By Caitlin Taylor

Jul 14, 2009 1:01pm

Obama Expects Unemployment Figures to “Tick Up for Several Months,” Despite Economy Stabilizing

ABC News’ Karen Travers and Sarah Tobianski report:

President Obama said today that while there has been “some stabilization in the financial markets” he expects unemployment figures to “tick up for several months.”

“The challenge for this administration is to make sure that even as we are stabilizing the financial system, we understand that the most important thing in the economy is, are people able to find good jobs that pay good wages,” he said after a meeting with Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende of the Netherlands.

Obama travels to Michigan today, a state he said has been “battered” not just in this recession but in the years leading up to it. He said that without government action on General Motors and Chrysler, “the situation in Michigan, I think it's fair to say would be far worse.”

The President said the same goes for the stimulus package. “We've made investments that early on have allowed a state like Michigan to lay off fewer teachers, fewer cops, fewer firefighters. Those are all jobs that would have been lost in the absence of the recovery package.”

In spite of that, he said it is not enough and that the biggest challenge for the U.S. and nations all around world is creating good paying jobs.

Obama said he has invited Prime Minister Balkenende to the G20 summit in Pittsburgh in September.

“We think that the Netherlands not only is one of the world's largest economies and most active internationally, but the prime minister has very specific expertise and experience in working with a whole range of world leaders, and I think his contribution will be greatly appreciated,” he said.

The president also said there will be a ceremony this year to commemorate the 400th anniversary of Henry Hudson exploring Manhattan on behalf of the Netherlands.

-Karen Travers and Sarah Tobianski

User Comments

President Obama has cancelled his original plans for a townhall, and is now flying all the way to Michigan just to make a speech.

Posted by: MayBee | July 14, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

The vice president said the Obama administration “misread how bad the economy was” but they still stand by its stimulus package and believes the plan will create more jobs as the pace of its spending gains momentum.
But, but, but, Obama said his stimulus package had to pass “right away” so that the unemployment rate wouldn’t reach 8 percent by May.
I’m starting to think they don’t know what they are doing.

Posted by: Danilo | July 14, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

The “stimulus” package will be an epic failure.
The One will be voted out in 2012 (and many in Congress in 2010/2012 who voted for this poorly constructed bill) due in large part to this fiasco.

Posted by: tjp612 | July 14, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Who pays for him to fly all around the country to ” just make ANOTHER speech”
and when will these people get tired of the speechs and start demanding some results?

Posted by: jim | July 14, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

But how is that possible, Mr. President, when you said ‘we are creating or saving’ more jobs that would have otherwise been lost?
When will our press put an end to this nonsense from the White House and call them on it?
‘ticking up’? QUANTIFY it.

Posted by: J House | July 14, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

“We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle” — Winston Churchhill

Posted by: ButHeHatesBrits | July 14, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

The “stimulus” package will be an epic failure.
I think the economy will eventually turn around and some will point at the stimulus as a success.
We’ll still have to pay for it, though.
ISTM a wise course would be to stop the planned spending that is still 2 years away and use that money, if they wish, to focus on creating a health care safety net. Without the economy taking a serious turn upward by August, nobody is going to believe this President and Congress know how to develop big legislation.

Posted by: MayBee | July 14, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Anyone else notice that The One no longer refers to the “4 million jobs that will be saved/created” through passage of the “stimulus” package? And remember that he stated the overwhelming majority of these jobs would be created within the private sectors?
Now it’s all about teachers, cops, and firefighters. No mention of the private sector…

Posted by: tjp612 | July 14, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Does this mean we get the $787 billion back?

Posted by: mesquito | July 14, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

“I think the economy will eventually turn around and some will point at the stimulus as a success. We’ll still have to pay for it, though.”
The economy at some point will turn around (in spite of the “stimulus”). But the economy will not be a complete recovery, rather it will be a “semi-jobless” recovery with historically high unemployment rates. The private sector and investors do not have confidence and trust in this administration and this Congress.

Posted by: tjp612 | July 14, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Notice the timing. When the “Press” is head over heals on the hearings for Sotomoyer, he makes this announcement, when it will have minimum exposure. The bloom is coming off the rose, folks! This crew is not ready for prime time, and the Hope and Change slogan will become a sick joke in a few more months. What a waste of an historic opportunity.

Posted by: Ralph | July 14, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

How much is it costing us to send him to the all-star game???!??!!?

Posted by: Ryan | July 14, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

“What a waste of an historic opportunity.”
Agreed – On several levels.

Posted by: tjp612 | July 14, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Obama is all in a panic about his stimulus going to pot. And despite his continuing positive talk about it and “hope” rhetoric, in addition to the overly accomodating media, the public is slowly getting wind of this President’s failings. Just follow along w/ Rasmussen’s Presidential Approval Index rating (today, -8) and you’ll see this. Rasmussen is dead accurate in their polling usually. It was as high as +10 on May 29! Oh how the “mighty” have fallen! Now, give it a couple more years and people will finally be on to the fact that this is “Jimmy Carter II, Revenge of the Failure.”

Posted by: Obama, the Second Coming | July 14, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Gerald Celente, a non partisan financial expert and top selling author who has made countless predictions and ALL have come true believes Obama’s Agenda will destroy America before his first term ends in 2012. That is not I saying this but Gerald Celente saying this, someone who knows much more about the situation we are in and headed for better the I do. He predictions are chilling. By 2011 to 2012 we can expect a complete break down of our financial systems due to the heavy burden being placed on the dollar, massive government debt creating a domino effect throughout the economy, Ghost malls, rioting, gang warfare, people losing everything. He predicted unemployment to rise with the stimulus. I suggest you look him up. Everything he is saying is coming true, he’s future predictions are not pleasant, especially if you have children.

