By Jaketapper

Jul 11, 2009 6:27am

Give it Some Time, Obama Says in Defending the Recovery Act

From Sarah Tobianski and Sunlen Miller

After a week of foreign travel President Obama uses his weekly address to refocus on the domestic agenda, launching into a strong defense of the success of the recovery act, and shoots down the notion that there is a need for a second stimulus.

"Even as we make progress on these challenges abroad, my thoughts are on the state of our economy at home," Obama said in his weekly address taped in L’Aquila Italy where the President was earlier in the week for the G8 summit.

The address responds to a growing chorus of criticism that the $787 billion recovery plan isn’t working as unemployment soars still to astounding levels.

“I realize that when we passed this Recovery Act, there were those who felt that doing nothing was somehow an answer,” the President will say.  “Today, some of those same critics are already judging the effort a failure although they have yet to offer a plausible alternative.”

The President says the recovery act was not designed to restore the economy to full health on its own, but to provide the boost necessary to stop the free fall.

The President tries to halt calls for a second stimulus, saying that the recovery plan wasn’t designed to work in four months, but two years, and that it will continue to accelerate as time passes.

“Part of what makes our current economic situation so challenging is that we already had massive deficits as the recession gathered force,” the President will say.  “And although the Recovery Act represents just a small fraction of our long term debt, people have legitimate questions as to whether we can afford reform without making our deficits much worse.”

The stimulus is working as it should, the President says and adds that the country is moving in the right direction.

“I am confident that the United States of America will weather this economic storm,” the President will say.  “But once we clear away the wreckage, the real question is what we will build in its place.  Even as we rescue this economy from a full blown crisis, I have insisted that we must rebuild it better than before.”
 
- Sarah Tobianski and Sunlen Miller

User Comments

I am one of those people who said doing nothing was the answer to the fiscal crisis, and I think we would have had unemployment at the same level it is now, but at least we would not have run up deficits that make the previous admins. deficits pale in comparison. I think the result of all this spending and printing of money will be stagflation like we saw in the 70′s. The stimulus may have done some good however in torpedoing cap and trade and universal health care, both of which really would have killed our economy.

Posted by: Jason | July 11, 2009, 6:43 am 6:43 am

About 200 billion out of the 800 billion has been spent so far, so yea, it will take a little time.

Posted by: Thinking | July 11, 2009, 7:25 am 7:25 am

I imagine “stimulus” projects will magically appear, which much fanfare, in September and October of 2010.

Posted by: mesquito | July 11, 2009, 7:42 am 7:42 am

Give it time? That’s not what he said when he sold that piece of junk. It never was stimulus package. It’s a package of trinkets for Democratic re-election. THAT is why most of it is designated for spending next year.

Posted by: drjohn | July 11, 2009, 7:52 am 7:52 am

Less than 100 billion has been spent this year. This year’s entire spending was originally supposed to be $107 billion. Go look it up at WaPo.

Posted by: drjohn | July 11, 2009, 7:53 am 7:53 am

It took Bush and friends 8 years to destroy the economy so yes it will take more then 6 months to fix it. I am one of the lucky ones here in Michigan with a good job. My job by the way is sales rep,and I service companies who supply parts to the automotive industry. I assure all you republicans /conservatives,my clients knew they were in deep trouble years before Mr Obama became President.By the way in my meetings high taxes and cap and trade never come up, but the cost of health care is a common topic.

Posted by: jim | July 11, 2009, 8:29 am 8:29 am

Jason,
You seem sure both will fail to pass.

Posted by: tanarg | July 11, 2009, 8:42 am 8:42 am

“But once we clear away the wreckage, the real question is what we will build in its place.”
The most frightening words I’ve ever read…

Posted by: Eyes Open | July 11, 2009, 8:56 am 8:56 am

After more thought I would like to add another point. In my 55 years of life, and 30 years in business I have never heard one person, or representative of a business, complain about high taxes. Could this be a talking point in the hope of securing votes by the Republican nut-jobs? Do birds fly and pigs roll in the mud. If the Republicans were capable of Governing then high taxes would be a mute point.

Posted by: jim | July 11, 2009, 9:31 am 9:31 am

The Obama Game Plan is to wait until we are close to the 2010 election before releasing this money….Hey look people what i have done for you, senario
Until then he doesn’t care a bit about people, they are toys in the democrats plan….PROVE ME WRONG

Posted by: Obamas brownnosing media network | July 11, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am

“In my 55 years of life, and 30 years in business I have never heard one person, or representative of a business, complain about high taxes.”
Where have you been living? A cave??

Posted by: Get Real | July 11, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am

The first stimulus package didn’t work and now President Odemer wants more. Who is going to pay for this second failure. Even Harry Reed knows a bad thing when he sees it. The Governor of Pennsylvania was so excited the other day on CNBC, that 11 million dollars of stimulus money created 38 jobs on a bridge fixing project. 1. the cost per job is OUTRAGUS!!! 2. when the bridge is fixed the 38 people will be out of work. 3. They are spending so much money that the National Debt will be so large, that it will Bankrupt this Country and thats is according to their own economist. I know we wanted CHANGE but not from the Wealthest Nation on the Planet to the Poorest.

Posted by: John M. Gerena | July 11, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

democrats rely on people needing them.Thats why they are spending all our money my grandchildren will feel the effect of obama and the dems. plus they just weakened our country and made every american in history look bad with his antics over seas. he is jimmy carter all over agian. be prepaird for cap and tax, then be ready to buy carbon credits for yourself and your family even your dog or cat cause they want to regulate the air you breath next
one thing to remember we are free they can not give us any freedom or rights unless they already took them from us.

Posted by: woods | July 11, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

If the stimulus bill isn’t supposed to work immediately then why is it called a stimulus bill and why was it passed in a hurry without anybody reading it. I have tried to give the president a chance, but this guy is full of it. Worse than Bush.

Posted by: peterg | July 11, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am

President, Obama intends to run the country’s finances just like he ran his household finances. He’s got a book of blank checks. I plan to make a lot of money, I am going to sell Green ink to the Treasury, They already have lots of red ink.

Posted by: John M. Gerena | July 11, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

He’s still on the campaign trail….. believing we are all mushrooms….. keep us in the dark and feed us bs. There is no ‘transparency’ except that some of us recognize and see through the baffling with bs and dazzling with charisma that he is so adept at. The Bush bashers blame the deficit on what Obama inherited – - well he has only tripled it so far……. and more to come. When will people wake up !?!?!?!?

Posted by: Reeba | July 11, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am

The stimulus is funded with borrowed money. If it doesn’t work, we the tax payers, have to pay it back. Even if it works, guess what, we the tax payers still have to pay it back.

Posted by: Luadda22 | July 11, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am

Quit blaming Bush for the problems we are in. Simple human greed and lots of it has gotten us to where we are, and throwing our childrens money at the symptoms will not cure the disease. Obama is a hypocrite of the first order. Why is his “timetable” not working?? He was big on demanding “timetables” regarding Iraq. He is leading Pork-barrel-election-year-politics at its best.

Posted by: LibertinTexas | July 11, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Obama’s “stimulus” is a train-wreck- these jobs figures are far worse than the ones the White House warned us about if we DIDN’T pass the bill- so it was passed, and then unemployment soars anyway? He said it would top-out at 8%, we give him a trillion dollars, and he and Joey Pluggs now tell us they “underestimated” as it pushes 10%?
-oh please
Instead of creating jobs, interest rates were bumped up, the dollar slid… and it didn’t help anybody get any work. Much of this is due to the fact that Obama’s agenda has mortified almost every machine of job-and-growth creation in the country.
The One couldn’t deliver the type of “temporary, targeted, and timely” bill that he promised repeatedly, and regardless of his image in the press, Obama simply lacks the the political stature to control Pelosi and Reid… who hit the trough hard, while bickering like siblings.
And the lack of GOP co-conspirators exposed Obama politically… this legislation now looks to be a HUGE gamble. And when all this pork-n-welfare fails to generate any real economic gains, the Democrats will face a bloodbath in 2010.
One could even make the argument that Obama knows his legacy will be in tatters by 2012… so is just ramming-through as much of his far-left agenda as he can before the day comes when people cringe at the mere mention of his name… sure seems like it.

Posted by: Reaganite Republican | July 11, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

