White House Plays Hardball; Says Fired IG Walpin Was “Confused, Disoriented” Engaged in “Inappropriate Conduct”
In a letter to Sens. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., and Susan Collins, R-Maine, the Chairman and Ranking Republicans on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, Norm Eisen, the Special Counsel to the President, outlined a number of reasons why President Obama fired Inspector General Gerald Walpin.
"Mr. Walpin was removed after a review was unanimously requested by the bi-partisan Board of the Corporation," Eisen writes in the letter, a copy of which was sent to Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., a key Obama ally who today expressed concern that President Obama did not abide by a law she wrote — and he supported as a senator — requiring 30 day notice to Congress before an Inspector General could be terminated.
In the letter, Eisen paints a less-than-flattering picture of Walpin, whose controversial tenure as Inspector General of the Corporation for National and Community Service ended last week with President Obama taking the extraordinary measure of firing him.
Eisen charged that at a May 20, 2009 board meeting Walpin "was confused, disoriented, unable to answer questions and exhibited other behavior that led the Board to question his capacity to serve."
Eisen writes that the President decided to take the step after learning that the Acting US Attorney for the Eastern District of California, Lawrence Brown, "a career prosecutor who was appointed to his post during the Bush Administrator, had filed a complaint about Mr. Walpin's conduct with the oversight body for Inspectors General, including for failing to disclose exculpatory evidence."
The Obama administration "further learned that Mr. Walpin had been absent from the Corporation's headquarters, insisting upon working from his home in New York over the objections of the Corporation's Board; that he had exhibited a lack of candor in providing material information to decision makers; and that he had engaged in other troubling and inappropriate conduct. Mr. Walpin had become unduly disruptive to agency operations, impairing his effectiveness and, for the reasons stated above, losing the confidence of the Board."
Eisen said he looks forward to "discussing the statutory requirements more fully" with the senators.
- jpt
Email
Santorum Wins Three States: What Does It Mean?
Rick Santorum Wins Minn., Mo. and Colo. Primaries
That’s not hardball.
Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | June 16, 2009, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
In other words, don’t question Obama’s pals or you’ll not only be illegally fired, but personally destroyed.
Hope. Change.
Posted by: Exurban Jon | June 16, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Firing incompetence instead of hiring it.
Change I believe in.
Posted by: RyanW | June 16, 2009, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
It’s more like T-ball…you put the subject on there and try to hold the bat steady, and the stand just kind of wabbles, wabble, wabble.
Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | June 16, 2009, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Norm Eisen, up to bat…
Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | June 16, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
Odd… no mention of $800K. Bet it never gets paid back.
Posted by: Ralph Thayer | June 16, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
I’d hardly call it hardball when they had to be forced into throwing a pitch.
There are several solid accusations there. If this guy is being railroaded, it should be easy enough for him to refute the factual complaints.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 16, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
Terry:”Before firing anyone, shouldn’t Mr. Obama present his bona fides e.g. his actual “long form” blrth certlflcate on file in Hawaii? ”
And why, exactly, does he need to present more bona fides than any other presidential candidate in the history of our nation? Never before has a certified birth certificate and even the personal vouching of the registrar of vital statistics and the state health director been considered inadequate. His birth was even announced in the paper, with copies available on microfiche (yes, Clinton’s campaign looked it up).
Have you ever seen your ‘long form’ birth certificate? I suppose you haven’t even seen your ‘green format’ record, or ‘medium width’ official citizenship approval. You should look into that.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 16, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Terry:”Does Mr. Obama qualify? How so?”
HAS ANY OTHER PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF OUR NATION PRESENTED MORE EVIDENCE OF NATIVE BIRTH THAN OBAMA?
No.
Doesn’t that make you seem a bit like a crack pot?
Posted by: jhw539 | June 16, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Exurban Jon:”you’ll not only be illegally fired,”
So is this the lie that the Right is trying to get people to believe by repeating it over and over? Is the Right so utterly incompetent that they can’t file a legal complaint? No, they are just counting on their base not caring about reality and preferring to just mindless parrot their lie.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 16, 2009, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Terry, unlike you Israelis, and apart from a lot of this sophomoric government-knows-best bull, and putting aside the shady politics, and looking past terminations without reasons, and besides all the connections to the Chicago political machine, and not taking into account the lost promises, a lot of us are proud of Obama making it to the white house with a difficult background. I am, anyway.
Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | June 16, 2009, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
First, the guy under investigation gave a lot of money to Obama’s election and is a personal friend. Second, the guy stole $800,000 and was supposed was under suspension to ever receive grant money. He ADMITTED he took the money. He is off suspension and will only pay back $400,000 and can take as long as he wants. Third, who cares if the group UNDER INVESTIGATE does not like the guy investigating them. Clinton did not like Ken Star but he could not just fire him. Fourth, Obama is supposed to be transparent and godly, not underhanded and sneaky. Really this is like that Rich pardon all over again. I would have thought he would have gone through extra steps as he had a personal relationship with the the person under investigation, especially as this is one of the like 5 laws that he actually had anything to do with in his very short stint as a Senator. I think a little more proof is needed that he is unstable – Joe Biden often appears disoriented and unaware and he still has his job.
Posted by: Hello?Media | June 16, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
watch out before celebrating Obama’s purge of those civil servants who dare question his modus operandi. “The Night of the Long Knives” will be soon be coming for you early supporters of Obama. Of course, not literally (hopefully) but a political purge of any true believers who help propel Barak to his erstwhile Presidency. Almost all who seize power eventually purge the ranks to consolidate power. They are afraid of competitors, those who know secrets/methods of their past, and, most importantly, want to remain in power by whatever means. Bewarned those who thought that “The One” would stop the wars, surveillence, spending, corruption, recessions, etc. It is all about the power and personal status (European spending sprees etc) not about any progressive, or other, values.
Posted by: Ed | June 16, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
Oh scandal! Oh controversy! Oh horror!
What a terrible person President Obama must be!
Oh scandal! Oh horror! Oh controversy!
Scandal after scandal. Horror after horror. Controversy after controversy!
Gosh I’m glad I don’t live in a right winger’s mind.
Posted by: danita | June 16, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
Actually, jhw539, I’m thinking of joining this birth certificate question. What do you have against it?
Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | June 16, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
And this too will be swept under the rug…
Walpin doesn’t stand a chance, just watch how many more “witnessess” come out from under a rock to validate these charges.
Get used to it folks… corruption and lies are still thriving in government.
This issue will never be honestly looked into and no area of the MSM will follow thru with hardcore reporting.
Just keep swallowing the lies that are constantly being rammed down your throat by the MSM and goverment and just remember to take an antacid.
Posted by: lm | June 16, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
Terry:”For other US Presidents, Both Bush’s, Clinton, Carter, Johnson, Nixon, Truman, Roosevelt, etc. no issue. ”
No issue? Why is that? They did not present their ‘long form’ birth certificate or interviews with the dr who delivered them.
“which is a very recent computer generated document and not even valid in Hawaii for identification purposes.”
Of course it isn’t – no photo. Try getting on a plane with your ‘long form’ and see how far you get. The birth certificate he released is the standard one available from the state of Hawaii and is completely valid for proving US citizenship and attaining a passport. Why is that?
“Shouldn’t the people of this country have the right to view the most basic of documents concerning the President — his birth certificate?”
No. They have the right to view proof of his citizenship, and Obama has met that bar to the same degree as every president ever before him.
Again, why are you hold Obama to a uniquely high bar? NO OTHER PRESIDENT HAS BEEN REQUIRED TO RELEASE THEIR SO CALLED ‘LONG FORM’ BIRTH CERTIFICATE.
