people who run this country. Time to unite and help ourselves I believe.
Posted by: jo joshua godfrey | June 21, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
The American people are counting on this administration to deliver health care reform that will reduce costs, expand coverage, and make insurance companies more accountable. In survey after survey, Americans support inclusion of a strong government-run public insurance option to compete against private insurers by more than 70%. Even Republicans support a public option by more than 60%.
I work in health care and fight insurance companies everyday to get patients the care they need. Will President Obama insist on having a robust, public insurance option open to all on Day One in health care legislation and give the American people what they want and need?
Ultimately, the American people need help and they don’t care if a public option passes with 51% or 100%, if it passes with cloture or reconciliation. They just want it to pass. Does Congress represent the will of the people or special interests?
Posted by: Janet Moore | June 21, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Why is it the American people, in general, don’t “get it” when it comes to health care REFORM? 1) Most people who have employer based group rates, don’t care about the rest. 2) Most insured people are not the least bit concerned because they are clueless when it comes to health care costs – their insurance pays most claims. 3) Those that are uninsured by choice, don’t care either.
Isn’t this about leveling the field for ALL THE PEOPLE, which by doing so, will force the Mafia (they are selling protection, after all) insurance companies to have to COMPETE and that translates to lower premiums or lost customers – take you pick.
Isn’t insurance, by it’s very definition, designed to spread the risk of all, by all? When cherry picking occurs, the field tilts in favor of the insurance company. Cherry picking doesn’t keep premiums low – it raises insurance companies profits and CEO’s bonuses. Mafia? YEP! Theives? YEP. Had enought? YEP! Time to take back our “streets” from those hoodlums that would force us to pay protection money to walk those very same streets – no competition as long as they own the turf!
Come on America, wake up – and quit being so damn selfish. Not everyone has a great job with benefits and golden parachutes for retirement.
Posted by: Bob Jurgensen | June 21, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Why can’t medicare eligibility be gradually allowed at younger ages? Start with having Medicare at 62 in 2010, Medicare at 60 in 2011 and two years each year until all are covered. Medicare has an expense ration of 3%, private insurance
takes over 30% for profits and administration. it is disgusting that the misery of people is exploited by private health insurance companies.
Posted by: pesach kremen | June 21, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Some opponents of a “Public Option” seem to believe that it would drive the present Health Insurance industry out of business. Would it?
Posted by: Bob Edgerly | June 21, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Regarding Timothy’s comment. If he would look at the experience that the countries of the world have with universal coverage he would find that his concerns,straight out of the republican fear talking points,are myths. Why is our system far more expensive than anyone elses and we rank 37th.Get informed!
Leon Logan
Posted by: Leon Logan | June 21, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
I’m currently living on a disability payment each month that’s charged a premium of $100+ for my Medicare A, B, and D coverage. Unfortunately, dental care is not included which “All The More” reasons we need Health Care reform Big Time, especially for those who’s incomes are limited.
Posted by: Anthony A Capobianco | June 21, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Will Medicare remain the same when the new program is initiated?
The elderly and children need medical and medicine coverage when needed as they do not have strong immune systems to fight deseases.
Posted by: carol Maghakian | June 21, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
First of all these comments sound like the old Republicans emass again. However, what happened to the health care plan that Congress has that was going to be offered to the people? Did that plan die somewhere? Thank you. William Danhof
Posted by: William Danhof | June 21, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Making Medicare a bit more income-based-for middle class-say up to net worth of $1 Million-or less than $2,500/month-would make sense.
Also, as another commentor said, if less money was spent on foreign occupations and military operations, more money would be freed up. Are you considering that, Mr. President?
Finally, monitoring how time is spent, by observation of neutral parties, might help eliminate inefficient use of medical money (ie spending time gossiping, backstabing, targeting, etc.). Can you do anything to increase staffing ratios in various levels of healthcare? Many aren’t staffed well enough to assure patient safety and quality of care. This could lead to lawsuits, which could be more costly than hiring more people. Even part-time, or per-diem staff.
Posted by: Lorraine | June 21, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
PLEASE SHOW ME WHERE SOCIALIZED HEALTH CARE HAS EVER WORKED??SHOW ME WHERE ANY GOVT. PROGRAM HAS WORKED.THE GOVT.SHOULD STAY OUT OF OUR LIVES!!
Posted by: GENE KUSHON | June 21, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
All our democratic modern industrial nations have single-payer; most Americans, Drs. (AMA has only a
small number of Drs. and AMA was opposed to medicare when it was proposed) and RNs want Single Payer. Have you checked out the millions of insurance agencies and pharmaceutical industrial complex money (lobbyists) go to Baucus and most Congress folks who enjoy federal single-payer! Americans want to get rid of the for-profit companies that have made us one of the worst countries for lack of prevention of
deaths (why of course, it wouldn’t be profitable to serve “sick” people)!
Unemployed people would be helped and businesses and unions would do better since they wouldn’t have to include health plans.
Let’s join the world that has enjoyed single-payer
for decades!
Posted by: Joan Sage | June 21, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
The U.S. is 37th in lack of prevention of death. All modern industrial democratic nations enjoy Single Payer Health care (like what our Congress and Federal
employees enjoy). But Congress is the recipient of
millions of dollars (Baucus the most) of health insurance agencies obscene profits. What ever happened to representation of the people–especially since most Americans, Drs., Rns want Single-Payer. The AMA (which represents the least # of doctors and are mostly retired) was against medicare when it was proposed so why
listen to them. Employees, including the unemployed, wouldn’t have to be bothered with
business health plans. All together it would be
government as payer but everyone would choose
their own doctors and the doctors wouldn’t have to
be directed by the for-profit agencies so it would be far less expensive and effective than what we have now. Yes, let’s bring home the troops and
save on for-profit war-makers.
Posted by: Joan Sage | June 21, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
My question is this:
Recently I was diagnosed with what insurers deem a pre-existing condition. I’ve been in great health (32 yrs old) all my life but a routine check up revealed high cholesterol and despite my healthy diet and exercise habits I’ll need drugs to keep it in check.
Presently I am paying COBRA – I was laid off but my new employer reimburses my health insurance. I pay 228.50/month plus co-pays and fees for medication that adds about $100/month extra. I am afraid once my COBRA expires I’ll be lucky to get insurance at a reasonable cost.
So now suddenly I can see the need for a public option, specifically the Progressive House Caucus’s conditions for it.
President Obama will you refuse to sign a healthcare bill that does not have a strong robust public option in it similar to the Progressive Caucus version?
Posted by: AJ | June 21, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
A 10% cut of “defense” saves a trillion dollars over ten years. How can anyone maintain that cost of universal health care is even remotely an issue? Has our peace dividend not matured yet?
Posted by: zurphys | June 21, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
What does it take to get Congress and the White House to notice that *all* the plans *they’re* pushing are more of the same stuff that’s already bankrupting us? How much more money are they going to take from the insurance companies before the corruption kills us all?
We need single-payer, because any system where the for-profit insurance companies have a say in coverage decisions will be as bad as what we have now – and that’s millions who can’t afford insurance, assuming they don’t have one of the thousands of ‘pre-existing conditions’ that the companies use to raise their profits.
Regulate insurance companies like public utilities: make them justify their rates and their salaries publicly, every year.
Posted by: P J Evans | June 21, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
I read all thirty pages of H.B.676 the Single Payer Health Care Plan bt Rep Conyers. It is a very well crafted bill and would give us the real reform so many desire in health care by creating a National Health Care Service and make Health Insurance Companies obsolete. It is worth reading and supporting. Why has President Obama ignored this approach?
Posted by: Dr. Art C. Donart | June 21, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
if the united states is this supposed democracy (which it’s intended on being in the first place) but if we’re to subscribe to that idea how in the world do we have to ask for marijuana to be legalized.. if it’s the majority opinion, isnt it governments job to carry that out? who are you to say no, if it’s what the people want? a government of the people, for the people and by the people. cheers.
Posted by: anthony moat | June 21, 2009, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
Why do our representatives get to enjoy health care benefits paid for by us, yet feel we are not entitled? Have they taken the “let them eat cake” attitude?
Posted by: Annette Riggs | June 21, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Mr. President:
During the campaign, you said: “This campaign is not about me; it’s about YOU.” Well, if it is about US, and over 70% of Americans want a government-run health-care system, why is there no discussion of this? What is more important — bipartisanship, or the 20,000 Americans dying every day due to lack of health insurance?
Posted by: Donna Bosink | June 21, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
I would like to know why it is that our legislators enjoy some of the best health care coverage in the world, but seem to care nothing for the fact that a great majority of their consituents, who put them in office either do not have health care insurance, or they are going bankrupt just paying their medical bills even if they have insurance, this is inexcusable and it is a crime and it is not the America that I grew up in and sometimes I think I do not want to live in anymore.
Posted by: Kathy Parnell | June 22, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am
I’d love to submit a question but have no interest in joining Digg in order to do so. But were I able to submit one, I’d ask:
Rather than dwell on combatting the fear-mongering of the health insurance industry about a ‘government take-over’ (since we have over four decades of popular and highly successful Medicare experience to offer up as an example of government competence in this area), please explain exactly what unique value the health insurance industry adds to health-care delivery that justifies its existence at our expense.
The quip “The only value that you can add to a banana is a bruise” might have been coined to comment upon the value added by private health insurance. About 1/3 of every dollar directed at privately-insured health care in this country is consumed by insurance industry overhead and profit plus the additional overhead which health-care providers incur in dealing with the varied paperwork of over 1,500 different insurers. By contrast, only about 2 cents of every dollar directed through Medicare parts A and B is consumed by overhead.
A significant majority of Americans – and a significant majority of their physicians – favor a single-payer “Medicare for all”-style approach to health care in this country. As long as providers continue to be paid fairly for their services the quality of those services will not decline (and might improve, since they don’t like dealing with insurers any more than we do).
So if voters don’t support the private insurance industry, and providers don’t support the private insurance industry, and the private insurance industry takes such a large chunk out of our health-care dollars (and overall economy), and the private insurance industry gets in the way of necessary medical care by placing profits first, and the private insurance industry won’t cover people who can’t afford its exorbitant rates, and we have a good example of a government-run single-payer system in Medicare to use as a template, why is private health insurance still at the core of (and threatening to become the entirety of) the so-called ‘reform’ that you’re proposing?
Posted by: Bill Todd | June 22, 2009, 2:03 am 2:03 am
Single-payer health care financing with private sector health care delivery seems the most rational for patients and health care providers. The vested interest against this proposal come from the the for-profit health insurance and the pharmaceutical industries. Most people are patients ultimately, not employees, management or executives of the health insurance and the pharmaceutical industries.
The situation demands the greatest good for the greatest number, not the greatest good for the most influential.
Please do the right thing, people before profits. The reverse order of priorities has gotten into the mess we’re in now.
Albert Einstein said, “We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” We need out of the problem.
Please do the right thing.
Posted by: brimcmike | June 22, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am
I’d like to know if all our elected persons and the President and his family are going to have the same healthcare as the rest of us.
Posted by: Patricia | June 22, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am
Ksmith.. The VA medical wastes so much. When you refill your RX’s they send them all seperatly and use fedex for shipping. Now that’s a hugh waste when they are shipping meds to veterans all over the country.
Posted by: Patricia | June 22, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am
First of all the Dems are the party of problem-solvers, ie The New Deal, GI Bill, WPA… Secondly, I feel govt does play very important roles, ie Police Dept., Fire Dept., National Parks, Libraries, infrastructure… If we can spend billions of dollars in Iraq there’s absolutely no reason why we can’t spend on health care for US citizens! Now for my questions about health care reform: Why isn’t the most economical & efficient solution favored by a majority of Americans which is the only bill with 83 co-sponsors, HR 676, be heard & scored by CBO? If many other industries can be done away with in this country the health insurance can be done away with also! If auto workers and many many other blue collar workers in this country must take pay and benefit cuts, then bankers, insurance companies, doctors, and pharmaseutical people can take pay cuts also! 60% of all health care dollars are subsidized by Fed gov’t now, and that includes employer-sponsored benefits! Do you think billions more taxpayer dollars should be transferred to insurance & pharco sectors in the name of ‘reform’?
Posted by: Jeanie Embry | June 22, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Corporate profits for Insurance Companies?
OR
Healthcare for people?
The decision is yours Mr. President.
Single Payer works and and is cost efficient. Over 70% of Americans favor it if the polls are worth anything.
The only reason NOT to go with Single Payer is that “our” legislators aren’t ours. They are working for “their” campaign contributors…the health insurance industry in this case.
Posted by: Evergreen2U | June 22, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Why is the conversation about the uninsured and not about the serious problems with our health care system? Many of us have insurance but it is next to useless. My insurance does not pay a penny until I hit a $2,000 deductible. I need a pap smear and mammagram right now but cannot afford it. There is so much abuse and evil in the present system and anyone who thinks care is not being rationed is not thinking. If you can’t afford it it is being rationed.
Posted by: Penny Pool | June 22, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Wow, in reading these posts I have to say that I am not the only one who is unhappy with this “healthcare reform” – what does Obama or the government know about healthcare?
I am a senior level healthcare executive dealing with reimbursement and I have to say that the most bureaucratic agencies that create administrative nightmares (and drive up costs) are the government run programs.
I also have issues with ABC airing a onesided view. This is totally appalling.
Posted by: Nancy | June 22, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
A few comments:
Why do people on this blog think single payer healthcare is the way to go. If we knock out all the competition, what will drive the government to ensure GOOD (adequate) coverage. They will be the only game in town. This makes absolutely no sense to get rid of any competition. It won’t control pricing – look at your utilities that have a monopoly or the US post office….
Secondly, I would like to ask President Obama what makes him qualified to create a healthcare plan? And also Why he isn’t insisting on opposing views being aired on this infomercial.
Posted by: Nancy | June 22, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Mr. President:
I thought during your campaign, you promised no additional taxes for the middle class – how then do you expect to pay for this program
And, how do you explain to your Medicare population that you want to cut programs out of the Medicare budget to help fund healthcare for all – even illegals and those who choose not to purchase a plan even though it is offered to them?
Posted by: Nancy | June 22, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Why are “single payer” advocates being excluded from the discussion meetings. Single payer would cover the most vulnerabe members of our society.
Will longterm care allow people to stay in their own homes instead of nursing homes? If not, why?
Will the two year weighting period for Medicare finally be dissolved? Being a Missourian and a person with a disability I did not qualify for Medicaid so I was without health care for over two years and my health declined rapidly. If you’re sick does it make sense to wait two years before going to the doctor? No it doesn’t! Neither does waiting for Medicare after you file for disability.
Will you stop the insurance companies, pharmacutical companies and their lobbyists from putting profits first and people last?
How many more people have to die before we have REAL health care reform?
Posted by: Richard Green | June 22, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Ref health care public plan. I am 100 pct for it. I am using the medicare plan as I passed 65 and I am impressed how well it works. I am sure that it can be improved as it is pres. Obama’s plan but all in all it works GREAT.
Robert Fischer
Posted by: robert fischer | June 22, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
President Obama, my question is why dont you put your foot down and go for the Public Healthcare Option. I’m a registered Republican who fully supports the Public Option and better yet the Single Payer System. I would gladly pay more taxes for this most fundamental necessity of life. The anxiety and fear of losing one’s savings, if any, to cover medical bills, of losing one’s home, or go into bankruptcy, makes a patient almost as sick as their sickness, and that is unconscionable in a country like ours. I’ve read all the Republicans Critics, their repetitive talking points, the fear mongering tactics, and I JUST DONT BUY IT. I’ve told my US Republican Senator just as much and more. The Private Healthcare Insurance Industry needs a Real Competitor with Real Clout, otherwise they’ll continue to bask in the safety of their pick and choose monopoly and greater profits as they have done so far at our expense. Their supposedly Free-Market competition, does not exist, never did, it simply stinks. They are so scared now, it’s about time.
President Obama, no “co-ops”, no gimmicks, no tweakings/weakening of the Public Option, GO FOR THE REAL THING, GO FOR IT! The time is now.