Posted by: sas | July 14, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

“IT’S WORKING.” – President Barack Obama two days ago
Really? If this is the Obama Administration’s idea of “working,” I’d hate to see what “failing” is.
Oh, wait. This current economy IS their definition of “saving or creating” jobs. Namely, they create no jobs and pretend they “saved” millions of others simply by their speeches and press conferences.
“I WON.” – President Barack Obama on being challenged.
We know. That’s a mistake, fortunately, that the country doesn’t have to make twice.

Posted by: Good Lt. | July 14, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

“…they create no jobs and pretend they “saved” millions of others simply by their speeches and press conferences.”
I think you happened upon something. Anyone who still has a job should be indebted to Obama for “saving” their job. It’s so evilly twisted; as long as unemployment stays under 50%, he figures he has enough votes for 2012.

Posted by: WhereWasThePress? | July 14, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

So now they have earned the right to destroy our health care system? All you libs, do you want these clowns messing w/ your insurance?? What a failure!

Posted by: Umm | July 14, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Obama is nothing more than an empty suit puppet. He’s doing whatever his socialist brothers tell him to do. He knows his plan will wreck the economy and he’s going in with both eyes open.

Posted by: afkbrad | July 14, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Hmn, multiple stimulus packages and talk of a “jobless recovery”… So where EXACTLY is my money (and jobs for that matter) going Barack??? (Crickets!) Oh, I’m sorry, did your TelePrompTer break AGAIN!!! Tsk! Tsk!

Posted by: hmn | July 14, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Obama’s success (or failure as it were) will depend on his aggregate performace over the LT. Put another way, if UE is high (i.e. above 9%) in 2010/12, then he’s toast. I honestly don’t see any of his econ. policies that are pro-business/growth. The results will be pretty stark – either his polocies will be a fabulous success or they’ll fall flat and he’ll be contributing to the UE rate in 2013 b/c he be one of them.

Posted by: volfan | July 14, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Even the teachers, firefighters, and cops know that the stimulus cannot save their jobs indefinitely. These are honorable jobs, but their long term existence is tied to a healthy economy. I am beginning to doubt that the funds in the current stimulus bill will outlast the recession.
There is no time to waste: improve the economy now, or a majority of us may be forced to become teachers, firefighters and cops.

Posted by: Mike | July 14, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

His failed stimulus package was an utter waste of taxpayers money. He doesn’t know what he is doing and we are not going to let him make a mess of energy or health care. After the next Congressional elections, he will just be told ” NO”

Posted by: Byron | July 14, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Great words form the man who had all the answers. Thats not how he campained. Now its broke and he cannot fix it. Thanks alot all you yes we canners. You got what you wanted’ A big mess and spending enough to fund half the world.

Posted by: Jim Rod | July 14, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Hey Jake, open your eyes – soon “Big Pharm” won’t be buying your newscast Advert spots, because the public opinion won’t matter anymore. Instead the money will be spent on “Big Politics.” Which means greasing the pockets of every slick willie in washington. ITs coming – your salary is going to drop. Universal healthcare bring it on.

Posted by: heavenislikethis | July 14, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

November, 2008
Obama said he aims to save or create 2.5 million jobs in a two-year plan… to “jumpstart job creation”
January, 2009
Obama said between 3 million and 4 million U.S. jobs could be saved or created by 2010, nearly 90% of them in the private sector
June, 2009
Obama pledged to pump stimulus money into the economy over the next several months to create or save more than 600,000 jobs this summer (125,000 temporary)
July, 2009
Obama said ARRA was not expected to restore the economy to full health on its own but to provide the boost necessary to stop the free fall
July 14, 2009
Obama says we are stabilizing the financial system but people must also be able to find good jobs that pay good wages
So now we’re back to stabilizing the financial system? That has nothing to do with ARRA – that was TARP – so it can’t be used to judge the success or failure of ARRA. If he backpeddles any faster or farther, he’ll be campaigning again – which he was better at anyway.
Good point about the teachers, police and firefighters. 90% of ARRA was for the private sector and yet he and his supporters are acting like this was the initial and major thrust of ARRA to start. Defining “recovery” in real time I guess.

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 14, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

The Netherlands? The country where 9 North African Muslims murdered Theo van Gogh because they didn’t like his movie which exposed Islam’s Koran-sanctioned brutal treatment of women? The country where fear continues to grow between the state-supported Muslims and the working Dutch? Where indigent immigrants are bringing the social welfare system to the breaking point?
The country where prostitution and drugs are open and legal?
Oh yeah, that’s what we should aspire to.

Posted by: maryo | July 14, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

I pray that everyone who voted for this guy pay economically and that those of us who actually listened to him during the campaign and tried to warn his cult of followers be spared of the coming economic catastrophe.

Posted by: Julian | July 14, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

If the bailed-out Wall Street Bankers are making cha ching with free money to prop-up stocks, then the economy is “stabilizing”. Wall Street and Washington are utterly DISCONNECTED from the reality of the real world.

Posted by: Barbara | July 14, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Notice the jobs Obama says he saved…teachers, firefighters, policemen etc. All of them depend on taxpayers for their funding yet the people who make stuff, provided goods and services and create a tax income to the government…tough $hit-and as some do without money the Government simply prints the money they need…sending all of us a tax bill that will have to be paid back by all of us. As a matter of fact he wants to add cap and tax to the citizens-businesses of this country making it even more difficult for a business to hire workers. While we are busy saving the planets eco systems the jobs we had move abroad and the Chinese and others say “no friggin way are we going to sign global treaties on carbon releases”. In the meantime those who have no jobs will soon be able to get their ingrown toenails treated for “free”.

Posted by: david | July 14, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

“I pray that everyone who voted for this guy pay economically and that those of us who actually listened to him during the campaign and tried to warn his cult of followers be spared of the coming economic catastrophe.”
Asking God to smite your fellow man….how right wing of you.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

“The Netherlands? The country where 9 North African Muslims murdered Theo van Gogh because they didn’t like his movie which exposed Islam’s Koran-sanctioned brutal treatment of women”
As opposed to our own country where lunatic right wingers kills cops, museum security or shoot up a family of hispanics.
And that’s just the last 6 months.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Obama travels to Michigan today, a state he said has been “battered” and then off to St. Louis to throw the first “pitch”. Economy, eeshnonomy, let’s play ball! (Oh, and a whole bunch of you are going to lose your jobs so… you can come to the game, too!