This has been through the courts and tossed out, including by the Supreme Court – the one with the same makeup that smacked down Gore in 2000. What a waste of time.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 16, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Help me resolve this issue… My son has a “Certification of Live Birth” like Mr. Obama. My son was born in in a European country. I was a U.S. Serviceman serving abroad at the time. My wife had a “Green Card” but was not yet a U.S. Citizen (she is now). Is my son eligible to run for President of the United States? Mr. Obama was born somewhere, of a Kenyan father and an underage (at the time) American girl. He has a “Certification of Live Birth”. Is he eligible to serve as President of the United States?
Posted by: Terry | June 16, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
I just saw him interviewed the other night and he looked and sounded perfectly coherent.
This “let’s destroy the good names of those out to get me” needs to stop. It’s childish.
Please don’t back down Senator McCaskill and Senator Grassley.
Or Mr. Tapper.
Posted by: teena | June 17, 2009, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Again, why are you hold Obama to a uniquely high bar? NO OTHER PRESIDENT HAS BEEN REQUIRED TO RELEASE THEIR SO CALLED ‘LONG FORM’ BIRTH CERTIFICATE.
——————-
Well, his father and family are from Kenya, right?..which is a first. And, though I really don’t want to get into this execept to say that those who demand more proof have good reason to, wasn’t his mother single in Hawaii when he was very young? So there really is good reason to ask, and I would think that Obama would be willing to comply simply to settle any doubts.
Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | June 17, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am
Terry:”My son has a “Certification of Live Birth” like Mr. Obama. My son was born in in a European country. ”
Obama’s birth certificate clearly state the location of birth as Honolulu. Where does your son’s certificate state he was born?
Also bear in mind numerous state officials from Hawaii have vouched for the accuracy of the official document, so now you’re talking a major conspiracy that has held for decades supporting a forged document (false place of birth). One spanning Obama’s entire life, since his birth announcement was in the Honolulu Advertiser on Sunday, Aug. 13, 1961. Now that’s planning ahead!
And again WHY MUST OBAMA PROVIDE MORE PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP THAN ANY OTHER PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF OUR NATION?
Posted by: jhw539 | June 17, 2009, 12:07 am 12:07 am
Terry:”For those that demanded, even howled for every disclosure from Mr. Bush, military records, college transcripts, medical records… they are surprisingly silent on a request for even the most basic document from Mr. Obama”
And you’re right on to making up some mythical hypocritical strawman. Who are these people? Can you provide a single verifiable name? I certainly did not care much for Bush’s transcripts, and I seem to recall that the Republicans Swiftboat arm was the one acutely interested in dredging up every possible record for disclosure. I suppose you’re upset about the push to publish drunk driving convictions and such.
Whatever, I’m off to bed.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 17, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am
“Mr. Walpin was removed after a review was UNANIMOUSLY requested by the BI-PARTISAN Board of the Corporation.”
————————————–
Gee, a unamimous request from a bi-partisan board – that is terribly suspicious!
Off with the President’s head! Send him back to Kenya!
How did the right wing become such fools? No wonder the majority of Americans have abandoned the crackpots.
Posted by: danita | June 17, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am
But that’s probably what you’re after, no?
Posted by: MarkLeavenworth | June 17, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am
If all this were true, why break the law to fire the guy? Why tell him he had 1 hour to resign? Also no comments from the “bipartisan” board. All this is supposedly based off of one meeting as well. Sorry its BS and Obama is trying to desperately cover his tracks.
Posted by: Zaggs | June 17, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am
The problem I have with this guy’s termination is that he was investigating a friend and political contributor to the president. Under the rules, an I.G. has to be specifically told why he/she is being fired and they have a 30 day review before Congress. The reasons given were very vague and makes this look very suspicious, especially since he was investigating a friend of the President.
Posted by: DL13 | June 17, 2009, 12:39 am 12:39 am
“was confused, disoriented, unable to answer questions …” Sounds like Mr. Obama when the occasional reporter dares to ask a followup…
Posted by: Terry | June 17, 2009, 12:41 am 12:41 am
Yes, Terry but the Supreme Court had a chance to stop this. And the Supreme Court of the United States let a foreigner become President! How sinister of them! They are corrupted! They want the country in the hands of foreigners!
Posted by: danita | June 17, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am
Hi DL13
I have to agree with you. Even assuming the guy was not a good IG, they should have waited a decent period before firing him. To do so just after a successful investigation of fraud sends the wrong message to other IGs.
Posted by: Terry | June 17, 2009, 12:46 am 12:46 am
Wait a sec, the Bush administration already sold the country down the pipes to China in order to finance their holy war against Iraq.
We’re already in the hands of foreigners. I guess Obama might not be that bad. At least he doesn’t OWN the country.
Posted by: danita | June 17, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am
Hi Denita,
Actually the Supreme Court never ruled on the merits of the case… check it out…
Posted by: Terry | June 17, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am
I saw Mr Walpin on Beck’s show, and he seemed to have all of his faculty’s about him. He clearly laid out the time-line and strategery to oust him without notice. I am crying his dismissal is a shiat sandwich, double-stuffed in a shiat sandwich. I am insulted that Obama’s team can attempt to insult my intelligence in this way.
Posted by: sybilll | June 17, 2009, 12:49 am 12:49 am
Hi sybilll
This thing has a script – just remember the travel office affair under Mr. Clinton. First the firing, then the smear, then the lawsuit, then the settlement. We are still in the regime of the smear.
Posted by: Terry | June 17, 2009, 12:52 am 12:52 am
Yes Terry, that sinister Supreme Court of the United States refused to even CONSIDER the case. They wanted a foreigner to become President and so refused to hear the case!
The Supreme Court of the United States enabled a foreigner to become President!
The country is in great peril! Run for your lives!
Posted by: danita | June 17, 2009, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Hi danita
Yes they refused to consider it because it is more properly and issue for the Congress and the Free Press. You are apparently not concerned. When the rule of law is cast aside, who will protect you?
Posted by: Terry | June 17, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am
Yes Terry, surely the Supreme Court of the United States would feel no need to protect the country from a FOREIGNER becoming President!
They would sooner wipe their hands like Pilate did with Christ!
Run for your life Terry! The sky is falling! The sky is falling!
Posted by: danita | June 17, 2009, 12:59 am 12:59 am
Hi Terry,
Honest question. If Obama now owns the MSM, with typical *grandma’s* never seeing the truth, are we truly sunk, as I fear? And, I have never been a fear-monger, and I lived through Carter and Clinton. Frankly, at this point, I would take Clinton.
Posted by: sybilll | June 17, 2009, 1:01 am 1:01 am
Hi danita,
You apparently have a lot of faith in the Supreme Court…
Posted by: Terry | June 17, 2009, 1:01 am 1:01 am
Hi sybilll
I never thought I would see that day… but I agree with you on Clinton… I would even overlook the interns….
Posted by: Terry | June 17, 2009, 1:03 am 1:03 am
Run for your life Terry! The sky is falling! The sky is falling!
President Obama is an evil foreigner out to sell the U.S.A. to China in debt bonds!
Wait a sec, Bush already did that to finance his holy war against Iraq.
You are now owned by China Terry! Run for your life!
Posted by: danita | June 17, 2009, 1:06 am 1:06 am
Hi danita
I don’t know where you are coming from. I have no fear of foreigners, I even married one and I have lived more than 20 years abroad working a living with foreigners.
Please try to understand that it is about the rule of law, in this case the supreme law of the land, the US Constitution. Are we to so casually dismiss one of its provisions because to do so helps a guy we like?
