By Jennifer Parker

Jul 8, 2009 7:03pm

Bipartisan Health Reform Negotiations on Life Support

Little progress has been made in continuing negotiations on Capitol Hill over a bipartisan health care reform bill … here are the key developments:

1) Taxing health care benefits? That idea is all but dead. Democratic leaders and President Obama have made it clear they don't want to go down this path. Republicans are also starting to peel away from the idea.

2) Bipartisan negotiations? They do continue … but they're on life support right now. The president had wanted a bipartisan bill with a lot of support from both Democrats and Republicans in the senate. Part of the issue is that if you lose the option of taxing health care benefits, it becomes very difficult for both side to agree on a way to find the money to pay for health care reform.

3) Obama's deadline of a bipartisan health care reform bill by the August recess? That is looking very hard to achieve. I heard today, for the first time, that the August recess may get pushed back to give senators more time. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Ia., A key player in the health reform negotiations, told me bipartisan talks are continuing, but he tweeted there is "no hard timeline" for any health care reform bill.

But Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said today that he doesn't see a path for a bipartisan bill on health care reform. "We both know there are no real bipartisan negotiations going on – peeling off an R or 2 is not real negotiation," McCain tweeted.

As a fall back plan, Democrats on Capitol Hill are planning to go this alone. That will increase the chance that we'll see Obama's public option in the bill.

Stay tuned…

–George Stephanopoulos

User Comments

I don’t think we’ll ever see real change in regards to healthcare reform. Again…big business with rule for the Republicans and keep it tied up while the Democrats will aim for goals they can’t reach nor get agreement on.

Posted by: MAry | July 8, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

mary… i have to aqgree with you. we need lower health care costs however and the most significant change which should occur is tort reform.in my experience at least and probably more than 10% of every doctors bottom line goes to malpractice insurance. reform that and you will see rates go down as every doctor will not feel compelled to test for every disease known and unknown to man in order to not get sued by somebody who likely didnt pay for the service in the first place.

Posted by: catman | July 8, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

The Dems should go for it. Obstructionist GOPers will say no to any proposal. They’re in chaos, desperate for any supposed political advantage. To this know-nothing crowd, that means NO! NOTHING! The Ted Stevens approach writ large.
The focus should be on the American people. Healthcare as it stands is critical and getting worse. We have to fix it now–there won’t be another chance anytime soon. Repubs are not bargaining in good faith but rather from desperation, and their main constituents are the insurance companies — their beloved private-sector bureaucrats. If the oligarchs can’t make obscene profits from something, these guys believe, it ain’t American. Which is one reason the GOP has fallen off the political cliff.
Let the Dems do the right thing, and do it alone if need be. And by all means let’s have a public option. That’s the only way we can possibly get cost containment. Don’t lose this opportunity — do it now!

Posted by: dennis | July 8, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Certainly we will know who backs those who oppose reform.

Posted by: GoGOP | July 8, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

This was the Bush/Rove fix for healthcare, he came out with it a couple years ago and then McCain picked it up for his campaign. Anyone that thinks sending more money to Washington will fix the problem needs their head examined. Not only taxing your income for healthcare but also any your employer contributes. How much money do you think is spent on each year, its way up there. Under Bush’s plan the people that are packing the load with inflated premiums are the ones to be taxed. This could put some in a higher tax bracket and it will definitely be less on your check. I found it hard to believe that Repubs would even think about another tax! I say find another way like stopping the abuse in Medicare and Medicaid.

Posted by: rickyt1234 | July 8, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

here is an AP article….”The wife of a senator playing a lead role on a national health care overhaul sits on the boards of four health care companies, one of several examples of lawmakers with ties to the medical industry. Jackie Clegg Dodd, wife of Sen. Chris Dodd, serves on the boards of Javelin Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cardiome Pharma Corp., Brookdale Senior Living, and Pear Tree Pharmaceuticals, a financial disclosure report the senator released Friday shows.”