Posted by: L | June 22, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Hi President Obama:
The government needs to realize that Complimentary/Alterative Health Care is just as important as CONVENTIONAL (which I said complimentary in error in the last post) medicine. Without COMPLIMENTARY/ALTERATIVE MEDICINE people are getting half the care they need in MOST areas of medicine. My question is simply – Why is complimentary/alternative medicine been put on the back burner and only allowed in some group plans and will your new health reform include this type of medicine for all AMERICANS individual or group? This is the best type of preventive medicine going. Convnetional medicine CANNOT AND DOES NOT UNDERSTAND CERTAIN ILLNESSES. Like poor Farrett Fawcett said in her recent documentary ‘WHY DON’T WE USE ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES AND MAKE THEM KNOWN IN AMERICA LIKE THEY ARE IN EUROPE?’ Lynn
Posted by: Lynn | June 22, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
FOR ALL YOU ANTI-OBAMAS HERE. THE GOP DOES NOTHING TO CORRECT THINGS. OUR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM WILL ONLY GET WORSE IF NOTHING IS DONE WITH RATES GOING UP EVERY SECOND BY GREEDS OF THE INSURANCE COMPANIES WHO KNOCK THE SERIOUSLY ILL OFF TREATMENT AND PLANS. YOU GOP FANS CALL THAT NORMAL???????? INSURANCE COMPANIES ARE CRIMINAL COMPANIES. COMPANIES CAN’T AFFORD HEALTH INSURANCE ANYMORE. CAN YOU AS AN INDIVIDUAL AFFORD $1,000.00 A MONTH FOR HEALTH INSURANCE? I CAN’T ALSO DON’T TRY AND TELL ME YOU WOULD WANT TO DO WITHOUT SOCIAL SECURITY, SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY, WORKMAN’S COMP, MEDICARE (THE SENIORS WOULD HAVE NOTHING IF IT WERE UP TO GOP), MEDICAID, SUBSIDIZED HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY AND DISABILED, ETC. AND ALL OF THESE PROGRAMS AND MORE WERE GIVEN TO US BY THE DEMOCRATS AND DON’T TELL ME YOU DON’T LIKE THESE PROGRAMS CAUSE IF YOU DO YOU ARE LYING. A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE ILL AND DEPEND ON THIS STUFF AS DO SENIORS SO ANY SENIOR WHO IS ANTI-OBAMA HAD BETTER THANK GOD WE HAVE DEMS BECAUSE THEY WOULD NOT HAVE THE GOODIES IF WE DIDN’T. NOW IT’S TIME FOR THE 18 TO 64 YEARS OLDS TO HAVE DECENT AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE.
Posted by: Lynn | June 22, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
I have not had health insurance in over 20 years. I don’t qualify for medical, so how long will it be before something is in place for me to be able to go to the doctor?
Posted by: cj | June 22, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
Whay haven’t you responded to and promoted the fiscal results expected from single-payer, the most popular idea for health care reform: job creation, lower administrative costs (3-6% compared to 33-36%, clinical controls on supplier induced demand that inflates speacialty care costs.
Posted by: Idigsinglepayer | June 22, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
If your public option is going to cost $1 trillion over the next year while a single-payer system will actually save billions of dollars, provide quality health care for all Americans, create 2.6 million new jobs, and two thirds of Americans are in favor of it, why haven’t you endorsed it vigorously?
Posted by: Gilbert Saucedo | June 22, 2009, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Mr. President,
Thank you for all of your efforts to help America back to her feet.
I have been following the HELP Senate Discussions for the AHCO, Affordable Healthy Choice Options Act, introduced by Senator Ted Kennedy, which aims to provide health care COVERAGE to everyone in America.
The AHCO Committee’s main focus on Friday, June 19th was in amending the wording to protect patients and doctors from the oversight by CMS through the use of the CER. Not one of them wanted to step up to the plate after much discussion and change the wording in the Robert’s Bill to read that doctors would not or should not be mandated to use the CER. And NO ONE wants the government to be the one to say… who can be treated, based on cost.
I don’t understand how there could even be a question about the government using costs to mandate physicians to use the CER to provide health care. Since the main purpose of the AHCO’s purpose is to provide QUALITY HEALTH CARE TO EVERYONE in America.
Those are nice words Mr. President, my question is how are we going to load an additional 43-46 million uninsured patients to the existing doctor’s rolls and still be able to provide QUALITY HEALTH CARE TO EVERYONE IN AMERICA where there is already a shortage of doctors?
My suggestions on preparing for the shortage of physicians.
- Provide grants for people wishing to become physicians. Those grants would be available to anyone with a 3.0 grade average.
- Grants would be provided with the following requirement/s:
- Following graduation and residency, their medical service would be provided in a specific area for a period of 8 years.
- If service is not provided for the 8 years then, a 1 year suspension would be leveled. The total cost of their education will be calculated. That amount will be divided by 8, thereby providing an annual cost.
- Credit will be given for each year of service. The remaining years will be due and repayable. Example, a physician completes their schooling under the grant. They provide services for 3 years. They cease to provide the promised service. They will owe a total cost for their education of 8 years and will be given credit for the 3 years service thereby leaving a balance owing for repayment of 5 years.
- That balance will be payable in as many years.
- Unemployed workers could be given grants to train in the medical professions where shortages exist or are expected to exist within the next 10 years with the same expectations as physicians.
- Community Health Centers should be erected by each County or Parish in each state. Everyone who resides in that County or Parish would be required to report for a physical and health accessment.
- Following the physical and health accessment every resident will be required to meet with a health counselor to learn how to improve their personal health.
- Exercise programs and run/walk tracks should be built/designed and maintained by each county or parish.
- Nutrition Classes should be made available to teach kids, teens, adults, and the elderly about healthy eating habits.
Grass root movements for healthy living should be encouraged for every stage of a life, thereby increasing the health of all Americans.
Secondly, there has been and continues to be much discussion about the rolls and responsibilities of private insurance companies and their policies used to control costs.
The discussions I saw last night focused on patients or their families whose policies were cancelled due to information the patient did not knowlingly provide on the private health insurance companies enrollment or application form because they were unaware that they had a certain medical problem because it had not been disclosed to them by their physician, but was merely a note the physician added to the patients medical records. That time limit is 2 years. That means that private health insurance companies have up to two years to review actual medical records for any applicate. There is no mandate or process whereby private insurance companies have to request and review medical records.
The CEO’s stated that only one half of one percent of policies are ever cancelled. Note, these policies were cancelled after a review of medical records after a claim had been filed. Although two CEO’s stated that statistics show that 98% of applicates are truthful, one stated that only 88% of their applicates are statisically truthful on their applications.
Applications are accepted and processed, and collection of premiums begins after the short application process is complete. From what I gathered, the application process consists of mailing out the application to the applicate. The applicate fills it out as truthfully as they can and returns their application. It is then reviewed by underwriters and returned to the applicate for review with requests for possible additional information. The applicate has 10 days to review their application whereby they are warned to check the accuracy and/or provide any additional information to the insurance company within 10 days. It is once again reviewed by the underwriting department a 2nd time and the policy is either denied or approved.
Once issued the applicate becomes insured and begins to pay the agreed amount for coverage.
But, a major problem exists with their policies, to wit… even the CEO’s themselves were uncertain as to what the criteria or underwriting rules are for a policy to be pulled for review.
There did not seem to be any denial that underwriting did not review or check into any insureds’ medical records unless a claim is filed for coverage of one of either 1400 or 2000 diseases, within the two years following approval of coverage. Otherwise medical records are not automatically or periodically pulled for review. Only a claim for one of the either 1400 or 2000 diseases listed would cause a claim to be sent internally to their underwriting department for further review and possible cancellation.
In the meantime, the insured have been paying their agreed premiums and copayments for services and have been insured.
The private insurance companies have as much as 1400 to 2000 different diseases that can trigger a claim to be reviewed, but not one of the CEO’s wanted to verbally list any of those triggers. Only one admitted that cancer would be one of the 1400 to 2000 diseases that would result in an automatic review of a patients application and medical records with the intention to look for any possible omissions of information or medical events left out from an application filed up to two years ago.
HIPPA under the Federal Guidelines provides wording that states coverage will continue, so there is a mandate that coverage continue even after employment as long as the insured maintains payment of their premiums. So how it is that coverage can even be cancelled? Under HIPPA it seems that coverage must continue, but at an additional cost.
It would be a simple fix to require insurance companies to review medical records within a 90 day period. Whereby they would only be required to review 12% of their clientele’s applications. Since the lowest truthfulness statistic shows 88% of applicates to be truthful, 12% is a good requirement. They could use their own critiera to choose which 12% of their insured they would pull records for. That same mysterious critiera that one of the CEO’s said his company used to determine which applications were reviewed by underwriting. My point is, their internal process should not matter to us as long as after 90 days, a policy remains in force as long as the premiums and copayments are made in a timely fashion and could not be cancelled unless FRAUD is committed.
So my question in regards to private insurance companies failure to review medical records until a claim for one of their 1400 or 2000 listed diseases that prompts a review by their underwriting department is… Shouldn’t there be a time limit for medical record review that is a better protector for the consumer?
I’d like to offer the following solutions in regards to time limits for an insurance company to review medical records.
- Application fees should be leved to allow for the additional cost of requesting and reviewing medical records;
- The cost for requesting medical records should be paid for by applicates.
- The cost of reviewing medical records should be paid for by the insurance company.
- An annual report detailing all costs associated with pulling and reviewing medical records should be sent to every applicate, insured, and be made available to the public for continued transparcey of the costs of performing medical record screening in regards to insurability.
- There shall be allowed a 90 day window in which insurance companies be allowed to review any applicates medical records in regards to approval or denial of coverage.
- If records cannot be obtained within the 90 day period BY THE INSURANCE COMPANY, then the APPLICATE will be responisble for obtaining and providing their medical records for review and once presented the insurance company will have 90 days to review those records and render a decision.
- No coverage will be provided during the 90 day review process.
- Any medical condition that should be diagnosised after the 90 days during which medical records are being requested or reviewed CANNOT BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT for purposes of denying or approving coverage. GET ER DONE~
So, Mr. Obama, what do you think of this proposal or do you have a proposal of your own? Yes, I’ll take the job… call me!
Once we become aware of a problem, we are responsible to do all within our power to fix it. If we are not personally able to fix it, we are then responsible to call someone who can and then follow up until it is corrected, doing whatever we can along the way to make it right.
Posted by: Gloria | June 23, 2009, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Mr. President,
Our health care system is a confusing, inefficient patchwork of programs. Why not eliminate Medicare and Medicaid and go to a single public option available to all Americans regardless of age or income?
Posted by: Ryan | June 23, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Will your program change Medicare benefits? What is needed for Seniors is a better prescription program. Will your program encompass prescriptions for everyone?
Roberta Whitaker
Tega Cay, SC
Posted by: Roberta Whitaker | June 23, 2009, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
Single Payer healthcare is the only reform that will actually drive down costs. We want this now.
I don’t want some foreign owned and operated insurance corporation making my decisions on healthcare based on their profits and bonuses.
I want to make decisions based on my Doctors advice and have it payed for by the government.
Posted by: connecticut man1 | June 24, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am
3/4 of the American people want a public option. 56 to 65% support single payer – depending on how you phrase the question.
Ignore the GOP! We didn’t vote for their continued failures. We want real healthcare reform.
Posted by: connecticut man1 | June 24, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
After several years of MA Commonwealth Care, the same type of socialized healthcare you are proposing, it is a total failure costing over 85% MORE than originally projected. Why would we want to expand this type of healthcare to a Federal program? COVERAGE does not equal CARE.
Posted by: Dave Rugh | June 24, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Aren’t the Senators who are opposed to a public plan COVERED BY A GOVERNMENT-RUN PLAN THEMSELVES? If so, how can they say such a plan would be ineffective or poorly managed? They are subsidized with 72% government funding in THEIR plan, but do not want the public to enjoy similar benefits.
Posted by: myles spicer | June 24, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
President Obama: What will all the insurance companies, employees and other administrators do if you succeed with healthcare reform?
Posted by: erin Maloney | June 24, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Why will the U.S. government not discuss the possibility of abandoning the failed war against marijuana smokers and replacing the prohibitionist stance with a stance of legalization, taxation and regulation?
Posted by: R.P | June 24, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Does government run healthcare work?
Do people in countries like Canada and Britian dislike their government run healthcare systems. Do they wish they were more like the US?
In 2008 Harris conducted a poll of 10 industrialized countries to see what their people thought of their healthcare system
Here are the results
Posted by: norris hall | June 24, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
I am employed and have health insurance taken every week from my paycheck, go to the Dr only when I have to. I can’t afford to go because after paying weekly health insurance I can’t afford the co-payment required to be seen. Why when they raise the insurance the co payment also goes up in price?
Posted by: Debbie | June 24, 2009, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Please accept the truth that Animal farming is the single largest casue of global warming, deteriorating health and pollution which need to be addressed right now as time is running away. Lets not be late to save the planet.
Posted by: Dr Dhiraj | June 24, 2009, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
When will we be getting back to work and when will small business start making ends meet and maybe a profit?!!!!
Posted by: dailyfooddiaryuser | June 25, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
How can Obama fix the health care problem without fixing the big insurance companies (the root source of our health care problems) , cap on litigations and TORT reform?
My stance is that the big insurance companies are the major source of our medical dilemma today: (a) restrict the patients access to any medical procedures and require doctors’ excessive testing (b) doesn’t pay doctors (< 40c to the $1 of doctors' fees, (c) doesn't pay hospitals also
Posted by: Rita Lam | July 6, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Whether to have health insurance or not, and certainly whether and how much to pay for it, are ABSOLUTE free choices of individual citizens, which supersedes governmental mandates in a free nation. Government has NO POWER whatsoever to even try to mandate it on all citizens just by virtue of their existing. It is unconstitutional, as violative of rights of privacy and equal protection, to name a few. It is not like car insurance, which you only need for the privilege of driving on public roads. Health care is private, not public. And, health care info. is personal and confidential, none of Big Brother’s business. I will never, ever report my personal health insurance info. to them, nor will they ever penalize me for it. I have a legal right to defend myself from that by all necessary means.
Posted by: Tom North | July 16, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
I think health care reform in some form is necessary for this country. I don’t think our current plan is great and I don’t think Obama’s plan is flawless either. There needs to be some sort of happy medium that will work for patients, physicians, and insurance companies.
Posted by: Disability Insurance | July 20, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
It’s boils down to the simple fact that the Americn people cannot trust the President and those in Congress that support the passage of a universal or national health care program that it will function as they project. The cost alone is reason enough to see it not pass. Once passed, the government will spend whatever additional tax payers’ dollars necessary to try and make it work. We’re hearing that some in Congress do not fully know what’s in the proposed legislation and exactly how it will work. The Americn people should be extremely alarmed at the prospect that the government will end up deeply involved in this aspect of our lives. The medical community and the health insurance companies need to accept the fact that reform is needed and commit to address those areas of our health care system that will bring down costs and insure that every American (not illegals) have access to affordable insurance. dlee
Posted by: David Lee | July 21, 2009, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Obama has moved government further into our lives than any other person in history.
Government is a bloated mess and for Obama to think that government can efficiently manage health care is just as insane as thinking it can run an auto manufacturer.
“You cannot build character and courage by taking away people’s initiative and independence.
You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves.”
Abraham Lincoln
Posted by: Terry | July 24, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am
While we sit among ourselves and calculate the pros and cons of a new healthcare system the cash register keeps ringing and we never ask were do the profits go. We never ask “why do I pay $600 a month for insurance just in case I get sick?” We never ask “why am I still sick after the $20,000, three day, hospital stay?” We never ask “why does this $300 a month medication eventually destroy my kidney or damage my liver?” THERE IS NO PROFIT IN YOU GETTING WELL!!!!! Billions are spent annually on medical care for all of you insured people and you are sicker than the ones that do not have health care. Stop eating fast food, high fat foods, exercise, put the billions on cleaning up pollutants and 70% of your health issues go away. Then we can stop having this conversation.
Posted by: Sharon | July 24, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Anyone complaining about healthcare reform has healthcare.There’s nothing anyone can do to make healthcare worse for me.Go for it.
Posted by: Eric | August 11, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
With the national debt looming at 11 or 12 trillion and this year’s deficit at 1.27 trillion how and when does Obama plan to wake up and turn this freefall around?
Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 17, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
My family has these three questions for President Obama:
1. Why can’t we have health services provided thru taxation like other countries have?
2. Do you plan to keep your word that you would not sign any bill that did not have a public option?
3. What we need is HEALTH CARE not more HEALTH INSURANCE programs. There will always be people who do not qualify for health insurance and who also do not qualify and cannot afford for Medicaid. What are these people suppose to do? We should have one health care system that any American can go to. As it is, we have millions of people suffering every single day. Pick an option – I vote for the same health care benefits that members of Congress have, and make it available to every American. It is obvious that if it left up to the insurance companies, we will have EXACTLY what we have now, and let’s face it with more and more people out of work and are without insurance, how are the medical facilities going to remain open?
So I guess my question is: Can you provide the same health care services that Congress receives to EVERY American?
Posted by: Linda | August 17, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
I would ask president Obama: Please, do not borrow money to solve our health care problems.
Posted by: guilelllermina | August 17, 2009, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
I would like president Obama to ask the opponents of health coverage for health coverage deprived citizens to tell these millions why they cannot have state health protection. If president cannot ask a very simple question his plan deserves to fail.
Posted by: DAVID SHARMA | August 18, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
In order to pay for healthcare. Can we cut a millon dollars off what we give Israel everyday. . or how about Puerto Rico or Africa and the many other countries. Bring it home. These are tough times.
Posted by: Dorothy Conley | August 19, 2009, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Dear President Obama:
Now I am reading that the White House is set to pull the plug on a government-run health insurance program.
What about people like my 23-yr.-old-son who has no insurance and could benefit from the economies of scale that a government program could leverage.
I firmly believe that every American citizen has the right to some form of health insurance. That is certainly better than no insurance and going broke in the process.
What option is the government going to provide for the uninsured now that there will be no government-run insurance program?