Mr. Obama has never been completely “vetted” by the press as was every predecessor both Democrat and Republican. This occurred becuase of the presses hope for him to be elected, and because of a fear of being called “racist’. Even now if ask any fundamental questions about this guy, you are dismissed as a crackpot.
Ask yourself why he won’t even release the most basic document – his birth certificate. Ask your self why he sends lawyers into court to keep this document under wraps. Ask yourself why his records at Occidental College are under wraps. Why his records at Harvard are under wraps. How he got to Editor of the Harvard law review, yet had no article published in it.
What is your conclusion? What is there to hide? Oh, I get it, you don’t care, you just love him…
Posted by: Terry | June 17, 2009, 1:15 am 1:15 am
Anyone who starts up with the birther nonsense has no credibility whatsoever. Remember, von Brunn is a birther. Nuff said.
Posted by: Texas Mom | June 17, 2009, 1:26 am 1:26 am
“Mr. Obama has never been completely “vetted” by the press as was every predecessor both Democrat and Republican. This occurred becuase of the presses hope for him to be elected, and because of a fear of being called “racist’.”
================================
Terry, you have no idea what kind of research ‘the press’ has put into President Obama and your statement is thus meaningless.
Your presumptions you state about the motivations of the press clearly say a lot more about you, than about the press.
You agenda is showing Terry.
The sky is falling Terry! The press is controlled by foreigners! The Supreme Court of the United States has allowed a foreigner to become President by refusing the hear the case! The press are all reverse racists! White people are losing out AGAIN!
The country is doomed Terry and only a person like you can save it!
Oh the corruption! Oh the scandal! Oh the drama!
That darn foreigner spoiling everything!
Too bad Bush already sold the country down the pipes to China in debt bonds Terry! You’ve been bought and sold already!
Posted by: danita | June 17, 2009, 1:32 am 1:32 am
Oh, come on!! Did Kevin Whathisname pilfer and mismanage the $850,000. dollars of taxpayer money OR NOT???? Is he or is he not a friend and supporter of Barack Hussein Obama? Did he or did he not agree to pay back half of the pilfered money? This lousy excuse for Mr. Walpin’s firing is pure BS! I have seen him on TV within the last 2 days and he was definitely NOT disoriented or confused about anything. This smells like Chicago Style Corruption and should be investigated by an Independent Prosecutor! Guess it will have to wait til we take back the House next year because the bozo’s in Congress are not about to allow an Investigation of any kind!
Posted by: Sunnyr | June 17, 2009, 1:35 am 1:35 am
Hi Danita,
Why so defensive? Why not even consider any of the serious issues I posed?
Posted by: Terry | June 17, 2009, 1:39 am 1:39 am
“Guess it will have to wait til WE take back the House next year”
——————————
til WE take the House?
hahaha . . . WE already have the House!
That President Obama he just don’t do nothing right! He just plain a wrong, corrupted man, I tells ya.
Only WE the Republicans are clean and not corrupted. President Obama he bad.
Posted by: danita | June 17, 2009, 1:42 am 1:42 am
Your shtick smells Terry, and I’ve pointed out why. Live, learn and grow.
Posted by: danita | June 17, 2009, 1:43 am 1:43 am
So this is “Change You Can Believe In” Investigate a crony of the president’s and get fired on one hour’s notice in blatant disregard for the law. Chicago Politics rules.
Posted by: rog | June 17, 2009, 2:03 am 2:03 am
Rog . ..
Sounds like you’ve totally prejudged the situation before all the information is in . .. a prejudiced approach is what one expects from those with a political agenda to flout.
Waiting until all the information is in and the situation is clearly stated and proved is what a decent, rational citizen might do.
Posted by: danita | June 17, 2009, 2:08 am 2:08 am
Obama is “Confused, Disoriented” Engaged in “Inappropriate Conduct”…
Posted by: BK | June 17, 2009, 2:59 am 2:59 am
Terry, having ‘lived overseas for twenty years’ I’d think you’d have finally realized that when you left the US you became the foreigner. With that attitude it’s a shame to think that you may actually be overseas representing us to other people.
Posted by: shame | June 17, 2009, 4:15 am 4:15 am
Regardless of level of confusion or disorientation Walpin is alleged to have exhibited, the the Inspector General Reform Act of 2008, co-sponsored by Obama gave rights to the inspectors general for this reason. Chicago politics was fine while it was possible to leave the city or state; a novelty if you could escape it. Chicago politics applied at the federal level is tyranny.
Posted by: ascpgh | June 17, 2009, 7:13 am 7:13 am
Another one of those “What if Bush did this?” moments…
It is just pathetic.
Posted by: drjohn | June 17, 2009, 7:20 am 7:20 am
“Pick the Target, Freeze It, Personalize It and Polarize It.” – Saul Alinsky
President Obama has learned his lessons well.
Posted by: Chuck | June 17, 2009, 7:31 am 7:31 am
Maybe Obama should stop and smell the roses in the Rose garden before they start to wilt. He’s the one who is dazed and confuzed. How did we get talked into electing this talking head anyways?
Posted by: Twig | June 17, 2009, 7:34 am 7:34 am
Oh… I get it… The ‘excuse’ is old age… and still it must have been National Security to not inform the legislative branch within 30 days?
I don’t know how you can be a Senator and enjoy what the executive branch is dishing out! I think some Democratics need to develop a backbone… and stand against “the change” because Americans aren’t likin’ it.
Posted by: Ben | June 17, 2009, 7:35 am 7:35 am
More oppressive progressive communist character assassination.
Posted by: JRD | June 17, 2009, 7:50 am 7:50 am
The interviews and the letters that Walpin has written do not seem to be confused, disoriented, or inappropriate. He was also doing his job effectively in finding fraud within the Americorps program. He was fired right after his investigation that got Obama’s buddy Johnson into trouble and was getting into huge amounts of fraud in the Americorps program at CUNY. The president has expanded Americorps 3x in size and the first lady has sent her former chief of staff to head the program and I am guessing that the replacement for Walpin will be a good friend of the Obama’s. All this paints a very bad picture of fraud and cronyism. I am betting that in 2010 when the democrats lose their majorities in the house and/or senate that we will see some real investigations started into this affair.
Posted by: Jason | June 17, 2009, 8:40 am 8:40 am
He must be sent to a re-education camp.
Posted by: pauldia | June 17, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am
If what is said by Eisen is true then there are causes for the firing….BUT
If the reasons are true then they should have been spelled out in the letter to the Senators AND should have been spelled out to Walpin. Further, you would expect a written record detailing when superiors discussed the behavior with Walpin, if opportunities for corrective action were made before the firing, etc. etc.
Posted by: jb | June 17, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am
A unanimous request for the Board of the Corporation, a board made of both Republicans and Dems was submitted to Obama to have Walpin removed. Basically Walpin’s bosses. And he was working from home despite objections to this from the board. Umm yeah if I worked from home I would be getting fired as well. The comments here are ridiculous considering Obama basically followed advice he was given by the people who were in charge of this organization. Even Fox news has a story today basically saying the same things.
Posted by: Ordermonger | June 17, 2009, 9:19 am 9:19 am
jb:”If the reasons are true then they should have been spelled out in the letter to the Senators AND should have been spelled out to Walpin. Further, you would expect a written record detailing when superiors discussed the behavior with Walpin, if opportunities for corrective action were made before the firing, etc. etc.”
The most polite thing to do was to not drag these things out for public discussion – heck, usually these are done as retirements to ‘spend time with my family.’ And are you suggesting there isn’t a written record? Seriously? There have been reports of at least two formal complaints – do you think those were done as smoke signals?