Posted by: CW | July 8, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Passing a health care bill that will make no difference in the delivery of health care is no reform. Just as the stimulus bill which failed to stem the tide of unemployment provided no stimulus to the economy or a boost to employment. The stock market is tanking again and the 401k which seemed like it was improving by 10% has lost all the gain. In the mean time the annual deficit has tripled and individuals too owe more money than they ever did. Congress can take a permanent recess because they are irrelevant in spearheading real change that will actually benefit main street. Unless there is a drastic spending cut we the people should not support any new spending.

Posted by: gjkotw01 | July 8, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Yes, if you are for this proposal and your elected official votes against it. Let’s hold them accountable. I think it’s a slap in the face they have Gov’t healthcare or whatever but, we can’t get it.

Posted by: T-ROC | July 8, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

How obviously sef serving is anyone proclaiming health care reform is wasteful spending.

Posted by: Disgusted | July 8, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

What great bipartisan alternative on health care does McCain have? That’s right; he wanted to tax health benefits…

Posted by: matt | July 8, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Sara Palin has no chance in hell of being our president,shes a good person but not pres. material!!! I get pissed off everytime I go to Tucson, Ariz. and see miles of 30t million dollar aircraft sitting in very large fields, build 10 or so less of them a year and fix the health care problem!!!!!! Give our new president a chance, changes HAVE to be maid!!

Posted by: mark carter | July 8, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

I have friends and customers in both Canada and England, who are very entrenched in government run healthcare programs. I have personally talked with people you have waited close to a year for an MRI. If you have been watching the news, you would see that Canada has a shortage of doctors. Ask yourself why. Who wants to go to school for ten years and then have the government tell you how much you are going to make and how you are going to treat your patients. My guess is that they either got out of medicine or emigrated to the U.S. Has anyone mentioned that the Canadians and Europeans also have a 50% tax rate to pay for these services.
If you do not think that will eventually happen to us here in the U.S., you are the king or queen of fantasy land.
This administration is pushing government into almost every area of our lives. If this is allowed to continue, you will not recognize this country in ten years. This is the biggest power grab I have seen in my lifetime. If you think that government is here to take care of you, then I am sure you are pleased with what is happening. I am not.
Mary Lynn

Posted by: Mary Nyman | July 8, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

BS, Mary. I’m glad you support the insurance companies. I don’t.

Posted by: Disgusted | July 8, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

“Has anyone mentioned that the Canadians and Europeans also have a 50% tax rate to pay for these services.” – The tax rate pays for a host of services and health care is just one of them. In the U.S. we pay pay twice as much per capita than Canadians or Europeans do and medical related debt is the second leading cause of bankruptcy in the U.S. What do we get for all this expense? On average the Canadians and the Europeans have longer life expectancies and lower infant death rates than we do. Both stats correlate with quality, affordable primary care. We need to change our system now – its killing us.

Posted by: Mark from atlanta | July 8, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

If the Health care industry is spending $1.4 million a day to defeat Obama’s heatl care plan.
Can you imagine how healt costs will skyrocket of Obamas plan doesn’t pass? Their going to get back what they are spending.

Posted by: John Nance Garner | July 8, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

47 million americans with out insurance policy maybe you mast take look the canadian healthcare we canadians love it and we have doctors do not let the propaganda of insurance companies to fool you

Posted by: koula fowler | July 8, 2009, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

47 million americans with out insurance policy maybe you mast take look the canadian healthcare we canadians love it and we have doctors do not let the propaganda of insurance companies to fool you

Posted by: koula fowler | July 8, 2009, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

It’s so sad and pathetic that “supporters” keep nattering the party line about “Republicans + Big Business.” Both sides are so entrenched in Big Business they don’t sneeze without permission from a CEO. The Democrats are just as motivated by the smell of power, prestige and status. And who created Big Insurance? Edward Kennedy, 1973 Health Maintenance Organization Act. Gave them power by law, reinforced in 1978. So keep nattering, the Dems are just as much to blame…

Posted by: Eyes Open | July 8, 2009, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

What part of “one-party” rule dont you people understand?
The republicans CANNOT stop the Dems from doing this! If you are foolish enough to believe that having the gov’t run universal healthcare, go for it. In the end your going to end up paying MORE for LESS.
Just remember, this is the same group who told us unemployment would not go over 9% if we passed the great “Stimulator”.
The same group that wrote the “stimulator”, rushing thru it, then somehow “someone” rewrote the language so that the AIG bonuses were legal. That got us 2 days of Barney Frank’s pathetic fake outrage and stupid hearings.
This is the same group who is telling you we need the Cap&Trade/Climate/Jobs bill (remember its a jobs bill now because the “Stimulator” has not created the jobs it was supposed to!)
Yep….Im sure they finally get it right when it comes to healthcare!!!
And remember…Obama promised ALL this wonderful stuff…..WITH NO INCREASES IN YOUR TAXES!!!!

Posted by: Mike_C | July 8, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Hey Georgie…. what a lousy article… why are YOU still blaming it on Republicans… The Demons have FULL control of BOTH houses……. the Demons can do what they want…. but we all KNOW they are SCARED to do it because the Demons will have to take FULL responsibilty for what ever piece of crap law they pass…… cant wait for the 2010 elections….. heheheheh

Posted by: Vet1973 | July 8, 2009, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Does Obama even live in the same America as everyone else? The country is hemmoraging 500,000 jobs a month. We are in “The Great Recession”. Companies are scared to death of hiring anyone because of the threat of ‘cap and trade’ (thanks Obama) and that they will be taxed and forced to pay for all employees health care (again thanks a lot Obama). Having been a consultant for 10 years I know this is supposed to be the ‘busy time’ when companies hire (before letting everyone go at Christmas laying them off). Well guess what they arent hiring and there will still be a huge Christmas layoff. When no one is buying stuff (real estate, cars, retail products in general) in January February 2010…what do you think will happen to the stock market? Unemployed people will max out the credit card to give junior & sis a decent christmas. Then what? When April 2010 comes and we are at 15% unemployment what do you think Uncle Sam will do to recoup his missing income tax revenue. All I can say is save every dime you have and be very thrifty we are in for a heck of a downturn, massive tax increases and inflation by then.

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 8, 2009, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Wow if the government can keep cigarettes and alcohol legal and tax them to pay for whatever why cant they make weed legal and tax marijuana to pay for their bloated healthcare and stimulus bills? I was just wondering out loud…

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 8, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Last month my daughter had gotten her tonsils out. The Ins. Co. refused to pay the $4000.00 because they said it was a pre existing condition. They said because she had strep throat to many times they would not pay for the surgery. I paid the $4000.00 out of pocket. My only other option was to wait till my daughter was in so much pain and go to an emergency room. We know that this happens many times and we end up paying for it anyway. In my opinion these companies should not be traded in the stock market. The pressure to produce profits hinders service. It is simple math, the more claims that they deny the more money they make. I would love to see the money in contributions that our leaders are going to collect from these companies to stall or vote against health care reform just like they were paid to pass the medicare bill. The leader of this bill left congress after the bill was passed and became the CEO of a pharmaceutical company with a 2 million dollar salary. I love how they start to spin this as socialism, because fear is their greatest strength. You say that you would hate to see this country in 10 years if this bill passes, I say I would hate to see it if it didn’t. I know people in Canada, England, France, and Germany and they don’t complain about having health care, they brag about it. Four years ago i needed Tagament and was shocked to hear from my pharmacy that it was $80.00 with insurance.(300.00 without insurance for a months supply) I called my mother in Europe and asked her to send me a 4 month supply. I paid $20.00 total where it would have cost me $320.00 with insurance. Great Plan!!! This is what our leaders gave us and they got paid very well for it. George Bush got about $850,000.00. Leaders from both sides got PAID!!!! If this bill doesn’t pass in the next year it will never pass. I leave you with a quote from George Bush during his re-election campaign, “We have turned the corner on health care reform, and we will never turn back” And he never did!!! Don’t be afraid of this.

Posted by: greg | July 8, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Hey Greg at least you got to pick which doctor took her tonsils out and she didnt have to wait 6 months for doctor beaureucrat to have them removed. Not only that but if there are complications or a problem later on you still get to sue the doctor too! Be glad your taxes arent 50% of your paycheck too while youre at it. $4000 divided by 12 months is $333 a month you have to pay. Do you want to pay half your paycheck for someone elses kids tonsils?

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 8, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Shut down the worthless parasitic republican created HMOs. It’s a phony baloney market. Put the people who work in HMOs to work digitising medical records. At least they’ll have productive jobs. No more 10 thousand a day for an ICU or 75 thousand for a prosthetic limb. It’s time a patient get what’s best for them instead of what’s best for the stockholders.

Posted by: rightbehind | July 8, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Hey Georgie why dont you do a REAL article… Why dont you find out what BO promised the Drug companies during his “SECRET” negotiations with them, that they making a big deal about last week……. ?

Posted by: Vet1973 | July 8, 2009, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

They need to do something with health care in the US. I am on medicaid. I am a diabetic with chronic pain issues. I went to my dr on the 25th of june and he wrote out my perscriptions. Medicaid refuses to fill them until the 11th of july. I have been in agony for 2 weeks and still have a few days to go. I may end up having to call an ambulance and go to the hospital to get some releif. How are they saving any money that way. Would be cheaper to fill my perscriptions that the dr perscribed for me and I need rather than pay an ambulance and hospital bill.

Posted by: chris | July 9, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

I would love for everyone to have health care– and I think it’s a travesty that families go bankrupt from medical expenses.
However, my wife is a Doctor at an Indian Health Service (Controlled by the United States government) clinic. She CANNOT prescribe the best medicine available because it costs too much. It is rationed health care. It is sub standard care.
Look at the Veterans Administration hospitals if you want to see what your health care will look like if this reform passes.
What we need is a simple bill- simple reform–
1. Insurance companies must have one price for their plans- you get that if you are an individual or a big company. 2. You cannot be dropped EVER. If you get sick you cannot be dropped when you are “better” and your prices cannot go up.
3. I actually like the idea that everyone must buy health insurance– it works for Auto insurance and would bring more money to the table.
4. Make doctors and hospitals publish their prices like a restaurant menu. you can see who has the best prices and go there (what we have now IS NOT a free market system.)
What we need is a reform of the rules– it could be a 100 page bill. Can you imagine what is stuffed into these 1000 page bills? People– this will be very bad for the country- we simply cannot afford it. Remember that Canada has a population of 33 million people– 1/10th the size of the USA…and it is still slow.
National Health Care sounds like a good idea in principle… but it WILL limit choices, it WILL raise taxes, it WILL hurt R&D in healthcare, it WILL hurt charitable health care efforts. What will it help? I’m not sure.

Posted by: Berry | July 9, 2009, 1:27 am 1:27 am

why is it we can always find money to fight wars and build bombs, or bail out corporations, but we can’t ever seem to find the money to do anything that’ll benefit the common citizen?

Posted by: dk | July 9, 2009, 1:48 am 1:48 am

I did get to choose the doctor I paid $4000.00 to and also got to pay my $1400.00 premium. And as for those other kids, we are both paying for them right now. What would have happened if I couldn’t pay for this surgery, wouldn’t I have to wait till she was in so much pain that I would have taken her to the hospital. Wouldn’t someone have had to pay for it then, and how is it that I can get medecine over seas for $20.00 that would have cost me $320.00 with insurance or $1200.00 without. At least I could have picked the doctor that wrote the script.

Posted by: greg | July 9, 2009, 2:14 am 2:14 am

Because dk– there are reasons that governments exist– in other words I’ll gladly pay more $40,000 of my income in taxes every year so that the US government can protect me– can make sure I live in a safe and free country.
I will NOT gladly pay taxes to be someone else’s nanny. Honestly– people are SUPPOSED to take care of themselves. What if all this went away– what if you had to fend for yourself and there were no stores or unemployment? If everyone would answer that question for themselves then they would understand why “liberal” and “progressive” agendas just don’t work. When there is no incentive to provide for yourself then no one does and the whole system collapses.