How come the health care programs in England and Canada can provide this option, but we can’t here in America? Is it because of powerful groups and lobbyist protecting there stake in the lucrative health-care pie?
Posted by: Catherine McEntee | August 19, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Now people want to complain about what Obama want to do should have thought about that when you voted for him. This health care reform is going to ruin us. Im a single mother and havent had insurance in years but still would never vote on this. I never recieved any help from the goverment because I made $2.67 to much to be approved by goverment programs.
Posted by: Jamie | August 19, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
My comment is: “President Obama, why won’t you commit yourself and your family to no more than the health care provided by your proposed program?”
Posted by: Anonymous | August 19, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Why are you taking away my freedom and liberty? The very freedoms and liberties that were granted you and gave you the opportunity to become president.
Posted by: Nancy | August 20, 2009, 2:27 am 2:27 am
Do you wish you could deport Rush Limbaugh to North Korea… .My real question is, In your agenda for America, how do you think we the people are doing to help make America #1 again?
Posted by: KKilgore | August 20, 2009, 7:00 am 7:00 am
This is such a huge deal effecting so many lives. How about putting it to a vote? Let the voting public decide.
Posted by: Bwheat | August 20, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
how do you justify being the president of equality, by spending 700 billion on the war and racist bailouts of the biggest loser companies. while the real people put up with ridiculous nra gun laws. america is destroyed by domestic terror. thankyou, wheres the tax payors million dollar bonuses.
Posted by: ricky yoham | August 20, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
If the goal of President Obama is to provide greater competition in the health insurance arena, why doesn’t he ask the democrats to allow insurance companies to sell insurance across state lines? His government plan will be sold across all 50 states.
Posted by: Wally | August 20, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
You won the presidency with a very impressive electoral college majority and ten million more people voted for you than for your opponent. Now that you’ve been in office, are you as confident of your abiity to handle the job as you were before you were elected? I voted for the other guy, and, unless events cause me to change my opinion, I do not plan to vote for you in 2012. My voting has nothing to do with the color of your skin — I would have gladly backed Colin Powell had he run — I just don’t think you have the experience needed in that job. I wish you and your family the best. May Irish Blessings be upon you and your family and may your enemies suffer the Irish curse of itching without the benefit of scratching. God be with you.
Posted by: John M | August 20, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
I would ask him why he told me I can keep my healthcare plan if I like it.
When I read the plan it says that this is possible but with the caveat that “the individual health insurance issuer offering such coverage does not enroll any individual in such coverage if the first effective date of coverage is on or after the first day of Y1.”
That means my policy is a lame duck policy and there is no guarantee that the issuer will continue to offer it to me.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 20, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
I would ask ABC why it seems to support the government takeover of healthcare in spite of the governments record:
The government now and has run:
1. Fannie Mae– it’s broke
2. Freddie Mac– it’s broke
3. Post Office– it’s broke
4. AmTrak– it’s broke
5. Medicaid– it’s going broke
6. Medicare– it’s going broke
7. Social Security– it’s going broke
Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 20, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
Ask him what George asked Geithner:
“To get the economy back on track, will President Barack Obama have to break his pledge not to raise taxes on 95 percent of Americans? In a “This Week” exclusive, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner told me, “We’re going to have to do what’s necessary.”
Geithner was clear that he believes a key component of economic recovery is deficit reduction. When I gave him several opportunities to rule out a middle class tax hike, he wouldn’t do it.”
Posted by: Ed Taylor | August 20, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
Mr Obama, I voted for you because I hoped that you could do good things for the people of this country.
I am thoroughly disheartened that you have allowed yourself to become mired in the quicksand of neocon lies.
It appears that you are going to appease the shouting lunatics till the country dies from lack of care.
That is not why I voted for you.
Posted by: William | August 21, 2009, 12:01 am 12:01 am
There is an incredible amount of passion associated with this issue — as it should be — but the passion is based on each person’s belief of what the reform would include. No one really KNOWS what the law would include!
I would like to ask president Obama to please outline IN PLAIN ENGLISH exactly what this reform would consist of.
Posted by: Susan Miller | August 21, 2009, 6:14 am 6:14 am
Everyone’s comments are very valid about the Reform to our Health Care System. In my opinion, everyone in America needs Health Care, no matter what level of their income or their statue is- no one should not be without medical and dental care.
Bravo to Obama and his Staff that have their focus on the citizens of the United States. This Health Care Reform should be look at if government officials would use this Health Care Reform themselves, without bais.
I’m sure that Obama staff will work to perfect our nation’s issues concerning Real Estate/Home Loans, UnEmployment, Military, Health Care, etc. We need a Change, and change takes time. Obama is trying- so as a nation under God- we need to work together with Obama and our governmemt to get results that is effective, effiencient, affordable, with positive & stable systems that works-not to break the American citizens’ pockets to reach the Governmet Reform goals.
Posted by: Rev.PJ | August 21, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
whats the point of having disability insurance, and when you recover and go back to work so you can get off the disability to take care of yourself and family, you are held resposible to pay back the money. I was off for six years now I’m expected to pay back money that I obviously had paid into my insurance plan. I barely live paycheck to paycheck as it is.
Posted by: dee | August 21, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
I wouldn’t want to be in the same room as the two faced Fascist. He has nothing to say that could be or should be believed by anyone. Lies, lies and more lies. This and his Fascist friends including Pelosi, Reid, Franks, Dodd, Waxman, Boxer and Kennedy have got to go. Nov 2, 2010 can’t come soon enough.
Posted by: PJ | August 21, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Jesus saves Obama spends
Posted by: jerry.tiller | August 22, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
all the goverment problems come from
the idiots, who are not educated or
qualified to due the jobs. If a investigation was done on employee’s they would receive pink slips.
Posted by: Barb | August 22, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
The comment from the 57 yr.old black
female should apply for a goverment job
she,has hands on knowledge of what needs
to be done to change the health care.
Posted by: Barb | August 22, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
I would ask the President about government corruption at the judical level, (district and circuit level). I would ask the President about deceptive business practices, judical corporate biaes or prejudgments, and military abuse in the judical system and the United States Patent Trade Mark Office.I would also ask the President about the sale of inventions or designs example the toothbrush covers manufactured in asia and broken agreements by the government. I ask the president to stop military spending in iraq and afgan and to (focus on the abuse in the United States by the military against civillians.) An example would be fraud, thief, and non justifiable homicide.
Posted by: William Greer Jr. | August 22, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Health care (or insurance) reform isn’t a new idea. It dates back to Roosevelt (TR). The posters here seem to think President Obama hatched this scheme to ruin the country. In fact, the goal is to help millions who don’t have health care options.
Posted by: Rufus Quail | August 23, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Last year our defecit was over $1Trillion, we will add another Trillion this year and Gov Healcare will add 2Trillion so that by Oct2010 we will owe $4Trillion and it take 100 years to pay for that if we never have another deficit. Obama is laying waste to our economy and how did he get to run for Office since he was born in a foreign Country….he talked about his wonderful Mother but He never allowed her to be seen! She was not even at His Inaugeration and has never even been in the WhiteHouse…is he ashamed of his caucasion skin? How did he become a Citizen? I believe he was illegaly elected. I’m sure the Law states he has to be born within our borders to be eligible for elected office.
Posted by: Bill Swindells | August 23, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
I would like to know what the healthcare changes would be before I say yes or no. I am an ICU nurse and do not understand why the changes are being presented in such a covert fashion. Put the plan out there and let us decide if we like it or not.
Posted by: Karen | August 23, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
I recently had a stroke. What are my chances of ever being insured, and at what price?
Posted by: Rose Furbee | August 23, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
President Obama,
Are you afraid there might be a negative backlash among your white supporters if you address the ever-important pressing and prevalent issue of racism and discrimination in America?
Posted by: Ayokunle Jiboku | August 24, 2009, 2:56 am 2:56 am
To: Charles Gibson,
Today I learned that the cost of living increase for Social Security recipients is denied for 2009 & 2010. How about the government paying back what it borrowed from Social Security? The vast majority of us are LOW Income. How do we pay for housing, food, insurance, fuel when everything we require spirals upwards?
I know what will bring popular support! Change the way Congress gets their raises & cost of living increases. You know like by not voting for the increases, but have it passed automatically at Midnight.
And last but not least, Reverse ALL Federal Pay Increases from January 1, 2009 – Present.
Which would include, Congress, Senate, & let’s not forget the head of the post office that with Congressional approval Doubled his salary to pad his retirement fund. It certainly wasn’t for doing a good job, considering the Post Office is Broke.
At the end of 2002, the Social Security trust fund had a balance of $1.22 trillion. During 2003, the Treasury received $544 billion in Social Security taxes and paid out $406 billion in Social Security benefits. Therefore, the trust fund received $138 billion in these special-issue Treasury bonds, resulting in a trust fund balance of $1.36 trillion at the end of 2003.
Please use this in your show.
Posted by: Wm Pittenger | August 24, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am
I’m just curious of the 15 million uninsured…how many can afford cell phones, cable and other unnecessary expenses. We had an acquaintance with a blackberry and $100/mo cell phone plan, upset that she did not know how to make her mortgage payment…While I have no right to tell her how to spend her money, I also believe the gov’t has no right in forcing me to spend for the things they believe is our ‘moral’ duty as opposed to letting me decide where I want my ‘moral’ obligation directed.
Posted by: Sarah Jolliff | August 24, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am
i am a male 69 yrs i feel the president is a great deal we need socialize medicine in the us to keep drug company and doctor from ripping off eveyone sociallize medicine works well in england and is the best deal for the people of the us. need to get rid of the lobbyest thry are buying the politician off.
Posted by: gary mack | August 24, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
i can see where we need some helth care reform in this country . but they say wqe can pay for this by savings here and there . i think what we need to do is this all these banks and all those that got bail out money say now that they are ok and are going to give big bonuses to the top guys i say if they can do that then give back what they owe me and all other tax payers and to say to obama i had to lose my home to not being able to pay for it so they should not be given no more money and if they can give out bonuses then pay ther debt to the tax payers and if not be locked up for stealing from me and all tax payers but i suspect you cant because you all are getting money in your pockets at the expense of the tax payers i know you wont answer me because i have given you the answer to a lot of this but you cant do this it will take money from crucked politations .and crucked ceo s
Posted by: D J BARRIER | August 24, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
If all Americans are to be on this plan, why does that not include federal employees?
Posted by: Jane | August 24, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
First let me say that I am not in favor of establishing another arm of the government to oversee health care in the United States. That said, I am in favor of leveling the playing field for health care users in the United States. What can your reform measures do to ensure all parties in the health care debate recieve a fair shake and ensure that the objective of health care in the United States is refocused on patient health and not profits.
Alfred Aguilar
Riverside, Ca.
Posted by: Alfred Aguilar | August 24, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
How can tis great union with the help of all those turnips in D. C. go from $2.6 billion in debt in 1910 with NO INCOME TAX to over $10.6 trillion last year with every kind of tax on the Americans @ss?
if ther wus no laser printers in the 1961 but only typewriters tat had Elite (small) and Pica (large) type how come your birth certificate is done from a laser printer?
if America is over $57 trillion in debt jus how can the turnips in D.C. even think about a spending bill much less so-call free health care.
if the American social security fund is $99 trillion short jus how can the turnips in D. C. not tax more and more onto the @ss of all taxpayers in order to keep the over 62 from not gettin’ a paycheck.
Has there ever been a “saving” bill passed by the turnips in D. C. and sign by a President?
Has any of those turnips read George Washington’s farewell address after only 8 years serving his country?
Posted by: madmilker | August 24, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Why are Americans paying more for health care than every nation on the planet and we are still only number 36 on the health scale when compared to other nations? Maybe healthcare should NOT be a for profit business anymore ? Lets look at French healthcare which seems to work and not UK or Canada which seem not to work.
Posted by: azim | August 24, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
If you are not going to include public option, then leave things as they are because I really don’t see what the reform would be if you leave out public option.
Posted by: proud_democrat | August 24, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Mr President,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,if this health care package is so good, i know we can count on you and your family as well as members of Congress to drop the Government sponsored health care insurance you currently enjoy and join the one proposed for the rest of us. You know you wont
Posted by: Jim | August 24, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Why can’t we model our health care plan after Canada? They seem to be doing well. Give everyone health coverage and bump the sales tax up to around 15-16%. Yah thats a lot of sales tax but not having to pay ne thing for health care seems like a solid idea to me.
Posted by: Brian | August 24, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
To add to my last comment it might not seem like bumping th sales tax could generate enough money to cover health care but think about the money the government would save on medicare and medicaid between that and the sales tax it would be enough to cover.
Posted by: Brian | August 24, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
THE WORKING POOR NEEDS AFFORDABLE HOUSING NATIONWIDE. HOUSING IS A NECESSITY, IT SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDER A LUXURY. WE NEED AFFORDABLE HOUSING NOW.
Posted by: kathleen collins | August 24, 2009, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
Mr. President,
If we don’t have universal health care, who pays care for those without insurance or can’t pay their own medical bills?
Posted by: DirtyShame | August 24, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
Are all congress including the president makeup going to be put on this new plan?
Posted by: Thesley Byrd | August 24, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
I think the Gov has way too much input in all our day to day personel lives.
I think Obama should be impeached and the rest of those talking heads fired.
We are so deep in debt our Great Great Grandchrildren will be slaves to the Gov
Posted by: TT | August 24, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
Notice the right wingers piling on with unsupported negative comments.
I know people who live in the UK – their system works, it has never bankrupted their country. Americans who live in the Netherlands, France, Spain say those systems work too and right now, those are the first countries coming out of the Republican caused world recession.
The only ones who want to stay with our current, broken, system are those profiting by it and those fools who accept every bit of right wing propaganda spewing around the country.
I know guys who have VA medical care – for decades now – none are complaining, let alone making up horror stories. Aging family members have had their lives saved by Medicare / Medicaid. Bringing all this “socialized medicine” to all of us will be the best thing we could hope for.
Oh yeah, we’ll pay for it with taxes. No free ride, just Americans doing their part to help themselves and other Americans whose only crime is getting sick. Find a way to make illegal aliens pay for their care and you’ve got just what this country needs.
And just look at what “privatized retirement plans” have done for those who trusted private enterprise: ruined dreams, billions to bailout crooked millionaires. Oh yeah, lets pay billions for inflated profits and the right to be told, “You’re too sick to insure.”
And who sold us the government without paying taxes idea in the first place? It was the conservatives in the Republican Party – selling “bad math” pipe dreams. Everyone who voted Republican in the last 15 years should be made to pay off the national debt themselves – dummies that they are.
Posted by: JN | August 24, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
People tend to over look the fact that currently the cost of our health care per year is rising faster than our cost of living wages. All of us are paying more for our own health care and we are also paying for those who cannot afford health care. Have you ever been to a hospital emergancy room and seen people there who want to see a doctor because they have a bad cough, or head ache, or just don’t feel good? Those are the people who don’t have health insurance that allows them to see a family doctor. While you and I are in there for real emergancies, we have to wait for those who “don’t feel good” because that’s the only way they can be seen by a doctor. If we do nothing then costs will continue to rise and those at the bottom will suffer more and tax payers will face higher and higher costs for everyone.
Posted by: JMitchell | August 24, 2009, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
Did You know,PERWEZ MUSHRRAF who planned september 11/01.He was involved same as Osama bin LADEN. The top terrorist in the entire world is PERWEZ MUSHRAF. I know what i am talking about,
he had the reason
Posted by: lodhia | August 24, 2009, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Talk to Kucinich. Just because you saw a UFO doesn’t mean you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Posted by: Dave in Cincy | August 25, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
The military, military health care, the interstate system and the post office. The post office got the bills to our house, the interstate took us to grandma, and the military keeps our enemies away while getting patched up by a health care system other than “private”.
Posted by: Kilroy | August 25, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
did the government use money from the social security funds that never was paid back and how much was actually taken fromthe fund. was it not one of the democrat plans to prtect social security,what has gone so wrong that now we talk about cutting these benefits that we paid for all these years. they are not entitlements they are paid for.
Posted by: earl | August 25, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
when will your administration stop trying to blame the bush administration for whats wrong with the economy and whatever. when do you inherit the blame.we have great respect for you but please get on with it.
Posted by: earl | August 25, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
stick to what you are hired to do, protect the country and our freedoms! Why the hell do you want to take care of us? please we have always managed, just don’t tax us to death.
Posted by: stephen | August 26, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am
Just one question: How can we eliminate all of the unnecessary treatment that is given to us?
Posted by: Josh | August 26, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am
AT THE END OF THE DAY ONLY ONE THING
MATTERS WHERE’S THE JOBS ???I WOULD LIKE
THE PRESIDENT TO KEEP A WEEKLY COUNT ON
1)NEW JOBS CREATED BY HIS PROGRAMS
2)LAY-OFF’S PREVENTED BY HIS PROGRAMS
3)UNEMPLOYMENT COUNT WHEN HE TOOK OFFICE
4)NEW JOB LOSS #S SINCE HE TOOK OFFICE
I WANT THESE JOB NUMBER’S NOW !!NOT
6 MONTH’S FROM NOW—SHOW ME THE RESULTS
MR.PRESIDENT AND I WILL SUPPORT YOUR
PROGRAMS.——MIKE–STORMVILLE NY
Posted by: MIKE | August 26, 2009, 3:48 am 3:48 am
Most don’t seem happy with the Health Care reform – and you know it… why do you want the obvious stated??
