An Interview with President Obama
MOSCOW – The day after he heralded a successful preliminary nuclear disarmament treaty with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, President Obama today told ABC News in an interview that his approach to foreign affairs was already bearing modest fruit in efforts to disarm Iran and North Korea.
“In North Korea what we saw was a very strong unanimity around a very strong sanctions regime that I think it’s fair to say that even two or three years ago might not have been imposed by either Russia or China,” the president said. “They might have blocked it in the Security Council. We’ve already seen a ship of North Korea’s turned back because of international effort to implement the sanctions and I think that is a positive step forward.”
Mr. Obama said that Iran’s “governing elites… are going through a struggle that has been mirrored painfully and powerfully on the streets.” He said that “the fact that we have both said we are willing to work with Iran — at the same time as we have been very clear about our grave deep concerns with respect to not just the violence, not just the detentions that have taken place — has created a space where the international community can potentially join and pressure Iran more effectively than they have in the past.”
That said, the president said that it was too early to declare the policy successful.
“Ultimately we’re going to have to see whether a country like Russia, for example, is willing to work with us to apply pressure on Iran to take a path toward international respectability as opposed to the path they’re on. That’s not something we’re going to know the results of for several more months as we continue to do the hard diplomatic work of putting this coalition together to tell Iran: ‘Make the better choice.’”
ABC News interviewed the president Tuesday afternoon at the exhibition center Gostiny Dvor, where he’d just finished speaking at the commencement address for the New Economic School.
Asked if the North Korean and Iranian nuclear proliferation challenges mean the United States needs Russia’s help more than Russia needs the United States, President Obama was non-committal.
“Russia, I think understands that their long term prosperity is still tied to the world economy and to the world community,” he said, arguing that “on a whole host of international issues they recognize that a partnership with the United States will strengthen them and their interests, so I think there’s the opportunity for mutual benefit here.”
He said of his new diplomatic efforts with Russia that the “tone” has been “reset” but now “comes the hard work of actually seeing this produce improvements in our security situation and the world security situation.”
On Michael Jackson’s Funeral: ‘At Some Point People Will Start Focusing Again on Things Like Nuclear Weapons’
Having joked that he’d have to discuss Michael Jackson in order to get media coverage of the U.S.-Russian summit, the president said he wasn’t at all irritated by the media attention to the funeral of the King of Pop.
“You know, this is part of American culture,” the president said. “Michael Jackson, like Elvis, like Sinatra, when somebody whose captivated the imagination of the country for that long passes away, people pay attention. And I assume at some point people will start focusing again on things like nuclear weapons.”
The last time President Obama was in Russia was in 2005 when then-Sen. Obama was part of a congressional delegation visiting future nuclear weapons sites.
At the time, the president recalled, “you had already started to see the Russian public concerned less with democracy and human rights than they were in consumption and a growing economy.”
Mr. Obama said that “there was a renewed confidence that in some ways had pushed those other issues out to the side.”
But in conversations with President Medvedev on this trip, President Obama says he’s convinced that “there is a growing recognition that if they want to diversity their economy, continuing to develop the entrepreneurs of the sort that I just spoke to at this graduation, that issues like rule of law, transparency, democracy are going to continue to be important.”
Mr. Obama predicted that after what he called Russia’s “wild swings” since the 1990s, “you’re starting to see Russia balance out. And I think that they want to pursue economic growth but I think that they recognize that some of the nagging issues around civil society still have to be fixed.”
‘There’s Nothing That We Would Have Done Differently’ on the Economy
Turning to domestic issues, the president said that when Vice President Joe Biden recently told ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos that the White House “misread” the economy when planning the stimulus package in January, the president said that “what Vice President Biden was referring to was simply the fact that when we passed he stimulus, we hadn’t gotten the full report of the first quarter contractions in the economy that turned out to be way worse than anybody had anticipated.”
But the president denied that his economic prescription was wrong because the diagnosis was incomplete.
“There’s nothing that we would have done differently,” he said. “We needed a stimulus and we needed a substantial stimulus.”
Even with an economic assessment that was, in retrospect, overly optimistic, the president said his team knew “there was an economic tsunami coming at us, and we still knew that we were going to need a substantial stimulus,” one that would include “tax cuts which you can get out really fast” and “money to states so they’re not laying off teachers and firefighters, and police officers at such a rapid pace.”
Infrastructure projects were always going to take “six months to eight months to get that money actually into the ground because that’s the nature of big infrastructure projects,” he said.
In Singapore over night, White House economic adviser Laura D’Andrea Tyson said that “we should be planning on a contingency basis for a second round of stimulus.” Would the president support a second stimulus package, as some congressional Democrats have proposed?
“The question that some have argued is, ‘Okay, what next?’ Maybe you stop the freefall but you still have close to 10% unemployment,’” the president said. “And you know, this is something that we wrestle with constantly.”
The challenge, the president said, is “that we inherited a big deficit, and it is at a certain point potentially counterproductive if we’re spending more money than we’re having to borrow.”
The president said supporters such as Gen. Colin Powell (Ret.) and billionaire investor Warren Buffet, who have said they’re worried about the massive deficits the Obama administration is creating, have “legitimate concerns. In the midterm and long term we’re going to have to get control of that.”
Working on short term stimulus “is one that where we’re pressing the gas, pressing the brakes, trying to get it right,” he said.
The issues the president is dealing with here may be serious, but First Lady Michelle Obama and First Tweens Sasha and Malia accompanied their father to Moscow.
Calling his daughters “great travelers,” the president said that “Sasha was walking down one of the halls of the Kremlin yesterday. She had her trench coat on, had her pockets in her trench coat.”
The president joked that he and his wife “called her Agent 99, she just looked like she knew where she was going. I thought she was going to pull out her shoe phone.”
– jpt

Email
Rick Santorum Encircled in Prayer
Boehner Slams Obama on Contraception Controversy
Mr. Obama said that Iran’s “governing elites… are going through a struggle that has been mirrored painfully and powerfully on the streets.”
What in the world does he mean by this? The governing elites are not going through a struggle amongst themselves. They are struggling to contain the unrest and dissatisfaction for them on the streets by using violence and blocking communication with the outside world. This statement may be coming true in a sense, now that some of the governing elites are trying to take advantage of the situation and get power for themselves, but it is a case where they are mirroring the struggle in the streets, not the other way around. How naive and stupid does Obama think everyone else is? We can all see the injustices committed by the Iranian regime and conclude that we should have no business talking to these cruel despots. Why can our president not stand up for what’s right and say, until you stop abusing your people, we will not negotiate or engage with you?
Posted by: Jason | July 7, 2009, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Obama is a true genius. Tapper and his ilk need to lay off.
Posted by: Matt | July 7, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Gosh, you guys are both rather indignant and not very clued up. Shame.
Stop, take a deep breath, do a little research.
Posted by: rob | July 7, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Hmmmmmmm Jake, no questions on the illegal firings of the Inspector Generals..Were these question poo pood after submitting them to Obama? another staged interview Jake? transparency please…..
Posted by: Obamas brownnosing media network | July 7, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Uhhhhhh…. What was all that malarky about “shovel-ready”? How could you let him say this without a followup?
A “shovel ready” project takes 6-8 months to start? Errrrrrrrr….
Posted by: Concerned in OH | Jul 7, 2009 9:51:22 AM
___________________________________
That was my my reaction as well when I read it. We heard countless “officials” on television touting these so called “shovel-ready” projects which I doubted when it was pushed. Nothing is shovel-ready with the government unless it is the maneure they shovel. The backpedaling is getting ridiculous.