Posted by: LetThemWatchBaseball | July 14, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

Obama: ““We think that the Netherlands not only is one of the world’s largest economies…”
Oh yes, with GDP at 16% of the US GDP, and right behind South Korea, Australia and Mexico.

Posted by: maryo | July 14, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Notice how the bar keeps changing for the stimulus. China’s stock market is up 71% this year, the country that is quickly embracing capitalism, will never submit to a policy of cap and tax and has a low corporate tax rate compared to ours and Obama still thinks that expanding our govt. will enable us to compete in a world market. One commentator had it right, instead of focusing on hope those who voted for him should have focused on his audacity.

Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | July 14, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

“Obama: ““We think that the Netherlands not only is one of the world’s largest economies…”
Oh yes, with GDP at 16% of the US GDP, and right behind South Korea, Australia and Mexico.”
Well considering that the Netherlands has only about 5% of our population, having 16% of our GDP is impressive.
Regardless of that, they seem to rank 15th or 16th in GDP making them worthy of the G20, no?

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

This is not surprising. The POTUS and his wife were drowning in debt before the media panned his book causing him to reap millions in royalties…saved by the bell. Before that he was litterally broke. He’s running the country the same way, spending like a drunken sailor, never worried about the massive debts he’s ringing up. We all got exactly what was advertized. A community organizer. Most community organizers are broke as are the communities they serve.

Posted by: jb | July 14, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

“China’s stock market is up 71% this year, the country that is quickly embracing capitalism”
China’s economy is capitalist?

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

“I pray that everyone who voted for this guy pay economically and that those of us who actually listened to him during the campaign and tried to warn his cult of followers be spared of the coming economic catastrophe.”
“Asking God to smite your fellow man….how right wing of you.”
Dude did you vote for this clown? if you did, you can’t escape the repercussions, you’ve had your cake and now you’ll eat your unemployment checks. I’m glad you believe in God too; you are going to need divine intervention in the coming days. Good luck!

Posted by: julian | July 14, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

The democrats killed their chances of “reforming” our energy and health care markets by passing that piece of bloated “stimulus” pork. When we are trying to figure out how to pay down the debt in the face of rising unemployment and inflation people will hold obama accountable. I just hope the republican or some other conservative third party movement gets their act together to cut non-defense spending and taxes dramatically to get us out of this mess. Ryan stop with your pathetic “right wingers are evil.” I thought obama campaigned on ending partisan politics. Guess I was wrong to believe he was different than any of the others.

Posted by: Jason | July 14, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Ryan C,
Rather than attacking “right-wingers,” would you care to defend your Messiah’s economic policies?

Posted by: tjp612 | July 14, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

The initial round of people who lost their jobs and lost their homes a year ago, were those that were already living “on the edge”. Many of us have been out of work for a year or more, hanging on to our homes because we had a plan. BUT….we are also relying on Obama’s word that jobs that will pay our bills are forthcoming. The next round of us who lose are homes are going to be the bread and butter of our society…those that have worked hard and done the right thing all of their lives. If this next round, which includes me, lose our homes….then you can bet we will have a very tough time rebuilding our lives, and rebuilding the economy.

Posted by: Lifesajourney | July 14, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

10.6 trillion – US debt 12/31/08
11.4 trillion – US debt 7/14/09
00.8 trillion – Spending 1/1/09-7/14/09
06.9 trillion – Potential debt 2009-2012
17.5 trillion – Total US debt end of 2012

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 14, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

I guess he hasn’t been informed of the 100 State Troopers who lost their jobs here in Mi. this month. Other Steates, believe me when i say i feel your pain- we have had 82 straight months of pain!

Posted by: TedinMich | July 14, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

“Dude did you vote for this clown?”
Oh yes.
“I’m glad you believe in God too;”
I don’t believe in praying to God for misforture of others.
That’s a right wing bastardization of the teachings of Jesus and reflects the right wing’s inherent selfishness.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

Ryan C,
Rather than attacking “right-wingers,” would you care to defend your Messiah’s economic policies?
Posted by: tjp612 | Jul 14, 2009 2:35:11 PM
_____________________________________
“crickets”

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 14, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

That’s a right wing bastardization of the teachings of Jesus and reflects the right wing’s inherent selfishness.
Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 14, 2009 2:43:58 PM
___________________________________
And the Christian currently sitting in the Oval Office is? And he supports what?

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 14, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Isn’t it odd how employment is suddenly the last thing to recover in a recession? I remember a different tune being played a few years ago when another president was in office.

Posted by: Axey | July 14, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

I doubt the person using the term “I pray” is actually on his knees praying for anything. It’s a figure of speech.

Posted by: Axey | July 14, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

===I don’t believe in praying to God for misforture of others. ===
Who said anything about God? Maybe he is praying to the High Priestess of Misfortune.

Posted by: Axey | July 14, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Axey – what are you talking about? Unemployment is a lagging indicator. Always has been, always will be. It takes a while for businesses to begin making money and to then start feeling comfortable about hiring.

Posted by: Eric | July 14, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

===Axey – what are you talking about? ===
Google it. Links aren’t allowed.

Posted by: Axey | July 14, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

reflects the right wing’s inherent selfishness. Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 14, 2009 2:43:58 PM
_______________________________
Selfishness has no political association. Neither does hypocrisy.

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 14, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

“Rather than attacking “right-wingers,” would you care to defend your Messiah’s economic policies?
Awwww I am not posting to the right wing satisfaction.
Especially when pointing out their racist violence.
But as far as the economy goes, the unemployment numbers are not good though the U6 figure is not as bad as one would think it would be. But the economy itself seems to have stabilized a bit.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Timmy . …
Bush sold off the United States in debt bonds to China to finance his neo-con wetdream of a war – and as you know basically doubled the national debt to $10 trillion.
In 2008, the United States paid $412 BILLION in INTEREST on its national debt. None of that can be blamed on President Obama.
You also should be clear that over $700 Billion of the current fiscal deficit was brought on stream under the Bush administration, not the Obama administration.
There is lots of blame to go around in this situation.