Now, the reason I’ve come to this page was the question: What would you ask Pres Obama? Well, I’d ask: Why are you allowing yourself to be used as the vehicle to run America dry?? What have you got to gain by doing this?? Do you ever consider what the true Almighty God thinks of what you’re a part of?
Posted by: evangaleah07 | August 26, 2009, 6:06 am 6:06 am
First I would say:
1. NO MORE DEBT. (period)
2. PAY OFF DEBT. (all of it)
3. SPEND ONLY WHAT YOU HAVE.
4. SAVE FOR THINGS YOU WANT.
5. SAVE ALOT OF MONEY FOR EMERGENCIES.
6. CHANGE WELFARE – DON’T WORK, DON’T EAT. MAKE SURE EVERYONE CONTRIBUTES.
7. NEVER NEVER NEVER REWARD SLOPPY, INEFFECTIVE, INEFFICIENT WORK.
8. MAJOR POLICIES – HEALTHCARE, NATIONAL DEBT, COMPANY BUYOUTS – PUT IT TO VOTE – 2/3 APPROVE – GO AHEAD
Posted by: David Bush | August 26, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am
So the democrats want to cut spending to medicare which we have all paid into for years BUT give free health care to ILLEGAL aliens who have paid nothing! What stupid illogical thinking. Make the ILLEGAL aliens pay for care just like I do, or send them all home.
Posted by: Dr. D | August 26, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Obama -= This guy is acting like a spoiled kid. Why is he et al putting a wrecking ball to the already in place medical “system”? Rather than destroy the skeleton FIX THE DAMN THING! THEY CAN’T EVEN GET THEIR STORY STRAIGHT SO HOW CAN YOU EXPECT THEM TO MANAGE THE HEALTH “Reform”?
Posted by: Jim L | August 26, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am
what does he like to do for fun?
Posted by: Marcie | August 26, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am
I am quite sure now that ANYTHING that Obama does WILL NOT WORK! I pity the idiots that voted for him making us ALL suffer for his and their own stupidity!
Posted by: Eva | August 26, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
What would I like to ask Pres Obama? If he would please resign and take his cabinet with him.
Posted by: Lynne | August 26, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Congressional healthcare premiums cost about $18000 per year per family. Let’s estimate that this means about $4500 per family member.
300,000,000 X $4500 = 1 trillion, 350 billion dollars each year.
Assume that 20% of us are somewhere between well off and filthy rich (>$250,000 per year), and so we don’t need the $4500…
X 80% =
1 trillion, 80 billion dollars each year.
Over 10 years, my plan will put the US into about $10 trillion dollars in debt. Obama puts his plan a little over $9 billion. Of course, they always underestimate.
We can get the Chinese, Russians and Europeans to pay for it by lending us money!
Whee, this governing thing is easy!
Posted by: mightycpa | August 26, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Do you believe the 10th Amendment should be repealed?
Posted by: Dan | August 26, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
I would ask him how come he is trying to ram this poorly written piece of crap down our throats.
Posted by: JOHN | August 26, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
THEY CAN’T EVEN RUN A “CASH FOR CLUNKERS” PROGRAM AND NOW THEY WANT RUN A TRILLION DOLLAR HEALTH CARE PROGRAM
Posted by: mannix1962 | August 26, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
At this point how about fixing our home modifications and leave healthcare alone and try and fix one problem and actually follow thru with one and then go to a next problem. Regardless as tax payers we still end up paying the majority for those who cant with our sweat. Does it really matter? How about save me from loosing my home? I pay taxes, my income was decreased, ccan you help me?
Posted by: Cynthia | August 26, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Why would you as president, seek to initiate a national health care programme based on the UK model which in and of itself is admittedly failed….? I thought a war was fought to win freedom from the British crown yet here we are in bed with them on this issue of national health?!?!
Posted by: Louis | August 26, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
What will be the difference between private health care providers who ration (decide what is and what is not needed)and that of the government backed plan which will also ration health care in order to REDUCE costs? Same face on different sides of the same coin it appears…
Posted by: Louis | August 26, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
How can you pass a health care plan without policies, prodedures and concrete rules being in place? WIll this amount to wing it as we go>
Posted by: Louis | August 26, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
The panicky people on this issue act as if over in Britain, Sweden, Switzerland, etc. etc. people lay dying in the streets and the average liffespan is 57 years. Quite to the contrary they have some of the longest lifespans in the world (indeed only the Japanese live longer than the Swedes), all while living in a health system that people here derisiely call socialist and believe will somehow lead to the end of civilization as we know it.
Posted by: Bob | August 26, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
To L Smith it would be different because we have a Pesident who wants to make it different and find ways to make it work!!
To the rest of you just reading your comment shows your ignorance. The two who made any sense are Zenola and EA Costa
Posted by: MPelkey | August 26, 2009, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
What can be done to bring the prescription coverage for recipients of
Medicare (who have paid into it all their lives), in line with MedicaAID
recipients who are getting free prescriptions and who arent paying into
the system at all?
My husband and I have worked all our
lives (as have our children) and we now
have diabetes (husband) and asthma
(myself). We reach the donut hole in
mid year and have extremely high
prescription bills.
I have been in a position, when I was
still working, to see Medicaid recipients receiving medicine that they
threw away as it wasn’t even needed or used. This made me ill to see it wasted as some of the things I saw were prescriptions that I was paying a premium price for!
All our prescriptions are much too high.
Please don’t “sell us down the river to
the drug companies”. Lets let some of
the foreign countries “help pay for
the development of new drugs” and pass
some of their savings on to us in the
USA! PLEASE!!!
Lastly, let’s make sure that the Medicaid recipients really need the
free drugs they’re given frequently!!
Posted by: M Wolf | August 27, 2009, 1:25 am 1:25 am
Mr. President, a question on health care and one on Social Security.
1. Will the proposed health care bill cover all Americans, including the members of the Legislative, the Judicial, and the Executive branches of the Federal Government, as well as their employees? If not, why not?
2. To ease the strain on Social Security, why not eliminate the “wage cap” on the FICA taxes?
Posted by: PALADIN | August 27, 2009, 2:21 am 2:21 am
Mr. Obama – First of all, I completely agree with health care reform – do it now or pay a bigger price later. What will you do to better control the message going forward that will mitigate the patently false claims that are being instigated by Republicans and their wealthy insurance industry patrons?
Posted by: DaveM | August 27, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
SO HERE I AM A SINGLE 50 YEAR OLD FEMALE WITH 4 SEPERATE KINDS OF CANCER EVEN WITH HEALTH INSURANCE I AM GOING BROKE FROM ALL OF THE EXTRAS AND CO PAYS. WILL UNITED HEALTH CARE REFORM STOP THIS. I AM UNABLE TO DO FOR MYSELF SO I HAVE TO STAY WHERE I AM EVEN THOUGH MEDICALLY I AM LOSING GROUND. WHAT AND HOW WILL THIS HELP ME
Posted by: KARRI ISHAM | August 27, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
My question to you, Mr. President is why do you feel that you and anyone who currently works for the government or retired from the government is entitled to better health care and retirement benefits? Why do you feel that you are better than the American people that put all of you into that office? If you want us all to have the same benefits, then why the separation? One day you too will become old and ill, but you wont have to worry about treatment because you have better coverage than ‘We the people’ have.
Posted by: Rhonda | August 27, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Why is his Health Care Plan being shoved down our throats, yet Obama and none of the others in Washington’s political rings will be using the plan he’s promoting?
Posted by: Freight | August 27, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Look back to when CLINTON was in office to see hillary had her hands in the health care system then! GET her out of the kitchen now!!
Posted by: william | August 27, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Your legacy as the 1st black president will also include that you were the 1st president of a bankrupt country.
Why are we not fixing a health care system that is not working before adding trillions of dollars to it?
Posted by: Rene of SC | August 27, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
President Obama, Can you promise us that no Health care bill that you sign into law will ever pay for any part of a sex change operation with federal funds?
Posted by: Brian O'Neil | August 27, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
“Name me one thing that the Government operates efficiently other than the military, and you want to give them responsibility for health care?”
WHY do you exclude the military?
Because I think that the military is well run.
ALSO, the FBI does their job well.
ALSO, the CDC does their job well.
ALSO, the FAA keeps the number of airplane crashes fairly low!
ALSO, NASA and DOE and NSF do great research in the basic (fundamental) sciences.
ALSO, the EPA keeps most of our drinking water safe and have reduced air polution dramatically.
ALSO, Social Security keeps millions of seniors out of poverty.
ALSO, Medicare has 85% approval rating by those who are covered.
ALSO, the VA has 85% approval rating by those who are covered.
Those people who reflexively hate on the United States government are really hating on the United States itself.
They cannot stand that we, WE, elected Barack Obama to be president.
Posted by: George | August 27, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Republicans: “Health care is not a right.”
Do you understand what you are saying?
YOU ARE SAYING THAT SOME PEOPLE WITH CANCER OR HEART ATTACK OR KIDNEY FAILURE SHOULD BE LEFT TO DIE.
The new GOP slogan: VOTE FOR THE PRO-DEATH REPUBLICAN PARTY.
What else needs to be said?
Posted by: Walter | August 27, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
hi
Posted by: staci | August 27, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
I know that President Obama has had mega tasks to acomplish as president, with that in mind my question is this if the economy is doing so well why are groceries and gas prices still so very high…I am sure many others have this question!!!!!!!
Posted by: staci | August 27, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
Instead, let me ask ABC and other liberal media a question, please. Why are you giving undue coverage to Mr. Obama? What is the big deal in the President taking a vacation? You are giving more coverage for his posh vacation, instead of covering other most important items. Here the people are languishing, and the President is wasting tax-payer money for expensive vacation to make his family comfortable.
Posted by: Mathew | August 27, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
Mr. President, why are you spending the precious dollars on vacation, when you could have used it toward development? Or could you not have given that amount as a gift to some poor children who cannot afford to anything Sasha and Malia are able to? I would ask this question to any President of ours – whether black, white, GOP or Dem. All of them are selfish. They come into the Oval promising that “pie in the sky” and once they get in, they forget all about those “lovely promises.” We, the Americans are so foolish. When some politician comes around saying “this” or promising “that,” we fall for it. Now look, he is having a wonderful time in the “Vineyard,” while thousands are on unemployment roster. His wife is becoming famous as the “fashion-loving-designer-crazy” First Lady of the century.
Posted by: JM | August 28, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am
We need to tax the rich, stop believing that health care is for the elite, and get on board with the developed countries with compassionate health care policies. Why don’t we have a system similar to Canada. There is way too much propaganda (lies) about this subject. I want health care, not health insurance policies.
Posted by: Ruby Love | August 28, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am
Medicare administrative costs are 3%, for- profit insurance administrative costs are 30%……get the picture?
Posted by: Lucy | August 28, 2009, 7:21 am 7:21 am
get the middle men Insurance Companies out of business because they are the real culprits b/w doctors and patients we need to reform healthcare with the big cheaters CFO’s insurance industry reform the medical liability system in this great USA
Posted by: tammy | August 28, 2009, 8:35 am 8:35 am
Why are you so intent on killing the elderly? You insist on making it hard for them to get health care. You’re already killing babies, now you want to kill off the elderly. Your version of health care is merely the film “Logan’s Run” in reality.
Posted by: M.T. Fisher | August 28, 2009, 9:22 am 9:22 am
What I want to know from our beloved President is why he feels that it is our job to give everyone healthcare? How does he intend to pay for it without raising taxes? Why are we cutting medicare to pay for more peoples healthcare, makes no sense.
Oh yeah and stop messing with the meaning of the constitution, elitists like our President don’t understand what common men like our founding fathers meant. So come walk twenty miles in my shoes Mr President then I may give you the benefit of the doubt about all the crap that has come out of your mouth the past two years.
Posted by: Tina | August 28, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am
The US have too much citizens.
In according to minimize the world population it is not good to heal all people.
More than hundred years of medic research and we still die on flu?
Today the medicine is so far that we would be able to live 110 years.
OK, it is not really living but waiting for the last stop.
Posted by: Wittgenstein | August 28, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am
I would ask president Obama about the medical system that Senators and Representatives are under. I would ask him why they have it so good and yet Americans can’t get this type of care without paying exorbitant prices. I would ask him if Medicaid and Social Security are so great then why not for our Congressmen, Senators, and the President.
If we want medical or retirement fixed in this country then they are going to have to fall under the same plans.
And if most Americans realized how they were paid out after they retire they would be sick to their stomachs. In that thought I believe they would also demand that their senators and representatives do something about it. Sadly, all of our Senators and Representatives have forgotten that they work for us the people. They believe they have reached an elevated state above the ones who pay their wages. We need something done about this Mr President!
Posted by: John | August 28, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am
insurance companies sell policies to make money it is not a charaty operation
Posted by: jerald | August 28, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Are you kidding me?
Posted by: William Chunyk | August 28, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
president said “everyone will have the same choices for medical as the senate and house and president’ now i understand they have voted to be exempt from any of the new medical options…so what is the truth
Posted by: doris valladao | August 28, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
MY QUESTION IS ,CAN HE STAY ON VACATION FOR A COUPLE MORE WEEKS?
ITS BEEN A NICE BREAK FROM HEARING FROM HIM EVERY 12 HOURS.
Posted by: BELLA | August 28, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Question: Given the government’s track record for establishing unnecessary beaurocracies at enormuous cost to the taxpayers, (Department of Energy-Carter, Department of Homeland Security-Bush, and now Department of Health?-Obama) would you consider establishing this extremely controversial health plan on a temporary basis so if it doesn’t perform as you say it will, it would auto-destruct? Kind of like the tape on Mission Impossible.
Posted by: Henry | August 28, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Obama has lied about everything he has campaigned on. The only answer is Ron Paul.
Posted by: Gary | August 28, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
This health care plan will cause layoffs of thousands of hospital workers and freeze pay levels and cause pay reductions. How can the American people afford a cut in real services.
The government seems to screw up any issue they get involved in due to a senate and congress with different agendas.
Presidnet Obama, you are failing the people that voted for you and the polls show that your rating is going south. You had many of us believing you were a conservative. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Posted by: Sam Moceri | August 28, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Mr. President,
If you had ever run a business, as I have, you would understand that managing “change”, that is “successful change” is one of the most difficult challenges faced by any manager. You would also realize that before moving to new frontiers, you first have to fix what is broken in the current system.
Your approach to managing our country demonstrates that you are woefully inept and I greatly fear the long term damage of your efforts to dissolve our economic system. You are nothing more than a glib child operating in an adult world. However, a very DANGEROUS glib child
Posted by: Sean C. James | August 28, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
I would ask him to eliminate the penalty/tax for drawing a 401K early. This would help folks who need money now and allow some to retire early leaving new jobs for others. Also, the cash for clunkers… sad to see good cars/trucks distroyed when some who don’t qualify for a loan drive around in real clunkers. Allow low income to trade a real clunker in for a better one.
Posted by: Teresa Davis | August 28, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
I would like to ask obama if the strings on his back are hurting him yet? usually puppets only last so long.
Posted by: Ray | August 29, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Politicians with ample health insurance are not listening to or truly empathizing with Americans who have little or no coverage. I did not understand the problems with health insurance until I lost mine. Now I know first hand how unfair our country’s system is. A complete overhaul is needed, not a bandaid! Why not require all our legislators to give up their own health insurance and try to get it privately? They’ll be making much different choices, then, and I’ll bet we’d quickly have universal health care.
Posted by: Mary | August 29, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am
I agree with Mary. I DARE our politicians to give up their own generous government supplied health care plan. Why do our politicians have better health care than ordinary Americans??? And why won’t they give us the same benefit???
Posted by: CH | August 29, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
America has become a country of dishonesty. We wouldn’t have any of these problems if there was not so much greed by people who are from Physicians to CEO.s who work in finance. Why even allow medicate to have a 15% leeway to charge patients over the norm. Do you think they will not always use that way to bill the system? I did a study for medicare waste twenty years ago and the waste was staggering then. I can imagine what it is now. This came from overbilling mostly or charging for items the patient never uses. Even in the hospital, the project what you will need and if you don’t use it, the charge stays unless the patient reviews the bill and requests it removed.
Posted by: MARY BROOKS | August 29, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Who wrote the health care bill and has every voting member of Congress read the bill?
My understanding listening to comments from a variety of sources is that our health care reform bill has been written by members of a presumed radical group called Alliance or something similar. More importantly to us, We the People, is that our elected officials, those, or the majority of those, we have put into office to protect us, casting aside the fact that they did NOT write the bill, have not even read the bill and are casting their votes.
Does this make any sense to anyone? I also understand that our elected politicians do not rely on the same medical care standards that are available to us, We the People. Could this be why they have NOT taken part in writing or reading the health care reform bill?
Thanks!
Posted by: AA | August 29, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
I agree , but the Post Office is not a good example,
I prefer the armed forces.