Also why no follow-up, Jake, on the unemployment rate that teh stimulus plan was supposed to cap at 8%? They’ve moved the goalposts to 10% now so they have begun to infer that the stimulus will cap the rate at 10%.
Errrrrrrrr….? More like Grrrrrrrr!
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 7, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
So, Mr. President, should Zelaya be returned to the Presidency of Hunduras, or to the custody of the elected government? Agovernment elected by the people which ordered Zelaya to be placed under arrest for what he did and await possible impeachment!
If you actually believe what you are spewing forth here, you would allow the duly elected government of Honduras to handle this situation as they see fit!
Posted by: Mike_C | July 7, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am
“Infrastructure projects were always going to take “six months to eight months to get that money actually into the ground because that’s the nature of big infrastructure projects,” he said.”
BS!
There are projects out here now that have the Recovery Act signs up! What we DO NOT know is exactly how many NEW jobs were created by these projects. Many shovel ready jobs were already to go…Hence the term “Shovel Ready”! That meant that contractors had been awarded the job or the sleection processes was already narrowed down to a very few possible companies.
So, Mr. President, how many new workers have been hired to work on these projects that actually have begun???
If only for the sake of proof that your “Stimulator” was actually working, You should know this already! Certainly you could even hire college kids around the country this summer to just contact companies who are currently working Recovery Act projects and find out how many people were hired based on there participation in a Recovery Act project!
Lookeeee what I did, I just created some new jobs! Granted, gov’t jobs, but good jobs for college students this summer!
Posted by: Mike_C | July 7, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Posted by: Mike_C | Jul 7, 2009 10:24:34 AM
If there were any “jobs created/saved” statistics, they would be plastered all over the media. The fact that there is no hoopla means there are no jobs.
This was sold to the public as a “jobs bill” plain and simple which will create 3.5 million jobs and cap the unemployment rate at 8%. The uninformed public bought this thinking the jobs would just roll off the assembly line right away.
But the “moonwalking” has already begun so we have to fight against it. Don’t let them get away with the “it’s too early” and “it’s a slow process” crap. If your representatives voted for this bill, vote them out in 2010 – no matter what party they represent!
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 7, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Well at least President Obama can answer a question without sticking his foot in his mouth like GW did constantly for 8 years. Recently interviewed in his new Dallas suburb a reported asked GW what he’s been doing, Bush replied cleaning up after his dogs did their business in the yard. Well finaly Bush has found a job he’s truly qualified for.
Posted by: Texcritter | July 7, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am
No trip to Kenya, pray tell?
ummm, does he think we’re stupid or something? Maybe he’s skipping that little visit because he knows we’re not.
Can of worms, there. It could get a little messy…so many questions, too few electrical outlets to feed the telOprompter…
Wish he would make a quick stop. He could upstage the Jackson funeral.
Posted by: Papoose | July 7, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am
Posted by: Texcritter | Jul 7, 2009 10:55:15 AM
And Palin is out fishing. Yea, we get it. You can’t let go.
It’s much better to have “wax figures” running the country than real people. I’ll take Bush, Cheney, McCain and Palin over this any day.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 7, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Well at least President Obama can answer a question without sticking his foot in his mouth like GW did constantly for 8 years.
Tex,
Yeah, lets see….he is right on top of that heathcare thingy…isn’t he? He is not sure what the plan is, but he knows he wants it passed by the end of the summer!
He was sure that “Stimulator” was going to keep unemployment from going where its already gone….Opps, that’s right they rushed into that one and didnt REALLY know what was going on. Despite having all those “geniuses” in all those little meeting and being part of all those nice commitees….
He was REALLY REALLY clear about that whole tax increase thingy too…..Opps, now suddenly the trail balloons and such are out there because you cant spend more money than God and not raise some too!
“cap & trade?”….hmm….yeah, that one is working out REAL good too. Perfect time to be tossing that hat into the economic ring! Ohh…yeah…I forgot…according to Obama, …that’s not an energy bill or a climate bill….its a JOBs bill.
If this bunch of misfits spent half the time counting the jobs they think they have created versus talking about it, we might have some idea of how effective this “Stimulator” really is!
Yep…your right…hard for Obama to stick his foot in his mouth…considering he has already spent it!
Posted by: Mike_C | July 7, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Hey Jake: did you hear about the clean air place that has 700 employees making $13.00 per hour? Yeah, it replaced a maytag factory which only had 1,800 enployes making $20.00 per hour. Sure, they hired 700 employees but what happened to the others. …Employment line…
Posted by: Gary | July 7, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am
===Well finaly Bush has found a job he’s truly qualified for.
Posted by: Texcritter | Jul 7, 2009 10:55:15 AM===
Yeah, comedian in chief. Bwahahaha!
Posted by: Axey | July 7, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am
speaking of Iran. What do you think this government site is about?:
anybody got any hackerfriends?
Congratulations with your president, i’m impressed with his ability to speak about complex matters without being cornered and resort to simple (but insufficient) answers.
Posted by: bjoern | July 7, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Obama:“In North Korea what we saw was a very strong unanimity around a very strong sanctions regime that I think it’s fair to say that even two or three years ago might not have been imposed by either Russia or China,” the president said. “They might have blocked it in the Security Council. We’ve already seen a ship of North Korea’s turned back because of international effort to implement the sanctions and I think that is a positive step forward.”
Mr. Obama said that Iran’s “governing elites… are going through a struggle that has been mirrored painfully and powerfully on the streets.” He said that “the fact that we have both said we are willing to work with Iran — at the same time as we have been very clear about our grave deep concerns with respect to not just the violence, not just the detentions that have taken place — has created a space where the international community can potentially join and pressure Iran more effectively than they have in the past.”
================
Genius!
In both of these statements, Obama is saying things have gotten so bad, the international community feels they may have to do *something*.
We have NK and Iran right where we want them!
Posted by: MayBee | July 7, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
The president said supporters such as Gen. Colin Powell (Ret.) and billionaire investor Warren Buffet, who have said they’re worried about the massive deficits the Obama administration is creating, have “legitimate concerns. In the midterm and long term we’re going to have to get control of that.”
============
Obama or O’Hara? He’ll think about that tomorrow. Tomorrow is another day.
They do have legitimate concerns, and thinking that we can somehow wait to figure out where to get the money as he plans to spend yet more of it isn’t a real plan.
Posted by: MayBee | July 7, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
I wonder why there is new talk of a second stimulus when only, what, about 15% of the current stimulus money has been paid out.
And the shovel ready jobs?… We know what they are really shovelling, don’t we?
Does Obama consider himself part of the “governing elites” in America? I think that his choice of words is very telling.
There was a reason some of the public wanted the press to do its job and investigate Obama and his friends were all about during the election.
Words matter, associations matter. The press dropped the ball on showing the American people who Obama really was. They were too busy screaming, tingling, fainting and trying to get into his good graces.
Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | July 7, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
WhereWasThePress . …
yawn, yawn, yawn . . . bash the President . . . yawn, yawn, yawn . . . fear the President. . . . yawn, yawn, yawn . .. smear the President. . .
Posted by: danita | July 7, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
yawn, yawn, yawn . . . bash the President . . . yawn, yawn, yawn . . . fear the President. . . . yawn, yawn, yawn . .. smear the President. . .
danita ,
LOL….whats good for the goose…..
Posted by: Mike_C | July 7, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Remember how the last President would hide for months at a time refusing to take news conferences or answer questions from the media?
And when he did answer questions, he was basically incomprehensible.
What a relief to have an intelligent, articulate President who actually seems to have an idea of what he’s doing.
The carpers on here may have their personal agenda to push, but President Obama is always detailed and specific in his responses – the majority of americans see this cleary.
He does not hide and stonewall information like the last President.