Posted by: danita | July 14, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

“And the Christian currently sitting in the Oval Office is? And he supports what?”
Certainly not the praying for the smiting of his enemies.
But this comes to mind
“I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.”

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

“Bush sold off the United States in debt bonds to China to finance his neo-con wetdream of a war – and as you know basically doubled the national debt to $10 trillion.”
I wonder how good a shape the US would be in financially if Bush had worked to pay down the debt instead of handing out tax cuts to his rich buddies.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Ryan C,
Rather than attacking “right-wingers,” would you care to defend your Messiah’s economic policies?
Posted by: tjp612 | Jul 14, 2009 2:35:11 PM
———–
Ah, come one now! You didn’t really mean that. You know very well you wing nuts do not want a civil debate. You’re just sitting here, enjoying venting your fantisies. I understand your pain. Although I didn’t dislike George Bush, I witnessed how many who couldn’t stand him labored in pain.

Posted by: David | July 14, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

@ Ryan C,
“But the economy itself seems to have stabilized a bit.”
On what basis? By what metrics? I’m sure the millions who are unemployed are comforted to hear this. I suppose you heard this from Geithner and believe it as gospel…
BTW – Since Geithner (as proclaimed by The One) is exceptional in his financial acumen, and since Geithner failed to pay his taxes, it must be due to “selfishness” rather than incompetence, right? Would that not imply Geithner is a “right-winger”? By extension Rangel, Daschle, Dodd, etc. are “right-wingers” as well (?)
s/
tjp612
Selfish Right-Winger

Posted by: tjp612 | July 14, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

“I wonder how good a shape the US would be in financially if Bush had worked to pay down the debt instead of handing out tax cuts to his rich buddies.”
So, Ryan C, you admit you are one of Bush’s “rich buddies” (since you received a tax cut)?
Hypocrisy?

Posted by: tjp612 | July 14, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Obama Expects Unemployment Figures to “Tick Up for Several Months,” Despite Economy Stabilizing
That’s odd, Obama’s Secretary of Agriculture “Tom Vilsak” said on Morning Joe this morning that he expects unemployment to start falling this fall.
Do these two bozo’s ever talk to each other?

Posted by: robtr | July 14, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

“I wonder how good a shape the US would be in financially if Bush had worked to pay down the debt instead of handing out tax cuts to his rich buddies.” Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 14, 2009 3:05:29 PM
_____________________________________
Ryan surely you know the ONLY way to improve the economy is for rich right wing politicians to hand out tax cuts to their rich buddies. Nothing else can possibly be done. That is the only answer. This is America!

Posted by: danita | July 14, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Posted by: Good Lt. | Jul 14, 2009 3:15:23 PM
You nailed it.

Posted by: tjp612 | July 14, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

US Airways today announced it is cutting jobs too.

Posted by: Just following | July 14, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

“Ryan surely you know the ONLY way to improve the economy is for rich right wing politicians to hand out tax cuts to their rich buddies. Nothing else can possibly be done. That is the only answer. This is America!”
Danita: I gave Ryan C the benefit of the doubt that he paid taxes during GWB’s administration (and thus received a tax cut). Based on your postings, I will not make the same assumption with regards to you.

Posted by: tjp612 | July 14, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Obama is crashing the Titanic into an iceberg with his eyes wide open. He knows his policies will destroy the economy yet he pushes on. Isn’t it about time we just go Galt on this administration?

Posted by: afkbrad | July 14, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

“On what basis? By what metrics? I’m sure the millions who are unemployed are comforted to hear this”
New unemployment claims have leveled off though continuing unemployment is of course still a serious issue.
I doubt there is much comforting economic to someone who has lost their job.
Of course you have called the unemployed parasites so your concern for them is galling in its insincerity.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

ROFLMAO!
Right wingers HATE it when you point out that selfishness and greed is their core philosophy.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Time to stop pretending that the democrats care about the poor and middle class. Everything this congress does is a gift to select businesses – everything from bailouts, financial gifts to automakers and even cap and trade (buy stock in GE) and the health care plan (going to make insurance companies very rich) all benefits business.
None of this is for the taxpayer — we just get to pay for it.

Posted by: c'est moi | July 14, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

“So, Ryan C, you admit you are one of Bush’s “rich buddies” (since you received a tax cut)?”
Its quite simple.
Bush wanted to cut taxes for the rich who by far enjoy the most impact from lower taxes, so it was packaged as an across the board tax cut.
If Bush had come out and just cut taxes for the rich, it would never have flown.
Of course by cutting everyone’s taxes, he set us up for further budget deficits instead of working on paying down the national debt.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

history is not made by fortune cookie politicos…
true: the new deal failed.
false: ww II got us out of the depression.
how can liberals and conservatives be wrong?? because neither have any inherent understanding of the economy.
we emerged from the great depression due to the CRISIS created by WWII and the complete and utter retooling of our economy in respons to it. prior to WWII we were primarily an agrarian economy with a side order of heavy industry. WWII transformed us into an industrial economy, heavily weighted towards the fields of automobile construction and aerospace.
Reagan’s tax policy got us through some tough times, but it wasn’t until the arrival of the INFORMATION ECONOMY that we truly BOOMED again…
Bush’s tax policy was a misapplication of supply side theory and produced another laissez-faire melt down. (see Hoover).
What is required now is neither a “Newer Deal” nor another “Reagan Tax Cut”… But a WWII style (or better yet, and Information Superhighway style) RETOOLING OF THE AMERICAN ECONOMY.
Innovation is the key. Absent that, we’re treading water, at best.