I guess you must be a big supporter of unions since you seem to believe that no one should be fired without triple review, cause in duplicate, and at least one second degree felony. And then he needs thirty days notice.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 17, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am
A unanimous request for the Board of the Corporation, a board made of both Republicans and Dems was submitted to Obama to have Walpin removed.
______________________________________
Walpin was the IG tasked with investigating the Corporation. So they can ask the watchdog to be fired? I would like to see where in the IG Reform Act that’s allowed.
Posted by: Ms Trish | June 17, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am
More lies and change from the changeling Obama
Posted by: Andy | June 17, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am
“Mr. Walpin was removed after a review was unanimously requested by the bi-partisan Board of the Corporation,” Eisen writes in the letter..”
Removed after a review was requested? Then there must be some original review paperwork somewhere? It says unanimously a bi-partisan decision of the board, so who are the Republicans (Besides Goldsmith) on the board and did they give a statement? Goldsmith serves on the Fannie Mae foundation, wonder if he has some luggage being held over his head…
“Lawrence Brown … had filed a complaint about Mr. Walpin’s conduct with the oversight body for Inspectors General, including for failing to disclose exculpatory evidence.”
Looked this up. This complaint was filed over the Kevin Johnson case!!!!
“Mr. Walpin referred the case to the U.S. attorney’s office so it could consider prosecuting Mr. Johnson and a colleague for misusing federal funds. The office reached a settlement with the academy that required the group repay some of the money it had received — an agreement that Mr. Walpin criticized in a report that he issued in May. — (note: This agreement was reached with THE Inspector General so the White House Staff, leaving Mr. Walpin out of the loop)
The acting U.S. attorney, Lawrence Brown, filed a complaint against Mr. Walpin with the integrity committee of the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, a federal body. The complaint was not immediately available, but Mr. Walpin’s defense refers to charges that he overstepped his authority as an auditor and improperly communicated to the press. Mr. Walpin denies both charges.”
Improperly communicated to the press?? Where was he supposed to go with this when your boss is undermining you?
This whole thing stinks.
Posted by: KR | June 17, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am
This seems, at the very least, particularly nasty and cruel. Why did this letter have to be made public? Are the accusations even true? Seems like Mr. Walpin may have a case.
Posted by: jennifert7 | June 17, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am
===And then he needs thirty days notice.
Posted by: jhw539 | Jun 17, 2009 9:35:48 AM===
I’m surprised. I never expected you to criticize something Obama signed off on.
Posted by: Axey | June 17, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am
===How did we get talked into electing this talking head anyways?
Posted by: Twig | Jun 17, 2009 7:34:38 AM===
Don’t blame me. I voted for McCain.
Posted by: Axey | June 17, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am
=== He was also doing his job effectively in finding fraud within the Americorps program.===
Well something was wrong since a settlement was reached. Wherein the accused forked over money.
Posted by: Axey | June 17, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am
“We issued two reports that the management of the Corporation and the board of directors didn’t like, because they criticized what the board was doing,” Walpin recalls. There is no question that Walpin discovered misuse of federal money in Kevin Johnson’s program, known as St. HOPE, and at City University of New York. But as a result of those investigations, relations between Walpin and top executives became frosty, and he says they cut him out of Corporation business that should normally include the inspector general.
About the deal….
Walpin was very unhappy. First of all, he said it was a terrible deal for the U.S. government, because St. HOPE was essentially insolvent and would never pay the money back. Second, he felt lifting Johnson’s suspension would dilute the effectiveness of future investigations; why should grant recipients worry about their misconduct if any sanctions can be so easily lifted? In the end, Johnson was not suspended, not debarred, and was probably not going to pay the vast majority of the money back.
“Walpin told the Corporation’s board of directors of his opinion. He told other officials. And he sent a report to Congress. “I was bringing Congress in to try to get its assistance in putting a spotlight on this,” he says.
Walpin’s actions undoubtedly angered top officials at the Corporation, and most likely at the White House as well. It would not be long before he was summarily dismissed. But he has no regrets. Whatever happens, he wrote recently, he is proud that he “refused to go along with the U.S. attorney’s office and the Corporation in bowing to the media and political pressure that resulted in this hasty settlement, contrary to the interests of the United States government.” “
Posted by: KR | June 17, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Why isn’t this being covered in the main news?!!
This is so ridiculous that Obama can fire an Inspector General (the position was created in response to Nixon’s Executive Branch fraud), without any actual evidence of wrongdoing, or doing a bad job. In fact, based on the Walpin’s reports and the fact that he was uncovering at least over a million dollars in fraud, I would say he is doing an excellent job.
Posted by: GuyP | June 17, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Actually, thinking about it for a second, Johnson should use Obama’s excuse and have the settlement voided since “he [Walpin] had engaged in other troubling and inappropriate conduct”.
Posted by: Axey | June 17, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Axey “===I guess you must be a big supporter of unions since you seem to believe that no one should be fired without triple review, cause in duplicate, and at least one second degree felony. And then he needs thirty days notice.
Posted by: jhw539 | Jun 17, 2009 9:35:48 AM===
I’m surprised. I never expected you to criticize something Obama signed off on.”
First off, I will have to remember that you don’t seem to comprehend sarcasm. And second off, in just the last week I have voiced support for two lawsuits against the Obama administration (FISA related and states secrets related – give to the EFF and ACLU to take a stand on these efforts to limit government power!).
The myth of an Obama ‘cult of personality’ is just that, a myth. He regularly takes flak from the left – heck, he can’t even get the same level of blind unquestioning support from his fellow party members in Congress. If you want to find a cult of personality, look at the Republican Congress’s voting record (and record number of filibusters at the end) during the 8 years of the Republican administration. And check out how the voters rewarded that blind devotion.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 17, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am
I think the only fair resolution to this problem would be a “Transparent” Q&A featuring Mr. Walpin and President Obama on live national television. Wait a minute, why not conduct this during the fair and balanced ABC World News broadcast next Wednesday from the White House Blue Room!!
To ensure a level playing field, you could allow President Obama to utilize his teleprompters. We would not want him to appear confused or disoriented without a script.
Side Note: Hey Charlie Gibson, make sure you bring some tissues for President Obama in case he begins whining about Fox News again.
Posted by: The Pot Stirrer | June 17, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
I’m sure it was just a coincidence that Walpin happened to be investigating an Obama supporter/friend. I’m sure that had nothing to do with it. He must be crazy or senile, or both. I’m really sure, but could someone pass the kool-aid? Please?
Posted by: mbs | June 17, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am
This is sick, sick, sick what the Obama administration is doing, and all to protect Johnson, an Obama crony.
Pay attention, the chipping away at people’s souls, this is how democracy dies.
Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | June 17, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Greg:”I’m a an American citizen.
Obama is not until PROVEN to ALL Americans, not just the ones who choose to believe in POLITICIANS! ”
He has proven himself an American citizen as much or more than every other US President in the history of our country. Your absurd conspiracy theory has gone up to the Supreme Court – which has the same makeup as the one that ruled against Gore case in 2000 – and been summarily dismissed. Please remove the tin foil hat and return to reality.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 17, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Wouldn’t an normal employer offer to seek help for someone who worked for them instead of giving them one hour to pack your desk and get out?
Just like when the Clinton’s had the Travel Office employee’s stuff dumped on the street.
Abuse of power.
Posted by: Art | June 17, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Didn’t Obama campaign on increasing funding to Americorps?
The first lady’s chief of staff is the director of Americorps?