Posted by: danita | July 7, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
danita says: “What a relief to have an intelligent, articulate President who actually seems to have an idea of what he’s doing.”
Umm, sure he can read well, but when he is off the cuff, he really is not that impressive. Does he have a coherent foreign policy? If so can you articulate what the Obama doctrine is? His domestic policy is much different than what he promised in the campaign, and his promise of change and transparency is laughable considering how his OLC has blocked requests for information not only on some of the same things that Bush did, but also on the firings of the Inspectors General among other things. What I really would like though is to go back to whether or not you can tell me what the Obama doctrine is in regards to foreign policy.
Posted by: Jason | July 7, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Jason . . .
You want me to detail the President’s foreign policy. Have you missed his trip to Russia? Have you missed his speeches to the Islamic countries? Did you miss his trip to Canada? Have you missed his negotiations with Russia to isolate Iran? Did you miss his promises to attack Al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan and his immediate followup on that?
You need to do some work yourself.
Posted by: danita | July 7, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Yes danita, he was very clear before the great “Stimulator”.
We must pass this bill NOW or face turning a crisis into a catastrophe.
We pass the bil1… now when it obvious to everyone that it is not working, we have VP, not Obama.. coming clean about how they blew it!
So if Obama is so clear with his responses, WHY wasn’t HE the one to admit the incredibly obvious.
….
….
patiently waiting the next Bush reference instead of an answer……
Posted by: Mike_C | July 7, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
“patiently waiting the next Bush reference instead of an answer……”
Posted by: Mike_C | Jul 7, 2009 2:27:05 PM
Mike, ex-President Bush can mumble incoherently for himself, no need for me to attempt to speak for him.
Mike, the Recovery and Reinvestment plan is a 4-year plan culminating in 2012. For you to expect it to work in A FEW SHORT MONTHS is – idiotic. You live in a fantasy world.
President Obama said clearly and repeatedly that this economic situation would not be any easy fix, that it would take time, and that things might well get worse before they get better.
Why is this so difficult for you to understand? Could it be your agenda to disparage everything the President does?
Posted by: danita | July 7, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
danita says: “You need to do some work yourself.”
My impression of his foreign policy is to isolate our traditional allies and try and engage those who have been isolated by the US and much of the international community. It makes little sense why he would promise to talk to Iran’s leadership no matter how badly they treat their people. It also makes no sense why he would continue to put very little pressure on North Korea and anger our allies in the UK and Israel. What was the point of him going to Russia? All he accomplished was an agreement to start talking about reducing the number of nuclear warheads, but in order to get an actual treaty signed, the russians will want him to pull the missile defense shield out of eastern europe. I am betting our Senators will not approve that and this is why he floated the idea of bypassing Senate approval, which is required by the constitution. Why are we getting involved in the Honduran situation by endorsing a man who broke Honduran law, but not getting involved in Iran? Why can we meddle in Israel and Honduras, but not in North Korea or Iran? The signals he sends are that we will appease those who oppose us and spurn the cooperation of our allies. This can not be good for our national interests.
Posted by: Jason | July 7, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
“to isolate our traditional allies”
Who are the traditional allies of the United States and name all who have been isolated by Obama.
Posted by: danita | July 7, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
“My impression of his foreign policy is to isolate our traditional allies and try and engage those who have been isolated by the US and much of the international community.”
Huh? Beyond the right wing in Israel being upset that he would dare talk to Iran, which traditional ally has been isolated?
“It makes little sense why he would promise to talk to Iran’s leadership no matter how badly they treat their people.”
Why not? We talk to plenty of countries that have horrid human rights records.
“It also makes no sense why he would continue to put very little pressure on North Korea and anger our allies in the UK and Israel”
Why would the UK and Israel be angry about NK?
And what pressure would you like for him to put on NK? A military strike?
Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
From the HuffPo Progress Report posted January 5, 2009.
And I quote:
“In his weekend radio address, Obama said that his goal is to put together a plan that “not only creates jobs in the short-term but spurs economic growth and competitiveness in the long-term.”
End quote.
And the end of this inane discussion about what kind of bill this was and is. Where are the “SHORT-TERM” jobs!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 7, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
“Why can we meddle in Israel and Honduras, but not in North Korea or Iran?”
Again, sorry Jason, but your use of the word ‘meddle’ is biased and wrong.
As has often been the case, the United States is involved in attempting to broker peace in the middle east – you call it meddling.
Many of the major countries in the world have come out against the military coup in Honduras – as did the United Stated. Can you name any countries that have supported the military actions and the new President Roberto Micheletti. The answer to that quesion is ‘no’. This coup has been almost universally opposed.
President Obama spoke forcefully against the crackdown on protestors in Iran. He spoke repeatedly to this, day after day – far more than he commented on Honduras AND in far stronger language. He is attempting to negotiate with Iran so we don’t have to ‘bomb them back to the stone age’ killing many innocent civilians, woman and children, etc.
And Obama has been forming a strong coalition against North Korea including traditional allies of N. Korea – Russia and China. Increasingly North Korea is being viewed as isolated troublemakers. This is the whole idea. Again, this takes place before you consider ‘bombing them back into the stone age’.
Posted by: danita | July 7, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
And for those waiting until 2012 to see how the Stimulus Plan works out (and you know who you are), the article goes on to say:
“The package will focus on providing assistance to low- and middle-income Americans, strengthening the nation’s infrastructure, and investing in states that are struggling with falling revenues, with the goal of creating or preserving at least 3 million jobs over the next two years.”
That’s 3 million jobs in 2 years – not 3, not 4 and not 8. Two years!
This was Obama’s promotion of the stimulus plan; no one else’s. So don’t anyone give me any crap about how “everyone knew it was going to take some time.”
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 7, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
The emperor has no clothes.
Posted by: Aaron | July 7, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Timmy . …
It’s been a FEW SHORT MONTHS . . . it’s not even near 2 years having passed.
You seem almost hysterical.
Posted by: danita | July 7, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
danita,
Many people from Obama’s own administration made firm statemnts about the great “Stimulator” Your the one here babbling on & on about how clear Obama is when he answers questions!
Was it the Presidents critics who claimed the unemployment rate would top out at 9%?
Was it the President’s critics that stated in May “the nation’s economy appears to have bottomed out”?
Was it the President’s critics this weekend who said “We misread the state of the economy” ?
Is it the president’s critics who are supporting restoration of a president in Honduras who was attempting to usurp the the will of the people by unilaterally altering the country’s constitution ?
By the way danita, in Joe bidens own words….
“So, no second stimulus?” I asked.
“No, I didn’t say that,” Biden said, “I think it’s premature to make that judgment. This was set up to spend out over 18 months.”
18 months not 36+ months!
So far, the gov’t website is STILL only showing job “estimates”…ZERO real data!
Now surely we have people who are supposed to be tracking these $$$, certainly they can tell us the number of new hires from the companies who have recieved “Stimulator” funds so far!
No one is saying that we should have full recovery at this point, but WHERE is ALL this TRANSPARENCY we were promised? Where are the number of jobs created so far? (By the way, The media should now and forever refuse to talk about the phantom phrase “saved job”)
Posted by: Mike_C | July 7, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
+++And what pressure would you like for him to put on NK? A military strike?+++ Since Ryan asked nicely, I will jump in and answer. No, not a military strike, but stopping the ship steaming to Mynamar with suspected contraband to show that we meant it when the UN passed a resolution saying that such ships could and should be stopped and searched. Showing the NK that these sanctions have teeth would be nice.
Posted by: GetReal | July 7, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
danita asks who the US allies are who have been isolated or diminished by Obama.