Posted by: john | July 14, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

I hope that by the end of the year, many more Americans will realize that Obama is the worst president this country has had. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know there’s been competition. Just recently, people said Bush was the worst. Well, ask yourself the classic question: are you better off now than with that horrible guy Bush?
For me, being unemployed, with little to no chance of finding work, it is getting harder to get down on my knees and worship Obama. Anyone else about ready to stop worshiping this lying loser who is destroying our ability to make a living.
Finally, am I supposed to be impressed if he gives me “free” health care while he destroys our economy?

Posted by: Bill Carson | July 14, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

ryan says: “New unemployment claims have leveled off though continuing unemployment is of course still a serious issue.”
Over 400,000 filed new unemployment claims in June. You call that leveling off, just because it is lower than the 700,000 a month earlier this year? The number of people who have been unemployed for longer than 27 months is 4.4 million, so you are right when you say continuing unemployment is serious. In spite of the last few months of his presidency, Bush averaged 5.2% unemployment compared to the 25 year high of over 9% we are facing now with the president himself saying it will only get worse over the next several months. If we went from a little over 5% to over 9% in 6 months, how bad will it be several months from now? Can anyone successfully argue that the “stimulus” bill made things better? I would argue it made things worse by destroying consumer confidence and destroying the confidence other countries have in the dollar. This admin has screwed things up even worse than the Bush admin did during it’s last couple months, and that’s saying something.

Posted by: Jason | July 14, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

>Of course by cutting everyone’s taxes,
…wait…you just said he only cut taxes for “the rich,” which, by the way, is another lie.
>he set us up for further budget deficits instead of working on paying down the national debt.
LOL
Is that so? What’s your boy Obama doing to pay down the national debt or the deficits?
Hint for 2010 and 2012: Comparing the Bush government deficits to the historic, unprecedented Obama deficits is a not going to be winning strategy, Mr. Fiscal Policy Genius.

Posted by: Good Lt. | July 14, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

CORRECTION: I misspoke when I said 4.4 million have been unemployed for more than 27 months. It is actually 27 weeks. Sorry about that.

Posted by: Jason | July 14, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

“Over 400,000 filed new unemployment claims in June. You call that leveling off, just because it is lower than the 700,000 a month earlier this year?”
Yes, that would be leveling off.
“The number of people who have been unemployed for longer than 27 months is 4.4 million, so you are right when you say continuing unemployment is serious.”
Which is Obama’s fault how?
“In spite of the last few months of his presidency, Bush averaged 5.2% unemployment compared to the 25 year high of over 9% we are facing now with the president himself saying it will only get worse over the next several months. If we went from a little over 5% to over 9% in 6 months”
Unemployment was 5.8% for the year in 2008.
In Bush’s last 3 month in office(Oct to Dec), the unemployment rates were 6.5%, 6.7% & 7.2%.
The unemployment rate hit 7.6 in Jan 2009 and now stands at 9.5%
In fact the last time it was close to 5.2% for a given month April of 2008 when it was at 5%.
Now unemployment has certainly gone up but why do right wingers just make up figures?

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

“Posted by: john | Jul 14, 2009 3:30:33 PM”
Pretty good summary.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

“Hint for 2010 and 2012: Comparing the Bush government deficits to the historic, unprecedented Obama deficits is a not going to be winning strategy, Mr. Fiscal Policy Genius.”
I think reminding people of the utter failure of Republican governance will serve the Democrats for the next decade or so.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Obama should be counseling Americans to get used to high levels of unemployment. The model that he seems keen on moving the country towards is that of Western European social democracies that are characterized by large social welfare expenditures that are funded by high level of taxation. Consequently, these economies are not as dynamic in creating jobs as the U.S. economy has historically been. When employment is 8% the Germans and the French celebrate. Get used to endemic high unemployment America. You voted for it.

Posted by: Steve | July 14, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Let’s go back to ‘trickle down’ economics, gosh that worked so well except for Bush forgot to tax anybody and just went ahead and overspent by about HALF A TRILLION dollars per year EVERY year of his presidency.
Forgetting to tax people and actually PAY for things was a small oversight on his part, but the country sure was left in a mess by the end of his terms. Accelerating unemployment, crashing industries, huge national debt . … okay, well this was coincidental, but still .. .
The Republicans had 6 years with control of the presidency and the Congress in which to anticipate or prepare for an economic crash. That they didn’t see it coming, or prepare for it cannot be blamed on anybody else. Can it?
What the ‘small government’ Republicans did during this time was overpend and not gather the money to pay for it.
Pretty confusing mess all round.

Posted by: danita | July 14, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

“I wonder how good a shape the US would be in financially if Bush had worked to pay down the debt instead of handing out tax cuts to his rich buddies.”
_____________________________________
This comment is kind of ironic, given the fact that now we have Obama paying off his union buddies.
Meet the new boss….Same as the old boss.

Posted by: Steve | July 14, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

“I think reminding people of the utter failure of Republican governance will serve the Democrats for the next decade or so.”
I would have thought so. But The One and the Dems have clearly over-reached and have proven themselves to be quite incompetent. I’m shocked at how quickly support for The One is unravelling. I had no hope for 2010 and 2012, but I’m feeling much better as I see The One’s sliding poll numbers.

Posted by: tjp612 | July 14, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Policies that will result in:
1. Higher Energy Costs
2. Higher Labor Costs
3. Higher Tax Burden
4 More Debt
will not create jobs.

Posted by: Steve | July 14, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Danita,
Are you aware that CONGRESS authorizes and spends the money in Washington…yes, Bush went along…he is responsible for the deficits too.
But, does it make any more sense to double and triple it?
And, which party was in control of the Congress for those 6 yrs?
You need a civics lesson, honey.

Posted by: J House | July 14, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Of course its going to go up!
This president is deliberately going to put thousands out of work, rather than spend 0.2% of the what the great “Stimulator” cost. That literal drop in the bucket of the Obama Spending spree would keep 22,000 people employed.
I am sure those people and their families will feel better knowing this president “cares”!
So much for this president being for hard working American laborer!