Private enterprise has had plenty of time to show us if
they can make it work.
I for one am more than happy to let the government
run health care, in England we had Government health control since the end of WW2.
It happened seamlessly and we only noticed that there were no more medical bills.
Posted by: Noel Pugh | August 29, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Why can you not see that you are ruining the economy and puting a heavy debt burden on our children and grandchildren such that they will live in poverty and in the ruins of a collapsed infrastructure? You have already brought the country to the brink of a revolutionary civil war in your mad attempt to systematically Change the USA from a free maarket to a socialist state. You have declared war on the intelligence community and by inference the DoD who cannot function without the intelligence community. You have the fastest declining support of any President in the history of the country. Yet you smile and act as if you still are the messiah. Poppycock!
Posted by: Trep | August 29, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Will you eventually take our Bible’s out of our homes?
Posted by: Joe | August 29, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Ihave been a nurse for 30+ years and believe if you have a right to education thru h.s.morally so too for health! But I truely beleive before we get universal medical we must sole the immigrant problem!!! Why do we not know who is in our country the greatest in many ways and worried about terrorism!!! Get every one registered and all pay taxes and then worry about universal health!!!!Betsy
Posted by: betsy | August 29, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
Socialized health care works great for the rest of the world. Health care is a basic human right, but not in the USA.
We are drive by greed and a negative economic model. All the negative health care issues that the conservatives are raving about are what we have now, thats what needs to change. Conservatives are literally killing America through greed and cowardice. Wake up, you fools, before the whole country you claim to love comes crashing down on your conservative heads.
Posted by: Brian Wind | August 29, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
I want to know since Obama wants to save money by doing away with all the unnecessary testing being done who is going to protect the doctors.There is not one mention of tort reform in this silly bill. We have billions in the bill for walking trails and farmers markets and we don’t have any money to pay for it, but if you question the silliness you are “unpatriotic and racist”.I think the world has gone mad!
Posted by: Karen | August 29, 2009, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
Why doesn’t – or didn’t! – Obama have intensive public hearings.. discussions…conferences…TV programs…reports.. et al, to inform the American public:
1. what is the present state of health care?
2. what needs to be improved?
3. why?
4. what do other countries have for their health care?
5. what can we learn from other countries?
After all this public discourse, appoint a bipartisan committee to devise and discuss systems that can be considered and implimented.
We then need to devise a health system that considers everybody, a non political, well researched system that helps, not hurts health care needs, free from politics and favoritism.
Posted by: hwoodude | August 30, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am
My daughter is not covered by healthcare and I am barely hanging on with paying for healthcare for myself. I would ask the President how I can help.
Posted by: Aly | August 30, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am
when is the economy going to get better ‘
things are not looking good the gas prices
are different everywhere you go and the food prices are up and work is slow my husband just got layed off and i am the one who is stuck paying the bills
Posted by: april | August 30, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
I am being told that access to basic Healthcare for the uninsured will cause problems.
Problems for who?
The people that are uninsured or the one’s that provide the poor coverage.
Where is the simple logic in this issue?
Posted by: Mike | August 30, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Two Easy Steps to Reform Healthcare:
(1) Speed up the Production of Healthworkers (efficiency of production: supply)
Revamp the educational licensing practices by enabling
-2 year associate degrees in healthcare
-4 year BS degrees in healthcare
-6 year Graduate level Masters Degrees in Health care
-8 year Ph.Ds. in health care (specialists)
Let expert decide what service each category can perform
(2) Step 2:
Govt sets up and funds a Healthcare bank account. The Govt. adds $5000 to the health care bank account of Americans each year with medical cards that enable us to pay Physician directly for health services or purchase insurance for major medical. WE are now responsible. If, at the end of the year, our primary physician designates us as up to date on medical check ups and meeting or exceeding general health goals, we can transfer any remaining money left in the account to our normal bank account or carry it over to pay for insurance. If we fail to meet our goals or are chronically ill, remaining account funds revert back to the government for that year. Physicians and insurance companies must publish itemized costs of service in some public website or their own website. The government enables interstate competition for insurance.
The key is wise, consumer driven use of health care dollars.
Posted by: Brian | August 30, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
What I would like to ask obama is this WHY are you hell bent on destorying American? And who is backing you?
My Husband paid into medicare all his working life, so i figure we are intitle to it, Now medicade they having paid anythingin to it. a lot of people that doesn’t have insurance had rather pay big car or house payment than have insurance. It a choice
Posted by: JoAnn | August 30, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Why is the health insurance good enough for me but not good enough for your family and Congress.
I am on a very fixed income since my husband passed away about 5 weeks ago and then I find out I don’t get a cost of living expense.
Please explain. I am very dissappointed in you and your other people in charge.
God Bless you all, you are prayed for everyday.
Ruth Proctor
803 Vanderford Street
Burlington, NC 27215
336-226-0264
Posted by: Ruth Proctor | August 30, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
We can afford health care and its a simple fix. We need to quit giving our hard earned money to places like Egypt. Hundreds of millions every year go out the back door for special interests,pet projects etc to foreign countries that hate America . We don’t get to vote on these things but the money keeps leaving and taxes keep going up. Look it up you might be surprised at the waste and B.S reasons they give to spend these monster sums with no imput what so ever from you or me. These things need change now not later,if he wants insurance then use some other countries money and give us a break.
Posted by: Bill | August 30, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
I am concerned about the public option for health care. If poorly thought out, it can take a perilous turn. The public option, if it is cheaper and limited, may allow all employers to forsake their current options and defer to the public option, thus largely reducing for many. Here are my questions:
Would you support a public health care option that is limited to those who do not have private health care?
Would you support a public option that is as generous as the one congress and president now receive from the public?
Posted by: Susan Scharfenberger | August 30, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Please get the law changed where people lose their life long homes because they can’t pay their local property taxes. Greedy people get to steal these homes.
Missing pay ones of taxes can cause you to lose your home. Foul.
Posted by: cherry west | August 30, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
Mr. President why did you sell the mother of a great nation into slavery to the highest bidder. Don’t side step the issue by blaming anyone other than yourself, Sir. You took over a nation with a $1.9T deficit and now owe $9T. You, Sir, have spent more than any other man in your position in the history of this nation and should be charged with treasonous acts fr doing such. How plead you, Traitor?
Posted by: WhatChange? | August 31, 2009, 4:39 am 4:39 am
JL, The medical system we have now is not courtesy of the GOP. What we have now is a two payer system set up by your democratic party with FDR. What we have is Social Security and Medicare violating a for profit medical system that works just fine by itself. It only is made worse when you force someone who turns 65 into the welfare system by law. It is social medicine in it’s purest sense and does not work. Just ask the retirees. It looks like it works wonderfully but fails miserably from the inside. Worse yet, Kind Sir/Madam it’s grossly underfunded and unsustainable already. “NOW” you want to confound it by adding more money and even more people? Here’s your sign. Just so we know where all the gullible people are in our world and can keep you separated from the voting stations in our next election. It’s going to be a reality check for realists wondering how we’re going to pay the bill left by socialist/marxist dreamers.
Posted by: WhatChange? | August 31, 2009, 4:48 am 4:48 am
My wife and I took care of her mother,Lillie for 12 Years with Althiemers. She just passed away last year on 13 June 2008. I would like to know the reasoning behind keeping the ss check and not pro rating it. The family needs every dime just to bury the person. Her mother earned that 13 days of money. The least the ss system could do is give that portion to the family instead of keeping it for themselves. Lillie Wester sure earned it.
Posted by: Wayne Pereau | August 31, 2009, 7:01 am 7:01 am
Why are people spreading out and out lies about the “evils” of the health care plan? Whay is the media intent on spreading these terrible lies? Why are we idly sitting by and letting it happen?
Posted by: Michael Babayco | August 31, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Why do you suppose people separate themselves from government? We are the US government – by the people and for the people. Why do you think we forgot that? The Health Care Plan is supposed to represent us taking better care of us. This was in line with your message in the beginning. We wanted change and we should accept change. It won’t hurt to give it a try. It can’t be worse than it already is. Do we have to be so dramatic? Anyway, thank you for your efforts.
Posted by: Tess Cooper | August 31, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am
The Berlin Wall came down 20 years ago, the soviet union collapsed 18 years ago. Both events proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that socialism is inefficient and prone to fail in the end!
Just why then is our president trying to move us towards socialism in such an important area of the economy such as our health care system?
Posted by: Not A. Socialist | August 31, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Wash out your mouth with soap and try telling people the truth, or just resign from office before any more damage is done.
Posted by: Carrie Chisholm | August 31, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
What we have been hearing is a scare tactic. Thus far, Social Security is run by the govt. no one seems to be complaining that they are not getting their checks on time. Medicare is a gov’t run program, when a seniors needs medical attention they get it. Is that socialism? Everyone is trying to talk about deficit and etc etc but no one seems to be talking about the 10 year tax cut that the previous adminstration gave to those who don’t need it. Plus the amount of money we spent Iraq and continue to spend in Iraq a war of choice. What the gov’t want is a choice so that there is competition that will help lower the cost. Right now, we have nothing but manopolistic insurance that is why these insurance companies want to maintain the status quo. They are spending millions of dollars to derail health care reform because it is no good for them. They don’t want to kill the goose that lays the golden egg. Why do you think they are spending and telling lies after lies on television, because they don’t care about helping American but their corporate profit. They want the satus quo. Without public option, this healthcare reform is no reform at all. Have you heard about Wendell Potter’s comment a executive for Humana and then Cigna. Please read Nicholas D Kristof’s column “Health Care Fit for Animals” and an earlier column titled “This Time, We Won’t Scare”.
It is unfortunate that some Ameicans are are prone to sound bits instead of doing their own research to find out the truth. American should be smarter than that but some are not because they are too lazy do find the truth. If we do not reform the health care system in America – the most expensive in the world and yet our infant mortality is 40% higher than the Canadians and American mothers are 57% more likely to die in childbirth than the Canadian ones – we are not getting our money’s worth and still 45-50 million American has no insurance – so where is the money going? Ask ourselves, what the heck is this system? We have to reform the system in order to save for the future-at the rate we are going, more Americans will be unuinsured but the cost continues to rise. Something got to be done – I don’t mind paying a little more in taxes as long as I know that my sick neighbor’s child will be able to get the medical assistance they need to live. This is the very crucial part of Christ’s teaching – read Luke’s gospel.
Danny Sulit
Posted by: Danilo Sulit | August 31, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
Jim W wrote: Name me one thing that the Government operates efficiently other than the military…
$1200 hammers, $800 toilet seats. This is efficiency?
Obama, show me your long form…
Posted by: Ranchoazul | August 31, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
EA Costa wrote: The only workable health care is Kucinich’s plan, which is to include all citizens and residents in the risk pool and make the Federal Government the insurer for all basic health care. Because of the size and nature of the risk pool the premiums would be small, perhaps as low as ten dollars a year per insured. That would also mean being able to get rid of Veterans’ Health as a separate item, and all other public health care plans. They would just become part of the pool. That in itself would save trillions. This is the way many industrialized countries do it, and by taking the burden off the employers and employees it would stimulate economic growth. Any plan that include private insurers will be a disaster, and just another burden on the economy.
When could any old doctor perform some of the requirements (read care) that some returning vets are going to need. Will they be able to diagnose problems related to low level, long exposure to radiation?
The local docs are no where near the VA quality. It is hard enough to get the care that I earned by doing 21.5 years for. You can not take that away too. that is asking too much.
Posted by: Ranchoazul | August 31, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Why is the single payer system off the table?
$787 billion TARP.
$700 million Stimulus.
Now ~$1 trillion for health care? the machine can not print the money that fast without breaking. That is why.
Posted by: Ranchoazul | August 31, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
during the early stages of your presidential debates, you promised to end the wars and bring the troops home.
why mr president, have you failed to bring our troops home?
alot of people fell for your promises to end the wars, when will you put an end to the fighting and bring the troops home?
Posted by: rusty | August 31, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
2 questions:
1) How can we add 27 million patients to the system without adding more facilities, doctors and nurses? What is he doing to incent the AMA to stop artificially limiting the number of doctors.
2) The single payer approach looks like it works in the UK and Canada because the UK still has a private system and Canada has the US system to ease the rationing of care that has resulted. What will be our saving option, Mexico?
Posted by: Marcus | August 31, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Diane and Charlie doing the questioning on ABC? I don’t expect fair and balanced journalist questions. I stopped watching ABC after Charlie took over for that very reason and the contents of the note.
Posted by: Barbara Blanton | August 31, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
Republican are so afraid, of Obama, you can see the jealousy, COME IN MCCAIN, O REALLY, health benefits is suck, he is doing something for all the American people, and no just the rich > stop been a liar, for the elderly, they believe anything,that is why you talk to them,
Posted by: Karla Marti | August 31, 2009, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
Our government is corrupt and incompetant. Let’s send the Democrats
home, they not for working tax payers.
Audit federal reserve and every agencies
they run. Get out of private sector, and do the real job you where elected for , you have sold this country out to foriegn interest. Limit terms in office,abide by the constitution your where given a long time before. Stay out of health care , cut your pay and benifits , you should get nothing for the job you have been doing, inforce the laws of the land, send all the judges home too. Obama isn;t American anyway , sure can blow my tax money , jetting around the world with his family. Enjoy while you can election day is coming.
Posted by: Demo Dave | August 31, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
this country is falling a part and Washington is playing games. Steel mills
closing , refinery work has shut down, any good jobs left are leaving daily, oil company and related industry pay good wages and they are shutdown all work since election. Sad news, the real problem was the banks and stock brokers sell the same oil over and over for high profits. One dollars of $4 plus gas going to bankers that we bailed out, we made are worst enemies rich, traitors is what i would call it, but our government is giving money to wrong people , stop jobs leaving this nation before it is too late. Natural gas is next , our enemies will flood our market with cheap gas and break or domestic companies, and our fertilizer conpany, when they get it done, then we will pay, wake up America, every time we become less dependant on the Mid-East
they and or stupid politicians break our companies, we must rebuild or refinery and chemical plants and steel industies and every thing that made us great. With out good jobs NO ECONOMY CAN GROW AND OUR COUNTRY WILL DIE If you build out of the country charge them extra to sell, the crap comimg out of China TOOLS ARE WORTHLESS JUNK
SAFETY HAZARDS FOR SURE
Posted by: Demo Dave | August 31, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security
(Government programs) are all going broke. With such a record of dismal failure, I can not, would not trust the Government to make decisions or administer monies for my health care, When a bill is introduced that the average Joe can understand and the bill include the President and Congress, then I may consider backing it!
Posted by: Pj Cooper | September 1, 2009, 1:19 am 1:19 am
My Question:
If billions of letters normally received by the U.S. Postal service are being replaced by the use of e-Mail, then why not have e-Mail users pay a fee (like postage stamps for postal mail) for each out going e-Mail?
Naturally the United States cannot control (or charge for) incoming e-Mail from outside the country; however, it would be simple for incoming and outgoing U.S generated e-Mails to be monitored by the owners of Internet servers, and they could prompt the receivers and senders of e-Mail to pay their e-Mail postage prior to allowing the e-Mail user to send or receive any e-Mails. The fee could also be added to the normal monthly billing statement, or large users could pre-pay for a certain number of e-Mail
transactions.
Surely the think tanks can figure out the detials.
What do you say Mr. President. The postal service is in dire straights, and all these additional funds just might pull them back into the black without having to raise normal postal service rates.
May God continue to bless you and all of yours,
Don D. Morrison
Posted by: Don Morrison | September 1, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
look folks it is not obama who is running the show it is the clintons and their rat pack obama brought to the white house,obama does what these jokers tell him,there was no change when he took office as he said more of the same if you elect hillary well looks like she was elected cause we are deffinitely getting more of the same.He took a vacation to get out of the kitchen cause the heat about healthcare deform was a little intense on the seat of his pants he had to get some releif so he left town.anyway never expect much from washington they never get it right except when one of those shady guys leave town before indictments are so called investigations come up then a lot of them get a little scared.all in all it is no joking matter what they have done to this country in the past 8 months ,we all may have to move to mexico to get releif
Posted by: felix bunch | September 1, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am
How is Obama’s boys going to bring down the cost of an aspirin from $5.00 in the hospital, or the cost of an MRI, or reduce a physical therapy treatment that requires no use of ANY equipment from over $400.00 per hour (not to mention the “account set-up” o $100.00). I like my doctor, but it’s at least $100.00 to talk to him MAYBE three minutes.
Can government do anything about this. (It’s rhetorical, kids!)
The BOTTOM LINE IS:
GET THE GOVERNMENT OUT OF MY LIFE.
They are incompetent…just look at Joe Biden.
But ,alas, I’m writing this to a state controlled news service.
Posted by: Wess | September 1, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
It should have been “How ARE Obama’s boys…and shoud have been “account set-up” OF $100.00.
I has a college eduction two, just like Jimbo!
Posted by: Wess | September 1, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Do any of you see the Marxism, the government-centered tactics, and the ever increasing output of Hussein’s friends that are coming , literally out of the woodwork, to head up these “czar jobs”.
Did any of you attend school? Do any of you remember what a “czar” was?