I named two of them in that post. The UK has been a staunch ally since the 19th century, and we reward them by not giving Brown the respect that a head of state deserves and by sneaking terrorists into British protectorates without their prior consent. We not only gave Brown a lousy collection of DVD’s that wouldn’t play on British players, but we also made light of it and let them know that our special relationship with them has ended under Obama’s admin. Israel has been treated like it has less sovereignty than one of our own states, Obama has no problem dictating to them what they can and can’t do with settlements in Israel and warning them that they better not defend their national security by attacking Iran’s nuclear sites. They are one of the two democracies in the middle east and we condemn them and we appease Iran. What gives? Oh and don’t forget Poland, Georgia, and the other former Soviet satellites who Obama seems content to allow the Russians to dominate again. How about Honduras, where we are more willing to defend the wannabe “president for life” Zelaya, rather than the rule of law? There will be more I am sure, but that’s enough to show a disturbing trend.
Posted by: Jason | July 7, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
ryan asks: “And what pressure would you like for him to put on NK? A military strike?”
As pathetically weak as the UN resolutions have been, how about starting by enforcing them with real sanctions, like complete economic isolation and seizing the accounts the Norks use in their arms sales to other countries? How about (speaking very generally) using cyberwarfare to bypass their firewalls and hacking into their ISP filters and allowing the people of North Korea to have full access to the web? There are a large number of economic pressures that we can apply if we did so with our allies outside the UN security council where China and Russia will veto anything with teeth. We don’t need to strike Iran or North Korea militarily, we can do more to pressure them by shutting down their access to world markets, which all flow through US banks or those of our allies.
Posted by: Jason | July 7, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
From the Wall Street Journal, February 18, 2009, the day (what we will now call) The First Stimulus Plan was signed into law:
“In addition, the administration is not ruling out a second stimulus package, though there are no plans to request one now, said White House press secretary Robert Gibbs.
“I think the president is going to do what’s necessary to grow this economy. But there are no particular plans at this point for a second stimulus package at the moment. I wouldn’t foreclose it, but I wouldn’t say… we’re readily making plans to do so.”
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 7, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
danita says: “And Obama has been forming a strong coalition against North Korea including traditional allies of N. Korea – Russia and China. Increasingly North Korea is being viewed as isolated troublemakers. This is the whole idea.”
Russia and China will never be part of a coalition that actually causes real harm to the regime that they have supported for years. Why is North Korea now being viewed as isolated troublemakers? Why not back as far as the 90′s when they continually flaunted UN resolutions? The Bush admin was criticized by liberals for isolating North Korea and calling them out on their trouble making, yet now you say this is Obama’s policy?
Posted by: Jason | July 7, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Not just regular old transparency Mike_C, but (again from the WSJ):
“The president also promised that his administration would provide “unprecedented … transparency and accountability.”
Oooooooo… It’s like he really meant it.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 7, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Danita says: “President Obama spoke forcefully against the crackdown on protestors in Iran. He spoke repeatedly to this, day after day – far more than he commented on Honduras AND in far stronger language. He is attempting to negotiate with Iran so we don’t have to ‘bomb them back to the stone age’ killing many innocent civilians, woman and children, etc.”
FAIL
Obama only started to condemn Iran when he was pressured by the entire world and even then he has been trying to have it both ways by talking tough and yet saying he will still negotiate with them no matter what they do. His admin has been far harsher on the Honduran interim government than you make it sound. They have dictated that Zelaya should be restored and we have stopped the foreign aid we were giving them. We don’t have to use military force against Iran, we can just blockade the ports and freeze their trading accounts with the US and our allies, which is what has been urged by the Iranian protestors.
Posted by: Jason | July 7, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
danita says: “Anyhow Mike, I’ve yet to hear you say the President has done anything worthwhile or right . .. that speaks volumes.”
I think most if not all conservatives praised the president for allowing the Navy SEALS to take out those pirates, and for putting a stop to the release of the “torture” pictures, and for learning the lesson of Iraq that the surge worked and to use that with different tactics in Afghanistan. If he has done more that I agree with I will praise him for that as well, but the vast majority of his decisions have been abysmal.
Posted by: Jason | July 7, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
I better sit down. I’m getting dizzy from all the spin.
The unemployed don’t care what consists of “a few short months.” They want the jobs they hoped were coming. This is typical. Promise the moon and then tap dance as fast as you can.
Of course, I know it was never about jobs in the first place. But I feel bad for – and compelled to fight for – those who bought into this fallacy, like my friend who emailed me. He’s having to swallow his pride and move he and his wife into their apartment in another state to try to survive.
But hey, no skin off this President’s nose. He’s in Russia staying in $13,000 a night hotel suites, dragging along their wife and kids and grandma and having a gay old time! All at the expense of my friend who paid his taxes and is now jobless and humiliated.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 7, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Jason . . .
“Obama only started to condemn Iran when he was pressured by the entire world”
Sorry, this is utter nonsense. President Obama did an astounding job of condemning the violence against the protestors while not giving the Iranians an excuse to blame America for outside meddling – an obvious ploy of the religious extremists in Iran.
Posted by: danita | July 7, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Timmy . .. .
You’re a fool for expecting magical results in A FEW SHORT MONTHS. You live in a fantasy world. It’s only you ‘right wingers’ who have been dumb enough to jump on any words you can find in an attempt to pretend the President promised immediate results.
Posted by: danita | July 7, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
danita says: “Sorry, this is utter nonsense. President Obama did an astounding job of condemning the violence against the protestors while not giving the Iranians an excuse to blame America for outside meddling – an obvious ploy of the religious extremists in Iran.”
Call it nonsense, but Obama did not say anything other than that he was concerned about the situation in Iran until after several world leaders including Merkel and Sarkozy condemned Iran’s mullahs, after which Obama held a quick presser to also condemn the violence, but to also reassure the mullahs that none of this was our doing and he would still engage with them once they got this thing under control. Oh yeah, and how did his no meddling policy work out? The mullahs accused the US and the UK of meddling in their affairs, which they would have done no matter what we did, so why not speak truth to corrupt power and condemn the murder of the Iranian people who only want freedom and democracy? I call this astounding as well, but I think we mean it in different ways.
Posted by: Jason | July 7, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Sorry Jason . . . you really miss the mark on Iran.
Posted by: danita | July 7, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
“he would still engage with them once they got this thing under control.”
Well yeah. Do you think we should not engage Iran and instead continue to trade saber rattling barbs?
“Oh yeah, and how did his no meddling policy work out? The mullahs accused the US and the UK of meddling in their affairs, which they would have done no matter what we did,”
Call it the legacy of our past.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
danita says that I miss the mark on Iran without refuting my arguments and ryan says that, of course we would negotiate with dictators who kill their people. I feel like we are on two totally different planets, and I don’t understand when or why liberals have stopped believing in democracy and holding dictators accountable. Obama wants to present himself in the mold of an FDR or a Kennedy, but neither one of these giants of liberalism would have ever condoned the current policy of appeasement in light of the killings and disappearances of Iranians who protest against the regime.
Posted by: Jason | July 7, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
danita,
who is expecting “magical” results? We simply want them to report ANY results! According you….we are all just supposed to shut up and wait for the “Magic”!
We are DEMANDING what this man PROMISED! we are now some months into this thing, yet when i go to the recovery website and run my mouse over that map of this greast country, ALL I see is the promise of estimated jobs. Not a single state with 250 jobs created or a 1000, or 2500, or even 10 !
Billions have been allocated out and millions spent in the bureacracy to mange it, YET…no data! No, I am not counting that fictional paper that Biden produced. I am going by the measuring stick that the President claimed all of America could use. The recovery website. Still no Data!
But interestingly enough, if you go to the LBS site….it seems to have data EVERY MONTH….