Posted by: Berry | July 9, 2009, 2:16 am 2:16 am

Bipartisan? The dumocrats idea of bipartisan is the Republicans caving in. This administration is the most partisan I have ever seen. Get off the liberal networks like ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, etc and you will see clear cut ideas the republicans have been offering on EVERY issue. As a health care provider I can guarantee you that just as with welfare, food stamps, housing, etc. IF YOU DON’T WORK OR CONTRIBUTE TO SOMETHING YOU DON’T CARE! You all are so zero’d in on controlling everyone and everything it makes me sick. Give me Torte reform (so Dr’s don’t pay $200,000 + in malpractice insurance). Stabilize illegals and send them to the borders!(63 illegals received organ transplants in CA last year. Did 63 US citizens die? This is life long care and immuno suppressing drugs, people. WAKE UP!!!!

Posted by: Terri | July 9, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am

“Shut down the worthless parasitic republican created HMOs” posted by rightbehind

Posted by: Eyes Open | July 9, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Health Care Reform. That in itself is an oxymoron. I agree that bills from hospitals for procedures are on the first look absurd. I just had an ultrasound and the hospital charged $350+ for the procedure (15 minutes) and the Doctor charged $175 for reading the ultrasound (5 minutes). Now, take into account it was a brand new ultrasound machine, cutting edge, brand new building for these Radiology Services, new employees for the new building, etc.etc. etc. Health care is not just the service but all the underlying staff that supports the “company”. It is also all the new technology which benefits the patients. It is also the cost of insurance not only for the doctors but also for the hospital. This is a sue happy country and we all pay for this. My husbanad is self employed and our insurance is very costly. Our taxes are unreal. If this health care bill is not truly thought through and pushed through there will be alot of people hurting. Where can we work on our health care options now? Medicaid and Medicare are broken but not unfixable. Should we continue to pay for people who choose to not work and run up the cost of health care for those that do work? One of the reasons to work is to have health care. What incentives can be used as a way to create a work force that can actually live on “minimum pay”. That is another item that is not talked about. Why has the minimum pay not kept up with the economy? What happens is that it pays more to not work than to work. Surely this can be handled. With the baby boomers turning 50-65, the burden Medicare/Medicaid will bear will be too great. Let’s fix this. The program is in place, why can’t we find ways to make it better? Why do we have to reinvent the proverbial wheel. Personally, I don’t want to end up with a system like Canada or Europe. I want to choose my own doctor, have procedures in a timely manner and have a choice of treatments.
Has government ever been able to provide services without mucking it up with politics? constituants? party privledge? How soon we forget the $300 hammers that the Navy was buying.
Don’t expect the government to FIX anything, let’s all fix it together. Remember….WE THE PEOPLE. I don’t know about you but I want our voice and vote. What happened to the people voting on these issues. Don’t try to make “immediate” decisions, they usually end up being less thought out and UNREAD!!!!!

Posted by: Dee | July 9, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

I agree the health care system is broken. Adding government is not the solution.

Posted by: xmarks | July 9, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

greg,
the fundamental question is was the $4000 cost appropriate. Your right when you say you could have waited, gone to the ER…and just let the “system” absorb your uninsured cost.
When you listen, really listen to the rhetoric that gets bantered around in this debate (from both sides), notice how no one has looked a bill like your daughters and said. this line item is part of the problem. Here is “x” costing $1000 dollars and ther eis no reason why is it should cost that much.
The debate is formed around grandieous ideas and theories how we “save” billions or “move” dollars around. ALL of that yack is complete garbage! Nothing will change when it comes to costs unless the gov’t rations it via cost per procedure or by not covering certain treatemtns under certain circumstances.
How can they “control” the cost, when they can’t even provide an example such as your daughter and then tell us which line items on that bill will be cut and how much they will be cut.
Look at the BS that is now being piled into that “Healthcare” bill now.

Tucked within is a provision that could provide billions of dollars for walking paths, streetlights, jungle gyms, and even farmers’ markets,” The Boston Globe’s Michael Kranish reports. “The add-ons – characterized as part of a broad effort to improve the nation’s health ‘infrastructure’ — appear in House and Senate versions of the bill.”