A big Obama supporter was misusing Americorps funds, barring him from receiving stimulus money as mayor.
The stimulus drastically increased funding to Americorps and oh, by the way, had money in wait for the Obama supportor Mayor in Sacremento. Funds he couldn’t get unless the the restrictions were lifted (thus the settlement).
And St. Hope, recieving 800k of tax payer money is insolvent and cannot pay back the settlement. Mr. Johnson has to pay back 73k of personal money he misused.
And the inspector General who uncovered it was fired.
It’s good to be King I guess.
…hmmmmm….
Posted by: KR | June 17, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Okay, this letter being made public basically calling Mr. Walpin mentally ill, is starting to make sense. I just read reports he appeared on Fox News the last couple of days. We all know that anyone going on Fox News and disagreeing with this administration or asking them to obey the law is just cause to be ridiculed in public.
Posted by: jennifert7 | June 17, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am
I saw Mr. Walpin on the news he sure did not look nutty to me, maybe he took his med and was able to sit through the interview am sure that is what some will say.
This is cold and heartless for any administration to pull this poor man’s name through the mud like this, what is going on with these people Obama sure is turning out to be scary, I feel so sorry for this man and he family no one deserves this kind of treatment no matter what the issue may be.
Posted by: SJ | June 17, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am
“I’m sure it was just a coincidence that Walpin happened to be investigating an Obama supporter/friend.”
So is this an excuse to misuse almost 500k of tax payer money? Oh he was an Obama supportor, being investigated by a Bush appointee, it can’t possibly be valid? When the administration, by virtue of reaching a deal to pay back money, admits that Johnson was guilty?
I don’t care if Daffy Duck investigated him, he personally pocketed 72k of tax payer money and thats just what they admit to.
And we are the ones drinking kool-aid… right.
Posted by: KR | June 17, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am
It’s hilarious to think an administration with Rahm “Dead to me!” Emmanuel is going to fire someone for disruptive behavior.
I realize not all employees are good employees, and maybe this guy really deserved to lose his job.
The lack of attention by the board and the administration that he actually found substantial wrongdoing while he was supposedly not doing his job is troublesome to me.
It could make me suspicious that the board was happy to just give taxpayer money away without oversight. I know that is unheard of in government….
Posted by: MayBee | June 17, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Just a little oh by the way, misuse of federal funds is normally jail time. The prosecuter NEVER BROUGHT UP CHARGES.
If this had been joe sixpack (and I work for the government, I can go to jail if I charge a meal to the government I wasn’t supposed to), you’d be locked up.
This isn’t just about croni-ism, by the mere fact that he was guilty of stealing from the government, that Mayor should be looking at charges and even jail time. But, he gets a pass. Lovely. Even the rule of law in this case is being circumvented for croni-ism.
Posted by: KR | June 17, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am
jhw539,
400,000.00 thousand REAL American CITIZENS have serious doubts.
NONE of the cases have been heard on their merits by the S.C. NONE of them.
They have only been told, “We will not hear these cases”…that is not the same.
Absurd? Absurd is following blindly ANY politician. You would take the side of man that you do not even know over your neighbors, the Americans?
Again, Kool-Aid is not the right recipe. It was Flavor-Aid and my family the Joneses can supply you with the correct recipe.
Posted by: Greg | June 17, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am
MayBee: The lack of attention by the board and the administration that he actually found substantial wrongdoing while he was supposedly not doing his job is troublesome to me.
_____________________________________
MayBee, you just hit the WH with the irony stick! Priceless!!!
Posted by: Ms Trish | June 17, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Greg:”NONE of the cases have been heard on their merits by the S.C. NONE of them.
They have only been told, “We will not hear these cases”…that is not the same. ”
Seriously, why do you think the Supreme Court, the guys who gave Bush the presidency, looked at this case and decided it was not worth their time? The Supreme Court had the opportunity to rule on it, they did take a look at the merits, and decided it was not worth their time.
The top court has had it’s say (along with various lower courts). Sorry if our Constitutional government system doesn’t satisfy you, but it has worked well enough to make us the most prosperous free country in the history of mankind so I think I’ll stick with it.
Posted by: jhw539 | June 17, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am
“The Supreme Court had the opportunity to rule on it, they did take a look at the merits, and decided it was not worth their time.”
Actually the response I read from the Supreme court is that the plantiff’s did not have undo hardship from the case and thus was not heard. In my knuckle dragging laymen terms I took it as, it didn’t have an effect on the plantiff one way or another so the court wouldn’t hear the case. There was no outcome that would benefit or harm the plantiff or defendent (in literal terms apparently).
I didn’t see anything from the court that talked about the merit of the case.
That being said, I personally don’t care. Some people do though and they want the vault original to be released instead of certified copy, supposedly it will have on there how it was filed, be it petition or present at birth. It takes a court order to see that without the President releasing it himself, I guess something he refused to do. I don’t know, doesn’t matter to me.
Posted by: KR | June 17, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Anyone that thinks this was a politically motivated investigation by Walpin (mbs in particular), obviously cannot read, because the investigation into Kevin Johnson’s St. HOPE foundation was done over a year ago, before Obama was president. It seems like it would be quite silly to waste resources investigating a long shot (at the time) presidential candidate’s supporters.
Posted by: GuyP | June 17, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am
[Eisen charged that at a May 20, 2009 board meeting Walpin "was confused, disoriented, unable to answer questions and exhibited other behavior that led the Board to question his capacity to serve."]
This is the worst of tactics/smears and right out of the Marxist handbook. Would think upon reading this; decent Congressmen and good citizens everywhere, would be shuddering at this ‘critque’ and so be attacking not only the virulent assignations; but challenging the messenger(s)of such degradation.
Only tactics lower; would be putting something in Walpin’s coffee to insure Obama, Inc. had it’s ‘t’s crossed, on this smear.
Suffice to say and with no surprise; it appears they wanted a quick ‘decapping’ here; and we know from their ‘long and collective history; that ‘they’ know exactly, how to do it.
Posted by: Catherine T. | June 17, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am
KR:”Actually the response I read from the Supreme court is that the plantiff’s did not have undo hardship from the case and thus was not heard. …
I didn’t see anything from the court that talked about the merit of the case. ”
The Supreme Court can take any case for any reason they want to. If they wanted to look at it, they would have looked at it. “Not worth our time” is not a proper reason to reject the case, hence the official justification. And just to provide that response indicates they did indeed take a brief look at the case.
Lower courts have looked indepth at the merits of the case and ruled unequivocally against them (that’s how it got to the Supremes).
Posted by: jhw539 | June 17, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Somewhere I came across the phrase-twist “decision-based evidence making.” Seems to fit the new “evidence” supporting the earlier decision.
Posted by: Ms Trish | June 17, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Catherine T:”[Eisen charged that at a May 20, 2009 board meeting Walpin "was confused, disoriented, unable to answer questions and exhibited other behavior that led the Board to question his capacity to serve."]
This is the worst of tactics/smears and right out of the Marxist handbook. ”
What? Could you provide any actual support for that hysterical claim?
This actually seems more like typical politics (which is not a compliment of Obama’s administration, but I don’t consider it an insult either – I don’t want a starry eyed hippy in the Whitehouse).
Posted by: jhw539 | June 17, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
This is the “Light Touch” that Obama promised us.
Thuggery, the Chicago Way.
Posted by: carl | June 17, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Gerald “was confused, disoriented, unable to answer questions and exhibited other behavior that led the Board to question his capacity to serve.”
The Truth explains:
Confused: Mr. Walpin does not understand that Obama is above the law and can make whatever decision at will, regardless of any laws previously supported by BHO.