Posted by: Mike_C | July 7, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
“I named two of them in that post. The UK has been a staunch ally since the 19th century, and we reward them by not giving Brown the respect that a head of state deserves and by sneaking terrorists into British protectorates without their prior consent.”
The UK became an ally in WW1, we became quite close until WW2 cemented our special relationship.
The courting of Roosevelt by Churchill makes for some great reading.
The 19th century was very much a time of the UK as a rival to the US, starting with the war of 1812 and up thru the Civil War when rapidly industrializing England wanted the South’s cotton.
“We not only gave Brown a lousy collection of DVD’s that wouldn’t play on British players”
ROFLMAO! Jason, really?
Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
“jump on any words you can find in an attempt to pretend the President promised immediate results.”
____________________________________
“In his weekend radio address, Obama said that his goal is to put together a plan that “not only creates jobs in the short-term but spurs economic growth and competitiveness in the long-term.”
NOT ANY WORDS; HIS OWN WORDS.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 7, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
“I think most if not all conservatives praised the president for allowing the Navy SEALS to take out those pirates,”
Depends if one watches right wing media.
Rush wanted to know where the outcry was against the killing of 3 black teenagers.
“and for putting a stop to the release of the “torture” pictures, and for learning the lesson of Iraq that the surge worked and to use that with different tactics in Afghanistan.”
The surge was the tactic not merely an increase of troops.
Obama is increasing the troops in Afghanistan but the tactics will not be the same.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
I’m sorry, Danita, you are blindly following a leader who backs dictators and Mullahs.
President Obama is in synch with the likes of Hugo Chavez, Daniel Orgtega and Fidel Castro in calling for Zelaya to be reinstated. Chavez even threatened to invade Honduras which was met by silence from the White House.
Why? Obama is a leftist, not a liberal and the fact that most of the MSM does not call him on his actions lets one know where they (the MSM) line up as well.
Obama’s immediate silence and lack of support (oxygen) purposefully extinguished the flames of freedom and democracy in Iran.
Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | July 7, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
“President Obama is in synch with the likes of Hugo Chavez, Daniel Orgtega and Fidel Castro in calling for Zelaya to be reinstated.”
We are of course taking the lead on bringing this situation to a close because South America is our “turf” (Monroe doctrine) but the UN vote on the resolution against the removal of Zelaya was unanimous.
I guess we’re all commies now.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
“As pathetically weak as the UN resolutions have been, how about starting by enforcing them with real sanctions, like complete economic isolation and seizing the accounts the Norks use in their arms sales to other countries?”
I could support that.
“How about (speaking very generally) using cyberwarfare to bypass their firewalls and hacking into their ISP filters and allowing the people of North Korea to have full access to the web?”
Probably because that would be an act of war.
“There are a large number of economic pressures that we can apply if we did so with our allies outside the UN security council where China and Russia will veto anything with teeth.”
Do you support a return to the 6 nation talks?
Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
When President Obama talked about retooling the economy for the long term do you think he meant . . . uhm . . . 6 months? And the short term was . .. uhm . . . 3 or 4 months? Posted by: danita | Jul 7, 2009 4:33:50 PM
______________________________________
I don’t know what he meant but I do know he sold this bill to the public as a short-term jobs bills, which is a shame for those who were out of work and had hope that they would be saved. Whether it is 3, 4, 5 months or 2 years, people have been mislead aggregiously.
The selling of this farse as a jobs bill was my original comment, which I doubt you remember, since you’ve been busy spinning. Nothing you’ve said has changed my mind about that. He literally sold the country a lie knowing the faithful would twist his words to protect him.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 7, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Timmy . .. .
“3 million, 4 million? what is the predicted number? Seems to change according to the wind.”
If you expect economic forecasting to be precise, you’re an idiot. What was being laid out was ballpark goals and intentions. We’ll see where things sit in 3 years from now.
Are you not aware this is an astounding situation that has not arisen before?
This was a world-wide economic collapse, virtually unprecedented.
You seem to think its some kind of parlour game where you get to point fingers and jump up and down.
Posted by: danita | July 7, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
When President Obama talked about retooling the economy for the long term do you think he meant . . . uhm . . . 6 months? And the short term was . .. uhm . . . 3 or 4 months?
DUH, in case you had not noticed danita, the short term is looking VERY BAD! People are sick of hearing….just wait…it will get better… Especially when this thing costly more than 3/4 TRILLION dollars!
I do believe we should hold their feet to the fire to find out EXACTLY what really IS happening!
Seems to me people went off the deep end over the goverment’s inability to move quickly to help those effected by Katrina.
This is certainly a situation that calls for similar swift action by our government. Yet you defend the lack of progress. I think we all know what you and other would be saying if this was a Republican President!
You can bury your head in the sand for a year or two if you want, I and many others however have mortgages & college bills to pay! I can’t afford to wait to to see if my job gets crushed while we all “wait” for the magic to happen!
Posted by: Mike_C | July 7, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
p.s – the world is not out of this economic collapse yet – not nearly!
Millions of jobs are still being lost worldwide, factories are closing, homes are being lost. ..
The stimulus money will help, but there really are no guarantees.
It’s also worth noting that when stock markets are falling, and the economy is in virtual free fall, it is part of the job of the government to foster a positive atmosphere. Too complex for you?
Posted by: danita | July 7, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Mike_C . .. .
If you think a magic wand can be waived that will fix all this – you’re sadly mistaken.
The global scale of this meltdown was unprecedented. It is not an easy fix.
That is why a lot of the first money’s went to bolster programs to support those losing their jobs in a crashing economy, or to bolster state and local budgets to avoid as many layoffs of teachers, police, fireman and health care workers as possible.
Surely you realize this? The program is 4 months into a 4 year run.
Posted by: danita | July 7, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Seems like nothing is working… maybe I’m not defining the plan’s timeline correctly.
June, 2009
CNNMoney
“The foreclosure problem is widespread but reaches plague proportions in 10 states; those hardest-hit areas account for 77% of all foreclosure filings. California had more than any other state with with 92,249 – nearly 29% of all U.S. filings.
“Florida posted the nation’s second highest number at 58,931, up 50% from May 2008. Other top 10 states were Nevada (17,157), Arizona (16,865), Michigan (13,891), Ohio (11,360), Illinois (10,942), Georgia (10,516), Texas (9,813) and Virginia (5,385).
“Nevada had the highest foreclosure rate with one filing for every 64 households. California, with one for every 144, and Florida, with one for every 148, were second and third respectively.”
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 7, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
So let me get this straight. “Right-wingers” are being vilified for being too cavalier and insensitive about the “global meltdown” and then vilified for acting like chicken littles when we point out how bad things are?
Oooo. Circular logic. Credibility is circling the drain. As one commenter here mentioned once, “The stupid, it burns.”
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 7, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Timmy . ..
Try to simplify it for yourself so you understand.
As the President said clearly and repeatedly to us – this is not going to be an easy fix. This is a world-wide economic breakdown. Things will improve, but things might get worse before they get better.
These things the President cautioned us about repeatedly. This is a major world-wide economic breakdown, not a parlour game.
It really is sad you didn’t listen and you choose to cherry pick a few items here and there. Same as was done under the last administration with the attack on Iraq that killed tens of thousands including our own. Cherry picking bits of information to suit your agenda.
Your phony expectations wouldn’t be so high after A FEW SHORT MONTHS if you had listened to what the President took great pains to say to us clearly.
Posted by: danita | July 7, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Fortunately, Mr. Obama can’t control all the information – not yet anyway. The truth will come out month by month in terms of unemployment, foreclosures, GDP, manufacturing – all of it. A few charts on a web site won’t fool anybody. Unfortunately, we’ll all be paying for a very long time. And God help us if a second stimulus bill is passed.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 7, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Some Russian media have headlines saying that the Obamas were no more than foreign tourists in Moscow.