What part of a government-run state do you not recognize here.
WAKE UP…this is not the country you grew up in any more.
Posted by: Wess | September 1, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Stop the insanity! NO ONE should profit excessively from the pain and suffering of others. For most cases, except smoking/drugs/alcohol related illnesses, being sick is NOT AN OPTION. Let’s get back to medical treatment for the sick and injured, not for absurd profit. Tax for-profit drug companies, medical insurance companies and hospitals at 90%. Medical treatment should be not-for-profit with a goal of returning the sick and injured back to healthy productive lives. PERIOD!!!
Posted by: NealE | September 1, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
The people who do not have insurance cannot be refused medical treatment at any hospital (by law). So why do you want the government to control all of those who do have insurance? Is it because your science Czar is an avowed “population control, forced abortion” supporter? Is it because you are trying to take people who work for a living to have medical benefits down a few notches by limiting their healthcare that they or the company they work for pay for? Is it because you want the power to control our lives from pre-birth to death? If those are not the reasons, then why try to ram it through Congress with no debate? If you are not trying to control everything, then why are you trying to take over all aspects of corporate America, of Medical America, of Banking America? Why? Because you personally think you can tell us how to live our lives better than we can possibly know how to? Or because you are seeking revenge for supposed wrongs done to? Why else would you have your thugs beat up a conservative black man for not agreeing with you?
Posted by: Linda | September 1, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
If heart attacks are often caused by lack of dental care, would it not be prudent to include it somewhere in the medical insurance bill? Almost every plan has a year to 15 months wait for anything more than a general check up and cleaning..and then they might cover 50%. The statistics state more than twice the amount of non-medical insurers have no affordable dental plan.
Posted by: MemCampbell | September 1, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Congratulations Mr. Obama!! I’m so proud of you.
All I want to ask is “how does it feel at the top”?
Eric -
Ohio State Buckeyes
Posted by: Eric | September 1, 2009, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
Thank you for caring enough to do something about our broken system. If a Dr. takes an oath to “do no harm” and then does nothing to help the sick because they do not have the almighty dollar, there is serious problems with our system. If you can figure out a way to take the silver spoon out of the have and have-more’s mouths and HELP SICK PEOPLE or PREVENT sickness, then Bless you. The Greed of Man is what keeps people sick and dying when those who profit billions sit back and let it happen. In every area, we can cut out the greed and overspending and DO THE RIGHT THING for our people. Create an America that we can be proud of.
Posted by: Jennifer Le'fer | September 1, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
I would ask President Obama, and I quote myself….”Dude, we’ve been in Afghanistan for 8 years, and we still have troops in Iraq. The cost of these wars is 864 billion in fiscal year 2008.
\ It seems to me, President Obama, that
ENDING THE WARS IN AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ
would provide the FUNDING to provide new health care options for the American People.
WITHOUT INCREASING THE BUDGET DEFICIT.
I figured this out without going to
Harvard like you.
Posted by: Lowell Bethel | September 1, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Health care problem is directly linked with jobs.
Taking care of the jobs should be the priority numnber one, because health care problem directly depends on it. When you have good paying job, either you get the insurance from the company you work at, or you are able to afford it.
Obama should focus on getting more and more people back to work, instead of beating around the bush.
He should immediately take necessary steps like incentives & remove barriers to encourage corporations and small businesses to hire locals instead of sending the contract out overseas.
Even if he manages to make health care avialable to everyone by using the model of the government plan like medicare, he will still be able to control the health care cost by putting more and more people back to work.
Actually there are higher number of americans with no health coverage than it is reported, because people are losing their jobs left and rigth, and contracts are being sent to overseas parties.
Many companies that took stimulus money have used the money to recover, and sent the jobs out to save.
By taking care of employment issue first, he will be able to kill two birds with one stone.
Posted by: Bran | September 2, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Officially there are almost 50 million poor people in america who cannot afford health insurance. It is believe the actual figures are much higher due to the recent layoffs. Poverty breeds crime. Crime breeds huge cost to the society, that is why we need to take care of the poor people in America. But the right approach is to start with training and jobs skills, and we know good paying jobs give health insurance. This direct approach will cut the deficits and burden on the tax payer.
Posted by: Bran | September 2, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
President Obama, Whats the rush and why the Document Dump on Health Care. Would you sign a 1000 page contract that would effect everyone in your life without reading it? Would you buy a car in Chicago without reading the contract? Lets use Government programs as a CREDIT REPORT based on how they operate,you know,Social Security,Medicare,Medicade,V.A.care,D.M.V.Welfare and other Government entitlements. Would you lend them money?
Posted by: R.M.Gold | September 2, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am
When are you going to stop being so “FULL OF YOURSELF”, AND sit down to the matters at hand and do one thing at a time and complete it before starting into the next PROBLEM this nation is facing?? Stop being on TV every single day of your presidency. Even on your vacation, you couldn’t stay away. And the next question is “Your not planning on running again when your term is up, are you?”
Posted by: Colleen | September 2, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
This may sound ignorant etc, but it is what I feel…the only way to benefit from any healthcare is to work for one of them. That way you receive a salary. Everything about any healthcare is a ripoff in one way or another.
Posted by: joanna38 | September 2, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Responding to Linda:
Do they charge 300% more so that they can claim that unpaid bill from some insurance they have, or if when they take the person to court, whatever is settled, they more or less receive full payment for services rendered, even if they only receive 1/3 of original bill? I heard that when they treat people who do not have insurance that somehow we, with insurance, end up paying those bills.
I finally joined a local supermarket pharmacy that offers $4 copay for prescriptions. In the beginning that is what I paid, but it has been a long time since I last paid $4…all copays have been more, even though I use generics. No explanation that makes sense, just plain and simply, “sorry, that is what it is”.
Posted by: joanna38 | September 2, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Mr. Obama why do you want to push your agenda? The biblical example of leadership is to lead by servanthood.
Your administration and your congress don’t seem willing to listen to us. All you want from us is our vote, and you seem to be campaigning yet!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | September 2, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
i think the health care reform, is a good thing especially for the poorer class of people in the country,and we all should support it just do n’t change the one you have and we should keep the medicaid.
thank you
Posted by: sonya | September 2, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
I would like to ask President Obama if the health care reform as he originally proposed was part of his effort to destroy America from “within”.
What this “President” is doing to America is the carefully calculated destruction of our nation and freedoms.
When are we going to stop giving everything to people who refuse to do anything for themselves? I for one have had enough.
I will vote against EVERY incumbent this election cycle.
Posted by: R. Sim | September 2, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Mr. President
We had great expectations from your new
guidance and administration.
The great joy in seeing your success from the campaign is tempered by the absolute
mess left by the former president and the congress.
How do you overcome such a deep & wide valley of problems to see the mountain top again?
May the force be with you.
Posted by: warren | September 2, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
I am baffled by the backlash about doing what’s best for the citizenry at large regarding health care reform. I have never heard anyone point out that our Constitution’s Preamble unambiguously states “…promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity,…” Is this not the Constitutional underpinning for Social Security and all other entitlement programs? When I suggest this to some voters, they seem astonished that such language was written by our Forefathers. Can you not use this as the Constitutional basis for reform, as it is in the best interests of our posterity to fix these problems now? It’s what I encourage for my grandchildren or grandnieces and grandnephews. Let the future not worry about illnesses and their consequences, but rather be abundantly healthy in order to strengthen and accelerate America’s potential and promise.
Posted by: Lance Wedor | September 2, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
I am 56 yrs.old…Am I gonna have all the social sequrity that I have paid into all these years of work? Will there be any left? enought to live on?
Posted by: Donna Broussard | September 2, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Medicare and the VA Healthcare system Works so well…. they covers millions of Americans. Medicaid should fall under the Public Option. If the government doesn’t work, why are you still paying taxes or even living here? Something must be working and has been for centuries. If Medicare is NOT working, why is it that the Republicans are “scaring” old people that their benefits will be cut? And they Are scared….why? They know that they will NOT be insured within the current greedy system. Furthermore, do you know How much money the Insurance Industry is GREASING the pockets of the “NO” men? Get a brain.
Posted by: sara | September 2, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
Why aren’t all insurance companies being allowed to operate across state lines? We should be able to improve our health care without reinventing the entire system. Help those that really need the help. Leave us alone that want to keep what we have. This is a REPUBLIC – not a socialist nation. As president your are responsible for doing what is best for the entire nation, not just your party.
Posted by: john | September 2, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
I voted the first time in presdential election. I honestly feel that I had mad a gravely mistake. I voted for Mr. Obama. Unfortunately, he disappointed me
deeply about the single payee Health
Care and also not giving social security
increase for 20010. I made a promise to
myself that I would not vote for
President Obama for a second term or any
other future presidential election. I
have been doing nothing but beaten
myself constantly for the great mistake
I made in voting for Mr.Obama. I go to
bed every night thinking I committed
sucide. I certainly looking forward to
his term ending. As an Africian-American
I relinquish my right to ever vote
again.
Posted by: James P.McCurdy | September 2, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Where is the long form birth certificate? Where is a sample of his writing while in Harvard Law School?
Where?
Posted by: Karol | September 2, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
Our President was elected by the majority of this country. He offered a new way to lead, and he was elected for it. He has a vision to move this country forward. I support him.
Posted by: Eilyn | September 2, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
We respect the office of the president and the authority that he has been given not just by the American people but most of all the authority given by the most holy God Jesus Christ.We pray that God would give our president wisdom and guidence to make the best decisions to lead our country. We pray for conviction and guidence and protection for him and his family. We belive for salvation and a personal relationship with Jesus Christ for our president and his family. We love our president and thank him for being willing to take this office. God bless our president and his family. Let us be slow to criticize our president and quick to pray for him.
Posted by: Michael and Jill Brinkley | September 3, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Look at the private health insurer. They only insure people that are in good health already a pay high premiums and when they do get sick they drop them and the CEOs take the money they already paid in for the bonus. We need health care reform with the public option.
Posted by: Mdunson | September 3, 2009, 5:15 am 5:15 am
Question for Pesident Obama:
Would you be willing to accept a Tax Reform though Healthcare to allow more choice through tax-attrition in regards to time-line restrictions on Medicare in place of a private insurance option and at the same time allow everyone else full tax credits along with Tort Reform,the Federal Mandate which supports more competition for private health insurers along with Reforms that will give Equal access regardless of health status in place of the Public Option ?
Posted by: Mike McAnally | September 3, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Mr. President,
U have a wonderful health plan. Why can’t America have your plan?
Posted by: Cathy Mills | September 3, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
All it will take to set these people who are apposed to the plan is to suggest that all plans be cut off, such as medicare etc. I personnaly depend on them as do millions of others. I suspect the ones who don’t like the plan haven’t even bothered to really check it out. Also I’m sure as the sun will rise tomarrow the insurance companys are fighting this with all the lawyers they have ….All we need is a little compasion for others.
Posted by: eve stefani | September 3, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
The government doesn’t run anything well unless they’re running it into the ground. Then, they do it flawlessly.
Insurance is a scam, much in the way the lottery (or any other form of gambling) is a scam. You are betting that you’re going to get sick (or have an auto accident, or die, etc.). If you don’t get sick, you lose money. If you DO get sick, you lose money.
The house always wins.
Posted by: Hosfac | September 3, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
The health bill would probably pass if the public could be assured as to the cost of the program. We read where cost could be 1-3 trillion. We all know that politicians give a low estimate of cost and when the programs are passed they increase tremendously.
Why can’t you give a reasonable cost of the health care bill and stick with that cost?
Posted by: john mack | September 3, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
YES..HERE IS MY QUESTION. OBAMA WHY DO YOU ASSOCIATE YOURSELF WITH COMMUNIST, MARXIST AND THE MOB ?
Posted by: Susan | September 3, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Since no Congressman or Senator complains about their health Coverage, What is the problem with offering this, end the debate and get on with other business.
Thanks,
Tom & Joan
Posted by: Tom & Joan Lemke | September 4, 2009, 6:34 am 6:34 am
Please explain all the CZARs, please explain your past and why all your records are under lock and key, please explain how you couldn’t pass a background check to become an FBI officer and yet you can become president, please explain why you cut 30% of our nukes, please explain why you support the ousted dictator in Honduras when their congress and their people ousted him because of his corruption and disrespect of their constitution, Please explain why you want to destroy our economy, please explain why you said all over the world that we aren’t a christian nation, please explain why you said were not nor ever would be at war with Islam when we been fighting them for 8yrs, please explain why every cabinet appointment you’ve made are criminals(tax evaders, admitted communist’s) Please explain how you control the mainstream news ABC,NBC,CBS,BSNBC and CNN.
Posted by: Vince | September 4, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
why would you make a healthcare plan that you yourself wouldnt use?
Posted by: Megan | September 4, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
There can’t be anyone who would deny that we need health care reform. But we don’t what has been offered so far. In fact, I doubt if there are 50 people in the country who know what is being proposed. Obama simply turned the project over to Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid and now runs around the country and makes numerous TV appearances to ask for support for the “plan” which he admitted he had never read! My parents and grandparents taught me never to buy a “pig in a poke” and I will not support any plan proposed that deepens our national debt even more with a 1.3 trillion dollar cost! We need reform, but it must be a workable and less expensive that what has been offered so far.
Why not set forth a plan that would cover all those unable to purchase health caree insurance and leave the rest as it is, with perhaps some improvement in medicare and medicaid. Also, Social Security is becoming much less secure. I have told my grown children to save all they can or invest in good stock and bonds because I really dont believe Social Security will be available when they need it, which is from 15 to 25 years from now! Anyhow, what makes anyone think that the government could run a complicated health care program when they cannot even cut the pork from bills, or properly conduct the “cash for clunkers” program with even a modicum of success?
Posted by: Terry Tidwell | September 5, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Would you consider leaving office early because of leading this country to ruin?
Posted by: frank | September 5, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
I would think that in the spirit of national health care,any legislation passed would include the congressman and senators to be covered the same as
the rest of us.
how about that for a show stopper!
Posted by: gene | September 5, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Obama has always hated people who has money especially a lot of money.Now he has a plan to take a lot of it and give to GE the UNIONS and POOR PEOPLE and some not yet mentioned!THe socialist
communist wants us to buy in on this outragious heathcare plan that only the ones that wrote knows what is in it?It is BS from the get-go he knows it so do we.NO VOTE now NO VOTE Tomorrow!!
Posted by: Roy | September 11, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Attention all you morons who voted for Obama.Come Aug 2011 you will not not be so lucky because all the things that are great now will be GONE thanks to
your HERO!!He is only good at speaking and fund raising anything else he is
very short of the target.Middle class is already shrinking will be sad that all we have worked for Obama STEALS it
I wish you well!!haha
Posted by: Roy | September 11, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
OH! I left out something important all
or should I tell you Obamacare is NOT Free like WELFARE it comes with a cost that the socialist is not telling you!!
But if you do not buy into it you might
wind-up loosing you house and everythin
in it!The last time I saw it $3858 fine
because every body shall have heathins
or get the shaft!!
Posted by: Roy | September 11, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
One last reminder ABC,CBS and NBC all have a “C”.That C stands for crap so if you are a steady watcher you are getting fed a stesdy diet of crap!They all love Obama!!
Posted by: Roy | September 11, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
why in the world would anyone think that the government can run anything well?name one?they only want control of more money,they are spending too fast to keep up.all at the cost of medicare.
Posted by: don | September 11, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
When are you getting the gas prices down to $1.59/gallon so I can afford to go to a doctor? I voted for Obama and he promised to get the gas prices down. Please help!
Posted by: Amanda Andolini | September 11, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
Obama, why are you putting in so many zars into our government officies? We the people did not vote for them. Why are you such a socialist, don’t you know that socialism has been proven not to work. Why do you have such anger against poor people, you act just like the Bush people, no difference between you and him. Why do you send so many troops into battle in Afghanistan. You are not anti-war, you are just like Bush. You lied to us.
Posted by: Hank Smith | September 12, 2009, 2:39 am 2:39 am
The reform that is needed is at the top. A seat in the congress or senate should not be a career position. They should serve only one term. Polititians care only about re-election not service. Give us a congress that is conserned about service and not their own perques and pensions and we’ll get reform in every sector of our economy and life where there is government involvement.
Posted by: davidg | September 12, 2009, 3:44 am 3:44 am
Leave us alone !!
We do not need a major health care overhaul. Fix the parts that are broken and get people back to work !!
I would ask Obama when he is going to retire ??
Posted by: stormcloud | September 12, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am
Sad thing is those opposed to health care reform don’t know and don’t care what is in the bills. They use their opposition solely to villify Obama. Truth is health care reform is necessary, but we need to both provide better and more comprehensive health care more efficiently and decrease the cost. The party of NO needs to show up so we can make health care and this country better. We also need to up the civility on these blogs and in any type of civil discourse.
Posted by: John | September 12, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Why, Mr. Obama are you attempting to usurp the constitution through the appointment of so many so called “czars” who have so many extreme leftist views? It is awfully hard to reach to the middle from that far to the left. Cass Sunstein and Van Jones are prime examples.