Disoriented: Mr. Walpin does not realize that all laws are suspended for Friends of Barack.
Unable to answer questions: Questions like “why are you exposing our crooked friends?”, “why are you being honest?”, “are you not a team player?”, and “do you think George Bush and Republicans are responsible for all the trouble in the world?” Mr. Walpin was stumped.
Exhibited other behavior that led the Board to question his capacity to serve: Mr. Walpin curiously chose NOT to resign when ordered, so the Administration had to break the law and fire him.
Silly independent thinkers will not make it in Washington. Notice that ABC complied with the Administrations demand for a star-studded propaganda mission on Federal Healthcare from the Blue Room. I’ll be popping popcorn for this love-fest.
Posted by: Truth | June 17, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am
I can’t wait for the REAL reason to come out. Michelle, I’m waiting!
Posted by: jim | June 17, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Wow! This is “faxing it in” at a very high level. If there’s negligence and gross misconduct on the part of the Head Nut, I think President Obama is well advised to terminate him immediately before he can do anymore damage. Administrators like this poison lots of good people with their arrogance and bad attitude. Not available, not accountable, and not gonna change = bye-bye.
Posted by: Joe in MT | June 17, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Guy: “Anyone that thinks this was a politically motivated investigation by Walpin (mbs in particular), obviously cannot read, because the investigation into Kevin Johnson’s St. HOPE foundation was done over a year ago, before Obama was president. It seems like it would be quite silly to waste resources investigating a long shot (at the time) presidential candidate’s supporters.”
Beck interviewed Walpin yesterday – according to Walpin it seems that the problem was that the investigation resulted in Kevin Johnson and his organization being suspended from accessing federal grants and when Johnson became mayor of Sacramento, Walpin was being pressured to lift the suspension.
Posted by: monkeymom | June 17, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Obama needs to look in the mirror.
Posted by: John | June 17, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
“Confused, Disoriented” Engaged in “Inappropriate Conduct”
If this criteria is applied equally, Biden better start looking for his next job because he’s about to be out of work.
Posted by: paul | June 17, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
If a person is confused wouldn’t you offer them help or counseling before you fire them. Obama is the worst thing this country has ever seen.
Posted by: feelingtogetherness | June 17, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
To some people on this forum, President Obama can do nothing right and every news item is an opportunity to badmouth the President, name call and insult.
The facts on this case are not yet clear nor proved. It is likely we will soon hear from the bi-partisan board that called for a review of this man’s performance. If the man was behaving as described in this news article, its not good. We will see how this ’30-day’ guideline fits into this situation.
Posted by: danita | June 17, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
danita – “To some people on this forum, President Obama can do nothing right and every news item is an opportunity to badmouth the President, name call and insult.”
There are those that fit your description, but many more who fit the “Obama can do no wrong” category.
Posted by: monkeymom | June 17, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
The White House says Mr. Walpin was confused and disoriented…yet that same week they had been talking with him about his support for Sotomayor.
Posted by: Ms Trish | June 17, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Seems there was an on-going FBI investigation into possible obstruction of justice at Kevin Johnson’s organization (the one Walpin found had misused taxpayer funds).
This probably was not a good time for the White House to step into this hornet’s nest.
Posted by: Ms Trish | June 17, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Falsely label a dissident as a mental case = Soviet thuggery politics.
Falsely label an IG exposing fraud as a mental case = 0bama thuggery politics.
Another example of Zero masterfully following the Saul Alinsky playbook on acquiring unchecked & absolute power.
Posted by: Jack | June 17, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
[jhe539: What? Could you provide any actual support for that hysterical claim?]
This actually seems more like typical politics (which is not a compliment of Obama’s administration, but I don’t consider it an insult either – I don’t want a starry eyed hippy in the Whitehouse.)
(Have to say, your worst fear re ‘starry-eyed hippy’ would be far less worrisome than what we have.) Keep in mind; did not say they invented character assasination; or have exclusive rights; but Marxists have ‘well adapted’ these tactics; if not made ‘high art’ of the MO. Saul Alynski fashions the same by his dictum; Identify; Isolate, Freeze; your target. . .(A tactic, we know, Obama and Lefties et al use regularly and rigorously)
some references: Mikhail Bakunin observed how rather than discussion of issues, the tried and tested method of leftism and Marxism was spread through the art of character assassination, [4] close associates of Marx were adept in the practice of:
. . .cowardly, odious and perfidious insinuations. They seldom (but not exclusively) make open accusation, but they insinuate, saying they “have heard – it is said – it may not be true, but’, and then they hurl the most abominable calumnies in your face.
More personally;
John Fuegi – 2002 – Biography & Autobiography – 732 pages
. . .we know Marx was given to outbursts of verbal violence and character assassination of those who did not slavishly follow him and his ideas. (A tradition that again; invited what is now a ‘core value’ for practicing and ambitious Marxists.
(Another, favored tactic is to attack one’s intelligence; as it leaves the ‘recipient’ unable to defend himself; without risking giving this insult. . .legs and a very familiar Leftist MO.)
Russian Proverb: “We treasure the deceit which uplifts us more than a thousand burdensome truths.”
Cannot think of a better summation of America’s viral ‘Obamania’; perped by the delusions of our Leftist MSM et al.
(Dont’ know; but maybe this speaks as well; to the personal, i.e. the ‘celebratory’ when one succeeds by using the worst of deceits; against another. Or perhaps there is another proverb for that one.)
Posted by: Catherine T. | June 17, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Obama did assert that asthma be treated with a breathalyzer. That was pretty disoriented, let alone completely wrong.
Clearly, Obama should resign.
Posted by: drjohn | June 17, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Dazed and confused.
Sounds like a great name for a song…
Posted by: drjohn | June 17, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Walpin was doing his job, questioning all the unchecked dealings between HELP, health, education, labor, pensions and other government organizations. I guess he got too close, Obama shut him out and he asked why.
BTW, Obama encourages working at home, heck Padilla does and he is supposed to run the CIA, he stays home with his wife in CA instead of moving to DC!
Also, they claim he was confused but sent him to speak at a convention right after making this assessment. His firing is a CRIME!
The unchecked dealings of this particular administration MUST BE INVESTIGATED!
Posted by: Santa | June 17, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Is this one-sided smear story part of the payback for getting an exclusive at the white house? Is ABC on Obama’s payroll now.
I just saw Walpin on TV. He seems a lot more articulate than most of our congress to me.
Posted by: Arnold | June 17, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
What else can you expect from the Obama Administration. Obama has only corrupt friends and does not like it when it is revealed. Dishonor your elders, that is what you do when they are finding and exposing the truth. Mr Walpin has character, integrity, and honesty – but then, those are character traits that you can not relate to.
Posted by: Ladybugsmother | June 17, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Too bad that MS Tish has lost use of her brain. Think about it. This guy is investigating his friend. He’s the last guy Obama should be firing. If he wanted to do it Right, follow the procedure, which is give the senate 30 days to evaluat the man. Obama sponsors the law himself for God’s sake. Get your damn head out of the sand before we’re all wearing Obama patches on our sleeves.
Posted by: Nate | June 17, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
The White House is lying about Gerald Walpin….and the White House broke the law….they were suppose it give a 30 day notice before letting him go.
Question Obama on this issue…if you have the guts.
Posted by: Dawn | June 17, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
If they can fire this decent and competent man for doing his job, just because he realized that KJ was paying back to you and me only 1/2 of what he STOLE and NO jail time, which others more than likely would have gotten; then think about this same bunch of disingenuous politicians deciding your health care decisions.