Yeah, they are REALY going to “control” something with the direction they going, but the last thing it will be is the cost of healthcare!
Another fun tidbit, Bumbling Barney Frank is back at it again. Now the least happy man in America wants to take TARP pay back money and feed it back out again. to what you ask….strange …but Barney is back at it again…playing in the housing markets! I guess help to create this great economic crisis in the first place was not enough for him!
Obama says they have turned a profit on what has been paid back do far.
+++
Last month, the General Accountability Office (GAO) reported that, through June 12, 2009, the government had received $6.2 billion in dividend payments. The original TARP legislation required that money made from the program “shall be paid into the general fund of the Treasury for reduction of the public debt.”
+++
what’s the matter Barney? Following the Law is not good enough for you?
So, Bumbling Barney sees a buck…he needs to spend it plus 2 more he doesn’t have! Hey moron, do you think that just maybe we can just follow the Law?
He is without question the biggiest hypocrite alive!

Posted by: Mike_C | July 9, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

I keep seeing this all over the Internet, so I will correct it one more time.
Ted Kennedy is the one mostly responsible for the creation of HMO’s. The bill passed in 1973 was done so mostly to appease his demands! Republicans caved in to Democrats here – get the facts straight!
So if you really want to trust a plan created by the man who is responsible for the HMO’s in this country – go right ahead and support it!

Posted by: Jon F | July 9, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Jon F
Exactly…but they have this blind spot that can’t let them see the words. Truly. Eye to brain disconnect on the HMO Act of 1973, authored by Edward Kennedy. Yes, I’m repeating, but maybe some synapse will link or something.
Nah. Just wishful thinking.

Posted by: Eyes Open | July 9, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

This is on the road to nowhere for several reasons. 1) The first priority of the insurance companies and the health care companies is profit. Some commenters have graphically described their problems with insurance companies who label so many illnesses “pre-existing conditions.” No way are they going to endanger their profits. 2)Both Republican and Democratic legislators receive money from the two groups. They aren´t going to shake up the quid pro quo system too much. 3) Taxing health care benefits? Give us a break. What benefits are there? Unless the ones getting taxed are the hospitals and doctors, after all, they are the ones getting the benefits. 4) There is no real way to pay for government health care now. No need to lay the blame on one particular party; there are too many who are responsible for the fact that the rich can get any health care they want; the middle class pays through the nose and still might not get the coverage; and the poor, not much of anything. A sad commentary on a democratic society.

Posted by: BachisBest | July 9, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

I just want to comment on the English health care system, the family and I lived in England for over three years and there health care sucks. Our landlord had been waiting on a hip replacement surgery for six years, he was in getting around with a walker and in terrible pain. I had checked on a vacsectomy and was informed there was a three year waiting list. Is this the so called system that we want.

Posted by: Ricky Shaw | July 9, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Using government advantage is best for everybody.
Nobody can collect the money to pay for health care as cheaply as the government can through a national sales tax and nobody can deliver high quality care and medications as cost effectively as the VA has for years.
A civilian model of this is the best fix in a new dual public/private system.
If private works keep it.
For everybody else, for our physical and financial health we need change, and freeing individuals and businesses from this burden will provide the greatest stimulus ever for our economy today and forever.
Public could provide:
Free care and medications for everyone using public care, rich, poor, old, young, everybody that asks for it.
Businesses that choose public for employees are not required to pay or be involved in health care.
Costs to citizens even covering everyone Hundreds of billions less than $2.5trillion spent in 2008.
Is this something for nothing socialism or good smart business?

Posted by: Bill Watson | July 9, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

The government are the same people who are spending $18M on the “stimulus transparency” website. $18M on a website?!!!
All the politicians have the reform part of the equation correct. If only they can leave government out of the health care business do we have a prayer at succeeding.
Or will they run that as a division of General Motors?
It is really simple – legislate the reform and throw in some assistance fot those who cannot pay. Beyond that we are going to have to wait until all the stimuluses are over and we are dug out of this financial hole.
The biggest thing that scares me about Obama is that he seems to have no idea of the reality of things. He doesn’t seem to get that government has never and will never administer health care correctly. He has no idea of when we are way spent out and will be for 20 years to come. He is totally an idealist with a big credit card. Well, that credit card is at the max and he hasn’t a clue as to the reality of it.