Posted by: Samuel Elliott | September 12, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
I was diagnosed with ann operable but malignant tumor this summer. Within two weeks I was recovering from a successful surgery. If I were in the UK or Canada I’d have to wait two or more years and would probably dies as a result of thw wait.
Why should I believe that this system isn’t what you are proposing?
Posted by: DennisL86 | September 12, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
I’m in the healthcare field. I like President Obama’s view of the healthcare reform. He also said No pulling the plug on Grandma and No illegals. That cinches it for me.
Posted by: HealthNut | September 13, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
I am almost 50 yr old and am so appauled at what I have seen, heard and experienced being a USA Citizen, born and raised. I have not seen or had a personal doctor in 15 years. With no insurance and no finances for medical costs, I do without! It’s nothing but chaos and emotionally disturbing trying to qualify for minimal medical and dental care at no costs. Where are all the Rights we are suppose to have as USA Citizens? We have none! Every USA Citizen should be able to have Medical care when and if needed 100% of the time, from start of life to the end of life. President Obama, why can USA give $$$ tons of it, for other countries needs and not even take care of it’s own back yard first?? We are not first, we fit in where applicable. Why cant you just say NO to them, and YES to USA? If after USA can resurect itself, then perhaps, some little monies to them. Why? Why? Why? Can’t USA take care of USA? Can you imagine what the USA could do with all the monies, USA does not get? Wow it does not take an Einstein or Rocket Scientist to figure it out…
Posted by: Ms. C. L. Ray | September 13, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
The Congressional plan call for 500 billion in savings from Medicare & Medicaid. Why don’t you do that 1st? I think the answer is obvious, the savings are all wishful thinking & LIES!
Posted by: AlanOnPalawan | September 13, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
I’d like to know how obama got a dialect like a black preacher, when he grew up in hawaii and was raised by white people. they sure didnt speak like that and nobody he hung out with in his youth spoke like that. so that is what I would ask the president. why do you speak the way you do? why?
Posted by: Davidtoo | September 13, 2009, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
President Obama, Please bring home the industry. Without “Made In USA” we will never get out of this terrible predicament.
thank you,
the little guy
Posted by: MR Robert | September 13, 2009, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Why can’t those who lose their jobs simply qualify for Medicare rather than the exhorbitant COBRA plan? I am one layoff away from being with health insurance.
Thanks for asking.
Posted by: syzitisi | September 13, 2009, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
That is, one layoff away from being withOUT health insurance…
Posted by: syzitisi | September 13, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
President Obama, Why are you the only one speaking out for Health Care Finance reform? Isn’t this problem serious enough that there should be a majority of elected officials (leaders)trying to make a good, efficient system, that America can live with?
The people need leaders right now in Congress. We don’t really care about the Democrats or Republicans per se. We just want the people who run for office, and get elected, to stop using their office for personal gain.
Why is it so difficult to ensure that any American, who gets sick, can get help?
To me, the Congress is acting like the children in the movie “Lord of the Flies.”
The Lawmakers are secluded in their offices, and have lost touch with the reality that there is a problem here with the health care finance system in America.
What would I ask President Obama?
President Obama, Why are you the only one speaking out for Health Care Finance reform? Isn’t this problem serious enough that there should be a majority of elected officials trying to make a good, efficient system, that America can live with?
Posted by: nativeremarks | September 14, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am
In a few yrs there will be no medicaid. Medicare will be better than now. Its really bad. I’m hoping that the time it takes to get into specialist won’t take as long. My husband had to wait 2 months for radiation. Due to all the tests, my specialists Dr’s. take 3 months now. It will cover the doughnut hole for medicare. Now we pay up to the cap of 2500.00. After that your on your own. up to 5,000.00. my husbands meds. He has lung disease and in remission with lung cancer. No generic meds. So, the pharmacal comp. are getting rich off low income.And middle class.Bushdid reform he made sure they got there part.Due to lobbyist. Now was that a social program or is it because Bush and his Congress did it. Try paying for HMO 160.00 month in healthcare.And 98.00 off the top for medicare.For 2. include the 15.00 for co pays and co pays on generics.Do this on 2100.00 a month in income. I will pay my share for reform. It has to be better.And what I read from my congressman it just what I need. And my children 3 out of 6 don’t have it.And there jobs offer it. But, can’t afford it.
Posted by: nykaren | September 14, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
I’d like to ask the President; when will he help the American people get rid of Acorn, it is corrupt.ABC; you also are corrupt, you ignore corruption, anything that will turn the light on this administration you ignore, that God for conservative radio, and FOX news; without those two media outlets, the American Public would not get the truth about much of anything. We all are not blind, The United States will not turn into a Socialist Country, I am not some white conservative, but a black man who disagree with most of what the President have to say, there is no need to overhaul healthcare, just fix what is broken, we have the best healthcare system on earth, I vote that all politicians take a 50 percent pay cut.
Posted by: PMont | September 14, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Why are you spending our money helter skelter?
How much are you using the Presidential air craft compared to other presidents?
Posted by: Ellis | September 14, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Mr Obama..I see ads Plastered everywhere from AARP stating “Healthcare Reform means Government Takeover” with False written over it…YET there are Videos of YOUR speaches out there and OUT of your own Mouth “The Government Takeover of Healthcare will not Happen Overnight” SO What I want to know is were YOU lying then or LYING now….
Posted by: JohnK | September 14, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
Many Americans wuold like the health care process slowed down and taken one step at the time. Why not have Congress and the American citizens look at Medicare alone–apart from any other program–and determine just what changes can be made without causing harm? I have sent three excellent suggestions to
two Conressmen, the President, and Ms. Pelosi. My only responses were a form letter from my congressman and form emails from the White House. If a suggestion from an ordinary citizen can cut Medicare expenses by millions, why not at least acknowledge the suggestion?
Too much too soon as a doctrine will never inspire confidence in any politician or any institution. Let’s work on Medicare first. If the government, with the help of the populace,can repair the bulk of Medicare’s problems within , say, the next year,I suggest that the citizenry will embrace the next change. What say you, Mr. President?
Posted by: Pat | September 15, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am
Oh yea, we can subsidize banks and bail out big corporations. What about the 47 million Americans that don’t have medical insurance. People are losing their jobs, small companies can’t afford medical insurance. Other countries such as England and Canada have government run plans that cover everyone. And no one should have to go into bankruptcy because they don’t have medical insurance.
There is $700 billion medical waste in this country. Couldn’t we address this problem and allocate more for the uninsured.
Posted by: CathyHig | September 15, 2009, 8:03 am 8:03 am
how can obama exspect the people of this country to trust the government with our health care, when our veterans,who have fought the fight and protected this country can’t get decent care.we have heros that are being turned away because paper work isn’t done,appointment are months away, or miles away. if obama can’t treat and take care of our many heros (one or two million) how is he going take care of the rest of us (260 million)
Posted by: roger | September 15, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am
Why do you continue to cow-tow to the Right Wing when everyone can tell you that they will never accept you or your policies? Abandon them and start working for the rest of us!
Posted by: Bill Nolan | September 15, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Reading the other comments, the thing that strikes me most is how many of those commentors have obviously not read the proposed legislation. Most of the fears expressed about reform don’t exist in the document.
Posted by: Ron | September 15, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Isn’t people’s relationship to their property sacred?
Posted by: JoeD | September 15, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
why doesn’t president Obama go on Rush or HAnnity for a face to face?
Posted by: Ed Stiles | September 15, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
I was wondering if you have considered offering free college to people that want to go to college to become a nurse, doctor or other medical personnel job in exchange for a reduced salary which would offer medical services to no-income/low income people? I would go to college and become a doctor if such a thing existed. I think 10 years of service after college would be a fair exchange.
Posted by: Tracy | September 15, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Why he is beeing meek in the face of a clearly orchestrated effort to make him look bad. 83 million Americans have federal health care and incur less overhead than private care. Why not discuss this?
Posted by: WN | September 15, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
I am a veteran and I receive first-rate care from my local VA medical facility. I believe that this would be a good model on which to build a health-care system since it is already inplace and the records are computerized. However,I also believe that this system should have guidelines in place for eligibility, such as those with no income and those with low to moderate incomes(Sorry, but I think that if you are in the six-figure income bracket, you can afford to pay out-of-pocket).
Posted by: Dennis M. Dwyer | September 15, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
I would like to read your college thesis. Why won’t you relase your paper?
Posted by: Rebekah | September 16, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Robert Moffit with the Heritage Foundation recently wrote on the proposed health exchanges. He notes that if the President wanted to create a national market for health insurance, he could simply propose the repeal of outdated provisions that prevent health insurance coverage to cross state lines. Why does the President NOT go ahead and do 2 simple things that would IMMEDIATELY help the insurance problem by (1) allowing competition of insurance programs across state lines and (2) moving forward with eradicating the billions of dollars he’s already identified as being wasted or going towards fraud in the current Medicare program? It doesn’t make sense to say you want to broaden the scope of a program which you say is already wasting billions of tax payer dollars. How would you explain such logic to your child? You couldn’t, because there is none. Lastly, I’m tired of ALL the rhetoric and bickering coming out of Washington – from the top down, and from the “left” to the “right”. You all have become so accustomed to espousing specious lies that the truth is nothing more than a masquerade.
Posted by: TDinAL | September 16, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Our federal representatives always seem to side with big business and private interests instead of with their constituents, resulting in the great health care debacle. I have written them on numerous occasions regarding the banning of prescription-only pharmaceutical drug ads, which cost millions to air, passing on, of course, those costs to those who need them, and everyone else. This onslaught and barrage of garbage is creating a new generation of hypochondriacs which, in turn, will lead to increased health care costs as people will flock to their doctors wondering if they have every illness touted on television and elsewhere. It is disgusting and should be banned. Millions upon millions of dollars could be slashed without this daily, 24/7 tirade of abuse. This practice is banned in Canada. When are we going to follow suit?
The same applies to the predatory and abusive health insurance companies. Both pharmaceutical companies and health insurance companies have extremely well-paid lobbyists who pander to our representatives as if we, their constituents, didn’t even exist. This is unacceptable. Lobbying should be criminalized along with banning these predatory pharmaceutical ads. In the end, we all end up being forced to pay to be abused. An entirely repugnant situation and is why health care reform is being so staunchly opposed.
Posted by: Rabid | September 16, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Why when Pfizer or large companies do crimes and get caught, they just pay the money back, If I stole money from banks and if I got caught, And I just had to pay money back. I would just steal again and again. CEO & crew should sit in prison just like any average person would
Posted by: Marlin | September 16, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
We need reform first. This is to expensive and ambitious during this bad economy. Take time and get it right. Look at what other countries with good healthcare are doing and slowly phase in new ways of providing healthcare. We need to get Americans back to work first. We must stop any incentives for american executives to outsource our jobs from this country. With more americans working, with good paying jobs, there will be more tax revenue for our government to spend.
Why not end insurance companies for profit. What about healthcare that is not tied to a job. Most people do not work for the same company for many years any more. If you change jobs you might have to change insurance and doctors. If you lose your job you may likely lose your health insurance also because cobra is expensive for may. Also we would no longer have employers reducing the hours of employees so they do not qualify for benefits.
Posted by: mike | September 16, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
In health insurance, unlike your previous position, we see you unsupportive of Single Payer Health Care. When we voted for you, we thought you would support this approach.
Is the reason that you do not support it, that your advisors, Larry Summers and Mr. Geithner are disapproving of it?
Thank you.
Posted by: Bob Phelps | September 16, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Stimulus spending dept. Auto Bailouts dept. Bank Bailouts dept. I have heard Freddy and Fanny May are overspent by 80 percent more dept. The government is printing new money like craze. Today we have a health care announcement for over 800 billion more dollars.
My Question is we can not afford any more spending! Why now!? I have a major Merrel Lynch financial adviser who just the other night was saying the US is quickly becoming a 3rd world county as far as dept vs. income.
All this can only lead to inflation and new taxes. Sad way to run things!
Posted by: Steve | September 16, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
I would like to ask The President if there will be a public option. I don’t have a job. I was offered to continue my insurance through COBRA after my severance ended at work. My payment would have been 495.00 a month through COBRA. If there is a public option how much would it average per month. Everyone may not get what they want in the reform, but something has to be done! I stand behind The President.
Posted by: Marion | September 16, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
Obama is a shill for NWO. Wanna know why is really going on?
Google “Ron Paul”. Google “The Money Masters”.
Posted by: Billy Boy | September 16, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
The entire idea (and practice) of a profit-based health care system ends with: If you do not have enough money, you deserve to die. In fact, everyone apposed to universal health care by the nature of their opposition cares none for the uninsured or bankrupt from medical dept and their possible lengthy, agonizing deaths. This callousness only makes a selfish, shameful nation.
President Obama: The previous administration drove its policies of destroying civil liberties and lining the pockets of their corporate investors without so much as blinking in the direction of the Democratic minority in Congress. Their agenda led to the death and displacement of millions in the middle east, the needless death of thousands of US servicemen and women, wanton murder by private security forces, and the torture of countless others. Now, after all that you had promised, after the people had given you a landslide victory for the express purpose of “changing the way Washington works”, are you betraying your fellow Americans by taking any notice of the party that attempted to destroy us in the first place? The GOP, and even many members of your own party have shown that they are not willing to negotiate with you to actually change anything. Will you, as President, with the powers available to you, rescind the medical benefits and coverage of the members of Congress until a resolution is passed ensuring all Americans can live without being cast aside like rotting meat if they cannot afford this travesty of healthcare?
There will be protests and challengers, but these are from and by misinformed fear-mongers. The majority of the country is counting on you to deliver, at least a whole-hearted battle-to-the-end over lifting the poor, unfortunate, and for-profit healthcare industry victims to the level that the people who tell them they deserve to die currently see themselves. We see that unchecked capitalism is self-destructive for those not granted with wealth. This, ultimately is not about parties or ideologies, but being a member of a Nation of people that actually care about each other, and a member of the human race as a whole; for in that, no one is outside the ‘system’.
Posted by: AaronK | September 17, 2009, 1:53 am 1:53 am
Mr. President, can you please tell me why there is no consideration of the impact of the cost of a medical education on the ultimate cost to the healthcare consumer, i.e., doctors, lawyers, dentists, etc. have such absurd, abusive educational costs they can’t afford to work for reasonable fees; they can’t afford to provide pro bono service; they can’t afford to work for government or non-profit health care agencies. In addition to substantial health care reform–please do something to create meaningful reform and opportunities for doctors, lawyers, dentists, etc. For example, why not give professionals across ALL DISCIPLINES a credit sufficient to permit someone with $100,000 in student loans to be debt free in 7 years, provided that they work for any single, or combination of, local, state, or federal government or non-profit agency during that time? This type of program, coupled with meaningful changes in health care, would open the doors of health care to hundreds of thousands of needy Americans, and would give doctors the opportunity to give back while reducing their debt.
Posted by: Dana B. | September 17, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am
Just a note to all of you think we can’t afford Obama’s plan; those who argue that the government can’t run anything well; that we can’t have the government telling us what doctors we can see, what medications we can have, etc.
(1) How can it be that other nations, with much less wealth than us, provide BETTER health care at less cost than we do? Surely, there must be a way to make this work in the US. Stop being a negative drain–take a long look at Germany!
(2) Just because Medicare is not a PERFECT system does not mean that it is a failure, and does not mean that the federal government is unable to develop and manage a successful national health care program. This has so much to do with perception of what consitutes “success.”
(3) We already have someone between the patient and the doctor–BIG BUSINESS (a/k/a the insurance and pharmaceutical companies)! Please look at what is going on already! If there has to be someone in the exam room with us, wouldn’t it be better to have it be the government, who at least we can vote out of office, who at least we can communicate with? The insurance companies have proven that they have no interest or intention in doing anything other than completely ignoring us while raping us financially. They are already deciding who lives and dies–while they take our money and cause needless, cruel suffering!
(4) The problems that have finally come to a head are not new. The insurance and pharmaceutical companies have known of these problems for a long and have done nothing. Why should we: (a) be concerned with their fate, or (b) believe that they are going to do anything different than what they’ve been doing?
Posted by: Dana B. | September 17, 2009, 8:56 am 8:56 am
In regards to your health plan, I will go along with any plan you put into effect as long as you , the Senate & Congress are also covered by it. I also think they should be on Social Security, I’m sure there would be a fix.
Posted by: Phyllis Johnson | September 17, 2009, 9:19 am 9:19 am
All I hear is to much talk. I want to know President Obama’s true aspirations, President or TV star. Countries that have government health care that work we should be mapping our plans off the good they find in those. This is like making it up as they go, scares me.
Posted by: Barbara | September 17, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am
If it is acknowledged that insurance companies and drug companies are overpriced and in some cases fraudulent, why not focus on forcing the health care providers to alter their criteria and make them become more competitive with each other. Just as ACORN has abused funds and has criminal elements among them, so do the insurance providers. CLEAN THAT UP, AND IT WILL HELP SOLVE THE PROBLEM. Healthcare is not a God given right, it is something that must be worked for and paid for – but not at the cost of every tax paying American having to provide for the 3rd generation Welfare recipients and illegals!!!!