Will ABC bring this up when at the White House for their very partisan and very, much hack-like promotion of ObamamaNannyStateCare?
Posted by: Noradora | June 17, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Obama has all of these “bi partisan” committees, who are made up of 5 total lefties and a couple of guys too scared to lose their post to make waves. I’m tired of him thinking that we’re too stupid to see through his BS. I hope we’re all getting tired of it.
Posted by: arthur | June 17, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Nate: Too bad that MS Tish has lost use of her brain.
___________________________
I will say respectfully that was not called for. You must have misread something, as I am not supportive of the President’s firing of Mr. Walpin.
Posted by: Ms Trish | June 17, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Your links on this page are all broken.
Posted by: Joe A | June 17, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Why is this not on the nightly news? What was done was illegal and ABC knows it. It might show Obama in a bad light so you won’t report it. How sad that you have gone from newsmen to yesmen.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | June 17, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
I think it is funny how this ABC article has not one mention about the possible scandal with Kevin Johnson, like it was not even a part of the reason Walpin got fired. White House Smear campaign. ABC, wake up and do your job!!!
Posted by: Brandon | June 17, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
I think what Obama did to Gerald Walpin is a disgrace. There is no evidence he was incompetent. Did you see Glen Beck today! He had Mr Walpin on his show today. I have lost all respect for Bam Bam.
Posted by: GLK | June 17, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
When is the media going to start doing its job ? The Walpin story would have been covered 24hrs a day had it happened on Bush’s watch ! But with the media in Obama’s back pocket, NOTHING!! Follow the money and paper trail to find the real reason Mr. Walpin was illegally fired!!!
Posted by: Greg | June 17, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Where is the integrity of this White House? What happened to our transparent government we were promised? Change? Yes We Can? It looks like Obama wants everybody to change – except the politicians.
Posted by: dgreatone | June 17, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
This is disgraceful! I hope people stand up before it is too late. This man should not lose his job. Even if there is a legitimate case against Walpin, why isnt obama following the law? Why is the media allowing him to be unaccountable to any one or any process or law–including the constitution
Posted by: peter | June 17, 2009, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
Pleeeessseee!!! I smell a COVER UP! This is beyond blatant. When will the US wake up??? Mayor Kevin Johnson is CORRUPT and is in Obama’s back pocket! This is why Mr. Walpin got fired. This is just another example of a White House “explaination” that totally INSULTS our intelligence. What else is new?
Posted by: bessrad | June 17, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
We need to stop the “machine” that is destroying integrity and honesty in this country! When you are wrong you are wrong and need to pay the price regardless of whether your freind is in the white house or not! :<
What they are doing to mr.walpin is totally absurd.
Posted by: Mrs. Kessler | June 17, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Please stand with those looking into the apparent illegal firing of Gerald Walpin. It appears Mr. Walpin was fired for doing his job, i.e. revealing corruption. Not only is his firing illegal, his good name is being smeared in the name of cronyism. A good American and senior citizen should not be treated with such disrespect. Please do not let this happen!
I have been dealing daily with all types of people for 35 years, including senile people. It is blatantly clear that Mr. Walpin is NOT senile! He is sharp as a tack.
Kevin Johnson should be criminally charged, and Mr. Walpin reinstated and issued an apology personally from Obama.
Posted by: JD Hansen | June 17, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
This story is also icredibly slanted. Where is the interview with the “senile old man”. Typical ABC. What pathetic journalism. I was a reporter for 13 years. This further promulgates the smear by refusing to ackowledge Mr. Walpin is IN NO WAY SENILE!!!!!! Put him on TV you dummies!
Posted by: JD Hansen | June 17, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
Even if you give that maybe this Walpin was Senile (which I really cannot see how he is) There is still the 30 days notice issue? (the same 30 day notice legislation that Obama supported) WHY IS OBAMA ignoring the very rule that he supported? That in and of itself is a huge issue that needs to be investigated by ABC News!
Posted by: Jay_C | June 17, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm
When will it be enough, ABC? How far must the POTUS go before you do your job? He violated the law, report it, as is your duty to the people of this country. Freedom of the press matters little when the press is made up of sycophants unwilling to ask hard questions. You are failing the American people and the bodies (IGs, ex-pastors,US Attorney, CEOs)are piling up. It’s laughable, that you even try to pass the infomercial on government sponsored health care as a “news conference”. I will not be watching, nor will anyone I know who has any sense. Most of us won’t be watching any of your other broadcasts either. Your sponsors need to know that the people no longer trust you to report the news. We choose to get our news from places that do actual reporting, choose to make our own decisions as to what is relevant and choose to interpret those reports on our own.
We will not watch ABC, not for the news, not in daytime, nor in primetime. We ask only that you do your job, and question things like unfullfilled campaign promises, squandering of taxpayer’s money, the creation of czars and abuses of power. Until we see some tough questions we will boycott your sponsors. We make up nearly half of voters in this country, and while the POTUS can ignore us until 2012, your sponsors can ill afford to.
Posted by: Kate | June 17, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
I am ashamed for ABC. I will no longer watch this network or support sponsors who advertise on it. I will do my homework and find out who they are. I will find out whose ads were on before, during, and after the Obama Healthcare Show and will make sure they know why I can no longer purchase their products or services.
Posted by: anorm | June 17, 2009, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
ABC has no obligation to address the Kevin Johnson scandal–as cheerleaders for BO, they’re doing their job to protect him…
Dear Fox News–Obama still wants you as his cheerleader too. That way, we’ll hear only what he wants us to hear.
Posted by: no-kool-aid | June 18, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Question President Obama in regards to this firing. Have you heard Walpin on the radio on TV? He is not confused, he is not senile. This is a smear. Get to the bottom of this ABC with truth and integrity.
Posted by: cindy | June 18, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am
I have never seen a more blatant attempt by a politician (President Obama) to smear and besmirch a dedicated hard working public servant whose only mistake was to follow the letter of the law and to hold accountable the political allies of President Obama. This is a clear cut case of ABUSE OF POWER and President Obama should be Impeached and thrown out of office for this egregious action. Investigate this story ABC! This man was all over Fox News and he is altogether, a smart and on-top-of-the-ball individual. Obama doesn’t like when this man holds his allies accountable to the law, so he fired him. This is disgusting. We should Fire Obama.
Posted by: Justin | June 18, 2009, 2:04 am 2:04 am
This article is disgraceful. I’m finished with ABC.
Posted by: Jeff | June 18, 2009, 3:09 am 3:09 am
I saw Mr Walpin on the Glenn Beck Show on 06/17/09. Mr Walpin is not at all senile or confused. He appears to be very capable and intelligent. His dismissal should be reversed immediately. It appears his audit was bringing things out that President Obama does not agree with, therefore, he fired him. This is totally wrong! Now, all other inspectors will be sure to line up with President Obama and will not be independent. President Obama is turning into a dictator with no checks or balances. There should be national outrage on this and the media is mostly ignoring this. President Obama should be investigated and held accountable for this.
Posted by: S.L. | June 18, 2009, 3:41 am 3:41 am
No mention of the other side anywhere in the article…time to write ABC, NBC…etc…any news media that does not do their job and tell the story in full so that the people of America are fully informed and they can make up their own minds!!
Posted by: Deirs | June 18, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Jake Tapper, YOU ROCK! for asking the question about Walpin. Keep it up; please don’t stop now. Ask about Kevin Johnson’s activities and his ties with Obama. It is possible for ABC to get back in the news business.