Posted by: Jon F | July 9, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

There is a bill being presented that states that no congressperson will pass a healthcare bill that has not been read and has not been posted on the internet for all to read. Remember that campaign promise?

Posted by: m vale | July 10, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

It might just be me, but I don’t want all my medical records on a big brother type government computer. Can you imagine the abuse? What happened to personal privacy?

Posted by: m vale | July 10, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

I don’t care what it costs to insure all of us. If we can spend 10 billion a month on a war of choice we can spend the same on providing some peace of mind to those who are without insurance . I’ve fought in America’s wars. I have paid my taxes. I had insurance for 30 years until I was forced into retirement and now I can’t get insurance when I need it most…… The misinformation about other countries health care is unbelievable. The point is they care enough about the welfare of their citizens to provide this basic human right. Come on America join the civilized world.

Posted by: terry Rush | July 11, 2009, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

I can’t help but notice that no one in the media was worried by centrism or bipartisanship when the republicans were in power.
Strawman, stalking horse, delusion. Whatever you want to call it, this is a false issue that has been dreamed up by some unknown people and embraced by Obama and the media.
It allows the republicans to maintain the status quo till they can get back in office and continue to push the country even further to the right.

Posted by: jan | July 12, 2009, 8:23 am 8:23 am

I should have added that failure to see the bipartisan garbage for what it is, is stupid.

Posted by: jan | July 12, 2009, 8:25 am 8:25 am

Anyone who can prove that the Canadians have longer life spans then we do in America without the factor of inner-city violence in play then please do so. To the contrary, they actually have shorter life spans because under single-payer healthcare you basically get no treatment once you reach a certain age, whichever age the bureaucrat see’s fit for you.

Posted by: Mike | July 16, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am

The Fraser Insitute, a Canadian Think Tank found that the average waiting time for a surgery in 2001 was 17.7 weeks!

Posted by: Mike | July 16, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am

A draft of the House Democrat health care bill is out, and it’s been leaked to ATR staff. There are several major tax increases in here, most of which violate the Taxpayer Protection Pledge. They include:
a tax on individuals failing to sign up for health care equal to the lesser of 2.5% of adjusted gross income (AGI) or the average individual premium amount
a tax on employers for not providing a health care plan equal to 8% of payroll. This becomes 0, 4, or 6 percent of payroll as payday totals dip below $400,000 annually
a new and undetermined excise tax on health insurance plans
codification of the “economic substance doctrine,” whereby businesses would not be able to engage in legal tax avoidance techniques without demonstrating a bona fide business purpose
delay of worldwide interest allocation, a baby step toward the full double-taxation of corporate profits earned overseas
the big one–a new “surtax” on the AGI of small businesses and other high income earners. Here’s the details:
1% on AGI of $350,000 to $500,000
1.5% on AGI of $500,000 to $1,000,000
5.4% on AGI of over $1,000,000
Those brackets are 50% if you’re Married Filing Separately, and 80% if you’re Single or Head of Household
This will result in a top rate of 45%, and a capital gains rate of over 25%. It’s more than that when you factor in that this surtax is NOT on taxable income, but on adjusted gross income (AGI). Factoring that plus state income tax in means that the top rate will exceed 50%, and the capital gains rate will exceed 30%.
And it actually gets a lot worse. Employers would also be mandated to provide health insurance under the bill, and the cost of health insurance would likely skyrocket because of new regulations called guaranteed issue and community rating. The only alternative, which many companies would either be forced into by cost considerations or choose for simplicity, would be to pay a payroll tax of as much as 8 percent. That’s on top of the existing 15.3 percent payroll tax for Social Security and Medicare, creating a new total payroll tax of 23.3 percent.

Posted by: mike | July 16, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

I own a small business, (200 employees)in Ca. I have tried but I can’t continue with these taxes. We are moving overseas and gave 180 employees pinnk slips on Friday. You cannoty get something for nothing. all these taxes are killing small businesses. Stop depending on your Government to take care of you. government wasn’t meant to take care of every need.

Posted by: mike | July 20, 2009, 2:25 am 2:25 am

Your article was very well written, I am very like it, I wish you
happy every day!

Posted by: LDL | October 12, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.