Posted by: Mike_C | July 14, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

“And, which party was in control of the Congress for those 6 yrs?”
The Republicans.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

RyanC,
I’d say it will be good for at least 20 yrs.Look at Jimmy Carter…Republicans can still milk him until he’s a goner.
He is a political weathervane, like this President and the House speaker…whatever their instinct on economics and forieng policy, you can be sure the opposite viewpoint is most likely the right one.

Posted by: J House | July 14, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

“This president is deliberately going to put thousands out of work, rather than spend 0.2% of the what the great “Stimulator” cost. That literal drop in the bucket of the Obama Spending spree would keep 22,000 people employed.”
Yes let’s spend $350M+ per fighter aircraft BEYOND what the Pentagon says is needed…
in the midst of a war against foes with no air force…
during a time of recession and budget deficits.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

“And, which party was in control of the Congress for those 6 yrs?”
The Republicans were, from 2001-2006. Dems didn’t retake the House until the 2006 midterms.

Posted by: gary | July 14, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

JHouse,
Don’t bother, she has exhibited time after time that she is the poster child for the dumbing down of America!
Defending the Obama faith, Billions after billions after billions spent in hopes that it may fix something – yet when it comes to spending under 2 Billion to insure 22,000 Americans remain employed, she says “its wasteful”!

Posted by: Mike_C | July 14, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

“I’d say it will be good for at least 20 yrs.Look at Jimmy Carter…Republicans can still milk him until he’s a goner.”
The only ones Jimmy Carter’s presidency scares are the dittoheads and Foxnews viewers who excuse Reagan’s promising the Iranians arms for hostages.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

So now Obama is an unemployment “barometer” when he couldnt predict what everyone else has been saying all along that unemployment is skyrocketing! Who is he trying to fool really? Himself? We all know they arent hiring Barack. The problem is you arent really helping the situation with cap and trade and government takeovers of healthcare and the auto industry. Legalize and tax weed already. You know its the only way to get the revenue, fight the profits of illegal mexican drug cartels, and create jobs so just do it already and stop trying to fleece the public in other ways.

Posted by: guesswhaturwrong | July 14, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Re: “And, which party was in control of the Congress for those 6 yrs?”
Republicans.
Let’s be clear. The Republicans created this economic mess. Their Milton Friedman trickle down, supply side economics doesn’t work. Any Republican who admires Milton Friedman, or who was mentored by him in college, should NOT be elected.
That being said, Obama is now the president and it is his responsibility to clean up this mess. He is unwilling to regulate the finance industry. Meanwhile, unemployment goes up, and the stimulus isn’t working.
My fear is that because of his inaction this economic mess will be long term or even permanent. I really wish Hillary had won. Obama is too inexperienced.

Posted by: karen | July 14, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

“Legalize and tax weed already.”
California is actually seriously considering this.
Last year during the now perennial budget crisis, some consortium of growers offered a billion dollars in tax revenues the day it was legalized.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Ever notice that when politicians make an arguement for more taxes it’s to avoid laying off police, firefighters, and teachers, but never the size of the bureacracy?

Posted by: LongT | July 14, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Let’s be clear. The Republicans created this economic mess.
==========
Why do you think Michigan was on the leading edge of this recession if it was created by Republicans?
Michigan has a Dem governor, and its biggest city is Dem-lead.

Posted by: MayBee | July 14, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

During the Bush administration, we had 59 consecutive months of job growth, and GDP was robust between 2002 and 2007. The economy didn’t crash until Bush was a lame duck and the Democrats controlled Congress. On election day of ’08, most of you Obama supporters had a job, a home, a car, plenty to eat, and private health care. When all of these things are taken from you, will you still blame Bush?

Posted by: John R. | July 14, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

The Republicans had 6 years with control of the presidency and the Congress in which to anticipate or prepare for an economic crash. That they didn’t see it coming, or prepare for it cannot be blamed on anybody else. Can it?
Posted by: danita | Jul 14, 2009 4:06:40 PM
__________________________________
Bush should have been more vigilant but it’s harder to see a disaster coming when you’ve got the likes of Maxine Waters, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Franklin Raines etc telling you there is “nothing wrong.” Were they in denial or just liars?

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 14, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

“During the Bush administration, we had 59 consecutive months of job growth, and GDP was robust between 2002 and 2007.”
A GDP growth based on fake paper profits and bubbles with a the most anemic job creation since WW2.
And those were the “good” times.
“The economy didn’t crash until Bush was a lame duck and the Democrats controlled Congress.”
Bush was not a lame duck until after the economy was in full blown meltdown.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

“I really wish Hillary had won. Obama is too inexperienced.”
I do not think Hillary could have won the general election had she won the Democratic nomination.
Too many hard feelings towards her.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Re: “California is actually seriously considering this.”
It should be done after Arnold leaves office. That incompetent fool turns everything into a defict and a debt.

Posted by: karen | July 14, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

“It should be done after Arnold leaves office. That incompetent fool turns everything into a defict and a debt.”
I can’t fault him too much on this.
CA government system is designed to do basically nothing.
Its gerrymandered to the point where only the extremists get elected on both sides with ridiculous releection rates, the “solution to that” being term limits which rob us of any competent experienced legislators, you have a prop system dominated by special interests….those are just the tip of the ice berg.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Bush was not a lame duck until after the economy was in full blown meltdown.
====================================
You actually believe the economy crashed before January of 2007? The unemployment rate for 2006 was 4.6 percent, and the stock market hit an all-time high in October of 2007.

Posted by: John R. | July 14, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

I will be glad when obama gets all these give away programs in effect.then i can sit on front porch like the other people have been doing for years.just hope they dont raise prices on mogan david vine.