Posted by: kAREN | September 17, 2009, 9:29 am 9:29 am
As currently written, House legislation will not take effect until 2013–the year AFTER your potential re-election. You state that ‘health insurance reform’ is ‘imperative’. Will you therefore commit–publicly–that any portion of the reform measures directly impacting the DELIVERY of the public’s health care will begin implementation immediately?
Posted by: Ray | September 17, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am
Asking Obama: When did you first realize that you are a pathological liar?
Posted by: richard schlenz | September 17, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
What I propose to President Obama:
1. Trash all existing health bills.
2. Have each party leader from both houses have their menbers submit 2 proposals with goal, cost and savings.
(Since there are more Dems than Reps, the Reps will have to suck it up)
3. A member of each party will accept the proposals, ensuring that only 2 proposals are submitted.
4. When compiled the issuers name will not be listed anywhere.
5. Now selected members can review the proposals. When complete, whats left can be retyped and it should be a working bill which can be submitted to the houses for review and voting.
Posted by: j | September 17, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Lets stop the debates.The american people are out to lunch.Will you and our leaders (sic)accept the same health plan as you are feeding us sideways.
Same cost,same coverage,if so i will accept.
Posted by: Bambam | September 17, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Do you not see how frustrated the people are? Treat us as you would treat yourself or your family.
Posted by: Cheryl | September 17, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
I would like him to explain to the people why he is for abortion. I know that he is a christian and we believe that killing is wrong. I am not for abortions, but I know that the rich will continue to get them and the knifer under the table will do them if they are not legal. I more important that people take preventive care. I hope his bill will include free care for college student, they are usually i the general population and don’t eat well. I also want to make sure that the hospitals and doctor stop using health care as a gold mine by reducing the payment they get for just participating in a plan. The Dr’s and hospitals have a duty to provide services .
Posted by: Judy | September 17, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Madoff’s ponzi scheme is chump change compared to the green energy and health care plans of our government. The lobbyist’s rule and we are all being fleeced for the wealthy and big corporations.
You will get the same health care that we have in Washington. Ya right
It’s like the watered down lobby rules for all politicians, an honor system my foot. If their lips are moving you know it’s a lie.
Let government draw up the legislation and let the people vote yes or no, not themselves. We will have a true democracy then.
Posted by: Philip | September 17, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
We really need a serious breakdown that it will cost each U.S. taxpayer to invest in reformed health care services. Everything is so undefined, and everyone is busy yelling at one another. If we have to pay any tax at all, My husband is a retired state CO, and we still pay too much for medical and dental. I have to add my benefits just to keep up with the dental services.
Posted by: Morgan | September 17, 2009, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
You keep saying we’ll ALL be covered. With what?
What will be covered?
What tests?
What will it cost me to have?
Is there a co-pay?
Is there a Deductible?
No true answers to these questions have been given to date!
Posted by: Tom Francois | September 18, 2009, 12:04 am 12:04 am
Single-payer universal healthcare is the best way to go. I am American who lived for 7 years in the UK where everyone has healthcare guaranteed by the government. And they never have to worry about ever going bankrupt due to medical bills. I’m back in the US now and think we must have a similar system as the other industrialized countries do. I understand the American tradition of do-it-yourself, but on the issue of healthcare I’m all for a government takeover, while permitting people to get private insurance if they so desire.
Posted by: joecool | September 18, 2009, 2:54 am 2:54 am
Why does it fall to the patient to be billed (or sent to a collection agency) when the doctor who (1) insisted on seeing and copying all insurance information at every single visit and then (2) NEVER SUBMITTED A BILL TO THE HEALTH INSURANCE company so he/she could be paid???? Why is this allowed? My credit score is lower than it should be for these bills. The medical providers are now claiming that the bills are too old and they have turned them over to collections. I called the insurance companies and they were NEVER BILLED. Appealing the bills takes time and even though I am now doing the job that the doctor did not do before, I can’t get approved for a loan until I pay for a debt that the insurance company clearly covers IF THEY HAD RECEIVED A BILL IN THE FIRST PLACE. Now, it falls into my overburdened lap to take care of it. ARGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Jonathan's Mom | September 18, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am
Sat on a plane next to a Canadian couple who gave me a good 1/2 hr+ of why we don’t want government run health care like Canadians have – need they say more ?
Posted by: BJackson | September 18, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am
If healthcare was such a huge priority to this administration, why didn’t they address it before spending tons of money on bailing out everything else? And, how much do these stupid czars make? Get rid of their salaries for starters. We’re too far in debt as it is and what they’re proposing just doesn’t add up. We, as well as our children, will be paying this off for years. I think the public needs a bailout! Give each of us a couple hundred thousand and turn us loose to pay off our bills and then the economy will get a boost because we’ll have less monthly bills to pay and more spending money available to boost the economy with in the future. If we’re gonna pay through the nose for healthcare, it better be the same plan Mr. Obama gets with the same coverage, otherwise leave my healthcare alone!
Posted by: sg75 | September 18, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
I am a nurse and half the doctors I work with have stated that they’ll retire before taking what the government will offer them if we end up with a government run system. Which leaves us with coverage, but no doctors to care for us. They say it’s not worth it after paying their nurses, other staff, student loans and malpractice insurance. One stated he’d be better off retiring and working for minimum wage, then MAYBE he’d get free or cheaper healthcare. It’s not hard to see that the if the public option happens the government will outbid all other companies and put them out of business, leading to a monopoly where the government makes all the decisions. I thought this was a free country?
Posted by: sg75 | September 18, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
My name is Carmen G. and I’m from Chicago. President Obama’s hometown. I would like to know, why are single american treated like second class citizens? I’m 58 yrs. old and chose never to get married or have children. When I attended Northwestern University in my college years, President Jimmy Carter had my back. I received grants which paid in full my college tuition.
Now in 2009 we don’t receive any benefits. Especially when we are unemployed and have no other source of income. Why don’t we get the help couples and families get when they fall on hard times?
Posted by: Carmen G. | September 18, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Where is the war on cancer that Tricky Dickie Nixon promised in 1974. When you talk about heathcare millions go into bogus cancer treatmens by doctors and hospials all over the country. If we could find a cure and more tolerable treatmsnts THAT WORK then we will have rid the world of this scorge. Personally I think plastics in the enviroment have a lot to do with the disease,they are EVERYWHERE.
Posted by: jill unger | September 18, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Are you going to bring manufacturing back to the United States? If so, are you going to resurect the Technical College system to train people to run the machines the manufacturing plants use?
Posted by: Pattib | September 18, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
What Reform? Fine the poor for not having insurance? lol, that is just business as usual. How about some tort reform, some common sense would go a long way towards making medical care more affordiable. It’s never going to happen though, Washington will not have the nerve to require common sense from their fellow lawyers, or from themselvs.
Posted by: Lyle Pardon | September 18, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
if people dont have medical insurance they die .dont yet treatment,anything is better than status quo.who are the real death squads people who dont support health care reform…let the blood be on your hands
Posted by: zach | September 18, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Why do we have to pattern everything after the Europeans? They may be a great bunch of people but we are not them. We are Americans and as such should look within our own country for the answers to our problems. Government control is not the answer to health care. Sometimes I wish a “housewife” would be able to look at the federal budget and balance it just like we have to do at home. The government is supposed to be held accountable to the people who put them in charge but with the llies, inuendoes, posturing and backstabbing we get from those in office how can we believe they have an answer for anything, much less healthcare. How about they quit cutting the programs for the poor and working poor, the handicapped and mentally challenged and start cutting back on their own benefits and wages? That would save trillions each year and maybe force the “leaders” of this nation to start doing whats good for the country and stop doing for themselves. Insurance companies are just as bad. They are taking a risk for that is their business but they also need to quit looking at profits so much and start doing what they claim they do, i.e. care for their clients. Do I have an answer? Not without the figures in front of me but I venture to say that anyone with good common sense could figure it out just fine. Maybe that’s the problem—our government doesn’t have any common sense!!
Posted by: Karen Young | September 18, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
remember people, president obama is working to make the system better for uninsured people- give the president a break. Get behind him and support him all the way. He has been the only president w/nerve to try to do something about the problems in the healthcare system. If you are worried about money-get another JOb.
Posted by: jay | September 18, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
I want to know why we handed the President a mandate for change and he’s handed us a government which only moves in reverse. Health Care Reform has become the designer puppy of this administration – all promises, no shelter. And we still have zero health coverage – though it looks as if we may get penalized for not being able to afford it. Not the change I voted for.
Posted by: fourdigg | September 18, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
Im 22 years old. I’ve been working since i’ve been 16. When i get to age 70, (the age retirement will be increased to) Where will my social security income be?? Will it contribute towards me?
Posted by: Juan | September 18, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
Why not FREE health care? Like Canada, The UK, etc? Works for them. Why hammer the poor with thousands of dollars in medical debts? Insurance companies are run for profit Mr.Obama, and not to the benefit of Americans. Much like Social Security and Free Education, we need to socialize medicine. So, why not?
Posted by: Klatu | September 18, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
*** WELFARE SYSTEM OUT OF CONTROL! ***
________________________________________
WHY are so many YOUNG HEALTHY people receiving ‘social benefits’ ????
ACCOUNTABILITY for social services needs to be tightened!
Example: A 32 year old male, on ‘welfare’ since his 20′s, receives benefits for himself, his wife, and his various children (inside and outside of marriage) while the state (AKA: working class) pays his rent (his mother owns building), heat (his windows open ALL winter long – very cold climate) and receives reduced fees for various other programs and services.
Is he required to work? Not in this country! When gas prices hit $4.00 and the average worker struggled to fuel their beat-up vehicle to get to the job – this joker is riding around on his atv’s, snowmobiles, demolition cars, etc…
This is only one example – sadly abuses are common place…
————————–
THE SYSTEM IS BROKEN!!!!
————————–
When will the ‘system’ protect those of us who work for a living (and then are forced to work for those that suck the life blood from others – because they are too lazy to provide for themselves or those they produce…)
THESE PEOPLE ARE GUILTY OF FRAUD AGAINST WORKING-CLASS AMERICA!!!
Posted by: EmptyPockets | September 18, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Why don’t you run a story about ABC’s present employee health insurance plans? You can then provide an in-depth analysis of the future impact of any projected changes that may be made by the Obama Administration.
Posted by: Michael J. Holland | September 19, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am
I enjoy a solid health plan with partner benefits. I put an exceptional amount in, under a FSA plan, almost $5000.00 for dental and prescription medications. I don’t earn a large amount but all my needs are taken care of. I really don’t want this to change. I can’t afford to be taxed and I can’t afford to lose my FSA. How could this possibly benefit me in any way. My maximum lifetime benefit is $100,000,000 and my co-pays are $15.
Posted by: John | September 19, 2009, 2:28 am 2:28 am
What would I ask Obama??
“What would it take for you to just walk away? Resign? Throw in your PERSONAL white towel instead of the country’s towel? Give up?”
“Are you REALLY going to stick around and make us THROW you out on your arse in 2012?”
I have a few more questions, but these are the most effective…
Posted by: Laughing__All__The__Way | September 19, 2009, 4:17 am 4:17 am
-
Even though corporations can’t vote, they pull the strings of all governments with their millions and their behind the scenes manipulation of Congressional campaign financing.
The American people can vote but they have less and less money and that is what determines the future of the United States.
The corporate money of banks, Wall Street, the oil companies, the mining companies and all other businesses with employed lobbyists, contracted ad agencies and contracted public relations firms will continue to steer this country into deeper deficits, more wars, more unemployment and more poverty until you and I get involved.
Corporate business money pays for all the commercials that pay for Rush Limbaugh’s $400,000,000 (four hundred million dollar) 5 year contract that he is paid to inflame the uninformed and thereby increase audience and ensure more profits and uninformed, pliable voters.
Businessmen are mostly Republicans so it makes sense that Limbaugh, Beck and all other political entertainer/demagogues use a megaphone paid for by Republican, business commercials.
If it were not for commercials, Limbaugh, Beck, O’Reilly and the rest of the talk show crowd and everybody else would be off the air including your monthly cable and satellite bills.
Then there would just be PBS, NPR, APR and the BBC. No hot heads, just facts and quality, family programs.
Posted by: Mort Meier | September 19, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
I really think that if there was a referendum on healthcare, and it was on a national ballot where every voter could vote, it would pass overwhelmingly. I’m for a public option. It’s time – The current system is corrupt and it’s not working for most people. My premiums are staggering and I have a huge deductible.
Posted by: J. B. Moore | September 20, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am
If I could talk to Obama, I would ask him to resign. And that pretty much says it all..
Posted by: Annie | September 20, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am
why have you spent almost $2m fighting the release of your documents?…school transcripts, birth records, school papers, etc? what are you hiding & why?
Posted by: rbonilla | September 20, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
If insurers will be forbidden to deny coverage for pre-existing conditions, why should I not carry minimal insurance and then up-grade if/when I am struck by disease or injury?
Posted by: Barry | September 20, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
I voted for Obama. I admire what he’s trying to do: every American with health insurance coverage. It’s a noble cause. However, I can’t support a health care plan that does not fix the problem of health care costs rising faster than inflation. We have insurance companies that are still legally able to discriminate when it goes against the numbers in their actuary tables. We have pharmaceutical companies charging $3500 a month and more for cancer treatment medication. These companies are charging exhorbitant costs while their CEO’s have multi-million dollar salaries. I’m all for free enterprise, but if these companies aren’t reigned in from their greed, the American people will continue to pay for it with their hard earned dollars.
I have a friend who recently looked into the Indiana HIP program for health care coverage. She’s was a casualty of the mortgage industry fall; she’s looking at having to file bankruptcy; she’s commission only right now and doesn’t have health care coverage; but because she is working even the HIP program wanted nearly $290 a month to cover her. Granted, it is cheaper than insurance company quotes, but how does she afford coverage? I can only imagine that requiring everyone to have health insurance couldn’t bring premiums much lower than that.
My vote goes for tighter regulation of insurance and pharmaceutical industries.
Posted by: cool_breezin | September 21, 2009, 2:03 am 2:03 am
Every time he talks he exonerates JOE WILSON’s comments. He may not outright lie but he totally avoids the truth. Of course he was trained as a laywer. Is is amazing what he is not aware of like ACORN
Posted by: ed wendel | September 21, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Under what authority does the government have to mandate healthcare. Why is noone arguing the constitutionality of these 2 bills. How can these bills be legal? Do we no longer use the Constitution? I just don’t get it.
Posted by: Aaron Smith | September 21, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
MISTER PRESIDENT;
AREN’T YOU GLAD YOU HAVE ALL THE LIBERAL MEDIA CARRYING YOUR WATER? CAN YOU IMAGINE IF THE MEDIA WOULD BECOME JOURNALISTS AGAIN INSTEAD OF POM POM SQUADS? HOW WOULD YOU ANSWER REAL QUESTIONS? THAT’S MY QUESTION.
Posted by: Julie | September 21, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
ABC Wants to Know: What Would You Ask President Obama?
How ’bout…. “What would it take for you to just resign, and maybe go back to community organizing with the likes of ACORN?”
Posted by: Namako_Expat | September 22, 2009, 2:39 am 2:39 am
I am neither democrat nor republican, and my comment is directed toward ####### like Carter and Clinton and new media elites, who seem determined to play the race card. You can call me racist or bigot or any other funky name that comes to mind, but I will not back down on the socialized medicine. I will not allow the news media and government to steal my hard-earned money and steal my Constitutional rights and consolidate a socialist stranglehold on my life, so help me God.
Posted by: Gary | September 22, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
My husband and I have to pay $6000. out of pocket before we can have any insurance help!This is our reward for paying ourselves for putting our kids through college (no government assistance!) and buying our food (no food stamps) and medical insurance?? What can you do to reward the middle class for being responsible??? I’ve got nothing against helping poor innocent kids but we are tired of helping lazy irresponsible people who seem to be taking advantage of the system!
Posted by: WendyGoddard | September 22, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am
I have been an RN in the Emergency Dept. of a Major hospital in Orlando, FL for 28 years. Do you really think that all those people in the ER with a runny nose have Ins? The answer is ABSOLUTELY NOT!
The regular person shoulders that. Insurance Companies love the uninformed people who are screaming that reform is Socialism. Trust me, you will be seen in the ER at a 500% mark up and people with Ins. End up paying for it.
The Ins. Company DOES NOT have your best interest at heart. Get a grip folks, we need reform and Fast!
Posted by: Kris | October 1, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am
While I can’t say that this bill is going to fix everything, keeping the status quo would be ten times worse. Those without health insurance live everyday in fear that one serious illness will wipe them out.
This bill is a huge step in the right direction. Now, all we need to do is fix our education system and institute immigration reform. No Child Left Behind is a joke – teachers are dumbing down our students b/c they are only teaching to the test. I could go on, but this is off topic.
Our polital system is so flawed it’s pathetic. Obama only has 9 more months to pass any legislation, I say this b/c after the midterm elections both the Senate and the House are going to be controlled by Republicans and there is no way that they are going to let anything with Obama’s name connected to it pass. I wish our politicians would stop all the bittering and just do their jobs.
Posted by: Josh | March 22, 2010, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm