What Does the President’s Promise “You’ll Be Able to Keep Your Health Care Plan, Period,” Really Mean?
“No matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise to the American people,” President Obama told the American Medical Association on June 15. “If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period. If you like your health care plan, you’ll be able to keep your health care plan, period. No one will take it away, no matter what.”
But today the president clarified that promise. It seems he wasn’t saying “no one” will take away any American’s health insurance – he was saying the government wouldn’t.
Which is not to say that the government wouldn’t create a situation where such a thing would happen.
ABC News asked how the president could make such a guarantee if the public run plan were cheaper, thus possibly enticing employers to enroll employees in that plan.
“When I say if you have your plan and you like it,…or you have a doctor and you like your doctor, that you don’t have to change plans, what I’m saying is the government is not going to make you change plans under health reform,” the President said.
The president went on to say that, “Now, are there going to be employers right now, assuming we don’t do anything — let’s say that we take the advice of some folks who are out there and say, ‘Oh, this is not the time to do health care. We can’t afford it. It’s too complicated. Let’s take our time,’ et cetera. So let’s assume that nothing happened. I can guarantee you that there’s the possibility for a whole lot of Americans out there that they’re not going to end up having the same health care they have. Because what’s going to happen is, as costs keep on going up, employers are going to start making decisions. We’ve got to raise premiums on our employees. In some cases, we can’t provide health insurance at all. And so there are going to be a whole set of changes out there. That’s exactly why health reform is so important.”
Pressed on the question of whether a public plan is non-negotiable, that he won’t sign a health care reform bill that does not include it, the president said that it was not, at least not yet.
“We have not drawn lines in the sand, other than that reform has to control costs and that it has to provide relief to people who don’t have health insurance or are under-insured,” the president said. “You know, those are the broad parameters that we’ve discussed. There are a whole host of other issues where ultimately I may have a strong opinion, and I will express those to members of Congress as this is shaping up. It’s too early to say that. Right now, I will say that our position is that a public plan makes sense.”
-jpt
Email
White House Blinks Amid Catholic Church Anger?
Navy SEAL Commander Advised: Get the Hell Out of the Media
Great Q, thanks.
My dad worked for a large company for 47 years. Part of his benefit package was retirement health care. With the advent of Medicare the company capped the number of years the health care benefit would exist and then offered the retirees a supplemental if they went on Medicare immediately, thus reducing the companies cost dramatically and shifting the “retirement benefit” to the government
Posted by: TB | June 23, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
President Obama also said in his press conference:
“As one of those options, for us to be able to say, here’s a public option that’s not profit-driven, that can keep down administrative costs, and that provides you good, quality care for a reasonable price as one of the options for you to choose, I think that makes sense.”
“Why would it drive private insurance out of business? If — if private — if private insurers say that the marketplace provides the best quality health care; if they tell us that they’re offering a good deal, then why is it that the government, which they say can’t run anything, suddenly is going to drive them out of business? That’s not logical.
“Now, the — I think that there’s going to be some healthy debates in Congress about the shape that this takes. I think there can be some legitimate concerns on the part of private insurers that if any public plan is simply being subsidized by taxpayers endlessly that over time they can’t compete with the government just printing money, so there are going to be some I think legitimate debates to be had about how this private plan takes shape.
“But just conceptually, the notion that all these insurance companies who say they’re giving consumers the best possible deal, if they can’t compete against a public plan as one option, with consumers making the decision what’s the best deal, that defies logic, which is why I think you’ve seen in the polling data overwhelming support for a public plan.”
President Obama is being totally disingenuous. He already admitted that the public plan would not be profit-driven. He knows that private insurance companies ARE profit-driven. They are in business to make money! So when the private companies say that “they’re giving consumers the best possible deal,” they mean staying within their own desired profit margins. Even if the federal government offered the exact same benefits as a particular private insurer, the federal government would charge significantly less for that coverage because it does not have to include a profit margin. Finally, the federal government has no intention of offering the same benefits. President Obama has already stated that there will be changes in the rules for offering insurance. These changes will drive up the prices that private insurers charge to even greater levels–making the federal government’s public option even more desireable.
The public option will be the death of private health insurance in American!
Posted by: James Danley | June 23, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Employers change health plans all the time to reduce their costs. The only game-changer is that there will be a new, not-for-profit, plan.
Personally, with health insurer CEO’s making up to $23 million per-year off of my premiums, I look forward to the choice of a health plan that has no profit motive.
Private insurers have the right to be concerned about competing against a taxpayer subsidized public health plan and they have the right to a level playing field, but sorry, the game needs to be changed. America spends way too much per person on health care and I believe a big reason why is, in fact, the profit motive.
Posted by: RichWhy | June 23, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Sounds like Obama was being deliberately deceptive when he said “no one” would take away your current health plan. Why would he try to deceive us like that?
Posted by: Paul | June 23, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
“I look forward to the choice of a health plan that has no profit motive.” – RichWhy
You’re assuming the quality of healthcare will be the same. Good luck with that. Can anyone say VA?
“America spends way too much per person on health care and I believe a big reason why is, in fact, the profit motive.” – RichWhy
Why doesn’t the govt just spend some time figuring out who actually needs the help and then help them. Why recreate the wheel?
Personaly, I like my plan, my rates are reasonable, my prescriptions are reasonable, I like my doctor, I see no big profits being made, my company helps me pay for it and if I have a big personal expense ever, I can possibly deduct it from my taxes. Leave me alone!
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | June 23, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Reputable studies have shown that about 120 million people will have companies that shift to the public plan because of costs. So far the government is not offering any studies on how many jobs will be lost because employers cannot afford a mandated health care system.
The government is also being quiet about the inability of employers to hire new people because of the mandates in the stimulus package that exteneded health care and unemployment benefits… people do not seem to understand that employers face a lot of government imposed costs for each employee they hire…. sad. I’m tired of the class warfare tone out the WH. Employers are not the enemy. There are too many hidden costs and uncertainties for employers to start hiring.
Posted by: Sadie | June 23, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
“I look forward to the choice of a health plan that has no profit motive.”
You don’t fully understand profit motive. To make a profit, you either lower your costs of delivering a product or you raise your selling price. If you can’t raise your price because your competitor is charging less, you have to lower your operating costs. With a commodity product, this is done by looking for operational efficiencies or providing significantly better service.
Not having a profit motive means you don’t care how much it costs to deliver a crappy product because you don’t care whether or not your product is better than the competition’s product.
The government doesn’t care what it costs because they have taxpayers footing the bill. Once they drive private insurance out of the market, they will care even less. They will have a monopoly on your health care and get away with running the most expensive, lowest quality healthcare system MY money can buy.
Posted by: Hogarth | June 23, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
What exactly does “under-insured” mean and who determines it?
Posted by: jennifert7 | June 23, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
The One is either an economic imbecile or a brazen liar when he says a public plan will not kill the private health care industry. Since employers, and not individuals are the main purchasers of health care, they will gravitate to the cheapest alternative. As James points out, that will be the public plan.
One other thing, when ever you hear the advocates for reform talk about “cost savings”, think “rationing”.
Posted by: Goheels | June 23, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Jennifer,
Many farmers are “underinsured.” They carry plans with enormous deductibles (thousands of dollars) that are in place in case of catastrophic illness.
In the meantime, they neglect routine care that falls under the deductible because they cannot afford the costs here and there for health maintenance. As a result, they are much more likely to encounter the very catastrophic situations that they are insured against.
However, they often find that even with such “coverage,” they still have to borrow money to pay for uncovered costs and lost work… or worse yet, they just go bankrupt.
You might argue that it is the farmer’s fault for taking such risks… but farmers usually don’t have enough money to spare 20,000$ for insurance.
Another example of “underinsurance” was that I was covered when my wife and I got married. We got pregnant with our first child, and discovered that the plan provided by my employer did not cover pregnancy. When we asked them what we should do, they handed us an application for state welfare. So, we went on the public plan.
Health care in the US needs radical reform. Right now, the insurance companies hold all the cards. And, apparently, they are now working to fill people’s heads with fear and half-truths….
just to continue milking the public.
Posted by: borneo | June 23, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
“But 50 million Americans don’t even have any healthcare coverage.” – jacksmith
Oh, it’s up to 50 million now? Good Lord!
This is the big lie. Walk into any emergency room and they will treat you.
And they call conservatives fear-mongers?
“robust public option”
Oxymoron.
Hey, nice cut-n-paste job, though.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | June 23, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Government healthcare is an oxymoron. The government runs the military that would gladly send you or your children to their death to further their aims.
Its actually good that we didnt invade Iran as if it were Iraq, otherwise we’d be blamed for it. Its pretty hypocritical of Obama to not make cigarettes illegal they are a far worse killer. He is just going to let tobacco companies do ‘business as usual’ except for a few advertisements and ruin the taste of cigarettes. Big tobacco will be allowed to continue to sell its poisonous muderous product that kills more people than Iran and both the wars in which we are still involved. Meanwhile marijuana something that would make jobs, is safer for your health to smoke, and is even used to help cancer patients is still 100% illegal federally. Making pot legal would put a 50% dent in the profit of Mexican drug cartels and yet Obama wont even consider it. Total hypocrisy.
Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | June 23, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
My husband own a small business-less than 25 employees. Over the years, he tried to form a small group (4 needed) to have health insurance. His employees were not interested as they were covered on spouses or parents insurance. Instead,they wanted more money in their paycheck. Now if the government forces employers to pay for health care insurance for employees, we will probably shut down the business as we can not afford the cost. I am sure we are not the only small business that will not be able to provide health care insurance and will have to close. Be careful what you wish for as it may end up not being what you really want.
Posted by: Beth | June 23, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
“This is the big lie. Walk into any emergency room and they will treat you.”
This is what conservatives are talking about how to fix health care.
Let the people who can afford it go to a doctor when they want to.
Everyone else, just run to the emergency room at the point of dying, pay thousands of dollars for cheap procedure, and then fight with collection agencies for years and years until you file bankruptcy.
We HAVE rationed care right now. It’s rationed on the basis of wealth. People with means go to the doctor on a regular basis…. poor people (and their children) don’t go at all. (Unless of course, they are on their death bed).
One of my friends had pneumonia for 3 months (he always said, “Oh, I just have a cough. I just need to rest.”) Eventually, he collapse and went to the ER… and they had to treat all these other complications….
Why? He couldn’t afford to go to the doctor… so he put it off.
My dad had a spinal condition. He thought he was “getting old.” Well, eventually, his “old age” took a sudden turn for the worse and he was hauled off in an ambulance for an emergency surgery. It was enormously expensive…. he ended up paralyzed… and he lost his minimum wage job… and ended up living on disability anyway! BUT IT COULD HAVE BEEN TREATED. HE COULD HAVE LIVED OUT HIS REMAINING YEARS WORKING, PAYING TAXES, AND FEELING HEALTHY. Instead, he had to “ration” his healthcare to keep up with his bills… and suffered because of it.
Posted by: borneo | June 23, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Jacksmith, George Will said it best, recently, in a round table discussion on ABC’s “This Week,”
“…you talk about the 46, 47 million uninsured. Fourteen million of them are already eligible for other government programs and haven’t signed up. Ten million are in households with household incomes of $75,000 a year and could afford it if they wanted to.
“Furthermore, an enormous number in that 47 million are not American citizens. Sixty percent of the uninsured in San Francisco are not citizens.”
The nearly 20 million illegal immigrants are included in that “47 million uninsured” total.
Posted by: James Danley | June 23, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Why must the government trump our right to make a good or bad decision when it comes to our personal health?
My wife and I both work hard and decided to get the best health insurance plan for our family that we could afford. We made a decision based on our reality and we budget our lives accordingly. Once Government gets involved our choices will be reduced. It always happens.
Competition for profit is part of the human reality and I want to pay more if I know it will be the best doctor for my kids. Let me make that decision.
And what about the common good? The great majority of people agrees that we need to help the ones that need help, but not subsidy entire lives. Thousands abuse the system now (housing, etc.), government involvement will only make it worst -in the name of compassion.
Posted by: JP | June 23, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
See, this way, the government can steer everyone toward government administered health-care and blame the private sector for abandoning private insurance when it becomes unaffordable.
Posted by: rowland | June 23, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
The Presidents promise that” you’ll be able to keep your health care plan,period”,means absolutely nothing.He also promised the Stimulus bill would not have any earmarks,promised the middle class no increase in taxes while at the same time promoting CAP and Trade which will hit everyone.The truth is not in him.
Posted by: Johnny L | June 23, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
“I can guarantee you that there’s the possibility for a whole lot of Americans out there that they’re not going to end up having the same health care they have.” This is a quote from the President of the USA!
I can guarantee that there’s a possibility… therefore we must act NOW! I’ve heard the same thing from any sales-person.
It’s like your inside tells you someone is trying to sell you snake oil. I can guarantee that there’s a possibility of an asteroid hitting earth sometime in the next few years or decades… yeah, I want to buy that snake oil.
Why must something so important be dealt in this fashion? We are talking about the American HealthCare System. There is a reason why, with all its faults, it still is the envy of the world. This is not a serious conversation. It’s just another version or Either You Are With Us Or You Are With Our Enemies.
Posted by: JP | June 23, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
“See, this way, the government can steer everyone toward government administered health-care and blame the private sector for abandoning private insurance when it becomes unaffordable. ”
Newsflash! Private insurance IS unaffordable for too many. And many more with each passing year.
Posted by: Steve | June 23, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
hey ABC keep this “presidents” photo up I love laughing at a comedian
Posted by: Obamas brownnosing media network | June 23, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
I am not American. I grew up in a country with Socialized medicine. Trust me, put down the cup of Kool-Aid. My mother, I was twelve, was diagnosed with ovarian cancer, she was scheduled for “surgery and treatment” in six months. She did not survive her wait for six month away surgery and treatment. I know BOO HOO me. But, I am telling you first hand. Do not do this to your children or yourself.
Posted by: Kit | June 23, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
I swear, the progressives want medical doctors to make about as much as garbage men!
Hey, Jakey, maybe next time you’re playing “journalist,” you could ask Obama about Section 3116 of the (Orwellian) “Affordable Health Choices Act” which specifically exempts Congressional members and all Federal employees (aka the Nomenklatura) from participating.
Posted by: MacGhil | June 23, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Thanks James Danley for finding those facts. I was looking for them myself.
I have no doubt that the system is not perfect. I also have no doubt that many people say they can’t afford hc insurance – but still seem to find the money to buy cigarettes, eat breakfast at the local mini-mart, go out drinking, and buy a big screen tv on credit.
I just don’t see why creating another govt agency has to be the only solution. Unless it’s not really about healthcare…
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | June 23, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
MacGhil | Jun 23, 2009 3:32:54 PM
That’s when we’ll all be voting for big govt so we can get on “the good” healthcare plan!
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | June 23, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
This is just another attempt on Obama’s part to move to a solcialistic based government. First he takes over the banking industry, then its automobiles, followed by the school systems and tobacco industries and now its health care. The statement “If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period. If you like your health care plan, you’ll be able to keep your health care plan, period. No one will take it away, no matter what.” is a snake (oil) in the grass at most. What it means is that if the insurance companies don’t buckle down and follow the government’s decrees, they will put the insurance companies out of business and totally run health care on a socialized medicine basis.
Posted by: William Hammersley | June 23, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
This is just another attempt on Obama’s part to move to a solcialistic based government. First he takes over the banking industry, then its automobiles, followed by the school systems and tobacco industries and now its health care. The statement “If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period. If you like your health care plan, you’ll be able to keep your health care plan, period. No one will take it away, no matter what.” is a snake (oil) in the grass at most. What it means is that if the insurance companies don’t buckle down and follow the government’s decrees, they will put the insurance companies out of business and totally run health care on a socialized medicine basis.
Posted by: William Hammersley | June 23, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Obama wants to insinuate the government into every aspect of your life. From you health care, your car, your bank, your salary. He’s power hungry. His talk of transparancy and reconciliation is bogus. He lies about everything. It is the fool who believes him on this. How would you like to be rolled in for surgery and open your eyes and see the gal from the DMV standing over you.
Listen to people who have socialized medicine. Mediocraty evenly distributed.
Posted by: Betsy | June 23, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Jennifer,
If you ask me, both sides are filling other people’s heads with fear and half-truths to get what they want. What you simply are doing is demanding access to private health coverage. Health care isn’t a right, but when a person is lying there dying or bleeding, the medical professional have an obligation to TREAT that person. Under a national health care system, that isn’t possible. It’s been demonstrated where it’s being tried that it won’t work.
You should be damned lucky to be on a public plan and stop being such a whiny crybaby about it, and stop and begin to think about all the people you need to thank who are paying for your PUBLIC health care coverage.
I find it ironic that the ones who get completely overlooked in this whole debate are the people holding the bill.
Posted by: BigSky | June 23, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
If the health care system is broke in this country, why are so many foreigners coming for medical care? Do you actually think that by insuring the 42 million uninsured in this country will fix or correct the problem? And, people wonder why the housing bubble burst because taxpayers are paying for the home loans of people who can’t afford to buy a home much less pay off a home loan.
Posted by: BigSky | June 23, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Traffic Cop Timmy wrote: “Unless it’s not really about healthcare…”
You hit it on the nail! It’s not about health care but control. The Left wants to control every aspect of our lives. Reforming health care (not to mention Cap & Trade) is only a means to that goal.
Posted by: James Danley | June 23, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Let the people who can afford it go to a doctor when they want to.
————————————
LOL….go north of the border….see just how fast you get to see a doctor!
The devil’s always in the details people! You have not heard exactly how these costs are going to be controlled. If an Xray was $X last year and its $Y this year, Is Obama going to just decree its going to be 1/2 of Y next year? You have not seen a schedule from ANYONE’s plan for you to compare premimums Vs coverages…and no one is telling you how much more money is going to sucked out of your pocket to pay for this beast!
At some point this thing is going to have to tell you your going to pay so much for your plan, what ever it might be. Then its going to have to tell you that your allowed a specific amout for an X-Ray, or a doctors visit, or the setting of a broken arm…etc
In the gov’ts plan, WHO is going to set the numbers? WHO is going to deny your claim when you (or the doctor) submits a bill for more than your plan covers? How is the government going to get hospitals, doctors, & rehab centers across the country to accept THEIR payment structures?
Posted by: Mike_C | June 23, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
“Furthermore, an enormous number in that 47 million are not American citizens. Sixty percent of the uninsured in San Francisco are not citizens.”
80% of the uninsured are citizens.
But you have to love Will using the dog whistle of San Fran to make sure the right wing is frothing.
“Ten million are in households with household incomes of $75,000 a year and could afford it if they wanted to.”
This is based on Census figures from 2005.
And AEI’s analysis (certainly no left bias) of those numbers found that 8.5% of the 46M uninsured made $75K+. That would be a little less than 4 million.
Other right wing blogs have transcribed this as 8.5M, then pushing that to 9M.
I wonder if Will just guesstimated that it went up to 10M.
Posted by: Ryan C | June 23, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
“If the health care system is broke in this country, why are so many foreigners coming for medical care?”
If the health care system is so great why are there so many Americans traveling to foreign countries for medical care?
Medical tourism is a two way street.
Posted by: Ryan C | June 23, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
It isn’t about health care. Obama plans to do with health care what he did with GM, Chrysler and the banks. It’s about Marxist liberal Democrats like Obama and his ilk, taking control of people’s lives to the point that Obama cements himself into permanent power through distraction, obfuscation of the facts, fear of dying, intimidation of political enemies and sheer unbridled demagoguery. C’mon people, pay attention, Obama is being joked about by Hugo Chavez as being more to the left of him.
Posted by: BigSky | June 23, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
MacGhil peels back the cloudy veneer on this in his comment upthread – WHY ARE CONGRESS AND ALL FEDERAL EMPLOYEES EXCEMPT from this?
Answers anyone? Obama? Pelosi? Hmmm?
Posted by: Dee | June 23, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
As the AP reported earlier this week .. “White House officials suggest the president’s rhetoric shouldn’t be taken literally”
Posted by: John Q Public | June 23, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
“I can guarantee you that there’s the possibility for a whole lot of Americans out there that they’re not going to end up having the same health care they have.”
—————————————
LOL….there’s a great possibility that for a whole lot of Americans out there that they wont have the same job or any job next year!
For the vast majority of Americans, when they do switch employers (for whatever reason) their health plans usally change in same way!
Posted by: Mike_C | June 23, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
“You’ll Be Able to Keep Your Health Care Plan, Period.”
In my opinion, it was very disrespectful that he would call someone a “Period.” Very vulgar.
Posted by: borneo | June 23, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Its very simple. If the government can not operate Medicare or Medicaid now because of rising costs how on earth can they possibly operate even a larger system? And why isn’t a reporter asking this question?
Posted by: Sas | June 23, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
People, people if you not like what Obama is proposing just don’t get it. It’s amazing we have become a nation of whiners. For the people that have kids I know you tell your kids STOP being a whiner. Come on people, think about the people that don’t have insurance, I am fortunate to have.
All these numbers you people are running, so what. Not having insurance I am sure if you making $75,000/yr and god forbids you get ill. Umm that means you can’t work which means you won’t have insurance because you have a job. Stop being whiners, we are the United States of America, act like it.
Posted by: T-ROC | June 23, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Obama’s promise re keeping health care means NOTHING, Jake, similar to all of Obama’s promises that do not relate to attacking America on foreign soil.
Posted by: the Truth | June 23, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
“If the health care system is so great why are there so many Americans traveling to foreign countries for medical care?”
Then go to Canada and stand in line.
Posted by: BigSky | June 23, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
“In my opinion, it was very disrespectful that he would call someone a “Period.” Very vulgar.”
No, the word is “arrogant”, “condescending” perhaps. He wants to end the debate now because he thinks he’s solved the health care crisis, when evidence worldwide disputes it. Obama is a punk who hasn’t owned a business or run a corporation and he’s made a living in that politically corrupt cesspool in Chicago.
Posted by: BigSky | June 23, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
The President sure is great at making promises with absolutely no facts to back them up. When is everyone going to realize he keeps telling people what they want to hear, regardless of his intentions of actually following through. He is a master manipulator…just ask yourself if you would buy it if George Bush told you how many jobs he was “saving”. It is an unverifiable statement that allows the administration to continue pushing more spending even though there is little evidence to show any progress! Obama continues to try and use ambiquous language so he can manipulate the statistics to his advantage. The ultimate goal is to eliminate private insurers regardless of his continuous denials!
Posted by: Curt | June 23, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
“He wants to end the debate now because he thinks he’s solved the health care crisis, when evidence worldwide disputes it.”
Worldwide evidence strongly suggests that nationalized healthcare systems are superior to our own and cheaper.
Posted by: Ryan C | June 23, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Ryan_C,
Instead of playing peat & repeat with outdated survey numbers – because thats all either side in this discussion REALLY have.
lets get to the details….the RELA ONES…
At some point this thing is going to have to tell you your going to pay so much for your plan, what ever it might be. Then its going to have to tell you that yourWhat will be the allowed amount for an X-Ray, or a doctors visit, or the setting of a broken arm…etc
If this thing is going to control costs, these numbers MUST by definiton exist! Otherwise, the costs will run out of control.
In the gov’ts plan, WHO is going to set the numbers? WHO is it that is going to deny your claim when you (or the doctor) submits a bill for more than your plan covers?
How is the government going to get hospitals, doctors, & rehab centers across the country to accept THEIR payment structures?
I want that pamphlet from Obamacare or TeddyCare or whatever name you want to asign to it. I want to compare those costs & coverages to what I have now AND I want to know how much more is going to ghet sucked of of my wallet to pay for all of this thing!
Posted by: Mike_C | June 23, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Personally, I think that Obama wants to eventually control everyone’s healthcare so that the govt can then start making coverage decisions for the elderly and disabled who will then not “qualify” for the requested procedure/medicine/care. (I believe this was spelled out in the Stimulus Plan). This will reduce the population in those groups, thus reducing the costs of Medicare and Social Security. It’s the only way to save those programs. People are living way too long for those programs to survive and they cannot possibly eliminate the programs (political suicide). So the only answer is to control people’s longevity.
Good example. My father-in-law received his second bypass surgery at 73, got pneumonia and spent 6 weeks in ICU in a medically induced comma. He eventually recovered and lived another 10 years. Under Obamacare, he would have been denied the surgery and not survived. THAT’s the cost the govt needs to eliminate and they can only do it after they control it all.
So all your lofty reasons why universal health care is being pushed? Total bull. Don’t believe any of it.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | June 23, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
Medicaid is the current government health care plan for those that can’t afford private. Doctors and dentists don’t have to, and most won’t, accept it. It’s ridiculous to say that another government health care plan, “voluntary” or forced on the people, will be accepted by doctors and dentists. They don’t have to now, they won’t have to then. That leaves the people without health care. And this solves what?
Posted by: Eyes Open | June 23, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Oh, Wah! Deal, people! We ALL voted for him, so lets just give him the opportunity to see what he can do. Surely you didn’t think that we could continue in the manner that we were going in for the last 8 years!!!! I work my patooty off for my family and my company decided that for family coverage it was going to go up to 6k a year. Are you kidding???? What is the point of health insurance. Unless I or one of my children get hit by a bus, I’m throwing money into the garbage. I NEED REFORM!
Thank you, Obama for helping people like me. No one has ever helped someone like me.
Posted by: Brandy_L | June 23, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
ryanc generally pulls his facts from the unbiased obama website. of late obamas is as credible as an iranian election.OBAMA PROMMISSED THE SAME HEALTH CARE AS A SENATOR? EVERYONE BUT UNIONS WILL HAVE TO PAY TAX TO SUPPORT THIS GIVE AWAY TO ILLEGALS.SEEMS TO BE A DIFERRENT STORY THEN HE CAMPAIGNED ON.HE BOUGHT AN ELECTION WITH PROMISSES TO THE POOR…a very iranian approach.
Posted by: catman | June 23, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
brandy l …WE ALL DID NOT VOTE FOR HIM. LIKE IRAN, WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO DISAGREE WITH THE CHOICE YOU MADE.46% of the country said NO BAMA.
Posted by: catman | June 23, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
No, technically the government will not force you to switch from your private insurance plan to the public plan. It’s just that the public plan will eradicate all the private insurers, and there will not be any private plans left in existence. And that is the whole point of instituting the public plan in the first place. There are already hundreds of private insurers out there, so adding a public plan does not increase competition and lower costs because there’s already plenty of competition. That’s all a bunch of nonsense that Obama s spouting to try to manipulate people into supporting a public plan. Don’t be dumb enough to fall for Obama’s lies unless you want to be on the two year waiting list when you need medical care under the public system.
Posted by: EyeDoc | June 23, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Brandy L, you’re assuming that the public plan will be cheaper with the same quality of care. Big assumption on your part. You’re also assuming that the govt will be able to run the plan without suuporting it with your taxes which is highly likely. You’ll be paying one way or the other. And then you’ll be complaining again. It’s time to realize the govt can’t save you.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | June 23, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
“Good example. My father-in-law received his second bypass surgery at 73, got pneumonia and spent 6 weeks in ICU in a medically induced comma. He eventually recovered and lived another 10 years. Under Obamacare, he would have been denied the surgery and not survived.”
At first I thought “utter nonsense”.
Then again…..
GLENDALE, Calif. – The family of a 17-year-old girl who died hours after her health insurer reversed a decision and said it would pay for a liver transplant plans to sue the company, their attorney said Friday.
Doctors at UCLA determined she needed a transplant and sent a letter to Cigna Corp.’s Cigna HealthCare on Dec. 11. The Philadelphia-based health insurance company denied payment for the transplant, saying the procedure was experimental and outside the scope of coverage.
Posted by: Ryan C | June 23, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
“Oh, Wah! Deal, people! We ALL voted for him…Thank you, Obama for helping people like me. No one has ever helped someone like me.”
Talk about Waaah! “Poor, pitiful me needs saving! Help me ObiWan…”
No, “we ALL” didn’t vote for him. Deal.
Posted by: Eyes Open | June 23, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
It bugs me…ppl on here oh 46% of America did not vote for Obama. So, what you whiners that’s all ppl do wahhhh wahhhh Obama is going to have a Gov’t healthcare plan.. Wahhh wahhh look at Canada, half of you never been to Canada much less LIVED there. How you know, it’s bad? Because your congressman said so?
STOP comparing it to Canada why not compare it to FRANCE oh bet you didn’t know their #1 in healthcare (oh your congressman didn’t tell you that). The whole Canada comparison is old sound like a broken needle. Move on.
People it’s simple you don’t want Gov’t insurance it’s simple don’t get it or just do with out.
I will go out on a limb here, two kinds of people are against Obama one-racist and two-republicans. The question is which one are you? (be honest, you’re behind a pc no one will know).
If you’re a Democrat and against Obama…you’re confused.
People ask if you don’t like Obama proposal..WHAT IS YOUR ALTERNATIVE? Stop being a critic and whining.
Posted by: T-ROC | June 23, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
David Gratzer is NOT my Congressman and writes for the respected City Journal:
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | June 23, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
t roc…typical democratic response…if you dont agree you must be a racist. i have worked annualy in canada over 15 years on assignments there. most people think the U.S. is much better. alternative plan..stop lawsuits…quit covering or providing health care to illegal aliens..eliminate pre existing conditions…give a tax credit to employers who provide insurance..tax unions the same way private business is taxed..el problemo solved. problem is obama supporters want something for free and it wont be exept for unions as everyone else will be taxed on it.
Posted by: catman | June 23, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
t roc….one last point…make more doctors…US doctors…not foreign transplants. expand our US medical schools.
Posted by: catman | June 23, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Dear President Obama,
I pay too much in car insurance. I am a safe driver so what is the point of having it? I would have to hit a bus to get my money’s worth! I’m throwing money into the garbage, for pete’s sake! Could you take over the auto insurance industry and give me cheaper rates?
Thanks.
Wah!
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | June 23, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
“i have worked annualy in canada over 15 years on assignments there. most people think the U.S. is much better.”
Many Canadians think the health care system in the United States serves only those with money or coverage. Many Canadians think millions of people are not covered under american health care.
Most Canadians certainly do not think the U.S. system is better, nor did they want to invade Iraq. Afghanistan yes, Iraq no.
Posted by: danita | June 23, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
traffic cop timmy…great point and i never thought of that one.do you know how many millions of people in california do not have car insurance?just like medical care….illegal aliens. so next it will be car insurance…then it will be utilites…then it will houses…we all have to be the same you know, regardless of your skills or efforts.
Posted by: catman | June 23, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Jake,
I’m sorry ,he was so mean to you today.
Good question Jake.
Posted by: catleya | June 23, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
T-ROC wrote: “…look at Canada, half of you never been to Canada much less LIVED there. How you know, it’s bad? Because your congressman said so?”
The “father” of Canada’s socialized health care system, Claude Castonguay, stated last year: “We thought we could resolve the system’s problems by rationing services or injecting massive amounts of new money into it…(Now) we are proposing to give a greater role to the private sector so that people can exercise freedom of choice.” So even Claude Castonguay says that their system is not working!
Posted by: James Danley | June 23, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
“keep your plan and keep your doctor”…..just don’t expect the same services, approval for treatment or ability for ‘special’ tests.
Posted by: Jessica | June 23, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
National health care wouldn’t be so bad if it were only to help Americans. Illegal aliens are not Americans and should not be included any insurance program paid for by the public. Seldom do I talk to anyone, liberal, conservative or moderate who doesn’t want to help our citizens, particularly the elderly and the working poor.
Posted by: Betty Williams | June 23, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Great work here Jake. Allow me to paraphrase your question for you, ‘if healthcare passes and my employer cuts my wages, doesn’t that mean you’ve broken you’re promise’.
Just, let me see if a different explanation to Obama’s helps clear it up any: the only component of health care reform not utterly superfluous to employer’s decisions about what plan they will provide their employee is whether or not to tax benefits. Since a public plan was what was the target of that question, it’s entirely a non-sequitur.
Let me explain: Generally speaking, if an employer decides to change plans it will do so either to cut costs or to improve benefits for its employees (ask yourself why employers provide health care in the first place if this statement sounds remotely controversial to you. It’s not.). If they are doing it for the latter reason than clearly employees will be pleased about the move. If they are doing it for the former reason and the value of the plan to the employee doesn’t change, then by definition the employee won’t give a damn. If on the other hand they change it to a plan of lesser value to the employees- a public plan or a private plan, the latter of which happens all the time already- than that is just a wage cut by another name.
This is a free market system. If employees wages are falling, then they are going to fall whether or not a public plan is part of health care reform. This is an uncontroversial undeniable statement.
Next time you decide to ask a health care question, do yourself a favor and vet it first with someone with half a clue about the subject matter.
Posted by: Majorajam | June 23, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
A week ago, I sustained a sports related injury, in California on a Saturday…Went to THREE urgent care facilities in an effort to have an x-ray..all three had armed guards posted at the front desk and all three had standing room only where MAYBE one in five spoke English; as well as, at the minimum at least a 3-5 hour wait..the last facility, with my arm iced up in ace bandage..I turned to my husband and said there is no way in h@// I am going to wait..so I spent the rest of the weekend popping Ibuprofen like candy to wait to see MY doctor on Monday…Do I want an open border Universal Health care system in California..Do I want our kids to experience this problem…ARE YOU CRAZY!!!!!!
Posted by: Parallex View | June 23, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Parallel_Lax view . . .
Sounds like a typical emergency room in many hospitals (with or without the language issues). I am a little surprised at armed guards but perhaps that is becoming the norm too.
Posted by: danita | June 23, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
The White House is NOT Obama’s White House so stop calling it HIS HOUSE – you are trying to make him sound like a GOD which he is not..THE WHITE HOUSE belongs to the people of the United States of America.As far as his health care plan…Wait until people are lined up like rats trying to get into the hospital or schedule surgery…Candians experience this daily thus the reason those who can afford to do so go to OTHER countries to get treatment…Government is better off staying out of Corporate America and out of Health care.
Posted by: Jlee | June 23, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
Is it REALLY as bad in other parts of the country, or is it just the border states. Doesn’t every hospital have armed guards as gate keepers???..I do believe that something has too be done to control health care costs..I think any sane person would agree with that..but if you open up government run HMO’s without limits as to who receives free services at the expense of those who are paying for it..well just look toward California’s budget problems for a look at the rest of the Country’s future…
Posted by: Parallex View | June 23, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
He is simply incapable of being honest and straightforward about the “public option.” He know he must be dishonest about it in order for it to be supported, and so without batting an eye he simply lies.
At least a shamefully supine press corps finally seems to have bestirred itself.
Posted by: Fructuoso Solano-Revuelta | June 23, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
I am a democrat and i did not vote for obama. i am confused. i am particularly confused about this discussion. is the problem that people don’t have insurance? so buy insurance. is the problem that there are not enough doctors? then pass out the visas and get the indian doctors and the philippina nurses in here. i don’t need insurance. i am healthy. if i need a doctor i go to one and i pay him $200. how hard is that?
Posted by: russ | June 23, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
Obama’s promise means absolutely nothing- just like everything else that comes out of his mouth.
Whatever he says, the opposite always comes to pass. He is an inveterate liar.
Posted by: drjohn | June 23, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Barack Obama is utterly incapable of telling the truth.
Whatever he says, the opposite always comes to pass.
Posted by: drjohn | June 23, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
I think the President is telling a bald-faced LIE. He knows that most employer’s will give up offering health care to their people and they will have no other choice but to sign on to Obamacare. This man wants a single payer system at any cost and is willing to LIE to get it. We have seen that much on a video he made in 2004! Liar, Liar, pants on Fire, Mr. Obama. Shame on you!!!!
Posted by: Sunnyr | June 23, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
Barack Obama is utterly incapable of telling the truth.
Whatever he says, the opposite always comes to pass.
Posted by: drjohn
—————————————–
THANK YOU!! I’ve noticed that too. This President is very cunning and can even keep a straight face when he’s lying to the people. Unbelievable.
Posted by: Sunnyr | June 23, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
IT IS EVIDENT THAT MOST SENATORS UNDERSTAND THAT A PASSAGE OF ANY TYPE OF HEALTH CARE BILL AT THIS POINT AND TIME WOULD BE A DEATH KNOLL TO OUR ECONOMY!!! AT LEAST THE DEM SENATORS REALIZE WHAT SIDE THEIR BREAD IS BUTTERED ON!!! GOOD FOR THEM!!
Posted by: Jimbo | June 23, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Obama’s past is preface to the future. His words now are meaningless drivel. In the past Obama wanted redistribution of wealth. In the past Obama stated clearly and definitively that he wanted a single payer health care system. His aides admnit that Obama’s promise to keep a private option is only a charade to keep doctors at the bargaining table. In the past Obama stated that cap and trade would cause electric rates to skyrocket.
That is the real Obama.
What he says now is garbage.
Posted by: drjohn | June 23, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
President Obama ran on a campaign platform of reforming the health care system and providing coverage for the millions without.
He is now doing his level best to deliver on that platform. ‘Liar’ doesn’t seem quite right. Nor does ‘utterly incapable of telling the truth’.
Could it be you have a personal political agenda to smear the President regardless of the truth?
Posted by: danita | June 23, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Yes OH, except for he hasn’t raised any taxes on that group. If he did, let’s see the proof.
Posted by: danita | June 23, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
President Obama said, “Not your income taxes, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.” Yet he signed the new law that raised the cigarette tax $0.61 (to a total of $1.01) per pack on EVERYONE who purchases cigarettes, not just those making over $250,000.
Posted by: James Danley | June 23, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Obama has been entirely consistent. If you don’t believe that, the Prez will surely tell you so–just like with his “consistent” condemnation of Iran, transparency policies, position on detainees and the war on terror, and promises on employment and the stimulus. If Obama says it, it must be so.
Posted by: WinstonSmith | June 23, 2009, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
“Not any of your taxes!” How many of your state legislatures are right now considering raising taxes–even if you make less than $250,000?
Posted by: James Danley | June 23, 2009, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Parallex View – Problem was you were dressed wrong. Next time wear an ICE shirt & hat and watch how fast you become the front of the line.
Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | June 23, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
I thought Jake’s question was perfect and it showed Obama’s method for handling *any* tough questions. He never got any throughout the election and he hates them. When he gets them, he immediately humiliates the questioner getting his press lap dogs in the room to laugh at them. This is his method of shutting down tough questioners. Jake took it like a man, didn’t crack a smile and showed his maturity and Obama’s immaturity. He’s not my president!
Posted by: Joe | June 24, 2009, 12:49 am 12:49 am
Question to Obama for tomorrow night, on Health Care~
Why do you continue to push this “Health Care” charade when there has NEVER been a socialized health care system, within the ENTIRE world, that worked?
Posted by: Kathie | June 24, 2009, 3:13 am 3:13 am
Danita~
Open your eyes!
Posted by: Kathie | June 24, 2009, 3:18 am 3:18 am
Joe~
He’s not ANYBODY’S President, he wasn’t born in the U.S. and therefore, is not President.
Posted by: Kathie | June 24, 2009, 3:22 am 3:22 am
Why would I keep my health insurance if I can get it cheaper through the government?
The entire problem with health care costs smells of a lack of true free enterprise and interference by the government. But, unlike buying a car at your leisure and from any number of dealerships (well, I guess fewer now) you don’t have too many choices when it comes to hospitals and health care systems.
Also, you can shop around, but if your employer is kicking in a percentage for insurance company X they probably won’t do the same for insurance company Y that you found yourself since you’re probably on a group plan. So then company Y would most likely cost you more anyway.
Posted by: Yellow Knife | June 24, 2009, 3:27 am 3:27 am
This President is incapable of being honest. Everything that comes out of his mouth is deceiving. He always sounds fair, but what he actually does and supports is the opposite of what he says. The Hypocrite in Cheif.
Also, This Cap and Trade(TAX) is a huge scam and is being voted on this Friday! New taxes will be priced into Everything we buy and our Electric bill. Call/email your Senetors and Congress representative and tell them to “Vote NO” on Cap and Trade
Posted by: Theresa | June 24, 2009, 8:08 am 8:08 am
The President and Congress are disingenuous in that no health care plan yet proposed addresses tort reform. Why does health care cost so much? Because attorneys are standing by ready to litigate at the drop of a hat for a doctor or nurse’s failure to achieve perfection. If tort reform is NOT a part of a health care reform package then it can’t work.
Posted by: MikeM | June 24, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Note to ABC News: read these comments. Pay attention to the opinions of your readers. Watch what happens to your ratings when you explore the depths of media bias.
Will there be a single person on the Obamacare special asking questions like, “How do you expect to reduce healthcare costs, when Medicare spending has increased ~30% faster than private spending on a per-person basis?” and “Where in the Constitution do you find a delegation of power to the federal government to institute a health insurance program?”
Posted by: Adam | June 24, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
The only way to win the war between Free Men and this Fascist Government is to give the Democrats *everything* they want. When they turn America into a third world nation they will have destroyed only themselves. We will still be here. It’s just the natural cycle of Birth, Life, Decline and Death. All hail 0bama, bringer of Death.
ROFLMAO@serfs…
Posted by: Watcher | June 24, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
The only way to win the war between Free Men and this Fascist Government is to give the Democrats *everything* they want. When they turn America into a third world nation they will have destroyed only themselves. We will still be here. It’s just the natural cycle of Birth, Life, Decline and Death. All hail 0bama, bringer of Death.
ROFLMAO@serfs…
Posted by: VerboteneGedanken | June 24, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Baah Baah. Get used to that sound because that’s what you’ll hear when all of you sheep are lined up for healthcare under this plan. When did Americans start loving security over liberty?
Posted by: Air Mike | June 24, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
We’ve heard about the 47 million people without health insurance. This is the impetus for taking over the health industry. What they don’t tell you is that about 43% of those people can afford insurance but they choose not to buy it. Many of the others are temporarily uninsured. Those who can’t afford insurance or health care have medicare or medicaid and rest are illegals who are never denied critical care.
Why in the world would we change the entire system to cover ALL of us when only a relative few (10%) need help?
Why would we change to a more costly, inferior care system without at least trying market reforms that would cost nothing?
If most of us weren’t forced into employer paid health insurance, if we could buy insurance across state lines, if we could pay only for the insurances services we need, we wouldn’t be talking about a health cost crisis.
For example, why should men have to pay for pregnancy benefits? Why shouldn’t we be allowed to shop around for the best deal in insurance?
If health care costs were more reasonable, we might only have to purchase insurance for catastrophic illness or accidents. In fact, many doctors are quitting the whole insurance merry-go-round and giving deals to patients who pay cash.
The middle man always costs more. If we can get away from using insurance to pay for routine care, we’ll save a lot of money.
Here’s the crux of the issue: There is no incentive for the government to truly reduce costs. Unlike businesses,
all they have to do is loot more taxes from us and force it upon us. Businesses must, in order to survive, compete by providing the best services for the least costs. The government has no competition and doesn’t have to provide quality service at the best cost.
Why would we entrust our health care to an entity that maintains operations that lose money hand over fist – The Postal Service, Amtrak, etc.
Why would we want to give MORE money to a government that wastes untold billions – some of which goes to studies about why men don’t like to wear condoms. Or how much methane is in cow farts. Or some building with politicians name on it. On and on.
Why would we trust a President who bought a car company with our money just to pay back the Unions who helped him get elected?
Why would we add government health “care” when we can’t even pay for the services we currently have like Social Security and Medicare that are unfunded by trillions?
It makes NO sense to me.
Posted by: GonnaGulch | June 24, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Wow! We learned today (Wednesday) that President Obama may have opened the door to taxing employee benefits. I have yet to hear whether there is a $250,000 threshold for taxing benefits. Could it be that President Obama is going to once again break his promise: “Not your income taxes, not your payroll taxes, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes,” on those making under $250,000?
Posted by: James Danley | June 24, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Logic clearly dictates that tne needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. This president is a pathological liar and a elitist. He tries to pander for personal popularity. The next thing you know he will be shaving his head if things don’t go his way.
Posted by: MrAllen | June 25, 2009, 8:34 am 8:34 am
Danita,
Are you an illegal looking for a free ride? You seem to be the only taken by his lies.. Do a little research, he has done the opposite of each campaign promise! How many lobbyist on his team??? He has created CZARs that only answer to him.. No checks and balances, the largest spending in our history, NO country has ever spent it sell in to prosperity. He promised unemployment of 8% for his stimulus.. we are at 10%.. Just wait until hyper inflation kicks in and a gallon of milk is 10 bucks.. His new bill for energy will tax everybody not just the rich.. and now the idiot wants to add a VAT tax of 20% (ever been to Europe?) I have been to over 100 countries and it doesn’t work! It may have been Bush’s recession but it will BE Obama’s depression.. Get a life and open your eyes because you will not like the new direction
Posted by: Cessnaxdriver | June 26, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Sounds to me like you people have not had any major illnesses. There are people who cannot afford insurance because the rates are so high due to a pre-existing condition. So they file for divorc to be able to get Medicaid that your tax dollars are paying for already.
Posted by: Rhonda | June 26, 2009, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
Obama has been entirely consistent you can’t ignore it.
Posted by: rotem | July 12, 2009, 4:12 am 4:12 am
I believe that Obama can do some changes.
Posted by: Oren | July 12, 2009, 4:13 am 4:13 am
loved Watcher’s comments above that said: note to ABC News, read these comments! It is very obvious from reading all the comments here that the American people are not dumb, quite the antithesis! i would not be surprised if ABC is not storing all of our email addresses for the new bho admin, as we will very soon all be targets of the government at the new “terrorists” of the country. Good job everyone…very articulate and very well expressed. now lets keep up the fight! We want our freedoms back!
Posted by: chatham | July 20, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Wow…most of these comments are terrifying. Not terrifying in a “good way” but terrifying in a “I can’t believe I live in the same country as these paranoid schizophrenic people way”. I put up with George Bush for 8 long years…quit whining because you have to put up with Obama. That is how a democracy works…sometimes your guy loses.
Posted by: Yikes | September 3, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Do you have more and brighter ideas or solutions, approach or whatever you may call it than President Obama’s stratagem? If you have, call the press and speak up!
Posted by: discount auto parts | September 4, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
For those of you out there who have health care already or are providing it to your employees of course you see no problem with our health care as it is today! But what about those who have no health care. It’s not about you and you alone! it’s about those who are dying on the streets who can’t even walk into a hospital and get the appropriate care because of people in this countrys greed. You can go to any other country and receive the proper care immediatley without having to do as much as give your name and in order for us to that if I have to pay a few more dollars in taxes I would rather it go to helping another than into the pockets of the greedy. I work in the health care industry. I do all the billing to the insurance companies and they spend more time trying to get out of paying then anything else! They are not worried about patients receiving care and getting better. It’s all about $$$. Our health care system is not working for all of us only those who can afford it! That’s rediculous, we were once the country that everyone envyed now we are the most feared and greedy country! That is not because of President Obama it’s because we aloud a crook to run this country for 8 years!!!! Health care reform is not going to hurt us, it is going to help us. It’s going to show that there are still people out there that care about others. It will be the begining of refacing our defaced country! We should stand by each other not step over the dying man on the street!
Posted by: Wendy | November 11, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Looks like we are one step closer to the destrucion of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The Obama care plan is not the answer to curing high health care costs, seems to me things would be better served by fixing the health care industry’s policy of billing multiple insurance providers an inflated billing amount for the same procedure on one individual and then sending out a bill to the individual as well!
This blame does not soley lie on President Obama, after all he is mearly a figure head, we seriously need to look at who we elect for every office in government!!! both state and federal.
maybe then the Democrats would not have majority control, and therfore would not be able to push their own personal agendas, screwing us the American people.
Posted by: Trent | December 24, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am