Posted by: rking | July 14, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Steve | Jul 14, 2009 4:13:34 PM-you should add more economic policies which Obama has spawned fatally negative economic policies in American historically;
biggest debts ($13,600,000,000,000.00)-2012,
biggest deficit($1,000,000,000,000.00)-07/2009
biggest budgets($3,600,000,000,000.00),
biggest printing of money($1,000,000,000,000.00)-finished printing on Mar.20,2009,
biggest expensive of Inauguration and The Apology Tour’09, Europe tour w/all his family.
biggest aiding $830,000,000.00 for TERROR GROUP OF HAMAS,
biggest Governments w/smallest efficiency,
IN THE TIME OF
biggest economic crisis,
biggest chaotic Stock Market in Wall St.
highest rate of unemployeement (9.5%),
highest rate of foreclosure.
WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THESE??

Posted by: Unhappy 1,000,000,000,000 Deficits | July 14, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

“You actually believe the economy crashed before January of 2007? The unemployment rate for 2006 was 4.6 percent, and the stock market hit an all-time high in October of 2007.”
Bush became a lame duck on Nov 5th 2008.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

“biggest chaotic Stock Market in Wall St.” Posted by: Unhappy 1,000,000,000,000 Deficits | Jul 14, 2009 5:57:12 PM
Nope, can’t blame that on President Obama – that was mostly under Bush. Markets fell from September 07 through to March 09, and have risen since.

Posted by: danita | July 14, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

“biggest deficit ($1,000,000,000,000.00)-07/2009″ Posted by: Unhappy 1,000,000,000,000 Deficits | Jul 14, 2009 5:57:12 PM
Nope, you can’t blame this all on President Obama. The fiscal year started in October and Bush contributed well over $700 Billion to the current deficit figure.

Posted by: danita | July 14, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Ryan C,
“CA government system is designed to do basically nothing.”
So why do you support a president who is fundamentally modeling the U.S. federal government after Califoria (deficits, energy policy, high taxes, etc.)?

Posted by: tjp612 | July 14, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

“biggest debts ($13,600,000,000,000.00)-2012,” Posted by: Unhappy 1,000,000,000,000 Deficits | Jul 14, 2009 5:57:12 PM
Nope, you can’t blame this all on President Obama. Bush took the national debt from $5 trillion to $10 trillion approximately.

Posted by: danita | July 14, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Re: “CA government system is designed to do basically nothing.”
That’s BS. It worked until Arnold got there. Nobody holds him accountable because the media don’t hold him accountable out of deference to his wife. Instead they blame the “system.”
Ever read the book The Shock Doctine by Naomi Klein? That’s what he’s doing in CA. He has run up an outrageous debt and defict, created a crisis, which gives him an excuse to make deep cuts in education, etc. that he knows the people oppose. There has been a non-stop budget crisis ever since he took office.
When he refuses to sign a budget on time, the defict increases. He does this every year, adding billions to what we owe.
When he refused to sign a budget on July 1st, the defict increased by 2 billion dollars. The IOUs are costing the state billions because he still hasn’t signed a budget. He’s a disaster, and his incompetence will derail the national economy.

Posted by: karen | July 14, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

“biggest Governments w/smallest efficiency” Posted by: Unhappy 1,000,000,000,000 Deficits | Jul 14, 2009 5:57:12 PM
No proof at all this is ‘smallest efficiency’. One would think Bush’s gross overspending after promising ‘smaller government’ was pretty damned inefficient.

Posted by: danita | July 14, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

“That’s BS. It worked until Arnold got there. Nobody holds him accountable because the media don’t hold him accountable out of deference to his wife. Instead they blame the “system.”"
Ahnuld has plenty of blame to accept for his missteps.
The inherent gridlock that is the CA legislative system is not one of them.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Hey…. “UNHAPPY”….. try this one:
BUSH (2001 to 2008)
= $5,000,000,000,000,000.00 Increase to the National Debt.
…. ALL THE DEFICITS during the 8 years of the Bush/Cheney Administration contributed to the $5 TRILLION increase in the National Debt. (Yearly Deficits = More National Debt)
By the way, …. the FY2008 Interest payment on the $10.5 TRILLION National Debt that Bush and Cheney racked up for us during their 8 years… it was $451 Billion ($50 Billion short of what it cost to run the Department of Defense each year). In other words, just on that ONE interest payment alone, we could have had a second DoD.
So why did I vote Democrat this time?
(A) Because Democrats have a history of paying down the National Debt and Republicans have a history of building it back up…. and also because…
(B) Unlike the Republicans, the Democrats don’t run around claiming they are the “fiscally conservative” party, when the Bush/Cheney years once again PROVED that they are not…. all you need to look at is the National Debt and see how much they fooled the American public.

Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | July 14, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

“So why do you support a president who is fundamentally modeling the U.S. federal government after Califoria (deficits, energy policy, high taxes, etc.)?”
Obama is seeking gerrymandered districts, term limits and supermajority votes on tax increases as a means of creating inefficient legislature by design?

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

“For the bureaucrat, the world is a mere object to be manipulated by him.” – Karl Marx.

Posted by: simply me | July 14, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

“For the bureaucrat, the world is a mere object to be manipulated by him.” – Karl Marx.
====================
LOL….. “oooooooooooh, scary”

Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | July 14, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Hey Ryan C,
How about an update on The One’s polling numbers? (feel free to toss in how the public feels about his policies as well)

Posted by: tjp612 | July 14, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

“How about an update on The One’s polling numbers?”
After a dip last week, he’s been on a short climb in RCP’s poll avg. though he’s still below 60%.
How about that Michael Steele describing his outreach efforts to minorities as “I got the fried chicken and potato salad” followed by a historically inaccurate rant about the Republican party leading the world against slavery.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

1. When President Carter left the White House (Jan 1981), the National Unemployment Rate (NUR) that month was at 7.5%.
2. For the next 21 months after assuming office, President Reagan struggled to bring the monthly NUR under 7%, but could not.
3. Between November 1981 and November 1983 (2 whole years under Ronald Reagan), the monthly National Unemployment Rate hovered above 8.3%, climbing to 9% and climbing even further to 10.8% (November & December 1982).
4. Finally, in September 1984 (3 years and 8 months after Ronald Reagan was inaugurated)… the Monthly National Unemployment Rate dropped below 7.5% (the monthly national unemployment rate that President Carter left him with).
The Moral of the Story: It took Ronald Reagan 3 years and 8 months to turn the monthly National Unemployment Rate around, and unemployment actually got worse before it got better.
If YOU really think that the National Unemployment Rate is going to turn around on a “dime”, in a matter of 6, 7, 8 months… or even 1 year, you don’t understand economics, and you sure don’t understand how “unemployment” is a lagging economic indicator.
CHECK IT OUT: … Goog: “U.S. Misery Index” and click on the left column “historical MONTHLY unemployment rate”.

Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | July 14, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Bush was not a lame duck until after the economy was in full blown meltdown.
Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 14, 2009 5:16:42 PM
___________________________________
I thought Bush was a lame duck for 8 years? And before that he was a lame duck governor, and before that he was a lame duck businessman, and before that he was a lame duck AF pilot, and before that he was a lame duck kid, and before that… oh, wait we don’t know “with any specificity” what Bush was before that.

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 14, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

I do not think Hillary could have won the general election had she won the Democratic nomination.
Too many hard feelings towards her.
Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 14, 2009 5:17:39 PM
_______________________________
Maybe not, but at least it might have been a fair fight (leg tingling-wise that is).

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 14, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

“GOOD ONE!” Traffic Cop…. “Good one!”

Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | July 14, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

“Maybe not, but at least it might have been a fair fight (leg tingling-wise that is).”
A fair fight between the Clinton and anyone else?
Why do you think the Obama campaign took whatever the McCain campaign had?
They were tempered in the fires of the primary vs the Clintons.
Democrats for the most part liked Hillary but independents did not.
She had the same issue as Obama in regards to experience when measured against McCain (who undercut his own argument with the selection of Palin).
But her biggest prob from the start were her high negatives.
It did not help that the Hsu scandal happened this cycle.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 14, 2009 7:21:19 PM
I was talking about the media – nice try though.

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 14, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

“I was talking about the media – nice try though.”
No I think FoxNews would have lied just as much about Hillary as they did Obama.
Maybe even more so.

Posted by: Ryan C | July 14, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

“Over 400,000 filed new unemployment claims in June. You call that leveling off, just because it is lower than the 700,000 a month earlier this year?”
Yes, that would be leveling off.
Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 14, 2009 3:44:25 PM
_____________________________________
Uh no, that would be businesses taking a breather to see where their at. There will be evaluation and watching of the bottom line for at least one more quarter. If they are losing money still, they will start laying off again.
Don’t be surprised if there is a “leveling off” in the 2nd quarter quarterly reports (due to the massive layoffs so far), which will be proclaimed from the mountain tops as the stimulus plan is working. There will be a lot of “Gracious God! Thank you President Obama!” going on.
3rd & 4th quarter reports will tell the tale for more layoffs.

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 14, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

No I think FoxNews would have lied just as much about Hillary as they did Obama.
Maybe even more so.
Posted by: Ryan C | Jul 14, 2009 7:35:20 PM
___________________________________
Yes, I’m sure… (rolls eyes)

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 14, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

How fast can the federal reseve print money any way?Do we need to buy more printing presses.Is it ok to cut down more trees and is the ink environmentally friendly.Or will this be the next crisis.Everything seems to be a crisis to OB,no time to think or study,hire a speed reader,just do it!If OB realy wants to work on something how about medicare or social security.Medicare is in such good shape let have the goverment run all the health care.Oh and would one of you libs pass me the coolaid. latter

Posted by: hiskooldropowt | July 14, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Congressional U.S. Federal Budget Approvals:
2009 – $3.10 trillion
2008 – $2.90 trillion
2007 – $2.77 trillion
A Democratically-controlled Congress could have voted against any of the 2007-2009 budgets but they didn’t. Maybe Rove and Bush have been setting them up all along for the 2010 election. ;-)
2006 – $2.7 trillion
2005 – $2.4 trillion
2004 – $2.3 trillion
2003 – $2.2 trillion
2002 – $2.0 trillion
2000-2001 budgets were submitted by Clinton.
And the grand prize goes to the Big Kahuna himself!
2010 – $3.60 trillion (submitted 2009 by President Obama)
Aloha Mr. President!

Posted by: Traffic Cop Timmy | July 14, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

That’s why you rushed your stimulus bill through so fast without reading it. You said it would cease unemployment and create jobs, tons of jobs.
Well????
You’re a thief and a liar!

Posted by: Makayla | July 14, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

This joker will never quit, will he? I am so looking forward to 2012!

Posted by: cgw | July 14, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

And the Cap-and-Trade bill will cause even more unemployment due to more manufacturing going off-shore to get away from the restictions. Yes, this is change we can believe in…good job idiot Democrats. You morons are really showing us Neocons up alright.

Posted by: Bill | July 14, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Yes Mr President the economy is
“stabilizing”.
Just like the Titanic “stabilized”
before it sunk to the bottom of
the ocean!

Posted by: reaganfan | July 14, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

More like surging up – watch for the Revised June figures…

Posted by: Terry | July 15, 2009, 1:18 am 1:18 am

at least he’s being honest about it. During the last election season we had George Bush still trying to convince us that the economy was OK. Somehow that was better than being given the bad news up front?
I’d be amazed by you poeple but 8 years of the Bush adminstration proved that you roll right through life with a smile after being lied to. I guess your disdain now proves you prefer it that way.

Posted by: dk | July 15, 2009, 6:13 am 6:13 am

At Least President Obama is being Honest more then i can say about that Idiot before him Bush Lied to us about the Economy Iraq etc Lying worthless President Bush was!

Posted by: ANGIE IN PA | July 15, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am

You mean we can’t spend our way out of another problem? Heresy!

Posted by: hmn | July 15, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Nice email to Sanford’s folks. Carry water for the GOP much?

Posted by: Jeebus | July 15, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.