Posted by: 4liberty | June 18, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am
It’s frightening that the Obama administration completely controls ABC, NBC, CBS and the mainstream network ‘news’ programs. And what is even scarier is that these ‘journalists’ know it and don’t seem to care. Holding back truthful stories to prevent any kind of embarassment to Obama is dangerous for this country. It’s propaganda at it’s worst. The truth will come out and I hope it puts all the butt kissing celebrity journalists out of business.
Posted by: kate | June 18, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Why isn’t the firing of a Inspector General who is investigating Friends-of-Obama a lead story? Why is ABC accepting the Obama excuses? The Obama excuses stink of corruption and coverup. What’s up ABC? Are you just political hacks for the Obama administration? Is Michelle’s “Victory Garden” kaput? Is the latests Capitol Hill adultery scandal just too important?
Posted by: jason stewart | June 18, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am
Mr. Tapper- Does it bother you to read so many comments that actually question whether you work for a news organization or a cheerleading company for Pres. Obama?
Posted by: David | June 18, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Normally, you would see comments that support the articles they’re reffering to. I see none here. Does that tell you something, Mr. Tapper?
It’s almost like Obama is using his Chicago thuggary to threaten these news corporations to report what he wants – or else face being fired or forced to resign. What else what cause these supposed journalisists to dig such a deep hole to bury their integrity and honesty in.
I stopped watching ABC two years ago. Why? Because I realized that I was missing the REAL news.
Don’t buy into the State-Run Media. It’s a disgrace. Journalism is dead.
By the way, Mr. Tapper, all of your links in the article are dead, just like your integrity.
Posted by: Thomas | June 18, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
IT IS TIME TO STAND UP TO THIS PRESIDENT AND HIS STAFF! WE MUST ALL UNITE AND TAKE BACK OUR FREEDOMS AND BE ABLE TO PROUDLY SAY “WE PUT YOU INTO THE WHITE HOUSE AND WE WILL TAKE YOU OUT AND THE SAME WITH OUR SENATORS AND CONGRESS.
WHY DO WE ALLOW OUR CONSTITUTION TO BE CHANGED OR REWRITTEN AND EVEN ABUSED, WHEN DO WE SAY ENOUGH AND SHOW THESE POLITICIANS THEY WORK FOR US NOT THEIR PARTY OR SPECIAL INTERESTS GROUPS, WE HAVE THE POWER TO FIRE THEM ALL!!
Posted by: Tony | June 18, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Nothing about the Johnson/Obama link in this?
Really?
ABC, you’re slowly squandering your reputation.
Posted by: codyrw | June 18, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
It looks to me like all this focus on Mr. Walpin’s integrity is a well placed smoke screen to cover up the real issue that was uncovered. Kevin Johnson is a crook and a thief and wont even be made to repay the $400,000 settlement back (due to creative wording and the fact that he is a good friend of the president).
Ultimately, what I want to know is…will ‘we the people’ still be participating in elections in 2010 or will we be a dictatorship?
Heil Hi…oh yeah, I mean, Obama. Wait. Am I still in AMERICA?!
I agree that Mr. Johnson should be criminally charged, and an apology issued to Mr. Walpin.
Posted by: Amy | June 19, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am
I’ve seen a lot of mean comments about Jake Tapper here. He’s the only member of the State-run media to ask tough questions of Obama. BUT … what’s up Jake? You left out some important information here. Pressure from above?
Posted by: Rick M | June 19, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Dear Mr Tapper, You have been one of the few MSM reporters to start asking this administration tough questions but it is time to step up to the next level! This Republic deserves some real investigative reporting in the style of Woodward & Bernstein regarding the firing of Mr. Walpin. I hope that type of journalism is still alive and not just reserved for Republicans. I have not sensed anything this fishy since Watergate, where is Deep Throat when you need him?
Posted by: Kurt Malec | June 19, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am
I’m not sure which is more enchanting. Is it the links that don’t link, or the lack of journalism? Charmant!
Posted by: David Simonson | June 19, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
It seems most of the comments I have read are coming from haters of the Obama administration. Get a grip on yourselves. I’m convinced Mr. Walpin was let go because of his behavior. Did any of you pay any attention to the part about the board meeting? Republicans were on that board meeting as well; they witnessed Walpin’s behavior as well.It seems like all you bitter Obama haters are grasping for straws.
Posted by: Alfred Waddell | June 19, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Have you ever known someone with a drinking problem? Or someone elderly who has side effects from medication? In either case, such people can often appear coherent and able, especially if they have time to pull themselves together, say for a TV or radio interview.
Posted by: Jim | June 19, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
I totally agree with the thoughts of “anorm”.
I no longer watch ABC and will be contacting their advertisers regarding the biased, so-called journalism. The elite media personnel need to look outside their pampered bubble. Middle America watches their news and entertainment programs. While middle America stands in line for health care under the proposed government program, the Manhattanites will be whisking by in limos to their private doctors with their expensive, health care programs.
Regarding Gerald Walprin…….independent inspector generals are to be given 30 days notice by law which was co-sponsored by Senator Obama. Jake Tapper………where are you?
Posted by: geri | June 19, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Can you imagine if Bush fired Walpin for the same thing? We’d have Woodward and Bernstein all over this making the elementary connections between Walpin and Obama’s pal Johnson…but for some unknown reason, ABC cannot put together this easy Investigative Journalism 101 story…and they wonder why their ratings are dropping. Jake Tapper, how do you call yourself even a member of the media? How comfortable is that Obama-bed you’re sleeping in? Rahm says “destroy Walpin” and you go along with it. Outrageous!
Posted by: Margot Hill | June 20, 2009, 7:26 am 7:26 am
Actually Pres. Bush DID fire two IG without cause in Feb 2002 which is what makes the right wing outrage aver the Walpin firing so ironic. Bush fired Luise S. Jordan, the IG at the Corporation for National and Community Service & Roberta L. Gross, the IG at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration . Both were IGs with good service records for over 5 years. Both were thanked for their service & simply told that the White House was in the process of selecting someone else. These were legal firings as the White House has the right to change appointments. This is in part what led to the Inspector General Reform Act of 2008 which state that an IG must be given 30 days and the congress must be given notification of the reasons for dismissal. What everyone fails to understand is that the Congress doesn’t have to agree with the reasons. They don’t have the right to vote or veto the reasons. They don’t get to grade how good the reasons are. They only have to be notified. This is why Walpin wasn’t fired outright, but was suspended with pay. He won’t be fired until the 30 days are passed. The reasoning behind the termination may or may not be political (as the Bush firings obviously were) but the White House hasn’t broken any laws. They are within their rights to dismiss any IG so long as they give their reasons to congress and don’t actually suspend pay until the 30 days are passed.
Posted by: Elizabeth Tuck | June 20, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Unbelievable! The report mentions the belated and weak justification for the firing and the comments from the Democratic senator – but no comments from Mr. Walpin or any of his supporters. Shouldn’t you maybe ask him his side of the story?
Talk about Pravda-like reporting. You’re criminally complicit in this illegal action.
Posted by: Brad - Michigan | June 22, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
My goodness the President fired a man for doing his job. Kevin Johnson misused stole etc $840,000.00. This story is becoming very interesting. Let the digging begin.
Posted by: greg | July 10, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am
This is just one of many such situations orchestrated by an arrogant administration determined to control everything and everyone.
Sure … the news headlines are disturbing enough…a trillion dollar Health Care proposal…another irresponsible stimulus package, etc. … but it is what is happening behind the scenes to good, solid,independent thinking public servants that is most detrimental to this great country.
Wake up Americans! This has nothing to do with race! Obama is destroying our way of life!
Posted by: Shahoon | July 18, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm