By MichaelJames

Jul 8, 2009 9:50pm

$18M Being Spent to Redesign Recovery.gov Web Site

ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: For those concerned about stimulus spending, the General Services Administration sends word tonight that $18 million in additional funds are being spent to redesign the Recovery.gov Web site. The new Web site promises to give taxpayers more information about where their money is going than the current version of the site. “Recovery.gov 2.0 will use innovative and interactive technologies to help taxpayers see where their dollars are being spent,” James A. Williams, commissioner of GSA’s Federal Acquisition Service, says in a press release announcing the contract awarded to Maryland-based Smartronix Inc. “Armed with easy access to this information, taxpayers can make government more accountable for its decisions.”   The contract calls for spending $9.5 million through January, and as much as $18 million through 2014, according to the GSA press release. “We are pleased that another major milestone has been achieved," Earl E. Devaney, chairman of the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board, says in the press release. “We thank the GSA for its assistance and look forward to working with Smartronix." UPDATE:  The RNC has released a new web ad mocking the Obama administration's decision to allocate additional funds to the redesign of the Recovery.gov Web site.

User Comments

Just hearing the word “transparency” ( as mentioned
by Earl E. Devaney, chairman of Recovery Accountability and Transparency) makes me feel ill.
How did we ever live without the “t” word for all
these years…. Did you have to look up the meaning of the word, since nobody is living by it since the
election?!

Posted by: 2smart4u | July 8, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

This is just a smokescreen so we dont realize he wants to veto the intelligence bill that would force Obama’s legislation and the government to actually be transparent and have to answer for what they have done.

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 8, 2009, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

I could redesign a whole lotta “innovative and interactive” websites for $18 million.
If they were talking about how much the band-width cost to keep the site up and running, I MIGHT be able to see it. But just a redesign???
I think maybe the government is already “accountable” for this bone-headed idea.

Posted by: Jaylah | July 8, 2009, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

Who ever heard of spending $18 million dollars on a website? Who is getting the money???

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 8, 2009, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Once the numbers are posted what are we going to be able to do about it really anyway?

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 8, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

guesswhaturwrong, that intelligence bill dates back to 1947. If you’re going to whine about it, whine at Harry S Truman and every president since then. Not Obama.

Posted by: Jaylah | July 8, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Hmmm… 18 Million bucks to redesign a government website….riggghhht! That’s enough money for 18 responsible 40 somethings to live the rest of their lives in relative comfort. It’s far less money than was spent so our Socialist leader and his black-hearted wife to have “date night” in New York on our dime.

Posted by: Taxpaying victim | July 8, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Classic government…. Doesn’t know what anything costs, and spends 20 times what anyone else would (18 million for a web site is crazy!).

Posted by: Jen | July 8, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

So it’s supposed to tell us what’s happening to our hard earned money? Unless the home page says “Here. Here is where your money is going,” then this is the most ridiculous thing ever ON TOP of being a waste of money in the first place.

Posted by: Pete | July 8, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Oxymoron of the day: Responsible Government Spending.
It ranks right up there with “Vacation bible school”.

Posted by: Taxpaying victim | July 8, 2009, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

“Oxymoron of the day: Responsible Government Spending.
It ranks right up there with “Vacation bible school”
LOL Well said!

Posted by: Jaylah | July 8, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

At this point even this foolishness does not surprise me. I have lost all faith in our government.

Posted by: CWG | July 8, 2009, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

All the good intentions and idealism of Obama is being squandered by those who were entrusted with executing and enforcing his plan viz. his cabinet and his staff. The stimulus will be judged not by the 18 million dollar web site but by the reversal of the job loss trend, by the economic growth and by the recovery of 401k plans. That the stimulus monies were intercepted and swindled by the usual suspects is no surprise. A second stimulus would be a disaster of epic proportions when the first one was so grossly mismanaged that the states used it for pie in the sky projects even though the states are in dire straits. It would have been preferable to let the states pay the funds towards their deficit reduction instead of unwanted porky projects. Businesses small and large are cutting costs and reducing the payroll to try and balance their books. Why can the government not do the same instead of getting bloated and mounting the deficits, sky high. All the talk of the windmills and green energy was just blowing hot air during the campaign.

Posted by: gjkotw01 | July 8, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Is this administration completely nuts, or are the contracts for this redesign going the way of pork? Personally, I’d like to know the name and URL of the company that has been contracted. The dollar figure is patently absurd.
I repeat……Is this administration absolutely NUTS!?

Posted by: John Vacek | July 8, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

OK kids..those that think 1.6 million a year to develop, staff and maintain a web site with a national presence, purpose and verifiable data set is a lot, please sit down. You obviously don’t know anything. That’s a site staffed and maintained by AT MOST eight FTEs. (full time employees) If you could do it for less, I suggest you bid the gig.

Posted by: vidtweeker | July 8, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

You mean to tell me the government spent 18 million dollars to keep informed and answer the question of over 300 million people. Talking about your glass house! Finally a government that reports to the people!! I suppose next your going to tell me people actually have jobs to do this. Wow! straight forward and easy to understand! No economics of dung!! Go Obama Go!

Posted by: rightbehind | July 8, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

18 million? I could have done it for 9 million!

Posted by: SamTyler1973 | July 8, 2009, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

For God’s sake… a web design job pays only about 20k a year these days at best.
I run a multi section/topic political site and do it in my spare time and do all the graphics and imbed live feeds chat and statistics for nothing.
Maybe I should get out of the health care business and stop saving lives for a living and work for the government.
I knew Obama was going to be true his word and cut the pork. I am guessing He meant instead of “fat” products (pork) he meant something more “Herbal”. You know, the kind one can smoke and lots of it. Because obviously someone in Washington is smoking something that kills brain cells.

Posted by: David Baron | July 8, 2009, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

So….? What’s the problem? Creation and administration of the website is giving tech workers jobs. Get over it, naysayers!

Posted by: bob10001 | July 8, 2009, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

18 Million for a website. Obsurd! Proving once again that both Republicans AND Democrats can gives millions of dollars to special people that are in cahoots with politicians. The fun will never end.

Posted by: Don | July 8, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

More Obama Spend Spend Spend, the Chinese must love this guy, as he hands the pink slip of another state to China!

Posted by: CC | July 8, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

vidtweeker, there’s a big difference between $1.6 million and $18 million, don’t you think?

Posted by: Jaylah | July 9, 2009, 12:02 am 12:02 am

No offense, folks but this is an incendiary article that purposely leaves out details. Ok, first of all – what is the scope of the redesign? Is it using new technologies? Is the site going to have an ongoing staff and maintenance cost? Is it going to be using other very costly yet importance sets of data (for the public good, of course) to bring something new to life that the American voters need to see? As someone who works in the web design industry here’s a tip: those that are doing it right are not cheap.

Posted by: cash | July 9, 2009, 12:04 am 12:04 am

This isn’t your typical static web site.
The cost of this site is what companies usually pay for the infrastructure and technologies needed. When you check your account in ATT or BoA those API’s did not just make themselves. This site will have a lot of variables, calls, etc that people usually don’t know of.
Also the CMS (Content Management System) is not your typical Drupal or Joomla, it is a unique solution.
So stop complaining about how much this site is going to cost, most people have no idea how much work is involved in the sites they browse.

Posted by: German | July 9, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am

German, be that as it may, perhaps you recall that we’re all supposed to be spending responsibly to get through this economic crisis? Maybe that doesn’t apply to the US government? (I don’t know why it shouldn’t!)
If people are really concerned about where the money is going, they can use the current website, and if they still have unanswered questions, they can write to their Congresspeople. They can even write to Obama! That’s right! In the good ol’ US of A, we’re allowed to write letters to the White House!! Snail mail letters, and even e-mail!
Given the current fiscal state of our government, $18 million for a “redesign” of a website is outrageous.

Posted by: Jaylah | July 9, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am

You have got to be kidding!! 18 million for a website? Not even ONE million. What the heck?
I went to that website and looked at California. All the stimulus money is going to areas that already have money not to the areas that need it!!!
I feel sick. I think we have been had…..again.

Posted by: Ver | July 9, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

If that’s the amount of money it takes to make a government website comprehensible, then so be it.

Posted by: Michael Peck | July 9, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

There’s a Twitter petition to pressure Smartronix into being transparent in how they are spending the $18 million. It is only reasonable, since the site is about transparency in spending the stimulus funds!
Sign/Tweet it here: http://act.ly/87

Posted by: Jim Gilliam | July 9, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Should just deposit the $18 mil into the Social Security system or Federal Reserve or toward the federal deficit. Completely ridiculous to spend it on a website. A website!

Posted by: hawgfan | July 9, 2009, 12:35 am 12:35 am

$10M in 6 months is a lot, even for government, but it’s not that hard:
Contracting reps are exceptionally inept at understanding the Web and have been copy/pasting the same 40 pages of RFP verbage for the last decade.
Contractors end up putting together impressive-on-paper teams of a dozen or more people to be sure they fully respond to all of the asinine requirements in the RFP, and then fill the positions with recent college grads w/ half the experience they promised at hourly rates less than 1/4 what their load is.
Meanwhile, half of the people on the team end up being expendable since their skillsets had much more to do with the RFP than with the reality of the project, yet they’re all kept on because each person in a chair translates to profit for the contractor, and nobody on the gov side has the heart to cut someone’s job.
Finally, the whole thing gets about half its features slashed right before deadline as the team of people doing real work is a few short, and there’s no additional funding since somebody dropped thousands of dollars on 8-core computers and every software suite known to man for the ‘social media team’ to shoe shop all day with.
Don’t even mention that internal gov server farms are charging tens of thousands for each database, stored procedure, API call, or dynamic anything that they have to set up. It’s all play money anyway, right?
Aaaand, that’s how you spend $18M on a crappy .gov website. Nobody in the private sector spends this much; they usually either know what they’re doing, or fail miserably for much cheaper before they get to the point of having to invest in this degree of ‘infrastructure.’ It is a hell of a lot of work though, and most people certainly do not appreciate what a good site (or even a functional one) should cost.
@David Baron: $20k a year? Maybe in India, dude. I bet your site is awesome, since you didn’t provide a url.

Posted by: Ugh | July 9, 2009, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Do we really need an interactive website that costs $18 million? I agree that it’s “not your typical static website,” but I think we’re buying a fleet of Ferraris when we really need just one Ford pickup truck.
$18 million for Chase Bank or Sears to handle e-commerce such as credit-card transactions linking orders with inventory and shipping? Yes, and more. But for GSA to tell us how the money is spent …
No.

Posted by: Tom | July 9, 2009, 1:18 am 1:18 am

what a waste of money our brilliant politicians at work again , disgusting they all should be voted out !!! all of them !!!

Posted by: M S Long Beach | July 9, 2009, 1:22 am 1:22 am

$18 million for a website? It almost makes sense when you consider the same government is willing to pay $13,000 for a plastic toilet seat.

Posted by: Rachel | July 9, 2009, 5:43 am 5:43 am

what’s really going on wit our country? Just like schwarzneggar said Reality TV!! Except 24/7 on Obama!! Why not he’s the main man right? we need extensive media laws to allow us to really understand what is going on in office.. People’s power is under-estimated, use it.

Posted by: so_when_do_they_give_in | July 9, 2009, 6:31 am 6:31 am

18 Million for a website? Did ABC spend $18 million to design this website? I highly doubt it. That is absolutely ridiculous.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 9, 2009, 6:49 am 6:49 am

Anyone who believes big government can do anything efficiently has been asleep. If they can’t provide a decently built website, how are they going to provide government managed healthcare without bankrupting the few who actually pay taxes? Government is NOT the answer. Just look to the VA to see the only model today for government run medicine. The VA fails veterans daily. Is THAT what you folks want? Obama is going to bankrupt the taxpayer with all of his socialist agenda items.

Posted by: fedup_11 | July 9, 2009, 7:10 am 7:10 am

STOP THE INSANITY!! We have entered the bizzarro world — everything is the opposite of how it should be. Stop the ride and let me off!

Posted by: mary | July 9, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am

So….? What’s the problem? Creation and administration of the website is giving tech workers jobs. Get over it, naysayers!
Posted by: bob10001 | Jul 8, 2009 11:50:05 PM
You’re a real genius. That’s not $18M in private sector money. That’s yet more government jobs being “created” by stealing our money.
How about I empty out your bank account and then use it to pay for a full time housekeeping staff at my house? Look! I just created a bunch of jobs!

Posted by: sigh | July 9, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Shouldn’t they be able to get a discount? I mean Al Gore invented the Internet right?!
On the other hand, why even create a site to show where the money is going… by the simple act of budgeting $18M for it, we know where it’s going! Out of the pockets of those who earned into the pockets of those who didn’t! Hope and Change…. Hope and Change…. Hope and Change…. just keep repeating it!

Posted by: HooliganDave | July 9, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am

All they know is how to spend! They can’t save one dollar!

Posted by: bobc | July 9, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Obama needs to get on national TV and EXPLAIN WHY this costs $18 Million!!

Posted by: WaterWatcher | July 9, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Personally, I’d like to know the name and URL of the company that has been contracted.
See paragraph three in the very article to which these comments are attached for the name of the company. Plug that name into Google. It comes right up. The very first result is the company’s own website, and there are lots and lots of other hits as well.

Posted by: reader_iam | July 9, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Oops! The italics didn’t work. This part of the previous comment …
“Personally, I’d like to know the name and URL of the company that has been contracted.”
… is a quote from another, and the rest was my response to that.

Posted by: reader_iam | July 9, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Ok,consider this: Assuming there are 300 million tax paying citizens in the US, $18 million costs each citizen less than 1/15 of one dollar. That seven cents per person goes toward making the site much more streamlined and easier to use. You can get the information you want that much faster, so you can go back to your day. I guarantee that a majority of those commenting on this site make above average income, which means in the time it took you to read this article and respond, you will have wasted way more than seven cents at your hourly rate.

Posted by: Wade Tandy | July 9, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Wake Up People……
This is just one example of the MILLIONS upon MILLIONS in that bill for “for management and administration and oversight”. Just Remember though that Chuckie Schumer said we really dont care about these kinds of inexpensive things.

Posted by: Mike_C | July 9, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am

If you make 20K as a web designer, find a new profession because you aren’t any good.
This cannot just be a “redesign”, this article has to be understating the process. I’m sure there is an entire back-end system being built to store, organize, and protect all this information. It probably also includes full time support by full time employees to keep this site running. This site is an investment in the future. Something that can be used for years to come.

Posted by: Lynz | July 9, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am

LOL….all you fools who still want the gov’t to run healthcare…WAKE UP!!!!!!!
This is exactly what we all have to look forward to if you people get your way! Lower costs my @ss!

Posted by: Mike_C | July 9, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Impeach Obama

Posted by: Katy | July 9, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Ok,consider this: Assuming there are 300 million tax paying citizens in the US, $18 million costs each citizen less than 1/15 of one dollar. That seven cents per person goes toward making the site much more streamlined and easier to use. You can get the information you want that much faster, so you can go back to your day. I guarantee that a majority of those commenting on this site make above average income, which means in the time it took you to read this article and respond, you will have wasted way more than seven cents at your hourly rate.
—————————–
Wade Tandy,
First off, there are not anywhere near 300 million tax payers in this country. By tax payers, i mean people who at the end of the year, have actually given more to the government than they get back.
Secondly, this is the same EXACT arguement that is being made to claim universal healthcare will make it affordable for everyone. Spread the cost out amongst us all. Only problem is when it comes to healthcare, There will be millions upon millions of these 18 million dollar events to spread out.
Third…Revamping that site is a COMPLETE waste if the site is not going to provide updated information about job creation. According to that site right now, 174 BILLION dollatrs have been made available from the 787 total. Yet only 60 Billion has been paid out.
These are nice things to know for sure, but what has the RESULT been so far given the outlay? Would it not be a nice thing to see on that graph that shows the 2 numbers I stated? …jobs created….

Posted by: Mike_C | July 9, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am

$18 million? How ridiculous. My nephew does websites for free! How hard can a major government website be?

Posted by: Jonathan Drain | D20 Source | July 9, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Its just payoff for political favors.
There is more to come.

Posted by: Lizzie | July 9, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

I guess you guys didn’t read the article… it has the name of the company that got the bid – Smartronix…. from Hollywood, MD.

Posted by: zeeter | July 9, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

$19M to redesign a website?? Sweet work if you can get it!
What’ya wanta bet it uses Silverlight?

Posted by: Gil | July 9, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Wow! I can hardly beleive that ABC would allow comments on this story. Will they be removed when it turns out most of them are anti-obama?

Posted by: William | July 9, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Everyone who doesn’t work in web design needs to stop commenting, because you don’t know what you’re talking about. That includes those of you who run a wordpress blog and think you’re a web designer. Try building a website of the scope and size of recovery.gov that will service 300mln users with no downtime or catastrophic errors, and then tell me $3.6mln/year is outrageous. It’s pricey, to be sure, but hardly as bad as many of you are trying to make out.

Posted by: David Claiborne | July 9, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

>So….? What’s the problem? Creation and administration of the website is giving tech workers jobs. Get over it, naysayers!
The problem is that Obama is destroying the economy.
That’s not “naysaying.” That’s OBJECTIVE REALITY.
Come join us and the rest of the new reality-based community here on the dark side. We have cookies.

Posted by: Good Lt | July 9, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Wait $18 million to redesign a web app? Does this contract come with anal lube and a 50′ flag pole? Talk about major tax payer/gov’t ripoff. On a side note I want to sell the gov’t a used wal-mart hammer. It retails for 2.5 million but i will be patriotic and sell it to the gov’t for $2 million.

Posted by: AL | July 9, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

@John Vacek
Actually as a project manager who has extensive experience in web apps. As a person who used to program in C and in html/java/flash I can tell you for sure that $18 mil is a ripoff price. Besides the place is already built, they are just modifying it.
@SamTyler1973
What places do you work at which you think a web design job pays 20k at best? I know web designers making 100k salaries – and that is not top of the totem pole. I have never heard of a web dork making 20k…30k is the lowest i have heard of
@anyone else
$18 mil is a ripoff – period.

Posted by: AL | July 9, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

I work for one of the worlds largest digital agencies and I can say that 19 million dollars through 2014 (5 years) is not all that unusual of a budget. This budget i’m assuming captures the regular content releases as well as evolving feature / functionality.
One thing people probably don’t realize is how much goes into creating a high volume high visibility website. One point I can speak to from my experience is that as a government website, the accessibility requirements for Americans with Disabilities are VERY strict. Coding and testing against these requirements is difficult and time consuming and ultimately costly.
This is the sort of project that has a team and likely an agency behind it – not your neighbors kid in his bedroom.

Posted by: E.M. August | July 9, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Nicely done Pete, Vacation Bible School. That’s a smile

Posted by: Sandman | July 9, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Ok now I’m officially ready for Sarah Palin in 2012

Posted by: Abel Nunez | July 9, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

Just-as or more important than the stated cost is whether this will be a cost-plus contract, where the contractor can spend willy-nilly and be assured of compensation and profit? Or will they be held, like all other businesses, to deliver the product within the quoted budget?

Posted by: Al Shenkin | July 9, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

@E.M. August
While 18 mil over 5 years may not be that high (for one account it is, but lets say for a moment 18 mil is fine). It does not take 5 years to build a complex web app. There are much more complex sites out there which cost a hell of a lot less and take less time.
If this site takes more then 6 months to create people are spending too much time playing video games instead of programming.

Posted by: AL | July 9, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Not to worry. Joe Biden is in charge, remember “don’t mess with Joe”. As soon as he remembers the name of the “address”, he will make sure the new web site is perfect. Remember this is all about a “three letter word JOBS”.

Posted by: pauldia | July 9, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

For 18 million dollars you could build super-interactive website for every branch of local/state/federal governmet, a data center, the building to put in, furnish it, and pay people to maintain it for the next 50 years.
Who the hell had their palms greased on this one?

Posted by: Michael Brewer | July 9, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

For all the whining about “but you haven’t created jobs in the 4 months since recovery plan started”, here jobs have been created and all we hear now is more complaining.
By the way, as a software engineer myself, the Republicans are INFAMOUS for having little to no technological capacity, crappy web sites, old technology implementation, and how can we Forget McCain’s not even knowing how to send or receive emails, etc. etc.
When the Republican/RtWing/Whiners stop whining and complaining and actually propose THEIR solution, maybe they won’t be ridiculed and dismissed as much as they are today. In the meantime, go ahead GOP’rs – keep whining and complaining and throwing dirt, you are doing a FINE job of burying your a permanently.
We gave you a rope and sure enough, you all are hanging yourselves. Good. “Enough is enough”.

Posted by: LjR | July 9, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

PS TO ALL THE PEOPLE HERE WHO THINK THEY CAN DO THIS FOR LESS – LISTEN UP:
I have worked for Apple, Sun, and others as a designer. There is a reason why your crappy design is generally dismissed. Contrary to what you like to think about your capacity to code and throw together a working product that can go up against the big dogs, the usability on your stuff is catastrophic. The reason why stuff like Apple sites, et al is highly profitable is because they use PROFESSIONALS vs. the $20k/hr person per above posts who think that somehow they have the design skills of a cognitive scientist or 25 year veteran graphic designer with training that they can make something actually functional.
Wake up people or at least finish your education.

Posted by: LjR | July 9, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Our spend happy government should remember the old adage “make do or do without”. The website is very functional as it is now. Times are very tough and it is an outrageous expense to pay $18 million for website *redesign* when kids are going to bed hungry at night. This is the problem with the politicians we have. They’re all wealthy and completely out of touch with reality.

Posted by: grannysunni | July 9, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

18 million on a website rebuild? How on earth do you spend that kind of money doing that? Someone is padding the heck out of someones pockets.

Posted by: Sean | July 9, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

For all the so-called experts here who are claiming they know it all.
To my knowledge this site has not had issues crashing or anything like that, so the REAL question is WHY modify it at all.
What is does need is better updating of data such as…ohhhh….Job Creation!!!
It does not need new bells & whistles at all. What is there is more than adequate to convey to the American people where their money is going and how much success or lack of success the expenditdures are having!

Posted by: Mike_C | July 9, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

I would do the redesign for $249,999.

Posted by: JDubya | July 9, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Why is $18M being spent to redesign a website that’s only been around for a few months?
Didn’t Recovery.gov 1.0 use “innovative and interactive technologies?” If not, why not? How much money was wasted there?
What inexperienced person authorized $18M to be spent on a website? Oh wait, we’re talking about the Obama administration! Do you know how many websites can be built with $18M in the private sector?
Great spin ABC News. The government is wasting more of our money and you’re making it sound like they’re doing us a favor.

Posted by: Carrie Days | July 9, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

The website already needs a redesign after how many months, five or six? And $18 million seems a tad high for less-then one year old website …. how about hiring a few college kids to do it for a fraction of that price.

Posted by: Real Clear | July 9, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

I work for Smartronix :)

Posted by: Katie | July 9, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

They’re probably spending about $17.7M on research on how to put chains, spinners, subs, and 12 TVs on it….

Posted by: Collin | July 9, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Just $18 million? Well, it’s just taxpayer money and there’s plenty more where that came from!
Pay up people – your government needs you to stop your greedy grumblings and pay up for the common good. If you are fortunate enough to earn money in this economy, you owe it to your country to share a portion of that money with others.

Posted by: C'est moi | July 9, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

I’m confused by the comments saying this redesign will create jobs. Isn’t designing a website a temporary job? Are we assuming it will be permanently under construction or are we counting temp jobs as “jobs created”?

Posted by: confused | July 9, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Smartronix is just up the road from the Patuxent Naval Air Test Center.
After all the base closings of the past couple of decades, it has become the center of the Navy’s full spectrum research, development, test and evaluation (RDT&E), engineering, and fleet support center for air platforms.
There are a lot of companies in the area around the base that specialize in military systems including security based systems (like Smartronix).

Posted by: Mike_C | July 9, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Typical government waste at its finest. This is beyond sickening. Another example of why we are failing. Just like the Roman Empire fell— we are on a fast track for the same results. All because of our INCOMPETENT, GREEDY, STUPID, ARROGANT LEADERS.

Posted by: jimbo | July 9, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Okay John Vacek:
8 FTE’s @ $60k (+20% benefits)= $720,000
Which leaves $780,000 a year to manage and maintain if that is actually included in the quote. The article specifically says “redesign”
And, if you read more closely, the $18M is on top of $9.5M so we’re talking closer to $30M through 2014. So now do the math: over 4.5 years the government will spend $27.5M to “redesign” a web site.
That’s 53 months, which makes the monthly cost $518867.00 and change.
So taking our salaries at $72k a year * 8 FTE’s at $6k a month that’s $48k for salaries, which leaves $470867.00 and change a month to operate and manage the site.
It’s still way way too much. and the salary I quote is higher than average which is pretty much the way gov’t pays, so, yes, they are out of touch with what things cost.
Go back and do your homework. This is just a waste of tax payer money. But it does create 8 stimulus jobs, so whew! we’re on our way to recovery.

Posted by: John Galt | July 9, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

I agree with vidtweeker, it most likely involves the cost of the datacenter, heating, cooling (very costly), staff to run the machines, gather the data, design the back-end as well as the front-end, etc. If that’s the case it’s not too far off.

Posted by: Anonymous | July 9, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

who the hell are they kidding? I’ve been developing and managing web properties since their inception. It does not require $18M to redesign the web site, even with security, encryption, massive database installations and site management. Give me a friggin break. Wake the hell up.
@boob10001, jesus get real. You honestly think that money is going to tech workers? Can I sell you the bay bridge incomplete? people are getting fat while the rest of us are going lean. This administration is a big disappointment. Nothing ever changes.

Posted by: stopdrinkingthecoolaid | July 9, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

It’s not just a website, it’s a huge database system for every dollar of the federal budget for the next 5 years (and historica most likely) with a full web API, dashboards and reporting. This is money well spent and the level of stupidity found in these comments makes me want to shoot myself. A project of that size and scope is incredibly complex and expensive. If they can actually pull this off, it will be a huge huge win for transparency and accountability.

Posted by: James | July 9, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

And queue the extremist comments in 3…2…1.

Posted by: Chris | July 9, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Gee… I seem to recall President Obama had a kick-ass web and social media presense during campaign. Can we appreciate a president that has embraced technology, and communitcates with his constituents in ways we use and understand every day? It won him the election.
I’ve been a web dev consultant for over a decade to a state agency. We bid on (and won) a 5-year project to develop, host and maintain a state-wide public information site for that agency. We were very fair with our resource allocations, prevailing wage calcs, etc., and no matter how we crunched it, we could not bring that project under $1 mil/year. There is a massive amount of work that goes into a site of that magnitude.

Posted by: jackie | July 9, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

FYC!!

Posted by: Bizzle | July 9, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Does anybody else think it’s ironic that they are spending $18M of your money on a website that tells you where your money is being spent?

Posted by: Nate | July 9, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

$18M for a website redesign? Moronic!!!
We definitely need to kick them at every level of government. Start fresh with citizens who have common sense not ivy league educations.

Posted by: Susie Q. America | July 9, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Too many so called experts here.
How many project managers who actually understand the full scale sourcing and billing for a large web development project? I’m talking fortune 100. Anyone?
That is the work I do and here is a little insider info… when it comes to important websites, you hire high profile, respected agencies to do the work. As you may imagine, this does not come cheap. Factored into the cost is not only the work, but the support level agreement, is also the agencies overhead.
Sure, this website could be done cheaper. By a less reputable firm / agency. With weaker testing and support facilities, a lower quality design group oh…. and a bunch of Indian off short coders.
My argument has nothing to do with whether this website is necessary (highly debateable – tax funded pro Obama PR tool)
But what I am saying, is that the project cost is not any sort of scandal.

Posted by: E.M. August | July 9, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Typo’s jeeze. Sorry bout that.

Posted by: E.M. August | July 9, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

I am in the industry and they already have existing infrastructure. They do not need to spend 18 million on a website. It can be done for much less. I deal with clients that have multi-tier worldwide applications that are web based and much more complicated in design and did not cost no where near 18 million to setup and run. You all forget they already have personnel as well. That is why the country is being raped. Most people do not have a clue to what is going on.

Posted by: Chris C | July 9, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

I can under cut that price. Pay me 2 million dollars and I will create a goverment web site with all the bells and whistles.

Posted by: BannedAgain | July 9, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

I could have created that site for $1500, with all the bells and whistles.

Posted by: BannedOnceAgain2 | July 9, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

No bid contracts for politically connected shell corporations. Recover your vote. It was wasted.

Posted by: Karen | July 9, 2009, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

The 18 mil. is spread out over 5 years. The back end database is an itemized list of 2.98 BILLION dollars in spending. So we are spending $18,000,000 to create a searchable database of expenditures of $2,980,000,000. Put another way, the annual cost of the database is about 1/827th of the total annual budget.

Posted by: Exosius Woolley | July 9, 2009, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

are you all nuts?
it’s obviously an entirely new redesign in terms of infrastructure et al… not merely aesthetics…
it’s not an unreasonable cost at all

Posted by: arcane | July 9, 2009, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Did I fall down the hole in Alice in Wonderland? I don’t want to know what they are doing if it is going to cost us $18 million. Take the $18 million and invest it in small business across the U.S. or invest the money in a national database and halt the prescription drug abuse killing our brothers and sisters. I simply don’t understand anything that is happening anymore. Lack of ethics, bad decision making, waste, … it is very sad.

Posted by: Deirdre Cavener | July 9, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

What company is doing it? Maybe I can apply as a data entry person for 1k a week salary

Posted by: politicsisdirty | July 9, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Today, Americans are being forced to evaluate their spending. People are choosing basic tv channels, local vacations, and in-home dining over expensive tv packages, trips, and fine dining. Most people can find ways to cut back on spending if they truly desire to do so. In today’s economic crisis, I would call an already expensive website that needs more money (just a few $18 million), ridiculous. Leave the website as is or even better, get rid of it. There are other ways to be transparent that cost less. Obama, be the leader you say you are and show smart money management. Otherwise, you just look like a 5 year old who thinks money grows on trees.

Posted by: Melanie | July 10, 2009, 2:24 am 2:24 am

My apologies, a correction is in order.
The posting date of Gov Solicitation AVT0009100 was dated June 16, 2009;
TThe contract was awarded to Smartronix on July 7:
As a matter of note the soliciation’s project scope matrix specifically identifies all network conduits, and KM database programs (Oracle) remain the responsibility and under management of the goverment! This is nothing but a a searchable data filtering site with a GUI.

Posted by: TX_Exec | July 10, 2009, 2:24 am 2:24 am

We know where it is going…no where good. Take the 18 mil and give it to the people without jobs, food, and a place to live. Geez does he never stop.
He spends 13,000 a night for a suite in Russia while people are homeless. He does not care …his ego is too big!
Going to go check out the update of the GOP ad that mocks him doing this…yeah I am democrat and still am sick of him

Posted by: Ly | July 10, 2009, 6:45 am 6:45 am

Who approved this complete waste of taxpayer money? Ought to be shot. Same person who bought the expensive hammers and toilets?
We want our money back, now.

Posted by: Amazingoly | July 10, 2009, 7:24 am 7:24 am

Person above said this is within correct figures for the website package. Well then, WE DON’T NEED IT! Fox, is doing a fine job on reporting the truth, so I can get my figures from their discussion panels.

Posted by: Phdpamela | July 10, 2009, 7:49 am 7:49 am

eight FTEs over 5 years & “If you could do it for less, I suggest you bid the gig.” – John Vacek
Which would soon be followed by “What the heck is a ‘JAWS browser’ & Section 508?” and “What do you mean, I have to make the site function consistently for Firefox, Safari, Chrome and Opera and not just Internet Explorer?!”
Yes, blind, color blind and low vision people DO use the internet and all government sites are required by law to ensure that the information contained on the site is available to them as well.

Posted by: Greg | July 10, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Here is an idea about making it easier to track the money….don’t spend it.

Posted by: David | July 10, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

One of my friend’s company is maintaining a site for US government, for $170,000 every year, the site actually is more like a page which contains a form.

Posted by: jack | July 10, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am

I work for a web design company and that sounds like a total rip off. I support the stimulus, but this is a total waste of money.

Posted by: Jas | July 10, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Problem is, the site will likely NOT be created or staffed by federal employees (who by the way could do an excellent job for a FRACTION of the cost)…it will be a federal contractor. That is why it will cost $18 million. …$2.5 million for the server, $2 million for software, $7 million for salaries, $2 million for office supplies,…etc., etc.

Posted by: Bob Nospam | July 10, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

People don’t realize that this money is putting lower income people to work. All you rich people should quit complaining and let the man with the plan get it done. You’ll see its gonna get better for a change.

Posted by: Warren Biggins | July 10, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Whose brilliant idea was this? That’s utterly ridiculous.

Posted by: Phoenix59 | July 10, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

I develop web applications at $8 an hour (I’m an intern).
According to that figure, it would take me 281,250 days of working 9-5 to make recovery.gov. Thats over 700 years.
I think if you locked 2 people in a room with the promise of $1 million dollars each if they pop out a good recovery.gov you’d eventually get a good recovery.gov

Posted by: tonyb | July 10, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Maybe they should just call geeksquad.

Posted by: John Hampton | July 10, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Indeed a milestone has been achieved. It has finally been proven, without a doubt, the government can do whatever the hell it wants and you can’t do a damn thing about it.
Someone help me get some nice no-bid contracts so I can help screw my neighbors

Posted by: Aus | July 10, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Its amazing how the koolaid drinkers can even find a way to excuse this kind of waste! When will they wake up and see what this administration is doing? Bush was an idiot, and he is gonna look like an all star after these progressives get thru bankrupting our country. Obama is gonna add 8 to 10 trillion dollars to our debt, not counting Cap and Trade, and Health Care! We are goona be looking at a 20 trillion dollar debt if he gets 2 terms! Thats double what the crook Bush did, and theses idiots think Obama is fixing things! Maybe do some research b4 you vote complete powere to a group of anti American progressives! But your the kind of idiots that think its ok to sign a bill b4 reading too!
WAKE UP AMERICA!

Posted by: scott wulf | July 10, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

I don’t need the government to spend $18,000,000 to show me how they’re wasting $1,000,000,000,000. Waste is waste, no matter how you blog it.

Posted by: notamindlessobamaite | July 10, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

how is the VALUE of this site equal to its cost? i’m all for transparency, but not when it has such a high price tag. how is this a priority right now?

Posted by: DB | July 10, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

There are probably international banks and large corporations that budget around 150k for website redesign – in short anything over a million IS absurd, no matter the scale and even given staff, equipment, hosting and bandwidth considerations. Here’s your hope and change in action…

Posted by: jim | July 13, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

This is getting unreal. Can we please come to the conclusion as a nation that the government only makes things worse? Please? Bush didn’t do a great job but at least he didn’t burden the next 100 years of Americans…

Posted by: Ryan | July 13, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Context please. What does the ABCnews.com website cost to maintain and upgrade yearly? What would it cost if you were building it from scratch starting today?

Posted by: Arachnae | July 14, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

This article is incredibly misleading. Read the original RFP — this is not a website redesign, it’s the fee for building and running the site with 24/7 support for *years*. This includes collecting and collating data continually from a wide array of sources. $18 mil for *years* of 24/7 support, hosting, data et al is actually reasonable.

Posted by: Craig C. Kip | July 18, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

for 18 million, you could have a team of people whose sole responsibility is pesonally email or call every American with regular updates and still have money left over for something else. And you’d create jobs that would last at least as long as this administration.
this feels like a $400 hammer…

Posted by: Jess | July 20, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Sounds like a little Voters Remorse LOL
Hows that Hopey-Changey thing working for you?!

Posted by: pinksugar | July 23, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

I want to know who got the no bid contract. I hear it is a campaign donor to Hussein himself. $18M for a website is not bad economics, it is criminal !!!

Posted by: Tom O'Halloran | July 25, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

if this is a “redesign”, what was wrong with, or what happened to the original design?
Who did the original design? What do they say about the work being done AGAIN?

Posted by: David | August 7, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

This is PR at it’s worst! 18 million to redesign a website. Does this adminsistration really believe the public will buy into this. This is payback to someone. It can’t possibly cost that much. Bill Gates would laugh if wasn’t already in Obama’s pocket.

Posted by: Kathleen Kaufmann | August 14, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

OK – this is old news, but it needs to be said. Technology is expensive people. This is not just “graphic design.” They are tying into backend systems which keep track of these numbers using databases, failover systems, blah blah blah. I have worked for companies that spent over a 100 million to implement ERP systems which tie into their organizations databases and link to websites for processing orders. This is no different. Add in staffing and boom – you would be surprised at how much this can cost. This is just spin – information taken out of context and presented with a slant that outrages those who have no background in it professionally.
At some point in these posts someone said a web designer gets paid like 20k. Where the hell is that? I have a staff of 5 and when you take in costs of benefits, salary, etc. You are looking AT A MINIMUM AN AVERAGE of 100k a person. You have back-end programmers, front-end programmers, designers, etc. Now through in redundent hardware, hosting costs, facility costs, etc.
The bottom line is, you just simply don’t get it. This stuff is expensive.

Posted by: aTechyWhoGetsIt | August 28, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Oh yeah, I forgot Database Admins, tech contracters (at $100 to $200 an hour – yes they do make that), software, middleware people (if you don’t know what this is – that proves my point).
Let’s be clear – I am not saying anyone here is ignorant or dumb. I am saying that most people have no clue what something costs unless you work in the industry. As far as I know Farming is cheap. Hell – buy a seed, plant it, water it, and pick it. But I am sure I am wrong on that point – otherwise why would they need gov. assistance too.

Posted by: aTechyWhoGetsIt | August 28, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

our goverment has totaly lost it.time for the american pepole to take back our goverment.and totaly change the people in congress.that the change we need.

Posted by: mark belloli | September 28, 2009, 8:59 am 8:59 am

its very good site to make tax payers aware about their complete money , which they are paying as tax, its good to know for everyone , who so ever pay tax… so go ahead…………
=======================================
alex01
mls search

Posted by: alex01 | October 27, 2009, 8:09 am 8:09 am

$18M? Are their webservers running Mac OS?

Posted by: Chicago_Sam | November 17, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

OH MY GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
$18 M for a lousy website with all these mistakes on it????????????????????????
OMG, this is Obama’s $200 toilet seat!

Posted by: NH | November 18, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

I’d have taken $1M to post phony job creation numbers and fake districts!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: NH | November 18, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Why is it that this isn’t exposed like accorn–this is a knowing fraud, another way for the gov’t t steel money from the taxpyers—PEOPLE IT’S TIME TO WAKE UP–BEFORE WE BECOME THE NEXT JONAH AND GET EATEN BY THE BIG WHALE—-(THE GOVERNMENT)

Posted by: Andrew Napoli | November 19, 2009, 1:49 am 1:49 am

what kind of idiot would grant a 18 million dollar contract for a web site.
it makes me sick.
what a bunch of idiots,idiots,idiots,idiots.
its mind blowing.
simple minded morons.
it doesn’t take many brains to see that contractor wanted to much money.
its just incredible how stupid these fools are in office.
they sit at a desk with other fools and tweak a contact to fare out of whack that no body wants to submit a bid for the contract and they end up with one contractor who bided.
what a bunch of dumb audgfdywf.

Posted by: bowlan | November 26, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Hmmm 18m for a website how about 18m for charity!

Posted by: Tom | November 27, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

18 MILLION DOLLARS and the website doesn’t even work right. I am a web designer and even I think this figure is completely absurd. How is this website even making the government accountable if they are only posting expenditures AFTER they happen?? The first thing the gov’t needs to be accountable for is spending 18 million dollars on a website. If government acted like a competitive business instead of a spoiled rich brat, maybe excessive spending like this would stop happening.

Posted by: Cas | December 4, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am

i think this a lot more money then i ever thinked of.18m is a huge money to be piad for.redesign is not so highly priced.and really its a big money.

Posted by: fat | January 4, 2010, 6:37 am 6:37 am

18 million is a lot of money for redesign.how it get approved it a big question for me.

Posted by: fat | January 4, 2010, 6:37 am 6:37 am

Government at it’s worst.
from the Banquet Manager

Posted by: banquet manager | January 9, 2010, 5:48 am 5:48 am

. According to the study, the most important tool for small businesses to succeed in 2010 is search engine marketing, while email marketing, public relations and social media cited as crucial for success.
23.8% of all small businesses reported that search engine marketing was the tool most needed for their business to succeed in 2010.

Posted by: davidbaer | January 22, 2010, 2:16 am 2:16 am

Fantastic work is quality and when you factor in the graphic designers and the web designers that they hired, the budget would easily balloon up.

Posted by: Doir Bravo | April 5, 2010, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Wow that is a lot of money! Imagine how many people could have gotten a medical treatment for it! I am not againts improving things but this seems like a total waste…

Posted by: Sean | May 10, 2010, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

I think maybe the government is already “accountable” for this bone-headed idea.

Posted by: Business Lawyer | April 5, 2011, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.