Posted by: tx281 | July 7, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
Some Russian media have headlines saying that the Obamas were no more than foreign tourists in Moscow. Posted by: tx281 | Jul 7, 2009 5:35:01 PM
____________________________________
Does that include Grandma?
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 7, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
“ryan says that, of course we would negotiate with dictators who kill their people. I feel like we are on two totally different planets,”
Were you born yesterday?
Are you unaware of the United States’s relationship with many prickly characters that have what we consider to be horrid human rights records either historically or this very day?
“Obama wants to present himself in the mold of an FDR or a Kennedy, but neither one of these giants of liberalism would have ever condoned the current policy of appeasement in light of the killings and disappearances of Iranians who protest against the regime.”
Oh I see, this wasn’t about reality but a cheap set up.
Posted by: Ryan C | July 7, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
“As the President said clearly and repeatedly to us – this is not going to be an easy fix. This is a world-wide economic breakdown. Things will improve, but things might get worse before they get better.”
You keep ignoring my point, but I’m not surprised. This bill was sold as a jobs bill. Agree or not? What the President said about the economy matters not one wit. He sold the bill to the public as a jobs bill and they bought it because they had hope that the job situation would improve. So far it has not (or the MSM would be screaming success!)
“These things the President cautioned us about repeatedly. This is a major world-wide economic breakdown, not a parlour game.”
I know that. Again, you criticize if we are too cavalier or too fear mongering. You can’t have it both ways. But that has nothing to do with the President selling this bill as a jobs bill. Either it can create jobs as advertised or it can’t. So far, nada. Even the states aren’t reporting anything unless you have seen stories I have not.
“It really is sad you didn’t listen and you choose to cherry pick a few items here and there.”
As do you – you just don’t see it or admit to it.
“Same as was done under the last administration with the attack on Iraq that killed tens of thousands including our own. Cherry picking bits of information to suit your agenda.”
N/A
“Your phony expectations wouldn’t be so high after A FEW SHORT MONTHS if you had listened to what the President took great pains to say to us clearly.”
First of all there are no SHORT MONTH or LONG MONTHS – there are just months. Second of all, 4.5 months have passed. Why don’t you just say 4.5 months instead of spinning. I am just reapeating what the President said. You are interpreting what he meant.
Posted by: danita | Jul 7, 2009 5:20:09 PM
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 7, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Obama wants to consider another stimulus bill. The previous stimulus bill that Democrats unanimously voted for has cost America hundreds of thousands of jobs.
And, they want to do it again even though fewer jobs would have been lost if they had done nothing. That, and very little of the stimulus money has been doled out. They are, to use a Gibbism, “obviously” waiting for the 2010 elections.
With apologies to Lewis Carroll, are we having Adventures in Obamaland?
`Take some more stimulus money,’ the March Hare said to Alice, very earnestly.
`I’ve had nothing yet,’ Alice replied in an offended tone, `so I can’t take more.’
`You mean you can’t take LESS,’ said the Hatter: `it’s very easy to take MORE than nothing.’
Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | July 7, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
They are, to use a Gibbism, “obviously” waiting for the 2010 elections. Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | Jul 7, 2009 5:54:42 PM
________________________________
Conservatives realized that was the strategy all along. It could backfire if things continue to get worse and worse. It may be too late by mid-2010, especially if nothing they have done before that works.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 7, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Timmy . . .
You’ve got to become better informed on the Recovery and Reinvestment plan before you’ll be able to discuss it with any insight.
The very first wave of this bill was intended to immediately shore up programs that would provide relief to people losing their jobs.
It also provided financing to state and local governments (as those state and local budgets crumbled under lost revenue) to limit the number of layoffs of teachers, police, firemen and health care workers.
These were the first stop gap measures intended to provide some stability. Much of this is already underway. The other phases of the program are coming into play or soon will.
Timmy – that you don’t understand how this program is being brought on stream does not mean its a good or a bad program. It only means you haven’t really studied it. I can only gather this by the uninformed things you continue to say.
The Recovery and Reinvestment program is on the White House web site for anyone interested in how it is structured through to 2012.
Posted by: danita | July 7, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Mr. Tapper, thanks for conducting such an interesting interview with real solid questions. I am sorry that ABC could not have taken more time away from the Jackson-funeral-mania to show more of the interview on television, as they should have. OH, well. As the president so rightly observed in the interview, that sort of obsessive attention to such stuff is part of our American culture, for better or worse. Thanks for sharing the interview with us here.
Thank you for the excellent question about the diagnosis being off, so does that mean the prescription might also be off. You framed the question well and the president tap danced. No surprises. Thanks for pinning him down on record as much as is possible on this and other issues. Good work.
I am getting a little tired of the administration always using jobs as the carrot when the bills they are shoving through do not actually result in the sort of job creation they suggest will be possible. The cap-and-trade bill is being pushed as a jobs bill, even as it contains language (similar to, but more extensive than, the language in the NAFTA bill way back when that provided support for workers who lost jobs because of that bill) about providing three years of monetary support for workers who lose their jobs because of the bill. Yes, I know the jobs supposedly being created are in different industries than the ones being lost, but it seems that if the job creation is going to go so well, those who lose their jobs should have no problem switching over to those magical green jobs, so why will they need three years at 70 percent of their former salaries, as well as job training and moving expenses?
oh, and the Sasha story the president told was adorable. Honestly.
Posted by: moderate | July 7, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
Crack me up. Danita wrote, “Timmy . . .
You’ve got to become better informed on the Recovery and Reinvestment plan before you’ll be able to discuss it with any insight.” That’s hilarious, Danita. Timmy, you keep on keepin’ on, my man. Not being well informed on a particular subject has never seemed to slow some people around here down one bit.
Posted by: moderate | July 7, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
The Recovery and Reinvestment program is on the White House web site for anyone interested in how it is structured through to 2012. Posted by: danita | Jul 7, 2009 6:30:04 PM
__________________________________
You mean the web site I went to the other day and provided quotes about the money being spent and how no jobs were being created. That web site? You accused me of using narrow examples, or something, to prove my point. I’m glad you’re will to go down with the ship. I’ll keep bailing and fighting against the tide.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 7, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Timmy, you keep on keepin’ on, my man. Posted by: moderate | Jul 7, 2009 9:42:46 PM
_____________________________________
Count on it. This country is too precious to just give it away.
I’m not a world citizen – don’t wanna be one – I’m a U.S. citizen and proud of it.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 7, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
RyanC,
Are you suggesting the US shouldn’t ever deal with other world leaders because ‘of their horrid human rights records’? Please…
Now, who was born yesterday?
Posted by: J House | July 7, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
The fact is the President is now being held hostage to his own policy by the Iranians themselves.They can get away with anything with no consequence, since this admin will talk ‘without pre-conditions’.
America held hostage-again.
Posted by: J House | July 7, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
The Recovery and Reinvestment program is on the White House web site for anyone interested in how it is structured through to 2012.
Timmy will give you a guided tour since he knows it so well (and so fairly) and moderate will be right there holding his hand.
Posted by: danita | July 8, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am
J House, President Obama is attempting to get international support against Iran (including the support of Russia) and negotiate Iran away from pursuing nuclear weapons so he doesn’t have to use the alternative of ‘bombing them back into the stone age’ which would kill many innocent civilians.
Having just seen the Bush administration and his neo-con think tankers kill hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, I think every tactic short of bombing them is worth pursuing.
Posted by: danita | July 8, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am
This President must be dizzy from all the SPIN!
Posted by: Sunnyr | July 8, 2009, 12:53 am 12:53 am
danita says: “Having just seen the Bush administration and his neo-con think tankers kill hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, I think every tactic short of bombing them is worth pursuing.”
Hundreds of thousands. Where do you get your numbers? Never mind. This is obviously something you have bought into without any dead bodies being found that come close to that kind of a number. Are you suggesting that the US military killed people and then secretly buried the bodies in mass graves? This is one of those pathetic made up numbers, kind of like the ones where ocean levels are supposed to go up 20ft and cover NY and CA. Try telling the truth, because if the US had killed even only dozens of innocent Iraqis and then buried them secretly it would be a disgusting crime. Do you think a secret like that could be kept if it was true? If you can’t comprehend that the integrity and morality of the US military is much greater than that of our politicians then you are a lost cause.
Posted by: Jason | July 8, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am
Timmy will give you a guided tour since he knows it so well (and so fairly) and moderate will be right there holding his hand. Posted by: danita | Jul 8, 2009 12:18:05 AM
__________________________________
Maybe we can double-date with you and Ryan_C. It’s so sweet how you encourage each other from time to time.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 8, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am
J House, President Obama is attempting to get international support against Iran (including the support of Russia) and negotiate Iran away from pursuing nuclear weapons Posted by: danita | Jul 8, 2009 12:22:36 AM
___________________________________
You’re kidding right? What fantasy land do you live in? I certainly hope Obama isn’t as naive as you are. Behind the scenes, Russia is suppling Iran with arms and whatever else they can afford to buy. Russia is just playing us like everyone else does. International support? I suppose the U.N. wil be involved. Good grief.
Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 8, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
“The Recovery and Reinvestment program is on the White House web site for anyone interested in how it is structured through to 2012.
Timmy will give you a guided tour since he knows it so well (and so fairly) and moderate will be right there holding his hand.”
danita, danita, danita……
I know I am assuming alot here, but try…just try to follow along here.
Forget this idea you have created about a 4 yr recovery plan. The recovery website does indeed mention 2012, BUT that has nothing to do with the job creation that everyone but you is discussing.
Take just a few moments and go here…
Now move your mouse around the map of the US. What do you see?
I see nice little message boxes popping up as I move from state to state. Boxes which say for New York as an example….Jobs created/saved in the next 2 years: 215,000. For Montana – Jobs created/saved in the next 2 years: 11,000. For Maine – Jobs created/saved in the next 2 years: 15,000.
You will PLEASE note this is talking about 2 years from the start of the “Stimulator”….NOT FOUR!
Further more, there is a link to file which describes the estimation methods. Now where in that file does the word save or saved appear. Therefore, We should not ever again discuss the term saved job. It is a phantom term. That document talks about job creation, not saved jobs.
The final line of the document is :
“The states and federal agencies will also be collecting actual data on jobs created by
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which is, of course, what ultimately matters.”
This is what I and other are looking for – the REAL Data! very simple actually…. X dollars = Y jobs!
Now, do you FINALLY understand? Instead of tossing out useless talking points, try focusing on the REAL WORLD! That is where the majority of us live & work. for a few million people out there, it’s where they want to work!
Posted by: Mike_C | July 8, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Timmy .. .
“You will PLEASE note this is talking about 2 years from the start of the “Stimulator”.”
Yes, Timmy . . . we’ve got over a year and half to go before 2 years has passed. We are A FEW SHORT MONTHS into the stimulus plan.
I know you have your own personal political agenda to attack the President over and over again. You have shown that time and time again – and you’ve proclaimed Bush and Cheney as your heroes.
At the same time, your fantasy world where the Republicans (for instance) or anybody else could just wave a magic wand and instantaneously create jobs – is way beyond reality.
Try to hear the following paragraphs Timmy . . .
President Obama said clearly to us and repeatedly that recovery from this economic crisis would not be easy, nor would it be fast.
The President repeatedly cautioned that things might get WORSE before they get better.
Again, that you didn’t hear this or didn’t understand it is no reason to attack the President repeatedly.
Your fantasy world is just that – this is a REAL worldwide problem and the recovery looks like its going to be difficult as we were cautioned.
Posted by: danita | July 8, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
Pardon me . . . that was for Mike . .
Posted by: danita | July 8, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
Well, that message was for a combination of Timmy and Mike . .
Posted by: danita | July 8, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
also Mike . …
The first wave of the Recovery and Reinvestiment plan was intended to put in place funding for programs to provide some support for those losing their jobs – and as mentioned before – funding to the states and the local governments to curtail as much as possible the laying off of police, firemen, teachers and health care givers.
State and local budgets had been massacred by the economic crash at the end of the Bush administration. I’m not sure you know how close things were to a complete disaster – we will find out when the jobs saved reports come in from the states and the local governments that without the quick action on this stimulus plan the country could have been in much worse condition.
It could have been much worse!
Jobs were being lost at the hundreds of thousands per month, and it was getting worse – IT STILL MAY! On the other hand, if we’re fortunate things may start to slow up and we may (and I have to presume this will be over a matter of years) start to get some real health back to the economy.
This world wide economic breakdown is NOT A JOKE or a parlour game.
Unfortunately it is seen by many as an opportunity to score some easy political points.
Posted by: danita | July 8, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
danita,
The only thing you stated in this entire thread that is even close to the mark…your right this is not a joke! Perhaps you should take off your Obama rosey glasses and realize that this thing is NOT performing as promised.
The day Obama signed it – “Mr. Obama touted the measure’s investments in health care, infrastructure, energy, education and, most importantly, job creation”
Wikopedia – “The impact to employment would be an increase of 0.8 million to 2.3 million by the end of 2009, an increase of 1.2 million to 3.6 million by the end of 2010″ – based on CBO analysis
I can pull up more and more examples of the fact this thing was about JOBS!
So danita, in your “deep understanding” of this thing, when will those 300,000 to 400,000+ job loss months going to reverse and show these new 800,000 to 2,300,000 jobs? July…August…Sept.?
Your the one here who is living in “Magic” land if your your going to bury your head in the sand on what this thing was supposed to do VS what is REALLY happening in the REAL WORLD.
The increase and extension of unemployment benefits WAS a good thing, BUT that does not create jobs!
You can try to float the party trial ballons all day. Your WRONG…it is that simple…YOU ARE WRONG. This is now classic spin! It failed to deliver as promised, so now you go back and change the promise!
Go back to the days leading up to the vote and then after the bill was passed. Jobs, Jobs, Jobs! Remember the President going for that photo op with those 25 cops? We were told this thing would indeed create jobs quickly by funding these “shovel ready” jobs.
The obvious flaw that logic was simple too. It did not take into account wether or not the construction companies that would be working these projects ACTUALLY need to hire new workers in order to accomplisg the task!
I notice you did not go to the site and realize that we are NOT creating jobs! It is now becoming obvious that the states are using the money they are getting from the “Stimulator” to prevent becoming the next California!
Posted by: Mike_C | July 8, 2009, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
Mike_C . .
“So danita, in your “deep understanding” of this thing, when will those 300,000 to 400,000+ job loss months going to reverse and show these new 800,000 to 2,300,000 jobs? July…August…Sept.?”
Mike . .. I’m not at all sure they will. We don’t live in a fantasy land. The best advice at the time said this money was needed.
You will remember at the end of the Bush administration financial institutions, banks and the automotive industry (and the subsidiary industries) were in virutally free-fall collapse. As was the rest of the economy. This went global.
Under Bush approximately $700 BILLION was identified to try to prop up the banks.
Under Obama an additional $787 BILLION was identified to shore up progams of support for the hundreds of thousands losing their jobs, shore up state and local budgets to prevent as many layoffs as possible or police, firemen, teachers and health care workers . . . and begin saving or creating jobs – an encourage the country in the direction of better education and use of cleaner energy, building a modern energy grid .. . and so on.
As you know this program unfolds over 4 years through to 2012.
Is it a stone guarantee – are you kidding me? Does it have a fighting chance – absolutely.
Seems to me you’re terribly quick to judge – but then again condemning the President was your goal during the election and it continues.
I think that as we travel through 2010 we will have a much better idea of how the world economies are responding to the stimulus programs; and if the world economy is recovering at all – I certainly hope so.
I don’t think there is a magic wand. I don’t know if the world can sustain the gross consumer society that fuelled the last few decades, the stock markets obviously couldn’t sustain it . . . can our resources sustain it? Very hard to say.
You seem to think there is some magic formulae for fixing all this – I’m not sure. I don’t think is as simplistic a situation as some people portray.
You were condemning Obama before the election – why would your continuing condemnation mark any special insight into the economic problems of the United States and the larger world?
I encourage you to think about ways the large numbers of people on the planet can survive and better themselves giving what to all appearances seems to be a collapse of the gross, debt ridden consumer society.
Posted by: danita | July 8, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Danita do you work in the adminitration?
Please answer how the POTUS and the VP could be standing senators befor taking office and not know the state of the economy. They voted for budgets,sat on committees, talked with fellow lawmakers, and still they didn’t know. They travelled all over the country campainging talking with people and had no clue what was going on. Obama worked very closely with Bush before taking office and apparently didn’t learn anything, what, did they sit around and talked sports? I’m baffled by someone that is supposed to be so brillant, and o in tune with what was needed to turn things around has made things worse.
Posted by: bmm | July 9, 2009, 1:28 am 1:28 am
“I’m baffled by someone that is supposed to be so brillant, and o in tune with what was needed to turn things around has made things worse.”
Well, its mostly just the Democrats are mostly filthy liars and cheats and President Obamas and his team are pretty stupid – and they’re Democrats after all;
If only those clean, honest and decent Republicans were in power snorting their noses around they would bomb Iran, bomb Venezuela, bomb North Korea – and fix this whole economy nonsense in the snap of their blessed fingers.
That’s what’s really go on.
Posted by: danita | July 9, 2009, 2:47 am 2:47 am
danita,
Flowerly language is not going to change the issue. You seem to want to rewrite history and claim the “Stimulator’ was not about jobs. There were many aspects to it to be sure, BUT, it was about jobs. When the POTUS says it will create 3.5 million jobs, it IS about jobs!
For some reason, you seem to think that people who are critical of this are just bashing the President. You are wrong.
you said…”I’m not at all sure they will. We don’t live in a fantasy land. The best advice at the time said this money was needed.”
Many, and I mean MANY people in the feild of economics did not think this would work from the beginning.
++++
On January 28, 2009, a full page advertisement with the names of approximately 200 economists who are against President Obama’s plan appeared in The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. The funding for this advertisement came from the Cato Institute. The ad stated
… we the undersigned do not believe that more government spending is a way to improve economic performance. More government spending by Hoover and Roosevelt did not pull the United States economy out of the Great Depression in the 1930s… To improve the economy, policymakers should focus on reforms that remove impediments to work, savings, investment, and production. Lower tax rates and a reduction in the burden of government are the best ways of using fiscal policy to boost growth.”
On March 11, 2009, The Wall Street Journal published a forecasting survey of 49 economists about the bill’s impact in regards to the Obama administration. President Obama and United States Secretary of the Treasury Timothy F. Geithner received failing grades, in the opinion of these economists, for their handling of the economic crisis and stimulus plan. Critics were divided over the bill, with 43% saying $500 billion more would be needed, while others were “skeptical of the need for stimulus at all.”
++++
You take the position this had to be done, BUT many disagree. Just because Obama chose a certain opinion, it does NOT mean it was the best advice! Those opposing this idea had just as many accolades in the field as those who the President listened to.
On the Bank Bailout, I was not in favor of that either! Wether you were for it or against it, the problem there was it NEVER was applied to toxic assets in the way we were told it would be! It went in many different direction for many different things, but NOT to buy up toxic assets. Just like we are now discovering that the states are not using the “Stimulator” as they should be.
You say…just wait..let it have time to work. I am not willing to do that. Many of my friends who have lost thier jobs this year are NOT willing to just wait and “hope” it works. We all want the transparency that Obama promised us to allow us to see how things are working…or NOT working. If a program is not working…kill it and move the money from it to a program that IS having success.
To watch and track performance like this is the way ALL gov’t expenditures should be evaluated. Which party is in power or controlling the political agenga is not relevant
If the states are using monies that were targeted for the “shovel-ready” jobs to keep from becoming the next California, then action needs to be taken to address getting the money where it NEEDS to be to create jobs.
I dont blame the states if they are doing what they feel is best to fulfill their obligations to their citizens, but is what they are doing “wrong” based on the bill, OR is this yet another “HOLE” in the “Stimulator” similar to the AIG bonus clauses that “mysteriously” altered. Again, rushing these things thru because we think we need to has so far resulted in additional problems and not so good “performance as promised” category.
Both of these massive spending bills PROVE why I do not want the government to rush into healthcare the way Obama wants to. He is still pushing for a bill by the end of the summer! Yet we all know that any bill passed this quickly will be full of holes. That is exactly what we dont need & can’t afford to have!
Also PLEASE…
“As you know this program unfolds over 4 years through to 2012″
First off, it actually calls for dispersing the monies all the way through 2016! Second, Already 174 Billion has been made available. The majority of this 787 will be available well before 2012!
seriously danita, listen to yourself.
would you be willing to say wait until 2012 to see the results if Bush were President?
How critical were you of him & the government’s handling of Katrina? This is a very similar kind of situation. A crisis needs a solution and road to recovery. Please do not insult the rest of us by saying you would grant Bush or another Republican 4 years to make your assestment of success or failure!
Posted by: Mike_C | July 9, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
bmm…danita…
The “excuse” the administration is pushing out now is that old “we didnt know it was this bad/what we inherited was worse than we thought” line.
a couple of points on this….
A. Then perhaps, just perhaps it might have been a really good idea to WAIT a few weeks and get ALL the real data – BEFORE ramming a 3/4 TRILLION dollars through the Congress on this.
B. When you run your campaign telling the country that
“We are in the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, and a lot of you I think are worried about your jobs, your pensions, your retirement accounts,” Obama said in Oct of last year.
the people are not going to buy into the excuse after you commit HUGE $$$ that you didn’t understand the situation.
One would think that with all the so-called economic talent he pulled together, there should not have been ANY big surprises. After all, as bad as it is, this is not worse than the depression! So, this is where common sense would kick in and say….
If you had this dream team of economic advisors, and you STILL did not understand how bad bad was, WHY should anyone believe that any next step you provide based on that same group’s recommendation?
This is why economics is considered a social science, not a science!
Posted by: Mike_C | July 9, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Well put Mike. I can’t believe how the president and the congress are getting away with this “it’s worse than we thought” stuff. The fate of the stimulus aside, it is their job to know how good/bad it is. Not only to know but to take responsibility for the situation – the buck stops here- their ducking and dodging is not acceptable and makes them less credible.
Posted by: bmm | July 9, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
You people talk about how you are baffled… Quite frankly, I’m baffled at how you can go on blaming one party over the other for the present circumstances. Personally I’m sick of both parties, but that aside, I don’t understand why people can’t understand that regardless of which party is in power, it is going to take time to bring economic recovery. For people to expect recovery to be quick just shows their naivety.
Posted by: spanish language software | December 5, 2010, 1:16 am 1:16 am