I still believe this is the beauty of the American political system. The opposing views are allowed to be discussed open in public. No one is getting arrested or being suppressed. Freedom and choice.
Now on the economy, it seems to me that now the Republicans are making the point that the stimulus package which they opposed is not working. And that most of the stimulus package was meant to grow the big bad government composed of good for nothing bureaucrats. so, the monies just went poof gone.
I find this assertion an insult to every American citizen’s intelligence. Who do the Republicans think they’re talking to, a bunch of stupid people?! Hey, give us some credit, we don’t form our opinion from just pure media hype. And all that crap about media bias, same old strategy it just isn’t effective anymore. Kinda’ like the American car manufacturers telling us their quality is good when we know it is not and just kept on selling us the same crap, it eventually catches up with you. A lie is a lie, it won’t become truth just because you have Fox news saying it over and over again as truth! We can’t continue to lie to ourselves as Americans and think we will convince the world that we are correct. Results will speak for itself. Let’s give this Administration a chance to complete their experiment, then judge it. That’s why it’s called the American Experiment, we were never suppose to feel fat dumb and happy. Americans are always hungry and we work hard as a nation but we can’t continue to exploit the people and think all will be ok while the top 10% echelon pound the hell out of the masses and tell us to create miracles and get paid peanuts.
The Republicans spent like drunken sailors when they were in charge and no drum beats about it during their term. Do you remember the Iraq war? Oh I forgot about that one, the mess that someone dumped on Obama’s lap. When all the loved ones of the Bush administration enriched themselves with the monies that went into that war, where were the cries of these same Republican senators for justice?! Are those mercenaries really more efficient than the bureaucrats the Republicans seem to wanna blame for all of our ills. Give us more credit to understand that when billions of dollars go missing and can not be accounted for by the GAO and everyone in the Republican party is silent about it, you don’t think we suspect the monies are being directed to pay off political debts. The Republicans want more of the same, tax cuts, tax cuts and more tax cuts. This is an old idea that works only to a certain extent but is not the only answer to all of our problems, at least that’s the experiment Obama team is trying to see. Something obviously went bad while the Republicans were in charge of the government, that much we know. Obama has only been in office for a little over 6 months and the American people expected him to fix all the mess that was created before him?! And the Republican solution to this is to throw the Democrats out (of course, we could see that move a mile away) and put them back in power and give more of the stimulus money to the people (er, I mean to their friends) with more tax cuts.
By the way, only 10% of the stimulus money has been spent thus far. The reason is that Obama team is trying to find a way to change the way money is spent to ensure it gets to those that need it. Not more of the same, give tons of money to those that don’t need it. Maybe it’s an idealistic approach and perhaps it will not yield all the desired results but they are trying to change it. Doing business as usual will certainly yield the same results which so far seems to show failure. Obama team made a mistake in estimating the continued growth of unemployment. But hey, the stock market has stopped eroding, that’s a good sign. The financial markets are starting to stabilize. The fact that we probably avoided depression is a good development. Bush had a hand in it by doing their bit in infusing dollars into the financial sector that melted down. The reason why there was financial meltdown is that the people who ran it knew that the gov’t would bail them out so, sure enough they took lots of risk, if they win in taking risk, they are heroes. if they fail, someone else bails them out and perhaps funnel some money to self for a golden parachute. If the Republicans think that the American don’t see it, this is a sad mistake! We see it! Stop insulting the intelligence of the American people.
If the Republicans don’t want to lead, then get out of the way. Go and continue to fool yourselves but we are quite frankly quite tired of the Republican’s ‘holier than thou’ attitude only to find they are worse than us in terms of holding up moral examples of our society.
America needs leaders to provide ideas on how things can get done. Not just a bunch of whiners and the first things that come out of their mouth is there is media conspiracy and the word, “NO!”
Republicans need new ideas.

Posted by: Choice | July 11, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

If the stimulus bill isn’t supposed to work immediately then why is it called a stimulus bill and why was it passed in a hurry without anybody reading it.
Exactly.
Why did poor Sherrod Brown have to be flown in from his mother’s funeral to sign it if it wasn’t something intended to work immediately? Congress surely could have waited to vote on something that was supposed to work 2 years out.
And why did President Obama fly out to Ohio to say the stimulus was already working to save some police recruits’ jobs, and to Caterpillar to say they wouldn’t have to lay people off?
Call me crazy, but I’m beginning to mistrust the now-or-never deadlines this administration likes to set.

Posted by: MayBee | July 11, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am

does anybody know what countries refuse to let democrats visit or live there. If we could only find that place it would be Eutopia

Posted by: john | July 11, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am

To be blunt, both Republicans and Democrats are going to be same, they will direct funds to their friends as payment for favors.
Republicans tend to give most of the monies to rich and trickle some to us in the middle. But the taxes hammer the middle, so we end up getting slammed, anyway. They giveth and taketh away; probably net, net, taketh away. The idea is to dangle sufficient carrots to make the exploitee think they’ll get rich but really it’s same exploitation.
Democrats tend to give most of the monies to social programs. Social programs are run by bureaucrats. I don’t think I would consider bureaucrats super rich; so they’ll likely spend the money allowing it to circulate. They say they want to take the money from rich for their social programs but nah, I don’t buy it, the middle gets squeezed too. Democrats ideal world is to have equality, it doesn’t work because it destroys the motivation of those that work hard to get ahead.
No matter which way you go, the middle gets the short end of the deal. So, which way would you rather error?!
Your choice, that’s what we call Freedom baby!

Posted by: choice | July 11, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Republicans did spend like drunken sailors during the Bush administration. IT DIDN’T HELP THE ECONOMY NOW DID IT? Obama’s deficit in his 1st 6 months is larger than the sum of the 6 month deficits of all Presidents before him combined. All Presidents combined. The National debt incurred by Obama’s budget will almost equal the national debt of all previous Presidents combined. By 2019, the US will pay more in interest on the US publically held debt to China and Japan than Social Security will pay to our own senior citizens.
When we raise these issues, it does appear that we’re talking to a bunch of stupid people, because only stupid people could think this fiscal irresponsibility to be a good thing.
Obama’s spending is not only bad economic policy, it’s immoral. Try telling your children that they’re going to be the ones to pay all this back.
By the way, please don’t forget that the Democrats have controlled Congress throughout the recession; the Dems took over about a year before the economy tanked.

Posted by: Meab | July 11, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am

Give it time ….
I would like too but the the company I have worked for over thirty years anounced yesterday that we were closing the doors. At 59 I am not ready to retire (in part because all of my investments went in the toliet last year). I would like to give it time but time has run out.

Posted by: NoTimeLeft | July 11, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

How can something that took eight years to screw up be fixed in six months? Seems like the very people who complain about welfare are now standing with their hands out.

Posted by: Disgusted | July 11, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

meab – You are right but you’ll never get a Dem to admit it. Bush is gone..his policies are gone…this is ALL O’Bama and the dems doing and it is a biggie! And CHOICE – You make absolutely no sense. You are only ranting and raving at the Reps because you are embarassed at what your party has done to this country. Want to help?? Vote these nuts out and QUICK!!!

Posted by: M. Summer | July 11, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

My stimulus money went to the higher interest rate the ccard cos. dumpd on me. A friend didn’t get a stimulus check because in 1984 she had a gov. loan for college. She thought it was paid but recently found out they also tacked on over $5,000 in interest. They took her check and applied it to the gov. loan. What stimulus

Posted by: ylterri | July 11, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

And did you hear that Wall street no longer needs to report program trading details. Now that more Washington transparency. Change you can count on.

Posted by: deanbob | July 11, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

give it time? and now he’s talking about raising the upper income tax bracket to 40%. plus local and sales taxes – the government gets 50% of all the money made from the top 5% of the income earners. and they still are trillions in debt. no – we don’t need “time” we need our money back. this guy sux.

Posted by: larry | July 11, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Give it enough time & the recession will end on its own – so why are we spending trillions of dollars on something that would happen anyway?

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 11, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Time for President Obama to understand that he is ON THE CLOCK. Why should the American population have faith and confidence in a cabinet made up of at least three tax cheats — INCLUDING THE SECRETARY OF TREASURY??
He sold the first stimulus package with the “8% unemployment” stipulation!! It is his ECONOMY, and now the OBAMA PLAN. It will either work or fail, and he will either WIN OR LOSE!

Posted by: PappyHappy | July 11, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

I agree with Larry. Stop the tax increases and give us our money back.
NOW

Posted by: ylterri | July 11, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Choice – right on, you’re telling it like it is. Some folks don’t want to hear the truth, but they need to grow up and get a new perspective.

Posted by: Bob | July 11, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

obama always says “they complain but they don’t have an alternative plan to the stimulus” which is outright LIE. the alternative was a government living within its means and cutting taxes – yet he continues to be allowed to walk around unchecked(yesterday) with his stupid straw man arguments. there is an alternative to this and many republicans, independents and even some democrats suggested it. he needs to be held reposnsible for this immoral and outrageous choice.

Posted by: larry | July 11, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

People need to get away from the Republican or Democrat blame game. As citizens we should be outraged at both sides and expect better. The first step is to vote all incumbents out with each election. The second step is to write/call/email you congressman weekly and demand action on the things that matter most to you. Quit accepting this incompetence.

Posted by: Jason | July 11, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

“I realize that when we passed this Recovery Act, there were those who felt that doing nothing was somehow an answer” — Obama
Mr. President, name one. Tell us who these “some” are.
He using standard deceitful Obama rhetoric. It’s part of every speech: Claim that the opposition has no position other than “do nothing,” rather than debating what people actually propose.
Folks, we’re being played by our own president.

Posted by: PD | July 11, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

And let’s consider “no nothing” as a real position: The people who proposed the stimulus made a prediction about how bad things would be without it. The economy with the stimulus is now worse than that prediction of the economy without it.
Since the stimulus is making things worse, it should be repealed.

Posted by: PD | July 11, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

PD – you are correct and you aid it better than i did. at least people are on to his game of deceit now. he uses the same standard three or four tricks – the straw man argument, the talk out of both sides of the mouth so people hear what they want to hear as they are hypnotically mesmerized by his smile and good looks, blaming bush for everything that has ever happened on the planet. none of them signs of a leader if you ask me.

Posted by: larry | July 11, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

So far the most visible achievement are the minor road and bridge repair and construction, which is good for states and highway workers, but no much for the unemployed auto and IT workers. Another major project is the ‘weatherization’ of federal building and low income housing, which may take decade to complete because each building is different and needs special engineering or architect considerations.

Posted by: austin | July 11, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Amazing that a rational people could delude into thinking that 1) Obama has any clue as to what he is doing, well other than “getting even” with the evil people who have been “responsible citizens”; 2) Is anything more than a Marxist demagogue; and 3) gives a twit about anything other than his own glorification.
This is a repulsive chapter in American history, and one we will not likely survive in tact. There are still plenty of dillusional leftist liberals who support this disaster, including the mainstream media minions.

Posted by: Jack Frost | July 11, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

“The stimulus is working as it should” the President says. ABC _ are you really calling that reporting? so – was the stimulus SUPPOSED to bring the unemployment level from 8.5% to 9.5% and possible to 10 or 11%. ABC – what are you writing? are you just taking notes when this guy speaks?

Posted by: lary | July 11, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Anyone yet see any abatement in the media’s mindless promulgation of Obama distortions. Takes little intelligence or gravitas to see through the charade that is unfolding. Perhaps history will record this as the age of willing dillusion.

Posted by: Jack Frost | July 11, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Jack Frost said, ”
Amazing that a rational people could delude into thinking that 1) Obama has any clue as to what he is doing, well other than “getting even” with the evil people who have been “responsible citizens”; 2) Is anything more than a Marxist demagogue; and 3) gives a twit about anything other than his own glorification.
“This is a repulsive chapter in American history, and one we will not likely survive in tact. There are still plenty of dillusional leftist liberals who support this disaster, including the mainstream media minions.”
AMEN!!!!! Well said, Jack Frost!

Posted by: JustMe | July 11, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Vote Palin-Romney 2012 for their rightwing conservatisim.
In 2012 we must vote for Governor Sarah Palin to become our President and Governor Mitt Romney to become our Vice President starting on January 20, 2013 , because of Governor Sarah Palin’s and Governor Mitt Romney’s superior right wing conservative philosophy. Governor Sarah Palin’s and Governor Mitt Romney’s superior right wing philosophy is shown in that they are pro God and Christianity, pro life, pro marriage; pro guns-second amendment, pro low taxes, pro low government spending; pro small government, pro unintrusive government, pro traditional and Judeo Christian values; pro Bible reading and prayer in our public schools, pro Christians schools and private education , pro private and free enterprise; pro military spending, anti arms agreements with Russia, pro creation; pro nuclear, pro conservative supreme court judges, pro American sovereignty; pro capitalism, anti communist, anti socialist; conservative on immigration, and pro constitution. John Warren

Posted by: John Warren | July 11, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

Larry and PD. So right. It isn’t taking long to get to know the real Obama, either his political ploys or his true feelings about the US, or the direction he wants to take the country.One commentator even went so far as to say that when he says anything you can be certain he will do the exact opposite.

Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | July 11, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

Obama is sounding like a free market proponent. give it time and it will work itself out.
His polciy along with unfunded Federal mandates and new taxes being debated are creating lots of uncertainity among those who make busienss investment decisions and consumers making decisions on their financial house.
what we all know as individuals and businesses, is that we must live within our means. We cannot borrow against the future indefinitly. its the unprecendent debt that caused Bush and the GOP problems and Obama and the Democrats are now compounding it many times over.
Before we get new spending, get the current house in order. Fix the unfunded Social Security and Medicare trillions. The Chinese will not lend to us forever.

Posted by: scott jeffries | July 11, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

Another thing, the dog ate my homework (we misread the economy, we inherited this)excuse is getting old.

Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | July 11, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Bush was baaaaaaaaaddd but Obama is even worse!!!

Posted by: junglejim123 | July 11, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Yes, I really wish the man would stop salivating over the prospect of raising taxes on people! This is the WORST thing that can be done in a recession, and you don’t need a propeller-headed economist to understand that one. Obama find this recession to be an “inconvenience” to his agenda, and isn’t really paying it the attention it deserves. Unfortunately his “inconvenience” is the source of many people’s pain.
Oh, and Republicans need to stop pushing Palin in 2012 for anything but local trash collector. She is totally unacceptable to conservative Democrats or Independents like myself – who want someone with at least a few brain cells to oppose Obama in the next election. She is probably one of the biggest reasons why he won last year as well. There are lots of intelligent Republicans – why pick the most annoying one for Presidential pick? If you do, we will just be assured of another 4 year term of Obama and his spending.

Posted by: Jon F | July 11, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

A reasonable statement from a reasonable man.
Governments around the world have introduced stimulus plans to do exactly what President Obama described, “provide a boost to stop the free fall.”
These monies are shoring up relief programs for those who are losing their jobs, and shoring up state and local budgets to prevent as many layoffs of police, firefighters, teachers and health care workers as possible.
Infrastructure programs coming on stream during the next year and a half should employ numbers of people.
At the end of the Bush administration financial institutions, banks, automotive companies and many others were in collapse. Hundreds of thousand were losing their jobs as the unemployment rate began steadily climbing beginning in March 2008. This continued on an upward trajectory through the end of the Bush administration and into the Obama presidency.
And this trend was seen on a global level.
President Obama has said from the beginning there are no magic fixes, that the economic crisis would take time to fix, and might get worse before it gets better.
He has said the program wasn’t designed to work in 4 months, but in 2 years and would accelerate toward that.
For the sake of people all around the world, we must hope this economic crisis/major recession begins to heal itself and that the stimulus monies do their job in shoring up and slowing the free fall.
For people around the world it means their lives and their livelihood.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Jon F …
$288 BILLION of the $784 Recovery and Reinvestment plan is in TAX RELIEF.
That’s ONE THIRD of the Recover Plan is in tax benefits.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

I’m wondering where to submit the alternative proposals ? would that be to the Dem controlled Congress ? I would be willing to stimulate the economy with a check in my pocket instead of a highway crossing for turtles !

Posted by: halfmn | July 11, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Some people didn’t pay attention. Most of the stimulus spending wouldn’t take place till 4th quarter 2009. We won’t know if the stimulus works till this time next year. This was reported when the stimulus was passed. Why all of a sudden is this a surprise?

Posted by: Matt Bjorndahl | July 11, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

On another note … I am a small business owner. Obama’s new taxes and policies are just forcing me to liquidate some things to pay his tax increases. I am not the only one in the same position – doing the same thing. If you want to go after the “rich” you should get your definition of rich straight. All he is doing is turning the upper middle class and small business into collateral
damage.
All of this is forcing people like myself to close things down, liquidate them, and get rid of employees in the process. For the past 30 years businesses in this country have been largely set up as “pass-through” entities where profits are taxes as the income of its owners. Mostly the large companies have a traditional corporate structure. In California, for example, 50% of workers are employed by small businesses.
It therefore doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out what happens if you put taxes on people owning this type of entity. Now our risk of return is even more precarious. In many cases there is a total lack of incentive to even stay in business and take further risks if you are promised only pennies on the dollar if you succeed. Its all downside risk and very little upside risk. Its best to liquidate now, keep the cash on the side until someone votes this clown out. Only then will we ever see relief to this recession.
I guess he thinks that his stimulus is all that is needed! Boy is he delusional!

Posted by: Jon F | July 11, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Matt Bjorndahl . . .
Matt, it’s a ‘surprise’ because those with an agenda to tear down the President don’t care much to pay attention to things like that. It doesn’t help their cause.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Jon F …
$288 BILLION of the $784 Recovery and Reinvestment plan is in TAX RELIEF.
That’s ONE THIRD of the Recover Plan is in tax benefits.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Danita: All the tax relief is going to people who will need to save it rather than spend it – and it seems that is happening.
The tax burden is being placed on the people who have the money to spend and invest – basically the upper middle class. This group of people are pulling their money out of the economy in large numbers.
For one thing, the money is needed to pay the additional taxes Obama is giving this segment (and more to come). It also now has become so risky to invest that it is not worth investing beyond a point if your “reward” for wise investing is to get to keep less than half of your earnings. Trillions of potential investment dollars are sidelined for the duration. Its precisely these dollars that would help spur a recovery. But Obama can’t wait on taxing people – yet complains that everyone is holding onto cash.
What do you think – Obama is going to get the country back on its feet because of all the new business his government owned GM will bring? I don’t think so!

Posted by: Jon F | July 11, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Danita: You can repeat yourself all you want, but a good half of that money is being used to pay off debt or to go into savings accounts. This does absolutely nothing for the economy.
Beside, the notion that giving people money to spend would jump start the economy was put into practice twice under George Bush (before the big crash). And we all know that if it didn’t work for Bush.

Posted by: Jon F | July 11, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Jon F . .. .
“half of that money is being used to pay off debt or being banked”
Paying off debt is not a bad thing at all. Nor is money deposited in banks. That means there is money available for further lending and spending.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Jon F . ..
What exact increases in taxes are you talking about? How much is your income, what percentage of tax raise did you recieve and when did it take effect?

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

“What do you think – Obama is going to get the country back on its feet because of all the new business his government owned GM will bring? I don’t think so!”
No, Jon I think President Obama saved a WHOLE bunch of jobs both at GM and in all their subsidiary supply manufacturing and supply industries and raw materials industries. American jobs.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

the more he seeds the idea of taxing for health benefits, raising taxes on the rich, having to have your home pass some government green mandate before you sell it, the more suspicion he is going to raise on what is really going to happen next. which means no one is going to invest, those with the brains and gumption to start a business are going to not take the risk. it’s not just his policies – it’s his attitude and the message he is sending – unknowingly. again – no sign of a leader – but the sign of someone who has an axe to grind.

Posted by: larry | July 11, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

larry . ..
Absolutely not . … I have money to invest and I continue to invest it in future industries. People with a vision of the future are moving forward with the encouragement provided.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

I said from the very beginning when Paulson and Bush started this crap that the government needed to appear to be doing something, anything, to look like they were pro-active. It was a better alternative than being viewed as doing nothing. At least then, no matter how bad it gets, the governemnt can always say, “think of how bad it could have gotten”.

Posted by: LongT | July 11, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

i would be careful with how you invest.

Posted by: larry | July 11, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

I love it, the media is in a frenzy because Obama’s policies simply aren’t working. Polls show the democratic controlled congress is at a 30% approval rating and falling fast, and now the newest poll numbers show republicans trumping democrats in 8 out of 10 pivotal issues including the economy. Story after story the liberal Obama loving media puts out stories like; “Where’s the republican leadership?” or “Will Palin resigning hurt the republicans?” The simple truth is, the democrats wanted it all and they got it, along with the public’s anger that things are getting worse. All the republicans have to do is sit back and watch the bloodbath while the media stamps its feet because its precious democrats wagon wheels are falling off. The media is so use to blaming the republicans that now they just don’t know what to do. Lets bring up Bushes wiretapping, lets bring up Palin, lets do something before the public catches on that the country is spiraling down the toilet. Too late, polling shows the public already knows and they’re blaming the democrats! Ha, ha, hahaha…..

Posted by: SAS | July 11, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

SAS ….
Its mostly just the Democrats are filthy liars and cheats and President Obamas and his team are pretty stupid – and they’re Democrats after all.
If only those clean, honest and decent Republicans were in power snorting their noses around they would bomb Iran, bomb Venezuela, bomb North Korea – and fix this whole economy nonsense with a snap of their blessed fingers.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Danita: It is clear by now that they banks are so badly in trouble that if some people payed down their card debt, it wouldn’t change their lending habits. The banks have been given cash and they still won’t change. People are waiting for the other shoe to drop and therefore are not spending at all – so we’d better get used to it. Its probably a good thing too in the long run.
My income (within the limits of what is your business to ask) is “over $250K”. In 2010, my marginal rate will go up by about 5% – and it is likely that the states will also raise taxes as well. And I pay tax in more than one state. What you need to understand is that when you have business income it isn’t a simple profit of loss taxation. I get taxed quite often on money earned by a company and then reinvested back into the company (improvements, etc.). It does not always follow that it all gets deducted if you reinvest it. So on top of everything else, I pay tax on far more money than I ever receive in my grubby little hands. Most people do not understand that this can and does happen often. So and extra 5% tax increase can effectively be an 8% increase or even more.
On top of that, I suspect that Obama will keep levying taxes on the “over $250K” crowd – and it will creep to even the “over $100K crowd”. In 10 years we will have less of a middle class than China. Obama has to keep raising taxes to support his agenda initiatives. He doesn’t talk about it when he introduces them – but someone will eventually have to pay for them – and it isn’t going to be Santa.
With profitability being down, there is far less margin these days – and it is fast becoming not worth the cost of doing business anymore.
Whether Obama saved jobs in the long run by buying GM is unclear. Many analysts give GM a very bleak future. Sometimes its best to let the course of things run out rather than artificially control it. Buying GM could very well cost “America” far more than it ever saves. Why prolong the inevitable? The only sure thing that buying GM did was to preserve the labor union’s interests – not the people who had invested in it with their retirement funds, etc.
The interesting thing between you and I is that we are both looking for the same kind of things for this country. We both want things to thrive and for this recession to stop people’s pain.
The main difference between the two of us is that I do not think Barack Obama is up to the job of fixing America, whereas you do. I may have voted for him, but have been nothing but disappointed by his dilettante behavior jumping into everything and finishing nothing. By trying to do everything at once he is going nowhere – a clear sign of inexperience. I am also shocked by his concept of what this country can afford to spend. While I am older and will probably not live long enough to see the country go belly up from our enormous deficit spending in 25 years – I do care. So it won’t affect me, but I care. There are lots of people who it will seriously affect and they are not told how this excessive deficit spending could impact them.

Posted by: Jon F | July 11, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

“I realize that when we passed the Recovery Act, there were those who thought that doing nothing was the answer.” isn’t that a lie? who said nothing should be done? no one. what they said was government should be smaller and taxes should be reduced. that is just one lie from “the dear one” in this article – along with “the stimulus is working as it should” – and a few others. but i’m sure we’ll find out later these were just “mis-speaks”

Posted by: larry | July 11, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

I don’t understand the harsh criticism. This wasn’t designed to happen overnight. Take comfort that isn’t happening fast, the faster it goes the faster it breaks.

Posted by: matchew | July 11, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Danita: You clearly are way young or haven’t been paying attention to politics for many years.
There is always a president who comes in with a great hope of the people – only to have these hopes dashed when they are shown to be a clown.
Bush was just a bit dumber than most.
Clinton, Reagan, LBJ, Kennedy – they were all expected to be game changes. Well, they were not. Obama will not be wither. He just has an enormous ego that makes him think he will go down in history as the greatest thing since buttered bread.
Presidents and politicians do not fix things beyond a point. There is a course of natural selection. Also history tends to repeat itself – think Vietnam and Iraq.

Posted by: Jon F | July 11, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Jon F – well said – i am much like you and have many similar experiences – i also don’t believe this president has any idea about economics – but i’m concerned he may be much more sinister – and using taxation and legislation for punitive reasons against a group of people he doesn’t see eye to eye with. i just don’t trust him at all.

Posted by: larry | July 11, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

All the economists told us that with or without the “stimulus” package, we’d begin to see the US emerge from the recession around the third quarter of 2009. Why spend billions (we can’t afford) when the normal cycle of business will run its course (as they always have and always will)? The reason is so BO can waste money on all the pet projects of DEM party and its throng of loyal subjects who still believe more government intervention is our only solution. Go figure.

Posted by: S | July 11, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

“Some people didn’t pay attention. Most of the stimulus spending wouldn’t take place till 4th quarter 2009. We won’t know if the stimulus works till this time next year. This was reported when the stimulus was passed. Why all of a sudden is this a surprise?”
Yes, we were paying attention and those things were not a surprise. What you’re leaving out is that the stimulus was also sold on the basis of “we need this NOW” so that it could begin to have an effect immediately. Hence the rush to get the thing passed before it could be properly examined.
So it’s perfectly valid to point out that things are worse with the stimulus than they were projected to be without it. When you consider the *entire* basis on which the stimulus was sold, including the purported immediate effect, and you observe the actual immediate effect (things worse than ever), it’s reasonable to point out that the remainder of the stimulus is a boondoggle as well.
However, I’ll give you this: There are at least a couple of bright spots: We have pretty “This project funded by the Recovery Act” signs along the highway, and an increase in the number of government hirings. At least those are bright spots if appearances are more important than substance, and hiring in the public sector rather than the private sector are good things.

Posted by: PD | July 11, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

The ‘stimulus’ and government meddling has actually slowed the bounce-back from the recession by not keeping the playing field level and giving banks and auto companies an unfair advantage while leaving us holding & paying the bill.

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 11, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

“Whether Obama saved jobs in the long run by buying GM is unclear. Many analysts give GM a very bleak future.”
I think the main point was to prop up as many jobs as possible IMMEDIATELY so that the economy didn’t completely crash. There were a lot of jobs that would have been lost and the cumulative effect could have been catastrophic.
It was an effort to solidify things for the short term, and hopefully give GM a chance to redesign and flourish long term.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Even as a staunch conservative I must say that liberals aren’t evil or stupid. They do, however, lack a biblical perspective on mercy and compassion. It’s OK to help people but think about the unintended consequences of welfare, especially when it comes to the families it was designed to help. The system encouraged single parents to stay single, unemployed and prolific. More babies, more money. It has trapped two generations in a cycle of poverty that could never be described as merciful by anyone with a basic understanding of mercy or compassion. A helping hand, not a handout is the absolute best we can do for someone going through a rough patch. Give them the tools to rise above their circumstances. Welfare enslaved millions of Americans, it did not liberate them from anything except personal responsibility. The percentage of Americans who pay absolutely no personal income taxes is not the way to rebuild a properous union. We all need to have skin in the game. Those who don’t have any skin in the game absolutely love Obama and the liberals who worship him. I’m just trying to understand the long-term value of bankrupting the U.S. in return for votes and power. Doesn’t seem American to me.

Posted by: S | July 11, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

“Give it Some Time, Obama Says in Defending the Recovery Act”
I fail to understand why someone should be given time to drive the bus over the cliff.

Posted by: PD | July 11, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

“Part of what makes our current economic situation so challenging is that we already had massive deficits as the recession gathered force.” so – obama – the answer is ten times more deficit spending? at least he’s only blaming bush by implying everything is his fault – rather than saying “the failed policies of george w bush.” i think we can start talking about this stimulus as part of “the failed policies of barack h obama and the congress of thieves”

Posted by: larry | July 11, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Danita…but LIBS don’t believe tax cuts work. They ripped Bush on this throughout the campaign even though government receipts from personal income taxes grew like crazy after the Bush tax cuts. (Yes, spending was the issue, but that doesn’t negate the reality of tax cuts increasing revenue). Check the IRS data if you don’t believe me.

Posted by: S | July 11, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

“It was an effort to solidify things for the short term, and hopefully give GM a chance to redesign and flourish long term.”
GM was selling cars at a loss per vehicle before the reorganization, having the boss fired (by Obama), getting a new boss (appointed by Obama), etc.
Unless something has changed, the new “leaner and meaner” GM will still be selling cars at a loss per vehicle. This means that we the taxpayers are subsidizing and propping up failure. How is this a good thing.

Posted by: PD | July 11, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

i rented a chrysler last week that had 13,000 miles on it – and the door – on the inside – was made out of plastic that was painted. the paint was so bad – it was already completely scratched – and you could pick it off with your fingernail without even trying. it was made a like cheap toy you;d buy from japan post world war II. the cars are horrible – the craftsmanship is horrible – and companies that build bad products need to evolve, or go out of business. not be propped up with our money. that is not a way to stimulate anything – except laziness, shoddiness, and entitlements.

Posted by: larry | July 11, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

As the decision was made under Bush to prop up the banks and the financial institutions (and the automotive companies), the example is established.
I think what everyone wanted to avoid was a virtual complete collapse. Whether that has been accomplished we will see in the next couple of years.
Is anybody really convinced a society based on gross consumerism, gross resource consumption and waste, and petroleum can actually sustain?
Do you have any idea how much North America throws out and wastes in food alone every day? This is not intelligent behavior.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

And another great thing about GM vehicle profitability and having the government involved with policy making: The vehicles that lose money are the small widowmakers — that is, the vehicles that the government wants you to buy. The vehicles that make money are the trucks and SUVs — that is, the vehicles that the government wants you not to buy.
So if the government has its way in influencing our buying decisions, what kind of financial outlook do you forecast for GM?
Yes, I know that Obama says “the last thing” he wants is to be running the car companies. But let’s just look at the evidence of his actions so far and draw the obvious conclusion: More profoundly deceitful rhetoric. Watch his actions, not his lips.

Posted by: PD | July 11, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

“Is anybody really convinced a society based on gross consumerism, gross resource consumption and waste, and petroleum can actually sustain?”
One can argue the *merits* of such a society, but it’s pretty obvious that, yes, it can sustain.

Posted by: PD | July 11, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Large trucks and SUV’s are finished – even in the market place. There are car lots FULL of unpurchased SUV’s and there have been for several years – the market disappeared once people caught on that SUV’s didn’t really represent “freedom to go anywhere” – they just represented high gas bills while you were stalled in commuter traffic.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

“Is anybody really convinced a society based on gross consumerism, gross resource consumption and waste, and petroleum can actually sustain?”
One can argue the *merits* of such a society, but it’s pretty obvious that, yes, it can sustain.
—————————————-
In my opinion, you’re living in a fantasy world. Our gross consumption and waste cannot sustain itself, we need to live smarter and better.
Do you have any idea how much food is thrown out and wasted in North America every day? Grotesque piggish creatures caught up in illusion. Can’t go on – we’ve got to get smarter.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

There’s no need to defend it. He made the right choice although he should spend 3 times as much. The republican clowns are quick to criticize this president even though they are responsible for the mess. If the republican clowns really believe that federal dollars don’t create jobs they should be the first to step up and refuse their paychecks. 18 more republican senate seats on the ballot. Sad we have to wait until Nov 2010 to send them packing.

Posted by: rightbehind | July 11, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

danita, your argument is self-contradictory. That there can be so much waste in a society is proof of its sheer economic effectiveness.
That’s why I say you can argue that the waste is not a good thing, but that’s a separate issue from the sustainability of the lifestyle.
If you say “It cannot go on forever,” well, of course nothing can. But it’s been going on pretty successfully for a long time.

Posted by: PD | July 11, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

I think people got tricked into thinking this would be a short process by the media saying that experts are seeing ‘greenshoots’, and Obama going from off his message of the economy being in dire straits. It took nearly 2 years for the economy to implode. It will take nearly that long for us to get out of this mess.

Posted by: Matt Bjorndahl | July 11, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

“If the republican clowns really believe that federal dollars don’t create jobs they should be the first to step up and refuse their paychecks.”
I admit that I’m struggling to discover the logic that connects the first and second halves of that sentence.
Let’s focus on just the first half: What are the jobs being created by federal dollars? If you’re referring to government jobs, I agree that those are being created. But those don’t really count as “stimulus” because they must be funded by private money. That is, you and I must pay for them by having money taken from us by the government.
So presumably you are talking about other jobs being created. What are they?

Posted by: PD | July 11, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

“It took nearly 2 years for the economy to implode.”
I see that you’ve identified the two years following the Democrats taking control of Congress. Would that others would make this connection, too.

Posted by: PD | July 11, 2009, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

The economic implosion had been in the works for quite some time (long before the Democrats took Congress in 2007) with the national debt in the United States doubling under Bush from $5 trillion to $10 trillion, personal debt doing the same and the debt of major financial institutions and the banks following exactly the same example.
It was a house of cards waiting to collapse.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

You know we have a clown in the White House and the suckers are just believing everything he says.He is good speaking lies no doubt perhaps better than Clinton but nevertheless lies and more lies.

Posted by: Frank | July 11, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Intelligent exchange of commodities is a great thing! Gross consumerism and gross waste of resources and pollution of the planet is idiotic at this point in time. Idiotic.
The house of cards will collapse on that one.
Unless of course you’re waiting for “the end days” – and then any kind of crap approach from the species is just fine. Moronic.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

i know if my taxes were cut – instead of being threatened to be raised – i would spend more money. and i wouldn’t spend it by investing in failed automotive companies – or making signs about how i’m spending it. and best of all – i wouldn’t wait 2 years before i started spending the extra income – and putting it back into the economy. that was the alternative plan that others put forward that obama now claims were never proposed.

Posted by: larry | July 11, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

“gross consumerism” what is that? it’s nothing but liberal words that offer a new platform for american self-loathing. it is your right to aquire what you need. al gore’s private jet? is that gross consumerism? obama and hsi wife flying to go to dinner? is that gross consumerism? pelosi taking a big plane back to california because she doesn’t like the small one – is that gross consumerism? barney frank bailing out a failing dealership in massachusetts with your tax money – in essence lobbying with your tax money – is that gross consumerism. limousine liberals all.

Posted by: larry | July 11, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

larry . . .
You and your children are going to have to figure that out for yourselves. And the next generation, and the next.
Do you have any idea how much food North America throws out and wastes every day? Worse than pigs. Pigs wouldn’t waste it. Unconscious and grotesque.
What? You think there’s no room for some drastic improvement in our consumption and waste habits?

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

If the stimulus was the be all, end all, cure all… Then WHY do we need another one??? Barack, um somebody actually knows about economics, maybe you should seek them out instead of listening to people pushing more polices that created the problem in the first place.
If you can’t manage the economy, you will NOT have a second term!!!

Posted by: hmn | July 11, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

i don’t think calling ourselves “pigs” is helpful ( and by the way – also name-calling) do you have any idea how much food the US gives away – and how much we supply the rest of the world? do you think the government should mandate how much you should have of anything? i don’t. we don’t work for the government – they work for us. and we are not “pigs.”

Posted by: larry | July 11, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

hmn – good point – and as you remember – the reason “the stimulus is so big is because we want to have to only do this once – we only have one chance to get this right” was the argument. errr. – once or twice – or three times – or until we have all the socialist programs we can dream up paid for by the few.

Posted by: larry | July 11, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

I was brought up ‘waste not – want not”. A good, old-fashioned value, and how many of us live by that anymore?
p.s. – I do not mean to insult pigs by describing the huge, grotesque daily waste of food that takes place in North America

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

the great thing about america – is how you were brought up – doesn’t have anything to do with how someone else was brought up – or how they choose to live their life.

Posted by: larry | July 11, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

“Give it time” How would you like it if the doctor diagnosed you with cancer and then when asked about the treatment he said “give it time”.
The economy and the country has cancer and Obama is accelerating the growth.
I’m afraid giving it time while he borrows more money and spends it on social programs is a death sentence.

Posted by: jon | July 11, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

“give it some time” Nice slogan from the man who wouldn’t allow the congress to at least READ the bill before it was passed… and the same BO who said un-employment rate would go above 8% if DIDN’T pass it RIGHT away….. the same BO whose vice president “It was just a “GUESS”"…… the same BO who said HE would have the most transparent administration ever… while BO is cutting secret backroom deals with the Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Corporations…… the same BO who said he would let the public read the bills BEFORE he signed them…….. BO has absolutely NO creditability….

Posted by: licentiousmedia | July 11, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

“Waste not – want not” was a major code of my parents’ generation, just a few short years ago – it stood the test of time through generations.
Hard to see a society that says ‘we love to waste and its our right’ is going to last for much longer.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

For all of you that wonder where those jobs are you must first pull your heads out of the economics of dung and begin to open your eyes. Lets take a bridge project for example. In order to build a bridge you need steel. Looks like the steel mills will be busy. Now contractors will be needed to assemble the bridge. Is the picture getting bigger? How about some road signs? Somebody has to make them. Going to be lots of hungry construction workers. Restaurants are going to need food. I know this is hard for some of you to understand. These things represent real economics. Not the economics of dung. It’s time we put our futures in whats tangible not speculation. President Obama has inherited a mess. The house of cards has fallen. It going to take money to clean up the mess. They could have printed the money and never told anyone about it and no one would have known the difference. 18 more republican senate seats on the ballot in 2010. All of them need to go.

Posted by: rightbehind | July 11, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

then you should contact your president and ask him to stop flying around the country to go on a date – and your house speaker to stop flying in a big plane to go home to california – and al gore to get rid of his private plane. my point is only i don’t want the government to tell me how i should live my life. and i don’t think we all be so readily tricked into falling into the self-loathing that the liberals use to trick society into taking more from them – and controlling them.

Posted by: larry | July 11, 2009, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

president obama has inherited a mess – and making a bigger one. hippocratic oath: first – do the patient no harm. not: first – use a disaster to spread your socialist agenda and create more entitlements.

Posted by: larry | July 11, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

“Lets take a bridge project for example. In order to build a bridge you need steel. Looks like the steel mills will be busy. Now contractors will be needed to assemble the bridge. Is the picture getting bigger? How about some road signs? Somebody has to make them. Going to be lots of hungry construction workers. Restaurants are going to need food. I know this is hard for some of you to understand. These things represent real economics.”
There is more to the picture. All of those things need to be paid for. And they’re paid for using our money. That’s money you and I don’t have to spend, going to those same restaurants, for example. That’s money that business owners don’t have to pay workers and create jobs.
Your scenario creates jobs out of thin air but forgets the part about how to pay for them, and the consequences of paying for them. Your scenario also does not include the extra cost of government bureaucracy to administer Recovery Act programs, which looks to me like money down the drain. I’m not seeing the net positive.

Posted by: PD | July 11, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

rightbehind President Obama has inherited a mess++++Jeez, not again. Most of us now just ignore posts that contain that excuse.

Posted by: Boxcar | July 11, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

“All of those things need to be paid for. And they’re paid for using our money”
Yes, that’s the way it works. If we all kept our money no bridges would get built, the commuter highways would fall into disrepair, the energy grid would remain old, obsolete and wasteful, police and fireman would not be available and so on . ..
That’s the way it works.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

All of those things need to be paid for. And they’re paid for using our money”
Yes, that’s the way it works. If we all kept our money no bridges would get built, the commuter highways would fall into disrepair, the energy grid would remain old, obsolete and wasteful, police and fireman would not be available and so on . ..
That’s the way it works
LOL! Last I checked all the money we use in the United States is owned by the United States. Interesting perspective though unless your one of the founding fathers then your name might be on it.

Posted by: rightbehind | July 11, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Time to vote in fiscally conservatives in 2010. The liberal spending of OUR tax dollars by the libs needs to stop!!!!

Posted by: pop | July 11, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

“LOL! Last I checked all the money we use in the United States is owned by the United States. Interesting perspective though unless your one of the founding fathers then your name might be on it.”
So when you get your paycheck, you think to yourself, “This is all the government’s money, they’re just loaning it to me”?

Posted by: PD | July 11, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

“That’s the way it works.”
What I am objecting to is the notion that tax dollars spent on “stimulus” magically results in a net gain of jobs. It might be that tax dollars poured into public works are being usefully employed. But it remains true that those are dollars not available to the taxpayers to pour into the economy on their terms.
Tell me how the stimulus is a job-creating program. I know about Obama traveling to Columbus to tout the “saving” of 25 (wow!) police officer jobs. But that’s very small potatoes. If he’s reduced to flakking such “gains” as evidence of the triumph of stimulus spending, it’s entirely unconvincing. And the stimulus money for the program runs out after a year or two, so the jobs end at that point, anyway.

Posted by: PD | July 11, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

“Time to vote in fiscally conservatives in 2010. The liberal spending of OUR tax dollars by the libs needs to stop!!!!”
Sorry ‘pop’ that’s what people tried in 2000 voting in the ‘fiscally conservative’ Republicans to the presidency and the Congress.
What happened with those Republicans?
That administration immediately OVERSPENT by HALF A TRILLION dollars (on av) every year of their regime. The Republicans doubled the national debt from $5 trillion to $10 trillion AND – just by coincidence, but none the less – left the country in complete financial turmoil. Stock market crashing. Banks and financial institutions crashing. Auto industry crashing. Tens of thousands of Americans being laid off, more and more each month beginning way back in March of 2008.
I’d be very careful in believing anything these ‘fiscal conservatives’ are promising.
We’re still trying to struggle our way out of that economic disaster – which the Republicans had 6 full years to prepare for, anticipate or prevent – and we may be struggling for a while yet.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

” It might be that tax dollars poured into public works are being usefully employed”
That is generally the idea. The Recovery and Reinvestment plan has $288 BILLION in tax relief – that is money going into your hands.
It also began with programs to shore up programs to help people currently losing their jobs by the tens of thousands, and programs to shore up state and local budgets to prevent as many job layoffs as possible of police, firefighters, teachers and health care workers. Local and state budgets were massacred by the economic crash.
The next phases include large amounts of public works projects which are detailed on the White House web site.
And some of the money is targeted at creating jobs in, and stoking, the new energy industries and the much-needed upgraded national energy grid.
That’s my basic understanding of how it works.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Since Americans have an attention span of about 15 minutes, they need to be constantly reminded that 8 years or more of conservative economics. It is going to take a looong time to get out of this Republican mess. The mess in California is the result of Reagan economics. Check it out.

Posted by: Dave Easterwood | July 11, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

As the previous poster points out, I wouldn’t trust any republican politicians if they asked me to loan them a dime!
Under a Republican White House and pretty much a majority republican congress from 2001 to 2007, the so-called “conservatives” increased the National Debt from $5.7 TRILLION (what Clinton left) to $8.7 TRILLION in 2007. By the time Bush/Cheney left office in 2009, the National Debt was over $10 TRILLION.
For Everyone’s information… the American taxpayer paid $451 Billion in Interest payments on the nation’s national debt in fiscal year 2008 alone. To give you some perspective on that, the Department of Defense budget each year (the largest portion of our nation’s budget) is ~$500 Billion. We could have built a second Department of Defense just on the FY08 interest payment on the national debt.
“Pop”…. vote republican?? (LOL)… For what? They claim to be “conservative” and for “smaller government”, but their record between 2001 and 2009 proved that they are anything but “conservative”.
I would reccomend that anyone who wants to know how much the Republicans wracked up the national debt during the past 8 years of Bush/Cheney, go look at the U.S. “Treasury Direct” web page.

Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | July 11, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Since Americans have an attention span of about 15 minutes, they need to be constantly reminded that 8 years or more of conservative economics. It is going to take a looong time to get out of this Republican mess. The mess in California is the result of Reagan economics. Check it out.
======================================
Dave, the California problem is not the Reagan economics but the BIG social services that California has. A big nanny state and it’s the model Pelosi and the rest of you yahoos want this country to become. California is broke so are 8 other “blue” states , check it out !

Posted by: Frank | July 11, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

It’s funny…. the current recession we’re in officially started in December 2007 (while G.W. Bush was in office), as per the National Bureau of Economic Research.
… and in September 08…. the republican candidate for President was saying what? “The fundamentals of the economy are strong” (LOL).
… now, some “ningkamputs” are ignorant enough to believe that this recession that began in December 2007, and was still going on a year later in 2008 when the Republican presidential candidate made his famous “fundamentals of the economy are strong” speech (LOL)… they now also believe that President Obama should be able to turn this economic mess that Bush left him with “on a dime.”
Well, that’s proof enough for me that Republicans…. They are “clueless” and ignorant about what it takes to turn an economic mess around…. I suggest that you all go take some economics courses at your local community college (LOL).

Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | July 11, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

Say what. Shows his concern for laid off Americans. Wow. Shocked at that one.

Posted by: Steve | July 11, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

6 of the 11 states that are “in the red” have Republican governors: (California, Arizona, Nevada, Alaska, Vermont, and Connecticut)… 6 of 11… that’s over 50% with Republican governors…. :-).

Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | July 11, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Obama lied and now is trying to cover it up. He is a fraud and it is time to elect a Congress that will stop his destruction of the economy, health care, and foreign relations. It is time to tell Obama “NO!!!”.

Posted by: brian | July 11, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

X-Republican Because of Bush ======California has the largest budget deficit and is repub.Number 2 is Illinois and is democratic,followed by New Jersey and Massachusetts which are also both democratic. Florida is number 5 and is repub. Number 6 is Pennsylvania and is democratic. Number 7 is georgia and is repub. Number 8 is North Carolina and is democratic. Connecticut is number 9 and is repub. New York is number 10 and is democratic. So 6 out of the top 10 with the largest budget deficits are democratic with them also having 3 out of the top 4. Alaska isn’t even in the top 10.Data provided by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the Wall Street Journal.

Posted by: Boxcar | July 11, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

rightbehind:
Keep drinking that Obama Kool-Aid.
Obama wasn’t elected to keep telling
us what a mess he inherited.
He was elected to fix the economy!
By the way which construction jobs are
you talking about?
The Messiah said they were shovel ready!
President Obama and the Democrats in
Congress rushed the stimulus bill
through without giving anyone a
chance to read it.
The Dems have been in control of
Congress since 2006.
The lack of oversight from Barney Frank and Chris Dodd regarding Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac caused the mortgage
crisis and the economic collapse.
The Dems will have been in control of
Congress for four years in 2010.
It’s time for a change!
Throw the Bums out!

Posted by: reaganfan | July 11, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

danita +++We’re still trying to struggle our way out of that economic disaster – which the Republicans had 6 full years to prepare for, anticipate or prevent – and we may be struggling for a while yet. ++++I dont recall Pelosi, Reid or Franks let alone Obama, granted he was wet nosed newbie, that stood up and said anything about what the future held for our economy.

Posted by: Boxcar | July 11, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Boxcar . ..
By stating 6 out of 11 states that are ‘in the red’ have Republican governors, ‘X-Republican Because of Bush’ is simply pointing out that you can barely see any noticeable difference at the state level between the ‘fiscally conservative’ Republicans and the ‘evil, money-spending’ Democrats.
The Republicans are not noticeably more ‘fiscally responsible’ than the Democrats to any significant degree at all.
Certainly the doubling of the national debt by the Bush administration in Washington proved this as well.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Boxcar . ..
The Republicans had control of the White House and Congress for basically 6 full years to prepare for, anticipate or prevent any upcoming economic crisis.
That they didn’t see it coming or prepare for it cannot be blamed on anyone else.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

danita thats not what his post states. His post wasn’t even close with any real facts so with you trying to tell us “what he meant to say is” you sound like every other butt covering obamabot.

Posted by: Boxcar | July 11, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

danita said “. If we all kept our money no bridges would get built, the commuter highways would fall into disrepair” That is incorrect. The Dulles Greenway is a privately built & operated highway. So it can be done without tax money.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | July 11, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

BOXCAR: “dont recall Pelosi, Reid or Franks let alone Obama, granted he was wet nosed newbie, that stood up and said anything about what the future held for our economy.”……LOL.
Boxcar, you are funny. It doesn’t take a “rocket scientist” nor a senator or congressman to “say anything about what the future held for our economy” (quoting you).
Let’s see Boxcar(“duhh?”)…. “cut, cut, cut, cut taxes while we spend, spend, spend, spend on Iraq and Afghanistan” …. you don’t think the huge national debt contributed to the economic crisis we’re in?? (LOL)
Also, look up these two laws sponsored and co-sponsored primarily by the Republicans (Phil Gramm was the pusher of these two laws) when they held control of the congress:
(1) Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999
(2) Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000
and yes… (because I know you’ll come back with this argument), Bill Clinton signed these two bills into law.
These two laws “deregulated” all the safeguards that were put in place by the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, after the Great Depression. Do you know what the Glass-Steagall Act was also called? “THE BANKING ACT OF 1933″. And it prevented us from falling into another depression until Phil Gramm (R-TX) decided we no longer needed the Glass-Steagall Act and introduced the two laws above to remove almost all regulation of financial markets and banks.
Most economist believe that these two laws were the culprits of the current recession that we are experiencing…. look it up!

Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | July 11, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Oh please spare me. Franks, Reid and along with Pelosi were sitting in the drivers seat of the banking/finanical bus for two years. Not once did they even tap the brakes. They just drove the bus right over the cliff. In the end everyone up there on both sides are responsible for this mess and if you think otherwise you are just delusional.
I’m out of here.

Posted by: Boxcar | July 11, 2009, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Boxcar . ..
Okay, I’ll say it myself . .
By understanding that 6 out of 11 states that are ‘in the red’ have Republican governors, it’s clearly pointed out out that you can barely see any noticeable difference at the state level between the ‘fiscally conservative’ Republicans and the ‘evil, money-spending’ Democrats.
The Republicans are not noticeably more ‘fiscally responsible’ than the Democrats to any significant degree at all.
Certainly the doubling of the national debt by the Bush administration in Washington proved this as well.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Boxcar . ..
I stick by what I said . .
The Republicans had control of the White House and Congress for basically 6 full years to prepare for, anticipate or prevent any upcoming economic crisis.
That they didn’t see it coming or prepare for it cannot be blamed on anyone else.
Seriously, that the Republicans didn’t see the economic crisis coming, nor prepare for it can’t be blamed on anyone else.

Posted by: danita | July 11, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

This is going to be his legacy, just a little longer, like the bills he got passes and the ones he turned down, all the same thing, a little longer before they take effect or wait a little longer before acting.

Posted by: CC | July 11, 2009, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Face it Boxcar…. the republican party no longer holds the White House or the Congress, because people like me (who use to fall for their b-s line, “the party of smaller government”) that voted for them.
Until I found out that that whole line that they throw out there about being “fically CONSERVATIVE”…. it isn’t really true when they put the nation $5 TRILLION in debt in a matter of 8 years.
It’s funny though…. some people like you… they still fall for that “line”.
I’d rather have the Democrats who at least tell me upfront, “well we may have to raise taxes if we’re going to put the country in a war that has two fronts (Iraq and Afghanistan)…. then, the Republicans who “claim” they are fiscally conservative when they really aren’t.
You don’t pay your bills at home by building debt, neither should the republicans have done the same to our government.

Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | July 11, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

Give it about 8 years to work.

Posted by: BK-1970 | July 11, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

X-Republican because of Bush. Whatever. Nobody believes it.

Posted by: BK-1970 | July 11, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

danita said By understanding that 6 out of 11 states that are ‘in the red’ have Republican governors, it’s clearly pointed out out that you can barely see any noticeable difference at the state level between the ‘fiscally conservative’ Republicans and the ‘evil, money-spending’ Democrats. ========================================
That statement is totally incorrect. Six out of the top ten states “in the red” are democratic, not republican. Just because you post the same bs twice does not validate it or make it correct.

Posted by: Vicky | July 11, 2009, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

X-Republican, Obama claimed he was going to use a surgical knoife and begin cutting the debt. There is no way you went from fiscally conservative, to backing a guy who is going to run a record deficit this year. Also, did you take a poll of economists on what caused this recession? First cause I found when I looked it up was that the Fed kept interest rates too low for too long causing the housing bubble to occur in 2004 through 2006. When the bubble burst, people with interest-only loans and people “flipping” houses were caught in the middle. The foreclosures then began to mount.

Posted by: BK-1970 | July 11, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

X-Republican Because of Bush |I’d rather have the Democrats who at least tell me upfront, “well we may have to raise taxes if we’re going to put the country in a war that has two fronts (Iraq and Afghanistan)…. then, the Republicans who “claim” they are fiscally conservative when they really aren’t.
======================================
I thought Obama “told us up front” that he was not going to raise taxes on the average citizen? Guess what, you were lied too.

Posted by: Vicky | July 11, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Obama just does not get it. ABC just does not get it. Pelosi does not get it.
Obama is taking this country down. We are going into the gutter. This man has no conception on how a government works or runs nor does he have any concept on proper etiquette of a President.
I have to laugh when I see the fools he has surrounded him self with. Nancy Pelosi, she is so far from the average person and so self-righteous she has no clue on real life. Look at her failed state of California wich she helped to get into the debt it is in with all the rest of the extreme leftist california tree hugging liberals.
Moving on Mr. Dodd from Ct. Hey it must be nice that you had a special rate on your mortgage for your family Mr. Dodd, are you special and above the rest of us.
What about Mr. Barney Franks from Taxachusetts. This man is a disgrace, his boyfriend was on the board of Freddie Mac he had special interest that the mortgages would go out to anyone regardless if they qualifed for a mortgage or not.
These elitist are taking us down a path of no return. They believe they know what is best for us because they went to Yale or Harvard yet many have barely worked a real day of their lives. I am sick and tired of people worshipping these pompous as#es. They are no good for the people nor this country.
Like the rest of us hard working Americans when are income goes down we have to cut back our spending. Well Obama and the left need to do the same they have lost 34% of their income tax base which represents 70% of the governments money. They to need to stop the spending and start cutting their own budgets. They need to do what many Americans have and have their pay cut like the rest of us. They also need to stop shoving a national medical plan down our throats which will cost trillions from who they call the “rich” people. Well guess what the “rich” is every taxpaying person in this country. They won’t tell you that, they have put up the words of the rich vs. the poor as a scare mongering tactic. Open up your eyes these people are no good. I do not care if they are Democrat or Republican if they voted for the Stimulus, Cap n Tax, health Care, we need to vote them out of office.
We need to take our country back. We do not need some big Fat Fed telling us how to spend our money and how to live our every aspect of our lives. What the heck do they know many of them have never worked a real job in their lives, come on community organizer gimme a break. We need experienced people in DC, we need honest hard-working people in DC. Take back this country!

Posted by: Foxnewsfan | July 11, 2009, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Danita, nice to see people catching on to your tendency to fudge the facts and assume that constant repetition will give them the patina of legitimacy. (Wonder where in public life you would have seen that pattern you emulate? I have a few ideas. *G*)
Since others have addressed your incorrect statement about whether Republicans or Democrats control the most financially troubled states, I will instead turn to another line you are peddling tonight that raises red flags for me. As always, you want to put ALL of the blame for the current financial disaster on Republicans, most particularly on George W Bush, and NONE of the blame on Democrats, and certainly not on The Chosen One. Sorry, but as they say in the south, that dog won’t hunt. You wrote, “Seriously, that the Republicans didn’t see the economic crisis coming, nor prepare for it can’t be blamed on anyone else.” Dear, at what point in our recent history have there been NO Democrats in Congress, no Democrat talking heads on cable television, no Democratic economists or financial planners, no Democratic public officials at all? I ask such a ridiculous question to make the point that your statement is equally ludicrous. If you can complain that the Republicans did not see the looming crisis and head it off, how can you not see that they were not alone? IF it were as obvious as you seem to think it was, why were there no Democrats in Congress crying out to warn America of the impending crisis?
In fact,there were a few people from both parties who sounded alarms about specific problems that contributed to the meltdown of the economy, such as McCain and others being concerned about the oversight of Fannie and Freddie. Face it, Danita, both parties were party to the development of this problem and both parties should work to get us out of it now, to the degree that the government has a role to play in fixing the economy. Of course, I think the government played only a small role in creating the problem and that it will ultimately play only a small role in fixing the economy– unless Obama has his way and excessive government involvement exacerbates the problem even more than it already has.

Posted by: moderate | July 12, 2009, 12:01 am 12:01 am

Da Nita,
Wow,
Do yourself a favor and do some research from some reliable sources before you post. How long ago did the housing bubble start. Who had control of what branch of government? What special interest group pushed for mortgages without proof of income….hmmmm ACORN……who did acorn support for office? Which head of the Fed also pushed for Easy Mortgages? What role did Barney the clown Franks play in all of this, what was he chair of? What about Mr. Dodd from Ct. do you know his role? Open your eyes Da Nita your lies won’t get pass many on this board

Posted by: foxnewsfan | July 12, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Clearly when you go state to state and examine states in the red, the split is very close to 50/50.
Much as you might try, you will see no great evidence of ‘the fiscally conservative’ Republicans, nor of the ‘evil, over-spending’ Democrats.
The overspending of the Bush administration is historical record – basically HALF A BILLION overspend each year of the administration.

Posted by: danita | July 12, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Da Nita,
Under Mr. Bush it went over half billion one time in 8yrs. Mr. Obama has us on paper for up to 5 Trillion of spending lined up!!!! That is the most in history. If You look at Mr. Bush his numbers were actually very much the norm historically. Get your facts right!

Posted by: foxnewsfan | July 12, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

That is over 500 Billion in last post not half billion.

Posted by: foxnewsfan | July 12, 2009, 12:14 am 12:14 am

The Republicans basically controlled the Presidency and Congress for 6 straight years. That the Republicans didn’t see the economic crisis coming, nor prepare for it, can’t be blamed on anyone else – and it can’t be denied.
Did anyone else see it coming, who knows but they had not been in the position of power the Republicans held.
It’s is very tough when things happen on your watch, but in this case they did.
It was the same with 9/11 – 9/11 happened on the Bush administration watch. Is it the Bush administration’s fault? Their primary duty was to keep America safe – after 9 months in office they failed. Historians will perhaps have more to say on this.
Can everything be blamed on the Republicans? Probably not. Were they in positions of power when these events were gathering and perhaps could have been prevented – yes they were.

Posted by: danita | July 12, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Da Nita,
You try to take a tragic event 911 and make it out to be the Republicans fault. Now as history recalls the world trade center was first bombed under Bill Clinton in 1993. What did Bill Clinton do to prevent this from happening again? Did you know that Bill Clinton had several opportunities to take Bin Laden out? Yet, he failed to give the final go order to do it.
Mr. Bush came to bat when 911 happened, we had intellegence chatter but nothing that hinted at this size event happening here.
Many innocent Americans died that day, do not forget who did attacked us. Like Mr. Bush stated to fight terrorist we must take a hard stand we must the hunt them, and the war will be a long and drawn out war hunting them down. We must not back down.
Mr. Bush led one of the greatest campaigns in history to go after the money, the networks, etc to get at the heart of many terrorist organizations world wide. This battle will be ongoing and never ending, once we loose our will the terrorist have won.
The news never reported the facts never reported would probably make your hair stand on end.

Posted by: foxnewsfan | July 12, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am

“You try to take a tragic event 911 and make it out to be the Republicans fault.”
Of course 9/11 was a tragic event, we all know that and no need to restate it to attempt to own it for a sympathetic effect.
I did very clearly state this event happened 9 months into the Bush administration, and if a primary duty of the administration was to protect America, this was a failure.
President Bush claimed he would find Bin Laden and ‘smoke him out’ – again, this MUST be considered a failure since Bin Laden has not been found. The all-out effort in Afghanistan was backed off in favor of an attack on Iraq – and we know Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
I’m not saying any of these things are easy – but the tasks a President faces are not expected to be easy.
Could someone else, or a different administration have done any better? We will never know – it is the Bush administration that was in place when these things happened on THEIR watch.

Posted by: danita | July 12, 2009, 1:08 am 1:08 am

Danita: Bush ran about $500B a year in the red. But Obama is running about $1.5T in the red – a significant increase. What is not that widely publicized is that he is also “enlarging the cash supply” – basically printing more money to keep the deficit down. While this may not seem harmful at first glance, it can easily lead to rampant inflation. It also makes foreign lenders like China very wary of their investment in the US.
Lets forget which side of politics you are attuned to – it isn’t really that important here. What is important is the fact that for 150 years the strength of the United States was backed by its economic strength. We could take the large role in the world that we did because we had the economy to back it up. Even during the great depression of the 30′s – we had a fairly good sized GDP.
That isn’t the case right now. We are fast becoming less and less of a superpower – more like super-broke. And yes, our standing in the world suffers for it. Obama’s biggest shortfall is that he ignores all of this to fund his agenda. He wants his place in history and he will blow every last dime the US can get it’s hands on to get there. But what if he’s wrong? What if he miscalculates? He’s already miscalculated terribly by totally over-estimating the growth of the American economy in his calculations of the future. Yes, he fudges the numbers and he knows very well what he is doing.
I have never seen a leader so fiscally irresponsible as Obama. Never. Less than 8 months into his presidency it is coming back to bite him too. People are getting wise to his agenda and motivations – and most of all his totally rampant overspending that would have made Bush look conservative in comparison. A few trillion more and even the Democrats will disown him. His spending is totally unsustainable. When he talks about saving money by spending more – it becomes a joke – at all of our expense.
Well – to all you 30 and under out there – you will be paying off this presidency’s bills until you are 90 years old! Your children too will pay – that is – if we are lucky to be intact in 10 or 20 years. I guess we can all auction off states on eBay when things get really bad.

Posted by: Jon F | July 12, 2009, 6:17 am 6:17 am

“Give it some time”…….Well Mister President, the “I want it now generation” that had to have everything now and is partially to blame for some of this economic malaise, now doesn’t have the patience to wait for the recovery either.

Posted by: vnvet69 | July 12, 2009, 7:35 am 7:35 am

JonF says : “…But what if he’s wrong? What if he miscalculates? …”
Jon, Since you never really know what your getting when you elect someone new to the Presidency, you could say that about every single President in the history of the US, and several of them have been ‘wrong’. Some have screwed up this country good in as little as 4 years, but we ALWAYS survive.
Whether GWB is one of those failures is very much up to personal perception and (unfortunately) party affiliation, but one thing was clear: What we were doing wasn’t working.
So I am up for giving someone else a stab at it with a new approach, and certainly giving that person more then 6 months to fix a problem that has been years in the making.

Posted by: Troy Street | July 12, 2009, 7:59 am 7:59 am

Obama’s “solutions” for solving the economic crisis always involve the federal government. Want an example of how the federal government works? In 1966 LBJ and the Dems introduced Medicare with a budget of around $3 billion. They projected it to grow to around $12 billion by 1990. In 1990 the Medicare budget was about $109 billion. Now, 20 years later the Medicare budget is over $400 billion. That is like so many poorly run, poorly administered, corrupt federal programs. HUD, Veterans Admin, Indian Affairs, Education Dept. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, SEC the list of US government disasters is endless. The bloated, corrupt Federal bureaucracy is like a giant mirror image of corrupt, bloated state governments like NY, California and Illinois where the public sector has gone rabidly insane and greedy.

Posted by: BigVaska | July 12, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am

>>>6 of the 11 states that are “in the red” have Republican governors: (California, Arizona, Nevada, Alaska, Vermont, and Connecticut)… 6 of 11… that’s over 50% with Republican governors…. :-).
Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush <<<
To X-Republican: To those outside Arizona, it may look like Governor Brewer, a Republican, is at fault for our current financial crisis but she is not. The fault lies with former Democratic governor Janet Napolitano. Napolitano resigned as governor to take her position as Secretary of Homeland Security in the Obama administration. Napolitano campaigned for Obama while neglecting her duties here. DHS was her golden reward and Napolitano bailed without telling AZ residents about the impending disaster.
Jan Brewer, a Republican, was Secretary of State and assumed the position of Governor upon Napolitano’s resignation – and immediately inherited the mess left behind. Brewer is making great changes and has taken a hard stand on the state budget with our legislators. It may end her political career but she is doing what is best for the people of AZ.

Posted by: grannysunni | July 12, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Sate and local governemnts are in trouble because of the current recession we’re in as a direct result of the Bush administration horrendous mismanagement,corruption, and unjust war. State governments rely on a good economy and government funding.The states hardest hit are those that rely heavily on manufacturing jobs to sustain their local and state economy. If the national economy was good, say like during the Clinton years, a state in trouble would be a direct result of mismanaged state funds. Both parties may have been privy to the meltdown, but there is no doubt where it began and where it will end. And now we wait for the turn around, that with time, will come again.

Posted by: marguerite | July 12, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

The Bush administration fell asleep at the wheel in the first 9 months. The Clinton administration didn’t take out Osama Bin Laden because he wasn’t directly linked to the terrorist attack in 1993.And on the two occasions, the camp where Osama could be hit, there were women and children living on the site. Imagine what would have happened had they bombed the camp? Sometimes things aren’t so black and white and one has to think ahead of the consequences of the act itself. Something the Bush administration should have done before invading Iraq on the premise of faulty and fabricated intelligence. To “take him out” would have involved the deaths of innocent children. And the Bush administration knew for sure Bin Laden was responsible for 911. Why didn’t Bush “take him out”? You really believe they couldn’t find him?

Posted by: Bea | July 12, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

You’ve never seen anyone as fiscally irresponsible? Are you kidding? Ummm, the previous eight years ring a bell? So quick to jump on the bashing ban wagon. How about giving the changes a chance to actually work.Do you really think the economy and the mess we are in can be turned around in less than a year? How long did it take Clinton to fix the mess he inherrited?

Posted by: Marguerite | July 12, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Obama needs to stop the shipping of USA jobs to India and halt, revoke and do away with H1-B visas altogether or unemployment is certain to keep rising. What happened to undoing the mistakes of former administrations and creating jobs. There arent any jobs in Africa for us Mr. President.

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 12, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

“Even as we make progress on these challenges abroad, my thoughts are on the state of our economy at home.” This is a statement you NEVER would have heard from Bush.

Posted by: rakko | July 12, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Buy stocks. Get rich with the Wall Street and Washington Wizards. TARP will make you rich.

Posted by: Gerry | July 12, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

It would show a little regard for all the American population, if the first family would show a little more compassion for everyone who can not afford extras.
Here is the family with granny and auntie in tow travelling around the world, visiting poor Africa, where you could see those unsmiling, malnourished children. How many families would Ghana’s government have been able to feed if they had used the money for the motorcade! This whole trip to Africa showed me absolutely nothing, no feeling, just a big ” Look at us! Here we come!

Posted by: 2smart4u | July 12, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

2Smart4u: How petty can you get? All Presidents have traveled abroad. Even if they didn’t, it wouldn’t affect the economy one bit. BTW, only the First Family went on the last trip. It didn’t include Obama’s mother-in-law or the aunt that you mentioned. Typical of the NoBama fanatics. If the facts aren’t negative enough, invent something and add it to make your point.

Posted by: Mike from Carolina | July 12, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

The country is hemmoraging 500,000 jobs a month. We are in “The Great Recession”. Companies are scared to death of hiring anyone because of the threat of ‘cap and trade’ (thanks Obama) and that they will be taxed and forced to pay for all employees health care (again thanks a lot Obama). Having been a consultant for 10 years I know this is supposed to be the ‘busy time’ when companies hire (before letting everyone go at Christmas laying them off). Well guess what they arent hiring and there will still be a huge Christmas layoff. When no one is buying stuff (real estate, cars, retail products in general) in January February 2010…what do you think will happen to the stock market? Unemployed people will max out the credit card to give junior & sis a decent christmas. Then what? When April 2010 comes and we are at 15% unemployment what do you think Uncle Sam will do to recoup his missing income tax revenue. All I can say is save every dime you have and be very thrifty we are in for a heck of a downturn, massive tax increases and inflation by then.

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 13, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Common sense would hold that no one person , nor even one political party can be blamed for the nation’s economic woes. As a matter of fact, we, the individuals of this nation, are to blame. We are in fact a government of the people, by the people, for the people. We have turned from being a nation of hard-working, thrifty, producers, to comfort-seeking, extravagant, consumers. We have sought out political leaders who will promise us “bread and circuses” (brush up on Roman history) – a life of ease, comfort, and no worries instead of leaders who will uphold the values that made our nation great. No amount of money, social programs, or government intervention will cure what ails us. It all comes down to each of us individually. Are we willing to stop living on credit? Are we willing to stop overindulging on things like housing, fuel, food, and luxuries? Are we willing to recognize that we are NOT entitled? Are we willing to realize that life is NOT all about me? It is not until we as individuals return to those values upon which this nation was built that we will see reform in the truest sense of the word. Best of all, we won’t need government supplying the reform – it will come from within each of us.

Posted by: clhs | July 13, 2009, 2:57 am 2:57 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.